WEBVTT - Markets, Electric Vehicles, and REITs (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find a Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. For now, let's talk

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>about the bond story, because you are seeing a really

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>massive historic moment here city coming out in this morning,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>adding to the to the talk about a hundred basis

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>points in these next two weeks. Nomura coming out of

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>course yesterday saying hundred is down there base case scenario.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for investing? Well, let's bring in

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Brown, the managing director and portfolio manager over at Pimco,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, to bring a talk about all things macro

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy and investing. Aaron, thank you as always for joining us.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>A hundred basis points, how effective is that really relative

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five basis points? Is there an element perhaps

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of almost panics that comes with the facts of the

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve may have to be that aggressive, you know,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that just given the inflation environment, that we're

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in right now. I don't think one hundred basis points

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>should be considered a panicked you know raise. And in fact,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what the fixed income pricing market

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is pricing in, there pricing in about nine two basis points.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So the fixed income markets are ready pretty much priced

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred basis point move at the July f

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>on C meeting, which is a little bit of a

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>gift to the FED because they're not going to surprise

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>markets if they do, in fact, hike one hundred basis points.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I also think that the market right now is really

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>focused on getting inflation down so well, you know, certainly

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in a normal environment, a hundred basis points would be

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a shock to markets. Given the inflation environment we are

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in right now, I think that's taking precedence over the

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>size of the move. That said, you really have to

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think about whether or not it's going to be that effective,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>especially over the short for managing inflation lower. Absolutely, especially um,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if the problem is on the supply side. Um, there's

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>not much of the FED can do. However, you make

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a good point. Everybody is freaking out about the possibility

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred basis points, and even some of our

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>writers this morning, we're calling it an historic rise. But

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is, if you look back in history,

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED has raised rates by one percent or more

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight times since nineteen seventies. So it's not as

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.839
<v Speaker 1>if it's a completely new move, right. I mean, we've

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>seen Paul Volker do it at five percent in one clip, right,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So we have to put this in

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a longer term context. Certainly, over the last a couple

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>of decades we haven't seen moves in this size, but

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if you go back overall longer window, we have, and

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we've also been in an inflation environment that's also unprecedented.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that right now the main focus of

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED is getting inflation lower and and doing what

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it takes in order to manage that that number, you know,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to something closer to where they're comfortable. Okay, but let

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>me let me put a counter point to Matt here. Yes,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight times, a lot of them were throughout the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>eighties and the vulgar era. But isn't that that's the

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>last time we had inflation this high? Right? But it

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't isn't the fear here, It's not just the fact

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that Vulgar hiked so aggressively they basically forced the entire

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>economy into recession. It's also the idea that after this

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>decade of the seventies of inflation, you have this mazed,

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>massive deflationary spiral. So Aaron I have to ask, is

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that what we're in store for next? I think that

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're likely in store for next is not a

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>deflationary spiral, but going back to and probably where the

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>comfort is is going back to a two to three

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>percent or even two to four percent band for inflation. Um.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that there has been a fundamental

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>shift over the last couple of years where we're likely

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>not going back to the normal that we were in

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of pre pandemic period, but probably a

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>higher normal than what we've been in over the last

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>ten years with respect to inflation. And I think that

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's okay for the FED. I mean, if anything, they

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they're managing to average inflation a little bit higher over

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the secular horizon. But um, you know, going back to

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of a disinflationary or deflationary environment I think is

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>for for at least over the medium term, is off

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the table. Yeah, I don't think we're getting set up

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for another if we are signed me up, because that

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really a bad economic situation in terms of what

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you're buying right now. Um, where do you like, where

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the most? Where's the most opportunity on the curve? Gary

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Shilling was in here the other day says he's going

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>along thirty years. That's no surprise, Yeah, And I actually

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with that. I mean, I think that there

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is fundamental demand um for thirty years, you know, from

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>pension funds and from insurance funds that look at the

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>US relative to other markets globally and find an attractive yield.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think buying the long end at this point

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also just in a longer term context, makes a lot

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of sense with respect to the fact that you know,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>three percent if you're guaranteed yield and return is pretty attractive.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>In this environment, it's gonna be you're hard pressed to

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>get that, you know, in risk assets right now. I

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>also think that Muni's offer from a taxable basis offer

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>really attractive returns as well. So that's another sort of

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pocket of opportunity that investors should be looking at all. Right, Aaron,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Pleasure having you on

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the program today. Aaron Brown there, managing director and portfolio

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>manager at PIMCO. We'll stick with this market story here

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because stocks are just plummeting. It is not a pretty picture.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh in the markets today down two percent. I wonder

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if we see a reversal even though there is this

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>really massive wall of worry. You've got pp I prices

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that were at an eleven handle following the CPI report

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at nine. Do you have recession odds a hundred basis

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>point hikes that are now the base case for Nomurra

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and city. And on top of that, you now have

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond and James Gorman warning about recession remembers. These

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>were two of the people who were so confident in

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>consumer strength and now it kind of looks like they're saying, well, yeah,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that whole recession scenario, there may be something to that.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>So how do you play the markets amid this wall

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of worry? We're gonna ask Brett Ewing, the chief market

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>strategist at First Franklin Financial Services. Brett, thank you as

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>always for joining. Let's start there a wall of worry.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you hop into this market or not? Well, thanks

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>for having me on UM, look the times to get

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>out there and start put in some capital work, or

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when times where you have pete worry, and we're certainly

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in those times. Um, we're the economy is likely in

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession. UM. I think that the rate hikes are

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly getting baked in here for consecutive one percent, probably

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>another fifty to seventy five and September. But the way

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at markets, UM, the question is not when

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we go in recession, it's just how deep it's going

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to be. And we do believe that it will be

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a fairly light recession. But we think that we are

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>currently in one, if not soon. We were talking with

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Gary Shilling, who is granted UM well known bear yesterday

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on the program. He says we're about halfway there in

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of the market draw down, to use a term

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of our day. We've heard similar things from Michael Urry,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>who also is obviously known for his barish calls. But

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about that, the fact that we've

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>seen valuation compression in the first half and now we're

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about to see the margin compressions. Yeah, I think the

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>question is the real question is does inflation keep accelerating? UM?

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to force the hand. I think

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED has already done their job. We're going to

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of demand destruction on the second half

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of this year. Um, we're already seeing it across the board.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The commodity markets are showing it. So, you know, I think,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have we hit a bottom in the market. I don't

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>think that that's our primary issue here. I don't think

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>it's got a massive leg down from here. I would

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>say that we could go another five to ten percent

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>right here, depending on the inflation numbers and how much

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive the FED would need to get. But isn't

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>there a bull ace here for the stock market in

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that if there is a global recession? Isn't the recessionary

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>playbook at least and I want to say, in the

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>past twenty years or so, to hop right back into

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>American markets, you buy American buy the dollar, buy US treasuries,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>by a defensive stocks, big tech. I feel like there

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be a bull case here for in the

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>worst day scenario, fun flows from the rest of the

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>world will rescue the stock market. Why aren't we seeing that? Well?

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the rest of the world is

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>also having quite a bit of trouble here. Um. You know,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>our dollars just skyrocketing on the dollar index, and I

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think that the dollar index will be a big discussion

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Jackson Hole conference coming up in late August.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that there's many central bankers from around the

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>world that are going to probably been Chairman Powell's here

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on that issue. Um. But I am in the bullish camp.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Just to be clear, I do believe um in equities,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think equities are absolutely the best asset class

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that you could be in right here. If you were

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>putting capital work and you had a three to five

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>year time horizon, there's no better place to go right now.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think trying to bottom tick is just meaningless right here.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that we are going to have these

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers start falling off as we move into the fall.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That's our base case, and you can look at every

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>market place. I mean look from getting of June. We've

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>got gas down, oils down, coppers down, weeks down, I

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>mean everywhere across the board. I believe you're gonna see

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>rents roll over a little bit as we get into

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the fall because the v R B o UH scene

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna probably have a correction and rent prices there

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from ten to I think the consumer is about

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to tighten up, and I think demand destruction the feat

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>has already accomplished it. Yeah, it does look like um

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as Dangerous says, it's been to call a peak and inflation.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It does look like these numbers should be it, because

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we do see eggs rolling over, we do see medals

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>coming down, we do see oils coming down. We've seen

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that for the last couple of weeks. So and just

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to add to that, let's look at the labor market.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there there's a lot of high level of

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>layoffs within the technology sector that are rolling through. My

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sources are telling me it's it's rolling through the I mean,

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you just had the financial some of the financial companies

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>report this morning. Layoffs are coming throughout the financial services

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>industry as well. And if you look at the jobless claims,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the four week moving average since the very first rate hike,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's up thirty eight percent already. Um And this's gonna

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>keep accelerating. And and that's what the Fed wanted to do,

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is cool it off. They've actually done their job, but

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>there's no way they can actually stop right here with

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>these high headline numbers. Got it all right, Brett, thanks

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Brett, you and their chief

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>market strategists at First Franklin Financial Services. It's bringing Travis

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Hestor right now. He's chief Electric vehicle officer over at

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>General Motors and uh, this company I think has made

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the most impressive electric vehicle of all time in

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the GMC Hummer. Pretty do you know what the Hummer

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>can do? We're talking about a thousand horsepower, ten thousand

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>pound feet of torque. It can crab walk. Travis, thanks

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. UM Now, most of us probably can't

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>afford a Hummer, or we'd have to stretch to get it.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But are these things coming down to price points that

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the average American could get into? Yeah, Hi, Matte, nice

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to be Thanks for having us son. Yes, we you know,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, General Motives. We're very much into EVS for

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>everybody in our vehicles and in our charging network. And

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>from a vehicle point of view, you're right. The Hummer

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is a fantastic vehicle. It can do trab walking, it

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>can do it has a what's to freedom mode, which

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is an acceleration mode, which is just fantastic. UM but

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it are more affordable, and you have sub thirty dollar

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>cars like the Bolt from the Bolt of the UV,

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>which are fantastic vehicles and very affordable and have some

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of our latest technology like take the Bolt EUV has

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the latest super cruse technology that's available UM and leads

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in almost any segment. So yeah, we have we have

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>price points and vehicles from low affordable vehicles through to

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some more expensive vehicles and everything in between. I'm looking

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at Hannah Elliott right now. She's walking right outside the

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio and she just did an excellent

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>piece on the Hummer that I'm sure you saw the

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>cover cover piece for Bloomberg Pursuit. She's standing on the

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>hood of the truck. UM on the other in the

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>spectrum we talk about the Bolt, right. I was lucky

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.599
<v Speaker 1>enough to drive around Detroit UM with Mark Royce in

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his Bolt. I think it was the first generation and

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>UM just the perfect vehicle for somebody on a budget

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who wants to get around without a big carbon footprint.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you produce enough though, I mean, I know there's

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge chip shortage right now that stranded some vehicles.

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>My Silverado truck included on lots. So what's the chip

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>situation Like, Yeah, there's no doubt with UM, you know,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the global economy and COVID and lots of supply chain

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>issues that there's been straying in the in the supply

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>chain network. But we're optimistic that we are in doing

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>everything we can every day to UM produce as many

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that our customers desire. You know, we have a long,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>wide inglist because we have such great vehicles, but we

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>do a lot to try and get them out and

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the situation is continuing to improve by you know,

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it evolves every day. The area is UM increased clarity

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>coming every day and we're getting better and faster every day. UM.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we're optimistic because we go forward. Matt Travis,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like everyone is getting into the e V

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>game now. Naturally you have Tesla, you got GM, you

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>got Forward, you name it. Everyone is hopping into this market.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious does the infrastructure really support it here

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>when you don't actually have this network of charging stations

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of funding. I think a lot of people

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>expected from the White House, from the government, from the

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>states like California, for example, who are very go green

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily exist yet. So in your opinion, I

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is twofold. One, how is GM differentiated

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>at all? And two does it feel like the market

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is getting ahead of itself? Thank you, that's a great

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>question creating. And uh, you know, we might have announcement

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>yesterday of this coast to coast charging infrastructure network which

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is very significant. Uh you know, it's two thousand charging stalls,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's five hundred locations. Importantly, they're all three hundred and

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty DC fast charge stations, which allows you to put

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of energy into the vehicle in a very

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>short amount of time. They'll be co branded Pilot Flying

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>J and Ultium Charge three sixty Ultium Charge three sixty

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>GMS network that aligns eleven different charge poard operators and

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>gives you, in this particular announcement yesterday, some very beneficial

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>things to the GM customers who buy our vehicles, things

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like exclusive reservations, discounts on charging, a really great technology

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>called plug and charge, which means you don't need to

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>use credit cards anymore. You just plug them, the charge

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>poort into the vehicle and the payment's taken care of.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Integration into the vehicle what we call our my Brand apps,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which are like the Chevrolet App or the Cadillac App,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and that helps you to get real time charger availability,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that does route planning, It allows you to make those

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>coast to coast trips. And so it's a very significant

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>um uh you know, north to south, east to west,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>city to city announcement. But as part of the GM

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Multium Charge three S network, we've previously announced a seven

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollar investment into that infrastructure. That

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>includes forty level two charges around dealer communities where we

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>all live and work. It includes three thousand, two hundred

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifty d C fast charges in the inner city environment,

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>which we do with our great partner e v Go.

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>UM So, we know it's a pretty comprehensive network that's

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>being built out here, and you know it's evolving at

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the same rate that evs are coming to market. And

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in this latest announcement we just made,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we will be getting that interstate free a charge are

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>installed early here in two thousand and twenty three. We're

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>moving pretty rapidly. Again, very cool, Hey Travis, tell us

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>about you your job and you know how it's changed

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>over the years at General Motors. I know you were

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the chief engineer for the Cadillac CT six, and you've

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 1>held engineering positions with other on other i CE projects.

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Now you're um, now you're running the growth or the

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>electric operations. What's the difference. Uh, yeah, So I've been

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with GM for almost twenty six years now, lots of it, Matt.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>As you said, I was a chief engineer on vehicles

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, UM, which was great because we

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do just such great vehicles. But as things have evolved here,

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, our technology development on electric vehicles and autonomous

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>vehicles is just surging. It great. Rights I've been involved

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with both of them on the product development side, but

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>now I'm lucky enough to get the opportunity to how

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>developed this on the infrastructure side and some of the

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>energy management side. And this is a highly fast evolving

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>area of our industry. And you know, the US has

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>such a great infrastructure with its freeway and highway networks.

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It's time to get the electric vehicle infrastructure side of

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that up and running. And I have a fabulous team

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of people who helped do that, and we have fabulous partners,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people like Pilot Flying J and even EGO, who help

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>us UM get that up and running, and then we're

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to help us execute that. So

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fairly you know. It's our industry is

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>evolving and our our roles are changing, and it's exciting.

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, it's I can't think of

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a more exciting time to be in our industry compared

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to the last hundred years. It's it's it's fantastic. I

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta say I would agree late sixties maybe late sixties,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I'd be there right with the Camaro. But in any case, Travis,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on. Thanks so much for joy

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in US chief Electric Vehicle Officer for General Motors. As

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been focused on today, more high, well high is

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an understatement. More massive inflation prints. With the p p

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I coming out at eleven point three yesterday, with the

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>c p I out at nine point one, let's talk

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with someone who can maybe offer you a solution in

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of the right hedge. David Auerbach joins us right now,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>managing director from Armada E. T F Advisors. And the

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>cool thing is David with you and my co anchor

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Kritty Gutta, I can say it's great to have y'all here. Yeah,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it definitely is. David got his b A, his b

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>A at Texas and his NBA at s m U. Well,

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the only reason he's telling me that is because for

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your information, David, and for our entire audience is my

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>brother actually went to s m U. I grew up here.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>To me, I'm a Dallas I'm a Dallas gal. I

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>spent a few years hitting the bars around s m US.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>My favorite places Highland Park one of my favorite places

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to hang out. Let's get back to well, actually it's

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really a real real estate and partly residential story

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that you have for us, David, right, because you think

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a great way to hedge against inflation. Absolutely,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and thanks so much for having me really appreciate it

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and love the Dallas ties. That's so cool. You know,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we take a very uniquepproach at our MADA. When we

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>launched the Home Appreciation US RE d E t F

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in March, we have this view that we're building our

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>fund on two fund principles. Number one, where people relocating

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>across the country and then which the residential read segments

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are benefiting from that relocation. From where we sit, we

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know that real estate is personal. There's If there's one

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that the three of us all have in common,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is that we're very fortunate enough to go to sleep

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with the roof over our head. Whether we live in

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>an apartment, we rent, the house where we live is home,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and that home is the most important investment decision that

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you make every single day. And as you mentioned about inflation,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>well we know that interest rates are going up basis

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>points lock it in for sure, most likely a hundred

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at this rate. But what that means is that cost

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of that mortgage now gets more expensive. You have to

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>come more to the table with the down payment, and

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's going to affect many first time home buyers

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and those that are probably in the market right now

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy that house. And for so many people

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just been impossible, right, I mean, not only were

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they priced out of the market when mortgage trades were cheap,

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>now they have no chance of getting in. I know

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people just anecdotally who can't buy a house,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and I know people who can't sell a house because

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the buyers just can't afford it. Now is that going

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to change? You know? I would say in the back

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, we would see some moderation. But frankly,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think part of plays into that old number

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one rule of real estate location, location, location ship. If

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you go talk to folks that are in Nashville or

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte or in Austin, you know, they may have a

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>different perspective. Right now, my neighbor across the streets sold

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>his house within a week here in Dallas and almost

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>got full offer on his property. And so, you know,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there are pockets that you're still seeing massive,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>massive strength. But the bigger problem here is that we

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all know there is a massive supply demand and balance

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the housing markets. There's just not enough housing inventory

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy the amount of demand that's out there. David,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>is that going to change? I want to bring up

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>another Texan that we're going to have on a little

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bit later on the show. Daniel DeMartino booth Um, whom

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you may know she advised the fed and wrote a

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>book called fed Up. She advised the Dallas Fed. Um.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>She has said it's possible that we have a glut

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>next year of housing and cars because so many people

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>are trying to fill this void. What do you think

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>about that possibility? You know, I don't know about that

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>glutt necessarily. Again, the part of the problem is that

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>what I'm air quoting this that affordable housing product, that

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>starter house doesn't exist anymore for those first time home buyers.

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>But instead you're seeing this plethora of single family rental

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms from like invitation homes, American Homes for rent. You know,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a tri con. There's a lot of single family

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rental properties that are out there. One other point, you know,

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>employment growth is driving household formation. We know that the

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>employment market is still strong with a three handle on

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate. As a result, again with inflation going up,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gas prices are up, and if you're an apartment landlord,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you're still knocking on your tenant's door on the first

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of the month saying where's my rent? Many of these

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>apartment companies, as an example, reporting you know, double digit

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>year over yr n o I growth, rental growth, strong

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterly sequential growth. We're going into the summer prime leasing

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>season for these apartment guys that are you know occupied,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and so again plays back into that thesis of where

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you live is that most important investment decision that you

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>make for yourself, for your family and for your kids. David,

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we got about a minute here. This is a trend

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not going away anytime soon. Do you foresee any

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of pop of the housing bubble any time in

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>our near future? If there is going to be I

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think a lob, it's going to be dictated on future

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>increases of the interest rates. We know obviously this next

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>one is there going to be more down the road

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this year because that will play into the own price

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciation and the moderation of the housing market going forward.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But again with us focused on house R E t

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>F here h A U S. You know, we're just

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to take it on a quarter by quarter basis,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>taking the news that's coming at us from the government, Fanning,

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>may redfin Zelo, Bloomberg, all the sources that are kind

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of telling us where the housing market is headed. And

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>right now I will tell you from where we sit,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>we really don't see that letting up until maybe, like

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, back half of this year, maybe into next year.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, David, thanks how much for joining us. Great

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 1>having you all on this morning. David auerback, managing director

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>at Armada E. T F Advisers, talking to us about

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>possible inflation hedges. He would suggest one, which is their

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Home Appreciation U s REAT. The ticker is house spelled

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in German h a u S and you can check

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it out on the Bloomberg h a U S Equity

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>d S. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller, three pt on Fall Sweeney

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio