Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shields. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the Freedom Hunt. Monday,
Speaker 1: November twenty first edition of the program. We have Elon
Speaker 1: Musk saying Trump can come back on Twitter. This is
Speaker 1: a big one, folks. Is he going to though? How
Speaker 1: will he respond to this possible social media coup? Will
Speaker 1: discuss that, and we also have some breaking news from
Speaker 1: over the weekend of a mass shooting and the discussion
Speaker 1: of Stow castic terrorism that came from this because the
Speaker 1: left immediately seeks to blame their political opponents anytime something
Speaker 1: horrific happens in this country. We'll discuss that and the
Speaker 1: continued lawfare against Donald Trump, including now a special counsel
Speaker 1: overseeing two criminal investigations and a new investigation being re upped.
Speaker 1: So it's kind of an old investigation that they're dusting
Speaker 1: off and saying it's a new one that involves well,
Speaker 1: i'll tell you in just a few minutes, but you
Speaker 1: know cyber criminals. They're constantly going through everything that can
Speaker 1: to find information about you to then steal your identity
Speaker 1: and take out loans in your name. They do this
Speaker 1: with your personal identifiable information, your PII. It's all over
Speaker 1: the dark web. It comes from data breaches because you
Speaker 1: give your stuff that you think is going to be
Speaker 1: safe and encrypted to some big company and then they
Speaker 1: get hacked and then it's all out there and you
Speaker 1: don't find out about this. Usually when the worst happens
Speaker 1: with your information, until there's a credit card in your
Speaker 1: name or a loan in your name you didn't take out.
Speaker 1: This has happened to me before. It's really annoying. That's
Speaker 1: why it's important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft
Speaker 1: are affecting all of our lives. You need LifeLock. LifeLock
Speaker 1: alerts to potential identity threats you may not spot on
Speaker 1: your own, like loans taken out in your name that
Speaker 1: you don't even know about. If you do become a
Speaker 1: victim of identity theft, because that can happen, I dedicated
Speaker 1: US based LifeLock restoration specialists will work to fix it. Now.
Speaker 1: No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all
Speaker 1: transactions at all businesses. But it's easy to help protect
Speaker 1: yourself with LifeLock. Join now and save up at twenty
Speaker 1: five percent off your first year with promo code buck
Speaker 1: Call one eight hundred LifeLock or head tolifelock dot com
Speaker 1: and use promo code buck Let's promo code buc k
Speaker 1: for twenty five percent off LifeLock dot com promo codebuck.
Speaker 1: So please do check that out. All right, Elon Twitter,
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, they're freaking out. He has said that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump can come back on to the platform. They are.
Speaker 1: First of all, I love this. Billionaires are destroying democracy
Speaker 1: and free speech. Why is it only a problem when
Speaker 1: the billionaires don't do what the left wants them to?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a question that is rhetorical because
Speaker 1: we know why. But it's funny, isn't it. Jeff Bezos
Speaker 1: buys the Washington Post, Steve jobs is widow buys or
Speaker 1: funds the Atlantic Magazine. I mean, you see all these
Speaker 1: different billionaires who run media companies that align with left
Speaker 1: wing ideology in some way align with Democrat ideology. And
Speaker 1: that's all fine. But when Elon Musk is like, hey,
Speaker 1: I think we're actually gonna do free speech on the
Speaker 1: Twitter platform. It's time for everyone to completely freak out.
Speaker 1: First of all, here's an MSNBC panelist. This is gonna
Speaker 1: be good on how this is all about a very white,
Speaker 1: sis hetero man protecting another one. Yeah, we'll discuss this
Speaker 1: play four. I'm absolutely disgusted. But what else do we
Speaker 1: expect from very white, privileged sith head of old men
Speaker 1: protecting each other because we always mistake wealth and inheritance
Speaker 1: were genius, So yeay, Elon Musk gets what he wants,
Speaker 1: his buddy back on the air in order them finished
Speaker 1: burning down democracy while he finishes burning down the town square,
Speaker 1: burning down democracy, burning down the town square. The problem
Speaker 1: with this exaggeration, as obvious and stupid as it is,
Speaker 1: is that with Libs it works. This stuff is said,
Speaker 1: and it does, unfortunately galvanize them and their thinking. They go, oh,
Speaker 1: it really is about defending our democracy. They really think
Speaker 1: this stuff. I know. I was hoping that they weren't
Speaker 1: so absurd, but they are, and that was reflected in
Speaker 1: the way the midterm elections worked. Because the democracy is
Speaker 1: in peril. Line in a lot of cases was more potent,
Speaker 1: and I didn't believe this could be possible because I
Speaker 1: didn't think people could be so easily manipulated and be
Speaker 1: so stupid. Shame on me for not understanding. I'm not
Speaker 1: seeing that in advance. But democracies in peril was more important,
Speaker 1: more potent to them than the economy, than crime, than
Speaker 1: the wide open, lawless southern border. But now Elon Musk
Speaker 1: saying that, or taking steps to make Twitter and actual
Speaker 1: free speech platform, that goes too far for them. That's unacceptable.
Speaker 1: And I mentioned the billionaires. They hate Elon Musk, George
Speaker 1: Soros they think is fantastic. Michael Bloomberg when it comes
Speaker 1: to his anti gun campaigns nationwide, they absolutely love it.
Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos buying the Washington Post, fantastic, Carlos Slim injecting
Speaker 1: he's a billionaire, a Mexican billionaire injecting a huge cash
Speaker 1: infusion to keep the New York Times alive. That's that's great,
Speaker 1: that's all defending our democracy. You know, you look at this,
Speaker 1: you say, why is that all? Okay? Here is some
Speaker 1: some former New York Times columnists, for example, I mean,
Speaker 1: this guy is he's a stupid person's idea of what
Speaker 1: a smart person sounds like on TV. I think because
Speaker 1: he says things that are moronic on a regular basis,
Speaker 1: but with a pseudo eloquence that then makes it seem
Speaker 1: to people that don't know better. Oh well, this must
Speaker 1: be intelligent. He's trashing Musk the billionaire, but his billionaires,
Speaker 1: I'm sure on his side on the left or just
Speaker 1: fine play five. First of all, I think something we
Speaker 1: often forget as Americans is that billionaires exist as a
Speaker 1: class of people who have that much money at our
Speaker 1: collective pleasure. Right, It is a policy choice to allow
Speaker 1: some people to accumulate that much money hundreds of billions
Speaker 1: of dollars in the case of people United States, before
Speaker 1: everybody has the chance to live with dignity. Right. Other
Speaker 1: countries make that choice very differently. We have chosen historically
Speaker 1: to heavily prioritize having billionaires over having dignity for all people.
Speaker 1: And that's a choice. I would just start by saying
Speaker 1: that we could make differently in the future. So let's
Speaker 1: just take all their money, or most of it, Let's
Speaker 1: take it and give it to people. These people are socialists, right,
Speaker 1: you'll understand a hardcore like early days of Marxism, socialism.
Speaker 1: This is what they want, this is what they believe
Speaker 1: that it is a policy choice to allow people to
Speaker 1: have what they gain through a free market system, meaning
Speaker 1: that if we just decide to take it, will take it.
Speaker 1: You know, you should pay very close attention because when
Speaker 1: the thuggishness of even the so called Democrat elites is
Speaker 1: on display, they mean this stuff. But now it's not
Speaker 1: going to be all billionaires that they want to go after,
Speaker 1: only the ones that don't fund the things that they like,
Speaker 1: only ones that right checks to the wrong people. They'll
Speaker 1: always be carve outs. There'll always be exceptions for Democrats.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have more billionaires than we do that are
Speaker 1: very involved in the media, obviously, Pierre Omidyar and George
Speaker 1: Soros and Jeff Bezo. You know, go down the list
Speaker 1: of these billionaires who are really active in media, funding media.
Speaker 1: They're fine with it as long as it's their team. Remember,
Speaker 1: they have no principles. They just have desire for power
Speaker 1: and emotional impulses. That is what defines the left. There's
Speaker 1: nothing that they'll say, well, our side, yeah, okay, we
Speaker 1: shouldn't do that either. No, no, when they do it,
Speaker 1: it's good when we do it. It's bad when we
Speaker 1: have power. It's bad when they have it. It's good.
Speaker 1: This is the way, this is their worldview, this is
Speaker 1: how they think. Meanwhile, on the right, we're always self
Speaker 1: policing doing this. Oh well, like we shouldn't do that
Speaker 1: because you know that's not even if it's really helpful
Speaker 1: to our side. You know this, one guy said something
Speaker 1: that conflicts with that years ago, and we need to
Speaker 1: be consistent. They don't worry about that stuff. Consistency principle.
Speaker 1: Those are problems we have here on the right. I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you about this shooting that happened
Speaker 1: into horrific shooting in Colorado Springs over the weekend. Five
Speaker 1: people were killed dozens injured at an LGBTQ nightclub called Cube.
Speaker 1: But before we'll get into that. And also there's more
Speaker 1: investigations Donald Trump that are announced even more there are.
Speaker 1: Literally I do this for a living all day. I
Speaker 1: sit here at I read and think about this. This
Speaker 1: is what I do all the time. And I can't
Speaker 1: even keep track of how many criminal investigations there are,
Speaker 1: or investigations in general there are of Donald Trump. So
Speaker 1: we'll get into that in a moment. But you know,
Speaker 1: I'm sitting in one right now, the most luxurious office
Speaker 1: chair you can get absolutely anywhere the X chair, and
Speaker 1: it's a luxury item in the sense that it's super
Speaker 1: comfortable and looks great, and this is top of the line.
Speaker 1: This is the best of the best. So it's not cheap, right,
Speaker 1: It's not a bargain basement kind of a thing. You're
Speaker 1: gonna pay for the best of the best, but you
Speaker 1: can still get a great value, and you can still
Speaker 1: also finance it. What you can do with X chair
Speaker 1: twenty dollars a month right now, you can finance your
Speaker 1: X chair, So for less than a dollar a day,
Speaker 1: you can own something that's going to make hours spent
Speaker 1: at your desk so much more comfortable and productive. I'm
Speaker 1: sitting in one right now. I love the X chair
Speaker 1: that I'm sitting in. If I could get everyone I
Speaker 1: know one of these, I would trust me. Until you
Speaker 1: sit in one of these X chairs, you can only
Speaker 1: partially appreciate just how good it makes you feel. There's
Speaker 1: an X chair for every style and budget, different colors,
Speaker 1: different editions, oh armrest, headrest, back massage, you're cooling pack
Speaker 1: for your lumbar region. It's amazing what the X chairs have.
Speaker 1: Check out all the options and they are wonderful financing
Speaker 1: plans at x chair buck dot com. That's the letter
Speaker 1: x chair buck buck dot com. No other chair can
Speaker 1: compare to x chair. Go to x chair buck dot
Speaker 1: com right now. Okay, my friends, there are moments in
Speaker 1: time when something truly horrific happens in this country, and
Speaker 1: the response that we should have is to come together
Speaker 1: as a country and just as human beings and say
Speaker 1: that is terror. Is there something that can be done,
Speaker 1: first of all, to help a community heal, to tend
Speaker 1: to those who have been directly affected by it, to
Speaker 1: support them, and in this instance, in the Colorado springs
Speaker 1: Que nightclub shooting, to support people who have either had
Speaker 1: lost one I have loved ones lost or injured in
Speaker 1: this evil shooting. That would be I think a mature
Speaker 1: and emotionally stable society's response to a vicious a vicious
Speaker 1: tragedy like what we just saw. Instead, it immediately breaks
Speaker 1: down because the Democrats do this every time into a
Speaker 1: political effort. The immediate aftermath of this is how can
Speaker 1: I make this about my political opponents, to slander them
Speaker 1: and to make them do what I want them to do,
Speaker 1: To use a tragedy to make them do what I
Speaker 1: want them to do. This is after every mass shooting. Now,
Speaker 1: this is what democrats, unless it's a mass shooting with
Speaker 1: a non white perpetrator who is not targeting let's say,
Speaker 1: a designated protected or oppressed group of some kind. You know,
Speaker 1: there are certain certain mass shootings that the media doesn't
Speaker 1: really spend much time or tension, not at all. As
Speaker 1: you know, even if there are multiple fatalities, they spend
Speaker 1: very little time on that, and they certainly spend far
Speaker 1: less time covering, say the weekly death toll from a
Speaker 1: horrific violence in Chicago. I mean, this past weekend there
Speaker 1: was a there were dozens of people shot in Chicago.
Speaker 1: There's a young girl I believe who was shot in
Speaker 1: the head and killed just from the crossfire. Yet another
Speaker 1: another criminal gang shooting situation where a child was killed
Speaker 1: in the crossfire. That doesn't get a lot of media
Speaker 1: attention because they can't use that for quite the same
Speaker 1: political impact. But when there is a mass shooting by
Speaker 1: a drain an evil lunatic of the Q nightclub, it's not,
Speaker 1: as I said, a moment for the country to come
Speaker 1: together in support of our fellow human beings. Here from
Speaker 1: the Colorado Springs community from the LGBT community who were
Speaker 1: attacked in this instance. That's not the first impulse of
Speaker 1: the Democrat left. That should be the first impulse of
Speaker 1: all decent people to come together and support and solidarity
Speaker 1: with them. No, it is used by the media as
Speaker 1: in as a moment to try to say you are
Speaker 1: responsible for this, meaning the right Conservatives, how does that happen? Well,
Speaker 1: these instances, fortunately, if you look at them, statistically, are
Speaker 1: very very rare. So what do they do? They come
Speaker 1: up with this idea of stochastic stochastic terrorism. Stochastic is
Speaker 1: a statistical term, one that honestly hadn't come across until
Speaker 1: it started being used in this way. That has to
Speaker 1: do with extreme variability and effectively unpredictability by statistical means,
Speaker 1: so statistically random occurrences. And so when they call it
Speaker 1: stochastic terrorism, what they mean is, or the way they
Speaker 1: use this is to say, this is the result these
Speaker 1: even though they are seemingly random, and even though they
Speaker 1: are statistically very rare, it is the direct result of you,
Speaker 1: meaning Republicans rhetoric and you meaning the right speaking about
Speaker 1: any number, whether it's guns or the trans community, or
Speaker 1: whatever it may be. You are responded, this is what
Speaker 1: they say, you are responsible, and you say, well, hold
Speaker 1: on a second. This effectively is separating out people from causality.
Speaker 1: I mean, to make this assertion and then to demand
Speaker 1: political obedience and concessions in response to it is deeply disingenuous.
Speaker 1: It's it's really disgraceful. And the only person who's responsible
Speaker 1: for or the shooting is the person, the monster, who
Speaker 1: did the shooting. But the Democrats don't accept that. No,
Speaker 1: it's everybody that they don't like and don't agree with
Speaker 1: on a range of subjects that have some tangential connection
Speaker 1: to some of the political issues that surround this kind
Speaker 1: of a mass shooting. It's awful that the that they
Speaker 1: use these instances in this way for political points, but
Speaker 1: they do. They use this as a weapon of political
Speaker 1: weapon against their opponents, and it is now common. This
Speaker 1: is the standard common practice of Democrats, and it is shameful.
Speaker 1: We cannot bend the knee to this. This is a
Speaker 1: form of emotional blackmail where people they weaponize fake virtue. Oh,
Speaker 1: if only you would agree with us on this law,
Speaker 1: this wouldn't have happened. He said, well, that's not true. Well,
Speaker 1: you're responsible. So now you really have to agree with us,
Speaker 1: your responsible before what happened. They say, well, why are
Speaker 1: we responsible? Exactly hold on it. Why isn't the individual responsible?
Speaker 1: Well you all know why, because this is about power
Speaker 1: for them. And I just wanted to switch gears here
Speaker 1: and say that. You know, they're they're bringing another investigation
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump. This time it's around whether Trump paid
Speaker 1: off the Stormy Daniels thing. It's crazy, but the Disattorney
Speaker 1: for New York has announced that they're going to go
Speaker 1: forward with this. They're going to re up this case.
Speaker 1: They think they may have some theory of the case
Speaker 1: now where they can actually bring they can actually bring
Speaker 1: charges against Donald Trump for this. That is in addition
Speaker 1: to the two cases now that are being overseen by
Speaker 1: this special Counsel. And here, for example, is Bill Barr,
Speaker 1: the former Attorney General under Trump, saying, look, on the
Speaker 1: Marlago case alone, they're probably going to bring some kind
Speaker 1: of a charge against Donald Trump play clip seven if
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice can show that these were indeed
Speaker 1: very sensitive documents, which I think they probably were, and
Speaker 1: also showed that the President consciously was involved in misleading
Speaker 1: the Department, deceiving the government and playing games after he
Speaker 1: had received this subpoena for the documents. Those are serious charges.
Speaker 1: I personally think that they probably have the basis for
Speaker 1: legitimately indicting the pression. I don't know, I'm speculating, but
Speaker 1: given what's gone on, I think they probably have the
Speaker 1: evidence that would check the box. They have the case.
Speaker 1: Do you think they will? I think it's becoming increasingly
Speaker 1: more likely now. I saw President Trump on Friday at
Speaker 1: Marrow Lago. I was there for a black tie event,
Speaker 1: and he was no uncertain terms, saying he's gonna this
Speaker 1: is a total sham, these charges, and he's gonna fight
Speaker 1: it with everything he's got. Here he is play clip six.
Speaker 1: I saw this live as he was saying this to
Speaker 1: the assembled folks there. This horrendous abuse of power is
Speaker 1: the latest of the long series of witch hunts started
Speaker 1: a long time ago. They want to do bad things
Speaker 1: to the greatest movement in the history of our country,
Speaker 1: but in particular bad things to me. But I've gotten
Speaker 1: used to it. It's lucky. It's lucky a lot of
Speaker 1: people wouldn't get used to it so easily. This is
Speaker 1: a rigg deal. Just as the twenty twenty election was rigged,
Speaker 1: and we can't let them get away with it. Over
Speaker 1: the years, I've given millions and millions of pages of documents,
Speaker 1: tax returns and everything else, and they have found nothing,
Speaker 1: which means I've proven to be one of the most
Speaker 1: honest and it is in people ever in our country.
Speaker 1: It is remarkable how many of these investigations against Trump
Speaker 1: they've had, and how none of them ever result in anything,
Speaker 1: it seems, and they just don't care. They just don't care.
Speaker 1: They keep bringing more investigations. This is the one that's
Speaker 1: going to get him. The walls they're closing in because
Speaker 1: you realize, even if they don't actually manage to prove anything,
Speaker 1: because there is no criminality, the process is the punishment.
Speaker 1: They're able to use this as a tool against Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and that's all they really care about. If they're wrong,
Speaker 1: in the long run, it doesn't change what's going on here,
Speaker 1: which is that they're just bringing a narrative of Trump
Speaker 1: as a criminal so that their mainstream media allies are sorry,
Speaker 1: corporate media allies are going to run with that endlessly.
Speaker 1: And then beyond that, if they do manage to get
Speaker 1: a manage to bring an indictment against Trump, which I
Speaker 1: think is a better than fifty fifty chance on the
Speaker 1: Marlago docs alone. Right now, what does that mean we
Speaker 1: can't actually have a free and fair election. They're going
Speaker 1: to prosecute the Republican candidate on some nonsense. The answer
Speaker 1: is yeah, that seems like where it is. It's going
Speaker 1: to be a crazy time in American politics the next
Speaker 1: couple of years. Friends, We're gonna have so much to
Speaker 1: talk about. I'm honored that you're here with me. I
Speaker 1: was going to be out today, by the way, I know,
Speaker 1: I was supposed to go shooting with some friends, some
Speaker 1: former seals and my brothers, but there was so much
Speaker 1: flooding in my area. I'm down here in Florida right
Speaker 1: now that I wasn't able to I wasn't able to
Speaker 1: go shooting today. So that's why I'm here with the
Speaker 1: show today. But I will be back tomorrow and I'll
Speaker 1: be in except for Thursday, obviously Thanksgiving Day with you
Speaker 1: every day this week and just talking today and my
Speaker 1: team about how we're gonna be building out more here
Speaker 1: in the studio soon. It's going to start to look
Speaker 1: actually like a studio. You've just got it. Under construction
Speaker 1: right now, so I appreciate your patience. For those who
Speaker 1: are rumble watchers, I know it's been The Waynes World
Speaker 1: basement is way fancier looking than this. I don't know
Speaker 1: what i'd call it. It It looks a little bit like
Speaker 1: we're in some kind of a dungeon in here, but
Speaker 1: that's because we're building it out as we go. We're
Speaker 1: building this pirate ship as it's sale else and I
Speaker 1: we'll talk to you more tomorrow. She'll tie