WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Romer, Tarullo, Finucane

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals. The financial stories that

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>cheap our world fed action to con concerns over dollar

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest people

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Through the eyes of the most influential

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, Star CEO, Kevin

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week with

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. A glass half full with

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the new president and a vaccine on the horizon. This

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. Four years ago,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>President Trump committed his administration to undoing much of what

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>came before him, whether it was trade policy, or financial

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>regulation or international agreements. President elect Biden has promised to

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>reverse much of that course, but to grow the economy,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>even as he pursues his goals on climate change, racial justice,

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and inequality. Can you do both? We asked Dan't rule

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of former Federal Reserve governor who held senior economic policy

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>roles in the Obama and Clinton administrations. I mean, in

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the short term, as as we've all been saying for

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>nine months now, uh, getting ahold of the virus, getting

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine out is the single most important thing to

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>continue a cyclical recovery, and that in and of itself

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>will provide a substantial boost hopefully through all and into

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>two So there, I think, as again as we've all

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>been saying, the public health issue is the most important

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>economic issue. In the short term, there is stimulus. I

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's a crying need for stimulus to carry us

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into the period where the whether the vaccine is going

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to take effect. But after that you are going to

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>get some tail winds basically from from their recovery. Longer term,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's a question of whether the now

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>president elect is going to be able to manage to

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>get Congress to go along with some of the spending

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>priorities that he has as an enormous amount he can

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>do just by having control of the executive branch, but

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it is going to be important for Congress to at

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>least be somewhat cooperative. Well, and when you talk Congress

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>as a practical we're probably talking the Senate right because

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as we sit here we're not gonna until late in January,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>where the Republicans or Democrats have the majority. Right now,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd probably say it's likely that the Republicans will.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible for a president buying to do business

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with Mitch McConnell and get some things done that certainly

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 1>knows we hadn't gotten done last time? Well, I think

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, David, if it's possible for any Democrat

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it, it's probably Joe Biden who can do it.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>He has he's not only a veteran of the Senate,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but obviously has a longstanding relationship with the Senator McConnell. Um.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But if we step back from personalities a bit, I

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think there may also be some motivation that at least

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican a handful of Republican members of the Senate may have.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So consider, for example, in infrastructure investment, I mean that

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that elicits raised eyebrows now in Washington, New York, and

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just about everywhere else. People have been talking about it

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>as a potential bipartisan um project and it hasn't happened.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think you've gotten an administration, as we will,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that has competence, that coordinates its policies, and that has

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a consistent set of policy, there are chances of working

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>something out become much greater. And consider, for example, if

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the EPA administrator and other heads of agencies in the

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>federal government begin to implement regulations directed towards climate change.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So you dealt with ecademy policies, certainly when you remember

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, but also before that in the administration,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Clint administration, you really dealt with econdic policy.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>As you look at the economy today, we still have

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>ways to come back. We've come back some, we still

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>always to come com particularly it comes to jobs. We've

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>still got over ten million people who don't have jobs

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>today who did before the pandemic. Is infrastructure the best, quickest,

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>more sure way to restore some of that in the

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>economy now. Coronavirus vaccine is the quickest, insurest way to

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do it, because that's what's going to get the service

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>sectors back up. And environment, I would say, David, the

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure investment is the medium to longer term project. It's

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>one that would both improve productivity and create good jobs

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>along the way. But as we've seen it again and again,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many times people say that projects are

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>shovel ready. Yeah, they're they're ready enough that you can

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>start walking to the truck to get the shovel, But

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they never seem to be ready to have as much

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>impact as quickly as you'd like them too. So you

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, Dan that there are some things that the

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>executive branch can do on its own, pretty much without

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>support through a divided Congress. Give us a sense in

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>the economic sphere, one are the things that this president,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>President Biden could get done in a reasonably short period

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of time. Well, within the labor department, for example, where

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got the uh Fair Labor Standards Act, he can

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>his appointees and make different determinations as to who's covered

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>by minimum wage laws when you have to pay over time,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing which could have a big effect.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Within the gig economy. Um, he can do things on

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>student debt relief as well. Uh. There there are any

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>number of regulatory actions that he can take, and of

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>course he can also use such spending powers as he

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>has with already appropriated or soon to be appropriated funds

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to redirect them. So in terms of economic priorities, there's

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit that he can do where he needs

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the cooperation of Congress is obviously in increasing total spending

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or total tax reforms. Should we be concerned all about

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the effect of regulation more regulation on the economic growth?

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>That's always a question, right UM, in any administration, no

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>matter what its ideological leanings. But I think in the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>areas where the President elect has emphasized most the regulatory agenda,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which would be on climate change, which would be on

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>worker protection UH, and to a lesser extent, financial regulation UH.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>In each of those areas, I think that it's quite

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>possible to get a set of regulations to achieve your

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>regulatory end, but do so in a sensible way that

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't create unnecessary disruption. That was Dan Trullo of Harvard

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Law School. Coming up, we'll talk with Tom Monte, chief

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>operating officer of Bank of America, and and finukin the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Bank's co vice chairman about why they're taking the lead

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in issuing sustainability bonds. That's coming up on Wall Street

0:06:54.120 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. E s G. Environmental, social

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and governance investing is all the rage, But how far

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>can it go. Bank of America has been a leader

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in sustainable investing, and it's not limited to the environment

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or to governance. Last month, b of A issued a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar sustainability bond tied to equality, with proceeds

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>going not just a clean transportation and energy, but also

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to alleviating inequalities in Black and Hispanic Latino communities. Tom Monteg,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>chief operating officer of Bank of America, and and Fanuken,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the bank's co vice chairman, explained the how and the why.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had made our billion dollar pledge for

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>racial equality, and after that, because we've been a leader

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in the green and social bonds, we decided it would

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be good to prod a blueprint for everyone else to

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to access this market, and so we put

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>together the two billion dollar sustainability bond, and it was

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>green and social. As you say, the difference for this

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was the social aspect of it was all for financial

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>empowerment for Black African American Hispanic Latino communities, and so

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire social aspect is there. And then this is

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hard work because once you do that, you have to

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>track the things that you're doing and make sure you're

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>doing them, and so there was a lot of work

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>internally and with finance to be able to have the

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tracking elements and know what we were gonna do. So

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we track how much we do in affordable housing, we

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>track how much we do for health practices. We tracked

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>supply change for minorities, and so all those things are

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the social aspect, David. So this was two billion.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We had incredible demand across from corporate, corporate treasurers and

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>from investors, and so we were very pleased with it.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, I think you'd like this that five years ago,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fifteen, there was thirty eight billion dollars

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of green social sustainable bonds. This year they'll be almost

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>fo so and we've been so ten times in five years,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and so we're really pleased with the bond and what's happened.

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And alway, it's part of how we work here. I

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was looking yesterday at just at affordable housing. Last year

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we had over eight thousand affordable housing units that we

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>helped finance, and of those eight thousand, over half of

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>them almost half of them, excuse me, we're green themselves.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we've tried to take green and social and

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things we do. So we we

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>were so excited about this, this bond and what represented

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.719
<v Speaker 1>in the blueprint it's set for America. So an as

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom just suggested, this is part of a larger plan,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a strategy for Bank of America. Put it in context,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit with the other things that Bank

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of America is doing. E s G is sort of

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a good reflection of our strategy of responsible growth. Uh,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>how could you be responsible if you're not thinking about

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sustainability in the long term. It's also, as as Tom

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is laying out, a very good business opportunity for us.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We probably represent about a quarter one fourth of the

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>social or E s G bonds that have been issued

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and underwritten in the last eight or nine year. Also,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just been and we meet with maybe the top

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty institutional investors. All of them are asking about this.

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>All of them expect for you to uh be be

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>progressive in this regard and to do more. And our

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>employees care about it too. And I might add that

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of regulation that will be coming

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Europe and the next year or so, so

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we think that this is the place to be. There's

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a big business opportunity, and we're going to have to

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.239
<v Speaker 1>do it anyway. So Tom pick upout the business opportunity.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you make money on this bond? How does

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>an investor make money? How do the proceeds come back?

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's making the money can pay off the bond? Well,

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the bonds proceeds to whoever issues the bond. On

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one hand, the bonds proceeds are used by us on

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>funding the things that we have written down that we're

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going to trap, be it green or be at the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>social aspect. So for that, that's how we invest our money,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's called a green or social bond.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>As far as the investor, they like these bonds because

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of E s G funds out there are

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>people that want to invest in E s G product.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh At times the s G product will trade better

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>than the non E s G product, and so they

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>can make money in that way. And in general, I

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's more and more money that's being used by

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>people to support this and this kind of effort, and

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why so much is being issued this way. And

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about that pricing issue. When you price the bond,

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>do you have to put a premium in to encourage

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>investors come in. And how is it traded SITUATIONE. It's

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>traded well. I mean the market has been you know,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been a month and a lot as you know,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things have happened in the month. So

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's traded well. You know. You usually it

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>will come at or slightly tighter than than a normal

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>than a normal bond would at the time. Um, but

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't see it all the time. And by the way,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>people are issuing different kinds of bonds too in this

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in this area in green where things are coupons can

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>go up and down based on how you meet the

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>different hurdles that you put for yourself, for a manufacturer

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>or someone on the paper industry, for example. So there's

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of bonds being done in the market right now.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So and as you say, thank you, America has been

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>dressing directly investing equity as well as loans into areas

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that need the help goodness nokes in this country. How

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do you coordinate if you coordinate at all, with the

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>proceeds of this bond, the sustainability bond that we've been

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about, with the other efforts do you do it

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with the same sorts of entities in some of the

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic and the Black communities. Yeah, the two are coordinated,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but but I think there's even a bigger effort here.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>This one is a jump start to the other. The

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars is intended to do things that we

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>might ordinarily not have been able to do. So perhaps

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>concessionary capital, maybe it's philanthropy. It's investigating and investing where

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we might not have before. So for instance, we've put

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got a program with minority deposit institutions where we

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>will put money, and we have always put deposits into

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>these institutions, but now we're going to put equity, and

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we've already done twelve of them. And the idea here

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is that when we put money into those institutions, they

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>give more, they can lend more at a community level,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so one begets the next, and it it just increases

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. The two billion dollar bond just means there's

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that much more opportunity to land and invest than we

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>might have had otherwise. Tom, what about the accountability for

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all this. I'm not even necessarily talking about Bank of America,

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but in general, there's a lot of people saying they're

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>doing environmental sustainable things, things good for social the social compact.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>How do we know that that's true because we don't

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>really have standards yet, do we? Well? We well, we

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have standards and the standards that we we literally have

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>our our auditors come in and make sure we are

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>doing the things that we list that we're going to do.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it is a it is a well trapped process.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>We you know, did we have as I said, ten

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of these type of bonds outstanding, five green

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>bonds to social We did a COVID bond also this

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>year which was one billion, and this two billion sustainable bonds.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So all of those bonds, I have a list of

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>things that the proceeds can be used for and that

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>list is tracked and maintain an audited UH to make

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sure we're doing that in success. In success, does this

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>create more customers for Bank of America as well? Sure,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of research to indicate that those companies that

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.599
<v Speaker 1>are good in E s G also have higher satisfaction

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>levels with their employees, with their customers, with their clients.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They're less volatile. Uh. There are any number of reasons

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>why you might do this. I also think, as I

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, that we will see legislation and regulation first

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out of Europe and potentially with the Biden administration here

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>United States. That was Antonucn, co vice chairman of Bank

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of America and Tom Monteg, the Bank's chief operating officer

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up. The election may not have gotten us past

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>our partisan disagreements, but economist Paul Wimer says the coronavirus

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>may force us to do just that, because in the

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>world of the pandemic, there are no blue or red states.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>President like Joe Biden will come to office with a

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>series of policy goals, but may well face a divided Congress.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And so we begin to look at the next four

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>years of a Biden administration and what it might hold.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We asked n y U economist and Nobel Laureate Paul Romer,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what will determine the course of the next four years

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>under a President Biden? And he began with the pandemic.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid that this might turn into an exercise where

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, the Blue States had it right. The

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Red States had it wrong. They've got to behave more

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Blue States. Neither of them did that that well.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>The Blue States had a lower death rate, but they've

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>also had slower recoveries of employment back to where we

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>were in January. So we need a new measure. Uh.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's different from what either side was doing, uh in

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three or four months. And I think it's

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>clear what that measure is. Do what the NBA did,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Do what Harvard and Cornell and NYU were doing. Test

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>people frequently, isolate them, and then let's get back to business.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, do what Taiwan did, as I understand,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to do what South Korea did as well. So it's

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty basic. We gotta test, we gotta do contact tracing,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where a mask, whatever you do. And he said specifically,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter who you voted for. Now, that seems

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple, but the simple can sometimes be hard because

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear people are going to comply with that. Yeah, well,

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. There was an interesting comparison of how New

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Jersey responded to an outbreak in the Orthodox Jewish community

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to how New York responded. New York responded

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>with the more traditional public health measures mandates, don't group

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>together in big groups, don't do this, don't do that,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>wear masks. In New Jersey, they just started testing people

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and gave people the information and this produced less of

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a backlash in New Jersey and more compliance because once

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>people started to see how many of them were infected,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they they took this much more seriously. So, as you say,

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we've got to figure out a way to do both

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>walk and chew gum as it were, which is to say,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the kind as open as we can at the

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>same time protect people. But beyond that, there are larger

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>issues over the next four years, eight years, twelve years

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we need to address with the economy, and we have

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>some people saying, look in order to really get growth

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>going again, because as you know well, professor Roma, we've

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not had really growth rates with the developed countries for

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some time the way we did before. We need some

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>massive things, something like a martial plan effectively to really

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>invest in the economy by the way we could use

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure, and we need to move to green technology.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, You're absolutely right if you look

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>at the growth over this entire recovery up until the pandemic,

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>both like the second Obama term and the Trump turn.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>This had the lowest rate of GDP growth of any

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>recovery since uh the end of World War two. So

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there is something deeper structural that we have to address.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is the time when borrowing is inexpensive.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the time to go big on borrow and build.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>So I hope we can reach a consensus on the

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things we could borrow and then build to

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>make the country better and profess as I say, you

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>received the Nobel Prize where you're working economics, and in

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>part I understand that was a growth theory that had

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with information and particularly government investing. We have

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Arvin Krishna, who's the CEO of IBM, just provided me

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with a letter that he's written to President elect Biden saying,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>look at we need to leverage science technology, We can

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to close the skills gap, We need to modernize digital infrastructure.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like the sorts of things you talk about. Yeah,

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>although you know, you know the joke about economists, there's

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>always this other hand. I worry just a little bit

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that this is gonna sound like the scientists saying we

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>told you so like we told you so, we were right.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Give us more money, give us more power, and everything

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>will be fine. I think the scientific community, the academic community,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>has to take ownership of the fact that expertise is

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not respected in the same way it once was. So

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to figure out what it will take to

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the confidence and trust amongst most members of the public.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>And we're not going to get there by just rooteful

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>or scolding people. Well, when you talk about expertise, it

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>makes me think a bit about the government itself, the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>federal government itself, because various experts have written saying that

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>under the Trump administration, there has been a d emphasis

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if I can put it that way, on expertise, and

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps we don't have the same intellectual firepower, the

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>inectual capital that we had before within the government. Yeah,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we we not only haven't promoted people, we've left positions unfilled,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>but we've also frozen people. We've paralyzed them so that

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>they're afraid to make decisions. I think this poor woman

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>whose job it is at the g O to decide

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>whether there's a consensus that the election is over and

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>then triggers the transition process. This woman is like frozen

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in place, afraid to make a decision because she's afraid

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>she'll get yelled at if she does. What's the obvious

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>thing is to recognize the the election is over, and

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there were people in the f d A, people in

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the CDC in the same way, they were frozen. They

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't take leadership, they wouldn't act, they wouldn't take the

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of bold steps we needed to take. So we

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>need an administration that gives people the confidence to rely

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on their professional expertise and do their jobs. Do we

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>know whether that's something the president could do with his

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>administration without the support of the Congress, because it looks

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like right now it's more likely than that that the

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Senate will have a majority of Republicans. Yeah. I think

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that the person who's at the very top of the

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>executive branch exerts an enormous influence over all of the

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>decisions made by all of the people under the executive branch.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think the signal from the top that you

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>will be trusted, you will be respected, even if you

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>disagree with some of your peers or some other UH

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>policy statement from within this this um UH this administration

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that that respect I think can enable the people all

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>up and down the bureaucracy to to do their jobs.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>That was Professor of economics Paul Rohmer of n y U.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we wrap up the week with our special

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>contributor Larry Summers. This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. It felt like we took a turn this

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>week toward a new president elect who called for unity.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The selection is over. It's trying to put aside the

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>partners of the partisanship and the rhetoric that designed to

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>demonize one another, toward a new Congress that looks like

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it won't go too far out on the progressive wing,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and toward a promising vaccine candidate from Fiser and beyond

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Tech that initial data suggested could be much more effective

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>than we thought. And so the markets were pretty much

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>off to the races and treasury yields signaled better times

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>lay ahead, at least until the end of the week.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>But is there a half empty part of that glass

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking past with continued division in a country

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>still led by a president who won't concede that he's

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lost for a reality check. We welcome to our rush

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>All Wall Street. We contributed Larry Summers and Steve Ratner,

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the chairman and CEUO Will Advisors, which manages the private

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and philanthropic funds for our founder and majority owner of

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael R. Bloomberg. So welcome to both of you. Letter.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Let me start with you. That's the question I've been

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>asking myself all week long. Are the markets getting ahead

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of themselves? We've got record numbers here at the end

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the week from the SMP and the Russell as well.

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We got that problems of vaccine, but at the same

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>time we have a hundred and fifty new cases a

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>day at this point in the United States. Who knows

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but I think it's important to remember that

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>at least nine of the value of the market, and

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>probably of the value of the market is from earnings

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to companies who are going to generate sometime after nine

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>months from now, And as long as that's true, it's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really long run prospects that matter more than short run prospects,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think the vaccine is a big deal in

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that regard. I think the fact that we're going to

0:22:55.240 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have a transition of power um in America is a

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>deal in that regard. So while I feel much worse

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>about the grimness of the winter than I did a

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>week or ten days ago, I feel better about the

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>long run UH future of the prospects, at least for

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>corporations UH in UH the United States. I think the

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>combination of the fact that we're going to have a

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>more stable government and whether it's good or bad, ultimately,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've got reservations about it, they're gonna be more

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>stymied in their abilities to promote inequality UM in the Congress.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That combination is pretty benign from the point of view

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of corporate interests. And that's of course with the stock

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>market reflects and Steve, what about that transition. It's not

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as abrupt of transition as we thought. It looks right

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>now at least like this, and it may well remain

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in repult your hands. What does that say about the

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>positive stimulus which all of it thought we needed rather badly,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>including to deal with the COVID NINETEAM problem. Yeah, I

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>think I agree with everything like I said, and I

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think adding stimulus or lack of stimulus into the equation

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is an important part of trying to understand the market.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make short term predictions either, but

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I would note that essentially on the same day, we

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>had the announcement of the vaccine, and we had the

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>news that we were going to have divided government, which

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the market I think correctly interpreted to mean we were

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have a lot less stimulus, and that sent

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>interest rates down, even as the vaccine and theory should

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have been more bullish for the economy. And so it

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was almost like the opposite of a perfect storm for

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the market, and that I had two good things happened

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more or less at the same time. Low interest rates,

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>which are very bullish for the market, as well as

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the prospect, the real prospect for the first time of

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine that could be a game changer within a

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>reasonable time horizon. So so, Larry, what about the interest

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>rate issue, and particularly the yield curve, because it really

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>steep and it's come off that a little bit towards

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the week. What is that yield curve

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>telling us anything relevant right now? You know, these movements

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are big in the slope of the yield curve relative

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to what we've seen lately, but but well, but by

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the standards of the longer term of economic history. Uh,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>These movements of ten twenty points, if that in UH

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve, aren't that immense, So I wouldn't overdo

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>uh the significance of those movements. And of course movements

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in the yield curve are different when they're about real

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rates than when they're about UH nominal interest rates.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>I do think we're at risk of making a consequential

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>error in not providing UH more stimulus. It may be

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that will be okay, because there's a lot of cash

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that got built up from unspent stimulus in the past,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but it may be that we're not okay. And so

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we're taking much more of a risk of

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a double dip than he is prudent. And UH, you know,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's happening around the rest of the world,

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and the risk that they're gonna be some real financial

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>aftershocks here is not something I'm prepared to predict, but

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly something that as a policy maker I would

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be UH ensuring the givest steve. As an investor,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>looking below the top line numbers on the equity indusease,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 1>what did we see this week? Because tech had been

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>driving things up. Then tech came off some of this week,

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it looked like we were at least flirting with some

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cyclicals and even some value stocks. What is that telling

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>us about what investors are thinking. Yeah, No, there was

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a significant rotation in the market uh this week, and

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>again it really related to the vaccine more than anything,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>because the cyplicals have that You've had the greatest dispersion

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>between growth so called growth stocks and so called value

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks and cypical stocks. Uh, certainly in my recollection, I

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>think probably in fact, I know essentially in history where

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like the nine we were at the pile dispersion between

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>those two fundamentally different investment strategies. And when the market

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>perceived that there was a light at the end of

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the so called tunnel, two interesting things happened. First, the

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>civical stocks rallied enormously. You had airlines up twenty percent

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in one day, hotel stocks, leisure stocks, everything that has

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>been really beaten up because of the virus. At the

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, ironically, you had the growth stocks come off

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because people uh perceived that there was might be less

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>use of these things going forward. So you had Zoom

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>stock go down I think four the first day after

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all this hit the news, and so markets. You know, we,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Larry and I have had many discussions about the efficiency

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of markets, but this was a case where the market

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>suddenly woke up and decided the world was going to

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>be different than what I thought it was going to be.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And you saw the stock prices, and just accordingly, Larry,

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we are on the border of a new era here

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>with a new pres in maybe a divideed government, we'll see,

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless we're turning a chapter here. As a practical matter,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the chances are that the Biden presidency,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's one term or two years, could be consequential.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that it will be made consequential by the

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the events that gonna deal with. It's gonna

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with a reconceptualization of some kind of the U.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>S relationship with China. These are going to be crucial

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>years for the global effort on climate change. Make no mistake,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>uh the expected return time of some kind of pandemic threat.

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is nowadays more like a once every fifteen year

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>thing than like a once every fifty year thing. And

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the world's gonna have to get it together to be

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ready for the next one. We're not, and that's going

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to depend on what happens in a Biden administration. Perhaps

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>most fundamentally, Abraham Lincoln talked about government by the people

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in government for the people, and he assumed that those

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>two things went together. And you saw in the number

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of people who voted for Donald Trump, what you saw

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in Brexit, what you saw in Boston, Naro's election in Brazil,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what you've seen with Modi in India, what you see

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the greater attraction of the Chinese model to people

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world. What you see in the number of

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>young people in the United States who professed not to

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>believe in democracy is the best system. Is increasing doubt

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>about the proposition the government by the people will always

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be the best government for the people. And fundamentally, that's

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the task of this administration to reconvince people of that

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>central American premise, both in the United States and a

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>around the rest of the world. So I did succeed

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or fail, This is likely to be a very very

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>consequential UH presidency. And I'm I'm optimal, I'm apt, but

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>no one can be certain. Well, everyone has a hope

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>for success, Steve, but as a practical matter. Can President

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden deal with a Mitch McConnell if he if he

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is a majority leader, and make it a government for

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the people. Whatever one could say about that, it means

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can he make fundamental change in what we're doing in

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this country. That That's exactly my concern about this. And

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything else I say in this show

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at all to sound partisan, but I would say the following,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which is that I understand why the markets to some

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>degree and lots of people that we all know, I

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>think divided government isn't such a bad idea to checks

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and balances limitation on what the president could do. But

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I worry a lot about I grew with everything like

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>said about the fears about democracy, the threats to democracy,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that the concerns that there may be a better system

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that democracies and working. You look at China's success in

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>getting past the virus and the way their economy is

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going to grow this year, unlike the way any other

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>developed country is going to grow this year. There's a

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>lot to worry about about democracy, and I worry that

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>divided government isn't going to help. Um. We are living

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in an ultrapartisan environment. There have been. You could count

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on one hand probably the number of bills that have

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>been passed by Congress in the last four years that

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>had any kind of bipartisan support of one kind or another.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Um Larry will be able to speak to this better

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>than I can. But we were both in Washington and

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine when the Democrats had sixty votes

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate until Teddy Kennedy died in August the

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, and even then it required perculian

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>efforts by by many people in the administration to get

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>even what got passed past. There you have an economist

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and an investor giving us the balance of hope on

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the one side and caution on the other. Many many

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Larry Some is our special contributor to Wall

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Street Week. He is, of course from Harvard and see

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ratter of will It Advisors, who invests the personal and

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>philmthropic funds of Michael R. Bloomberg. And that does it

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. See you next week.