1
00:00:01,160 --> 00:00:06,040
Speaker 1: Former FBI director James Combing. He's in serious trouble, indicted

2
00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:08,879
Speaker 1: now on two counts, and the charges that have been

3
00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:12,520
Speaker 1: brought against him are significant. It also comes from a

4
00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:17,079
Speaker 1: hearing that happened in front of Judiciary Center. Ted Cruz

5
00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:20,400
Speaker 1: is going to be a very important part of this

6
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:26,119
Speaker 1: entire case because of the questioning of James Comber about

7
00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:29,520
Speaker 1: five years ago. Now, why is this happening now? The

8
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:33,600
Speaker 1: statue of limitations is running out? And is it going

9
00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:36,720
Speaker 1: to actually be a case where James Comby could go

10
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 1: to jail? But first I want to talk to you

11
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:41,960
Speaker 1: about my friends over at Patriot Mobile. You've got a

12
00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:45,360
Speaker 1: lot of choices for cell phone service, with new ones

13
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:48,080
Speaker 1: popping up all the time. But if you want to

14
00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:50,440
Speaker 1: make a difference and you want to stop giving your

15
00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,360
Speaker 1: money to liberal companies, well one way you can do

16
00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:56,880
Speaker 1: that is by getting rid of Liberal Mobile you probably

17
00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:59,800
Speaker 1: have right now. That is where hundreds of thousands of

18
00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:03,360
Speaker 1: Americans are now coming together and have made Patriot Mobile

19
00:01:03,400 --> 00:01:05,880
Speaker 1: what they are today. They've been in service now for

20
00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:10,600
Speaker 1: thirteen years, and right now is the best time ever

21
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,800
Speaker 1: to switch because it's never been easier. Now, before I

22
00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:15,800
Speaker 1: tell you about that, I want you to know why

23
00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:19,000
Speaker 1: switching is so important, because every time you make a call,

24
00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:20,960
Speaker 1: every time you send a text, and every time that

25
00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,480
Speaker 1: you pay your bill, you're actually standing up for the

26
00:01:23,560 --> 00:01:26,440
Speaker 1: values you believe in. Your First and your Second Amendment rights,

27
00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:30,280
Speaker 1: the rights of unborn children, and you stand with our military,

28
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:34,120
Speaker 1: our veterans, our wounded warriors, and our fallen soldier families.

29
00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:36,920
Speaker 1: Because Patriot Mobile takes about five percent of your bill

30
00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:40,119
Speaker 1: every month at no extra cost to you, and they

31
00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:44,360
Speaker 1: give it back to these organizations that fight for our values. Now,

32
00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:47,120
Speaker 1: let's talk about switching. It has never been easier. You

33
00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:50,800
Speaker 1: can keep your same number, keep your same phone, or upgrade.

34
00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:53,640
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile's got a one hundred percent US based customer

35
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,120
Speaker 1: service team and literally they can now with technology, get

36
00:01:57,120 --> 00:01:59,760
Speaker 1: you activated in minutes from the comfort of your home

37
00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,800
Speaker 1: or your office. You're second contractor owe money on your phones,

38
00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:07,600
Speaker 1: no worries. Patriot Mobile has a contract buyout program. And

39
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:11,200
Speaker 1: this is how we win, folks by aligning our spending

40
00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:14,920
Speaker 1: with our values. Every dollar we spend matters. Now, let

41
00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:16,960
Speaker 1: me also give you a free month of service. Go

42
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:23,239
Speaker 1: to Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson that's Patriot Mobile. Dot

43
00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,840
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson, or you can call them nine to

44
00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:30,960
Speaker 1: seven to two Patriot, use the promo code ferguson, and

45
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:34,200
Speaker 1: you're gonna get one month free service by switching today.

46
00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:37,960
Speaker 1: So again, Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson, use the promo

47
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:40,440
Speaker 1: code ferguson. You'll get a free month of service today

48
00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:43,799
Speaker 1: Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine to seven to

49
00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:47,000
Speaker 1: two Patriot. I want you to hear what Senata Cruz

50
00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:49,560
Speaker 1: had to say as we sat down and talked about this.

51
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:52,200
Speaker 1: Take a listen, all right, So, Senator, I want to

52
00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:55,799
Speaker 1: start with this clip, and I think this is a

53
00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:58,800
Speaker 1: great starting point for this indictment of the former FBI

54
00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:03,480
Speaker 1: director James Comey. This is you questioning Comy back in

55
00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:08,519
Speaker 1: September of twenty twenty. This is the back and forth

56
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:12,120
Speaker 1: between the two of you. Everyone listening. This is really

57
00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,400
Speaker 1: an important part of history now and going to probably

58
00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:15,760
Speaker 1: be an important part of this case.

59
00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:22,000
Speaker 2: To another topic. On May third, twenty seventeen, in this committee,

60
00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:25,600
Speaker 2: Chairman Grassley asked you point blank quote, have you ever

61
00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:29,520
Speaker 2: been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating

62
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:33,079
Speaker 2: to the Trump investigation of the Clinton investigation. You responded

63
00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:38,040
Speaker 2: under oath quote never. He then asked you, quote, have

64
00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:40,480
Speaker 2: you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be

65
00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:44,360
Speaker 2: an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation

66
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:49,760
Speaker 2: or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath No. Now,

67
00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:52,720
Speaker 2: as you know, mister McCabe, who works for you as

68
00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:57,560
Speaker 2: publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the

69
00:03:57,560 --> 00:03:59,960
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal and that you were a directly aware

70
00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:04,880
Speaker 2: of it and that you directly authorized it. Now, what

71
00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:08,400
Speaker 2: mister McCabe is saying and what you testified to this

72
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:11,800
Speaker 2: committee cannot both be true. One or the other is false.

73
00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:13,600
Speaker 2: Who's telling the truth?

74
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:16,960
Speaker 3: I just can only speak to my testimony. I stand

75
00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:19,560
Speaker 3: by what the testimony you summarized that I gave in

76
00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:20,880
Speaker 3: May of twenty seventeen.

77
00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:24,000
Speaker 2: So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak.

78
00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,479
Speaker 2: And mister mccab if he says contrary, is not telling

79
00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:28,599
Speaker 2: the truth. Is that correct?

80
00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:31,719
Speaker 3: Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine

81
00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:32,320
Speaker 3: is the same.

82
00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:34,400
Speaker 2: Today, all right, I'm going to make a final point

83
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:38,480
Speaker 2: because my time has expired. This investigation of the president

84
00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:41,400
Speaker 2: was corrupt. The FBI and the Department of Justice were

85
00:04:41,400 --> 00:04:45,200
Speaker 2: politicized and weaponized, and in my opinion, there are only

86
00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:50,400
Speaker 2: two possibilities that you were deliberately corrupt or willfully incompetent,

87
00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:54,320
Speaker 2: and I don't believe you were incompetent. This has done

88
00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:58,360
Speaker 2: severe damage to the professionals and the honorable men and

89
00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:02,080
Speaker 2: women at the FBI, because law enforcement should not be

90
00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:03,400
Speaker 2: used as a political weapon.

91
00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:07,200
Speaker 1: All right, So you listen to that, and then you'll

92
00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:10,320
Speaker 1: look at the indictment. Count one false statement to the

93
00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,760
Speaker 1: US Senate that he had not quote authorized someone else

94
00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:17,320
Speaker 1: of the FBI to be an anonymous news source. Count two,

95
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:21,520
Speaker 1: call me obstructed the Senate Judiciary Committee's investigation through his

96
00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:26,440
Speaker 1: quote false and misleading statements. That is a big smoking gun.

97
00:05:27,720 --> 00:05:30,120
Speaker 2: Well it is. It's the basis of the indictment and

98
00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,040
Speaker 2: this will be the central focus of the trial. Now.

99
00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:37,360
Speaker 2: James Comy put out a statement tonight on Instagram, and

100
00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:40,679
Speaker 2: his statement is striking in that it is a political statement.

101
00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,480
Speaker 2: It is not a statement about the facts of the law.

102
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:45,919
Speaker 2: So give a listen to what James Comby said this

103
00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:47,560
Speaker 2: evening in response to the indictment.

104
00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:50,880
Speaker 3: My family and I have known for years that there

105
00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:55,040
Speaker 3: are costs to standing up to Donald Trump, but we

106
00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 3: couldn't imagine ourselves living any other way. We will not

107
00:05:59,279 --> 00:06:03,560
Speaker 3: live on our knees, and you shouldn't either. Somebody that

108
00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:07,280
Speaker 3: I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool

109
00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:11,960
Speaker 3: of a tyrant, and she's right. But I'm not afraid,

110
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:15,800
Speaker 3: and I hope you're not either. I hope instead you

111
00:06:15,880 --> 00:06:20,160
Speaker 3: are engaged, You are paying attention, and you will vote

112
00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:24,640
Speaker 3: like your beloved country depends upon it, which it does.

113
00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,960
Speaker 3: My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but

114
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:33,200
Speaker 3: I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and

115
00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:35,719
Speaker 3: I'm innocent, So let's have a trial.

116
00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,839
Speaker 1: I love how he is a victim there and acting

117
00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:43,919
Speaker 1: like he's above all of this. But center, let's just

118
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,720
Speaker 1: go back to three point thirty of twenty three. James

119
00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:52,160
Speaker 1: Comy tweeted out, quote, it's been a good day. That

120
00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:54,440
Speaker 1: is how I reacted to trumping and died in the

121
00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:57,839
Speaker 1: Alvin Bragg hush money case. So to act like he's

122
00:06:57,839 --> 00:06:59,760
Speaker 1: some sort of guy that's above all this, look at

123
00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:00,560
Speaker 1: his own words.

124
00:07:01,240 --> 00:07:03,680
Speaker 2: Well, his statement he put out in response to this

125
00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:07,039
Speaker 2: that could have been given by Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi,

126
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:10,960
Speaker 2: or Keing, Jeffries, or any other political Democrat, and in fact,

127
00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:13,520
Speaker 2: he makes a call come out and vote. It's a

128
00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:16,840
Speaker 2: get out the vote message. This is a former director

129
00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:18,760
Speaker 2: of the FBI. But to give you a sense of

130
00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:22,680
Speaker 2: just how much he loathes Donald Trump, this is a

131
00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:25,200
Speaker 2: former director of the FBI who tweeted out to the

132
00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:30,120
Speaker 2: world a picture of shells spelling out eighty six forty seven,

133
00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:32,760
Speaker 2: in other words, slang for kill the current President of

134
00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:36,680
Speaker 2: the United States, Donald J. Trump. To say, calling for

135
00:07:36,760 --> 00:07:39,360
Speaker 2: the murder of the sitting president is not appropriate for

136
00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:43,480
Speaker 2: the former FBI director. In an ordinary time, that would

137
00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:47,320
Speaker 2: be such an obvious statement that nobody would even think

138
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:51,360
Speaker 2: to say it. But that's just how much James Comy

139
00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:56,720
Speaker 2: loathes Donald Trump. And understand. When Trump became president the

140
00:07:56,720 --> 00:08:02,280
Speaker 2: first time in January of twenty seventeen, President Trump unfortunately

141
00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:05,440
Speaker 2: made a serious mistake, which is he left James Comy

142
00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:10,880
Speaker 2: in office. In hindsight, on January twentieth, twenty seventeen, President

143
00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:13,000
Speaker 2: Trump should have called James Comy and said thank you

144
00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:15,000
Speaker 2: for your service to the nation. Your services are no

145
00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:19,240
Speaker 2: longer required. I am certain President Trump wishes he had

146
00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,640
Speaker 2: done that. I think the White House team believed that

147
00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:26,640
Speaker 2: Komy could focus on law enforcement could not be politicized,

148
00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:32,720
Speaker 2: and that assumption proved to be in error. James Comy

149
00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:37,439
Speaker 2: presided over weaponizing and politicizing the FBI. He was part

150
00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:41,800
Speaker 2: of weaponizing and politicizing the Department of Justice. And it

151
00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:46,000
Speaker 2: was because they hated Donald Trump, and frankly, they were

152
00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:49,160
Speaker 2: angry at the American people for electing him in twenty sixteen,

153
00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:54,280
Speaker 2: and so the FBI set out to try to attack

154
00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:58,000
Speaker 2: and to try to ultimately remove from office the President

155
00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:03,040
Speaker 2: of the United States. Now, again this should not bear saying,

156
00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:07,120
Speaker 2: but it is not the job of law enforcement to

157
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,160
Speaker 2: determine the will of the voters. Is wrong, and the

158
00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:12,920
Speaker 2: elected president should no longer be president. But that's what

159
00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:15,839
Speaker 2: Comy presided over. And so when I listen to him

160
00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:19,760
Speaker 2: say I weep for the Department of Justice, it really is.

161
00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:22,520
Speaker 2: You know, there's a Yiddish word, hootspot. And I got

162
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:24,600
Speaker 2: to say, James Comy really ought to have a T

163
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:28,600
Speaker 2: shirt with that printed on it, because he is grieving

164
00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:31,959
Speaker 2: for the Department of Justice. Why because he has been

165
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:35,240
Speaker 2: indicted for what I think is clearly a felony, and

166
00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:38,960
Speaker 2: we're going to break down in just minutes, Why exactly

167
00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:41,160
Speaker 2: this is a felony, what the crime is. And I

168
00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:45,480
Speaker 2: want to point out nowhere in his statement does Comy

169
00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:48,160
Speaker 2: get into the actual facts. Nowhere in the statement does

170
00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:50,720
Speaker 2: he get into what he did. Nowhere in the statement

171
00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:53,200
Speaker 2: does he get into the law. He just gives a

172
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,360
Speaker 2: political statement. He will not be on his knees. He

173
00:09:56,480 --> 00:09:59,880
Speaker 2: calls Trump a tyrant who is ruling by fear. Look,

174
00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:02,720
Speaker 2: this is an indictment that was returned by a grand

175
00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:06,040
Speaker 2: jury in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and it was returned

176
00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:11,840
Speaker 2: because of I believe clear evidence demonstrating Comy committed felonies.

177
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:17,120
Speaker 1: Senator, I want to bring up a point that no

178
00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:20,880
Speaker 1: one in the media has brought up so far about

179
00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:23,839
Speaker 1: this indictment. And I brought it up on CNN and

180
00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,680
Speaker 1: they were like all deer in headlights, there is something

181
00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:29,800
Speaker 1: about this case. And they were saying, Oh, this is

182
00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:34,440
Speaker 1: just political retribution by Donald Trump that clearly they weren't

183
00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,400
Speaker 1: going to bring this case. He had to fire the

184
00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:39,320
Speaker 1: person in charge of this office in Virginia, had to

185
00:10:39,360 --> 00:10:41,720
Speaker 1: put in somebody that would weaponize the DOJ.

186
00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:44,920
Speaker 4: Here's the fact that most people don't know.

187
00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:50,240
Speaker 1: James Comy's own son in law was literally inside the

188
00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:53,880
Speaker 1: prosecutor's office that was tasked.

189
00:10:54,600 --> 00:10:58,320
Speaker 4: Just think about this with indicting his father in law.

190
00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:00,920
Speaker 1: And so when you say it there and I look

191
00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:02,960
Speaker 1: at this, I'm like, man, the deep state got together

192
00:11:03,080 --> 00:11:04,880
Speaker 1: to protect James Comy at all costs.

193
00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:08,120
Speaker 4: And as soon as the indictment came out later in the.

194
00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:12,840
Speaker 1: Day, James Comy's son in law then gave his resignation

195
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,760
Speaker 1: letter because I guess he just couldn't stop what was inevitable.

196
00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:18,960
Speaker 2: Well, and look, I think what should govern this case

197
00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:22,800
Speaker 2: is the facts and the law. And I believe James

198
00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:26,160
Speaker 2: Comy should have been indicted five years ago, and indeed

199
00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:28,520
Speaker 2: I called upon him to be indicted five years ago.

200
00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:30,640
Speaker 2: So let me lay out the facts and in December

201
00:11:30,679 --> 00:11:33,840
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty. So the questioning that we played in

202
00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:37,160
Speaker 2: the first segment was September thirtieth of twenty twenty. And

203
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:40,120
Speaker 2: by the way, the reason the indictment was brought right

204
00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,720
Speaker 2: now is the statute limitations was going to run next

205
00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:44,600
Speaker 2: week and so they had to bring it before the

206
00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:47,120
Speaker 2: end of the statute limitations or they would not be

207
00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:50,800
Speaker 2: able to charge him. But on December tenth of twenty twenty,

208
00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:54,080
Speaker 2: here's the letter that I sent to Bill Barr, then

209
00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,719
Speaker 2: the Attorney General of the United States, and Christopher Ray,

210
00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:02,480
Speaker 2: who was then the director of the FBI. Days before

211
00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:06,160
Speaker 2: the presidential election in twenty sixteen, a Wall Street Journal

212
00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,440
Speaker 2: article quoted an anonymous source confirming the existence of a

213
00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:13,240
Speaker 2: probe into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server

214
00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:17,440
Speaker 2: while serving as Secretary of State, an investigation that up

215
00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,520
Speaker 2: to that point, mister Comy and the FBI declined to confirm.

216
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:25,120
Speaker 2: We now know that this leak was authorized by then

217
00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:30,440
Speaker 2: Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe. Mister McCabe initially

218
00:12:30,480 --> 00:12:33,760
Speaker 2: told FBI agents under oath that he did not authorize

219
00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:36,720
Speaker 2: the leak and he did not know who did, but

220
00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:41,160
Speaker 2: when confronted later with contrary evidence, he confessed both to

221
00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:46,960
Speaker 2: knowing about and authorizing the leak. We do not know, however,

222
00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:51,720
Speaker 2: whether and to what extent then FBI Director Comy was

223
00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:56,000
Speaker 2: aware of and authorized this leak. After the fact, mister

224
00:12:56,040 --> 00:13:00,400
Speaker 2: Comy has repeatedly stated, I'm sorry. Mister McCabe has repeatedly

225
00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:04,840
Speaker 2: stated that mister komy knew of and effectively authorized the

226
00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:08,520
Speaker 2: leak by approving it. He told the Office of Inspector

227
00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:12,559
Speaker 2: General that quote he and Komy discussed the October thirtieth

228
00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:16,199
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal article in person on October thirty first,

229
00:13:16,240 --> 00:13:21,120
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, and that at that meeting, quote he told

230
00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:25,640
Speaker 2: Comy that he had authorized ad slash Opa and Special

231
00:13:25,679 --> 00:13:29,320
Speaker 2: Council to disclose the account of the August twelfth call

232
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:33,600
Speaker 2: and did not say anything in any way to suggest

233
00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:38,320
Speaker 2: that it was unauthorized. According to mister McCabe, mister Komy

234
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:42,480
Speaker 2: quote did not react negatively, just kind of accepted it,

235
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:47,280
Speaker 2: and quote thought it was a good idea that they

236
00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:51,920
Speaker 2: presented this information to the media. He again reiterated mister

237
00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:54,880
Speaker 2: Comy's involvement at a hearing last month at the Senate

238
00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:59,560
Speaker 2: Judiciary Committee. I asked mister McCabe. According to The Washington

239
00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:04,800
Speaker 2: Times April eighteenth, twenty eighteen, mister McCabe insisted that he

240
00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:07,600
Speaker 2: told his boss that he had authorized disclosure about the

241
00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:13,080
Speaker 2: Clinton investigation, but mister Comy has denied this claim, and

242
00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:16,840
Speaker 2: mister McCabe told investigators that mister Comy knew he had

243
00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:20,440
Speaker 2: authorized disclosure and agreed it was a good idea. Is

244
00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:25,560
Speaker 2: that accurate? Is that your testimony to this committee? Mister

245
00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:31,960
Speaker 2: McCabe replied, that is my recollection. Mister Comy, however, has

246
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:35,160
Speaker 2: sworn under oath that he has neither authorized the leak

247
00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,840
Speaker 2: nor knew of mister McCabe's involvement. At a May twenty

248
00:14:38,880 --> 00:14:43,000
Speaker 2: seventeenth hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Grassley asked,

249
00:14:43,040 --> 00:14:46,960
Speaker 2: mister Comy, have you ever been an anonymous source in

250
00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:50,720
Speaker 2: news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or

251
00:14:50,760 --> 00:14:58,000
Speaker 2: the Clinton investigation. Mister Comy replied never. Senator Grassley then asked,

252
00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,280
Speaker 2: have you ever authorized some someone else at the FBI

253
00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:04,120
Speaker 2: to be an anonymous source in news reports about the

254
00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:10,880
Speaker 2: Trump investigation or the Clinton administration? He testified no. And

255
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:15,480
Speaker 2: this October that a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, mister Komy testified,

256
00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:19,400
Speaker 2: in response to my questioning, quote, I stand by the

257
00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:22,000
Speaker 2: testimony that you summarized that I gave in May of

258
00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:26,360
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen. Mister Komy's denial in front of the Senate

259
00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:30,120
Speaker 2: is consistent with his statement to the OIG. He told

260
00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:34,440
Speaker 2: the OIG that quote, he recalled seeing this article, but

261
00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:37,320
Speaker 2: he did not know how the disclosure about the paidag

262
00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:41,680
Speaker 2: call in the October thirtieth article happened. He said that

263
00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,880
Speaker 2: he was quote very concerned about that part of the article.

264
00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:49,560
Speaker 2: Komy told OIG he considered the disclosure about the paidag's

265
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:55,240
Speaker 2: call problematic because it related the sensitive FBI information. The

266
00:15:55,280 --> 00:16:00,200
Speaker 2: OIG report continues, quote according to Komy, he discover us

267
00:16:00,280 --> 00:16:03,200
Speaker 2: the issue with mccab after the article was published, and

268
00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:08,000
Speaker 2: at the time mccab quote definitely did not tell me

269
00:16:08,080 --> 00:16:12,320
Speaker 2: that he authorized the disclosure of the paidag call. Comy

270
00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:17,280
Speaker 2: said that mccab gave him the exact opposite impression. Mister

271
00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:20,440
Speaker 2: Comy asserted that he took from whatever communication they had

272
00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:24,280
Speaker 2: that mister mccab wasn't involved in the leak. And here's

273
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:31,479
Speaker 2: what's critical. Mister Comy and mister McCabe's statements are irreconcilably contradictory.

274
00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:34,600
Speaker 2: Mister mccab says that he told mister Comy of the

275
00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,960
Speaker 2: leak and that mister Comy approved, effectively authorizing the leak

276
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:42,400
Speaker 2: after the fact. Mister Comy, on the other hand, has

277
00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:45,120
Speaker 2: said that he neither authorized the leak nor knew of

278
00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:50,360
Speaker 2: mister McCabe's involvement. One of them is lying under oath

279
00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:55,040
Speaker 2: a Federal crime eighteen USC. Section sixteen twenty one. The

280
00:16:55,120 --> 00:17:00,400
Speaker 2: American people deserve to know who those are the facts,

281
00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:05,720
Speaker 2: and it is a simple binary choice. Either James Comy

282
00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:09,880
Speaker 2: lied under oath and committed to felony, or Andrew McCabe

283
00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:12,640
Speaker 2: lied under oath or committed to felony. Because what they

284
00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:15,320
Speaker 2: said is precisely opposite. There is not a world in

285
00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:18,160
Speaker 2: which neither of them committed a felony. And the only

286
00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:23,000
Speaker 2: choice is which one broke the law by bringing this indictment. Obviously,

287
00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,800
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice has determined it was James Comy

288
00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:30,040
Speaker 2: who lied under oath and broke the law, and that's

289
00:17:30,040 --> 00:17:31,480
Speaker 2: what the trial will be all about.

290
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:32,840
Speaker 4: All right, Senator.

291
00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:36,840
Speaker 1: So here's what I've been hearing on online from the media.

292
00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:39,639
Speaker 1: They're like, hey, Donald Trump weighed in on this too much.

293
00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:41,760
Speaker 1: They're gonna get this thing kicked out before it even

294
00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:44,159
Speaker 1: goes to a judge. This is a waste of the

295
00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:48,720
Speaker 1: American taxpayer's dollars. And then if that's not enough, they say, well,

296
00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:52,080
Speaker 1: no one ever gets indicted and they actually go forward

297
00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:54,680
Speaker 1: and get a conviction on someone lying to Congress because well,

298
00:17:54,680 --> 00:17:56,560
Speaker 1: a lot of people lie to Congress, and even if

299
00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:58,080
Speaker 1: you did lie, it may have been a mistake. It's

300
00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:01,359
Speaker 1: gonna be very hard to get a conviction. Break down,

301
00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:03,960
Speaker 1: how this could roll out in court, what could happen?

302
00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:07,359
Speaker 2: Well, at the end of the day, the factual predicate

303
00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:11,159
Speaker 2: behind this crime is not terribly complicated. As I mentioned,

304
00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:15,680
Speaker 2: there's a direct contradiction between James Comey's testimony under oath

305
00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:19,879
Speaker 2: before the Senate and Andrew McCabe's testimony under oath before

306
00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:23,960
Speaker 2: the Senate. They cannot both be true. One or the

307
00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:27,600
Speaker 2: other is deliberately lying. And how do we know which

308
00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:30,960
Speaker 2: one is likely to be lying? Well, the FBI, in

309
00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:34,720
Speaker 2: all likelihood, possesses the information that confirms who's telling the

310
00:18:34,760 --> 00:18:39,200
Speaker 2: truth and who's lying. Indeed, if you look at the

311
00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:44,159
Speaker 2: account of what occurred, mckab initially told the same lie

312
00:18:44,359 --> 00:18:48,680
Speaker 2: that Komy did. Mckayb initially said he didn't leak the information. Yeah,

313
00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:51,240
Speaker 2: he didn't authorize it and he didn't know who did.

314
00:18:51,520 --> 00:18:56,600
Speaker 2: But then the FBI Office of Inspector General confronted him

315
00:18:57,040 --> 00:19:00,080
Speaker 2: with contrary evidence. I don't know what the contrary evidence is,

316
00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:02,639
Speaker 2: but they put in front of him, mister McCabe, you

317
00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:05,800
Speaker 2: said you didn't leak this information. Well, boom, here's the

318
00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:09,000
Speaker 2: evidence to the contrary And what did McCabe do oh crap,

319
00:19:09,040 --> 00:19:12,320
Speaker 2: you got me. Okay, you're right, I leaked it. I'm

320
00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:15,280
Speaker 2: the one who did it, and I talked to Comy

321
00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:17,800
Speaker 2: about it. I told him about it. So he admitted

322
00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:20,800
Speaker 2: that when he was caught in a lie. I don't

323
00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:26,760
Speaker 2: know specifically what confirming evidence the FBI in the Department

324
00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:30,280
Speaker 2: of Justice has, but they have enough that they caused

325
00:19:30,359 --> 00:19:34,840
Speaker 2: McCabe to reverse his first lie and instead to say, yes,

326
00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:37,879
Speaker 2: he did it, and Comy knew about it. And so

327
00:19:38,080 --> 00:19:40,600
Speaker 2: between the two, you know, it was interesting. When I

328
00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:44,000
Speaker 2: was questioning Comy, he said a couple of times, well,

329
00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:47,840
Speaker 2: I'm not going to characterize, as he put it, Andy's testimony. Well,

330
00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:50,720
Speaker 2: I get politically that's a smart move, not to characterize

331
00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:54,600
Speaker 2: Andy's testimony. But you know what, his entire legal defense

332
00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:57,120
Speaker 2: is going to be, McCabe is lying because he doesn't

333
00:19:57,160 --> 00:20:01,720
Speaker 2: have an alternative. That's his only argument is when McCabe said, under.

334
00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:04,000
Speaker 4: Oath, good point that I know about it.

335
00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:07,879
Speaker 2: Comy's defense team is going to have to say McCabe

336
00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:09,480
Speaker 2: was lying. And by the way, mccab is going to

337
00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:13,919
Speaker 2: be the star witness at the prosecution. The prosecution is

338
00:20:13,920 --> 00:20:17,480
Speaker 2: going to put Andy McCabe on the stand and he's

339
00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:21,600
Speaker 2: going to ask them, did you leak it? Now, I'm

340
00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:24,120
Speaker 2: going to predict Andy McCabe is going to say, yes,

341
00:20:25,359 --> 00:20:28,400
Speaker 2: did you talk to James Comy about it? Yes? Did

342
00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:31,520
Speaker 2: he authorize it? Yes? And the reason I'm going to

343
00:20:31,560 --> 00:20:33,160
Speaker 2: predict he's going to do all of that is because

344
00:20:33,160 --> 00:20:37,320
Speaker 2: Andy McCabe testified to that in front of Congress, and

345
00:20:37,359 --> 00:20:40,480
Speaker 2: if he gives any other answer, he'll be indicted for

346
00:20:40,560 --> 00:20:44,119
Speaker 2: lying to Congress. So he can't have it both ways.

347
00:20:45,040 --> 00:20:49,280
Speaker 2: And I expect that Comy's lawyer will try to cross

348
00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:52,760
Speaker 2: examine him, and we'll try to argue McCabe is lying.

349
00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:55,119
Speaker 2: But it's very difficult to see why McCabe would have

350
00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:59,200
Speaker 2: any incentive to lie. He and Comy were thick as thieves.

351
00:21:00,160 --> 00:21:04,840
Speaker 2: He was only forced to admit the truth when confronted

352
00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:07,760
Speaker 2: with contrary evidence. Again, we don't know what that evidence is,

353
00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:11,439
Speaker 2: but presumably the FBI and the Department of Justice do so.

354
00:21:11,520 --> 00:21:15,119
Speaker 2: I don't know if it is contemporaneous phone calls, perhaps

355
00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:17,399
Speaker 2: with the reporters. I don't know if it is notes.

356
00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,480
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's emails. I don't know if

357
00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:22,480
Speaker 2: it's testimony from someone else at the FBI. Who said, Hey,

358
00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:25,800
Speaker 2: Andrew McCabe told me to do this. But it is something,

359
00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:30,399
Speaker 2: and it was something that was compelling enough that it

360
00:21:30,600 --> 00:21:34,920
Speaker 2: caused Andrew McCabe to abandon line number one. And and

361
00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:37,760
Speaker 2: so at the end of the day, this is not

362
00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:42,400
Speaker 2: a complicated factual case. This is not some grand tapestry.

363
00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:47,600
Speaker 2: It's a he said, he said, she said. But you

364
00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:50,879
Speaker 2: have both testimonies under oath, and it's going to be

365
00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:53,879
Speaker 2: a question of what additional evidence is there to confirm

366
00:21:53,920 --> 00:21:56,720
Speaker 2: who's telling the truth and who's not. I also think

367
00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:02,040
Speaker 2: I will be surprised if James Comey's lawyer puts him

368
00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:06,600
Speaker 2: on the stand. Now, under our justice system, the prosecution

369
00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:11,560
Speaker 2: cannot force a defendant to testify. But I'm going to

370
00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:13,760
Speaker 2: predict James Comy is not going to take the stand

371
00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:18,280
Speaker 2: because if he takes the stand, he can be cross examined,

372
00:22:18,320 --> 00:22:21,040
Speaker 2: and he does not want to be cross examined, because

373
00:22:21,080 --> 00:22:26,760
Speaker 2: this is someone who presided over weaponizing the Department of

374
00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:30,120
Speaker 2: Justice with the objective of taking out Donald J. Trump

375
00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:34,280
Speaker 2: and getting under oath, getting cross examined by a skilled

376
00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:37,040
Speaker 2: trial attorney, and again under oath. By the way, if

377
00:22:37,080 --> 00:22:39,480
Speaker 2: he lies in his trial testimony, he can be indicted

378
00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:43,040
Speaker 2: and prosecuted again for lying under oath. Again, I don't

379
00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:46,760
Speaker 2: think his lawyer will do that. And so at the

380
00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:48,639
Speaker 2: end of the day, look, the press is going to

381
00:22:48,720 --> 00:22:51,639
Speaker 2: go on and on and say, well, Trump hates James Comy.

382
00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:55,440
Speaker 2: That is certainly true, but being hated by the President

383
00:22:55,520 --> 00:22:58,439
Speaker 2: is not enough to exonerate you from criminal conduct. And

384
00:22:58,480 --> 00:23:02,440
Speaker 2: in this instance, I believe Comy should have been indicted

385
00:23:02,480 --> 00:23:06,280
Speaker 2: five years ago because it was clear he had deliberately

386
00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:09,879
Speaker 2: lied to Congress. And look, we started by playing my

387
00:23:09,960 --> 00:23:15,280
Speaker 2: cross examination. This wasn't an absent minded lie. This wasn't oh,

388
00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:19,600
Speaker 2: I'm not paying attention. This was careful, This was deliberate,

389
00:23:19,680 --> 00:23:23,159
Speaker 2: this was strategic, this was planned. I believe this was

390
00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:26,960
Speaker 2: James Comy saying, I face no accountability whatsoever. I can

391
00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:29,560
Speaker 2: lie under oath and no one's going to hold me

392
00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:33,119
Speaker 2: to account. And I think he feels he feels clever,

393
00:23:33,359 --> 00:23:36,680
Speaker 2: but he also feels vindicated. Listen, James Comy was someone

394
00:23:37,840 --> 00:23:41,560
Speaker 2: who I think fancied himself as j Edgar Hoover. He

395
00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:47,120
Speaker 2: fancied himself as as an incredibly powerful director of the FBI,

396
00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:52,080
Speaker 2: empowered to remove the tyrant. That's what he said in

397
00:23:52,119 --> 00:23:56,040
Speaker 2: his statement tonight that he thinks Trump is a tyrant.

398
00:23:56,080 --> 00:23:58,359
Speaker 2: And I think when the American people elected him in

399
00:23:58,400 --> 00:24:02,600
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, I think Comy was angry and he decided

400
00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:05,240
Speaker 2: he would use the power of the FBI to remove

401
00:24:05,359 --> 00:24:08,920
Speaker 2: the president elected by the people. And so I think

402
00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:12,560
Speaker 2: it is quite fitting that he is facing accountability for

403
00:24:12,640 --> 00:24:17,960
Speaker 2: committing criminal conduct. Let me repeat, this indictment is not

404
00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:20,280
Speaker 2: for being an opponent of Donald Trump. It is not

405
00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:25,080
Speaker 2: for being a political political figure on the other side

406
00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:29,560
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump. This indictment is for deliberately and knowingly

407
00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:32,359
Speaker 2: lying under oath to the United States Senate, which is

408
00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:36,159
Speaker 2: a clear and unmistakable felony. And and I think I

409
00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:40,200
Speaker 2: think Comy. I think the odds are good that Comy

410
00:24:40,240 --> 00:24:43,639
Speaker 2: will be convicted. And I think if he's convicted, I

411
00:24:43,640 --> 00:24:45,160
Speaker 2: think he's going to serve jail time.

412
00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:48,600
Speaker 1: How much of it very quickly. Of his past will

413
00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:51,880
Speaker 1: come back to haunt him. He is a prolific guy

414
00:24:52,040 --> 00:24:53,879
Speaker 1: when it comes to leaking. He's a pro at it.

415
00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:56,040
Speaker 1: He's on amateur Yes, he knows how to leak. Hell,

416
00:24:56,080 --> 00:24:59,200
Speaker 1: he leaked information that was apparently classified to make sure

417
00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:02,600
Speaker 1: that there was a a special counsel that went after

418
00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:05,000
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. We know that for a fact, and it

419
00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:07,399
Speaker 1: went to one of his former law friends at a

420
00:25:07,480 --> 00:25:10,680
Speaker 1: university that then went to a newspaper. That is a fact.

421
00:25:10,960 --> 00:25:12,800
Speaker 1: Will that come up? And then the other question I

422
00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,800
Speaker 1: have for you quickly is this, will the testimony the

423
00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:17,960
Speaker 1: day before Congress be used in court?

424
00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:18,639
Speaker 4: Or literally?

425
00:25:18,680 --> 00:25:21,800
Speaker 1: Will senators that interviewed him, Would you guys go to

426
00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:23,920
Speaker 1: court or would they just use the testimony video?

427
00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:26,640
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think they would use the testimony. They would

428
00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:28,760
Speaker 2: read or play the testimony. I don't think you're going

429
00:25:28,840 --> 00:25:33,200
Speaker 2: to see senators testifying, and the record is clear and objective,

430
00:25:33,240 --> 00:25:37,479
Speaker 2: and so everyone knows exactly what his testimony was. In

431
00:25:37,600 --> 00:25:40,120
Speaker 2: terms of his past pattern, I think it could certainly

432
00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:43,160
Speaker 2: come in. The prosecution might try to bring it in

433
00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:46,480
Speaker 2: to establish a pattern. That would be difficult. But I

434
00:25:46,480 --> 00:25:50,160
Speaker 2: think if Comey's lawyer argues, well, he couldn't possibly have

435
00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:53,400
Speaker 2: approved this, he never would have approved a leak, then

436
00:25:53,480 --> 00:25:55,639
Speaker 2: I think the prosecution would be able to get all

437
00:25:55,680 --> 00:25:59,440
Speaker 2: of that in as rebuttal to the defendant's argument. So

438
00:25:59,480 --> 00:26:01,040
Speaker 2: I think it's more more likely to come in as

439
00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:05,679
Speaker 2: rebuttal evidence than directly proving a pattern. But my guess

440
00:26:05,800 --> 00:26:08,600
Speaker 2: is one way or another that evidence is going to

441
00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:10,520
Speaker 2: come in. And you're right, there's a clear pattern. Comy

442
00:26:10,600 --> 00:26:13,080
Speaker 2: has a long pattern of relying on media leaks to

443
00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:14,920
Speaker 2: advance his own personal agenda.

444
00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:17,439
Speaker 1: Don't forget Share this podcast wherever you can with your

445
00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:19,240
Speaker 1: family and your friends, and I'll see you back here

446
00:26:19,240 --> 00:26:19,680
Speaker 1: tomorrow