WEBVTT - Alan Parsons

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, welcome, welcome back to the Bob left St podcast.

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is the one and only Alan Parsons. Alan,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>good to have you on the podcast. Thanks, but it's

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>great to be you. Thank you. So how's your back? Oh,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you heard? Yeah, I've, I've had I've had some back

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>problems over the years and my my doctor Orthopedist suggested

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that I do this procedure because it's suddenly fed up

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>a month ago and sadly I had to cancel an

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>entire European tour, but I got I got the I

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>got the surgery it was. It's now been three weeks

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm slowly getting better, but it's nice of you

0:00:54.560 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask. What was the surgery? It was called decompression

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of L two, l three and l three to l four.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>If that means anything, which does? Oh, it does. and

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you in pain now? Are you okay? Little, just

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit? I'm not. I'm not using pain colors

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm fine when I'm like sitting down or

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lying down. But yeah, I'm comfortable, perfectly comfortable right now.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>So when might we see you back on the road?

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We have we have gigs in November. Uh, I don't

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to make anything happen before then, just

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. But plenty, plenty of going on in

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the new year as well. and Are you

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>working now primarily just to have fun or do you

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>need the money? Everybody needs the money. That's true. There's

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>never enough money. Um, I've I've I've been keeping busy

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. Um, I just had delby atmos installed,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>installed in my studio, so I've been experimenting with that

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and hoping to do some remixing. I'm hoping that the

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I robot album we will be the next from the

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>APP cattler. I'm also working with David Pack from Ambrosia.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>He wants a Delby atmos mix of his first two albums.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And I've also been working with the drama of Lenny

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Kravitz's band. His name is Franklin Vanderbilt and I've done

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole album with him and we're just we've just

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>got some touch ups to to do on that and

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>then it will be finished. Tell me about your take

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on Dolby atmos. It's a little soon for me to

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>say because I've literally only had it here a week

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>now and I was I was pretty happy with with

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>five point one and got got very used to it.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just more speakers to think about. That's

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>that's really what it's all about. I mean we've got

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to speakers and you've got four speakers in the ceiling

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know that that makes a difference, and two

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>side speakers. I'm pointing right. We don't have a video,

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can see. You can see me that nobody

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>else can. Yeah, we've got two four speakers and sitting

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on two new speakers at side. So I mean, you know,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's infinitely variable how you how you play sounds. Um,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I I found that with five point one, you is,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you quickly ran out of ideas about where to put things.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, what you put in the back channels and

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what you'd keep in the front channels and so on.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But I've I've come to enjoy, you know, multi channel

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sound generally. So I'm very hopeful that the atmos will

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>work for me. Well. You know, if you listen to Apple,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>which most people are listening to to channel, the remixes

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>so far sound in most cases radically different from the originals.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm like, unlike with you, doesn't tend to be

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the same mixer that it was originally, but the vocals

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>are down in the mix. I mean, we've lived through

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>so many iterations of Saman Mono. Dysteria was a big jump,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but quad and all these other things they never seem

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to ultimately gain holes. Will be interesting to see what

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>happens with autmost. Yes, Um, I'm I mean it's the Buzzword.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean everybody in the industry is talking about it.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be the new the new the new

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>fashion and, interestingly, I I'm curious to know why Americans

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>call it at most, because you don't use the word atmosphere,

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't say at most fear. So I'm on. I'm

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on a a kind of a quest to get people

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to say atmost, not at most. You can, you can

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be the first, you can me the first, absolutely okay.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So you have album. Repeat after me, atmos almos close.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'M gonna leave in it that. We'll see what the

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>public decides on if they continue to use at wilser

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at Muss as sound irrelevant of the moniker and how

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you pronounce it. So you have a new album from

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the new world. It's entitled why Now? Why a new

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>album now? Well, I was. I think I was reasonably

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>overdue for it for another album, that the last album.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The secret came out. I think it wast so three

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>years Um and you know, frankly, the the the covid

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.679
<v Speaker 1>outbreak actually helped because, you know, everybody that I worked

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with on the new album was was, you know, fully

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated or had already got over Covid, and so I

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was able to work in person with the and so

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that that worked out, that we worked out really well, whereas,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, we could not play live. That was absolutely

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in the particularly in one just was a

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>disaster for everybody. It might might as well not have existed. Okay,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>reading the credit to the album. You know, multiple studios

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>are used us, blackbird in Nashville. So did you actually

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go there or were these done remote? We we did

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in Nashville remote. There's this h great program

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>called source connect, which allows us to interact as if

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they were in the room. All we have to do

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is send them the track and they control their own transport.

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But it works out really well and you know, we

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>can point a camera at them on you know, do

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 1>facetime on a phone whatever, but it's Um, it's great

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>because you save. You Save on Holt Hotel rooms and

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and hotels, hotel rooms and their fairs. Sorry, and you

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know that they don't have to travel, so I think

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're better off for it. But you're traditionally an analog

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>guy and that's inherently digital. So how do you feel

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about that? What do you say? I'm a inherently analog guy.

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been supporting digital ever since ceed first started. Um,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I went from you know, mixing in in in digital too, uh,

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Sony Twenty four track digital, which became Sony Forty eight

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>track digital. No, I've I've been recording essentially digitally for

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>quite a while now. Um. But, having said that, my

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>studio now is although of course I use pro tools

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like most people, which is a digital recording format. It's

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>very high very high resolution digital format, but I use

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an analog console and that's that's a joy for me

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just to just to do everything like it used to be,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, setting up mikes and having each each mic

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on its own analog channel and then then committing it

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to pro tools. And when did you stop, or did

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever stop, using tape? Oh, yeah, I think we

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a valid path would have been the first

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>time there was not a tape machine inside, even a

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>digital tape machine. But yes, that that was a good

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>while ago. That was ninety four. So I haven't seen

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a tape machine basically since ninety four. And what's the

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>difference between your knee analyze, so I'm told? Sorry, I

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>mean two thousand four, not that sounded pretty early very

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>much right. Was Two four. So it was a practical matter.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between your analog Nive and a digital board?

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Um, you know, it's just a little more tactile.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Every every channel has its own controls, its own sands,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>its own accues and whereas digital tend to digital consoles

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to group things together and you have to hit

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a button to to go to a particular channel that

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to modify, whereas on a on an analog board,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much a control surface, but it's a

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an information giver. It tells you what

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing at a glance, whereas it on a digital

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>console that's almost impossible to assess. What what every every

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>channel is doing at the same time. And what about

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the sound? Well, believe it or not,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>digital audio is still in its infancy and it gets

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>better every day. Analog to digital converters, digital to analog

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>converters get better every day. Um. And you know, I think,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I truly believe, one day we will just look back

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on analog tape recording as as a piece of history

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>because we can duplicate it exactly in digital and we'll

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>say what, what, what was? What was wrong with digital

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in the first place? But it did get better, it

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really did get better. And what's your take on the

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>vinyl renaissance? It's that's that's really interesting. I mean that

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly a move towards the public favoring uh, a pure,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>pure signal path to to to the to their systems. Um.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Vinyl is Um, you know, it's, it's, it's, it's the

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thing you hold in your hand and you can read

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the cover notes and and but the sound is great,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>especially the the mastering that's been going on at tough

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>speed to improve the quality. Yet again, I'm all in

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>favor of it and I I just came recently came back,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>before I went into hospital, from Munich in Germany, where

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there is clearly a move towards the final the game.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was looking at looking at vinyl turntables

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>costing a hundred and sixty thousand euros. I mean it's

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable. Let's be very specific. If the path is

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a digital path and you end up with a digital master,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about old stuff for sixties and seven

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not modern stuff. What's the logic in cutting it

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in vinyl? That's a very good question. I mean, Um,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just that people are getting back to

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>having a really good stereo system in their homes and,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a good a good turntable is part of that.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Out of that equation, I think. I mean they might,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they might have a CD player as well, but audiophiles

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are definitely sort of moving towards finyl. There's no question. Well,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as an engineer and an expert here, Um, although I

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>still have all my vinyl, I have multiple turntables, etcetera. It.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked to the professional community and they say inherently

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there's distortion and the record for no other reason, the

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>needle moves from the outer groove to the inner groove

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's more of an affectation than the sound being

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>better than digital today standards. Your take on that? You

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>say it's just a fashion thing. Let's go back in

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the early days of digital and you heard. I mean.

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I use this example. I remember having the original back

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in black, a C D, C C D, and I

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of power. I never want to hit

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the storeship in my system and I turned it up

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and my ears would bleed. I put on Thet I

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>put on the vinyl and you could feel it in

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the house would shake. Okay, people, people might say that

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was distortion, but it was palpable. But now when I

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to things, you know resolution certainly of nineties six,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>never mind CD quality. All the experts say that. You

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>know that. I talked to said you like the sound

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a vinyl, great, but it's not more accurate and the

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>digital original is actually better. But I'm asking you that

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>question for your take. If if the digital original was

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>done at High Ras, like K or o high or

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>even Um, yes, I would argue that that that's the

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the highest quotity you're gonna get. Uh, but uh,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, for older recordings, I think I think final.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the final wins out, despite the pulps and crackles.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can, we can put up with us.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree. If it's if it's kind of analog to

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>begin with. That's a whole different thing. Yeah, but a

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people buying vinyl today, or younger people, were

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>just buying something cutting digital that's been, you know, transferred

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>to vinyl. I don't get it. Yeah, that that is

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit that is a bit weird. But needless to say,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the landscape is different in the recording industry than it

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>used to be. I'm talking about the commercial and the

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>marketing and we used to have a major label. There're

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of albums out there. You know, a

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of older acts it's a disincentive. They don't even

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>record new music anymore because they're fearful it won't reach

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>their customers. Is that something that interduce your brain? Very

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>much so. But I'm pleased, I'm very pleased that I

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to have enough lasting power to to at least

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>make albums. I don't sell albums anything like how I

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>used to. I mean all the Alam Passer's project albums

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>went to at least gold, most amount platinum or even

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>double platinum. But you know, I'm still here. I'm still

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting the Alan Parsons Project by playing live, UH and

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it very much. So, I mean it's it is

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a warrior. I mean there's a lot of British bands

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in particular who who just are terrified to put out

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>another album in case it completely stiff h but I've

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>done okay in that respect and the playing live really

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really does help keep the name, the name alive, even

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>though we don't call it the Alan passons project. We

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>call it the Alan Parsons Live Project, Um, which is

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a salute to Eric Wilson, who who was

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the other half of the Alan Passon's project. It was

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just just the two of US really. So how do

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you plan to market the records so your people are

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>aware of it and we'll hear it? I'm much reliant

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on the label, which is frontiers, frontiers records out of

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Italy. Um, they have a lot of a

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of rock acts on their on their roster. Um.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm also very aware of the power of social media

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>these days. I mean if if if we post on

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on our own facebook site, you know it'll get it

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>will get some attention and we can make it reach

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>other other websites as well. That that that's great. You

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>know that that that's the way to promote something these days.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's, it's all. It's all about the Internet. And

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to what degree you personally active? You have other people

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do it for you. I do most of the time.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I have other people do it, okay, one of one

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of whom is my wife, one of whom is my

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>son in law. So you have this album with the

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Italian company. Did they pay for the record? Did you

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>pay for the record? Um, they paid me an advance

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and I paid for it. And at the end of

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the day you're going to be in the black or

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the red on the record. That remains to be seen.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the accounts yet. I'm I'm hoping it

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>will be close to break even at least. And what

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about your royalty stream? How's that doing? Really good. Um,

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the analysis project catalog, both both for

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sound recording and publishing, is very much alive and doing

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>well and it's become it's become something I rely upon. Uh,

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's strong, it's great. Do you still own your

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>own publishing? I never did. I never did. It was

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>assigned to two publishers and of course I I own

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>rights to receive royalties on those, on those entities. But

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>know that that I don't own any of my copyrights.

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a hundred cents in the dollar, how

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>much that it goes to you? Mm Hmm U. based

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on a record sale? No, no, no, based on based

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on a song. If there's a hundred, uh, freak. You know,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>an artist might own their publishing, paid administrators somewhere between

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>three and ten percent, the other nineties them. Uh. An

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>artist may have a deal with a publisher and the

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>publisher owns the copyright. They take fifty, the artist who

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote a gift fift also, if they co wrote it.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>They ends up with so in the in this publishing

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and a song, how much do you ultimately get in

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the revenue drink? I think we're I'm publishing. Okay, so

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that's good. That's a good number. How about the issue

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of regaining the Copyright of your Alan Parsons Projects Records?

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If you go on that road, we've we've done it.

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>We've done what what is called termination, which means that

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we we we ultimately get get rights to it at

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a certain point. But I don't think I'll ever literally

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>clawback that all the copyrights. I don't I don't think

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen. But I know it's fashionable to

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to sell one's one's rights these days. I mean everybody's

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>doing it and I've been thinking about it. But no, no,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>no firm decisions yet. What would be your motivation to

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>do it or not to it? Well, it's that it's

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that big m word again. I mean it's it's money

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket. You know. Um, I'm living very comfortably,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, now, with with the current live shows and

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the current record sales. But you know, there's a if

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a way of uh supplementing that income overnight, that

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>would be very nice. I'm not getting any younger either.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I'm seventy three. A Nice little

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a nice little few million dollars, you know, back in

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the bank would would be very nice. I might consider

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>buying a second home or something, although, of course, if

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd sold them uh recently and invested the proceeds, with

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the market crash, you know, that would have worked against you.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so let's go back to the beginning. What

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>were you growing up? Circumstances like? I I was an

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>only child. Both my parents were musical. My My dad

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>played piano and flute and my mother played a Celtic

0:20:55.280 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>up and there was always it was always music in

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>my household. My Dad was always playing classical music, which

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is why my knowledge of classical music is is pretty good.

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I I went to good schools in London,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>prep school called the hall and went on to what

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the English would call a public school. Uh, but it's

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>very it's very much a private school. That was Westminster,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Westminster School, which was adjacent to Westminster Abbey in London,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>so very sort of prestigious location. But I left. I

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>left at sixteen. I was considered by a vocational guidance

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>person to be unsuitable to to continue to the age

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen in order to go to college or anything.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So I left at sixteen, went went to well, before

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you go there, what'd your parents say when the guy

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we got into said get out of here? I think,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're supported me on it. When my my

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>school reports were dreadful. You know, he he has no

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>interest in this subject. You know he's he's slacking, he

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>will not, will not do his homework and all that

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So yeah, it was. It was. It

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>surprised me. I thought, Oh my God, Oh my God,

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be hating school for at least another

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>two years. But I really hadn't considered the option of

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>leaving school. And I mean Americans use the expression high

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>school dropout. I suppose. I suppose that's what I was

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>really but I was a dropout from a public school,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>prestigious English Public School, you know, right up there amongst Eaton, Harrow,

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>St Paul's, or big public schools as we call them. Um.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So I was an unusual was an unusual dropout. What

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of kid were you growing up? Popular, unpopular, loner,

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>into your own things. Usually single kids have their own

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>unique perspective in life. I had a good childhood. I

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>wasn't bullied at school, if that's what you mean, but

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I I mentioned I was. I wasn't an only child

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and I had lots of friends. I did okay. We,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>my my parents, lived in in an area of London

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>which was was fairly upper middle class, actually a very

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Jewish area. I'm not Jewish myself, but we lived in

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a substantially Jewish area and I generally had a good childhood.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I I enjoyed my my my father had a sort

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of passion for gadgetry and building things and I think

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of rubbed rubbed off on me as well,

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and I I learned. I learned a great deal from him.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Needles to say, music was revolutionized with the Beatles in

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the British invasion. To what degree were you growing up

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to popular music and what was your experience?

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I was very, very into part music. I started taking

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting about Ah. Distinctly remember a friend of

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Mine Picking Up Oh Carol by Neil Sadaka, whatever year

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that is. I think that's probably around that time. I

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was a huge fan of cliff and the shadows, Richard,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that is Um and in terms of American music, I

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was listening to Chat Berry, Buddy Holly, of course. So yeah,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I was there. I was there at the beginning of

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of Pop and, to what you know,

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a seismic event when the Beatles came to America.

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>What was your experience in the UK? I was still

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>at school. Um, I mean I was the biggest beatle

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fan you could you could ever imagine. I really was very, very,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>very into their music right right from the beginning, right

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from from me to you and love me do through

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to the through to their ultimate breakup. So did you

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>play a musical instrument growing up? Uh, I took piano lessons.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't particularly enjoy learning, learning piano from a teacher,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I was I was more interested in playing by here

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and I did the same for the flute. The good

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is it taught me musical notation which

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I was I might not have been able to to

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>use in later life. I mean I use musical musical

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>notation now to substantial degree, especially for orchestral arrangements and

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so on. But yeah, it was it was a good

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that I did. I did have piano and flute lessons.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Played in an orchestra at school as well. Um Plenty of,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of musical events going on in my chilter. So

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you pushed out of school at Sixteen and one level

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>your thrilled you don't have to go two more years.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>What goes from your head then? What you'RE gonna do?

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I somehow knew that I would be in the entertainment

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>industry somewhere. I given consideration to sound. You know, I

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't really know what what a recording engineer was back then,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but I said I to work with sound and I

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>also considered television. I I actually filled in forms for

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the BBC, you know, to become a TV cameraman, you know,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to be trained as a TV cameraman. But that that,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that just went by the wayside and I did a

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>similar thing with e m I that I knew em.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I was a big record company. So my first job

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>after leaving school was with the M I was. that

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a hard job to get because from the outside, you know,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>people are salivating for jobs like that. It was actually

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an apprenticeship scheme, it wasn't you know. I started in

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a in a research lab which was making television camera tubes,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a very technical job. I learned how to do glass blowing,

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>which was interesting, and that that that, you know, just

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>taught me what industry was like. I mean every everybody

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>else in the in the department, that TV Camera Tube Department,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>was at least ten years older than me. So I

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was the youngster, you know, but I got on well,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I got on all right. And how did you get

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>from there to the studio? Well, there are two more stages.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That the the TV research lab was was in haze

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in Middlesex, which is west of London, about fifteen miles

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>west of central Lona. Um. I then transferred to a

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to a department called tape records, which was which was

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>great as far as I was concerned. They were they

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>were they were, you know, very involved with listening to

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>EMMI product, duplicating EMI product. Um. The Department is actually

0:28:53.800 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>devoted to manufacturing mono versions of the of their their

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>product on tape on the little three inch or five

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and little five inch plastic schools, and they were actually

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>very good sounding, very good sounding products. But I worked

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in that department, you know, helping to maintain tape machines

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and so on. But then I got into a copying

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>room where Abbey road would send there the latest efforts

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>down to us to be duplicated for foreign countries. So

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I was literally one of the very first people to

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hear sergeant pepper from the master tape, before anybody in

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the great wide world had had ever even heard of it,

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and alone listen to it. So how do you end

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up in the studio? Well, the studio was, thankfully, Um

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a department associated with this tape records department. That where

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I was working, and I simply wrote to the manager

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>said I've been working for em I since I'm now

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in tape records. I would very much appreciate a visit

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to Abbey Road to see what see what goes on

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and if, if there were any vacancies, I'd be very interested.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That same week he received a letter. I was invited

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to an interview and two weeks later I went walked

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>up those steps for the first time and I became

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a trainee, trainee engineer at happy with the studios. Well,

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, as time went on that was the first

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>step in most studios was the tea boy, but you

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>were part of a larger system. What was you? What

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>were your duties? into what degree were the instructing you

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>when store in there? I, like most of the bureaud engineers,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I started in the tape library, literally just logging in

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tapes that derived and logging out tapes that people ask for.

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Fairly mundane tasks, but it taught me the importance of

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of correctly identifying what's what's on on the on the

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>tape box, what's on the tape, because it's it's terrifying

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes to see how how little detail goes into marking

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>up a tape box and I actually ended up writing

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a book called the Master Tapebook, which which emphasized that

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that particular importance. So literally, probably only a month in

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the tape in the tape library.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Then I was allowed to be a fly on the wall.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>will fly on the wall for sessions. The Very First

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Session and I sat in on, was a band called

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the gods, and musicologists will tell you that, oh, yes,

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the gods, that was Ken Ken Hensley's first band, which

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it was, but he was a keyboard player, not a

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not a guitarist, as he was in your eye heat.

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So how long was it before you got to touch anything? Oh,

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>quite quite a while. Um. Well, no, actually I mean

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you say touching the I was allowed on to touch

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a tape machine because that's essentially what I was training for,

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a tape operator, assistant engineer. So I got

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to know, you know, the workings of a of the

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>studio four track machines. Most most sessions were four track.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>When I first arrived, the Beatles were there doing the

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>white album, just as I right, some of which was

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>eight track. But it was very, very much a lash

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>up too to use an eight track machine with a

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>four track console. But I got I got to I

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get to see any of that. Um, it

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was sometime later that that I actually got to a

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>record record with Paul McCartney. That was that was years later.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Um the experience of of of of training

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>under you know, great engineers like Jeff emeric and Petere Vince,

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Peter Bawn, Peter Mu Ken Scott who, of course, you

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>will know, went on to be a very successful producer

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>with David Bowie. Um, just just watching, just watching them.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And then, you know, I was let loose probably probably

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years into my employment at at

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>at Abbey Road with the hollies. I've done a bunch

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of sessions with the hollies as as their tape operator,

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as their second engineer, but their engineer was double booked

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and they offered me the job for the first time,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, my first real engineering, engineering GIG, and it

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>went okay. I mean I I listened back to it

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>now and I think, Oh, if only, if only, if only,

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>if only. But it came out pretty good. And were

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you thrilled just to be in the belly of the beast?

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Are Very quickly did that fall away and you were

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>just doing a job? Oh, no, I was. I was

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>totally totally into I know it didn't feel like a

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>job as well at all. I was very, very much

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>into what I was doing and I would I would work,

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, crazy hours in order to just just to

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy myself. It was the best job in the world.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And had anyone taught you how to use the border?

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You just observed and when the other guy who's double

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>book you, sat down to do it. Yeah, I mean

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I I had a pretty good idea how how the

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>console effectively worked. But the Abbey road engineers used to

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be known as balance engineers, and that's that's really what

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what the balance engineers did? They deal with the mix

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>between instruments. So it was right to use the word balance.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But I yeah, my my, my first ventures into engineering

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>all came from the experience of watching others. Okay, I

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have a question. You know, when the Beatle CDs first

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>came out in the eighties, the early albums, everyone was

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>shocked how good they sound, but if you look at

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the equipment it seems so primitive. Why was the sound

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so good? Good, good engineering, just solid, good engineering. That's

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was all about. I mean it's it's

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary that those early albums were done on four track

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at at best. I think the first album was done,

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>done to track. So they would record, you know, a

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>backing track based drums, guitars and then they would add

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the vocals and that was it. That was the that

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was the master tape. And I'm sure you've heard the

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so called Stereo versions, early Stereo versions of those albums.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>All the music is on the left on the vocals

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are on the right and they call it stereo crazy.

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So what happened after the hollies? Well, I started to uh,

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, get more, more work with the hollies, plenty

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of work with with them, Um, and it was wasn't

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really very long until H I had until, you know,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the dark side of the moon sessions. Really, that was

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty pretty soon after that period. Um. But

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the the important, the important step that

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>happened between me being a tape up and being an

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>engineer was was being sent down to the Beatles studio

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>in Savo row to tape up for them. So that

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was the that was the first Beatles experience, Um, and

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I was, of course, on the roof for the for

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the rooftop session, which was magnucent day. I will never,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>never forget that, um. So I continued after that. I

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was I was. I spent a period engineering and and

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>tape hopping. You know I did. I wasn't considered a

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>fully fledged engineer really until probably until until that Sut

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the moon. That's when it that's when it all came together. Okay,

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>so you're there at the Beatles studio. We just had

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>this exhaustive get back movie. To what degree did you

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>like it, not like it, and did it conform with

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>your remembrance of what happened there? UH, the the letter

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>B movie was was. I found it really sort of depressing. UH, I.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it rep entered what what was going

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on very well. But I think Peter Jackson's movies is

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not only complete, but it's uh, it gives a

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>much brighter picture of of what went on during that period.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in it. I'm in get back. You see

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>me credited on screen as Alan Parsons, tape operator. Um.

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So I was very, very pleased about that. I actually

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>met Peter Jackson a few months before the release and

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he showed me a couple of clips. It was great.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a lovely guy and very talented and you

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can't believe the the improvement in quality that he managed

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to get between the the sixteen mill film and what

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you see in the in the get back series. And

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what was your involvement with the Abbey Road? UH, at

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the time of the Getty Road, the Abbey road album

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>by the Beatles. Oh, I see, Um, I was tape up. Um,

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there were two two main engineers, Jeff emeric and Phil McDonald. Um.

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I was there interacting with the band occasionally.

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, uh, Paul or John might you know, say

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can you play that again, or whatever. So I wouldn't

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>call it establishing a huge friendship, but we we, we

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were business associate, but a great experience to watch them

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>at work, see how their their minds worked and what

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they what they could achieve. It was actually interesting that

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on on Abbey road they weren't often all there together.

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>In tended to be a one, one beetle at a time,

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>coming into Polish off their own their own compositions, and

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>they would have they would have had to be there

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>together to do the backing tracks. But all the well,

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the later overdos tended to be solistry, experiences by experiences

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>by one beatle alone. Diesles to say, these are legendary

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>records that the audiences contemplated literally for decades, half a century,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and you watch the get back movie and they seem

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to be so fanciful just writing in the studio and

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what goes on. What was your experience of

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the creative process? Well, you know, I didn't really see

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>them songwriting. I mean I don't know what their process

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>was for the songwriting. I mean I think it was

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>well established by by Abbey Road that that John was

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>writing his songs and Paul was writing his songs. It

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't was no longer a genuine Lennon McCartney situation, even

0:41:53.680 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>though the credits continued to say Lennon McCartney. Um. So

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I can't really answer what they uh, what, you know,

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the processes they went through to to write a song.

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But I certainly got to see, uh, you know, the

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas they had to make each song different, or two, two,

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you know too, to make it sound, you know, as

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>good as it does on the on the final mix.

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was a lot of work, a lot

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of work after the basic tracks, on on on everything,

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>including a orchestra for the first time. I think they've

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>never had a really full size orchestra perform on their

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>music before. So how did you get the GIG on

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>dark side of the Moon? I had been previously working

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with them on atom up mother. I tape opped the

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>whole the whole thing, until it was mixing time. Um

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Bawn, their engineer again, very very great engineer. He

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>was unable to do mixing sessions and they very graciously

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just said, Alan, would you like to have a go

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>at it because you know, you know the music, which

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I did. You know, I knew, I knew every every note.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>If they've brought in one of the other engineers it

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>might have been a more complicated process. But yeah, I

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>mixed it. They were happy with it and that ultimately

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>led to me getting the GIG for dark side of

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the Moon. Okay, they were had singles, hits. Originally Sidbart

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the band. That didn't translate to America. Then

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they had all these records on harvest, M A, Gumma,

0:43:54.560 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Adam Hart mother. From a outside perspective it seemed the

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>dark side of the moon was definitely a different direction.

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>was that the perception in the studio? Was this just

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>another pink floyd album? It turned out to be such

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a Gargagean success. I think everybody recognized it was. It

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was different and I think at the end of the day,

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody thought it was, without a doubt, their best work today. Um.

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't, I don't think any of us, myself included,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought that would still be talking about it fifty

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>years later. I mean it's it's really unbelievable. And other

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>than operating the board, what were your contributions? Well, Um,

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a few bits and pieces. I I came up with

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the clock's idea for for time because I had previously

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>recorded the clocks in a in an antique shop not

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>far from the studios, Um, which was ostensibly for a

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sound effects record which which I think got released but

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 1>sold about ten copies. Um. So that, yeah, we we

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>took all these chiming clocks and ticking clocks and synchronized

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them all together. Each each clock was recorded separately and

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just literally pressingly play buttonet at a particular moment to

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>make them synchronize, um striking at the same time. So

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that was one little contribution which, yeah, fairly major, fairly

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>fairly memorable section of the album. Um, the the loop

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on the loop on money was quite painstaking. The assembled

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we we amassed a number of sounds like dropped, dropping

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a bag of coins on the on the on the

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>wooden floor in number two studio, tearing up paper the

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Cash Register, of course. And we we made these continuous loops,

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but they sounded when the first couple of loops we

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tried sounded terrible. There was no sort of rhythm to

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it and we discovered that the only way to make

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it rhythmically correct was to actually take a ruler and

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>measure a precise length of tape that would be spliced

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on to the next similarly measured splicing tape. That's what

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that's how it ended up. What you hear on the

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>intro and ultimately what they played to. They played to that, that,

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>that that loop. There was no there was no click

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>track or anything or any metronome. They literally just played

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to that, to that loop, although it faded out um

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>soon after the intro. They then went free form. Now,

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if you go online there's pushed back from Roger Water

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is relative to your contribution by the same talk and

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he pushes back on everything. Yeah, I mean, you have

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts about that? What's saying? Saying that actually saying

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that my my contribution was was limited or ill or

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 1>or or essentially that you were just doing what you're

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>doing would have been successful with anybody. It was really

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>much is about them and that you've been treading on

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your work there thereafter. Yeah, that's that's that's Roger. Um,

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I think. Um, I can safely say that David and

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>David and Nick have always been very supportive of of

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>my my various exploits. They've always they've always maintained that

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I did a nice job on that side man, and

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so much so that David actually played on a on

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a one of my on my first solo album. So

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what was the experience of being involved in such a

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>successful record? You're a guy who's unknown and then all

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden you have the biggest album in the world,

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and how did that affect your career? Oh, it was

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>very positive on my career. I I was actually offered

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a job. I mean I had been when the when

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the album came out, I was on the road with him.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I was doing their lives sound as well as occasional

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>studio sessions. We went back into the studio to do

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the famous household objects album, which never happened, which never

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>never really went anywhere. But yes, I the phone started

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to ring. People wanted to work with me and I

0:48:56.520 --> 0:49:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was getting into production at at that time seventies, early

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>early seventy, so not not long after the success of

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>dark siloment and thankfully my my earliest productions met with

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>considerable success, and that that was that was the path

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to producing further acts and ultimately the Alan Pasmer's project.

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>And how did you end up working with McCartney on

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 1>red rose speed? Yeah, that was just essentially a an

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>extension of you know, we knew each other from from

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>an Abbey road he he knew of my my work

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with with Pink Floyd. I think, although I'm not I'm

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>not very good on on comparing dates, but I think,

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd probably already done a dark siderment by

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the time I started working with him. But we were

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we always got on well. Well, like on Red Rose Speed,

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with big barn bed etcetera. To what degree? Because this

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who cut records totally by himself. So

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what was your role on those records? He he, he

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>looked towards his engineers. You know, he worked them hard,

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 1>or any engineer that's worked with ball will tell him.

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you this. You know he'll he'll he's not

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly technical. He can't, you can't describe in technical terms

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what he's looking for. He would just say, Oh, let's

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>let's make the snare drum sound better and how I

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>would have moved the MIC. Try a different MIC, try

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a different Eq, you know. And Yeah, I think ultimately

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he probably got the result he wanted. But yeah, he

0:50:54.440 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was pretty demanding, pretty pretty you know, working his working

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>his engineers hard. So how did you meet Eric Wiles?

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Eric had been coming in and out of Abbey Road

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>as a UM as a producer. He, uh, he, and

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I I mean I worked on a couple of sessions

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>he was involved with and I sensed his great expertise

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on the music business and we got chatting and he said,

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what you need is a manager, and I went, oh, really,

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know engineers had or producers even had had managers.

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 1>But yes, he, he, I was. I became one of

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the first engineer producers to be to have a manager.

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's how it all started. And then literally

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in no time after we signed the management deal. Ah,

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we were looking towards making an album of a gland

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>post stories. A little bit slower heart you okay, you're

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 1>making managery deal. How do you end up making an

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>album about Edgar Allan Pole story? Where does that come from?

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It was it was very much Eric's idea where he

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>had had a passion for for the work of Poe

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as as a child, as as had I, I mean

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I i. I read it a whole bunch of his

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>short stories myself and I thought it was a great

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>idea to to make a concept album based on the

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>work of Po Um. We we really didn't anticipate at

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the time that it would be known as the Alan

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Pasta's project. The Alan Pastor project was literally just a

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>descriptive term for what, for the album we were making.

0:53:03.000 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, I honestly didn't think it would become the

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>name of the act. But that's what that's that's what

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Russ Reagan, the president at the American label, he said. No,

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the act is the Alan paster's project. We're

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're going to call it tells a mystery imagination,

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the Alan paster's project. Yeah, and what did Eric say

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about that? Well, he in later life he said that

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was the the best, best decision he ever made to

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>put my name as the as the artist and he

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 1>also said it was the worst decision because he he

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the the attention or the accolade that that

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I did. But yes, he often said that in interview.

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It was my best decision, also my wifet decision. so

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you decide to make a record. I think it's on

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>flying careers metal label in U K. It's on twentieth

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>century in uh the US. Twenty Century was not a

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>good label. How did you end up on twentieth century? Um?

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>That was because the band Ambrosia had had signed with

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Twentie Um. There was also another connection. Twentie signed Carl Douglas,

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>who was the Kung Fu fighting guy. Uh So, essentially,

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>ambrosia Carl Douglas and Eric going to talk to the

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>president at the label and he that was that was

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.080
<v Speaker 1>good enough for him to to to sign sign us

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for for the for the first album. Yeah, hits with

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Carl Douglas, hits with Ambrosia. Okay, so you were involved

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Ambrosia before the tales of mystery in the

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>marriage nature. How did you get involved with the Ambrosia? Um?

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting story. The the the first I knew

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of Ambrosia was was a phone call from a guy

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>called Gordon Parry who had been there sort of protege Um.

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>He was a classical music engineer at Decca and I

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just happened to be passing the telephone at the commissionaire's desk,

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Security Guy's desk, and I picked up the phone

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>said Abro Studios Canna help you, and this voice from

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Perry said I'd like to speak to Alem pass

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said yeah, this is ourn and ended up

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 1>being a fifteen minute conversation, that he would invite me

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to come down, come over to to Los Angeles to

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>work with this band. And it just so happened that

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that phone call came when I was already booked to

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>go to l a for the grammys because I've been

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>nominated for the dark side of the Moon Uh to

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>get an engineering grammy, and during during my visit, I

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>want to hear their album and I love liked it

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>very much, and then the offer came into not not

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to stay on and mix. Mixed their album. Then it

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was a few months later that it was still working

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>progress at that time, but I loved it and mixing

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:31.960
<v Speaker 1>their first album led to my producing their second album.

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere I never traveled. So the first album again, I

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's their best work, the iconic song of course,

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>just holding on too, holding onto yesterday. What did you

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 1>do in the mix to make you know, to make

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it sound so good? Yeah, I I give credit to

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the engineers that recorded it. I mean I think it's

0:56:52.320 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a nicely, nicely executed mix. Um, I I really can't

0:57:01.920 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you in tangible expressions what what I actually did.

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't have any magic magic buttons or

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>magic equipment. The equipment was still fairly primitive in those days.

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Digital delays and so I'm still still hadn't really hit

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the hit the market, but it was, it was. It

0:57:25.040 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was a nice recording. You know, the violin part it's

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>lovely and David Pack did a great vocal. so you

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>decide to make this record with Eric Wilson about Edgar

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Allan Poe. What are the next steps in terms of

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>creation of the music, getting a record deal, casting the record?

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Walk me through that. Well, we, uh, we did the

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with with Rassrigan of Twentieth Century at the Music

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Conference in Cannes in France, which is called me dam,

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and essentially we had we had a meeting with Russ

0:58:05.320 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and told him, told him that we had this idea

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a record based on ground post stories, and

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he loved the idea and essentially said yeah, off you go,

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:23.479
<v Speaker 1>here's a check, which is great, and it's it's, it's

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when he when he first heard the album,

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he was which we also did in France,

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that was in Paris. He he actually used the words

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I like it, but I don't love it, but that

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was that was on the first hearing. And then after

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing it a few more times, he said, Oh my God,

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the best albumue best album I've ever heard.

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, he totally changed his stance on that. I

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>did one and half the album of being instrumental, on

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the other album being a traditional slam based rock record. Um,

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that was probably more of my my influence than anything else.

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, historically I've I've been, you know, much more

0:59:07.840 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>responsible for for instrumental tracks than than vocal tracks. But

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of course a lot of a lot of that time

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is taken up by the fall of the House of Usha,

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a purely orchestral piece. Um, that's that's something

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I I really enjoyed, you know, putting a classical org

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>strip together for music I'm I'm responsible for. So that

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was that was really that was a big moment Um. Yes,

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know there there are various orchestral and instrumental interludes

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the album which, in commercial terms, they they're not

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not considered necessary in commercial terms. And when we

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>eventually signed with Clive Davis, he was always looking for

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hit songs. You know, you were never of considered an

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>instrumental track for a single. But yeah, I think in

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the early, early periods of the APP tells Mry I

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>robot pyramid, I did make a a more substantial contribution

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as a as a as a composer, particularly for the

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for the instrumental tracks. And on that album you have

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Brown, of the crazy world of Arthur Brown. How

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>does he end up singing? A partner of a business

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>partner of Eric's, knew him. Um It was. It was

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a great, great afternoon when he came into to sing

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the tell tale heart he uh, we played we played

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>him Eric's guide vocal, which is incredibly simple. That you

1:00:51.760 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>should have seen him running it alone. But then the

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>night you know, and he heard it and it's very

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>down to earth and so yeah, I think, I think

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got it, goes into the studio, goes onto the mic,

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we played the track and then suddenly it's wow, it was.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>We were really worried that he wouldn't he wouldn't find himself,

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't find his crazy world for our track, but

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>he very much did and I think it's a standout,

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>standout track on the first album. Love it. And then

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how did you end up using John Miles? He'd have

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a pre existing relationship with him. I did. Yes, we

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had a big success with his his first two singles

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and his first album. UH, sadly not in America, but

1:01:41.800 --> 1:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we did incredibly well with John and in the UK

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of Europe. Incredibly talented his singing. Sadly

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we lost him a few months ago. He died of

1:01:54.000 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>cancer just, Oh, I don't know, three or four months ago, um.

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But I always regarded him as a great singer and

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why I invited him back on several occasions to

1:02:07.200 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sing other songs and tell me about the use of

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the vote order on the Raven. The vote Codea was

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>actually an e m I creation. Um, there was a

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>big audio research department at as where I where I

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>worked had worked earlier, um in that TV camera department. Um,

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they they came up with this box that we had

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of asked for. We said, how can we, how

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>can we add a vocal to an instrument and make

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it sound like it's one thing, and there was this Um,

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a series of stories on on record. That

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was called sparky's magic piano. I don't know if you

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that one, though it was it was

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>an American productive, but there was literally a talking piano.

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's very it's very cleverly done and I think we,

1:03:13.440 --> 1:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we all hoped that that that's what it would achieve.

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But in the end it it just made a voice

1:03:19.320 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>sound very electronic and it worked well for the Raven.

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we spent a long time touring and

1:03:27.520 --> 1:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>throwing trying different buttons, different settings and so on. But Um,

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it I think it was pretty much the first,

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>first foe CODA used on a on a on a record.

1:03:42.200 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So you have this very extensive cover, hypnosis, cover, uh,

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. In America, I don't think there's a

1:03:52.920 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>gatefold at all, and then shortly thereafter the album just

1:03:56.480 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>says a cover of you on it. Yeah, well, I

1:04:00.160 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was furious about that. That really was. And when when

1:04:05.520 --> 1:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>people give me that set, that second simplified sleeve, to sign,

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I I kind of go a grunt, grunt my disapproval.

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that you should have the original cover, not

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>this cover. But no, that the the the gate, the

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>gate field did exist, I think, worldwide. It was very extravagant,

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>chasing paper between pages and stuff, and it wasn't it

1:04:33.120 --> 1:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a very lavish package, but it was great. I loved it. Okay,

1:04:38.040 --> 1:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that album. I bought it originally as a

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Provo and they had an unlimited supply at my store

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I would buy them for other people. Huh, what

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was the perception of success on that first album for

1:04:50.400 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your from your viewpoint? I mean I was I was

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>amazed and I thought it, you know, we thought the

1:04:58.760 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>album was good, but we thought it literally fall by

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the wayside, you know. But you know, we're a new act.

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We have high hopes and but the success of tales

1:05:11.680 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of mystery and the sect, the continued success of the

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>act through, you know, several other albums with with Arista,

1:05:21.720 --> 1:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I I have never ceased to be amazed at the

1:05:25.480 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>success and was always slightly trepidacious shall we say, but

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it was always great news that, you know, it was

1:05:37.400 --> 1:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>getting on playlists and that it was it was, you know,

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>actually shifting copies out of record stores. It was always

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it was always a great relief and and you know,

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I was proud. I was very proud. So you have

1:05:54.160 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>one record on twentieth century. How do you end up

1:05:56.720 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>bouncing from there to Aosta? Well, the first album deal

1:06:02.120 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>much too much to Russ Reagan's Chagra, I think, was Um.

1:06:08.200 --> 1:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It was just a single album deal. So we were

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we were free to go go to anyone. Um. You

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know you don't, you don't, you don't take a called

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Clive Davis Likely, but that's what happened. He

1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>invited us to dinner in London, famous, famous restaurant called Lorenzo's,

1:06:32.280 --> 1:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and essentially he he said he wanted to sign us

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for a multi album deal and not soon after that meeting,

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, Eric flew to New York and did the

1:06:47.200 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>business and there we were. We were signed to Aristair

1:06:51.400 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for our for our second album, I robu so. At

1:06:56.480 --> 1:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the time he Arista was still just starting. He had

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Patty Smith. There was a lot of goodwill, even though

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he gotten fired he'd written his book, but his time

1:07:07.880 --> 1:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>went on. As you referenced earlier, he was all about

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hits and he was famous for meddling with the music

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of artists. Now ultimately ended up being with, you know,

1:07:19.440 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>top forty artists who may not have even written the songs.

1:07:22.240 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>What was your experience working with Clive Davis? He he

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to, you know, a single of every album.

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He want wanted to make sure that it was commercial

1:07:34.360 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in his eyes. He would always suggest edits. He would

1:07:38.160 --> 1:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>he would even have his own people do do edits,

1:07:44.080 --> 1:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>some of which worked well, some of which sounded absolutely horrible.

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But he yes, he liked he he liked to be

1:07:54.280 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>close to the music. You know, really, you know, identify

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>buying the structure of a song and saying, you know,

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the the chorus, the chorus doesn't happen until a minute

1:08:08.200 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half in. We needed to happen less than

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a minute in, and stuff like that. But you know,

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't, you can't argue. He knew what he was doing.

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>He had he had the ear for hits. You ready

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>do so you would listen to him, you would change

1:08:23.320 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the songs. will be okay with that. It was usually

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a compromise. I never, I never put anything out that

1:08:29.439 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I was actually, you know, actually unhappy with. No, we, we, we, we, I.

1:08:41.080 --> 1:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's how to put this really we. Uh. Oh,

1:08:44.880 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we just kept each other happy. I mean we,

1:08:48.400 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we would come if they were compromise was necessarily on

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a on an edit or. Uh. He never, never sought

1:08:56.960 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to have US Remix, which, of course, labels are famous

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for telling acts to remix their songs, but he never

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>did that. Just just the structure, just, you know, when

1:09:11.160 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the chorus happens, when the Solo. We had a long solo,

1:09:14.040 --> 1:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, on Games people play, and we cut that

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>down and I was I was fine with that and

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:25.519
<v Speaker 1>it was. Yeah, it was mutual decisions on on the

1:09:25.640 --> 1:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>edits and I think both of us were happy in

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the end. I don't think. I never put anything out

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that I was seriously unhappy with. Now, it wasn't like

1:09:35.439 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>every album I had hits on it. There were ups,

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there were downs. was He ever angry with you or

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lost faith in you or you felt like a second

1:09:44.240 --> 1:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or third class citizen? No, no, I always had a

1:09:47.840 --> 1:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>great relationship with client. H Never, never a harsh word. Okay,

1:09:55.120 --> 1:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately serious becomes the Chicago Bulls the anthem,

1:10:02.360 --> 1:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it becomes sports the anthem. Did that happen totally independent

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of you? And what did you think of that? I

1:10:10.439 --> 1:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>had absolutely no idea. It certainly wasn't written as a

1:10:14.360 --> 1:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>as a sports team. It was. It was written on

1:10:19.240 --> 1:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>a fairlight computer instrument which was very high tech back

1:10:25.680 --> 1:10:29.519
<v Speaker 1>in the early eighties, Um, and it was just an

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>intro to tow eye in the sky. Ah, that somebody

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at the at the Chicago Bulls said this will this

1:10:38.920 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>will make great walk on music for Michael Jordan. And

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if that happened and several other sports teams followed, it

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>baffles me. I mean I think I think it works great,

1:10:54.960 --> 1:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly was not the last thing on my

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mind that it would be used for sports. But it

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>continues to be used to this day. It is that lucrative.

1:11:04.320 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>The fact they do. It's lucrative in terms of TV advertising,

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>use on TV shows. American idol, for example, use it occasionally, um,

1:11:18.800 --> 1:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but sadly when it's used in in sports games, in

1:11:24.280 --> 1:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>stadiums and so on, no, there is no there is

1:11:27.720 --> 1:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>no record of it, there's no there's no money change

1:11:29.680 --> 1:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>hands because it just goes into a big pot which

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is shared by all, all musicians and writers. No, B

1:11:39.880 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>M I as cap so on, um C sack, which

1:11:44.479 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is the society I'm with. They would be angry if

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't mentioned that. Um, yeah, it's just just goes

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:59.479
<v Speaker 1>into this general pot. It's not considered a a sink license.

1:12:00.400 --> 1:12:03.519
<v Speaker 1>That's what that's what's valuable to to a writer and

1:12:04.640 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a musical act to get what is known as a

1:12:07.280 --> 1:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sync license. That means pictures. The sound has to be

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>licensed to go with a picture and considering that the

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, ball game really is all about the people

1:12:21.560 --> 1:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on the court, not not, not, not a video. So

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're making all these records. They come on under the

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>moniker Alan Parsons Project. What do you do and what

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>does Eric Do? Well, we we both. We both came

1:12:38.880 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>to the studio in the early stages of each album

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>with with what we worked on on our own leading

1:12:50.760 --> 1:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>up to that first day. Um Eric would usually usually

1:12:56.360 --> 1:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have a cassette with a rough version of the song

1:13:00.280 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>as he saw it at the time. Um, I also

1:13:05.240 --> 1:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>made demos. By the time, by the time I and

1:13:10.439 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the sky came along, I was I was back in London,

1:13:14.120 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>having lived in Monaco for a couple of years. Um, yeah,

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we just came in and sort of say here's what

1:13:21.760 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got, what have you got? And then we would

1:13:24.200 --> 1:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>collaborate and I was famous for changing the structures of

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>his of his songs, you know, or changing the key

1:13:32.200 --> 1:13:35.599
<v Speaker 1>or changing the temple or whatever. Um. That's sort sort

1:13:35.600 --> 1:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>of borne out by the recent releases of box sets

1:13:38.600 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which include Eric's songwriting diaries, as we call very sort

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of basic piano and vocal versions of songs, almost bearing

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>no relationship to the final products sometimes. So would one

1:13:55.120 --> 1:13:59.879
<v Speaker 1>say that he essentially wrote all the songs? I'm slightly

1:14:00.000 --> 1:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to say that he wrote all the songs because

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there were there were occasions when I made very definite

1:14:08.600 --> 1:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>co Co writing compositions, Co writing contributions. But yes, I

1:14:16.400 --> 1:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>mean he was. He was a talented songwriters, he um,

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and part of that talent as a songwriter was the

1:14:28.640 --> 1:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the ability to write lyrics. I wasn't strong lyrics. So

1:14:34.280 --> 1:14:37.519
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say that, if you want to

1:14:37.560 --> 1:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>break down the music and the lyrics into proportions, I

1:14:43.360 --> 1:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>would say Eric was, you know, maybe the musical composer.

1:14:50.400 --> 1:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe the musical composer but of the lyrics would

1:14:56.360 --> 1:15:00.559
<v Speaker 1>would be composed by him. I probably contributed one line

1:15:00.640 --> 1:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or two during during the course of ten albums. So

1:15:07.200 --> 1:15:09.679
<v Speaker 1>like when you talked about the first album, you talked

1:15:09.680 --> 1:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>about the instrumental second side. That was your thing. Did

1:15:12.760 --> 1:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you actually compose that, or did he compose that, or

1:15:15.240 --> 1:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>did you do it together? It was I think I

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>could give Andrew Powell who. Who? Who actually orchestrated it

1:15:24.439 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and made it, made it performable. It was designed to be.

1:15:30.160 --> 1:15:33.559
<v Speaker 1>It was designed to echo a piece by Claude Debussy,

1:15:34.400 --> 1:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>who had written a piece called the House based on

1:15:38.200 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the same story on the foot of the house of us.

1:15:40.800 --> 1:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was unfinished and we we kind of

1:15:43.760 --> 1:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>borrowed from from Debussy in a couple of places and

1:15:48.560 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's magical. I think it's a it's very debussy,

1:15:52.280 --> 1:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you know, if you know his music. Um,

1:15:56.760 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was we took a risk. Were, you know,

1:15:59.520 --> 1:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight minutes of orchestral music opening the second

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>side of an album. That that was pretty risky. I think. Now,

1:16:06.800 --> 1:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately there's a dispute with Erasta and you deliver a

1:16:12.160 --> 1:16:14.759
<v Speaker 1>quick album to get out of the contract, which ultimately

1:16:14.760 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come out at that time. What went down around then? Um,

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Eric was always, always the businessman and you know, I

1:16:26.520 --> 1:16:28.519
<v Speaker 1>I told you I never had a harsh word with

1:16:28.560 --> 1:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Clive Davis, but I think, I think carrick probably did

1:16:32.479 --> 1:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with Clive and with the business affairs people, and that

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the relationship went somewhat sour after the after the EV album,

1:16:46.160 --> 1:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and the guy probably the gaudy album as well, and

1:16:52.040 --> 1:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we just made an instrumental contractual obligation album and that

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately resulted in a lawsuit which got settled out of

1:17:03.920 --> 1:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>court and we resigned. So there was a happy ending

1:17:08.000 --> 1:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. But the album in question, the Sicilian Defense,

1:17:13.240 --> 1:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is quite definitely my least favorite album of all time

1:17:20.560 --> 1:17:24.559
<v Speaker 1>by any artist. Okay, so you make tales of mystery

1:17:24.560 --> 1:17:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and imagination. To what degree you are you still getting

1:17:28.600 --> 1:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>calls to produce an engineer, and how do you handle those?

1:17:34.040 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I get get a lot of calls. I get I

1:17:36.479 --> 1:17:43.799
<v Speaker 1>get sent, you know, CDs or sometimes a little memory

1:17:43.880 --> 1:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>six with people's music. All the time. There's there's no

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>shortage of work for me. It should should I choose

1:17:50.920 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to take people up on it, but I keep busy

1:17:55.000 --> 1:17:58.519
<v Speaker 1>with just the things I generate and but even back

1:17:58.560 --> 1:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies, same thing. You were making the transition. Um, yeah, well,

1:18:04.840 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I was. Yes, I I had a couple of production

1:18:08.360 --> 1:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>acts that I was successful with. Pilot was one John Miles,

1:18:12.720 --> 1:18:15.839
<v Speaker 1>who we've already mentioned. I also did the three albums

1:18:15.840 --> 1:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with El Stewart, which did very well. So I kept busy.

1:18:21.600 --> 1:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I was never, never board. But you weren't saying now

1:18:27.040 --> 1:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm an act, I don't want to produce records anymore,

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or did you eventually say that? Oh No, no, no,

1:18:32.320 --> 1:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I was always even with the Alan Passon's project, I

1:18:34.840 --> 1:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was the producer and that that was that was a given.

1:18:38.040 --> 1:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about third parties, third parties. Yeah, I was,

1:18:43.360 --> 1:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was happy to be to take on

1:18:48.400 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>production work with with other artists, but I couldn't take

1:18:52.439 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on everything that was offered, clearly because the project kept

1:18:55.920 --> 1:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>me busy and things like pilot, John Miles and Al

1:19:01.479 --> 1:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Stewart took up a lot, a lot of my time. Okay,

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so we hit the twenty first century, you end up

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>releasing a course for engineers. How does that come together

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and what exactly is it? It's called the arts and

1:19:17.400 --> 1:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>science of sound recording. We spent two years assembling a

1:19:25.520 --> 1:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>DVD course. The DVD was the was the format of

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>choice as we prepared this, this series of videos. Um.

1:19:36.640 --> 1:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It stemmed from a similar project that my partner in

1:19:44.120 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the venture, a British guy called Julian Kolbeck,

1:19:48.920 --> 1:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>who who I first met as a as a musician

1:19:53.280 --> 1:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on a session for a band I was working with.

1:19:55.800 --> 1:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Um He had done a similar um educational project on

1:20:02.960 --> 1:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on VHS tape, probably probably a full ten twelve years

1:20:08.800 --> 1:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier and he just came to me and said would

1:20:13.640 --> 1:20:17.559
<v Speaker 1>you like to make a you know, a video recording course,

1:20:17.560 --> 1:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and I said Yeah, I'd love to do that. He said,

1:20:20.200 --> 1:20:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it'll take very long. We'll probably we'll

1:20:22.600 --> 1:20:24.719
<v Speaker 1>get an advance from somebody and it will take about

1:20:24.760 --> 1:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>three months to put together. We didn't realize that it

1:20:27.439 --> 1:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>would be two years and nine hours of of educational stuff,

1:20:33.320 --> 1:20:36.519
<v Speaker 1>but it was fun to do and it's still very

1:20:36.560 --> 1:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>much alive. It's still being used not only by interested

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>individuals but by bye by schools, colleges you know, that

1:20:46.520 --> 1:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have engineering courses. So if one watches it, what will

1:20:51.160 --> 1:20:57.759
<v Speaker 1>they take from it? Hopefully, um give them a better

1:20:57.800 --> 1:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of what goes on in a recording studio. Uh,

1:21:01.160 --> 1:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of people think the

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>recording studio is this mysterious place where you you go

1:21:07.840 --> 1:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and play your song and then out pops a CD

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>out of a slot, you know, at the bottom of

1:21:13.640 --> 1:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the studio equipment. You know, people, people just don't really

1:21:18.479 --> 1:21:22.599
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand what goes on. Uh, it's it's very

1:21:22.600 --> 1:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to represent a recording session in such a way

1:21:28.160 --> 1:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's that. It's but it's interesting. I mean, being

1:21:33.800 --> 1:21:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a fly on the wall in a in a studio

1:21:35.840 --> 1:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>recording is it's incredibly uninteresting. It's it just seems that

1:21:41.400 --> 1:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the tape keeps rolling and everything sounds the same and

1:21:44.200 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it goes on and on and on. But we we

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>try in this series, I think, to to you know,

1:21:50.479 --> 1:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to take to lift the veil and show people and

1:21:54.680 --> 1:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what really happens. You know, how how a vocal is

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>recorded and compiled, how you achieve certain drum sounds, keyboard sounds,

1:22:05.120 --> 1:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>guitar sounds, um it's and it's it's designed to be

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>useful to two novices as well as experience engineers. So

1:22:19.479 --> 1:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we we, we, we worked quite hard to try and

1:22:22.800 --> 1:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>make it entertaining as well as informative. How did you

1:22:32.520 --> 1:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>end up living in the United States? When did you

1:22:34.960 --> 1:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>come here and how did you end up in Santa Barbara?

1:22:39.479 --> 1:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I had bought a house in Montesito, which is a

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>adjunct to to Santa Barbara, back in the nineties, with

1:22:48.479 --> 1:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>my ex wife and my two sons. Um It became

1:22:53.960 --> 1:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>clear that my ex wife was not was not comfortable

1:22:57.720 --> 1:23:03.519
<v Speaker 1>in America, so we went back to the UK. Yeah, AH, then,

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and soon, soon after uh, we got back. I I

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>met Lisa, my my my now wife, and we I

1:23:19.800 --> 1:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>decided I wanted to to live with her and she

1:23:24.280 --> 1:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>had to two daughters and she came to she came

1:23:28.360 --> 1:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to the UK for a while. We we lived in

1:23:33.320 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a house just outside London. You met you met her were.

1:23:38.840 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I met her in Maryland. Maryland, a big shard there

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in Mary Maryland. I'm trying to think of the name.

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It merryweather post. Merryweather Post, you got it, that's the one.

1:23:53.520 --> 1:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That's where we met. And so when we decided we

1:23:59.800 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>were going to live together, we we considered all the options.

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I think we all said California was the most likely

1:24:08.560 --> 1:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and because of my previous experience in Santa Barbara, I

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>really liked. I really liked Santa Barbara and and do

1:24:16.080 --> 1:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to this day. So in two thousand and three we

1:24:19.760 --> 1:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>got married and the rest is history. And how did

1:24:23.320 --> 1:24:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you end up deciding to build a studio? I really

1:24:31.360 --> 1:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>did not build a studio to the same specification as

1:24:35.400 --> 1:24:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the one I now have. Until until I did build

1:24:40.600 --> 1:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this one, I I was just working in rooms in

1:24:44.320 --> 1:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a in our in our house. A valid path was

1:24:48.240 --> 1:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>just literally done in a two adjacent bedrooms and I

1:24:57.080 --> 1:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think I resisted because I knew, I knew how expensive,

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, building a studio is, and the one I'm

1:25:06.439 --> 1:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>speaking from now is, no exceptions, cost a great deal

1:25:09.680 --> 1:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of money. But I'm I'm really glad that I did

1:25:12.960 --> 1:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do it because the the work that I did in

1:25:18.040 --> 1:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the early, early years of my solo careers Um I think,

1:25:22.800 --> 1:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>suffered through not having a decent studio. But I'm really,

1:25:27.160 --> 1:25:31.519
<v Speaker 1>really delighted with the results I'm getting in this in

1:25:31.600 --> 1:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this new studio. Now, if one goes online there's a

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>whole website for the studio. It seems like it's in

1:25:38.000 --> 1:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of nowhere in Santa Barbara. How did you

1:25:41.080 --> 1:25:43.599
<v Speaker 1>end up with that property? Is a continuous with your

1:25:44.360 --> 1:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>home property what's the story there? Um, the home studios

1:25:50.240 --> 1:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>have always has always been. Yeah, Home Studios Really, really

1:25:55.680 --> 1:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not very not very extravagant equipment wise at all. If

1:26:00.800 --> 1:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I if I, if I needed a proper studio, I would,

1:26:05.120 --> 1:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I would go go to a commercial studio to work.

1:26:10.080 --> 1:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>So it became it was more of a sort of

1:26:12.600 --> 1:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>environment to listen to stuff, composed stuff. Um. But yeah,

1:26:21.040 --> 1:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad that I made the decision a couple

1:26:25.160 --> 1:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of years ago to build, to build this new studio.

1:26:28.160 --> 1:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very, very, very happy with it and it's now

1:26:32.920 --> 1:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>state of the art because I've put this new system

1:26:37.280 --> 1:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>which everybody in the industry is talking about, Delby atmos. Okay,

1:26:41.400 --> 1:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but the property. That's fun. Did you already own that property? Yes, yeah,

1:26:46.320 --> 1:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we bought. We bought this House in Oh five and

1:26:51.200 --> 1:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been been there here ever since. But seventeen years

1:26:56.240 --> 1:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same house. I've never done that before. The

1:26:59.160 --> 1:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>studio is not attached to the house you live in. Correct, correct,

1:27:03.520 --> 1:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an outbuilding. You know, if you go online,

1:27:06.400 --> 1:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems, and I've got another email, seems like you're

1:27:09.160 --> 1:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for third parties to book your studio. Are you

1:27:12.360 --> 1:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>into what degree or people using it and I regarded

1:27:17.120 --> 1:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>as being fairly, fairly new as a as a commercial studio. Um.

1:27:23.600 --> 1:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I've I've had one or two clients in here, um

1:27:28.320 --> 1:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to enjoy themselves. It's Um, I I don't,

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't let anybody in. I like to meet them

1:27:38.320 --> 1:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and talk to them and find out what they want

1:27:40.080 --> 1:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to do rather than just do it on a on

1:27:44.280 --> 1:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a strictly business basis. I won't do that and I'll

1:27:49.200 --> 1:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>only I'll only have clients in here, if you can

1:27:52.360 --> 1:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>call them clients, when I know that I'm not not

1:27:56.880 --> 1:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in need of studio time myself. Now, you know, so

1:28:01.320 --> 1:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>many studios have gone out of business. There's not only

1:28:04.280 --> 1:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the song costs of the building and equipment. You have

1:28:07.240 --> 1:28:11.759
<v Speaker 1>to continue to update the equipment. There's ongoing equipment costs.

1:28:12.400 --> 1:28:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Has that been your experience? How you know you have

1:28:14.600 --> 1:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to budget for that? Yes, I mean it's not just

1:28:19.600 --> 1:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>recording equipment, it's musical equipment. There's always a new scent,

1:28:22.960 --> 1:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there's always a new microphones to check out, which baffles

1:28:27.400 --> 1:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>me because you know I've I've been making perfectly good,

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>good recordings with with my existing mic collection. I really

1:28:36.479 --> 1:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't need any new ones. Because they're they're never substantially

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>different from the best microphones in my in my cupboard. Um, yeah,

1:28:46.120 --> 1:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a certain need to budget for new stuff,

1:28:51.720 --> 1:28:55.599
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just as likely to buy a new scent

1:28:55.800 --> 1:28:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or a new guitar as I am to buy a

1:28:57.479 --> 1:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>new preempt for the studio. So, prior to the Internet era,

1:29:02.640 --> 1:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the business was cohesive. There were a limited number of labels.

1:29:06.320 --> 1:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>If you were on a major label you were far

1:29:09.479 --> 1:29:12.719
<v Speaker 1>down the food chain. So at this point in time,

1:29:12.800 --> 1:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>do you feel part of the larger business or you

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:21.679
<v Speaker 1>really just in the Alan Parsons Business? MHM, I've I've

1:29:21.960 --> 1:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost touch with the industry. I Um, when

1:29:25.400 --> 1:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I was making albums with Ariston, we were constantly in

1:29:28.400 --> 1:29:33.759
<v Speaker 1>touch with press people, marketing people, so on and so Um.

1:29:33.800 --> 1:29:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, I'm I'm doing the occasional interview to

1:29:36.479 --> 1:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>promote the album which comes out this week. Um, but

1:29:42.200 --> 1:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really it's not not, not a strong relationship with with

1:29:46.400 --> 1:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>labels anymore. Of course, for live shows I have to

1:29:53.400 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with agents, promoters and that kind of stuff, but

1:29:58.479 --> 1:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the recording industry, not, not, not very

1:30:02.240 --> 1:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in tune with it, with what's going on. Don't don't

1:30:05.080 --> 1:30:07.599
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time listening to modern music and

1:30:07.760 --> 1:30:10.519
<v Speaker 1>you keep in touch with all the people from the past,

1:30:10.640 --> 1:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or you're pretty much a homebody just doing your own thing.

1:30:13.720 --> 1:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I tried to. I try to stay in touch the

1:30:17.080 --> 1:30:21.599
<v Speaker 1>people I've worked with in the past. John, of course,

1:30:23.000 --> 1:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I've already mentioned, died sadly a few months ago. We

1:30:25.880 --> 1:30:29.519
<v Speaker 1>were we were always good friends, always in touch with

1:30:29.560 --> 1:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>each other. Um, David Pat from Ambrogier has been a

1:30:34.400 --> 1:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>good friend ever since the ever since the first album,

1:30:37.840 --> 1:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or my first album and his first album, which were

1:30:41.800 --> 1:30:44.519
<v Speaker 1>released close to each other. Colin Blunt Stone, I bumped

1:30:44.560 --> 1:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bump into now and again. Last time I saw him

1:30:48.080 --> 1:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>was on a cruise, you know, music cruise. Um, I

1:30:53.320 --> 1:30:56.679
<v Speaker 1>never saw Arthur Brown again after after tales of mystery,

1:30:56.760 --> 1:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but there we are. Um, yeah, I mean I I

1:31:05.080 --> 1:31:07.679
<v Speaker 1>try to try to keep in touch with people who

1:31:08.640 --> 1:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are ultimately responsible in part to my success. So I

1:31:12.600 --> 1:31:15.599
<v Speaker 1>would always be grateful for that. Well, you have this

1:31:15.640 --> 1:31:19.759
<v Speaker 1>new album, Alan. I wish you continued success and thanks

1:31:19.760 --> 1:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for taking the time to talk to me.

1:31:22.720 --> 1:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>You're very welcome, Bob. Thank you. Look forward to hearing

1:31:26.880 --> 1:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this on the you bet. Until next time, this is

1:31:30.800 --> 1:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Bob leftslet's h