WEBVTT - #337 Packers Unscripted: Ongoing adjustments

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>M Hi, everybody, Welcome to Packers unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, sitting alongside I trusted colleague west

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Hodkuwitz for coming to you here from our studios at

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lambeau Field West. Another day closer to Packers Lions Sunday afternoon,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Ford Field in Detroit, and as the Packers get into

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of their on field practice preparation for this game,

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>worth going over the injury report here as we sit

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in week five, because while Randall Cobb and Geronimo Alison

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>with a hamstring and concussion, respectively, are not back on

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the practice field for the Packers at the cornerback position,

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin King and Jaire Alexander, both dealing with coroyin and

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>reas were on the practice field and that's a potentially

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>good sign for this past defense heading into a game

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>against Matthew Stafford. Absolutely, and those three receivers that the

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Lions have, certainly the Packers are well acquainted with. Marvin

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Jones Jr. Has had a fair amount of success over

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>them the last few seasons. Golden Tate is a type

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of player possession receiver you always have to take into

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>account regardless of where he's lining up much like a

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb type, you know, impact player for their offense.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And then also Kenny Gallabay, who's who was their third

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>round pick last year, has made an impact. So yeah,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's of the passing yards so far for the Lions

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this season, those three receivers. So Packers want to be

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at full strength at cornerback. We'll have to see all

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the week plays out here. But the

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that Kevin King was back in a full capacity

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, it was kind of funny because that the

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>actual injuryport gets released later in the day, but he

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was standing at his locker after practice talking about it

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and was basically asked, Hey, if you have to play

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>at less than ercent are you able to do that

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>with a groin injury? And he thought about it for

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a second, he goes, yes, I can, but I'm a

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred so it's all good. So uh, And then as

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it turned out, he ended up being a full participant.

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think for Kevin King, I'm not saying there's

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>any time in which it's good for a player not

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to be playing, but I think these last two weeks

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are really beneficial for him because certainly he's been able

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to rest up with the groin injury. He also was

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the shoulder before that. The Packers are gonna

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>need Kevin King to be at his full strength to

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be an impact player for this defense, for the Packers

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to get to where they want to be at the

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. And now him coming back a

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect opponent, three really good weapons for the Lions. They

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>want to have that secondary at his best. Yeah, we

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>saw when Kevin King left the game in Week two

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. There was a bit of a domino

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>effect for the Packers defense there against Minnesota and then

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the first half against Washington. Still some adjustments and

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and things didn't really settle down in terms of the

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>past defense. From the second half of the Washington game

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>now through obviously the Buffalo game against a rookie quarterback,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>mind you, but the Packers seem to settle in with

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>their secondary and with the roles. Now you potentially have

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that positive domino effect of King coming back into the

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>lineup based on extra options of how to match up

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and and how to use different combinations of players and

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that. It's sort of a domino effect the

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>other way, he is one of the type of players

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just projecting this to be what he's going

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be in this league, I think, to me, looking

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>at his intangibles and looking at what he's put on

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>film in his first ten and a half eleven games

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of his career, Kevin King just seems like the kind

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of guy that you plug in at boundary cornerback and

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you just don't think about it. He solves that puzzle

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for you. He's a a guy that's going to be

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>able to travel with top receivers if you need him

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do that. If you want to have him play

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>one side, he can do that as well. But he

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has the versatility, the flexibility, and the overall talent to

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to match up with the Stefon Diggs of

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, as we saw last year with you know,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones and A. J. Green does Bryant. He doesn't

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>step away from those challenges. But the nice effect of

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that as well is that R Alexander stepped up and

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought played really well in his absence here the

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks and him being able to get back

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on the practice field after leaving with the groin injury.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of different pieces for this secondary

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly they did lose Devon House. But then you

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>go inside Bashad Brelan, you have Tremon Williams playing how

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he's playing right now as a boundary corner in this

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>league at age thirty five. Josh Jackson stepped up, and

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I just think you look at the versatility of guys

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>like Jermaine Whitehead and Josh Jones. As the season wears on,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna need to tap into that depth. The Packers

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>did it the last couple of weeks. But if you

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have Kevin King healthy, available and ready to go, it

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get any better than that. This is a really

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>good test for him now, you know, hopefully being able

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to get back on the field Sunday and seeing what

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he can do against those threats in Ford Field. Yeah,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes the Packers entire defense that much

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>more versatile in terms of what Mike Petton can choose

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to do in different situations when you have a corner

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with the just the physical attributes and the skill set

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the king out there on a regular basis, Right,

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and how soon we forget I mean that game against

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, the Packers ran seven defensive backs a lot.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>They played six defensive backs in a base defense, so

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to have that ace upper sleeve again after

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>last week where they basically had to finish the game

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Nickel just because of kind of the attrition at

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that position. All right, well, I've got to catch up

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on a little sponsor business here west because I neglected

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>my duty on yesterday's show. So at home or here

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in the stands, we all know that Green Bay fans

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>give it their all and that takes a lot of energy.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>So grab a warm bowl of Campbell's Chunky Soup. It's

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>meaty goodness fuels the greatness of Packers fans everywhere. Try

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the delicious classic chicken noodle soup. Just visit your local

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>supermarket and ask for Campbell's Chunky Soup. Official sup partner

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Green Bay Packers. Okay, getting back to the

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>injuries at the wide receiver position, Randall Cobb, Geronim Wilson

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not in practice. Davante Adams pops up on the injury

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>report with a calf injury limited participant in practice. We'll

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have to see how the wheak goes on. If this is,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, anything to be concerned about as far as

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday's availability. I don't want to speculate necessarily one way

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>or the other with that, but regardless, it certainly looks

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Packers have a couple of options here in

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>terms of how to compensate for some things in the

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Either you go in with a lot more

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, two tight end maybe even three tight end

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>packages and work those tight ends even more into the

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>passing game, or you turn over a lot of snaps

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to the rookie wide receivers. Valdez Scantling obviously played a

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lot against Buffalo. We talked about the positives and negatives

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of his kind of first real big game on an

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL stage. And then you've also got Jamon Moore and

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>eq St Brown who were certainly itching for their opportunity

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. You have any sense at all of how

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, may you know, go into this from a

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>planning perspective, I really don't like. But the thing I

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>like about it, and we talked about this, I don't

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>know if you recall I think even in training camp

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>about with the two tight end looks and even in

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to some extent the three tight end looks at they're

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>able to be use they can be so multiple, especially

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're using a guy like Time Montgomery who's a

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>pseudo receiver, pseudo running back that could play a multitude

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of different roles for you. It's able to keep a

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>defense on its heels a little bit. Meet Personally, I

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>still wonder if the regardless of who's available, regardless of

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Allison passed at the concussion protocol like Nick Perry did

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>last week where we didn't actually miss a game, or

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Cobs able to get back on the field at some

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>point in Davante Adams, this is just a blimp on

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the radar and he's fine. Maybe you do have you know,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>most or if not all, those guys available, But either way,

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the game plan for this has to be

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>running back heavy base, specifically alone on just the production

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that the lines have been giving up in the run

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>game this year. They go into this game thirty second

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Last week, Ezekiel Elliott ends up having

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty rushing yards against them in that victory.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this has to be an Aaron Jones type game.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It has to be a Jamal Williams and in Time

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery type games. So I think, if nothing else, what

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>these injuries are doing in this specific encounter, Is it

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe will allow the Packers open up the playbook a

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. Maybe we see more Marcedes Lewis, Maybe

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we see more of those two tight end looks that

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw throughout the preseason. It was probably their base

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>package throughout the preseason. They have depth at tight end

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and running back to turn to depending on what they

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>want to do with those receivers. Yeah, and as we

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier in the week too, I'm curious to

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>see just because we haven't seen Marcedes Lewis involved that

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>much in the passing game yet for the Packers, if

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if that's something that maybe gets unveiled here out of

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>necessity based on your your options at wide receiver. I

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with you on the running game situation that

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you just have to look at the statistics. The Lions

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are struggling to stop the run. As we've talked about,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they've changed a lot of things on defense. The front

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>four that was so much the foundation of their defense

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in previous years with the and Dominican Susan Nick Fairley's

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Vanenbosch's that's not how this defense is built anymore.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay is their playmaker at cornerback. They have Glover

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Quinn at safety. Um, you know guys like that. The

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>defense is just built differently and they're struggling right now

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to stop the run. So you have to take advantage

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. That being said, you know, if these rookie

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers get an opportunity, they have to cash in, right.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is even if if they if if

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Jamon Moore or MVS they get one ball thrown

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>their way in Detroit, make the play because with Aaron Rodgers,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go a long way. I mean, that's

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how Geronimo Alison did, right. I mean you brought it

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up in your story on Rogers. He talked about at

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta game. Now that's two years ago. Yeah, back

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Cobb ended up being a scratch. I think Time Montgomery

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ended up being a scratch in that game. Jordy Nelson

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think was I'm trying to remember if he was

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>even available for that one. But anyway, they were down

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were depleted at receiver, so it ended up

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>being Geronimo Allison, Jeff Janison, Trevor Day, Trevor Davis, and

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Alison who just came off the practice squad, ended up

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>having the best game out of everybody, and and and

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about it. We talked about it. That's what

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was sort of his coming out party, and told Rogers,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy I can count on, this is

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a guy that could be a playmaker in this offense.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a big hit for Alison to be in the

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol, just because he's been so darn consistent. I

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know there was a couple of drop passes there, but

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>still already had eighty receiving yards in that game against

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. Well, and you just wonder if the one

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that he took the hit, if he makes the catch

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than drops it, does he end up not getting

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that type of hit and and doesn't have a concussion

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>One of those things that you just yeah, if the

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>drop pass doesn't happen, maybe we're not talking about a

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol. But to your original point with MVS. With

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamon Moore with a Gunemius st. Brown, if those guys

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do get into this game, if it's one step, if

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fifties four snaps like it was for Valdis Scantling

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>last week, you have to make sure that you use

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>those two the best of your ability to show Aaron

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers that you know what I can play in this

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>offense and I can be your receiver. All right? Well,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>double duty on the sponsor business. Today, West, it's time

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to enter the Cousins Subs Best Seats in the House promotion.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You and a guest could win a chance to kick

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>back on the fifty yard line in style. Two pairs

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of lucky Packers fans will be chosen prior to each

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>home game for this v I P experience. Enter daily

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>now through December sixteen by completing the entry form and submitting.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>For complete rules and eligibility, go to Packers dot com

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>slash Best Seats Cousin Subs. We believe in better. Okay,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the Detroit Lions being last in the league

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at defending the run over the last handful of years,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they've been last or close to last in the league

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at running the ball on offense. That is not the

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>case anymore. Looking up the statistics, they're actually up to

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty in the league in rushing yardage and even more impressively,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>seventh in the league in yards per carry. As far

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as running the ball. Hey, but those are those are

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not rankings that the Detroit Lions are used to with

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>running the football. They've been last in the league in

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards two of the last four years, and they've

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>been in the high twenties the other two years. They've

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>been anywhere from six to last in the league over

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the last four years in yards per carry. They are

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>emphasizing the run game. They're trying to develop that complementary

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>running game for a quarterback like Matthew Stafford. And this

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a type of preparation week that's

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a little different for the Packers going up against the

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Lions because really they're in my opinion, They're rushing statistics

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>become even more impressive when you look at the fact

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that they've been behind in the fourth quarter in the

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>majority in basically three of their four games where they

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a chance to continue running the ball because

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they because they've been behind. They racked up the big

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards in the win over New England. But this

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>team is showing a determination to run the football and

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Packers have to be ready for it. Yeah, and

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this is in ever since. I mean, you can always

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>draw the comparisons between them at the running back position

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and what Cleveland has gone through at the quarterback position.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They lost Barry Sanders. I think that was James Stewart

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that came after him had a thousand yards season. But

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ever since then, it's been a carousel. They've used second

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>round draft picks, they've used first round draft picks on

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the position. Well, and and they and they thought they

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>had a future feature back in job at best, and

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>concussions and ended his career because he was looking like

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a very promising prospect for them. Absolutely So now they

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>got Carrie on Johnson. And it's funny, Mike, because so often,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked about as recently as these last

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, people ask about the Packers in the

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>running game and who are you going to feature, Well,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>look at what Detroit's also doing. They have Carrie on Johnson,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, the spark plug is the big hitter,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>home run hitter. Yeah, he's he's speedy guy, he's fast.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You have obviously, um, you know Blunt who has been

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>a big power back all these years, the Hammer, the Hammer,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>his last name fits his running style exactly. And then

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you got theoretic, who's more of the complimentary receiving type

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of it almost mirrors what Green Bay is doing, which

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>almost mirrors what the NFL is doing in two thousand eighteen.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just the way things go. But I mean, getting

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the original point, Johnson has been a revelation

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for this offense. He finally ended that streak of of

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that skid. I guess you could say of them not

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>having a hundred yard rusher, which at the end of

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the day, it's not a big deal with has went

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>through it a number of years ago too, before Eddie

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Lacy got here. But it is a question you have

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep answering. It's a question the head coach and

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense has to keep addressing. It's something that takes

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on a life of its own in certain and to

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent, they ended that. So you're out of

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that that equation now for the next season or two.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But the thing what Johnson is is you can tell

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that isn't a that isn't a fluke.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get his yards, he's gonna get his production.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And as he gets more established in his offense, is

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they get more confidence in him. He's going to be

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy that not only the Packers, but the NFC

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>North in general is gonna have to deal with. Yeah, well,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly something the Packers will be prepared for on Sunday

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>before we go today West. Though it is Thursday, I

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to touch on the Thursday night football matchup this

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>week because one of the things that's happened here in

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL this season with Fox Major Network taking over

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday night television package, is these matchups on Thursday

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>nights are they aren't just like throw aways of some

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, let's give so and so, you know,

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a primetime game that doesn't normally get one. We saw

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams against the Vikings last week, got the Colts

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots this week. Now this is no longer

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Manning against Tom Brady, but it's Andrew Luck against

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady and two guys who have faced each other

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in the postseason, including in an a f C championship game.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And you have all the drama of what happened with

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the coaching search in the off season with Josh McDaniels

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and and GM Chris Ballard for the Indianapolis Colts. So

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are really interesting. Another interesting Thursday up matchup and one

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that could have some significant implications in the FC. It's

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a must win game for both teams. I mean, you

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the Patriots, they're trying to get back on

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the positive side of five. In the Colts with Andrew

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Luck coming back, this is supposed to be okay, well

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we're back to being a contender again. Well they're sitting

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one in three. The other storyline that I don't think

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is getting talked enough about this week is the fact

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is Andrew Luck's return against New England. That

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>was that looked Mike, when you go back to those

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a f C Championship games, when you go back to

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>where things were headed in two thousand, twelve and thirteen

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen, it looked like Tom Brady versus Manning was

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just gonna shift to Tom Brady versus Love and then

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he deals with the shoulder injury. They obviously go through

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>their issues. Jacoby Brissette comes in, who has ties to

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>New England, and things kind of get jumbled a little bit.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But as Chris Ballard said, the rivalries back on after

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened with Josh McDaniels. Obviously, Frank Wright coming

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in has a lot of familiarity. Now you know with

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that that New England Patriots team. It's gonna be a

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>really fun game to watch, And to be honest with you,

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I I from a player perspective. I've always felt for

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the players. I think it's a tough turnaround for guys

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to make it almost you know, kind of a natural

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>just just for them to be able to be expected

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to play again on three days rest. But I'd be

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>lying to you if I told you I wasn't watching

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>these games. For me personally, especially with us covering games

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on Sundays, it's really difficult to sit down and watch

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL football, uh if you're specifically honed in on one team.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm always tuned in and I'll be tuned in again.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really fun matchup between two teams

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that have a really interesting backstory. Yeah. Well, the rest

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Thursday nights late this year, there are a

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting matchups, so we'll keep talking about them

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as we go along, including the Packers. I know the

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks are going through some tough times right now.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see where things are at a month

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from now, but there's a lot of history in that

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>stadium with the Green Bay Packers and Seattle Seahawks. You're

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not even just counting the NFC, the NFC Championship game,

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Century link with the Packers. There's there's a story there.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>So again me personally, if you're gonna have Thursday night

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>football games, make them compelling, make them watchable, and you know,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>let the chips fall where they may. All Right with that,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll call it a wrap on this edition of Packers Unscripted.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow all of our coverage of the

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>team on Packers dot com. On Twitter, you can still

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>follow him at west Hot I'm at Mike Spofford at

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers is still the team account. Thanks for tuning in, everybody,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>See you next time.