WEBVTT - Amazon, Apple Report, Trump Pleads Not Guilty

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>We brought you a lot of earnings. The big one

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>we want to focus on, though, of course, is Amazon's

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>second quarter online stores net sales coming in above estimates.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>North American net sales for the second quarter come in

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>above estimates, Physical store net sales come in above estimates,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>second quarter subscription service net sales come in in slightly

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>above estimates, and operating income, that ever important one, coming

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>in way above estimates. The estimates were for four point

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>seven to two billion, and we're seeing results of seven

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>point six to eight billion. Stock up more than six

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>percent in the postmarket. Right now, I want to bring

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>in senior US retail analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, Punamguoyle, who

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>has had exactly seven minutes to go through this tire report. Poonum,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>give us the big takeaways you have.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sure, so, just looking at the press release really quickly,

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>it looks good on all fronts. I really can't find

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 3>anything bad to say today, I think what caught us

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 3>by surprise and in a good way is really AWS.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, we were thinking that AWS sales would have

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>slowed given just commentary we had heard from Microsoft, but

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>those came in above expectations and they said the business stabilized. Also,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 3>guidance was ahead of consensus. So overall, really across the board,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing pretty good momentum at Amazon.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, talk to me about Amazon's retail business as well,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 4>because we know the analysts have been looking for signs

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>that those margins are improving after their cost cutting measures.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 4>I know that you're just looking through all of this, poonam,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>but what do we know so far about that?

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the cost cutting is definitely helping the

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>keep in mind that they continue to invest in that

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>fast and free shipping and really speeding up those timelines.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think the margin story, more than on the

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>retail side, is just ab after turning to growth and

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>really driving up that profitability to allow for other areas

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of investment is key here. But we will continue to

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>see them really, you know, remove costs where they're unnecessary

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>or just not driving the ROI that we'd like to

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 3>see from Amazon.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of joking Punham a few minutes ago

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>when I talked about, you know, having to take a

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>drink when you saw a mention of AI, just because

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it's totally what investors want to see. And again, I

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>know you're a retail analyst, senior retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>but we can't talk about Amazon without talking about AWS.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And a big portion of Andanty Jasse's statement is dedicated

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to what AWS has been doing when it comes to

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 2>generative AI in the cloud. What do investors need to

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 2>know about that?

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think AI is going to be in every

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>single conversation we hear from here on for many years

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to come, whether it's retail or tech companies. And Amazon

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 3>will continue to invest in AI and will continue to

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 3>use it as a competitive edge, whether it's for AWS

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 3>or even for its online business. Both on the cost

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>side avolves on the marketing and sales side, where it

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>can really tailor assortments to better meat customers demand and

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 3>really drive up that conversion. So we don't see that

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>conversation going away at all. It is going to take

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>center stage. How we're going to determine the actual ROI

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>from each of those initiatives within AI. It's probably going

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to be a little harder to really tell.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 4>One of the other things that I'm fascinated in because

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm such a participant in it is the Prime Day event.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Looks like in the Internet's report, more than three hundred

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>and seventy five million items purchased customers, saving more than

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>two point five billion dollars poonam. I know that the

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>market typically sloughs off Prime Day, but what does the

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>earning statement tell you about both Prime Day and the

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>future of Amazon as kind of a retailer that consumers

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>are going to go to for these purchases.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Prime Day is an important event for Amazon.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, they hold it twice a year, and they

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>already spoke about it once right after the event where

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>they that the first Prime Day was actually the biggest

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>online sales day in their history, which means it's their

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>past Cyber Monday last year as well. So that's encouraging,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and it tells us that the consumer is seeking value

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and they go to Amazon to find that value. We're

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in a period of a time where the consumer is

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>really stretched down their dollars. Discretionary spending has been mixed

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and slowing as we move into the back half of

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the year for the all important holiday season. Amazon needs

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>to continue to stay on top of consumer's mind, show

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>their value promise, and all still show that they can

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>have a pretty broad assortment at a good price and

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 3>can get it to you fast for no cost.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>If you're a prime number, Is Amazon where you find value?

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Has it positioned itself as a value leader, especially in

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>relation to and in comparison to Walmart and what Walmart's

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to do with its own prime competition.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I think you know, when you think of value,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Amazon definitely provides value, especially when you look across Amazon's

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>owned brands, right, I think that's where they can press

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the pedal a little further. Amazon basic items are provided

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>at a pretty good value to consumers. And then more

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>than value, it's about convenience, right. It's the fact that

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>you go to Amazon and you type in that you

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 3>want the cell phone charger, and there you go. You

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>have a laundry list of cell phone chargers that you

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>could choose from, some branded, some non branded, and you

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>can get them same day.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're making me, you're reminding me about advertising advertising revenue.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>What's Amazon doing. What are we seeing with the most

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>recent quarter when it comes to ad revenue?

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Great, it was up twenty two percent in the quarter

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 3>and continues to be a driving force or Amazon. They're

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 3>doing really well on the advertising front. We continue to

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>expect to see double digit gains there. And remember advertising

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>that one business that probably could boast the highest profit margins,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 3>even better than AWS. So as Amazon scales that business,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 3>it's only going to continue to help drive its bottom line.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 4>They also mentioned in the report there are premieres of

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 4>additional Amazon original films and series, of course, I mean

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>when a marvelous Missus mazol on some other great performers

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 4>for them. Is there anything of note to you when

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the Prime video story in this earning

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>statement here?

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So you know, we just ran some data earlier

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 3>this month or last month, I should say, in July.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 3>The summer I Turned Pretty was released on July thirteen,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and that's season two, and we saw a huge uptick

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in downloads on Prime Video. So content is king for

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Prime Video. The more better the content that rolls out

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 3>on Amazon, we think they'll definitely bring up interest in

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>both getting new members onto Prime as well as just

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 3>keeping members that are on it, still interested and really

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 3>using the platform more and more in their daily lives.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Puna, Before we let you go talk to us about

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 2>how to read into the strength of the consumer. You

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>said that the consumers stretched right now, they're looking for value.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Where else can we look in Amazon report to give

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>us an idea for just how the American consumer, how

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the American economy is doing.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the consumer is stretched, but the consumer

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 3>is making trade off. So you're going to see an

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>area of retail where some consumers will choose Amazon and

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>some will choose to move away from some of the

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 3>other retailers where they don't really have value, nor are

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>they differentiated, and nor can they provide convenience. So we're

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 3>going to see a mixed bag of earnings. We just

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>had Revolve report last night, and you know, they were

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>talking about the consumer being weaker, especially on the luxury end,

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>which is interesting to hear. And then we've heard dollar

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>stores and others talk about how the value consumer is stretched.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's really about the consumer making trade offs and

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>going to the retailer that has exactly what they want

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>to meet their needs. And Amazon fits that bucket is

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>what they.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Dispersed Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US retail analyst Punamguayl.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com Radio app and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Another piece of history being made today as former President

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Trump is entering the courtroom. He's inside the courtroom for

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 4>his arraignment on those January sixth charges. This is his

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 4>third indictment as former president, here again appearing in a

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>federal courtroom in Washington to be arraigned on those charges

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 4>that he conspired to remain in office despite the loss

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 4>of the twenty twenty election. So we are going to

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 4>dig into this story right now. We've got Bloomberg Law

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 4>host and legal analyst June Grasso, and we've also got

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg US Legal reporter David Veraicus. I hope I said

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 4>that correctly. Day, Thank you so much. Okay, on the

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>latest with the Trump indictment and that arrangement today, David,

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I want to start with you because we've gotten used

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>to covering this type of event here when it comes

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 4>to the former President. What is significant about today?

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 6>What is different for you?

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 4>What are you watching?

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is what's known as an initial appearance and

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 7>an arraignment, where Trump will be formally notified of the

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 7>charges and he's expected to enter a not guilty plea.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 7>The judge will also set bail terms, and it's expected

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 7>that he would be released until his trial. We don't

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 7>have a trial date yet. It's possible the judge would

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 7>set a trial date, but probably not. This is a

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 7>magistrate judge, and it's the district judge who would probably

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 7>set the trial date and a schedule for pre trial

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 7>hearings and motions.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>David, I want to stick with you for one more

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll bring in in June. But you know,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>with Maddy was alluding to this with President Trump in

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>appearing before court, this is the third indictment, and I

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>think there's a risk that people sort of think to themselves, Okay,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>well this is now normal. This is not normal. This

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>is not normal in US history. Right now we're seeing

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>a foecount indictment that accuses President Trump of conspiring to

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>defraud the US, interfering with the counting votes in twenty twenty,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>obstructing conspiring to obstruct Congress's certification of the election results,

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and conspiring against the right to vote. I mean, these

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>are some of these things that were in an indictment.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Go back to the wake of the Civil Rights Act,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>was voting.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 7>This is an extraordinary moment in our nation's history. The

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 7>Justice Department has accused him essentially of an assault on democracy,

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 7>and you know, Trump and his supporters say that he

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 7>had a free speech right to say what he said

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 7>at the time, and that the prosecutors will not be

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 7>able to show that he had criminal intent here. It's

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 7>going to be a tremendous legal battle, and it's also

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 7>going to be extraordinary over the next few months because

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 7>of the need to set proper schedules between the three trials,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 7>and there's also the possibility of a fourth indictment. This

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 7>is Georgia, right in Georgia and Atlanta, so we've never

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 7>seen anything like this in our history. And all of

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 7>this is bookending Trump's third run for the White House.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 4>I just quickly want to stick with you on the

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Justice Department because you mentioned that I'm curious about how

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 4>much feedback we're going to see the Justice Department getting

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the criticism that it's been this is political,

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 4>that this is a political move. How much do you

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 4>anticipate that commentary coming to the Justice Department.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>I expect there's going to be a sustained political attack

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 7>from the Republican Party, from Trump allies, from conservative media,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 7>and I also expect it's likely that the Justice Department

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 7>won't respond except in court and so well. Trump can

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 7>make a great deal of comments on social media and live,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 7>the Justice Department is greatly constrained in what they can say.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring in June Grosso. She is the

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Law host and legal analyst here at Bloomberg June.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Every time in the last forty eight hours that we've

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 2>gone by your desk, you've been reading this indictment. I

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know how many times you've redered it. This really

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>three times? Okay, so it's about forty five pages. Give

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>us your takeaways as you've spent so much time in it,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and really the gravity of it.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's hard to overestimate or the gravity of this.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 8>And this is an attack on an alleged attack on

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 8>American democracy, And what strikes me is the relentlessness with

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 8>which former President Trump is alleged to have acted in

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 8>this matter. He was told over and over again, and

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 8>it's really set out carefully in this indictment. So they

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 8>talk about how many times he was told and how

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 8>many people he was told that the elections were fair,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 8>and they list, and that's why I think it's important

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 8>for people to read this. They list, for example, the

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 8>defendant's vice president, the senior leaders of the Justice Department,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 8>Director of National and Intelligence, Department of Homeland Securities, Cybersecurity

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 8>and Infrastructure Security Agency, senior White House attorney, senior staffers

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.479
<v Speaker 8>on the defendants re election campaign, state legislators and officials,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 8>state and federal courts. All those people, in different ways

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 8>told President drump that the election, there was no fraud

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 8>in the election. And still he went forward and repeated

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 8>the same things that they had told him were false.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 8>For example, he said more than ten thousand voters in

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 8>Georgia were actually dead. He said that there were two

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 8>hundred five thousand more votes than voters in Pennsylvania.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>On and on, all things demonstrably untrue.

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and suitcases of fake votes being counted.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>In Georgia, conspiracy theories.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 8>It's if you look at this, if you read it

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 8>you'll see how the Special Council has laid out each

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 8>and every detail, though I'm sure he is not given

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 8>all the details out in this and it's overwhelming.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 7>I would also point out there's going to be a

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 7>legal question of Trump really believe these claims that there

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 7>was fraud in the election, and how do you prove

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 7>that though, Well, they have a lot of people around

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 7>Trump who said that he told me this, or he

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 7>told me that. They can use direct statements from his aids.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 7>They can also use circumstantial evidence, and it may be

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 7>that he was repeatedly told that your fraud claims are

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 7>not true, and he believed it anyway, And so the

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 7>burden is on the Justice Department and the prosecutors to

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 7>prove what was in his mind.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, and June, I know you know this so well.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 4>But on the second page, the indictment acknowledges that former

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 4>President Trump had that First Amendment right to lie. Talk

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to me about the distinction that's made in the indictment

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 4>about the difference between that right and what was done.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 8>So it's surprising to me that Donald Trump's luers are

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 8>still advancing a First Amendment defense because obviously the Special

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 8>Council has written this in a way to try to

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 8>deflect any First Amendment claims. So there's a difference. First

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 8>Amendment is speech. What they're alleging here is conduct, and

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 8>that's there's a big difference in speech and conduct because

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 8>with a conspiracy, with any conspiracy, they are going to

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 8>be usually words spoken, and that doesn't make it a

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 8>First Amendment claim. It's the conduct that is at issue here.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 8>So the way he's written this is to say, yes,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 8>you can say this, Yes you can even say that

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 8>the election was false, but that doesn't make it a

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 8>First Amendment claim. So it's kind of surprising that that

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 8>seems to be the main thread of the defense here.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 4>What do we know about the co conspirators mentioned in

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 4>the indictment to June, I know there's a lot of

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 4>speculation about that, but having read it so many times,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 4>why can you tell us?

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think we have identified at least five out

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 8>of the six, and it could be that we've identified

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 8>the sixth one, but I don't want to say anything.

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 6>At this point.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 8>But so it's Rudy Giuliani is very obviously consputer number one.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 8>John Eastman's attorney has said that he is conspirator number two.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 8>You have Sidney Powell, the lawyer who appeared on so

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 8>many with so many wild theories, and Jeffrey Clark, who

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 8>was a former assistant Attorney General, and then Kenneth Chessper

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 8>who is an appellate attorney. Those are the unnamed co conspirators.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 8>And the question is is the special counsel going to

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 8>name them at some point charge them, because if he

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 8>names them, he's going to in an indictment he has

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 8>to charge them.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I want to bring David in because

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance David that you know, if you're Rudy

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Giuliani right now, maybe you're being advised to cooperate with

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Special Counsel Jack Smith, and yeah, talk to us about

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>you know that process there.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 7>It's it's hard to tell for sure from the indictment

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 7>whether any of the co conspirators are cooperating, although there

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 7>is that possibility. There's one tactical reason that Jack Smith

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 7>may have only charged Donald Trump, which is if you

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 7>bring in more defendants, then that could prolong the trial

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 7>and the proceedings. And it seems, as June suggested, that

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 7>they want to make this as streamlined as possible to

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 7>get in the trial before the.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Election is I can tell you what I just want

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 8>to say one thing. I am sure that co conspiritor

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 8>number two, who is Johnny Smith, the attorney, is not

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 8>cooperating because his attorney is said that he's going to

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 8>send a brief to the Special Council next week setting

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 8>forth all the reasons why he should not be charged.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 8>That he was acting as the council.

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>We're getting a headline right now that the President Trump

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>expectedly has pleaded not guilty to twenty twenty election charges.

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>So no big surprise there.

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 8>But he also said that just to finish at the

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 8>thought that if he is charged, he will not cooperate,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 8>he will not take a plea. So at least he's

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 8>out of the game.

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So, David, I guess it raises the question of one

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't able to answer when a colleague asked me

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>earlier today when I was preparing for this interview with

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>both of you and preparing for him to be at court.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Is President Trump going to go to prison? I couldn't

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 2>answer the question.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 7>That well, first of all, that suggests that he'll be convicted.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 7>He has to be convicted, and you know it's possible

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 7>that he could. He faces up to twenty years on

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 7>the most serious charge. That's just on one charge, right,

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 7>But the way the federal sentencing works is usually white

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 7>collar defendants would serve considerably less time. So I can't

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 7>answer the question of whether he's going to prison for sure,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 7>but I could say that he can run for president

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 7>under indictment. He can run for president if he's convicted,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 7>and even if he goes to prison, he could run

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 7>for president. There's also the possibility that if he's elected,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 7>he could pardon himself. This is something that analysts legal

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 7>nis have been talking about and it's kind of extraordinary

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 7>and unprecedented. But we don't know quite how this will

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 7>play out, but it seems to be a distinct possibility.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 8>I've talked to lawyers and they seem to be on

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 8>whether or not he would be sent to prison. Some

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 8>lawyers I've spoken to said, well, he could be sent

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 8>to a country club prison like they have out west,

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 8>and we've heard about those prisons right where, or he

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 8>could be placed under some kind of house arrest arrangement

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 8>at Mara Lago. Others have said that it might be

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 8>that the president, who is in office at the time

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 8>might do something like think that, okay, he's had enough

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 8>right now he's been exposed, and might themselves, you know,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 8>grant him clemency of some kind. So I don't know

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 8>if the judge would The judge here is a very

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 8>tough sentencing judge, so I'm not sure she wouldn't send

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 8>him to prison well convicted, Well, David.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>What about Georgia the potential fourth indictment, Correct me if

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong, But that's one that he couldn't parton himself from.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 7>Right, The original indictment by the Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 7>and any possible indictment by Fannie Willis in Atlanta, She's

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 7>the Fulton County DA are not subject to pardons or

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 7>clemencies under the federal system. So it seems that those

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 7>are charges that present particular peril for Trump. But it

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 7>also seems that it's almost certain that the Special Counsel

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 7>would like to go first.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's interesting in June, I know you know this.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 4>So while the Special Council is going to focus on

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 4>the idea that mister Trump was not delusional at the time,

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 4>is there any chance of that changing because it would

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 4>save him from prison time.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't think so. I think that, you know, in

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 8>order to prove his case, he's going to have to

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 8>prove that Donald Trump had intent, as David was saying,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 8>and you know that's true of any crime, that you

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 8>have to prove intent. And I think that there's no

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 8>way that the Special Council would would deviate from that

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 8>or in any way say that Donald Trump was not

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 8>of sound mind in his defense. May try that, but no, no, seriously,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 8>I just don't think that that. I mean, some of

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 8>the defenses that they've put out are what you said,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 8>first Amendment, advice of counsel. You know, there are different

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 8>ways that they'll approach it. They also have sort of

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 8>as Donald Trump has said over and over and over

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 8>again from years and years, that it's a witch hunt

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 8>and that he's being prosecuted, that there's a you know,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 8>favoritism in the prosecution. So that may be another one,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 8>but he is upsound mind.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 4>And then timeline, I feel like is the next big

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 4>important question because we do want to know whether or

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 4>not there's a chance that he could be back in

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 4>the Oval office by the time that this case has decided.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 4>What do we know about the timeline?

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'll give you a live update. Trump has pleaded

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 7>not guilty in federal court in DC. The judge is

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 7>releasing him without bail, and he's agreeing to various conditions

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 7>of release, but there is no trial set yet in

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 7>this case. The Manhattan DA's cases scheduled for March, and

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 7>the mar Alago documents cases scheduled for May.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 8>The New York Attorney General's suit is also is going

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 8>in October, and then Jean Carrol in January.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, guys, we're going to wrap because we've got to

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>break the Apple earnings. But June we're going to have

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 4>you back in a bit.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I do want to thank both of you. That's Jean Grasso.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>She is Bloomberg Law host and legal analysts, and also,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>of course, Bloomberg US Legal reporter David Doriakis on the

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 2>latest with the Trump indictment.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, plenty of news to get you. Fortunately,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>we go from Amazon earnings to the latest with President

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump's indictment, to Apple earnings, and we've got great guests

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 2>for all of them, including our next one, Thomas Thornton,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>President and founder of hedge Fund Telemetry, on the latest

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Apple earnings joining us. You have Tom had only you know, wow,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>look at this thirty three three minutes to go through

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 2>these numbers. But give us your gut reaction here.

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it looks like it's pretty much in line.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 5>I think everybody was expecting services to offset the weaker hardware,

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 5>and that's generally what we got. Mac was a little better,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 5>I've had a little lighter. EPs was better, and revenues

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 5>were sort of inline. I think I'm a buysider, so

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 5>I think that the buyside had a little higher expectation

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 5>for revenues. But you know, I think it's it's pretty

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 5>much in line, and now we want to see what

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 5>we're going to get for the next quarter.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>How do you think they did that with EPs? How

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 2>did they get EPs to come in above estimates when

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>revenue was just in line? What did they do on

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the inside their last quarter?

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 5>You know they could I think I noticed some of

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 5>their operating expenses were lower, and you know they've got

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 5>the mass buy back, and that guy that does the

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 5>buyback should be getting the biggest bonus.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 7>A good point.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 5>With his elbow on the button all day, that's.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 7>A good point.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 4>That was such a great question, Tim of how they

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 4>got there that I love that question. I'm stealing that

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of earnings, for the rest of my

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 4>life covering them.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 8>Tom.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 4>I want to go to you on the iPhone revenue

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 4>missing estimates. I know that we kind of anticipated that,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 4>particularly because of the sluggish sales of the iPhone and

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 4>some of those other devices there, But talk to me

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 4>about how critical it's going to be moving forward for

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Apple to really dig deep into those iPhone sales figuring

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 4>out ways to get consumers to either upgrade or get

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 4>new products.

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm a little surprised that the iPhone sales were light.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 5>They were expected to be up one year over year,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 5>which isn't so great, but it's light. And now they

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 5>have the iPhone fifteen that it's coming out. I don't

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 5>think it's it's stably going to be a big event.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 5>From a new feature standpoint, It's going to look pretty

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 5>much the same a little better camera. And you know,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the one reason I thought that they would have a

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 5>little bit better iPhone sales was they cleared out a

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 5>lot of inventory in June and in China especially, So

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 5>it's it'll be interesting to see what the management says

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 5>on the calls regarding that.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm really glad you brought up China because I want

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the Greater China story. Third quarter Greater

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>China revenue was a bright spot for the company, fifteen

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>point seven to six billion. Estimates were for fourteen point

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>five to nine billion. Dig deeper there, though. The China

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 2>story is so important to Apple, and it's got a

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 2>very complicated relationship with the country when it comes to

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 2>how it stores its data, where its products are made,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and increasingly where its products are not going to be

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>made in the future as it transitions at least some

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of them to suppliers and to manufacturers who are building

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>plants in India. Talk to us about the China story.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, First of all, Tim Cook is the best CEO

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 5>because he knows how to play the political game very

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 5>very well. He does it all the time in China

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 5>and he does it in the US as well. But

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 5>I think that. The one thing about China that I'm

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>a little concerned about going forward is they just announced

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 5>that they're going to put limitations on children and their

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 5>handsets their phones, So that could be a little bit

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 5>of a problem going forward because they did see a

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 5>pickup in services and services. That's interesting because the game

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 5>there were a lot of games released in the second

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 5>quarter in China and China approved them, So this could

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 5>be a little bit of a headwind going forward.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So let me get this straight. If a kid is

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>not staying up late after ten pm in their room

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 2>playing on their iPad or their iPhone games and not

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>buying those games, or not not buying products within the games,

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 2>if they're in at purchases in China because China is

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>cracking down on that, you see that as a real

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>headwind for the company.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's it's a risk. I mean, I think that

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 5>they had a lot of momentum coming out of Q

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 5>two and it could be a little bit of a

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 5>headwind for them. Look, I think kids are going to

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 5>try and figure out a way to download games and

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 5>play games as much as they possibly can, maybe more

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 5>now I don't know.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I don't know what the you know, I

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know how that looks in China. How do you

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>control for that? I truly don't know.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, China can do a lot of different things.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Went with Apple and to shut down some of the

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 5>the access that people can have to their phones.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's I just want it for contact, Maddie. I

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>just want to repeat sort of the how important of

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a segment Greater China is as a reportable segment. In

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the most recent quarter, the three months that ended July

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 2>first three, it was the third biggest reportable net sales

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>by reportable segment coming after year up with twenty billion

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars in the Americas with a thirty five point three

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>billion Greater China coming in Maddie at fifteen point seven

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 2>five eight billion dollars.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's just interesting. I mean, looking at the

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 4>headline here, it kind of says it all from Markum

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 4>and Apple meeting estimates after services help offset that hardware slump.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I wonder how the China story plays into that from

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 4>your perspective, Tom, is there a world in which that

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 4>hardware slump is saved because of the China story For Apple?

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, there were a couple sell side notes that I

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 5>read it said that, you know, we had a big

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 5>iPhone cell through in June. It was a big, big,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 5>big month, a lot of inventory cleared, but they saw

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 5>some China deceleration in July. So those are the early

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 5>checks that we're what we're seeing right now. So it's

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 5>it's gonna be tough too with the new phone. I

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 5>just can't really get too excited about it. There's been

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 5>some talk about delays. Yeah, there's also that going around.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Tom, you give me the opportunity to kind

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of like, you know, you read my mind here. I

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>was thinking as we went into this report today, I

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>think I forgot I used to cover this company so closely.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I used to get every new iPhone as a review model.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know which iPhone I have anymore. It

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>takes great pictures, it runs fast, It does everything I

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>needed to do, and I don't see myself upgrading at

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the same rate that I used to upgrade. This is

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a story I've been saying for five years.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>At this point, that's true.

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 5>You can go back and look at the past three iPhones,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 5>and you've heard the bulls say we're going to see

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 5>this giant refresh upgrade cycle it's going to happen. I

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 5>think this one's going to be a little tougher too,

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 5>because they are planning on raising the prices of the phones.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 5>And one thing that's probably smart for them is they're

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 5>going to focus on the high priced bone to push

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 5>out a little harder out there into the market. But look,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 5>if the economy slows, if you have the college student

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 5>loan repayments start to happen, I think that's going to

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 5>be a little bit tough. And the other thing is

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 5>people are sort of throwing away this next quarter and

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 5>they're looking more towards the December quarter. So I think

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 5>that's why the stock's moved higher in anticipation for the

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 5>wide release of the iPhone fifteen. So I think that's

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of what's happening. The market isn't really punishing the

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 5>stock too much right now. It looks like it's pretty

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 5>much in line.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 4>We pause for me. On the student loan story, you're

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 4>saying that the unpositing of student loan repayments in the

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 4>fall is potentially a sizeable headwind for Apple sales.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. The average repayment is four hundred dollars a month.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that's gonna change a lot of consumers spending plans,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 5>and certainly, again, as Tim said, if your phone is

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 5>working just fine, why do you really need to upgrade

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 5>to a phone that is basically the same as what

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 5>you have right now? There's nothing really that exciting in

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 5>the phone. The next phone that's gonna have wines around

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 5>the block and people waiting for the next great thing.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that's exactly why you saw the release

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>of Apple's Vision Pro the unveiling. I don't want to

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>say the release. That's why we saw the unveiling in

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the last few months of Apple Vision Pro tom because

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that is where Apple sees a growth area. It's just

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>so different than anything Apple has ever released in the past,

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>not just because of price, not just because of product category,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 2>but because of availability and how they're not making it

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>available to so many people. What's your read on it.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I think that Apple is flexing its muscles

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 5>as far as a technology company again, and that's really

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 5>nice to see. We've all been enamored with all the

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 5>great technology that Apple's released over the years, and this

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 5>is certainly something that is really really stunning. The technology

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 5>is just mind blowing. I haven't seen one on obviously

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 5>nobody's really seen it, but I just think the price

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 5>point is going to be difficult, and they're not going

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 5>to have this in wide release until the first quarter

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 5>next year, so this is really something that they're going

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 5>to I mean, it's kind of a bad thing that

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 5>they're going to miss the holiday seasonal shopping for this

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 5>new product.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's funny. I would really not want that under

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 4>my Christmas street, but I can imagine a lot of

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 4>people would, so I understand it. I'm sorry, I'm really

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 4>headsets like I can't I'm not the market for it,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>and I also feel like women don't want to wear headsets,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 4>but that's a separate story that we're going to cover.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 4>I also want to talk to you about the earnings

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 4>call because I anticipate that there are going to be

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of questions about the headset, a lot of

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 4>other questions about iPhone sales, how they're planning to deal

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 4>with that. What would your single biggest question.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Be, Well, there's there's there's three things that I think

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 5>they're going to talk about, and let's just start right

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 5>with the obvious AI. What are they going to say

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 5>about AI? And then there's India, Then the headset. They'll

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 5>talk about that, and then obviously they'll talk about the

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 5>iPhone fifteen and how wonderful it's going to be. But

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 5>AI is what people are going to be listening for.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 5>If they have something that's meaningful that they're going to

0:33:55.880 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 5>release for the consumer, maybe this order or next quarter,

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 5>what would that look like. It's probably going to be

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 5>something like Siri, something in a very advanced type of

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 5>search product, huh, that they'll have. I don't know. I

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 5>just think it'll be interesting to see if they can

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 5>come up with something that's different and unique and something

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 5>that people can use on their phones seamlessly like every

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 5>other Apple product.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Tom, we really appreciate you taking the time in joining

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 2>us this afternoon, especially only having three minutes to actually

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>go through these numbers. You gave us a lot of

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>really good stuff. That's Thomas Thornton, president and founder of

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the Hedge Fund Telemetry, joining us to talk about the

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 2>latest Apple learnings.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.959
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim sten Of from Bloomberg Radio.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 6>We're gonna go.

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Back to DC here because former President Trump is expected

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 4>to leave the courthouse soon. The hearing has wrapped up,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 4>and we're getting some reports in about potential next steps

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to trial dates. So we're gonna jump

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 4>right into it with our guests here. We've got Bloomberg

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Law host and legal analyst June Grasso. We've also got

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 4>a fantastic guest to talk about this, Robert mens. He

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 4>is a former former federal prosecutor and partner at Macarter

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 4>and English to talk with us about this as well.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 2>June, I a household name to you, June, I feel like.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I have been Yes, I've known him for decades. Bob,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, for years and years.

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 2>In as soon as Maddie said, introduced you, Robert, she said, Bobby.

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean you too, should just talk.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 6>Just go Jim and.

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't need to be here.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Maddy. I jumped on you.

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 8>No, no, no, June, you know what I what I wanted

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 8>to say and get Bob's opinion on this. So the judge,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 8>the magistrate judge who told Trump that she's consulted with

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 8>the trial judge has set August twenty eighth as the

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 8>next hearing date in Judge Chuckins Court, and also in

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 8>seven days wants briefings about how long the case is

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 8>going to take. So does that indicate to you that

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 8>they're going to try to move this quickly?

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 6>I think they will try to move it quickly.

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 10>I think the judge here wants to get her hands

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 10>around the issues in this case as soon as possible.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.479
<v Speaker 10>She wants to put the defense on the record as

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 10>to what they think they're going to need in terms

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 10>of timing to be ready to go to trial. I'm

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 10>sure the prosecution is going to say they'll be ready

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 10>to go as quickly as possible, as quickly as.

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 6>They can get a trial date from the judge.

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 10>So it's really going to be up to the defense

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 10>to try to explain what time they need. They're going

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 10>to want discovery, obviously from the prosecution. The extent of

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 10>that discovery is going to drive the timing of this trial.

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 10>How many documents kind of discovery are we talking about?

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 10>Unlike the mar Lago case, where there are all kinds

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 10>of issues about national security, because of the nature of

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 10>that case, we really don't have that here so much

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 10>if we have it at all, and so this case

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 10>could be fairly streamlined. And I do think that this

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.479
<v Speaker 10>judge is going to try to move this case along

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 10>as quickly as you can.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, as you mentioned, though, Trump's lawyers will do whatever

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 4>they can to delay it. Robert, as a former federal

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 4>prosecutor here, what do you anticipate that they could do

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 4>that would be effective in their efforts to delay the trial?

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think they're going to tell the judge they

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 10>need a certain amount of time to absorb all the information. Again,

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 10>I think it will depend on the volume of discovery

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 10>that prosecutors are going to provide to them. We just

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 10>don't really know what that is at this point, but

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 10>there could be literally hundreds of interviews. Those may or

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 10>may not be memorialized in grand jury testimony, for example,

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 10>they could be memorialized in what's called the three to

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 10>zero two, which is an FBI memorandum that memorializes the interview.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 6>All that stuff has to be provided to.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 10>The defense, and the defense does have to have a

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 10>reasonable amount of time to absorb that information to prepare

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 10>for trial, and.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 6>The judge will be sensitive to that.

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean, she's gonna want to move this case along,

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 10>but she also is going to be very aware that

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 10>the defense does have to have a reasonable amount of

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 10>time to get ready here, because if she moves too quickly,

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 10>that creates some kind of an issue. Even if there's

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 10>a trial, even if there's a conviction, it could be

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 10>overturned on appeal if the defense can say, we were

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 10>just simply not ready to defend this case.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 6>So we're gonna have.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 10>To see what the discovery looks like. That will ultimately

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 10>drive the scheduling.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Here, excuse me, I got to turn my microphone. If

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you're watching us on YouTube, you can see on the

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 2>right side of the screen President Trump has left court

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 2>after pleading not guilties, now making his way to Reagan

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 2>National Airport to board his jet. June I want to

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 2>know about timing here, and we did just here from

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Robert about you know, the delicate balance that the judge

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 2>has to to sort of walk to make certain that

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the defense has enough time to prepare, but also that

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 2>it's not something that's delayed, especially their political implications here too.

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, he's going to be campaigning. And you know one

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 8>of the dates that they set was that they were

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 8>considering was near one of the debates, which he said

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 8>he hasn't going to be in, and a lot of

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 8>these hearings the defendant doesn't have to be there for

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 8>the hearings themselves. But I think what's really interesting, and

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 8>I mentioned this before, is that da Alvin Bragg, who

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 8>has a firm trial date of March twenty fifth of

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 8>next year, has said that in the interests of justice,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 8>he would consider, you know, moving that trial date. And

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 8>let's all face it, this case is considered the most

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 8>important of the case is because of what allegedly happened here,

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 8>and so I would think that this is the case

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 8>and it'd be interesting to see whether the prosecution is

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 8>going to try to move this case faster than the

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 8>classified documents case, which, as Bob and I have discussed

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 8>just recently, the classified documents case seems like it's more straightforward,

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 8>but you have all those classified documents that have to

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 8>be dealt with. And another thing is John Laura, who

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 8>is one of Trump's attorneys, was on I think it

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 8>was CNN the other night and he was saying that

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 8>this case, this trial could take nine months or year. Bob,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 8>obviously that seems a little bit long.

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, it isn't It isn't.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.399
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I've tried lots of cases in federal court

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 10>and defended them, and it's not that unusual to have

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 10>a trial that ultimately goes to trial, you know, a

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 10>year or more after the indictment. But again, that depends

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 10>on a lot of other factors, you know, like the

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 10>volume of documents that the defense has to review and analyze,

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, where they need to engage experts. For example,

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 10>in a financial fraud case, the defense is going to say,

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 10>don't judge me to hire an accountant, a forensic account

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 10>to go through all this. Then you've got issues about

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 10>scheduling with the with the lawyer's other schedules, and of

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 10>course you have the judges schedule. But this is a

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 10>case that is so important that clearly the judge is

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 10>going to clear her schedule to try this as soon

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 10>as possible, and I think she's going to expect the

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 10>same from the defense lawyers. She's not going to say, well,

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 10>we're going to bump this trial because the defense lawyer

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 10>has got a conflict with some other trial.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 8>You know. Laura was saying that the case, the trial itself,

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 8>could take nine months to a year you know the trial, right,

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 8>not getting to trial. I mean, do you think that's

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 8>an overestimate?

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean it certainly is, because you know the

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 10>length of the trial is going to be largely driven

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 10>by the prosecution.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, in any case, what typically happens is, you know,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 10>most of the witnesses, and many times all of the

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 10>witnesses are prosecution witnesses. The defense usually does not put

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 10>on many witnesses at all. Now that's not to say

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 10>that in this case they may not call some witnesses,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 10>but the government bears the burden of proof. Obviously, the

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 10>government has to prove each and every element of the

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 10>case beyond a reasonable doubt, and so the burden is

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 10>on them to put the case on.

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 6>It's their case.

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 10>They can streamline this case as much as they see

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 10>it is necessary or to move it along. I see

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 10>no way this case would last a year to try.

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 10>That's just hyperbole. That's never going to happen, Robert, depending

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 10>on I.

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Want to jump in because I don't have a ton

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of time, and I want and given that you're a

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 2>former federal prosecutor, you're now a partner at the macarter

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 2>in English as well, how strong is the government's case.

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it's a pretty strong case, but I

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 10>do think there are some defenses here, and you know,

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 10>the defense here has already alluded to that.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, this is a case that's going to be tried.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 10>In the court of public opinion long before it ever

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 10>gets to the court room. That's clearly the defense strategy here.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 10>You know, they're looking for some type of jury nullification,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 10>which means they have to convince just one juror to

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 10>not vote to vict regardless of what the evidence is,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 10>if they believe that the entire process has been rigged.

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 6>I think that's what.

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 10>They're shooting for here. But they are going to raise

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 10>the First Amendment issue, that this is really a free

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 10>speech case, and they're also going to raise this advice

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 10>on lawyers. They're going to say that President Trump relied

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 10>on the advice of these counsel and as such, she's

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 10>allowed to rely on that, and.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 6>That's a defense. If those lawyers were wrong, it's not

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 6>his fault. He hasn't committed a crime.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, I also want to ask about the point that

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 4>you made earlier June about the timelines of the different

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 4>cases here. Yeah, Bob, I'm curious from your perspective, what's

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 4>the right strategy for that?

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 10>Well, first of all, you know, they can't really control

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 10>Alvin Bragg, as June said, but he's already agreed to

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 10>step back, which makes a lot of sense. So we

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 10>really have these two federal cases at this point, unless

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 10>the DA in Atlanta also jumps into the fray here.

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 10>I think if I'm the special counsel I'm looking at

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 10>that case at mar A Lago, I do think they're

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 10>strong facts, but it's not as compelling a case, and

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 10>the defense frankly does have a better argument given the

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 10>classified documents, that this case is going to take a

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 10>long time. So I think we're going to see the

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 10>government double down on this case and try to push

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 10>it as forward as quickly as they can.

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 8>Especially because in Florida they now they had a superseding

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 8>indictment adding another defendant, which makes it a little more complicated.

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 8>They have now three three code defendants, So that's another

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:23.800
<v Speaker 8>reason why that case may lang.

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 4>Robert, if you are Special counsel Jack Smith right now,

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 4>how confident are you feeling about this?

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 10>I think he's pretty confident. I think there's obviously a

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 10>lot of evidence out there. His indictment was incredibly detailed.

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 10>It showed a lot of work that the Special Council's

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 10>Office had done. They've done a lot of interviews, They've

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 10>got statements obviously from Vice President Pence, you know, former.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 6>US Attorney General Bill Barr.

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's all kinds of people there who obviously

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 10>we're giving advice to foreign President Trump that the election

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 10>was not stolen, that he didn't win the election, and

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 10>he went on to make these statements. Anyway, they also

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 10>have his state and I also think to think the

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 10>prosecutors are holding back some of that evidence. They're not

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 10>going to show their entire hand in this indictment. So

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 10>I think there's more to come when this case actually

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 10>goes to trial.

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Mark Meadows just mentioned as chief of staff in

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 8>passing a couple of times. Now you got to wonder

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 8>if he's not a co conspirator, is he cooperating?

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Does he seem you're not gonna you already went through

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the co conspirators June.

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 8>No, he's no, he's not. No, he's not he's not

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 8>one of the co conspirators that are unnamed. So you're saying,

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm speculating that since he's not and he was so

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 8>involved in what Trump was doing, and he was on

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 8>the phone call with the Georgia Secretary of State, remember that.

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 8>And I'm just one. I'm speculating. Is he then cooperating

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 8>and that's why he's not listed at all?

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, We're gonna have to leave it there. Guys, really

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 2>appreciate both of you joining us this afternoon. A special

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.760
<v Speaker 2>thanks to our guest Bloomberg Law host and legal analyst

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Drian Grosso and also Robert Vin's former federal prosecutor and

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.879
<v Speaker 2>partner at the law firm, Macarter and English, join us

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk the latest with President Trump.

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 5>A brother mac a journal. Now about you? Let me drive?

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, no, no, no, Honry please, I'll do the gravels.

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Excuse me, I want to drive.

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 3>It's good question.

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we got fewer than seventeen minutes on

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the way to close right now, and despite some of

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the selling yesterday, we're seeing a bit of stability in

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the broader markets. Is wait to hear results from Apple

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and Amazon. Taking a look at what's going on on

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred, We're down two tenths

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 2>of one percent, the down down one tenth of one percent,

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 2>an Astec down one tenth of one percent. Here to

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 2>discuss the big picture as well as today's trade is

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Beata Ker, chief Impact Officer at the Kopia Group. It's

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 2>a private equity firm. Biatta was though formerly cohead of

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Investment in Well Strategies at Burns in private wealth Management,

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 2>so we know that even though she's at a PE

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 2>firm now, she does not ignore the public markets. Piata,

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 2>good to have you with us this afternoon. First of all,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 2>what's a chief impact officer do?

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 9>Well? Thanks for the question and thanks for having me

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.400
<v Speaker 9>in your right. Public markets and private markets are very correlated,

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 9>and impact is very correlated to investment. In the Kopia Group,

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 9>we are focused on providing capital to lower middle market

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 9>companies and particular diverse owned businesses, and as an impact officer,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 9>I'm focused on measuring the impact of our capital, which

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 9>ultimately we think will help narrow the wealth gap for

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 9>underrepresented communities in the US.

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 2>When you say providing capital, do you mean you're investing

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 2>in these companies as a private equity partner, as a

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 2>venture capital partner, or using private credit.

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is the latter. It is private credit, and

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 9>that is where we are squarely focused as a capital provider.

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 9>And one of the great benefits of private credit is

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 9>that it's non emotive capital. And we know equity in

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 9>businesses is in fact the greatest asset to forming wealth

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 9>in this country. So providing capital for growth that is

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 9>not diluted gets the owner to retain their equity yet

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 9>accelerate growth is really the vehicle of investment that we've chosen.

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So why does a company come to you instead of

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 2>a bank for money?

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, first of all, the banks used to be seventy

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 9>percent of the capital provider for lower middle market companies.

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 9>At last count, post Silicon Valley it is ten percent,

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 9>so we know post GFC there was a huge retrenchment

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 9>of banks from a regulatory perspective, and this year's events

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 9>have only continued that trend. So frankly, the banks have

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 9>been there for them for shorter term financing accounts, receivable revolvers,

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 9>but growth capital, acquisition capital with an average tenor four

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 9>to five years, private credit organizations have really stepped up

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.760
<v Speaker 9>to be the primary providers for this really important segment

0:48:58.800 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 9>of our economy.

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Can I ask you about private credit, because I'm curious

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 4>about what happens to our economy when private credit stops

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 4>being able to kind of save us. Am I right

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 4>to be worried about that?

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a great question. I think it's always

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 9>great to worry about the next thing. I think what's

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 9>interesting about private credit it's actually been around for over

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 9>thirty years. It's just been part of banking institutions, and

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 9>I think the leading private credit lenders in today's market

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 9>many ways have been former bankers, if you will. So

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.400
<v Speaker 9>private credit capital has been around, just in various functions

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:38.359
<v Speaker 9>and different types of organizations. And I think the other

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.720
<v Speaker 9>thing that's reassuring is that lately there is no evidence

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 9>of private credit going away. In fact, it's really an

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 9>exploding ask the class from the positive sense in terms

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 9>of many capital providers such as ourselves, launching to really

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.320
<v Speaker 9>be there for those organizations.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you mentioned kind of always wanting to look

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 4>ahead to the next shoe to drop and the next

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 4>negative thing that could be coming. It makes me think

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 4>about the jobs report that we're going to be getting

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 4>in tomorrow, likely to be positive as it has been,

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 4>But what are you anticipating and what are you thinking

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 4>that the market reaction could look like tomorrow.

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, at the Kopia Group, I'm going to center my

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 9>answer more around how that affects the lower middle market

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 9>businesses that were in particular focused on, and one of

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.919
<v Speaker 9>the key statistics sell shares that in fact, lower middle

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 9>market businesses are the fastest growing segment of the middle market,

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 9>and in fact they've been hiring aggressively. So statistics show

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.719
<v Speaker 9>that these businesses continue to be revenue positive, and while

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 9>wages are going up and they're managing margins and that's

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 9>an area of pressure, job growth is actually something that

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 9>we see as a positive trend in the private markets.

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 9>And as you know, in the broader public and private

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 9>market picture, this economy has appeared to be very resilient.

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 9>So I thought the Fitch downgrading this week was it

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 9>st timing, because obviously jobs and wages have remained quite robust,

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 9>and the US economy has not appeared to be struggling.

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 9>So I would just add that broader perspective on recent macro.

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Events economy is surveyed by Bloomberg, are expecting the payrolls

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 2>report to show wow, look at that two hundred thousand

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and last months would be two hundred nine thousand

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 2>by last month. I mean June, because we're do in

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:33.720
<v Speaker 2>July tomorrow. So beyond payrolls tomorrow, let's talk broader about

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the equity markets. And again, I know you're in private equity. Now,

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you're focused on private credit, but you do not ignore

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in the equity markets. We're up on

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred more than fifteen percent

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:46.880
<v Speaker 2>so far this year, more than seventeen percent, even with

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the pullback that we've seen this week. Are we in

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 2>over our skis?

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm not sure we're in over our skis. We

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 9>might be the beginning of a new bowl market. Frankly,

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.800
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of robust nature to the economy. I

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 9>think we should just watch valuations relative to earnings. As

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, earnings and multiples do tell the story of

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 9>the equity markets, and I think you could see some

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 9>pullback given how robust this rally has been. But another

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 9>thing to point out about the rally is, remember how

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 9>narrow it has been. It's reminiscent of prior equity rallies

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 9>where you had a couple of key names note in

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 9>the technology space really driving most of the return. So

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 9>I think, kind of bringing it back to private credit,

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 9>I think what we're seeing is a lot of enthusiasm

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 9>from allocators that might be long term optimistic about equities,

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 9>but feel really great about investing with companies with our

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 9>cash flowing businesses and yield in the meantime, while there

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 9>might be some ongoing volatility in the equity markets.

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 4>How much do you think about big earnings like Apple

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 4>on Amazon today in your kind of overview on your work.

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 6>Not that much.

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, what effects our earnings and what happens to

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 9>our companies is ultimately fortune five hundred. Growth does affect

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 9>the types of companies we're looking at, because we're looking

0:53:05.800 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 9>at investing in healthcare and business services and logistics, in

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 9>distribution and in food. So of course the supply chain

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 9>is going to flow through to lower middle market businesses,

0:53:16.800 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 9>and in particular, what we would know is commitments to

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 9>invest with diverse suppliers. Is that benefit to the opportunity

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 9>set that we see here at the Coopia Group. So

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 9>of course, the overall economy matters day by day earnings,

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 9>especially as say for the tech companies, a little bit

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 9>less of an area of focus for the sectors that

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 9>we're king in.

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 2>On be out of just ten seconds. What's your recession

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 2>outlook for the next twelve months.

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 9>I think we're in a soft landing scenario. I think

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 9>I'm optimistic and constructive about the overall economy.

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, there it is. I have to end on

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:57.959
<v Speaker 2>some soul asylum. Sarah, great choice, nice job.

0:53:58.080 --> 0:53:58.800
<v Speaker 4>We love the music.

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 2>We do love the music. Here Biata Kerr, chief Impact

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Officer at the Kopia Group, who really thank you for

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 2>taking the time today.

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Jerminale.