WEBVTT - Bloomberg's Rana on Microsoft, Talev on Clinton, Orlando(Audio)

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Radio, plus mobile, and on your radio.

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Handquarters.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Howlett. Stocks are trading Lawer and this update

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Brooks Brothers. Big event there

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>semi annual sale is going on now through June. Shop

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>early for the best selection. Visit Brooks Brothers dot com

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to shop the entire collection or to find the location

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>closest to you. SMP five hundred index moving lower by

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>seven points to two thousand eighty eight, a drop of

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>four tenths of one percent down, Industrials down fifty nine,

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a drop of three tenths of one percent, and has

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>stacked down twenty four a drop of five tenths of

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Ten You up six thirty second, Zeal there

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one point six one percent, Gold up ten dollars ten cents,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the ounce to twelve eighty six, a gain of eight

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>tenths of one percent. Crude oil down twenty four cents

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for eighty three on West Texas Intermediate. That is a

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>drop of five tenths of one I'm Charlie Pellett and

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a Bloomberg business flash. You're resuming to taking stock

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>with pin Box and Kathleen News on Bloomberg Radio. Microsoft,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in what is by far the largest acquisition in the

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>company's history, said it has reached a deal to purchase

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>linked In. That's the professional social networking company. Price tag

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty six point two billion dollars in cash. Here to

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>tell us more on ag Rana. He is our senior

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst of software and I T Services for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>providing unique real time research and context on a variety

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of industries and all the markets and government factors that

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>affect business. Our terminal customers can access this function. Just

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>type b I go on the Bloomberg on a rag.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Why is Microsoft buying a social network in company? I

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's the first thing we saw this morning and

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought this, you know, thought about the same um

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you could say, can underum that outmost everybody had. But

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you look at this thing, Microsoft is

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at to expand into areas and cloud and mobile

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that those are the two things have always talked about

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>ever since the new CEO came on. And within the cloud,

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they already have a good handle on the infrastructure services.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>They have a good handle on platform of the services

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>where they were really behind this cloud application something that

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>UM salesforce cells, workday cells. But when you look at

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>something like a LinkedIn, you can start using this as

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a as a software where people can't look at prospective

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>their their clients there, you know, if they want to

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hire somebody, so you can bypass the custom applications um,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, through this particular avenue. That's just one way

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. It's by far there are the

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>five biggest deals. I mean, it's by far the biggest,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>right it is, you know, looking at Skype or Nokia

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or others. Uh. But for LinkedIn, obviously somebody's making a

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. But besides that, in terms of their

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>business model and how they grow the company and how

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know they mesh with Microsoft, what does they mean

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for them? See one of the things they said, and

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they talked about this being trying to get into the

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>CRTM space a couple of years ago. Um, they had

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>some little bit of hiccups over there in that area.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>They the stock really got you know, beaten up over

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few months. And you know, one could argue

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft under the Microsoft umbrella or their backing or

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the financial mind, the distribution network, they can possibly achieve

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what they want, uh, you know, far better on the

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft than they were they could do as an independent company.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm just looking at the details for LinkedIn about

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>three billion in revenue, correct, and we're talking about net

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>income of oops, it doesn't have any net income. So

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what is Microsoft going to bring to the party that

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>will turn this into a profit making enterprise? So you

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>as as you remember, Microsoft is one of the companies

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that provides legacy software. It's been around for ages. The

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>question is how does it be an enterprise company for

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years. And you have a lot of

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>these Internet based companies that are trying to um you know,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>increase their network, increase their product portfolio, and Microsoft can

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>help them with that regard, and this company helps Microsoft

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of trying to give products that are more relevant for

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the next generation. I don't think you want to look

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>at it from a creative point of view or the

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>financial point of view at this point to see whether

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's strategically fits with the company or not, and then

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>go out and examine two to three years from now

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to see how it stands financially well and it's it

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just is what does it tells? Though? I guess about uh,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're telling us, but I'm really trying to

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>see them. Where is Microsoft going? Because this is some

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people consider LinkedIn basically social media side, right. Definitely, it's

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not a technology side. It's got some tech analogy that

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's infrastructure, but it's about bringing people together, bringing

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people together, absolutely, Cathleene. So think about it this way.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>What does salesforce dot com provide? It provides a portal

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>for sales people to go in and enter their records

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who did I talk to today? Who's

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>my right prospect? How can I reach out to them

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and have that whole history of conversation there to make

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>sure how I close my deal? Why can't you do

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that with Lincoln? If you if you are a recruiter today,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>why do you need a human capital management software where

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you wanna you're looking for prospective going out and looking

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for some employees for talent acquisition? Why don't you just

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>go to LinkedIn and hire someone directly from there? And

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have to think about it. Can you extend

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>this platform to use it internally? Whether you want to

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>monitor the life of an employee ever since that person

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>came into the firm to the point they left and

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>left the phone. Does it somehow bring me closer to

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft brand? If I'm not in the Microsoft world otherwise,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but I now I'm part of linked In, I don't

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>think about I mean, I don't think that helps in

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that way. It truly helps Microsoft case of being a

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more relevant in the cloud world. Do you

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to come back and look at

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this as a Nokia deal, because you know, I gotta say,

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>everything that you've described about LinkedIn was almost exactly what

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bomber said when they acquired Nokia. The Nokia was

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>slightly different that the Angel over there was consumer and

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were looking truly behind the mirror when

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they were doing this. This one is a lot more

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>forward looking. All right, Well, Ana, Grana, you're going to

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be staying one step ahead. So we're gonna let you

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to work because you're a very busy man today.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Senior analysts of software and I T Services for Bloomberg

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence joining us in our Bloomberg eleven thirty studio in

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>New York. Now, how we are going to Margaret tal

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>if she's senior White House reporter for Bloomberg editorial. She

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>is joining us from Hillary Clinton's speech today, so she's also,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>did I say, senior White House correspondent. That's why she's

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland. Some regret what did Hillary Clinton say today

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and how did it resonate after the Orlando of shootings.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, a much more somber tone than what she

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had expected to be doing inclusum today. This was originally

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be her sort of debut battleground state appearance,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of a victory lap but without alienating

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders fans, etcetera. It obviously turned into something much different.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>A moment of silence before she took the stage, uh,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and then a message UM that was both a gun

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>controlled message and an inclusivity message, but also a tough

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on terrorism message, saying that um uh, the US has

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to respond by taking military style weapons off the street,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is a call to prevent the proliferation of

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of assault weapons UM. But at the same

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>time that Saudi Arabian and their US allies and partners

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that reaching have to do more themselves to stop funding

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or allowing people uh in their own countries to fund

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>radical She had um efforts and UH, suggesting also that

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Donald Arms approach is the wrong approach UM in terms

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of talking about bands on LOGM, immigration and that sort

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of saying calling for the country to return to a

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of unity spirit like there was after nine eleven.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That was her message today, Margaret, I wonder if you

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>could speak to the issue of terrorism as a political

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>debating point when it comes to the battle between Donald

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Hillary Clinton in the election. Certainly. I mean

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when Secretary Clinton took the stage today, she said, today

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is not about politics, but of course this has become

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>immediately about politics, uh since the Sunday early Sunday morning shooting. UM.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Both candidates today this is dominating the dialogue in the debate.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Clinton again using this renew call for doing control

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about inclusivity, support for LGBT community, and support

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for American Muslims. Donald Trump using this both to call

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on President Obama and Secretary Clinton had stepped down and

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>step back, and to renew calls for immigration bands UH

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and surveillance of Muslims. So two really different approaches, each

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>galvanizing their basis. The political question, of course, is what

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>does the middle of America. What do independence and moderate

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Americans ideologically want to hear and want to see done

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from their leaders. Well, it seems significant to me, and

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned this that she's focusing on Saudi Arabia

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, and and allowing funding for terrigors organizations to occur.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>She's addressing schools that radical Muslims, we would consider them

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>radical from our point of view. At least are are

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>teaching kids there are certain ideology. How hard can she

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>drive that point home? And how far do you think

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that takes her with the electorate politically? That's an appealing message,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know for Americans. I think that, Uh. The nuance

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to watch for is how she addresses the threat today

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>calling it radicals Johodism. You don't hear her talking much

0:09:55.720 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>about radical Islam or radical Muslims, although the word yet

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he certainly conveys the Lama as opposed to be a

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>different religion, but talking about radical johda Uh. Hillary Clinton

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is trying to calibrate this in a way where she

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can show both of her experience a Secretary of State, uh,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of her outlook that she is, you know,

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>tough and willing to say tough things, even two allies,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time that she doesn't think the

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>right approaches is to turn that toughnessness inward on all

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Muslim Americans. UM trying to sort of send off what

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>will be Republican Donald Trump's attacks on her, you know,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>toughness and't willing to fight UM, while while still saying

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that she's not going to get drawn into kind of

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>an emotional rhetorical battle. I want to thank you very

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Margaret Tullef, Senior White House correspondent

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News in Cleveland today, I mean attended Secretary

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's speech earlier in the day, and just to note,

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>our hearts and our prayers go out to the victims

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and the families of the shooting in Orlando, and we

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>also send our thoughts to the people of Orlando. You're

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to taking Stock on pim Fox my co host

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Hayes. You're listening to Bloomberg Radiohea