WEBVTT - FTX Fallout Grows and TikTok's Project Texas

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde at Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and I'med Lovelow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on today's show, f t X contagion continues,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>while Finance CEO c Z seeks to be the new

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>savior of crypto, will reflect on the fallout with one

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of the early f t X investors, Class President Biden

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and China's Jijing Ping have charted a path towards warmer

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>ties between the two nations. We can discuss the impact

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on the technology sector, particularly chips and amid crypto concerns.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Tech laos and geopolitical warriors can start up still raise money. Yes,

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be speaking with legendary VC investor

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Vinod Kosla, plus an exclusive conversation with Maven Connects CEO

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on its latest funding round. We want to think about

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the long term in investment opportunities right now within well crypto.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Many people dialing back that particular trade at the moment

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>they might still be looking in the metaverse, but maybe

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not f TX. The collapse still being felt, and indeed

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in Bahamas, the Bahamian police and regulators they're saying that

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>they're working to investigate whether there was actually criminal misconduct

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>ed in the collapse of the crypto empire. This after

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>interviewing ft x is co founder sand Bankwun Freed on Saturday,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Katanga Johnson is based in Nassau in the Bahamas

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and has been following this story for us in Katanga.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, give us the latest in terms of the impact,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly on sam bankman Freed at the moment we understand,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of course he was sat down with the police on

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Saturday here in the Bahamas. Yes, authorities have began investigating

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sam Bankman Freed and f t X, particularly around Friday's

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>withdrawals from local investors, who at the same time that

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>many local investors were able to withdraw their money from

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the platform, global investors had been shut out. And while

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the company, he said it had gotten a nod from

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulator to allow for this, given a key a

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>loophole in regulations here, the regulators said it did not

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in any way suggest or approve for FTX to allow

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>such withdrawals. This is just one of the touching points

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>right now on the ground as regulators, both the Bahama

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Securities Commission as well as the Financial Crimes Unit of

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the police look into this matter. Authorities say they're still

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>investigating yet, they haven't come to any sort of conclusion,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but once they do, they'll make a recommendation to the

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>public prosecutor, who have then actually begin a criminal misconduct

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>pro Well, that would be my question, Katanga. What kind

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of trouble is Sam Branktan Freed in in the Bahama

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>is what kind of rebacussions does he and f t

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>X face. It's a little too soon to tell. It

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>will depend on whether the findings of these investigations suggests

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that he did engage in criminal misconduct. Uh. Just some

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of the color on the ground is that many investors

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've spoken to and there's been reporting on this,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just feeling so ways betrayed. Some are trying to make

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of the person they knew, who they either worked

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>with day to day or came to trust. As he

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>was busy building a community center beginning the launch of

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the other FTX headquarters, were standing in front of the

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more current one. They're building a new one that including

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a hotel. Many people felt as if there were so

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>many efforts to to advance to the presence of crypto

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas and u SPF reputation certainly ruined that potential.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Some people have told us, I'm sure a lot of

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>emotions where you are right now, Katanga Johnson, of course

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas. We thank you so much for your

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reporting throughout the day. Now let's get back to, of course,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the wider cryptosphere. Right now, Blue motional basket has been

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all across what is not only a criminal probe for SPF,

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>also looking within the SEC as well. But what about

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the impact on the money he's lost for others? What

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are the ripple effects of contagion effects on some big

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>money managers here in the US and worldwide. Yeah, let's

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>take a look directly at the ones that are reporting

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>their exposures. Some of them have a large amount of

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their own capital. Eight up Gallos Capital for example, has

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>set up to forty five million dollars worth, a significant amount,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they say. I guy also says a large majority of

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>their capital was tied as well to f t X.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Galaxy Digital had seventy seven million, Except for that was

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only about four percent of their capital base. They will

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>walk away from this just fine with a bruise in

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of what they have lost. Genesis of course, we

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know has been working with d c G and they

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have one hundred seventy five million tied to this, So

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>this is just starting to emerge. I had a conversation

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>late Friday with Michael Novograts of Galaxy Digital, and he

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>expects his former estimation of dozens of headge funds failing

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will only start to exacerbate in this type of a market.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Carolina brings us to the next point here,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>which is that c Z trunk Goings out of finance,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to start an industry fund here to rescue firms

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that have exposure to f t X but perhaps are

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>good projects to be working with, ones that were honest projects.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>There were a variety of responses to this. He had

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter spaces asked me anything this morning. But in

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>terms of what investors were reacting to to this, you

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have folks like Justin's son saying that a he Tron,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Poloniacs and Huobe would be very very reticent or not reticent,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>veether they would like to echo the recovery fund here

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and how these builders in a tough time on the

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>reticent side. Now is someone like a Peter Schiff who

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>says that let's maybe not spend money rescuing projects that

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be saved. He said, it's not a good idea

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to throw good money after bad. So moral hazard has

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>been a looming questions since the beginning of these crypto

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>industry issues here and now you're really coming to see

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this debate out to play on who gets saved and

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how Sonia were really in a situation now where c

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Z is kind of positioning himself as the industry savior, Well,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we sure have him coming out with this industry fund.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I think a question here is again who gets saved

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and who participates in a fund like this? How much

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>money is put into a fun like this. It's interesting

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>when we were doing all the references add on what

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this looks the most like, was whether it's an n

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>F global or if it's an LTCM type moment, an

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of an industry wide bailout of sorts has come

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>up a lot to rescue projects that might have had

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>their money tied up into f t X. Otherwise, who

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>would do it at this point? This is not like

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an industry that's backed by the government like other

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>lending industries are. I would say, what is becoming very

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>clear is that others will come into severe financial stress.

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Take Block five, for example, which just today had mentioned

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they hired a financial advisor to sort this. I mean, well,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>this is the irony, right because c Z is now

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to be the white Knight. Previously it's been some

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>mikemen Free have been the white Knight bailing out Celsius

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>voyage of Block five, as you just mentioned block Fire.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>What all these companies that had depended upon ft X

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sources for resilience. And an interesting thing I would point

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>out myself this morning is that Alan that asked me

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>anything spaces that CZ had health he had mentioned and

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was not relying on venture capital money. Yet

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the venture capitals that had poured

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so much money into the crypto space and have lost

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>money on the back of it. They may indeed need

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to also figure out their own ways to figure out

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>how to inject more liquidity into some of the companies

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that they had provided funding too, because otherwise they may

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have to take more losses. And so are some of

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>these uh saving opportunities coming out of a point of weakness.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You do hear he did say seasy and this morning

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on that Twitter spaces that for some people this is

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a good opportunity to buy its suppressed prices, and that

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like the past, this might be an opportunity to buy

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>things during a point in time that we may not

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>remember years later. Although I can't imagine not remember everyone's

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>going to remember me for last two weeks. Yeah, well,

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean with all the chaos, and I guess my

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>mind goes to confusion. You start thinking about regulators, right,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Shinali CFTC. How empowering is the negative headlines we've seen

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to a regulator and how they act in this industry

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I wouldn't get so excited about the power

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of regulators to move forward so quickly. Ed if you

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think about it. F t X itself f t XS,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>U S s r U, s ARM had a proposal

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to change some rules regarding clearinghouse intermediate intermediation in the

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry with the CFTC, so clearly the f t

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>X was working with regulators here. Regulators might not be

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>so quickly to move on certain proposals here with that

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>type of mistrust looming in the industry and being so

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>close to the brink of changing rules from one of

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the major players. That is the poster child now of

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the crypto collapse of two. On the other hand, people

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have lost money at scale here. So it's not just

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a CFTC but the SEC and other regulators that might

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>move faster in order to protect consumer funds as they

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>pertain to the United States and where those funds are

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>kept at the end of the day, and how importantly here,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>how they are classified. Because no matter what, you can

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>you put as many protections as you want in retrospect.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Until the industry and the CFTC and SEC can put

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>definitions on some of these things, which is clearly still

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue out play here, it's hard to imagine the

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>regulators moving forward in any meaningful way. Al Right, Glamductionati Basset,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you. It's this a story that has many days

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to run. I'm sure the economy does not look great

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Things are slowing down. You're seeing layoffs in

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>many many sectors of the economy. People are are slowing down. Um,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities say, if we're not in a recession right now,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we're likely to be in one very soon. So my

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>advice to people, whether they're small business owners or you know, is, uh,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>take some risk off the table Amazon found to Jeff

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Bezos there on CNN earlier talking what about the layoffs,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course then we learned that Amazon itself is

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>planning for its largest ever round of layoffs, cutting well

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to potentially ten employees according to sources, we wouldn't dive

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>into the current pullback and tech hiring the valuations when

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>none other than a silicon value venture capitalists you know

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>well phone Cosla founder. Cosla Venture is one of the

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>largest global venture firms with approximately fifteen billion dollars in

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>assets on the management. It is times like this we

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>turn to you and your experience, your expertise. More layoffs

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to become more more reticence to invest, even from a

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>VC perspective, do you think. I don't think there's rest

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>rediscence to invest from a VC perspective, but there will

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be more layoffs to come. I think the error of

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>exuberance cause companies to take on a lot of fat.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Good margins, good cash flows, allow people to be sloppy

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about expense control and what really matters. Everything is okay

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to do because one can afford it. I think now

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good time to do that reckoning and

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fix things. Cut off the extra fat, get back to

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the basics. I do think I do think we'll see

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the best investing in the next decade. Technogal you have

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>been in this industry for thirty six years, and respectfully,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a few recessions, and we keep hearing that

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>we're destined for recession. But some of the best companies

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are born out of recession. Do you agree with that?

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely agree with that. You know, when when Google

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon and Facebook are cutting off their most advanced

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>projects and their best, most radical projects, those are the

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very people who do great startups, they will be leaving

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and starting new companies, and that those will show up

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on your radar screen five years from now, but our

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>radar screen very soon. The talk to us a little

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about the area of crypto, the ripple effects at

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>ups had, and indeed what we're learning in terms of

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of a founder. When you've invested money within people,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of course you keep on believing in that individual. How

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>do you know when it's the right time to pull

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the plug? Well, that's why every week venture capitalists to

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>decide for themselves. And venture capitalists are big boys, so

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to worry about venture capitalists. There's a

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people, consumers that get hurt in this

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that we need to worry about. I'm actually optimistic with

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the SPX fiasco that the regulators will step up and

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be much more aggressive. I was a little bit optimistic

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when they've imposed a fine on Kim kardation. I think

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>way more enforcement, way more clarity on what the regulations are,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>less fighting between the various agencies doing regulation. I think

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a real opportunity to enable crypto for the

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>real world of business, not the crypto world alone. I

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>separate crypto as crypto for crypto world and crypto for

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the real world building real businesses that impact what we

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>know as businesses today. And I think if the regulators

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>step up, as I hope they will, this will really

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>enable that. I mean much of this. The blame can

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be laid on the sec and others who haven't stepped

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>up and provided clarity on what is possible, what's the token,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the security, what can you do, and what can't

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you do. I think it's a real opportunity, and I

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>hope the crumbling off ft X provides pressure to do

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this on the regulators. Then a cryptocurrency meltdown has kind

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of dominated headlines. So as President Biden's meeting ping. You

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>told us in June that the US and China were

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>headed for a techno economic war. Were you right, Well,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I've always believed that, and I think this is a

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty year perspective. They're not one year perspective. I

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>totally believe that, and it will continue to be the case.

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But we can compete in a more civilized manner with

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a clearer setup rules of what is acceptable behavior in

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this For example, cyber spin espionage is not acceptable. Um.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it will help to talk, and it will,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but we will still be in this battle, and frankly,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the world will be better off if two people are

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>competing with the good set of well defined rules for technology.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But if the Western world wins the technology battle, they'll

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>win the political and economic battle too. In another area

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you're focused on is climate tech. Our latest data from

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Energy Finance showed the third straight quarter drop

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in VC and private equity investment into climate tech. You

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wrote in the op ed in The Economist that we

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are too focused on twenty thirty climate goals and we

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be more focused on the longer term twenty

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty climate goals. How does that drive your investment decisions?

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The startups that you are or are not putting money

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>into in that sector. So our job is to invest early,

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, when people are requiring five or ten million

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars to do something. The bulk of the deployment comes

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in mature technologies, and that's not our business. But what

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we invest in should be a prototype or proven technology

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>by twenty and deployed by twenty forty and hopefully fully

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>deployed by That's sort of the perspective we keep in mind.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing we invest in gets to liquid it in less

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>than five to ten years, and so with that in mind,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the current perturbations up and down don't matter as much

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>except to keep these companies funded, which is what we

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about by being more or less conservative, depending upon

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>what the markets are doing. But of course you've written

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about the thing that you need to be if your

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a VC is optimistic. So let's finish on an optimistic moment,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>where are you thinking of allocating money? Which are the

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>areas that you think will be the diamonds in the

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>rough at this particular market where we are worried about

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>an economic dial back. We are worried about the amount

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of money being put to work. Well, the largest investment

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we've ever made was an opening, so AI is definitely

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>more transformative than most people imagine. We did that five

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:41.239
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and I'd say that world has accelerated dramatically

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years. So I'm very happy with that.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be a very very rich area.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It will be more disruptive to incumbents than most people realize, uh,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is something we do need to both take

0:16:54.920 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>advantage of as the disruptors and mostly on the disruptive inside,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but also in how to partner with the right incumbents

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to cause lt change to happen. Climate will continue to

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be a big area, and I think the application of

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>AI to healthcare will be very very important. I've talked

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that. I'm much more confident that that

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>will be disrupted in the way people can't imagine today

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in in the next decade or so. So lots of

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>areas and lots of technology enablers, whether it's AI, three

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>D printing, UM computational techniques in general, all leading to

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>very very promising areas for tech based investing. All right, then,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a Coastler, founder of Coast la Vengeres. Thank you. What

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>an honor is to have you on the show this Monday.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Coming up Apples working on its next major product and

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality headset. We'll talk about metaverse, composition and more.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Next this is Bloomberg time for talking tech. Apples mixed

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>reality headset maybe a year away. But we've been asking

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you in the audience which company you think wins out

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in the race to the metaverse. Most people responded Apple,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>even though Meta, the parent company of Facebook, already dominates

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the market for virtual reality. It's an interesting one because

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Meta has such a big head start. But you out

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>there think that it's Apple that's gonna win in the

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>long run, and we have some clues about what they'll do.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We think that will have a three D virtual world,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>according to job postings on Apple's site and Bloomberg's reporting,

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and a video service is going to be a key feature.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Keep watching. Sticking with virtual and the metaverse, Nike announcing

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>an online store for trading and purchase of virtual sneakers.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Bear with me on this one. This is dot swoosh,

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>where you can go to the platform and it's the

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>latest bet from a Key's management on the metaverse all

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for a marketplace on digital sneakers. That's your talking tech Caroline.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Someone somewhere still caring about that metaverse, but caring about

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>those n f T s that are related to it

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and Nike among them, Top Swoosh, I love it ed,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a bloom meg Technology and Ludlow there in

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York and before

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we go out to you, we want to be discussing

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>how geopolitic politics front and center this week, G twenty

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>upon us. It appears that the US and China relationship

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of warming up. Is that what you're watching? Yeah,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to read the markets because the on camera

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Biden and g might be a little different

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to what we're hearing from inside China and Chinese officials.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You look at the technology sector a lot of red

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on the board to start the week, but it was

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>actually the US listed China a d r s that

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>did better outperform. Looking at the NAZ that Golden Dragon

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>China index on camera, there's a warming of relationships going

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>into this meeting. We were super focused on semiconductors. The

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>socks actually closing down one percent because a lot of

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what policy action from the US has focused on is

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>curving technology exports chip exports to China. Now that's on camera.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Off camera, we actually got a pretty blunt state from

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Chinese Foreign Ministry that pointed out, referring to

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>existing US policy, that starting a trade war or technology

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>war is not what China wants to be doing right now.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about it not being in the best interests

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. So even though we had a very

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of public show of affection between the two nations,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of concern here about what the US

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is doing to curb technology exports to China, and China's

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>tech sector has been here it's a clear global laggage.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You look at the Hang Seng Tech Index for example,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>those are Hong Kong listed Chinese tech stocks. It's really

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>lags behind tech stocks, not just in the United States,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but in Europe as well. November has been better. We've

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>seen a recover very in that sector in China, big

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>part of that being the easing of COVID zero policy

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>in China. But the issue around US curbing chip technology

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>exports to United States still kind of top of mind

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the relationship between the two nations,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>even if the macro or the economic picture is improving slightly. Yeah,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and really well put, and let's just go even more

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>broad with that relationship. Because President Biden Jijing paying of course,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>did meet for about three hours we understand in Bali, Indonesia,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and look, they did agree on a series of good

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>will gestures, but there were still some areas of disagreement.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>To take a listen, I've made it clear to President

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Jijimping that I thought they had an obligational attempt to

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>make it clear to North Korea that they should not

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>engage and long range nuclear tests. And I made it

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>clear as well that if they did, they meaning North Korea,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that we would have to take certain actions that would

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>be more defensive on our behalf, and it would not

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be directed against North Korea. I'm assuming we're not being

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>directed against China, but it will be to send him

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a clear message to North Korea. Concerns about North Korea,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>concerns about of course Russia, Ukraine, and then the ongoing

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>concerns about economic ties. Let's go back into the whole

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>chip sector. Now, a blue bags Debbie Wou, who typically

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>is in Taipei. She's visiting US right now. She's in

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. And Debbie go back to what seemed to

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>be a real effort from both the Biden camp and

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Sejing Things camp to try and warm up relations to

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>at least start ties once again, relationships to be a

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit better and progressive. Is that going to help

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the chip sector a little? Perhaps so? Prot Biden said

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>today that he didn't see the need for a year

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>new court war after a meeting with Chinese Theaterial City

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Team ping. But what we have seen over past a

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>few months, it's also a little bit worrying because US

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>US veiled sweeping restrictions in early Act all bird to

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>restrict China's access to UH chip technologies, and Washington also

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>wants allies including the Netherlands and Japan to come on

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>board to help suppress China's development of a domestic chip

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>industry at home. And as to how this will well

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>build out, I think we need a little bit more

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>time to see what happens after Biden and and she's

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting earlier today and then uh Brien Biden is also

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a plane too, sent the Secretary of State UH Anthony

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln to China early next year to sort of help

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>resume a collaboration on a series of issues including a

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>climate change and food security and whether are the two

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>countries my warm lea take from I think we all

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have to await and see that. It's interesting. We talked

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about the on camera relationship between President Biden Energy and

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>then the off camera statements from China's foreign ministry. But

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that in the background, the United States

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>has been trying to get allies on board as as

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to participate right in in technology export curbs. How do

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they go about convincing their allies to participate so to

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Two senior US officials are expected to visit the Netherlands

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this month to speak with their Dutch counterpart about expo

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>control issues, although there is no deal expected out of

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this new round of talks. And at the same time,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>though American officials has repeatedly said in public that if

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>allies do not come on board with the UH to

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>UH sort of aligned with the US on the latest

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>extra control measures, that the what the US has in

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>its tool boxes to ban the sales of foreign chip

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>production equipment that contains even the smallest amounts of American

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>technology to China, so that's what the US can do.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So clearly there's the implicit threat from Washington that the

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>consulant l a UH course or forced the ELLI to

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do some things. Although right now what we see is

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the balminisiation still wants UH allies to

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of like more collaborate rather than sort of single

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>hendly being forced by US to UH go towerlet direction

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Debbie is interesting. Of course, later this week we have

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in video with its numbers, its revenue coming from China,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a deep relationship there. How much have you seen the

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>knock on effects of the steps taken so far by

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the administration, and how much Corporate America and indeed Corporate

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>China been speaking out against it so well in video

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>together with several other U S CHIP firms have said

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that the latest expert control measures will cause them millions

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>or even billions of dollars in ourselves UH in the

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese market. So clearly they would hope to see a

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>bit more UH lostening up restrictions in the future. But

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, in the media's case, they help.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>What they are trying to do is to sort of

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>design are a new set of products that can sort

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of meet the US expo export control thresholds, so that

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>way they can continue to do our business in China

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and minimize impact from our The latest US rules

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>were definitely into those numbers come sixteenth three. Thank you

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so much, de w As always. Meanwhile, back here in

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States, let's just talk about a virtual health platform,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>maven Clinic, because it's just raised ninety million dollars, bringing

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's funding now up to in excess of three million.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>As it expands the care for women and family health.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a seriously got led by general catalysts as well

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>as CBS Health ventchers to name but a few of

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the players. I was lucky enough to catch up with

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Mayven Clinic CEO Cape Writer exclusively about her vision for

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the growing company and men of course his tech layoffs

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and the economic uncertainty. What we represent in terms of

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>an investment is not just kind of you know, reducing

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>health care costs um for tilly image are some of

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the top costs um you know, at at companies and

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and so certainly we we have that as part of

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>our value proposition, but really it's about investing in diversity

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>equity and inclusion, and I think that's still very top

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of mind for for a lot of employers. And so

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, given if they're looking at where to prioritize,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that we have a double bottom line value

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>proposition of book cost reduction as well as improving d E. I.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're also that the labor market may be

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>loosening up, but we're still at a time where you know,

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>there's been the lowest rates of female participation in the

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>workforce in decades, and you know, and from an inclusion

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and belonging standpoint, I think employers are still trying to

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to build those strategies and so maybe

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in supports across all those fronts. So interesting, So you

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>don't feel that there might be any wavering from a

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>leadership perspective in businesses to be thinking about d I

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at the time that the pendulum slightnes swings. From an

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>economic perspective, you know, we've we've certainly seen a few

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of our of our prospects this year um in our

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pipeline high to say okay, we're going to pull back

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, We're not going to invest. But but no,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that when you do have to

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>make tough decisions around labor force and and and you know,

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>driving layoff and putting out layoffs, you also want to

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deliver some good news alongside of that, and uh and

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that you're you're continuing to build a

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>really strong culture and take care of the people you had.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, maybe maybe is a is a

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>way to do that and enhancing benefits here for for

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>working families. Is it's certainly one way to do that.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean even internally, UM, for us, it's it's something

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>we think about. Yeah, talk up to us about how

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking internally at the moment your own people. Are

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you hiring freeze? Is a hiring freeze? Are you still hiring?

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>How you looking to expand the team or have to

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>cut it? Yeah, no, we're not. We're very fortunate UM

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>where we are continuing to grow not quite as aggressively

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe as we would have grown in UM. And we

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are really kind of looking at where every single dollar

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is spent. I think every single business now, UM, you

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>know is really sharpening those pencils and ensuring that if

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if they're not are already profitable, that you are on

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that path And and and certainly your core products are UM.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But for us UM, you know, we we are still

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in in in high growth mode and so we're able

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to you know, we're expecting to grow our our head

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>count by twenty next year. UM. Not across UM you know,

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all teams, but certainly you know our core product engineering,

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>clinical teams. UM. We will still be hiring quite a bit.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay when you're thinking of your people and

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also recompensing them. What about an exit strategy here? You're

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not worth in the billions You've just raised another funding around.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You're good in terms of money raised, But do you

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the public markets and think, what is our

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>exit strategy here? Or is it not not entering the

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>head Well, I can tell you I'm very happy that

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not a public company right now, UM, but I

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>think absolutely that is in our future when it's the

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>right time. I don't think it's an end event in

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and of itself. But for us, you know, I do

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think that we are in the very early innings of

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of of innovation in healthcare, of digital health, of women's

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and family health, and so you know, I think the

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>world needs big for profit, a political healthcare companies that

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are just deeply focused on underserved populations like we are

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and so you know we we want to stay

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>independent and continue to grow and probably eventually exit UM

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in the in the public markets when the time's right,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>mayven Clinic CEO Kate right of that coming up, we

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>are joined by an early investor in f t X.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>See thinking now this is bad. No one can protect

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a bad player, to be very frank, um, Well, if

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy is very good at lying, and it's very

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>good at just pretending to be one night, well he's not.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Somebody wants Violet the law. The law is not going

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to prevent that. The law can help to reduce that UM.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>As the industry players, we should be more vocal about it.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We should, we should set very transgenders for the industry.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Finance CEO CZ throwing a little bit of shade there

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at f t X and indeed the bad actors the

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>G twenty summit over in Balley. He went on to

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>say that clearer crypto standards are more important than ever.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the shade being throne, about how investors

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>feel sunny seeing former chief commercial officer of a bit

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>pay who invested in ft X when the round was

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>volluing the company about sixteen billion, and went on to

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>raise another load of money at a thirty two billion

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars or thereabouts valuation. Overall sunny, do you feel there's

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of still water to go under a bridge,

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of learnings to be made. But do you

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's a liar? Do you think in some way

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that he was a bad actor? What do you make

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of your investment? Yeah? I think he uh, he got

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a little over his head. I think. You know, the

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>team is very young. That's the first thing you know

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>us when you meet people from ft X, they're all

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>very young, kind of inexperienced. You know, Sam had worked

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years at a hedgephone and a quantrator

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe something like that, and all of a sudden, now

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>he's running a sixteen billion dollar global company that was

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>hiring people all over the world. So it's very tough

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to manage. And normally companies like that you see you know, Mackenzie,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>contol X, McKenzie people working their executives at Harvard Business

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>School people and none of those people were there, which

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is a very young team that was very well. They're

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>all great people and they worked seven and so I'm

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure what they knew, what Sam was doing and

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>all that, but that that's how it ended up where

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it is today. Unfortunately, when you sat down with Sam

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and he pitched his vision to you and you decided

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest, what was it about him that pushed you

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to invest? Was it data? Empirical analysis? Was it him? Yeah?

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So I have met Sam once on a call we

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing trying to explain the crypto payments as and

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>while I was at bit pay, and we spent a

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of time together on that, and I spent a

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more time with the rest of his team actually,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And so when they were raising around, they invited me

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted to invest, and the deck they sent

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>me it was actually pretty white for a sixteen billion

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar around. It was only ten slides, but one of

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the slides happened to say that in one will do

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one point two billion of revenue, eight hundred million of

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>net income and only a hundred employees. That really was

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the selling point actually, and what they were doing, so

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that was premarkable. What was absent from that deck was

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>any mention of Alameda Research or FTX tokens. What do

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you feel now, Sonny? So I feel a little bit.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. Again, I didn't invest two hundred million dollars

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in ways coated and only have to answer to my wife. Um,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little different that way. I'm more much

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>more important. Yes, I'm more upset for the industry and

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened. It's another black eye. Obviously there were some

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>red flags, but in investing, people go with momentum. Anyways,

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it was more that he really preached himself as the

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>leader of this whole movement, working with regulators and all that.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And I went to the f t X conference which

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>was in Bahamas last year, which is very professionally done.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>F t X is going to be an investor in

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>my new company I'm launching pretty soon. So I really

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed trust and faith in them, and I love the team.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>The teamwork seven, they are great people. They're hustling and

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they all unfortunately probably lost everything and equity and all that.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So it is a shame what happened, but it's more

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a black eye for the industry and we need to

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we keep shooting ourselves in the foot again. Bitcoin didn't

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>fail us, right, Bitcoin, the crypto companies, crypto currencies were

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>all fine. It was bad actors doing bad things. Again,

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which is why bitcoin was creating the first place. Sonny,

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you just said, I think that ft X is an

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>investor in your new company. What was that experience like,

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's been some remarkable reporting coming from Antonio Bloomberg

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about how that seemed very muddied at the time of

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>where the money and the funds were coming from. Did

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you get the money from an f t X related

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>in the play institution? Yeah, so we never actually called

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that money at luckily so we never had to worry

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>about that um. But yes, that is gonna be half

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to unravel. F t X slash Almeda, by the way,

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is an investor in many companies throughout the crypto industry.

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And how that unwindes now we're not sure. And what

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>does f t X do with all the tokens they

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>owned to like Salanta tokens own several bi down and

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Salant tokens. If they have to unload all that, what

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>happens to the Salanta market and things like that. So

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of companies that have f t X

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>slash Almeda again on the captain, I think al Meda

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>invested in more companies than f t X UM And

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens with all that remains to be seen. However

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you recalibrates it, then have you had to reevaluate everything

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know and think about this industry. So I've

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>been in crypto for eight years, so nine years probably now,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>so we've seen a lot of Upton downs and again

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not your keys, not your coins are becoming more of

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a saying again. And the thing about f t X

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>was it wasn't why do we use by a lot

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of people, especially in America. It was more used by

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of hedge fund crypto funds offshore that we're doing

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trading and all that, and they had

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a great user experience. So they're the ones that are

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get hit. So I don't see it affecting

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>many other crypto companies throughout the world like coin based, Gemni,

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>hit pay Crap and et cetera, all the order companies.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Never FIC just came out in the last three years.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a chance to even work with them.

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>We didn't They came on so fast, and so unfortunately

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, what's happened this cycle is all

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about leverage and that never happened six years ago. That's

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a new thing that's created in the industry now, which

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>again didn't need to happen, which again is us shooting

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in the foot. I feel like, well, we saw

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>this conversation talking about how you invested in SPF. You

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have also sought to raise money for your own ventures.

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you just c vcs canceling meetings now? Yes, So

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the traditional silicon vale vcs are spooped, to say the least,

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>crypto vcs aren't as much spoop because they see this

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as Bitcoin performed. Well, it wasn't Bitcoin's fall. This was

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a bad actor and this is why bitcoin was created

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to help prevent these types of things and unfortunate when

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we got hit by that. So they believe bitcoin will

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>be a hundred thousand dollars the next three years, and

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so they have big funds, all right, So they're investing

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>still at the same pace. That's their belief and all that.

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Traditional silicon by vcs are much more hesitant now to

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>invest in crypto companies. Actually we're seeing that and they're

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>investing there. Hasn't en us in anything right now, So

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's silicon value dcs anyways right now, Sonny, almost the

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>failure here was the centralization of decentralized crypto, and I'm

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in therefore, when we see a cz trying to

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>be the new white knight, is that the way in

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which the industry resurrects itself another centralized position there. Yeah,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so that that is the big question, right, And that's

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the problem, right. And you know, Binance, funny enough, was

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the one three or four years ago the regulators hid

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the most. Actually they are the ones having all the

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>issues with the regulators. And coin Base was kind of

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the golds there, and f t X was new on

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the scene trying to become like coin Base and saying

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not finance, we're like coin based and all that,

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and so c Z, I think, you know, was always

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>buying in a bad with the regulators, and now he's

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>coming on as this white knight. But you know, he's

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>still got to buy and still have a lot of

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>issues to sort out with regulators too. So I don't

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're the savior. The savior is higher having proper governance,

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>getting regular regulations involved in Unfortunately, I think regulations will

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>probably happen, but they'll probably overdo it, which I guess

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is better than not doing it. So I think we'll

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>see that coming probably the next year or so. Really

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>great to get your personal anecdotes, your professional take, and indeed,

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>well thank you for coming on when you're still being

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>raising money for your own new venture. We thank you

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so much, former chief commank you guys very much a

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>bit pay come back with the new company that you're with. Well,

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't checked out what's trending on Twitter, if

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you failed to notice all the TikTok's and the instagram

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>reels about it, well you should have known that it

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>was a record breaking weekend for the box office of

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Black Panther Wakanda Forever. It's a past all expectations. A

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>d eighty million dollars taken in here in the United

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>States alone, three million dollars raked in worldwide. Now, this

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>makes it the best ever opening at the box office

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from the month of November. Now, it's about thirteenth in

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>line if you're looking and opening weekends overall. And let's

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stack it up to how it's helped the likes of

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>theater change such as AMC. Look, at one point the

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>shares popped as much as about nine percent or so,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they came back down. That's still AMC on the highest

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>side as people get excited about us returning to the

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 1>theaters getting that popcorn. Let's look at there it compares

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>against some of the other Marvel franchises because look, Avengers

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Endgame cleaned it up. We know that born in three

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty seven million dollars. And actually it's still below

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the takings for the opening weekend of Black Panther itself. Nevertheless,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a great turnout overall. And and really my key question

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is have you watched it yet? I have not, but

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it's on the weekend list. Carrot, you wan't say my

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>word for it, That does it. For this edition of

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology Tuesday, we have Andrea Warney to discuss how

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>vcs are recalculating valuations of crypto ferns. And do not

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>forget check out our podcast because we are everywhere you

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>want to be socially. Look at the terminal you go

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to Apple, Spotify, I Heart if you want to have

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>us in our audio version. But for now, from New York,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco, this brave new world of a new

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tech show. This is Bloomberg