Speaker 1: So I'm looking at CNN and their their chiron graphic.
Speaker 1: Right now at the bottom of the screen is soon
Speaker 1: Trump to wold news conference and in fallout from book.
Speaker 1: I will bet you that's not what his press conference
Speaker 1: is about. I'll bet it's about something else entirely. Now,
Speaker 1: there may be some questions about the book, but if
Speaker 1: I'm CNN, it's gonna be real hard to get out
Speaker 1: of bed and go to work every day if I'm
Speaker 1: seeing it. You know why, because everything they've tried has
Speaker 1: blown up in their face. And you know how, I know.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is still president. Donald Trump is still in
Speaker 1: the Oval Office. He's still president, He's still calling the shots.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is still the man with the power in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. CNN has devoted its existence to getting Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: They have failed miserably. CNN does not have one success
Speaker 1: story to tell, and yet here they are getting up
Speaker 1: every day and failing famously. They're failing publicly. They are
Speaker 1: failing right in front of our eyes, and they apparently
Speaker 1: don't care. They're gonna get up every day and continue
Speaker 1: to do what they're doing, which is totally embarrassing themselves.
Speaker 1: Every day there's a new blockbuster like there was nothing
Speaker 1: the day before. Every day there is a new this
Speaker 1: is it. This is the end of Donald Trump. Every day, folks,
Speaker 1: for four years, for four years, every day there has
Speaker 1: been a new this is it for Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: yet Donald Trump has survived every one of those days.
Speaker 1: He has survived every one of those stories and has thrived.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has got approval numbers over fifty percent now
Speaker 1: in Rasmussen. Donald Trump has record approval numbers among African Americans.
Speaker 1: Trump's support among likely black voters has surged to forty
Speaker 1: two percent. Folks. Trump's support among likely black voters surges
Speaker 1: to by the same token. Joe Biden's percentage of the
Speaker 1: Hispanic vote is below where Hillary Clinton's was four years ago.
Speaker 1: Biden's support among Hispanic voters dips below Hillary Clinton's. They
Speaker 1: don't have any success stories, CNN has bombed. They have
Speaker 1: failed everything they've tried, and yet they get up every
Speaker 1: day and they start every day as though nothing happened
Speaker 1: the day before, and they've got a blockbuster. Yep, they
Speaker 1: got a block every day, a brand new blockbuster that
Speaker 1: is going to destroy Donald Trump. CNN is convinced that
Speaker 1: Trump is going to come forward and sheepishly, defensively trying
Speaker 1: to explain what's in the Woodward book. And as we
Speaker 1: so properly, cleverly illustrated earlier, what's in the Woodward book
Speaker 1: is not even new, as Trump was telling the people
Speaker 1: of this country what what words big flash is all
Speaker 1: the way back on February seven. In fact, let me
Speaker 1: grab soundbites number two, A, and three. Carl Bernstein was
Speaker 1: Woodward's partner when they broke the Watergate story. And poor Carl.
Speaker 1: You know, Woodward doesn't write his books with Bernstein anymore.
Speaker 1: So it's it's Bob Woodward this and Bob Woodward that,
Speaker 1: and Bernstein's got nothing. Bernstein's got CNN and whatever you
Speaker 1: can drum up, and that's pretty much it. So Bernstein
Speaker 1: has a has a pattern. Whenever what were even publishes
Speaker 1: a book, then Bernstein has a way of dealing with it.
Speaker 1: Here is Bernstein talking to Brianna Keiler at CNN This
Speaker 1: is Yesterday. Her question to Bernstein was, what are your
Speaker 1: reactions to the revelations that we're learning today about President
Speaker 1: Trump in in Woodward's book. This is one of the
Speaker 1: great presidential felonies of all time, maybe the greatest presidential felony,
Speaker 1: and we have the smoking gun tape of the president
Speaker 1: committing the felony. This is a kind of homicidal negligence.
Speaker 1: Thousands and thousands and thousands of people have lost their
Speaker 1: lives because the president put his own re election interest.
Speaker 1: It is a dereliction of duty recorded as no other
Speaker 1: presidential dereliction of duty has been, even more so than
Speaker 1: the Nixon tapes in this instance, the facts here are
Speaker 1: even graver than in water Day. There you have it.
Speaker 1: That's what Bernstein says every time. This is worse than Watergate.
Speaker 1: This is worse than Nixon. This is worse than anything
Speaker 1: that's happened. This is a presidential felony unlike we've ever seen.
Speaker 1: We put together a montage of the way Carl Bernstein
Speaker 1: does this. Our montage runs from December eleven all the
Speaker 1: way to July of this year. No president, including Richard Nixon,
Speaker 1: disdains fact in the way that this president elect does.
Speaker 1: The Trump presidency is worse than Watergate. What we're seeing
Speaker 1: is worse than Watergate. Keep getting asked, are there echoes
Speaker 1: of Watergate? Slow motion? Saturday night massacre, Monday night slaughter,
Speaker 1: the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. How similar it
Speaker 1: is to what we've seen Trump do. The two fit together,
Speaker 1: the Nixon impeachment. This impeachment is about cover up, like
Speaker 1: in Watergate, more treacherous than Nixon. Republican leadership marched to
Speaker 1: the White House and said to Richard Nixon, you are
Speaker 1: unfit to remain in office. Something similar has got to happen,
Speaker 1: except Carl, it hasn't. It doesn't you guys, You people
Speaker 1: at CNN every day come up with a new blockbuster,
Speaker 1: and that's gonna destroy Donald Trump. And he's still there.
Speaker 1: And you guys look like more and more bigger and
Speaker 1: bigger fools each time you try one of these things.
Speaker 1: It is phenomenal how you guys at CNN continue to
Speaker 1: embarrass yourselves every day it's something brand new, as though
Speaker 1: there was not something yesterday. Every day you tell your
Speaker 1: viewers you had just discovered some outrageous thing that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has been doing, and you expect that thing to
Speaker 1: so outrage your viewers that Trump is history. Trump's done.
Speaker 1: Trump has no prayer, except you've worn people out. You've
Speaker 1: been telling people for four years every day about these
Speaker 1: supposed atrocities. You've made people numb to your own reporting.
Speaker 1: You've made people numb to your own assertions. In fact,
Speaker 1: I've got something here in the stacks. Let me find this.
Speaker 1: We've got We've got audio of Jeff Zucker talking to
Speaker 1: Trump's lawyer, the rat what's his name? Cohen? Let me
Speaker 1: find this. Is it twenty six? Is it just one
Speaker 1: sound bite? That's all it is? There's not too seven?
Speaker 1: All right, here we go. This is not Jeff Zucker
Speaker 1: runs CNN and he used to be the executive producer
Speaker 1: to Today Show, and he climbed the ladder and he's
Speaker 1: now running CNN. And what we have Tucker Carlson last
Speaker 1: night played audio of a phone call March two thousand sixteen.
Speaker 1: This is, obviously before the election. Is a phone call
Speaker 1: in March between Michael Cohen, Trump's lawyer, and Jeff Zucker.
Speaker 1: And they're talking about Zucker's desire to work with Trump
Speaker 1: if he's elected. After Cohen says to Zucker that he
Speaker 1: should email candidate Trump about his ideas, Zucker, now let
Speaker 1: me I have to I have to say, wait, wait
Speaker 1: a second. Here, I know for a fact that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump does not email, and never has, He does not
Speaker 1: have an email address. Now, his lawyer suggesting to Cohen
Speaker 1: that he email. Suggesting to to Zucker that he emailed Trump.
Speaker 1: Cohen would have to know that Trump doesn't have an
Speaker 1: email address. I mean, if Cohen is Trump's lawyer and fixer,
Speaker 1: he would have to know that. So Cohen telling Zucker
Speaker 1: to email Trump is akin to telling Zucker to go
Speaker 1: jump off the bridge, because there's no way you're gonna
Speaker 1: reach Trump with an email. He does not have an
Speaker 1: email address. And you know why, because emails survive emails
Speaker 1: last He has seen too many of his friends exposed.
Speaker 1: He has seen too much embarrassing stuff be dredged up
Speaker 1: from email archives. He does not email. I know this
Speaker 1: email for me, it was a primary way of communication
Speaker 1: once I lost my hearing and I the Trump people
Speaker 1: reached out to me one day some reason for what
Speaker 1: I'm want to play golf or something, and I said,
Speaker 1: could you give an email address or I could reply,
Speaker 1: because I don't know if the president does an email,
Speaker 1: you gotta call us doesn't email. Nope, he does not
Speaker 1: have an email address. He does not. He does not
Speaker 1: have a At the point at that time they said
Speaker 1: he didn't even have a phone. This before Twitter, So
Speaker 1: this before two thousand six or two thousand and seven.
Speaker 1: He he does not, he does not use a device
Speaker 1: for emailing. We'll obviously the iPhone didn't hit the two
Speaker 1: thousand seven, so it was after that. But they made
Speaker 1: a point of telling me that he does an email,
Speaker 1: that I asked him about it, and he doesn't, never
Speaker 1: has so anyway, here is Michael Cohen telling Zucker to
Speaker 1: email Trump. His ideas, I'm very conscious of not putting
Speaker 1: too much in email, as you're a lawyer, as you understand,
Speaker 1: and you know, and as fond as I am of
Speaker 1: the Boss, he also has a tendency, like you know,
Speaker 1: if I call him or I email him, he then
Speaker 1: is capable of going out in his next rally and
Speaker 1: saying that we just talked, and I can't have that.
Speaker 1: If you know what I'm saying, This just two thousand sixty,
Speaker 1: and that's Jeff Zucker. That's Jeff Zucker saying I can't
Speaker 1: afford to put anything in an email. People will discover it.
Speaker 1: I can't afford to be seen emailing the boss. I
Speaker 1: can't afford for anybody at CNN to know that I've
Speaker 1: reached out to you, Cohen. I can't afford anybody at
Speaker 1: CNN or on my audience, knowing that that I am
Speaker 1: trying to make a connection with Trump as a friend.
Speaker 1: So here's play the SoundBite again. This is Zucker after
Speaker 1: Cohen tells him the email Trump. If you want to
Speaker 1: talk to Trump about working for him, doing something with him,
Speaker 1: you need to send him an email. I'm very conscious
Speaker 1: of not putting too much in email as you're a lawyer,
Speaker 1: as you understand, and you know, and as fond as
Speaker 1: I am of the Boss, he also has a tendency,
Speaker 1: like you know, if I call him or I email him,
Speaker 1: he then is capable of going out in his next
Speaker 1: rally and saying that we just talked, and I can't
Speaker 1: have that, if you know what I'm saying. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: Mr Zucker, you couldn't have emailed in because he didn't
Speaker 1: have you had the email. And distuss, his assistants have email,
Speaker 1: So if if you wanted to email Trump, you had
Speaker 1: to email an assistant. And if you got to reply,
Speaker 1: what Trump would do would be right a personal response
Speaker 1: on it, like a word or two, and then they
Speaker 1: would take a picture of that and scan it and
Speaker 1: and email that back to you. But Trump would never
Speaker 1: respond in an email. He does not have an email address.
Speaker 1: He never will have one. His assistants, I'll do. But
Speaker 1: the point here is that Zucker was kissing up here
Speaker 1: in this phone call. He wanted to be part of
Speaker 1: what Trump was doing. If Trump wins, there's more of
Speaker 1: the phone call, and this is it. Next sound by
Speaker 1: three to one hit it. I have all these proposals
Speaker 1: for him, like I want to do a weekly you know,
Speaker 1: I want to do a weekly show with him and
Speaker 1: all this stuff. When is he back in New York tomorrows?
Speaker 1: You know? You know what you should do is who's
Speaker 1: ever around him today should just be calling him a
Speaker 1: contomy in all day so that he's gets so he's
Speaker 1: used to it, so that when he hears it from Rubio,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. A con man, con man and gun man.
Speaker 1: He thinks that's his name, you know. So here's Cohen
Speaker 1: advising Cohen, Zucker advising Cohen how to get ready for
Speaker 1: Rubio and up coming to me, just have everybody called
Speaker 1: him con man because that's what Ruby is going to do,
Speaker 1: and get used to it. So here's Zucker trying to
Speaker 1: help him out planning for the debate. Now Zucker is
Speaker 1: the guy that's now running CNN, which has one objective,
Speaker 1: and that is getting rid of Donald Trump, destroying Trump,
Speaker 1: ruining Trump, his presidency and his life and his businesses.
Speaker 1: J in Alburquerque. It's great to have you with us, sir,
Speaker 1: glad you're weighted high right. My heart felt best wishes
Speaker 1: for you and Catherine in your family. And he's challenging times.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir, very much appreciate. Hey, you know what
Speaker 1: I told Mr. Snerdley is simply the US Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is the man for this time. And I don't care
Speaker 1: who writes or speaks whatever by whichever media. I trust
Speaker 1: Donald Trump implicitly. I know Donald Trump intuitively, instinctively. I
Speaker 1: don't know him personally like you do. But I'm telling
Speaker 1: you what I know. That guy is here to do
Speaker 1: the right thing, and he's got the guts and the
Speaker 1: brains to accomplish what he sets out to do for
Speaker 1: this country. Rush. He's got the record, by the way,
Speaker 1: to prove that he's done it. He's got and and
Speaker 1: and you know, if you you talked earlier about digging
Speaker 1: up dirt, let's just go back to the early campaign
Speaker 1: days of two thousand fifteen, when he started introducing himself
Speaker 1: and his past to the country, and he made this
Speaker 1: comment many many times. Never drank, never smoked, never did drugs.
Speaker 1: And to this day I have not heard anyone come
Speaker 1: forward to try to refute that or say, oh, that's bs.
Speaker 1: You know, I knew Donald when he was a pothead
Speaker 1: or whatever. None of that has ever come up because
Speaker 1: it doesn't exist, just like the rest of his crap
Speaker 1: doesn't exist and has not existed. You know, that's a
Speaker 1: that's actually a a good point. None of these allegations
Speaker 1: that they have made about Trump are true. Nobody's got
Speaker 1: any evidence for any of it. Trump, Russia, collusion, impeachment, Ukraine,
Speaker 1: none of it. None of it, that's what. And yet CNN,
Speaker 1: like the little locomotive, they just keep getting up every
Speaker 1: day and shooting themselves in the foot and don't even
Speaker 1: know they're doing it