Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Impeachment two point zero
Speaker 1: is a disaster. Trump says, this is the continuation of
Speaker 1: a witch hunt. Liz Cheney and Mitch McConnell break ranks
Speaker 1: with him, Mike Pence won't invoke the twenty fifth Amendment,
Speaker 1: and Los Angeles wants you to wear a mask inside
Speaker 1: your own home. Buck sextons just coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American great,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: shows CIA analyst I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, this is
Speaker 1: not going to help. Let's be very clear about that.
Speaker 1: This movie moved by Democrats underway right now to impeach
Speaker 1: and remove the president of the United States with seven
Speaker 1: days left to go in office is unfair, it's unhelpful,
Speaker 1: it's hypocritical. When you look at the charges and what
Speaker 1: they're saying, this isn't based upon and you have to
Speaker 1: you have to be very clear, you have to really
Speaker 1: look at what's happening, because they're gonna misdirect you, they're
Speaker 1: gonna lie to you. This is not based on just
Speaker 1: Trump using rhetoric and saying things about the election that
Speaker 1: we're not true. This is about insurrection, incitement to insurrection,
Speaker 1: they say, that's what they're really going after Trump for.
Speaker 1: They are claiming that the President of the United States
Speaker 1: told that mob on Capitol Hill to ransack and and
Speaker 1: attack the United States Capitol while it was certifying the election.
Speaker 1: Now you can go back yourself, look at the transcript
Speaker 1: or watch the speech on video that Trump gave. He
Speaker 1: did not say that. That's just not true. They can
Speaker 1: keep repeating this as much as they want. They can
Speaker 1: claim that Trump was the head of this terrorist organization
Speaker 1: that tried to seize the capital. He never said anything
Speaker 1: that you could claim in a court, for example, reasonably
Speaker 1: would lead someone to acts of imminent violence, and that's
Speaker 1: what incitement would have to be. Now, let's also remember
Speaker 1: if the new standard were to operate under, is that
Speaker 1: politicians who say reckless and untrue things are responsible for
Speaker 1: the acts of any person who acts upon what they're
Speaker 1: saying on their own accord and breaks the law. We
Speaker 1: got a lot of Democrats who need to be locked
Speaker 1: up for incitement to riot over BLM because they were
Speaker 1: telling the public constantly that police officers are racists who
Speaker 1: murder people, who murder unarmed black men for no reason
Speaker 1: other than their own bigotry and disgraceful soul. Right. That's it,
Speaker 1: That's what their line. The foundation of Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: is built upon a lie that cops killed unarmed black
Speaker 1: men without consequence routinely and systematically in this country. That's
Speaker 1: not true. It's not that it never happens, and we
Speaker 1: all agree that when it does happen, it's highly unjust
Speaker 1: and wrong and evil. But to impugne all the almost
Speaker 1: million law enforcement officers in this country, police officers, to
Speaker 1: impune them over this, and to suggest that this is widespread,
Speaker 1: it is a part of the system, and therefore everyone
Speaker 1: within this system is tainted by it is a lie.
Speaker 1: We have three hundred and thirty million people in this country,
Speaker 1: and you have less than a hundred unarmed black men
Speaker 1: shot in recent years. When you look at the statistics,
Speaker 1: that is a very very small number. Every single one
Speaker 1: of those, when it's an unjust shooting, is a tragedy.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats lie about this all the time, and
Speaker 1: it has resulted in not one, but hundreds of riots
Speaker 1: and violet incidents and destruction of property and police officers
Speaker 1: being executed, being murdered in their cars. That's the result
Speaker 1: of the rhetoric that is deployed routinely by the left.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna we've got to take this piece by piece.
Speaker 1: If you're telling me that Trump is responsible for the
Speaker 1: violence that came from a small all group compared to
Speaker 1: the overall group of protesters in DC. Right, it was
Speaker 1: perhaps a couple of thousand, and we estimate at least
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand people, say a lot more, who knows,
Speaker 1: protested lawfully in DC two thousand or so. We don't
Speaker 1: have exact numbers here. But they made a horrible, you know,
Speaker 1: egregious error and should be punished for it. But you'll
Speaker 1: notice I will say that. I'll say that even though
Speaker 1: I know it upsets a lot of people who agree
Speaker 1: with me on a whole lot of things politically, But
Speaker 1: I truly believe that this is a moral question. The left,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, when it comes to BLM and ANTIFA, they
Speaker 1: will not treat it as a moral question. They will
Speaker 1: treat those riots and that violence as a question of
Speaker 1: political expediency, and they will excuse it, they will downplay it,
Speaker 1: they will ignore it. They will quote mostly peaceful protest it.
Speaker 1: That's what they do. So now we're supposed to take
Speaker 1: lectures from them about incitement. I mentioned to you that
Speaker 1: there was a Bernie Sanders supporter who tried just a
Speaker 1: few years ago to murder the most conservative members of
Speaker 1: Congress he could find. He tracked them down, he scouted
Speaker 1: out the location, and with a semionic rifle, he almost
Speaker 1: killed Steve Scalisee. He hit him. He tried to kill
Speaker 1: Senator Rand Paul. He was an avowed Democrat and a
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders supporter who was yelling, this is for healthcare.
Speaker 1: Now you can say, and I would say, this is fair.
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders did not tell anyone to go engage in violence.
Speaker 1: But Bernie Sanders, along with the Democrats, routinely say things
Speaker 1: like Republicans don't care about the poor, they don't care
Speaker 1: about people dying from lack of healthcare. Well, if somebody
Speaker 1: really believes that, and they decide that they're going to
Speaker 1: make that a moral question, if they think that that's true,
Speaker 1: that Republicans really don't care if people die in agony
Speaker 1: because of lack of access to healthcare, because Republicans are
Speaker 1: so greedy and hate the poor. We know, whatever nonsense
Speaker 1: leftism they're going to spread about this, there will be
Speaker 1: individuals who decide to take violent action. We don't hold
Speaker 1: Bernie Centers responsible for that, do we. That's exactly what's
Speaker 1: being done to President Trump. Look, the rhetoric about the
Speaker 1: election went too far. If you're going to say I won,
Speaker 1: you have to be able to prove it. Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: as of what we've seen in recently, it's not even
Speaker 1: as of today, Joe Biden has won the election, full stop.
Speaker 1: Who knows what the future will bring. Maybe we'll find
Speaker 1: out more information. Joe Biden won this election, and Trump
Speaker 1: went too far in the claims about how it was.
Speaker 1: It wasn't even just that there was some fraud and
Speaker 1: we're gonna find it. It was. It was a landslide
Speaker 1: for Trump, that's what he was saying. Now we can
Speaker 1: criticize that, and I know there's a tremendous disappointment for
Speaker 1: Trump personally as well as for all his supporters around this.
Speaker 1: There was disappointment for me. I feel what you are
Speaker 1: feeling with regard to the sense of loss for the
Speaker 1: future of the country that we're now going to have
Speaker 1: a Biden administration that I think is gonna make everybody
Speaker 1: less free, poorer, more divided, more angry. I think this
Speaker 1: will be bad, but I do respect the system that
Speaker 1: we have. And once you start saying, well, I don't
Speaker 1: care anymore, Buck, we gotta get rid of this or
Speaker 1: overthrow this. Understand what you're really talking about. That's a
Speaker 1: grave step, and we are not there. We can still
Speaker 1: work within this system we have. I implore you, please,
Speaker 1: everyone out there listening all across the country, there are
Speaker 1: a lot of you. Don't give up, hope and don't
Speaker 1: forget who you are. We will work within this system.
Speaker 1: I'm seeing these these stories about, you know, armed protests
Speaker 1: the day before the inauguration. I know that you can
Speaker 1: tell me about what happened at Trump's inauguration. I'm quite
Speaker 1: aware of it. They burn that limousine in the streets,
Speaker 1: anarchic riots. That's disgusting, it's awful, it's wrong. We are
Speaker 1: not them now. If people are going to peacefully and
Speaker 1: lawfully protests, of course, fine, I get it, support it.
Speaker 1: But I start seeing this change in the rhetoric. You know,
Speaker 1: this is not what I remember from the Tea Party
Speaker 1: of we're all going to show up and have our
Speaker 1: voices heard. There's another element that's entering into this where
Speaker 1: people are suggesting we have to abandon the system, and
Speaker 1: that's not I strongly disagree, and I think that that's
Speaker 1: that's a very dangerous, indestructive path. So there should be
Speaker 1: we should not allow that. And let me just tell
Speaker 1: you this right now, the Democrats are coming into power.
Speaker 1: You know, it would help them further suppressed speech and
Speaker 1: freedom more than anything else. If a few idiots really
Speaker 1: cross the line again, plays right into the Democrats, and
Speaker 1: they're already talking about using counter terrorism law against Conservatives.
Speaker 1: They're already talking about this. They'll do it, they'll do it,
Speaker 1: and so let's not give these authoritarians an excuse for
Speaker 1: further overreach. Now, all that said, I'm saying we have
Speaker 1: to stay within the system. Democrats are abusing the system.
Speaker 1: They are hurting the process set forward for impeachment and
Speaker 1: removal from office. They're they're intentionally going around the way
Speaker 1: it's supposed to work. There's they're moving past the judiciary,
Speaker 1: They're they're going right to let's let's get to the
Speaker 1: floor vote. Let's let's ram this thing through as quickly
Speaker 1: as possible to what end? Why do this? Trump lost
Speaker 1: the election, He's done, He's done in a week. What
Speaker 1: purpose would it serve for the American people right now?
Speaker 1: Other than to be a slap in the face of
Speaker 1: the seventy four million people who voted for Trump on
Speaker 1: in this past November and the sixty some odd million
Speaker 1: that voted for him back in twenty sixteen. It's meant
Speaker 1: to humiliate an undermine. No one thinks Trump's not leaving.
Speaker 1: Trump knows he's leaving now it's over. So why do this?
Speaker 1: Why kick a man when he's down? Well, this is
Speaker 1: where I say. They are going around and they're trying
Speaker 1: to ram home their advantage. They want retribution. They want retribution,
Speaker 1: not just against Trump, against Trump's supporters. And I do
Speaker 1: believe that Republicans need to need to stay clear eyed
Speaker 1: on this one and not give in to the Democrat mob.
Speaker 1: Not give into at this stage. What possible benefit could
Speaker 1: there be to repudiate the president and his whole legacy.
Speaker 1: I remember, until the COVID pandemic and the Democrats exploiting
Speaker 1: that issue to the maximum and making us all as
Speaker 1: miserable and terrified as possible. But until that came along,
Speaker 1: the country did very well. For three years of Trump's presidency,
Speaker 1: things were good. They can lie about it as much
Speaker 1: as they want. I remember things were good and the
Speaker 1: president was overall a very strong president for three years.
Speaker 1: The fourth year things changed. The fourth year we had
Speaker 1: COVID and we had lockdowns and the whole mood of
Speaker 1: the country changed. What does what does it tell the
Speaker 1: American people right now? If with a week left to go,
Speaker 1: this president is removed, is removed by this congressional procedure.
Speaker 1: The people who say there need to be accountability, he
Speaker 1: lost the election. If they want to have a vote
Speaker 1: of censure, that's reasonable and within the process. But to
Speaker 1: remove with only a week left because they say he's
Speaker 1: in imminent danger, I think that's I think that's vindictive,
Speaker 1: and I think it's excessive, and I think it's all base.
Speaker 1: Remember they're not even just making the claim that he
Speaker 1: lied about the election because Nancy Pelosi lied about the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election. Oh, it was hijack. The Democrats spent
Speaker 1: four years lying about what happened in twenty sixteen and
Speaker 1: Russia collusion and all this insanity from them. Big Tech
Speaker 1: didn't crack down on them, no votes of censure against them.
Speaker 1: None of them lost their jobs, either the media or
Speaker 1: in politics for openly and repeatedly lying to your faces
Speaker 1: America for years about Russia collusion. So I don't want
Speaker 1: to hear that, oh Trump's comments about the election. They
Speaker 1: still say. The Democrats still say that Georgia gubernatorial election
Speaker 1: was stolen from Stacy Abrams. They do this all the time.
Speaker 1: They objected to more states in twenty seventeen at a
Speaker 1: certification than the Republicans were in this election. So this
Speaker 1: should not be about, oh, we don't like what Trump
Speaker 1: said about the election, therefore he should be impeached and
Speaker 1: removed from office, because look what the Democrats were saying
Speaker 1: about it. This is about incitement to insurrection. That's why
Speaker 1: they go for that charge. And on that charge, we
Speaker 1: need to be very precise and we need to stand
Speaker 1: for m On principle, the president cannot be held responsible
Speaker 1: for the actions of a mob that he did not direct.
Speaker 1: He did not say go break the law, he did
Speaker 1: not say go attack people. Was his rhetoric overheated about
Speaker 1: the election? Should he have been more measured? Should he
Speaker 1: have stayed within the confines of what the evidence he
Speaker 1: had and could present was yes, But is he directly
Speaker 1: responsible for the riot in Capitol Hill. That's if we
Speaker 1: make that connection. There are Democrats who have lots more
Speaker 1: riots and violence and deaths, including deaths of police officers,
Speaker 1: to answer for because of the incitement of the BLM
Speaker 1: and Antifa mobs we've seen in the last twelve months.
Speaker 1: That's the truth. There is no good reason to remove
Speaker 1: the president from office right now. He's gone in a week.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom und This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast on the impeachment. It's really a continuation
Speaker 1: of the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics.
Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. It's absolutely ridiculous. This impeachment is causing tremendous anger,
Speaker 1: and you're doing it. And it's really a terrible thing
Speaker 1: that they're doing. For Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Chumor to
Speaker 1: continue on this path, I think it's causing tremendous danger
Speaker 1: to our country and it's causing tremendous anger. I want
Speaker 1: no violence. I want no violence, he says. He keeps
Speaker 1: saying to remain peaceful, but that doesn't ever get accounted
Speaker 1: for in the media's discussions about this. They blame him
Speaker 1: for everything he brings up. The witch hunt Russia Kaloo
Speaker 1: was a witch hunt. It was disgraceful, it was dishonest,
Speaker 1: and it was used to harm the Trump presidency, unfortunately
Speaker 1: with substantial effect, and therefore it really hurt the American
Speaker 1: people because bitter and vicious Democrats were willing to work
Speaker 1: in clear collusion with the media to lie and lie
Speaker 1: and lie about it. So I think we should all
Speaker 1: we should all see this for what it is. They've
Speaker 1: been trying to remove this president through some mechanism from
Speaker 1: the very beginning, even if they had to lie about
Speaker 1: it entirely. Don't we think we should take that into account.
Speaker 1: Now there is something of a cry wolf scenario here
Speaker 1: that we should be aware of. They keep saying that
Speaker 1: Trump is a clear and present danger, a clear and
Speaker 1: present danger. Now we have had a terrible incident at
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill, and they're trying to place it all on
Speaker 1: Trump's shoulders. I'm not saying that there aren't reasons to
Speaker 1: criticize the president post this election. There are, but to
Speaker 1: say that he is responsible for the riot and that
Speaker 1: he must be removed from office with one week left
Speaker 1: to go. Because of this seems much more a continuation
Speaker 1: of the Democrat mania to remove him than an actual
Speaker 1: fair minded assessment of what his culpability is. In the
Speaker 1: violent riot and Capitol Hill, that's where we really are
Speaker 1: and that's where we should say no, no, we won't
Speaker 1: give the Democrat left what it wants here. It's not
Speaker 1: in the interests of the country. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Understand
Speaker 1: that the Democrats are not planning on limiting the reprisals
Speaker 1: to Trump and his family. They want to create the
Speaker 1: underlying legal architecture to come after you if you stand
Speaker 1: for the Trump movement, if you continue to push conservative
Speaker 1: ideas that are in opposition to the Biden Harris administration,
Speaker 1: they want to find ways to go after and silence you.
Speaker 1: Now they will say, of course, no, we only want
Speaker 1: to stop domestic terrorists and insurrectionists. Really, look at the
Speaker 1: way that they've used the term white supremacy now as
Speaker 1: a catch all term for essentially anything opposed to what
Speaker 1: the left claims is social justice is now called white supremacy.
Speaker 1: Anything that you can point to and say, well, we'll
Speaker 1: hold on a second that I disagree with this racially
Speaker 1: conscious policy, as a Supreme Court referred to it in
Speaker 1: a relatively recent decision, the racial entitlement state that you
Speaker 1: should not make determinations of law based upon skin color
Speaker 1: or ethnicity. That that's wrong. It's a violation of the
Speaker 1: equal protection clause. That's white supremacy. Now, everything is white supremacy.
Speaker 1: And they do that because it's a useful tactic to
Speaker 1: frighten people and to attack people who are not actually,
Speaker 1: of course, white supremacist white supremacies, but are people who
Speaker 1: oppose your politics and want to stop you. And while
Speaker 1: we're sitting here having our discussion about the constitutional processes,
Speaker 1: now that the Democrats are really running rough shot over by.
Speaker 1: They're jumping past the normal procedure even for an impeachment.
Speaker 1: They're trying to leverage the threat of impeachment to use
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment against the president. Here's what Trump
Speaker 1: says about that. By the way, play one, free speech
Speaker 1: is under assault like never before. The twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: is of zero risk to me. But we'll come back
Speaker 1: to haunt Joe Bay and the Biden administration. As the
Speaker 1: expression goes be careful what you wish for saying something
Speaker 1: that a lot of us have been alluding to for
Speaker 1: some time here whereby the easy path out for Joe
Speaker 1: Biden at any point in his presidency will be to
Speaker 1: step down. And or there are some who believe that
Speaker 1: they will just claim that twenty fifth Amendment means that
Speaker 1: he's no longer of sound mind, and this is because
Speaker 1: of his age. And no one who knows anything about
Speaker 1: the kind of decline that people can have that we
Speaker 1: are all heading for as we age, no one can
Speaker 1: say that this is an unrealistic possibility. So Trump is
Speaker 1: pointing out, you may actually have a twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: invocation about Joe Biden, because yes he could. And let
Speaker 1: me be very clear, I wish for the health of
Speaker 1: the President of the United States. I wish for the
Speaker 1: good health and longevity and safety of every president of
Speaker 1: the United States period. Now Joe Biden is of an
Speaker 1: age though where there is a concern about his health
Speaker 1: over the eight years of his term. So Trump is
Speaker 1: making reference to you know, I wonder if Democrats in
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment, if this may be there may
Speaker 1: be some historic irony here in their constant attempts to
Speaker 1: use it as a weapon of politics, when that's not
Speaker 1: what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to be infirmity
Speaker 1: to do the job really a physical physiological condition. It's
Speaker 1: not just we don't like you, we're going to use
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment to remove you. So he points
Speaker 1: that out. How overheated, How overheated is the rhetoric that
Speaker 1: you're hearing, you know, because right now and a lot
Speaker 1: of conservative channels and everything, a lot of places that
Speaker 1: you would turn for news there, they're having a very
Speaker 1: hard time. The ratings are plummeting. A lot of people
Speaker 1: on the right don't want to hear about these things.
Speaker 1: They don't want to And look, I understand that in
Speaker 1: the sense that there's not a lot of good news
Speaker 1: right now to share. I'm looking forward. I'm trying, I'm
Speaker 1: finding I'm squeezing every silver lining I can. I'm doing
Speaker 1: whatever I can to give a full context and perspective
Speaker 1: to what's going on in the country right now. But
Speaker 1: I will not lie to you. As you know, and
Speaker 1: I think that this is this is a dark and
Speaker 1: dangerous time. But if you want to understand how much
Speaker 1: worse it can get, if you want to understand what's
Speaker 1: really at issue here. If we continue in this direction,
Speaker 1: especially when this is all happening, we still have a
Speaker 1: Republican president, Republican executive branch that's about to change, folks,
Speaker 1: that's about to change. So we need to be aware
Speaker 1: of what's coming. CNN has among the worst national security
Speaker 1: analysts of any place I can think of, and I'm
Speaker 1: including third tier think tanks and academia, and I mean CNN,
Speaker 1: And I know because essentially was one of them for
Speaker 1: two years. Uh that that CNN does employ some of
Speaker 1: the dumbest people on national security you'll ever find. And
Speaker 1: they say exactly what that audience wants to hear, and
Speaker 1: they and they try to filter it through this prism
Speaker 1: of I went to, you know, the Kennedy School, which
Speaker 1: they would come out, who cares, you know, you look
Speaker 1: at these places, these institutions of higher learning. We're all
Speaker 1: supposed to be so impressed, you know, the same way
Speaker 1: that conservatives don't get a fair shake in social media,
Speaker 1: and we all know that now they used to deny it,
Speaker 1: but it's true. Conservatives also if you're if you're a
Speaker 1: right of center, you will not get a fair shake
Speaker 1: in academia, especially a humanity's program, international relations programs. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: you you have to be at least a democrat, if
Speaker 1: not a leftist, if not an outright leftist, if you
Speaker 1: want to excel in those places. So you're supposed to
Speaker 1: believe that the credentials that some of these will have
Speaker 1: makes what they're saying not moronic. I'm here to tell
Speaker 1: you no, it's quite moronic. And here's a very good
Speaker 1: example of that. As UH national security analyst Juliet Kaimum.
Speaker 1: She's somebody who has said some of the dumbest things
Speaker 1: imaginable on air. Even when I'll never forget this, she
Speaker 1: she claimed that I was putting troops in danger overseas
Speaker 1: because by criticizing Obama administration form She did this on TV,
Speaker 1: criticizing Obama administration foreign policy, that our enemies would be
Speaker 1: emboldened to attack our soldiers. I know, Oh, that's that's
Speaker 1: a really clever formulation. So if I don't like Obama's uh,
Speaker 1: you know, with withdrawal plan that never actually happened in Afghanistan, right,
Speaker 1: Or if I have any criticism of Obama, I'm helping
Speaker 1: are you're doing bin Laden's work that was basically the line.
Speaker 1: Of course then been line got killed. But you know
Speaker 1: you're doing I'll has work for them. They would, they
Speaker 1: would try stuff like this, So that I had this
Speaker 1: exchange with this woman years ago, I'll never forget it.
Speaker 1: And I said to her, excuse me, I've actually served
Speaker 1: on military basis as a civilian CIA advisor and ridden
Speaker 1: around with them in humbies and helicopters and tried to
Speaker 1: help in the war effort as an analyst. Always very
Speaker 1: clear about this, but I actually took some risk and
Speaker 1: have deep respect for the military and the much greater
Speaker 1: risks that they were taking in the war zone on
Speaker 1: a daily basis. I'm not going to hear this crap
Speaker 1: from this clown because oh, I teach at the Kennedy
Speaker 1: School or whatever, means nothing. He's nothing. Although there's a
Speaker 1: woman who teaches at Yale, miss Asha Rangapa, who is
Speaker 1: like a chief Russia truther or collusion person, never reputed,
Speaker 1: just saying idiotic stuff, completely unproof. But she was a Comyite.
Speaker 1: She was one of James Coomey's disciples, so they hired
Speaker 1: her at Sea and this is what you get. Now.
Speaker 1: You might be saying, why does all this matter because
Speaker 1: they are inciting the CNN audience against all of you.
Speaker 1: They were doing it with Russia collusion, all these national
Speaker 1: security analysts, and now they're taking it even a step further.
Speaker 1: This is what was said on National TV about not
Speaker 1: just Trump, about you, with no pushback from the anchor,
Speaker 1: no effort to try to give any nuance or clarification.
Speaker 1: Here play clip two, and I think what we have
Speaker 1: to remember is Trump is the spiritual but I will
Speaker 1: also say operational leader of this domestic terrorism effort. He
Speaker 1: tells them where to go, he tells them what to do,
Speaker 1: he tells them why they're angry. And so we need
Speaker 1: to start at the top, like any counter terrorism effort,
Speaker 1: which is total isolation of the President of the United States. Impeachment, yes,
Speaker 1: twenty fifth Amendment, yes, deep platforming, yes, all of the above,
Speaker 1: No money, no access to campaign funds, a complete isolation
Speaker 1: because as the leader of a terrorist organization is viewed
Speaker 1: as a loser, as a not winner, it is harder
Speaker 1: for him to recruit. Look, he's going to have his
Speaker 1: radical elements. We will arrest them, we will isolate them.
Speaker 1: But what we have to make sure is that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump does not have a second act. I know I
Speaker 1: sound incredibly harsh right now calling the president at this,
Speaker 1: but we are in the tactical response right now. Enough
Speaker 1: with the let's unity and stuff. This is a tactical
Speaker 1: effort right now to make sure that we protect American
Speaker 1: citizens and of course the next president of the United
Speaker 1: States here Jim Shooto there, yeah, yeah, that's right, he's
Speaker 1: that's right, he's This was the quote, the spiritual leader
Speaker 1: for domestic terrorists? What do we do with spiritual leaders
Speaker 1: of other terrorists groups? Think about the implications of what
Speaker 1: this woman is saying on National TV? Yep, yep, Jim Shooto, yes, yes,
Speaker 1: So it was very, very, very bright, very she's honestly,
Speaker 1: she's a clown and an imbecile, but elevated. A lot
Speaker 1: of people heard that if he's the leader of a
Speaker 1: domestic terrorist group, what does that make anyone who's voted
Speaker 1: for him, What does that mean for your civil rights?
Speaker 1: Your civil liberties going forward? This is what they are
Speaker 1: saying right now, and Republicans think, and this is this
Speaker 1: is something I meant to get to earlier. Some Republicans,
Speaker 1: I should say, I mean, we've got you've got a
Speaker 1: handful of them who are going along with this impeachment
Speaker 1: effort who want to be a part of it. They
Speaker 1: think that casting Trump out now is going to put
Speaker 1: the country back on a pathway to better political, spiritual
Speaker 1: and legal health. I mean, that's going to put us
Speaker 1: back on track. Are they out of their minds? It
Speaker 1: makes everything worse. They shouldn't know that. There shouldn't be
Speaker 1: any any doubt that this would just this would give
Speaker 1: so much more oxygen to the very small but unfortunately
Speaker 1: significant enough contingent on the far right that creates all
Speaker 1: these crazy conspiracy theories and all. There's all this stuff
Speaker 1: going on with the lizard people and the and the
Speaker 1: pedophile rings at the top of the government and all this,
Speaker 1: all this stuff gets elevated if at this stage Republicans
Speaker 1: go along with this. President is gone. No, no one
Speaker 1: is going to abide by and order the President gives
Speaker 1: that would put Americans in danger right now. We all
Speaker 1: know that Mike Pence won't allow it, Others won't allow it.
Speaker 1: It's not gonna happen, and the President's not going to
Speaker 1: do it. Look, he went too far with the election
Speaker 1: challenge stuff. We need to come to grips with that.
Speaker 1: But he did not incite and direct a domestic terrorist
Speaker 1: attack on the Capitol. That's just not true. Now, that's
Speaker 1: not saying that what happened the Capitol wasn't an illegal
Speaker 1: and awful riot. It was. And there are people, Look,
Speaker 1: I'm it saddens me that for saying that I've got
Speaker 1: I've got people, they're saying they're not. They're gonna tune
Speaker 1: me out or they don't. Oh yeah, who they gonna
Speaker 1: turn to. They're gonna turn to people who spent the
Speaker 1: last four years just doing nothing. But everything Trump did
Speaker 1: was was brilliant and genius. Everything Trump did he gets
Speaker 1: a BackRub for it was amazing. Is that who we
Speaker 1: are as as conservatives? Do we have principles and ideas?
Speaker 1: Do we care about the founding and the Constitution? Or
Speaker 1: is it all just about Trump? Those of you who
Speaker 1: are still staying and listening, you know it is about
Speaker 1: all those things. It's not just about Trump. Trump was
Speaker 1: the vessel. Trump was the tool for achieving goals that
Speaker 1: we have. It wasn't all about this one man. He's flawed,
Speaker 1: any human being, any man, woman is flawed. We know that.
Speaker 1: And he made mistakes and I'm not going to pretend
Speaker 1: he didn't certainly in this post election period, but before
Speaker 1: then as well. But we can't allow you see, this
Speaker 1: is what they left always does you know there's there's
Speaker 1: a surge at the southern border. The laws on the
Speaker 1: books say you arrest people who are coming into the
Speaker 1: country illegally. The Trump administration is executing the laws as
Speaker 1: they're written. That means there are families that are being separated.
Speaker 1: There's there's no facilities built that can hold them all
Speaker 1: together at the time. And instead of saying, hold on,
Speaker 1: we really don't want to, which the administration did, but
Speaker 1: instead of saying hold on, we don't want to separate
Speaker 1: moms from their kids, even for illegal crossings and everything,
Speaker 1: we should keep family units together. And that's a reasonable position,
Speaker 1: and it was the one the administration took when this issue.
Speaker 1: When this issue came up with pushback, and I understand that,
Speaker 1: but they jumped to, oh, it's like Nazi concentration camps
Speaker 1: at the border. They jumped to the Immigrations and Customs
Speaker 1: enforcement and border patrol are like the SS. They were
Speaker 1: saying stuff like this. You remember that same same kind
Speaker 1: of ideas at work here. There's a problem with the
Speaker 1: post election rhetoric and the continuation. I supported all the
Speaker 1: legal challenges, everything that was within the system and lawful.
Speaker 1: I wanted answers too, and I still want some answers.
Speaker 1: I still have questions about how certain things happened in
Speaker 1: this election. That hasn't changed. For those of you that
Speaker 1: keep saying, Buck, what about the answers? I want the answers.
Speaker 1: But we we exhausted the legal options and the clock
Speaker 1: that we had. That's where it ended. But they're trying
Speaker 1: to take this and make it so much more, and
Speaker 1: we you have to remember, it's not just about Brump.
Speaker 1: This is about this is about expanding the punishment. The
Speaker 1: punitive nature of all this is for everybody who's not
Speaker 1: on board with Biden Harris twenty one. That means you,
Speaker 1: that means me, do not forget it. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom mud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Any
Speaker 1: of those who are inside the Capitol should not be
Speaker 1: able to fly and should be placed on the no
Speaker 1: fly list. We are calling on the authorities FBI, TSA,
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security to put them on the no
Speaker 1: fly list immediately. Amidst the continued threat of future violence online,
Speaker 1: the federal government's own concerns. I spoke to Director Ray
Speaker 1: about this twice in the last few days. We cannot
Speaker 1: allow these same insurrectionists to get on a plane and
Speaker 1: cause more violence and more damage. These individuals are threat
Speaker 1: to the homeland as defined by the law. The law
Speaker 1: allows this, and they should be placed on the no
Speaker 1: fly list without any due process. Chuck Schumer soon or
Speaker 1: now rather current Senate Majority leader, without any due process,
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer wants American citizens to have rights taken away
Speaker 1: from them. Now. I want to know does everyone does
Speaker 1: everyone who is at the Capitol but not necessarily involved
Speaker 1: in attacking or destroying or trespassing, did they go? Who
Speaker 1: goes on this list? Senator Schumer, You're going to put
Speaker 1: American citizens who have had no due process, no trial,
Speaker 1: no nothing, on the no fly list. This is the
Speaker 1: expansion of the war on terror effort we used against
Speaker 1: al Qaeda, which was an existential threat to the country.
Speaker 1: As you recall from what happened on nine to eleven
Speaker 1: and the other plots as well. This is the expansion
Speaker 1: of that apparatus to include Trump supporters. That's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats have planned here. Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: Essen show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. My
Speaker 1: main and Jesse Kelly is in the house. He is
Speaker 1: the host of I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on the
Speaker 1: First TV can download the First TV app It's all
Speaker 1: about free speech, watching anytime, and also the host of
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show in radio syndication. Mister Kelly, good
Speaker 1: to have you. It's going to be here, Bucket's going
Speaker 1: to be in a v neck once again. I just
Speaker 1: feel more alive. So what do you see happening across
Speaker 1: the country right now? With this focus, of course on
Speaker 1: what's going on in DC, But what is this political
Speaker 1: moment we're in. We're in one of the most out
Speaker 1: of touch political moments I've ever seen in my entire life.
Speaker 1: I don't understand it. I understand Washington, DC is a bubble.
Speaker 1: I lived there for a year. I know you've lived there.
Speaker 1: It is a bubble, and it really is you exist
Speaker 1: in your own world and you're unaware of how real
Speaker 1: people think. I don't think it's ever been as dangerous
Speaker 1: of a bubble as it is right now. And this
Speaker 1: is what I mean. There is such a hatred and
Speaker 1: anger building out there, especially on the right. Trump was
Speaker 1: a response of all that hatred and anger, and then
Speaker 1: they spent four years getting called Nazis. They spent four
Speaker 1: years getting murdered, assaulted, looted, and now we're moving that
Speaker 1: stuff into legislation. So the hatred on the right has
Speaker 1: never been higher we saw it with that disaster in
Speaker 1: the Capitol last week, has never been highed this anger.
Speaker 1: And the people in DC are either unaware of that
Speaker 1: or don't care, because they're taking each in every step
Speaker 1: they could possibly take to light a match and drop
Speaker 1: it in the powder cake. I've never seen it, and
Speaker 1: I've said this a manion times about I don't want
Speaker 1: anybody to get hurt, not on the left, not on
Speaker 1: the right, and nobody I don't like. Political violence is
Speaker 1: just awful. Somebody's gonna die in this country if somebody
Speaker 1: doesn't turn down the temperature. We've already had people die.
Speaker 1: Someone's gonna die if we have somebody doesn't step up
Speaker 1: and actually try to calm things down, and impeaching the
Speaker 1: president again is not calming things down. What do you
Speaker 1: think the calculations are for those Republicans in the Congress
Speaker 1: who are going along with this. I see this, and
Speaker 1: I think, is it that they believe that there's a
Speaker 1: political advantage for them down the line in this, because
Speaker 1: I think that would have they that's a miscalculation on
Speaker 1: that front. And then beyond that, on the moral side
Speaker 1: of it. To me, they're going along with the notion
Speaker 1: that Trump called for an insurrection. I mean, there are
Speaker 1: prominent Democrats who are saying that Trump is effectively the
Speaker 1: leader of a terrorist organization now, and Republicans want to
Speaker 1: play along with that. Well, look, I think, and again
Speaker 1: this goes back to my bubble miscalculation thing. Obviously, as
Speaker 1: you will know, you talk about this all the time
Speaker 1: when your great shows that there's a certain segment of
Speaker 1: the Republican Party, probably a significant segment, that really hates
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Many of them have been quiet about it
Speaker 1: for four years because you didn't want to go head
Speaker 1: to head and get blasted on Twitter. But they really
Speaker 1: hate Donald Trump. They've hated the whole thing. They've been
Speaker 1: dying for it to just go away so we could
Speaker 1: go back to how things were. And I think they
Speaker 1: are viewing that thing at the Capitol as an opportunity
Speaker 1: to finally be rid of him. They're worried even once
Speaker 1: he's not president and anymore, he's going to carry a
Speaker 1: big stick. He's gonna run things, and they want to
Speaker 1: stop that and cut it off. But they don't realize
Speaker 1: that the Trump is them, if you want to call
Speaker 1: it that, or the Trump movement is about so much
Speaker 1: more than Donald Trump. It's about way more than that.
Speaker 1: You can get rid of the man tomorrow and send
Speaker 1: him to the moon, and the movement that brought him
Speaker 1: still remains. And these people were now matter than they
Speaker 1: were before. They're not less mad the matter. Do you
Speaker 1: think that the elect the election dispute, which as we know,
Speaker 1: it's I mean, it's over now in the process sense,
Speaker 1: but there's still a lot of people who have their feelings,
Speaker 1: and they're being told by big tech and others. You're
Speaker 1: not allowed to disagree with the outcome publicly. You're not
Speaker 1: allowed to say that you think that this was illegitimate.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed to say that, which is I think
Speaker 1: a really interesting president. Considering Stacy Abrahams in Georgia, the
Speaker 1: Democrats for the presidential election in twenty six teen, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden you have to say, you have to
Speaker 1: bend the knee and say this or else. But putting that,
Speaker 1: putting that aside for a second, do you think that
Speaker 1: it was really was the election the straw that broke
Speaker 1: the camel's back for a lot of people or was
Speaker 1: it just you know, an entry into a new level
Speaker 1: of disaffection and anger because of what the implications were. Oh,
Speaker 1: I think it jumped everything up significantly. It jumped everything
Speaker 1: up significantly. I mean, these movements, this anger, it can
Speaker 1: go like this, but it has these moments where it
Speaker 1: goes vertical. And that is certainly a moment where it
Speaker 1: went vertical. But I should be clear, the anger out
Speaker 1: there is not like I just said, it's not about Trump.
Speaker 1: It's not just about the election either. Yeah, that cranked
Speaker 1: it up a whole bunch more, but it's about more
Speaker 1: than that. People do feel a large portion of this
Speaker 1: society does feel that this election was stolen. That there's
Speaker 1: a bunch of election fraught out there. And you can
Speaker 1: tell all those people the right, You can tell all
Speaker 1: those people they're crazy. But whatever you can do is
Speaker 1: change their minds at this point in time. But I
Speaker 1: promise you this poking them all in the ribs and
Speaker 1: lecturing them all day long about how stupid they are
Speaker 1: and then impeaching the man they think they just reelected
Speaker 1: is the worst thing you could possibly do if you're
Speaker 1: trying to unite the country. Speaking to you, my friend
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly, he's the host of I'm Right with Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly on the First TV and also the Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: radio show, Jesse, what do we? What do we do? Now?
Speaker 1: I keep asking people that whose opinions I respect on this,
Speaker 1: and I think it's a It's not an easy question,
Speaker 1: but I want to get as many perspectives on it
Speaker 1: as I can because I think one of the issues
Speaker 1: we have right now is people are writing me and
Speaker 1: they're saying, we've lost the Senate, we don't have the House,
Speaker 1: we've lost the presidency. The media is all against us,
Speaker 1: Big tech is all against us, Corporate America is all
Speaker 1: against us. We talk about about fighting back politically, how
Speaker 1: do we even do that right now? And it seems
Speaker 1: that I try to just counsel right The best I
Speaker 1: can come up with is is patients, it will you know?
Speaker 1: This moment will pass? Do you have anything for the
Speaker 1: folks that feel that way? Well? What should they be thinking?
Speaker 1: But I do actually, I do you. Ever, I'm sure
Speaker 1: you probably are read up on it because you're one
Speaker 1: of these fancy CIA types about how Mao actually managed
Speaker 1: to take over China, and I realize that we're not
Speaker 1: Mao fans. I would certainly hope not. But it didn't
Speaker 1: start in the big sexy cities. He started in the countryside.
Speaker 1: He started with the peasants, he started with the farmers,
Speaker 1: and that's where he started conquer this little area and
Speaker 1: that little area. I think we're looking right now, we're looking.
Speaker 1: We don't have the presidency, we don't have the House,
Speaker 1: we don't have the Senate. Not all is lost. But
Speaker 1: what's your city council look like? What does your school
Speaker 1: board look like? What's your mayor look like? What's your
Speaker 1: state House seat, what's your state Senate seat look like?
Speaker 1: These races, there are so many easily winnable races out there.
Speaker 1: If we would identify them and go after them, and
Speaker 1: Democrats do that. Great, your local politics, we can start there.
Speaker 1: It doesn't have to be the sexy United States Senate.
Speaker 1: Start local anyway. Then you can still live your life
Speaker 1: and be on the school board and start affecting change.
Speaker 1: That's how Democrats. That's how they won the culture war.
Speaker 1: I mean, we lost a culture war in like eighty
Speaker 1: years because they got in the school boards, they got
Speaker 1: in the city council offices. They're changing things locally. They
Speaker 1: took over the das. Why do you think none of
Speaker 1: the Black Lives matter Antifa scumbags got charged and every
Speaker 1: one of those guys in the Capitol building is going
Speaker 1: to have the book thrown at them because they identify
Speaker 1: DA races. That's where we could go. We're not powerless.
Speaker 1: The powers just shifted. We have to focus on easier things,
Speaker 1: softer targets. We seem to on our side because our ideology,
Speaker 1: and I think it goes very deeply. It's it's almost
Speaker 1: a feature of the conservative mind is that we don't
Speaker 1: want to bother other people and we don't want to
Speaker 1: be bothered. So I think we have a natural I
Speaker 1: think conservatives have a natural inclination to say, look, if
Speaker 1: you know, if you're gonna be the crazies who show
Speaker 1: up at the school board meetings and demand, you know,
Speaker 1: all the social justice stuff, it just, you know, I
Speaker 1: can't handle this, Like I just want to go back
Speaker 1: to my family and my job. Leave me alone, and
Speaker 1: I understand and I sympathize with that. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't like dealing with crazy either. But I think to
Speaker 1: your point about the way that we've seeded so much
Speaker 1: territory over time, what you find is that that mentality,
Speaker 1: their desire, their innate desire to control institutions and to
Speaker 1: control others with those institutions, has been remarkably successful. As
Speaker 1: we look at academia, big tech, the school systems, Hollywood.
Speaker 1: I mean, you go down the list, I mean corporate America. Now,
Speaker 1: we always hear about Wall Street and big business as
Speaker 1: though they're all these FatCat Republicans smoking cigars who run
Speaker 1: these companies. If you see the public statements that are
Speaker 1: being put out all the time that are clearly political
Speaker 1: in nature from the biggest companies in America, nine times
Speaker 1: out of ten, it's like a Nancy Pelosi press release.
Speaker 1: They got the schools, buck, they got the schools. Every
Speaker 1: everybody knows in war, you control the supply lines, you
Speaker 1: win the war. They control the supply lines. Four million
Speaker 1: college graduates a year. Think how many generations, entire generations
Speaker 1: now have been educated in America's America sucks anti education system.
Speaker 1: That's what we have and yesterday's hippie college radical you
Speaker 1: laughed at on the corner, he's today's senator, he's today's CEO.
Speaker 1: These guys are so nuts. At these big corporations, they'll
Speaker 1: have gigantic meetings about corporate social responsibility and where you
Speaker 1: think they're all in there and fancy ties and going
Speaker 1: over pie graphs and we spent this much on the
Speaker 1: overhead and we have to drop this. They're in there
Speaker 1: talking about when's the last time we did a transgender campaign.
Speaker 1: We need to get kids involved this time too. They're
Speaker 1: having these meetings at the highest levels because we lost
Speaker 1: the schools. Man. Once we lost the schools we lost,
Speaker 1: we have to start taking those background or all. The
Speaker 1: rest of this is just arrange in the deck chairs
Speaker 1: on the Titanic. It's not easy to give this president advice.
Speaker 1: I've actually tried once or twice. What would you like
Speaker 1: to see, putting aside whether he would take it, what
Speaker 1: would you want to see the president due from here
Speaker 1: on out? What's the most helpful. What's the most helpful
Speaker 1: approach he could have for the country. I think he
Speaker 1: should step away for a little while. And I don't
Speaker 1: say that because I want him gone. I say that
Speaker 1: for his own mental health. I think if I were
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, to try to let everyone miss me a
Speaker 1: little bit, you know what they say, I mean, always
Speaker 1: leave him wanting more. I would piece out of the
Speaker 1: White House and what is it six days when he's gone,
Speaker 1: and I'd be on a boat in the Mediterranean for
Speaker 1: about four or five months, even grapes with my supermodel wife,
Speaker 1: and then I'd show back up with a big Trump
Speaker 1: rally about you know, six months to a year later.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't get away, you know what. Let everybody find
Speaker 1: out what these DC Republicans are like. But let everyone
Speaker 1: find out when I'm not there to take all the
Speaker 1: slings and arrows for you. You y'all go in joy it,
Speaker 1: because then you can come back and you'll look like
Speaker 1: the return of Christ, with all due respect for it.
Speaker 1: Do you think anyone is going to step up here
Speaker 1: from the GOP ranks in a way that's really meaningful
Speaker 1: of I'm looking around, and clearly the fact that the
Speaker 1: left hates Cruise and Holly so much is an indicator,
Speaker 1: you know, is a check mark in the plus column
Speaker 1: for me. For those guys, and the fact they want
Speaker 1: to put them on the no fly lists as if
Speaker 1: they're you know, bin Laden's bin Laden's agents. But what
Speaker 1: do you what do you see as as the future
Speaker 1: of the party. And I mean five years from now,
Speaker 1: I mean for the next six to twelve months. Oh,
Speaker 1: I think Rhonda Santis is about to become the next
Speaker 1: nominee for the Republican presidency. I think he's about to
Speaker 1: lock it down. When you saw immediately the response to
Speaker 1: you know, the big tech censorship of Trump was every
Speaker 1: Republican whimpering and that's impeaching and at all these other things.
Speaker 1: What does Rhonda Santis do? He comes out and starts
Speaker 1: divesting state funds from Apple and Google in all these places.
Speaker 1: He comes out and fires back. And you could hate
Speaker 1: ron De Santis, you can disagree with that, but that
Speaker 1: is a man very much in touch with how the
Speaker 1: Republican base feels. Rhonda Santis at this point in time,
Speaker 1: is the leader by a mile in the clubhouse to
Speaker 1: be the Republican nominee for twenty twenty four. I think
Speaker 1: you're gonna hear him be really loud over the next
Speaker 1: four years, because if he's got any political winstincts at all,
Speaker 1: he knows it's his to lose. Right now, I'm speaking
Speaker 1: to Jesse Kelly, host of I'm right with Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: on the first TV Jesse, Yeah, you're a Texan and
Speaker 1: your governor has been I would say mediocre at best
Speaker 1: during the lockdowns, maybe maybe a little bit better than
Speaker 1: like Newsham and Cuomo DeSantis in Florida has shown I
Speaker 1: think the best results for his state under circumstances. I believe,
Speaker 1: and you and I have been discussing this both together
Speaker 1: and are on our respective shows from the very beginning
Speaker 1: that we have a major battle ahead because there's going
Speaker 1: to be this lingering lockdown effect that even as the
Speaker 1: vaccines are out there, and even as where even as
Speaker 1: the numbers they will look the numbers would come down,
Speaker 1: even if we did nothing right, they would come down
Speaker 1: in because of just all the people that would have
Speaker 1: already been infected by probably April or May, which is
Speaker 1: what we saw last year. The seasonality of this virus
Speaker 1: is quite clear. But as the numbers go down, and
Speaker 1: as we have more and more vaccine we're gonna have,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to battle against efforts and with the
Speaker 1: federal government now fully on board to just sort of
Speaker 1: continue this hyper controlled state that we're in, and I
Speaker 1: think we're gonna have to mount a really serious pushback
Speaker 1: against this. Oh it's not going away because because this
Speaker 1: is what's going to happen. But there are too many
Speaker 1: people who highly invested in coronavirus being real. Because coronavirus,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's false, but in coronavirus being you know,
Speaker 1: the worst thing in the world. We have to lock
Speaker 1: everything down because corona virus has a allowed them to
Speaker 1: crush traditionally Republican things like small businesses, churches and things
Speaker 1: like that, and b who wants to give up the
Speaker 1: TV time? But the big thing now, buck is it's
Speaker 1: going to allow them to pass bills they'd never be
Speaker 1: able to get through before. People are mad about that
Speaker 1: last coronavirus jerk bill they pass through where we're all
Speaker 1: got six hundred dollars and they send a bunch of
Speaker 1: money to Pakistan. You people better buckle up. That's as
Speaker 1: good as those bills get. The Coronavirus Relief bill, they're
Speaker 1: gonna be able to throw anything they want in the
Speaker 1: next bill and they call it Coronavirus Relief and everybody's
Speaker 1: gonna pass it because nobody wants to be the guy
Speaker 1: who's against coronavirus relief. They're gonna pass five more than
Speaker 1: it's funny you say us, because I've already I've been
Speaker 1: telling everybody. If Republicans try anything to stop, what will
Speaker 1: be the most I mean, it's gonna be like the
Speaker 1: drunken sailor, no offense Navy, the drunken sailor, you know,
Speaker 1: with the with the checkbook out, just whatever the Democrats want.
Speaker 1: And if Republicans, let's say, try to stop into the Senate,
Speaker 1: then you know, you know what happens. They're gonna say, guys,
Speaker 1: we gotta get rid of the filibuster because this coronavirus
Speaker 1: relief package depends on it. We got to get you
Speaker 1: the money, so we're gonna have to get rid of
Speaker 1: the filibuster. And then it's game on even more. Oh yeah, well,
Speaker 1: it's the ultimate. It was the ultimate trojan horse. And Republicans, look,
Speaker 1: they didn't realize it early enough. You did, I did,
Speaker 1: But they did not realize it early enough. They got
Speaker 1: all over the panic and it took him a month
Speaker 1: or two before they finally woke up and looked around
Speaker 1: and realized, oh wow, the left is going to use
Speaker 1: this to utterly destroy us, and they are. And I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't have something bright and sunny to tell anybody
Speaker 1: about what the federal government is going to do for
Speaker 1: the next two years. I just don't there There isn't
Speaker 1: good news I can bring you. But I will tell
Speaker 1: you this. Focus on your local politics, and every once
Speaker 1: in a while, every once in a while, take this
Speaker 1: and set it down. Once you're done, watch it the
Speaker 1: first you're done watching Buck for the day, set the
Speaker 1: phone down, go play with your kids. You're gonna have
Speaker 1: to learn how to compartmentalize. I mean, I completely agree.
Speaker 1: I mentioned this, I've mentioned this on the show earlier
Speaker 1: in the week, that everyone just need to take a
Speaker 1: deep breath, focus on what actually matters in your day
Speaker 1: to day life. That doesn't mean to give up on
Speaker 1: these political fights, but you know, there's only so much
Speaker 1: any one of us can do individually. You've got to
Speaker 1: become comfortable with facts. It's it's going to be a
Speaker 1: tough ride for the country, certainly for the next two years.
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly, everybody, Jesse, great to have you, my friend,
Speaker 1: Thank you, appreciate you. Bob, You're in the freedom This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast right now. Trump organization
Speaker 1: profits about seventeen million a year from these contracts. They
Speaker 1: cover four different sites, three in Manhattan, one in the Bronx,
Speaker 1: different entertainment sites. And look, it's quite clear the President
Speaker 1: of the United States directed a mob to attack the
Speaker 1: US Congress during the electoral College vote. That's that's I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, even saying the words Mika, it's almost impossible
Speaker 1: to believe. But it's criminal activity. And so it's very clear,
Speaker 1: and the lawyers looked at it was just as clear
Speaker 1: as a bell. That's grounds for severing these contracts. And
Speaker 1: we're moving to do that right away. Economic sanctions against
Speaker 1: Trump post presidency, You're going to see a lot more
Speaker 1: of this um. They're going to try to take down
Speaker 1: the entire Trump organization, piece by piece, all of it.
Speaker 1: They're going to try to remove his name from all
Speaker 1: the buildings that it's on. They are going after not
Speaker 1: only the man, Donald Trump and his family and his supporters,
Speaker 1: but remember, they want to destroy the brand as well.
Speaker 1: They really, they really want to annihilate his name and
Speaker 1: all of the the implications that had carried of success,
Speaker 1: of luxury, of all these different things. That have been
Speaker 1: built up. They want to destroy the Trump brand. You're
Speaker 1: going to see a concerted, a widespread campaign to do
Speaker 1: this in every place where Democrats have control, and I
Speaker 1: don't know how affective the Trump organization is going to
Speaker 1: be at fighting back there. They have their Look, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of there's a lot of money involved in
Speaker 1: these deals there. Maybe people will forget about this, but
Speaker 1: you think about the luxury real estate market, for example,
Speaker 1: and the relationships with banks and the institutional heft that
Speaker 1: you need to be able to do the things in
Speaker 1: private life as a businessman that Trump needs to do.
Speaker 1: They're going to go after it. And I don't know
Speaker 1: how many places once Trump is out of power are
Speaker 1: going to be willing to withstand that pressure campaign and
Speaker 1: understand this. If they are able to destroy the Trump brand,
Speaker 1: it also serves as a warning to everyone else. You're
Speaker 1: a billionaire who wants to buy a channel and flip
Speaker 1: it and make it free speech or even conservative in nature,
Speaker 1: better think twice about that one. You're a wealthy donor
Speaker 1: who wants to support outreach efforts for the GOP to
Speaker 1: the minority communities for twenty twenty two turnout, I want
Speaker 1: to think that one through again. They're coming after everybody
Speaker 1: of value. That's their plan. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Our
Speaker 1: Man in DC joins us now Harlan Hill. He is
Speaker 1: a political consultant and strategist, actually works on campaigns and
Speaker 1: knows the inner workings of the Beltway. He's going to
Speaker 1: tell us what he's seeing and hearing. Harlan. Great to
Speaker 1: have you, and that's great to do with you. As always, Buck,
Speaker 1: what do you make of this stuff that's going on
Speaker 1: with the impeachment two point oh fiasco on Capitol Hill? Well,
Speaker 1: what's what's DC feeling like right now? Well, first of all,
Speaker 1: address what the actual vibe in the city's like. Obviously
Speaker 1: everything's been shut down because of COVID, but in addition
Speaker 1: to that, we've been living through riots all through the summer. Now,
Speaker 1: during all the BLM riots, I had never seen the
Speaker 1: response that we are currently seeing based on the events
Speaker 1: of last Wednesday. There is military on every corner. You
Speaker 1: have to show your ID or some proof as to
Speaker 1: why you're traveling to different parts of downtown Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: the nation's capitol. You need to show your papers, you
Speaker 1: need to show your ID. I had to demonstrate that
Speaker 1: I was heading home and what my reasons for traveling
Speaker 1: were last night. They're not because of any k kurfew,
Speaker 1: just in the middle of the afternoon. It is unprecedented
Speaker 1: the response to last week's events that we're seeing play
Speaker 1: out in the streets since it's almost hysterical. I'm sure
Speaker 1: you've seen the images of the thousands of National Guard
Speaker 1: troops quartered in the United States Capital. We've seen these
Speaker 1: images play out over the second impeachment, which is absolutely absurd.
Speaker 1: I mean, the president will be out in a matter
Speaker 1: of days, so it's clear that there's a political calculation
Speaker 1: here to ruin the president's reputation and to preclude him
Speaker 1: from running for office at some point in the future.
Speaker 1: But worse than all of that have been the efforts
Speaker 1: by the Democrats to execute what I think is basically
Speaker 1: a coup. They've attempted to remove the president, directing the
Speaker 1: vice president to exercise the twenty fifth Amendment. Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: communicated last Friday with the Joint chiefs of Staff. That
Speaker 1: has been reported by all the main stream media outlets
Speaker 1: suggesting that the nuclear codes should be stripped from the
Speaker 1: president United States. This is unprecedented. What what constitutional authority?
Speaker 1: I mean? First, first off, I mean you mentioned this,
Speaker 1: and I don't want to interrupt you, Harlem, but I
Speaker 1: want to get some specifics here from you. I mean,
Speaker 1: we know that the twenty fifth Amendment is not there.
Speaker 1: It's very clear that it's meant for incapacity, incapacitation. It's
Speaker 1: not I don't like the president, let's just use this
Speaker 1: as a tool to undo an election. So that's one part.
Speaker 1: But but Pelosi trying to strip the nuclear codes from
Speaker 1: the president. On what basis could she possibly legally be
Speaker 1: doing that? There is none none, I mean addressing the
Speaker 1: point of twenty fifth Amendment UM. Nancy Plosi actually has
Speaker 1: spoken a lot on this and the Monthly against the election,
Speaker 1: and she had wanted to symbol of this panel to
Speaker 1: sort of explore what the requirements would be for for
Speaker 1: for exercising the twenty fifth Amendment in her own panel,
Speaker 1: and Nancy Posi's office communicated that it would have to
Speaker 1: be based on science and medicine that the president was
Speaker 1: incapacitated UM, and there's zero science, zero medical analysis from
Speaker 1: any of the presidence positions or anyone close to the
Speaker 1: president that would require his removal, let alone his removal
Speaker 1: mere days before he's supposed to peacefully transfer power. I mean,
Speaker 1: Democrats really want this nation to start healing buck and
Speaker 1: they want a peaceful transfer of power. They should be
Speaker 1: glad that the President has come to the table in
Speaker 1: a conciliatory fashion, as he has over the last week
Speaker 1: released multiple videos guaranteeing that that that there will be
Speaker 1: no issue handing off power to the Biden administration. UM.
Speaker 1: It is important that President Trump communicate to his supporters
Speaker 1: that this has happened. We don't like it. We have
Speaker 1: questions about what happened. That's behind us now at this point,
Speaker 1: the President has said that, UM, and so for the
Speaker 1: good of the nation, Democrats should stop playing games now,
Speaker 1: should stop playing games now. They truly wanted to escalate this,
Speaker 1: but I actually don't think they wanted to escalate. They
Speaker 1: wanted to escalate. They would stop these this impeachment shenanigans.
Speaker 1: They would stop pulling Nancy Plosi, who is you know,
Speaker 1: third in line. You know, she's right behind Mike Pence
Speaker 1: in the line of secession. Wouldn't be floating these conspiracy
Speaker 1: theories about the presence incapacitation and suggesting that the Department
Speaker 1: of Defense should strip him of his ability to defend
Speaker 1: the nation in a nuclear attack. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: sedition textbook. What they're doing is so dangerous. Um it is.
Speaker 1: It's an escalation at a time when this country needs
Speaker 1: to start coming together and start figuring out both parties, Um,
Speaker 1: how we save the country. And Harlan, you're you're a
Speaker 1: political consultant, you work on campaigns in DC, and you've
Speaker 1: also you're close to a know many people at the
Speaker 1: top levels of this White House, including including the president. Uh.
Speaker 1: How how much of a concern do you have that
Speaker 1: the the the witch hunt effect, if you will, for
Speaker 1: President Trump is going to continue even after Biden's inauguration,
Speaker 1: to go after people that are essentially called Trump enablers. Right.
Speaker 1: You see that language use sometime sometimes, And given the
Speaker 1: hysteria the Democrats are affording right now, they're calling the
Speaker 1: president a terrorist, a leader, they're calling the president and
Speaker 1: an insurrectionist, I feel like we have to take seriously
Speaker 1: they are going to come after people legally, professionally and
Speaker 1: seek to destroy them. I mean speak. I speak privately
Speaker 1: with a lot of pretty powerful people in our movement,
Speaker 1: very powerful conservatives, people that were in the Trump administration
Speaker 1: or the campaign, and U influencers on television and social media.
Speaker 1: And there's this universal fear that what the Democrats are
Speaker 1: going to do here and what they're already doing it
Speaker 1: is punishment. They're punishing us for the Trump movement in
Speaker 1: a way that we've never we've we've never seen in
Speaker 1: this country since McCarthyism, first of all, um, and we
Speaker 1: certainly never saw um when President Trump won in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: They're going to go after us personally, uh, financially, and
Speaker 1: the repercussions are going to be long lasting. And Democrats
Speaker 1: should should should question the wisdom of this because they're
Speaker 1: setting a president that it's not going to be a
Speaker 1: pretty one bad you know, which is that in this
Speaker 1: country when we lose elections apparently, or when we win elections,
Speaker 1: rather we silence the parting opposition. We can have the
Speaker 1: leader of the opposition party who will be President Trump
Speaker 1: when he transfers power um uh silenced and banned from
Speaker 1: social media, banned from communicating with this followers will have
Speaker 1: them deep banked, so they can't even go out and
Speaker 1: get loans and mortgages. There are there are a lot
Speaker 1: of people that think this is not just going to
Speaker 1: impact the President of the United States, It's going to
Speaker 1: impact all of the conservative leadership. And I'm talking about
Speaker 1: mainstream establishment conservatives. I'm talking about people that were pro
Speaker 1: Trump the whole way in order to teach them to
Speaker 1: listen and listen. And I think there are various people
Speaker 1: in the establishment the Republican Party that will applaud that.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of people that, through President Trump's
Speaker 1: rise to power, they looked at this as a challenge
Speaker 1: of waiting out the clock for for for the end
Speaker 1: of the president's administration, and that they would come back
Speaker 1: and return to the old flavor of the Republican Who
Speaker 1: do you think Harlan is in that? Are you seeing
Speaker 1: movement from within the GOP for for not someone to
Speaker 1: fill in the vacuum that will leave after Trump goes,
Speaker 1: but that wants to revert to the party of let's
Speaker 1: say Romney and McCain pre Trump twenty sixteen election win.
Speaker 1: Sorry Black, I watched it there. I just said, who
Speaker 1: who do you see trying to revert or try try
Speaker 1: to try to take the Republican Party back to what
Speaker 1: it was before Trump was the de facto leader of it.
Speaker 1: I mean, are you seeing any politicians right now that
Speaker 1: you think, oh, I see that they want to go
Speaker 1: back to the Bush, Romney McCain era. Well, just last
Speaker 1: thought something we saw Liz Cheney, right, I mean, she
Speaker 1: is supporting impeachment and m and now she's engaged in
Speaker 1: an all out war between the Republican Caucus and the House.
Speaker 1: And and because there's still many, many, many many America
Speaker 1: First Republicans in positions of power and throughout the caucus
Speaker 1: over in the House, Jim Jordan's one of them, Matt Gates.
Speaker 1: The list is long. And but you know, Liz Cheney
Speaker 1: is is I think she's surprised that there haven't been
Speaker 1: more people that have ristened to her defense. By you know,
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney has never stopped carrying the mantle for the
Speaker 1: establishment Republican Party that couldn't manage to win an election
Speaker 1: that you know, he mit himself led us to defeat,
Speaker 1: and an election that I think was quite linnable against
Speaker 1: Barack Obama. Despite all of Barack Obama's charisma and everything,
Speaker 1: the economy was in dire straits. Obamacare was a disaster.
Speaker 1: He didn't get us out of any of the foreign
Speaker 1: wars that he promised to. I mean, I think that,
Speaker 1: I really really think Mitt Romney missed an opportunity in
Speaker 1: twenty and twelve and he never came to terms with it.
Speaker 1: And he resented the fact that President Trump tapped into
Speaker 1: something that he didn't realize, and so and so mid
Speaker 1: Romney will be one of those people, no question there
Speaker 1: there There are more of them, I think a profile
Speaker 1: in the Senate than there are in the House. Speaking
Speaker 1: of Harland Hill, political consultants, strategist and a man who
Speaker 1: knows the inner workings at DC, Well, Harlan, the social
Speaker 1: media crackdown which affects you and me because we both
Speaker 1: have pretty active have had active social media presence. Are
Speaker 1: you seeing are you seeing the beginnings you think of
Speaker 1: an effective resistance or answer to this? Or is your
Speaker 1: expectation that the Google, Facebook, Amazon on move here is
Speaker 1: the beginning of much more of this? You know, have
Speaker 1: they given us their best shot by locking down Parlor
Speaker 1: and now they're concerned about the backlash or do you
Speaker 1: think they realize, oh we got away with that one,
Speaker 1: we got more targets we can go after now, all
Speaker 1: of them being conservative. Well, I think that the social
Speaker 1: media companies are in a tough spot because they're primarily
Speaker 1: made up of far left employees, their boards are comprised
Speaker 1: of far left activists, and they're cowtowing to an incoming
Speaker 1: Democratic administration that they fear looking at like the Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren wing of the Democratic Party, that they fear will
Speaker 1: seek to break up these big tech monopolies for antitrust concerns.
Speaker 1: And so the reason that they're doing all of this
Speaker 1: is to keep their the boards happy, keep their employees happy,
Speaker 1: and to play kate Democrats so that they won't be
Speaker 1: broken up over the next four years. Um and uh
Speaker 1: so they're they're they're like a loyal little puppy that
Speaker 1: is willing to do whatever the depressibill. So my concern
Speaker 1: is that there's gonna be a lot more of this
Speaker 1: coming to your point. They've gotten away with a lot.
Speaker 1: They got away with banning the leader of the free
Speaker 1: world from communicating to his constituents. You know, look, you
Speaker 1: may not like Trump, but I think one of the
Speaker 1: one of the what are the innovations of his administration
Speaker 1: is that even you always knew what he was thinking.
Speaker 1: You you have basically a direct line to the man
Speaker 1: through Twitter. Now I don't know what's going on with
Speaker 1: the President anymore, you know. I mean, it's it's, it's, it's,
Speaker 1: it is, it is such as it has done such
Speaker 1: a disservice to the public. UM, and I don't see
Speaker 1: any reason why this won't stop. It won't stop with
Speaker 1: social media. It will impact Republicans ability to fundraise. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if there are movements UM to encumber
Speaker 1: the way in which we accept donations online. UH, that
Speaker 1: there'll be calls for vis in master Card, in American
Speaker 1: Express and Discover to not um process credit card transactions
Speaker 1: for political contributions to Republicans. UM. That's that's on the horizon,
Speaker 1: that's coming. There's already been efforts to disrupt our ability
Speaker 1: to use email services like mail Jim Constant Contact to
Speaker 1: send SMS messages to supporters. These are these are these
Speaker 1: are critical, especially in the time of coronavirus where we
Speaker 1: can't go on dou traditional campaigning. These are essential tools
Speaker 1: for being able to conduct a campaign online, and they've
Speaker 1: gotten in social media. They're going after all these other
Speaker 1: aspects of running a campaign. I don't know what happens.
Speaker 1: Anything short of legislation isn't going to fix this, and um,
Speaker 1: because you know, we won't have the house to send
Speaker 1: in the White House, I don't know what we do
Speaker 1: about it in the next two years. I think it's
Speaker 1: a very important, very important point, Harland. I only, I
Speaker 1: only I see this as the beginning. I don't see
Speaker 1: this as there. I think it's the begin of a
Speaker 1: lot more. And the fight is very steeply uphill for
Speaker 1: us to try to take back some autonomy and some
Speaker 1: freedom on the internet. But Harlan Hill, everybody political consultant.
Speaker 1: You'll see him on shows including this one going forward
Speaker 1: and Harlan, thank you so much. You're in the Freedom
Speaker 1: d This is the Buck Sexton Show, Podcast number one.
Speaker 1: There are just seven days left. What's the point, Well,
Speaker 1: every day that Donald Trump's in office, every hour the
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's in office, the American people are at risk
Speaker 1: and our national security is at risk. I think he's
Speaker 1: proven time and time again that he's capable of doing
Speaker 1: very dangerous things. As we sit here right now, he
Speaker 1: is the commander in chief in the American people are
Speaker 1: less safe because of it. Number two, it's divisive. Impeachment
Speaker 1: is divisive. Well, there needs to be unity and healing
Speaker 1: in our country, there's no doubt about that. But in
Speaker 1: every case, unity and healing requires truth and accountability. You know,
Speaker 1: people around the world, dictators and despots and would be
Speaker 1: autocrats as well as the American people need to see
Speaker 1: that our democracy will not be intimidated, it will not
Speaker 1: be browbeaten, that actions have consequences, and that's important for
Speaker 1: the rule of law, and that's important for our healing
Speaker 1: as a nation. Oh yeah, healing as a nation. That's
Speaker 1: that's what they're going to tell you. This is going
Speaker 1: to help the nation heal. Impeaching and removing the duly
Speaker 1: elected president of the United States when you can count
Speaker 1: the hours pretty easily that he has left in office.
Speaker 1: That's that's what the new plan is going to be. Um. Look,
Speaker 1: they'll say anything at this point, and they want to
Speaker 1: go after They want to humiliate and destroy Trump as
Speaker 1: you know. And then there's the people around him too.
Speaker 1: I mean you have Senator Sharad Brown or Shared Brown
Speaker 1: whatever I think as Sharad actually on Josh Holly. They
Speaker 1: want to they want to expel him from the Senator.
Speaker 1: So so it's not just Trump, but they want to
Speaker 1: undo election results. They want to do this too. Anybody
Speaker 1: who has been supporting Trump, who who is duly elected
Speaker 1: as well, Place sixteen. The public humiliation doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: matter much, even even some of their allies. There. Senator
Speaker 1: Holly is sort of mentor. Former Senator danforth Is said
Speaker 1: that he was speaking flow I remember exact words, but
Speaker 1: that he wished he hadn't encouraged him to run for
Speaker 1: the Senate. There, you're hearing that. But the Senate is
Speaker 1: a body needs to take action, and I know Senator
Speaker 1: McConnell won't, but we should if he's not going to resign,
Speaker 1: which of course they won't. They continue to be like
Speaker 1: Trump and take no responsibility for anything. Even though we
Speaker 1: saw their words, we saw the picture of Holly, who
Speaker 1: George will said, there's a huge chasm between his ambition
Speaker 1: and his achievement. Then we should take action on expulsion,
Speaker 1: expulsion from the Senate. They want to do it to Holly,
Speaker 1: they want to do to cruze this. This is showing
Speaker 1: you they want to expel all the Republicans. You get
Speaker 1: that right. They're limiting it right now because they're trying
Speaker 1: to go after their most important and most vulnerable targets.
Speaker 1: But if they could, they would They would ban the
Speaker 1: Republican Party right now if they could get away with it.
Speaker 1: They have one party control of this country in their sites.
Speaker 1: So why Biden talking about what he's going to do
Speaker 1: on immigration and the legislative moves that you can expect
Speaker 1: in the first hundred days that they have one. That
Speaker 1: is the goal, one party control. It's not about unity
Speaker 1: or healing or anything else. It's about being in charge
Speaker 1: without any opposition, and they think they can achieve it.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. But they're saying holding him accountable
Speaker 1: is different from the people who directly were involved in
Speaker 1: tearing down the doors and rampaging of the Capitol building. Well,
Speaker 1: Osama bin Laden did not enter US soil on September eleven,
Speaker 1: but it was widely acknowledged that he was responsible for
Speaker 1: inspiring the attack on our country, and the President with
Speaker 1: his words, using the words fight with the speakers that
Speaker 1: he assembled that day, who called for trial by combat
Speaker 1: and said we have to take names and kick ass.
Speaker 1: That is hate speech that inspired and radicalized people to
Speaker 1: storm the Capitol. And when he read the indictments from
Speaker 1: the US Attorney's Office of people who've been arrested in
Speaker 1: their FBI interviews, they cite that they were called there
Speaker 1: by the president. They were in the Capitol because the
Speaker 1: President told them to do so. So we must hold
Speaker 1: this president accountable for his inciting words than things. Paramore
Speaker 1: Eric Swalwell deciding that he's going to call the President
Speaker 1: of the United States or compare the President of the
Speaker 1: United States to Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden. That's
Speaker 1: that's what we've That's what it's turned to, folks. That's
Speaker 1: where we are. This is a sitting member of Congress.
Speaker 1: This is someone who is on the House Intelligence Committee,
Speaker 1: which is increasingly looking like it is poorly named because
Speaker 1: there's a lot of morons on it. And he's saying
Speaker 1: that the President, in the same way that Osama bin
Speaker 1: Laden didn't actually drive the planes of the buildings, Trump
Speaker 1: is responsible for what happened to the Capitol. I keep
Speaker 1: telling you go back and read the transcript and you
Speaker 1: will see that it is not true that the President
Speaker 1: called for violence. He said peacefully. He wanted a protest
Speaker 1: to show all the support. That's that's what he said.
Speaker 1: I mean, they can pretend that he said other things,
Speaker 1: and they can say and I think that the fair
Speaker 1: criticisms here are when the legal options were exhausted, the
Speaker 1: president needed to that the president needed to tone it
Speaker 1: down and not try to push Mike Pence and not
Speaker 1: try to do these other things. That's where the President's
Speaker 1: judgment went awry. And I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: won't tell you that because right now, if you say
Speaker 1: the President did anything wrong, there are some people on
Speaker 1: the right who will I'll never listen to you. Get
Speaker 1: I tell you the truth. This is the Truth Show.
Speaker 1: There can be other you know, cheerleaders for all things
Speaker 1: that Trump has ever done shows. I'm the Truth Show,
Speaker 1: and that's that's something that I'm just that's going to
Speaker 1: continue no matter what. And if I'm doing it, you know,
Speaker 1: if I'm doing the truth show in an actual hut
Speaker 1: that we can call the freedom Hut, in some you know,
Speaker 1: warm place on a beach with five people listening because
Speaker 1: I'm telling the truth, then that's what it is. But
Speaker 1: I know this audience, I know the people who listen
Speaker 1: to this show, and your honorable good patriots who love
Speaker 1: the country and love your fellow human being the way
Speaker 1: that I do. So that's why I know I can
Speaker 1: speak the truth to you. And you know, I feel
Speaker 1: badly for the for people in conservative media who have
Speaker 1: boxed themselves into a corner where their only purpose, I mean,
Speaker 1: there's I'm a national security expert. I mean, I'm My
Speaker 1: existence in this world of median commentary has never revolved
Speaker 1: around only being able to speak about Trump and Trumpian things.
Speaker 1: I got into this, like I came out of counter
Speaker 1: terrorism work, right, So there's a lot that we have
Speaker 1: to do. There's a lot that we're going to have
Speaker 1: to deal with going forward. But Eric Swalwell is is
Speaker 1: going back into this. Eric swalle is an idiot, and
Speaker 1: he's a disgrace the United States Congress. And to say,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm a New Yorker, but just even as
Speaker 1: an American, to start comparing this president who just got
Speaker 1: seventy four million votes to a vicious, barbaric terrorist who
Speaker 1: called for the mass murder of men, women, and children
Speaker 1: is heinous beyond words. I mean this, you know, they
Speaker 1: they compare Trump to Hitler, They compare Trump to Stalin,
Speaker 1: they compare Trump to bin Laden. Now, I mean, is
Speaker 1: there anyone else just so they can cross it all
Speaker 1: off the list. It's it's disgusting. It's disgusting. And that's
Speaker 1: also why at some level we should just we shouldn't
Speaker 1: give into this. We shouldn't give into this, because that
Speaker 1: will encourage more of it, this kind of overreaching, insane,
Speaker 1: unfair attack. You know, if they I've said this, if
Speaker 1: they wanted to censure the president for his comments about
Speaker 1: the election, that's one thing they're not doing. They're not censuring.
Speaker 1: They're trying to use the most extreme sanction that the
Speaker 1: Congress has, and even that's after they've tried to do
Speaker 1: an end run on that by just using the twenty
Speaker 1: fifth Amendment. It's as though we're we're supposed to pretend
Speaker 1: that Trump is actually not able to continue in the
Speaker 1: job for health reasons, which is just not true. And
Speaker 1: if you're talking about extreme, you know, over statement about
Speaker 1: what had happened, AOC is just she's representative of the
Speaker 1: widespread left wing mentality here about not only Trump but
Speaker 1: about all of his supporters. But first, let me start
Speaker 1: with with this, because she's she's on a rampage right now.
Speaker 1: I mean AOC who is, by media standards, the most
Speaker 1: powerful Democrat in the country. I mean she gets more attention,
Speaker 1: more focus, has more followers, more adherence to hanging on
Speaker 1: her every word than any other Democrat in the United States.
Speaker 1: More Southern Biden, more Southern Harris. They have more political
Speaker 1: Biden rather has more political power than she does, but
Speaker 1: media power, messaging, propaganda effect AO see his head and
Speaker 1: shoulders about Joe Biden. Here are some of the things
Speaker 1: that she is telling to the people who believe and
Speaker 1: listen to her first off play clip seven. As for myself,
Speaker 1: I had a pretty traumatizing event happened to me. And
Speaker 1: I do not know if I can even disclose the
Speaker 1: full details of that event due to security concerns, but
Speaker 1: I can tell you that I had a very close
Speaker 1: encounter where I thought I was going to die. And
Speaker 1: you have all of those thoughts where you know at
Speaker 1: the end of your life, and all of these thoughts
Speaker 1: come rushing to you, and that's what happened to a
Speaker 1: lot of us on Wednesday. Now, I've condemned unequivocally and
Speaker 1: entirely the the riot and any violence associated with the riot,
Speaker 1: riot on Capitol Hill. And I'm not budging on that,
Speaker 1: and I did it from the first second it happened
Speaker 1: till now that's not that's not going to change with me, right.
Speaker 1: So anyone who's saying, oh, but Bucket wasn't as beat, No,
Speaker 1: it was. It was absolutely horrific. But what we're seeing
Speaker 1: here is the usage of that that awful moment to
Speaker 1: expand beyond, to use this for political purposes and tie
Speaker 1: it directly to Donald Trump and claim that he was
Speaker 1: essentially the mafia boss, are ordering, the ordering, the the soldier,
Speaker 1: so to speak, in this mafia analogy, to go forward, um,
Speaker 1: and and to take violent action, or you know, if
Speaker 1: he was a cartel boss, it would be the cicario.
Speaker 1: Right that there's that Trump is responsible for sending these
Speaker 1: people in to go after members of Congress in this way. Um,
Speaker 1: that's not supported by that Trump ordered this. That's not
Speaker 1: supported by any facts that we have at evidence right now.
Speaker 1: And I would just point to what happened to Steve
Speaker 1: Scalise and those Republican members of Congress. I know it
Speaker 1: was a few years ago, but you know that there
Speaker 1: was no one in on the conservative side was saying
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders needs to be expelled from the Senate because
Speaker 1: one of his supporters went out there and tried to
Speaker 1: i mean, actively try to mass murder and shot a
Speaker 1: member of the United States Congress for the crime of
Speaker 1: being a Republican. Nobody saying Bernie Sanders should be expelled
Speaker 1: for that. So what is the difference here, Well, they'll
Speaker 1: say that Trump's r rhetoric was more was more reckless.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's a debate where you could have
Speaker 1: But when you're saying that people like Bernie Sanders that
Speaker 1: Republicans don't care about people getting healthcare. They don't care
Speaker 1: if you die from cancer that's treated. They don't care
Speaker 1: if your family members suffer in misery. They don't want
Speaker 1: you to healthcare because they're bad people. That's the Democrat.
Speaker 1: It's never that we think there's a better, more efficient
Speaker 1: way to deliver healthcare using free market principles with less regulation,
Speaker 1: less government interference. That's never their version of why we
Speaker 1: want a different we want a different healthcare system than
Speaker 1: what they're proposing. Right, It's that we don't care about
Speaker 1: poor people dying from diseases, is what they say. That's
Speaker 1: their claim. Well, if that's true. You're saying that we're
Speaker 1: moral monsters. People are going to act on that, But
Speaker 1: we cannot blame those who are taking upon their own,
Speaker 1: in their own decision making process, to act in a
Speaker 1: violent way based upon heated political rhetoric. And if we're
Speaker 1: gonna do that, then every member of the United States
Speaker 1: Congress is a Democrat needs to resign or be expelled
Speaker 1: because of their support for BLM and anti fall. And
Speaker 1: that's just, that's just they cannot get around that. They
Speaker 1: can keep talking about it like we don't know, like
Speaker 1: not aware, they cannot get around that. And then you
Speaker 1: have this other, this other comment that we're all supposed
Speaker 1: to comply, we're all supposed to bend the knee on this.
Speaker 1: I remember, I've been talking about how white supremacy has
Speaker 1: been expanded so much to just be a catch all
Speaker 1: term for I hate conservatives. Has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: racism or anything else. It's just they just use this
Speaker 1: term in such broad fashion that it ceases to have
Speaker 1: any real connection to actual white supremacy. AOC is saying,
Speaker 1: you know that that you're you're the problem if you
Speaker 1: don't think that Trump is a representation of white supremacy
Speaker 1: place six because a lot of people have drank the
Speaker 1: poison of white supremacy, and that's what Donald Trump represents
Speaker 1: just as and if at this point you haven't recognized
Speaker 1: that and you don't see it, maybe you have a
Speaker 1: lot of work to do too. Maybe we have a
Speaker 1: lot of work to do. I don't I don't know
Speaker 1: how many times we're gonna have to say this. But
Speaker 1: they can keep they can keep saying that the only
Speaker 1: reason people vote for Trump is white supremacy. It's not
Speaker 1: going to make it true. They can keep saying that
Speaker 1: Trump is a white supremacist. It's not going to make
Speaker 1: it true. They lied about what he said at Charlottesville
Speaker 1: for four years. We know that they lied about it.
Speaker 1: He did not say that he thought that the neo
Speaker 1: Nazis at Charlotesville were good people. But why would they
Speaker 1: have to lie about it? If he's such a white supremacist.
Speaker 1: Can't they just use his actual statements instead of misrepresenting
Speaker 1: or just lying about his statements. I think that's worth
Speaker 1: noting a but AOC. Remember it's not just about Trump,
Speaker 1: It's not just about this expansion of white supremacy as
Speaker 1: a term. They're also going after Ted Cruz play eight
Speaker 1: and so I want to be clear to Senator Ted Cruz,
Speaker 1: you do not belong in the United States Senate. I
Speaker 1: want to be clear to Senator Josh Holly, you do
Speaker 1: not belong in the United States Senate. You do not
Speaker 1: belong in any democratically elected seat when you don't when
Speaker 1: you do not believe that that election was even legitimate
Speaker 1: according to your self serving claims, So get out. If
Speaker 1: they had any shred of integrity, any shred of integrity
Speaker 1: about their claims, their lies, really, but their claims about
Speaker 1: this election, they would take off their their pin and
Speaker 1: turn it in. You see what's happening here. The demand
Speaker 1: is not just for Trump's removal. The demand is for
Speaker 1: the removal of Donald Trump and every Republican who was
Speaker 1: willing to fight for Donald Trump during his time in
Speaker 1: office in a way that was prominent and effective. They
Speaker 1: want Holly gone, they want Cruise gone. You know, anyone
Speaker 1: who was a part I'm sure if they could, they'd want,
Speaker 1: you know, Matt Gates gone. I'm not saying they've said that,
Speaker 1: but you know, anybody who was a prominent supporter of
Speaker 1: Trump they want to see lose their job. Because this is,
Speaker 1: as I've said, it's about the eradication, the destruction of
Speaker 1: the Trump movement in its entirety. They're not using a
Speaker 1: scalpel here, They're using a sledgehammer. They want to take
Speaker 1: the whole thing apart and just crush it and destroy it,
Speaker 1: and all this stuff, all the moralizing about, oh, this
Speaker 1: is necessary for unity and bring us together, that's not
Speaker 1: what their goal is. They say that because it's useful propaganda,
Speaker 1: but the actual goal they seek is not to bring
Speaker 1: the country together. It's to get half the country to submit.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. While many people on the right saw
Speaker 1: the digital purge coming, I think the ferocity of the
Speaker 1: ambush has been a shock. The major tech companies, specifically Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook,
Speaker 1: and Twitter, have become absolutely brazen in their partisan assaults.
Speaker 1: They used to pretend that right of center views were
Speaker 1: mysteriously censored or banished by accident, but now they're just
Speaker 1: outright telling Americans we decide what you can say. If
Speaker 1: you don't abide by their dictates, they will banish you
Speaker 1: from the Internet. To make matters worse. I's not clear
Speaker 1: these companies are working together handful of the most powerful, wealthy,
Speaker 1: and influential companies on the planet have shown that they
Speaker 1: can and will unite to elevate or destroy political candidates,
Speaker 1: online competitors, anybody who they decide is a threat to
Speaker 1: their messianic progressive worldview. They've become the world's most powerful
Speaker 1: censorship cartel. It's not an exaggeration to say that this
Speaker 1: is the most serious threat to free speech since the
Speaker 1: founding of the Internet. The tech giants not only control
Speaker 1: the most important content platforms online, they own and run
Speaker 1: much of the Internet's underlying infrastructure. It's one thing to
Speaker 1: be told that you can't tweet anymore because of your
Speaker 1: Facebook videos, or because that or rather, or you can't
Speaker 1: put Facebook videos up, or that you've been demonetized. Right.
Speaker 1: That's one thing, But it's another to find out, as
Speaker 1: the free speech microblogging site Parlor just did, that Amazon
Speaker 1: Web Services has actually shut off your servers and put
Speaker 1: you entirely out of business. Add to that the flight
Speaker 1: of text messaging, email payment processors, even legal services. All
Speaker 1: of this happened to Arler because nobody wants to cross
Speaker 1: the censorship cartel, and it's clear that Silicon Valley has
Speaker 1: the ability to annihilate any online enterprise with insufficiently left
Speaker 1: wing politics. Well, there's extreme tension around the transfer of
Speaker 1: government power right now. The first signs of the Great
Speaker 1: Digital Purge had nothing to do with the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: We have to remember this. The social media suppression campaign
Speaker 1: of accurate New York's Post reporting New York Post reporting
Speaker 1: about Hunter Biden has hacked information was certainly a major
Speaker 1: indicator of the trouble soon to come. But the oligarchs
Speaker 1: of Silicon Valley showed us what they were planning even
Speaker 1: earlier than that with their fact checks around COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: question the efficacy of masks against the virus gets suspended
Speaker 1: from Facebook from misset information claim on Twitter that pandemic
Speaker 1: lockdowns haven't stopped the virus in major cities. Watch as
Speaker 1: your account gets dinged with a fact check for lacking context.
Speaker 1: Who determines what the acceptable limits of free speech in
Speaker 1: America today are? Well, it's a combination of big text,
Speaker 1: independent fact checkers who are all leftists, and algorithms that
Speaker 1: unsurprisingly suppress and target conservatives and their beliefs. The censorship
Speaker 1: will lead a lead this country down a dangerous path.
Speaker 1: If it continues, and ideas that Internet elites deemed too
Speaker 1: dangerous are problematic for online sharing will find other ways
Speaker 1: to spread. Dark conspiracies will flourish, as will distrust and
Speaker 1: mounting frustration. More broadly, Eventually this suppression will boil over
Speaker 1: and we see how destructive and ugly that can be.
Speaker 1: All of this is likely to get worse before it
Speaker 1: gets better. Their ultimate plan is not to eliminate hate
Speaker 1: from the Internet, but to hobble conservatism as an ideological
Speaker 1: force in American politics. If the oligarchs at Google, Facebook,
Speaker 1: and Amazon have to sacrifice our central freedom to get there,
Speaker 1: they view it as a small price to pay, and
Speaker 1: they've got deep pockets. Thanks for listening to the Bus
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair.
Speaker 1: Feel those funky beats. It's time for roll Call, Roll Call.
Speaker 1: Remember to go to Bucksexton dot com. Check in there.
Speaker 1: I've got an editorial up today. Please do go and
Speaker 1: click and remember bookmark Bucksexton dot com. Make sure it's
Speaker 1: a place you're going. And you can always listen to
Speaker 1: the show on demand there, and if for some reason
Speaker 1: we get deep platformed off of our social sites, which
Speaker 1: I am honestly concerned about, you can still go to
Speaker 1: bucksexton dot com. And we're hoping that we're going to
Speaker 1: be able to create enough redundancy and back up for
Speaker 1: it that they won't they won't be able to kick
Speaker 1: us off, or at least it'll take them long enough
Speaker 1: that by the time they want to, they'll have lost
Speaker 1: some of this a desire to suppress or ability to.
Speaker 1: I just we're doing what we can with the platforms
Speaker 1: we have while we can. That's my that's my approach
Speaker 1: to this. It's information guerrilla warfare. You gotta just come
Speaker 1: at it wherever you can, with everything you got. So
Speaker 1: make sure buck sexton dot com is a place that
Speaker 1: you're checking in. We're posting stories there. Please also give
Speaker 1: us your emails. We can create a direct email list
Speaker 1: with you on it where we can reach out to
Speaker 1: you with a newsletter all things freedom hunt. We got
Speaker 1: all kinds of plans, but I need you to go
Speaker 1: there to buck sexton dot com and and please please
Speaker 1: do so, And like I said, make it make it
Speaker 1: a bookmark. Don't just do it once bookmark it, go check.
Speaker 1: We've got stories every day going up road. Call time now, JP, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: just wanted to say, as a longtime listening to your show,
Speaker 1: I really appreciate you giving us the truth during this
Speaker 1: difficult time, even though it's hard. I agree with you
Speaker 1: we always need to stay in the fight, but violence
Speaker 1: and lawlessness is not the answer, and we'll lead down
Speaker 1: a very bad path. Just want to say thanks for
Speaker 1: putting so much hard work into your show. In my opinion,
Speaker 1: it is the best out there and I have listened
Speaker 1: almost every day for over eight years. Now. I know
Speaker 1: you said you're losing followers and listeners this past week,
Speaker 1: but I am with you. Thank you for what you
Speaker 1: do and shields high, JP. I'm honored man, honestly, thank you,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. You know the fact that I'm
Speaker 1: going on people now that i'll be listening to me
Speaker 1: pretty soon. Here, we're going to be close to a
Speaker 1: decade of listening to the Buck Sexton Show, and you've
Speaker 1: been with me for all these years, and it's because
Speaker 1: of you. It's because of people listening on their station
Speaker 1: or listening to the podcast, and we're a combination of
Speaker 1: those two things. And checking out our sponsors. That's why
Speaker 1: our show grows. And we've been able to do all
Speaker 1: the things that we've done these years, and it means
Speaker 1: a lot. And I would really hope that you know
Speaker 1: the same way that when you have a relationship with
Speaker 1: somebody in your life that's a friend, even if you
Speaker 1: disagree with them on something, you don't cut them out,
Speaker 1: you don't abandon them because you understand that one we
Speaker 1: should all approach difficult topics with some humility, But also
Speaker 1: what about all the times before where that guy was
Speaker 1: there for you? What about all the times when that
Speaker 1: person stood up for you or helped you or was
Speaker 1: with you. You know, that's and and and in a
Speaker 1: really it's clear that a radio audience and a radio
Speaker 1: show like this, we build a relationship. You spend time
Speaker 1: with me, I spend time with you every day, And
Speaker 1: so I hope that anyone listening feels like it's it's
Speaker 1: never about one one decision, one policy, one thing. It's
Speaker 1: always the totality of what this has meant to you,
Speaker 1: I would hope. And in many cases, every day for years,
Speaker 1: or at least Monday through Friday. I mean, we do
Speaker 1: have to give producer Mark weekends off for having sakes, right,
Speaker 1: we gotta get we gotta let the guy have a life.
Speaker 1: You're not. You don't think we go seven days a
Speaker 1: week with the show, right, producer, Mark you like I
Speaker 1: am allowed to have a life. Huh. Yeah, of course,
Speaker 1: that's why we give you weekends. Oh, thank you so
Speaker 1: much all day on the week. We we we got
Speaker 1: you all day in the Monday through Friday though preci
Speaker 1: no off time. Yeah yeah, yeah, but we've been taking
Speaker 1: off holidays anymore. Working on Monday. Um, we are working
Speaker 1: on Monday. Yeah, I know. I wanted the listener to
Speaker 1: know that. I know you're you're giving me a look
Speaker 1: right now, probably, but the listeners should know we'll be here.
Speaker 1: We normally aren't. That's right, we are. We're working on
Speaker 1: MLK Day. Um. We think there's a lot of important
Speaker 1: stuff to talk about, and so hopefully a lot of
Speaker 1: you will have a nice a nice holiday celebrating a
Speaker 1: great American and we will be able to talk to
Speaker 1: you about what's going on in the world. That's that's
Speaker 1: the way. It is. So not not allowed time off
Speaker 1: for us. John writes, Buck, I love your show. I
Speaker 1: have four forty minute drives a day to take my
Speaker 1: or two and from school. We'll listen to your podcast
Speaker 1: as well as Sean Hannity and on occasion Rush. I
Speaker 1: only found out about you because of the ads during
Speaker 1: the Sea A Shawn podcast, so I gave you a try.
Speaker 1: So glad I did. My daughter is five and my
Speaker 1: son is three. I'm raising them to be strong conservative patriots,
Speaker 1: and my daughter even told their kindergarten class Joe Biden
Speaker 1: should stay in the safety of his basement. He's in
Speaker 1: cognitive decline and you'd be dumb to vote for him. Lol.
Speaker 1: That's pretty funny. Such a highlight for me as a father.
Speaker 1: I enjoyed your show Friday very much, especially when you
Speaker 1: had Mike the Anarchist on the guests before him, he
Speaker 1: was a military lawyer I don't recall his name. Made
Speaker 1: a great point that I don't think the forefathers could
Speaker 1: have ever imagined. He said, our courts aren't set up
Speaker 1: to handle elections. There's no reason they should be, or
Speaker 1: it should ever get to that point. But since they're not,
Speaker 1: is there a time and place for anarchy? Love you
Speaker 1: Buck keeping the strong patriot. You are well, John, So
Speaker 1: glad that you discovered us and you're a part of
Speaker 1: the free him Hut now. And I'm obviously in very
Speaker 1: elite company. If you listen to me, Rush and Sean, Um,
Speaker 1: you know, if I'm just gonna say it, if those
Speaker 1: if those were if you gave me three, if I
Speaker 1: wasn't me and you gave me three shows to listen to,
Speaker 1: it would be Buck, Rush and Sean. So there you go. Uh.
Speaker 1: But as for um, as for what you're asking about it, Oh,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad you enjoyed Michael Mouse to Malice is
Speaker 1: He's such an interesting guy and on a personal level,
Speaker 1: I just I like the guy. He's he's a friend.
Speaker 1: I think he's a really amusing dude. He's a he's
Speaker 1: a good guy, and but he's interesting and there's so
Speaker 1: few people I feel like these days. You know, one
Speaker 1: of the things we're gonna be able to do on
Speaker 1: this show more is I'm gonna be able to just
Speaker 1: tackle topics and I think will be of interest. We
Speaker 1: can learn things together. There's been such a kind of
Speaker 1: maniacal media focus on Trump, Tump, tump, trump, trumpet. It's
Speaker 1: all Trump all the time. There's a big world out there, friends,
Speaker 1: There's a lot of history, there's a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of road way ahead of us too. There's a
Speaker 1: lot to explore and to learn about it, to talk
Speaker 1: about that still matters. I'm I'm not saying, oh, we're
Speaker 1: gonna all of a sudden, I'm gonna be teaching you,
Speaker 1: you know, paper mache here or something, but it others.
Speaker 1: We've got to talk about immigration, the history of immigration,
Speaker 1: the legality, the the the truth about how it affects
Speaker 1: our day to day lives. And and you know, there's
Speaker 1: there's national security challenges out there, and there's China, and
Speaker 1: there's so much that I'm I'm actually, if you're looking
Speaker 1: for a silver lining, I mean for this show, it
Speaker 1: will be. We will be able to because we're not
Speaker 1: all on on constant defense because of these psychotic anti
Speaker 1: Trump libs with the whole Russia collusion nonsensitive thing. We
Speaker 1: will be able to talk about a wide array of
Speaker 1: topics here and I think we'll be able to expand
Speaker 1: into things. Uh and And that's so yes, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: with John um. I I'm glad you enjoy Michael Malice
Speaker 1: and he's an example. I want to have more. I
Speaker 1: want to have more very guests on not just talking
Speaker 1: about Trump or Russia collusion, or how the Democrats are crazy,
Speaker 1: but people that have specific expertise and things. Because if
Speaker 1: you're gonna give me your time every day, yeah, we
Speaker 1: got to be in the fight. We gotta be talking
Speaker 1: about what matters to the country, and we do. But
Speaker 1: I also want this to be a place where we're
Speaker 1: learning together. One of my favorite things about this show
Speaker 1: is that I have a constant reason to be learning
Speaker 1: and learning and learning more all the time because to
Speaker 1: serve you as best I can as the host of
Speaker 1: this program, the more knowledge and the more insight I
Speaker 1: can bring to every topic I talk about, the better.
Speaker 1: So I get to be You are my excuse, This
Speaker 1: audience is my excuse to be a perpetual student. And
Speaker 1: then I get to present to the rest of the class.
Speaker 1: You know, I am among you and of you, but
Speaker 1: also in this privileged position of being able to tell
Speaker 1: you what I'm learning that I think is useful. And
Speaker 1: then you tell me and that's why roll call, it's
Speaker 1: why we have this, and you share back that information.
Speaker 1: You tell me what your analysis, your thoughts are, so
Speaker 1: you know that that's that's the magic of what we
Speaker 1: do here. That's the magic of what we do here. Oh,
Speaker 1: ask for your question about anarchy. Look if we headed
Speaker 1: into some dystopian future where where all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you know, people were disappearing. I mean, this has happened
Speaker 1: in other countries. That's a different world than we'd have
Speaker 1: to we'd have to talk about what we would do.
Speaker 1: But we're not there. All right, We still the process.
Speaker 1: I know everyone's assuming the process is so broken. Well,
Speaker 1: the truth is that, Joe, But we may have lost
Speaker 1: this election. Friends, Look what just happened in Georgia, all right, them,
Speaker 1: There's a lot of Democrats out there and they voted.
Speaker 1: And you know, when I say we may have lost
Speaker 1: this election, we lost. I'm not saying, but we we
Speaker 1: may have lost it even if you were able to
Speaker 1: find every single pace of fraud. And I know people
Speaker 1: don't want to believe this there was fraud, was there
Speaker 1: enough to change the outcome? Even if we found it
Speaker 1: unclear and unlikely unlikely? This is the other the mental
Speaker 1: transition we have to make is that Trump might have
Speaker 1: gotten beat here, folks. And again I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: say he didn't lose the election, but I'm saying, even
Speaker 1: if you found meaning that the election's don Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: gonna be president. That's clear. But even if we were
Speaker 1: to find every bit of fraud, Biden might have just
Speaker 1: gotten more votes all in. Even if this was a
Speaker 1: perfect election, meaning that we unearthed all and I'm not
Speaker 1: saying it was perfect, but if we if we found
Speaker 1: every illegitimate ballot and discounted it, look at the eight states,
Speaker 1: look at the marginal victory in all these different states.
Speaker 1: That's where so we keep saying the system failed, the
Speaker 1: system failed. What if our candidate failed? What if our
Speaker 1: candidate failed? And I people don't you can get mad
Speaker 1: at me. I'm telling you the truth. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: the truth. Notice I'm not speaking definitively because I don't know,
Speaker 1: but we have to open our minds to that. And
Speaker 1: I mean, our candidate failed to win reelection. That's that's
Speaker 1: the part of this that people have not wanted to.
Speaker 1: We haven't wanted to go down that pathway. We've had
Speaker 1: this this honestly, this mental and emotional safe space of
Speaker 1: you know, they're all there's the legal challenges, legal challenges,
Speaker 1: legal challenges. You know, at some point if you had
Speaker 1: the breakup talk, having the why don't I check on you.
Speaker 1: I don't know how many of you have gone through this.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm unmarried, so I have had more than
Speaker 1: my fair share of single life as a guy who's
Speaker 1: almost forty now, I've had lots of dating and you know,
Speaker 1: and like to get married soon. I'm working on it's
Speaker 1: it's you know, things are, things are progressing well in
Speaker 1: that front. But you know, you can set up this.
Speaker 1: I want to chet can talk on a check and
Speaker 1: talk with you in a couple of weeks. Thing. I
Speaker 1: know a lot of people do this, They have the
Speaker 1: breakup talk. Look, it's not gonna work out. I don't think.
Speaker 1: And then, but you know, why don't I Why don't
Speaker 1: I talk to you in a couple Why don't we
Speaker 1: Why don't we see where we are in a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks, Let's see where you're. That becomes very unhealthy
Speaker 1: because you keep one person usually is holding out hope.
Speaker 1: Oh this isn't really over, This isn't really over. And
Speaker 1: that's what these legal challenges provided for a lot of
Speaker 1: Trump supporters. We'll talk in two weeks. Maybe Rudy's gonna
Speaker 1: pull something off, Maybe someone's gonna know. Now now we
Speaker 1: we have had that, we've had the breakup talk. We've
Speaker 1: had the we lost the election talk. That's and and
Speaker 1: I derive nothing put but sadness from that reality. But
Speaker 1: it is the reality I did. You know, I did
Speaker 1: everything I could, pushed, promoted everything I could to get
Speaker 1: Trump reelected. It didn't It didn't work. It didn't work.
Speaker 1: I people in my position there's some feel some degree
Speaker 1: of failure in this. You know, the the mainstream media. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a lot more of them and everything else. But
Speaker 1: you know, we we we like to think that with
Speaker 1: a lot less we can still beat them. You know,
Speaker 1: we can still go toe to toe with them on messaging.
Speaker 1: And you know, with our with our the generals of
Speaker 1: our movement, the kernels of our movement so to speak,
Speaker 1: you know, the Rush and Sean and you know, the
Speaker 1: big voices out there that they're they're able to match
Speaker 1: and go toe to toe in impact with the messaging
Speaker 1: for the mainstream media. This time around, they they might
Speaker 1: have gotten the best of us. You know, we're we're
Speaker 1: doing a real after action We're doing a real after
Speaker 1: action assessment. Now, this isn't that, this isn't the time
Speaker 1: for pandering. We're telling people what they want to hear.
Speaker 1: We're in this together. Friends, I'm gonna need you to
Speaker 1: keep me happy and sane in the months and years ahead,
Speaker 1: given what we're facing this administration. So we can either
Speaker 1: we can either be on on on our team here
Speaker 1: and look at things honestly. You know. I can be
Speaker 1: I can be the coach of this team of team Buck.
Speaker 1: I mean I can't say I'm the coach of the
Speaker 1: whole country and pull us all together in the locker
Speaker 1: room and say, look, guys, we lost this one, how
Speaker 1: do we find the next one? Or I can be
Speaker 1: the coaches all they paid off the ref Oh, they
Speaker 1: threw the refs through the game, and they paid off
Speaker 1: and ed by the way, I mean, did they pay
Speaker 1: off the refs? I can't, but I'm not going to
Speaker 1: tell you they did because I can't prove it. I
Speaker 1: don't know that. It's not helpful. It's not helpful. This
Speaker 1: is the time for honesty and coming together. That's what
Speaker 1: we're doing here, Yes, for this show, but also for
Speaker 1: this country and for conservatism. You're in the freedom Hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more
Speaker 1: road call. We got Kyle and on this one Buck
Speaker 1: on Friday, you said, there will be a silver lining someday,
Speaker 1: even if we can't see how yet. I'm sure Republicans
Speaker 1: felt us somewhere away after Nixon's resignation, but a few
Speaker 1: years later, Reagan beat Carter and ushered in the Golden
Speaker 1: Age of Conservatism. Historical analogies can give us a sense
Speaker 1: of hope, but we have to make sure we hold
Speaker 1: our head and heads high and keep pressing forward. In
Speaker 1: the future. It's always darkness before the dawn shields high.
Speaker 1: Semplify Kyle perfectly said, completely agree with you, and that's
Speaker 1: where we should be now. Always remember who you are.
Speaker 1: Always remember that your decency, your honor, your integrity, your
Speaker 1: love of family, country, and God cannot be taken from you,
Speaker 1: cannot even be disturbed by outside forces. As long as
Speaker 1: you have that internal fortitude and peace that comes from
Speaker 1: knowing who you are and acting within your principles and
Speaker 1: within your honor, then and you're good to go. And
Speaker 1: they can throw all these things at you, all these
Speaker 1: slings and arrows, you will be all right. You will
Speaker 1: be better than that. You'll be who you need to be.
Speaker 1: Chris hey Buck original Saturday Squad here. I really dig
Speaker 1: the show. Your commentary and producer Mark's banter with you
Speaker 1: at the end of the show see produced the Mark.
Speaker 1: They love you and not all of them are Mets fans. Wow,
Speaker 1: look at that. Yeah, I'm thinking about the US capital
Speaker 1: break in this week. Let me stay first. They never
Speaker 1: should have attacked the officers or into the building. What
Speaker 1: sticks out to me is that the protests went to
Speaker 1: the Capitol building and not the surrounding buildings. I find
Speaker 1: it interesting they went while Congress was in session. That
Speaker 1: really seemed to scare them. It brought the realization that
Speaker 1: Congress answers to the people, and in this case, the
Speaker 1: people really close to them. It puts a sincere fear
Speaker 1: into them. We saw of the past nine months, it's
Speaker 1: okay to protest and destroy on Democrat terms, but forbidden
Speaker 1: for Republicans to even voice an opinion. Still trying to
Speaker 1: process this line of thinking. I appreciate your analysis on
Speaker 1: all the topics. I hate that the capital was breached
Speaker 1: for the harm at cause, and secondly because I now
Speaker 1: fear the left will use it to beat down conservative
Speaker 1: for years to come. Keep up the great work, Chris.
Speaker 1: Really appreciate your writing in Everybody. I need you all now.
Speaker 1: More than ever, and I also need your help to
Speaker 1: get the word out to pass the buck. To tell
Speaker 1: people about this show. Please, even if they can't listen
Speaker 1: on their local radio yet and we're working on that too,
Speaker 1: please tell them to download the podcast, listen to podcasts.
Speaker 1: Podcasts always free. You can listen to bucksxten dot com.
Speaker 1: Just tell them to go to bucksxten dot com. Shields
Speaker 1: High