WEBVTT - Rupert Murdoch and Alternative Facts

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course Rupert Murdoch and alternative Facts. Right,

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you can already guess where I'm coming down on this one.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>There are no such things as alternative facts. There are

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>alternative perspectives, of course, but facts are facts, despite whatever

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>spin Kellyan Conway tried to deploy during the Trump years.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We can disagree about how to interpret facts, but there

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they remain stubborn things. When stubborn people collide with stubborn things,

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>When the like of Rupert Murdoch assembles a media empire

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>largely designed to embrace and disseminate disinformation, you have the

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>makings of a Crash Course episode. Murdoch, the ninety two

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>year old progenitor the Fox News Miasma, recently retired from

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>his perch atop Fox Corp and News Corp. Fox owns

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>various Fox media and broadcasting properties. News Corp. Pulls over

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more straight arrow enterprises like a Wall Street Journal and HarperCollins,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as a handful of brass knuckle tabloids that

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have cut swaths through new York, London and Sydney. But

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Fox is likely to define Murdoch's legacy a legacy. Some

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of his former executives now reject. Three of them jointly

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>noted in a recent public statement, and I quote we

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>never envisioned and would not knowingly have enabled, the disinformation

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>machine that, in our opinion, Fox has become. For his part,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch seems untroubled barrier mistakes, he likes to say. Joining

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>me today is Molly Jong Fast, a special correspondent for

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair, a ubiquitous TV commentator, and the host of

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fast Politics podcast. Molly is shrewd, candid and unspinnable.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about Murdoch, the media, and the

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>epic disinformation cyclones surrounding us. Howdy Molly, Hi, how are

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you ell? I'm glad to have you on.

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad to join you.

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So the departure point for talking about Rupert Murdoch's career

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and his legacy, I say, I have a hard time

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>believing that a noted hard worker and control freak like

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch, who assembled this giant empire of media assets

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>from scratch with a little help, you know, from an

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Australian paper he inherited from his father, will just let

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>go of the reins and let young Lachlan run the show.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that's the case. We'll talk about that. But

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know just first and foremost, what is

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch stepping down from his perch symbolized to you?

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about that?

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's a fake. Say again, this

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>is the question here when you have people who are

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>bad faith actors, like the Murdochs and Donald Trump, and

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, people where again and again they have told

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>you who they are. I want to believe them. So

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I put very little steak in what Rupert Murdoch says publicly,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and much more steak in whatever it is that he does.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, look this sort of death star,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the New York Posts, the Wall Street Journal, all Fox News.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Fox News is the most destructive of the trio.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But Fox News has got many other conservative media, you know,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the right side broadcasting. They've gone on American news, right streamers, Newsmax,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>so they are no longer just one cancer. There's a

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>metastasis right in our American media ecosystem. So I would

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>say that I don't put much steak in what Rupert

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>says or what lock row.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with, why do you think Rupert's being disingenuous?

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I have no reason to think one way

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 2>or the I mean, here's what I would say. I

0:03:55.320 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>think life imitates art, and he will probably stay controlling

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the company until he dies, as he did on the

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>HBO show Succession, which I know is not actually a biopic,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>but more and more it does seem like, you.

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Know, Rupert's mother, I think she lived till she was

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at least one hundred and twenty, but that might be

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>too high. It's definitely well north of one hundred. So

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he could, you know, if the genes are at tel

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Rupert could be with us, you know, for twenty more years.

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think what's relevant about Rupert Murdock stemming

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>down is that there is the acknowledgment here, there's the

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 2>tacit acknowledgment that someday he will die. And when he

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>does die, do you.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Think that's really the tacit acknowledgement He does because he thought, well,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to send his segal out to the

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>world that I recognize my own more.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Talent fatality at ninety two. I mean, you know, this

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>is not some like brave you know, shot across the

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>bow here. I mean, he's in his nineties. But I

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>would say this. I think that what is relevant about

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>this is that of eventually the kids are going to

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>have a fight because there are four kids, four voting kids,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and only one of them is an actual fascist or

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're not supposed to say fascist is fascist adjacent?

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Or is fascist friendly? Okay, yeah, is fascist friendly? So

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be a big fight and it'll be that,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I think is what is interesting.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Just so our listeners know that the Murdock's exercise control

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>over their media empire through a trust, and the kiddies

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>each have an equal stake. Lockin's running the show has

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one steak, but his.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Siblings Elizabeth and James, and there's one other one who's older.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they all have their own say, and there appear

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be of a different political persuasion than Lachlan. Some

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people anticipate a food fight.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>And then there are the younger kids who don't have

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>voting stakes, but who do have financial stakes. So I mean, eventually,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 2>when he dies, there will be a real reckoning for

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the station. But again, the thing about Fox, which I

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 2>think is import or to realize and was not true

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety six when it started, is that the

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>horse has already left the barn, right, like Pandora is

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 2>out of the box. Right. If Fox ends tomorrow, they're

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>still right side broadcasting. There's still Newsmax. There is such

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>little pushback to.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of the fact checking, fact checking and.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Pushback when they lie that they can get away with it.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about the ecosystem that Murdoch has built,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's worth pausing for a moment to think about

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how we got here, which is he rode test at

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this overseas. Yeah, first in Australia and then

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on Fleet Street, and then he came to America and

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>owned a succession of papers that he went to school on.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Originally the Village Voice, He had New York Magazine. At

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>one point he ended up with the New York Post,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>then he famously got the Wall Street Journal. Over a

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 1>period of decades. But Fox was the sort of realization

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>of some of the lessons he and overseas. Right.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think look, propaganda works, right, and

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>what we saw with the Dominion case, which I think

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>is really an important moment in American media studies.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Right is here, But I want to wait. I want

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to wait to get to this case. I just want

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit for a minute about the

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of thoughts itself long before dominion came along. You know,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>he built this network under Roger Ales that had a

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>combination of a news arm and commentators. But the real

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>mojo for the network where it's commentators. They tracked in

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories, seth Rich, birtherism, you know, the January sixth uprising,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>alternative viewpoints about what that meant over a period of decades.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that got traction?

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Why do I think it got traction? I think Look,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>tabloids have a long and storied history in America and

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Great Britain, and people like to read trash. I mean

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that is like, I feel like that is one of

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>our basest instincts. And for a long time politicians in

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 2>America at least had a sort of code and honor code. Right,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 2>so you know you would have a decorum, right, there'd

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>be Senate decorum and you still have it. It's interesting

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you still have a disconnect between the Senate and the House,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>right the House is significantly. People are much sleazier to

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>each other in the House and they're in the Senate.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Right in the Senate because you kind of it's a

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit more clubby, which can also be problematic sometimes.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think people liked that there was this kind

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of tabloidiness of it, and I think all right, And

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I also think that like one of the reasons why

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>this propaganda has really grown is because there are really

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 2>racist people in this country who see that they demographically

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 2>can't beat it, right, they can't win, right, they are

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>not having babies fast enough to keep this country white.

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And the racism the underlying I'm not even going to

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>say it's anxiety, because I don't think you should give

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 2>them the benefit of the doubt. The racism, the sort

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>of American racism which has I think long been an

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 2>undercurrent in life in America for centuries. Yeah, really got

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.359
<v Speaker 2>all flared up with this when they started to understand

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>this demographic change and then also when they started to

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>feel that they could not keep up the standards of

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>living that their parents had.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I mean, but that's anxiety as opposed

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to racism. You know, the idea that you can't keep

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>up your living standards. I'm not denying that they're obviously

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>racism and sent some of this as well, right, but

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it is informed by a number of factors, and I

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>do think economic anxiety is one of them, right.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But I also think the deep undercurrent, Right, you don't

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>get to Obama's birth certificate unless you're a racist, right,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't, because otherwise that's not insecurity about your job.

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>That's the belief that this man can possibly be one

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>of OZ because he's black.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Birtherism and Obama is a signal

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>moment because it involves so many things. Obama was presiding

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of an administration that was dealing with the fallout of

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a financial crisis, right, people feeling economically insecure. He was

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>black in a nation in which, you know, as you noted,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the demographics were working against white people. And he was

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>being pillaried in a media ecosystem that could make conspiracy

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>theories go viral and a way they hadn't before. And

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things to think about with

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Fox and its evolution is they put their finger on

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of this issue of discontent. When Roger Ales first

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>started the idea that there was this silent majority that

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't being heard from on the major networks, and they

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of took baby steps. When you look back into

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it now, you know, sort of soft conspiracy theories. The

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>institutions are against you, but they weren't wholesale trafficking initially

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in propaganda, racism and disinformation. And with each passing decade

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it became more and more severe. And I do think

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Birtherrism moment as when the floodgates began to

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>open and led right into the shoes of Donald Trump.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, and Trump was part of it, right.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>This is like the Tea Party, you know, the Tea

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Party is this sort of rage towards institutions for not

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 2>delivering what you want. And then you've got from there

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Birtherrism and the beginning of Donald Trump. I mean, hell

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>has no fury like a white man told he might

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>have to be the same as everyone else.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Murdoch is clearly a newsman in the old

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fashioned sense of it. He's liked newsrooms, he's liked reporters,

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>he's owned properties that do do quote unquote straight news reporting.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But he also knows what he's unleashed on the other

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>side of that ledger, which is again propaganda disinformation, playing

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>people's worst emotions. I think I know the answer to

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this one, but I always like hearing other people's thoughts

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.359
<v Speaker 1>on it. Why do you think he likes to luxuriate

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the cesspool while also funding old fashioned news gathering.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>So I actually think that there was a moment, or

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 2>at least two moments that I can think of, where

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Murdoch tried to pump the brakes on Fox and it

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>was too late, and so instead of stopping the propaganda,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they lost market share. I think at some point he

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 2>realized that he was no longer driving the bus off

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the cliff, that the bus was going on autopilot off

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the cliff. Now I still don't think he gets any

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>credit for that, but I do think he's savvy enough

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 2>to know that at this point the monster he has

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>no control anymore.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So what are the two moments?

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Moment is first, when Trump starts to get the nomination,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 2>sometime between twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, he realizes that

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>this guy's going to be the nominee, he doesn't want

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it and there's nothing he can do right. And then

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>he's going to win. And then after January sixth, they

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>all said like, we're going to stop doing this, and

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't because they saw their numbers go down. I mean,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>count is not really the right word, and they didn't.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think that's the other moment.

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you're saying that he luxuriated in the cesspool

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because he had created an unstoppable machine, not because he

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>liked rubbing it all over his arms and legs.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he wants money. I think all he cares

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>about is money, and I think that this was the

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>winning formula and by the time that door was open,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 2>he just was like, you know, look, this is an

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>incredibly competitive business, and I think this guy cares more

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>about winning than about like American democracy. I don't think

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Ripper Murdoch wakes up in the morning and is like, oh,

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I might be ruining America's democracy. I think he's like,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are good, the numbers are bad.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And famously he's used his media holdings to flex It

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>gives him enormous way in the business world, it gives

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>them enormous way in the political world.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 2>You want to win. You don't get to be a

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>billionaire like that. Unless you just don't And I curse,

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>now I can't curse. You don't care about anything but winning.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, famously he even had editors who went

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>around wire tapping people. Whether the extent to which Rupert

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>knew about that or didn't was debated in a courtroom.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But he did establish a culture of very brass knuckled

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>approach to digging into people's business and sort of threatening

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>enemies perceived or actual.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, of course, I mean the guy is that,

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, we don't spend enough time I say this

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>as someone who grew up very not wealthy myself, but

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>in a place where I was exposed to a lot

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of wealthy people. We don't spend enough time talking about

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the kind of extreme I want to say, ambition and

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 2>lack of compassion. One must have to make billions of dollars.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's fair to say that billionaires

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>are not like you and I that.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>They offer although I would say I do know compassionate billionaires, right,

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and I do know billionaires who have high standards. And

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that Rupert is an unusual amalgam of low standards,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>no standards, variable standards, professed high standards and it would

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>seem a almost complete lack of compassion.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean right, and he also in his mind whatever.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>We can't know what's in his mind, but the pure

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>ambition does not lend itself to compassion.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>On that note, I'm going to take a break so

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we can hear from our sponsor and we'll come right back.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We're back with Molly John Fast, Vanity fair scribe. We're

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the arc in a very brief, compressed

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>way of Rupert Murdoch's career. He's handed the reins off

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to his sons. One thing I just want to touch

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>back on is this idea of what changed in the

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>propagandic ecosystem in the sort of seventies, eighties, nineties up

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to the notts and now because I think of you know,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>past events where people's jaw dropped the Willie Horton ad.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, when Michael Ducaccus was running for president, Fox

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>calling Florida early for George W. Bush when the final

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>vote tally in his race against Al Gore was still

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>being calculated. Those sorts of things at the time were

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>much debated and seen as sort of grotesque manifestations of

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hardball politics and a kind of unreltting news environment. But

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>none of it really seems again to me to be

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on the same par with what began when Barack Obama

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>became president. Even the Clintons. I think the Clintons would complain,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as Hillary did, you know, vast right wing conspiracy. I

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't even think the Clintons were really exposed to the

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>same kinds of things that Barack Obama was. And so

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I do see Obama the Obama presidency assist departure point

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>along with the rise of social media and then the

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>advent of Donald Trump. We talked a little bit earlier

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about that demarcation, but I want to talk about it

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more now in terms of how you

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think about that.

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, look, social media. I think social media

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>is amazing and good because I came of age I

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 2>started writing in the nineties, and there were just so

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>many gatekeepers, right. You'd write a piece for Vogue, and

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe it would go up, and maybe it would get

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>thrown out. You know, you'd pitch the editorial page of

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the New York Post. You know, there were just gatekeeper

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>after gatekeeper after gatekeeper, and I think that was the

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>way it was, but it would sometimes cause really interesting

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>voices to not be able to break through. And so

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>what I do think is really cool about social media

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>is that you do have people like I was watching

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>this TikTok the other day of this amazing guy who's

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>like a brilliant pundit who there is no way you

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 2>would ever have heard of this person was it not

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 2>for TikTok? And I am just delighted by it every day. Unfortunately,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think that I really do look at

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Congress as this sort of biggest screen.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's putting the car before the

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>horse to go to Congress. So I agree with you, well,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, go ahead.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Things were not regulated properly in the beginning because people

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't understand it, and so you know, content was kind

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of given away for free and then all of a sudden,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and again I blame I was going to say, equal

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 2>parts Congress and media companies for not being able to

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>see what was coming, and then all of a sudden

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>we all had to backpedal and say, like, you like

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 2>our free content, now will you willing to pay forty

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>bucks a year for it?

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, very smart analysis as well is

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have conflicted feelings about the idea of gatekeepers.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>As you've pointed out gatekeepers especially in the you know,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the classic big metro newspaper era, three network era, it

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was largely white men. It became privileged white men who

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>stood atop those various institutions, and it meant that diverse

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>few points didn't come into the newsroom. It meant that

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a variety of subjects didn't get covered, and meant that

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>talented people like you in a previous era wouldn't have

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>gotten a shot. So social broke apart that kind of

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>media monopoly on the intellectual and creative side. And I

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's important and worthy.

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, to pause you for a second,

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>because like, I come from a family of like I'm

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 2>a NEPO. I don't want to say baby, but NEPO

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 2>middle aged. So let's not cry for me, Argentina.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Here should we tell the audience about your elements?

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, my mom was writer, my grandfather was a writer,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>or they're both day No, my mother is still alive. Sorry,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>sorry mom, Sorry mom, But I'm just saying I don't

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>know that. I think I was quite lucky by being

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 2>born where I was born, But I dot.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You're also being modest. Now you also have your own

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>collection of talents, right that had to get discovered in

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a specific way.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that you know, there are a

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of people for whom the you know, social media

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>has been in Sorry, go on, So yes, I didn't

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>mean to interrupetw No, No, it's.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>All good, and I agree with that. I also think

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a positive side to gatekeeping m HM, which

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is being a screen for value. Now, if it's just

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of people with their hands on the

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>gate then what you're screening for has very narrow parameters.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you also are concerned that propaganda, racism, right,

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>negative aspects of how we communicate or live or act

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in the world shouldn't just be plastered all over people's

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs twenty four to seven or pumped into their ears

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven, or put in their papers twenty

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>four to seven, gatekeepers play and important. That's true, and

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that is where social media has completely dropped the ball,

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've lived under this. I think canard that, well,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we're technology platforms. We had Facebook and Twitter and TikTok

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>are just technology platforms and we are just here to

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>let everything blossom and we can't play any role in

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>telling people to go the other way right, and that

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>has been lost. Along with the privilege that disappeared. The

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gatekeeping role has really been, I think disastrously watered down.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I agree, and I.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Think there's a certain longing people now have for clarity

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>around facts. Where do facts reside? Who assesses them? Can

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>media be a vehicle for actually finding commonality having civic discussions.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very hard right now, and I'm not

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about it, But I was wondering if you are

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 2>It about facts coming back?

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, about the ability to have narratives that people

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>can consider dispassionately, with an eye towards problem solving, as

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>opposed to mudslinging, with an eye towards creating good policy,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to saying policy doesn't exist, with an eye

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>towards communicating better because we're a diverse community, as opposed

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to using it to create for their divisions. You know,

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the proactive positive side of media.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 2>I mean again, media reflects the culture, right, so you know,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>we could like sit down and talk about the people

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>on the opinion side at the New York Times or

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 2>at the Washington Post or at the Wall Street Journal.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 2>But I actually think when I think about that question,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I think of, like I do a podcast too, where

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I interview nine guests a week and I talk to

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of politicians, and like, I don't think media

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 2>solves its problems itself, but there are some pretty exciting

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I interviewed Congresswoman Summer Lee, who I've interviewed before,

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>and she was talking about you know, she had a

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 2>statement that Menendez needs to resign. Robert Menendez, demo from

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, who is.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Face with lots of gold bars.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>He's facing his second set of indictments. Gold bars, Mercedes

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is half of that.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff in pockets.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but she had said, you know, we're not going

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to we have no moral high ground if we don't

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>take it, and we cannot be the party that tells

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Clarence Thomas he has to resign after going to two

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>different Koch Brothers summits. If we have a senator who's

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 2>googling how much can you sell a gold bar for?

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a high minded thought, and I don't disagree

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think there's a moral thing there that

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you're airing on the podcast. There's a point being driven towards.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>But I'm talking about sort of the broader world we

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>live in right now, when people are surrounded, particularly via

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>social by raw propaganda and disinformation, and not by strong

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations about a moral way to be a senator or

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what is and isn't breaking the law. I'm worried about

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the broader world that in right now.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, with this disinformation, misinformation, the propaganda stuff.

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I worry about it, and I would love Congress to

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>do more legislating on it, and they have an opportunity

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to which they have continually let the orse out of

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the barn. But I do worry about it, and I

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly worry about, you know, this continual death of local news.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But I also I don't know. I mean, maybe this

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>is a moral failing on my part, But I'm a

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit hopeful because we have seen this is not

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen where Trump won, you know, because we saw

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 2>online there was a story about John Podesta and spirit

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 2>cooking and comet ping pong, right like we've actually seen

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>in the last bunch of elections, Republicans have underperformed even

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>when they have said, you know, blatant lies about a candidate.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm thinking about like herschel Walker versus Reverend Warnock, right,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Like that was a race where the Republicans were pumping

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>out a lot of information about Reverend Warnock and he

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 2>still won. So I am a little bit more hopeful

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 2>about that. There is definitely a fair amount of Misteve

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Banna calls of flooding the zone with you know, but

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that it works quite the same way

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 2>it used to.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that's because voters and viewers have

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>become more sophisticated because of the barrage of muck, that

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they've become more able to sort of discern reality from fiction.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, But I do know that my husband

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>sent me a picture of a raccoon eating a piece

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of pizza on top of a garbage can, and I

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>immediately wrote back, is that real? So I do think

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>like we are much more savvy in a certain way.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that seven years ago I would have

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.239
<v Speaker 2>said is that real? I probably would have been like,

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>where did you see that?

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think what we've gone through these phases in

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Murdoch Trump Waltz that we've seen since twenty fifteen.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It begins with Bill O'Reilly in a kind of lighter

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>version of pumping the gas. And then you get to

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Sean Hannity, where he's very much in the tank with Trump.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>They're talking on the phone, He's making up excuses for

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump on air. When Trump's numerous liaisons with other women

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>come into the public purview, Sean Hannity is saying, well,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just look at King David. He had five hundred consorts,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and all these other absurdities to explain away

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the grotesque immorality of it all. And then we wind

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>up with Tucker Carlson, who is an open propagandist. He

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>creates alternative narratives whether Trump is there or not. And

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so it suggests to me that Trump is, and the

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>media cohort next to it can last well beyond Rupert

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch and well beyond Donald Trump, because it'll always will

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be another Tucker Carlson who realizes, you don't need Trump

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or Murdoch to make this work.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to. I feel like you're making

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 2>me be the hopeful one here, Tim that's not gone.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>No one wants that.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I want you to road test if I'm

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>being too unhopeful.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So Look, Chucker Colson, in my mind, was one of

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the scariest as someone who has had seen what he's

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>done to people he targeted. He was really, in my mind,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the sort of scariest of those kind of

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>people out.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>There, especially because he was really good at it.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was really good. Look, I think the thing

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>that we don't talk about enough, and I'm sorry to

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 2>tell you I'm gonna again be optimistic here. I don't

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>know what's happening, but after January sixth, a lot of

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump supporters went to jail. They went to jail for

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 2>doing what Trump told them to do, right on us, yes,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And so what that did is it had a chilling effect,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe not on all of them, but certainly on some

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of them. Right they realized that like you do crime,

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 2>even for your guy, you go to jail. And that's

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>why we have people going to jail in this country

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>because the idea is and again it doesn't always work, certainly,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>but accountability causes people to stop doing things. And so

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's worth thinking about. You know, Trump

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 2>has had four indictments and each time he has not

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 2>had huge crowds show up at the courtrooms.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Remember in Georgia. There was a lot of anxiety that

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>closed down the streets. They closed down to this, They

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 2>goes on that, and in the end it was really

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>not a huge crowd. I also think, and again, there

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 2>was a time and I say this not from like

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>reporting I've done, but just from my own experiences online

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 2>as a woman online, there were times during the Trump

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 2>administration when things were really hot, like you could get

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>really a lot of death threats in a minute. These guys, yeah,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>these guys were You were just getting death threats and

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>death threats and death threats. That seems to have pooled

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 2>down a little bit. And you know, Tucker Carlson, he was.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the thing about Fox, which I think is

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>important to realize is that Fox always wins. They're like

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the house right with these reporters, reporters, with their opinion hosts.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>They always win. So like they fire Bill O'Reilly and

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Reilly went on to have a podcast and not

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>really do anything, and they fired Tucker, who was their

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 2>biggest rainmaker. And Tucker is doing a thing on X

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 2>but it's not really it's sort of no consequence. And

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Tucker's gone from like this major voice to so if

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>we were a year ago and Tucker were still on

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the air, he'd be telling Matt Gates what to do.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 2>There was a time last year when Tucker Carlson was

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>telling Republicans in Congress that they needed to start a commission.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember what it was called, but a commission

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to investigate the January sixth Commission. So he was like

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>giving direct orders to mentor legislators. Yeah, that doesn't happen anymore.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So I actually think Tucker Carlson was unique because he

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 2>was much smarter than most of those people and really

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>uniquely dangerous.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And that happy note, We're going to take another break

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear from your sponsor. My friend the Optimist will

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be coming back, and we will be back shortly. I'm

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>back with Molly Jong, fast writer, podcast host and professional gadfly. So, Molly,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the road behind us and the

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>road we've just emerged from in terms of the media

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>colliding with the Murdoch Empire and with political haymaking. Rupert

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>stepped out of the game, at least temporarilier. He'll be

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more behind the scenes. What do you think about going

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>into the twenty twenty four election in terms of the

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>media's relationship through overcoming disinformation and propaganda in the interests

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of fact gathering, while also being plain about when people

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are trying to spin them or lie to them. You know,

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a bill of particulars that are hard for a

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of media organizations to balance.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Well. One of the things that I'm the most concerned

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 2>about is the false equivalencies, and that I think really

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the road to another Trump presidency is lined with you know,

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I listened to a really straight news reported podcast. I'm

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to mention it because I'm going to be

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>really critical now, and these are very smart, really mainstreamy

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>straight reporters, but they are addicted to the ada I think.

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I know the podcast, I think to the idea of

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>both sides sort of having equal ways.

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, and just that somehow the you know, Trump tried

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to end democracy, he tried to end it, right, and

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Biden news three years older than Trump. These two things

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 2>are not equivalent, and so I do think that is

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a big problem. I also think Republicans, and not even Republicans,

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 2>this sort of far right heritage crew have worked the

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 2>refs so hard that every time a mainstream medium political

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 2>editor is looking over a piece he's saying like, do

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 2>we seem too liberal? Does this seem to have a

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>liberal bias? And again that is not how this is

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>supposed to go. Right. You need have a democracy bias,

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 2>not a political biab.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, and the healthy question is do we have it right?

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And accounting for how biases can shape what you think

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong is I do think there's a good, strong,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>honorable legacy in mainstream news gathering about assuming you're ignorant,

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>assuming you need to dig a little further to get

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>towards where the truth resides, and that trying to do

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that on breaking news in an anodyne, programmatic way serves

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a purpose. I think the problem in the Trump era

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is that process ran up against a man who's a

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pathological liar and who had self interest ahead of everything else,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and the media, I think had a hard time figuring

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>out how you package what he was about using traditional methods,

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think going into twenty twenty four it's possibly

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>even more pressing than it wasn't twenty sixteen that the

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>media learned to shed some of its traditions so people

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>can understand the reality around them.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right. I mean I also think

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>this guy is unprecedented. Right, You're not covering a normal politician.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But they had said I would say, like the Republican

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>parties talked to talk to fascism, right or tap to

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>an anti democratic I mean, right now we have Al

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Obama fighting with the Supreme Court about their refusal to

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 2>redraw the maps. This Supreme Court, which is a very

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Trump heavy six ' three court, right.

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Which believes in federalism and letting the states have more.

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Work, leeves in federalism, which believes in originalism, which isn't

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 2>even a thing, which believes that you know that women

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>can be beaten by their husbands if it's smaller than

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 2>a thumb. Obviously, I'm speaking hyperbolically here, but I do

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>think that, you know, this Republican Party has really turned

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 2>on democratic norms. So I think there is a feeling

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 2>in mainstream media that you cannot be hysterical, that you

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>cannot be emotional, that you must be calm and look

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 2>at things squarely, which is true. But if Donald Trump

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>gets re elected, we may no longer have elections. So

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you can be calm and look

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 2>squarely at the end of democracy that way.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think this tension is between quote unquote

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fact based reporting and accurate reporting, because not all accurate

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>reporting only involves the fact pattern and involves interpreting intent,

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and Trump has long broadcast his intent in a way

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that isn't simply about fact checking, and the media I

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think has lacked certainly. I think in twenty fifteen and

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen early warning systems portraying that and educating people

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>about it. I think the reality of his presidency put

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media back on its feet, and there's another bite

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of the apple coming in. I think a lot of

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the coverage of the January sixth insurrection showed the media

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in better form. But in that case, everyone could agree

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that breaking into the capital overtly and being violent on

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the steps of the Capitol was a bad thing, regardless

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of the spin that was tried to put around interpreting

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that event. I think Trump still roll forward with this

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that because he's a presidential candidate, he gets treated

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with a certain amount of distance and introspection that doesn't

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>actually reflect what he's about and what he's doing.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right. I also think that that

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>they're just the framing. It's so hard to get out

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 2>of the framing. One of the things that I do

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 2>think the media has done that's really good is they

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 2>no longer we'll say things like I mean, I was

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this weekend where Trump threatened General Milly with execution.

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Executing a former general. Yes, way that czars and pharaohs

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the past did it.

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Not a very normal thing for a healthy democracy When

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>he said that, I think previous iterations of the mainstream

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>media covering Trump would have had does Milly deserve to die?

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 2>You know as a headline. Now, what I think is

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>interesting is there's just sort of been silence, which actually

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 2>think is awesome, so bad, but in a different way.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 2>So remember Trump in twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, the number

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 2>was that he had about two billion dollars in free

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>media from saying crazy stuff and having it reported credulously.

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 2>So now I think we have another problem, but it's

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a different problem, which is he's not getting that free media,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 2>but people aren't seeing what he's doing.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not getting the air you know to float his balloon.

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But people also aren't being critical of what he's doing

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and covering the sort of the dimensions of it in

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a robust enough way. Yeah, So what is the structure

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that solves this problem in your mind? I have a

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>thought about that. But what is an overarching approach to

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this that you think would remedy this.

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know, you tell me.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think part of it is just being

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive about how things are packaged for viewers and

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for readers and for listeners. I think you can have

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>very short, just the facts, ma'am, kinds of synopsies of

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>events that give people a general handle on what occurred

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't need to take sides. But I don't think

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that should exist is the only take. I think that's

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>why commentary exists. I think that's why news analysis exists,

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think papers and broadcasters with the ability to

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do it should be more aggressive about packaging those things

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>together to give their audience a fuller picture of what

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the world's really about, and do it in a highly responsible,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but very aggressive way. I think that that's the traditional

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>role of the meeting. I think the media just has

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to adapt to the fact that there's more disinformation and

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>propaganda out there that has to be taken on head

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on and chewed up and exposed for what it is.

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing is that social media companies

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be brought to heal. I think they have

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>to be treated the same way as traditional media organizations.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to police their platforms for garbage

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and disinformation and hate speech in the same way that

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional publications have done it. I think those are two

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>strong steps towards getting there. But that might be too simplistic.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Come up.

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the question is is section two thirty

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>good or you know, should media company is not be

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>responsible for what is published on there?

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean Section two thirty was invented at a time

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>when media platforms were being built from scratch, and it

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was a way to give startups without a lot of

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>money a way to get content that they didn't have

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to police so they could get their feet on the ground.

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Those same platforms, a number of them emerged as major

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>multimedia forces that I think now should police what's on

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>their pages, or their platforms or their airwaves. And I

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 1>think that Section two thirty shouldn't give Facebook or Twitter

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a free past towards again bringing up this ugly word,

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but being better gatekeepers.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I agree.

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>When you look at where we are right now, do

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you see a media organization doing it in a way

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that you think is right. Is there a media organization

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that you think has a good playbook?

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a hard question. There are a lot of journalists

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>that I really say back writing a lot of really

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 2>interesting stuff. You know, what is so interesting about the

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 2>moment we are in is more and more everything becomes decentralized. Right, So, like,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 2>there are people I always read at the New York Times,

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 2>people I always read about any Fair, people I always

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 2>read at The Atlantic, people I always read at the

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Washington Post. There are people I love at the New Yorker.

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So I would say what's pretty interesting is like these

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of brands have in my mind. I don't read

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 2>something necessarily because of where it is. I read it

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>because of who wrote it.

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So the personal filter becomes more important.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's not always true, And I'll read

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 2>all the sort of politics vertical at the Washington Post

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and the New York Times or but I tend to

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>like their opinion writers who I just skip them.

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I always like to end the pods with asking people

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about what they've learned, what they know now that they

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't know before. Molly does Rupert Murdoch dissent from the

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>top of Fox and the evolution of Fox over the

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>last decades teach you anything about the way that the

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>media ecosystem in the Murdoch ero works.

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I just think you can never underestimate the way that

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 2>some people just want to watch the world burn.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So you sees though you are actually the pessimist

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>after all this back and forth about who's the opertor

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>who's the pessimist. I mean, I don't necessarily disagree. I mean,

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the Republican political agenda is to

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>defenestrate the federal government, and Donald Trump would just like

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to burn the house down rather not being given re entry.

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's true. But the extent to which

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people will sort of enjoy the conflagration is a trippy

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>element of all that.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I also think Donald Trump just wants to stay out

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of jail. I mean, you know, I think that at

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, the man just thinks like

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 2>this will keep him out of jail, and we cannot

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.720
<v Speaker 2>underestimate the kind of motivator that is for him.

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>That's a discusion for the next time you come on

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk with me, Mollie, because we're out of time today.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining me.

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Molly jong Fast is a special correspondent for Vanity Fair

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and the hosts of the Fast Politics podcast. You can

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>find her on Twitter at Molly jong Fast. Here at

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>crash Course, we believe that collisions can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising,

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and always instructive. In today's Crash Course, I learned that

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I may be perceived by some as a pessimist, even

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>though I've always thought of myself as an optimist. But

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>given the media sworld that we're in now, I have

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to say I feel very pessimistic. What did you learn?

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet at

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Opinion handle at Opinion or me at Tim

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:47.439
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our show wherever you're listening right now and

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:52.959
<v Speaker 1>leave us a review. It helps more people find the show.

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by the indispensable Anna Maserakas, Moses

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Ondam and me, our supervib producers Magnus Hendrickson, and we

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>had editing help from Sage Bauman, Katie Boyce, Jeff Grocott,

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nize, and Christine Vanden. Bilart Blake Maple says, our

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sound engineering and our original theme song was composed by

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien. We'll be back next week

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>with another crash course.