WEBVTT - Stanley Cup Finals Game 5 Preview and Best Bets (Ep. 716)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Good afternoon everyone, and welcome into the NHL Stanley Cup

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Playoffs live stream here on the Fantasy Pros Twitch channel.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>We are now through four games of the Stanley Cup

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Finals and the series is tied. It's now down to

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a best of three. I am Tyler Conniam, joined as

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>always by Betting Pros, NHL expert and resident Edmonton Oilers

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fan Kelly Kirby. These intros during the finals are very

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>easy because I just say, what do you think after

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the last game? Exactly?

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have much better feelings today than I did

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesday, let me tell.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>You I would think so yeah, yeah, that was a

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fun one. Excited to talk about that today. As a reminder,

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we are live each and every Tuesday and Friday at

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>three pm here on Twitch until the Stanley Cup Finals

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>is done. So there was potential that today would have

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>been our last stream. Not the case. Thank you Oilers,

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so if you're watching say thank you to Edmonton as well.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching this on YouTube, reminder to subscribe and

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>follow us on twitch at twitch dot tv slash Fantasy

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Pros so you can join us live Tuesday and Friday

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>at three Eastern. If you're in the chat, feel free

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to drop a comment, drop a question, and as we

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>get into it, as always, I'll let you take the floor.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a hell of a hockey game last night.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me your initial reactions and excitement oilers, tie it up.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me tell you. I've had a week, like

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>some really sad things have happened, and I like hurried home,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>got in my seat, like at like six fifty nine,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm in Central times on right, and they scored those

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>three goals and I literally was just like sure, like

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>this fits right in, and I was like I'm gonna

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>just go like I just went and like changed clothes,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and I was just, you know, do I even want

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to go back and keep watching this? Like is it

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>too much sadness? And then I walked back, sat down

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>like whatever, we may only have two of these games left.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>And then all of a sudden, it was just like

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>here they come, and I thought, Okay, we're gonna do this,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>like I think we got it now maybe and maybe

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>it was like that pentitiveness. And then when they took

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the lead in the third, I was like, this is great.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And then when Florida scored with nineteen and a half

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>secs left, my dad, who does not watch hockey message

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>me and goes He's like, really, we're gonna go to overtime.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, we are we now, okay, I got it.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it was like three games in one. The

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>first period was all Florida, the second period's all Edmonton,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and then it kind of evened out for the third

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>period in overtime as well. And we were talking before

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we started recording. I watched the first period three nothing Florida,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, I'm not an Oilers fan. I got

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bets on the Oilers and all that

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>so and just being Canadian, I got the rooting interest there,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but I was like, you know what, forget it. Turned

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it off after the first period, got into bed and

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my wife's like, I think they have Beinton just scores.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, I'll put it on the radio. Then

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it was three to two, Then it was three to three.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, hey, I guess I'm just back up watching

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this now. And then as you mentioned, Florida, they take

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the lead. Then Florida scores at the end there, and

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those things where you just felt

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like Florida's probably going to win this game. They get

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it to the early lead, they lose it, they go down,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they come back, like it's just one of those ebbs

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and flows where it feels like the Florida Panthers are

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>going to win the hockey game and they don't. The

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton Oilers win it there to tie up to series

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>two to two. So plus that, as I mentioned not

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>our final stream, we also did well on the bets,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know you had had dry Sidle two plus

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>points for plus money. He's basically good for two plus

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>points every single time both had Oiler's money line. I

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>had plus one plus one thirty yesterday for the Oilers,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>which was crazy, which was nice, and then over City there.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's been hitting, which is which is great. And

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>just watching these two teams like because it's been nice

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because we've watched all these games, been watching the playoffs

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. You watch these two teams play, and

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's unequivocally the two best teams left in the NHL.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Like just the high level play in the passing and

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the special teams and everything super incredible to watch. But

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask the big questions. Stuart Skinner gets

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pulled after the first period they go to is it

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Picard or Pickers.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Picard, but I'm not sure.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I like saying Picard because of like Star Trek.

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, and I don't like Star Treks. So if you

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>want to go the other way, we can, but that's

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>all You're gone.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So we can do either one. So I have to

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>ask you, what is going to be their game plan

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in game five?

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Because we feel like every time we have this conversation,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we're like, oh, it's definitely skinner, then it's not right.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So what is your assumption that we'll be doing for

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>game five? And net?

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I was so excited that they pulled him,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think it was mostly not because I thought

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>he was like down or out or whatever, but even

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 2>what I was saying in game three where I'm like, okay,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>rest him, like he looked like he needed a game off,

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 2>like and you know, in the flow of a regular season,

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>like he would have had a rest by now. So yeah,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I had no problem with that. And then and then

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Pickard or Picard came in and and really just shut

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>it down, Like I he looked great, and I'm like,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, we have two average goalies. And so

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>for me, I'm like, play the fresher one, Like I

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 2>don't know, Like that's I'm kind of hung up on it.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Where I think I think Pickers should start. Now, see

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 2>now you have me thinking about the pronunciation every time

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 2>I say it. But I think that he should start

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>game five just because he looked good game four. We

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 2>know he brought us back during round one. It doesn't

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>make me nervous to start him, So I think that's

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 2>where i'd go.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a good point that you mentioned as you get

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this deep into the playoffs, like someone like Bobrovski who's

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>played every single game, you know, I know they have

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>some days off. It's going to be a bit of

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a quicker turnaround game four to game five. Just today

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>off and then we're right back at it tomorrow. So

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for a player who, you know, Bobrowski's used to carrying

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that weight and playing all those games, Skinner and Picard,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they kind of split it fairly evenly down

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the middle. So I'm very interested to see what they

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>decide to do there. As you mentioned, when Skinner came

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>out in the first round, Guard came in and he

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was great, and it probably would have been his playoffs

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to start or not if he didn't get hurt. There

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is a funny little meme that you shared with us

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier that I'm hoping Seth can put up on the

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>screen there. And this is the quintessential Edmonton Oiler's. Normal

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>teams they get a lead, they hold the lead, and

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then they win the game. Yep, that's not how the

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Edmonton Oilers operate. They want to give up the first goal.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They want absolute chaos ensue and then somehow win the game.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It is unbelievable the amount of times that this team

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>gets down, not only by one or two goals, like

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>they were the first team in history after thirty seven

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>tries to be down three goals in a Stanley Cup

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>finals game and come back and win the game. I

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>know this isn't a strategy, but what do you attribute

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their ability to do this to.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I don't know who to credit On Twitter,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I just like stole it, but I had seen it

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>in a number of places, so I just want to

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>give that out. But yeah, I don't know. I mean

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I want, you know, the lame answer

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>would be like, oh, they just never quit, like and

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's just more of a we got

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to make the challenge more. We have to like figure out,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, how are we going to do it? What

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 2>are we going to do? And then it's I really

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>think they get into you know, we blacked out the word,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>but I kind of think they get into like, Okay, well,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>f this, let's go yeah and not a not in

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 2>a f this we're going to totally win the game

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 2>as much as okay, well, let's just start doing whatever

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>we want to do. And that's the chaos in the middle.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, my favorite part of the meme actually is

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the woman on top at win the game who's just

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>like yay, And I'm like, if you're an Oilers fan,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that is exactly how it feels like you are in

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>a car that is on fire and like you're excited,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>but you're also a little nervous still.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, And there's the famous again the clip

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>from last year in the finals and there down three

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>CODDR McDavid in the dressing room during an intermission, you know,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>completely cursing out the team, saying get it together. And

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought I would not be surprised if that's the

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>exact same speech that he gave after that first period.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>There and then they just come out a different team.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't take as many penalties, they just look a

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more confident. They start playing their game. So again

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>another instance of it's the best of three now. So

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we've had so many different versions of this series already.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really been one of the better series that we've seen.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So which version of the Oilers come out, the one

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that are rattled or can't stay out of the penalty

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>box and Stuart Skinner can't stop a buck or the

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>version that was the second period where it's how does

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody ever beat this team? So I think that's that's

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 1>what I'm excited to see. As I mentioned second period,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>three hundred answered three unanswered goals yet and they came

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:20.679
<v Speaker 1>from sort of maybe unlikely sources, Nugent Hopkins, nurse, Pod

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>cales In, Pod coles in, you know, not your dry Sidle,

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not your McDavid to get them back into it. Then

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they get a goal from Walman at the end, they're

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and unbelievable. He was wide open forever on that one

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>time slapshot that goes in, and then of course Ryan

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Hart ties it for Florida. We go to the end,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>dry Sidle gets the winner, and that was a bit

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of a softie there that Bubrovski led in what did

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you make of that overtime goal?

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was payback for Marshawn's overtime goal in

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Game two, when it just it's the most helpless feeling.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 2>I actually have empathy for Panthers fans on that regard,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>where it's like he stops, he's an acrobat, he stops everything,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and then just this weird little squeaker goes through your legs.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.599
<v Speaker 2>It's just horrible. So that's how we felt at the

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>end of of Game two. So and sometimes that's just

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>what it is, right, I mean, hockey is like, yeah,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it's talent beyond belief, but that the amount that the

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>puck bounces and just rolls around. I honestly, I am

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>always like I don't know how anyone scores, and I

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know how anyone stops it.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of those things we've talked about how

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Oilers just feel like the team of destiny, and

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>then to do it with a minute left in overtime,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Panthers just need to survive another minute. Pebrovski's made some

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable saves in that game, made a couple on dry

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sidle and then for that to be the goal. Again,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of those things of like, you know,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>destiny just seems to be on their side a little bit.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You see it, whether it's a good bounce in basketball

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>or ball's just foul and baseball the goal is like

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that at the end of the day, could end up

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>being the difference between winning the Stanley Cup or not

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>winning the Stanley Cup. Before we get into Game five

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and how we're betting that, I do just want to

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you about an offer at FanDuel. So if you

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>want to boost your bets, new FanDuel customers can bet

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>five dollars and win two hundred and fifty dollars in

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>bonus bets. If that first bet hits, all you need

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to do is head over to bettingpros dot com slash

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>fan Duel to get started. That's bettingpros dot Com slash FanDuel.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Make your plays on FanDuel today, make a bet five

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars and try to win two hundred and fifty dollars. Okay,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So the stage is now set. It's Game five. The

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>series shifts back to Edmonton. As expected, the Oilers are

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Favorites minus one fifteen, minus one twenty, Panthers around plus

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>one oh five. I can't read what that says on

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the screen. Pinnacle plus one oh seven maybe, but they're

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>in the plus one one oh seven, so plus one

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>oh five plus one ten range. Before we talk about

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the total, which is I feel like going to be

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a topic of conversation. What do you

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think about that opening line? I think it's pretty pretty

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in line with what I expected.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's actually exactly in line with what I figured

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it would come out. And that's it's kind of the

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>let's let's concede that these teams are incredibly close together

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and that Edmonton at home should have I mean, they

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 2>should be favored and so, but I wouldn't I would

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>want Florida to go much higher than that, because then

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 2>I would then I would start to feel like I

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>would almost want to bet them. So I am fine

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>at minus one fifteen or plus one or seven. I

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 2>think those are actually really good numbers.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think of anything, I was thinking, Oilers maybe

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>one fifteen, one twenty, and Panther is closer to even money.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised that it is as high as one

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>oh seven not enough to make me want to bet it.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I am going to put some money on the Oilers,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but if anything, maybe Panthers. But again, the home ice

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>advantage is a big deal. And then the over under

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's I feel like it's gonna be six and a

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>half probably the rest of this series unless something crazy happens.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I did notice there aren't a lot of places to

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>get a six. I've been taking over six the first well,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I took the under for Game three. That was the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>only time I took the under. But every other time

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>six over over over, it's gone to six and a

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>half pretty much everywhere they are gonna make or they

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are gonna make it a little bit profitable at plus

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>one oh five, it's juice to the under. This time

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at minus six at minus one twenty for six and

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. So what are your thoughts on the total there? Yeah?

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I think part of my thought is how many games

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>do we have to see before before we're like, maybe

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe seven goals might get scored here. I you know,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I really, really truly believe that the game three was

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 2>the one that was going to go under, and it

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>sat there at hung there, But then the other three

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I don't know what we're I don't know

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>what we're doing four to three and overtime seems to

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 2>be like the play that I would think of prior

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to all of the games. So no, And I think

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 2>when the first four games go over six and a half, like,

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 2>how do you offer an over six? Like? How do

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>you give them that? And I kind of want to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 2>see as people keep thinking about it, how like what

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 2>good odds can we get on the over six and

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>a half? Like just how high up can we get

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that to go? And I think people are going to

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>overthink it and if it if it gets to I mean,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I've already bet it. I think I got it at

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a plus one fifteen somewhere.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're actually on opposite sides of that one and

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk talk about that and the reason behind that.

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But very exciting for game five. Could it be a

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>repeat of last year we talked you know again last

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>time there down three to zero in the series, they

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>start coming back. Anytime they seem to face adversity, they

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are coming back. I don't want to say the Oilers

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are invincible, but they do seem like they just have

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe the ninth live there. It's another game, they come

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>back from the deficit. As we mentioned thirty seven and one, now,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>teams that are up three to nothing in a Stanley

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Cup finals game to win the game. Oilers are the

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first team to do that. And then when you look

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at who scored and who's done what, you know, we

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>get another three points from dry Sidle, we get one

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>from McDavid. They're both tied with thirty two in the

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Cup playoffs. To Chuck is the closest Panther and

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he's only got twenty one, so he's eleven points back

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of both of those players. Dry Sidle and McDavid also

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>both lead this series with seven and six points. And

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>then on the flip side for the Panthers, Sam Bennett

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>has six. He is Bennett, Marshawn and dry Sidle are

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>leading the way all there with four goals. So as

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we go into Game five, we saw it with the

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>way Edmonton came back. They're three goals in the second

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>period were a lot more of their depth pieces. Do

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you think the depth is going to play another role

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in Game five? Are we going to keep rolling with

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>dry Sidle, McDavid, Bennett, Ryan Hart, Yeah.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm going to roll with the latter. I

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>think I feel like the depth is always going to

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>play a role. And if if the Oilers can get

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>something from lines three or four, and any goal from

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>lines three or four is would be fantastic. But no,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just keep coming back to I feel

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>like it's just going to come down to it's gonna

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 2>come down to that top line for Edmonton doing what

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>they can do. And and if again, like if Kine

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>could come in and do something like the ones we

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>saw Connor Brown, I'm not gonna even try today. It's

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like I'm seeing Walman's who are like, yeah, that's great,

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and I really like that. But I'm like, in terms

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of like what are we going to rely on from

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>a betting perspective, I'm this to me going home. This

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>is where we just start going at what Dry, Sidle

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and McDavid could get done.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's every time I try to say sathing,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the deepest cut that nobody is ever

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get. But there used to be these old

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>commercials in the nineties for a watch brand called Esquire,

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and they'd get these Canadian athletes to just say, like

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>their name Esquire, and there used to be. I think

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a skier named Scott Pazinski, and he would

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>say Scott Pazinski, esquire if anybody can remember that, that's

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who that reminds me of there as well, And I

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>got to agree. This has been the series where the

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stars have shown up. The only player to record a

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>point in each and every game of this series so

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>far is Sam Bennett. He has two to one. Sorry,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got two to one, one and one, so he's

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a good bet. They're starting to get juicy though, like

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>even Connor McDavid two points in Game five is minus

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>one twenty five. Issue is going to continue to be penalties.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>There were four power plays on each side. The Panther

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>scored on two of them, the Oilers scored on one

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of them. We've talked about this before as well, that

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the refs it doesn't look like they're going to open

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it up and just let them go. It looks like

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to keep calling a pretty tight game. So

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>who do you think that favors.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>That's actually a really interesting question that I thought of

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>when when I was prepping for the show, that you know,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a let's give it up for Edmonton not giving them

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>eleven power plays like that was that's fun hockey. I

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>mean only four, which is terrible, but I'm okay with it.

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it benefits Edmonton a smidge more, just because

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 2>if they're going to call it tighter and Florida is

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a more physical team, I think that that's that there

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 2>might be one or two calls that get in there that,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, if we were going to just let them ride,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>there's no way they would call it. Now. If that

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>continues into Game five is the question, because I feel

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>like they could actually go with, okay, well now we're

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna let them get more physical, which would benefit Florida.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I don't know, and I don't know why Edmonton.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>They usually do a pretty good job of staying out

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of power plays, but I think the ones last night

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>at least, if we're gonna look at the positive, we're

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of genuine like power play opportunities, not like we

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>got baited into something stupid penalties. So that's yeah.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They they did seem to play a little bit of

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a smarter game. And then one issue might be Ryan

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>nushen Hopkins, big participant of the penalty kill. He's nursing

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an injury. We don't really quite know what's going on there.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He was questionable before Game three and he played, but

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>he's still out there on the penalty kill, so you

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder if that can be a factor. They're

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>relying on him to be a producer on offense as well,

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and he's on the penalty kill, so you have to

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>think one of Edmonton's biggest priorities has to be staying

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the box, because I mean, obviously you don't

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want to give the other team the advantage, but Florida's

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>done a really good job of making them pay and

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they're scoring on those power plays and they can continue

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to do so, which will be interesting. And again we

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>touched on the goalie situation already as well, whether it's

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Picard or whether it's going to be Stuart Skinner and

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Bobroski let in the softie there in overtime, but he

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>did make a bunch of big stops. He's still got

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a safe percentage of nine to one to two. So

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>two scenarios, it's Bobroski versus Skinner who has the advantage.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>If it's Bobroski versus Picard who gets the advantage, is

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>it still going to be Florida regardless, or do you

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think Edmonton can get an edge in net?

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it's about it's Bobovski. We're not even going

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>We don't I like to discuss some things. That one

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>is not a discussion, Like he's just got the experience

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 2>and I don't. It doesn't matter what Skinner or Pacard

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 2>doing that, they're just not They're not gonna measure up.

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean I even had a dream last night like that.

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I was just like, what would it be like if

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>we put both Skinner and Picard in that? Like could

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 2>we cover more ground?

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Like a long trench shot?

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, just would we be able to stop them? So, yeah,

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I know it's always gonna be Bioroshki.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>H and Babrowski's gone his saves prop has gone over

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>in all four games so far this series. Is that

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>something you're looking at for game five or do you

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe this is like does anything correct or

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just over over over.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's gonna go over, but I think

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna raise the number and like once you're there,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>then you know how high will it go? Before You're like,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>it's just you know, even before overtimes. He has crossed

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the number they've put up in every game, and I'm like,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like, you know, we might see a

0:18:58.240 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven and a half, we might see a twenty

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half, but probably not. I would say

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna bump to twenty seven.

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think they're gonna they're just gonna keep

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>pumping it up there because I think everyone's just been

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on those numbers and they're gonna have to start correcting

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>them before we get into our best bets. I did

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to you about the NHL prop bet

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet, So if you are betting on Game five

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night, you need to be using the NHL prop

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>bet cheat sheet. It shows you the very best play values,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very best value plays each and every day. You can

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>get daily prop bet value rankings based on projections, find

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the best props for shots on goal, points, saves, and more.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Use it now at bettingpros dot com, slash NHL props

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or on the Betting Pros app So I've been heavy

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on there for not only the NHL, but the w

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>NBA and the NBA Finals as well. So that's where

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you want to be if you want to be betting props. Okay,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so let's start talking about Game five. Let's start talking

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about our bets.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Bets.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna kick it off here. I like the Edmonton

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Oilers at minus one twenty. I think they're the team

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of death. I still think they're the team that wins

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the Stanley Cup. I've got them to win the Cup.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got them to win game one in the Cup.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Might as well take them to win Game five as well.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the home ice advantage is going to be

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just enough, and I do think they have enough momentum

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Florida. They get the split, it gets

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a game they should not have won. They're coming back

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>home now. I like them on home ice minus one twenty.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get a little bit interesting, you

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>want plus money. Look at them to win in sixty minutes.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this game goes to overtime. I am

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>flipping the script and taking under six and a half

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>or minus one twenty. And here's the interesting thing. If

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I can find a six, I might punt out of

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this and take over on the six. But that half

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a goal does mean something to me because the push

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>potential is essentially, in my mind, a win. So you

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>almost have sort of insurance there. But at some point,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think in this series we will inevitably see

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>an under six and a half. Does this game series

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>go seven, It's very possible we could see that, but

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I do think this is another instant where whoever wins

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Game six is very likely to win the Stanley Cup.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>So having said that, I do think, and I always say,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>if the Oilers win, take the over, and again if

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get a six punt out of this and

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>take the over six. But I do think at some

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>point we're going to see a game where there aren't

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a million goals scored. I'm going to bet on not

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>being Game five for under six and a half. And

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>actually when I put this graphic together, the only bet

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that's different from the last time we did it was

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the under because I've got to go back to Brad Marshawn.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Last time I bet it was minus one twenty. Now

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's even money for him just to record a point.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, he's got four points in this series.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>He had one in Game two, two in Game two,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>one in Game three, and he didn't get a point

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in Game four. I think he's going to be ready.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to play a lot of minutes.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to four Panthers are going to

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>rely on him. So it's also sort of a safety

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>net for myself as wealthy others don't win this game.

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that Marshaw might be a reason why. So

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take Marshawan to record a point for

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one hundred. What do you got?

0:21:58.359 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 2>What do I got? Well, first, I was going to

0:21:59.920 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>my like, if you're a neutral party, if you're not me,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and you want to put some money on the pl

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>like closer to game time, when Florida is on the

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 2>money line, that plus numbers is high, it's going to

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>get I would throw it on there. And then assuming

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Florida's gonna score first, and then you should be able

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>to get plus money on the oilers, like you know immediately.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to like hedge a little bit,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you can do it that way. I am. I'm taking

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 2>the over. It's not on the slide. I just the

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>over six and a half at home. I've tweeted it

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>so many times at this point it feels dumb, but

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, death taxes and the over in Edmonton, Like

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like it's just gonna keep going the

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>way it's going. And like I said, that four to

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>three feel is just it's just there. It's constantly there.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>So so those are the two non props when it

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>comes to props themselves. Like you said, the McDavid two points,

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not betting that at at minus money like that

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't. He probably will, but I don't think it's

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>worth that. So I'm gonna go with the two plus assists.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>He has a scored yet, I feel like or he

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>hasn't towared lately. I feel like he's that he's due

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>for that as well, but I think that the amount

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 2>he's facilitating in the way that they kind of let

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 2>him cross the line again last night, I feel like

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>the two assists are there and power plays, et cetera.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>And tied to that, I think Evan Bouchard for an

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>any time goal at plus four fifty is absurd. So

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 2>he's on the power play, he's with McDonald or McDavid

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and dry Cidle and Newton Hopkins all of the time,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and he shoots constantly, like you know, yeah, he only

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 2>shot three. He only got three shots on goal yesterday,

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>but prior to that it was seven goals eight or

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>eight shots, nine shots, like, I mean, it's just he's

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna I think at some point it's going to go

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>in again like it did in Game two. And then

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I put Sam squared one point each. I like both

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Bennett and Ryan Hurt to pick up a goal in

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>this game, and their odds alone are not too bad.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>But if you put them together, then you're at plus

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 2>one sixty eight. So and mostly between you and me,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to the superscript and writes stand so

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>there's also that. But yeah, so that's why I'm rolling it.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And I like to McDavid play too there to assist

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty four. As you mentioned, he hasn't scored

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in the finals yet, and he I mean, it's not

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>for lack of trying. He's been there. He's had some

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>good opportunities. Last night, I had a great opportunity where

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>he skied through a lot of the defense there. But

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he's been playing facilitator very very well, and he sort

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of let dry Sidle take over that role of you

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>go and score these goals, and he's been perfectly fine

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>with that. So I didn't initially have McDavid as an

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>anytime goal scorer. I might still bet that that's something

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that the books might like to do a super boost

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on or a bet boost on, and maybe you get

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>him for plus two hundred or over in game five,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.239
<v Speaker 1>at which point I do like that. Right now it's

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>around plus one forty. I just don't think the value

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is there because he hasn't scored yet, so you could

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>say he's due. I'm going to look at it more

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>like if I'm taking the under. I've already got a

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>point prop there. I'm probably not going to get too

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>heavy into the overs there, but that could all change.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I also really like the strategy to of wait for

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Oilers to inevitably go down. Even I should have

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>checked what the odds were last night when they were

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>down three to nothing after the first period, because it

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been plus six seven hundred. That that would

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have been I think worth a sprinkle on, and I

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think something to keep in mind for game five too.

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it was plus six twenty. I looked

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 2>at it, and again, if I hadn't had the worst

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>week ever, I probably I might have tried it, or

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe I should have anyway, But yeah, it's uh. But again,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>like with if whichever team starts at plus money. I've

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 2>been doing that a little bit where then I head

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>when the other team scores first, and for sure in

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>this one I would do it.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. And on that note, that's really

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all we have to talk about for game five. So

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get out of here, let people know where

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they can find you on socials and on betting pros.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, so on socials, on Twitter slash x, I'm

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 2>at the Wonky Penguin, and on Blue Sky I'm at

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the Wonky Penguin. And I should probably even this up early.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>On betting pros because I'm betting pros. I am, it's

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Bettingpros dot com. You slash won Keep Penguin. There's no

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 2>no so may I might talk to Blaine about that,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>but great to get.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That fixed up. I'm at Tyler Coddium across Socials, Bettingpros

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, slash slash Tyler Condium. As a render. We

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>will be back next Tuesday because there will still be

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>more hockey as we're getting close to the end of

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Stanley Cup finals here. If you're watching this on YouTube,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure you follow and subscribe on Twitch, Twitch dot

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Tv slash Fantasy Pros so you can join us live

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>next Tuesday, where hopefully we're talking about someone being on

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the verge of winning the Stanley Cup. So thank you,

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoy your weekend, go oilers, and we'll see you next week.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 3>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 3>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:26:53.400 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros s