WEBVTT - iPhone Sales Fall in China, Tesla Preview

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car Playing and broud Otto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Apple China iPhone sales dive nineteen percent in the worst

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>quarter since twenty twenty. And this is a big issue

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>because we know that China represents approximately twenty percent of

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the sales for Apple. It's obviously critical to their supply chain.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So if there's one company that at least in my

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>mind that has quote unquote China risk associated with it,

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>it's it's Apple. Man Deep Singh joins us here. He's

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a senior technolog channels for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>here in our New York City studio. So mandeb Apple

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>China iPhone sales dive nineteen percent in the first quarter,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the worst twenty what's your takeaway there?

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's not new news, so we knew this

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>was coming. There was some counterpoint data I think last

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>month that their March sales were pretty bad, so expected,

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>but it kind of solid Desfies the point that you know,

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the China weakness is playing out much worse than what

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 3>people expected, and the China revenue probably is gonna be

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>like this for the foreseeable future unless something changes at

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the geopolitical level, or Apple launches a new device that

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>everyone wants, that latest iPhone that everyone would want. But

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>for now, Huawei and the domestic competitors seemed to be

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>catching up in terms of features, and that's enough to

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>take the share in the domestic market.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>So this is a story then of consumer shifting to competitors,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>or is it just that demand for phones is down

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>because there's some macro weakness in the Chinese consumer.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Think There is a policy element to it as well,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>so obviously a lot is kind of driven by what

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>is done at the government level. First they banned the

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>use of iPhones, and now they're making sure that the

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 3>domestic vendors have a good chance of taking share. And

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>because the phone is comparable in features, then I guess

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the Apple lock in that everyone thought was so strong

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 3>that you just can't get out of your iOS isn't

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 3>really helping or like in this case, and they are

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.559
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of move out of the iOS ecosystem

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>and you start using this new phone.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>What's Apple say about their position in China? What they

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>may need to do to regain momentum. Do they have

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>any strategy they've articulated.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, they are having an event on May

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 3>seventh where they're launching a new iPad lineup. There will

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>be something very similar for the iPhone. They will launch

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>a new device with AI capabilities. So their play is,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>we will launch a new phone, a new tablet with

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>AI capabilities that everyone is looking for, and hopefully that

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>drives the refreshed cycle.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 4>And how does the slumping demand in China compare to

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 4>the US demand? Because I have to admit a lot

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 4>of people feel very pure pressure to stay with an

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 4>iPhone versus a different device, simply because if you're in

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>a group chat and you have blue text messages like

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>it seems like that's actually a really strong feature that

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 4>can ramp up demand, at least in the US. So

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>how does that compare it and how are you so?

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I will say, I think Apple is still gaining share

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>in other markets US, India, other pockets as well outside

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of China, but that China revenue is almost twenty percent

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>of their sales. And if it's going to be zero

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years from now. Then you have to

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>ask yourself what makes for that revenue shortfall and for

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 3>a variety of reasons, as we talked about, you know,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>related to China, But even if they are doing well

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>in other regions, it's just pressure in terms of unit

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>sales and what do you do. Do you keep raising

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the prices of the phone, which they may have to

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>because they have to relocate the supply chains out of China.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the other aspect of the cost pressures when it

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to making this phone. They will have a lot

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 3>of that because they have to relocate those supply chains

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's not easy.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised they haven't take any more aggressive approach in India,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>like maybe a lower cost model to appeal to that marketplace.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>What's their India strategy?

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so far, I think they are catering to

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that premium segment and they have had success, you know,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in terms of that one percent or two percent penetration

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>that they have had, you know, in terms of the region.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 3>But a low cost phone it's hard in India simply

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>because how low can you go? And Apple has tried

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that with different skews in the past, they haven't had

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a ton of success with low CON's phones because again,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the competitors are quite fierce when it comes to you know,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the feature said and the quality of the phones that

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>they offer, and so it will be an interesting strategy

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 3>if they decide to pursue that. But for now, I

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 3>don't think anything can make up for that China revenue

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 3>shortfall because it's declining at a very rapid pace.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>So their earnings aren't until May second. They have that

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 4>launch event on May seventh, but we do have some

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>other big tech earnings coming this week. Can you talk

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 4>about that?

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, Meta, I think it's a company

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>that has had a great turnaround story, and we know

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 3>turnarounds are tough intech, but Meta has shown that, you know,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a remarkable story when it comes to laying off

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent people and then growing revenue twenty five

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>percent in subsequent quarters. I mean, it just speaks for

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 3>how well they have executed and now they are at

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 3>the top of the game and it comes to having

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>their own large a model, So that could make a

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 3>difference in terms of, you know, the new revenue stream

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 3>that everyone wants to see with meta and probably the

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>metaverse may become a side show. I think another company

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 3>that I feel is not very well understood and probably

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 3>everyone thinks they're going to get disrupted is Google Alphabet,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 3>and that's where it would be interesting to see what

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>they do around search because all the survey work that

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 3>we have done, it shows that, you know, the new

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 3>companies chat GPT, Perplexity, they have taken some share when

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the search queries. Now. Still, the counter

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 3>argument is everyone still needs to go to Google Maps

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>or Google Search to look at what chat GPT is

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>generating because they're not sourcing the links. So in the end,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Google is still getting the traffic, but obviously the search

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 3>is starting somewhere else, and that's the key risk that

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>they have to address.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, so does does Google have an AI play

0:06:59.240 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>per se?

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So their Gemini large anglid model. I mean, we

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 3>all know it wasn't a success initially, but now they

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 3>have caught up in terms of features and look, Google

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to integrate Gemini everywhere because that's going to

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>hurt their ad revenue. So they're very careful with how

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>they roll out and how they make those UI changes

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>because it's going to be disruptive to their incumbent position.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to digital.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Ads market, do you use Gemini?

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I do, and I think for certain tasks like generating

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>summaries and you know, video editing, that kind of stuff,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>image editing, it's great. But I don't use it for

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 3>my search yet because when it comes to the traditional

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Google search, it's still the go to place. When I

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 3>think about you know certain things to do, and that's

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the behavior I think.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, you're a guy, Men Deep sing Senior techounts

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>when you go. When you start using something, I'll start

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>using it when men and when Anna Rock tells me

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to upgrade my phone, all upgrade my phone. That's how

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I roll Men Deep Seeing Senior Tech outs or Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Join us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>iPhone China Apple. It's a big, big challenge for them,

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as many you've said, almost twenty percent of the revenue

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>comes out of China. They need to figure that out.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Emily Grafao, Paul Swen, you're live here in the Bloomberg

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>INTERACTI Broker Studio or streaming live on YouTube as well.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Emily Grafao a proud graduate of the University of Richmond.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry University of Virginia. Sorry slip slip. As is

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>our next guest, Garrett Nelson, Vice president and Senior equity

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 2>analyst at cfr A Research. Garrett, my notes here, say

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 2>you're in Richmond, Virginia. How'd you work that scam?

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 5>That's right, only only an hour from Charlottesville. So as

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>a as a proud who, very happy living so close

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 5>to the album.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Marler, all right, very good. I'm surrounded by UVA folks. Hey,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Elon Musk, let's talk Tesla. You're the auto dude

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>at CFRA. What does he have to do on the

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>conference call today? It seems like he's got to pull

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>a rabbit out of some kind of hat here to

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 2>reverse the bad mojo around the stock.

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 5>Look, there's no question the stakes are extremely high heading

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 5>into this earnings release. The stock is down more than

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 5>forty year to date, coming off a year in which

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 5>shares more than doubled. Tesla's earnings execution also hasn't been great.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 5>They've missed on the bottom line each of the last

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 5>two quarters, you know, but we think the challenges they

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 5>face at this point are well understood by investors. They're

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 5>having issues with the ramp up of production of the

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 5>cyber truck. The TV market overall is oversaturated and growth

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 5>rates have slowed tremendously. And you know, there's some uncertainty

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>regarding the future product pipeline when they might bring to

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 5>market the mass market ev or ROBOTAXI. You know, that's

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 5>not really clear right now. So certainly a lot to

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 5>look for. There's always a lot on the line. Tesla

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 5>is one of the most anticipated earnings releases every quarter,

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 5>but even more so this quarter.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Can you talk a little bit about Tesla's efforts

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 4>to cut prices on their vehicles and how that is

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 4>going to play into the earnings. I see a lot

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 4>of headlines about cutting costs. They recently slashed prices I

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 4>think two weeks ago on most of their models. Is

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 4>that something that investors should be watching for? Even more

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>today in the earnings.

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 5>So Tesla's been cutting prices steadily for over a year now.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Remember just after the New year twenty twenty three, they

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 5>announced a price cut, a series of price cuts, and

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 5>there have been, you know, several price cut announcements since then.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 5>So it's going to impact both the top line and

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the bottom line. You're really going to see it in

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 5>the gross margins that they report. So but you know,

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 5>also Tesla's at a point where they opened two new

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 5>factories just a couple of years ago, in Austin and

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 5>in Berlin, and they're still in the process of ramping

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 5>those plants up to full capacity. So you know, if

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 5>they can do that cut prices and drive sales higher,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 5>they can drive down their unit costs by doing so.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Auto manufacturing is a very high fixed cost business, so

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 5>ultimately they want to run those plants at the highest

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 5>possible capacity utilization rate without surrendering too much margin.

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So I guess to me, thank you blue Button, to me, Garrett,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the most fundamental issue here, and I'm not

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 2>sure Elon Musk can really address it, is what is

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 2>the overall fundamental long term demand for EV's. You know,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of folks out there that are saying

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's not great, it's not what maybe the

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>industry once thought. What's your view on that.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's a big reason behind the sell

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 5>off in Tesla and other EV manufacturers. I mean, look

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 5>at the stock price of Ribby and Lucid Fisker. Is

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 5>that the growth rates have disappointed, you know, compared to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 5>what investors thought growth would look like just two or

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 5>three years ago. So you know, it's been a disappointment.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 5>And one thing you can point to is that governments

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 5>around the world are putting EV mandates in place, and so,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, we think that's a big positive for Tesla.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Obviously as an EV peer play. You're also seeing a

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 5>number of traditional auto manufacturers really pull back on their

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 5>planned EV investment. So over the longer term, there should

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 5>be a lot less competition in the EV market for Tesla,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 5>which really opens up the market opportunity.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 4>What else makes Tesla different than other pure play EV manufacturers.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 4>If you read the Walter Isaacson biography of Elon Musk's,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 4>you kind of get a sense that Musk never wanted

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Tesla to just be an EV company, but thinks of

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 4>it more as an AI company, a battery company. How

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 4>much does that matter to investors right now when the

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 4>stock is down, you know, forty percent year to date.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 5>We argue it should matter. I mean, look, they have

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 5>an energy business, energy storage that if you look last year,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 5>it's been growing faster than the auto business. They hardly

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 5>get any credit for that business, and so you know,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.359
<v Speaker 5>we think it should matter. But really, the big distinguishing

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 5>factor when you look at Tesla relative to to other

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 5>competitors is its balance sheet. You know, this, this isn't

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 5>the Tesla of three or four years ago that was

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 5>just barely getting by. Tesla had today has an investment

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 5>grade balance sheet. They're sitting on over twenty nine billion

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 5>dollars of cash, They have some of the highest gross

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 5>margins in the industry, and we think they have an

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 5>attractive development pipeline. So you know, that's really you've seen

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 5>a bifurcation in the market where you know, some of

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 5>the smaller, newer ed players like the ones I mentioned,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, some of them have either declared bankruptcy or

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 5>are flirting with bankruptcy. So you know, Tesla is really

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 5>in a much different position than those companies, and in fact,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 5>a lot of traditional automnifact and manufacturers don't even have

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 5>investment grade balance sheets, so you know, they're in a

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 5>better position than those companies in our opinion.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Garrett has, do you have the confidence that Tesla can

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 2>profitably make an EV at a thirty thirty five thousand

0:14:58.200 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars price point?

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Going to be difficult. So you know, when Elon Musk

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 5>first started talking about this mass market EV years ago,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 5>it you know, it was a twenty five thousand dollars

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 5>EV and that just isn't you know, with inflation that

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 5>we've experienced since then and the economy continues to experience,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 5>we think, you know, if this happens, it's it's more

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>likely to have a price point somewhere north of thirty thousand,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 5>maybe thirty or thirty five thousand, And that's really a

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 5>price point that they're that they're going to need to

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 5>produce it profitably in this environment.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 4>I have two questions. One quick question we talked about

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 4>the balance sheet. Does Tesla still have bitcoin on their

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 4>balance sheet? Remember when that news came out like two

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 4>years ago?

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 5>They do, And you know, that was a drag on

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 5>on Tesla for a while. When bitcoin was falling. With

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin having rebounded, you know, they've divested some of the bitcoin,

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 5>but they do have some amount on the balance sheet.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 5>I would have to check the ten K for the

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 5>exact amount, but they do. They do still have some bitcoin.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 4>The other question I had was just when the earnings

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 4>come out, you know, what are you looking for? Best

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 4>case scenario? You know, what kind of headline would you

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 4>have to see to you know, start buying more Tesla

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 4>after the earnings.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Really the biggest thing is we're looking for some certainty

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 5>regarding the cyber truck. From as far as we can tell,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>from the time they made first deliveries of that vehicle

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 5>in November, you know, through the end of March, they've

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 5>only produced maybe a few thousand units of the cyber truck.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Now the reservation count for that model is somewhere north

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 5>of two million, So you have two million customers out

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 5>there who are waiting delivery of their cyber truck. They're

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 5>having difficulty ramping up production. There was a recall just announced,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 5>and so you know, we're looking for some certainty regarding

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 5>when they might hit certain production milestones for the cyber truck,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 5>which is going to have an impact on their full

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 5>year deliveries obviously, and then looking ahead into twenty twenty five.

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, if you look across the street, Earning's

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 5>estimates have come down massively for twenty twenty four, and

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 5>so we think they're at a level which are much

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 5>more achievable here, and so the really the story becomes

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 5>more of a twenty twenty five and beyond story, which

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 5>is what investors are looking for, you know, taking the

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 5>longer view, but also they want to see better execution

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 5>in the near term.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 2>All right, Garet, thanks so much for joining us. Really

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Garrett Nelson, Vice president's Senior Equity analytcfr A Research,

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>A proud Wahoo from the University of Virginia, somehow working

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 2>his scam from Richmond, Virginia, one of my favorite towns

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>anywhere my twins are born. There a great city, great

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 2>place to live. Garrett's got it figured out there doing

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street thing from Richmond, Regina. Good for him,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Tesla after the close, that's going to be big.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car, playing Android

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>otto with the Bloomberg Business app listen on demand wherever

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 2>One of the big names reporting today is UPS, big

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>brown profit higher than analysts estimates, talking about headcount management,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>restructuring of its delivery rats are beginning to bear some fruit.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's check in with the expert on all things transport

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and that would be one lead classical. He's a senior

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>transportation's logistics analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. He's safely a sconce

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>down in our Princeton office and he joins us there

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>via zoom. So, Lee, it looks like this UPS put

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 2>us some good numbers. What are really the drivers here?

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, hey Paul, thanks for having me on.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 6>I think it's really about what they're doing on the

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 6>cost side. I think that's really the driver of the

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 6>outperformance in EPs, because revenue did come in slightly lower

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 6>than expectations on lower volumes. You know, they're dealing with

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 6>lower volumes from last share last year when they you know,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 6>were negotiating their labor contract and a lot of shippers

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of try to find other alternatives in case there

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 6>was an issue with their network, you know, from a strike.

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 6>But obviously that didn't happen now they're being pretty busy

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 6>trying to win back that share, so, you know, I

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 6>think what they're all in all, it was a good quarter.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 6>I think if UPS is you know, meeting or beating expectations,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 6>that's a good thing. Because they've had a rough year,

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 6>driven a lot by that labor negotiation, which increased costs

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 6>considerably and resulted in a lost amount of volume, which

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, for a company like UPS, the deleveraging effect

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 6>on margins is quite substantial. But there are definitely some

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 6>good news in the report today that you know, we

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 6>remain optimistic that they might be even looking to possibly increase,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, their full year guidance for twenty twenty four,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 6>especially as the US postal service contract which they recently

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 6>won from FedEx starts hitting their.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>P and L.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 4>When you talk about average daily package volume down, your

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 4>over year revenue down year over year, how much of

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the softer demand for UPS is related to macro economic

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 4>factors and maybe coming out of the pandemic consumers shipping less.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Is that a factor here?

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's a you know, probably a trieffective things.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 6>It's probably a softer great outlook all together that coupled

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.959
<v Speaker 6>with tougher comparisons, and the fact that they are you know,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 6>are still trying to win back the share that they

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 6>lost from their labor contract negotiation. So I think think

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 6>those three things are kind of weighing on their their volumes,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 6>probably more than maybe their competitors like a FedEx or

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 6>a DHL Hayley.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I know, labor is a big deal with UPS and

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 2>these companies here. I know UPS they had a new

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 2>labor contract that really pushed up wages and benefits starting

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess this year. But then on the other side,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>they also cut twelve hundred or twelve thousand white collar jobs.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>That's like fourteen percent of the workforce here. So talk

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to us about the labor and component they're in the

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 2>cost structure.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean that they're they're doing the right things.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, the contract might have a you know, with

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 6>the team serves, might have had a negative impact to margins,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 6>but you know, we are going to anniversary those in

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 6>the second half of the year, so those comparisons won't

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 6>be as bad. And also, you know, does provide them

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 6>with a steady labor force, because you know, if your

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 6>labor is happy, you're gonna have less turnover. You have

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 6>less turnover, you probably have better service and better safety,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 6>and that usually yields better profits. So I think, like

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 6>when you if you look longer term, beyond the initial

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 6>shock of that new contract, which is very front loaded,

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, the increases aren't as bad. As we get

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 6>to year two, it's not going to be as bad.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 6>And listen, you know UPS and FedEx and a lot of

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 6>these companies, you know they did get a little on

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 6>the fat side, if you will, on their corporate ranks,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 6>and I think they're both doing the right things and

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 6>terming in terms of trimming it for the new normal

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 6>of what their operating environment is today.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 4>How should investors be thinking about UPS? The stock is

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 4>up one point five percent right now, but it's down

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 4>about six percent year to date, underperforming the broader market.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and if you even look even further over the

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 6>last twelve months, you know it's down almost twenty five percent,

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 6>underperforming not only the broader market, but you know it's

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 6>closest peer fed X, which is up around eighteen percent

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 6>over the last twelve months. So you know, I think

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 6>what they need to do is they need to execute.

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 6>They do not only to execute on their twenty twenty

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 6>four plans, but their twenty twenty six plans, and I

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 6>do as I said earlier, I think there is some

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 6>opportunity for some upside surprise. Given their US postal service contract.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't didn't really make that much money for FedEx.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 6>But I think UPS's network is very different than fedexits.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 6>It's more integrated, it's not a hub and spoke network,

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 6>and that will provide them with some profitability. And management

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 6>is pretty confident, at least it peers confident that this

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 6>business is going to be not only creative to earnings,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 6>but a creative to margins. And that's kind of what

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, we as we look at the company, really

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 6>want to see. We really want to see those domestic

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 6>margins start to improve.

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Haylee, what are the companies saying about kind of normalized

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 2>growth rates in terms of I guess, unit volume. Where's

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 2>this US economy in terms of just packages? Is it

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>a GDP kind of number? Is that kind of the story.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a GDP kind of number. But you know,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 6>UPS wants to grow beyond GDP and and how they're

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 6>going to do that is they've made some pretty significant

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 6>uh not in size necessarily, but in terms of you know,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 6>capabilities acquisitions. You know, they bought a company Roady, which

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 6>you know it's not a drink on the road, well,

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 6>but it's it's it is. What they do is they

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 6>deliver heavy stuff to people's doors, So think furniture, think

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 6>uh uh, workout equipment, fitness equipment, and that is done

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 6>through more or less an asset light model where you know,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 6>they're arranging the delivery. So that's that's a very good business.

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 6>They're also invested or acquired a company that does returns

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 6>without box, without having it to box it, so it's

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot easier for consumers to you know, either go

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 6>to a UPS store or one of the other drop

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 6>points that UPS provides, uh to to to return something.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 6>And that's good for UPS because that stuff goes into

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 6>their system and it becomes a B two b uh

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 6>deliver where when we say B to B business business

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 6>and meaning that there's more density, so it's you know,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 6>they're they're shipping, you know, they're consolidating and shipping twenty

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 6>boxes versus just one envelope, and that tends to be

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 6>more profitable. Uh. And then their investments in the healthcare space,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 6>you know their goal is to be the largest healthcare

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 6>logistics provider. Healthcare has above average margins for transportation companies

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 6>given the high level of service that's involved there. I

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 6>think temperature control, think you know, uh, the fact that

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 6>it has to get get get somewhere at a very

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 6>specific time. So you know, those are higher, higher margin

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 6>business So you know, I think that those growth areas

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 6>I just mentioned will help them grow their overall volumes

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 6>beyond you know, just GDP numbers.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, just real quickly, Lea, I'm looking at the stock,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>my god, Over the last five years, UPS and FedEx

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>both grew at a compounded annuer rate of eight point

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 2>eight percent, spot on below the S and P five

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirteen percent. But why do investors own these stock?

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>What's the call to own a fed X or UPS?

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, Paul, as you know, we don't do a recommendation

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 6>to your bi but you know, it's a really it's

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 6>a play on e commerce. It's a play on the

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 6>global economy. And you know, it's more, it's more and

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 6>more becoming a play on near shoring. You know, the

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 6>ups is and the Fedexes and the dhls of the world,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 6>even the freight forwarders like a kuninaugl You know, they're

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 6>all going to benefit from the changes and supply chains.

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 6>At supply chains, you know, change and shifts and get

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 6>more complicated. These companies really prove their worth during these times.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 6>And you know, I think that if if you believe

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 6>in near shoring, if you believe in you know the

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 6>fact that we're going to be buying more online, not less. Uh,

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 6>these are places where you want to be. And it's

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 6>really about the management teams that are in place, whether

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 6>it's UPS or FedEx, can they change their organizations to

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 6>the new normal. It's and it looks like they're both

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 6>doing it. It's not going to be an overnight change.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 6>It's going to take time because these are very you know,

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 6>huge networks and they and they're not as easy to

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 6>change as it would, you know, changing a menu at

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 6>a restaurant.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Right right, All right, A league, thanks as always for

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>joining us. Lee Lascal, senior transportation analysts of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>joining us from the Princeton offices of Bloomberg.

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Here you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty PM.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>My data came out here from SMP generally below consensus.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess the composite came into fifty spot nine versus

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>fifty two. That was a consensus of fifty two point

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>one was for the last period as well. Chris Willimson

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>joins us. He's a chief business economist at SMP Global

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 2>Market Intelligence. Chris walk us through kind of what we

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 2>saw here with the pmis for the month of April.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so there's two surveys really, one of manufacturing, one

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 7>of services. So the latter is private sector services. So

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 7>these are this ranges from consumer based services to business services.

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 7>It excludes retail importantly, and it excludes government. Now, both

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 7>of those surveys lost some momentum. Collectively over the first quarter,

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 7>they'd signal fairly decent growth around two percent annualized, with

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 7>that upturn becoming increasingly broad based services led, but manufacturing

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 7>also starting to pick up some momentum. But in April

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 7>we've seen both of those surveys lose some output. Growth pace.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 7>It's still in expansion territory as far as output's concerned,

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 7>but with growth sort of slipping below the two percent

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 7>annualized GDP rate, that's the signal from it. So looks

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 7>like the second quarter could disappoint compared to the first

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 7>quarter based on these these survey data, as your previous

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 7>interview was referring to these these survey data have been

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 7>a bit softer than recent GDP numbers, so you know

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 7>that needs to be born in mind.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So any sense of what's driving there, Like, I'm not

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>sure how to think about this on a month a

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>month basis. Is it just kind of noise month a

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 2>month and I really want to look at it on

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>a longer trend or does the slowdown in April does

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that kind of suggest something might be a foot?

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it does look like there's been some adjustment to demand,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 7>so new order inflows, the amount of work flowing into

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 7>manufacturers and service providers that fell for the first time

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 7>in six months in April only. Just it is a

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 7>small decline, but this contrasts with growth of demand that

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 7>we've seen over prior periods, and it looks like you're

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 7>getting some adjust meant here to the financial conditions that

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 7>businesses are facing. So previously we've seen, you know, companies

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 7>look forward to rate cuts and that stimulating demand those

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 7>loosening of financial conditions out and over the course of

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 7>the last few weeks, we've seen further signs that you're

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 7>not going to get all those rate cuts that you hope,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 7>and indeed market starting to price in now more possibility

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 7>of a rate hike. That's feeding through to markets. It's

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 7>increasing borrowing costs and it looks like that's feeding through

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 7>to the business environment. We've seen. We've seen this creep

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 7>in before in terms of how those financial conditions really

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 7>do seem to quickly affect the demand environment, and it

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 7>looks like that's what we've got here in April, a

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 7>bit of a sort of reality check. Whether this persists

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 7>in coming months is going to be the key thing

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 7>to look out for, but it does look like that,

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 7>certainly going into the second quarter, you're seeing the demand

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 7>environment soften compared to what we've seen previously.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Chris, thanks so much for joining us. Chris Williamson,

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>chief Business Economists at SMP Global Markets, joining us from

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 2>London via zoom and again the SMP Global manufacturing PMI

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 2>for the month of April comme in at forty nine

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>point nine. Consensus was fifty two. On the services side,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it came in at fifty point nine, still expansionary, but

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>below the consensus of fifty two, and both of those

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 2>were down from last month, which we're both close to

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty two, so again at deceleration there. So when you

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>put them all together, the services and manufacturing on a

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>composite basis came into fifty point nine versus fifty two.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 2>So we'll keep an eye on out a slowdown in

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the SMP. It's a survey of manufacturing and service activity

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>out there in economy. Economists kind of take a look

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>at that to see about the outlook for services and

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 2>for manufacturing.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Emily Rafe is sitting in for Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>We're live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. We're

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>also streaming live on YouTube dot com, so head over

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 2>there and search Bloomberg Podcast. I'm in the process thanks

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 2>to Emily's tip. I'm in the process of logging into

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and loading clear Space onto my phone the app, and

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 2>that is to limit self, limit my use of certain

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 2>social media things that I feel like are wasting my time.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it blocks your access to the apps, and it

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 4>actually makes you do a breathing.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 7>Exercise, of course, and.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 4>It gives you a quote and an inspirational quote before

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 4>you log on. So you really have to question, do

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I really want to open social media right now?

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Good? This is like the lock on the liquor cabinet.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, that's the analogy that from our generation that

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 2>brings us to TikTok, because that's a lot of what

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 2>people are concerned about in TikTok. You know, it looks

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 2>like they might be banned here or forced of a divesture.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's going on, since I'm not a TikToker,

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>but I know it's huge because most people are on TikTok.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Matt Schuttenhelm, I don't know if he's on TikTok. I'm

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna guess no, but I don't know. He's a media

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>litigation analyst to Bloomberg Intelligence. Yeah, he's a lawyer, but

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we talked to him anyway because he's really really smart. Matt,

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 2>can you tell us what's going on with our good

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>friends at TikTok is what is Congress looking to do?

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so this bill is really advancing in Congress faster

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 8>than I think many of us expected.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>That.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 8>The aim of this bill is that to force a

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 8>divestiture of TikTok from byte Edance, which is based in

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 8>China and is the parent company here. And basically the

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 8>bill operates by saying, if that divestiture doesn't happen within

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 8>two hundred and seventy days or maybe there's a potential

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 8>ninety day extension of that, if that divestiture doesn't happen,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 8>and then TikTok can't be hosted in app stores, or

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.959
<v Speaker 8>it can't be there can be no web hosting of

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 8>the app. So it's effectively a ban if that divestiture

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 8>doesn't happen. And so this has cleared the House of

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 8>Representatives on Saturday. That was their second vote by an

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 8>overwhelming bipartisan majority. Today it's tied up in the Senate,

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 8>and this is tied to the Ukraine Foreign aid package,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 8>and so it's going to be very unlikely for the

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 8>Senate to resist it, so very likely that this becomes law.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 8>President Biden has said he'll sign it, and so I

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 8>think we're you know, we're off to the courts now

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 8>on this question.

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 4>What is Congress most concerned about when it comes to TikTok?

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 4>Why have they introduced this legislation?

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's it's really motivated by by two concerns. One,

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 8>it's a concern about access to all of this data.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 8>We have one hundred and fifty one hundred and seventy

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 8>million Americans on this TikTok is collecting all of their

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 8>data about what they're clicking on, and potentially China has

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 8>access to that since byte Dance is located UH with

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 8>within within China. And the other concern is a propaganda concern.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 8>How much can can China play a role in in

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 8>in dictating the messages that that that TikTok prioritizes and

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 8>and what the messages that it's that it's UH declaring

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 8>to our youth you know that are that are using

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 8>this so so often, so it's sort of those dual

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 8>concerns that that have really driven this.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And Matt, what have we heard from Bite Dance, if anything,

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 2>what do they intend to do if Congress passes this?

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think I think they've signaled pretty clearly that

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 8>there will be a lawsuit to challenge this, and so

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 8>I think that's going to be the next stage. So

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 8>we saw this when President Trump, before he was against

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 8>a band hetally tried to ban TikTok in twenty twenty,

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 8>and there was litigation about this, brought both by TikTok

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 8>and by TikTok's users. And here the bill itself tells

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 8>us what court that's going to go to. It's the

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 8>d C Circuit here here in Washington. And so I

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 8>think Byte Dance and TikTok are very likely to very

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 8>soon bring this lawsuit challenging Congress's action.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone who's on TikTok wants to know, is

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 4>TikTok going to be banned? What is the likelihood right

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 4>now that in a couple months people in the US

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 4>won't be able to use.

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>The app YEP.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 8>So right now there's three moving pieces here. So one

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 8>will Congress pass this, and I think there. The answer

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 8>is very likely yes, and that's likely to happen today

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 8>or tomorrow. President Biden will sign it. Then there are

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 8>two other moving parts. One can TikTok win in the

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 8>courts and stop this with the First Amendment challenge. I

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 8>don't give them very good odds to do that. I

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 8>give them only about a thirty percent chance to succeed

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 8>with the court challenge. Then the last moving pieces can

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 8>there be a divestiture of the app. And that one's

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 8>sort of the big wild card, because what we don't

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 8>know is whether China will permit a divestiture or not.

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 8>It has signaled that it won't approve something like that.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 8>So even if you put that at a toss up

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 8>fifty percent and you say it's you know, TikTok has

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 8>a thirty percent chance in the courts, you know, there's

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 8>a fairly good chance that the app does disappear in

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 8>the next year.

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 3>How do you ban an app?

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 8>How do you ban technically? Yeah, so, technically the approach

0:37:55.080 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 8>here is to prevent it from being carried in app stores.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 8>It can't be updated and made accessible to users in

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 8>the United States, both in the app stores, and then

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 8>it can't be hosted. So this app has to sit

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 8>on a server somewhere that in a way that makes

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 8>it accessible. And the the approach in this legislation is

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 8>that if any company makes it accessible through web hosting

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 8>or through app store access, that they are subject to

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 8>significant penalties and fines in a case brought by the FTC.

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 8>So that's the enforcement mechanism here. It's not directly against

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 8>bytenance or TikTok, it's against those that would would make

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 8>the app available.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, can I just have some server in China or

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else, you know, overseas do it?

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 8>That might be the workaround. Maybe they'll they'll try to

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 8>do something like that, and then then you have a

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 8>question of how how how well the US could it

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 8>could enforce enforce that. But I guess that that would

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 8>be maybe the next move if if everything else is

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 8>failing for TikTok.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, So, but the bottom line is for you

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lawyer types, you think this is going to go to

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, the d C Circuit gets it first, and I

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 8>think there's a decent chance that the DC Circuit is

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 8>the final word. I think if the d C Circuit

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 8>were to rule for TikTok. And to say that there

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 8>is a First Amendment challenge that's really going to interest

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 8>the Supreme Court. I think that would motivate the Supreme

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 8>Court to take take a look at it. If the

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 8>d C Circuit issues a definitive ruling upholding Congress's law here,

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 8>maybe the Supreme Court says, you know, look, the d

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 8>C Circuit got it right, we don't need to take

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 8>that up.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, good stuff. That's what we like talking

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to you. We get it straight, the straight poop and

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 2>all the legal stuff. He gives you, like percentages of

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 2>what can actually happen.

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 6>We love.

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>That's why we love talking to Matt schelling Helme. He's

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.479
<v Speaker 2>one of those people that doesn't carry cash. That's the big,

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 2>big mark against met schell helm Otherwise he's a great

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>attorney and a great litigation analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. But

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 2>he's like the kids, they don't carry cash.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, we don't need How do you buy how

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 4>do you buy a truck outside the office. They took

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Apple pay.

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>They took applepay.

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, there you go. This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast,

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal