WEBVTT - How AI Facial Recognition Works

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, it's me Josh, and I'm here to tell

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you it's official. We're going to be in Vancouver, b C.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And Portland, Oregon this March. On March twenty nine, will

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be at the Chance Center in Vancouver and on March

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>will be at the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall in Portland.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So come see us. Tickets go on sale this Friday.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Go to s Y s K live dot com for

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>ticket links and info and everything you need and we'll

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>see you guys in March. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know,

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles Scooter,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Computer Bryant and Jerry Um Matthew Broderick in War Games

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Rolling and this is Should Know. That's good. Thanks. What's

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>your name, Josh m hmm? Okay, Josh, Ali Shedy in

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>More Games Okay Clark, I know Aaron Cooper is doing

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>right now? Man? How cute was she in that movie? Like?

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I think they designed that movie for like every thirteen

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>year old boy in America's fall in love with Ali

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>shed I think you're talking about um short Circuit. I

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>never saw that, believe that what with Johnny five. I mean,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I know the movie. You gotta see it. Really, it's

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty awful, especially with um oh, what's his name? Who

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>is the sleeves ball from Fast Times at Ridgemont High?

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Who is the ticket scalper? Yes, he plays a Indian

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like Asian Indian character, like full on brown face and everything.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really bad. The movie is bad enough, but then

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>now when you go back and see that, to your like,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe this. I can't believe it. I think

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he's Italian, oh easily, maybe Jewish or maybe just a

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>straight up white guy. He's definitely not Asian Indian. No,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he's not. But anyway, go see Short Circuit. Okay, see

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>what you think Ali shed He just keeps looking at

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the camera going, I'm so sorry that was a big

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hit though she didn't have anything be sorry about. Um So.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess War Games is kind of in your your wheelhouse. Yeah,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a little old for me. Yeah, because I

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>saw that when I was like twelve, bish uh, and

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you would have been I don't know how how much

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>younger are you. I would have been seven seven. Yeah,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a little young for War Games, I would think.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still watched your wherever, but I was like, yeah,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's hilarious. The computer is called Whopper. Yeah, I mean

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it was right in my wheelhouse, right. I remember at

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of war Games, Uh, they lock in, you know,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they're decoding the the code one number and letter at

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a time. Very suspenseful and yeah, very suspenseful. And it

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>finally locks in and me and my friends memerized it

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so we could go home and plug it into an

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple too to see what happened. Nothing, Okay, how do

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you plug in a number anyway? What does that even mean? Oh? Yeah,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's true, you know. Yeah. I remember a very rudimentary

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>program you could run where you could type in like

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>four lines of whatever I don't even know if you

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>call it code with a phrase, and it would run

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the phrase like a thousand times all over your screen

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and a big scroll. And then that just thought that

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>was the coolest thing ever. I feel like, I remember

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking just like five lines was like the

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>only part I remember is twenty go to ten and

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ten was the phrase I think something like I don't remember.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Then I was like, man, let's just play Castle Wolfenstein.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That was a good one. I remember, did Oregon Trail.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I never did as well. I was Castle Wolfenstein, but

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like wolf and signed on the PC. Oh yeah, like

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>move left arrow, right arrow, shoot uh shoot dash, which

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is some sort of a bullet. Yeah. It was fun.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>That was fun, and I thought it was just like

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the height of technological gaming. It was it was at

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the time. But now, Chuck, we've reached the height of

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>technology which is being tracked everywhere you go, look at

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you all the time by whoever wants to do that.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna change your name to Josh smooth up a

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Raider Clark for that transition. Very nice. Yeah, Like I

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like Ali Shedy Clark, Josh, Ali Shedy and Clark. Yeah,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a good one. Uh did you put this together?

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It was this you and this is Dave. Dave Brews

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>good stuff in high Dave. We finally got to meet

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Dave and his family, lovely family that we cursed awfully

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in front of in Seattle. I felt terrible, thanks for

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>adding yourself to the max and he was like, you

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>know whatever, he was fine. His kids were adorable, they

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>were they were great. They couldn't look at me though

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that really they were probably just him did by your present,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>No No, it was because I cursed so badly. So

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>this is good stuff. Though. Facial recognition technology that they've

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>been kind of at since the nineteen fifties, which they

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>rolled out as a test in two thousand two at

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl in New Orleans, did not go that well. No,

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a little clunky back then, but it's gotten

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot better since then. Let me explain why. For

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's listened to the End of the World with

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark the AI episode in particular, everything associated with

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence got way better starting around two thousand seven,

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>when neural nets became a viable form of machine learning.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Because you don't have to train a computer what constitutes

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a human face and what to look for. You just

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>feeded a bunch of pictures of faces and say these

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>are human faces, learn what a human faces and they

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>trained themselves. And so around about two thousand seven, two

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, two thousand nine, everything had to do with

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>machine learning got way smarter because we started using neural

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>nets and facial recognition software is no exception. Yeah, and

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there were a few things that kind of converged all

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time or around the same time. Uh,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>social meds kind of coming on the scene right in

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that wheelhouse was a big deal. Um, Facebook, this is staggering.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook just by itself processes three hundred and fifty million

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>new photos through its uh facial recognition software every day,

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and every time one comes through. Mark Zuckerberg goes like,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you think it's neat when you go when you put

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a picture up and it says like would you like

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to tag Emily your wife because that's her? And you think, oh, well,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that's super easy, thanks Facebook. But then you don't think, like,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, all right, how do they know that's

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>my wife? And you know, it's like with everything else, Uh,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there's privacy people that were like, whoa do you guys

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>realize what's going on? And then of the sheep they're

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>like huh no, no, they're like no, it's great, Like

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to go in and like make click

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>two links or two buttons to take the way easier.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So that was one thing. There's way more photos out

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there for those machines to learn one like good high

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>quality photos right uty million a day just on Facebook alone, um,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which means the machines were getting smarter, They were getting

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>better and better at at training themselves. And then lastly, um,

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that has led to a ubiquity in in facial recognition.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That the better the machines have gotten, the easier it

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>has been to put together data sets for them to

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>train on, which is lots and lots of pictures of people. Um,

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the cheaper the technology has gotten, which means the more

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>people that are now using facial recognition than ever. Yeah.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has a service called Recognition with a K, which

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is not a good look. No, it looks very German.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>There's something about replacing at sea with the K. It

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just looks creepy, Like when you spell America with a K,

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it means something. It means like bad America. Yet they

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>went right full steam ahead and called it recognition. You

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have to say it like that, you do, I think,

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have to be like squeezing the air out

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of a syringe while you're saying it too. Um, so

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they have this. I didn't even know about this, but

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's ubiquitous and it's not super expensive, and that means

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that the law enforcement agencies agencies they don't have to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like create their own they can just say, well, just

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to sign up for a recognition right exactly. Because it's there,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and because it's it's relatively cheap, you can just get

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a subscription, not just law enforcement agencies. If you have

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>a photo sharing app or whatever and you want some

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology, you just contract with with Amazon, and

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon goes here, you go, here's our data, and you

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can or um like our code, and you can put

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it onto your platform. Anybody can use it. Um. So

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of everywhere, and that makes a lot

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of people, including me, very very nervous because as this

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>guy wood Row hurt Zog, if he's not Werner hurt Zog, brother,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be disappointed. But but a wood Row and a

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Werner come on, you know anyway. Um. Wood Row hurt

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Zog as a professor of computer science, and I believe privacy,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>civil liberty. Um. He basically says, Look, there is no

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>way we're going to reap the benefits of facial recognition

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>without ultimately sliding irreversibly into a dystopian surveillance state where

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's happening right now, and if we don't do something

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, it's never going to change back. We're about

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>to fully give up our privacy because it's one thing

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to have your phone tracked you can give up your phone,

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>get yourself a burner phone, like you're Jesse Pinkman or

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and then you just throw that phone away.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>You can't be tracked anymore. You can't get a burner face.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And if that does become a thing down the line,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it'll be very, very expensive. So the average person can't

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>get a burner face. Will be tracked by our face

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>everywhere we go. And as we add more and more

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>cameras and this technology becomes cheaper and cheaper, it's we

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>will be living in a world where there will be

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>zero privacy and will be monitored and tracked because it

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>will be so easy, and it will be sold to

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>us like it's being sold to us now that it's

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a law enforcement tool to get the bad guys. But

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it's eventually going to extend to include everybody. But what

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have to worry about. You're an upstanding citizen.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if you're tracked. That's not true. That's

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just not the case, everybody, It's not case. All right,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna call that soap soapbox soliloquy number one of

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what I guarantee will be probably three or four. Uh,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>let's talk of a little bit about how it works.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It is biometric authentication. Um. It's like a fingerprint or

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a retina scan. And basically what it does is, uh,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it is precise measurements of a face to calculate every

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>person's very unique visual geometry, like how far apart your

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>eyes are, how how far apart your pupils are from

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>your nostrils. Yeah, your facial geometry, how your face is

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>all set up? I think. Yeah, it's even gotten into

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>things like facial hair, skin tone, um, skin texture. Yeah,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it'll get just more and more specific. Yeah.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, because they're getting the machines are

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>getting better and better and easier and easier to train

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff, you can just add more and more

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>data to it, and the the the recognition will just

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>become increasingly um um good. Yeah. And if you want

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to throw off facial recognition software and freak out every

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>human you meet to shave your eyebrows, oh yeah, that

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a little freaky. Have you ever seen that.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You've seen it before, I'm sure in movies and stuff.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting thing. I remember a kid in industrial

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>arts class did that one year. He was like a

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>little you know, kind of a ninth grade burnout, and

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he just showed up one day with no eyebrows, like

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you would I think like not having a nose would

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be more easily accepted. There's something just uncanny when someone

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>shaves their eyebrows, Like one day they have them, the

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>next day they don't. Was it like immediately recognizable what

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing was, or was it like that's the thing

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>off today? Whereas if you, you know, you came in

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>the next day without a nose, the first thing you

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>would say is what happened to your nose? What happened

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to your nose? Todd? Yeah, and Todd would be like,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't rent of it. I fell off. So those

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>measurements we were talking about. What happens then is they

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>compare that just like a fingerprint, with a database of images.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And depending on what this is for, it could be

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like just within your company, or it could be the

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>FBI's database of mugshots, or it could be the d

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>m VS database of driver's license photos yeh, which we'll

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>get into. Yeah. What's interesting is each stage of the way,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a different algorithm that does you know, each increasingly

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated step, until you finally have basically like all of

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the different data points for that, you know, what makes

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>up that facial geometry, and then you can compare it

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to all the other data points. We think of like

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a computer running like a you know, a picture, You've

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>got your input picture and then running you know, all

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the pictures next to it. That's not what it's doing.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's running the numbers. Basically, it's doing computer stuff. Yeah.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I love that first step, which is you have to

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>teach the computer what a face is. So, I mean,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>seems silly, but of course that's what it is. Well, yeah,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because I mean if you show it a picture of

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>a person standing next to a fire hydra shaming on

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the fire Hydran, Yeah, and say hello, handsome, So this

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>is what a human face looks like. Yeah, or no,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a butt, And then it starts, you know, closer, closer.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, now that's a face. You know what a

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>face is. Now move on to step two, which is

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stop screwing around. Yeah, so now you know what a

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>face is. You've got to normalize it for the photo,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>which means there are not that many. Well, let's you

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have to put it in the dockers. That normalizes, Um,

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you isolate that face, and then you have to make

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>sure that it's normalized as far as looking at the camera.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So if it's a if you get a photo of

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>someone from a CCTV, let's say, and it's sort of

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a three quarter, they have the ability to make it

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as if it is looking straight at you. Yeah, the

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>computer can pretty accurately predict what the rest of the

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>face looks like face you know it on, I guess

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>face on um. And when it normalizes it like that,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes it much easier to compare to other pictures because,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see, most of the pictures or most of

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the data points that it's comparing it to, are taken

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from databases of pictures that have been taking of people

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>face on. Right. So that's why it wants to go

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to driver's license. Yeah, well just spoiled it. But yes,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we already said that. Oh we did, Yeah, I did, Okay,

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I missed it, I know. So uh from there, do

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you have more algorithms still that isolate parts of the face. Um.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is where my old theory that like, there

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>are only so many sort of facial combinations, so that's

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>why you have doppelgangers. We got to do an episode

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on doppel Gan. There's only so many things you can

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do with two eyes to eyebrows and nose in a

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mouth and cheekbones and in chin. Well, okay, what else?

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's not a whole lot. There's lips, lips, sure,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what about um uh uh uh, that's about it. These

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>are called elevens, the ridges between your eyebrows. Well, if

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to get super specific, but that's what I'm saying.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're getting more and more specific. Oh yeah, yeah.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But my whole point is, and we'll learn and here

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and facial recognition. They do use Apple gangers, but put

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a pin in that so they recognize all these features

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and then each feature becomes what's called a nodal point

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>or no Dowell point. I think, nodal nodal, I think.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is where you're gonna get your super exact

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>uh angles and distances between all these parts as a

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>flat two dimensional thing. Which my question was because below here,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it talks about Apple and their iPhone have

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a three D facial recognition. Is that is two dimensional

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>superior to three D? I don't know, or is it

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just because that's what all the pictures are in the databasis,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's what they do. I don't know. All I

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>know is my phone usually unlocks when I look at it.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what? I Hey, that's having to take off

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>my sunglasses. Worst so I found I've got some wayfarers

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that I don't have to take, but my aviators I

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>do have to take off. Interesting do they keep trying

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to make you into mav when you have on the

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the go ahead? What is that? That was Tom Cruise

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>laughing and chewing gum. Okay, wow thanks, I feel like okay,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>um we we we gotta keep going because I was

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about to take a break unnecessarily. So um when the

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>when the computer is running through the pictures, it just

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>sis soon goes like no, no, no, no, no, millions

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and millions of times and then finally goes yes. But

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>when it says yes and it spits out another picture,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not like this is that person? No you want

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>it to be. Because we all watch n c I S,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we all watch c S I, we all watch um

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Law and Order, we all watch um uh party down

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 1>uh Andy Griffith, that Mattlock, the whole CHAMAI um, so

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to just spit out and be like, here's

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>your here's your your person of interest, right. But what

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really doing is it's it's producing a similarity score

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that is probabilistic. It's saying this is there's this percent

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>chance that this is the same person as the picture

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 1>or the person in the picture that you uploaded. It's

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a guess. It is, so a sophisticated

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>guess it is, and the better computers get at this,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the likelier it is that if they say this is

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a there's a chances the same person that it's the

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>same person. But it's as we'll see, it's up to

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the human user to determine what is an acceptable threshold

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of a confidence Is it no? Is it no? Frankly,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it really should be about or higher should be the

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>confidence setting for the confidence level. Didn't that what Amazon's

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>recognition says the threshold should be. I'm glad you said that, man,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>because it really is creepy and I couldn't put my

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>finger on it. And it's exactly I mean, I knew

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the k looked weird or whatever, but it hadn't hit

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>me that just how creepy it is and just how

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>off the mark or potentially on the mark that name is. Like, Oh, like,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if my name was spelled c h u K, I'm

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sinister a little bit, you'd be more sinister. Yeah, I

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think you could ever be truly sinister. I appreciate that. Alright,

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break. I'm gonna go work on sinistering

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>up a bit, and we'll talk a little bit more

0:19:37.960 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about some of the uses of f R right after this. So,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>as with all technology, it has to be abbreviated into

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>two letters, the second of which is are do they

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>call it f R? I've seen it, Yes, I was

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just silly, but it doesn't surprise me. Nope. So in

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>f R facial recognition technology, there are there are some

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>some beneficial uses for it. Yeah, Like we said, you

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>got to tag people is chief among them. The for

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>people like you and me, that's the pinnacle as it stands.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to tag people yourself. Facebook does it

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for you. That's what we're trading everything for. I gotta

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>calm down. Okay. There are some other, like genuinely beneficial

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>uses too. There's a nonprofit company called Thorn that scans

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>missing person's pictures against um pictures of children in child

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>porn videos, um or suspected human and trafficking to to

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>get matches, and apparently they've rescued a hundred kids so

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>far from using that technology. There's a pretty beneficial use

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of facial recognition software. Uh dating apps. Let's say you

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>want to you can get pretty specific on what kind

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of face you find attractive, which is interesting. But you

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>can say I really think, um, I like guys with

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>high cheekbones, and but no, you would go find mall lips.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It would be more like, um, somebody could be like, oh,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I really find Christian Bale attractive, and they get a

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>picture of Christian Bale into this dating app and I

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>would come up. But I wouldn't because I wouldn't be

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in the dating app because I'm happily married. Do you

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>think you look like Christian Bale? I'm told that a lot. Really, Yeah,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that's weird. Don't think you look anything like it. I

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't either, but people say interesting. I'm I don't know

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what I would do if I was dating now. I

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>guess I would just go to a service and say

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and aliety type sure for more games era, But they'd

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>be like, okay, sir, you would just upload the picture.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to come into the office, which is

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really not even open to the public, and just tell

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>us you're interested in Ali sheety type like a weirdo.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>You mean, dating apps don't have offices where they just

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>feel complaints and interested parties. You sit down and they

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>they videotape you with the VHS camera, put you on

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with some other guys on the tape. That's how they

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>used to do it. Oh yeah, that was one of

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the subplots of Singles, the Cameron Crow movie. Oh yeah,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Expect the Best was the name of the

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>dating service, and you would make a videotape and like

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a watch video tapes of people you know, saying who

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they are. How do you remember that? I was a

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>big singles fan. That's not a bunch I got you. Yeah,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Expect the Best. You me pack of cigarettes and some coffee.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't need anything else becausezoom tight. So what else here?

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This was? UM Taylor Swift and and her security team

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on tour used it to scan the audience to see

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>if any of the creeps who have harassed and doctor

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>were in the audience. That's super beneficial. No one should

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>have to go through that. UM also, cops use it

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in myriad ways, but in particular especially beneficial or um

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>when they use facial recognition to identify people who can't

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>identify themselves. Somebody in the midst of a psychotic break,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>perhaps somebody wasted on troom's um, somebody you're not Jesus Christ,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>who who has uh amnesia, Our friend Benjamin Kyle, who

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>apparently knows who he is now but he's decided not

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to disclose it publicly. Remember the guy he was found

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>behind a burger king near a dumpster, had zero recollection

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of who he was or how he got there, and

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was this international publicity publicizing like who he

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that he couldn't remember who he was, and somebody

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>finally came forward and identified him. So now he knows

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>who he was, but he went like a decade without knowing.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, when I said, sorry, you're not Jesus Christ,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I was making fun of the guy on mushrooms, not

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>someone in the midst of a psychotic break. I just

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be very specific. I think that was very

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>clear a right to make sure everybody knows that. So uh.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Those are some of the good ways that it can

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>be used UM. Now let's talk about all the bad ways. Yeah,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you're talking about the government, you're talking

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about law enforcement, when you're talking about things like what's

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>going on allegedly in China with CCTVs everywhere trained to

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>UM to single out ethnic minorities and religious groups just

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>walking down the street going about their day. Yeah, that's

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it gets into much different territory than tagging people in

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>dating apps. Yeah, it's pretty difficult to attend your religious

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>service if you're not allowed to attend your religious service

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're being tracked everywhere you go. Yeah, that's why

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>places like and this is the most predictable thing in

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the world San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley and then Somerville, Maine.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>I knew the Manners would be in there. They're not

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into this, that's right. They have banned law enforcement UM

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>from using facial recognition altogether in California UM as a state,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and the ACE has put a three or moratorium on

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the use of it UM body cams, which and the

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a c l U is basically I know this is

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>jumping ahead, but they're at the point where they're like,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to tap the brakes here for a few

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>years and like because there's no legislation about this yet

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's just going full steam ahead. Yeah, I really

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to like like run past that there

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>is aside from Berkeley, San Francisco, who's the other one,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Oakland and Somerville, Maine. UM, there are no laws, state, local,

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>or federal governing the use of facial recognition technology by

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement. It's just happening very fast. Whatever they want

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, they can do UM and in some cases

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they do all sorts of stuff with it. They will

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>use it, like the NYPD very famously used UM what

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about with doppelgangers. There was a guy

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who was caught stealing beer at a CVS. Not even

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a duane read a CVS. UM, and they said, but

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy looks a lot like Woody Harrelson. We don't

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>have a good we don't have a good shot of

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>him to use in official recognitions. So they went and

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>got a pick of Woody Harrelson, and there they came

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>up with a match, and they think it was the

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>guy on video and CVS and so UM. The Georgetown

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>School of Law UH produced a study called Garbage in,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Garbage Out, and they were basically like, that's not okay,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you really shouldn't be doing that. But that's the level

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of legality as it stands right now. There's it's just

0:26:55.640 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>open season, um, and uh, it's just basically whatever you

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>want to do, you can do as far as facial

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>recognition is concerned. In that story in particular, it's like

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>some people are like, awesome, the system works. Sure. Other

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>people are like, what about poor Woody Harrelson. He was

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>really in danger right then of being implicated in this

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>beer stealing scheme from CVS and what he said? What dude,

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I love that guy man. True Detective the first season, Yeah,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>first four episodes just amazing. That's called using a probe

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>photo when you use when you say, hey, that looks

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>like someone. They also did the same with one of

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the New York Knicks. Apparently I could not, for the

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>life of me find out who. Yeah, it's like he's

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>being protected or something that maybe no one said who

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>it was. Um, a couple of numbers for you, though. Uh.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The FBI receives about fifty thousand facial recognition search submissions

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a month for their database. So that's the other thing.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have even the money for a subscription

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon Recognition, or you don't have an I T

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>person who's capable of assembling and putting it, you know,

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>using it UM. You can just submit these requests to

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. So there's a lot of different avenues you

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>could take his law enforcement to to UM to use

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology to catch suspected criminals. Yeah. I was

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about to say bad guys, but who knows. We'll see

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not always the case. So here's some more numbers though,

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because you know it needs to be regulated. But when

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it works, it really works. Yeah, it really does though.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It is the thing. Yeah, there was one department where

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>they said it lowered the average time required for an

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>officer to identify a subject from an image from thirty

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>days to three minutes, which kind of brings home the

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>point there's another number in here. This interesting, but uh,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it brings on the point that like, this is something

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that human policemen were doing. Officers were doing with their

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs by flipping through books, yes, for thirty days straight,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>saying like it doesn't look like this person. This is

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like a chance to really speed up that process and

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to spend more time in theory catching bad guys. Yes,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing for it. I'm just saying they were

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>doing this anyway, just through manpower. Right. I think the

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is is anytime you add artificial intelligence automatically makes

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the user of the artificial intelligence aside unfair unfairly advantaged.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the criminals are able to use AI

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to steal beer from cvs more effectively, but the cops

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are using AI to catch them stealing beer more effectively.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of like, yes, it makes sense to

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>catch like child pornographers and um human traffickers and rapists

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and murderers and violent criminals with this stuff, but using

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that kind of technology catch somebody who stole beer from

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a CVS. If that's when it starts to feel like

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what kind of society are we moving towards? You know? Well,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I think someone not. And let me keep going here

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for a second, because I don't want people be like,

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you in favor of the guy stealing beer

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from CVS? No, I'm not. I think you're a scumbag

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you steal beer from CVS. But I also think

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's overkilled to use facial recognition technology to catch

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that person. Use old fashioned police tactics or don't catch them. Yes,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of the fairness of the old western

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City. I think I might be on the

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>other side because I don't think we need to set

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a fair playing ground between criminals and cops and saying

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's unfair that cops can use this stuff and

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>criminals are just out there not able to use these

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>same techniques. Okay, So my the fairness thing doesn't just

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>end at the law and order thing, right like, Like,

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not just with cops using it. They they have

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this huge advantage. I totally get how people would be like, no,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>give the cops that huge advantage. I don't have an

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>issue with that in and of itself. I think my

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>issue comes a step or two down the road, sure,

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where the government or the cops, acting on behalf of

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the government, use that against everyday citizens who have no

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>recourse whatsoever. That that that that lopsidedness that's so evident

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're using AI to catch somebody's stealing beer from

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the CBS. It's really easy to kind of follow that

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a little further across to the horizon and see just

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>how unfair life could be and how oppressive that could

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be using that technology. I think that's ultimately what I'm saying.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I hopefully dug myself out of that hole by now so.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and this gets into some of the controversies

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and the arguments if you're if you're scanning mug shots

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>uh for rapists and arsonists and murderers and violent criminals,

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're catching people, You're not gonna find a lot

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of people that say, well, that's not fair, go back

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and use take a month to look through a mug

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>shot book instead, and waste a bunch of time and

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>don't be efficient. So I think most people would say

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at mug shots, although we should point

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>out that a mug shot doesn't mean that just means

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you're arrested. That doesn't mean you were guilty of anything.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Um So, there are plenty of opportunities for false positives

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and people being put in jail that shouldn't be. But

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's not a lot of people who are like, no,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not use mugshot databases right Exactly, If you're scanning driver's

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>license databases or other just general public databases, that's when

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it gets super tricky because we can't avoid the fact

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that what that means is in in the Center on

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Privacy and Technology, Um kind of stated very plainly what

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that means is everyone is in a perpetual lineup. Essentially,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have a driver's license, you're part of a

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>police lineup. Yeah, whether you like it or not, whether

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know it or not. And if that computer says

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the guy, it's Chuck Bryant, Uh, they will say, oh,

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't strike me as very sinister, or in the

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>computer would be like, trust me, this is the guy. Uh,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with like an eighty something percent confidence interval. Um, Chuck,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly you're going to get visited by the cops and

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you'll even get arrested because you were a little

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>KG when they talked to you and you set off

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.719
<v Speaker 1>their cop radar or whatever. And then the next thing

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're in court being charged with the crime

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't commit because the computer implicated you and

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the cops thought that you were acting KG. And let's

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>say that you were a very very poor person and

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any money to mount a decent defense.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The best you can afford is a free public defender

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>who has fifty other cases is not really paying very

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>much attention to you and you're in jail now because

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you got convicted wrongly because you were putting a lineup

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just because you had a driver's license. Yeah. I think

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, um, and this is total my privilege coming

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>through as well, Like I'd want to see some numbers

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and if one of every ten thousand arrest and conviction

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of a real criminal or an a rapist and a murderer,

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's three people that get falsely identified and have

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to go through the system and may or it may

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not be acquitted, I'd want to see those numbers. But

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>again that's coming from a privileged position as someone who

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>could afford a legal defense who uh white, Yeah exactly.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>That's another one too, is that people of color uh

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>bear a inordinate burden, disproportionate burden when it comes to

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technologies. We'll see well, I mean you might

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as well go ahead and talk about that. It's um.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think from the beginning, even with social media, there

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>were certain facial recognition, early facial recognition technologies that admitted like,

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not as good as uh seeing or recognizing faces

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with darker skin. It's just not that good. Yeah, I

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>think something like darker skinned men and women were recognized,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve and thirty were misidentified, compared to one percent and

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of light skinned men and him in And

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they say it's because of the data sets that these

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>machines have been trained on, which is not it's not purposefully,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but it makes sense if you live in like a

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>generally like like the white people are in power, and

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like whiteness is the most celebrated part of the

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>society or whatever. That's why you're going to have more

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pictures of And when you feed just a bunch of

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pictures from your society into a machine and say, learn

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>what faces are, it's going to go, oh, white men,

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I got you. Well, they just are more white people.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Numbers wise, probably has something to do with it, right, Um, Yes,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a really that is an excellent point as well,

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But the fact of the matter is the

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>data sets that the machines are learning on are largely

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>white and largely male, and so they're just not as

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>good at recognizing the differences in faces among um people

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>who aren't white males. Uh, let's read these quotes. There's

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of good quotes here. The first one is

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>from Woodrow Heart sog. I was going to read it

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as wurner. I don't know if I can. I should

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get Nolan here. He does a good burner. The most

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>uniquely dangerous surveillance mechanism ever intended. It's an irresistible tool

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for oppression that's perfectly suited for governments to display unprecedented

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 1>authoritary tane I'm sorry, authoritarian control and an all out

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>privacy eviscerating machine. I just realized it's heart sog, so

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's spelled differently. It's a j r T hert

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sog is just h g r z o G. I'm

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>glad that we didn't figure that out beforehand, though. You

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>want to take the other one though. I also I

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have to say I detected a hint of Michael Caine

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in there too. There might have been a little bit.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to get Michael Caine out of my system.

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>What's the other one? Oh? From Microsoft president Brad Smith? Yeah. So.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Brad Smith says that when combined with ubiquitous cameras and

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>massive computing power and storage in the cloud, a government

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>could use facial recognition technology to enable continuous surveillance of

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 1>specific individuals like they're supposedly doing in China as an aside,

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it could follow anyone anywhere, or for that matter, everyone everywhere,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at any time, or even all the time. And he

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't this wasn't a sales pitch. He was speaking out

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>against this to Congress, saying like, guys, we gotta we

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>have to do something about this, because this is the

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>path we're heading down. And that's why uh Seth abrama

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Witz changed his name to Brad Smith. It sounds like

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a total like like I just want to blend in. UM.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So you've got scanning against mug shots, scanning against driver's licenses,

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and then um, there's a new one that just came out.

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times just released this expose on January eighteenth,

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 1>just a few days ago, UM on a company called

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>clear View AI. And apparently even among um Silicon Valley

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>there has been this longstanding kind of unspoken thing where

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>let's steer clear of this facial recognition technology because it's

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>such a tool of oppression potentially. And clear View AI said, hey,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not from Silicon Valley. Well, we're just going to

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do our own thing. So now there's this, there's this

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 1>tool that's available to law enforcement agencies that they're using.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember that one that one guy who had a quote

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that, um, it went from thirty days to three minutes.

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>They were almost certainly using clear View AI. And the

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>reason clear View AI has such an advantage because they've

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>gone to this place where everyone else said was off limits,

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>which is scraping social media. So rather than the forty

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one million driver's license and mug shot pictures that is

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>available in the FBI's database, clear View AI is this

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>app that you can subscribe to for a year for

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like two thousand and ten thousand dollars, and they have

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>three billion pictures, including links to the social accounts of

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the people whose pictures come up, so that you can

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not only see who it is, you can find out

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>where they're at right then. And it's a hugely invasive thing.

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's no legislation on this whatsoever. And it's only

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just recently come out that this this company even exists,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>or that this app exists, and that law enforcement is

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>using this stuff because again there's basically no laws saying

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you can do this, you can't do that. Um And

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>again Woodrow Herzog has basically said, there's no way we're

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>going to realize the benefits of this without the incredibly

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>disproportionate drawbacks, and um, he just calls for an all

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>outband of the technology. He's basically saying it's not worth it.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take another break. Oh my gosh, we

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't taken our second break yet. Uh, and we'll be

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>right back to talk about the rest of this stuff

0:39:52.040 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>right after this. I think we should talk a little bit,

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about the false positives, UM, and I

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think within Amazon, their contention is that what you're talking

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about with like the studies out of m I T

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that said, UM, that there are too many false positive

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>is he's they're saying, wait a minute, you're talking about

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>facial analysis, not facial recognition, and those are two different things.

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I did not understand this at all. I went and

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>looked it up and I just fully get it. Either

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there's it sounds like some tap dancing to me. I

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>looked at and there's like not a distinction between those

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>two aside from this quote. Yeah, it's basically the same thing.

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And also it doesn't even make sense as a defense.

0:40:56.040 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So basically what they're saying is that um, that they

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.479
<v Speaker 1>were being called out by M I. T. S. Media Lab.

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>They did a two thousand eighteen study. That's the one

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that found that there's like a twelve and thirty five

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>misidentification among darker skinned men and women women. I think yeah, um,

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon said no, no, no, uh, you guys are

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>using facial analysis, not facial recognition. It's like, no, that's

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case at all. They're doing facial recognition.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. I'm glad it wouldn't just me, because you

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>see I wrote I don't get it next to this.

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a it was a bad, a bad jam,

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But I think their point was, well, you're

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell the gender of somebody, and if you're

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>doing binary gender stuff, like you're trying to say this

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>as male or female, you can't really use facial recognition

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>for that, especially among darker skinned people. And they said

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't use that, especially in cases of people's

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>civil liberties or whatever. But it still remains the case

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that if you are a darker skinned person and you're

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>being looked at by a police department that has their

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>threshold for a confidence level set low, yeah, there's a

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>chance that a false positive is going to be put

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>out there, right, And that's that can be trouble for

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you if you don't have the money to mount a defense.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And even if you do have the money, you shouldn't

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>have to mount a defense to spend money on that

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to be equitted of a crime. Just because the computer

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is not so good at a distinguishing Um black people

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think it is among white people. Yeah, And what you

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>know when it comes to where this is going to

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>end up legally, Uh, you might want to look at

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth Amendment. Um. It gets really dicey on how

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you interpret the constitution when you talk about illegal search

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and seizure? Is this a search or a seizure? Probably not, um,

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because it depends on what we're talking about with the

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Um. You've probably been stopped h in a

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at a d y checkpoint, and that's stopping everybody. That's

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the same thing. It's like, if you're in

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a car, we're gonna stop you and check you out

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because the couplet the public, the public his said, you know,

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, it's reasonable, it's not super invasive. And if

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you're stopping drunk drivers, it's just putting someone out for

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. Yeah, the court said, if it's minimally

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>invasive and the public good or the potential for public good,

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which is in this case getting drunk drivers off the

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>road is high enough, then it's it's okay to basically

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>search everybody without probable cause. Yeah. Same with T s

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>A checkpoints when it comes to official rulings. Obviously we

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have one in facial recognition yet. But if you

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Carpenter v. United States, the court ruled five

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>four that police violated uh Fourth Amendment rights of a

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>man when they asked for his cell phone location data

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>without a warrant from T Mobile. Um. So hopefully this

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>nuance will prevail, and it just won't. It looks like

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it probably won't be some blanket ruling that just says, yep,

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you can use it for whatever you want, right if

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it even gets to that point, and if the court

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hears it, which probably would. So. The other thing that

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>um that is has become worrisome for people, though, is there.

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It's becoming um our society is becoming increasingly surveiled. Right

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like ring the ring doorbell. They market to law enforcement

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>basically saying like you can, you can, These people like

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.919
<v Speaker 1>will pay to have video cameras put on their house

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can go get these videos on neighborhood all

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, people like my car got broken into, who

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can help me out with their cameras. So it's being

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>marketed to law enforcement. Your TV has a camera and

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>your smart speaker has a microphone and it So the

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>more that we are um surveiled and the more ubiquitous

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology gets, the easier will be to not

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>just scan a picture of somebody stealing beard of a

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>CVS against the mugshot database, or but to say this

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>person right here that you're you're looking at, that the

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>cameras following, that's this, that's that's um, that's uh, that's

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryant right there. And everywhere you walk there's getting

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a little icon next to your head Chuck Bryant. You know,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 1>if you click it, it'll show you your Facebook page

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or a map to your house or whatever. They want

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to know, your police record, it doesn't matter. And that

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're increasingly getting closer to. And some

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.959
<v Speaker 1>people say this is what they're already doing in China. Yeah,

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and London has has They were one of the first

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on the CCTV train. Yes, but they use humans, which

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is fair right for recognizing phases. Yeah, they have people

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 1>like actually looking at the at the individual monitors looking

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for crime. This is this is the idea of this

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is it's just tracking people who are just doing nothing wrong. Yeah,

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but there are plenty of people on the other side

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we should point out that are like, you know what,

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're catching bad guys, that's great. If you're a

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>good guy, you've got nothing to hide, so you shouldn't

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>sweat it. Yeah. I can never remember the name of

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the article. I'll try to find it, but there's a

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>man I wish I could remember off the top of

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>my head. But there's there's this amazing article from a

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>few years back, um that that basically says like that's

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a terrible argument that that even if you have

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing to hide, you still, um are a human being.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And if somebody wanted to put together and but if

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody wanted to put together like a dossier on your

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing things that you've done or said or thought or whatever,

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>um and and put it all together and condensed it,

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you can make anybody look bad. No one should want

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to live in a situation where like that could conceivably

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>happen in the police state. Yeah, police state, good stuff.

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see how it pans out. I'm not

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 1>saying police state stuff. Police date. It's good stuff. Yeah,

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens right in Woodrow, Hurtzog and let

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>us know what to do. If you want to know

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>more about facial recognition technology, you can go onto the

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>internet and start reading stuff about it. Definitely read the

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>New York Times expose about um clear view AI came

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>out January. Yes, okay, since I said that it's time

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for a listener mitt all right, now it's not you

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 1>know what it's time for. Oh yeah, I know it's

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>time for you ready, Yeah, you say it. It's time

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for administrative details. All right. This is part two. This

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>is where we thank people on the show that have

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sent us kindness. Is via snail mail. Siggy s I

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>g D. I sent sent me some hand that it

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sucks not you for some reason. I don't know why.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I got some socks too. Oh really yeah, I didn't

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>know who they were from, so they may be from Siggy.

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think probably what it was is you left him

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with my desk and I thank you for it, CHUCKR

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.240
<v Speaker 1>do another one while I'm pulling up my list acting.

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Julie Shoop made us t shirts. Shoop, this is good stuff.

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Faux band name tour shirts. Uh, super fun. Thanks a

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of Julie. Very cool. Uh, you're still working, so

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep going. Thalia Dawes is our pal from Australia,

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>said my daughter a couple of books. She's a very

0:48:20.520 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lovely lady who has a very adorable and whip smart

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>daughter about the same age, who listens to our show.

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And um, I was just like, man, I wish she

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lived here. We could go into play date. They both

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.760
<v Speaker 1>seemed like lovely humans. There's such thing as plains. Yeah,

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>good Australia for a play date. Um. So at our

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Portland's main show, Chuck, we had like a lot of um,

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of neat gifts. Jim Diefenbacher made

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>us amazing cross hatch portraits of them. Yeah, those were

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>great of us, like of a photo we took I

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think on like our West Coast tour from two. It

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>brought back some memories saw that. It's just really great stuff.

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And you can see Jim's work at Jim Diefenbaker dot com,

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>j I M D I E F F E N

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 1>B A C H E R dot com and they

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>were framed in everything. Yeah, very sweet stuff, Jim. We

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 1>got some home tapped maple syrup from Andy Huntsberger from

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Elgin I A, Okay, what's Iowa? Is that Iowa? Yeah? Yeah, okay, Yeah,

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say the wrong state. What are

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you gonna say? You know, I think I went to

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>say Illinoia. If you ever see Gary Gulman's bid on

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Nate abbreviating the states, dude, just look it up. One

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of the great comedy bits I've ever seen. It's hysterical.

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. Uh oh. Another at the Portlands Show, we

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 1>got a letter from tog Braun from Downea's day Boat

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from Lloyd Braun. Tog Braun Um and Downey's day Boats

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mission is to bring sustainable, delicious scalops from Maine to

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the world, and she said that scalops have varietals like

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>oysters and that main has the best. So check out

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 1>down East day Boat dot com. Coke Braun feel free

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to send us some scallops as long as they've been

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>appropriately refrigerated. The entire time. I got another children's book,

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Are You a Good Egg? And that was from Peter Deutschel,

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 1>along with some stuff you should know coasters. Yeah yeah,

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks again Peter. I think we thanked him last episode

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for the coasters too. I didn't know about the children's book.

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Then Sarah Law who is an s y s k

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Army member. Um, she came to the Toronto show and

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>she brought us a bunch of um Canadian goodies, everything

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>from Japanese cheesecakes and tarts from Uncle Tetsus. So good.

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh. I think some other stuff too, like

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>coffee crisps, which are my favorite. Um. Yeah, so thanks

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Sarah's always that is everything from Japan awesome.

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 1>They just it's really good. They don't necessarily invent much.

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.080
<v Speaker 1>They just take other people's inventions and perfect them. And

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they take a lot of pride in

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like doing things right. I think that he could say that,

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>probably because we got from Matt an assortment of food

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>things from Japan and that came in today, including our

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>beloved QP Man's. I love that stuff. It's been too long, man,

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.400
<v Speaker 1>God bless you. Let's see Leah Harrison gave us some

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing goodies to including coffee Crisp and Canadian Smarties, which

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are way better than American Smarties because they involved chocolate

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and super smarties. A student named Maria Styling wrote us

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a letter for an honors English project because she had

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to write someone who inspired her, and she asked this.

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I told her we to answer, how do we choose

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a topic? Maria? We choose a topic. It's not it's

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty low fih. We just send each other one each

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>week on whatever happens to grab our fancy. We're always

0:51:55.520 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 1>looking around our world, uh and thinking I wonder about that.

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>That's as that's as easy as it gets. And we'll

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>just send each other an email and times out of

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred will say great, let's do it. Yeah more ka,

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>let's see um oh. Michael C. Learner, who's an attorney

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at Law and Reno, sent us a letter about getting

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the word out about the National Consumer Law Center, for

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>which Learner does a lot of pro bono work for

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>people who are poor and getting screwed over because of debt.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>As he put it so, he pointed to the National

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Law Center and the Practicing law Institutes Consumer Financial Services.

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Answer book. So if you are in debt and you're

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>getting pushed around, go check those things out, says Michael C. Learner.

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff Van Ostro, and we gotta thank him again.

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Our buddy from Washington sent us a book by his

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 1>friend Andy Robbins called Field Guide to the North American Jackalothes.

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Pretty awesome, that's pretty fun. Paul Speth from Mars Community

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Brewing Company in Chicago gives a bunch of beer at

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago show. Thank you for that. Um, I got

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 1>one more. Okay, I'll go and finish up and then

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you can round us out. Man, I have a whole page.

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Laugh all right. Robert Highland from Wammo, this was just

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.839
<v Speaker 1>came in today. Okay. He works for Wammo. He sent

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>us each their seventieth anniversary super book. Oh wow, thanks

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Like you guys talk a lot about wammo products.

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Does it bounce? I have not dropped it on the floor. YEA,

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>let's find out. Give it a try. I'm gonna do

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple more and then well maybe we'll split these

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>up because there for both of us for another episode.

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's up to you. He can blaze through them too.

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Now there's too many Um, so let's see the Crown

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Royal people again for hooking us up. Very sweet. They've

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>hooked us up many, many times. Um. And they gave

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.399
<v Speaker 1>us a nice congratulations because we've got the Best Curiosity

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Award from the Heart Podcast Awards last year. Oh yeah,

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's how old this one is. Mick Sullivan gave us

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a copy of his book The Meat Shower, which is

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 1>amazingly illustrated. You can check it out on the Past

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and the Curious dot com. Yeah that just sounds really

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 1>greats it really does. Let's see, um and over round

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>everything out with Danielle Dixon, who is a real life

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>marine biologists chuck at the University of Delaware, and she

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sent us a couple of copies of her kids books

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>See Stories, children's books based on real science. You can

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>check it out at s E A S T O

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>r Y books dot com. Alright, you're gonna save the rest.

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna save the restival splow up. All right. Thanks

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody who sent us stuff, and and thank you also

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 1>just for saying hi to anyone who does. You can

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>say hi to us by sending us an email. Wrap

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it up, spending on the bottom, send it off to

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at i heart radio dot com. Stuff you

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:51.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.