WEBVTT - Executive Disorder: Do Americans Hate ICE & Trump Now? DHS Shutdown, Shooting in Rhode Island

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>This is it could happen here? Executive Disorder, our weekly

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and what it means for you. I'm Garrison Davis to name,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 2>joined by James Stout, Mia Wong and Robert Evans. This

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>episode recovering the week February eleventh to February eighteenth. Some

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>small news items up top. Last week, the FDA declined

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to review a new flu vaccine from Maderna. On February twelfth,

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Tom Hoeman announced that Operation Metro Surge has concluded and

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 2>quote significant drawdown has already been underway this week and

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>will continue through the next week.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Un quote.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Zarmamdani has ordered a new audit of city agencies to

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>ensure compliance with sanctuary city laws in New York and

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Colbert says that CBS refused to air his interview

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Tallerico, citing the FCC's

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>equal time rule. Despite this rule historically having an exception

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>for late night talk show interviews. Last month, FCC Chairman

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Carr threatened to enforce the rule regardless of the

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>well established President that excluded talk show interviews. And finally,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 2>the owner of a warehouse facility in Hutchins, Texas, so

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>so that they won't sell or lease the building to

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the federal government as a detention facility. The city's mayor

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>and council all opposed the project. Seizure by eminent domain

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is still possible.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I guess with that, there's been campaigns in

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 4>a couple of other small, traditionally conservative rural areas to

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 4>not lease facilities for ICE. And it's still a little unclear,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 4>and I suspect it's kind of column A columbee. How

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 4>much of this is, you know, nimbiism and how much

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 4>of this is resistance to ICE specifically.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we covered a little of that in the episode

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 5>I did on Social Circle, which is in Georgia last week.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 6>But I think it's fair to say both.

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And obviously when I say nimbism, I don't mean

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 4>it in a bad way.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>It's bad to have this in your bag.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, But like their issue was into moral one

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>in some cases, Yeah.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 6>In some cases.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 5>I think in some cases it's their little columny, little

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 5>column B.

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's hard to tell.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think like It's worth noting, for instance,

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 5>hearing in southern California right a town called Dulzura, pretty

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 5>small town. Maybe you've heard of it from when the

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 5>KKK did border patrols there back in the day. But

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 5>the Border patrol are trying to build a big new

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>facility there and have been for some time called New

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 5>brown Field. There has been local opposition to that among

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 5>people who are very like people who I have spoken

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 5>to are otherwise conservative, and like, some of it is, yeah,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't want this changing the character of the town.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't want a giant detention center that would eclipse

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 5>the population of this very small town. Some of it

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 5>is also like I want them to be locking up

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 5>people out here. We have a nice life out here,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we have little lots of fields and

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 5>horses and space, and it seems like it would be

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 5>really fucked.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 6>Up to have people detained out here.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Like I think like that that Nimby impulse can sometime

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 5>like could still combine with even people who are not

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, abolitionists. They don't want to be confronted with

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 5>the horrors directly next to them.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>And we'll talk a little bit more about the numbers

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 4>like ICE's polling numbers, like how popular they are with Americans.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 4>But one of the things we've seen this year is

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 4>that like they've been shedding support even from Republicans. So like,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, whatever debate we have here, that's like certainly

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>not a non factor.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Definitely.

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's now time for us to talk about

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 4>the biggest news story this week, which is that Shilah

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>buff was arrested in New Orleans during Marty Graw after

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>getting into.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>A series of fights. Who he was in the movie Holes?

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he was also in a different production called Holes,

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>but not based on a book.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>He was in Holes.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I forgot, Yeah, it was in both holes.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 6>So I don't know who this person is.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I've never Yeah, he's a he's a child actor who

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is a who was very popular during the early two

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 4>thousands and has gone. He played the Indiana Jones's son

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 4>in the reboot event or in the new in the

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>fourth Indiana Jones movie God and then he has He

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>has since kind of fallen into madness and disrepute. He's

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 4>a spousal abuser. He's repeatedly assaulted people in public. He

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>showed up on that webcam white supremacists were drinking milk

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 4>on once for reasons that are still to this day

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 4>somewhat unclear to me. And he got into a fight

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 4>in Marty Gras, which is just just just a fun

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>little bit of news. My favorite part of this is

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 4>that he assaulted a guy. He was repeatedly restrained by

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>members of a bar, and whenever they would let him

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 4>go because they just wanted him to leave they didn't

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 4>want to call the cops, he would then continue to

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 4>attack the guy he was assaulting until they forced they

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 4>were forced to call the police and have him arrested.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 4>And I've been in Marty Gras over the last few days,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 4>and let me tell you, getting arrested by the police

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>during Marty Gras not easy. I don't have a lot

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 4>to say about that other than I was surprised by

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the number of very political floats that I saw, particularly

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 4>at least one that was entirely paper mache ice guy's

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>in a very like, non flattering way. There were a

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of like costumes and a number of like references

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 4>on floats. There's a couple of pretty hideous caricatures of

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump on floats, and they all got like a widely

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 4>positive reaction and I find this interesting, and I'm bringing

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 4>this up because the research that I've largely been doing

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>for the EED this week is trying to get a

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 4>handle on, like where Americans are polling right now and

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 4>how popular or unpopular is the president and his agenda,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 4>because like we see articles every week about like Trump's

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 4>polls hit a new low, or the most recent article

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 4>that I think it's gallup is no longer going to

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 4>be doing presidential like popularity polling. But I wanted to

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 4>get a look at, like how the actual parties and

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>their agendas are holding up. And it's a pretty shocking

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 4>gap between I mean September October, like fall of last

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 4>year and today. So in September of twenty twenty five,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 4>per Yugov, the Democratic Party had about a sixty four

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 4>percent unfavorable So like sixty four percent of polled Americans

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't like the Democratic Party and a little less than

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 4>thirty four percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 4>the Democratic Party. And if you actually look at the

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 4>graphs for those that you GOV presents, they're basically making

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 4>like a wineglass shape, right, So what that means is

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 4>unfavorability is moving up and favorability is moving down rapidly,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 4>like at the time at which those bulls were taken

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 4>in September of last year. Meanwhile, the Republican Party, neither

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 4>party was popular, but the Republican Party the wineglass shape

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 4>was a lot more muted, more like a shot glass.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 4>Fifty five point four percent of Americans pulled by Yugov

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 4>expressed a unfavorable opinion of the Republican Party, at about

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 4>forty two point three expressed a favorable opinion. You can

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 4>compare this to October twenty twenty five polling by Pew Research,

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>which showed something similar. Sixty four percent of Americans were

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 4>frustrated with the Republican Party, Seventy five percent of Americans

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 4>reported being frustrated with the Democratic Party. Forty nine percent

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>of Americans poll replied that they were angry at the

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party, Fifty percent reported being angry at the Democratic Party. Similarly, Republicans,

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 4>thirty six cent of Americans felt hopeful about the Republican Party,

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight percent of Americans felt hopeful about the Democratic Party,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 4>and then twenty seven percent of Americans were proud of

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the Republican Party sixteen percent Democratic Party.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Those are pretty bleak numbers.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 4>For the Democrats coming in the fall of twenty twenty five.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Like that is kind of black pilling stuff, right. This

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 4>was in the fall of last year, pretty rapid change

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 4>fro where things had been about four years ago. For example,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 4>in September of twenty twenty one, about sixty four percent

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 4>of Americans had expressed frustration with the Dimmerocratic Party as

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 4>opposed to seventy five percent four years later.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's all fall of last year.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, between when the polls that I read to you

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 4>came out and now we've had a cup several major

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 4>things happen. One of the more significant was the long shutdown,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>which was disasters for Republican favorability and for Trump's own favorability.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 4>And we also had a significant I mean, obviously in

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 4>LA and in Chicago. Ice had been doing very terrible

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and very like you know, I guess I should say,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 4>like documented crimes, like horrible things that were spread widely

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 4>on social media. But that has also accelerated massively in

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 4>the first couple of weeks of twenty twenty six. And

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing now in more recent polls taken in

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 4>late January and from anywhere from like kind of early

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:54.479
<v Speaker 4>January to late January and early February is a significant reversal.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So NBC News's Decision desk collated a bunch of different

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 4>polls like Daily Mail, Marquette, Wall Street, Journal, Yahoo, you

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 4>go of Fox News, Emerson, and over the last month

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 4>or so, you're looking at an average spread of all

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>of these polls of about negative nineteen point nine percent

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 4>favorability for the Republican Party and about negative twelve point

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 4>eight percent favorability for the Democratic Party. So when you

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 4>think back to those numbers from last fall, that's a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 4>pretty dramatic change, and it kind of correlates to a

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 4>dramatic change in Trump's own favorability, which has gone down

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 4>by about twelve percent per the average of those polls

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 4>that kind of aggregated by NBC Newsdesk.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Their article notes quote.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Ipso's polling released in late January found fifty one percent

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 4>of Americans say Trump's immigration policy is on the wrong track. Amazingly,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 4>just a year ago, American said Republicans have a better plan, policy,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>and approach than Democrats on immigration by a twenty two

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 4>point margin. Now that advantage is down to five points.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 4>So while Trump is underwater with immigration his and the

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party. These policies towards immigration are still more popular

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 4>than the Democratic Party's responses to immigration, but they have

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>also collapsed in terms of like. The gap between those

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 4>two things, again, twenty two point margin to a five

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 4>point lead is a is a pretty dramatic narrowing. And

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that has come along with this

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 4>is an increasing agreement among Americans that ICE has not

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 4>only gone too far, but needs to be if not

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 4>abolished entirely, then severely curtailed, and a lot of Americans

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 4>a shocking amount currently support abolishing ICE entirely. A PBS

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 4>News NPR Merist poll released recently found that a majority

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 4>of Americans feel ICE is making the country less safe

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>and has gone too far. Six in ten Americans disapprove

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 4>of what ICE is doing, only about three in ten

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>approve of it, So by a two to one margin,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Americans disapprove ICE's operations to approve of their behavior. This

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 4>is a very like political breakdown. About ninety one percent

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>of Democrats disapprove of ICE, sixty cent of Independence disapprove

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 4>of ICE. Meanwhile, seventy three percent of Republicans approve of ICE.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 4>But even that number has dropped fairly recently.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 4>In fact, the percentage of Americans that believe Ice hasn't

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 4>gone far enough dropped from eighteen percent to twelve percent

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 4>over the last year, and only about twenty two percent

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 4>of Americans feel like Ice is doing a good job

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>compared to twenty six percent of Americans a year ago.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 4>So we're seeing like pretty unequivocally Americans rejecting the Republican

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 4>tactics on immigration, and they tend to be blaming Ice

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 4>for it, right Like. That's one of the things that's

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 4>most interesting to me is that both Ice and President

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Trump have seen the most dramatic collapses in public support,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 4>which suggests to me that, like, Americans are kind of

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 4>tying these two things together. Currently, per Yugov, as of

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 4>January twenty fourth, twenty twenty six, more Americans support abolishing

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 4>ICE than oppose it. Now, this has not mean a

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 4>majority of American support abolishing ICE. I've seen some people

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 4>mistate that forty six percent of US adults, as pulled

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 4>by Yugov, somewhat or strongly support abolishing Ice, twelve percent

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are not sure, forty one percent somewhat or strongly oppose

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 4>abolishing ice.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's still pretty striking.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, say a plurality, right, Maybe now would be a

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 5>good time to talk a little bit about like where Democrats,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 5>different Democrats are, different wings of the Democrat Party are

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 5>on abolishing ice, because I think it's one of these

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 5>areas where like the further up the party you go,

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 5>the more detached from that public opinion you get. So

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 5>maybe you will start the Keem Jeffries, Democrat leader in

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 5>the House, hit him on the Joy Reid Show on

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 5>the topic of abolishing ice.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 7>Why not lead and say abolish ice? Because what you're

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 7>telling us is you want our taxpayer dollars to pay

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 7>for a lawless, massed armed agency to continue terrorizing our cities.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 7>And I'm trying to figure out how you, as a

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 7>leader can be telling Americans that their taxpayer dollars should

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 7>be going twice, I don't.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 8>Understand anything that you just said when I've moved English, well,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 8>I don't understand anything that you've just said to me

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 8>when I've made clear that taxpayer dollars should be used

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 8>to make life more affordable for the American people, not

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 8>brutaliz or kill them. That's the whole reason we're in

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 8>this fight right now. That's the whole reason the DHS

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 8>is getting ready to shut down.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>That's abolish abolish ice.

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 8>That is a listen. I'm going to use the language

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 8>that I want to use. You can use the language

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 8>that you want to use.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 5>You can see Jeffries visibly kind of tense when the

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 5>phrase abolish ice is used, right like, he's yeah, he

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 5>wants nothing to do with it. The immediate responses is

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to go to affordability. I do want to note that

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 5>when he was previously asked if he would use the

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 5>appropriations process to rain in eyes, he did exactly the

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 5>same thing.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 7>But why not use the appropriations as to rain in ice, leadergen.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 5>For an operation?

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 9>No, what I'm what I'm focused on right now, Chad,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 9>is to make life better for the American people by

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 9>extending the affordable care and tax credits, which, by the way,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of folks in this institution believe was not possible.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 9>But Democrats made clear before the government was shut down

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 9>that we were in this fight until we win this

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 9>fight on behalf of the American lower the cost, save

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 9>health care.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>That's our objection.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Why there, he does the same thing, right, he goes

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 5>back to affordability, which is something that Democrats have done

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 5>for the last year and a half right when asked

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 5>to take a strong leadership stance and ice, far too

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 5>much of their leadership has instead like tried to deflect

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 5>to affordabilit I do want to note that, like they

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 5>are now doing exactly what he was deflecting from there, right, Yeah,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 5>and that was only less than a month ago.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because it's like this cowardice on like specific

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>terms and messaging. Yeah, even though they are using the

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>provisions process to try to rain an ice like that

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>is that, Yeah, that is what they are doing now.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's like a complete complete cowardice or actually like yeah,

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>trying to like use like public pressure to your advantage

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, Like.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's doing the thing and almost like failing to

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 5>It's not that he's doing the thing, you know, as

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 5>many of us would wish he did, but like he's

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 5>failing to take the easy win. Yeah, like because of

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 5>like you say this like institutional cowardice or like these

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 5>it's like there's some kind of red line rhetorically for

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 5>jeffrees and other leadership Democrats that they will not cross.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 5>And I have to believe that some of that comes

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 5>from what they see as like the long legacy of

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Or like perceptions of the Democratic Party is like too

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>far to the left, is too extreme or something.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they that, like specifically the perception that they like

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 5>attempted to abolish the institution of policing, which was not

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 5>really anything that they had that was not in their

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 5>policy platform. Right, they were not Democrat leaders saying We're

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 5>going to do away with the cops. In fact, Biden

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 5>was talking about how we need to fund the police,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 5>not defund the police in twenty twenty.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, But nonetheless, like that, there seems to be this real,

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 5>like it's very hard for them to break that rhetorical boundary.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 5>It's not entirely just jeffreyes on this. Seven Dems cross

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 5>party lines in late January to vote for a DHS

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 5>funding bill. So we got Representative Henry Quella of Texas.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 10>Worst the worst Democratic congressman.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, shit, fucking.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Texas Deems hit different and like specifically like Rio Grande

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Valley Democrats are a different breed.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 10>God, it sucks so much.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>There's Jared Golden of Maine, Mary Glousen camp Perez Washington,

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Laura Gillen, Don Davis of North Carolina, Lauri Gillan is

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 5>New York, Tom Swosey of New York, and Vicente Gonzales

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 5>of Texas.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 6>This is not it.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 5>There's not a position that is unique to Jeffrey's right, Like,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 5>this's this idea that like, perhaps there needs to be

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 5>some reform of ICE, but bit abolishing it would go

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 5>far too far. Other Democrats have introduced an act which

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 5>would essentially move funding from ICE to local law enforcement.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 5>So it would take that seventy five billion dollar budget

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 5>allocation to ICE and move it to local cops.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 5>This is called the Providing Useful Budgets for Localities to

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 5>invest in cops by substituting six appropriations from federal enforcement

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 5>to yield results Act.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 11>Holy shit, Now, wonder these people's favorabilities like negative onondrillion.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good word.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 5>It's what we call a backronym in that they have

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 5>started with the word public safety and then made a

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 5>really horrendous attempt turning that into an acronym. There is

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 5>also like a wing of the Democratic Party right there

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 5>on the left, which is more forthright about abolishing ICE.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 5>His clip of AOC talking about why I should be abolished.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 5>And this is at an event in Queen's Yeah.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 12>ICE is a very young agency relative to many others.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 12>Enforcements of people who committed crimes that were undocumented or

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 12>had visas used to be under the Department of Justice.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 12>And in the Department of Justice, if someone wants to

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 12>come to your house, you need a judge. You mean,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 12>you need an entire judicial process, You need a warrant

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 12>to ensure that your constitutional liberties would take are respected.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 12>You need all of it. What they did was that

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 12>they took ICE out, well, they took Immigration enforcement out

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 12>of the DOJ, which had very tight rains on what

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 12>you're allowed to do. They take that they put it

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 12>into this new agency that they put at the time,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 12>which is a Department of Homeland Security. First of all,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 12>in what world does FEMA belong under the same umbrella

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 12>as ICE. It makes no sense at all, no sense

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 12>at all. And what happened is that once you take

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 12>that enforcement piece out of that agency, they then start

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 12>to answer to nobody. Even though I technically, statutorily their

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 12>responsibility is just supposed to be on immigration enforcement. They

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 12>are now expanding their data collection to US citizens, to

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 12>everyone on this soil.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>They are waiving.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 12>These phones around and saying that they're implementing facial recognition

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 12>technology to a centralized database. We have to fight this

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 12>tooth and nail. We need to defund it. We need

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 12>to not allow this to be collected by private companies.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 12>A lot of what we need to do is not

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 12>just revisit Session seven oh two. We need to abolish ICE,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 12>and we need to have complemented.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 13>Changes block that up.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>One thing I do want to note about her statements

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>is that during the appropriations process, she did give statements

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>about how she was pushing to defund ICE as an agency,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 2>and this did cause a reaction from some i'll call

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>them over the online leftists, claiming that it had changed

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 2>positions from wanting to abolish to defund, that this is

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 2>some sort of slide. And then she then had to

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 2>follow up with saying, well, currently, the way to restrict

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>ICE and lead to abolishing it is through defunding it.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's what we're doing through the appropriations process. No,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>my position has not changed. I still think think the

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>agency should be abolished.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:49.200 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a broad issue we had, which was that

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 4>at the end of twenty twenty, as a result of

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 4>all of the federal agents that were in American cities

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 4>and had been video brutalizing citizens and places like Portland,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot of anger about DHS.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>In particular.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a column for Business Insider about like, look,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 4>this agency is going to remain under Biden, but if

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 4>we don't cut the legs out from under the entire agency,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 4>it's basically set up to be the president's secret police.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 4>And broadly speaking, the Democrats didn't do anything to stop it.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 4>But I also, like, I guess where I am on

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 4>this is. I think it's kind of counterproductive at this point.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>The failures of the Biden administration, I think are quite

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 4>manifest in what the Trump administration is doing right now.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 4>And what I want to focus on is the fact

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 4>that we've had, in the space of several months, Americans

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>become more than twice as likely to support abolishing ICE,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 4>which is both a fragile coalition because the fact that

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the number has changed so rapidly means that it could

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 4>potentially change back. Like, I don't feel solid in counting

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 4>on that to be the permanent state of affairs, but

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>it introduces an opportunity, and it's an opportunity to build

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 4>support to destroy this agency. And I think it's probably

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 4>too much to hope for DHS as a whole and

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 4>anything close to the near term. But the fact that

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 4>during the Biden administration so much got punted on, I

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 4>don't know, like we're past that. We have the opportunity, now,

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 4>we have the anger now I do I retain my worry,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 4>And I would say almost one of my biggest political

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 4>fears is that twenty twenty six and twenty twenty eight

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 4>go well for Democrats. They do again what happened under

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 4>the Biden administration.

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and they leave all these things intact.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 4>But one of the big differences that we have, at

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 4>least right now is that at no point was abolishing

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 4>ICE polling the way it is right now during the

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 4>Biden or the first Trump administration. Yeah, And I think

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>we have to take advantage of that. There's momentum right now,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 4>like this is a.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Crucial time, not just like we're talking here in terms

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 5>of like abolishing ICE moves us back to the two

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 5>thousand and three norm right, Like what it doesn't do

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 5>is fixed the fundamental issue here, which is that there

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 5>are not legal pathways for people to come to the

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 5>US and there need to be and like I think

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 5>like now is the time for people who are involved

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 5>in democratic politics right to agitate for like a genuine

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 5>reform package. I don't think we will ever see support

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 5>like this again for legalization of undocumented people, for Dreamers right,

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 5>or people who are impacted by deferred action for childhood arrivals,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 5>which is a policy that it came to place under Obama.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 6>Like, now is the time for substantial immigration reform.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 5>I say this knowing that this will not fix a problem.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Like more than most people you know, I have seen

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 5>the horrors of our immigration system firsthand, but like there

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 5>is a moment right now that we could change things

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 5>for the better. And I share roberts worry that if

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Democrats get like an easy win even in the midterms,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 5>that we might not get that. And like what we

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 5>saw rounder Biden was a big pointer to what we're

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 5>seeing under Trump that essentially the DHS was almost impossible

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 5>for him to control. Yeah, in that he acquiesced to oads,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 5>he is still responsible for them, like the buckstops with him.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 6>He's president.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm not certain that he planned it, but nonetheless it

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 5>continued to happen for months and months and months out

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 5>of his presidency, right, Like, it was very obvious the

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 5>way this was going to go if we got another

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 5>Trump presidency, and if they do that again, we're just

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 5>setting the table for things to get worse again.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think James the task before is twofold, right,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 4>because on one hand, we have to reform the system

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 4>by which people gain legal acceptance to live in this country,

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 4>and that also includes I think there needs to be

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 4>a push for some sort of federal law that will

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 4>make it impossible or at least much harder, to reverse

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 4>these acceptances and to do things like nullify or cancel

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 4>green cards and permanent residency like the administration is doing

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 4>right now. Like both, we need increased pathways and we

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 4>need increased resilience to promise people that, hey, if you

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 4>go through all of these hoops to become a legal

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 4>resident or a citizen or whatever, it can't just get

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 4>pulled away the next time a Republican wins office.

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 4>And then on the other side of things, you have

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>this vast, uncontrollable militant agency built as the armed wing

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of the presidency that has to be destroyed because it

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 4>can't exist a democracy yeah, it's no compatible and then

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>you have I mean I would extend that to DHS

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 4>as a whole. But it's my same issue with like,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 4>if we can defund ICE right now, I'm always in

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 4>favor of taking away some of their money.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>That's not the extent of what I think should happen

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to ICE.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 4>It's just like it's a salient, right, Like you have

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to look at it that way. Like it it would

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 4>be as if you're you're like, well, it's not worth

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 4>winning the Battle of Stalingrad because that doesn't give us

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Berlein It's well, but these are steps, you know, you

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 4>try to damage and reduce the agency's power and ability

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 4>to function. Yeah, while you're continuing. And I guess the

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 4>worry about that too is that if you do defund ICE,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 4>if they because we've had some Trump has made a

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 4>couple comments about worrying that, like we need to reduce

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of the tempo at which ICE is operating because

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 4>it's bad for them.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 3>So that is kind of one of my concerns.

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 4>That maybe if they, if they pull back on the

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 4>throttle a little bit, the rage will decline enough that

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 4>there's not this kind of motivation and behind abolishing but

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's just a fear you kind of

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 4>have to eat, as opposed to not trying to stop

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 4>and reduce the harms the agency does in the immediate

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 4>term while you're working long term for abolition.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Did want to talk a little about other numbers, because

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 4>immigration is obviously a major issue for American voters. It's

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 4>an issue people pick who they're going to vote for

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 4>the presidency on. It's one of them, but it's not

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 4>the main one. As a general rule, throughout most of

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 4>modern political history, the kind of the top issue for

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 4>Americans is the economy. And if the economy is bad,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 4>it is very hard for your party to stay in power.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 4>If the economy is good, it is a lot easier

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 4>for your party to stay in power. Right, Like, these

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 4>are fairly basic facts of political life in the United States,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 4>always with some caveats, but that it bears looking at

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 4>how do Americans feel about the economy and who do

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 4>they blame for the fact that they feel badly about

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 4>the economy? And per Politico, which carried out a recent survey,

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 4>about forty six percent of Americans say the cost of

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 4>living is the worst they can remember it ever being

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 4>This includes thirty seven percent of people who voted for

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Trump in twenty twenty four, and Americans pretty like significantly

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>agree that this is a Trump problem. Inflation, the fact

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 4>that they can't afford things is on him because he's

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 4>the present. Again, forty six percent of Americans say it's

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Trump's economy and his administration is responsible for rising costs.

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 4>And this is true both among Republicans and Democrats, which

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 4>is very interesting to me. A percentage of Americans, based

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 4>on the vote in the twenty four election, fifty three

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 4>percent of Harris voters in twenty twenty four say the

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 4>cost of living is the worst they've seen it, and again,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 4>thirty seven percent of Trump voters in twenty twenty four

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 4>feel the same way. So that is it's an example

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 4>of something that we've talked about and wondered about on

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 4>this show a lot, which is like how much.

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Does reac break through the fever swamps? And this is

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>suggesting that, like to a pretty solid degree, that actually

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Trump is I still think he's got a floor of

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>somewhere around thirty percent of Americans who will follow him

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 3>into the pits of hell, even if it means shoveling

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>themselves into it, but that number used to be like

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>forty percent, right, and it does seem to be declining.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 4>This is being treated as a five alarm fire among

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the Trump White House, which is interesting me for a

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 4>couple of reasons. You know, anytime you talk with especially

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 4>people them left about but also increasingly a lot of

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Democrats about the midterm elections in the twenty twenty eight elections,

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I think you have to deal with his people saying,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 4>but are there going to be elections?

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 4>And you know it's I don't dismiss those concerns out

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 4>of hand, obviously in part because the administration is talking

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 4>right now about having ice agents and polling places, right,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 4>you do have to acknowledge that as a concern. But

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 4>at the same time, I think if you're looking at

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>this rationally, you have to note that the Trump administration

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 4>internally is acting as if there will be elections and

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that those will be competitive elections. They are worried about

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 4>the economy, they are worried about their polling, and they

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 4>are taking actions to try to mitigate the worries that

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 4>they have, which they wouldn't be doing if they were

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 4>already sure there's never going to be another election. Right,

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 4>and that is important to remember. It doesn't mean there's

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 4>not a danger, doesn't mean they won't try shit if

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 4>they lose, but it does mean that they are treating

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 4>these political issues as political issues that they have to

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 4>deal with via messaging. There is an article in Fox

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 4>News recently about Trump's team huddling to decide on midterm messaging.

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to quote from that now.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 4>The meeting, which was confirmed to Fox News by sources

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 4>familiar with the gathering, was hosted by White House Chief

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 4>of Staff Susie Wilds and Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair,

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 4>who is steering Trump's political strategy. According to sources, the

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 4>message during a slide presentation by chief polster and Chief

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Strategists and strategist Toorney Fabrizio was that the economy will

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 4>be the top issue in the minds of voters, and

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 4>the White House needs to spotlight its efforts on easy affordability.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 4>The meeting was held as the GOP ares to defend

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 4>their control of the Senate and their razor thin House

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 4>majority in November's midterm elections. Republicans are also dealing with

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>the presidents continued underwater approval ratings and a slew of surveys,

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 4>including the latest Fox and News pulling that indicates Americans

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 4>are pessimistic about the economy, and publicly, the administration's claim

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 4>is that Americans are happy with the economy. The economy

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 4>is the best it's ever been. Look At how good

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 4>the doo is. It's over fifty thousand, right, Yeah, But

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 4>everything we're hearing internally, like all of the reports that

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 4>from people inside the administration about like what's going on

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>day to day, is that they're wide awake and worried

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 4>over the fact that their economic numbers are completely fucking

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 4>dog shit. Now, what does this mean for the midterm elections, Well,

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 4>very few people that I have found who are like

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>credible analysts don't expect the Democrats to retake the House, right.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Meaning, most credible analysts do think the Dems are likely

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>to retake the House.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 4>That said, there's a fairly few people who expect a

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty eighteen style Democratic blowout, among like the professional bull

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>watchers and stuff, which is, if you remember the Democrats

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>flipped about forty one seats. There's a couple of reasons

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 4>for this, right, And I found a good article in

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 4>The Hill that's kind of analyzing like why we shouldn't

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 4>be expecting some of the exuberants that you're seeing on

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 4>social media about like early elections and how bad Trump's

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 4>numbers are, is maybe making people overly optimistic about like

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 4>flipping all of Congress to Democratic control, which is not

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 4>currently the likeliest outcome. And there's a couple of reasons

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 4>for this. One of them is that, as unpopular as

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Trump is, and I've hit on that quite a lot,

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 4>the Democratic Party's overall favorability is at about thirty three percent,

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 4>which is nine points lower than the Republican Party's favorability

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 4>and you know, depending on the poll, five to ten

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 4>points lower than Trump's own favorability. This is based on

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 4>a Marquette Law School pol Right, So Trump is very unpopular,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 4>so with the Republican Party, but people don't like the Democrats,

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the Democratic Party as a whole. People like individual Democrats,

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people like their Congress person, a lot

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 4>of people like whoever it is they want to see

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 4>as the presidential candidate. You know, you can look at

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, you've got folks who really like Mamdani or

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 4>really like pritzkerp But as a whole, voters, including Democratic

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 4>voters don't feel very positively towards the Democratic Party, in

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 4>many cases more negatively still than they feel about the

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party that started to turn around. But if you're

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of hoping that there's going to be like a

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 4>full on switch that makes it immediately possible to successfully

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>impeach President Trump, that is extraordinarily unlikely to come in

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty six, right, which doesn't mean that it's unlikely

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 4>to have a good result. Republicans losing control of Congress

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 4>is a good result.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Right. There's just a lot less. I mean, there's a

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 3>lot less.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Even if you're kind of taking the unfavorability of the

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Democratic Party out of it, there's a lot fewer seats

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 4>up for grabs right now. In twenty eighteen, and when that,

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, the Democrats flipped forty one seats. There were

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 4>seventy five competitive races this year. Heading into the midterms,

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>there were only eighteen. Right, there's a lot less that

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 4>can flip. And I don't think Republicans are likely to

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 4>lose control of the Senate, right, And the polling shows

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 4>things being pretty razor thin there. Democrats have about a

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 4>four percent advantage according to Economist. You GOV polling right

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 4>now in the congressional midterms, and there's a three point

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 4>margin of error, so you're looking at like a lead,

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 4>but not enough of one for a complete fucking blowout. Right,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 4>there has been some more positive data, like kind of

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 4>right before we came on to record this, like I

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 4>looked at some charts by Focal Data that was kind

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 4>of breaking down midterm voting and tensioned by groups and

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 4>looking at like likely voters, And this is always kind

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 4>of a little bit like voodoo, right in terms of

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 4>how you're trying to, like, well, how likely is a

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 4>likely voter and how do we like factor in realistically

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 4>are they going to show up anyway if you're kind

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 4>of assuming that like people who self report as likely

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 4>voters will only actually vote about a third of the time.

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Per this study, Democrats are ahead by about seven points

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 4>in a generic house ballot. So you know, that's kind

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 4>of where we are right now. I think we're looking

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 4>at a midterm season that's going to go well for

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats, But I don't think we're looking at a

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 4>midterm season that delivers us from the Republican Party being

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>able to ram through legislation. I think our kind of

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 4>best case scenario is one in which they have to

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 4>give major concessions because the Democrats have you know, flipped

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 4>the House at the very least like.

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's that's big. But I don't think.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think Trump's going to get impeached starting January

0:35:58.440 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 4>of next year.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 11>The one thing I will say about the polling data

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 11>is that so obviously Democrats tend to perform better in

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 11>special elections because to vote in a special election, you

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 11>have to be a higher interest voter. And that also

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 11>special election cycles get driven by immediate like anger over stuff,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 11>and there's a bunch of different factors that dry special

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 11>election turn out. And also the Democrats have been absolutely

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 11>obliterating the Republicans in all the special elections that have

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 11>been happening recently, or even in the cases where they're lose,

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 11>they're losing by very small margins in places where Trump

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 11>was wining blowouts. Yeah, so I think if you want

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 11>to be optimistic, I think that's the case for optimism.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 11>But also, yeah, like we're not going to have all

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 11>of our problems magically solved by the mid terms.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yes, to specify on that, what you were saying,

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 4>there was a special election in Tennessee and Republican Matt

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Van Epps beat the Democrat often Bane by nine points,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 4>but Trump had won in twenty twenty five, were there

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 4>by twenty two points.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and like like a few we talked about this

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 11>on the show. But like last year there was there

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 11>was an election in like a special election in western

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 11>Iowa that Trump had won by double digits and the

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 11>Democrats won by double digits.

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 6>And that kind of thing shouldn't be happening.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 11>It sure shouldn't, No it is, And yeah, you know,

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 11>so that's that's the optimistic case.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 4>And hey, like I've just come in saying like, hey,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 4>don't expect Congress to be completely flipped, but like, you know,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 4>it's the times are crazy. Who knows what else? Who

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 4>knows how many more people Ice is going to murder?

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Who knows like what other like how bad the economy's

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 4>going to get.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 6>We might have invaded Canada by then, Like who knows.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Anything's on the table, anything's still on the table. We're

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 4>just kind of looking at shit from February.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, and some of this shit will depend on

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 5>like what atrocities they commit in the weeks and days

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 5>before the midterm election. Right then, I think we see

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 5>so around certain the killing of Rene Good, the killing

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 5>of Alex pretty right, we see those things shift public

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 5>opinion dramatically. And the ongoing snatching of immigrants and deportations

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 5>and sending people back to places where they be tortured

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 5>and killed. Like that's kind of the background and it

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 5>makes people angry, but like it's these these these specific

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 5>actions which seem to shift public opinion dramatically. All right,

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 5>So on that topic, I guess we should talk about

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 5>the quote unquote shutdown, and specifically the shutdown of the

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Department of Homeland Security.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I guess the first thing to clarify is this isn't

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 5>a government shut down in the sense of the shutdown

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 5>we saw last year, right that that lasted like forty

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 5>plus days.

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, It's a partial shutdown.

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 6>It's partial shutdown.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 5>What's happening right now is the Democrats are holding up

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 5>further funding for DHS until the administration agrees to some

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 5>concessions that they have asked for. This is unlikely to

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 5>impact ICE and CBP a very great deal for a.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Couple of reasons.

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Firstly, the Taxi Spending Cuts Bill right, twenty twenty five

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 5>bill funded them to an absolutely unfathomable degree, I think

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 5>sixty five and seventy million, respectively. More quickly, it will

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 5>affect other agencies under DHS. Those includes Transport Security Administration,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Federal Emergency Management Administration, the Secret Service, and the Coast Guard.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 5>Some TSA workers will be working that they will likely

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 5>not be receiving pay. This is pretty common right that

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 5>they're deemed does quite unquite essential workers, and that means

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 5>that they will be expected you to work. What we

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 5>saw last time was that as the shutdown dragged on,

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 5>people were calling in sick or not coming into work

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 5>because they were taking other jobs right because they had

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 5>bills to pay. The reason this is happening is because

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Democrats successfully managed to get Trump to separate DHS funding

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 5>from another spending bill, which passed through and funded the

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 5>rest of the federal government.

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 6>They are demanding an end to masking.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 5>I should clarify specifically like masking in the sense of

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 5>law enforcement officers wearing gates over their faces, a return

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 5>to opposites displaying their name, badge, and ID number, increased

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 5>oversight of detention conditions, coordination with local law enforcement, and

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 5>end to the detention of US citizens targeted enforcement and

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 5>not roving patrols, and a unified use of force and

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 5>uniform conduct policy for CBP and ICE, and then an

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 5>end to raids using Form two point fifteen. I'm just

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 5>going to note here them moving forwardre going to refer

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 5>to that using its it's that name and not call

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 5>it an administrative warrant, because an administrative warrant like kind

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 5>of implies the action of a judge. But these are

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 5>forms that are filled out right that it is not

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 5>the same early aspected as a warrant, and that's a

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 5>judicial warrant. The Republican counterproposals so far have shown pretty

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 5>little common ground on this, aside from over body cameras

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 5>where Gnome did implement body cameras. As I said, ICE

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 5>and CBP will continue doing what they do right. I

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 5>was at the border on Saturday and I saw tons

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 5>of CBP patrols. They do not seem to have slowed

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 5>down with their wall construction. That may overtime slow down.

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 5>They won't be paying like the workers week by week

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 5>on those contracts. They will be paying a contractor who

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 5>might be paying a subcontractor, so that would take time

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 5>to slow down. The things that will slow down. Are

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 5>things like the oversight function to DHS, potentially administrative and

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 5>hiring functions, things like that, right, But the actual like

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 5>on the ground patrolling, most of those people are deemed

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 5>as essential workers. So it seems unlikely that we will see,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 5>for instance, fewer CBP patrols at the border or fewer

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 5>ero iscera agents like tasked with doing these ongoing raids.

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, talking about DHS, I want to talk a

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 5>little bit more about the Coast Guard. I think it's

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 5>likely that some people won't be aware that the Coast

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Guard is an element of the DHS. They're also a

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 5>branch of the military, right they're the only branch of

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 5>the military that's under the DHS. Yes, so they considered veterans,

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 5>but they're not on the DoD or the DOW as

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 5>you can now call it. The NBC has a piece

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 5>suggesting that there is, I guess, a split in the

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Coast Guard between lower ranks and higher ranks, and specifically

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 5>they're talking about feeling that Coast Guard is moving away

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 5>from its court mission, which is search and rescue. They

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 5>highlight one incident in February of last year when a

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Coast guardsmen went overboard and a Coast Guard see one

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 5>thirty was detailed to participate in the search for that

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Coast guardsman.

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:08.799
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 5>It had previously been detailed for a deportation flight that

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 5>it was retasked to assist with the search. According to

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 5>the piece, quote non verbally instructed the acting Commandant of

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the Coast Guard, Admiral Kevin Lunday, to pull the plane

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 5>off the search and rescue mission so it would not

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 5>miss the immigrant flight, a part of DHS's so called

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 5>alien expulsion operations. According to two US officials and a

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Coastguard official, as a result, what happened is that local

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Coast Guard officials in San Diego scrambled to find two

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 5>C twenty seven's that could fulfill that deportation flight. In

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 5>doing so, that freed out the Sea one thirty to

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 5>then go return to participate in the search. Right. They

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 5>did continue searching, I believe, for one hundred and ninety hours,

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 5>but they never found the missing Coast guardsmen.

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 5>You cannot and will never be able to conclusively prove

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 5>that all of this back and forth with this one

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 5>thirty had any impact on that, But this incident has

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 5>clearly had an impact on morale and it suggested general

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 5>shift in priorities away from search and rescue.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 6>And towards doing more border enforcement.

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Under NOME seven hundred and fifty flights have been redirected

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 5>from their regular work to instead deport migrants. This comes

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 5>after she removed a high ranking Coast Guard official from

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 5>her house so that Nope could live at the house.

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Wait what Yeah, yeah, she kicked the Coastguard person out.

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Of their house.

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this was last year. She moved with like very

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 5>short notice. She moved onto a shit, Yeah, she moved

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 5>onto a base.

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah with Lewandowski, right, that might be the case, goes,

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 2>there was like a few people in like the cabinet

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 2>or orbit.

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes, I thought you meant like they were cohabiting.

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, no, okay, yeah, okay, beautiful domestic life.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah okay, I was, I was. I don't want to

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 5>doubt you. That would have been in news to me. Yes,

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 5>a number of Trumps, like executive officials, are living on

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 5>basis more than is usual. I think the Millers maybe

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 5>do as well.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 6>But yeah.

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 5>She also purchased two Gulf Stream jets to fly her around,

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 5>unlike most government jets, which tend to be returned towards

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 5>what's called a sterile state after use. That just means

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.439
<v Speaker 5>that they go back to being completely clean, like they're

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 5>like a generic jet. They're not your jet. Nome prefers

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 5>to keep some personal items aboard the Gulf streams, but

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.760
<v Speaker 5>one of these items, a heated blanket, was left behind

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.240
<v Speaker 5>after her jet broke down she had to switch planes.

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Coylewandowski reportedly sheltered at the Coastguard flight staff and demanded

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 5>they turn around before attempting to fire the pilot, who

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 5>fused to do so.

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Jesus right, I need my blanky.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 10>I need my blanky.

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Turn around.

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think she'd she had a rough week. I

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 5>guess one of the blankets.

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 11>These are absolutely just like the softest fascist that have

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 11>ever ruled the country. Like it, turn off flight around

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 11>because I left my baby blanket like.

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah right, like I oh god.

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Fortunately, I guess they de escalated that one and continued

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 5>the flight. Blanket free, the fire the pike. Yeah, I

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 5>think it is interesting to look at Coast Guards morale. Right, Like,

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 5>Coast guards traditional mission has been search and rescue and

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 5>then the interdiction of like drug vessels, and they have

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 5>been doing a great deal of order enforcement stuff and

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 5>removal stuff. And it is obviously like people who have

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 5>been at the Coast Guard for a long time, not

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:44.879
<v Speaker 5>what they joined the Coast Guard to do. I will

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 5>just say that there are very few areas in which

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 5>the United Kingdom has worked shit out, but the lifeboats

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.879
<v Speaker 5>are one of them. They are mentioned in Mutual Aid.

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 5>The Royal National Lifeboat Institute has an article on for

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 5>Popkin on their website.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 10>Incredible and it.

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Is one of the really genuinely good things about Britain.

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 5>By contrasting that are not part of our government security apparatus.

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because that makes no sense. The entire agency of

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 2>DHS makes no sense whatsoever.

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's just because.

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there are better ways to do this.

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean it makes again, it makes a lot of

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 4>sense as the president's private army.

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 2>For our final segment in this episode, some tragic news.

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>On Monday afternoon, February sixteenth, two people were killed in

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a shooting at a hockey game in Pawtucket, Rhode Island.

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Before the shooter died by suicide. Three others were shot

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 2>but survived their injuries. In the aftermath of the strategy,

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 2>people across the right and the left have both used

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 2>this shooting offensively and defensively in the culture war because

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 2>of the shooter's general identity and far right conspiratorial politics,

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:57.760
<v Speaker 2>even though evidence points towards this being targeted domestic violence.

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>The deceased or the shooter's X onefe and eldest son,

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and the deceased ex wife's parents were critically wounded but survived,

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 2>as did a family friend. The shooter's other son was

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 2>on the ice playing hockey while the shooting took place. Ordinarily,

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 2>we would not talk about an instant like this in

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the news because there's a lot of domestic violence shootings

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that happened across the United States every week, and not

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 2>all of them become national news stories. This is news

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>because of its weaponization in the political culture war, but

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 2>under most methodologies like this incident would not even be

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 2>categorized as a mass shooting because less than four people died.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 2>It does qualify under the Gun Violence Archive criteria, which

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 2>counts injuries not debts, in which this would be the

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 2>forty first shooting in the US this year. But after

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 2>the shooting took place, right wing accounts and influences started

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 2>using this as a part of their trans mass shooter narrative.

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 2>On Monday night, the Pawtucket Police that they believed the

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 2>shooting stemmed from a family dispute. The shooter was fifty

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 2>six years old with six kids. About ten years ago,

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 2>the shooter started identifying as a transgender woman and used

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the name Roberta Esposito. The legal last name is Dorgan.

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:19.360
<v Speaker 2>They're not Hispanic, oh. The shooter was divorced about five

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to six years ago, and Dorgan's ex wife lists the

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 2>grounds for divorce in the documents as quote, gender reassignment, surgery,

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 2>narcissistic and personality disorder traits. Then she crossed that out

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and instead wrote quote irrevocable differences which caused the remediable

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 2>breakdown of the marriage unquote. The shooter was extremely active

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter, made anti semitic and conspiratorial posts, and frequently

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:55.319
<v Speaker 2>interacted with a large assortment of mega influencers, as well

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 2>as far right, neo Nazi, and conspiracy theory influencers like

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. Dorgan also shared pictures of

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.919
<v Speaker 2>a massive like SS toteen CoV tattoo on their right

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 2>arm and wrote on Twitter quote post off trans to

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the right of Hitler and quote you can be pro

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 2>LGBT and pro Trump unquote. From looking through their Twitter

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 2>it it mostly appears to be someone who is suffering

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:27.959
<v Speaker 2>from extreme mental distress. It's hard to, you know, chart

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 2>how much of the political beliefs that can be to

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 2>split on Twitter are like genuinely held versus how much

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they relate to long standing mental health issues this person

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 2>suffered from, which I'll get into in a sec.

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.439
<v Speaker 6>I'm still a little hung up on the name.

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 2>The name also, I think relates to just this person's

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>very very not well.

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Okay, they're just trying to pay people off, flick with correct.

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I think everything about this person can be seen as

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 2>an expression of like antisociality politics their presentation the name now.

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 2>While right wing news agent Season influencers have used this

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 2>horrifying instant of domestic violence for their trans mass shooter narrative,

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 2>framing every transperson is at risk of randomly becoming a

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 2>mass killer while ignoring this shooter's own extremist politics, people

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 2>on the left have blamed this tragedy on the shooter

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 2>being a quote unquote far right Trump supporter or a

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote Nazi groper. And this is in part a

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 2>defensive reaction against the right zone like misleading and non

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 2>source claims about a statistical epidemic of trans violence. But

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 2>laying blame on Make America Great Again and the MAGA

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 2>movement doesn't really get us much closer to understanding this violence.

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 2>We're so used to defaulting to this heartizan culture war

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 2>like ideological explanation for the cause of public violence, whether

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that's you know, for the right, trans ideology or neo Nazism,

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.840
<v Speaker 2>even though both in this case and the shooting in

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Canada last week, which I talked about a few days

0:51:56.840 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 2>ago on the show, this was like anti social, unstable

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 2>and self destructive individuals who kill family members and then

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 2>created a deadly public situation leading them to kill themselves.

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Despite Nazi tattoos and Twitter posts, this hockey game shooting

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 2>was not ideologically motivated violence. This was targeted interpersonal violence

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 2>against family stemming from extreme mental health issues. This goes

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 2>beyond like right left politics. This shooter just seemed to

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 2>be drawn to anything seen as extreme or anything that

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 2>produced anti social effects. The daughter of the shooter briefly

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 2>spoke to local news on Monday, saying that the shooter

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>was her father and that the shooter had quote unquote

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 2>mental health issues and was quote unquote very sick. The

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence said in a statement

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Monday night, quote while details are still emerging, we know

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that violence within families and intimate relationships can have devastating

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and far reaching impacts. Domestic violence does not stay behind

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 2>closed doors. It affects children, extended family members, and entire communities.

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 10>Unquote.

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I guess if you want to do

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>analysis of it, it's that like the thing that's actually

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a predictive for violence is domestic violence, and this is

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>another really horrible to mastic violence incidents.

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's it's pretty tragic.

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Interestingly, there was some news that came out today, which

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 2>is Wednesday, that one of the other sons of this

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 2>shooter was arrested a few years ago in North Providence

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 2>for setting fires to a black church, which did appear

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to be ideologically motivated violence. Police found notebooks inside of

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 2>this person's home filled with hateful writings quote, gutten down

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone that isn't white. If one is white, spread the gospel.

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Always give our bloodline a chance unquote. So this incident

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 2>of a arson in a black church is definitely ideologically motivated.

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's been a great, stremely normal country.

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And this person was sentenced to six years in prison.

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow.

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 6>So the person that's the son of the person, the.

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Son of the shooter, one of the sons of the shooter.

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:11.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they had several sense.

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just a pretty tragic series of incidents with this family.

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 5>I do find it really disturbing that the thing that

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 5>you mentioned where people just kind of drop into a

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 5>channel when it comes to responding to a tragedy like this, like,

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 5>and I find it really upsetting when I see it

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 5>from like, yeah, left and progressive organizations that promote firearms

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 5>training or like.

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 6>I just find it really kind.

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Of disappointing, I guess, to see people dropping into these

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 5>same kind of callous and dismissive responses.

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 6>It's just something that's been weighing on me recently.

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:50.280
<v Speaker 5>I am a person who owns guns, but it's still

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, I'm disappointed.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 6>I guess.

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:57.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, well we reported the news.

0:54:58.160 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Put a transcrol on your couch.

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And if you have some news that you think

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 5>we should report, tips, you can do so by emailing

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Cool Zone Tips at proton dot me. If you have

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 5>someone that you would like to be a guest on

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 5>our show, or a topic that you think Roberts should

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.240
<v Speaker 5>cover from behind the bustards, we will make another email

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 5>for that, but if you could just not email the

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 5>tip line. If you're a publicist and you email, I

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 5>will block you.

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:25.439
<v Speaker 3>We reported the new.

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 13>It Could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 13>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:43.280
<v Speaker 13>coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 13>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:49.280
<v Speaker 13>now find sources where it Could Happen here listen directly

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 13>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.