WEBVTT - Reddit Traders Beat The Masters of the Universe: Jim Bianco

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. A big new player with

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of money and sophistication has entered the game, and

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not going away. That's what Jim Bianco, our

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>next guest, says, Wall Street never saw the Redators coming.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>To Bianco as president of Bianco Research and Bloomberg Opinion columnist,

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim just first of all, on today's action. Are the

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>rehdators sort of retreating just a little bit into their

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>corners in preparation for something else big? Or they just

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>now sort of having executed their plan for game stop?

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Are they sort of just retreating in general? I think

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that the retreating from the trade um they won. The

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>announcement was yesterday when we found out that the gigantic

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>short in the in game stock and some of these

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 1>other stocks was covered by the hedge funds. The hedge

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>funds took a big loss. They walked away, and now

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the short squeeze is ending, and so that they're all

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>exiting the trade right now, and they're exiting presumably in a

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a big loss. Dave Portnoy texting, are sending out a

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>tweeting he lost seven hundred thousand dollars on the mean

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>stocks here. This is I mean, the retail investors are

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>getting crushed here, aren't they. No, they're not getting crushed.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>There are some that are losing. Portnoy loss some money,

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's not a big loss for him. He'll be back,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably with a bigger gainer loss by the

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the week if you follow him like like

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I do closely. Um, a lot of the a lot

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of the buying on all the way up to the top,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>which we found out now was a shortcover. It wasn't

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>necessarily retailed. Look, if the answer is there's seven point

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>five million people in Reddit that some of those people

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lose with the market with this stock going down. Yes,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you're asking us the perfection in the trade, um, no,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there isn't. But if you said, here's a group of

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, here's a group of retail traders who did

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>better the retail traders by far did better in this episode.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>The masters of the Universe got hurt a lot worse

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in this trade than the retail traders. Yeah, Jim, how

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>do they not see this coming? I mean some of

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>them are definitely in there on those reddits, uh you

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know sub breddits. I was communicating with one, you know,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>very large hedge fund manager last week and he actually said,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really shocking a swarm of small investors overpowering any

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sense of value. These were his words. How do they

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>not see this coming? I think the problem is the

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>word collusion. Look when the stock got over to a

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of the float, I think it's illegal. It's a short,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a naked short. But even if it isn't illegal, Uh,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it is very poor risk management by a lot of

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>these hedge funds to have that bigger short. Why they

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>have that bigger short because they all looked at each

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>other and let me let me not men sports. Is

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs gonna stick it to us? Is another hedge

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>fund gonna stick it to us? Is JP Morgan gonna

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>stick it to us? No, none of them are going

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to stick it to us. So it's not imprudent to

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.839
<v Speaker 1>run that kind of risk, and then they said, who

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>out there is going to figure this out and stick

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it to us? And we found out who because if

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you go on the Reddit boards, they talked exactly about

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the Starting in October, they identified Melvin Capital as being

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the big short and when the uh when when the

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>short does? Report came out by Citron Research two weeks ago.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>They literally said, this is the this is the event.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, let's go. We've got them because they're at

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>maximum squeeze potential. I think when Michael Lewis whites the book,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna call this. Now, we've got the greatest trade

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that's ever been done. So jim um. Some of these

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>meme stocks, if you will, all to MidCap, relatively thin floats, um,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>big short positions, easy to squeeze. Re surprised to see

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Reddit traders going to something like a commodity like silver, Yeah,

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised by that. Um. That doesn't seem to

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be kind of their modus operandi. And there is some

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>debate on Reddit whether or not they're actually doing that

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as well too. But even if it is silver, it

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't silver. You know one of my favorite movies, it's

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a hunt for Red October when the torpedo missed the

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>boat moving around in the ocean. That's the Reddit traders

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for another target. So there'll be another chapter to

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this story. I don't know if it will be next

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>week or in three months, but this crowd is still

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>out there unless the I would say before the last

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, we've been seeing this coming. When Buffets sold

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>his airlines, it was no less than Dave Portnoy who

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>led the charge that said Buffett is old and he's

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>past his prime. Let's all up the airlines. They doubled

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in a month. Portantly made a ton of money off

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that trade back then, and the airlines are even higher.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>They bought the work from home stocks that weren't in

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the indexes. They bought Tesla one up and then got

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>into the SMP. They've even been playing the cryptocurrencies, so

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been largely winning at this Now. I'm not saying

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win forever, but what they've been doing is

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been looking at Wall streets practices, which has a

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit of collusion. This is the kind of the

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>way we all do this, and they've been gaming their

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>system over and over again and taking advantage of it.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is going to have to change the way

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they do money. We're never going to see another big

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>short interest in a stock like this again as we

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>move forward, because the fear is there now that somebody

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>will stick it to us if we ever do it. Jim,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are you concerned on the effect that this will have

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on short setters and short sellers making their research available

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for everybody to view. I mean, in a sense, the

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>short sellers were the little guy for a long time,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and they were the people that were sticized by some

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and they were the people that were,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting themselves out there, not saying that they

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.559
<v Speaker 1>were all, you know, heroes or Robin hoods themselves. Let's

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's make that very very clear. But some

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of them did have excellent research and they were willing

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to share it with the world, and it can't have

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>been all bad, no. I agree. Short selling is a

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>critical function in the market, and the guys like Jim

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Chainos Marcotis, they are been very very good at identifying

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>literally fraudulent companies and explaining why they've been fraudulent through

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>research reports, and profiting off of that. That is a

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very valuable service. But then there were these smash and

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>grab type of short sellers that kind of got in

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, and like I said, the other institutions didn't

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>put a stop to it until retail did. And now

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>all short sellers have been tarnished. And I think that

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, that's not a good thing.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It is still a valuable function that was a little overdone,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that's finally getting pulled back from the frost. But if

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 1>if the Jim chanos Is marcutis Is of the world

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have to go into hiding now or witness protection programs

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because of this, I don't think in the long run

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this has benefits all of us. Jim, do you expect

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>any regulatory oversight to grow out of this from Washington

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or the SEC um. We've heard some rumblings. I hope

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there is, but I think they're looking in the wrong place.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they need to start with their short selling rules.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons the SEC was invented in ninety

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three was abuse of short selling in the nine crash,

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and they still after ninety years, can't seem to get

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it right. I hope that they start looking there at

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that and I think maybe they should start looking at

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the institutional community too, Is there a little bit of

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>coordination or collusion going on there as well? That's in

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>some cases like the famous you know idea spanners at

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds old that's not really legal for them

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But we've done whole showtime shows called

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>billions about this because such an accepted practice right now

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. I hope they looked there as opposed

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to how do we how do we restrict and restrain

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>these message boards? They weren't the problem. They identified the problem, right. Hey, Jim,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.119
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>your perspective on markets. Jim Bianco, President of Bianco Research

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Opinion Calumnis. You can read all of Jim's

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>work and all of the Bloomberg opinion columnists at Bloomberg

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Slash Opinion or O P I N. Go

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal. Lizza Chapman joins us now. She is

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a venture capital reporter here at Bloomberg. And the reason

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk to Lizette is because we have

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for robin Hood to go public, potentially in

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>May of this year or so. Lizette have the events

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the last few weeks changed robin hoodsplans at Alls

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely had thrown a real wench in um kind of

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>how they approach the public markets. If anything, it's made

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it much more pressing because they realize that they do

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>need these extra capital requirements. So, you know, while before

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at an I p O or I

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>p O or some type of way to go public,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, early to late spring, now they're they're not

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even really talking about the timing as much as they

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are that yes, we need to go public, not a

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>matter necessarily of when, but as why, and so as

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they resolved this recent hubub um, you know they'll be

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll be looking at um exactly how to go public. Yeah, Liz,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is their talk or what is the level of talk

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>about a spack? A spack to me might be a

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>way to consider it, could be could get them into

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the public market sooner, perhaps with less scrutiny. Um, what

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are they thinking about us back? That's a great point,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of companies have definitely availed themselves as

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that like last year was all time record high. It

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was more last year than it was I think in

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years combined. So it's definitely top of talks.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But right now, to be honest, this is a you know,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a you know, small but fast growing company.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Um it is. They say that they are profitable. Um

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's what we've been told. According to sources

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>familiar um back is one of the options. Um so

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is a direct listing, which is what palat here and Spotify.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>You may remember they've done that previously. So those are

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>two other options that they're also talking and thinking about.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But but to be honest, you know, there so they've

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>been so focused on just dealing with this crisis right now.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean they raised you know, they were able to

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>raise they had to raise one billion dollars in a

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>span of twelve hours, and that that number increased to

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>three point four billion over the course of seventy two hours,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just to you know, create that comfort and make sure

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that they could continue trading regularly against But that has

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>been their primary focus up until now. Now. Who knows. Yeah,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure, they definitely want to, you know, keep working

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>beautifully so that people don't lose trust or face. In

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood, Lizzat we were just speaking with somebody who

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the game stuff. Probably should have tried to buy

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitch at some point, and we know, of course that

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon boa Twitch for less than a billion dollar or is.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But we did get Uber making another acquisition today for

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>one point one billion dollars. Not the alcohol startup Drizzly.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about this pricing. I mean, essentially, this

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is literally an alcohol delivery service. Is it worth one

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars? Well, I'm sure that the investors

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who last um backed in twent seventeen and valued at

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at seventies three millions according to pitch Book, I'm sure

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>they are popping champaign today and ordering a plenty of

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>things by Drizzly or other means, because that is one

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>heck of a return. So sent three million, not even

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>three years, barely three years ago. Yeah, exactly, So, I mean,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that's kind of the way the venture

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>capital game is played, right, You only need one really

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>great company to knock it out of the park to

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>make up for all the other losses. Um. You know

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what Uber guests with this is um. You know, they

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>get to expand their alcohol delivering They were doing it

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for four through Postmates, which you remember they acquired uh

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>last year for two point six billions and they were

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>able to do it through a corner shop, which was

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>their acquisition in Mexico. But this is a really big

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>push doubling down, maybe even tripling down and delivery boost

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sales or through the roof. During the pandemic, um, you know,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Drizzly itself said that their sales were up four above

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>historical levels, um back in May, and UM, you know,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think many people can say that that, you know,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>alcohol consumption is up historically, so you know this this

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a chance for Uber to really dig down

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>into delivery because, as we've talked about before, it's ride

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>hailing service. It's just been decimated by the pandemic. So

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>people are shut in, people are ordering food, you know,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and and now booze and um. They can also do

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>uh pharmaceuticals or pharmacy, uh, you know, items and also packages.

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is part of Uber's overall shift to just say, look, guys,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna do flying cars. Are not going to

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do um, you know, flying flying tax these are electric scooters.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Were just going to do delivery and rides and darn it,

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to turn a profit this year. So that's

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>their focus. Hey, was that how what's the mood out

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>there in Silicon Valley as it relates to doing deals

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>raising capital. How much does the pandemic slow things down? Oh? Man,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I've been you know, kind of cloistered away.

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley is more of a of an idea, I

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think to send an actual location. So I've been working

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from home since since March. But I can tell you

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>from talking to early stage investors, UM, some of them

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>say that that their deal flow is higher than it's

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>ever been, and the numbers back that up. You know,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>even though they're not doing all these deals in in

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, over coffees and over drinks and networking, all

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff has gone. Yet last year was the highest

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>amount of venture capital on on record. And we also saw, um,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most of the megafunding deals, the massive

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>million plus deals that pumps that total um, you know,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to an all time I So to your answer, you know,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to your question, what's the mood, Um, it's busy. I

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think people are just grinding it through, still getting deals done.

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it on zoom, they're doing it and called um.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, we're still very much affective on

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic here as we are in other parts of

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Hey, Lozette, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciated getting your thoughts there on some interesting

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>news coming out of the valley there with Uber and

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>UH with Robin Hood as well. Listen Lazette Chapman, venture

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>capital reporter for a Bloomberg News in are based out

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Well, one of the industries that was

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly disrupted by the pandemic was retail. The acceleration of

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the migration from bricks and mortar to e commerce just

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really proceeded during this pandemic and continues to do so.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the latest on kind of where we are

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in the retail environment here. We do that with Tay Lopez.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>He's executive chairman and CEO of Retail e Commerce Ventures

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>based in Miami, Florida. Ty, thank so much for joining us.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of kind of where we are

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in the retail landscape now, you know, bricks and mortar

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>versus e commerce. How are the retailers adapting? Yeah, I

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>mean it's still a slow burn, slow transition. Hard to

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>teach old dogs new tricks, as they say, so I

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>don't see them changing fast enough to allay the you know,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>coming tidal wave that they're starting to feel. So yeah,

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the short answer in my opinion. So, Ty, what

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>brands are you using a potential targets? Well, you know,

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>usually the bankruptcy and so on the first quarter they

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>slowly ramp up. People tried to make it through and

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>watch how the holidays, you know, November, December, Black Friday did.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So I expect it to ramp up a little bit

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter. It's usually snow slow. Now, Um,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>French Escas was one that was for sale. We did

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not go after that one. It's starting to heat up

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. People are realizing, hey, we can buy

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these distressed brands. Um, the last thing we bought with

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Stein Martin radio shack in November and in November, so

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what's coming up. Everybody's kind of, like I said,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, can we make the switch? Can we do

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it fast enough? And I think when the audited financials

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>come out from the fourth quarter of last years when

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll start seeing bigger decisions being made about the bankruptcy

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or selling. So t is your strategy to kind of

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>identify high quality brands, brands that really have good value

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, but for whatever reason, did not manage

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that transition from physical to e commerce and then get

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that brand by that brand, acquire that brand and try

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it yourself. Yes, exactly what we're looking for

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is brands that are not distressed breaking the order that

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was distressed. So if we think the brand itself is distressed,

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we're less interested. We've passed on various brands in the

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>last six months. Sometimes you know, I'm just down being

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>too busy, but sometimes we felt like, you know, that

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>brand doesn't have much power. But when you look at

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>something like stein Mart, for example, radio Shack, people still

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>stop shopping their dress bomb here one. It's just the

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>economics of the scores is what was distressed. And since

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't really take stores on that, that segmentation of

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>distress doesn't bother us at all. What about Game Stop?

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>What kind of reputation does that brand have these days? Wow,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a great clash hit. I would say, you know,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the origin the Game Stop, it's

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this chewy co founder coming on the board and kind

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of bringing life that he can revive the brand. I read,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I forget the name. I read yesterday an act of

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder or a consultant who told them two years ago,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you should have bought Twitch. You know, that would have

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been to play because that transitions you. Not only it's

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>not e commerce, but it puts you in that world

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that you should be. And so I think games stopped.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>They have to do more. They have to have to

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be some fundamental changes. Um. I can't speak to it

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't researched much, but I thought I was

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting quote. If they had, you know, made that

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitch acquisition several years ago, maybe they wouldn't be so

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>distressed right now. So I think it's it's one on

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the brink. It can be turned around maybe, but it's teetering,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we'll see. Ty. What's the status of

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Brooks Brothers. That was a big brand at the beginning

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic. I believe filed for bankers if it

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly challenged. Yes, a company called a b G Authentic

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Brands Group out of New York. I thought, I'm not

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mistaken made that made that acquisition. They do a little

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>bit different than us. Um, really well run business makes

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money backed by black Stones or black

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Rocks already, and they buy things that they focused on

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>licensing revenue. So they felt for us Brookstone as our

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Brooks brothers. Um, you know, we didn't. We didn't understand

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>how we can add as much value. But they buy

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it for the global licensing rights. And so I think

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that happened about four or five months ago that they

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>made the acquisition. I think it was if I'm not

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>mistaken publicly, it was in the three hundreds. Wow. What's

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting talk to us about fundraising? Is it an easy

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>time for fundraising? It feels like there's so much cash

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. I mean, so many stacks and so much

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, so many signals of frost really across this market.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing that tie or people coming to you

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to to to hunt your money? Uh? You know, but

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to say coming to us the instantly hand

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>us money. But um, there is an element I'm reading

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>rereading Robert Schiller's book A Rational Exuberant. That's a good

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one for everybody to reread. The Noble Applies winner wrote

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it a while ago. But um, we raise money uniquely.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not a fund or a holding company. We mostly

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>raised from a network. We've kind of built this kind

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of group club of high network that credited investors. So

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>most of what we do is with this group of

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of credit investors who directly have relationships with us.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But we are yes. I mean, the spack world is

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be fascinating because all these facts for and

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to eventually, you know, find a target or

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>give the money back. So I think it is an

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting time. It's relatively easy to raise. But you know,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you start to push up against the

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>paradox of choice investors go, there's so much we at

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>tact and there's so much to do they do, and

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to talk about. Time we'll have to

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do it again soon to talk more about all of this.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Tayl Opez of Retail e Commerce Adventures, thank you. Let's

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>switch gears now to Global Oil ex on mobile. It

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pledged to safeguard it's mammoth dividend after posting its first

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>annual loss in at least forty years, a show of

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>defiance by an oil driller besieged by activist investors, lawmakers

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and climate change campaigners. Let's get the latest on that.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>We could do that with Fernando Vallier, oil and gas

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence Fernando talked to us about Exon Mobile.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Here a brutal, brutal year for them, but they're keeping

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the dividend. That's right, Paul. They're they're maintaining their fifteen

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar dividend, but at the sacrifice of restoring their

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>their peer leading returns. Excellent has been the leader UH

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in returns on capital for the sector for several years,

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but since eighteen it lost its ground, first to Totel

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and now to Chevron, and it is maintaining its evidence

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but flashing growth in the projects that were supposed to

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>bring it back towards the head of the line. UM.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You see the target for the Permian, for example, one

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of its ground jewels going from one point two million

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>barrels by seven hundred thousand barrels a day UM. So

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the growth is really slowing down, and some of its

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>other key pillars from as as soon as March of

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. But poor New Guinea and Mozambique also falling.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>By the wayside as it prefers to to funnel money

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>towards the dividend as opposed to showing up. It's UH.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It's falling production and returns on capital. What made them

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>make that decision. It was that there was too much

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>risk in hanging on for some of these plays to

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay off. UM. I think it's primarily a concern

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that cutting its dividend will drive away some of its

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>shareholder base. It is a retail focused shareholder base that's

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>really for uh important that for whom the dividend is

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very important. So there's a concern that if they do

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually cut the dividend, there would be a movement away

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from the stock, and then that would consequently impact it's

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>cost the capital. My view is that by continuing to

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>pay such a large dividend and not addressing its following

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>return on capital, the sustainability of that dividend in the

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>long term is coming into under question. Forna talk to

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>us about Exxon's results for first annual loss in forty years.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the story. Well, the story is again uh, just

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>fallen margins that were coming along before this as they

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to over invest. But obviously the pandemic taking its

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>toll on the on returns both in the upstream and

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on the refining and chemicals segment. Chemicals has been the strongest,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but even that we're closer to the ten year lows

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on margins than we are to to to the highs

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in Need seventeen and and again that's

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>driven a massive gap in their balance sheet and a

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>significant cash outflow. Excellent also took a nineteen and a

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>half billion dollar impairment on assets in the US on

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the natural gas side, and also Western Canada and Argentina

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>place that they had under development that are now outside

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of their scope. Just generally for an under the price

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of oil today is pretty high, up on the three

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>percent and above fifty a barrel for w C I

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is that just a factor of the weather, natural gas

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>prices going up, and so wonder is there more at

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>play here? Well, there's been cuts in production, widespread cuts

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in production. The question is at this price, how much

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of it is restored? And we see, for example, as

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in Canada, Canada is now backed up above

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels, as Alberta removed quotas UH is. The

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>US shale producers also increasing the amount of completion crews

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on the field, so we'll see higher production in there.

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a question on how long Saudi Arabia

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and other members of OKAY plus we'll stick to their

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>quota as and production quotes cut. If prices remain at

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>this level. Uh, there is always a prisoner's dilemma that

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be the guy that cuts too

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>much and drives prices higher. So eventually we expect some

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of that production to come back online. We've also had

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Libya reopening their ports, so we're going to see some

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>production there picked back up in the next couple of weeks.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Fernando, thank you for that much. Appreciate the

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>input there. Fernando Valet joining us there and Paul. It

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is quite stunting to see oil black about fifty five

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel. It's been in the forties for as

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>long as I remember now. Yeah, And you know, we

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>always talk about and we talk about a commodity top

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hat supplying demand, and it just feels like this commodity

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is driven by the demand side of the equation a

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in this market. People expecting, uh, you know,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>good news on the COVID virus and reopening the economy,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is you know, certainly at the top of

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a reopening trade for many investors. Yeah, for sure. Once

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>again thanks to Fernando Valet. Oil and Gas analyst for

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio