WEBVTT - Week 8

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the Fan, presented by Green Built Premium

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and Devanny's, your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>football speculation and advice. Fantasy Football Weekly is brought to

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you by fanball dot Com, town Hall Family, Greater Twin Cities,

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Honda Dealers, Shoe Sensors, Hudson Ford and by Park Tavern

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>now Wow, along with fanball dot Com Scott Fish, Matt Harrison,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson. Here's the fans, Paul Charchi in Welcome

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to Week number eight. Fantasy players. Some of you already

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in a big hole if you went up against DeShawn Watson.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I was worried going into that matchup that Watson would

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>um would be overshadowed by a running game that I

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>thought would be very successful. And the running game was,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 1>but Watson went absolutely berserk. I thought they might rest

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>him with the chest injury. Didn't matter. My co host today,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish, Brian Johnson, Hello, guys, Hey, how's it going

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>very good? Thank you uh and a celebration of sorts.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Landry, our longtime producer for the show, final shift

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>of his final show before leaving the state to go

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>reap his fortunes on the East Coast. We will miss you.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We got to abuse the sound bar as much as

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at the button bar. The only reason we have a

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>functional button bar. That's right, keep the vulture on hand.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>There's the vulture right there. Yes, that's all the beauty

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>right there. My last of a peacock will be the

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lasting legacy of Tony Landry. There days, Baby, Tony, you're

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting a beer after the show. I don't see why

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't, like I got an apartment to clean or

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>anything to do. But beers sound great. Beer is good.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what beer is really good? The official beer

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football grain Belt Premium. Many thanks for our decade

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>long sponsor grain Belt Premium. Don't forget to play the

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the free Crush charts challenge at grain belt dot com.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>When two thousand dollars in a trip to Manny's Steakhouse

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for our winners banquet in January, it's one of the

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>highlights of my year. It's awesome. Many thanks for friends

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>at the brewery. They keep doing this year after year,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Sean Ryan and Brett Moss and Lee

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Wendinger and Chad and Jody Marty and then the general

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>manager at Manny's Dave Wilson of course, Uh, guys plenty

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to get to. Over the course of the show, will

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>do three hot questions. We will take a handful of calls,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe even before Lightning round, which might happen as well.

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>We will also give you premature speculation nine players upon

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>whom to take a chance. And let's dive into the

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Eagles and the Jaguars, another early Saturday game. I know

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>some of you got screwed on this deal with Melvin

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Gordon last week. Yeah, yeah, just go set your Saturday

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lineup right now for Saturday morning and a clock. Yeah,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and the alarm clock. I tweeted that to literally set

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>because we saw this on Saturday, so like midday Saturday,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when Melvin Gordon was going to be a game time decision,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, you're Melvin Gordon owner, it's not crazy

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to set your alarm clock for seven o'clock so you

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>know if he's in or out, um and that as

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it turned out, that would have probably been a good move.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But I know some of you got burned on this.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that won't be the case here, Scott. Let's jump

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>into Eagles taking on the Jaguars. Jack for all the

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>problems that Jaguars have. Defense is still pretty good and uh,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>London is a great place for Bortles, so again, it's

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>got a good London track Lewis last year. Yeah, but

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll start on the eagle side with Wentz in that

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>passing game. The Jaguars have been pretty tough, but they

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>are missing going to be missing three corner three, three

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive backs for this one, two of them that didn't

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>even make the trip, including a j Bowie boy. Excuse me. Uh,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Wentz has at least two hundred and seventy five yards

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and multiple touchdowns in four straight The Jags have held

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone but Mahomes under two thirty five. They're barely allowing

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, but Mahomes had three hundred, Prescott had two touchdowns,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Brady had two touchdowns. I think it's an okay matchup

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>for Wentz here. I gave him a B grade in

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Jeffrey also gave a B grade. The

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Jags allowing the fewest receiving yards and just the second

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fewest receiving touchdowns to wide receivers this year. It's pretty

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough. But since returning from injury, he has at

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>least seventy yards and at least one touchdown in three

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of those four games, and he's averaging over ten targets

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a game, seven catches in each. The only dud was

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. I think he's going to be solid here.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I I give him a B grade. I very close

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to him in A grade. But I think this Jags

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>defense still going to be pretty tough C grade for

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>with all those defensive back injuries. I think that he's

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, and the third string against lot corners,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the third string slot corner. I like Nelson game. Yeah.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The only problem is is insanely low, like seven yards

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>per catch rate he's got. He's got five games under

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards and in all those games he had

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>like four or five six seven catches. You know, it's

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem there. Cole Beasley from the slot a

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago had a really good game, so

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I did get agg egg RC grade. I think he's

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>startable arts A grade. The Jags have held down most

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the tight ends they faced, but allowed Kelsey to

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>explode on them. The difference, he was the only tight

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>end to see over five targets on the Jags. Art's

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is Averagina eleven per game. He's gonna have no trouble.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have no trouble at all for a small

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Wood and Clement. Uh small Wood is he's starting and

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>he's out snapping. Clement so and he's getting goal and works.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So although the Jags are top ten against running backs

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this season, they are bottom half in the last three weeks.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh so recently they're not quite as good their number

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>one against backs in the receiving game. That's tough. I

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>do like Smallwood for a C grade and Clement for

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade. Though the last three running backs to

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>play the Jags all topped eighty seven yards. Right, that's good.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give a caveat there. It took twenty two carries,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and over the last two years, no Eagles back has

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>had more than eighteen carries. That's the problem. Ya, small

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was not going to get that, but he's going to

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>get the majority. He's barely startable, but I did give

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>him se grade. On the Jag side, London, Blake Bortles

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>has eight touchdowns in the last three games in London.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles have a lot of multiple touchdowns and or

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards to three of the last four quarterbacks

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they played. It would be just like the NFL for

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>portals to look just dreadful. Then show up for this

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you your Super Bowl champion Eagles, and then have a

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>big game. Exactly. That's I gave him a C grade

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>because he could be benched by halftime, or he could

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be London Blake Bortles. Uh, Cole I benched killing Cole Westbrook.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I also benched. His numbers have gone down every week

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>since Week four for Cole, four games under forty five

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>yards in the last five chart, seven targets out of

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>nowhere last week. But he's still bench. We can't trust him.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a SEA grade to Donte Moncrief. Weirdly, Blake

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Bartles has targeted his big receiver, whether it be the

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end or a big receiver, in most of those

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 1>eight touchdowns in London, and uh, he's a mon Creef

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 1>has had thirty three targets in the last four games

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>over seventy five yards, and three of them kind of

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>craped the bat against Dallas. But Phil is allowing the

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>third most receptions and fifth most yards to wide receivers.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think mon Creeve is playable here all right. As

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for Hide and yelled in I had this flipped, but

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna flip it again right here. With reports that

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Hyde might see six of the touches, I'm flipping over

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to I think I might flip to Bench and both

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.679
<v Speaker 1>honestly until I see what I think you showed against

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. I was going to give Hide a bench

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and yelled in a see because through the through the

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>area the Eagles can be you know, played against. But

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just benching now with these new reports that Hides

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>canna see more work. Yeah, and for Hide now you can't.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't really want to start him against a great

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Eagles run defense, maybe the best in the NFL, and

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>his first game back, we don't know how much the

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>playbook even knows and ever what his usage will be. Yeah,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then he gets to buy. Then he gets Leonard for

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Net coming back. And this is why I've been saying,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a real scenario out there where you

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>could just drop Hide or try to trade Hide maybe

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>come now, you know you know that's there? Is that right?

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean? The Fortnet thing is still a huge, huge

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>question mark. And if Fortnette doesn't come back, well, then

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Hide becomes a quasi flex player every week. Who knows,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta believe for net by now after after

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from now, he's got to be ready, right,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you think you'd think Let's move on Brown's taking on

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Brian Um expected a lot more from the

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Browns against a terrible Tampa secondary last week, and now

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they get another bad secondary. Do you feel better about

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield this week? And do you think he improves

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>upon a mediocre performance last week? Yeah, you would hope.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So these teams didn't meet in Week one with the

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Browns entirely different team. Tyrod Taylor started that game. Carlos

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Hide was on the team. They were also playing in

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>the tail end of a hurricane. Literally that's you never

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>think whatever hit Cleveland, but yeah I did. So let's

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>start with you know, Hide obviously gone. Let's start with

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chub real quick. Hide had twenty two carries in

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that Week one game against pitt Pittsburgh, but since then,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>only one other opposing running back has top to eleven

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>carries against the Steelers. UH teams are running under thirty

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the time against them. Game scripts do

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not favor backs on the ground. Chubb actually had twenty

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one yards on three carries in the opener, so if

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you extrapolate that seven yards per carry, he gets fifteen.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's only in a flexi level play for me

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the volume, it's not gonna be their fifteen

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>carries is very ceilings. So just to see for him, Uh,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you think could be a game for Duke Johnson, but

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it is not. He's on the bench. The Steelers have

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>given up a league low three point five catches and

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>only twenty one receiving yards per game to running backs.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Duke Onie Mustard twenty five combo yards in the first

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>meeting on one catch, so he's on the pine Jarvis

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Landry complete opposite. He is in with an A grade

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>fifteen targets in week one. Only Adam Feeland has logged

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>more games with at least ten targets and the ten

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns the Steelers have allowed, which is a lot,

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>six have gone to spot Seavers and Landry had a

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>great game in the opener, so he's a safe, safe play.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callaway. Though he's on the bench. He's had frying

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>panhans of late, lots of drops, only two targets last week.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Just mentioned that Landry saw fifteen targets in the first meeting.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>All the other Cleveland wide receivers combined for only eight

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>targets in that first game. Callaway had just one, So

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he's on the bench. But David and Joku another a

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for Cleveland. Pittsburgh has allowed the most receptions, the sixth

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>most yards, and been tied for the seven most touchdowns

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to tight ends. The Ravens tight ends total ten

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>catches for ninety nine yards against the Steelers, and Joco

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>was in a smash spot here this week. I can't

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't argue that by any means. And then Baker Mayfield,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a conservative sea here. But you

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>love Njoku, you love Landry. Mayfield is startable h posing

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks passing forty one times per game against the Steelers,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So Mayfield will be thrown in this one. Over to

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers side. A lot of good stuff to talk about,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>starting with James Conner, who Cleveland steamer the Browns one

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred ninety plus combo yards to touchdown. Uh

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>No Levy on Bill yet again. And here's one great

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>stat I found on Twitter from Graham Barfield. Connor is

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>averaging over five yards per carry on seventy seventeen point

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>five percent of his attempts when facing a stacked box.

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Levan Bell is averaging three point two yards per carry

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last two years when facing stack box stack

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>box on sevenercent of his carry So basically, Connor is

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just as good as Levy on Bill, there's a stead

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. I I talked to somebody at the Friday

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Football Feast yesterday yesterday. Excuse me who was selling Connor

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on the cheap because he, you know, he firmly believed

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that Bell is gonna come back and take his job.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, why would that happen? He's playing every bit

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, if not better than Bell ever played, So

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>why would the team suddenly up end their depth chart?

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you remember I did that in the past

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>when Bill was suspended in D'Angelo Williams was playing very well.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone thought when Bill came back it was gonna be

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a timeshare. But nope, Bill, they don't timeshare. No, they

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>never timeshare. And Connor's your starter when Bell comes back.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Connors a starter for a team that never time sharrees

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>agreed can today Antonio Brown obviously your starter and your

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>fans lineup easy A worth mentioning starting quarterback E J.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Gaines is out for Cleveland and free safety da Marius

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>Randall questionable to play. So easy A for Brown, I'll

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>give out Juju Smith Schuster a b uh. He will

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be facing the latest three names slot cornerback in the NFL,

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian Body Calhoun. Does he have to change his last

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>name like Lake Calhoun anymore? But Juju has average seven

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>catches and a hundred thirty one yards over his last

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two against Cleveland. Very safe B grade as uh vans

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>McDonald will get as well. He missed the first game

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>between these two teams with Jesse James had sixty yards

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Cleveland has given up the seventh most

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>catches to tight ends. So Vance is in a good

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>spot and Big Ben gets an A at home. That's simple.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>This is actually his uh first home game against Cleveland.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Those missed the last two because of injury. But for

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, in that last meeting, three seventy nine

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and three might be a safe floor for Ben in

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this one. Yeah. I like I like that a lot.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he I've got him at quarterback number six

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>six this week. Yeah, I'd like been a lot in

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this game. Uh, let's I'm gonna try to squeeze in

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins taking on the Giants. Let's start with Adrian Peterson. Um,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been I've every week. I'm kind of more and

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>more surprised. I not that I thought he wouldn't be good.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I just figured by now we'd be hurt, dinged up

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>things that have just somehow gone off the rails. Nope,

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he's He's been terrific. H New York has given up

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown to a running back in all seven of

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>their games. One way or now. They're not all rushing

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but mostly rushing. They rank eleventh and rushing yards allowed

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eleventh and rushing yards per carry, which is pretty good.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And Chris Thompson's still not right. And even if Chris

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Thompson goes, he's a game time decision. APS got forty

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>one out of the forty five team rushing attempts the

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks. A beast b great on Adrian. Don't

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>forget no more snacks, Harrison. So those nobs. That's a

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>great point. That's you're absolutely right. That's very fair point,

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, about Matt. About Matt Harrison, our co host.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We should start calling him Snack Harrison with one s. Oh.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>I like that Snack Harrison Harrison. All right, Uh, maybe

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>it's snap because he's one t snat Harrison. Let's go

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to the passing Chris Thompson. Let me just one other

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>running back mentioned here. I think he might play, but

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>before the injury, he was trending in the wrong direction.

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous about starting him here. The Giants pass defense

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>broadly has been very good, and they're giving up just

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>forty three receiving yards through the air two runners. So

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just wait and see. On Chris Thompson, I'm seeing

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>get him dropped in some leagues. This is the wrong

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>time to drop him. He's coming back, but I don't

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>want to start him here. Let's go to the passing game.

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Alex Smith. Giants pass defense has been

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>beating up pretty badly over the last three weeks, but

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that was against Cam Newton, Carson Wentzon, Matt Ryan. Those

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are elite level quarterbacks. Alex Smith is not playing at

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that level, especially with his receivers all banged up. Jamison

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Crowder won't play. Paul Richardson's a maybe Elia Apple is

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>gone and Grant Haley will fill in. Brian, what is

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Grant Haley? Yeah, it's just he's just some guy. He's

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a he's a thing now, all right, So you'll get

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>him Grant. I had Alex Smith as a as a

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>bench before the trade. I've got him as a C

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>grade right now. Paul Richardson, if he goes, you could

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>throw a dart here and gamble that he plays in that.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The Giant secondary discombobulated in its first game without Eli Apple.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple played one side of the field, So if Grant

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Haley is going to play that side, they can just

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>put Paul Richardson on that side every play if they

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>want to. They could be way more combobulated without Eli Apple.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It could be additioned by subtraction. That is possible. Actually,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I looked up Eli's uh uh every I looked up

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>all of his His coverage numbers on Pro Football focuses

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are actually pretty good. He was actually having a pretty

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>good season. I think he's only given up one touchdown

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage all year. Um. Lastly, Jordan read on

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the bench to what a massive disappointment he's been. If

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I had told you guys at the beginning of the

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>season that through eight weeks he had play healthy and

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>playing every single week. What kind of numbers do you

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think you would have gotten out of Jordan Reed? Way

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>better ones and far better. Right might be outscoring him

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, or it's got to be pretty close watch.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it is probably pretty close between those guys.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Jordan read right now as we enter a week eight,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>has one touchdown two hundred sixty eight yards and by

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, that's forty yards of game forty. That's it.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's been. It's been a disaster for Jordan Reid. We're

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna put him on the on the bench. The Giants

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have been great against tight ends all season. They've given

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>up just four receptions to the position per game. They've

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>only given up one tight end score all year. Flipping

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly to the Giant side, sat Kwon Barkley has a

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tough match up against Washington, the team that just held

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Zeke to their second lowest rushing total of his career.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>No back has top sixty one yards on the ground

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>against them worst over the past three games. They've held Zeke,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, and mark Ingram four outstanding RB

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ones to a total of one thirty rushing yards. That's amazing.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So se Kwan is gonna have to do it. It's

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to find a way into the endzone, which

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is done in almost every game, and it's been a

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>series of torutal matchups. I'm tired of saying this for

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Barkley for once. I want to just have an easy

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>matchup and even coast through. But this is not going

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a testament to Peterson because he's running so

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>well that are able to control the clock and running

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>might be part of it. All right, Let's go to

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the passing games C grade and Eli Manning dreadful and

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>his two matchups against Washington last year. Get this against

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins last year. One hundred thirteen yards. One hundred

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty two yards. That's a starting NFL quarterback, terrible Redskins

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the twelfth ranked secondary. It's not great, and Josh

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Norman is awful, but it's a It's a lot better

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>than what we saw against Atlanta last week. Eli's averaging

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just one touchdown per game, and aside from Odell Beckham,

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot of positive matchups among his receivers.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Just to see grade here. Odell Beckham sums to a

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>C grade as well. Against Washington, He's average one hundred

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>six receiving yards and one touchdown over the last five games,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>which I love. Redskins defense has allowed at least two

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty passing years and or multiple touchdown passes in

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>every game. Um, actually, I don't think I sho meant

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to have him as a SEA. Wait a minute, and

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I need to have him up as an

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>A or B hanging. I'm double checking my notes on this.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he's an A. Sorry A grade on Oldell

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Beckham had him slott in the wrong place. I'm like

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>reading this, going, this is all good news for Beckham.

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing's good night. What am I talking about?

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Redskins best cornerback Quinn Dunbar is missing practice with a

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>mysterious nerve ailment and he may not go and so

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Beckham potentially getting backup work behind him at the cornerback position.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So I Beckham a start C grade and I think

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this one is correct for Sterling Shepherd. Shepherd accounts of

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning's passing yards five reception seventy three yards on average.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a This is significant for an offense that

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>passes a lot more than any other team in the league.

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>The Redskins starting slack corner Fabium Row suffering ankle injury

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and Sunday, and if he doesn't go, Sterling Shepherd could

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>have backup coverage on him too. Then lastly, Evan Ingram

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>quiet last week in his first game back. Redskins rank

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in the top half of the league and yards fantasy

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>points allowed to tight ends through six games, though they

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have not allowed a single tight end to go for

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards. I've just got a C grade and Evan Ingram.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be cautious on on Ingram in this matchup.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Um Sterling Shepard could could will vault up to a

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>B start if we If Fabian Moreau is out. Washington

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has allowed five wide receiver touch shows last like two

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>or three weeks, and part of Josh and Norman has

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>given up almost hey like half of them. He's a

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>disaster out there. He's all He's all name and reputation.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>At this point, when we come back, nine players not

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>normally in your starting lineup, take a chance on us

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>after this. This is Fantasy Football Weekly presented my green

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Bell Premium on the Van size does matter. Hey, it's

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Rosen at six ft five. It is take a

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Nine players not normally in your starting lineup.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Three quarterbacks, three on the backs, three receivers. We begin

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback position. Scott got turned on Mike. I

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have mitched Robinsky. I actually really sneakily like both the

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in this game. But Mitch Dusk, that's you really

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>should have gone with the other quarterback in this game

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because you sneak here. Everybody's got Robinsky already. Alright, you

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>should have gone Donald on this one. You want me

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to go Donald? They do, because that's the nature of

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this bit is I think they're mostly guys. Alright, just

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up off the waiver, all right, Sam Donald, Then

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>let's go with him the bat. The Bears have been

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>torched two weeks in a row by Brady and Brock

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>over six d and fifty combined yards, three touchdowns. They

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>all multiple touchdowns in five of their seven games. They

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>do leave the league in interceptions with eleven. That's how

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>many Donald has. But Donald has three straight multiple touchdown games,

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and he just recorded his second and third best yardage

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>days in his in his you know short career. So

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I see, I think that's the more in there. You got.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Whisky is inside my top ten this week. I like

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hell has frozen over. We have to find the Mitch

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Dubisky sound right now. There's no said, there's no there's

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>none of their anymore. There's no sad Trombotsky. We've moved

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on all right. Hell of an audible at the line

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage there, Scott, Yeah, that was well done. I

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>got Case Keenum at Kansas City. Uh. Four of the

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>six quarterbacks to face the Chiefs so far have notched

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at least three forty passing yards and one touchdown. But granted,

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Keenum was not one of those four quarters sportless as

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I recall, yeah that I'm just gonna chocolate up to

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>being a little rusty. He has looked better as of late.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He didn't need to throw a lot in last week's

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were out of Arizona, and Emmanuel Sanders did vulture a

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdown from him. We'll go with that, Tony there

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that past first passing vulture touchdown history. But it was

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>two games prior. Case was well over three hundred passing

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and had two touchdowns in each and posing quarterbacks

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>throwing over forty three times per game, we expect Broncos

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to be chasing points. So Keenum is my guy? What

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>did Odell Beckham do to Eli Manning owners a couple

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago? That can happen? Derek Carr goes up

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in in Indianapolis and I'll acknowledge the car wasn't good

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the last time we saw him but before the bye.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's been a serviceable fantasy quarterback in four of

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>oakland six games. And in those four games, get this

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the average game for Derek Carr three hundred thirty eight

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown and a half. That doesn't seem right.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you can pick in two thirds of his games,

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>he's given you an average of three d thirty eight

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>yards and one and a half touchdowns. Will this be

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>one of his good games? Well? Probably it's against Indianapolis.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And prior to facing Derek Anderson last week, the Colts

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>had allowed three straight huge passing performances, with opposing quarterbacks

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>averaging three hundred thirty two yards and two and a

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>half touchdowns per game. And what about the loss of

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper? You might be thinking, I say, who cares?

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Ask any fantasy owner, how reliable Amari Cooper was. Who

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>cares Derek Carr take a chance on me? Like, let's

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>go to our running backs. I have Trent and Kennon

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in that same game. I'm loving this game for some reason.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, hit five targets last week. Keep your's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>four catches for sixty nine nice yards and Paul's five

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to ten touches from last week are gone. I expect

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Cannon to see you know, ten twelve touches and he's

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>great in the receiving game. The Bears have allowed seven

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>catches for fifty five yards in a touchdown per game

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.239
<v Speaker 1>over the last five. Over the last three. All right,

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I got Ronald Jones at Cincinnati. Now, I'm no Internet doctor,

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but Peyton Barber is wearing down. He's been questionable all week,

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just finally got a practice in yesterday. Already at seventy

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>five carries on the season, that's half of his career total.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So his durability is not yet proven. And uh so

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm liking Barbara to get more opportunities in this game

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals, who are allowing a hundred nine yards

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>per game on the ground to running backs. At five

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>point yard five plus yards were carry and opposing backs

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are averaging more than six and a half catches and

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty five yards through the year. Jones has always been

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pegged solely as a two down back. He is a

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two down ball. He had a fifteen yard reception last week,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and he caught three passes the game before, so there's

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some hope in the passing games. So I got Ronald

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones in a high school ring affair. Raight He Mostard is,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you're probable starting running back for the forty niners this week.

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>He's the last two games he's posted on rushing yards

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not bad. Matt Brida just can't finish a game. He

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>keeps trying to play, keeps getting hurt. And even if

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Brita is active in this game, it doesn't mean he's

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the starter. They want to rest up Brita,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and if that that may mean zero carries for Brita

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or a much diminished workload. Most importantly for Rahee Mostard.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>He goes up against Carolina, the worst team against the

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>run all year long, giving up the most rushing into Arizona. Sorry,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals starts with c That's all he got to

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>go on and why that just happened? I am I'm

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>totally not combobulated right now. Arizona ranks dead last and

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts, rushing yards, rushing touchdowns allowed. I love Raheem mostart.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>If they rule out Matt Brida, he's gonna be in

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>my top ten this week. If they rule Breed out.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's this music putting us to sleep, and maybe

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that is part of it. We are I can barely

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on our wide receivers. We got Taylor Gabriel.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I really really love him that I've liked him all season, really,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but I really like him this week. He's gonna He's

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a good matchup against Buster Screen if he's healthy,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which it sounds like he might not be, so he's

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a backup in this lodge. The Jets allow

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the seventh most fantasy points to wide receiver this year,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>and eleven different receivers have topped a hundred yards and

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>or scored. Five slot receivers have topped seventy yards on

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jet. I'll admit, like Ceiling Tate Landry, they're good ones,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but this is a good matchup for Taylor Gabriel alright,

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I got New Orleans Ben Watson at Minnesota. Basically any

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>warm body at tight end against Minnesota. I tried to

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>tout Chris Herndon on this show last week. Was met

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with some resistance, but hopefully I won't bound a lot,

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of resistance. We can check the tape

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.959
<v Speaker 1>on that one. Watson's in a great spot against the Vikings,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>allowing more than five and a half catches and seventy

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to the position, and despite only having

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>three tight or three touchdowns of tight ends, the Vikings

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have yielded the fourth most red zone targets to the position.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Watson is third on the scenes and red zone targets,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't sound all that impressive, but it's not bad

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>considering his teammates are Alvin Kamara and Michael Thomas. Hey, guys,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>who leads the Buccaneers receivers in snaps after Mike Evans?

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans is number one? Who is your number two

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>receiver in snaps for Buccaneers receivers? I know the answer?

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Should I just say? Because it's Adam Humphries. It is

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphries. Is it's not Chris Godwin, It is not

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Jackson. It is Adam Humphries who plays out of

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the slot, and that means that he's going to face

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a Cincinnati defense in complete disarray, not only playing poorly

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, there aren't twenty nine and passing yards allowed,

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but most importantly, they're starting slack corner Darky's dennerd out.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So that means that Adam Humphreys is going up against

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>backup slot corner Tony McRae. A fantastic opportunity for Adam Humphries.

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So this week Sundays Humped in Sunday is hump Day

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>for Adam Humphries. Let's dive back into some matchups Jets

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bears. You just we already talked about half of

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the players in this Matthew Scott, So we already know

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that you love the Jets quarterback. You love one of

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jets receivers, baring back as well. Yeah, so we've

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about we've talked about a couple of these guys already,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but let's let's jump into the Jets. How about not

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>liking most of his passing game despite liking Donald It's

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that it's one of those things

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where you know quin Quincy noon one. Once he left

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a slot, he's kind of disappeared. Uh. Jordan Matthews just

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>joined the team. Robbie Anderson maybe, but he just has

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one game over forty five yards. He had that huge one,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but one game over forty five yards and curse, he's

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>super inconsistent. Uh. Slock guys, slock guys against the Bears

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty six yards, nine yards, thirty six yards, fifty nine yards,

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty six yards. They actually haven't been that great outside

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of Cobbs one big week. So I don't love any

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of them. I'm kind of benching them all. Herndon, I'm

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>giving a c Four Cans could have. Starting tight ends

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have scored against the Bears. Herndon scored in two straight.

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>He had seven targets last week, two scores off the

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. Um, all those tight ends in those

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>four weeks were between five and fifty yards. Three catches,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>probably going to get a score as well. So uh.

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>In the running game, Cannon was my take home. I

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>still like crow well because I think he's going to

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>get enough touches to be viable here. Despite the Bears

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not allowing a rushing touchdown, they've given three through the air,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so cannon again. But but he should get just enough

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>volume to uh to be start where the I can

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>see him getting fifteen seventeen eighteen touches here that that's

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>startable in my book. All right. On the other side,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Travisky was no longer my take com so, so I'm

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going to give a B grade to him, and I

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>would consider even higher, maybe even an A grade. It's

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very close right on that edge. B plus. If

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you will, I will. You're allowing it this year? That's awesome, um,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>only because you pivoted. Okay, okay, okay. Jets have allowed

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in five of the last six games, and

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not all studs. Tannehill Portals Keenom's drought ended with

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>them over twenty six fantasy points to each of the

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>last three. Travisky is averaging four touchdowns per game over

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the last three. He's on such such a hot streak.

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>He's also a top ten running back lately too. He

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>has at least three fifty yards passing, at least forty

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>five yards rushing, and multiple touchdowns in each of those

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>three straight games. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's crazy. What is

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the happy trombone? Sound like Tony. All right, Burton, I'm

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>giving it all your inner John Philip Sousa, Uh take

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ume was Gabriel. I really really love him this week.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>If Robinson does not play Anthony, Miller becomes a sneaky grade.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I I don't. I don't love him if he does,

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>though Robinson I would give a C grade. If he

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>does play Burton, I give a B grade to the

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Jets are middle of the road against tight ends, but

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Ebron touched them a couple of weeks ago, and and

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Burton us four receptions in four last five games, four targets,

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and all those games for few yards and three of

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>those games. Uh, at least uh Cohen love him this week.

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>He has at least seven catches, at least one touchdown,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at least sixty nine nice receiving yards in each of

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three games. He's averaging over a total yards

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in that span. Uh. It's a great matchup for Cohen. Howard, However,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade two and barely because if

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you take away the high double birthday game, Uh, the

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Backs have not been been very good unless they get

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>over twelve attempts and you're gonna need that from Howard.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>He's not getting third down usage. I think he's barely startable. Yeah,

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that. I like calling a lot better,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I like coming a lot better going forward. Yeah. I

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>considered an A grade for Cohen, but I didn't go

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that high. I was. Yeah, I think I think heniled

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it just right. When we come back, Andy Dalton, Yeah,

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they that Ald offense late an egg for us and

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>what looked like a great matchup and not only got

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>another great matchup? Do you trust your Bengals find out

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. This is does Football Weekly presented

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>by green Bell Premium on the Fan. It's the biggest

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>holiday concert of the year. Jingle presented. He could have

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just kept playing that, really, I like, uh, seventies six trombone.

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's some happy trombone right there. Let's just

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>make it you're rejoined music from now on. There we go.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Mind how many traumbones just to smooth seventy six? You

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>know it would have been the same with seventy Yeah,

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have been. Seventy seven have been too many.

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Seventy five would have been too few. John Philip Susan

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>knew just how many traumbones for that piece. There was

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a five year scientific study to figure it out. Bucks

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>take Yeah, how does he handle so many bones once?

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't tell you. Bucks take onto the Bengals. Let's

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>start on the buck in here side. I it's another

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in a series of easy matchups for Jamis Winston. It is.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And the best part about Winston in the past game

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>with Tampa Bay is their defense is so bad that

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just um. Let me just mention Winston's uh pass catchers,

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get to his grade. I'm giving Mike Evans

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an a targeted eleven times by Winston last week. Top

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the hundred yards opposing wide receivers are averaging yards in

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game against the Bengals, more specifically number

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ones I've gotten it done against since he's starting. In

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Week one, t Y Hilton touchdown, John Brown touchdown, Devon

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Funch's touchdown, Julio Jones nine for one step no touchdown. Obviously,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys sit no touchdown for him, and we won't

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>count Miami in this discussion. But an Antonio Brown touchdown,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill touchdown. So I like Evans here. I don't

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Sean Jackson he's on the bench because Adam

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey's was charges take a chance of me wide receiver,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way Scott or myself are benching. Chris Godwin,

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>who I'm giving a B two, has school in four

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of six games at least five catches and four of

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>his last five, and despite having his BI already, he's

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tied for the lead in touchdowns from inside the ten

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>yard line with Michael Thomas, and then two other players

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>will be shocking in the stat They're tied for touchdowns

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>inside the ten yard line t Y Hilton and James White,

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Godwin and Michael Thomas. Well, the reason for

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton is because Andrew Luck can't throw further

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>than ten yards, so that's why take it easy on Luck.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And since he has ranked number it is ranked twenty

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>seven thingst number two wide receivers by Football Outsider, So

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I love Godwin this week. I also like O. J. Howard.

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He gets to be The Bengals have allowed seven different

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends to notch fifty yards indoor a touchdown, and

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise they've allowed the second most catches and

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the tight end positions, So easy B for

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard but I still have Bread on the bench because

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he's second fiddle in that game. UH if you miss,

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>take a chance and we have to go back in

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>uh podcasts. But I have paid barbera on the bench,

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and Ronald Jones as might take a chance on me

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>running back and then uh Jameis Winson to circle back

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to him. He gets an A because I love Godwin

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Evans and Adam Humphreys so much, and over to to

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>since the almost straight a's uh will be one B here,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Joe Mixon. Over the last three weeks,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 1>two running backs have touched the ball for Cincinnati, Joe

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Mixing fifty six touches, Mark Walton eight, mixing straight Bell cowing.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Opposing running backs are averaging plus touches against the Bucks,

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>who again will be without Vinny Curry and much more importantly,

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Gerald McCoy will miss this game again, So Mixing in

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>an amazing spot as is a J Green again A

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for him. Tampa Bay is one of two teams surrender

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at least sixteen catches to wide receivers and have allowed

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a one one yard receiver and four of their last six.

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So easy A for Green, easy A for Tyler Boyd.

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Slot receivers have just slayed the Buccaneers this year. Juju Taylor,

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel Gabriel, Jarvis, Landry Nelson Aglar even topped eight yards

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with a touchdown. So Tyler Boyd in a great spot.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>M J. Stewart is the is the bucks slock cornerback

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>getting destroyed in his rookie year. And some people were

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>saying genre us might be a good dark thrill. I

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 1>might have been one of those people a few hours ago.

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>But he is out, not go there. Uh c j Uzoma,

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I can give him a B borderline A. The Bucks

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have loved the third most catches and second most touchdowns

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends, so Zuma is certainly startable. And Andy

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Dalton he obviously after all those pass catching grades. Uh

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't you want to hear some shocking good news? Sony

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Michelle at practice today? What no way? But see if

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he was fully healthy he would miss practice. I'm not

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>buying it. I'm not buying it. When that injury went down,

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, just saw his leg off. Now just amputate.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's over. Is that practice problem is there? Monday night game?

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know you're you really can't you can't do

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>much in terms of trying to guess if he's gonna

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>go and if he does, what his snap kind of

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would be. But this would suggest that at worst you're

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll be starting him next week. It's an interesting spot

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to make an Ivory pivot. Possibly, Yeah, you could pick

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>up Chris Ivory, Chris Ivory and then making night night.

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that, angle Buck. Here's another

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>game where it's kind of a start everybody game, Broncos

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Chiefs. Uh. We already talked about some

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the players in here, but let's starting with case Keenum,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>who was Bryant's take a chance on me quarterback. So

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some of his receivers. I've got a

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Emmanuel Sanders. The Chiefs surrender a ton

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of passing yards. You already know that, but actually they're

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>only giving up fifty seven percent of their passing yards

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to whiteouts. They're getting killed by tight ends and running

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>backs out of the backfield as much as anything else.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Sanders only had five catches for forty five yards when

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>these teams met in Week four. They B grade on

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders, C grade on Damarius Thomas. The Chiefs again

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they're giving up a lot more to running backs and

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and he hasn't topped sixty six yards in

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>five straight games against the Kansas City Chiefs. He has

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>scored once in his last seven games against the Chiefs.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>That's to Marius Thomas. The trends aren't great. And though

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a juicy matchup, and it is for

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>some other people like Philip Lindsay with an A grade

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and my number four ranking at the running back position,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman has been ruled out. Ah, do I love it?

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Career game coming against the Kansas City team that's giving

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>up over yds on the ground and a league wars

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards through the air to opposing running backs.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a fantastic opportunity for him to write the ship.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna get a ton of looks both

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and through the air. This is um

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>And even if the Chiefs take a big lead, which

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they usually do in every game, I think they've been

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a heading like eight four of their plays they've played

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with the lead. Fine, you know, Philip Lindsay, They'll just

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>throw to Philip Lindsay, So one way or another, Lindsay

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>sitting out of potentially gigantic game. Also as they take

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance, I mean candidate DeVante Booker, who's actually got

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more targets and receptions than Lindsay has. He will get

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot more use now that Royce Freeman has been

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. He is definitely startable available in of leagues.

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Go get Davante Booker if you're in a pinch, give

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 1>him a start this week, especially in PPR leagues. Last

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 1>guy I want to mention Jeff Hireman, is their tight

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>end available in every league in America. There isn't a

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>smile league fanball too very cheap. Chiefs have allowed the

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 1>second most yards, the eighth most receptions, and the seventh

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>most Fantasy points to the tight end position three times

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>already an opposing tight end to top seventy five yards.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff higher Men is startable this week with a C

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>grade going over to the chief side. Obviously, Mahomes, Hunt

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and Kelsey obvious A grades my number one, two and

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>one ranked players at their positions. Let's spend a second

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>on Tyreek Hill, who lines up all over the field,

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but he spends most of his time in the slot,

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which gives him a tough matchup against the one remaining

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>really good Bengals corner Chris Harris Jr. Hill was limited

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to fifty four yards against Denver in week number or

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>did catch nine passes but only turn into fifty four yards.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So I've just got to be great on Tyreek Kill

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>one of his lower grades of the year, and a

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>cautious CE grade on Sammy Watkins. Um he's only getting

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen per cent of Patrick Mahomes targets. That's just not

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>enough volume. And I love his matchup. He goes up

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>against the aged and ineffective Adam pac Man Jones, but

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it's I just need to get more catches. I've got

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on him because the matchup is so positive,

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that you can trust him to

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>turn his three or four targets into much of anything

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>meaningful fantasy wise. Snaps like a game. Yeah, there's that

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>too for Watkins, right he's on the field. At least

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they just never throw to him. What does Patrick Mahomes

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>know that the rest of us don't. Next matchup, Seahawks

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Lions, Scott. I loved Chris Carson in

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this game before the Snacks Harrison trade, but what do

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you think about what do you think about him? Now?

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You just got there. He just got there. Well, we'll

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>see how limited those snaps are for snacks. He might

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>play the whole game, who knows. But I still I

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.760
<v Speaker 1>still like it because the Lions have just been terrible

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>all us to stand there though. He doesn't have to

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really learn any play that snacks just got to be snacks. Yes, well,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the Lions have allowed at least a hundred and twenty

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>total yards to running back seeing every single game this

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>year and over, it's such a good matchup. Yeah, I

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>still have Carson. I had Carson with an A grade.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I still am going to leave it there for now.

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's tep it. It's it's there's a little

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more concerned there, Davis. I'm on the bench.

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that his snaps are close to Tart Carson,

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's not getting the touches. And the second running

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>back for Seattle has only had one Okay Fantasy Day

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this entire year. It's the lead dog that gets it.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>So Carson with a U in the passing game, I'm

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>giving Wilson a B game a B grade. The lines

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have allowed multiple touchdowns two qbs in all but one

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>game this year. Wilson the same, But it's more about

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>this time of year for Wilson. He's notoriously Yeah, in

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>two thousands sixteen his run started Week nine. Last year

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was week seven, it was week ten, was week seven.

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>His rook year, it was week eight. This isn't just

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like a one year thing too. This is his entire

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>career he starts at this point, so I really like

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it for him. His floor, his rushing floor has been

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 1>low this year. He hasn't rushed over twenty five yards yet,

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but that also goes up in the second half of

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think this is a good matchup for it. Um.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>This defense just allowed seven hundred total yards and five

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to Brady and Brock over the last two weeks,

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm giving Baldwin and Lockett B grades because of that. UM.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>The Lions maybe top ten against wide receivers on the season,

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but over the last three weeks they're dead last in

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points allowed and they only played two games, and

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the season they played the Jets, the forty

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>niners without Goodwin, the Patriots without Edelman or Gordon. There's

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a reason they were ranked so high. It's not because

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they were good, it's because of the matchup. So B

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>grades for both Lockett and Baldwin. Over the Lions side. Stafford,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm given a B grade even though the Legion of

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Boom is gone. And but they're like top three, top

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>five this year on page Look at the quarterbacks the

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks exactly they are. They faced the easiest quarterbacking schedule

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of any team in the NFL. It's kind of just like,

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>why what I said about the On the other side,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Lions defense, you face some easy matchups and you're

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna you're gonna look good. The over under fifty makes

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>me really like a little bit of a shootout in

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. And Stafford's thrown from multiple touchdowns in five straight.

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are averaging the totals of all the Lions

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>games this year over fifty points per game on average

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for the total, so I think they're gonna hit it.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I give Tate Golden Tate. He's disappeared a little bit

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>over less a couple of weeks. Seattle's been giving up

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a few good slot weeks. But it's a revenge game,

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>which was yeah, I was like that or revenge game

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>for Golden Tape be grade for Goladay. Weirdly, not only

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>does he leave the team in the yards in the

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks on the season, he has just two

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fewer yards than Golden Tate and the same amount of touchdowns.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He said, he's right there, right there with him. Marvin Jones,

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade. I considered bench. He's in fact,

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I wrote he's the third fiddle. It's really what he is. Um,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but he is averaging three catches per game, He's getting

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>seven targets games, and uh, the three games where the

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Lions average thirty points per game, he really did show up.

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give him. You know, where he scored

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>over third where they scored over thirty points, I'm giving

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>him a cee. Uh. Benching Roberts, I don't trust that

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. No Detroit tight end has gone over fifteen

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>yards this this season until last week. That's a fluke.

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Roberts was a fluke last week. Carry On Johnson, huge

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>game in a perfect storm against Miami. Miami is just terrible,

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible against running backs. But I do like Johnson this

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>week with Riddick out, I'm bench blunt. Uh. He has

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for a touchdown, but that's all you can expect.

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's a two to one split. I

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see four. Four out of the last

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>six lead backs against the Seahawks have topped a hundred

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>total yards, and those players scored five total touchdowns. I

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's the range for carry on near a hundred

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:22.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe a score. R um let's let's Golden takes a

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>free agent after this year. Let's assume he's somewhere else. Yeah,

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:31.959
<v Speaker 1>where's your preseason ranking on Kenny Golladay? Are you really

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>asking me this one? I'm asking you because I'm I'm

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 1>a I'm a huge Golladay hunk. That's probably why you're

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Definitely, definitely top twenty four. That's it. It's

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you can go, oh, I thought you were gonna tell

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 1>me top twelve. One. I haven't dug into it, but

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like saying instinct the question. In fact, I think

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>dynasty wise, he is a top twenty five asset at

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:00.439
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver right now. Um, but yeah, he it's gonna

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be close. He's gonna threaten top twelve for Me's gone.

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna try to work in one quick call. Hi, Tim,

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks to your patience. Jeez, yeah, we don't want to

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>hear your leaf blower. Sorry about that. Okay, I have

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a guillotine question for you, all right, somebody in a

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>guillotine league. I love it, unlike all three of us.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I love the league, so it's great

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>format for everybody's loving it's so great idea charts really

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>love fantastic My question, And I've got a few players

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>here to go through. Um, I've been listening to the

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>entire show, but so at running back, I plan to

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>start James Conner and Philip Lindsay. Receiver will be Ja

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio. I'm between Emmanuel Sanders, Sa Kwan and carry

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on and Chris Goodwin for my flight. What do y'all think?

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good players right there. Normally it's all day,

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but this week is it's a brutal matchup. I still

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can bench them though, Like I'm off

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Kwan any kind of daily format. This is you don't

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>want to pay his price, but man, it's Sanders. It's

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Sanders or Quan. But I gotta go with the what

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you'd expect to still be guaranteed touches and a bad matchup.

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But I lean Kuan barely over Saders. I just can't bend. Partly,

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you do it. That's my thought too.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I I've been riding them all year, so your opinion.

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Tim, Good luck in your guarantine league. It's

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a blast, isn't it. It's so much It's so much fun. Yeah, absolutely,

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>all right. We'll take a break when we come back.

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Three hot questions for a panel of experts. Play along

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at home, see if you can go. Three and oh.

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Fantasy Football Weekly, pressed by devans Man. Everyone

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>been liver here from my good friends over at town

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Hall Brewery. Listen, town Hall is now going to offer

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show. Fantasy Football Weekly week Numbreak

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Don't get set your Saturday morning rosters, Sunday

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>morning rosters, I should say Saturday morning set them. Now

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got another early London game. You don't want to

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be caught off guard with any late breaking news. Although

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have anybody that's coming into that game

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>as a game time decision either, so hopefully, of course,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>at this time last week we know Melvin Gordon was

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be a game time decision. But we knew

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he was questionable, but didn't didn't really think he wouldn't go,

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I just let's get that squared away.

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I knew, I just didn't tell anyone. Just be sure

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you have London Blake Bortles in your lineup before you

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>go to bed too. Yeah, you don't want, you don't want,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want the want to miss out on the

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>American version, Let's let's dive into hot question number one.

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>With Will Fuller done for the year, once Kiki Cutie returns,

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>probably after the bye, is he a wide receiver one?

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>A wide receiver to a flex or a bench Kiki

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Cutie Scott, I'm gonna go with a wide receiver too,

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>based on just the volume of the wide receiver two

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 1>kits in that offense right now. Uh. He had six

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for fifty one in a touchdown in the one game

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>without Faller, the game that Fuller left in the third

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>quarter A couple of games ago, he had eleven for

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>one or nine, but nine targets after nine he was

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>targeted nine times. There you go, nine times nine times. Yeah,

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>so he was targeted nine times eight catches for eighty

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two yards in those two and a half quarters after

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Faller left. I think he's going to continue to see

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten targets when he comes back, if he

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy. All right, Yeah, I don't have much to add.

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I got wide receiver two as well. I'm just looking

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the schedule. Broncos next week can't stop anyone

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ground or through the air. But then the

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>remaining matchups Redskins, Titans, Browns, Colts, Jets, Eagles, all those

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are more of a plus matchup for receivers and they

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>are for running backs, so they're all great matchups for Cutie.

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So wide receiver two, I really struggled because he's right

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on the edge of wide receiver too and flex. For

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>me to be a wide receiver too, he's got to

0:48:56.239 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>be roughly a top twenty receiver most weeks or better.

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Our top twenty, our twentieth receivers are guys. You know,

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this week we're in the Robert Woods and Emmanuel Sanders

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:12.959
<v Speaker 1>ranked area k CT is just not there. I think, yeah,

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that's I've got a flex on him, despite the fact

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think he's gonna be really good. And two,

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put numbers on all the players on all

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the teams that Brian just said down the stretch, here's

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>where those teams rank. Fantasy points allowed to wide receivers

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year for the Texans and

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Kiki Quti twenty second, four, eight, twenty six, and twenty eight.

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's just gonna be a series. And

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the one one that sounded good Indianapolis

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was that eight their secondaries degrading before very eyes. The

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.400
<v Speaker 1>high numbers are good. Fort Yeah, high numbers are good.

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia is giving up the twenty eight most fantasy points

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, so it's all positive for him, but

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I I can't quite get him into my top twenty

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>or top twenty four. Correct answer, Here's here's another point

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for your flex hamstring injurys Linger and he's been in

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and out. So how many examples of that do we need?

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Question number two. Everybody's talking about Amari Cooper's value in Texas,

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but what about Jordy Nelson's value in Oakland for the

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:24.919
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. Is Jordy a wide receiver? One

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to flex or bench? So I struggled to

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 1>think to come up with what Jordy Nelson was when

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper was on the team, and I looking back,

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he had scored in three of the last four games,

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so I guess he was a fix player. Really probably.

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking a super long time about where Amri's

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>three point seven targets are gonna, right, and those are

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bloated by two games of double digit targets. But I

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't think I'm gonna say Nelson was

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a flex player, and his value doesn't really change because

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the third most targeted player on that team, behind

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook and Jalen Richards. So if anyone's gonna still

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get more targets, it's gonna be Martavis Bryant, probably Cook,

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and probably be short. I think Jordy just stays as is,

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'll give him a very very generous flex Creed

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, yeah, kind of the same flex in good

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>matchups is what I wrote down. I mean, they've trailed

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>in all but one game by midway through the third,

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and trailed early in the fourth and that other one,

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so playing catchup was already factored in. This offense isn't

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be good. Lynches out to the offense is probably

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna stall more. I barely, barely, barely. Think he's a

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>fletch flex play and really just good matchups. You guys

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 1>are dead wrong. Oh boy, we'll start with your bad math.

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Cooper was getting five and a half

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 1>targets per game, thirty two targets in six games, and

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that and at least hyperpose. At least half of those

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go to Jordy Nelson, right half of the

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. So let's throw a couple of

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>targets at Jourdy right now. He already has fifty more

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points than a Marie Cooper, so he was already

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>better than a Mari Cooper. To your point you made earlier,

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the team's behind all the time and passing all the

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 1>time through sheer volume. He's going to do well rest

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. Only two tough matchups. The rest of

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>them are jaw droppingly easy San Francisco, Indie Chargers Chiefs.

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And listen to his playoff run for Jordy Nelson Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Denver,

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and then wraps up. If you play weeks seventeen, you shouldn't.

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. I'm telling you we're going to have A

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and B grades on Jordy Nelson in a lot of

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the remaining matchups again two bad ones, seven or eight

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>really positive matchups the rest of the year schedule, But

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to take up that much time. It's

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a wide receiver to the rest of

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, vans Hot. Question number three, now that Byron left,

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which is calling plays for the Cardinals, will he boost

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson's fantasy value a little, a lot, not at all,

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>or does it actually go back words? So you got

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:03.799
<v Speaker 1>four options, a lot, a little, not at all, or

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 1>does it go backwards? Scott, by the way, it is

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:10.839
<v Speaker 1>three point seven receptions per game. Uh, this is really

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 1>tough for me because he was averaging forty seven yards

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>per game and twenty three receiving yards a game. That's

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>seven yards of game. He if he gets up to

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>seventy rushing yards per game in thirty five receiving per game,

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a fifty percent increase and that's easily doable. I

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mean easily doable. Increase the touchdowns he did have five

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and what seven games, so that that's not as repeatable.

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm gonna go with a lot because I think

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is probably the floor on his increase. All right, Yeah,

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go a lot too because left Which said

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna mirror Bruce Arians usage, and they fell together

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. And honestly, as long as you don't mirror

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 1>anyone but Mike McCool you could mirror like a twenty

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>year old Stone college kid using David Johnson and Madden

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and the ice gonna his production is gonna go way up.

0:53:58.320 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson will be on the edges way more, will be

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 1>utilize the way he should. And uh, the schedule is

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna help him out a lot. I won't dive into it,

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>but it is very meaty, So a lot, a lot,

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot see Mike McCoy. Uh, David Johnson will be

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>aided a lot by sanity returning to the coaching staff

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>under Byron Leftwich. Now, in fairness, we don't anything about

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator Byron Leftwich. He's never had an NFL play

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 1>call at this level. He's never been an offensive coordinator.

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>This thing could go badly, but we're just assuming it

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can't go any worse than what Mike McCoy did to

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. I hope he runs it up the middle

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on his very first the fantasy they will, they'll blow up.

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>The schedule is so favorable fantasy points allowed. I'm not

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you the teams. I'm just gonna tell you

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy points allowed rankings for the remaining teams on

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the schedule for David Johnson twenty three, thirty one, twenty five, sixteen, fifteen,

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, twenty six. Dear lord, none of them below fifth.

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all below, They're all an They're on the bottom half.

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He won't see a top half defense and fantasy points

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running backs all year. It's a fantastic opportunity

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for David Johnson by low send out some trade offers,

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 1>shake things up in your league, and let's talk about

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Colts and the Raiders, Brian Colts. Uh feels like

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:24.399
<v Speaker 1>another in a series of just easy, easy matchups every week.

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels like it's an easy matchup for the Colts.

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about the cold side already told you,

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like I always, I like Derek Carr on the other side.

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But talk to me about the cold side and Aarondrew

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 1>luck and if this string of amazing performances are going

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to continue, yeah they should. And think of it this way.

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Andrew Luck is gonna have all his toys back

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to t Y Hilton. Jack doil is

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 1>coming back back. Andrew Luck himself was had to be

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a little The rust is shaking off with every week.

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So Andrew Luck gets an A in this matchup. Because

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I love Ti t Y Hilton, he gets an A.

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Oakland is allowing seventy six yards per game to number

0:55:56.960 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>one wide receivers. Seattle wide receivers total three touchdowns against

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in Week six. Guys like Jeron Brown and

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>David Moore were scoring. So Hilton's great play. But I'm

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>not playing any other wide receiver for indeed, it's as

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>two modeled between Chester Rogers and Ryan Grant. They're all

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. But Eric Ebron still on a good play.

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Given him a be Even with Jack Doyle's return. Oakland

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 1>has allowed to tight end touch on two of their

0:56:21.800 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>last three games. And Ebron seems to be the guy

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone for Andrew Luk and then uh

0:56:27.000 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to running backs real quick for the Colts. Marlon

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Mack looked great last week. I can give him a B.

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>He was questionable to play, but practicing full yesterday. He

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>should be good to go, and as long as he's

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in the starting lineup. Nineham Hines and Jordan Wilkins are

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not relevant, so they are on the bench. Over to

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Got a lot of c's looks like my

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>high school report card. Here, Doug Martin will start with

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>him and gets to see, how did you get I

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:52.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I studied hard. The Colts have allowed more

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>than four point five yards per carry over the last

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:58.720
<v Speaker 1>five games, but Oakland ranks dead last in the NFL

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and yards created before the contact point one point eight.

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So Martin is not good and he's gonna have to

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:08.839
<v Speaker 1>work hard, so just to see the volume should be there.

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's the only reason he gets a starting grade. Actually,

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like Jayley Michard Moore in PPR, he gets to see

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>despite already having his by he ranks top ten among

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>NFL running backs and targets, catches and receiving yards, so

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he is certainly viable in PPR, maybe even in standard UH.

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook always viable. He gets an opposing tight ends

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have posted monster numbers against the Colts, so Cook is

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup easily. Jordy Nelson is a wide receiver too.

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I had to see on him as a Yeah, uh,

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>volume coming, a lot of volume coming. Uh. The Colts

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>secondary is banged up, and we respect Oakland to be

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>chasing points. And for that reason, Martevis Bryant now the

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>other starter on the boundary. It gets to see. Uh,

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary receivers have done very well. Comparable secondary receivers Terrell Prior, Cordurell, Patterson,

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller, I'll have scored against the Colts in recent weeks.

0:57:57.040 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So Bryant is a nice hail Mary play. What do

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you think about I talked about this with p A

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday on the feast. What do you think about my

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fan ball DFS play of car to Martavis Bryant in

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a big tournament like the twenty dollar tournament. We have

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>fan ball account slash radio. Yeah, what do you think about?

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>That is a cheap hook up? Absolutely, Brian came incause

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that trade went down y salary. I love Yet you

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>cleared up a lot of cap space and you said

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that's how I get That's how I get tat Gurley

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in my line up. Our kareem hunt into my might

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have high ownership and something like that. You will and

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and and Derek Carr you'll take a chance to

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback for that very reason. And that is the

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>end of that chapter. It is the end of that chapter.

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's um, let's try to work in one more matchup,

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Ravens taking on the Panthers. That's me. Hold on, I

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta go to the right page. Here we go. Let's

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 1>start on the Baltimore side. In the passing game. Joe

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Flacco throwing forty three times per game. You don't think

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Ravens as being this past happy offense. We

0:58:56.360 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 1>think of them as a conservative organization. Everything else. Nope,

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>already three times per game. Joe Flacco, with all that volume,

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he usually ends up with decent maybe not explosive stats,

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but decent stats. This week he plays against the Carolina

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>defense that's allowed exactly two touchdown passes in five straight games.

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's another two coming for Joe Flaco.

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the same guy that through yards

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the game last year. How about that? Right, it's

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a there's a very different offense. And if I think

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got two touchdown passes coming, I gotta like John

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown right your angle. Here is a deep hook up.

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging twenty yards per catch. Which is ridiculous. Caroline

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is allowing the fourth most receptions of twenty yards are

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>more so the deep poke up coming for John Brown

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like him be grade also, And by the way, Flacca

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was a B grade as well. Michael Crabtree C grade.

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He gets more targets actually than Brown does. It's a

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>hit and MS Panthers defense've had some good games. They

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>actually did a nice job against A. J. Green and

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones. But I think it's um It's maybe on

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the tougher side of the matchup for Crabtree, but just

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 1>through sheer volume, I think he ultimately gets something done here.

0:59:57.000 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll run the overwhelming majority of of play against inconsistent

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Dante Jackson. Who else do we like? Alex Collins

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>has a B grade in this one, even though, uh,

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>even though they're giving up over four point six yards

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:13.439
<v Speaker 1>per carry, which is a lot opposing running backs, they're

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>only rushing eighteen times a game, fourth fewest against the Panthers,

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and so volume may not be the friend to Alex Collins.

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned earlier, again, everything seems to go

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>through Flacco's arm right now, So Mynie Collins actually catch

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of passes which you will do per game. Uh.

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Carolina kept Phillies committee in check last week, but they've

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>given up big games to opposing lead backs in each

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>other game. So I think Collins is still very startable

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>here with a B grade, but he doesn't get a

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of volume and Bunk Allen is on the bench.

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Carolina side. Cam Newton's toughest matchup

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. If you're ever gonna bunch Cam, this

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is it. We had a guy this morning. We told

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>him Mayfield over Cam. Yeah, I've got Cam way down

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback number sevent You probably have another quarterback on

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>roster that I like, bar Um. The Ravens secondary is awesome.

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>They ranked number two in passing yards allowed, number three

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in passing touchdowns allowed. And what's more, Newton isn't likely

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to rush for a score. The Ravens haven't given up

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a rushing touchdown to a quarterback in twenty five straight games.

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So Cam Newton's brutal to start this week. Let's go

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>staying with the passing game. The only other guys who

1:01:19.120 --> 1:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can consider starting or Devin Funches, who has hit the

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yard mark just once in his last thirty

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>nine games. How does it? How does any number one

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver only get one hundred yard game once in thirty

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>nine games. You know what you're gonna get from him.

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>It's sixty yards a decent chance of a touch down.

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>He's scored him three the past four games. Um, and

1:01:38.840 --> 1:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a touchdown that could salvage his game. The

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Ravens give up the second fewest yards to receivers, but

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they are giving up one touchdown per game to the position.

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So if there's gonna be one touchdown catch to be

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>had here, it'll go to Funches. So we'll try him

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at a see grade. Greg Olsen has been miserable since

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his return, but the Ravens have had some difficulty with

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, allowing the most receptions eleventh most yards at

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. They hadn't given up a score to a

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end until last week. Um, I've got to barely

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>see grade on greg Olsen only because he's a tight

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>end and the position so thin. Really. Lastly, Christian McCaffrey

1:02:14.480 --> 1:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also his toughest matchup of the year. Baltimore is allowed

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the fewest fantasy points to running backs. They ranked fourth

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in yards per carry. They've only given up two rushing

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns all year, and they lead the league in the

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fewest receiving yards, the fewest catches, and the fewest touchdowns

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running backs. There is no angle of positive

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>positivity for Christian McCaffrey from a matchup standpoint none. He's

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy he's gonna struggle mightily that you're alluding to,

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but by Low on him after this game, I feel like, yeah,

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be like his third or fourth straight

1:02:43.640 --> 1:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bad game potentially, And you're right, this might be your

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>by Low moment. It's just been a series of tough

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>matchups for Christian McCaffrey. We'll take a break. When we

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>come back. Another set of matchups for you, including Packers

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Rams. Is there anybody to bench in

1:02:59.080 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this game? Can you go right back to Geronimo Allison.

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that when we come back. This is

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly presented by Green Bill Premium on the Van.

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey it's Mark Rosen. You know we're all different. So

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the Greater Twinsities Hot the Dealers offered. Welcome back to

1:03:31.920 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the show, Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, year number

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, Week number eight of the NFL season. I'm

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charching. My co hosts are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson.

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>A shout out to our Crush Charts Challenge winner Mitchell Anderson. Betty,

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he goes by Mitch or Mitchell. I

1:03:54.720 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to meet him at the at the banquet. Yeah,

1:03:57.400 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be great. Maybe you could be his date

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because you get to bring you get to bring a date, um,

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it'll be like fathers will bring sons some

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm down for that, don't worry. Yeah, I mean that, sure, absolutely,

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd be down for a lot after that.

1:04:12.200 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You could hit the w afterwards, only for you know,

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you turn into a night that turn it into a

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whole night. It is you, just you. You roll yourself

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>out of there um again. As you already know, you

1:04:23.560 --> 1:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>should be playing the free to play Crush Charts Challenge

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at grain belt dot Com. Every point by which your

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>team beats my team gets you an entry into the

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>end of week drawing, and the beauty of it is

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>no salary gap. You you basically just a superstar roster.

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like Girly Chimera. You just Patrick Mahomes and Aaron

1:04:41.600 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers are my starting quarterbacks. It's great. You don't ever

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>get that luxury any other time. We love that, so

1:04:47.640 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>encourage you to uh to give that a shot. Grain

1:04:50.280 --> 1:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>belt dot Com. Let's dive back into the matchups. Packers

1:04:54.200 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>take on the Rams, Scott and you know, yeah, start everybody.

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But I've gotten a ton of questions about Geronimo Allison

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and I want to know what you're thinking.

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I I like him here, Yeah he has. He has

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at least sixty yards and twelve and a half PPR

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>points in all four games that he's played this season.

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The second receiver, the second receiver for the Packers has

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>had at least six targets in every game this season,

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and he has at least five catches in three of

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>his four games. I think this is gonna be a

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>shootout with that fifty six and a half over under.

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So Allison is the guy I actually like more than Cobb.

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I gave Allison a B grade. I gave cop a

1:05:30.160 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>C grade. I don't know if he's going to play exactly.

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>He practiced fully. He's questionable, but he practiced fully. Here's me,

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>here's my concerns. Will he play? And he hasn't top

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards since Week one, Heelan and Sanders had good

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>games in the slot against the Rams. Everyone else disappeared. Uh, Cobb,

1:05:48.560 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean watch it. I want available in a lot

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of leagues. Yeah, I want pieces in the shootout, but

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he's barely a C grade for me. Adams is an obviously,

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and so is Rogers. I mean Rivers, Will some Keendom,

1:06:00.640 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Cousins all had great Fantasy days. Even Carr had three

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards. Teams have to keep up, and Adams is

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the top option. Both A grades there. Jimmy Graham I

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>gave a C grade to he has twenty targets and

1:06:11.200 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty yards over the last two weeks. But

1:06:14.000 --> 1:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>those twenty targets he only averages five and a half

1:06:17.080 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>per game with Cobb and Allison in so he expected

1:06:20.960 --> 1:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>drop here. Um, yeah, even though it's going to be

1:06:24.120 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a shootout, I expect to drop so. Uh. The Rams

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>their teenthins tight ends, but that's partially due to huge

1:06:30.920 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>games against Kittle and Cook all the others. No otherwise,

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>no other tight end had over twenty five yards except

1:06:37.280 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for those two. So I'm a little hesitant there. The

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>running game. I'm benching it because how many times at

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay running back his top sixt yards this year

1:06:44.280 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing one just once and they only have two rushing touchdowns. Yeah,

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a wreck. Yeah, here's at this point,

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm done guessing when Mike McCarthy will play Aaron Jones.

1:06:55.360 --> 1:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to wait for him to play Aaron Jones

1:06:57.280 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch and then I'll react to it. I'm done

1:06:59.320 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>guessing ahead of Yeah, the Rams are allowing four point

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry to running max, which is seventh worst,

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but everyone abandons the run against them, so nobody can

1:07:08.800 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>rack up enough yards. Uh. On the on the Ram side,

1:07:12.440 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I got a's on everyone. Cup is doubtful and very

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>very very unlikely to play, so I'm benching him. But

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I got I I don't even know that I need

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to go through it. But Reynolds I'm benching as well,

1:07:24.240 --> 1:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just to put that out there. He has two targets

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks with Cup out, which I

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thought you'd do more. Yeah, it's not happy. Yeah, but

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you're starting Girley Cooks Woods Golf. They're all a grades great. Yeah,

1:07:35.680 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's all Yeah, No, no more really needs to

1:07:37.960 --> 1:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be said, all right. Forty nine take on the Cardinals. Brian,

1:07:41.120 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I love where Hee most. He was might take a

1:07:42.920 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to me running back. We talked about him earlier,

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>A great chance of going here. Even if Matt Breed

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is active, I don't think he's gonna get a lot

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of work in this game as they try to finally

1:07:50.960 --> 1:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>get him healthy. No, you know they bread forced himself

1:07:54.280 --> 1:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>on the field last week, lasted about five carries. So yeah,

1:07:57.360 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so Monster, it's a great play either way. And bread A,

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if he is active, I think you gotta air on

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the side of caution and sit him if you ow.

1:08:03.520 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said, we'll say he's on the bench regardless

1:08:05.320 --> 1:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of being active or not. Let's go to the already

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>when was already one of my favorite players, and now

1:08:11.240 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he is my favorite player. George Kittle say, this man

1:08:15.520 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to score for his fantasy owners. He doesn't care.

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that last team? Did you see this?

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>For those who didn't hear this, While his touchdown was

1:08:23.400 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>getting reviewed, he was picked up on micro whatever saying Tara,

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get this one from my fantasy owners. He

1:08:29.000 --> 1:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it for himself. He didn't want it for

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners. He wanted it for his fancy. Yeah,

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>these teams have met a few weeks ago. By the way,

1:08:36.000 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I Kidi had five catches for eighty three yards. That's

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a safe floor here. He gets an A for me.

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Brual matchup, though Arizona has been great against the tight

1:08:42.520 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>end positions. But that's the only thing, haven't They haven't

1:08:45.160 --> 1:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>faced a lot of good tight ends. Jordan Reid had

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>four for forty eight and a touchdown. Tyler Higbee managed

1:08:50.240 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to score. Yeah, if you're counting up Matt Lacos as

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>a competition at the tight end position, then they're tough.

1:08:57.160 --> 1:08:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Kid will gets the A mark, he's Goodwin gets the opposite.

1:08:59.600 --> 1:09:01.639
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench. He's gonna draw Pat Pete. It's

1:09:01.720 --> 1:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that simple. I don't like good Win in this game.

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Pierre Garson not expected to play, not that you're contemplating

1:09:07.880 --> 1:09:10.519
<v Speaker 1>starting him, but here's a sneaky play. A bonus take

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>com is Trent Taylor, who had seven catches for sixty

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>one yards in a touchdown when these teams made a

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago. And slot receivers have been doing very

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>well against the Cardinals because Pat Pete will not travel there.

1:09:20.720 --> 1:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Manny Sanders six for one oh two and a touchdown,

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam thieland eleven fore and one. Granted Trent Taylor is

1:09:26.680 --> 1:09:29.519
<v Speaker 1>not those guys, but then target totals for slot receivers

1:09:29.560 --> 1:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and games before that, Doug Baldwin coming off injury saw

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>seven targets, Taylor Gabriel saw ten. So Trent Taylor is

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be involved in this game. So he gets a

1:09:37.120 --> 1:09:39.639
<v Speaker 1>CEE for me. But CJ be Third is on the bench.

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go into that too much. More over

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to day, Uh the Cardinals side, David Johnson, gonna give

1:09:45.400 --> 1:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>him an a here, managed to score twice in the

1:09:47.640 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, despite the fact that Mike McCoy was employed

1:09:50.520 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Cardinals at the time. But uh, San Francisco

1:09:53.240 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>allowing a hundred and thirty combo yards and one and

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns for games to run per game to

1:09:57.439 --> 1:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs left, which is gonna get Johnson involved? Wan

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this one a plus for me actually with David Johnson,

1:10:03.320 --> 1:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk and give him a see he's starting to emerge.

1:10:06.120 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>At least seventy five yards and or a touchdown in

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>three of his last five games, had three catches for

1:10:10.880 --> 1:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty five yards in a touchdown in the first meeting.

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The Niners have allowed four wide receiver touchdowns in the

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>last three games, and they could still be without Richard Sherman.

1:10:18.320 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So Kirk is viable and so is Larry Fitzgerald. Just

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to see for him though. He was quiet in the

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, but he wasn't near on uh PPR leagues.

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>He's tough to sit. So he just gets a C

1:10:28.680 --> 1:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for me, as does Ricky Seals Jones. Uh, this is

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Just you actually sounded constipated saying his name.

1:10:39.600 --> 1:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Ye R s J was targeted six times in the

1:10:43.240 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>first meeting. Did not catch a pass though, but the

1:10:46.200 --> 1:10:49.479
<v Speaker 1>usage was there, and uh, Jimmy Graham has put put

1:10:49.520 --> 1:10:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a big numbers against San fran and Uh so rs

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>J is viable in a depleted tight end landscape, but

1:10:56.479 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen on the bench. Let's wrap up this sigment

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>with Vikings and Saints on Sunday night. From the Vikings side,

1:11:04.120 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a lot of passing from Kirk Cousins

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Saints are the best run defense and

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings offensive line just isn't up to the challenge

1:11:11.040 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of trying to maintain a running game that, in fairness

1:11:13.200 --> 1:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>has been good the last two weeks, but won't be

1:11:15.680 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>here Vikings Uh Saints giving up just two point eight

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry to opposing running backs number one in

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the league, forty seven yards per game to opposing running

1:11:24.120 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>backs number one in the league. So tons, and by

1:11:26.400 --> 1:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, that's why Lottavias Murray's on the bench in

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't think he's gonna get enough work here.

1:11:30.640 --> 1:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Your only hope is a goal line run from Lottavia's Murray.

1:11:33.920 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>You're playing for touchdowns, and we can't say for sure

1:11:36.560 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to happen. This game goes through Kirk

1:11:39.040 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Cousins armed. I believe the Vikings will be playing from

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>behind due to the injuries that they've got, and Kirk's

1:11:44.080 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to throw to keep up. And the Vikings

1:11:46.120 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>throw the third most times per game anyway, And so

1:11:49.520 --> 1:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got an a grade on Kirk if not if

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:53.879
<v Speaker 1>only through volume, if nothing else. Although the Saints secondary

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:56.479
<v Speaker 1>has improved over the last three games, giving up two

1:11:56.680 --> 1:11:58.479
<v Speaker 1>d seventy yards and one scored per game over the

1:11:58.600 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>last three, but Cousins will get there on volume. I

1:12:01.120 --> 1:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>expect passes in this one. Adam Theland a great matchup.

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a good matchup last week, great matchup this

1:12:09.120 --> 1:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>week too. He draws slot cornerback P J. Williams, who's

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst at his position. He is allowing

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback passer rating of one hundred forty six against him.

1:12:20.760 --> 1:12:23.639
<v Speaker 1>P J. Williams, and he's going to cover Adam Theeland,

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the hottest receiver in football. I love I love Theland's

1:12:26.840 --> 1:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here. Stefan Diggs gets the flip side of that

1:12:30.080 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and potentially very tough matchup again. He gets Marshawn Lattimer,

1:12:33.960 --> 1:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>who typically shadows the opponent's best outside receiver. Lattimer got

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:40.599
<v Speaker 1>roasted in the opener in Week one, but since then

1:12:40.680 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been much better. Get this, Lattimer's averaging twenty nine

1:12:45.240 --> 1:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in his coverage. That's it. So Diggs

1:12:49.040 --> 1:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is only a beast start in this game. Um Eli

1:12:51.479 --> 1:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple should not be a factor. I don't think this

1:12:53.520 --> 1:12:57.799
<v Speaker 1>early in the game. Then, Kyle Rudolph. Saints have surrendered

1:12:57.840 --> 1:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>only one touchdown to a tight end all year, and

1:13:00.200 --> 1:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>since Week one they haven't allowed any tight end to

1:13:02.160 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>reach even thirty yards. So Cal Rodolph sums down to

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a C again. I think only through volume. Do I

1:13:07.200 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like him here, and ideally if he played a different position,

1:13:09.240 --> 1:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't be startable. But again, you gotta basically start

1:13:11.880 --> 1:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>every plausible tight end and fantasy. So I give him

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here. Saint side so many people that

1:13:18.040 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I like against the injury depleted Vikings. Anthony Barr has

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out of this game. I don't think Xavier

1:13:23.800 --> 1:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes is gonna go. I think the warm up they'll

1:13:25.760 --> 1:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>try to see what the ankles like uh on on Sunday.

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But even so, this is it's it's a super dicey

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>start here. Michael Thomas is an A grade no matter what.

1:13:35.640 --> 1:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He's an A plus grade if Xavier Rhodes can't go,

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and if we like Thomas that much, obviously Drew Brees

1:13:40.600 --> 1:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is an A grade here as well. Um and one

1:13:42.960 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>of the key reasons Anthony Barr is not gonna play.

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:48.479
<v Speaker 1>And if without Anthony Barr, that means Alvin Kamara, who

1:13:48.479 --> 1:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>would normally be covered by Bar, their fastest of their linebackers,

1:13:52.680 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that. Trent Cannon just put up seventy yards

1:13:56.280 --> 1:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings through the air last week, much of

1:13:59.320 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that coming after Anthony Barr was out, so they're gonna

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>do the same things coming Comari's potentially sitting on a

1:14:05.760 --> 1:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>very big game. He's got an A grade as well.

1:14:09.560 --> 1:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>While we're talking running backs, mark Ingram gets a B

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:14.599
<v Speaker 1>grade because the Vikings is just a straight up run

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>defense is good and Linval Joseph should come back. In

1:14:17.479 --> 1:14:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the last three outings, the Vikings have only given up

1:14:19.640 --> 1:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty six yards on the ground per game. Only Todd

1:14:23.360 --> 1:14:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is top fifty nine yards individually against the Vikings

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all season long. So I've just got a B grade

1:14:30.000 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on mark Ingram in one of his toughest assignments of

1:14:32.200 --> 1:14:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the year. Back to the passing game for a minute,

1:14:34.600 --> 1:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Tray Kwon Smith will draw Trey Waynes and a speed

1:14:38.400 --> 1:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>versus speed matchup. I don't think he gets a lot

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of receptions here, but he could turn one of them

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>into a long game. It's a high risk higher word play.

1:14:45.040 --> 1:14:47.479
<v Speaker 1>A C grade on Trey Kwan Smith, a C grade

1:14:47.520 --> 1:14:49.719
<v Speaker 1>on Cameron Meredith because the Vikings are without their slack

1:14:49.760 --> 1:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Mike Hughes and his backup Mackenzie Alexander might be

1:14:53.160 --> 1:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>forced to go outside and play Michael Thomas. If Xavier

1:14:56.080 --> 1:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes can't play, and I don't think Xavier Rhode is

1:14:57.760 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, so Cameron Merrit a sneaky start as well,

1:15:01.560 --> 1:15:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and Ben Watson was to take a chance on me

1:15:03.960 --> 1:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>tight end that Brian told you about earlier. We'll take

1:15:07.280 --> 1:15:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a break when we come back. Premature Speculation our final

1:15:09.720 --> 1:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>matchup of the day, and your phone calls in lightning round.

1:15:13.160 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Fantasy Football Weekly, presented by devanies on a Man.

1:15:18.840 --> 1:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It's Saturday oct What's new today on the Free I

1:15:21.880 --> 1:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. After final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, what's

1:15:31.760 --> 1:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up with you? And tell me? We've got over

1:15:34.479 --> 1:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>time with Carly Zooker, some vikings rewind, and then we're

1:15:37.400 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna join Wisconsin and Northwestern had progress at walk all right,

1:15:41.479 --> 1:15:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that's as much Wisconsin as I want is in progress,

1:15:43.920 --> 1:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you? Currently tight at seven. Premature Speculation is a

1:15:47.479 --> 1:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>segment we do every week in which we identify a

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:52.519
<v Speaker 1>player who we think you should pick up now that

1:15:52.600 --> 1:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>will be a hotter waiver wire pick up next week,

1:15:55.800 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>but he's already on your roster because you're a week ahead. Scott,

1:15:58.680 --> 1:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>who you got? You know, we kind of talked about

1:16:00.960 --> 1:16:03.439
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit with Jordy Nelson, But I think

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Martavis Bryant, who's only eight percent ESPN, It's possible you've

1:16:07.840 --> 1:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>gotten him. You've got him already, but the numbers on

1:16:10.200 --> 1:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the sites don't show that you do. So who his

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule is on REO, with that Pittsburgh Cincinnati, Denver playoffs

1:16:17.200 --> 1:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>schedule and a lot of other great matchups, I put

1:16:19.320 --> 1:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>down Martavis Bryant all right. My prespect is a little

1:16:23.200 --> 1:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>more for the Dynasty end or super flex crowd. But

1:16:26.760 --> 1:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going New York Giants Kyle because quite simply, Eli

1:16:32.320 --> 1:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Mann cooked and Uh from the University of Richmond, smaller school,

1:16:38.160 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>big body quarterback picked in the fourth round. The guys

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are gonna see what they have in him, and there

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of good spots coming up. Uh next

1:16:44.400 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>week at San Francisco could be a viable start for

1:16:47.240 --> 1:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyle or the following week at home against the Buccaneers.

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Is any good we'll find that. I mean what I'm saying,

1:16:53.880 --> 1:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's we'll think the weapons New York has and why

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>don't they trade from I don't know what are we

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do? Dynasty ones now? Guess yeah, I'm gonna

1:17:06.280 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>throw it out. Chris Chris Warren of Oakland. Yeah, there

1:17:09.000 --> 1:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you go, Chris war next year, get him. Stashum and

1:17:11.840 --> 1:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I are yeah yeah, because Martin and Binch, I don't

1:17:15.240 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>know they're not back start back. He might be peewee

1:17:19.400 --> 1:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>football prospects too. If you need him, yes, I do, Yeah,

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>contact Jiffanni. Bernard is due to come back as early

1:17:26.800 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>as next week, and you want to have You want

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to have the handcuff in this deal if nothing else,

1:17:31.720 --> 1:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Bernard likely Mixing is getting a lot of

1:17:34.120 --> 1:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>run as a workhorse right now. I think they want

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to work Mixing. The want to work Bernard in once

1:17:38.040 --> 1:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, which could be as soon as next week.

1:17:40.120 --> 1:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>When reports start showing up on Wednesday of next week

1:17:42.720 --> 1:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about how Bernard has returned to practice, other people are

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go swoop up, swoop him up, and you want

1:17:48.000 --> 1:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to go get him. Now, let's do our final matchup, Scott.

1:17:51.760 --> 1:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the Monday Night or Patriots against the Bills. As

1:17:54.240 --> 1:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier in the show, Sony Michelle shockingly practicing.

1:17:58.080 --> 1:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you want to you want to

1:17:59.479 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>start a here, No, But luckily this is it feels

1:18:01.960 --> 1:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like a game where you have several potential pivots or

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>at least a pivot or two if you can go

1:18:06.520 --> 1:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>get Ivory right. Um for on the path side, I

1:18:10.320 --> 1:18:12.519
<v Speaker 1>still gave Brady and a I think they're going to

1:18:12.640 --> 1:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>get ahead the bull the Bills. The Bills defense has

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good against against quarterbacks, but Brady has at

1:18:19.800 --> 1:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>least three hundred yards and our multiple touchdowns in every

1:18:22.360 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>game except for except for that Lion's dud um And

1:18:26.160 --> 1:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if you look look deeper in the numbers against the Bills,

1:18:28.280 --> 1:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean Cousins and Rogers just barely missed three hundred

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Flacco rivers and luck all had three touchdowns. I'm fine

1:18:34.240 --> 1:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with Brady. Hey grade A grade for Gordon. I'm looking

1:18:39.120 --> 1:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>for your reaction on that, because I yeah, pent the

1:18:42.520 --> 1:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week, last two weeks ago, and not just

1:18:45.760 --> 1:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>his first hundred yard game over seventeen yards per catch

1:18:48.840 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>with the Pats, sixteen targets over the last two weeks.

1:18:51.720 --> 1:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>He's the main guy there. B grade for Edelman, Uh,

1:18:55.960 --> 1:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>mainly because I don't think this becomes a shootout. I

1:18:58.040 --> 1:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think the Pats get up and then they hold it

1:18:59.760 --> 1:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>down own Um. He's average ade eight targets over and

1:19:03.360 --> 1:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>over five catches per games. Since return returning, scored in

1:19:06.360 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>two straight um Hogan, I am benching now. His only

1:19:11.000 --> 1:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>two games came in his two good games came in

1:19:13.880 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>complete shootouts, and I don't think this is a shootout.

1:19:17.560 --> 1:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Gronk B grade on the night side, he's gronk. On

1:19:21.280 --> 1:19:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the bad side, he's been limited. Uh, he missed last

1:19:24.439 --> 1:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>week randomly. He tends to be very injury concerned. It's

1:19:29.360 --> 1:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Monday night and the Bills have been very tough against

1:19:31.680 --> 1:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>height ends. I if you can, I would almost put

1:19:34.760 --> 1:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>him in your flex and possibly consider guys like him

1:19:38.439 --> 1:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and Michelle. Get him in your flex so you can

1:19:41.280 --> 1:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly pivot to Ivory, who might get the start over there.

1:19:44.120 --> 1:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>If McCoy doesn't go, James White A grade just if

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Michelle doesn't go, especially just a definite eight grade. He

1:19:51.240 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>has seven touchdowns this season and his averaging over ten

1:19:54.080 --> 1:19:57.599
<v Speaker 1>targets per game in the last four, which is unreal bottom.

1:19:57.840 --> 1:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo sits bottom ten of NAY points allowed to running

1:20:01.240 --> 1:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>backs and has given up an average of a three

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards to opponent to opposing backfields over the last

1:20:07.280 --> 1:20:10.559
<v Speaker 1>four games. So a grade there. If Michelle does play,

1:20:10.640 --> 1:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I would give him an A grade. I

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think I would. Yeah, we don't even know how much

1:20:15.080 --> 1:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>runn he'd get on that knee if I need very

1:20:18.160 --> 1:20:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I I wouldn't start him, though, I'd only

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>put him if you can pivot. That's the only way,

1:20:24.520 --> 1:20:26.519
<v Speaker 1>the only start him as you can pivot to somebody

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>else on the Monday night, or if he doesn't go

1:20:28.280 --> 1:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>like Chris. I but but James Wedge is the one

1:20:30.120 --> 1:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not even remotely concerned of because of his

1:20:32.960 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game work. On the Buffalo side, I'm sitting everyone

1:20:37.560 --> 1:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I've reased the only one that possibly could get a

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>C grade for me if we know McCoy's out, which

1:20:42.080 --> 1:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't at this moment. But otherwise I'm mentioned everyone

1:20:45.240 --> 1:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, and we don't need to say anything more

1:20:46.720 --> 1:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about Buffalo bills than that it is time for lightning round.

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>That means one question among two players. One question among

1:20:54.760 --> 1:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>two players. You will be able to listen to your answer,

1:20:57.800 --> 1:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>probably on your radio, so zoom. We go through the quickly.

1:21:00.479 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times have already moved on to the

1:21:01.960 --> 1:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>next the next person in line by the time you're

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>listening for an answer. Ben, you are first. All right, guys,

1:21:08.960 --> 1:21:11.599
<v Speaker 1>he'll be quick. This is gonna be rough. The standard

1:21:12.120 --> 1:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>scoring non PPR, I guess Barner or hide. I guess

1:21:21.520 --> 1:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Barner or I would go hide. Yeah, you gotta

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>go hide because if Michelle does play, Barner might not

1:21:27.520 --> 1:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>even see the I think from guaranteed touches. Dan, you're next.

1:21:33.640 --> 1:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I have both PPR and non PPR. Do I consider

1:21:37.120 --> 1:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>starting Mostart over Um McCaffrey. Yes, if they rule Breed out,

1:21:43.479 --> 1:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for sure, definitely would. And even so, if you're in

1:21:46.840 --> 1:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>two different leagues, I might split it in half and

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cover your bases. But frankly, most it's got way more

1:21:51.960 --> 1:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>upside problems. You may not hear about breed until later

1:21:54.040 --> 1:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's late. It's a late game. That's a good point.

1:21:56.280 --> 1:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>You got a bank on McCaffrey. Yeah, I don't know.

1:21:59.520 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I see I've play Moster. Yeah, but I I I'm

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a high risk guy. Ryan Hello, Yes, JAYL Rohard or Booker,

1:22:09.320 --> 1:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>uh Richard Safer. He's got He's seven catches and there's

1:22:13.160 --> 1:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>seven at least not a big He's got a great matchup.

1:22:16.720 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But man, it's DeVante Booker. I just can't do it.

1:22:20.400 --> 1:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Is some great talent If it's PPRS, Shard is it

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>PPR standard. Oh, we don't know because he's gone. Ron Ryan. Now,

1:22:26.280 --> 1:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello Ryan, he going it? Say it again? Goliday or

1:22:31.880 --> 1:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>lock it Holiday? Lock it? Okay, I mean lock it

1:22:36.960 --> 1:22:39.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're less matals defeat on that offense than Orange Detroit.

1:22:40.560 --> 1:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>John your next as we need Troubinsky or a rod Um.

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Rogers Love Rogers my number two quarterback this week

1:22:52.280 --> 1:22:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and a fantastic matchup. Hello Diana, Hi, guys, this whole question.

1:22:58.360 --> 1:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going against Bryan's garbage team and I have to

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>choose between c Ja Bathard or Alex Smith. Brian, you

1:23:06.920 --> 1:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>should answer it. Then you can't. Brian can't answer it.

1:23:10.880 --> 1:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish Bowl where I failed to start Lamar Miller

1:23:13.360 --> 1:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>by the Lake because I went to a hockey game. Yeah, yeah,

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it was. What should Diana do? I think I had

1:23:21.280 --> 1:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Bethard rated higher this week, but Alex Smith has a

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>far better matchup. Yeah, that's that's pretty ugly. I'd go

1:23:30.840 --> 1:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>beth just hoping for some rushing yards. Is that far

1:23:33.280 --> 1:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense to get points per first time? Brian? Please? Phil? Hello?

1:23:38.960 --> 1:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, Um, would you chance wrong or I'm blinking?

1:23:42.760 --> 1:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But the tight end from the Bear story tray Burton easily. Yep,

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:51.519
<v Speaker 1>ty Burton. Burton's correct, Yeah, the wrong thing, it's all.

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It's all. The difficulty of course here is that he's

1:23:54.840 --> 1:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, so we don't know his status and you've

1:23:56.800 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>got to make a call sooner than that. But it's Buffalo, right,

1:24:00.920 --> 1:24:03.759
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I lock and Phil, what's yeah? I'm actually

1:24:03.800 --> 1:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>hanging out, but sorry if I hung up on you,

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. Bron statline historically against Buffalo is absolutely ridiculous.

1:24:10.160 --> 1:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's lunacy looking at that game. Long those games and Buffalo, baby,

1:24:14.240 --> 1:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>let's try Emily Hello, Hi, Yeah, finitely from Jacksonville. Again,

1:24:22.080 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it was Golliday or Sterling Shepherd. Brian, I think you're

1:24:24.479 --> 1:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>up on this one. Yeah, we're waiting on news of

1:24:27.000 --> 1:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Washington slot corner. Right he's out. What was his

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Nameabi and Moreau. If he is out, it's Shepherd with

1:24:33.800 --> 1:24:39.599
<v Speaker 1>a bullet, but I would probably en Gala day otherwise, Brian. Hello, Yeah,

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>full point Golden Taper Johnson, Golden Tate with a really

1:24:46.240 --> 1:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>juicy matchup this week, like like him a lot at

1:24:49.240 --> 1:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the revenge game hadn't sound as much as I was hoping.

1:24:51.960 --> 1:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's see here. I think I can go to Joe. Hello, Joe, Hi, Hi, Dan,

1:24:59.120 --> 1:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph or Joko. Oh if this is coming to me,

1:25:03.320 --> 1:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I have been joking with my tight end one. All right,

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>there you go, Bill. Your next PPR Travis Kelsey or

1:25:10.280 --> 1:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert Wood. It's Kelsey or Robert Kelsey. Three straight over

1:25:14.240 --> 1:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards against Denver and that's going to continue.

1:25:16.520 --> 1:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>He is fantastic. Yeah, that's nice, Rod. Hello, the rest

1:25:23.040 --> 1:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Question half point PPR Ingram or Michelle.

1:25:29.080 --> 1:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the healthy back. I'm gonna take the

1:25:31.120 --> 1:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>guy who doesn't have a reoccurring knee problem. So I

1:25:33.479 --> 1:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would I would take Ingram over Michelle rest of the way,

1:25:36.280 --> 1:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a reasonable way to go. Andy, Hello,

1:25:39.960 --> 1:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys, half point PPR shub or do I go

1:25:44.479 --> 1:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with like faced out? Sorry? Al right, Andy, I don't,

1:25:53.920 --> 1:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>so we'll go with somebody else. Go with you? You're next,

1:25:59.160 --> 1:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim Well, yes, half point GPR. Hold onto Ronald Jones

1:26:04.400 --> 1:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>or Pip All right, Oh my gosh, this is such

1:26:07.680 --> 1:26:10.599
<v Speaker 1>a good week for potentially Ronald Jones. But I still

1:26:10.640 --> 1:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can't even start him because I'm not sure. I'd probably

1:26:13.120 --> 1:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably go with Charches prespective Geo. Okay, Kevin your next, Kevin?

1:26:21.479 --> 1:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>All right? So see the deal is if you try

1:26:23.800 --> 1:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to it on the radio, it doesn't work.

1:26:26.200 --> 1:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you gotta just you can't listen to the

1:26:29.120 --> 1:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>radio while you're on hold. Natalie, Hello, Hello, Standard Lead,

1:26:34.320 --> 1:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett or Sterling Shepherd. Okay, Uh, lock it regardless

1:26:39.640 --> 1:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Washington's Lot Corner status, unlock it. I like

1:26:42.800 --> 1:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>our three female callers today, and a reminder we've got

1:26:45.760 --> 1:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got chick chat coming next week to your opener,

1:26:48.160 --> 1:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is next week. I think it's chick chat

1:26:50.479 --> 1:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>next week. All female callers were already looking forward to that. Paul,

1:26:53.880 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're next. We'll stick list the locker questions half point

1:26:57.800 --> 1:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>GPR Locke or Alice. I'm sticking with locket here, although

1:27:03.120 --> 1:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I liked the Ellison matchup a lot, and I think

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of points to be had there, but

1:27:06.840 --> 1:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lock it's what's not to like about the

1:27:09.240 --> 1:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>lock It's done all season, Mikey, and it is a

1:27:13.439 --> 1:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. Mike. You next, Hi, Uh, Standards League Chris

1:27:18.960 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Godwin or Dortan Howard? All right? Is this mine? Yes,

1:27:23.680 --> 1:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it's yours standard. You said, I guess, I guess Howard's

1:27:29.960 --> 1:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the safe play Andrew your next? Agreed? If I could

1:27:34.360 --> 1:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>listen online, I'd like to listen online. Listen online. Uh,

1:27:38.600 --> 1:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I got cousin or mahomes homes every week but barely,

1:27:45.080 --> 1:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is mahomes. It's mos number one. Can't bench homes.

1:27:49.200 --> 1:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Although again, I think Kirk is sitting on a really

1:27:51.160 --> 1:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>nice game Taco your next. Hey, guys, a non PPR.

1:27:55.800 --> 1:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Another Locke question, lock it or dirty? Locket? And I'm

1:28:01.640 --> 1:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jordy Guy. I've suddenly turned into Jordy Guy out

1:28:04.800 --> 1:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of this Crow. Every single caller has lock it on

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>their team. It does seem that way, doesn't it. Nobody

1:28:09.360 --> 1:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>likes playing him, even in a good matchup. Pop drop

1:28:11.680 --> 1:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and lock it? Uh, Josh your next standard leaf or Gordon? Oh,

1:28:19.840 --> 1:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon easily for me? Yeah, agreed. Uh, We're We're Crow. Well,

1:28:23.439 --> 1:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's got Chicago. They haven't given up a rushing touchdown

1:28:25.479 --> 1:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>yet this year. Uh. If you have missed a part

1:28:27.680 --> 1:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the show, check on the podcast Cafe and fan

1:28:30.240 --> 1:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>on demand, also on iTunes. Also have our own challenge

1:28:33.560 --> 1:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>on I Heart Radio. On the app, you can be

1:28:36.360 --> 1:28:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy football weekly channel right there. Uh, faun farewell,

1:28:41.320 --> 1:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Tony Landry, many years our technical our technical board, op

1:28:45.800 --> 1:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>producer guy. Thank you for all of your work, all

1:28:48.080 --> 1:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the sound drops, everything else. Don't wish you the best

1:28:50.920 --> 1:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of luck in Washington as you transition your career to

1:28:53.680 --> 1:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger and maybe even better things. Thank you, Tony. We'll

1:28:56.800 --> 1:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. We think it's chick chat for

1:28:58.840 --> 1:29:01.639
<v Speaker 1>dear opener next week and that'll be Uh. That's always

1:29:01.680 --> 1:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. If you have a moment to

1:29:03.520 --> 1:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>rate and review of the podcast, we appreciate that very

1:29:06.600 --> 1:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>very much. We'll talk to you next week. Everybody, Bye bye.

1:29:16.360 --> 1:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Fantasy Football Weekly presented by Green Bell Premium

1:29:20.479 --> 1:29:24.479
<v Speaker 1>on the fans. Truck Truck, Truck, Truck, Truck, It's not

1:29:24.640 --> 1:29:26.439
<v Speaker 1>just trucks. Want that Rosedale show. Relate