Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge Should we break up
Speaker 1: the tech giants, the Democrats big plan for Biden? No
Speaker 1: holds barred, so to speak on Capitol Hill, life next
Speaker 1: to Junkie's Alley here at NYC, and how the Left
Speaker 1: plants ruin your suburb? Buck Sextons, coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence, Make no mistake American Great
Speaker 1: Here a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Former CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, welcome everybody
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. Honored to have you here
Speaker 1: with me as always, My, oh my. We are in
Speaker 1: it now, aren't we. The presidential election getting closer every day,
Speaker 1: and we're actually gonna have to talk about this now.
Speaker 1: The news media has been so busy with their make
Speaker 1: America Miserable Again, campaign, terrifying everyone constantly engaged in all
Speaker 1: kinds of fear mongering, that there's been such a lack
Speaker 1: of focus really on the actual presidential election of the campaigns.
Speaker 1: We will get to all that and more, but first
Speaker 1: I want to talk about what's going on today on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill because this matters a whole lot when it
Speaker 1: comes to the election, and matters a lot when it
Speaker 1: comes to everything in our lives right now that touch
Speaker 1: on the commercial, the political, economic. You have the four
Speaker 1: biggest tech CEOs in the game right now, Sorry Elon,
Speaker 1: note not quite at that. At that same level, you
Speaker 1: have these four tech CEOs Bezos, Musk, Pitchai, and Zuckerberg.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Pizo Cook, See Elon got in my head Bezos, Cook, Pitch,
Speaker 1: I and Zuckerberg, Facebook, Google, Apple, and Amazon respectively. And
Speaker 1: for a lot of folks, I understand this. They hear
Speaker 1: all big tech and monopolies and what companies really think
Speaker 1: about this have a bigger influence right now on your life.
Speaker 1: Start started that proposition. I think about my own day
Speaker 1: and how much of what I find is based on Google.
Speaker 1: You know, if I wanted to buy racket strings yesterday
Speaker 1: rights whate went on Google find the best place for rackets,
Speaker 1: and then I ended up saying, well, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: maybe I'll get a better price and get it more
Speaker 1: quickly at Amazons than I go on Amazon. And I'm
Speaker 1: probably gonna go on Facebook when I get my new
Speaker 1: racket strings, and you know, show hey, look at me
Speaker 1: with my new stuff, my new gear out on the court.
Speaker 1: Tennis is a real sport. Don't give me all that
Speaker 1: I know. I know what some of you are thinking.
Speaker 1: I like tennis, so here. You know, at some point
Speaker 1: I'll turn into a golfer and then you can all
Speaker 1: give me crap for that. So we see these companies
Speaker 1: having such a massive, outsized influence on our lives, and
Speaker 1: we also know something else about them. They are as
Speaker 1: left wing as the faculty lounge of PCU Politically Correct University.
Speaker 1: If you haven't seen the movie, I highly recommend it.
Speaker 1: They are absolutely devoted to the evangelizing project of the
Speaker 1: left to make America a more progressive place. At Silicon
Speaker 1: Valley is the only is really the only area of
Speaker 1: the country I can think of that I would agree
Speaker 1: is probably more liberal in its culture, more left wing
Speaker 1: in its approach to life than where I am here
Speaker 1: in New York City or even Washington, DC. So Silicon
Speaker 1: Valley is swampier than the swamp. And they are influencing
Speaker 1: so many things in your day to day lines. And
Speaker 1: we could talk about all the different ways that they
Speaker 1: are stifling competition and how they're acting as as monopolies
Speaker 1: now and especially for the information platforms like Facebook and Google.
Speaker 1: You know, with Apple, Apples a little harder for me
Speaker 1: because there's a lot of people that make a whole
Speaker 1: lot of electronics products, and I, look, I tell you
Speaker 1: my biases. I share them with you openly, so you
Speaker 1: know where I'm coming from. I like Apple products a
Speaker 1: whole lot. I think they're pretty great, So that one
Speaker 1: for me. But they'll they'll talk about the app store
Speaker 1: and what gets elevated. Look, I know, for example, I'm
Speaker 1: in the podcast business as well as the radio business,
Speaker 1: and what gets shown to people in the Apple Store
Speaker 1: when it comes to politics matters a whole lot. Discovery
Speaker 1: is critical. So Apple has its own little version of
Speaker 1: Google within its ecosystem for what podcasts get listened to.
Speaker 1: And this is part of why you have so many
Speaker 1: left wing podcasts. You say, this is a crappy podcast
Speaker 1: and this person has no audience outside of their podcast,
Speaker 1: but they are, you know, the top of the Apple
Speaker 1: Store and the Apple one hundred, whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: And they'll say, well, look, this person gets so many downloads,
Speaker 1: but yeah, have they been the featured podcast this whole time?
Speaker 1: And you may say, I don't, I don't podcast that's
Speaker 1: your problem, not my problem. Yeah, but this is all
Speaker 1: about information dissemination. Why do you think the wokeness has
Speaker 1: taken over our culture? Why is the NFL, why is
Speaker 1: the l MLB overrun with wokeness? NBA overrun with this
Speaker 1: virtue signaling left wing anti americanism because of the dominance
Speaker 1: within the culture. How do you get to cultural dominance
Speaker 1: control the means of production, to take this into a
Speaker 1: Marxist lexicon, the means of production of ideas. They know this,
Speaker 1: they understand how important this is. And that's why we've had,
Speaker 1: you know, leaks and people who have come forward, and
Speaker 1: whether it's you know, surreptitiously acquired audio or emails. We
Speaker 1: see that within these big tech conglomerates, the story had
Speaker 1: been for years. Oh it's just an algorithm. Oh it
Speaker 1: doesn't there's there's no bias in any of this. That's
Speaker 1: a lie. That's a lie. Right. We know that there
Speaker 1: are people working in these companies who are able to
Speaker 1: subjectively put their thumb on the scale for one side,
Speaker 1: and they do, and it is always for the Libs.
Speaker 1: This is why conservatives get banned. This is why conservatives
Speaker 1: are constantly fighting with these platforms. This is why I've
Speaker 1: said we've got to build our own platforms, at least
Speaker 1: as a safe haven from this nonsense, at least as
Speaker 1: an alternative. No, this is why I'm on Parlor as
Speaker 1: well as on Twitter. This is why I'm telling you Instagram, Facebook.
Speaker 1: One thing I've learned in business is that if you're gonna,
Speaker 1: if you're gonna have boss, a boss, it's great to have,
Speaker 1: or it's better if you can to have many bosses,
Speaker 1: certainly in the media business, because then you're reaching more audience.
Speaker 1: But also no one has total control over what you're doing.
Speaker 1: And the same thing is true about us as individuals
Speaker 1: with our social media. Better to have multiple platforms going
Speaker 1: all at once so that you can share your ideas.
Speaker 1: Any single one of you listening to this show right
Speaker 1: now has the ability to put forward a meme or
Speaker 1: you know, just write a quote on your Facebook page
Speaker 1: that could go viral and that could end up and
Speaker 1: you've seen this happen retweeted by the President of the
Speaker 1: United States to eighty million followers. Any single person listening
Speaker 1: to this and this is true. I'm not you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not just blowing smoke here. You know, it's true.
Speaker 1: So the power of these platforms is immense. For every
Speaker 1: individual listening to this show a show right now, people
Speaker 1: ask me, they say, hey, Buck, how can I help
Speaker 1: you know? What's one way you can help make awesome
Speaker 1: memes to me? Send them to me? Tell me, hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: share this and I'll say, you know, this is from
Speaker 1: so and so, and we'll put it out there. Any
Speaker 1: One of you can do that if you're so inclined.
Speaker 1: Now I know a lot of you're like Buck. I'm
Speaker 1: actually I got a family and kids, and I got
Speaker 1: things I gotta do. Well, that's why I'm here presenting
Speaker 1: you with content. But if anybody wants to get in
Speaker 1: that game, they can. And it's different than it was
Speaker 1: in the late nineties, where oh, I'm going to start
Speaker 1: a blog and I will have two friends who read it. No,
Speaker 1: the moment you put it out there on this platform,
Speaker 1: it's in the marketplace of ideas. The problem we have
Speaker 1: with the lips is that they are cheating in that
Speaker 1: marketplace constantly, constantly. And now I saw the explanation or
Speaker 1: the testimony of Jeff Bezos, who does have a pretty
Speaker 1: interesting life story, I will say, and to call him
Speaker 1: a success story is obviously a tremendous understatement is the
Speaker 1: richest guy in the world is the richest dude on
Speaker 1: planet Earth. It's pretty amazing when you think about it
Speaker 1: and his company. And I will say this, I I
Speaker 1: think I probably personally buy I don't know, fifty or
Speaker 1: sixty percent of all my all the objects that aren't
Speaker 1: food that I buy probably come to me via Amazon.
Speaker 1: So that that influences you're thinking, Right, it's so convenient.
Speaker 1: It shows up so quickly. You know, I type in,
Speaker 1: you know, give me the thing. I'm a bob that
Speaker 1: I need to do the thing over the over the fridge,
Speaker 1: and they're like, oh, you mean the whosa what's it?
Speaker 1: And I'm like, yes, that's perfect, Thank you Amazon. And
Speaker 1: it shows up at my door sometimes in a day.
Speaker 1: It's that you get addicted to that convenience. Just like
Speaker 1: we've become addicted to the convenience of Google. We've become
Speaker 1: addicted to the convenience of Amazon, and the constant connectivity
Speaker 1: of Facebook, and just the seamlessness and the and the
Speaker 1: and the reliability of the software and the hardware from Apple.
Speaker 1: Right now, there's a lot of good these companies have
Speaker 1: done in terms of their products, which is why they
Speaker 1: are really the most powerful companies on planet Earth right now.
Speaker 1: They are. I don't think you can find a company
Speaker 1: that is more powerful than these tech companies, and that's
Speaker 1: reflected not just in how wealthy the people running them
Speaker 1: have become, but in their influence in the culture. But
Speaker 1: here's the thing. The libs obviously don't want the same
Speaker 1: kinds of regulations that exist elsewhere in media. They want
Speaker 1: the playing field tilted toward them, and so they've adopted
Speaker 1: this line, which is a lie that all the platforms
Speaker 1: don't have a bias, and that has become increasingly difficult.
Speaker 1: That's now just gas lighting. It's very challenging for them
Speaker 1: to continue with that because we turn around and say, well,
Speaker 1: what about this case. What about this case? Donald Trump
Speaker 1: Junior just got suspended from Twitter for retweeting something that's
Speaker 1: completely in the current news discourse about hydroxy chloroquine. How
Speaker 1: do we change this? How does this shift? Oh, they
Speaker 1: promise us that they will make it better. That they
Speaker 1: promise us that they will make this better, and then
Speaker 1: they don't. Right, Oh, no, there's no bias. They're just
Speaker 1: this is just what we have gone through this cycle.
Speaker 1: Let's learn from history gone through this cycle with the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, and we were late figuring it out as
Speaker 1: a people, and the American people, those who have their
Speaker 1: eyes open that abcnbccbs CNN, New York Times, washing posts,
Speaker 1: these are propaganda outlets for the Democrat Party. They might
Speaker 1: as well be paid by the DNC. That is the truth.
Speaker 1: And here we are having this hearing on Capitol Hill
Speaker 1: where we'll be told, oh, there's no bias, Oh this
Speaker 1: is all just fine, my friends. We're going into an
Speaker 1: election cycle right now. We're going into the height of
Speaker 1: the presidential election right now, and there are so many
Speaker 1: ways that these tech giants and Google and Facebook when
Speaker 1: it comes to the politics, are the most obvious in this,
Speaker 1: although Amazon on the Washington Post and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of a lot of stuff that goes on there too,
Speaker 1: But there are so many ways that they will be
Speaker 1: able to skew perception and they only have to do
Speaker 1: it just a little bit. Just the smallest hand on
Speaker 1: the dial at Google could perhaps turn a state blue.
Speaker 1: And we know this because the Democrats have also been
Speaker 1: telling us for years now because they're insane that with
Speaker 1: Russia collusion, Trump effectively stole the election that was what
Speaker 1: a hundred thousand dollars of Facebook ads by a bunch
Speaker 1: of Russians and acting like Bozo's online. That's right, that's
Speaker 1: that is the story that, Oh they cheated in the election,
Speaker 1: Oh they were going to change the election. What do
Speaker 1: you think has more influence a random person spending one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars on Facebook or you know this random
Speaker 1: group I should say in Russia spending that money, which
Speaker 1: is the equivalent of pouring a cup of water from
Speaker 1: your sink in the ocean and saying you've changed the temperature.
Speaker 1: Or the company that is in charge of all of
Speaker 1: the ad accounts, all of what goes you know that
Speaker 1: can shadow band, that can do all these different use
Speaker 1: all these tools, and you have no transparency, no accountability
Speaker 1: for this whatsoever, and is clearly devoted top to bottom
Speaker 1: with the ethos of its as a company, with the
Speaker 1: political leanings of the people that work there. It couldn't
Speaker 1: be any more obvious. These are effectively organs of the
Speaker 1: Biden campaign right now. They can't be open about that
Speaker 1: because then then they'd be too clearly in the crosshairs
Speaker 1: for regulations. So what do they do? They say, Oh,
Speaker 1: we're not a publisher, We're a platform. Does the phone
Speaker 1: company drop calls that come from, you know, a Republican fundraisers, No,
Speaker 1: they do not. The phone company is a platform. Facebook
Speaker 1: is not a platform. Facebook is a mega publisher. Google
Speaker 1: is not just a search engine. Google is an editorial machine.
Speaker 1: Everything it does there's an editorial bent, an editorial decision made.
Speaker 1: They should be subject to the same rules and regulations
Speaker 1: as any other media and information entity, or we should
Speaker 1: just get rid of all regulation altogether and stop pretending
Speaker 1: that there's any need for regulation. That's where we are
Speaker 1: on all this, my friends, that's the truth. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was quite a day yesterday on Capitol Hill. We
Speaker 1: were just talking about the testimony from these tech giants,
Speaker 1: and look, I think there's gonna be a lot of noise,
Speaker 1: a lot of oh gosh, you know, I'm a Republican.
Speaker 1: Or now we're gonna we're gonna do this, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna that. Trump is tweeting out that he's gonna do
Speaker 1: executive orders on that. Now, that may be helpful, but
Speaker 1: remember that executive order could end up lasting a total
Speaker 1: of oh I don't know four months last depends on
Speaker 1: when Trump does it. So we do need to remember
Speaker 1: that executive orders are less durable even than legislation. So
Speaker 1: with that in mind, I can't get that excited about
Speaker 1: people saying, Oh, we're gonna we're gonna regulate or we'll see.
Speaker 1: It's starting to be a little bit like Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: with I'm gonna get to the bottom a Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be on I'm gonna be on Fox News tonight.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get to the bottom of it, Lindsay Graham says,
Speaker 1: and then we go, Okay, Lindsay, We're still waiting for that.
Speaker 1: How's that coming along? You know? It's great for the
Speaker 1: Fox News talking points though. So then there's the hearings
Speaker 1: that happened yesterday with Attorney General Bar and this stuff
Speaker 1: was incredible. We talked about some of it yesterday. I
Speaker 1: played a little bit of it for you yesterday. But
Speaker 1: the biggest thing you have to remember is just how
Speaker 1: utterly and completely disrespectful they were to the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: And look, I know there's partisanship here, and I'm not
Speaker 1: expecting them to be nice to Bar. I'm not expecting
Speaker 1: them to do anything that would show that they are
Speaker 1: favorable toward him. But I do think, I do think
Speaker 1: that it's fair to expect that they treat him the same,
Speaker 1: with the same basic dignity that they would treat anyone
Speaker 1: who shows up there. And if you thought that, you
Speaker 1: would be wrong. I mean, here's the bar as a
Speaker 1: senior citizen. Okay, the guy's doing this just because he
Speaker 1: wants to help his country. He is rich, he is established,
Speaker 1: he's already been attorney general. This is actually who you
Speaker 1: want if you want the equivalent of Cincinnatus, the Roman
Speaker 1: general for attorney general, you want someone like Bill bar
Speaker 1: because he shows up and he's like, I'm just going
Speaker 1: to do the job the way it should be done.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not angling for my deal with Simon
Speaker 1: and Schuster. I'm not looking to get a Fox News
Speaker 1: contract as soon as ORIENTO see an end contractor or
Speaker 1: MSNBC whatever. I'm not looking to do that as soon
Speaker 1: as I get out of here. I'm looking to the
Speaker 1: best attorney general possible. And he's very effective. So for
Speaker 1: those two reasons, he's honorable and he's effective. Democrats loathe him,
Speaker 1: I mean, they absolutely hate him at to the point
Speaker 1: where it's almost comical. I mean it's it's it's nasty,
Speaker 1: but it's funny at the same time. Here is the
Speaker 1: Attorney General. It isn't known that when somebody, when a
Speaker 1: witness says, can I have a break, It's like when
Speaker 1: a kid is in school and says, you know, I
Speaker 1: have I have I need a bathroom break. You know,
Speaker 1: imagine if you're in school and the teacher you say,
Speaker 1: I got to go to the bathroom. The teacher goes, no,
Speaker 1: not allowed. That's pretty much what happened to the Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the United States yesterday. Uh for for a moment.
Speaker 1: I mean, they did relent, they did reulette. I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to overstate this play clib one. Mister Sherman, could
Speaker 1: we take a five minute Dean is recognized? Could we
Speaker 1: take a five minute break? Mister Cherman, No, that's a
Speaker 1: common Curtis Dean is a airman of every witness. I
Speaker 1: waited forty five. We're an hour for you this morning.
Speaker 1: I haven't had lunch. I'd like to take a five
Speaker 1: minute break. Mister Attorney General. We are almost finished. We're
Speaker 1: gonna be finishing in a few minutes. Otherwise you can,
Speaker 1: we can certainly take a break, but you're real class.
Speaker 1: Yeah class after that, yes, after this, if you still,
Speaker 1: we'll have a break. No, he wants a break now now,
Speaker 1: and you just you just missed rudeness. I think we're
Speaker 1: seeing it on display. Let's let the Attorney General have
Speaker 1: a break. Committee will stand in recess it now. Thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you, mister Sherman. Hello, he says, you're a real
Speaker 1: class act. Yeah, Jerry Nadler a k A. The worst,
Speaker 1: the worst, but at least at least in the end
Speaker 1: he did have to relent and let the Attorney General
Speaker 1: get some water and use the rest them after hours
Speaker 1: of shouting at him like morons, because that's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats in Congress are. Thanks for listening to The bus
Speaker 1: Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh,
Speaker 1: just how rude were they to the second time Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the United States Bill Barr. Here's a fantastic
Speaker 1: supercut to let you know that all Democrats think they
Speaker 1: have to say is I reclaim my time. I reclaim
Speaker 1: my time, and they get to make any accusation they
Speaker 1: want badger a witness, not let them respond and just
Speaker 1: keep on going. I mean it was it was appalling,
Speaker 1: kind of hilarious because it was so appalling. Here they
Speaker 1: go plick clip four. Didn't it correct? No? No, what
Speaker 1: is correct? Is that? What is corrected? On February tenth, Monday,
Speaker 1: I gave instructions as to what mcan answering your question.
Speaker 1: Let him answer, reclaiming my time. We're on February tenth, sir.
Speaker 1: On February tenth, reclaiming my time, Sir, reclaiming my time,
Speaker 1: and I know you don't want to answer. You are wrong, mister.
Speaker 1: Turns out that was he found the investigation, but being
Speaker 1: allociated properly, he said. He found reclaiming my time without
Speaker 1: political bias, he said he and in April, reclaiming my
Speaker 1: time is reclaiming my time, not reclaiming my time without
Speaker 1: any remedy. I'm reclaiming my time. When people resist law enforcement,
Speaker 1: they're not peace claiming my time. I'm surprised at your
Speaker 1: lack of respect. Gentleman. Does not have the time. I
Speaker 1: don't want the time. I just want I want the
Speaker 1: Attorney General to be able to have enough time to
Speaker 1: respond to accusations and questions. Ask him and you guys
Speaker 1: not cut him off where you want? Is there relevant?
Speaker 1: But do you have anything you want to say in
Speaker 1: response to these speeches that have been given by the
Speaker 1: other side, and then you've been cut off. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: let's on Lafayette. On Lafayette. The gentleman's time is expired.
Speaker 1: The gentleman's time is expired. They didn't give him any time.
Speaker 1: They didn't give any They're just you know, you, you're
Speaker 1: an evil trader or Russia collusion, Trump's dowards blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: What do you think about that? Oh? I reclaim my time. Oh,
Speaker 1: I reclaim my time. That's what they said that, that's
Speaker 1: what they were doing. It was. It was like being
Speaker 1: back on CNN back in the day. Oh excuse me,
Speaker 1: a conservative commentator box section. So Trump has a supporter
Speaker 1: who tweeted this racist thing. What do you think about
Speaker 1: this racist thing? Well, let's go over to Van Jones.
Speaker 1: Van Jones talk to us about why the Republicans are
Speaker 1: so racist an evil. I'm like wall wait, Oh, I thought, oh,
Speaker 1: we're in the trust tree. I thought we were in
Speaker 1: the nest. No, we were not. We were at CNN.
Speaker 1: We were at CNN. It was definitely it was the
Speaker 1: opposite of the trust Tree, whatever that is. But there
Speaker 1: were some important moments too. I mean the thing that
Speaker 1: everybody was focused on was just how deranged the Democrats,
Speaker 1: where that's not new. It may make it into the news,
Speaker 1: but it's not new. There were two really how powerful
Speaker 1: moments from the hearing that go right to the heart
Speaker 1: of what's happening in this country every day and why
Speaker 1: the Democrats cannot be trusted and the Democrats need to
Speaker 1: be kept away from power everything. We need to do
Speaker 1: everything possible to keep them away from power. This is
Speaker 1: when Bill Barr finally did get to speak for a moment.
Speaker 1: He talked about the protests, quote unquote, which your riots,
Speaker 1: which your assaults, which your domestic terrorism going on in
Speaker 1: Seattle and Portland. I mean, remember they're they're blinding police officers.
Speaker 1: Now you're not seeing that blast that out all over
Speaker 1: the news all of the news organizations. They're trying to
Speaker 1: intentionally blind cops. If someone tried to blind me and
Speaker 1: I had to kill them to stop them from doing it,
Speaker 1: I would not feel badly. I'm not going to go
Speaker 1: blind because someone is a moron who thinks they're finding
Speaker 1: some revolution against the United States. If I had to
Speaker 1: use lethal force to defend myself from someone blinding me
Speaker 1: with a laser, I would do that, and I would
Speaker 1: not I would not feel guilty about it for a second.
Speaker 1: In fact, I'd say I'm glad I had the ability
Speaker 1: to use the lethal force, and I would And if
Speaker 1: if they took me into court for it, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: not going blind. They are blinding police officers on purpose,
Speaker 1: trying to and they may have already succeeded. Think about
Speaker 1: what I would be like for you, for your family. Oh,
Speaker 1: but they're just protesters. That's a lie. And the scum
Speaker 1: at CNN and MSNBC who play these games mostly peaceful protests.
Speaker 1: We don't like the violence, but you know, we're not
Speaker 1: going to condemn it. They should be ashamed of themselves,
Speaker 1: but they have no shame. They are, by their very nature,
Speaker 1: by their character, shameless. Attorney General Barr was able to
Speaker 1: at least tell the country what's happening in Portland, specifically
Speaker 1: play clip two. In the wake of George Floyd's death,
Speaker 1: violent rioters and anarchists have hijacked legitimate protests. Toreak senseless
Speaker 1: havoc and destruction on innocent victims are in situation in Portland.
Speaker 1: As a telling an example, every night for the past
Speaker 1: two months of hundreds of rioters have laid siege to
Speaker 1: the federal courthouse and other nearby federal property. The rioters
Speaker 1: have come equipped for fight, armed with powerful slingshots, tasers, sledgehammers, saws, knives, rifles,
Speaker 1: and explosive devices. Inside the courthouse are relatively small number
Speaker 1: of federal law enforcement personnel charged with the defensive mission
Speaker 1: to protect the courthouse. What unfolds nightly around the courthouse
Speaker 1: cannot reasonably be called protest. It is, by any objective measure,
Speaker 1: an assault on the government of the United States. As
Speaker 1: elected officials of the federal government, every member of this committee,
Speaker 1: regardless of your political views or your feelings about the
Speaker 1: Trump administerisration, should condemn violence against federal officers and the
Speaker 1: destruction of federal property. What occurs nightly around the courthouse
Speaker 1: cannot be reasonably called a protest by any objective measure.
Speaker 1: It is an assault on the government of the United States.
Speaker 1: You see the left, the Libs, the Democrats, they think
Speaker 1: that they have a right to do that. They believe
Speaker 1: that they have the right to assault the government of
Speaker 1: the United States when Donald Trump is the president. I
Speaker 1: think this is fully justified. They've been doing this in
Speaker 1: different ways for years, and there is no principle that
Speaker 1: they are trying to protect in any of this. This
Speaker 1: is about the relentless pursuit of power. Attorney General making
Speaker 1: this point so that everybody could hear these are not protests.
Speaker 1: We are in an era now where you have more
Speaker 1: ability than ever to hear you, to have your voice heard,
Speaker 1: to spread your information, to spread your message. Now, of
Speaker 1: course we're talking about tech giants and the way that
Speaker 1: they restrict that they aren't restricted for libs. You want
Speaker 1: to be a crazy antifalloon and America should be socialist
Speaker 1: and we should all listen to AOC abolish the police,
Speaker 1: green new deal. You want to be that monumentally stupid,
Speaker 1: you can go for it, spreading a lot of place
Speaker 1: of all your buddies, click like and share it around
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. What's with the attacking a courthouse?
Speaker 1: Why do that? Because it is a transfer of power.
Speaker 1: It changes the perception that the federal government under Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is a legitimate governing body. That's what they are doing.
Speaker 1: That is the purpose of the theatrics here and the
Speaker 1: reason for the violence, the reason for the destruction. And
Speaker 1: I'm glad the Attorney General was able to tell America
Speaker 1: when he wasn't being interrupted to tell America about that.
Speaker 1: That was that's telling people who are talking about these
Speaker 1: protests and oh the moms in Portland defending people. It's
Speaker 1: very straightforward. Protesters who don't do a legal crap and
Speaker 1: try to hurt people or destroy things can do you know,
Speaker 1: no one stops them. Oh, I'm sorry, I take that back.
Speaker 1: If they're protesting unconstitutional lockdowns, then Governor as will send
Speaker 1: cops in and then then they'll be threatened and face
Speaker 1: you know, because their First Amendment rights don't count. You
Speaker 1: gotta keep locking down forever. But if you're a Democrat stooge,
Speaker 1: then yeah, of course you can do whatever you want.
Speaker 1: You get out there, protests, be as loud as you want.
Speaker 1: But the laws the law. It either applies to all
Speaker 1: of us or it doesn't. You either get in trouble
Speaker 1: for defacing federal property or no one should get in
Speaker 1: trouble for defacing federal property. Right. I don't want to
Speaker 1: live in a two tiered justice system. That was the
Speaker 1: primary message at the start of the hearing going into
Speaker 1: the hearing from the turn in general about why he
Speaker 1: even took the job. We live in a two tiered
Speaker 1: justice system now in this country. We need to set
Speaker 1: it right. Libs are so sanctimonious and delusional and emotionally
Speaker 1: unstable and self righteous that they really think the laws
Speaker 1: don't apply to them. Now when it comes to protest, now,
Speaker 1: when it comes to abuse of power, now, when it
Speaker 1: comes to corruption, Oh no, it doesn't apply to them.
Speaker 1: Just like we see with the lockdowns. You wear a
Speaker 1: mask and social distance and don't have a job or else,
Speaker 1: but you know, fancy lives. They'll break the rules and
Speaker 1: when and how they see fit and expect there to
Speaker 1: be no consequences to it. But there was really in
Speaker 1: some ways and equally, and you could argue even more
Speaker 1: troubling exchange that goes to the heart of all of this.
Speaker 1: And I often tell you about the mass psychosis, the
Speaker 1: delusion of the Democrats in the Trump era and how
Speaker 1: just incredibly, really unhinged and vicious they are about this.
Speaker 1: And I'm somebody who I've grown up around Democrats. I
Speaker 1: live in a Democrats city, I have seen this change.
Speaker 1: There is nothing like what we are in the middle
Speaker 1: of now. There is nothing like this before in my
Speaker 1: life lifetime, certainly in American politics, where if you vote Republican,
Speaker 1: if you support the President of the United States, you
Speaker 1: are a target for destruction and humiliation. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: if you're a public person or not. They they just
Speaker 1: can't help themselves. They have truly lost it, and there's
Speaker 1: no sense overriding sense of honor, of decency, of kindness.
Speaker 1: I know that word people laugh at when you say
Speaker 1: it in the context of politics, but you know, I
Speaker 1: go hard at the Democrats at the left on Twitter,
Speaker 1: and I do make fun of politicians, but I do
Speaker 1: have limits. First of all, I don't go after civilians yet,
Speaker 1: I'm not mocking people and trying to humiliate individuals ever,
Speaker 1: and I also try to keep it on the issues.
Speaker 1: I also try to keep it about what the arguments are,
Speaker 1: you know, and not going I certainly don't do the
Speaker 1: things that lives always do, you know, make fun of
Speaker 1: people's appearance, make fun of their name, make fun of
Speaker 1: their family. I mean, the Libs do this constantly, constantly,
Speaker 1: It's it's just a part of their political culture. Now
Speaker 1: you know, you're you're ugly, You're you're the worst. You know,
Speaker 1: no one likes you. I mean, they really try to
Speaker 1: go after people in a way that is disgusting. And
Speaker 1: you might say, well, that's just social media and people
Speaker 1: act like mediacs on it, but no, it's it's representative
Speaker 1: of the way that that political party views its mission
Speaker 1: and its goal, which is scorched earth, stop at nothing.
Speaker 1: And there's no sense of mercy, of mercy, of fair play,
Speaker 1: of decency that comes into this. Whatever it takes to win.
Speaker 1: Whoever gets destroyed, we don't care. That is their approach,
Speaker 1: which is why Donald Trump was such a breast of
Speaker 1: fresh air for so many of us, because he came
Speaker 1: in and said, no, no, I'm not gonna let you
Speaker 1: do this, not gonna let you humiliate me, not gonna
Speaker 1: bend the knee like some whimp like Mitt Romney, not
Speaker 1: gonna do it. Here is in exchange between the Attorney
Speaker 1: General and a sitting member of Congress. Now let's understand
Speaker 1: this is a member of Congress from from Georgia. Let's
Speaker 1: understand that their theory is that the Attorney General interceded
Speaker 1: on behalf of Roger Stone because He's Trump's buddy. That's
Speaker 1: the theory, and they all, they all believe this. The
Speaker 1: Attorney General the entirety of the roger Stone prosecution, which
Speaker 1: only happened because of a sham investigation. But you know
Speaker 1: he did, he did mislead the investigators. The Attorney General
Speaker 1: said it was a righteous prosecution. You cannot lie to investigators.
Speaker 1: The problem was just why would you send this guy
Speaker 1: to prison for twice as long as anybody else under
Speaker 1: the same circumstances. He wasn't getting He wasn't getting special
Speaker 1: positive treatment within the DOJ because of his ties to Trump.
Speaker 1: He was getting special negative treatment. They were making an
Speaker 1: example out of him, out of roger Stone, because of
Speaker 1: his action Trump. And look at the way this exchange
Speaker 1: actually happens, or listen to the way it does when
Speaker 1: the Attorney General just asks a question that just a normal, rational,
Speaker 1: reasonable person would want an answer to play clip eight.
Speaker 1: Do you think the American people don't understand that you
Speaker 1: were carrying out trumps I was not. I had not
Speaker 1: discussed my sentencing recommendation with anyone at the White House
Speaker 1: or anyone or anyone outside wanted you to do. And
Speaker 1: that's what you did. No, attorney, let me ask you,
Speaker 1: do you think it's fair. Do you think it is
Speaker 1: fair for a sixty seven year old man reclaim may
Speaker 1: be sent to prison for seven to nine years? It
Speaker 1: was in accordance with the sentencing you know, it was
Speaker 1: not notice this congressman. Yeah, that's right. It was in
Speaker 1: accordance with Yeah, send Rogers, don't. I don't give a
Speaker 1: crap what the guidelines say. And as the Attorney General
Speaker 1: points out, actually worked and it was way above the guidelines.
Speaker 1: For the record, this guy a questioning him was not impressive,
Speaker 1: to say, the least one of the one of the
Speaker 1: one of the least least capable of all the questioners
Speaker 1: among the Democrats, which is really saying something. I mean
Speaker 1: he got Eric Swalwell with his IQ probably somewhere in
Speaker 1: the mid eighties. Uh. You look at this issue and
Speaker 1: you say, how could anyone think that sending Roger Stone,
Speaker 1: a sixty seven year old man to prison for seven
Speaker 1: to nine years for a non violent crime where there's
Speaker 1: really no it's a process crime. He didn't It didn't
Speaker 1: stop anything from happening, It didn't hurt anyone, It didn't
Speaker 1: do anything. It was essentially just showing disrespect to the
Speaker 1: Muller probe, which while technically you can't do, I totally
Speaker 1: understand why he did it. I wouldn't have lied, but
Speaker 1: I would have told them to blank themselves whenever I
Speaker 1: got the opportunity. But the Democrats won't even they won't
Speaker 1: even admit that. No, they wanted. They wanted Roger Stone
Speaker 1: to go to prison for up to nine years federal prison.
Speaker 1: Very good chance that he might end up dying in
Speaker 1: federal prison if that happened, because of what Because he
Speaker 1: lied to the Muller investigators about something Bill Clinton lot
Speaker 1: under oath, he didn't even get charge. Folks, right, we
Speaker 1: all know that. I mean, the double standards here are
Speaker 1: so blaring that it's just it's stunning. Let's see, there's
Speaker 1: a viciousness. There is a sadism that Democrats have brought
Speaker 1: into politics. Now. They want people to suffer. They want
Speaker 1: you to be ruined because they are so ruthless in
Speaker 1: their desire for power, because they've rejected let's just be honest,
Speaker 1: I mean, they've they've rejected traditional Judaeo Christian morality. They've
Speaker 1: rejected the vision of the Founders, They've rejected all of
Speaker 1: these anchors to decency, commonality, and unity because they want
Speaker 1: to be in charge. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh this is great.
Speaker 1: I didn't know this. Producer Nick told me this just
Speaker 1: now and we checked it out. It's true. So that
Speaker 1: was Hank Johnson who wanted Roger Stone to go to
Speaker 1: prison for perhaps the rest of his natural life, which
Speaker 1: is just a stupid and vicious position, but that's one
Speaker 1: the Democrats hold. Hank Johnson's also the guy who said
Speaker 1: during a House Armed Services Committee meeting as he was
Speaker 1: questioning Admiral Robert Willard, this was some years some years back.
Speaker 1: I think it was maybe twenty, I don't know it was,
Speaker 1: it was some years ago, and he said, uh, this
Speaker 1: is Hank Johnson my fear. This is about the impact
Speaker 1: of US troops on the island of Guam. Hank Johnson asked, quote,
Speaker 1: my fear is that the whole island will become so
Speaker 1: overpopulated that it will tip over and capsize. He said,
Speaker 1: that's the guy who's asking me, that's the guy who's
Speaker 1: asking the Attorney General questions going going, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: in a battle of wits, Hank Johnson and Bill Barr
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. After sixty two nights of
Speaker 1: terrorizing downtown Portland, there seems to be a deal that
Speaker 1: is struck between the governor in Oregon and the acting
Speaker 1: head of DHS, Secretary of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf. They've
Speaker 1: been talking and they've reached a quote joint plan to
Speaker 1: end the violent activity in Portland directed at federal properties
Speaker 1: and law enforcement officers. That plan, this is all up
Speaker 1: on Fox News, includes the robust presence of Oregon State
Speaker 1: Police in downtown Portland. State and local law enforcement will
Speaker 1: begin securing properties and streets, especially those surrounding federal properties
Speaker 1: that have been under nightly attack for the past two months.
Speaker 1: Oregon State Police will coordinate with federal protect Service officers
Speaker 1: to ensure all federal facilities remain protected and secure. Oh So,
Speaker 1: after the deployment of federal officers and the humiliation, the
Speaker 1: national humiliation that these governors and mayors have received because
Speaker 1: of there's finally some news coverage of all of this.
Speaker 1: After that happens. Now, finally cops are going to be allowed.
Speaker 1: State and local police will be allowed to do their
Speaker 1: jobs and protect federal buildings in Portland. I gotta say,
Speaker 1: I'm not convinced that they will do the job. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think they'll probably make a show of it for
Speaker 1: a while. But these lunatic leftists, they live there. They're
Speaker 1: not going anywhere. They're not going to just disappear entirely.
Speaker 1: They'll wait until the heat passes a little bit, so
Speaker 1: to speak, and then they'll start doing this crap again.
Speaker 1: We got an election, folks, you think that now the
Speaker 1: Democrat left is going to I gotta stop saying it's
Speaker 1: just the Democrats, because the Democrats are the left interchangeable.
Speaker 1: Let's use these words interchangeably. Right, It's like tomato tomato,
Speaker 1: Democrat and leftist. And again there's a little there's a
Speaker 1: little bit of distinction that we could talk about, but
Speaker 1: it's pretty darn close. So yeah, Governor Kate Brown comes
Speaker 1: out here after my discussion with Vice President Pence and others.
Speaker 1: This was on Twitter. The federal government has agreed to
Speaker 1: withdraw federal officers from Poortland. They've acted as an occupying
Speaker 1: force and brought violence. Wow, what a lunatic starting tomorrow,
Speaker 1: all Customs and Border Protection and Ice officers will leave
Speaker 1: downtown Portland. Our local Oregon State Police officers will be
Speaker 1: downtown to protect Oregonians right to free speech and keep
Speaker 1: the peace. Let's center the Black Lives Matter movements demands
Speaker 1: for racial justice and political police accountability. It's time for
Speaker 1: bold action to reform police practices. What a disgraceful moron
Speaker 1: she is. Yeah, it's all about it's about justice for
Speaker 1: George Floyd. That's where they want to burn down a
Speaker 1: federal courthouse. The guy that killed George Floyd is probably
Speaker 1: spending the rest of his life in prison. What does
Speaker 1: this always just get forgotten in this whole conversation. No
Speaker 1: one said it was okay. Everyone said it was horrible.
Speaker 1: And he's very likely. I mean he's, you know, innocent
Speaker 1: until proven guilty in a court of law, but he's
Speaker 1: very likely he spend the rest of his life in prison.
Speaker 1: They act like this was something, you know, the way
Speaker 1: the left talks about this. Where the Democrats discuss this issue,
Speaker 1: it says, though we all said, yeah, you know what
Speaker 1: that officer did, it's that standard procedure. Sorry, the guys,
Speaker 1: the guys going to live the rest of his life
Speaker 1: in a cell most likely. So when they say they
Speaker 1: want justice, now we could talk about how does it ever?
Speaker 1: Is there really such a thing when someone is murdered,
Speaker 1: when someone is killed? Is there such a thing as justice?
Speaker 1: That's another conversation, But it's not a particular injustice in
Speaker 1: this case through the system. But Governor Kate Brown doesn't
Speaker 1: doesn't think any of that, doesn't care about any of that.
Speaker 1: She is in an abominable disgrace. This is the problem
Speaker 1: in an Oregon. I've been in Oregon. I've actually been
Speaker 1: to Portlands. Such a beautiful state and such cool people,
Speaker 1: such good food, there's all. There's a lot to love.
Speaker 1: There's a lot to love about. The coastline is amazing
Speaker 1: in Oregon. I've never been in Pacific Northwest. The coastline
Speaker 1: there is so beautiful, so much to like about it.
Speaker 1: The politics there though, I mean, look, the looney left
Speaker 1: is running the show. The looney left is running the show.
Speaker 1: So we'll see what happens now that they're Oh and
Speaker 1: my other favorite thing is that they were This was great.
Speaker 1: I mean, favorite is in It's just it's just another
Speaker 1: example of how outrageous the whole thing is. Uh, they had.
Speaker 1: They were threatening to sue. Uh, this is real that
Speaker 1: they were. They were threatening to sue the federal government
Speaker 1: for an unauthorized fence. That's right, and on all authorized fence.
Speaker 1: You can't make this stuff up. They wanted to every
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes, they were going to be sending the federal
Speaker 1: government of bill Portland's finding fens fifty dollars every fifteen
Speaker 1: minutes for a fence surrounding a courthouse. That's right. These
Speaker 1: little petty totalitarian nutsos, these whacka dus, and I'm talking
Speaker 1: about the people running the government there. They were going
Speaker 1: to start setting the federal government a bill because they
Speaker 1: had to build a fence to protect federal property, and
Speaker 1: they didn't get like the permitting process or something. I
Speaker 1: got news for the governor of Oregon and the mayor
Speaker 1: Ted Wheeler, a little antifa aran boy. I got news
Speaker 1: for them. Oregon and Portland are in fact under the
Speaker 1: jurisdiction of the United States federal government. Yeah, I know,
Speaker 1: I know, that's kind of a shock. This was coming
Speaker 1: from the Portland City Council. Same thank, same idea. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, Portland finds the fens two hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: so far over the fence outside the courthouse. That's right,
Speaker 1: it's going to try to squeeze the federal Look, it's
Speaker 1: all politics, right, squeeze the federal government for money. Portland
Speaker 1: spends two hundred thousand dollars every every thirty seconds paying
Speaker 1: you know, bureaucrats who are entirely useless. So it's not
Speaker 1: like this is a big, a big chunk of change
Speaker 1: in the grand scheme of things. But it just shows
Speaker 1: you what the attitude is. It shows you the attitude is.
Speaker 1: After all we've been through, after all we've learned, we
Speaker 1: end up having a situation here where sure enough, sure enough,
Speaker 1: we can't expect Democrats to take action that should be nonpartisan. Right,
Speaker 1: This is not about safe streets, protecting federal courthouses. This
Speaker 1: is not supposed to be an issue of left or right.
Speaker 1: But increasingly we see that they just don't care. Bill
Speaker 1: Barr asked them yesterday. We don't have this audio, but
Speaker 1: Bill Barr asked them yesterday, why is it that only
Speaker 1: Republicans seem to be against rioting? And that's a very
Speaker 1: powerful question to ask. Why is it the case that
Speaker 1: only Republicans right now are making a public case against writing.
Speaker 1: I thought we were all supposed to be against rioting.
Speaker 1: I thought we were all supposed to be in favor
Speaker 1: of the rule of law, safety and property rights. I
Speaker 1: know we're not. I I'm not naive. What are you
Speaker 1: The lives are insane, of course, I'm the one who
Speaker 1: tells you every day they're insane. We know this, but
Speaker 1: to see it at this level, it's so brazen. They're
Speaker 1: not even hiding it as the point, right, it used
Speaker 1: to be. This is like when the Democrats would due
Speaker 1: on immigration. It used to be, oh, we want a
Speaker 1: secure border. Two, and then they'd work constantly undermine the border,
Speaker 1: underminde the border, undermine the border, right, Oh, no, we
Speaker 1: want a secure border two. No, no, no no, no, undermine
Speaker 1: the border behind closed doors, behind the scenes, the media
Speaker 1: cheering them on the whole time. Right, But they would say, technically, yeah,
Speaker 1: we want a secure border. Law and order was something
Speaker 1: that they would say, Oh no, we all want safety
Speaker 1: on the streets. And then they promote all these ideas,
Speaker 1: you know, bail reform and so on and so forth,
Speaker 1: all these things that make us less safe. And now
Speaker 1: we've gone to the point where we are less safe.
Speaker 1: And what do they do. Oh, that's right, they just
Speaker 1: they say, yeah, this is the way it is is,
Speaker 1: this is how it happens. This is how the cookie
Speaker 1: crumbles America. Democrats want you to know that you are
Speaker 1: less safe, that the government is not on your side
Speaker 1: unless you will do their bidding. They will not protect
Speaker 1: your rights unless you are a little you know, bleating
Speaker 1: sheep for the left. Then you'll get special rights. Then
Speaker 1: the pandemic doesn't matter anymore. Then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: everything is different. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I said they acted
Speaker 1: like stormtroopers, and they did, and my colleagues have said
Speaker 1: that as well. What is it. I'm a organizer, That's
Speaker 1: how I came into all of this, Chair of the
Speaker 1: California Democratic Party, and peaceful protest is who we are
Speaker 1: and what we do and do. Some other people come
Speaker 1: along and try to disrupts, but you don't send in
Speaker 1: people acting like stormtroopers into the scene and evoking even
Speaker 1: more even more unease and unrest. But he should be
Speaker 1: answering for what he did at Lafayette's Square a disgrace.
Speaker 1: So it's really he was like a blob. He was
Speaker 1: a just a henchman for the President of the United
Speaker 1: States instead of the Attorney General of the United States
Speaker 1: of America. It's like chardonnay, socialist Nancy lives in a
Speaker 1: different dimension or something. I mean, it's definitely not the
Speaker 1: case that you would think she had actually watched that hearing,
Speaker 1: or you'd have to think that she watched it. And
Speaker 1: it's just really really dumb calling the Attorney general a blob. Also,
Speaker 1: is that, I mean, he's an older guy. Is that
Speaker 1: some kind of like knock on his weight? I kind
Speaker 1: of what a heck he is it? You know, as
Speaker 1: I didn't say that they were they were stormtroopers. They
Speaker 1: were acting like stormtroopers. And then I fell asleep in
Speaker 1: my crew detay, and then the staff came and woke
Speaker 1: me up and told me that, oh, miss miss miss Nancy,
Speaker 1: perhaps it's time for a nap. Most powerful elected democrat
Speaker 1: in the country. Folks. There you go, belowsie, yep, saying
Speaker 1: just nonsense about Attorney General Bar. You know what would
Speaker 1: be fun to watch a battle of wits between an
Speaker 1: attorney general Bar. It's just I mean, it would be
Speaker 1: a heavyweight fighting fighting a super featherweight. But nonetheless, it
Speaker 1: would be entertaining. It would be entertaining, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: And I meant that intellectually, not so as a book.
Speaker 1: You don't actually want to see them in a steel
Speaker 1: cage match, No, I'm not. I'm not a lunatic. It's
Speaker 1: the lives who want men and women to fight in MMA.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry men who identify as women to fight women
Speaker 1: in MMA. That's not that's not my position, that's not
Speaker 1: my preferred policy outcome. But I've been telling you that
Speaker 1: there's a deterioration in the agreement and understanding that we
Speaker 1: all have about some very core issues in society, things
Speaker 1: that should not be up for debate or discussion, things
Speaker 1: that we should all agree upon, and Democrats are abandoning
Speaker 1: them increasingly. Well, an example of that is what's happening
Speaker 1: right here. I think I've said on this show several
Speaker 1: times I've talked to you about it, that I saw
Speaker 1: that I saw Heroin use, you know, with a with
Speaker 1: a needle in broad daylight, right next to where I
Speaker 1: live in Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, in New York York City.
Speaker 1: That I saw this actually occur, and I've never seen
Speaker 1: that before in New York in my life. And I've
Speaker 1: seen a lot of things, and I've seen a lot
Speaker 1: of drug use, I've seen a lot of crime. I've
Speaker 1: seen stuff happen. And I mean I used to be
Speaker 1: I used to be out of you know, late night
Speaker 1: party kind of guys when I was like seventeen eighteen
Speaker 1: years old, believed or not. I'd stay out till sometimes
Speaker 1: all night long, but usually two or three o'clock in
Speaker 1: the morning. I'd try to come home. But I never
Speaker 1: really gotten any trouble. I was a good boy, but
Speaker 1: I did see some stuff. And I've never seen broad
Speaker 1: daylight heroin use with somebody who was clearly a junkie.
Speaker 1: I don't know what else to say, clearly a junkie,
Speaker 1: and I saw it. New York Post here in the
Speaker 1: city just did a story on this one about what
Speaker 1: they're calling junkie Alley. And I know you could say
Speaker 1: this is this is oh, this is something that has
Speaker 1: come up in your area, bock. But this is just
Speaker 1: about no. This is indicative. This is symbolic of what
Speaker 1: is happening to major Democrats cities all across these United States.
Speaker 1: They are being ruined. They are ruining these cities, they
Speaker 1: are destroying the biggest urban centers when you have and
Speaker 1: let me just tell you this, the cleanup process of
Speaker 1: Times Square, believe it or not, named for the New
Speaker 1: York Times left wing rag that it has it has become,
Speaker 1: or perhaps it always was and now we just see it,
Speaker 1: but it Times Square was a place when I was
Speaker 1: a kid that you didn't want to go to. There
Speaker 1: were pickpockets everywhere, there were people running all kinds of scams.
Speaker 1: There were drug dealers on the streets, especially you know
Speaker 1: at night, a lot of drug dealers going on, prostitutes
Speaker 1: really well known for street walkers, prostitutes just looking for John's.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was so horrible, unsafe, depressing, criminality rampant,
Speaker 1: and that was in the the heart of the heart
Speaker 1: of New York City. And Juliani came in and was
Speaker 1: like enough of this of this stuff where you know,
Speaker 1: they started shutting down. They had all these and it's amazing.
Speaker 1: I think back and see this. When I was a kid,
Speaker 1: you know, drive through the neighborhood with my parents if
Speaker 1: we had to go to Lincoln Tunne, we get out
Speaker 1: to drive through this area and there were a whole
Speaker 1: stretches that were all these triple X peep shows and
Speaker 1: porno stores and all this stuff, and there were street
Speaker 1: wall I mean, it was disgusting. It was just it
Speaker 1: was like the Red Light district of Amsterdam without any
Speaker 1: of the bureaucratic oversight in cleanliness. And it's just nasty
Speaker 1: the whole thing. And I got fixed. Now, well, I
Speaker 1: should say until recently. If you come to New York
Speaker 1: and I always tell people, don't go to Times Square.
Speaker 1: That's the worst part of the city. It's the biggest,
Speaker 1: crappiest chain restaurants, the you know, the most amount of
Speaker 1: people that are trying to rip off tourists. They love
Speaker 1: to do this thing where they they ask you your
Speaker 1: name and they write it on a CD and then
Speaker 1: and then they hand it to you and say, that'll
Speaker 1: be twenty dollars. That's my CD. Why well, you said
Speaker 1: your name, you want it right, I mean this, give
Speaker 1: me twenty dollars, give me fifty dollars. And if you don't,
Speaker 1: they get up in your face. They love to do
Speaker 1: that to tourists who are uncomfortable here, don't know what's
Speaker 1: going on. And I hate it whenever that whenever this happens.
Speaker 1: But you know, the city generally speaking in Midtown at
Speaker 1: Times Square turned into like Disney World. You know it
Speaker 1: was clean. You got red Lobster, you got the Gap,
Speaker 1: you got movie theaters and lots of police presents. That's
Speaker 1: gone away. All those things are shut down. There's been
Speaker 1: looting and riding in the streets, as we all know.
Speaker 1: And now you have people who are laid out all
Speaker 1: the street, I mean actually lying on the on the
Speaker 1: street and injecting themselves with hypodermic needles full of heroin
Speaker 1: and broad daylight, while people are trying to go about
Speaker 1: their lives around them, while people are walking their kids
Speaker 1: to get some fresh air. We know they're not in school.
Speaker 1: Um yeah, that's that's now New York. What better example
Speaker 1: could you have of the the decay of Democrat cities?
Speaker 1: Then here in the single largest concentration of Democrat political
Speaker 1: power and wealth and media media muscle, and you can't
Speaker 1: even I can't even go out. I cannot go and
Speaker 1: walk to Lula the French bulldog, who's adorable by the way,
Speaker 1: and if you follow me on Instagram you will see her.
Speaker 1: So there's a big good set up there. But I
Speaker 1: cannot go outside and walk the dog now and not
Speaker 1: have there be a very serious possibility that I have
Speaker 1: to cross the street because of a clearly deranged person
Speaker 1: walking toward me in broad daylight. And you said, how
Speaker 1: do you know the derange? Because they're screaming curses at
Speaker 1: the sky and yelling racial epithets and being just complete lunatics,
Speaker 1: and they look like they haven't bathed in about six months,
Speaker 1: and their clothing is all torn, and they might have
Speaker 1: a Heroin syringe sticking out of their arm. So I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure. I mean, I'm not trying to judge a
Speaker 1: book by its cover, so to speak, but I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure there's a person you don't want to walk very
Speaker 1: close to as they're flailing their arms and cursing and
Speaker 1: this you see this all the time now. Oh and
Speaker 1: Deblasio has spent over a billion dollars, actually had his
Speaker 1: wife running a program that spent over one point two
Speaker 1: billion dollars on mental health, assisting mental health. Mental health
Speaker 1: in the city is worse than it's ever been for everybody,
Speaker 1: particularly though, for those who are truly mentally ill and
Speaker 1: need the most help. This is what you get when
Speaker 1: you put democrats in charge. Friends, Let's all remember that.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Oh, here's another great example of
Speaker 1: how Democrats now abandoned things that for a long time
Speaker 1: they pretended they wanted to achieve as well, but just
Speaker 1: use different methods to achieve it. You border security, for example,
Speaker 1: safe streets, property rights, these kinds of things, protecting federal courthouses,
Speaker 1: protecting public property. Here you have AOC who is really
Speaker 1: the the center of the Democrat Party's orthodox you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, she is a perfect encapsulation of a lot
Speaker 1: of the superficialities the Democrats are are desperate to sort
Speaker 1: of celebrate and advance. You know, she's young, and she's female,
Speaker 1: and she's she's Latina, and all these things that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are just that is what matters to them, not
Speaker 1: the content of a person's character or how intelligent or
Speaker 1: how how you know, worthwhile they are in their career
Speaker 1: field or whatever. Maybe no, no no, no, no, it's it's this.
Speaker 1: It's the diversity obsession. Added to this really socialist. I
Speaker 1: was gonna say radical socialist, but isn't all socialism kind
Speaker 1: of radical? But she's perhaps a radical socialist mindset. You
Speaker 1: know that they She just is the perfect encapsulation of
Speaker 1: what the modern Democrat party is all about, what it
Speaker 1: believes in. It's kind of a brainless chance ing of
Speaker 1: socialist slogans added to a lot of virtue signaling and
Speaker 1: a complete rejection of the knowledge that we've acquired as
Speaker 1: a society about what works and what makes for things
Speaker 1: that are objectively good. There are some things in society
Speaker 1: that it's not about what color you are, what gender
Speaker 1: you are, what religion you are. They're just objectively good
Speaker 1: for everybody, right, and we want that forever. We want
Speaker 1: everybody to be safe on the streets, everyone to be
Speaker 1: safe in their homes. We want everyone to have their
Speaker 1: property rights respected, and everybody to be treated fairly under
Speaker 1: the law. These are all these are things that are
Speaker 1: supposed to hold us all together. They're the foundational concepts
Speaker 1: of our society. Democrats are attacking those and until recently
Speaker 1: you could argue that sovereignty, which is not possible without
Speaker 1: a secure border, is something that Democrats also at least
Speaker 1: give lip service to supporting. But now they've abandoned that
Speaker 1: as well. Now sovereignty is journalism. Sovereignty is xenophobia. Here's
Speaker 1: an AOC telling you where the Democrat Party is now
Speaker 1: on all of this play eleven. One of the big
Speaker 1: issues that we have in our country is that the
Speaker 1: amount of racist I have ice cream, by the way,
Speaker 1: but the amount you know, with the amount of xenophobia
Speaker 1: that we're seeing, especially this administration, there's so much language
Speaker 1: that's disrespecting undocumented people when the fact of the matter
Speaker 1: is they're the ones who These are the families and
Speaker 1: the individuals that are making sure that we're fed. They're
Speaker 1: often taking care of our children, they are often making
Speaker 1: sure that our workplaces in our homes are sanitary. And
Speaker 1: so we cannot go on with kind of these xenophobic
Speaker 1: narratives that undocumented people are somehow wrong. Undocumented people are
Speaker 1: somehow wrong. Yes, you notice how they That's why they
Speaker 1: want to call it documented because it's a little bit
Speaker 1: heavier of a lift to say that we shouldn't consider
Speaker 1: illegal immigration to be wrong because of the very term
Speaker 1: you'd say. So, breaking the law is not wrong, m
Speaker 1: breaking the law is not wrong. I'm i gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I'm wondering at what point the left's incoherence will actually
Speaker 1: start to turn people who are Democrats but still have
Speaker 1: their faculties of reason away from the party at least
Speaker 1: to being independents. How could you be associated affiliated with this?
Speaker 1: I think you're part of a movement that is intellectually consistent,
Speaker 1: intellectually worthwhile. The whole thing is really quite quite stunning,
Speaker 1: quite absurd, quite absurd, not nearly as absurd as the
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful mechanism. I meant to talk about this before.
Speaker 1: I just want to get into this, Representative Jordan. We're
Speaker 1: not going to go too deep into the hearings again,
Speaker 1: We've talked about that a lot, but Representative Jim Jordan
Speaker 1: spoke about the peaceful protests line that's out there, and
Speaker 1: I wanted to get this into the show. Pliliff thirteen.
Speaker 1: Our peaceful protests violent, Mister Attorney General. No do peaceful
Speaker 1: protests destroy businesses? No? Do peaceful protest injured officers? No?
Speaker 1: Do peaceful protests attacks civilians? No? Do peaceful protests burn
Speaker 1: down buildings? No? I was you know the video we played,
Speaker 1: it's hard to watch. It's really hard to watch to
Speaker 1: see that happening in our great country. But there was
Speaker 1: what one the start of it was almost laughable, where
Speaker 1: you have the reporters saying, as a building is burning
Speaker 1: behind him, it's not generally speaking, an unruly protest, it's
Speaker 1: mostly just a protest. I mean, it's almost laughable when
Speaker 1: you have the reporters saying, I guess, I guess he's saying,
Speaker 1: it's not a fire, it's just a burning building. I
Speaker 1: guess he's saying, it's a peaceful burning building. That really
Speaker 1: has become I think, in many ways the best distillation
Speaker 1: of exactly what the Democrat Party has become. The Democrat
Speaker 1: Party and its media lackeys. I know we always go
Speaker 1: back and forth, or the Democrat lackeys of the media.
Speaker 1: I think it goes either way. You can make the
Speaker 1: case either way. They are really exemplified now by having
Speaker 1: reporters stand in front of burning buildings, focusing, focusing their attention,
Speaker 1: editorializing with their focus on how most of the people
Speaker 1: weren't the ones lighting this building on fire. It's really
Speaker 1: important to establish that when they will also they spend
Speaker 1: how much time trying to impune and undermine all Trump
Speaker 1: supporters by saying that a bunch of tiki torch carrying
Speaker 1: morons in Charlottesville were somehow symbolic of the entire Trump movement,
Speaker 1: and then they lied to Trump supporting them, which he
Speaker 1: did not. He did not do lie. One of the
Speaker 1: biggest lies they've told about Trump of all, that's a
Speaker 1: huge one, and it's one that they relied on for
Speaker 1: years to you know, people that don't pay very close attention,
Speaker 1: that have lives to live. And I know, I don't
Speaker 1: knock people that aren't spending their all their time in
Speaker 1: this this matrix of political propaganda, right I people have lives.
Speaker 1: I always tell you, listen to this show and you know,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe watch like Tucker and then call it a day.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's it, right, I mean, that's that's what
Speaker 1: you get. I think that's all you need. But nonetheless, nonetheless,
Speaker 1: I I can't help but be furious, frustrated, and you know,
Speaker 1: you reach this point where you just wonder how it
Speaker 1: sounds a little bit like how dare you, sir? Another?
Speaker 1: But it's like, how do these people how do they
Speaker 1: feel good about themselves in the media when they do this,
Speaker 1: when they lie in this way? How How could they
Speaker 1: think that this was, you know, a reasonable position for them?
Speaker 1: How could they think that this isn't They're not a
Speaker 1: part of the problem. Well, it all depends on what
Speaker 1: your goal is. Make an omelet, you gotta break a
Speaker 1: few eggs. If you're a Democrat. To elect Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: you gotta burn down a few federal courthouses, apparently, And
Speaker 1: it's all part of the destroy to destroy the country,
Speaker 1: be a an insurgency. Forget about a campaign of unity
Speaker 1: and uplift and good ideas. Joe Biden doesn't have any
Speaker 1: of that. I'm Joe Biden. I'm here. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: talk real loud and look like any moment now might
Speaker 1: just just fall asleep for a bit. It's been a
Speaker 1: long day. You know. There's corn pop. I said, Hey, man, hey,
Speaker 1: corn pop. Has it been buddy, It's been you know.
Speaker 1: Here I am seven little chipmunks sitting on a branch,
Speaker 1: seeing a lot of acorns on Joe Biden's ranch. Step
Speaker 1: into my office. Joe Biden supposed to fix all that.
Speaker 1: It's supposed to make it all better, but not until
Speaker 1: he wins. They're not even gonna talk about anything else, really,
Speaker 1: because right now Joe Biden is just a placeholder. There
Speaker 1: is misery, and then there is something else. That is
Speaker 1: the choice they are forcing upon the country. That is
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do. They're making the country feel
Speaker 1: like it's future is bleak and that things are going
Speaker 1: terribly right now. And I don't just mean, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: we don't have a workers need higher wages or the
Speaker 1: usual Democrats up. I'm saying they want you to think
Speaker 1: you're gonna die if Joe Biden does not win the election.
Speaker 1: They're gonna die from COVID or maybe you're gonna die
Speaker 1: from riots that turn violent. I don't know, it could
Speaker 1: be either, but that's the perception they want you to have.
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz said this and he absolutely nailed it. Blake
Speaker 1: clip fourteen, And I'll tell you the fundamental choice here
Speaker 1: is do we want people working or not. What you incentivize,
Speaker 1: you get more of. What the Democrats want is they
Speaker 1: want to incentivize they want to pay people not to
Speaker 1: work because they want as many people not working as
Speaker 1: possible Between now an election day. Our objective should be
Speaker 1: maximizing the rewards for working and getting people back in
Speaker 1: the workforce. And I believe the election in November is
Speaker 1: going to turn on that question. If we're back at work,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wins and Republicans have a good election but
Speaker 1: if the Democrats succeed, they're objective. They want tens of
Speaker 1: millions of people at home alone, unemployed, broke and ticked
Speaker 1: off because they think that's how they elect Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: And that is really cynical and a bad outcome. Yes,
Speaker 1: it is cynical and a bad outcome, but that is
Speaker 1: what they're doing. That is what they want. That is
Speaker 1: the reality that we are facing. Now. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, speaking
Speaker 1: of Democrat plans to make things worse for people. There
Speaker 1: is the project of the Obama administration affirmatively furthering fair housing.
Speaker 1: All right, that is the project of the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: We all remember this on the short version of what
Speaker 1: this would be is a usage of the federal government
Speaker 1: to through zoning laws and regulations to make sure that
Speaker 1: they are pushing for public housing. We call it projects.
Speaker 1: Here in New York, at least, we used to public
Speaker 1: housing to be set up in suburbs, high density public housing,
Speaker 1: so so moving a large structure that will be a
Speaker 1: predominantly people who are going to be either getting Section
Speaker 1: Aid vouchers or are in either subsidized or free housing,
Speaker 1: depending on what their income is and to move those
Speaker 1: into the suburbs. Now, look, a lot of people need help,
Speaker 1: I get it, you know. And this is not about
Speaker 1: saying why why would anybody, you know, why would anybody
Speaker 1: want to try to promote a better life for people
Speaker 1: who are going to be living in public housing than
Speaker 1: what they have in a lot of the crime, the
Speaker 1: crime filled neighborhoods where you tend to have in urban
Speaker 1: areas public housing. But we also know that there is
Speaker 1: a public Housing Police Authority, for example in New York,
Speaker 1: just for public housing because there's such a concentration of
Speaker 1: crime that occurs in public housing units here. That's just
Speaker 1: a fact. This is just what happens. And you also
Speaker 1: know that public housing, if you live near it, can
Speaker 1: be incredibly damaging. And this is just the market speaking.
Speaker 1: People can say what do they want? It can be
Speaker 1: incredibly damaging to property values. People tend to not and
Speaker 1: again this were democrats, you know, they like to push
Speaker 1: these policies as long as doesn't affect them. They want
Speaker 1: you if you live out in the summer, in the
Speaker 1: suburbs or even pretty close to what will be rural areas,
Speaker 1: they want a big public housing project. Right, you know,
Speaker 1: in your neighborhood, and then the additional strain and resources
Speaker 1: needed for it in your school system. And that's what
Speaker 1: they want. They want to make sure that they are
Speaker 1: moving that out into the suburbs. Now, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna sell this right now. This is similar to
Speaker 1: some of the policies that are that Deblasio in New York,
Speaker 1: I don't know what it is in other cities pushes
Speaker 1: for having a SRO single room occupancy hotels where people
Speaker 1: which are just known to be places where there's a
Speaker 1: lot of drug use and a lot of crime going on,
Speaker 1: and it's you know, they can get zoned for them,
Speaker 1: but for people that can't afford, that can't that won't
Speaker 1: get at least that no landlord will rent to them.
Speaker 1: They want these SROs where you just rent a room
Speaker 1: by the day, and you know, they're they're obviously going
Speaker 1: to be places that you see a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of people with a tremendous amount of problems showing up.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's not going to live next to them, okay.
Speaker 1: And this is where this is where the fraudulence of
Speaker 1: the Democrats comes to the forefront once again. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: the rich lives, you know, the same way that they
Speaker 1: want to talk about how your school district. Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, you can't have a charter school option and
Speaker 1: your school district, you know, really you should have a
Speaker 1: forced greater diversity agenda in your school wherever your school is.
Speaker 1: That it's not allowed to just be people from the community.
Speaker 1: They want to bring people from the poorest parts of
Speaker 1: the city and make sure there's our poorest part of
Speaker 1: your county and make sure they're in your school, but
Speaker 1: not in the democrats own school district. Now that they
Speaker 1: don't want that, right, The politicians who push this always
Speaker 1: reject it when it's in their backyard. The same thing
Speaker 1: here with these affirmatively further and fair housing regulations. They
Speaker 1: do this because they want to say it. See, Republicans
Speaker 1: are being racist because they don't want large public housing
Speaker 1: projects put in the middle of the suburbs when people
Speaker 1: have moved to the suburbs for less housing density and
Speaker 1: less crime. That's one of the big and a better
Speaker 1: school system. Well, if you're going to build huge remember
Speaker 1: this is the government intruding on the market saying we're
Speaker 1: going to build a large, a large housing project in
Speaker 1: your neighborhood. It's not that some developers said, yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a market for this, people want to live here. It's no,
Speaker 1: we're going to park this here. As the government, we're
Speaker 1: going to change the zoning regulations that say this is
Speaker 1: where it needs to be. You've got more strained on
Speaker 1: your schools, the likelihood of rising crime, and certainly more
Speaker 1: housing density, which we all know now too in the
Speaker 1: era of COVID is a big thing. Well, I bring
Speaker 1: it up because the Democrats have been wanting to do
Speaker 1: this for a long time. Donald Trump just tweeted out
Speaker 1: around lunchtime today. I'm happy to inform all the people
Speaker 1: living in their living their suburban lifestyle dream, that you
Speaker 1: will no longer, the President says, You're no longer be
Speaker 1: bothered or financially hurt by having low income housing built
Speaker 1: in your neighborhood. Your housing prices will go up based
Speaker 1: on the market, and crime will go down. I have
Speaker 1: rescinded the Obama Biden affirmatively furthering fair housing rule enjoy.
Speaker 1: So there you go, the President taking another action here.
Speaker 1: Housing should be based on the market and based on
Speaker 1: individual choices. It should not be the federal government doing this.
Speaker 1: Social engineering, because you know what happens if you create
Speaker 1: greater housing density and bring more crime to a suburb,
Speaker 1: people will leave that suburb, go to another suburb, and
Speaker 1: it's it's just keeps happen. It just keeps happening. Right,
Speaker 1: instead of looking at why suburbs that are doing well,
Speaker 1: not all them do, some of them have a lot
Speaker 1: of crime. But instead of looking at why a suburb
Speaker 1: is doing well and trying to replicate that elsewhere, they figure,
Speaker 1: let's take the problems that we know existing cities and
Speaker 1: have for decades and make it much worse. You know
Speaker 1: what another thing is housing project can never go up
Speaker 1: in value, never go up in value, doesn't go up
Speaker 1: in value when the government builds low income housing. That's
Speaker 1: what it is, always in forever. So you know what
Speaker 1: that What does that mean? How does that help the
Speaker 1: surrounding neighborhood. You know, you've effectively created an artificial drag
Speaker 1: on property. So people, you know what they want to do.
Speaker 1: They want to leave, and the cycle continues and it continues.
Speaker 1: But Democrat they want to pull other people into that
Speaker 1: cycle as long as it's not rich Democrat donors and people.
Speaker 1: Let go on CNN and make lots of money they
Speaker 1: don't have to deal with that. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Will
Speaker 1: we mugo or not? That is one of many questions
Speaker 1: I have for our next guest, our main man Ned Ryan,
Speaker 1: founder of American Majority. He knows the political fire like
Speaker 1: the back of his hand, and he joins us now
Speaker 1: to tell us what's what mister ned How are you doing? Buddy?
Speaker 1: Good to be back with you block. Yeah. I don't
Speaker 1: know if I know all things, but maybe I can
Speaker 1: illuminate on some issues. I just wanted to do a
Speaker 1: little quick aside here be congrats to your dad who
Speaker 1: got the Presidential Medal of Freedom last week. That's that's
Speaker 1: some pretty baller stuff. Yeah, no, I appreciate you saying
Speaker 1: something is pretty pretty amazing. I tell people, in the
Speaker 1: entire history of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, there have
Speaker 1: been only two track and field athletes that have received it,
Speaker 1: Jesse Owens and Jim Ryan. And further that there's only
Speaker 1: seven people that have won an Olympic medal and the
Speaker 1: Presidential Medal of Freedom. So it was. It was just
Speaker 1: an amazing day to be there to watch, you know,
Speaker 1: President Trump, you know, really acknowledge my dad put the
Speaker 1: Presidential Medal of Freedom on him. He even caught me
Speaker 1: up last minute, by the way, bucause we're walking into
Speaker 1: the room. The President looked at my sister me and said, hey,
Speaker 1: do you do do you guys want to say something
Speaker 1: about your dad during the ceremony. I'm like, sure, I'd
Speaker 1: love to. And so that was. That was a really
Speaker 1: nice touch about a president be able to say a
Speaker 1: few things about my dad. But true, truly a great man,
Speaker 1: not only for his Olympic and running career and his
Speaker 1: congressional career, but we could use a lot more Jim
Speaker 1: Ryans in this world for his honesty and his decency.
Speaker 1: And I say, you know, I tell people nobility, this
Speaker 1: is truly somebody that is worthy of emulation. Absolutely well,
Speaker 1: God bless and the congratulations again. Now let's now let's
Speaker 1: crush them lives. So tell me what's going on here
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill from your perspective with these tech giants. Here,
Speaker 1: here's my problem. I told this, I told this wonderful
Speaker 1: and highly esteemed audience that I love everything that I
Speaker 1: think I need to say about why the tech companies
Speaker 1: are a problem. The part of this I want to
Speaker 1: talk to you about is what are we really gonna do?
Speaker 1: And I do have a somewhat I wouldn't a cynical
Speaker 1: quite yeah, maybe jaded point of view on this where
Speaker 1: it feels like we're gonna say, oh, they got a
Speaker 1: lot of bias, and oh, you know that's not good,
Speaker 1: and there'll be some Republicans that give gaseous speeches on
Speaker 1: this in the Congress and then nothing happens. You think
Speaker 1: it might be another way, And if it could be
Speaker 1: another way, how could it go? Well, there can be
Speaker 1: another way. I think you're right. I mean, I'm for
Speaker 1: all of the above. They are definitely, in their current form,
Speaker 1: the tech oligarchy is a threat to the American republic right.
Speaker 1: It's a threat to freedom of speech, free flow of information,
Speaker 1: their ability to manipulate that information leads to results and elections,
Speaker 1: all of these things. It's a very dangerous thing. And
Speaker 1: yet you're right. I mean, we hear nothing but talk
Speaker 1: talk talk from Republicans and I'm for all of the
Speaker 1: above and dealing with these tech companies. Section two thirty
Speaker 1: removed that exemption. If that works antitrust suits. You know,
Speaker 1: how did Facebook and Google end up between the two
Speaker 1: of them having three hundred companies? If that's when not monopoly?
Speaker 1: What is? But you know, I wrote an interesting piece
Speaker 1: on this last fall in which I want to go
Speaker 1: after their business model. You know, we can do the
Speaker 1: antitrust stop, we can remove the two thirty exemption, but
Speaker 1: I want to go after their business model. And give
Speaker 1: me a few seconds to explain this. If you go
Speaker 1: back to the nineteen ninety two indopt Goo versus i
Speaker 1: RS Commissioner, it was a rare case in which it
Speaker 1: was nine nothing unanimous decision and Harry Blackman, liberal judge,
Speaker 1: and Clarence Thomas all agreed on this issue. And the
Speaker 1: real issue was what do you do with intangible listed
Speaker 1: intangible assets? Well, you have to capitalize them. You can't
Speaker 1: deduct them anymore. And so I tell people, what does
Speaker 1: it come down to when you have Google and Amazon
Speaker 1: and Facebook ads. Their ads are all about building customer lists,
Speaker 1: and one of the definitions of an listed intangible asset
Speaker 1: is a customer list database. So if you look at
Speaker 1: how those ads are being used, they're being used for
Speaker 1: customer acquisition. Well, what people are able to do now
Speaker 1: is deduct them, not realize them. And so I tell
Speaker 1: people go back and look at this piece. And again
Speaker 1: I would encourage people go to American Greatness and look
Speaker 1: at this. At September of last year, the question being
Speaker 1: this and this is how you box them into a
Speaker 1: corner book. They want to say, we're just doing ads
Speaker 1: on a public medium. Okay, if you're a public medium,
Speaker 1: that's going to open you up to oversight of the FTC,
Speaker 1: the FCC, all of these things which they are desperate
Speaker 1: to avoid. And if they're not a public medium and
Speaker 1: they are doing customer list acquisition, well they don't. People
Speaker 1: don't get to deduct the money spent on that anymore.
Speaker 1: They have to capitalize long term. It would cut their
Speaker 1: revenue in half overnight. And so all Trump has to
Speaker 1: do on this, I mean literally, this is what it
Speaker 1: comes down to. Book. He has to talk to Secretary Manuchin.
Speaker 1: He has to tell them you will issue a Treasury
Speaker 1: edict and make this issue of customer list building an
Speaker 1: acquisition a Tier one audit issue. And then companies that
Speaker 1: have been deducting these Google and Facebook and Amazon ads
Speaker 1: have to z and amortize over long term, would completely
Speaker 1: change their business model, cut their revenue in half. And
Speaker 1: so I tell people, if you really are that serious
Speaker 1: about it, if Trump really is serious, there are ways
Speaker 1: to do it. And almost overnight, the question is is
Speaker 1: there the political courage and will to actually do something
Speaker 1: about it. So, but cutting their revenue, does that, just
Speaker 1: in your mind mean then that they won't be able
Speaker 1: to maintain that same degree of dominance and competitors will
Speaker 1: then have a real shot. Is that the point or
Speaker 1: is it just to slap him in the face and
Speaker 1: say you don't get to be as Richard Power? No? No No, no,
Speaker 1: no no. It opens up the market to competition. All
Speaker 1: of sudden, people are going to start looking for cheaper
Speaker 1: ways to do this. It actually brings us back. This
Speaker 1: is my issue with a lot of this boo because
Speaker 1: we've gotten into this monopolistic situation. We have not allowed competition.
Speaker 1: We have allowed of consolidation. I mean Google controls what
Speaker 1: ninety percent plus of search engine traffic. We have allowed
Speaker 1: monopoly to develop. And that's why I'm encouraging Republicans and
Speaker 1: actually telling them some of these approaches this is actually
Speaker 1: to promote free market capitalism and competition. We have to
Speaker 1: give more oversight. We have to change the tax regulations.
Speaker 1: We have to go back and look at some of
Speaker 1: these things like bandakco versus irs to say we are
Speaker 1: going to break this apart, to bring back free market competition,
Speaker 1: to allow more competitors to rise up, to give more
Speaker 1: people choices. Because we also know this Buck, and again
Speaker 1: I'm preaching to the choir. Not only are Google and
Speaker 1: Amazon and Facebook monopolistic, their worldview is really monochromatic among them,
Speaker 1: and it's not our world deal, ned Ryan, founder of
Speaker 1: American Majorities, or buddy of ours. We're talking now about
Speaker 1: obviously tech, but I want to switch gears if I
Speaker 1: can with you, Ned to, how is the so we
Speaker 1: call the new and improved Trump Campaign. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: Aaron Parini joining us here in just a moment to
Speaker 1: tell us what they're planning and what's coming up, so
Speaker 1: we can skip that. But just from a messaging and
Speaker 1: ground game up to this point perspective, have you seen
Speaker 1: a real shift, because I know you were. You were
Speaker 1: very vocal and in favor of a changeup at the
Speaker 1: top of the Trump campaign. It happened. Are we moving
Speaker 1: in the right direction? Now because people keep asking me, Bucket,
Speaker 1: think Trump's gonna win, And I look at them and say,
Speaker 1: if I told you I knew, I'd be lying. I mean,
Speaker 1: no one knows, but it feels like a coin toss
Speaker 1: right now. What are you? What are you seeing? Which
Speaker 1: actually is a good thing, buck I mean, first of all,
Speaker 1: I would remind people go back and look at some
Speaker 1: of these polls Midsummer nineteen eighty eight. In fact, Duke Caucus,
Speaker 1: George HW. Bush Duke Caucus was up by seventeen at
Speaker 1: that point. And guess who didn't win in nineteen eighty eight.
Speaker 1: So I tell people polls in the middle of the
Speaker 1: summer really don't mean much. Let's look at these polls
Speaker 1: after the convention, and again look at the likely voter
Speaker 1: polls in the battleground states. And again we all know
Speaker 1: this comes down to seven to ten states. It's trending
Speaker 1: in the right direction. Book. I will say that again,
Speaker 1: the reset on the masterging, the switch of the campaign manager,
Speaker 1: the reset of the entire Florida team who they just
Speaker 1: brought and one of the best ground operatives to run
Speaker 1: the entire states field work, which is fantastic. Let's put
Speaker 1: it this way, do I think Trump is still down? Yes?
Speaker 1: Do I think he's trending in the right direction? Yes?
Speaker 1: And I even told this to him on Friday. I said, Shure,
Speaker 1: you're down on some of the polls, but the polls
Speaker 1: that you're actually doing really well in our voter expectation polls,
Speaker 1: which right now, really before the campaign gets heated up,
Speaker 1: dead heat between Trump and Biden, and by voter expectation polls.
Speaker 1: I say this. People are asked right now the election
Speaker 1: were today July of twenty twenty, who would you vote for? Well,
Speaker 1: I vote for Biden. Well who do you expect to win? Well?
Speaker 1: I think Trump by two. And so the voter expectation
Speaker 1: polls are actually a better indicator, and the summer are
Speaker 1: a better indicator of who will actually win the fall
Speaker 1: elections than straight up voter polls. Really won. How is
Speaker 1: the campaign's digital game? I know this sounds a little
Speaker 1: bit like, you know, kind of campaign walk nerds stuff, folks,
Speaker 1: but but you know, I just we can't have rallies, right,
Speaker 1: We don't have don't have the usual political stuff going
Speaker 1: on that we would all expect that we all saw
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. I mean those Trump rallies. They were
Speaker 1: highly entertaining, they were electric. There was just something going
Speaker 1: on there. It was infectious. When you saw it on TV,
Speaker 1: you just had to watch it. You had to see it.
Speaker 1: Infectious probably the best word to use these days. But
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, It's it's just there was
Speaker 1: so much, there was so much that was going on
Speaker 1: with it. What's the plan to use the digital platforms
Speaker 1: to recreate that? It's what you and I both know.
Speaker 1: It can never be fully recreated, right, getting people into
Speaker 1: a massive arena, with that excitement, with people in clothes,
Speaker 1: just being able to be with each other, You're never
Speaker 1: going to fully recreate that. But I think they're doing
Speaker 1: a solid job. I think that one of the reasons
Speaker 1: we both know this book that you see these democratic
Speaker 1: governors trying to keep the lockdowns, trying to push some
Speaker 1: of this, including those in the mainstream media. They know
Speaker 1: how powerful those rallies were in twenty sixteen, and they're
Speaker 1: doing their best to prevent them happening again in twenty twenty. So,
Speaker 1: you know, solid effort on the social media, but you're
Speaker 1: never going to recreate those in person rallies. And my
Speaker 1: hope is at some point they're going to try and
Speaker 1: get those going again and doing it a little bit
Speaker 1: more sophisticated than the Tulsa one was do you think
Speaker 1: that they finally have been able to turn the tide
Speaker 1: on this law and order issue given what we've seen
Speaker 1: in Seattle and Portland. I was very frustrated you when
Speaker 1: I talked about this on this show with the early
Speaker 1: you know, outreach to the other side, as if that's
Speaker 1: what was really, you know, criminal justice reform was what
Speaker 1: this was really all about. It clearly wasn't. Do you
Speaker 1: think they've turned the tide on that. I think so.
Speaker 1: I mean, the thing that's pretty amazing that we're of
Speaker 1: course not hearing that much about, is this whole issue
Speaker 1: of bringing back law and order, of actually using the
Speaker 1: National Guard, of using some of these federal law enforcement
Speaker 1: agents to go into places like Portland and say we're
Speaker 1: not going to actually let this happened, We're going to enforce,
Speaker 1: we're going to protect act. It actually plays really well
Speaker 1: with the suburban moms, and so it's one of those
Speaker 1: things that Okay, let's take that, let's continue going down
Speaker 1: this path. And I think this is one of the
Speaker 1: powerful messages that that Trump can actually even hit harder
Speaker 1: is to the suburban moms, to this very important critical
Speaker 1: voting block. This will never come to your neighborhood. I'm
Speaker 1: never gonna let this happen to your grocery store. You know,
Speaker 1: on your grocery stores, you're gonna be able to shop
Speaker 1: in safety. I've got you. I will never let this happen.
Speaker 1: So I think he is turning the corner, and I
Speaker 1: tell people there's there's think that's good. That's good to hear.
Speaker 1: I hear you, man Ned. We we gotta leave it
Speaker 1: there for today. But Ned Ryan of American Majority is
Speaker 1: the founder a man Ned. Great to have you. We'll
Speaker 1: talk soon. Thanks, Buck, You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. We can now
Speaker 1: count the weeks instead of months, really if you want to,
Speaker 1: until people cast their votes. In this presidential election, we're
Speaker 1: seeing a lot of early polls. People will tell you
Speaker 1: the polls don't matter, but then they'll show you all
Speaker 1: the polls of what's happening with the Trump campaign. What
Speaker 1: can we expect now that we know we're in this
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen ero where mass gatherings are not happening. I
Speaker 1: want to bring somebody on who can tell us exactly
Speaker 1: what the plan is, and that is Aaron Parini. She
Speaker 1: is the director of Press Communications for the Trump campaign. Aaron,
Speaker 1: thanks so much. Yeah, thanks for having me on. So
Speaker 1: let's let's just start with this. What is the plan
Speaker 1: for the next month or so from the Trump campaign?
Speaker 1: What are we going to see so that this president,
Speaker 1: who was this force of nature in twenty sixteen with
Speaker 1: live rallies, We know the rallies aren't happening right now,
Speaker 1: So how is the message going to get out there?
Speaker 1: And what is the Trump campaign planning to do so
Speaker 1: that people can actually hear why the president should get
Speaker 1: four more years. So there are a couple of things
Speaker 1: we're going to be doing right. One, you will hear
Speaker 1: us hitting Joe Biden because while the media gives him
Speaker 1: a path, and yesterday he took you know, the hard
Speaker 1: hitting questions of why Delaware and you know, how do
Speaker 1: you feel your campaigns going? While the media maybe trying
Speaker 1: to provide ample cover for Joe buying, We're going to
Speaker 1: continue to be out there talking about his record. And
Speaker 1: we have built such an infrastructure in this campaign even
Speaker 1: if we can't do in person rallies. The way that
Speaker 1: are very traditional to the Trump apparatus. What you will
Speaker 1: see is our nightly broadcast across our social media platforms.
Speaker 1: Those have received over one billion with the b views
Speaker 1: since we started them at the end of March, every night,
Speaker 1: seven nights a week. We are also continuing to stay
Speaker 1: aggressive with our field program. We had a national Weekend
Speaker 1: of Action over this last weekend where we made one
Speaker 1: point eight million voter contacts, deployed tens of thousands of volunteers,
Speaker 1: and managed to bring in thousands more volunteers through that weekend.
Speaker 1: So we're at five million doors nationally knocked so far
Speaker 1: and sixty one million voter contacts made by phone. We
Speaker 1: have the app. We've how many different ways to continue
Speaker 1: to get the message out there, but to get it
Speaker 1: directly to the American people without the media bias, without
Speaker 1: the media filter. So we've got different opportunities in different
Speaker 1: ways to do do that and we will continue to do so.
Speaker 1: Now where do people go. They're listeners are saying, okay, wait,
Speaker 1: what's what's seven o'clock social media Trump campaign? Where where
Speaker 1: do they tune in or how do they get involved?
Speaker 1: So the best way is eight pm Eastern time every
Speaker 1: night on all of Team Trump's platforms, So Team Trump Twitter,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Facebook, YouTube, on the app itself, the Trump
Speaker 1: twenty twenty campaign app for both Android and Apple. Every
Speaker 1: night eight pm you can tune in and we have
Speaker 1: original broadcasting every night. Tonight is Wednesday, so you will
Speaker 1: see the Right View, which is our take on the View,
Speaker 1: and it's Laura Trump, Kimberly Gilfoil, and Mercedes Schlap and
Speaker 1: Katrina Pearson talking about the news of the day, what's
Speaker 1: going on in this country and how President Trump is
Speaker 1: fighting while Joe Biden has to fight his record. We're
Speaker 1: out there all the time doing that and it's the
Speaker 1: best way to stay engaged with the campaign. So we're
Speaker 1: speaking Aaron Parini, who is a Trump campaign director of
Speaker 1: press communications. One of the major messages that the campaign
Speaker 1: is going to focus on. I know we could go on.
Speaker 1: This could be a three hour conversation, right, but if
Speaker 1: you were just to give us the what is the
Speaker 1: elevator pitch that we will be hearing from the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign and from the President himself about why he should
Speaker 1: get four more years, why should the American people look
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty has been a tough year for the world,
Speaker 1: not just for America in some ways, why should we
Speaker 1: give Trump four more years. The only person who can
Speaker 1: bring back the booming America and booming economy that we
Speaker 1: saw under President Trump is President Trump. And then we
Speaker 1: can go into hitting Joe Biden. That means Joe Biden
Speaker 1: oversaw the slowest economic recovery since World War Two. We
Speaker 1: saw how he handled the pandemic when they had the
Speaker 1: swine flu. He stopped testing, they stopped reporting cases. And
Speaker 1: this is one thing the media is allowing to happen
Speaker 1: in this country is that they are acting like Joe
Speaker 1: Biden doesn't have a disastrous forty year record to run on.
Speaker 1: He has racially insensitive comments. He has worked to raise
Speaker 1: taxes on the American people, to limit opportunity, to destroy
Speaker 1: the foundation of this country, and he has been one
Speaker 1: of the leading forces in this nation for it to
Speaker 1: try and not be the greatness that it is. President
Speaker 1: Trump said, hey, enough with the government. And one thing
Speaker 1: that people always tend to forget is that the reason
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is president is because of the failures of
Speaker 1: Obama and Biden. That is why Donald J. Trump is president.
Speaker 1: You don't want to go back to that. And so
Speaker 1: we're going to be out there fighting. If it's Joe
Speaker 1: Biden talking about race, if it's talking about the economy,
Speaker 1: whatever it is, we know where his record is and
Speaker 1: we are going to remind people because we know when
Speaker 1: he says build back better, what he is saying is
Speaker 1: we want to get back to where we were already
Speaker 1: under President Trump. But the only person who could do
Speaker 1: that is President Trump. What is the campaign asking for
Speaker 1: or what is our position on debates between President Trump
Speaker 1: and Biden? And do you think that Biden's going to
Speaker 1: show up for debates. Joe Biden has no reason not
Speaker 1: to show up to debates. Why Because he did a
Speaker 1: socially distanced debate against Bernie Sanders during the primary season
Speaker 1: during COVID. He has no reason whatsoever not to show
Speaker 1: up to these debates. And if he doesn't show up,
Speaker 1: it shows what a coward he is and how unfit
Speaker 1: he is to serve. President Trump is ready to debate
Speaker 1: Joe Biden because they've got a contrasting record that they
Speaker 1: can talk about. And let me tell you, get the
Speaker 1: popcorn ready when it happens, because President Trump will absolutely
Speaker 1: embarrassed Joe Biden, because Joe Biden will have to stand
Speaker 1: there without a teleprompter, put together a complete thought and
Speaker 1: try to defend his policies at the same time against
Speaker 1: President Trump, who we have all seen is a formidable debater.
Speaker 1: We are going to pursue these, We are going to
Speaker 1: do our best to make sure these happen. And it's
Speaker 1: really I mean that Joe Biden Camp has no reason
Speaker 1: not to do it. Aaron Courney, director of pressiman Ocations
Speaker 1: for the Trump campaign. Aaron, thanks so much, Good luck
Speaker 1: to you. We'll talk to you soon. Thank you. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio Apple or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts, Liberty, Truth and Great Hair. Feel those
Speaker 1: funky beats. It's time for roll call, all right, roll
Speaker 1: call when we get to hear from all of you
Speaker 1: across the country. And if we really want to hear
Speaker 1: from you, m let's uh, let's make sure that we
Speaker 1: know that we can call in to produce your Mark
Speaker 1: at eight four four nine two eight two five eight
Speaker 1: four four nine hundred buck and we can have producer
Speaker 1: Mark listen to your wonderful voicemails and we'll play them
Speaker 1: on Friday, and we look forward to that no one
Speaker 1: looks forward to as much as producer Mark. Who who
Speaker 1: needs to watch a baseball game and enjoy some delicious
Speaker 1: pizza when they could be listening to voicemails for a
Speaker 1: few hours as additional workder in the week? Am I right,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark? Exactly? Who needs sports when I have voicemails? Exactly?
Speaker 1: M So maybe one of you can call it and
Speaker 1: be like, no, play a ball, you know, just to
Speaker 1: give a little taste of what's what he's missing as
Speaker 1: he's listening to the voicemails. But we do like it
Speaker 1: when you call in and we will play them on
Speaker 1: Friday eight four four nine hundred. Buck Also make sure
Speaker 1: you're going to buck Sexton dot com posting stories there.
Speaker 1: We're working on a store where we're going to sell
Speaker 1: T shirts. I think any day now we're gonna get
Speaker 1: the green light on that. I'll tell you about it.
Speaker 1: It'll be very exciting. Team buck Gear never goes out
Speaker 1: of style. And also Instagram, we're gonna be posting more
Speaker 1: videos stories I just posted at Telula Photo. She looked
Speaker 1: adorable buck Sexton on Instagram. Please do follow me there,
Speaker 1: all right, Jake Bucket Mark, I think the President needs
Speaker 1: to have the Justice Department and act a nationwide protection
Speaker 1: measure against malicious prosecution for cops. What I mean is
Speaker 1: temporarily until the rioting is subdued. Have all cases brought
Speaker 1: against local cops who are implicated in police brutality be
Speaker 1: handled by a special prosecutor appointed by the President. As
Speaker 1: long as local Democrat prosecutors think they can make themselves
Speaker 1: famous by throwing the book at any cop who's just
Speaker 1: trying to do their job, cops will have their hands tied.
Speaker 1: I guarantee those guys who want to get in there
Speaker 1: and stop the madness but don't feel empowered to do
Speaker 1: it on threat of politically motivated prosecution and harassment. Let
Speaker 1: me see, do we think the problem here, my friend, Jake,
Speaker 1: is a jurisdictional issue. The cops are going to fall
Speaker 1: under local law enforcement. It's not going to be a
Speaker 1: federal issue. Could you try to pass a federal law specifically,
Speaker 1: I don't know. You claim that cops are involved in
Speaker 1: interstate commerce or the regulation of interstate commerce by their
Speaker 1: very job, and you get tenuous, some tenuous tie into
Speaker 1: how we could make this a federal issue. But I
Speaker 1: just look, I Jake, I like your idea. I just
Speaker 1: don't know if we could really make this happen. You're
Speaker 1: right about Democrat prosecutors think they can make themselves famous
Speaker 1: by throwing the book at any cop. We know, We've
Speaker 1: seen it. We know this, this is this is happening.
Speaker 1: Speaking of cops, I've been watching this show Bosh on Amazon.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark you ever seen it? I have not no
Speaker 1: pretty good actually be better than I thought it would be.
Speaker 1: But one this is a very little thing. But I
Speaker 1: just keep noticing this because I've spent a fair amount
Speaker 1: of time out in LA in the last few years.
Speaker 1: And the guy who plays the Bosh character, he's like
Speaker 1: this tough, this tough talking cop, and he's got a
Speaker 1: what it looks almost like a Hemp wrist band that
Speaker 1: he wears. You know, it's like a little rope wristband.
Speaker 1: And I see this in LA all the time. Guys
Speaker 1: in LA have a lot of wrist jewelry, risk adornments
Speaker 1: in a coutrement. And if it was like, it's only
Speaker 1: in Los Angeles that I see this. You know, I
Speaker 1: don't mean like the Live Strong. Oh, I guess people
Speaker 1: don't really Lance Armstrong. It's he had a quite a fall.
Speaker 1: But you know what I mean, it's not like that's
Speaker 1: It's just they wear a lot of little beaded jewelry things.
Speaker 1: The guys wear them on their wrists and I mean,
Speaker 1: like the tough cop guy wears an Honor's risk And
Speaker 1: I don't know. You're you've never been Have you been
Speaker 1: out to La recently, producer bar I've been to California recently.
Speaker 1: I think it's just like a surfer kind of thing.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like a surfery thing. That's right. It's
Speaker 1: sort of like a surfery thing, but very unique. I
Speaker 1: don't know, I don't see this anywhere. I don't see
Speaker 1: this anywhere else in the country. Where you have you know,
Speaker 1: men in their forties and fifties who have multiple bracelets on.
Speaker 1: That's that's what you see. There's bracelets. There were there
Speaker 1: were bracelets out there. I don't know. It's interesting. And
Speaker 1: also really fancy white T shirts. You see a lot
Speaker 1: of that in Los Angeles too. You'll go out to
Speaker 1: like a nice restaurant and people will be wearing a
Speaker 1: white T shirt and I'm always like, hmm, that's but
Speaker 1: if you if you show up to a room full
Speaker 1: of people wearing white T shirt with their ristualry in
Speaker 1: La and you, like me, are from the East Coast
Speaker 1: and you wear like a polo shirt and khaki pants.
Speaker 1: Now you look like a guy at the Mutual of
Speaker 1: Omahawk conference from nineteen ninety five. You know, So that's
Speaker 1: the thing, when you know, when in Rome, when in La.
Speaker 1: I get it. I get it, all right. That was
Speaker 1: quite a digression, Mike. Next up here, Hey Buck, I
Speaker 1: discovered your show a few months back. As a conservative
Speaker 1: living in Boston, I'm often outnumbered around here. Your knowledge
Speaker 1: and insight, I've given me great talking points. Do crush
Speaker 1: my lib friends and colleagues, and hear the lamentations of
Speaker 1: their women. Thanks for the fighting the good fight, Hi'll say.
Speaker 1: He didn't say the lamentations of the women thing. I
Speaker 1: added that in because it's a conan the barbarian reference.
Speaker 1: But Mike, I'm so glad to help out my man.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. I love having people out here
Speaker 1: in the Northeast on the East Coast who are outnumbered
Speaker 1: conservatives like me and still fighting the fight doing their things.
Speaker 1: So God bless please spread the word to any of
Speaker 1: your fellow underground conservatives in the Boston area. Gotta say
Speaker 1: I love Ball. There's a certain charm to that place.
Speaker 1: I went there for a wedding a couple of years ago,
Speaker 1: spent the whole weekend there, did the hop Ball and
Speaker 1: hop Off tour and all the all the revolutionary history stuff.
Speaker 1: It's just great and great, great food town too, Nothing
Speaker 1: but respect for Boston food. They really do it right there.
Speaker 1: So but Producer Market's cold, and it's a dem state
Speaker 1: with high taxis, so don't worry. And I can't own guns. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're not going there. We'll go visit exactly exactly. We'll
Speaker 1: go see our friends, our team Buck friends of Boston.
Speaker 1: But the Freedom Hunt is not is not going to
Speaker 1: be moving to Boston anytime, Carol. You know the statues
Speaker 1: are being pulled down, leaving an empty pedestal. My ideas
Speaker 1: to install statues of Biden showing him smelling women's necks,
Speaker 1: bouncing children on his knee, holding a chain in a swimsuit,
Speaker 1: looking for cornpop, just generally being creepy. Maybe a bust
Speaker 1: of his face gaping with mouth gaping. It would be
Speaker 1: a good use of the empty pedestals. Carol, what are
Speaker 1: you trying to give us nightmares. Here, I'm a statue
Speaker 1: of me when I was at the pool and my
Speaker 1: leg hair was blonde and the sun had bleaching. Little
Speaker 1: kids have come. They come touch my leg hair, but
Speaker 1: not in a weird way, in a Joe Biden way. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. They just you know, they just come along
Speaker 1: and touch those leg hairs and kind of prickly like
Speaker 1: a hedgehog. Not really porcupine. Porcupine will stab you with
Speaker 1: those little quails wears or a hedgehog. It's just a
Speaker 1: little rough, a little different, you know. And my chain
Speaker 1: and corn pop was you know, hey, man, you want
Speaker 1: to fight? And I was like, hold on a second.
Speaker 1: Hedgehogs and porcupines and there's time for a nap. There
Speaker 1: you go, there you go. That's uh. I don't think
Speaker 1: they're gonna make statues of Biden anytime soon, though, How
Speaker 1: long before you start seeing a lot of statues of Obama?
Speaker 1: Within this decade, there'll be a lot as there'll be
Speaker 1: statues of Obama popping up all over the place. Oh,
Speaker 1: get ready for that. Statues of Obama gonna happen. I
Speaker 1: don't think they're gonna be stature. He's a hello, which
Speaker 1: makes her so upset. I'm sure what happened to my statue?
Speaker 1: He didn't win, Hillary, you didn't win. It's a part
Speaker 1: of me that every time I make fun of Hillary's like,
Speaker 1: I'm afraid I'm gonna open my closet door. So I
Speaker 1: think she's even like I'm here. You know, she's just ah,
Speaker 1: you get escaper, She's everywhere, She's everywhere, all right. The
Speaker 1: man known as Chopper, he likes to write in and
Speaker 1: we always remember it because his name is Chopper. Book.
Speaker 1: It's not often I have to disagree with you on
Speaker 1: this point, but I think it must be stated. Eric
Speaker 1: Swalwell is not the most famous for the Russian collusion. Lie.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure he's most famous for farting on a
Speaker 1: live TV interview. May seem trivial, but I believe in
Speaker 1: the truth. BS. Thank you for giving people a voice. Well,
Speaker 1: why man, you certainly got to the Chopper with this one,
Speaker 1: So thank you for that. And yes, I do recall
Speaker 1: that there was the great Swalwell flatulence incident of twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen and look happened. You know, I don't I don't
Speaker 1: really make a lot of fun on that because you know,
Speaker 1: I don't make a lot of fun on that because
Speaker 1: it can happen to the best of us. You know,
Speaker 1: one day, you know, I don't know, I do a
Speaker 1: lot of radio things. Canna happen, John Shield Tie Real
Speaker 1: News fan, Oh John, going back in the day here,
Speaker 1: blast femurs, the both of you. Man of Steel always
Speaker 1: calling you out, Producer Mark. Man of Steel was a
Speaker 1: great Superman movie, mainly because it brought Crypton, its story
Speaker 1: and its technology to life in a way never previously
Speaker 1: seen before. Now, as for the other Superman movies, you're
Speaker 1: going you're both too young to know what it was
Speaker 1: like to see Reef be Superman as a kid. Stop
Speaker 1: trying to ruin my childhood. Bring back Movieline Friday and
Speaker 1: Commie Bear please. Um well, here, we could do this
Speaker 1: if you want to try to challenge me with an
Speaker 1: action movie quote and that actually predates Producer Marks times.
Speaker 1: He doesn't remember action movie quote Friday, which we used
Speaker 1: to do in the show, which was a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: Can we can bring it back and replace the voicemails.
Speaker 1: I'm okay with that. Well, yeah, but then we then
Speaker 1: we have to start taking live calls, Producer Mark, because
Speaker 1: that's how No, No, we don't have the capability. Sorry, yeah,
Speaker 1: So what we will do is you can call in
Speaker 1: to producer Mark's favorite voicemail box and you could pose
Speaker 1: an action movie quote there, which would be a succinct
Speaker 1: and useful voicemail for us. There you go. Action movie
Speaker 1: quote Friday is also now rolled into voicemail Friday. And
Speaker 1: as for Commy Bear, I don't know, some people really
Speaker 1: like commy I felt like Commy Bear, you know, was
Speaker 1: a was a among the team Buck universe. Was a
Speaker 1: an acquired taste. But the more the more time pass,
Speaker 1: I still people we haven't I haven't done Commy Bear,
Speaker 1: and I don't know, four years now, five years now,
Speaker 1: people still like, where's Commie Bear? So I guess we
Speaker 1: could bring them back. It'd be a fun thing to do,
Speaker 1: especially for Instagram or all right, all right, all right,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking about it. I'm thinking about it for sure.
Speaker 1: Richard Buck Here in North Carolina, King Cooper has decreed
Speaker 1: that no alcohol can be sold after eleven p When
Speaker 1: did the Chinese flu become prohibition of adult beverages? When
Speaker 1: did these fools get this power? I wish a local
Speaker 1: bar here would open an illegal speakeasy. I'd go get
Speaker 1: a drink and get some to go Chromo chips. Oh
Speaker 1: what do you buy? Cuomo chips? Cuomo chips? Oh? What
Speaker 1: you eat when you're trying to drink some alcohol and
Speaker 1: you have to pretend you're eating food? Why do you
Speaker 1: have to pretend to eat food? Because I say so?
Speaker 1: Why do I say so? Because I'm the governor and
Speaker 1: I like to be in power and in control. What
Speaker 1: do I say this? Because if you're not in control,
Speaker 1: then you know you get it right? That's Cuomo. I
Speaker 1: hoist my mug of adult beverage to salute you and Mark,
Speaker 1: keep your shields high. Richard, thank you so much, and
Speaker 1: we hoist our our mug back at you. My mug
Speaker 1: full of black rifle coffee. We hoist hoisted back at you, Prissa, Mark,
Speaker 1: Are you a coffee drinker? I don't even know. I'm
Speaker 1: not no interesting. My older brother, who is a guy
Speaker 1: who's very healthy and full of energy, he doesn't drink
Speaker 1: coffee either. I just don't even know how that's possible.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm not a healthy or full of energy. I
Speaker 1: just don't like coffee. You're not a tea drinker. You
Speaker 1: don't strike me as kind of guy. I like iced tea. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but like Arizona is not real. That's like no, I
Speaker 1: actually have an iced team maker, Like you'll brew yourself
Speaker 1: team go into a big jug and put some ice
Speaker 1: in it. You know what I got recently? It's a
Speaker 1: game changer. Is one of those make your own seltzer
Speaker 1: at home things. I love it. Oh, I love it.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to name the common brand of it,
Speaker 1: but yes, yes, well maybe that common brand should become
Speaker 1: a sponsor of this show because I use their product
Speaker 1: and love it, so I might I might have to, uh,
Speaker 1: you know what, that's a that would be a fun
Speaker 1: thing to reach out and find out about, because it is,
Speaker 1: in fact the case that I love making mine. I'm
Speaker 1: a carbonated I'm a carbonated beverage kind of guy. Love it,
Speaker 1: just love it. So there we have it. All right.
Speaker 1: Next step we had Richard. Now we got rich Hey Buck. Actually, wait,
Speaker 1: hold on a second. I got to take a quick, quick,
Speaker 1: quick breather. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast, all right. Next up here we
Speaker 1: have rich who writes, hey, Buck de fouch, by way
Speaker 1: of embracing it, masquerade in outdoor settings. Oh, the masquerade
Speaker 1: in outdoor settings has done us a favor in removing
Speaker 1: any doubts about his credibility and motive. It is not
Speaker 1: a coincidence that has pitched veered wildly left. Oh Rich,
Speaker 1: I see what you did there. I also find it
Speaker 1: interesting that the normally anti big pharma crowd is either
Speaker 1: ignoring generic hydroxy chloroquine regiments were oddly dismissing its success
Speaker 1: in the US as well as around the world. Oh,
Speaker 1: we didn't hear the President Trump defended his remember the
Speaker 1: hydroxychloroquine thing yesterday? He actually because people attacked the doctor
Speaker 1: Stella Emanuel. They went after her and said that she's
Speaker 1: like a phony doctor, and she went to medical school
Speaker 1: in Africa, and we're all they were all mocking her
Speaker 1: and tearing her down. And Trump spoke on this and
Speaker 1: here's what he said, Mark play sixteen. I was very
Speaker 1: impressed by her. Now nothing about her. I had never
Speaker 1: seen her before. But certainly you could put her up
Speaker 1: and let her have a voice. So what they did
Speaker 1: is they could down their voice self. They seemed to
Speaker 1: never take down the other side. They only take downs
Speaker 1: conservative voice. This is James And with hydrope, all I
Speaker 1: want to do is save lives, not a pyramids, I
Speaker 1: dropped you or anything else. All I want to do
Speaker 1: is save lives. If we can save lives, that's great. Now.
Speaker 1: One thing we're doing very well unvaccine and very well
Speaker 1: or ver good, so that's very importment. But I happen
Speaker 1: to be a believer in HYDROPTI I used this, I
Speaker 1: had no problem. I happen to be a believer. Many
Speaker 1: many people agree with me. A great test six came
Speaker 1: out from the ports clinic and makes you get very respected.
Speaker 1: We'll see how it is. I hate the audio that
Speaker 1: he gets sometimes in the pool spray, where you have
Speaker 1: the reporters all in the gaggle, all the DC insiders,
Speaker 1: have all the cool terms. They all gather around him,
Speaker 1: especially before he gets on Marine one, and look the
Speaker 1: president saying he believes hydroxy chloroquin. I have not. I've
Speaker 1: never told you that that it works. I don't know
Speaker 1: that it works, and I don't know anyone who also
Speaker 1: knows that it works. We're still figuring this out, and
Speaker 1: I do know that people have lied to you about
Speaker 1: the dangers of it, that's for sure. We're still trying
Speaker 1: to figure out what is true and what is not
Speaker 1: with regard to hydroxy chloroquine. All right back into the
Speaker 1: role call mix here, Austin writes it on Instagram direct message,
Speaker 1: which I appreciate. Austin writes, you are the man. Also
Speaker 1: love your dog. How old is Toulou? Austin. Toulou is
Speaker 1: just about eleven, and she is amazing and she naps
Speaker 1: a lot. She's an old lady, but she still got
Speaker 1: some spunk. She still got fire, you know, especially when
Speaker 1: there's bacon or freshly roasted chicken in the mix. Then
Speaker 1: she gets very excited. It's my parents French bulldog, but
Speaker 1: I've had her for the whole of the pandemic so
Speaker 1: my parents don't have to worry about going outside when
Speaker 1: they don't want to, or going in the you know,
Speaker 1: elevator in the building where they live because there's a
Speaker 1: lot of traffic foot traffic in there. So you know,
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who has to live with the realities of
Speaker 1: trying to keep loved ones safe during this pandemic and
Speaker 1: do everything I can. And this has been a it's
Speaker 1: been a happy situation, and that I've never really had
Speaker 1: a dog that I was taken care of for this
Speaker 1: long before. And she's amazing. I mean, I definitely, I've
Speaker 1: always been a dog person, but I need to have
Speaker 1: a dog in my life, that's for sure. I grew
Speaker 1: up in the Boston Terrier. Boston Terriers are great little dogs.
Speaker 1: And remember I'm in a city, so you gotta go
Speaker 1: with city dogs. Jacqueline to weigh in on on the sandwich debate,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, I must agree with Buck that maybe you
Speaker 1: may be using some live logic in your argument. Is
Speaker 1: this a social construct? Whatever we say is a sandwich?
Speaker 1: It is, I'm a hot dog that identifies as a sandwich.
Speaker 1: Lool in your face producer Mark, in your face from Jacqueline,
Speaker 1: A hot dog is a hot dog, not a sandwich. Wow. Okay.
Speaker 1: Also we'll leave it there. That's it for today, everybody,
Speaker 1: great show has always hope you enjoyed it. Past the Buck,
Speaker 1: Tell a friend, Share that podcast on Spotify, Shields High