WEBVTT - Surveillance: Investing in Lyft With NYU’s Segram (Correct)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg I

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>do want to dig into that Deutsche Bank barger. I

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>think if it's fascinating for a lot of perspectives, what

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>did I talk about it? Let's talk about it because

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been on the cards for absolutely h s And finally,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's official now that they're actually in talk

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do we just assume it's executed? Um, well, I think

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that they're probably are a whole bunch of potential challenges

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>here still, I mean, I think that the question is

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what form is this going to take? Is this murder?

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think Luigi's and Galis actually has some views

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on this. He's a finance professor at the Niversity of

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago at the Booth School of Business and he joins

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Director Broker Studios. Luigi, thank

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. What do you think

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about this murger? So this is a merger of failed

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>banks banks that don't succeed in the marketplace by themself,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and they have to merge because they're very weak, even

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>if in the past they have shown that they are

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not very good at merging, because if you remember comments

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>back comes from a very bad merger with Dresden and

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank tried to integrate deutge post Bank and did

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>not do very well and at some point try to

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>sell it and they couldn't even sell it. So I

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>don't think they have a good record in merging, and

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the only reason why they're emerging is because they're trying

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to basically achieve three things. One is fire more people,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have to have the permission of the German

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>government to fire people. They got it that that's a Hinterestly,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes from a Social Democratic minister, so imagine what

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the Conservative would have done so in so that's one.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The second is probably they can gain a little bit

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of market power, but most importantly they certainly become too

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>big to fail, and they are trying to sell that

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the German national champion. Now, Germany has a

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of good things going for itself, but this is

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not one of those. Deutsche as a tradition of cheating.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more, uh pay more fines than it

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is worth in the equity market today because and so

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think and it's not very profitable. So I

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think that a bank in this condition is not in

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the situation to acquire another one. And the fact that

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing that they figure out means how

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>bad the banking sector is in Europe this moment, Alouigi.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>For a long time, we've referred to Many is the

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>powerhouse of Europe. The banking sector is certainly not the

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>powerhouse of Europe. Why does the German banking sector have

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>these problems still? Actually, I think that that's uh strategic

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to maintain industry. I think that the banking sector in

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Italy in Germany is dominated by the spreadcast and the

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>cooperative and both these institutions don't have profits as an objective.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>They have basically the well being of their partners and

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>their um of the of the company's they financed. So

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the banking sector in Germany is postponed

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to the industor sector, and that's the reason why the

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>industa sector is so strong and the banking sector is

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a weak. I'm struggling to understand how Commerce Bank, how

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank still has about a six steak in Commerce

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Bank and will probably roll over that stake into the

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank Commerce Bank Merger. I mean, basically, is this

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>now ftionalization. I think that Germany, that is very taff

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with the other European countries system of state eight when

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to its own banks, has been extremely generous

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in state aid. I think that most Americans don't know

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that top is nothing by comparison to what Germany did

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>for its bank in two thousand and eight. So I

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>guess if we can broaden out a little bit, given

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we do have the FED week coming

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>up and we have this persistently weak data in Europe,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is this joytsche Bank Commerce Bank merger emblematic of the

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:44.119
<v Speaker 1>persistent weakness in the euroregion that could potentially deepen beyond

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>what people are expecting. I think that that's certainly one

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>reason I think that Germany does sphere is low down.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>There are two views of the world here. There are

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>those who say that there's been a temporary thing due

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of accident like the low water in

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rhine River that made it difficult to export, and

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>given some regulation the car industry that has low down

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>production and then now we're back to two normal Um

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I am more sort of worried, especially with the softness

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of China. China is a big export market

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for Germany and if this is an issue, German manufacturing

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>will suffered. And nobody talks about this. But if we

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>were to go into a very hard Brexit, the problem

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>would not just be for the United Kingdom. Germany exports

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of car to the UK, and so hot

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Brexit will be a pretty bad news for Europe in general,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but particularly for Germany. So with with this context, I

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>think that there we is a need to do something

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>with the banking sector that is too big and too unprofitable.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And part of this unprofitability is the fact that uh,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost to income ratio is very high. So unfoldedly,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I think with structuring and job cuts are on the line,

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is why do you need to merge to

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>do that? And I fear that this is just a

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>political play that on the one end, the German politician

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>allow for job cuts, on the other hand, they do

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>form a national champion that would be easier for the

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>German government to control and direct Luigi, can a national

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>champion compete on the international stage if it is efficient, Yes,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but given the record of Deutscher, my answer is not.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Luigi is in fantastic to catch up with your finance

0:06:48.680 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>professor at university if Chicago Birth School. We are so

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lucky to have Herrin Seagram joining us here in our

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Blueberg Interactive Broker Studios in New York. Ran Stagram is

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a New York University. Stern Up professor of Finance. Heard

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the two point one billion dollar valuation on its face

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>four lifts, I p O and I believe that values

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>accompanied about eighteen plus billion dollars. How do you even

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>value that? Thanks for having me, Lisa. So the way

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to look about LIFT is think about it as a

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>platform business. And if you take the EV two sales

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for the market overall is about two to and a half.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But generally platform business is priced between seven and ten x.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you take the current revenues on face value

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at two billion dollars to point one billion, if you

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>grow that at twenty five per year for the next

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>five years, that gives a future value of roughly between

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty and thirty five billion. And if you discount that

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>back at the cost of capital that will give you

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>roughly around twenty one billion. So investors are pretty much

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>paying for the future rather than the current state of

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>affairs for this company. This is important. They're paying for

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the future, and they're paying for the future at a

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>very expensive time. It just raises a question, are people

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>getting in at the peak? Is lift uh and and

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and and our our lift and Uber kind of trying

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize here on this potential Peakye, that is absolutely right.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It is more liquidity event for the private equity investors

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>who got into Lift and Uber earlier, so they are

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>cashing out, no doubt. UM. But I have a feeling

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this valuation would grow into this UM. So although they

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are catching it at peak, UM, I have a feeling

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this company. I'm optimistic generally about this company, your optimist company,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and and thinking that people will probably get good value

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or at least fair value if they buy into the

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I p o of fair values better I would say,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not good value, fair value. But this raises a question

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>really on a broader level, because right now the SMP

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is poised for its best quarterly performance since we are

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at a market that is so uh robust,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and melting up, And there is a question, you know,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is this a bad time to get in or is

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>it also fair value? UM I abuse tend to come

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the peaks of the market because original investors, early

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>investors are trying to cash out. But I have a

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling SMP has some room to run, especially then federal

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>reserves on hold, and US is the best place to

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>invest compared to rest of the globe. I have a

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling this melt up is going to continue for a while, Okay,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And then what does that say for the other I

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>p o s that are slated like the Ubers and

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>all the other high profile unicorns. Um Uber is um

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>planning to go to the market between hundred and one

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion. It is similar again with thinking about that

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>as a platform business, and they are also diversified into

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>other types of businesses. So market is again attaching a

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seven to between seven and ten multiple to this company,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it is the current current valuation.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We are being We are valuing these companies on a

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>forward multiple. That is my humble opinion. Just what your

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on on Lift and Uber and how one company

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is very very focused on what it does it's a

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>right hailing service that's left. Uber seems to be spread

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more doing various different things. What

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on the kind of premium you've attached

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the focused company versus the one that's trying to

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>do a whole lot more. Thanks for having me, Jonathan,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>good to be with you. Um, there are two types

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of businesses. If you think about it's a focused company, Um,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they have as you said, they're very focused on right

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hailing and they're planning to expand the business. They're currently

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in the North Hamn region right now, so that's the

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>target market. But when you take Uber for example, they

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have more levers to pull, so it is more of

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a diversified business. So investors think about these businesses in

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a different way. Um, simple folks, business can be valued

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in a different way and a diversified business would be

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>valid in a different way. So for us to compare

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>these two companies at this moment, I don't think it

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is advisable, just in terms of how mature some of

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the companies are coming to market as well. I think

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people find that interesting relative to where

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we were, so maybe ten twenty years ago, where relatively

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>young companies would come to market, they would become public

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>companies for very good reasons. Now it seems they remain

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>private for a whole lot longer, Professor, Why do you

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>think that is? Because private market funding so available. If

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you take Master's Sun buying into uber so three or

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars being pumped into Even last week he

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>invested into Grab in Singapore. So the private market funding

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is readily available. Cash is cheap at this lower interest rates.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why these companies are staying long a private. They

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have no need to come to the public markets, but

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to cash out rate if they have gotten in.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>For a take for example, what master Son did with

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba put in twenty million and the stake is

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting at one and twenty billion today, So people are

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>comfortable sitting with it in the private market, they don't

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have to really cash out. But then markets that that

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are such a high why don't you take advantage of it?

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>It's well great. Some people would say that the availability

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of capital and the private markets to some degree, and

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me to what degree you think this

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is true, is breeding arrogance of leadership of some of

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>these tech companies and when they do come public, the

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ownership structures are different. So we'll let me make this

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really simple. For a typical investor who's looking to participate

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in an I p O, they won't actually own the company,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>won't have the voting rights that maybe they would have

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>got ten twenty years ago, because the leadership are able

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to keep hold of the ownership and voting rights the

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>management of the company a way that maybe they didn't

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>many years ago. Why do you think that is changing

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and you think eventually there will be pushed back from

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the investor community. There will be eventually be a push back,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that is the case right now.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Investors have come to terms with it. This is the

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>norm for technology companies. You take Sergio Brain, Mark Zuckerberg,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all the top leaders, I don't know, I don't want

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to call them top, but the leaders they tend to

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hold on a majority of the voting rights. Investors are

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not currently punishing the valuations of these companies. I know

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it weakens the corporate governance structure of the company, but

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that is impacting the valuation. Maybe there

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a push back in the future, but I

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think I don't see that right now. Do you

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>think that these companies being public will impede their growth

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>because these an these these leaders have never been accountable

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to shareholders in the same kind of way and having

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of deal with quarter to quarter expectations versus

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>longer term plans and just burning through cash. Lisa, You're right,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be tough for them. They had their wish.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>When they are private, they can do whatever they want

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to Now they're accountable to the market and the investors.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But when you come into public markets with valuations of

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion one and twenty billion, investors would give a

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>leeway for those leaders because they have a proven track record.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If these valuations are holed up for the next year

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or two, they have proven that they can grow this business,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think investors are going to be on the

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>sideline letting these companies grow on their own. Paren Segrim,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Thank you, Lisa,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you Jonathan for having Thank you sir, Thank you

0:14:46.000 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>very much. Boeing shares down a little bit lessan two

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent following news that the f a

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>A had been warned that Boeing had too much power

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in the approval process seven years ago and they had

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not paid any attention. This looks terrible for the f A,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>looks terrible for Boeing. Here to talk about the potential

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ramifications for it is Brook Sutherland Bloomberg opinion columnists joining

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>us here in our interactive Broker Studios. Broke just give

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what the Seattle Times investigation found

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that really showed this should have been on the radar

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the f A A and frankly Boeing as well. No, absolutely,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I think to your point. So this

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is seven years ago, two thousand twelve. This is actually

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>pre the Dreamline or battery problems as well, which did

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of course result in the f A grounding those planes.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So this has been sort of an ongoing issue that

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody should have been rather abundantly aware of and perhaps

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at a little bit more aggressively. So a couple

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of things from the Seattle Times investigation. What they have

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>found is, you know, it's been well documented that f

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>A has been outsourcing certification work to the aircraft manufacturers.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Now this is something that's actually gotten approval from people

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in government and sort of you know, one over their

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>support because the f A does not have very much money,

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is also a rather timely process that these

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>aircraft certified. Before you continue, is there some sort of

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>external check on the in house corporate overseers that are

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>overseeing themselves. Well, in theory, the f A has the

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to approve the Boeing employees that are you know,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>put in place to act as sort of officials of

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the f A as far as the certification process, and

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if they have issues of conflicts of interests that arrived,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they can replace them. But what the Seattle Times is

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>reporting is that employees did raise concerns about certain Boeing managers,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and their managers at the f a A basically overruled that,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're pushing them to sort of speed up the

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>certification process to try to get this bowing blank out.

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Because remember the reason why Boeing was investing in the

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>seven Max is because air Bus came out with a

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>three Neo, which had much more fuel efficient engines, was

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>very attractive to airlines for a lot of different reasons,

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and Boeing needed a response, and they needed one very quickly.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>They were already behind air Bus in terms of production. Um,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the other really key things from the Seattle

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Times report for me were the details of this safety

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>analysis that Boeing did on the maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation system,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which is that slight control system that's being sort of

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pinpointed as a possible cause for both of these fatal crashes. Now,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so in that safety analysis which Boeing did as part

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the certification process, as part of this outsourcing of

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the work, um, they understate the thrust that can put

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the degree of thrust on the plane's nose down. Um.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>They also failed to acknowledge the fact that this system resets,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>so if the plane's nose is diving and the pilot

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>corrects that, the system can go through the process all

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>over again, which is what happened that we heard about

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Ladish crash. And that really sort of undermines

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Bowing's narrative because with the first crash they said, oh, well,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pilot should have known about this. They have all this,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, basic training of how to handle a dive. Well,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pilots are trained for sort of a continuous dive. That's

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>not what happened. This was sort of up and down,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>step by step, and you know, with the degree of

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.719
<v Speaker 1>thrust the system is capable of. That was sort of

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what led to this being so disastrous. So I want

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to pick up on this idea that it goes counter

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to Boeing's narrative. I'm wondering how much liability Bowing is

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>going to have here given the fact that they were

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>aware of potential risks, the fact that they were lobbying

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>f A A and the f A was not getting

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>them in check, and they are their own overseers. The

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that that they have that onus, does that leave

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>them with more responsibility? Uh, financially at this point, the

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that the risks were understated in this safety analysis

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that was submitted they f A is not a good

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>look for Boeing, especially because they're now saying, Okay, we'll

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>know this is actually how it worked. Um, I think

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're already starting to see sort of lawsuits

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>from the families of of the people who died in

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>these crashes. I am not a lawyer, so I'm not

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>going to speculate onto the outcome of that, but just

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at it, it does not look good for Boeing.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean just in terms of their culpability here, in

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of not really taking ownership of some of these issues.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that just raises a lot of questions and

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and and not to not to diminish the personal tragedy

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this. I mean a lot of people, hundreds

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of people lost their lives because of what happened. I

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>do have to wonder from a business perspective with Boeing,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is the big risk the liability is the potential lawsuits

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>or is it that companies airlines are not going to

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>order from Boeing because they have that much less confidence.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the bigger risk as far as, um, you know,

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Boeing's liability is first of all, what happens as a

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>result of this grounding, and a lot of it is

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>to pendant on how long the grounding is and what

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators ultimately decide is the problem here. Um. So after

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the Lion Air crash, I mean Boeing was sort of saying, well,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a software issue. They were supposedly working on

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a fix that was reportedly supposed to be out by

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>year end. Obviously that did not happen, and said we

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>had the Ethiopian Airlines crash, which in my mind sort

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of ups the stakes as far as how you actually

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fix this I don't think it's as simple anymore. It's

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just a software download. I think you're certainly going to

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>have to have retraining of pilots, which is going to

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>be expensive. That's probably going to be a bill that

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Boeing has to front, including the cost of, you know,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>replenishing airlines lost revenue for having these planes out of service.

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Um Now, the more dire scenario is that the f

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a A is forced to sort of revisit the whole

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>certification of the seven thirties seven Max designed to say, Okay,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we needed to be more rigorous about this, we need

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to go through a more in depth process. There's also

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a question about the f a and what happens here

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with that agency, especially given the fact that any potential

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>badness around the organization was just magnified by the fact

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that they were so late to the game in terms

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of halting the use of the seven thirty seven Max

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>A jet. I'm wondering is there any potential recourse that

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers could take with the f a A, uh, possibly

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>appropriating a little more money so they could have outside investigators,

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps making sure that they have the personnel who

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are not going to do this again. I certainly think

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that this idea of outsourcing the certification work to Boeing

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to be under a lot of scrutiny. You're

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly gonna have a lot of hearings. Now. I will

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>say the Trump administration actually expanded that outsourcing program just

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago to include, um, you know,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>other types of products. So it will be interesting to

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>see how this plays out because, of course, the Trump

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>administration is very big on deregulation, and obviously in this

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>case and some of the President's tweets would suggest that,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we need to have stronger oversight here.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be really interesting to see how that

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>tension plays out. But I will say the f A

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is not the only game in town anymore, like it

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be that the FAYS were carried in the

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>aviation industry. And what you saw in this case, which

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think is remarkable, is that other aviation regulators

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>are saying, we don't really trust what you have to say.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>We're going to make our own decisions as far as

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this plane as air worth. Other other

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>regulators are talking about internationally, right, I mean, I think

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you saw that with like how quick they were to

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>ground the plane regardless of what THEA was, which to

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>me raises also a question of how this affects the

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>companies in the United States that are regulated by the

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>f a A and others that are outsourcing some of

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>their their their services. To me, it makes me wonder

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>whether that's going to put these companies at a disadvantage

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>competitively internationally because people will have less faith that they

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have truly passed all of the tests. Well, I mean,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I think so any of these aircraft have to be

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of certified by all of these aviation regulators anyway,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and so like all of these companies are going to

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>be very intimately familiar with the criteria other regulators. But

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>what you could see to your point is that you know,

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Europeans, the Brazilians, China steps up their scrutiny and

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they have more stringent requirements in the f A because

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they need to fill that void. Did

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>any other agencies sign off on the seven thirty seven

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>max yet in the United States internationally? I would have

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to double check that, but I would believe, I mean,

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>if they're flying, then they probably are. So it might

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be the f a A that's got egg on its

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>face right now. But it seems like perhaps it wasn't

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>them alone that signed off on it. No, it wasn't.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But so Brazil and the Europeans did push back on

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the really re certification processes that they ultimately,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, put that plane in the sky. But they

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>did have more concerns and there was a little bit

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>more of a pushback in those conversations. Brook Sutherland, thank

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us today. Brook Sutherland

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg opinion columnist and she is fabulous. Read

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>her columns. You can find them online. You can find

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>them on the Bloomberg of brook Sutherland. She is really

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one of our top notch columnists here. Thanks for listening

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.