WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: Starting Pitcher Rankings, Part Deux! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening. Tee

0:00:30.120 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>dun Yeah yeah. As welcome by ex spun find Rob Say,

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Prancess practice, start ball Ladies and job in yours. With that,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we look at you inside up studio at thirty four.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. Here's Frank Snaffle. I am grand sauce. Mean,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? Breggy? Hey, what's going on? Man? Feeling better

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>now that we're here talk a little Fantasy Baseball pulled

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the story earlier on Fantasy Sports Today was running for

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the bus. He like pulled my calf. I feel like

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>an old man. I'm all banged up, but happy to

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 1>be here with you. Greg. Continuing our starting picture preview

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Part two, Part Part nose you go? What's going on

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with you? Hi? To sleep last night? I slept pretty

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>well last night. Now issues great? I feel I almost

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>started my um my next position ranks, and we're doing

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the outfielders the next two days. It's like almost started that.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that too, but then I did. It's

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>only like a hundred and fifty of them to rank,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always find a way. There's so many

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, there's just so many outfielders. And I got

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the starting pictures done. I saw it. It's true, so

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>all the colors, this guy, it's real. What's the content

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that you need doing my job? So tonight I'll have

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to work on the outfields. I could have done it

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>last night instead of I had a debate to watch,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so I couldn't do it one of those. I mean,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>come on, we can just how about you, uh tell

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>us about your Trevor Bauer rankings, Greg, and then we

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can just have a debate right here on this. As

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out in just a few moments, Trevor Bauer

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>number twenty two on my rankings. Unbelievable. Let's unbelievable that

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there's Trevor Bauer the best Red's picture question we're gonna

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have to answer. Learned anything last year? Greg? We owned him.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We owned him, that we lived through it. Find that

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in much much cheaper, much cheaper for this year. Many back.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I want to hear more in Sunny Gray.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The hey guys will get into you. I want to

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about It's honey as well as and a sleepers

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. First as wells update. Thank you Greg Susman.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I have song Bostocky and we their bff sportscred news updates.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's head over to the NBA breaking news.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Hornets gardener Leak Monk has been suspended indefinitely for violating

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the NBA's antique drug program. Note word on how many

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>games Malik Monk will miss at this point, but he

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has suspended indefinitely, so he will be off the roster

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tonight when the Hornets host the Knicks seven ten pm

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Times. Hornets are getting two points in that matchup,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>two of seven your total. A couple of great games

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>later on tonight you have the Memphis Grizzlies at the

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Houston Rockets. Rockets favored by eleven and a half points

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seven and a half on your total. After that,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the clip first at the Phoenix Suns the

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Clippers seven point favorites two thirty two and a half

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>year total and the nightcap ten forty pm Eastern Time

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>from Utah Boston at UTAW the Jazz five and a

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites to eighteen and a half your total

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in that one. Let's go to the MLB score card here.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Spring training games going on. But the news is J. D.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Davis and m R I revealed Wednesday. No new structural

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>damage per mets GM Brody Van wagon In looks like

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Davis has an avoided significant injury. And Justin Verlander, the

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>astros ace and number three pitcher on Frank Stanfold and

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susten's players starting pitchers list has been scratched Thursday.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Not significant injuries though expected there. And Maria sherf Polva

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tennis star, five time Grand Slam champion has retired from tennis.

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That's it nineteen years. The turney two year old Russian

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>reached number one in the w t A rankings in

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>eight and twenty twelve, but has dropped to in the

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>world the last ranking she was involved in. That's it

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>from Maria Charova and that's it for me with your

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>BFFs sports script news update guys, back to all right,

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot there, sewn. Maria Sharapova to quote book

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of t five time, five time, five time, five time,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>five time Grand Slam Champion, hanging it up, hanging up

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the racket? Is that what they call it? I don't know. Anyway,

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into our starting pitcher preview Part two,

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the show here on the Fantasy BFS,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically getting out our top forty seven starting pitchers, and

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you some sleepers as well as well. You do,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg something like to say as well, But what we

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>also have is a snippet of the NBA tip trill

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>from earlier today, Greg Susman with Daily Rhodo dot COM's

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Drew dink Meyer to talk about one of the players

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that they're focusing on tonight in the NBA b F slate.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to shooting guard here, Drew, and that Raises.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Now do well Marta Rosen, which makes sense because La

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Aldres is not in there tonight, like end, A

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more of that coming your way. But in these

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>games between San Antonio and Dallas, you gotta like Tmarta Rosen. Yeah,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Tmarta Rosen. In the games without LaMarcus Alders this year,

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>his usage rate a shot up to over thirty. The

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>rebounding and the assist rates have have bounced up as well,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and so he's just got a huge opportunity set whenever

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>LaMarcus Aldridge is off the floor. And that's consistent when

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at on a game level basis, or just

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season when they both played in the

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>same game and Aldred just been off the floor, the

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>use of right really skyrockets. So you know, thirty five

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>plus minutes of that tonight against Dallas, a team that

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you know plays fast and is a little bit loose

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>around the defensive side of the ball, a really good

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>price tag on to Marta Rosen. It doesn't look like

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been adjusted for the assumption that Aldridges out price

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>below seven thousand. You should really take advantage of that tonight.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of like the c j MC Collumns

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>situation from the last few nights, where without Damian Lillard,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>c j MC Collins rates explode without LaMarcus soldiers to

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Marta Rosen's rates explode. I don't know if we'll quite

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>get the performances from tomorrow that we've been getting from

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>c J, but I think it's very likely to pay

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>off the six price tag and shout out to Daily

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo Andrew dick Meyer. The guys have been absolutely crushing

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it all season long. From an NFL NBA Dfest perspective,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>also from an NFL Dfest perspective, But right now we're

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in NBA season. We're prepping for Fantasy baseball as well.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But these guys have done a phenomenal job. They gave

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>out Joel Embid the other day, Greg, and he dropped

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a career high forty nine points tonight to Marta Rosen.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>With La Marcus Aldridge out, the usage rate goes up,

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the points per game go up for Demarta Rosen. I

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think it makes a ton of sense de mar de

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Rosian with a Lamargus Aldridge, He's gotta be a lock

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for your lot up. I know Drew also likes Luka

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>doantech Here to night givebout joellan vehicle days ago, as

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you said, Dwelling Bead was your NBA Fantasy Player of

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the night. Thanks for those forty nine points. All right,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get a new starting pitching Part du Part two,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Part dose, and we begin with Claire. I have two, Frank,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>because we did one twenty one yesterday Claire twenty two.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It's power power, let's go. There's no way that you

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>actually want Trevor Bauer and he is a target of yours.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Why not? All right, So tell me why, Greg, I'll

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you why you're wrong. The Trevor Bauer obviously two

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It was awesome last year he was drafted

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as an ace like pitcher. He's just twenty nine years old.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And listen, he had to set back last year. Didn't

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>really feel right in Cleveland. Warily work out that well. Um,

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>but while all the numbers were much worse last year

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>than they were the year prior, you're doing a great job,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job of selling Trevor Bauer. You can

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. You've got nothing, dude, Why do you have

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer? Reg Number twenty two at starting pitcher? Here's

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to here's what you need to know. He had one

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal season. Can't take anything away from him. Back at

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen, a two point to one e r A

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>great If you had him that year, probably helped to

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>win a Fantasy Baseball championship. If you own him last year,

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he did not help you. In fact, he hurt you.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>He was terrible. He had an ear a over four

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a four point four eight ear a like he has

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>had for most of his career. Actually, in fact, outside

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of that two thousand eighteen season, Trevor Bauer has had

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>an ear a of at least four point one nine

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in every single season as a starting pitcher in Major

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>League baseball. He's not good. He's Robbie Ray. Robbie Ray

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and Trevor Bauer have the basically same career numbers, and

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I will illustrate that to you right now. Robbie Ray

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>four eleven career e r A one three five whip

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>career eleven case per nine. Trevor Bauer four point zero

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>four ear a. Alright, he's point zero seven better, one

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>point three zero whip point zero five better. There nine

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half case per nine in his career. I

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>will give you this. Over the past three seasons, his

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>caper nine has been up over ten. Still not as

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>good as Robbie Ray. Why are we drafting Trevor Bower two, three,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>four rounds ahead of Robbie Ray. If you want someone

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna suck at everything except give you strikeouts, why

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you just take Robbie Ray? Greg Okay, you think

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that sherevor Bower can still improve, Like I feel Robbie

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Ray is Robbie Robbie Ray is can't you ever? I

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna say, but isn't eighteen like the aberration?

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that just the outliers? Obviously? But I think that

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>not these both of these guys didn't have that top

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>prospect pedigree, And I like, I don't like Robbie Robbie right,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray ragged. I'll tell you the time that you

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>draft Robbie Ray, greg is you pair him with Kyle

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Hendricks And I don't. And I believe it was I

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>believe it was Alex Chamberlain, who was a Baseball Writer

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Year last year, Fantasy Baseball Writer of the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Year with Fan Grafs still the phenomenal job. He kind

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of brought about the idea of pairing together Robbie Ray

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Hendricks and making one super picture because it

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. Hendricks is gonna give you

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ear a, He's gonna give you whip. I'm not gonna

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>give you strikeouts. I'll be Ray. I'm gonna give you strikeouts,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you nothing else. Maybe he'll give you wins.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Because that division outside of the Dodgers is lackluster and

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>should have good run support behind him. But outside of Batman.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>But I get it on Trevor Bauer, the swinging strike percentage,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout ability, I understand it. But you can get

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts later on in the draft. We'll talk about to

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Nelson limit, We'll talk about Robbie Ray, Canton, Mayata. You

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>can get strikeouts anywhere. All he's gonna do is hurt

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>your ear and whip as well, unless he doesn't sally

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about Sunny Gray, his teammate the other side up. Yes,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season. Compete

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support and much more safe temper

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>sent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily road dot Com backslash Dunk to learn more.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Tompson had done it, and just like into the ground,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>rock and Roll was being born. Marijuana. We with scorn

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>all your here on the show. Game you wanted to

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>talk about Trevor Bauer, You got it now. All I

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>want to do is talking right back here. B f

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>F's Frank, I'm Greg. We we talked about Trevor Bauer

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about well. Frank mentioned during the break

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to me they maybe the pigeon coach Larry Johnson in

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati the work his magic, because he's worked his magic before,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically with his old pupil, Sonny Gray. Sunny Gray. Last

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>year you had a really nice bow back yere from

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>his couple of tough years in New York. Sonny Gray

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is my number? Where is he? My number? Twenty five

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>pitcher off the board right? Where is he for you?

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Gray is my number right, So we both have

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>He's at our top twenty five there. I know you

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>really like Sonny Gray. This year a great bashback year.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think, uh, he's twenty twenty, more like

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. Then says seen, Well, I think that they

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>figured some things out last year, and you mentioned that

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he was reunited with his former pitching coach Derek Johnson,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Derrek Johnson came over from the Brewers and obviously

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>did a phenomenal job with players while he was with

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in Milwaukee, and then last year wound up helping Sonny

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Gray and Luis Castillo get to the next level. And

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he was just phenomenal last year. UH sub three e

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>r A one oh eight whip the x fit was

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher three six five. But even if

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>he gave you, you know, a mid three's e r

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>A this year, based on where he's going at top

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty five starting pitcher, I think that you would be

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all right with that the strikeouts were up. He does

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you want. He gets strikeouts, He gets a

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of groundballs, nearly a percent groundball rate. Still struggles

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much with the walks. But last year, Greg,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've always said this about Sonny grade is that

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get enough strikeouts to mitigate the walks. Last

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>year was the year that he actually finally did that.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Posted a career high eleven percent swinging strike rate pent

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>K rate was by far the highest of his career

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and fourteenth highest among qualified starting pitchers last year. The

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference for him was that he started using his

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches more, and we hear that a lot in

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>baseball is get away from the bast the fastball, use

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>your breaking pitches more. That's exactly what he did. Use

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the slider more, used the curveball more. Uh and the

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>slider rated as a top twelve pitch according to fan

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Graphs pitch Values. His curveball was top five among curveballs

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>last year as well. So there's some people that speculate

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that his breaking pitches won't be as good. And I

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>believe when we had Nick Pollock on a pitcher list,

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that was his hesitancy when it comes to Sonny Gray.

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if he can come anywhere close to

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>replicating what he did with his breaking pitches last year, Greg,

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that he can give you a you know,

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>three five to three seven e r A with you

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>know one one five, two to one two oh whip

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with you know, really good strike outs, add eighty innings.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if he does that, he's likely going

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a top five, top thirty starting pitcher once again.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Sony is obviously not sexy. Um, like you said, the

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>washer down strike guys, we're up. Um. I feel like

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you just have fatigue on Sonny Greg, Greg, is that

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I do? I I think that he's a really good

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>word for it. What do you want him as? So

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, and I was going to bring

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this up as well. I think if you play in

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team league, and that's more so for deep

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>performance NFBC formats, I don't mind him as my SP two.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it, but ideally I would want him

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as my SP three. And I think there's something we

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>should break down as well, and I wanted to mention

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this is that we went over our top twenty one

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>pitchers yesterday. Greg. When I'm doing my drafts, I want

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to come away with at least two of my top

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, right, and that's when that's what Garrit Cohler

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to Graham in the first round. If not, you know,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a Patrick Corbin or a Geldo in the third.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to grab a Morton or a

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Paddock or a Synder Guard. I know you like Syndergraard

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot in that fourth round range. Give me two

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of my top twenty one starting pitchers, and then I

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>also want to extend that to give me three of

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>my top thirty Sunny Grays inside of that top thirty.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't mind him as my SP three ideally

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, Sunny great for me. I haven't met twenty five.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, he's an SP three here A draft

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunny Gray, you're not in. I can only see me

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>drafting Sunny Grey Wight team with you, like I can

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be talkings anywhere, like, hey, this is how the team

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is kind of shaped. Me up. I want Sunny Gray here,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but like, okay, I can see that. I don't see

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>myself really drafting him. The thing is, the price isn't

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near what he did last year, because it's because

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not just me that has getting in like a

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the six eight rounds in the seventh round. Yeah,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not just me that has that. It's he goes. Yeah,

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who are skeptical of what

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>he did last year. Right, So that's why you know,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>if you like him, you'll get him at at a

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>solid value. If not, I mean, just keep letting them

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>fall down the board. So I have a tier that

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>goes from two to twenty seven. I mention Trevor Bauer,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Sonny Grace. You only have six guys in

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that tire. I only have six guys in that's here

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>because my mind is similar. I have it from thirty one.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit bigger. Okay, that's interesting. One. I'm

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna read you, my guys, and then you can get

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>into years. You can put it, and you guys should

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>put it up so everybody can see what we're talking about.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>So I got Trevor Bauer here at two, followed by

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Jose Burrios, Corey Kluber, Sonny Gray or Less Carrasco and

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Glass. Now, and that's really when my tear ends,

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have Wheeler starting my next year. What I know,

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you hate Bauer and that's fine. What do you think

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of it, Frank Corey Cluber? I I'm

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>not in on either this year because at the point

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you were. We did the starting picture preview on FC

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. My two bus were Trevor Bauer and Corey Cluber. Okay, yeah,

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you're just not buying that. Clue were always a terrible

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>apron onnoight, are you just not buying that, Corey Cluber

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and bounce back in anyway? I mean, I'm not ruling

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it out. There's definitely maybe having some a year off

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>from that shoulder like that could be helpful. It might

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it might actually help him, right, and he's older now,

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think what we saw last year, we just

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can't completely dispute that. And I understand much last year.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>He normally gets off to slow starts, Greg, But I

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>mean what he did last year was really bad. Yeah,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but he meets seven starts. It's not like insignificant. That's

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>almost a quarter of the season. Well, fine, Star Wars,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, if the slow start, those seven

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>starts at eight fil nay, it wasn't warm yet, it's

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>cold in Cleveland. You're making the case for Clover here, Greg,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And look, he he might make me look stupid here

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>if he bounces back with Texas. He's not in the

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>r angeen. Yeah, that's why it looks. It's hard to be.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>He's one year removed from a two eight nine e

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>r A was zero point nine nine. Like he was great,

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about that. But I think late in

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight teen we started to see the skills a

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>road a little bit, definitely, and then early last year,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>so that's all we have to go on. It's like

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the first month of last year and the last month

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>or two of eighteen and those last three months have

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not been good and he's getting up there in age

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Over here, here's what lander and granky. There's

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>no signs right with Cluber. There is a bad months,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>three months was a bad month, five eight e r

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>A and seven starts last year the walks three point

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>seven nine bad. That's not something you normally see out

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of Klueber. His twenty two percent hey rate was his

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>lowest and twenty thirteen in those first seven starts. And

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>here's another thing, Greg three seventy babbitt for the record.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But here's what I get to on the babbitt last

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>over the past two seasons is hard contact rate is

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty six point seven percent. From two thousand and eleven

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>through seventeen, his hard contact was twenty seven percent over

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the past two seasons now and again this is going

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>back to eighteen where we're starting to see a trend

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of him giving up hard contact. The past two seasons

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>up over thirty six percent hard contact, which is nowhere

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>what it has been in years past. For Corey Klueber.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>There is a range of outcomes, um where he completely

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>makes me look foolish and he goes back to being

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Corey Cluober of old. I I recognize that, but

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not willing to take that gamble. Give me someone

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like Sonny Gray, who I still think is young enough

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, showed us what his upside was last year.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Give me one of these you know hype guys starting

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>pitchers with Mantas and Max Freed and Gallen all players

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>who we think could take that next step. Corey Cloober

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg at age thirty four, is someone that I am

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>worried about this season. We'll say this, Corey Clubers fastball,

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh was the slowest that has ever been ninety one

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>point in a six miles per hour in those seven

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>starts last year. Uh he usually around ninety three and

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>ninety one. If he's losing juicual the fastball, that's not

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>so good. Who do you have closing out this whole

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>tier or is making up this whole tier for you? Yeah?

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have a twenty two through thirty one. For me,

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.959
<v Speaker 1>this is my tier three, and I really want one

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of these guys as my SP three if at all possible.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I have Tyler Glass now at SP twenty two, followed

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>by Brandon Woodruff, Jose Barrios, Sonny Gray, Carlos Carrasco Max

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Freed to seven, Zack Gallon at, Frankie Mantas at nine,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wheeler at thirty, and Mike Saroka at thirty one.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>That rounds out that tier for me. And as you

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>can see up on the screen, Uh, the start of

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty two is the beginning of the next year. So

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, you're hiring than Brandon would you have which

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we which we knew already that you literally leave that

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>up Alt Saw. I want to be able to compare.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So Brandon, would you if you have higher than than

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I do, which we which we knew about. He's your

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>number twenty three overall? What makes you so high? I

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>would your I get Glass note right, like, I'm a

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit worried about the health with Glass now after

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>you come back last year. But it was tough for him.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to buy in a little bit all this

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about using like a split change up to even

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>if he uses that like ten, it's it's literally it's

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a matter of staying healthy. But if Glass now stays

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>healthy for like one fifth year, one sixty, it's like

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the steel the draft. Totally agree with that. I was

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>totally all on the glass now you can stay healthy. Um,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>there is risk, Bob. But Brandon, would you you have

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a twenty three, I have him down at thirty and

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>then you have all the hype guys back to back

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to back year twenty nine. The Lazardo is a little

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bit lower here for you at thirty four and a

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>different tier. Um, we're getting those guys in a few moments.

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>But why are you showing brand Wood this year? So

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he is very fastball and sinker reliant, which normally I

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>would like a starting pitcher to have, you know, a

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitch that he really can rely on. He used

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the slider about twenty percent. Uh, and it's a solid slider.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's really really reliant on his four steamer and

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>his sinker ball. And last year, Greg, I mean it

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was a breakout. You remember, throughout spring training he was

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>someone that you know, a lot of people were touting

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>as a sleeper and it came to fruition A three

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>six t e r A last year a three point

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>three six x Fips says that maybe he should have

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>been even better than he was last season. Greg a

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>one one four whip. I think the strikeouts might take

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a step back. He was at

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half case per nine. Yet his uh,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>his strikeout rate was it seems a little deceptive based

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on the eleven point nine percent swinging strike rate. Actually

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>wrote next with swinging strike crate Matt. So maybe the

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>strikeout has come down a little bit for Woodruff. But

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he's someone that could get groundballs. He has good command.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't walk too many batters two point two two

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>walks for nine last year, and there were always kind

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of signs of him being good. He was just never

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>used solely as a starting pitcher. He's been using relief,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back and forth a little bit. But in the

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues he was very good. Um, I think there's

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like. He relies on his fastball. He

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>throws it like miles per hour. I saw his first

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>start the other day in spring training. He was hitting

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like ninety nine regularly. So I mean he throws extremely

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>hard and as one of the best fastballs in the game. Um,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying in. I don't mind him as an SP

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>three or again, if you play in one of these

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues in the great fantasy based presentations, I not ideally,

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>but I wound up with him as my SP two

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Corbin. So I'm gonna continue to hammer out

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching in that draft, but I do not mind

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>him whatsoever as an SP three. Greg and the numbers

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>all going up for Brandon wouldr Off. Of course, he's

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta get you on the Brandon would Off training. Come on,

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. Look at the stats last year. I was like, sure,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to Brandon would More. He's good and all

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>over him last year and I was like missing something here,

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good. Yes, you get back in on them

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>this year. All right, let's get the hype guys here

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and go further down in our top forty.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Stick around Dave's roll out after this. I want to

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodal dot com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and much more safe ten percent on winning

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk Visit Daily road

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunc you learn more all right back

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>here on the b F F F Brant, Saucepan and

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank standfor let's get to the hype guys here a

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, Frank and you had your boy Max Freed

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of leading this tier off, Max Free, Zach Allen,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Mullintos all in that pack for you. These are Lozardo.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>A little bit later on, I Lozardo as the head

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of my hype guys. You mentioned it on Twitter last night.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned as you walked in the Haris Lozardo now

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>has a new high pick in the NFBC going in

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round. People are buying the hype once again

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on Hazar's Lizardo. Yeah, and I like Lozardo. The reason

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>why I have him ranked a little bit lower than

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those other guys is, as you can see

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the projection below, they have him projected over on Fangraphs

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and forty nine endings pitch. That to

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>me is extreme best case scenario, because this is somebody

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>who only pitched fifty five innings last year, pitched three

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>more in the postseason. The year before that, he threw

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and nine innings only through forty three. This

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guy has never really thrown that many endings. And I

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>know that the reports that have come out of Oakland

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are there's gonna be no ending's limit for Lozardo and A. J. Puck.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying that, because they want to play in

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the postseason, they want to go deep. They need Lozardo

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and Puck to yes, help them get there, but they're

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>also gonna need them once they get to the postseason.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 1>So and if I'm projecting Lozardo, I'm not giving him

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>much more than a hundred and thirty or a hundred

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and forty endings pitch greg And for that reason, that's

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>why I have him ranked below names like Freed and

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Gallon and Montage, just because I think that those guys

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna give you more endings. Maybe Lozardo is better

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on a per ending basis, but the thing is you're

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>probably going to get thirty to forty more endings pitch

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out of those other pictures. Yeah, you exactly what I

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to say that I think he's just better

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>than all the guys that you mentioned, Gallen Freed, It's

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue with that. I mean, the guy is

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous to five three r A in the minors. Sure,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, Montas pitch h nineties six citings around a

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>major suspension that wiped him out for most of the year.

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>He was phenomenal last year. I remember you, Floria and

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I were hanging out, uh and dancing around Frankie Montas.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We all bought in and it worked out. I remember

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Florio at first did not like Frankie mont hitting and

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I had to try and talk him into it. But

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Frankie Mantas what he did last year, and

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it was not p D related. He finally just put

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it all together. Look at his career, his career log

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>year by year. There was one year where he got

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>a ton of strikeouts but would walk too many batters,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and in the next year he limited the walks and

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>then didn't get any strikeouts. And last year he finally

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>figured it all out. Has prospect pedigree always through hard,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's not pe D related. What he did last

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>year was related to the fact that he introduced a splitter.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He introduced a new pitch, and last year thirty five

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>percent chase rate that would have ranked twelve among starting pitchers.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Fortcent groundball rate has solid command, gives you groundballs, solid strikeouts,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe around a strikeout for any like nine

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>per nine kind of guy. Not gonna wow you there.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think someone who can pitch to a you

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>know again, three five to three seven e R. I

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>think someone similar to like a Sonny Gray. That's why

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I have these guys ranked similarly. Some people might be

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>skeptical because it was the only season he's ever done

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it Greg, but I'm not one of those people. Raymondas

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>is twenty six years older Jurdge wenty seven at the

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>end of March, and I agree, finally put it all together.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>He was a guy that once it started going right

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, we all kind of notice because what he

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was doing seemed legitimate. And when he came back from

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the suspension, I picked up where he left off. I

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think his final start, he only made one start after suspensions,

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>good six innings of one run ball with six strikeouts

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>against the of the Anahi Mangels Los Angeles Angels. Whatever, Well,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>this is good and if he could just continue on

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this path, You're got a nice value here. With Frankie Mantaz,

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I'm with you. I like Frankie Mantas,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not as much as I like Freed and Zach Gallen.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about these guys a lot, but we'll just

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of reiterated real quick. I mean with Zach Gallen,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>traded over from the Miami Marlins last year, and what

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he did in the PCL, the Pacific Coach League, mind

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you wear, the average e r A was like five

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in this league last year. That's how bad pitching was.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He had a one seven seven e ar A, a

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>zero point seven whip and and twelve strikeouts and a

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>third endings pitch. When he came up last year, did

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>struggle with command a little bit. I didn't. I don't

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think he had enough confidence in his stuff from the

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>get go. But as the season went along, once he

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>got traded to the dimeback, stills walks started to come

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit, the strikeouts remained all along. He

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>has four different pitches that he can rely on, four seam, curve, cutter,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>change up, and he threw a hundred and seventy one

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and a third endings pitch between the Miners and the

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Major's last year. So I don't think he's gonna be

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on any type of endings limit. I think He's probably

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a hundred seventy five hundred endings of

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>really really good baseball. That is Zack zac Gallen and

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then Max Freed. Greg, just look at the numbers, man,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the strikeouts were phenomenal. He really took a step

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>forward in terms of command the spring, not the spring. No, no, no,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's good. Look, if you're scared off of Max Freed,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to let him fall because I will take him

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in all of my drafts. He did get blown up

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in his first start here in the springcent groundball rate, Greg,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how about this in the second half for Max Freed

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ten point two case for nine three point six r

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>A with a three point one to x fit. We're

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all in on Max Freed. And let's go over to

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg Suspen with I don't know a sports screed news update.

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna believe this, Bam, bam, bamy. You are

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>going to believe everything about Tell you Edwin Diaz shut

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>down for the season because he stinks. Wrong team, Thank

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Try again? Uh, what team and what

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>player do you think we get hurt it spring training

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in February? Um, do you any spice very close in

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>right City. Oh is it a Brandon Nemo? I saw

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it was hurt early. Oh no, no, right he was

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on again, Right City. Don't say Garrett colegreg right team.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, you expect this player to

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>get Judge, Chuck. Carlos Stanton heard his right calf during

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>outfield work and an m R I revealed the grade

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one calf stream. This is insane. This is absolutely insane.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I would like you to please stand up right now

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and pat me on the back. Come over here and

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just give me a pat on the back. Let's go.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susan here on the BFS Live, give me a

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pat on the back. For anyone who watched Fantasy Sports

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>today the other day, believe it was tuesday. We had

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>our outfield preview. I said my bus at the position

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gian Carlos Stanton and Aaron Judge, These gentlemen cannot

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy. You need to stop buying in oh, fifty

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>home runs one year in Marlins Park. He has one

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>season over forty home runs in his career. He closes

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>his eyes when he swings, he can't hit a breaking pitch,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>he's overrated, and now he's hurt once again. How much

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>time is he gonna miss? Unlikely to be ready to go?

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>There you go, perfect, Clint Frasier, Welcome to the team. Sockman,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tuckman, Oh no, I know who it's gonna be,

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Miguel and dude, dude, the do The first batted ball

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in today's Yankee game went to who Mike in left field?

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you, he looked good. Pretty damn

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>shaky cat good ball look better than Stanton did. Well,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard to look better than sating, Greg. All

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do is be on the field. This is ridiculous. Man.

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm more so angry just from like a Yankee fan perspective.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously, look, I don't want anyone to get hurt,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's just like it's obvious to me, why do

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we keep drafting these guys that are built like Adonis's.

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That's it's just doesn't work in baseball. It doesn't. George

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>always hurt, Stanton always hurt. Joey Gallo last year, Oblique,

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he's built like a mammoth human being as well. Greg.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's frustrating all around from a baseball perspective,

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, It's it never ends, man, It never ends.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Stanton felt the CAF injury yesterday at the end of

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>his workout, Yankee sent him for an m RI. I today,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, Greg, are you gonna draft Max for you

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this year? What? Yeah? Alright? Cool? Max? Straight? Um, I

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>noticed that one hype guy is a little bit oh right,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he's actually hiring your rankings and most people, but he's

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower than I have them. That's the

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Lamette. Um, how come you're a little bit lower

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>hinds with the other guys. Yeah, it just comes back

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to the projection. How many endings are you projecting for

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to Nelson Lamette this upcoming season? The strikeouts are gonna

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be great, There's no doubt about that. And last year

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he was unlucky pitched to an ear a over four

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a three point four for Xfit, but the whip was high.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It's always gonna be high because he walks a lot

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of guys. He's very similar to this mold of like

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a Trevor Bauer or a Robbie Ray type, except I

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think the ear A can be a little bit better.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He had a thirty three point six percent strikeout rate

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>last year that would have ranked fourth among starting pitchers

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if he qualified. But you know, over three and a

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>half walks per nine last season, over four walks per

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>nine for his career. Uh, the swinging strike rate was

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>great fourteen percent. That would have been tied with Chaine

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Bieber for ninth among starting pitchers last year. Uh. Kind

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of worry about him being just a two pitch Picture Greg.

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>He used like a four seams sinker and he uses

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a slider. It's like it's like a or it's like

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a slider curve type pitch of the time, and it's

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a great pitch. But I worry about him just being

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a two pitch pitcher. I'm probably not going to own

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>him just because there's always someone in the draft that

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>likes him more than I. But I do acknowledge that

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the talent is there and the strikeout upside is there.

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But I do worry about the projected endings as well.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>He's probably giving you like one fifty if we're being

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on I think innings are a fair question mark. Control

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously also a fair question mark when it comes to limit.

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm high on him. I have no issue drafting him

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty much where he's going, Like I want one of

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>these guys you know it's fun. You wanted to get

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it right, I won't one in every single one. I

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.439
<v Speaker 1>don't want to leave a draft without one of Franks Freed,

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallen, Frankie Mantas, Lizardo or even if you want

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to put into this mix as well, who you your

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>eyes with the Los Angeles Dodgers. Well, so your eyes

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't inside my top forty seven. I think he's very similar,

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Like he's forty really good. So here's my thing, with

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>how many innings, how many things you set it with Lizardo,

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>he's in the rotation you set it with the Nelson Limt.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You've already said he's in. Really he's in, He's already

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>you know he's he's the sp four. They're basically saying

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that their rotation is set with Alex Wood rounding it out.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know that mind, that's what it really get

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>scerning about him. You still have to worry about it

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>because the Dodgers have a lot of really really good

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>depth greg they have rows tripling if if Urias is struggling, obviously,

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers have aspirations of I don't know if they're

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>ever gonna do it winning a World Series and going

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>deep into the postseason once again. I mean, if there's

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>any year they can do it, it's this year. But

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>last year only seventy nine and two thirds endings pitched

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Major and in the major's two endings in

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the minors, so you know, slightly over eighty. And look,

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I've I've got to be fair in my analysis. If

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm criticizing someone like Lazardo for not getting much more

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred and thirty hundred forty endings pitched, I

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be consistent with Urias, and I think that

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>some of those concerns remain. Uh fan graphs they have

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>him projected for, you know, right around between a hundred

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and thirty and a hundred forty. I think that's a

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fair projection. But he's probably gonna be really good in

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>those one nings. You're talking like a sub three point

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>five e r A a good whip and over a

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>strikeout for any I really think that's attainable. For who

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we are, Your rights rights in the rotation because cantatas

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you right, you are not talking about them when they're

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>new places. Next, I want to be the next Daily

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy millionaire dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash dunk to

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>learn more. Next for real, those cust live on sports

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>from Jared Smits will check in the wrong it doesn't

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>join me on the NBA Twitch program to the NBA

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Our at some point, I assume you will stick

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>around for this, right for the NBA Fantasy Hour. Yeah,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can. Uh, I don't know. It tice me me,

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, take me out for dinner and well

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll do the Fantasy Hour together. No, we

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do what the plan aren't auction. We also have to

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>plan a date for you to make me some buttermilk

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fried chicken. It look pretty good, dude, It was amazing.

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of work, admittedly, yeh. Was it

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>worth it? Yes? Yes? Speaking of which, Greg, will you

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be trying the new KFC fried chicken on a doughnut sandwich.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I understand a lot of people are going to be

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>grossed out by it, and I get it. It's one

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of those things, Greig, where I have to try it.

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I had to try it. At least you're going to

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have a heart attack. I think I am so plan

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for a new coast. I don't want to do that.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned going to break about Julia. You said it's

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the rotations, the number four starting picture announced by

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. I'm gonna do my research to make sure

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not lying at it. I hope I'm not lying either.

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You just take him, No, I didn't take him. We

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>took res Hoskins in the ninth round. It's my guy. Um.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But the reason that there are spots in the rotations

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>just hundred, Ryou and Kenta Mayata are no longer in

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the rotation with the Dodgers because they're no longer on

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the Dodger My he's in Minnesota and Ryou heads over

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to Toronto. I have these players both inside of my

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>top forty seven, with Rye being at forty three, my

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hand at forty seven. But I think it very similar, Um,

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>similar pictures obviously right. He was amazing last year. Where

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are these guys for you? So I have re you

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>at thirty nine. I have David Price at forty three.

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You didn't bring up David Price. Well, he's joining the rotation.

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I have him at thirty seven. Okay, so we all

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have We have these guys in pretty much similar ranges,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have my Ada at forty six. We're very

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>close there. So here's the three guys inside our top

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. Yeah, and here's what I'll say if we

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>could throw the rankings back up again, my basically thirty

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 1>two through forty seven, and you see thirty two through

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>forty here, I'll let you know just not listed here, uh,

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>forty one through forty seven. I have a Rod, Kyle Hendricks,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>David Price, Robbie Ray, Matthew Boyd Quentamida, and of course

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe must grow like I got it mcget him inside

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the top forty seven year. But unless it was Greg,

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a good mix of this area of the draft

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is you have pictures who are going to be really

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really good on a per ending basis. Guys like your Ryots,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.959
<v Speaker 1>guys like you, Guys like Quentomata, guys like David Price.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be really good when they're on the mound.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever reason, whether it's due to injury risk

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>or the fact that they've never pitched that many endings before,

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't really project them for much more than a

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty maybe a hundred and sixty endings. But

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you do have some good balancing acts with Kyle Hendricks,

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>someone like a Madison bum Garner, somebody like and Eduardo Rodriguez,

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or someone like a Joe must Grow. These are all

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pictures who I think are going to give you ennings,

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're not gonna be as good of endings. They're

0:39:57.520 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be you know, high three's e r A

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're being honest. But they're also going to, you know,

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>give you close to tings and they're gonna give you

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>solid strikeout. It's not great, you know, between seven and

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>eight case per nine, and a lot of these guys

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna give you good whip. Greg. If there's one

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thing Kyle Hendricks is going to give you, it's a

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>good whip. Over the last four seasons, he has a

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>one point one one whip that is twelve best. I'm

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>unqualified starting pitchers last year. I think I believe Bumgunner

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had around like a one zero whip and he did

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that for two d endings. Getting two hundred endings of

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a whip is awesome, and those are that that's an

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>elite whip specialist everything else that Bum'm gonna give you. Personally,

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like Bummy because the underlying numbers were

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not great. It's probably gonna give you close to a

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>four ear right, maybe even more than that. The guys

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>out here, you know, Rodeo in and and doing all

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this other stuff. Mason Saunders nickname whatever he is. Uh,

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>he is an injury risk as well, but it's two

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh gives you that volume and gives you

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>a good whip as well. So I think this range

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of starting pitchers greg is really good in terms of

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>giving you endings but also giving you players who are

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really good on a per ending basis. And you can

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of pair some of those pictures together. Yeah, I

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I like all of them. The current Dodger picture,

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the X Dodgers pictures. I think I'm in on all

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of them because I think they're been undervalued. I know

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there is there's injury risk specifically, right, you always missed

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>his time when you kind of just leave him alone

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and let him beat in the starting rotation. Frank, he's

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, man. I think he just in the a

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>L probably pitched around a four E r A, maybe

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less than that. It's a great division

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to pitching. He has to face the tigers and oils

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Indians. Yeah, Indian strike out a lot. The

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>strikeout numbers have always been good. Four. He has a

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent swinging strike right and backed back seasons, Greig,

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>some of that comes out of the pen. I realized

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that well last year made twenty six starts like thirty

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>seven appearances, undred and fifty three endings. Pitch. I don't

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with him. Question is does he separate

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>himself from the other pictures in this tier? You know, Greg,

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a lot of them are similar. How

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do you differentiate Kenta Maeda from like a David Price,

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, because David Price last year had his highest

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>strikeout race like the past five years. I think so

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I actually like Price. I have Price. Price is gonna

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>get you wins too, and Priced ten spots higher that

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I have kids in my hand. He'll get you wins.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But I have priced ten spots higher because out of

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Boston and in the NL, those are two really good

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 1>factors for David Price. I think so for David Price.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked into this last night, his career versus the Yankees.

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know it's bad. An e r

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>A over five horrible, a one four three whip in

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>head of in two hundred and fifty two hundred and

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine ning sample that's like to David Price seasons

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and he has an e r A overre five against

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. He doesn't have to face the Yankees anymore.

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>He gets to face the Giants four or five times

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a season, the Padres, who Okay, yeah, we're kind of

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about Tatis and Machado, but I think there's still

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>some question mark. Yeah, I don't have to go to Colorado.

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>That's true, all right? So those are top Are there

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody else inside your top seven? That's when my tear ends.

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>But there anybody in this section of guys that are

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on your list or right outside your list that you

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have not mentioned that you wanted to at least get

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>on getting on before we want to some of our

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>late round sleepers just quickly mentioned Matthew Boyd. I think

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Boyd is basically the American League version of Robbie Ray.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very similar. They give up a lot

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of hard contact, a lot of home runs. That was

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an issue for Boyd last year, but he's going to

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>give you strike out. So again, if you can marry

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a Matthew Boyd with a Kyle Hendricks who's gonna help

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>your ratios, or you know, someone similar to that, I

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think it makes a lot of sense as well. Joe

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 1>must Grove, I'll just say it quickly, Greg, I know

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're out on must Grove finally. For years we're

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>pounding the table on Joe must Grove. But Ray Series

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is no longer. The Pitching Coach Series puts an emphasis

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on fastballs and sinkers. Joe must Grows fastball was not

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a good one. The final month of the season, he

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>saw an uptick in velocity, started using his slider more,

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>started using his breaking pitches more, and he does have

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>very good command. He's going to be a plus whip contributor.

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I still believe in the skills of Musgrove. I think

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these years he's going to put it together,

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, a lot of people were burned by him

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>last year, and he's following down draft boards and you

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can get him as like your SP five or your

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>SP six. So at that point, why not My next

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>crew is numbers forty ninety eight that included Joe Muscrow,

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>also includes Joe Muscrow's ex teammate Lance mc colors. He's

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like a lot today, frank about some of these younger

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>pictures that will be limited and how many Anis are

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>going to give you. You look kind of jumping back

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in a Lasma Colors who hasn't started a game yet

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>in screen training. You know, he's working his way up

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>towards that. Hopefully we'll get there next week. Here's someone

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the drafting. Probably not because he's going into similar range

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as you're riots and not going much later than a

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the names that we just mentioned, and he

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>might be as good as those guys on a per

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>enning basis. Career three six seven e ar a from

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Colors, but he's never pitched more than a hundred

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eight endings, and coming off the injury, he

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>has struggled with command in the past. He has a

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>career three point five three walks per nine. I feel

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like the first season Backgreg, it's you know, that's something

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that someone struggles with right coming off of a major

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>injury like this, is they can struggle with command early on.

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Lansom Color strikes me as someone who, you know, if

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>he's shaky this year, I'll be in on heading into

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>next year, assuming that he's healthy, because you'll get him

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>at a discount. Lansom Colors not really someone that I'm

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>targeting this upcoming season. I think we could see some

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>rough patches early on Greg. Also in this crew of

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>guys around Lansmer Colors for me, or some names that

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the past that we like, Frank

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver, he's in there, Marcus Stroman is in there,

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Rivn Canny and Caleb Smith as well. Yeah. Look, when

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Luke Weaver, he was great last year.

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>He just got hurt and I understand it's scary like

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he's he was dealing with a forearm injury. It seems

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like at any point his elbow could just fall off

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming year, but he was finally starting to figure

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it out. And we know that Luke Weaver has that

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>prospect pedigree came over in the Paul Goldsmith trade, devastating

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>fastball changeup combination. The difference was last year Greg, he

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>started using a cutter about fift the time and it

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>was a really really good cutter. So having that third

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>pitch that he can go to. H you saw it

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching too, you know, uh a sub three five e

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ar a um gets groundballs as well. Luke Leaver is

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>someone that I like. I realized there is risk with him,

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but if he can stay healthy, he's one of these

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>guys that can return potentially top thirty starting pitcher value

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and the other names you mentioned. Caleb Smith first eleven

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>starts last year was lights out. That really really struggled

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the second half. I believe he was pitching through

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>injury and that's what ultimately affected him. Stroman started using

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>his slider more in the final months of the season.

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>When we went over to the New York Mets, Greg,

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts went up for him. He's always someone who's

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a lot of groundballs. If he can

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 1>maintain some of those some of those swinging miss numbers

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that we saw what the Mets, then this could potentially

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be the best season that we see out of Marcus Stroman,

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's been good for long time. In his initial

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>adding with Mets this spring, all right, I'm gonna throw

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we have two minutes left, Zill Ferrell, I'm gonna just

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 1>throw names at you. You give me like a one

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sentence response. Sure, I mean he is a football. Um,

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>well do they get baseball last year? All right, ready,

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go her mom Marquez No, Jake Odoriesi, No, not really.

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike foltonevitch I was originally in on Faulty. I don't

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:22.919
<v Speaker 1>mind him as a back end rotation piece. But last

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>year the swinging miss still wasn't Their strikeouts weren't great.

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So the walks a lot of guys. There are a

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of players in this range that I like more

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like Caleb Smith, I like more Andrew Heeny, Andrewhani. I like.

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of staying healthy. We know that

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a really really good pitcher. Interesting pitch mix, but

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot of strikeouts as well, and solid command,

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not not bad command for the strikeouts that he gives you.

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Just needs to stay healthy. I think he's really good

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>when he's on the mount. Adrian Houser Adrian Houser is

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a name that I'm targeting, and you can get him

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as you know, a bench piece um in your league's

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And he's someone who got a lot of groundballs last year. Greg,

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in your fifty crown ball rate over nine

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>case for nine last year had solid come in. Maybe

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it was just a blip and and aberration, but you

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>look pretty damn good last year. The brewers randomly find

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>starting pictures like this. I like Adrian Houser alright. Finally

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>John Gray. Uh, maybe he'll be in a Yankee uniform soon, Greg,

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and then I could buy in there. But I'm someone

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just never going to own pictures in Colorado. You

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>can tell me about the swinging strike Rade, the strikeouts

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all you want with Marquez and John Gray and what

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>will you can stream them on the road. It's too

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>much of a headache. I want a player that I

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>can use all the time. John Gray is not one

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. All right, there you have those are

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>starting picture rank sweeted us what you like and what

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't for roll coach coaches up next. Thanks to

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Seawan and Alex down stairs. For Frank, I'm Gregg all

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 1>again tomorrow. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season.

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.919
<v Speaker 1>safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>code Dunk. Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash donc to

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>learn more. H