WEBVTT - Bonus Episode: "Have Some Fun With This"

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Brent, how you doing doing?

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And do you think we should talk about these latest tranches?

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather not. The word throws me. I just don't

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I've never understood what it means exactly.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I look that up. I googled it.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 3>They say that a tranch is a this is what

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they say a portion, a slice, or a division of

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 3>a larger hole. But basically I think they're saying it's

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>finance or business.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but so why do we use it to describe

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>a UFO dump of documents, videos, photos, all that stuff.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 3>That's an excellent question. Most people I know, I don't

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 3>know about your experience. Most people I know call it

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the UFO dump. Did you see the stuff from the

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 3>UFO dump?

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think, if I'm not mistaken, I remember when

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the first tranch came out. I looked and where you

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 2>go as to war dot gov backslash UFO, which sounds

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>a little ponderous.

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>At ponderous, I think it's a forward slash UFO coming

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it war is a little strange. I personally think we

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>should try to get that UFO dump dot com if

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 3>we can, we should. Yes, so let's look into that. Hey, so, yeah,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>it's been a busy time. I don't know what you've

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>been up to you. He looks like you're traveling. What's

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>going on?

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I am traveling, and in fact I'm actually right down

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the hall in your house. I haven't told you that yet.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But you've gotten done.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 3>He had this beautiful artifice all set up, and now

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows it's just a sham.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, so I am traveling, but I think you're

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>doing much more interesting things than I am. You were

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>just on Doctor Phil with Chris Mellan.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a trip. And in fact, this is

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the actual outfit I wore on Doctor Phil. So I'm

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>wearing it again for good.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Luck for us, because it was a pretty good show.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>And Phil, when we did it, had been claiming accurately

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that he had been given access to this tranch of documents.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Early, so number four, the fourth tranch.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>The fourth transch and he was talking about exclusivity and

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>all of that stuff. And yeah, I guess the only

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>thing that was interesting was that his people, who producers,

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>had given me thirty pages of show notes ahead of time.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>To take a look at thirty pages.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>It was I actually like our show notes. I didn't

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>even get through all of them before the show started.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 3>It was just an overwhelming amount. But I feel good

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't overwhelming just to me, because after the show,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Phil said that he had no actually says it in

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the show, which people. By the way, if you go

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 3>to art site Hollywood UFOs dot com, you can actually

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>go listen to his show. But he said that he

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>had of these thirty notes, gotten through about three pages

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>of them, which sometimes is actually like our show, right.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We've done that too, show.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Damn, we had fifty five pages.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember doing any of this stuff, but yeah,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>so so wild.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Well what was the big takeaway? Did you guys make

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>any news or break any news on the show?

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>First, I would say, because Phil can be a controversial

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>character these days, he seemed like a very nice man

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to me. I've been on his show twice, the first

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 3>time with Louel Azondo. He's very friendly. But I think

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the difference between the last time we did that show

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and this time is that he's extremely into this UFO thing.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>He's all about UFOs and UAP and I don't know

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's making news exactly, but man, this guy came

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>out of the gates saying the government's been lying to

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>us for seventy nine years, really hard charging we've been

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>lied to. We shouldn't be taking it. And it was

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>interesting to hear him make that comment. Now you said, though,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>do we make any news? Not maybe on the air,

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Although I do think it was a good show. I

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 3>thought between Chris Mellan and I and Phil setting up

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 3>these questions, we had a chance to do basic catch

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>up UFO one oh one kind of thing for people

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>that are new to the subject, which I think is great.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>There's positive value to all that. Here's the news we made.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>But I didn't actually learn about it till off camera,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>so we didn't make it on camera. But I said

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to him afterwards, you got this stuff exclusively and all that.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Phil tell me about that, and he talked about

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>how he actually received the materials. But the highlight for me, Brent,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>as he says, and he got a note from President Trump.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And that was kind of news to me that there's

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>an actual note in the thing and so and it

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>said it said, have some fun with this.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Have some fun with this. Okay. Now, if Trump wrote

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 2>that in a sharpie, is that an executive order? Now?

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I take it as an executive order. I think if

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>you and I want to be patriotic Americans at this

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>time and get with the program, he's told us to

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>have some fun with it. So I think that's probably

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>what we should be doing. And by the way, though,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think what's interesting about that if you provide

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 3>exclusive access and whether people argue about whether that's actually

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the right word or whatever, But if you get a

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit early and you get a note from the President,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 3>that's not nothing. And so I wonder if somebody in

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the White House, whether it's Trump or one of his people,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>is actually trying to set Doctor Phillip is the voice

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 3>of disclosure or something like, somebody who could actually be

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>at the calming influence whether we have catastrophic disclosure, someone

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>who can help walk us through this whole thing. That's

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>you've used the phrase as many do ontological shock. If

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>there's ontological shock, maybe we need a tour guide through it.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's what they're saying.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll bet that is the thinking. I would like to

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>counter that thinking with an opinion that I actually I

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>like doctor phil He's a fun person to listen to.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>He seems very smart. But I think he also by

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>virtue of him being essentially hand picked by Trump and

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>given exclusive access. He's, whether he wants to be or not,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 2>a polarizing figure in our political landscape. And I think

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 2>what we need, if we're going to have a voice

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of disclosure is somebody that can speak to everyone and

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 2>is an accepted, respected, and trusted voice to not just

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 2>our country but to the world. And again, much as

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I admire doctor Phil, I'm not sure he meets that qualification.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 3>He's polarizing right now. It doesn't mean that he doesn't

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 3>have a large audience. Still, they're interested in him, and

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>that he's probably a good voice for those people that

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>are willing to accept him in that role. But if

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 3>you look on x or any or Reddit or any

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>of the places, he's a guy that people have opinions

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that he treated me nicely on the air,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>notwithstanding that's just it's almost irrelevant. But he's probably no

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>more the voice of all disclosure for all people than

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Kid Rock is the voice of new music for all people.

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just someone that Trump likes.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, But so what we need, what I would

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>look for is somebody who's a little bit more above

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the fray, somebody that is would be a trusted voice

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>again internationally. Now, ordinarily i'd go with somebody like Tom Hanks,

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>but unfortunately Tom Hanks there's a lot of conspiracy theories

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 2>swirling around him. Is there anybody in the pop culture

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>sphere that you can think of that would fit the bill?

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to throw out Steven Spielberg's name. He's going

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>for the last right before Disclosure Day. In the run up,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 3>he certainly did dozens, if not hundreds, of interviews where

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>he was trying to be the voice of the people. Hey,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I've been studying this for a while. I think this

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>is all true. Let me be your tour guide by

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>allowing you to see Disclosure Day. So you could say

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>that Spielberg was auditioning. Now, whether he passed the audition

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>or not, I don't know what's your take.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say polarizing, at least within the UFO community.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel like a lot of people love the film

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people didn't for various reasons. And

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>so I think Spielberg's a good candidate. I put him

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>up on the board, but I still would say he's

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>not the perfect candidate.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we should probably.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Rule out or rule in the idea that a politician

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>might be that person, right, But the problem, it seems

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 3>to me is Republicans wouldn't support a Democrat, and Democrats

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't support a Republican in that role unless they were

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 3>extremely special. So then you've got to say, it's not

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>somebody out of nowhere. It would have to be somebody

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>who's already been speaking on this topic in the public

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 3>square right now on the Republican side of the bench.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>That's what burchat Luna and the guy that was just

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>on Jesse Michael's show right after us Burlison, Eric Burlison. Yes, okay,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>So these are all people who are outspoken and generally speaking,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 3>I like what they're outspoken about. I think that they

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>are speaking to a certain segment of the population if

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>nothing else. But they are all Republicans and aren't likely

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 3>to work for the Democrats as the voice of hope

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>for the future.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So probably not.

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And if you jump over the fence to the

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Democratic side, who do we got Schumer?

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Schumer has been outspoken, he's in this, but let's face it,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 3>he's not mister Charisma. He certainly is controversial. So yeah,

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>we've got to rule him out too, So I guess

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 3>I got to rest my case here. No politicians can

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>be considered for the global ambassador of disclosure.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the music sector, right, there's some big international names there.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's go down the list. Bruce Springsteen.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, unfortunately Bruce, because he endorsed Trump's opponent.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to write.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift did oh?

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Did o?

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Beyonce did oh?

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you've got that, You've got it. No, I

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>thought you were. I thought you were going to say

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I got it. Will Smith? What about Will Smith? Everybody

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>likes Will Smith.

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 2>That did not jump to mind unless unless with Will Smith.

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Unless what we need is our voice of disclosure to

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>go smack the aliens in the face when they land.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>As we said, we still don't know exactly what is

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.239
<v Speaker 3>being disclosed? What before we move beyond that? Though celebrities

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 3>are interesting, But is there anybody in the news business,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Because if you were thinking back to the sixties, you'd

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>have to say, Walter Cronkuid clearly could have been a

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 3>consensus candidate in the last century right to tell everybody

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 3>what was going on? Could a newsperson be that person?

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Today?

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 2>All the big news outlets are again polarizing. It's pick

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a side, but in the news, I don't know, are

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>you nominating yourself?

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>No? And if I was, my wife would say no, okay.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 3>And besides, I think we're talking about a globally important

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>person of some kind, and that we've put that in

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the back of our minds the other day and I'm

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 3>still drawing a blank.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I have somebody, and I think it's going

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>to be someone that has a special appeal to you,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>knowing your interests, and it's somebody who I'm racking my brain.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I can't think of any way that he's politicized himself

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in a way that would take him out of the running.

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But he's somebody that is hugely famous, I think, beloved

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 2>by most of the world. I don't know anything that

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you can put a knock against him, and he transcends

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 2>all generations.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I am on the edge of my chair, literally on

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>the edge of my chair right now. My mind is

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 3>racing because you just said it might be somebody that

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I would support and know I don't know.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Hit me, Sir Paul McCartney.

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, okay, I'm sitting with that for a second.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Here all kidding aside. I kind of like it. Think

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 3>about it. Here's a guy, Paul McCartney, over the years

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>has always been so polite and cheeky and ironic that

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 3>he's everybody's friend. He's been wonderful in interviews, He's been

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 3>around forever. Everybody likes his concerts, they like his music,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>and he's a sir. So that's pretty cool. You don't listen.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned obviously I am a huge Beatles fan. So

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>is my friend George Nap by the way, so from

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the UFO community, we both though yes on I did

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>write that book once there was a way about what

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>if the Beatles never broke up? And the only thing

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I ever turned up that I felt was political during

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>that time period is he wrote a song about the

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Irish conflict with Britain. But that seems like old news

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 3>right now. I don't think that's going to keep him

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 3>from anything. I don't recall any political overtly political statements

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 3>the guys made.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>He might be perfect well.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned he could write a song for disclosure.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>This could be the new we are the world. And

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>by the way, who better than Sir Paul to come

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>up with something that rhymes with tranches.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Listen if he did, If anybody could do that, Brent,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Sir Paul could do that.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I like that on so many levels.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I guess we should just tell our friends in MI

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 3>six and the CIA, not that you and I have

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 3>any friends in such organizations. So we're speaking metaphorically there.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Maybe if Britain and the US intelligence agencies could get

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 3>together and agree on Sir Paul, they could brief the

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>hell out of him and he could be that guy. Honestly, Again,

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 3>if Sir Paul sat down and said, hey, I didn't

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>see this coming for myself, but I've been read in

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and here's what I've learned. Here's what I've seen. Imagine

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 3>imagine showing Sir Paul McCartney a craft or a body,

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>or letting him talk to a live creature.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm digging this, but I'm.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Buying that album.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you that I'm buying that album. Hey, everybody,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Bryce here, be sure to tune in every Thursday when

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>you can get a brand new episode of Sound, Light

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>and Frequency. It's available wherever you get your podcasts. Hope

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you enjoyed our little bonus feature here. We'll be doing

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>more of these in the future as part of our

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>relentless global campaign for podcast domination