WEBVTT - 2017 Draft Predictions

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>M The Around the NFL Podcast has it's swagger back.

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Around the NFL Podcast.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>My name is Dan Hansis, and I am joined by

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a room filled with heroes, Mark Sessler, Chris Westling, and

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Roshal. What's up boys? Hey Dan? Getting the band

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>back together? Ah much thanks to Connie Fox and Petrick Claiban.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>We're sitting in well. Mark and I were at our

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>private retreat in the mountains. It's nice to see one

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of the world's great romances, you know, living life again.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>We are well. We actually didn't stay in a cabin together.

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We did you even see each other? Yeah? I didn't

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>see Dan for more than one second all weekend. So

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but I met you and Simone you know who are

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Who's having a birthday? The romances back on track? Did

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you say what you're suggesting that? It was not only track?

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Greg very awkward in social settings at times. This is

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking When you said you don't know what

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, that's kind of I would say, I'm comfortable.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I just make other people feel awkward. I think you

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>do a fine job in the post softball setting. That's good. Yeah,

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're two and our softball team, by the way, another

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thumping of UM, a middling unit. So I I'm very happy.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's about the start of the season for the Shield,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>UM and that's something to be excited about. Mark. We'd

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>love to get you at a game. I definitely when

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is the next game we are playing? I believe a

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>week from Thursday. We're on the rare double by, which

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>could hurt our momentum a little bit, but you know,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to get too upset about. Recharge the batteries. I

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>will be there. Good exc This is the around the

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL podcuest driven by Honi and today's show UH is

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>an important one because we are less than damn it.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say less than twenty four hours away

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from the draft. That is not accurate, so I have

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to say something less sexy, like we are less than

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one hours away from the two thousand and seventeen

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft in Philadelphia, an event that will be held

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>west outside. I take my duties as host very um seriously,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and I did want to try to get a Philadelphia

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>area meteorologist on the show, UH, So I reached out

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to Connie Fox, who, strangely didn't get back to me.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>A little bit odd. She's in Philadelphia right now. Reached

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>out to John Gonzalez, who also, uh, he did get

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>back to me. John Roll Gonzoles born March seven is

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>American sportswriter who was married to NFL media broadcaster Colleen Wolf. John,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who's The Pisces, resides in Los Angeles with his wife

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and two dogs. Uh. John did not know, and it

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>had one friend but took a job recently in d C.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh So no, no weather person uh to come on

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the show. So we have no idea. And in a

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>way it's more exciting. Yeah, that's the way to go. Yeah,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the weather man is never wrong, So why do we

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know that information? We want to be flying

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>blind blind, flying blind on this one. Very exciting. But anyway,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the draft is tomorrow, so you know we're gonna do

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what it is? Don't get my lunch the

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft addition, and don't you me so phone ears,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>don't you dare come at me? Or what's coming? Said?

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The orange? You don't want the orange. You don't want it.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>The sound of someone eating an orange is especially bad.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It is not pleasant. Don't want it because the banana

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was bad. Oh, the banana was real bad. But the

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>orange can make ears bleed. That's all I'm saying. Send me,

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Why dare you send me one tweet? One? Are you?

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Son of send me one tweet before Thursday show? And

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the orange when I mean I'm in their court.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I cannot stand this. Uh sounds of people chewing various

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>foods and you take particular that right there, You take

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>particular joy in it. And it is a torture to sign.

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel like eating a banana should be soundless, is it, though, Sydney?

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it? There's some sucking and some lip smacking, and

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he's terrible anyway, So we will do our are props

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are sandwich props, whereby we each make predictions for the draft.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We go around the room a few times, and then

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we tracked the those predictions with the help, of course,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the great Nick Fourtier for Tier for tier? Does

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that ever? Do we know for sure? He confirmed to

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>me that it's Nick Fourtier. Oh, Nick Fourtier, kind of

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>like Phil Plantier, remember him? Great? Oh yeah, great batting

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>stance on that left handed slugger of the Red Sex

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and all time batting stands. Bill plant here. But anyway,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick four tier a go get my lunch dot org

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>tracks all all the standings for our predictions. So we

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>will make some for the draft. Very exciting. But before

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we do that, we're gonna hit the news. Uh so,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, let's do it. Said, before the battle

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>can be one on the field, the war must be

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>one on Draft days. Got about ten hours. I'm gonna

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>do what's best for the team. That of course, the

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>one of Mark Sessa's favorite films of all time, Draft Day,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>starring Costner. And they just put up some clips if

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're curious about the movie, they just put

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>up some clips on YouTube. Um, various clips from that

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that film. They just put them up. Yeah, it's you

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>know that movie clips dot com or something and they

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they they actually that's part of their job. They take

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>different parts from movies and then just throw it up

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. If you if you're a Draft Day fan

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mark I know you are, go there and relive

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the great uh conquests of the Cleveland Browns history.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>They're fake two thousand fourteen Draft with Kevin Costner's GM. Well,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a tired bit. I don't think about this

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>movie at all, and it's brought me nothing but um

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>agitation from the three of you and others. Well, if

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to relive how excited you were at the time,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you can just google, like I just did right now,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Draft Day Movie Mark Sessler review and you actually find

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the official Draft Day Movie account which includes the review

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>from Mark Sessler. Delivers on the Draft Day movie, delivers

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the great tension of the NFL Draft while showing

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>how human the entire prod This is full of heart

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>from as I told you, as I told you, full

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of hot from stock to finish of the NFL Draft

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>while showing how human the entire process is. Let me

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you what, As I mentioned, I had multiple classes

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of wine in me when I texted that that review,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to take it back. I did

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>write it. I should not have ever done that, obviously,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But Greg and Dan have now put themselves into a

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>special little bucket, and it's called the revenge bucket. And

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be an incredible practical joke that I

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>will that I will and act on the two of you.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But you will never know that it came from me,

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and it will not happen in the next fifteen to

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty hours. Where Oh, that's a call back to the

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast when I took Mark to town on a movie

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>review did three and a half years ago. No, it

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>may come eight months from now, eight teen years from now,

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but it will be severe, really West, how long as

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>West doesn't slip up, only West survives. I already he

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was quoting you as well. I don't know how West

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>got away. West came out of the theater calling it

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a solid bee if I don't, I do not distance

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>myself from that movie at all. I think it's underrated. No,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and I like because Dan and Mark actually wrote a

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>little known fact a review of the movie on the website,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and that came right. I forgot about that fact. Yeah,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that came up when I just googled it too. And

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it is funny how toned down it is in that

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's solid football, fair for fans in need of a fix.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a little more tempered. Because I was a

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>by line, I was bringing it down a little bit,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark was pumping up. That's because there had already been occurrences,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe on our website as like a background splash

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>page where Dan HELLI also got pulled into this he

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and I had our quotes on the back of every

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL dot Com article, and I thought, I will never

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>allow this to happen in my life ever again. Remember

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark's last revenge bucket? No, what was it? We were

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all turned into cat lovers on Instagram? Oh yeah, that

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was good though. That still that will not have the

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>feel good or of that right that that's still my

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>profile picture on Twitter. All right, let's let's do some

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>news and we will start with, Oh my god, Adrian

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Peterson got a job. Ladies and gentlemen, congratulations buddy. The

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints and Uh, the veteran running back finalized

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a two year deal that will pay Peterson seven million.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>The deal included three and a half million guaranteed in TV,

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth up to eight point to five million

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with incentives and escalators. Uh. This puts uh Peterson in

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a backfield with Mark Ingram, which on paper, Uh, Greg

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like you do some damage. Do you like the move?

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think it makes sense for the Saints

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to add another offensive weapon. They're a team that likes

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to have multiple running backs. Their backfield, despite Ingram being there,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was very thin until this move, so that I think

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they were gonna add someone in the draft or in

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>free agency, And to me, you're gonna get a motivated

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson. And I'm not too worried about who gets

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, who gets the you know, who gets the carries.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's plenty to go around with for Ingram

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and Peterson, and that this is a team where he

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fits pretty well. They don't use the shotgun very much

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>among the bottom teams in the entire NFL in terms

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of using the shotgun, and I trust John Payton in

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of how he's gonna use different offensive weapons, including Peterson.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's reading this situation wrong, and I think

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is reading Adrian Peterson wrong. He should be

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the favorite for comeback Player of the Year honors. He's

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a freakish athlete. He can't be compared to any other

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty two year old running back we've seen this century.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He's better than them. He's more physically gifted than them.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>He's an exceptional talent. And and I don't this idea

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>that he's Tim high Tower. Give me a break. Tim

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>high Tower coming off a half a decade out of

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the game and had to bust his but just to

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>make the team. Peterson got a two point five million

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>dollar signing bonus. He's not going to be the backup

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Ingram. It's not well, that's just not true.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Those I mean, I think it doesn't matter who's backup

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>who started. They're gonna split it, so they're gonna both

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>be factors. Peterson will likely not be on the field

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>as much on passing down but Ingram's never played more

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>than five fifty snaps in his life anyways. The pain

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Saints were at their best when they had four

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>guys in their backfield Pierre Thomas, Chris Ivory. Uh, you

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>know who am I thinking about back then? Darren Sprawls

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he here. You know, they would go three or four deep,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what they'll do. I think it's

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the more interesting landing spots. And it's they

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>play the Vikings, which is which is fantastic for me.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I want to just make sure that Adrian Peterson,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who seems totally motivated as a as a football player

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>from wire to wire, that at this situation they all

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about there's a clear role, there's gonna be. It's

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>great for the Saints, but weeks, eight weeks, nine weeks in.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>If Adrian Peterson isn't happy with his role, if there's

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>issues with mark Ingram not being happy with the role,

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens there, Maybe it works out fine for me.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a why not if you can get Adrian Peterson,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he came out of at a at a pretty low cost.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You're the Saints, You've you've basically been a nonentity in

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoff picture for too many years at this point,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>go for it. Why not? It is amazing again how

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tough it is to be running back around thirty years

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of age and Peterson's thirty two. Um, this is a

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>guy who's a legendary player, and he is earning three

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half million average salary this season, putting him

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>behind the likes of Frank Gore no disrespect, Greg Theo,

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Ritic blal Pal, Ryan Matthews, they'll make less than mark Ingram. So, basically,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, despite the fact that

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he has this legendary resume, despite the fact that he's

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>already shown once that he can defy the odds when

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he came back from that knee injury and ran for

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand yards, he had to settle for journeyman type money. Uh,

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and that could be an incentive for him as well.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I would think in his statement, I think it was

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>telling that he was explained that he was going to

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have a role. He's not expecting to dominate carries. I'm

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sure he wants to beat out mark Ingram because he's

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a competitor. But Ian Rappaport NFL Network Insider, you have

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pointed out it was very purposeful that he's making two

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars less than Ingram. They didn't want to

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>upset Ingram. They said, if you're coming in, you're gonna

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>come in below Ingram, who's been there for six years

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and has been our guy essentially in terms of between

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the tackles. Runner and Peterson accepted that he signed the contract,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but he did now I want to see how where

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we are in November with that. That's all. He also said,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I could tell Sean Payton did his due diligence on

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how I could contribute, and there's no way you will

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>never convince me that Adrian Peterson signed on with Sean

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Payton and telling him you're going to be mark Ingram's

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>back up. I totally agree with that. I just told him,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>look the best, because this is how all backfields in

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL work week to week. If you're running well,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna play. And Adrian Peterson is confident enough they

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>have Corse. He looks at mark Ingram and says, I'm

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more talented than him. I'm going to play, but Traveris

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Cadet will wind up getting a hundred snaps. There's only

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven hundred snaps all year. They're gonna play mark Ingram,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a great addition for a team

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of weapons. They have a chance.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I know we make fun of the Saints defense and

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they're seven and nine every single year. But if they

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>can just be somewhat close to the middle of the

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>pack on defense. They have a great young group of

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>receivers as as good as they've had really, uh since

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they were in the Super Bowl, maybe even better than then,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and they still have an effective quarterback. They got a chance.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And it also opens up the fact that you they

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were better last year, you have your backfield wrapped up.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They want to go defense heavy in the draft that

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to be better. They were better last year.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>They just have to be even better than what they're doing.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>What the Cowboys do, run the ball, hydro defense. Adrian

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Peterson signed and now Marshall and Lynch looks like this

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is squared away as well. He should become an official

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>member of the Oakland Raiders. On Wednesday, Lynch's representatives and

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders have agreed two terms on a contract and

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the team has hashed out the details of a trade

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for Lynch's rights with the Seahawks. Multiple sources and firm

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations. According to Mike Garfolo and Ian Rappaport, the

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>draft compensation will be a swap of late round picks

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle gets Oakland's fifth round pick in exchange for

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's sixth round pick. According to a source, uh and

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>now uh. The only thing left is for the five

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>time Pro Bowl back to take a physical with the

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and if that checks out this saga mark is

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the books and Marshawn Lynch joins the Raiders and

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>an offense that has a chance to be the a

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>f c's best. Yes, it does. I think I think

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it boils down to this elongated saga when this gets going.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>What kind of player is Marshawn Lynch. I'm of the

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mindset that you know, we know who he is. The break,

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the year long break probably got his body back in shape.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He has a chance, you like in the last situation

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with Adrian Peterson, they have other good running backs. I

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like Jyleen Rochard, But if he's going to be the

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lynch of old, he's going to have a carved

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out big role in that offense. It just as a

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>matter of how Durably is where he is physically. He

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't look quite the same as last full season.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't healthy. He's gonna be running behind a much

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>better offensive line. But if I had to choose which

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of these two running backs, I feel more confident it

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would be Adrian Peterson. But yeah, I don't know if

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we have to choose one or the other. I feel

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like they'll both exceed expectations because expectations for thirty ye

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>old running backs are so low, and both guys have

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>fresh legs. Both guys should be on top five NFL offenses.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Which is kind of interesting that everybody poo poo's the

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of power backs in two thousand seventeen, especially aging

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>power backs, and two of the best offenses want them.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that Lynch, to me, is the bigger risk

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of bringing him on board to an offense

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and hoping that he becomes an important part of it,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just because he was out of football for a year

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the last time he saw him, he wasn't at his best.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>He is. Let's be honest here, I mean, this is

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy he's gonna be playing in Oakland. There could

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>be some distractions for him, a guy that that is

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>tied in so tightly with that community. You don't know,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>uh if Marshall and Lynch is gonna be the same

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>focus type of professional athlete he was when we last

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>saw him. So I think there is some risk there,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Peterson to me seems like a guy that has

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>uh you have less to worry about him. But Peterson

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>was essentially out of football last year too with another

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>major injury. I mean, it's it's fair there are risks

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>with both. But I think we were a lot we

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would we see these as reliable players who aren't coming

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>back to make money, and it's they're coming back to

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>make a statement and we get to watch him. I mean,

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna they're gonna make them more entertaining when they're

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>on uh TV. By the time people listen to this,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Lynch will probably have passed his physical and this news

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>will be official. And he did send out a tweet

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>while we were up here, UH basically confirmed it, saying, yes,

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Lord man, I'm thankful, but I just got real. I

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>had hell of fun in Seattle. But I'm really really

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm really from Oakland ough like really really really from

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Oakland O town business. Breath on me. Can someone decipher

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that and translate it to me in English? Oh? I

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's excited. I think I'm It says I'm excited

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to play for my hometown Raiders. We like these Raiders

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. Is that right? Well, he's thanking God and

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>also the twelfth Man, which is the Seattle something called

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a Lord a w D. That's Jesus. And then he says, uh,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this all this speculation, will it or won't? Won't it happen? Oh? No,

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>there's something about happy email deer in here twice and

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>West I'm trying to I'm trying to give you the

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>information you asked for. But despite my love of playing

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks, I am an Oakland guy. That's where

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm from. Those are my people, and I'm really excited

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to represent my city. This is about Oakland and about

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>me and joining back up with the Oakland people. What

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>about the last line, which is a purposeful misspelling of

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>business breath. I don't that want town business breath on me?

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>That one. I'm not with you. I don't know. It's

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not cool to spell correctly. That's what I can add

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to this next one. For white guys, we discussed the

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>social implication of the new Kendrick Lamar album. I don't

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>know why, like wanting grammar to be correct or wanting

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>communication to be correct has to be a white guy.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>This is on West's right. And is it like you

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>need street cred just to say things in a certain way.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Just you use the communication correctly, please, so we can

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>tell what you're saying. Mark, Well, the language is always shifting.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The people that were thirty years older than us laughed

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>at the way that we communicated and how we did it.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And even in our newsroom the language is shifted in

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the last five six years we've been there drastically. So

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I just see it as more of that Look, say

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what you want, but there's a way to run. Language

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is shifting. One way for speaking in an other way.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>For writing, you have to be able to communicate I'm

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>with you, I just see you, and I is like

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>standing there is this tidal wave of iss like basically

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>swallowing us up, and we're you know that missive is

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>quiet and going away. Let's just move on. Martavis Brian

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is conditionally reinstated by the NFL the team. That team

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>being the Pittsburgh Steelers, announced Tuesday Bryant missed the entirety

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the season for multiple violations of the league's Policy

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Substances of abuse. UM, Bryan is going to obviously,

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you have to walk the straight and narrow uh path

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>here to to stay off of the league's the league's radar.

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. But if he if, if he does that,

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and if he gets back the trust of Ben Roethlisberger,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>who seemed very miffed about the way things played out

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. UM, West, the Steelers and we're just talking

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Raiders could have the best offense. The Steelers,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, this offense could be close, unstoppable. Well, spoil alert.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a post draft banger on the best

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>offenses in the NFL. The three teams we've talked about

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so far, we'll all be in the top five, the Saints,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, and the Steelers. If you compare the Raiders

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone's talking about them to the Steelers. I take the

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Steelers at every position, every position. I bet the Patriots

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>are in that top five too, Yes, they will be.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a potentially every every position, even

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, even the offensive line. I would take

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers at every position. And we saw in two

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen at the second half of the season, especially

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>when the Steelers were doing amazing things, Antonio Brown and

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Martevis Bryant were the best by far receiving duo in

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I think this is potentially a bigger deal

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>than the last two players we just talked about. He's

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>not a bigger name. More people don't know about Martevis Bryant,

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>but him plugging him back into Pittsburgh's offense could do

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>more than it than Lynch or Adrian Peterson either of

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>those two other teams. I said on Twitter, I think

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this was you know, that could be the biggest offseason

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>edition any any team made. Then James Palmer, you know,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>pointed out what about J. J. Watt and I thought,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>all right, James Palmer on offense, you know you do

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a great job. You do a great job covering all

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the teams. You're you've got great hair. Why do you

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>got to poke holes immediately in my point with a

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>better point, because I guess J. J. Watt would be

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>would be technically something going on with you and James Palmer.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is about interaction and debate. It's not a I'm

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in a silo. My opinion just beams out over. He

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>made a fair he made a fair point. J. J.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Watt is great, but Brian seems angry. That's that's the

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing. It's like, if he made a good point,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't it just be like, oh, good point. J P.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on with our day. Well, it's a bit plus.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>This guy, he's got enough. He's got enough going on

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in his life. You know, great, great at his job.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>He was called the brother with the great hair by

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Willie mcguinnis on live air, which you know everyone wants.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>He has great hair. It feels like um sort of

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>action figuring military hair like it's perfect. It's absolutely perfect.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Got you with that. That's a good, good description. I'm

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna all right, Harrispec's hair. The only thing I'll say

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>about James's hair. The only thing I'm gonna say about it.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit too perfect. Mm hm, musted up

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I'm sure he does. Out of them

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>town on a Saturday night. More suspension talk. Daryl Washington,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember that guy? I barely do. But the NFL on

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday notified the Cardinals linebacker that he has been reinstated

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on a conditional basis. Washington has been uh suspended without

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>pay since May of yes, folks, almost three years for

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>violating the league's policy and program for substances of abuse.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>His band was tied to marijuana um which, if it

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>was just weed, the guy was out of football for

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>three years of smoking weed. He did a lot of

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>other other problems. There were other Yes, he had some incidence.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>He had some incidence off field incidents. Has been off

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>my radar for a while. The third year old linebacker

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>may join the Cardinals at their training facility, participating and meetings, conditioning,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>work in similar active activities, the league announced, but we

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know market if the Cardinals even will choose to

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>keep him with him after this long stay away from

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. He was a productive member of the team

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>before it all went side with Yeah, the Cardinals put

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out about as lukewarm of a statement as you possibly could.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It basically said, considering we have been prohibited from having

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>contact with Washington over the last three years, it would

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be premature today to discuss the potential return of the team.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>They basically said, we're super plugged into the draft. We'll

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>deal with this when we have time. Very fair, because

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Steve Kim when he was suspended in the

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>off season in Washington, Steve Kim came out with about

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as strong a statement as you could against him because

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just the marijuana. It was, uh, you know,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there was an assault issue with a performer girlfriend. It

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>was basically a myriad of nonsense where and failing more tests,

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>more tests, multiple tests. There's you know, the Cardinals at

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that time, super Bowl window wide open. We don't have

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>time for players. We can't rely on next man up,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It's what they said. And so now you're not waiting

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for him necessarily to come back into the building. I

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>think they'll cut him, really yeah. I think just there.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The statements they've made over the years have been so

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>negative about him. He's thirty years old. He was a

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>very good player. For people that don't remember, I second

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 1>team All Pro. But that was two thousand twelve, and

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he's thirty, and he's been a mess. And I just

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just their statements over the last two or three years

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have been so scathing at points, borderline scathing, that I

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think they'll just let him go. He was one of

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the best inside linebackers in football right before he suspended.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But his game is pure speed. He's a lot like

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan schis Ear. He's thirty years old. Now. I don't

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>know if that pure speed is gonna be there when

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you're running a four or eight as a linebacker. I

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're gonna do that at each thirty.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Domestic violence to the climate, it sounds crazy, but it's

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's changed even since since he first completely suspended. Uh,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think that could be a factor to him

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>getting cut. Dan On on the trope front, he has

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>released a statement saying that he is in the best

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>shape of my life. He's article articles also not bloody likely. Uh.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, Let's talk a little draft bus, little bit

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of draft buzz biz. That's a buzz sound. The Browns, Oh,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. They got the whole world in there and

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the palm of their little hand, mark, the little globe

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>sitting in their little brown paw. Uh. Picking at number

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>one and number twelve. Lucky the Rams lost that game

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Niners. For your mark, You were right to

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrate that day. Think, well, we'll see where the celebration

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>comes or where it ends. Two days away from now,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just one day away from the NFL Draft, the Browns

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are starting to make some moves. Owners of the first

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and twelve pick. They need a quarterback. But here's the thing.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL Networks Mike Silver reported the Browns have spoken with

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>at least four teams in the top eight about trading

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>up Mark. Recklessly speculate the four teams in the top

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>eight that they're talking to. I would say that you

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have spoken with the forty nause forty Niners have wisely

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>said that they want Mitchell Robinsky potentially at number two.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the Titans at number five make a ton

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of sense, because you want to get in front of

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Uh, and it honestly, if your key is

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to get in front of the Jets, I would say

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe even the Bears and the Jaguars. Well, the Jets

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>do make sense? Yeah, the Jets, Yeah, the Jet all right.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean if the Jets aren't if the Jets don't

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>want Mitchell Robinsky or a quarterback, then you could flip

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>out with them too, right, So the Jets, the Titans,

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners, the Jaguars are an option. What was

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the other team you had there? Basically every team, and

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean one through two through seven. To me that

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the little pressure points Tennessee, you know, at five they

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>want to trade. They've made it clear through you know,

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah reported that they have made it clear that

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to trade John. They they've said publicly there's

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a fifty fifty chance they'll trade hold on. He said,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at least fifty fifty, which tells me it's yes. And

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>then the other team to me is the Bills at

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>ten could take a quarterback, so you would you would

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think you would if you were gonna take If you're

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna move up, you want to move ahead of the

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>next two teams in front of them, the Saints and

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bills, who theoretically could take did you hear any was? Uh,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>my family was in town, so I was kind of

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>had a pocket, But did you hear any of that

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>buzz over the weekend about forty two, No streets talking.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't they be discussing that and make it see

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>why that's I'm not. It's their moment right now, so

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not saying that that won't continue to

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be the case, but forty two. Just keep an eye

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on it. I would say, I've got nothing but love

0:28:51.680 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for fifty two. You see Jesus uh. Speaking of the rounds,

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>mark you, I think you have a statement to make potentially,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>or you can refrain from it. But um. On April eighteenth,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you tweeted, I'm tempered and lost as a Browns fan,

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but the hopeful slash a logical spirit in me that

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>fell for Cleveland and eight six here's two words, Colin

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick mahomes. Yeah, update, update, I mean I the keyword,

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and there was illogical and sort of lost in everything else,

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like I I really do. Here's where I stand. I

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>If Cleveland is going to trade up or do anything,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it better be for another rock solid, defensive type prospect.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to. I don't want them to go

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>up and reach and give away picks for any of

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks. I'm not saying I've studied this as much

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as other people. It certainly have not. But starting to

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>watch more and more Mitchell Robiski, more and more of

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and all of them, I think these guys are

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>also imperfect that I cannot understand why you would trade

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>up or why you'd allow this to leak out of

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your building to such a degree. I kind of feel

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that might all this might be a

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>massive smoke screen. It might all be nonsense. But I

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>am not sitting here pining for one of these quarterbacks

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at all. I would rather them not trade up at

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>all and get two great players at one and twelve.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to feel better in terms of there there

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was some unrest about the Miles Garrett situation. Feels like

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're very close to getting the report that it's a

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>done deal the Browns will take. If it is not there,

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to suffer the risk of thirty

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one other teams. There have been words banning around, shouldn't

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the league if they might getting this wrong. Well, no,

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that someone said that they should not be in the league.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>If they don't understand that you take Myles Garrett number one,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they they simply are not competitive. You cannot go into

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>year two of Hugh Jackson where it sounds like there's

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>issues inside the building about who wants What if that's

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>true with Myles Garrett not being the number one pick

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and letting that fall to a team like the Niners,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an unbelievable situation that sets you up to you

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for he again years of comparison with the player you

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>passed on. So what would we call up like this

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is catchuan rough Riders or I would I honestly, I

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>would not do anything at that point. I don't know

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. Come on, what if we got

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>rid of the Browns? The terrible number? You can't stay

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>with at one? It's an easy answer, the Montreal Alouettes. Okay,

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>flip places with them? Yeah, here we go. I agree,

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it's embarrassing. I agree with what you're

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>saying Mark, in terms of that you're suspecting this could

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all be a smoke screen. I think what you're saying

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about not being excited about your bisky is so logical.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be true that that teams aren't going to

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be trading up for these quarterbacks and the smart play

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>will be to see if if they fall down, and

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of course some will get taken, but I I just

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>can't buy it that that teams are gonna be giving

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>up extra draft stock. It is a um. Every year

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>moving on, there is always seems to be a first

0:31:55.440 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>round talent where a bombshell drops that throws, you know,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>messes up draft boards and also potentially messes up a

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>person's life. And in this case, Ohio State quarterback Garyon Conley,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>who is considered one of the top prospects in this draft. Uh,

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it was learned this week that he's being investigated by

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>police after he was accused of rape by a woman

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month. That as according to Cleveland police, who

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>confirmed it to NFL media, Conley has not been charged

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or arrested in connection with the alleged incident. UM. But

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it goes without saying Greg Rosenthal that, uh, this could

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lead some teams to go in a different direction. We

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>saw it with Laramie Tunsel on a much lesser potential

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>situation involving the player, which was the weed bong gas

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>mask thing. Leyall Collins a couple of years ago opted

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to um not get drafted at all and went the

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>other route. Hold teams not to draft him, and now

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Connley finds himself potentially in a similar situation. Yeah, it is.

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to know how this will shake out. It's

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>such a serious accusation. The police can you know, as

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, confirmed to the NFL that they're investigating it,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's going to take time, you know. I

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I went and looked in just where was this guy

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get drafted? To begin with? He was thought

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of as a top three, top three or four cornerback,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was probably a mid to late type of first round pick.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And with this sort of uncertainty, I mean, people have

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>compared it to Collins. To me, they're they're different. They're

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>very different situations, especially because Collins told teams not to

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>draft him. You would you would think teams would just

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>stay away. But we're guessing about about things that it's

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of unknowable, right, I mean, wouldn't they just stay

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Just happened. We just learned about the case, and so

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all that has to play out. It is. I think

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it must be a surprise to UM scouts because I

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>was looking at Bob McGinn puts out the scouting reports

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and talks to scouts about these players, and the words

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>used to describe only were great character kid. Everybody loves

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy, really good teammate, leader of the group. So

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not someone where there's like this map, this history

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of of uh, you know, strange behavior, illegal behavior on

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>any level. So it's it's it's it's terrible timing, and

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's true, then he won't be drafted at all.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to know though that by that time

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Thursday comes around. Moving on, Jake Long was the number

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>one pick of the two thousand eight NFL draft, uh

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and he is calling it a career. Almost thirty two

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>years old. He announced his decision on Twitter on Monday,

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and was nine years to the day when he became

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the first overall pick of the two thousand eight draft,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Chris Long and who Matt Matt Ryan, who

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>went number three that year. UH Long released a long

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>statemen about his decision to leave the game. Injuries have

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>basically just completely destroyed him in the last couple of years.

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>After he was a true lockdown left corner for several years. No,

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he was a corner, actually was do your homework, a

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lockdown left tackle for multiple years with the Dolphins. Um

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know, notable to bring it up. Nice career

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for Jake, but I do have um a statement to

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>make you do. I do as the CEO slash GM

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>slash Director of Communications for sash inventor slash inventor. You

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are the Jerry Jones in this in this situation slash

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>gerra in so many ways of the San Diego Graybeards.

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Big announcement here, the San Diego Graybeards will induct longtime

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>left tackle Jake Long into our Ring of Honor on Sunday,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>October twenty two and a half time of our home

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>contest against the Jacksonville Jaguars. Please join us as we

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>honor Jake for his years of service to the NFL's

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 1>most senior friendly French guys. It seems fifty dash dash,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty dash dash. He's got everything you look for in

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a franchise caliber player for the Gray Beards. He was

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>once an All Pro, always on the Gray Beards. He was.

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>He was on my Gray Beards team in both the

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen and two thousand sixteen now fits. And

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what I thought long and hard about

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>putting him on two thousand seventeen. I think when I

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 1>decided not to. Once he saw the article get published

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on NFL dot com, he said, if the gray beards

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are passing on me, I think maybe it's not to

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>move to the next step in my life. I think

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you are over your long pun limit for this whole segment.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are all unintentional. Unintentional. Uh, that's what's happening in

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the news. No, Jake Cutler, Yeah, all right. Care the

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of the league doesn't care about him. Neither do we.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>J Color wants to play. His agent is telling people,

0:36:55.800 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there you go, good luck, good luck Jay. Now moving on.

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It is time, and I want to say I want

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to start this by saying we have we have gotten sloppy,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>much like we we we failed in our promotion of

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>our video shows that just ran for the last month. Um,

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't something we did, uh you know, on purpose.

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't you know, we didn't mean for it to

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>happen this way, but we just we kind of let

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ourselves down with that a little bit. And you know,

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we we being part of a collective, we but we

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are part of right. Maybe you know, maybe others could

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>help us as well with that. I don't know if

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the world was aware that we had those

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>video shows. But maybe next time around there will be

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a general awareness. But this situation with Go get my Lunch, Uh,

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 1>you turd uh, is that we have gotten a little

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lax in paying off sandwiches. And I just want to

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>say with peace and love that I don't think we

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>should do Go Get My Lunch anymore unless we get

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the core of it, which was put your

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sandwich where your mouth is. And if you get a

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>proposition incorrect, you gotta deal out sandwiches. It's coming out

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of your wallet. Thoughts. I am all for this. I

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>think that there should be some accountability attached to your

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>uh propositions. Oh, I I totally agree. Uh. Looking at

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the Go Get my Lunch site, I think I was

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven and six in our last little round. You always

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>turned this into like a promotion. My family has ant

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that can feed, that could feed us. For a week,

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been they've been waiting for those sandwiches, and I

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>have to tell I have to tell my kids now

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>another some responsibility attached these picks might ruin your percentages

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, right, because I think three of us

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>might care a little bit more and actually try on

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the conscious level. We only stopped like for one or

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>two times. West was three and nine last time. I mean,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, why would why would we just start now?

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't we have to make up these old West? Why

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>don't we Okay, we're all in agreement. Let's get back

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>into paying off the sandwich I didn't I didn't express

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>agreement with that. But well here's what I stay there.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Here one thing, when it comes to pay them off,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely murky because at this point we've had two

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>waves of sandwich bets, super Bowl and uh, free agency,

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's sort of up and down with our standings.

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You kind of have a good run a bad run.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got to find some sort of system to find

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>out what anyone actually owes. Well, let's start now, right

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and the standings will you know, obviously every all the

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>picks count, but starting with the draft here is a

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>nice um chance to reboot in terms of the payment.

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you've succeeded up to now, as Greg has

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately exactly unfortunate, would be very good to have lost

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of sandwich is the last few rounds. It never

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>really matter. Your weird didn't matter. Then now we'll just arbitrary,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and we decided that it matters. Now, now you're right,

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that is bad, bad news for you, but you know,

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>come on, get over it. Very good news for West. Um.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And now West, before we get into these you have

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to understand that I think this is a very important

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>round for you. I had three thousand and seventeen NFL Draft.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You you you went three and eleven. Uh for free agency? Uh?

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He did go one and oh in the super Bowl

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time. What was the one even there?

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Marks that the super Bowl will

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not happen. Nailed that one. Um. Yeah, I think if

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll look back on history, when we first started this segment,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I was in first place for a while and then

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I went in the bucket like you did during the

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>draft wing year. Damn I did. I had that really

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bad draft, which really the fact that I'm just behind

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Greg is a real credit to the old Zuster coming

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>back from what I think was a one in fourteen

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen draft. But here we are, now, West,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.919
<v Speaker 1>this is your opportunity to get back in the game.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Crawl back to five hundred and once you get to

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>five and now let's get into him. Mark. We start

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>with you your first proposition, and for those that are

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:03.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to our first for the first time, uh, each

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of us will go around make a prediction about the draft,

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and then each of us will have the opportunity to

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>take up that person on their predictions say no, no, no, no,

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong jibbroni, and then there are sandwiches in play

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for the winner and the loser. My first prop is

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>two words long, it rains, rains. Where's the draft us?

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It is outside, and it is an incredible risk. You

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are going right up to mother nature and you're saying

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we're taking you on. We want three days of sunny,

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>blissful weather, low low winds. I'm seeing some precipitate. Are

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we not allowed to do any research? I would say,

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have not done any up to now, that

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we would that would that you? I would say I

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would not if I were you. But you are more

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>what more than welcome to do whatever you want to do.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Well here this is a perfect example. Maybe a couple

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, that's yeah, why not, it's gonna rain,

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna rain, let's go for it. But now

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I know there's actual there's like you either do either

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a very good chance, or that there's

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a little chance. I don't know. I think the weather

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in the east is very unpredictable. You want to tie

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself to a weather report, be my guest. I would

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>say that even if it rains at all, any amount

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of precipitate, any water from the sky, and we have

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Connraar on the scene, I'm going to have him on

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>this minute. Minute. Well, it's only during the draft. Now,

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what if it's overnight Friday night, but not during the draft?

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it needs to be during the draft. I

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's fair to say Saturday, Friday, Thursday, Friday

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>or Saturday from when the pispeak in to end, not

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if it d If it rains in the middle of

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the night, I'm not going to tag you to that.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>That seems a little ridiculous. I was thinking just Thursday night.

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But you're saying for the entire weekend. The draft is

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a three day affair. I'm gonna take you up on that.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>If they haven't even looked yet, sure, I'm gonna look anyways.

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>What if it rains during off hours, That's what I'm saying.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to only peg you during active like bell open,

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>this bell close, this type thing. I think that's making

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it even more fair. I'm gonna look at the five

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>day weather I maybe should not have taken you up well,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Gregory did uh? It looks like right now chance of

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 1>precipitation at its high on Saturday in your corner. Friday

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>partly cloudy. So it's here on Thursday, accord in National

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Weather Service. But I took you on it. I'll take

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you yeah, according yeah, weather that coming. So you say

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it will rain, I am saying it will rain at

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>one point during the active pick session of the draft,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>either no precipitation. I have not done any homework on

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this issue and purposely tuned out greg and Dan during

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this segment. I'm taking you up on it as well.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I like it all right. So there you go, a

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of sandwiches on the line, tides of rain, Chris

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>westling here it is a big, big brown for Chris.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>We all know what the pressure is on. No pressure,

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.959
<v Speaker 1>No diamonds, Chris West. Should the forty nine ers stay

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>put at number two, they will not draft an offensive player,

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>which means no Leonard for Net, no Mitchell Trobinsky. If

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners do not trade out of the round.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>They will not take it interesting because no one really

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks will take Trabinsky. I mean that would be a stunt.

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.919
<v Speaker 1>All kinds of reporters do I don't think I haven't

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>seen reporters on our network. We've already said you're not

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>buying it. They're throwing it out there that the forty

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Niners are putting it out there, come come grat us.

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think anyone believes there's any chance. So

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who does that really? Leave just for NET? Essentially, So

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of just betting. You're not trying to dress

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>down my statement and Trobisky just because you don't believe

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>talk pro im talking it out I'm talking about I

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess up. You knows the steaks and watch

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>out Greg, Greg always dressed diminish. Whatever you put out there, Oh,

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this isn't really going out on a limb. Yeah, I'm

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not talk you talk out the persons. So you're saying

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just for NET. Why don't you just say just

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for NET and leave Trabisky out of it. I was

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go or NET to the forty Niners as my

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>onion hanger, but now since I have this opportunity. I'll

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just take you up on that anyways, so I'll kill

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>my other one. I'll take you up because because why not.

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I wanted to see what happens. I

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good prop. Let's go for it. Wait

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>take you wait, I'm confused. You're saying it will He's

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>saying it's a defensive player. All right, I agree, So

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to take him up on that. Right,

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you think it will be a defensive player. Yes, I

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's a heavy favorite, or a punter or a kicker,

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or I think I think I will lose a sandwich.

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going to just be I'm gonna be a

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>sport about it. And well, you did have a nice

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>round where you let Sydney act as you're conduit. I'm

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>taking every bet unless something is totally outlandish. Yeah, um,

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know. This game always confuses me. I

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.439
<v Speaker 1>think that the forty niners will stay in the pick

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and pick a defensive player. So that means that I

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>will not take you on anything, right all right? God? Alright?

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Moving um now I'm thinking about it. Well, if pick,

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm flipping back again, because why would I change what

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 1>my onion hanger was even if it was an onion hanger,

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. I'll take you. I'll say, why not? Right,

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if that was your onion hanger, it was gonna be

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that you would. You know it's gone

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>now though, right, you're bad. I gotta come up with

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a new one, he said. Do you know that, as

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>per tradition, the producer has to come up with a

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>go get my lunch prop for the draft as well.

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I did become aware of that about twenty minutes ago.

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Irishman Brandon McGinnis is the only producer

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to ever win a sandwich prop, and it came on

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the draft last season when he predicted correctly that the

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys would take Jalen's or a team would take Jalen

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith in the first two rounds of the draft. He

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>picked up four sandwiches there. That was nice. I think

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe the producers are cursed. They were, so he got

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that one, right. Jalen Smith is now not doing so great,

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, so maybe I should just stay sit this

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>one out. Let's try. He got He got a sandwiches, though,

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I do you remember getting Brandon? Uh, this is part

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of your job. You have to do it said, so

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>even if you have to kinda like laylow a little bit,

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe ease up on the drops for the next fifteen minutes.

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 1>So you gotta come up with something essentially begin your

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>draft prep. When we did, I'll go next. I don't

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what? Do I know? Nothing? So the one

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the one team that I fall very closely during this

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>walk up process obviously is the Jets. So I will

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>throw one out there with the Jets. Uh, it is

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a double, it's a two partner, a tease. What do

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 1>they call it in your parlance? Greg? Is that a tease? Parlay? Parlay?

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it is? Parley in the parlance? Not

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>at The Jets will go defense in the first round

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for a ninth consecutive year. Hm, and they will not

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:59.240
<v Speaker 1>take a quarterback in their first three picks. You uh,

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know you will take that? Yeah, you went against

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the normal rules. That's sort of an onion hanging right

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there by putting two different things on the table because

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of I agree the top players tend this year.

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it's mostly defense up there, but I

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.319
<v Speaker 1>think they'll take a quarterback. So I'm taking you up

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>on that sandwich. Mark, I will too. I mean it's

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a complex I've tried these complex, multi pronged bets and

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh for nine on them. So I'm gonna

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>try to win one back. And here's and here's my logic.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to get into the quarterback situation again,

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but I will say the Jets have so many holes

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the roster that I think they

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to uh just stock up on various

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>players that can help and maybe Todd Bowles help save

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>his job. And also you're convincing me as you're talking

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>trade out of that number six pitch. I think they're

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>desperate to do that as well. And I think that

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>would be done uh all around the idea of stocking

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>up the roster and kicking the can on quarterback until

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>next year, so we'll see what well. And you're GM

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>would probably be in the position of having to already

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>cut and release a quarterback he just drafted about seven

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred days ago or three hundred and sixty five days ago.

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's probably that it's such a bad

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>look before Hackenburg has ever stepped on the field. Uh,

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know if the guy is real. Oh,

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this would be the Christian Hackenburg is real drop. But

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Sydney right now is powering away trying to come up

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with so anyway, I got I got three sandwiches locked

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in on that one. I'm a little worried about this one. Yeah,

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a good job. Yeah, you kind of hoodwinked

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>us with the double pronged maneuver. I don't work. But O. J.

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Howard is sitting out there too. I think you there

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are a couple factors out there. Yeah, I think. I

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think they have the onions to pick Howard, but

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that could happen. Greg alright right, wearing the Henley today,

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, on Chris Westling's corner. A little bit interesting. Well,

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he is the strong silent type, so it's a it's

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a good fit for him. Henley is what the strong

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:00.320
<v Speaker 1>silent types wear. Yeah, like, whatever you're wearing, let the

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>strong silent type swear. Uh. Ruben Foster in the news

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>for failing that drug test, talked about it a little

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bit on Monday's show. People a little worried, you know, well,

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 1>will that crush his draft stock? I'm gonna say no

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that despite failing the drug test, despite having an altercation

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with with the hospital worker and whatnot. Some reports that

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't really made a great impression. I'll say he

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>still gets taken in the top fifteen picks, doesn't end

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>up parding his draft pick top fifteen, top fifteen. I'll

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>take you up on that. Hell, I don't know, yeah,

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that. Why not? I had a problem where

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna go? I don't know. Well, I think

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have gone and he was a lock for

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.280
<v Speaker 1>top ten. People thought he'd be about a top twelve

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>type of pick. I think people maybe the Saints even

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>were a factor. I had a prop which I will

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:56.959
<v Speaker 1>not use, where he falls out of the top ten.

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he's gonna fall much farther than that.

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I I the one thing that we're hearing is that

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the issues, the stuff that's cropped up, a lot of

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>teams don't consider it massive, massive issue. Um, I'm not

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take you up on that one. Actually, what

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 1>was the what happened at the doctor check in? That

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that was a fun little story. Yeah, just that he

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>was waiting for a long time for his tests. Whether

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it was an m R I I'm not really sure.

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And he started getting a little ornery and he got

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>into it with a hospital worker, you know, some sort

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.439
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth, and he ended up getting kicked

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kicked out. Maybe the hospital worker was a class A jerk.

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I like, I like mean linebackers. I'd like I would

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like if my team had one, well means hospital workers.

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Though everyone about that, I mean to anyone. Yes, Baltimore

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Raven rush for twenty yards right up the middle of

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>our defense of that. Take this guy off my draft board.

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, wait, I hate to do this, but I

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>really need to run to the to the men's room

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:02.879
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Oh my god, I'm just gonna stop down.

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna stop, but we're gonna do our read

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. You gotta check on his meds. That is weird.

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That has never happened on this show. But there he goes, strong,

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>silent type, small bladder. We're gonna stretch read excuse himself

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to go use the restaurant. Yeah, that's what I hope

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not a real emergency. Well, well, I need some

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>new underpants. And on that subject, elevate your underwear game

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to the next level with you know what it is?

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>What is meand's? Oh just seriously, soft, feel good and

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he's delivered right to your door. Means are designed in

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>l A and made from sustainably sourced micromodal nailed it

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey fabric three times softer than cop cotton. Meandi's softer

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>than soft. Lug undis coming ever changing selection of classic colors,

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>bold shades, and adventurous patterns, so you can tell your

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Undis to your own personal style. And guess what what

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You can save time and money each month with a

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 1>monthly subscription. And if you're not ready for a subscription,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, you can still save. That's because meds is

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>offering you off your first pair. Just use our special

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>U R L met Undis dot com slash NFL and

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get off your first pair and uh go ahead revamp

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your underwear dry. You deserve it. Once again. It's Medis

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash NFL dot com slash NFL seventeen. I

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 1>will real quick. I don't want to be labor the point,

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but both of your women were excited about the Meundi scenario.

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Their performance enhancing enhancing dy's it's like using a corked bat.

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me just put it that way away. Their end eineered,

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which is taking nothing away like a wonder from you

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>guys or anybody that wears me and these, which is

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>an excellent product, but that if there's another reason why

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to get these? Oh yeah, they contour the lower body

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>very well. I would say that I am a fringe.

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm closing in on a subscription. I'm not just saying

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that because the rest of my under underwear selection. This

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from someone who didn't even wear underwear until the

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:30.880
<v Speaker 1>last may have converted me and I, you know, wearing

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that leopard print one right now, and I want to

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>see what other selections they have. Whatever it is that

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>black and White Bears Sydney, can we work on getting

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a statement from the Shadowy League figure relevant to this

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 1>discussion on why it is not an individualized offer code?

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you respectfully, ask like, Hey, the guys I'm a

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the show, would like a explanation why the

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>offer code is universal. I predict the answer will be vanilla.

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And here it comes Greg right on Q emergency averted. Greg,

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 1>we decided uh not to even do the meyandis read.

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We spent the entire time talking about your abrupt exit.

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I have no regrets. No, hey, listen, it could have

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>ended a lot worse than it did. Put it that

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>way all right, By the way, next round, did you

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>just go second time? Mark? I have not. Yeah, before

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:32.919
<v Speaker 1>we do that, let's do our group way Drew. It's

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>just one prop and we all make a guess and

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>that that will be the following scenario. What slot or

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which slot, what slot will the first quarterback be taken?

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It So, whether you believe that to be the first round,

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think most people think it will happen in the

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>first round. Forget about the team, because the teams could

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>trade out, and it's very possible that's how this ends

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>up playing out, although you never know. Uh so not

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the team, just the number one through thirty two, go

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>around the room, or if you don't think anybody quarter right,

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>go say off the board that too. That would be

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>an onion hanger. Um, Mark, you'r up, uh just reading

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the tea leaves don't want this to happen. I'm gonna

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>go number five Titans, Well, number five wherever that wherever

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that ends up being whatever team someone trading possibly the

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Browns not trading down, trading up. I believe into five.

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm also gonna take number five since the Titans are

0:56:34.520 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to trade down interesting well, reading the tea leaves once again,

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>five is makes a lot of sense. Six makes a

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Uh. So I will say, just to

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>be different, I will say the Jets will trade out

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of six, uh, and I'll I believe the Browns will

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>trade into it, uh and they'll make the pick there,

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say six. My thought process was, was ten

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 1>or twelve? Really where the two I was looking at?

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:09.359
<v Speaker 1>People think the Bills might take Deshaun Watson. I think

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Trabinsky could end up just fall into the Browns, which

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>no one would be too shocked by. But I'm gonna

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>go with the Bills. I think I think let's go

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 1>number ten, number ten. So two fives, six and a

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ten mark go your next prop. Alright, controversial player, talk

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>about a guy with a lot of baggage. But also

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it depends what kind of team you are, where your

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>ownerships at. Joe Mixon considered by some to be a

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal talent. I say that he is gone by pick

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>number thirty five already five. I had a Joe Mixon

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one that is similar to this. We could team up.

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It was my onion hanger. What happens other people's onion

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hangers are just my second or third problem. Well, I'm

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>getting just getting warmed up. Mine is a little more

0:57:56.000 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 1>onion e Um, Well, you can still hanging anyway. So

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you're saying he will go in the top thirty picks

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 1>despite that horrific domestic or violence incident at the restaurant,

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>which obviously is on a lot of people's radar. And

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been we've been starting to go to school on

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>these players, and and I think the general thought is

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he he might be the most complete running back in

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this draft, even more than Leonard for Nett, and if if,

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if not for that incident, you know, he'd probably be

0:58:23.680 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty pick. I will take you up on that.

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's right around the over under. So

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that makes that makes some sense. But that's that's real

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 1>early on day two, that is the first three picks.

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Those three picks are Cleveland, San Francisco, and Jacksonville. You

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 1>could argue I didn't want to go deeper because I

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>think those three teams potentially would have a need at

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>running back and would potentially take a chance. You could

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>also make the argument that one or two of those

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>teams will scratch that itch in the first round, which

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>will leave maybe just one team that hasn't need at

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that point. I will also go I'll take you up

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on that. I just think um teams and it's a

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:04.000
<v Speaker 1>different world. We were just talking about that earlier in

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the show. I think some teams don't want to invest

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to pick that high with someone with that type of baggage.

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, mid to late second round

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a more likely spot. We'll take you up.

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky one. I'm gonna take it. It's

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a tough one for me to figure out, but I'm

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna take it. Why not, West, you're up. Christian McCaffrey

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>does not get drafted by a team called the Carolina Panthers.

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Kind of interesting. So you're taking the field. That's a rare,

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a clever move. The funny West, look at mine

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>right here. Christian McCaffrey will not go to the Panthers.

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're in the same boat on this taking eighty

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>five records. Seriously, he wants to bounce back. So anyway,

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>since that was my exact next prop, I will not

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>take you up on it. A conventional wisdom is that

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he is going to the Panthers, but that's that's bump

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>kiss to me. Conventional is them the day before the draft.

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'd like it a lot better if the

1:00:04.040 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Eagles were picking before the Panthers. I I'm looking, let's

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>barring trades. I'm looking at one through seven, and I

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see the candidate that grabs him ahead of Carolina.

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And he's such a such an ideal talent and need

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fit for Carolina that this is one of the rare

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>ones where I'm not going to take you up. I

1:00:22.720 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think that you're logic. DJ. You said he is going

1:00:26.720 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to Carolina, right, I believe he's going to Carolina. Well

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you would take him up? Oh, I will take you up.

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Then I heard that wrong. Yeah, yeah, DJ um Daniel

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeremiah tweety. He was wondering if McCaffrey would even get

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to eight. I will not take you up on that,

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just because anytime there's that big of a consensus, I

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you never know. I mean, if everyone really

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>know something that much, it seems like it could be

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty. But there's always a chance, like DJ said

1:00:54.640 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't even get to Carolina. Well, like San

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Diego would be surprising. But DJ kind of mentioned even

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>actually because they're not a franchise. Yeah, that's a good point.

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers, maybe the gray Beards jump up into the

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>top eight featured back. They do. He said, some teams,

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>even with running backs in place, like him that much

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's not your traditional you know one a he

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he would maybe be. I guess I'm the reason I

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>am going Panthers is because if one through seven, four

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>nets gonna go to one of those teams, maybe the

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners, then McCaffrey is your clear number two guy.

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And it just fits so neatly for the Panthers that

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, if they if they go another, if

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna pick a running back, it's him. In my book,

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>U nexce one simple, The Browns and the Texans will

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>take quarterbacks in the first round. The room stops that

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>its tracks. Well, I just offensive I think they will.

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I can't take you on that. I think I think

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>both teams are bound to do. Starting to come out

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of your your new strategy. It's it's too logical. I

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just agree that they're that they will. Yeah, my logic

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is obvious. The Browns, if you threw a wild card

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in there, then I'm taking up, but then they are not.

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are two not Those are two clear quarterback targets.

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns have two first round picks, and they could hypothetically

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>trade out one of those picks, even move back in

1:02:30.160 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the first round, and still get a guy they like potentially.

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And Um and the Texans, I think they're desperate to

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>turn the page again once more, and I think there's

1:02:39.920 --> 1:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure once again coming down from that from ownership. Get

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>me my new quarterback and make me forget about the

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>old ones. So I think it's bro the Cardinals in there,

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I take you up. I can't, I can't triple. I

1:02:51.920 --> 1:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>can't do they Where did you come down on this? West?

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the logic is sound. The Browns and

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Texans plan to draft a quarterback in the first round,

1:03:04.560 --> 1:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna take you up on it because there's

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>no telling who's gonna be there at The guy that

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Texans want might be off the board, so they might

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have to adjust on the fly. I will take you

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>up on it. I've fallen into the trap again by

1:03:16.920 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>including too many uh you know parts. Whenever you do that,

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you get in trouble. But it wouldn't be gut see

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>at all to say one of you know, both one

1:03:26.280 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. No, I don't even think this is too

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>many parts. I think you're right. I think it's perfect.

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Like we must be getting good at these games, because

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all of these feel like fifty fifty shots to me,

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>almost impossible to to pick. But I'm gonna do what

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>West says, uh for the same reason that you just

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>never you never know. And and maybe maybe the Texans

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>love Patrick Mahomes and maybe it gets taken before there.

1:03:46.480 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. I have a theory on why they all

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>seem like it's not just that we're getting better. The

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>draft is not our area of expertise, so our knowledge

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is like, okay, that sounds reasonable me And I think

1:03:56.600 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the more mysterious in a long time.

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Ruben Foster want to still like rattle around my brain. Well,

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>people have said even though we we don't know anything,

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know anything. And then on top of that,

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the conventional wisdom is people know less about this draft

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of what's gonna happen than any draft in a while.

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no one has any clue what the forty

1:04:19.240 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Niners are even gonna do it too. There's like five

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>or six players people have been thrown to them. So

1:04:23.680 --> 1:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, by the way, just for time reasons, Greg,

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do your second one, then we have one

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>more each. We gotta go. Okay, Uh, this whole taking

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>my onion hanger before really confused. Walla Walla is big onions.

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>There is giant sweet Spanish onions are good. Maybe I'll oh, Greg,

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you're up, sorry, Red Walla Wallace. You have done this

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the in the restroom. I like the internal monologue.

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have John Ross. Maybe we're going too deep here.

1:04:59.000 --> 1:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>John Ross is gonna be taken ahead of Mike Williams.

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>These are kind of the two two of the top

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>three receivers. There's been some talk Ross actually might fall

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>right out of the first round, so then I would

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be totally wrong. But this guy is fast, and people

1:05:12.440 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>love fast. People like speed. He set the Combine's gonna

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>bet on that. He broke the record of Chris Johnson.

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So people get excited about it. But I think the

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>people that get more excited about that are probably the

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people like the layman. Uh, and maybe not the people

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in the building. I'm saying what I would get excited

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about here. Mike Williams and he kind of sounds like

1:05:31.240 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys who maybe doesn't get a ton

1:05:33.080 --> 1:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of Williams and he's poisoning the well for this Mike Williams,

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I will take you up on that. I think that

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Williams will go before. Once again, it seems like a

1:05:43.800 --> 1:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>reasonable right on the nose, but I'll take you up.

1:05:48.320 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this one's a little bit of an upset.

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely an up It's definitely an upset. Pick upset.

1:05:54.440 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>John Ross's fragility will be the deciding factor. Yeah, he's

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>got some injury concerns. And Mike Williams is a lot

1:06:02.760 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of late our visits. Teams are interested. I will take

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you up to I think Mike Williams goes first. Fragility

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a big factor with these players. Fertility, one of one

1:06:17.240 --> 1:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of the players don't have all the information on one

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of the players has an eight year old kid. That's

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an old kid. It's an old kid. It's a lot

1:06:25.640 --> 1:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of mileage on that kid. All right, last round, here

1:06:27.960 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we go, And if you haven't dropped an onion hanger yet,

1:06:30.080 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it is time. Alright. Well number one, I like giving

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>food to my friends. I'm okay occasionally swinging for the fences.

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to give you some robotic, ultralogical onion hanger.

1:06:42.120 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that this outdoor huge onions. I've already told

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you that weather is going to be a legit factor

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in this draft. There's gonna be a lot of these clowns,

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>these tables. Well, all right, you in the National Weather Service,

1:06:58.000 --> 1:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get their pick in quick at your

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>card up. But there's a lot of confusion. Are we

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>are we postponing this pick that pick that for the

1:07:05.480 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>first time since the Vikings in two just to pick.

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying in the first round, but between round

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>one and seven, a team is going to miss a

1:07:14.800 --> 1:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pick and it's not gonna be as the headline grabber

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like it was when the Vikings completely botched that. But

1:07:21.240 --> 1:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>over the course of these rounds, weather chaos, utter sort

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of just nonsense, is going to force one team to

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>blank on a pick. Good luck ever keeping the draft

1:07:31.800 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>indoors again. When you've got this kind of mayhem, total

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>mayhem bedlam, they'll be putting these these drafts and underground bunkers.

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>After what happens as well, Look at the excitement were

1:07:42.920 --> 1:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>banned by putting it outside. Next year no one will

1:07:49.920 --> 1:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>miss their pick in my opinion. Okay, yeah, next year,

1:07:53.120 --> 1:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>team is draft while we shoot paintballs at them. I'm

1:07:56.960 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna take you up. Oh surprising, feels reasonable, I could go.

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I will take you up on it. That was good

1:08:05.120 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on that good hang all right, West, Time for yours. Well,

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced we're ever paying off these sandwiches there.

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the last edition. If we don't pay it off.

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>My onion hanger. You want big onions, you gotta get

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>big onions. The old man woke up and now he

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>won't shut up. Joe Mixon gets drafted before Dalvin Cook.

1:08:26.080 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Well, I will take you up on that,

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>just because I like having the ones all make sense together.

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I just said he's not gonna get taken in the

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>top thirty five, so that's an easy call for me.

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying Dalvin Cook gets drafted like in the forties. Okay,

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's a good onon hanger. I will take

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you up on it too. I'll take you but it

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>next a lot of sandwiches in play. J. J. Watt,

1:08:55.000 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Texans All World defender will tweet well or Instagram or

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>some use of his social media a childhood photo with

1:09:05.840 --> 1:09:10.599
<v Speaker 1>brother t J, along with some cringe E Foe inspirational hokum.

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>When TJ is drafted, I feel like there's like he's

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>almost absolutely going to do that. Well, I'm actually saying

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:27.519
<v Speaker 1>these specifics like an onion protector, a specific image from

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>their childhood together, and it has he has to have something,

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>uh cringe e fox inspirational decides whether it's cringe. Okay,

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's break this down. If he sends a picture,

1:09:40.400 --> 1:09:44.639
<v Speaker 1>let's say, of him and his brother at last year's

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin game or something that doesn't know no good, it

1:09:48.320 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>has to be something from I'm gonna extend it a

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit to like, you know, the formative years. So

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>anything from when they were you know, single digit age

1:09:57.680 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>through junior high, high school and some unif form that

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen before, some early high. Now what if,

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what if let's just have a for instance, the quote

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is always thought you would you would make it this far?

1:10:10.200 --> 1:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So proud of you, bro? Does that count? Okay? It

1:10:13.000 --> 1:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be pre pubescent. I don't I don't

1:10:16.360 --> 1:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on downstairs or under the armpit, so

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you. But it's gonna be like twelve

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and under. I mean, like if it's their freshman high

1:10:23.960 --> 1:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>school photo, that's not really childhood. Yeah no, I said

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>coming of age formative years type thing. So yes, any

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty far apart in years, so yeah, I will take no.

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think actually what you've done

1:10:39.320 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>has made an excellent prediction that this is exactly what

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:44.519
<v Speaker 1>j J would j J wat would need to be

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>put into like a medically induced coma to not do exactly. Agree,

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gotta do it. This movie's gonna use it. I'm

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get a single like I mean, it was

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a fine I'm stunned. I don't prediction it's not. It

1:10:57.960 --> 1:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that it's a shock only out of character

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>or bold. I feel like it's a one. The hyper

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>specific specificity of it all is that how you saying

1:11:08.520 --> 1:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>specificity specificity? It? To me, it's a fifty thing like

1:11:13.960 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's doing that. The only question is whether the picture

1:11:17.120 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is new or old. That those are the only questions,

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going fifty five that it's an old picture.

1:11:21.600 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So no one took you off a rare

1:11:24.200 --> 1:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>onion hanger without stunner, all right, Greg and Sydney on deck. Wow,

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>she's nervous. I can tell all right, Leonard, four Nette

1:11:34.160 --> 1:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to forty Niners was going to be it, but that's

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gone now. So let's go with the Saints or the Cardinals.

1:11:40.960 --> 1:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>One of these two teams will take their quarterback of

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the future on Thursday night. Okay, one of them, one

1:11:50.600 --> 1:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of those two. Can I ask you one question when

1:11:52.360 --> 1:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we say quarterback of the future, we're not quarter four

1:11:54.880 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>years to find out if he actually a quarterback a

1:11:57.479 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>quarter They will take a first round quarterback one of them. Yes,

1:12:01.520 --> 1:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I will take you up on that. I will take

1:12:05.800 --> 1:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you up. I don't think either will. They're both pretty high.

1:12:08.920 --> 1:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they might have to trade back in to

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>get it. You know, I think the Cardinals will take

1:12:15.280 --> 1:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. But I'm gonna take you up on it

1:12:17.080 --> 1:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>because they need a lot of things right now. All right,

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the field. I'll take it. The Cardinals really

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>needed the quarterback of the future, that's they do. But

1:12:27.200 --> 1:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they could easily address it next year two or when

1:12:30.320 --> 1:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>all of these quarterbacks fall to the second round, right

1:12:33.120 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that that could get me. We're talking first round, right,

1:12:35.880 --> 1:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>first round. They're kind of thirteen is rich unless you're

1:12:38.479 --> 1:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>really in love. Kind of hoping. I'm hoping that one

1:12:40.840 --> 1:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of them trades back up, maybe the Saints, but Saints

1:12:45.120 --> 1:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, they could bump back in, are they an

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>They're thirty two, the last pick in the first round.

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a good spot for a quarterback with the much

1:12:54.200 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>covet and fifthier option. You know, Drew Drew Brees by

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, this in on record that he plans to

1:13:03.240 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>play into his forties and all this talk about them

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>needing like desperately to draft the quarterback. Come on, he's

1:13:08.960 --> 1:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>still one of the best five quarterbacks in the NFL.

1:13:10.880 --> 1:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>So little yeah, everbody come down, all right, drafting Garrett

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Grayson every year. Finally, we might need some timpani for

1:13:18.160 --> 1:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this one said, because I know this is such a

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>big moment for you to carry on the torch that

1:13:24.960 --> 1:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the Irishman passed to you after going four and oh

1:13:28.760 --> 1:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. Your prop all right here it is, I'm

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like shaking. I've never seen Sydney this nervous. Okay, she's

1:13:38.880 --> 1:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not a gambler. There will be a t. J. Watt

1:13:41.880 --> 1:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cam and we will see t J. Watt like, the

1:13:45.160 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>camera will cut to him and linger on him. You know,

1:13:47.439 --> 1:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>like a real not just oh hey, there's t J. Watt.

1:13:49.920 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to cut to him specifically at least

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>uh nine times before he's drafted. So you're all right,

1:13:58.479 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do you first of all, do you know any of

1:13:59.760 --> 1:14:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the aduction details? Are you just going because you could

1:14:03.520 --> 1:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>find this out right? So you're saying, there will be

1:14:06.560 --> 1:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a camera in t J. Watt's home or his family's

1:14:10.160 --> 1:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>home wherever he is, and before he gets drafted, which

1:14:14.280 --> 1:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>could be in the first round, it could be in

1:14:16.880 --> 1:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the second round. Uh, there will be nine cutaways, nine

1:14:20.960 --> 1:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>cuts at least nine before he's drafted. Nine drafted. That's

1:14:25.240 --> 1:14:27.559
<v Speaker 1>a large number. I will take that out. I will

1:14:27.640 --> 1:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>take you to and you know what I seeds Calvin Johnson.

1:14:30.120 --> 1:14:32.519
<v Speaker 1>This is why we've got great listeners. They can keep

1:14:32.640 --> 1:14:36.439
<v Speaker 1>track of the exact number here. That's another game they

1:14:36.479 --> 1:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>can play. That is an all time on treating them

1:14:39.240 --> 1:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like their toddlers. Greg, listen, there were sixteen cutaways. I'm

1:14:42.360 --> 1:14:44.519
<v Speaker 1>just saying we're gonna be right, and we're not gonna

1:14:44.560 --> 1:14:47.439
<v Speaker 1>be We're not gonna be totally focused on every second,

1:14:47.600 --> 1:14:50.599
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not I don't watch ESPN anyways. The city's

1:14:50.920 --> 1:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Sydney just shared some logic there that there were sixteen

1:14:54.240 --> 1:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>cutaways of t J's brother during that playoff game while

1:14:57.439 --> 1:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he was on the bench. U. But it is a

1:15:01.120 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>little apples and oranges there. I think you're in deep

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>trouble there in the home. That's a wild card. That's

1:15:09.280 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a wild card. He's probably there board drafted before, but

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>before that's a lot before. Yeah, I mean, of course

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking up. I like it. It's a creative I mean,

1:15:20.960 --> 1:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not as bad as when t d went for

1:15:24.240 --> 1:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>forty touchdowns, but it's close. So just as a summation here,

1:15:32.200 --> 1:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what city needs to happen? She needs t J. Watt

1:15:35.360 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the players that has NFL network cameras.

1:15:39.600 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Is an NFL network only you said ESPN, didn't you?

1:15:43.120 --> 1:15:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Or is it or ESPN? That's important? Actually we'll give

1:15:46.640 --> 1:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you either. Thought about those details? Want to give her either, Well,

1:15:49.840 --> 1:15:51.599
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, it's only it's going to be one

1:15:51.720 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 1>or the other. They probably wouldn't both NFL network feels

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like they could go super gushy on this. So whichever

1:15:57.560 --> 1:16:01.559
<v Speaker 1>network has new and if neither network has him, you lose.

1:16:01.600 --> 1:16:05.599
<v Speaker 1>He's already done before the draft even starts. But Sydney

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very honest woman. But I also feel like

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>she might have some intel that she's not sharing with us.

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>WHOA interesting. I just got a feeling, a bit of

1:16:13.400 --> 1:16:15.519
<v Speaker 1>a sessler that Sid's got an think I'm running in

1:16:15.600 --> 1:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>high circles. It's all that new money. You're above the

1:16:19.960 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>treetops a little bit honest. All right, there you go.

1:16:23.000 --> 1:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So there are the two thousand seventeen draft props, many

1:16:26.479 --> 1:16:29.559
<v Speaker 1>of which will be decided by the time uh your

1:16:29.600 --> 1:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>next here from us. We will um record a podcast

1:16:34.240 --> 1:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>immediately after the first round and get it to you,

1:16:39.160 --> 1:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>uh you know. Really, I'm gonna say around you know,

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>midnight or so, uh Pacific time will drop, you know,

1:16:46.600 --> 1:16:48.599
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the night on the East coast

1:16:48.680 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when you wake up, it's there for you. I don't

1:16:50.920 --> 1:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>know the time zone situation in the UK and beyond that,

1:16:54.200 --> 1:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys can figure it out. But just know that

1:16:56.320 --> 1:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we are going to get this thing out to you

1:16:59.240 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>right after the AFT as soon as possible, and then

1:17:02.120 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>again on Saturday, after the completion of the seventh round,

1:17:05.479 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>will be back upstairs and we will do a full

1:17:08.960 --> 1:17:10.559
<v Speaker 1>recap of the draft. So that will be our next

1:17:10.640 --> 1:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>two shows and we're very excited, uh to bring them

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to should be ready for the morning commute in the UK.

1:17:17.560 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You know about eight hours there, eight or nine of

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>them more for those who work. Not everyone in the

1:17:21.240 --> 1:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>UK works. Some will to speed in their rooms, literally nothing.

1:17:25.720 --> 1:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Our friend Simon is a taxi driver, so he who

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>knows what kind of hours he has? Right, let's go. God,

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the Rainers. This is Dan Hanson signing off

1:17:38.880 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Quiet Storm, the Mailman, the Boss and new money.

1:17:43.400 --> 1:17:46.599
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna give us some new sandwiches soon. Till Thursday