WEBVTT - The Legal Basis for Retaking the Panama Canal, plus No Taxes on Tips is Happening

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in his verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with you and Senator I never thought i'd say there

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was a whole lot of action today in the Senate

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Panama Canal. But that is

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened. Is we're learning a lot more about

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the corruption there that should shock a lot of Americans.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, today I chaired a hearing in the Senate Commerce

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Committee on the Panama Canal. And listen, Donald Trump has

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 2>raised this issue. It is a very significant issue. I

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>got to say. When he raised it, a lot of

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>people in the media, a lot of Democrats dismissed it,

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>thought it was crazy talk. But I actually think it

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>is a very serious point. We've talked about this before

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast, but today I chaired a hearing on

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 2>the Panama Canal, and in particular on the conduct that

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Panama has committed potentially in violation of the treaty. So

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the United States built that canal. Over thirty thousand lives

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>were lost in the construction of that canal. Over fifteen

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in today's dollars were spent by America, by

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>American taxpayers, in building that canal. And Jimmy Carter sadly

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 2>gave it away, gave it to Panama. It was indefensible.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I remember I was a little kid. You were not

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>even been a sparkle in your daddy's eyeball when this happened.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.919
<v Speaker 3>But I remember it well, and I remember being pissed.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, this was one of the major

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>issues that got Ronald Reagan elected in nineteen eighty because

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Carter gave this away. Well, Donald Trump has rightly

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>raised this, and in particular when Jimmy Carter gave it away.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Panama agreed to a very specific treaty, a treaty to

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>keep the Panama Canal neutral and to charge America fair

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and equitable rates. And the hearing we had today was

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>testimony from numerous experts that Panama is in violation of

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>that treaty. That number one, that they have seeded enormous

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>control to China over the canal, and this is the

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 2>point President Trump has made that is really quite powerful.

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>And number two, that they are charging exorbitant rates to

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>American shippers, to commercial shippers, and to the US Navy.

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>And so that hearing we're going to break down today.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>We also we saw this weekend, President Trump went and

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 2>did a major event pressing his policy for no taxes

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>on tips. This is a policy we're going to get enacted.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I am the author of the legislation in the Senate

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>to get this done, and I believe we're going to

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>get this done this year.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>We're going to break that down as well.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a moment real quick and talk

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to you about January the twenty seventh. You may not

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>have realized, but the twenty seventh was International Holocaust Remembrance

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Day Day to remember the great evil of the Holocaust,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>when millions of Jews were slaughtered during the Nazis reign

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of terror. Today, unfortunately, the rise in global anti Semitism

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and the constant attacks on Israel are showing us that

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's more important than ever to remember the atrocities of

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the Holocaust to ensure that it never happens again. And

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm proud to stand with the International Fellowship

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of Christians and Jews. They do incredible work by providing food, shelter,

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and safety to Jews in Israel and around the world,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>including those remaining Holocaust survivors. Your donation today will help

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>provide food water, medicine, and not only basic necessities of

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish community, but also things like bomb shelters and

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>armored ambulances that they need in Israel right now. And

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>through your gift, you will stand with the Jewish people

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and against this growing anti Semitism and hatred. So to

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>give to show your support to the Jewish people, you

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>can visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's one word, support IFCJ

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>dot org. You can also call and give them a

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>donation eighty eight for eight eight IFCJ that's eight eight

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>eight four eight eight IFCJ eighty eight four eight eight

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>four three two five or support IFCJ dot org. All right,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.559
<v Speaker 1>so Senator, let's go back in history and really dive

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>into how all this got started. And you mentioned in

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the intro there America built the Panama Canal and then

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it was given away. So let's talk about the building.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the price, Let's talk about the cost

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and including people that literally gave their lives building this

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible thing, why it was built, and then let's get

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to why we gave it away.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Listen, it was a massive investment from the United States.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>It was an extraordinary endeavor. Teddy Roosevelt had the vision

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to build the Panama Canal. Look, it used to be

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that's traverse from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. You

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>had to go all the way south below South America,

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 2>and that took enormous time. It was enormously costly, and

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>America said, we can construct a canal through Panama. We

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>can cut that journey dramatically shorter. It was a major investment,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and as I said, over thirty thousand lives were lost

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>building that canal. It was not a small investment. Fifteen

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. And listen, before we get started, I want

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to just just take a musical moment to reflect, So

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>give a listen. That's what we're talking about today.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I love that you played the song there, and

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys actually talked about possibly playing that today in Congress,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which made me laugh at the hearing as well.

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's true, and so let's start. So we opened

0:05:58.920 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the hearing.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the Senate Commerce Committee of which I'm chairman,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 2>has explicit jurisdiction over the Panama Canal because it is

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 2>enormously important for American commerce, and so that's why we

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>started with this major hearing. So give a listen. This

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>is my opening statement as we open the hearing. We're

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>here today to examine a monument to American ingenuity, the

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Panama Canal. Senator Moreno down there suggested we open the

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 2>hearing by playing Van Halen and Panama. We may not

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>do that, but between the American construction of the Panama Canal,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the French effort to build an Isthmus Canal an America's

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 2>triumphant completion of that canal, the major infrastructure projects across

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Panama cost more than thirty five thousand lives. For the

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>final decade of work on the Panama Canal, the United

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 2>States spent nearly four hundred million dollars equivalent to more

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>than fifteen billion today.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>The Panama Canal.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Proved a truly invaluable asset, sparing both cargo ships and

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>warships the long journey around South America. When President Carter

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>gave it away to Panama, Americans were puzzled, confused, and

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>many outraged. With the passage of time, many have lost

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>sight of the canal's importance, both to national security and

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to the US economy. Not President Trump, when he demanded

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>fair treatment for American ships and goods. Many in the

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>media scoffed. But the Panama Canal was not just given away.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>President Carter struck a bargain, He made a treaty, and

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>President Trump is making a serious and substantive argument that

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>that treaty is being violated right now. This committee has

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>jurisdiction under the Senate rules over the Panama Canal and

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>today will examine evidence of potential violations.

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Resident Trump has highlighted two key issues.

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Number one, the danger of China exploiting or blocking passage

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>through the canal, and number two, the exorbitant costs for transit.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Chinese companies are right now building a bridge across the

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>canal at a slow pace so as to take nearly

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a decade, and Chinese companies control container points ports at

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>either end. The partially completed bridge gives China the ability

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to block the canal without warning, and the ports give

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 2>China ready observation post to take to time that action.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>This situation, I believe poses acute risks to US national security. Meanwhile,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the high fees for canal transit disproportionately affect Americans because

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>US cargo accounts for nearly three quarters of canal transits.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Navy vessels pay additional fees that apply only to worships.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Canal profits regularly exceed three billion dollars. This money comes

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 2>from both American taxpayers and consumers in the form of

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 2>higher costs for goods. American tourists aboard cruises, particularly those

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Caribbean Sea, are essentially captive to any fees

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 2>Panama chooses to levy or canal transits, and they have

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>pair paid unfair prices for fuel bunkering at terminals in

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Panama as a result of government granted monopoly. Panama's government

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>relies on these exploitative fees. Nearly one tenth of its

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>budget is paid for with canal profit, as those fees

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 2>cascade through the American economy and the federal fisk. The

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Chinese Communist Party advances its global economic contests against the

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>United States and takes a militaristic interest in the canal.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 2>While President Trump is rightly focused on the these key

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>issues their additional problems. In the last two years, the

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Canal Authority generated record revenue even while transits were depressed

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>by drought conditions, and the only comfort to delayed and

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>overcharge ships is that Panama may invest in more fresh.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Water reserves in the future.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Even as it takes advantage of the global maritime system,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Panama has emerged as a bad actor. Panama has for

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>years flagged dozens of vessels in the Iranian ghost Fleet,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>which brought Iran tens of billions of dollars in oil

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>profits to fund terror across the world, and Chinese companies

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 2>have won contracts, often without fair competition, as the infamous

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Belton Road initiative has come to Panama. China often engages

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>in debt trap diplomacy to enable economic and political coercion

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>in Panama. It also seems to have exploited simple corruption.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So center you will get these warnings and they're like

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple red flags here Iran and China and this bridge,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and basically the highest bidder can get whatever the hell

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>they want, no matter how shady they are from Panama

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Panama Canal Am I wrong.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>You're not.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>And there were several striking things in the hearing. Number One,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>we had a series of witnesses from the Federal Maritime Commission,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and we had an international law professor who testified about

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the neutrality treaty, and they testified about a number of things.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Number One, there's a treaty that governs this. So this

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 2>is not simply Donald Trump raising an issue. Gosh, we

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 2>want the Panama Canal. Panama made a commitment when Jimmy

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Carter gave this away, and they made a commitment number one,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>that the Panama Canal would remain neutral, that it would

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>not allow another foreign power to have control over it,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 2>to have military access to it. And number two, they

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 2>made a commitment that entreaty that they would charge fair

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>and equitable fees. Now, on the first point, we heard

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of testimony that Panama has made a

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 2>massive pivot towards China. Listen, China is engaged in something

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 2>called the Belton Road Initiative where they're investing in ports

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and infrastructure all over the world, and they're spending billions

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and billions of dollars trying to gain power over the

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 2>United States. And the Panama Canal is critical to US

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>national security and to our economy. So on both ends

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Panama Canal, on the Pacific side and on

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the Atlantic side, China controls. Chinese corporations control massive ports

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that are right there that give them access and give

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>them the ability to observe all traffic going through the

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 2>canal and potentially to shut down all traffic going through

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the canal. As I mentioned also in my opening, theyreuilding

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a bridge across the canal. They are spending over a

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>decade building that bridge. That bridge gives them the capacity

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to number one, to engage in surveillance of every ship

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 2>going through the canal. But number two, if listen, we

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>get to a time in the future where we're in

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>serious conflict with China, let's say a military conflict. Let's

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>say they invade Taiwan and we are suddenly at risk

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 2>of a shooting war. China has the capacity to shut

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>down the Panama Canal, to use that bridge, to use

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the ports on both ends. It ends to say we

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>will annow allow no transit through that canal. That would

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>be enormously harmful to the United States, and the point

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that was made in the hearing that is directly contrary

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>to the Treaty Panama sign. Secondly, Panama makes roughly three

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in fees from transit across the Panama Canal.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Seventy five percent of those transits are American ships, so

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they are either American cargo ships, commercial ships going across,

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>or there are American military ships the US Navy going across.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But either way, Panama is making billions. And the testimony

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>we heard in the hearing today is that on both

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>of those grounds there is a strong argument that Panama

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>is in violation of the treaty. Now, what's interesting, ben

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I asked the international law professor was testifying. I said, Okay,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>if Panama is in violation of the treaty, number one,

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>how is that determined? And number two, what is the remedy.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>On the question of how is that determined? The testimony

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>we got today is the professor said, well, under the

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of the treaty, each party determines unilaterally whether the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>other is in violation, which means the United States has

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the ability to determine President Trump and this administration can

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>determine Panama is in violation. That is decisive. And then secondly,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the remedy. Initially, when I asked the remedy, what the

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>professor testified is that the remedy contemplated in the treaty

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>was direct military action by the United States to reassert

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>its control. I also asked, okay, if they're in violation

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of the treaty, is there a potential to assert that

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the treaty is null and void and the United States

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>will reassert control on that question, he went back and forth,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>But I will say that testimony I think gave enormous

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>heft to the points President Trump has been making.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So you look at this and you say, all right,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what are the options now for President Trump and then

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for Congress because we can't get it back right there,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it. I'd be like, we just take this

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>thing back. We built it. I don't think it's that simple.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair fair point to make? Starting off?

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting you and I did a podcast

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.359
<v Speaker 2>early on when President Trump was talking about Canada, Panama,

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and Greenland, and I put them on a spectrum. I said, Canada,

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it ain't going to become the fifty first state. Their

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>President Trump is just trolling Canada. He's messing with Trudeau.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, his trolling of Trudeau probably cost

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>him being Prime minister. I mean, it was perhaps the

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>most epic troll in history.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Greenland, on the other.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Hand, as we discussed at length on this podcast, I

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>think there's a very serious argument that it is in

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the United States's interest to try to acquire Greenland, to

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 2>try to acquire a number one for national security reasons

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>because Greenland has a critical geographic location in the Arctic.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>If God forbid, we had a military conflict with Russia

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 2>or China, any ICBMs and any military attack would likely

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 2>come over the Arctic. Greenland is precisely situated to be

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>able to intercept and combat that. But also Greenland has

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 2>vast natural resources, in particular rarest minerals and critical minerals,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and so I think it is very much at our

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>interest to pursue Greenland.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, I will.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Say a little over a week ago, I had a

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>long conversation with the Danish ambassador. So Greenland is controlled

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>by Denmark, and the Danish ambassador was quite distressed because

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I've been very vocal, including on this podcast, and so

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I got a call from the Danish ambassador, what are

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 2>you saying on Verdict, which is is an interesting did.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Your response was do go listen to it?

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 3>It's up there.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I did have a good life. And the Danish ambassador

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is like, why are you attacking us? And I said, listen,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 2>let me be clear, you're a friend, you're an ally.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not remotely proposing military action against Denmark or Greenland.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>But friends and allies can have real conversations, and I

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 2>think it is very much in our interest to acquire Greenland.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And the ambassador said it's not for sale, and I said, well,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>everything's for sale, and we're at least going to have

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a conversation, because I think it is both in our

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>interest and your interest to have that conversation, and so

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>that we had a very direct, I think of very

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 2>positive conversations, and I expect over the next four years

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration is going to press that discussion.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 2>At the time you and I did that podcast, I

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>viewed the Panamac Canal as somewhere in the middle. I

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 2>said at the time, I said, we're not going to

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>get it back, but I think the president is negotiating

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>over priced, negotiating to lower the prices of transit. Now

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's still true. I think the worst case

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>outcome of this discussion is we end up with a

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>very significant reduction in the cost the price for American

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 2>ships to transit the Panama Canal, both commercial ships and

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 2>US Navy ships. That's a very good outcome. I also

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 2>think it is very likely we will see a significant

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>diminution in China's control and influence over the Panama Canal.

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>That is a massive benefit. But I got to say,

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>after this hearing today, I've moved. I actually think the

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 2>treaty arguments here are quite serious. And I get Panama

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>would be horrified to give up the canal because they

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 2>were given a gigantic gift from Jimmy Carter at the

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>expense of the United States of America. But I think

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the arguments that Panama is violating the treaty and has

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>forfeited its right to the canal, I think those arguments

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>are very serious, and I expect the administration to pursue

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>them seriously.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about also the contraband in essence is going

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>through there Iran and China really getting a grand deal,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but also the idea that we don't know what's going

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>through there on those ships. How concerned are you about that?

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And could this also bring that into perspective where Panama says, hey,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we can't do this right now, we're under too much

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of a spotlight.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, that is a very real problem. So for example,

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Panama has flagged multiple ships from Iran from their ghost fleet,

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the ghost fleet that they're using to transit oil and

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Iran Iran.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Have a definition, by the way, I have a ghost

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>fleet for people that don't understand what that means.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So there were in law massive sanctions on Iran selling

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>oil under Joe Biden. He essentially refused to enforce those sanctions,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and so Iran used a ghost fleet to get a

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>round down those sanctions.

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>It was ships.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>That that were operating under under foreign flags that that

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 2>that were basically hiding from the sanctions regime. By the way,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one of the most significant things the

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration is going to do is reimpose those sanctions

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 2>on Iran and cut off their revenue. Joe Biden, the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Democrats basically gave one hundred billion dollars to the Ayatola

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 2>who's chanting death to America and death to Israel. And

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I believe that that has ended on January twentieth, and

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 2>it should end. Panama was complicit in that that they

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>were part of that endeavor. And by the way, Panama

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 2>also made it made a very deliberate decision to pivot

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>towards China. So, for example, several years ago, Panama severed

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>diplomatic relationships with Taiwan and instead embraced China and they

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>did so at the same time that China was making

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 2>massive investments in the ports on both ends of the canal.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And understand the way China does this, The Chinese government

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 2>subsidizes those investments so that no American company can outbid them.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Because the Chinese government is essentially subsidizing them. They're not

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>doing it for economic purposes. They're not doing it because

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>it makes business sense. They're doing it for strategic purposes

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>because China wants to control the Panama Canal. Now I

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>get why the Chinese communist government wants to do that,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 2>but Panama letting them do that is I believe in

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 2>direct violation of the treaty and that that's what the

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>hearing was about today.

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Final question on this moving forward? How quick will there

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be movement on this issue?

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Look, I don't know. I think this hearing was important today,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'll tell you what I thought was most significant.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So I called the hearing, and as a chairman, I

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>can call a hearing on any topic I want.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know how the day Democrats would react.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know if the Democrats would show up the

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>hearing and begin screaming and saying Trump is a lunatic

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>and how Darry do this. I didn't know what they

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>would say. The most interesting thing about the hearing today

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 2>is the Democrats. Almost every Democrat echoed the points that

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you and I have been making that China has far

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>too much influence over the Panama Canal and also the

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Panama Canal is charging excessive fees. I'm not sure what

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that means, but it surprised me.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>We did not have.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I sort of anticipated some long Democrat speeches about how

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Trump is a crazy man. We didn't get any of that,

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think that was a very interesting particularly the

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Chinese influence on the Panama Canal. There was very significant

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan agreement. I think that's a very promising sign.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, then we got to use that bipartisan

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sign to move into topic number two, and that is yep.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was a big proponent of taxes going away

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 1>on tips. Now, this is a very big issue in

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the campaign. He got a lot of traction with a

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of Americans that work hard part of their salaries tips.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Not having taxes on those tips would be huge for

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>American workers and also our economy. So this is something

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that has come back up again where Donald Trump's trying

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to pay off on this. The question is what's going

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to happen with Congress on that? And before I get

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to that, I want to tell you about our friends

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>over at Patriot Mobile. While we may have won this election,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the fight to restore our great nation is only beginning,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and now is the time to take a stand, especially

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the dollars you spend. Well, that's

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>why I want you to know about Patriot Mobile because

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they are America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. Patriot Mobile

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>offers a way to vote with your wallet without compromising

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 1>on quality or can nvenience. And Patriot Mobile isn't just

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>about providing exceptional cell phone service. It's a call to

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>action to defend our rights and freedoms. With Patriot Mobile,

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not only do you get outstanding nationwide coverage because they

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>operate on all three major networks, so you get the

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>coverage you want every day, but you get it without

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the wo agenda of Big Mobile. Patriot Mobile has a

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>coverage guarantee. And here's the best part. Every time you

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>make a call and every dollar you spend, you support

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the first and the second Amendments the sanctity of life.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors, and

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>switching is never been easier. You keep your same number

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got now, keep your same phone, or upgrade to

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a new one right now. Go to Patriotmobile dot com

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>slash verdict or call them nine to seven to Patriot

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and get a free month of service with a promo

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>code Verdict. Switch to Patriot Mobile today and defend freedom

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>with every call and every text you make. That's Patriot

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Mobile dot com slash verdict or call them nine seven

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to Patriot. All right, So, taxes tips, It was clearly

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a big campaign issue. It brought in a lot of voters.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people came to Donald Trump and said

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this couldn't have a huge impact. Now it's paying off

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on it. Is there a real chance?

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>So yes, and I believe this will happen. This will

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>happen by the.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 3>End of the year.

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's rewind. In the middle of the presidential campaign,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump was in Las Vegas, Nevada, and he actually

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>told us the story. So he came by in the

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>middle of the campaign. He had lunch with all the

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Republican senators and he said, listen, I was in Vegas.

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I had a rally that night.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>They said, I was having lunch and he said, there

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>was a waitress who came. It was serving me my meal,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>and he said she began like complaining about the enormous

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>burden that the Biden administration had put on recording her tips,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 2>on paying taxes on tips.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And he said, I pulled out.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>A piece of paper and I got out of pen

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and I just wrote, no taxes on tips.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>They said, it's just.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>An idea that popped in my head. And he said, look,

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 2>some people they focus group things, they do white papers.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 2>He said, I didn't do any of that. I just

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>wrote it down from the conversation I had with the

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 2>waitress over lunch.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 3>And he said.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I had that rally later the day and I had

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>thousands of people there, and he said, I just threw

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 2>it out there no taxes on tips.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 3>And he said and they went crazy. They went absolutely crazy.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 2>And I got to say, there are times when Trump

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I just think has an instinct that is a very good,

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 2>gut instinct, and I think this policy makes enormous sense.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And so when he announced it.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 2>He's right. The crowd went crazy. I looked at it

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and I said, this is this is a great idea.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I immediately went to my team and I said, let's

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 2>draft the legislation to make this happen. So the next week,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I filed federal legislation of no taxes on tips. Now

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>what's interesting, Ben, is when I filed this, it immediately

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>became bipartisan. Both senators from Nevada, Jackie Rosen and Catherine

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Court's Master, both of them immediately co sponsored it. One

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of them said to me, she said, look in Nevada,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent of the employees in the entire state

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 2>are tipped workers. And so it was bipartisan. And then

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 2>shortly thereafter, Kamala Harris endorsed it and she said, this

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>is a great idea. So it became there was enormous

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan support. Now, obviously Trump is won, we have a

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Republican Senate at Republican House. I've refiled my legislation. Here's

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>what I'm pressing to happen. So Trump just was back

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>in Nevada in Las Vegas just made a huge push

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to pass this. I am pressing for Congress to pass

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the legislation right now. It doesn't have to be part

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>a budget reconciliation. Now for any tax bill. Under the Constitution,

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the House of Representatives has to originate it. So if

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a provision in the Constitution, the Senate cannot start

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a tax bill. A tax bill has to originate with

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the House. So I am merging the Speaker of the House.

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm merging the majority leader, take up my legislation no

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:23.719
<v Speaker 2>taxes on tips.

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Just pass it.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>We have the votes in the House, Republicans can pass it.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>If it passes and goes over to the Senate, I

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>believe we can pass it in the Senate, and I

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>think we'll get sixty votes, so we don't have to

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>wait for reconciliation. Reconciliation is the process that gets around

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the filibuster. Lets us pass something with just fifty votes.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we need that for no taxes on tips.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 2>If the House passes it, what I'm merging John Thune,

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the Senate majority leaders put it on the Senate floor.

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll get sixty votes, and that means we

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 2>could pass it. It would be a big bipartisan win,

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and we'll put it on President Trump's desk. He can

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>sign it into law as a huge victory. And by

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the way, it's a win win man. If we put

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>her on the floor and Democrats decide to be partisan.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 2>They decide, Okay, we're going to oppose it, because we

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>just oppose any tax cut, we oppose anything Trump wants.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's not the end of the day.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>If Democrats defeat it in the Senate because we can't

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>get to sixty, that's fine. Then we'll stick it in

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>budget reconciliation. We can get it done with fifty. But

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a win win because every Democrat senator who votes no,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>that is an ugly issue in two years to go

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>face the voters and say, hey, I voted against no

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>taxes on tips, even though every waiter, every waitress, every bartender,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>every taxi driver, every uber driver, every barber, every hairstylist,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 2>every nail salon person, everyone who is real lying on

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>tips cares a lot about this. So if the Democrats

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 2>all want to vote against it, look, I think this

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>policy is an incredible embodiment of the most important political

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>transformation of the last decade, which is that Republicans have

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 2>become a blue collar party. We are the party of

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>waiters and waitresses and working men and women, and so

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Democrats can decide where they stand. But I think we

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 2>ought to get this passed, and one way or another,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 2>my prediction is this will get done before the end

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty five.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this one of those issues where people should call

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>their congressmen, their centers. I mean we talk about this. Yes, yes, yes,

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes, And what do you say? This is

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>good for my state, this is good for my city,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this is good for hourly workers.

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the best argument. Just pass no taxes on tips.

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>So look, one of the things to understand when you

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>call your congressman, when you call your senator, if you

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>make a detailed, subtle argument, that doesn't get through. So

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>every member of Congress gets what I get every day,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 2>which is I get an email. So all right, let

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 2>me find my email from today. Call totals. So one

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, twenty five. Today there were one thousand, three

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy two calls to my office. There were

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and fifty four to DC. There were six

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighteen to Texas. There were four hundred and

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>eighty two live calls. So we had interns and staff

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>assistants who answered four hundred.

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>And eighty two calls.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Today there were eight hundred ninety calls that went to voicemails.

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Of those calls, one three hundred and twenty two Texans called,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty non Texans called, so overwhelmingly the calls were Texans.

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So let's break it down casework So that's I've got

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>an issue with soci security, I've got an issue with

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the VA, I've got an issue with the government. Forty

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>five of those calls were caseworking. I've got a whole

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 2>team that works to help text and deal with the

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>government every day. Twenty four dealt with the academy, so

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>young men and women, high school students that want to

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 2>go to service academy. So twenty four of them. Eight

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>concerned the campaign. I don't know what they concerned. Ninety

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>one concerned scheduling. So people calling saying, hey, can you

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>come and do this event or this other event. Now

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of the breakdown, eighteen called in support of me. Twenty

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>eight called in opposition to me. So people called and said,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I can't stand Cruiz, He's terrible.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that gets recorded.

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Ten people called in support a President Trump, Seventy nine

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>people called in opposition to President Trump. Now nominations. Seventy

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 2>five people called in support of President Trump's nominees. Seventy

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>people called in opposition to President Trump's nominees. Now, it's interesting,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 2>RFK Junior got a bunch of calls one hundred and

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven people this is yesterday in support of RFK

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Junior for HHS Secretary. Ninety three people called in opposition

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to RFK Junior, so about two to one, Bobby Kennedy,

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the calls were coming in. Nineteen people called in support

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of Cash Battel for FBI director. Four hundred and thirty

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 2>two people called in opposition to Cash Battel as FBI director.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think there probably were some liberal groups stirring

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 2>up calls because that number is big enough, four hundred

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and thirty.

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I was to say, when you see days like that,

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you got to be thinking somebody went on an email

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>campaign or a callboitz campaign and said, yeah, target this

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>member today specifically, because if it doesn't match the day before,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the day after, that's when that's kind of the tel right.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And that happens.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 2>There are groups that will focus and say make these calls.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 2>And I think those calls the four hundred and thirty two,

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>that's a big enough number. That's where that probably came from. Now,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>In addition, forty eight people called in support of Tulsea Gabbard,

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty two people called in opposition to Telsey Gabbert. On

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>legislative issues, thirteen people called in support of border security,

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>two people called in opposition to border security, and interestingly enough,

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and seventy four people called in opposition to

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the omb pause of federally appropriated funds. So, look, that's

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 2>the sort of report. I get that report every day,

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and I read it every day. Now look what we

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 2>get over the course of the year, hundreds of thousands

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of calls. So I can't listen to every voicemail that

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 2>comes in. I could literally spend all day long doing

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 2>nothing but listening to voicemails and not do any hearings,

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 2>not do any legislation, and I still wouldn't have enough time.

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>So the way I consume that data is through a

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>report like that. I just read you the report that

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 2>came today. Every other member consumes it the same way.

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying is, if you want Congress to pass

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 2>no taxes on tips, you don't need to present a long, detailed,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 2>subtle argument as to all of the pros and cons.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Just pick up the phone and call your member and

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 2>say pass no taxes on tips. If you say that sentence,

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 2>it will get recorded in a report just like that

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to the House member of the senator you're calling. That's

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 2>how the information gets consumed.

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>That's encouraging. By the way you said, everybody looks at

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>their call list like the same way you.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Do it, I hope.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know that there may be some people

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that don't give a damn.

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 3>I look at it every day.

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 2>I can't promise that all five hundred and thirty five

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 2>members of Congress do, but I certainly look at it

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 2>every day because I work for thirty one million Texans

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and so I want to see what issues people are

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 2>engaged on and what they care about.

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible. Don't forget call your congressman, call your senator.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It can make a huge difference, especially during confirmations and

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on issues like taxes on tips. Going away, we do

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the show Monday was a Friday to gain give you

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this exact type of information. So make sure that that

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe button, auto download button and share it on social media.

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people right now are looking for answers

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>with all the changes in Washington, and it makes a

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>massive difference when you guys share this podcast on social

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>media and also when you write us a five star

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>review and the Center and I will see you back

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>here Friday morning.