WEBVTT - Anitza Nip on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's bringing our guest and it's and it who's head

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of fixed income research at UBP. So we've we had

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>an improvement from the June lows too, about four or

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>five days ago. In corporate credit in the United States,

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we had spreads coming in. Seemed like a pretty good environment.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>The one problem with corporate credit in Asia, I would

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think lots of issues, but the strong dollar. How much

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is the strong dollar leading to outflows in UH in

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit in Asia? Well, basically we've been seeing outfloats

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year on the emerging market side, including Asia,

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually it's one of the factors been affecting

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the credit spreads here in Asia. Corporate credit. UM, we've

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>been actually seeing moderate to float so far for the

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lost UM a few weeks to about like a month,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and give a strong dollar, it's going to continue. We

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>reckoned that, um, the outfloats would may pick up again. However,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, substantially some of the outdoors has

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>been sort of you know, being taken away UM during

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the year, So I would say, um, the movement at

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment could be more moderated than before. And that

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely you know, UM, you've substantially higher in terms of

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>dollar here, it could as an impact, but I think

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it should be sort of moderated going forward. Where's the

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>best opportunity that you see right now in Asian corporate credit? Okay? Um,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>given we are still in a writing rate environment, so

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 1>we need to be cautious and defensive in Asia credit.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So what we are trying to do will we will

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>look at high grade names and also focus on the quality.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>The main reason that we go for high grades because

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in writing rate environment, higher credits generally will be more

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>affected because some of the issues that would we could

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>balance it and they are with higher leverage, so their

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>credit spread wordwide don't now because people worry about their earnings. Um.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we'll keep our duration short because

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>now we've got an inverted your curve, isn't it like

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the two years is actually higher than ten years and

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>people just don't got compensated by taking rids on the

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ten year side. So we we stress the importance of

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>short duration. In the corporate credit side. We definitely prefer

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>quality names in the corporate perpetual bonds simply because the

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>credit differential between senior and corporate perpetual has wide enough,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>which um, we look it looks attractive at the moment. However,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we will focus on short core dates and also with

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>high coupon reset. We're not particularly a big fan of

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fixedful life at the moment, so we prefer the high

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>coupon reset in which the issue would have a better

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>chance of calling the paper if they need to during

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the core days. So the other things we like. Yeah,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this is mostly for institutional investors. Retail investors sometimes a

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit cut off from access to corporate credit like this.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Are there e t f s for instance throughout Asia

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that give that access at the moment, they can also

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the e t F But I

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>would say even for individual investor, they do will be

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>able to look at some of the corporate credits because

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>some of them are actually available in the market. But

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, people get minimum something like that. Yeah,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but of course they can also look at some of

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the gt F funds definitely, Yeah, that's also available and

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>also provide them with some sort of diversification as well.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>When we look at what happened yesterday with the cut

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to the LPR from the banks, I mean that was

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>very much reflected in the equity market, but perhaps not

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>as much in the bond market. Tell us, I guess

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>your concerns here about the China property space. Okay, Basically,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think at the moment people are still you know,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>need time to restore their confidence in the property market

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>because what they are PHAs and would be have been

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, various headlines. Some sort of defaultebrates has been

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>increasing as well, and people do worry about the restructuring

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>process for some of the defaulted issuer. So I think

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, people still need to see some of

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the measures that the come that come you know, come

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>up by the government, whether it would be effective like

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, recently, as you mentioned, you know, cutaining of

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all those raids and at the same time they try

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that some of the presold project could

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>be delivered to home by Yes. So I think, you know,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>all these measures are positive, but at the same time,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>people need to monitor closely. I think people need to watch,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how the restructuring um would be for somewhat

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>default to issue us. So I think that would be

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>something that people would monitor closely. In looking at you know,

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the big macro picture, we are in a phase coming

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>up of quantitative tightening after a long period of quantitative

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>easing UM setting aside China, of course, but for the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>most part that that's the case. So well, QT, I mean,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if QUI pushed people into risky assets, will QT push

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>them into a lot safer assets? And what might that be?

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would it likely be quality stocks or or

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>investment grade credit? What? What do you think people would

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be looking at? Cash? Yeah, okay, cash is an alternative,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, people do need to invest

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>right because the inflation is also high. It's also coming up.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So what people should look at would be UM on

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a defensive strategy, go for high grade you know, park

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>their money to the short end, and if the market

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 1>turn around then they can always liquidate you know, short

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>end uh bonds very easily, and you know, like go

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>into something risky. But at the moment, we emphasize on

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that be defensive, go for high grade short data.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You're saying this rising recession risk, we're looking ahead to

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole. What are you expecting there in terms of

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess more of a hawkish statement. Well, okay, at

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this stage, I think you know anything that they talk

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>about any indications about inflation, writs of recession. I think

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be you know, a very good indicator to

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the investor. Um our house wheel. Basically it's reckoned that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the reception riceless rising you know in the d M market.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, inflation may not peat yet. So

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think all these will definitely you know, affect the

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiment as well as risk appetite from the investor. Okay,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>big question just overall again, you know, we always have

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this nervousness before a FED meeting or in this case

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson hole, does it clear next week after this is done? Well,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really depending on what you know, fact is going to deliver.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>If they're delivering something that is expected, I guess the

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>market would be able to sort of stabilize a bit.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But if they delivered something that's you know, unexpected or

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>being too hockey ish, I think the market you know,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>could um you know, have a different strategy going forward.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's a great heavie with us. Thank you for

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>coming into our Hong Kong studio and it's as hip

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as head of Fixed Income Research Asia at UVP with

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>us in Hong Kong,