WEBVTT - The Fallout from OpenAI Firing CEO Sam Altman

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Tech Are Yet Now. Normally I say tech news items

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesdays and Thursdays, But over this past weekend a

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty big sequence of events happened and it really merits

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a deeper discussion. I'm sure most of you have at

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>least heard something about this story. The short version is

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman, the CEO of open Ai, received his walking

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>papers from the company's board of directors. Then the board

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of flipped out and begged him to come back

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to the company, and he ultimately decided now I'm good,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>y'all can do this on your own. And last I heard,

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he has now joined Microsoft's Advanced AI department. Which is

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a weekend. So today I thought we

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would talk a bit about Altman, We talk a bit

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>about open Ai, We chat about what went down behind

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>closed doors this past Friday, why the board of directors

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>fired Altman, why they then switched gears so quickly, and

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what it all means going forward. Now. I did an

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>episode titled the Story of Open AI at the beginning

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of this year, which published in January. I am going

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to retread a lot of that same ground here in

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different context, because it's necessary to really unravel

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what was going on over the last weekend. So first up,

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who is Sam Altman. Well, he grew up in Saint Louis, Missouri,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and as a kid he became really interested in programming.

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 1>According to The New Yorker, he was programming as early

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as age eight, and that he went so far to

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>take a part a Macintosh computer in order to learn

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how it worked. He also challenged social restrictions and taboos.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>When a Christian group announced a boycott for an assembly

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that was supposed to be focused on sexuality, Altman came

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>out to his community as gay, and he challenged them

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to adopt an open attitude toward different ideas. And he

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was just a teenager at the time, so very much

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>someone who is curious, motivated, and by most accounts I've read, fearless.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Altman attended Stanford, but he was only there for two years.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>He studied computer science while he was there. In fact,

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>he studied artificial intelligence by some of the leading thinkers

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the discipline at Stanford, but he dropped out of

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>college in order to work on an app and a

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>business idea. So in many ways, it was the stereotypical

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>founder story of Silicon Valley. Right. You go to Stanford,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and when you're there, you're really there to make connections.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't bother completing your studies, You drop out of school,

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you make a company, and then you get rich. It's

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, you know, the whole idea of step one,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>go to Stanford, step two, drop out, step three profit.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could argue that if you can make

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a successful tech business, there's no real point to completing

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>your studies. I mean, if your studies are all about

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>learning the technology and it turns out you already have

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a good mastery of that and you can make a

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>profitable business, why would you continue to spend money going

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to school, unless, of course, maybe you would grow more

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as a person and develop a deeper appreciation and understanding

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of things that could perhaps help you when you make

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions in the future. But don't listen to me. I

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>graduated with a degree in the humanities, so I have

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>these wacky ideas about how the experience of college is

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about more than just learning a subject. But that's beside

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the point. Let's get back to Sam Altman. So the

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>app he was working on with a few friends was

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>called Looped loopt, and it was meant to let users

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to share their location data with selected other users, So

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you can make friends with people on the app, and

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>then you could share your precise location with that person,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of a shorthand way of saying here I am.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And it could facilitate stuff like real world meetups. Like

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you're heading to a concert venue and it's

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a big venue. There's a lot of different interests and stuff.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You get there, you're going to meet up with your friends.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>You use this app to say this is specifically where

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I am, so that you can find each other. That's

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a use case. The Looped team applied to

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the Why Combinator accelerator company to become part of their program.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about Why Combinator for a moment. It is,

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>as I said, a startup accelerator organization. So Why Combinator

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>its purpose is to provide early funding in promising startup

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 1>ideas in order for them to start to get off

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the ground. So it's an early investment part of a

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>startup so that they can at least get a chance

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to mature into an actual business. Now, in return for

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this early investment, why Combinator takes a small percentage of

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ownership in the startup. So let's say that why Combinator

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>provides you know, a fairly modest sum in the early days,

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Like it was a lot of money, don't get me wrong,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe like one hundred thousand dollars or maybe one

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty thousand dollars. That's a lot of money,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's a tiny amount when you think about what

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a company needs to actually run. So this is really

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just to get a startup to go from idea to

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>something slightly more you know, coherent. But in return, why

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Combinator gets like, you know, seven percent ownership of that startup. Now,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say that startup is something like Dropbox, and then

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>years down the road it's worth you know, more than

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars. Well, that becomes a heck of a

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>return on investment. Right, you can have a huge profit

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as this startup accelerator, even if just a few of

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the startups really hit it big. Ideally, you want them

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>all to hit big and then you get huge payouts

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>down the line, and you become an important part of

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the whole tech startup ecosystem, which is exactly what why

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Combinator said up to do now why Combinator launched in

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, that was the same year that

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Looped would become part of its inaugural class of startups. Essentially, now,

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not all startups make it. Obviously, Looped at least appeared

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to do well initially, at least on paper. Altman and

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues secured a couple of major rounds of investment funding,

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Series A and Series B. The company's valuation hit more

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred and seventy million dollars. But they were

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 1>running into a tiny little problem. They had developed this app,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't convince people to use it. They were

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>all thinking that, you know, Looped was going to be

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this really useful and popular tool. Everyone was going to

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>download it. But turns out the general public didn't seem

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to agree with that, and so in twenty twelve, Looped

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that team accepted an offer from the company green Dot,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and they sold Looped for around forty three million dollars.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That's also a lot of money, but it did not

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>cover the amount of money that venture capitalists had invested

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>into looped, so it was a negative return for investors.

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes you bet on the ponies and you lose.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But Altman walked away with around five million bucks, so

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty decent return for him, even though

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the app that he had worked on for several years

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>never really gained traction. Now, in the wake of this disappointment,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Altman founded a venture capital company of his own, and

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it was called Hydrazine Capital. So he sunk most of

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>his personal wealth that he had earned from this sale

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>into this new venture capital company, and he also raised

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>millions more from other investors. He focused on investing in

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that were in the y Combinator program, and he

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was largely successful in this. He was picking some really

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>good startups, and he was backing ones that would become

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a big deal in the tech space a few years

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>down the road, and so he was seeing big returns

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on those investments. Within just a few years, his venture

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>capital firm increased in value by an order of magnitude.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>But Altman wasn't super happy doing this work. He didn't

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>find it rewarding on a personal level. Financially sure, but

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on a personal level, he didn't really like the work,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so he then extricated himself from the venture capital company

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to try and do something else. Now, around this same time,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the folks who were behind why Combinator were looking to

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>hand off the whole accelerator program to someone else to

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>lead it, and that someone else ended up being Sam Altman.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The guy had gone through the process with looped and

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>now he would be running it, and he reportedly agreed

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>without hesitation. He was eager to do this job. It

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>was something that he didn't even necessarily know he wanted

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to do, but once he was offered it, he was

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>really enthusiastic about doing it. So he really ramped up

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>y Combinator, and Altman began recruiting, you know, startups that

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>were focused on science and technology, so we're talking about

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>bleeding edge stuff like quantum computing or nuclear power or

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>AI that kind of stuff. Around this time, he started

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to be part of a group that included Elon Musk,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and this group ostensibly wanted to develop artificial intelligence in

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a responsible, accountable way while being extra careful not to

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do anything foolish to make safe artificial intelligence. You know,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to go down the wrong path and

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>do something like accidentally unleash Skynet and terminators all over

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the place, so this group would become open ai. Now,

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the original open ai was a non profit organization, and

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea was to help in this effort to

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>foster the development of artificial intelligence in a responsible and

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>safe way. It wasn't some for profit company pushing a

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>generative AI chatbot at that time, and it was not

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>yet a partner to massive companies like Microsoft. So Altman

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>was running y Combinator, and he also began to work

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with the open ai folks and tried to recruit various

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>leaders in artificial intelligence to join open ai. In twenty fifteen,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman published a two part blog post about machine

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and quote why you should fear it end quote,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And it starts off with the comfort sentence and I

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 1>quote development of superhuman machine intelligence SMI is probably the

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity end quote.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Now Altman allows that other massive threats, like say, an

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>asteroid hitting the Earth, are possibly more likely to happen

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>than super human intelligent machines run amok, but he also

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>points out that a lot of the other threats that

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we think of, like super volcanoes and climate crisis might

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>end up having a massive impact on the human population,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>but probably wouldn't just totally wipe out humans in totality.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But superhuman machine intelligence, he argued, did have that potential,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and that this is why he thought of it as

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>being the most important or perhaps most dangerous threat. Almand

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>goes on in those blog posts to point out that

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>SMI doesn't have to be malevolent to be a threat.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Just setting an SMI to complete a task like trying

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to manage resources could end up causing massive human harm.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>The SMI might determine that the biggest cause of resource

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>depletion is the human race, So presto, you get rid

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of the people, and now you don't have to worry

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>about these resources running out anymore. Now that's an oversimplification,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but you get the idea. Altman's point is if you

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>don't develop artificial intelligence in a way that is safe,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you can get terrible consequences, whether that was your goal

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise. And of course there are malicious ways to

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>use AI. Right You could develop AI in an effort

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to try and come up with new biological weapons. For example,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that's often a scenario that's cited by concerned critics of

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. That's certainly something that could potentially happen. So

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>again Altman saying, well, you need to have the right

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>team responsible to develop AI in a way that is

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>most likely to benefit people and to protect people from

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>malicious or badly designed AI. So Altman makes an argument

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that machine intelligence could hit an inflection point once recursive

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>self improvement becomes a real possibility. That means, if we

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where we can create machines that

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>are smart enough to reprogram themselves, and to reprogram themselves

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is better than what humans could do,

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so to program these machines at a higher than human

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>level of capability, a superhuman capability, if you will, then

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>machines suddenly engage in self improvement and can do so

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at increasingly shorter intervals. They get better at doing the

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're doing, so they get better at improving themselves,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and they improve themselves over and over, and this becomes

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a version of the singularity, which is a moment where

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>change is so sudden and it's happening all the time

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that effectively it becomes impossible to even describe the present,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>everything will change and continue to change at a rate

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that's beyond our ability to describe. Altman says, we might

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>be creeping toward that now, and maybe we're creeping toward

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it at a rate that's just impossible for us to

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>notice because it's so gradual. That makes it really tricky,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>because it could be that it goes from it's happening

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>so slowly that we can't notice it, to it's happening

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so quickly that we are unable to describe it, and

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's no point in the middle where we can say,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a second. So in part two of his blog posts,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Altman makes a clear argument. He says, quote, the US

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>government and all other governments should regulate the development of SMI.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>In an ideal world, regulation would slow down the bad

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>guys and speed up the good guys. It seems like

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the first SMI to be developed will

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be very important end quote. Essentially, what Altman is arguing

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>here is that if ethical researchers develop a superhuman machine

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence first, they can employ that SMI to prevent the

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>development or deployment of malevolent or poorly built SMIs. So

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we unleash our good guy Superman against their bad guy

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>General Zod or you know whatever whichever superhero supervillain pairing

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you happen to like. Interestingly, this is going to come

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>back again when we talk about Altman and his appearances

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world while talking about the potential for AI regulations.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we dive any further into this, let's take a

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>quick break to thank our sponsors and we'll be right back.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So Altman went so far in his blog posts to

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>say that he thinks, generally speaking, that tech is often overregulated,

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but on the flip side, he doesn't want to live

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in a world that has no regulation at all. In

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>some cases, you can see regulation as a necessary evil

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it does slow down innovation or it has

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences, but in the absence of regulation you can

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>have some really poorly thought out deployments that can cause

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of harm. From twenty fifteen to twenty eighteen,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai operated as a nonprofit organization. The organization championed

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the open part of its name, claiming that it would

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>freely share research and its patents with AI researchers all

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world, all in an effort to ensure safety

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in AI development. Greg Brockman, one of the co founders,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>identified a short list of top AI researchers, and the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>organization as a whole began to recruit several of them

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to join open ai as the first employees of the organization.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>The talent helped attract more talent. Some folks said they

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>actually joined open ai because it was where you could

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>work on really exciting research with the most brilliant and

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>talented people in the discipline, even though it would mean

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be making as much money there as you

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>could somewhere else. Even high paid individuals at companies like

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Google found themselves switching jobs for the chance to work

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>on something that they saw as important and challenging and

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially critical to the survival of humanity. One of those

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people who would also be listed as a co founder

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of open ai was Ilia Sutzkiver, who would become chief

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Scientist at open ai and would join the board of directors.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Musk reportedly played a critical role in recruiting Sutzkiver over

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to open Ai. Like it went back and forth between

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>open Ai and Google, which really wanted to hold on

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to him, and reportedly the Musk was a big reason

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>why Sutskever eventually moved over to open ai, and also

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Ilia Sutzkever is one of the people who would ultimately

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be part of the decision making group that fired Sam

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Altman this past weekend. Anyway, we're up to twenty eighteen,

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and behind the scenes there was drama a bruin, and

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>much of it was in the cauldron known as Elon Musk.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a big surprise there, right, because Elon Musk is

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a magnet for drama in the tech sphere

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and the business sector. So Musk was on the board

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of directors for open Ai, but in twenty eighteen he

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>left open ai entirely, and the official story was that

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk chose to step down because of a potential conflict

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of interest because there he was on the board of

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>directors for an organization working on artificial intelligence, but he

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>also was CEO of Tesla, a car company that was

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>pushing hard to develop and deploy autonomous driving capabilities to

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the market, and autonomous driving is of course a subset

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of artificial intelligence, so stepping down was the responsible thing

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to do because of this potential conflict of interest between

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the two companies. There was, however, more to his decision

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>than just that. So, according to Business Insider, Musk was

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not happy with open Ay's progress. He compared it negatively

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to Google. He was saying Google is spending huge amounts

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of money and is getting ahead in artificial intelligence research,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and he argued Musk argued that Google, and he specifically

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>targeted Larry Page in this criticism, was not paying any

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>attention to safety, that safety was not a factor when

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>it came to Google's approach to artificial intelligence, and so

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the things he said that it

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was critical of open ai, saying you're not doing enough,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and he was kind of pointing at Sam Altman as

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the reason for them, that Altman's leadership was the reason

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>why open ai was lagging behind. So Musk then reportedly

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>went to other co founders of open ai, including Sam Altman,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and essentially he said, I want to run open ai,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and he was told in no uncertain terms that this

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would not happen, and so, again, according to Business Insider,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk decided to take his ball and leave. His ball

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>also included a sizable investment or donation to open ai,

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so when he left, he left with a whole bunch

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>of money that otherwise was going to go to the

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>organization and didn't. Musk would later say he disagreed with

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the direction of open ai and that the company wasn't

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>nearly as open as its name would suggest. That last

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>criticism happened after open Ai would create a for profit

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>company in twenty nineteen. Musk actually leveled the lack of

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>openness at open Ai that critique. Around twenty twenty, Musk

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>also was founding his own ai research organization and would

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>occasionally throw shade at open Ai and Sam Altman. And

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I am not an Elon Musk fan. Most of y'all

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know this. I'm not a huge fan of Elon Musk. However,

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the criticisms he had toward open

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Ai I actually agree with, or at least I think

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they were true, like the fact that open ai was

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming less open. I think that criticism has merit. Meanwhile,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>open Ai was in a pretty tough position because, as

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, artificial intelligence research is expensive, so you

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>need access to a whole lot of compute power and

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not cheap, and then you also need to have

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the money to attract the best talent, especially if your

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>goal is to be the first to develop superhuman machine

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that is ethically sound. Like, if that's your goal

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and you need to outpace everybody else who's also working

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on developing superhuman machine intelligence, you got to spend the

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>big bucks to get the top of the class to

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>come over to your organization. And a nonprofit organization is

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just not the fastest way to gather huge amounts of

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>money needed to fund research and operations. It would be

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>way easier if you could get investors to pour money in,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but investors want a return. Meanwhile, a nonprofit is a

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>place where you donate money. You're not expecting return on

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your donation. It's no an investment. This is what led

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the decision to create a for profit arm of

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>open ai, which in turn would generate money that could

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be theoretically at least used by the nonprofit part of

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>open ai to further the original organization's goals and mission.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So the result was open Ai LP, which open Ai

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>called a capped profit company. So what the heck is

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a capped profit company? That's actually a really good question,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because I've found two somewhat conflicting answers from various sources.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Like they lay it out in two different ways that

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>are similar but distinct. So I'm going to give you

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>both of the ways that it has been explained in

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>various sources, because I'm gonna be honest with y'all. I'm

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not a business person. Despite the fact that I have

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>hosted a business podcast of the Best, I'm not really

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a business person, so I can't pretend like I have

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a firm grip on this. And also, open ai was

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of charting new territory while they were announcing this.

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But here are the two ways that it is frequently described.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So version number one means that open ai would accept

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>investments from venture capitalists and that would pay out returns

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on those investments from profits, but only up to a

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>certain amount. So in open AI's case, the early backers,

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the people who first poured money in to open ai,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>would have a cap of one hundred times their initial investment.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's take a very simple scenario. Let's say that

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>some kids in your neighborhood want to start a lemonade

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>stand and you invest one dollar into their lemonade stand. Now,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say the kids running the stand turn out to

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be business geniuses and your dollar investment helps lead that

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stand into making tens of thousands of dollars in profits, Like,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>even after the expenses, these kids are raking in tens

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars. However, when you invested, you did

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>so knowing there was a one hundred time cap on returns,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So that means the most you're ever going to get

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from the stand is one hundred dollars. It's a one

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred times return on your investment. Meanwhile, those snot nosed

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kids who never could have made the stand without your

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar are pocketing thousands of bucks and they're franchising across

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the town, those rotten kids. Anyway, that's one version of

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>how the capped profit structure work. It works, investors can

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>make a return, but only up to a certain amount,

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the early backers being one hundred times whatever they put in,

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and that means if they put in ten million dollars,

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they could potentially make as much as a billion dollars

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>in returns if open ai profited that much. So you

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>know it does add up. However, there is a second

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>explanation for capped profit that, like I said, is slightly different.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So in this version, investors would pour money into open

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ai and open ai would hold back on distributing any

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>returns on profits until those profits reached at least one

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred times the investments that had been made. So using

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>our limonade stand example, you've donated one dollar to the

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>limonade stand business, you would not see a return on

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that investment until the liminade stand made at least one

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in profit. At that point you could start

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to receive returns. And a few explanations kind of combine

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the first version I mentioned in this version, and frankly,

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just to be transparent, this kind of confuses me. So

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, Time at time dot Com uses the second

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>explanation right that you don't get any returns until the

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>profits reach one hundred times whatever your investment level was,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but then includes the phrase quote anything above that being

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred times profit would be donated back to

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofit. So if that's the case, it means you

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't get a return until the profits hit that one

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred times your investment, and then anything over one hundred

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>times your investment would be going toward the investment into

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofit or a donation into the nonprofit, which means

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess you would be limited to one hundred times.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like maybe it's a combination of these two,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's just been poorly reported in various places. It

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>just it seems a little confusing to me, and it

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>also seems like it'd be confusing from an investor standpoint

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of whether or not it would even make sense to

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pour money into this. I think a lot of reporting

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>around the cap profit nature is just incomplete, and that's

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem that there were just there's just a lack

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of good explanations of this. And also, I mean, I'm dense,

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>so that's the other part of the problem. But anyway,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>however you frame the context of a capped profit company,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the structure would give open ai the chance to court

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>investors and to hold a whole bunch of money that

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they could then pour into research and recruiting. A one

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred times factor is pretty darn big, And arguably you

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>could say this was necessary because while open ai had

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this noble mission, the truth is you still had massive

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 1>companies like Amazon and Google and Meta. These companies have

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really deep pockets and a desire to invest in AI research,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you didn't do something, there was just no way,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>no matter how noble the cause you were going to

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>keep up with these companies. So that was kind of

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the decision making factors that drove open eye to launch

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this for profit arm of the organization, and that didn't

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>make everybody happy. In fact, it was controversial, to put

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it lightly, There were critics who were asking if it

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>would even be possible for open ai to continue to

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pursue its mission of ethical AI development while also operating

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a commercial business that was profiting off of artificial intelligence development.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That these two things could not be in alignment and

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>would mean that ultimately open ai would not be able

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to achieve its mission. Complicating matters was that open ai

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>began to back away from that whole open part of

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy, which again Elon Musk would criticize. In twenty twenty.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Open a Eye sighted a concern that malicious developers might

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>take the information the research being shared from open ai

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and use that information to develop nasty and harmful applications,

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least poorly designed ones. So now they're saying,

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, our knowledge is dangerous. So I know, we

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>said we were going to share it so that we

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>could benefit humanity, but now we're scared that if we

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>share it people will misuse it, so we're not going

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that anymore. So again, like Musk was saying,

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it was no longer being as open as the name

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>had implied. So yeah, his criticisms had weight. Open ai

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>really was moving away from an unassailable nonprofit status and

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>also was getting less open in the process. Sure, the

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>folks that open ai had explanations for why they were

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>doing this, but it didn't change the fact that the

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>open Ai of twenty nineteen was fundamentally different than the

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>organization that had started in twenty fifteen. All Right, we're

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going to take another break. When we come back, we'll

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>talk more about what happened in the following years that

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then led to the situation that we saw unfold this

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>past weekend. But first, let's thank our sponsors. Okay, So

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we left off in around twenty nineteen. We're gonna skip

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead a few years. So the battle for AI talent

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was a constant one in the tech space, but the

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>world at large remained pretty much oblivious to open ai

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and the folks who were involved in that company. Open

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>ai just wasn't a name that your average person was

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>aware of. But that would change in November twenty twenty two.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That's when OpenAI introduced the chatbot called chat GPT. This

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>chat bot drew on a large language model, the GPT model,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>which had gone through a couple of iterations, and it

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>would use that language model to generate responses to queries

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and input. The responses often seemed like a human being

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>had actually written it. It didn't come across as your

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>typical AI generated text. It seemed more natural than that.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It also seemed like it was a really smart person

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the response, someone who appeared to be an

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>authority on whatever the subject was. Like any subject you

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>could think of, you could put into this thing, and

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>chat gpt would generate a response that seemed to be

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty definitive. And there were limitations on chat GPT's expertise.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>The open Ai announced that chat gpt really only had

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>access to information leading up to September twenty twenty one,

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you asked it to explain anything that happened

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>after September twenty twenty one, you'd be out of luck

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>because chat GPT wouldn't have access to that information. But

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate, chat gpt seemed incredible. Now

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>over the following weeks after its introduction, we would start

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to see various critics and skeptics raise concerns about generative

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>AI in general, really and chat GPT in particular. Now,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these conversations had already started because there were

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>already text to image generative AI tools out there that

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>had prompted some concern. Chat GPT created new discussions about

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>how generative AI could make misinformation. They could engage in plagiarism,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it could slander someone, or it could just produce the

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong response due to something that the AI field calls hallucinations.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they call it confabulations instead. So this is when

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>an AI model fabricates an answer for whatever reason. Like

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one reason that AI might just make something up is

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't have access to relevant information that relates

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to the query. So instead the chatbot produces an answer that,

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from a linguistic perspective, is statistically relevant. In other words,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's creating sentences that are linguistically correct but factually incorrect

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't know the difference, and it's just trying

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to provide a response to the question that was asked

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. Now, this meant that sometimes you could ask

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>chat GBT to solve a problem for you, and the

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>response you would get would sound authoritative and sound like

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's correct, but in fact it was entirely wrong. And

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>following these criticisms came concerns from lawmakers who began to

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>ask the very same questions that open AI was intended

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to address when folks first got together back in twenty

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to create it in the first place. Now, as

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we all know, the law trails behind technological development, sometimes

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>by years. It takes time to make laws, and then

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it takes time to approve them and to pass them

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>into law. If you rush, you're likely to make problems worse,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least, you're likely to complicate matters

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>so that it becomes very difficult to comply with the

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>laws you've written. So Altman, who had already made his

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>philosophy around regulation known in that blog post from twenty fifteen,

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>began to meet with various officials all around the world. Now,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that sam Altman would help legislators understand

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the potential risks of artificial intelligence and presumably create the

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>most responsible approach to regulations to ensure safety. But skeptics

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>were worried that what sam Altman was actually doing was

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just stacking the deck to favor Open a Eye over

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>other AI companies. You see, Altman had long held this

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>position that it's really important for an ethical group of

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>researchers to beat everybody else to the punch to develop

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that superhuman machine intelligence in order to prevent catastrophe. That

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you don't do that, you're essentially sealing your own doom.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course Altman viewed open AI as that ethical group.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It is the group that's dedicated to creating ethical, safe AI,

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and Altmann felt that regulations could help mitigate the risk

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of bad actors or inept creators from making dangerous machine intelligence.

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>And so these skeptics were arguing Altman's position was that

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>regulations should really hold back everybody else and then favor

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>open AI and allow it to move forward towards this

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>goal of creating benign, protective machine intelligence. So in other words, yeah,

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the AI field needs rights, but more importantly, those regulations

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>need to stop every one other than open AI. That

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was how the skeptics saw Sam Altman's position as he

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>met with all these different leaders, and in fact we

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>saw proposals for putting AI research on hold for half

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a year. In fact, Elon Musk argued for this. Now,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the skeptics came out again and said, well, I see

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the need to kind of pump the brakes so that

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we make sure that all this work in AI isn't

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>going to cause enormous harm in the future. But of

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>course Musk is arguing for this because he wants to

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>create his own AI research division. And if you force

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry as a whole to hold off for six

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>months on moving forward, it would give Musk the opportunity

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to start to build out the foundations for his own

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>AI division while not losing more ground to competitors like

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. It's a cutthroat world out in that AI field, y'all. Now.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>In January of this year, in twenty twenty three, news

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>broke that Microsoft was investing around ten billion with a

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>B dollars in open Ai. Microsoft had already invested billions

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in open Ai over the previous years, in twenty nineteen

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and twenty twenty one, specifically, so this was seen as

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's effort to catch up to rivals like Google and Amazon,

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which had already been spending their own billions in AI research.

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The relationship between Microsoft and open Ai would manifest in

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways, including in Microsoft incorporating chat GPT

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>into its search feature in bing. For a long time,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has been pushing being an edge toward becoming more

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>important in the market, but as come up time and

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>again up against the brick wall that is Google. In August,

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>open Ai announced in an enterprise version of chat gpt,

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and then in September, open Ai allowed the chatbot to

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>access information on the Internet for the first time. So

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>now that restriction where it could only access information up

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to September twenty twenty one, had been lifted. Now it

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>could access real time information around the world. On the

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.959
<v Speaker 1>political side, lawmakers around the world, particularly in the United

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>States and in the European Union, began to grow more

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned about AI and its possible uses and the risks

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>associated with it. So more pressure was building on the

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence discipline in general and open ai in particular,

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because open ai was seen as sort of the leading

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>authority in artificial intelligence. Chad GPT had really captured a

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest around the world, and at the same

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>time you had some people within open ai who were

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>really clinging onto the ideals of the original nonprofit organization

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and who had growing concerns about where open ai was

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>headed because of the for profit arm of the company.

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So similar to Elon Musk, there were people, high level

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>people in open ai who were starting to feel uncomfortable

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>with where the organization was going. Now, just a couple

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, open ai held its first developer conference.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Sam Altman took the stage on November sixth, so not

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>long ago, and he took the stage as CEO of

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, and he listened off some pretty incredible statistics

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that open ai can count more than

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of Fortune five hundred companies as customers. That's incredible.

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It shows how influential open ai is in this field.

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Open AI's partnership with Microsoft also played a huge part

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>in Sam Altman's presentation. But again, behind the scenes, things

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>were far from honky dory. You had open Ai doing

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>gangbusters on a business level, but again some of the

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>scientists who were part of the board of directors were

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>growing increasingly concerned that the company was guilty of the

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>very behaviors that open Ai was meant to head off.

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>That open ai was developing and deploying tools without putting

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in appropriate safeguards or considering the consequences of unleashing these

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>tools that open ai had become more about monetizing technologies

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and innovation and less about ethical development of artificial intelligence.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>There were also some personal tensions that were growing between

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Altman and other members of the board, such as Ilia Sutzkever. So,

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>according to Time, Altman reduced Ilia's role in the company,

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>while Ilia worried that Altman was launching side projects that

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>would benefit from open AI's work but also not be

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>accountable to open ai. So, in other words, ILIO was

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about this sort of conflict of interest that Altman

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was going to end up pursuing some developments of artificial

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that were not governed by the board of open

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ai and thus not constrained by these ethical concerns. So

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this really boiled over. During the developer conference, Altman made

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>several announcements that Ilya reportedly objected to, including the unveiling

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of a customizable version of chat GPT that, in theory,

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>could run autonomously once it was told what tasks it

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to handle. So the critics on the board

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>outnumbered Altman's supporters. You had essentially two camps. You had

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the people who thought Altman was in the right, including

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Altman and Brockman, and then you had other members who

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>were more concerned. And last Friday, that's when the board

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>decided it was time to fire Sam Altman. They saw

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Altman as being too reckless, not nearly cautious enough, and

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>despite open AI's market performance, which was incredible, they felt

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the company was moving in the wrong direction and that

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it needed new leadership as a result, so they decided

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they had to fire Sam Altman as CEO. Now. Reportedly,

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Altman learned of this fate in a Zoom meeting. Ilia

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was the one who told him that he had to

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>go to the Zoom meeting, and it happened shortly before

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the board announced their decision Publicly. Greg Brockman, co founder

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>president of open Ai, he was not told of this meeting,

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, he found out about Sam Altman getting

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>fired just shortly before open Ai released the news to

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the public. Similarly, Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft, also

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>found out essentially when the news got released to the public,

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and this set off a metaphorical explosion in the tech world. First,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>open AI's board didn't exactly have a real good transition

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.439
<v Speaker 1>plan in place, to handle this, nor did it seem

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to really comprehend the extent of the fallout this decision

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>would have, particularly in the way they did it, where

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they did not consult with Microsoft, a partner that was

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>going to invest ten billion dollars into the company, or

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>talk it over with the other executives before making the decision.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So even the folks who agreed that Altman was perhaps

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>not being cautious enough felt that the board's move was

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>poorly thought out and even more poorly executed. It's really

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against that. Like, even if you feel

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Altman was absolutely leading open Ai in the

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong way the wrong direction, you can also say that

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the way the board handled this ultimately was disastrous. So

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Greg Brockman announced that he was leaving open Ai once

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the news went public that Sam Altman had been fired,

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>So open Ai would see both its CEO and its

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>president leave the company in one day. Some members of

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the board, like Ilia, expressed regret for having supported the

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>measure to fire Altman, like they said later like I

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of wish we hadn't done that. Iliosutskiv would go

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on to sign an open letter saying as much, and

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>even threatened to leave Open a Eye along with more

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>than five hundred other staff members over this decision. Just

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a big old whoopsie, right, so the board found itself

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in extremely hot water. They had done the classy thing

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of waiting until a Friday to announce a massive decision.

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>My guess is this was probably in an effort to

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>take at least some of the sting out of the

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>news cycle, the idea of being like, well, if it's

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday afternoon, no one's going to pay attention

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>because we're going into the weekend. By the time it

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>comes around to Monday, things are going to cool off

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Plus here in the United States, we're going

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>into a holiday week with Thanksgiving, so there won't be

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of opportunity to bring a whole lot

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of attention to this, and we'll be able to get

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>away relatively unscathed. That is not how it turned out, however. Instead,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the news media went bonkers with this decision, and how

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>could you not chat GPT and open AI. They had

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>been the center of so many headlines throughout the whole year.

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, this was going to get a lot of attention,

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and so while they were hoping that they could get

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>away with this without it being too painful. Immediately, investors

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>started to freak out about this change. A bunch of

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>them essentially indicated that they would pull out of open

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.479
<v Speaker 1>ai and they would back whatever Altman chose to do next.

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So if Altman launched his own competing artificial intelligence company,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they were going to back Altman, not open Ai. There

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 1>were hints that Microsoft could potentially even do the same,

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's ten billion dollars plus. You had the general

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>staff who felt that this was the wrong move, and

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they felt that this was a terrible mistake, and they

0:45:56.200 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>were threatening a mass walkout of the company. It was

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the worst reaction you could expect from a

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>big announcement. So it did not take very long for

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>news to break that the board was trying hard to

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>take back what it had done and to try and

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>convince Altman and Brockman to return to the company, but

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>by then the damage had been done. Altman was not

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>interested in coming back. Specifically, he said unless the board

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>stepped down, he would not come back, and that would

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>become a real sticking point. Mira Murrati, the chief technology

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>officer for open Ai, would serve as interim CEO for

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about two whole days. Murati reportedly was the person who

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>actually reached out to Altman to try and convince him

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to come back to open AIE. But while Altman did

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>return to open AI's headquarters to negotiate, and he said

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the first and only time he would ever

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have a guest badge to open AIE, those negotiations didn't

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>really go very far, so the board decided on a

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>new interim CEO, perhaps because of a perception that Murrati

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was maybe a bit too pro Altman and they needed

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to get someone who would be more in their pocket.

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:16.879
<v Speaker 1>They chose the former CEO of Twitch, Emmitt Sheer, who

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any experience with artificial intelligence. By this time,

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the board directors consisted of just four people, people who

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have been pressured to step down but refused to do so.

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Thus Altman did not come back to the company. Altman

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and Brockman, meanwhile, weren't exactly on the job market for

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>very long, because Microsoft swiftly hired both of them to

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>head up a new advanced AI research team within Microsoft.

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Nadella also said Microsoft remains committed to supporting open AI,

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.359
<v Speaker 1>hinting that those ten billion dollars, most of which has

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 1>not made its way to open Ai yet. Open Ai

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>has received just a fraction of that ten billion dollars,

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 1>but the hint is that that money will continue to

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>go to OpenAI, that Microsoft is not backing out of

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that agreement, but Altman is going to end up working

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>directly with Microsoft and will have the title of CEO

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for whatever this Advanced AI part of Microsoft ends up

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>being called. A few other prominent executives and scientists from

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>open Ai are apparently moving over to Microsoft as well,

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so there are already other defections from open Ai to Microsoft. Meanwhile,

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>back at open Ai, a lot of folks who work

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 1>within the company have been posting their support for Altman

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on platforms like x so there's a concern that there's

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a mass walkout and resignation following this move.

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Certainly other companies like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta would

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be eager to get hold of some of that talent,

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's entirely possible that the board of open Ai,

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in a move made out of concern for the company's

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>safety and humanity safety, may have actually doomed the organization entirely.

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure hiring a former CEO of Twitch is

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be enough to prevent disaster. Now, all that

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>being said, open ai is in an incredible position. A

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>recent evaluation placed the company at around eighty six billion dollars.

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft says it is committed to this ongoing relationship with

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Chad GPT is still an incredibly important tool

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in the tech space, particularly with the introduction of the

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>enterprise product of chat GPT. So could open ai just

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>be too big to fail? Maybe? I think this monumental

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>misstep will test that hypothesis. I do not know how

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it's all going to shake out. From a business perspective,

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say open ai is in a really strong position.

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But then if the organization suddenly sees a mass defection

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from its researchers and staff, that could very well change.

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to see. And of course, now we're

0:49:57.280 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>on a holiday week, so it might be another week

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but before we start getting answers. But yeah, that's kind

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of an update on what went down this past weekend

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and why it happened, Like all those different factors that

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>built up to this big explosion of activity. Now you

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have a bit more background as to what was going on.

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>As to whose side I'm on, I don't know. I

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that Altman's leadership was not always the best

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as far as trying to achieve the goal of ethical AI.

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I do not think that it was almost like engaging

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in a necessary evil kind of thing. But I'm not

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>sure that the evil is really necessary. But what do

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I know. I know that AI is very hard and

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 1>very expensive, and I don't know how you get the

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>money to do it the right way and still beat

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>out all the companies that don't have those restrictions on them.

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I just know that it's a mess.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But now it's a mess we can put behind us

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>until we see what happens next. I hope you are

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.