WEBVTT - Why Your Brain Likes Conspiracy

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Julie Douglas and my name is Ben Bowlen. I

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>host car Stuff Stuff Then Want you to Know, and

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>today I am guest hosting with you, Julie. That's right.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Today Robert is not here, but in his stead is

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Mr Ben Boleyn and Robert will be back um for

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>April five and infinity beyond that. But so thank you

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>very much for hanging out with us today. Oh, thank you.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually a big time fan, longtime listener, first time

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>co host. Yeah, yeah, I know. It's very nice to

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have you here because today's topic, we think is going

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to lend itself nicely to April Fool's Day and a

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of what you do with stuff they don't want

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you to know because you deal with conspiracy theories of time, right, Yes, yes,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>it is in a lot of ways. I would say

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the focus of stuff then want you to know.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We also cover some paranormal things. But if we're talking

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>about conspiracy theories, uh, let's let's go ahead and take

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it all the way to the top. Let's let's take

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it to the Moon to the Moon. All right, you're

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you're speaking of the conspiracy theory that the moon landing

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was just a hoax perpetrated by the United States government. Yes,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is uh, that's that's great. You've encapsulated it

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in a sentence. This if if conspiracy theories were like

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a band and they had a discography, this would be

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on the greatest hits because this is one of the

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>classic conspiracies and it ranges. The reasons that people believe

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the moon landing was faked can can change depending on

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances and the conversation. But you know, we've got

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>an excellent uh, we've got an excellent article for our

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>own John Fuller, Right, that's right, and wonderful editor, John.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's a great article, and it's about why some

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>people believe the moon landings were a hoax. And you know,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some reasons that you'll typically here. Oh yeah, I

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>mean they're really really um. Typical things are that if

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the photographs, there are no stars in

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the background, right and um, and they say, well, if

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no there are no stars, obviously this was done

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on a set, right. And now, so it's like you

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>know what that's not actually why, it's because the sun's

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>rays are hitting the surface and it's way too bright

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for any camera to capture something in the distance. Right, So,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are these reasons that seem kind of

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>logical that that you can see in conspiracy theory, you know,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>starting to weave them their way in. But then you

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>can refute it just as easily with well science and

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>an empirical objective observation. Um, there's also you know, it's funny,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a sidebar this conspiracy theory. One of the furthest

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>reaches of it is the idea that Stanley Kubrick, no

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one other than Stanley Kubrick himself, actually participated and was

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the one who filmed the fake landing on the Moon.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I know it all makes sense now the

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pieces come together. I got it, totally makes sense because

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got skin in the game with one. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds sort of reasonable. Of course, these explanations

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>people would have, if they don't, uh, if they don't

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>seem to quite jibe with what you already know, then

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there must be a reason for that. And the reason,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of course can't be that we were wrong. Oh no, no,

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>what's it was? Another really good one from that. Okay,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go with the infamous sea rock. A lot of

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>people who believe the moon landing was faked will tell

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you that it was a prop that was that actually

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>dentally was shown on film with the letters C on

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it like someone some uh foolish proper person forgot to

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>turn the rock around because you know whatever, like maybe

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the company's logo was emblazoned on it and the sea

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was showing right, And never mind that, NASA says, this

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is most likely a stray hair that got onto the

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>film and the developing process, because of course that's just

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>smoke and mirrors, right right, that's just of course you have.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>NASA would say that that seems really logical, and that's

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not the only one, of course, you you know,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we have a list of these here somewhere.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Um shadow links. Oh yeah, the different shadow links. They

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>were saying, okay, here's here's a photo of two astronauts

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are standing together, and yet their photo is showing these

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lengths that are disproportionate, and why is that? Why is that? Yeah? Yeah,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and so NASA says, okay, again, it's not some sort

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of faulty lighting system that we used on our set

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that you think we built. It's actually that the terrain

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is rough and it's hilly and it produces variance. Is

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just like if you were to take a picture on

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a snow covered right and that you know, of course

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense again if you have taken photographs on

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a snow covered hill. But of course, if you believe

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is all some sort of large attempt to

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>cover up quote unquote the truth, then of course NASA

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna come up with explanations that may even seem clever,

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but but they don't jive again with what you're thinking.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Another example, the American flag flapping in the breeze. Uh.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>As we know, one of the reasons that there's not

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a resort on the Moon yet is that the atmosphere

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is not conducive to human beings or wind, and so

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea is, how could how could the wind uh

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>show a flag or how could the film show a

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>flag flapping in the breeze. And that's that's one of

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the other points. I mean, we you know, we could

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>go on about this, uh, we go on about this forever,

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, Robert I apologize if people write mean things

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about moon landings to you. Please please guys forward the

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>email to me. Um, you know you have other accusations

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.239
<v Speaker 1>slow motion films and wires. And for a long time,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>these groups, the people who believed in that the moon

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>landing was faked for some reason, and the people who

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that those people were crazy, were understandably contentious and

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and um right, right, yes, And it was difficult for

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>them to have a dialogue about that until Julian Assange

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of wiki leaks released some very interesting cables regarding the

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>moon landing. Yeah, it turns out it's conclusively proven, due

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to the or from these diplomatic cables, uh, that the

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>moon landing was faked with the assistance Stanley Kubrick, this

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just hit the news. Go ahead and google it. You're kidding,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Well to make sure you get right to

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the story, go ahead and google Happy April Fool's Day

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>been fallen. I'm sorry, yeah, it's but you see how

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>easy that was. I started, I was like, what wiki leaks, Wait,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a new source, because it sounds reasonable if

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>something like that was going to come from somewhere right right,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Our new source in the sense that we're starting obviously

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a flood of information we haven't gotten before,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sure new sensory information, right, And my brain was starting

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to take that in and I have to say, like

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, no, and he's he's not he's

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not actually telling the truth that were there. But a

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>little part of my brain was going, but Wiki leaks

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>telling us stuff we haven't known before. And I think

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what's so fascinating about just the whole is the

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>man the moon landings, where they a hoax, but the

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, we have this sort of logic

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that can't help but assemble itself on its own. It's

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>almost like its own emergence in our brain cells try

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and put all this together for us. And I was

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. You know, we can't help but detect patterns,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and especially when we look at path examples um that

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have eroded our faith and information and government in the corporations.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And a really good example is the cigarette industry. Oh

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a great example, you know. I mean, you know,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for years, you know, decades long foot see playing with

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the government in terms of the information that they released

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about cigarettes and how harmful they are. So you've got

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>an example like that in the public, well knows now

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that that was information that was kept from them. We've

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>got Watergate, You've got Milli Vanilli, you know. I mean,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>these are things that you can start to point to

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, if it happened before, you know,

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't happen again. This presentation is brought to you

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>by Intel Sponsors of Tomorrow because human beings depend The

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>way that the human species has survived for so long

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is really based on the ability to detect patterns and

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to think critically and abstractly about the future, or to

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>let the precedent set from those past experiences influence our

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>attitudes and behaviors when confronted with information that seems similar

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or seems to again coincide with what we had believed before.

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And this can lead to a funny little thing. And

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>by funny little thing, I mean one an enormously influential

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>theory of psychology, uh that we call cognitive dissonance. Yeah,

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the bread to the butter when it comes to

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories and how we try to explain to ourselves, um,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>how this could happen? And I will you know, I

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>do want to say, like I'm not making fun of

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theorists. And I'm not making light of UM any

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, but I do think that we all have

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a conspiracy theorists inside of ourselves. Sure,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't necessary really have to be UM for

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>something like it doesn't necessarily have to be for something

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that the world is ruled by freemasons

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>or reptilian aliens or anything. It can be, it can

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it can be a small sort of theory as uh.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about a little bit before on

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the air where you say, you know, uh, that person

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is after me, Yeah, yeah, or my cat, My cat

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is purposely you know, perpetrating this crime against me. I

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just know it. I just need to get that camera

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in my house hooked up and then I'll have evidence. Well,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>cats are are actually vengeful creatures. So I don't know

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that example, right, But I mean, basically, when you bring

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>up cognitive dissonance, what we're talking about, and in more

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>high salutent terms, is that when actions conflict with our beliefs,

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they can produce a phenomenon called cognitive distance, and it's

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially a way of dealing with a discomfort that arises

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>when your brain is trying to parse out two different

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>cognitions which can and be manifested in our beliefs or

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>our actions. And uh, here's the if if I could

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>take us with a historical sidebar real quicks. Okay, So

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this term cognitive dissonance. We we get this from the

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties by a social psychologist named Leon Festinger. And uh,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing is his his research came about because

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to understand why a UFO doomsday cult

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>uh increased trying to proselytize new believers when their prophecy failed.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>So this actually does come from a study of conspiracy theory. Okay.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So and so his he kind of sat there and went, hey,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>now that that, um, it's obvious that the UFOs maybe

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the evidence that that this group thought there

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>was why in the world where they continue with their beliefs, Right,

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he was like, what's going on here? Excellent question for

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for the we'll do the reader's digest version of this.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So basically, there's, uh, this person, this cult leader who

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>begins receiving messages of course, uh, intangible messages from a

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>UFO telling her about the end of the world, gathering

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>up followers. These she forms a cult. These people are

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>um together, united in their preparation for a coming apocalypse

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with a definite date. And the date comes and it

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>goes and nothing. The world surprisingly does not end. But

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the cult leader, uh strangely enough, gets a new message

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that says, due to their the good works of the

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>cult and the good intentions or whatnot, um, they have

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>saved the world, which means that their religion is now

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not disproven but further validated, which means that they have

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow um. This this kind of attempt to even out

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or balance the gap between the knowledge that they have,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that the world is not ended, and the

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>actions that they took, you know, um, and to make themselves,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say, feel better, but to sort

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of rationalize the distance between those two. I don't know though,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the crux of it. I mean, because

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the discomfort they're feeling, right, Yes, that's the

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>cognitive distance. Okay, they're like that is not matching up.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>And and all of a sudden, the cult leader, in

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>automatic writing, right, which is like so eighties, um, you know,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gets this message and then they're all relieved of that

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>discomfort and that relief outweighs the chance I suppose for

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>true knowledge in this case. And so they're they're going

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to be tied to that because at least they're feeling better,

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's all squared to their logic and life is

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>normal again, at least for them, whatever normal is. And

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then with as Fastener was exploring this, you know,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he said that there are that this dissonance produces a discomfort,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and correspondingly, there will arise pressures to reduce or eliminate

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this dissonance. And you know, he goes on to analyze

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which this dissonance occurs and how it resolves,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and he found that there are several ways to to

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>find this. Uh, there are several ways to deal with

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this cognitive dissonance, and I'll tell you what they are. Um,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a person may try to change one or more of

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their behaviors or beliefs. That's the first way. The second

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is that a person may try to acquire new information

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>or beliefs to increase the consonants, which will lessen the

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>overall dissonance. I mean, that's that's obvious in the case

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of the UFOL cult. And then the third is that

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a person may try to forget or play down the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>importan the cognition that butting up against the contradictory cognition.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's our smoking example again, right, there's a there's

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a great example of smoking. Um. And this is from passenger. Again,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm quoting a passenger. Uh. He says, for example, a

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>cigarette smoker who believes that smoking is bad for his

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>health has an opinion that is dissonant with the knowledge

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that he is continuing to smoke. He may have many

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>other opinions, beliefs, or items of knowledge that are consonant

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with continuing to smoke, but the dissonance still exists too,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and because of that come because of that discomfort, you know,

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because humans want patterns. We want all the pieces of

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a puzzle to fit. Because of that, this smoker in

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this question may try to change a behavior belief, may

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>try to quit smoking, for instance, UH, may try to

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>learn new things that will increase the consonants, something that says, well,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>smoking might be bad for other people, but for me,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's actually genius, um, you know. Or may just try

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to forget it or play it down, you know, never

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>mind them young, or I'm under a last stress. Yeah, yeah,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and the forgetting part right, I may have to say,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit that when I was a smoker,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I oftentimes, you know, sort of willfully forgot the fact

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that I was doing all sorts of crazy things to

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>my poor cells in my body. Um. So, I mean

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it happens, right, And that's why I say it's it's

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>really this. This is so fascinating because there is a

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of cognitive dissonance going on with us, all

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of us at some level, every day with with the

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we're dealing with. And then you just see

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it in really extreme forms and stuff like conspiracy theories

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>revolving around the moon. Sure sure, or we we could

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>also see at times, um, cognitive dissonance can really come

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out in uh decision points, you know. Uh. For for instance,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you will often hear that people will say a a

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>public figure or a politician or a large, um, very

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>influential business owner is saying things that seem to be hypocritical.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But how much of that is actually how much of

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that is um malevolent or calculated? And how much of

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that is just these poor folks functioning under cognitive dissonances. Yeah,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so and basically funneling those perceptions through right, so this

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. There is a neuroscientist named Cameron Carter

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>at the University of California Davis and UM. This is

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>actually information pulled from a Newsweek article titled Wired for

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Hypocrisy by Sharon Bagley UM. Carter used volunteers to study

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>their brains basically during cognitive dissonance UH, and he did

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that with fl MARI and the volunteer spent forty five

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>minutes doing a really rope task inside fm R I

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>tube and then afterward they were asked to answer questions

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about their experience, which, of course the board across the

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>board they did not like, which seems obvious, right, You're

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>stuck in a tiny little tube doing something boring and

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you're really gonna probably so I would highly dislike it.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would check highly disliked UM. But they

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were asked to answer the questions again that they had

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>answered after their first experience, and this time half of

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the volunteers were told that their answers were going to

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be read by a nervous patient who needed reassurance about

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>undergoing an fm R. The other half were told that

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they were going to get a dollar each time they

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>answered the questions as though they were enjoying the scanner kitching.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So as though, so that's the that's the important part,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to answer the questions um with two sort of present

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>an opinion publicly that does not match with their personal

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>opinion or experience. Yeah, and of course I'm just gonna

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ask which do you think which narra do you think

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was more effective? Hmmm, that's you know, that's a question

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. That's tricky because it seems, you know, on

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the offset, just with this information, it seems like there

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>may be a difference between the people who am angst

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>us are profiteers and who amongst us are nurturing people. Okay,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, for just just for guessing, just

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of guessing, I would say that the

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>people who are the people who are motivated by the

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>money probably think that the probably actually think that this

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>might be a better thing. No, no, no, no, wait,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>oh I don't know, I don't know. Oh, I don't know.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you just revealed your your black capitalist heart.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I did. I'm a profiteer, yeah, you're a profitier. Actually,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it was the people who were most concerned about a

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nervous patient and the exciting thing about this whole thing,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>UM wasn't necessarily that they could see the neural correlations

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>what was going on inside of their brain when they

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were lying, because they also took f M R I

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>when they were UM, when they were essentially lying on

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>those tests to see what was going on, all of

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>those brains, All the areas in the brain were active,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>all those areas that are trying to square two different

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>pieces of information. Yes, yeah, that was definitely happening, and

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that is interesting in and of itself. But the really again,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting thing was that it was the people

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who um who were trying to yeah that this this

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>phony patient that it was okay. Those were the people

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>who have the most activity. And then those were also

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the people who afterward continued to say that they had

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a good experience and that they changed their brain essentially,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like they changed their actually their actions and their beliefs

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>based on this. Julie, there is there is a fan

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Orwell somewhere out there on the internet listening to

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>show right now, and they're waiting for us to say

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it you win, double think. It's it's almost it's it's

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar to that, and it sort of makes sense,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because if you think about it, your cognitive dissonance is

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of your brain asking why is this happening? Why

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>am I doing this? Um? And now that I have

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that answer wrong, it makes sense that the people who

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are receiving an external reward or an external justification for

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>their line will find themselves uh less uh, you know,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with less of a desire to internally retrofit their ideas.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So they can say they can say, you know, well,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm lying to these people. I'm getting a

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar every time. Let me lie to some more people. Yeah, sure, yeah,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't really have any skin in the game emotionally. Yeah,

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. But when you're trying to be involved,

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>um and motivate someone, I guess in a in a

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in a qualified way, whether when your reward is something

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that is qualitative rather than quantitative. In this case, right,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to make somebody feel better, and in the

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>process of saying all these it's not that bad, it's

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not that boring, you're gonna have fun. In the process

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, they're starting to um. So sort of pull

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the move that Merlin pulls in a Connecticut Yankee King

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Arthur's court. The Mark Twain book, Merlin makes the mistake

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.479
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of magicians and believes that his stuff

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is actual magic. And uh so you start to believe

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>yourself as you sell these days. Well, I will tell you.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a personal example, and it'll be a

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>short one. But when we were at south By Southwest,

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I was at the Austin Airport and I was coming home,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and it was overbooked, of course, and I had not

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>had a seat confirmed yet, even though you know, I've

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>had my um my arrangements made well in advance. And

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>so what happened is I got bumped from that plane

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and I was rerouted to St. Paul, Minnesota, and then

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>back down to Atlanta. St. Paul. Yeah, it was mad.

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It was steaming mad, understandable. It was like a love

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>ster that had crawled out of the pot and I

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was seeking revenge. Um And they said, okay, well, and

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna tell you how much they paid me

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for my inconveniences, but they paid me a considerable sum.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And at the time I was like, yeah, whatever, money

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. You're awful. But I can't tell them are

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>awful because it's the principle of the things right, I did.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't actually say it's the principal thing, and thanks

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot and whatever, um, And I have to say

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that ever since then, I applied that money to a

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mini vacation and the experience feels a lot less awful

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>than it was, because it was it was like then

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, another eight hours of travel, um,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I want and so forth. But I'm going

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that that sort of cognitive dissonance was

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>dispelled by the folks at Delta. So I know that

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they're studying this, and you're now you're reaching the state

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of consonants where things are starting to fit together. Things

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are fine, but kind a mini vacation. But here's the question.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh and and just for the just for the goodies,

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for the people who love the love the specifics and

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the anatomical Yeah, yeah, we should. We should talk about

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the brain that that are letting up

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>during that from R I, So, cognitive dissonance engages the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>dorsal anterior singulate cortex and anterior insula. Yes, these are

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the parts that These are the parts that light up.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>If you want to look on a map of the brain,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>will not light up. I don't mean like someone's brain

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is made of LEDs. Right, but this is the blood

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is rushing to those parts of the rain. Sure the

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>activity increases there during these cognitive dissonance things. And Julie,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you, um, do you think that

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>this experience uh in your personal life has given you

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a confirmation bias? Uh. I don't know that it's given

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>me a confirmation bias, but I can tell you that

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I've certainly felt or or have my own confirmation biases

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in my own life. And when we talk about confirmation bias,

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>it's really similar to cognitive dissonance, and that again we

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can't help but create patterns out of random randomness. Yes,

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like the like the Supreme Court of the United States,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the the human species. The human brain places a great

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>value on precedent and on expectations that the past should

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>match the president in the future. Right. And there is

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting book, uh, Leonard Metal metalon though excuse me,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>only try that a gang, because I'm sure that at

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>least his his family would appreciate that I pronounced it correctly.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But Leonard Mallette. Now it's called Drunkard's Walk, and it's

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a book about randomness, and it turns chaos theory UM

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and Medlow is also the co writer of A Brief

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>History Time with Stephen Hawking and for those of you

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that are interested in this, he's also the victor of

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube face off with Depac Chopra on quantum entanglement

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and spirituality. And I know some people are going to

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>love to check out that way. It's really it's actually

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty great. Um. I definitely recommend it. But he talks

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about the confirmation bias UM and he says that when

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we are in the grasp of an illusion, or for

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that matter, whenever we have a new idea, instead of

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>searching for waste prove our ideas wrong, we usually attempt

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to prove them correct. Psychologists call this confirmation bias, and

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it presents a major impediment to our ability to break

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>free of the misinterpretation of randomness. Uh. And it goes

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>on with to make matters worse. Not only do we

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>preferentially seek evidence to confirm our preconceived notions, but we

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>also interpret ambiguous evidence in favor of our ideas. This

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can be a big problem because data are often ambiguous,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so by ignoring some patterns and emphasizing others, our clever

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>brains can reinforce their belief even in the absence of

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>convincing data. Yeah. So, I mean that's what I think

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is interesting about confirmation confirmation biases. It is like cognitive dissonance,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>but this is more behavioral. I suppose um and and

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>again stems from our experiences and pointing back to what

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>our expectations are. And I thought that was so fascinating

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>about the not looking at the ways that we're wrong,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.719
<v Speaker 1>because we always assume that we're right. Yeah, and and

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of and a lot of people, myself included,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at times. You know, it's nobody's favorite thing to be wrong. No,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>no's just around saying like, how are how am I

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the following ways at this very moment. You know, Now,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I I tried to do that when I'm working on

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>something really important right before I put it out, because

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just but that's just sort of a

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>way to proof read or cross check yourself. And in

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the natural world, in informal situations that doesn't really happen.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>People want to know if you if you, for instance,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that the moon landing is faked. When you're reading things,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you're reading things science proves that you are reading things

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that will tend to reinforce your beliefs rather than denigratee

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>or erode those beliefs. Right, You're often going to seek

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>out information that that corroberates what you're thinking. Essentially. Yeah, um,

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to give you an example actually of

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias. I think that we have year perpetuated by me.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>And this is from a listener emails from Russ Smith

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and he says, hey, guys, Russ and Alliance, ohio here,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the show. I'm a college student and listen

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to your podcast all the time walking to and from class.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But as a side note, you should always be aware

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of your surroundings, especially when you're walking by yourself or

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the dark. That's true. Just a small correction though.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>In one of your recent podcast you mentioned the lorax

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>cutting down needs. The lorax was speaking for the excuse me,

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I flew up that, I'm sorry, um, cutting down trees,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not needs and causing the environmental change. In fact, it

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was the onceler who cut down the trees to make

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the needs. The Lorax was speaking for the trees against

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the onesler all the best, Russ. Okay, so that was

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>me Um, and I do this all the time. Always

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>when I mean to talk about the on Sler, I

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>always talk about the Lorax because in my mind it's

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>acts cutting down or and I cannot square it. And

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it drives me nuts because honestly, I read this book

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at least once a week to my two year old,

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not just my own personal reading. So anyway, so confirmation bias,

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias right there. Well, actually that's not conformation, that's

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cognitive dissonance. Excuse me. So yeah, I mean there, that's

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in action right there. My brain is trying to square it.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So myth mufford move on my part. Oh, but that's

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just part of the human conditions. So now we have

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a final proof, Um, as some of the conspiracy fans

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of asked me, we have final proof that at least

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the people who works at ausup works is

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>not a robot or an android. Yes, that is a

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>real letter that I received. Yeah, but I mean you're

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of shimmering a little bit. I mean, how do

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're not, you know, a Hall of

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Graham like beamed in here by the illuminati. That's a

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question, and that might be that might

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>be a podcast that goes uh more more on my end.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh we have we have you guys. So, um, well,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>some people would say that, uh. Some people say, A,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's ridiculous because the technology doesn't exist. But people

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>who already believe that, of course, would say, no, person a,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you're being ridiculous because that technology does exist, and it's

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously been suppressed for thousands of years. Insert various building

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>blocks of existing thought or existing school thought there. Um,

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people will uh in almost you know, it's easier to

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>describe this in terms of conspiracy theories, but this is

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a common phenomenon in the human brain, both cognitive distance

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and confirmation bias. I don't know, I just you're shimmering again.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm starting to think maybe you've just been

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sent to talk about this and maybe make me think

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that the moon landing actually was not a hoax and

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you were sent here, weren't you. Well, that is a

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting question that we cannot answer completely. I am

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not at liberty to divulge that. And all right, fine,

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>well you're confirming or denying it. I have some uh,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some great news, which is that our own science guru,

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb, will be returning uh very soon. That's right,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and we'll be talking about what should be

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about Flange's next week and why we have five

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on each hand, which is such a good question. It

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is it Actually, it's really fascinating, so we'll explore that.

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But before we wrap up today, I just wanted to

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>give a really quick shout out to Rich Miles. It

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is your birthday. Happy birthday, birthday, March one. Um. He

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is in Laramie, Wyoming, and Nicole and his uh girlfriend

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Mica actually wanted to to give you a shout out, so, um,

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's your birthday, your birthday. We won't do that too much,

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but really, I hope you have a wonderful birthday. And

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for listening. And I would love

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to know Ben Bullen. Yes, Julie, can you tell us

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>where people can reach you, how they can find you

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and your various forms holographic forms. Oh yes, yes, you

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can find you can find car stuff stuff then want

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you to know um and stuff of genus on Facebook, Twitter,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got got blogs. Um. Also, let me pass the

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>shout out baton to our own John Fuller, of course,

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>who has written this excellent article about the moon landings.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you can. You can find John's article, along with

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>several other interesting, fascinating articles, on the website how stuff

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. You've probably heard about our handy search bar.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right, just pop it in there, and you can

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>also find stuff to blow your mind at blow the

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>mind at Facebook and Twitter, and you can also drop

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>us note let us know what your favorite conspiracy theory

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is at and blow the mind at how stuff works

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. For more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>visit how stuff works dot com. To learn more about

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, click on the podcast icon in the upper

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>right corner of our homepage. The how stuff Works iPhone

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>app has a ride. Download it today on iTunes