WEBVTT - What Are We Doing Here?

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a recording and progress, ah, recording is in progress. Okay, well, everybody,

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the renew Subcenters podcast. And I'm joined by

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>my usual cohort, Caitlin Thompson. Because I am still in Australia. Yes,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I know people are wondering have I moved back permanently?

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you something. With what's going on

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, my passport back here is looking

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I'm gonna I'm not gonna lie. And it's

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been good to be here throughout it all. And every

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>now and again something comes up on my computer, on

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>my phone or with the people that i'm my best

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>friend who I'm staying with, her husband comes up and says,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ, your ages. You see what happened today? Anyway,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Joined by Caitlin Thompson. Caitlin, good day, mate, gooday.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>I've also been on the road a little bit and

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I have managed to leave the country and I thought

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>should I just stay here?

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>And I have to say I contemplated it for a minute.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I did. Anyway, It's it's scary what's happening

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the president might himself the president today

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Kennedy Center just because he can. Is hilarious

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to make.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Bud is we can uh just do whatever we want now.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>So you want to call it the Gulf of America,

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I think we should call it the Golf of Tennis.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Mom.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Also the president of Kennedy Center, re Nice Stubs, is

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>now the president of Tennis.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Like we can just get it. No, we do whatever

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 3>we want now.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Great, I'm not paying a taxes and I'm going to

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>be the chancellor of sport.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Chancellor sports? What would I be?

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Vice Chancellor of sport?

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>What the president?

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Because I thought of it. We have so much to

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:53.919
<v Speaker 3>talk about.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Australian Open has only been done for a few days

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and we've already had tournaments few weeks over the last

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>week or two. We had a tournament in Dallas. This

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>was phenomenally entertaining. We had a tournament in two in

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Going on, talk us through some of the stuff that

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you've been seeing.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Carlitos al Karaz got his first tittle of the seasons.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Love came back, Beatsala does love Chapeau coming back?

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Man, what a great comeback.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Give me your thoughts on it, because I'll be honest,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch a lot of it, just because you know,

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>while I'm Australia. While I'm here in Australia, I try

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and like switch off from watching a lot of tennis.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Even though I have the Renae Substams podcast. I'm more

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>inclined to talk about our listeners writing into us today

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on the old Socials. But I want your thoughts on

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>basically what you saw from those guys, especially Carlos. I

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>mean to do and to win that tournament indoors. He

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>had a really tough tournament. He was able to do it.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>That's got to even give him a ton of common EID.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>It's going into these big tournaments in Indian Wells.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And Miami totally and you know, obviously he's on hard court.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>We saw him win the Surface Slams last year.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Little known fact.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Carlos's first title came indoors on hardcourt, did

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it not. He's actually got quite a resume on indoor

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>hard courts, and it's nice to kind of see him

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 2>prepping for this swing of the season that's going to

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 2>be outdoors, but yes, on hard courts. It had been

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>a minute since he won a sort of flashy title.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I loved it. I have a lot of thoughts about

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the nose strip.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I love that he's wearing a nose strip. You know, listen,

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>we're all trying to optimize. I started wearing mouth tape

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>at night, and kaspar UD's wearing a no strip and

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>he gets to the finals of Dallas. So coincidence, I

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know. But maybe we should be doing this podcast

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 2>with no strips.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe we should. I mean that's just like

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that as an indicator for all of us that we

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>all need to breathe a little bit better. But I mean,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he came into the tournament not feeling well. So but

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he's done not a few times now. But for me,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's good for him because it started to be a

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit on now. He's done well on hardcot, he's

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>won the US Open, he's won indoor titles before, et cetera.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But it was starting to get to the point where,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, is his game going to hold up through

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the next you know, ten, twelve, fifteen, hopefully twenty years

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>playing indoors on fast courts, and he proved to everybody

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that he could do that. So I'm excited that he

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>was able to get that title to give himself the

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence to know that he can go in and play

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on hard court against it's just can he do it

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>against someone like a sinner, you know, with the big

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>weapons that he has with the serve and the forehand,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the groundies. But hey, listen, it was a good effort.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Totally a good effort and nice to see him. This

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>is typically part of the year that he's not usually

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that healthy. You know, in years past anywhe else he's

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>shown up with some injuries. He I remember how to

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>pull out of the Rear Open. I think it was

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>last year, so you know, this is kind of like

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>middle of the of the winter, late winter time period

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 2>is I think a little tough on his party because

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously he goes pretty hard ahead of Australia. So yeah,

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 2>like good signs, playing well, moving well and not on

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 2>his favorite surface.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Was great.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>The one that I was really excited about and I

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>watched it a lot because it's in my time zone

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 2>or close to it, was the Dallas Open, and you know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>it was great to see Riley playing well. It was

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>great to see Casper Rude make a final. There were

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 2>some fun upsets by Shapavallave who beat Tommy Paul and

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Fritz back to back before taking out Casperud in

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 2>the final. And for me, Shapavala has always been one

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>of those exciting players. Obviously he's a shot maker. Obviously

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 2>he goes for it, obviously with a big lefty, you know,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the one handy, flashy. This is like the kind of

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 2>player that is like super cat neep for me, and

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>then like totally flames out because of all the reasons,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>which you know, Casperude is on the other end of

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum, who's like really safe, really smart, doesn't take a.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Lot of risk, doesn't need to.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So it was like that classic matchup that I just

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>really love, especially when the shop Maker pulls it out

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 2>and you know, look, does this pretend anything for shoppavalive season?

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Is he like a in the conversation now? I doubt it,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 2>But nonetheless it's fun to see a player that you

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>haven't had a chance to talk about or really watch

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>go deep in a long time do just that and

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 2>lift a trophy over their head. Yeah.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Look, he's always had the talent. We know that he's

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>had these ups and downs. He's has these emotional ups

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and downs as well. It's been very well documented, and

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he's always had that You know the talent, but as

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Sam Stosa said last week, like talent is one thing, right,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, people can assume you're going to do well,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like a Madison Key's, like you keep talking about it,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you should win a Grand Slam. Until you do it,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always going to be that speculation of, oh, oh,

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't do it, you know what I mean.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So talent can only get you so far. But I

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think with him, he I think he's always going to

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have been better as he got older because he has

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>such shot making and so many choices of shot and

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so flashy and so talented that it sort of takes

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit longer to get comfortable with what

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you need to do under pressure.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>And I hope, I hope that's true. I love it.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do believe. I think he's actually going to

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have a very very good year. I would not be surprised,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's a potential of him getting back

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, getting up to the top ten by

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this time next year. We know that he has the

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>talent to do it. No, he has the weapons. It's

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of him controlling his emotions. It's a

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>matter of him, you know, picking the right shot and

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>shot selection is massive when you're that talented, and when

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you have sixteen shots that you can choose from, it's like, no, man,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>this one works. Just keep doing it, you know. And

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's had sort of coaching ups and downs and hasn't

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>really had so I just think I think we're going

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot from Dennis this year, and I

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think that he's it could potentially be the best US

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>had in a long long time.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I would love that, And also if that were to

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>become true, I think it would portend well to this

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>idea that like it is worth playing the long game

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in tennis and having the complete repertoire, even if it

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 2>means you take longer to develop, because when you are

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>on it's it's just that it's like, okay, you know,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>good great offense does be great defense in tatas, and

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's I love matches that prove that thesis.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, especially and let's face it, especially indoors, and so

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that definitely helps him. There's definitely a lot of players

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that really do just respond better indoors and they play

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>better indoors, and I would say that would be him.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do believe that, you know, he is going

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to only get better as he gets older, because all

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the all the bullshit kind of has to be gotten

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>rid of at some point if you really want to

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be good. And I believe that he hopefully is getting

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>more and mature and more into him being comfortable on

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the court of what to do under pressure anyway. So yeah,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so very exciting. Was really happy to see him get

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that that tournament win. Just recently, Saballenka got taken out

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>by Alexandrova. I thought that was interesting, tough, tough match.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So Sablenka's kind of had two back to back losses

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's yeah, I been a rarity for her. But

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that, can I just say, I

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that Mattie Keith decided, you know, like

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to decide on your schedules, you know, early

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on in the year. And I think it's really great

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that Maddie has sort of put the racket down for

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and decided not to go to the

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Middle East totally.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think especially after the high and the emotional,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, culmination of not just a two week tournament,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 2>but really like decade of close calls. Yeah, like give

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>yourself some breathing room. Come back to the States. Do

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, she probably doesn't have a ton of sponsor

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>obligations there anyway, Come back, get your head sorted, spend

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>some time soaking it up with your family, you know,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>instead of just going straight on to the other end

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to like, you know, do you get talked about

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>as a favorite now?

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, it's kind of hard to imagine.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, like now everyone has a

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions for you when you were doing so well,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>just kind of flying under the radar. So yeah, I

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 2>think that's really smart schedule management on her part, and

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 2>also like she has so much of the year still

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to go. Winning the first Slam and is in a

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of ways like such a disruptive thing because you know,

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen Arena Sbalaca the last couple of years

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, like it's taken her a bit to find

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 2>her footing again after starting off the year so hot

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, And so for me it feels like, Okay, actually,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>that's really smart and I love doing it. I don't

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 2>know if she was at the super Bowl, but I

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>do know who was at the super Bowl.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I died. I don't know. I mean,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think every single person watching that that's a tennis

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>fan or tennis person.

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I was like, that's azing, Like that's the arena. I

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 2>was like, that's arena.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And all of a sudden, I'm like, I'm loving Kendrick

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like it was great. It was such a in your

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>face kind of like very obvious, like middle finger to

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>certain people in America. Let's put of and and a

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>someone in Canada, as we know, right, But the fact

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that all of a sudden, I'm looking at it and

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>then it's the arena is dancing. I died. I fell

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>off the couch myself. I was like, oh my god,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there was Serena and I was like what I'm like,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and then they showed her again. I was like very

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>quick and then very quick and I died.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 3>And I knew when she was here in the Crip Park.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I was like, there it is Center Corrida Olympics twenty twelve, shoes.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Back exactly, and she looks great.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>So I was great.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, girl, Serena.

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Wins the super Bowl.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Serena wins the super Bowl. It was it was frigging awesome.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Tennis is the best even when it's not our sport,

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 2>we still somehow managed.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>To win before the Super Bowl obviously was played or

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>during that time. We have to talk about the fact

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that Belinda Benchic, she comes back after having a baby,

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>wins the tournament in Abbadubby like what like how awesome

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is She's always played well in the Middle East, but

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>she played great in Australia. I think the biggest, you know,

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>issue that has always been her problem Belinda Benchitch is

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that her emotional you know, ups and downs. Let's let's saying,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a little strappy on the court and a little bit

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of drama and dramatic and blah blah blah. And

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Caitlin, when you become a mom, things

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>change in your brain a little bit. And I think that,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, for her, her maturity level has gone through

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the roof and we're seeing it on the court and

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just just in the way that you know, she the

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>players that she beat, I mean, beating the Rebakina as

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>well in that tournament and then winning the tournament three

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>cents against Ashlyn Krueger got to give her a lot

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of credit. Credit. This young American has really done well

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the last twelve months. I give some kudos to

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Joyce, her coach, who I know, you know, he

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>did a great job with obviously Marie Sharapovo when she

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was younger, and I think he's a great coach for her.

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was really really great to see Belinda

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Benchitch win that match in three sets and have a

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>baby right there with her husband, Like it was just

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>too good.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>It does strike me that like when your focus off

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the court kind of gives you a little bit of equilibrium.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>And also she's so young still, so yeah, it's quite

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 2>easy for her to come back after maternity leave as

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed to like, you know, older moms certainly, but I think, like, yeah,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you're right, it gave her a little bit of equanimity.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see her like, as Renee Stubbs would say,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>carrying on like a pork chap, which she is capable

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of doing either at this tournament nor at the Australian Open.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it was sort of like, okay, cool mom

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 2>vibes in the best way passible.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean she beat Victoria kuda Matova. Oh no, I

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>mean I was like what when I saw that score,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like what. Nice also to see Vondrosepha back

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, because she had a really tough start to

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. She beat Putin Saber in that tournament and

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>beat Emma Radakanu. We're going to get to Emma in

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a second, but but nice to see if Ondressova back

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because that was a really tough start to the year.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I was in Adelaide. She was playing really well. She

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was up a set and to want to I think

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>against Putin Saber actually who she beaten in Abu Dhabi,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>but she pulled up No, no, it was it was Schneider.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But she pulled up hurt with a hamstring sort of

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>something going on in a leg, and I thought, no,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be kidding. Her first tournament back and

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>she's already injured again. But it was nice to see

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>her back playing so quickly after, you know what what

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>We weren't sure what was wrong with her, and so

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just happy because Vondress of us just fun. She's

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>just a really good time and it was smiling.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>She's got a cool game. She's yeah, it's like a

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>really good cool she's cool, she's got cool tattoos. It's

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>just like there's a lot of like good vibes around her,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like she's especially for one of the

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 2>chech players who you know certainly there's a cohord of them.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 3>She's like kind of.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Loose in a way that's a little fun and a

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit unexpected, in a way that I absolutely love.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, no, dress was great.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to Ema rad Kano and then I also

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about the the robots.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Emma d Kana when we when we

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>do our question, so what we're going to do? I

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sent out a tweet or a on the socials to

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>send me send us your questions, so let's get to them.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we're going to be able to

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get to them all the so many, but one of

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the let's start with the Blue Sky, because we love

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky. Mister Derek Price asked Stubbsy, what can you

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>legally say about the allegations against Rebeckian his coach? His

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>band has been extended, so let's get into the rebuckin

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>his story. Caitlin, what are your.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Thoughts good for the WTA. I said it before and

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll say it again.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>They issued this ban provisionally ahead of the Australian Open

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>as everyone suspected he might. He blew right through it

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and showed up anyway and did all sorts of continuation

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>of seemingly what he was accused of doing, and he

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of put you know again. Unfortunately, Elena Rebarkin in

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a terrible spot. Gronie Vinisovitch leaves the camp, as we

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>all sort of predicted he would, with this situation to

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>get worse, and it did. And then the WTA, to

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>their great credit, said okay, well we have receipts and

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>we're going to release the information. So now we are

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>no longer sort of actually protecting you by not releasing

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>this stuff, but now sort of your you know, you're

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the details are now for public consumption.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 3>It is sad, it is terrible.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Nobody deserves to be treated like this, certainly not by

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a coach, and it is implicated in the WTA's official

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>findings that he is also her romantic partner. All sorts

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of questions arise about coercion abuse, you know, those are

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the right questions to ask. We don't know all the

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>answers to them. All we can say is, obviously everybody

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is rooting for Elena Robacchina, who's a by all accounts

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>incredibly lovely young woman, but.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Good for them.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>This is not only creating because I have seen people

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>say like, oh, well, who cares, Like it's her choice,

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, no, no, no. If this is your place

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>of work and someone else is being abusive in your

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>place of work, and by all accounts, this had so

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>many witnesses, so many receipts, so many different points of view,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 2>even if they are not being abusive towards you at

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>this exact moment, just knowing that the tour or your

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>workplace is tolerating somebody behaving this way makes you the

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>factor less safe. It makes other people less safe. It's

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>just the right thing to do is to nip this

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 2>in the bud in a environment where sports governing bodies

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>move glacially and conservatively. The WTA seemingly did neither.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Chapeau yep, I agree so well said, I don't really

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>need to add anything more to that other than the

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that, look, you know, some of us know a

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more than others. I clearly was around this toxic

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>environment with him and her quite often. I've spoken about

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it on the pod many times, and you know people

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that say, well, it's her decision. Yes, it is her decision.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's a lot of there's a lot

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of coheresive control relationships that get really toxic and really bad.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And do I think that she's in, you know, an

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>environment that is not healthy for absolutely, there's no question

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. You don't see, you know, her coach Goron

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Ivanisovitch decide after this time, even though he enjoyed working

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>with her, say I'm out of here because he clearly

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has seen stuff that he's not okay with too. But

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>also the fitness trainer, you know, who's been there for

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a long long time, you know, and.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Clearly if any BEDDA would know, it would be this person.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's gone as well. And you know, when

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the information that they have, there's clearly people

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in her camp or around her enough to say the

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things that have been said about what he has said

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and done to her. And so in that respect, that

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is her work environment. As you said, saying sorry unacceptable.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Banned for a year, and I think it's you know,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>quite quite honestly, he should be banned forever on the

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>WTA tour. He should not be allowed to be able

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to come on the tour and work with any girl,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's his tendency, particularly when you've got someone who's

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like lovely and as nice and as great players as Elina.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's been a really good move. Now

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what is she going to do with the personally? Again?

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that's her decision and it's not good, so we'll see.

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean feeling for her, but yeah, well side

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>steps in all right. Greek Blu questions, kiping co Ja Rube.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think changes in tournaments are sort of

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like corporate greed, like the date expansions in the US

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Open mixed doubles event, which we'll should get to, but

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it is it, but it is a business. Thoughts. What

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the mixed doubles situation and the

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>extended tournaments, Caitlin.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 2>I want you to answer that question first, because I

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>actually think my answer may be controversial, and oh, I know.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Where you're going with this. I don't understand this move. Now.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>What I know is, yes, I understand that they're trying

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to make mixed doubles more attractive, They're trying to make

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>mixed doubles more important, but in the trying to make

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it more of a showcase, I get all of that,

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but to put it in the week before the tournament.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Do not tell me it's part of the tournament. It

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is during qualifying, okay, it's not during the tournament. And

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a complete side show. It now feels

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like an exhibition of a mixed doubles event. That's what

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, and that to me is not okay

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to handing out a Grand Slam title

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. And I feel like

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in the second week of the US Open, you know,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you struggle to have matches on the outside court for

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>people that you know, want to buy a grounds pass

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and come and see the tennis, and now there's going

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot less matches going on out there.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>They'll have juniors, which is great, and they'll have doubles,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which is great, but not to have the mixed it

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>feels just like it's an exhibition and to four games, like,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing here? It's an exhibition. It's not

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a Grand Slam event anymore. That's how I feel. It's

0:20:58.920 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, I wanted you to go first, not because

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I necessarily disagree with anything you said, but I think

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>like that bears being said and that's all true, full stop.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>The four game thing feels like, what are we doing here?

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to? Should we just like do tiddleywinks?

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Or you know, why don't we just.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I kind of understand the qualities week.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>In the sense that you know, when you go to

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 2>some of these matches in the second week of a Slam,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>it's the best players at this event and there's nobody

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>watching them, and that sucks. It sucks for the tournament,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It sucks for the players, and it sucks for the

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 2>fans who could or would be there but probably can't

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>afford the finals or don't want to, aren't fervent enough

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 2>fans to uh you know, show up for anything but

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the finals of the singles, right, Because they tend to

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 2>put the singles in the doubles on the same day,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>on the same ticket, right, it doesn't help with the

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 2>point that I think you also made when we were

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about this a little earlier, which is like, the

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons they do this is one of

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the reasons they keep doubles and mixed and all the

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 2>other events to the legends, the Whillies, the juniors to

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the second week is as the tournament field and singles

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>gets thinned out. There's just like simply not enough matches

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 2>to justify like the grounds and the entirety of the stadium. Right,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>if there's only one thing going on in the stadium,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>then what are we doing here? You're gonna come all

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the way to Queen's for one match? So yeah, this

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>doesn't solve that. I do sort of feel for the

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>tournaments who are trying very hard to make money. Obviously

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 2>the Slams need the least a person.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, calm, the farm makes so much freakin' money.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>They make more money on honeyduces than you and I

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>will make in our fucking lifetime.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely true.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>That said, they were trying to market the game and

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>make sure that it's reaching people and top of funnel fans.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind the experimentation. And here comes my controversial opinion.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I love doubles. You love doubles. I love watching doubles.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Playing doubles doubles is important. It's important to me, and

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 2>I actually go to these matches and I watched them

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>on TV because I care about them. I do think

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that we it is a long time since you played

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>doubles with Stephan Graff and you know John Mcap.

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the top players don't play doubles anymore. And yes,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was beating. So when my Grandslam titles

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Kim Clyiks and Martina Hingis.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>You played the Williams sisters and.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>William Yeah, of course I played all the top.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>The single, probably most exciting match I've ever sat at

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in my whole life was when center court Wimbledon, Andy

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Murray and Serena Williams.

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Come out to play mixed doubles. It was so cool.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>The stadium lost its mind, and I didn't really care

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 2>about anything else that was going on in the tournament,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly not singles, because I was watching Andy Murray and

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Serena Willing played mixed doubles together. So I do think

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>there does need to be a little bit of a rejiggering,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you know. Riley o'poka a couple of years ago suggested

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a very controversial idea that might have some.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Legs, which is like, if you are in.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 2>The singles field, if you qualified to be in a

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 2>singles field, do you get an automatic entry into the

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>doubles or should you perhaps bump double specialists. I'm not

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>saying I believe in that, but I think it was

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>an interesting idea.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opposed to that. I this is going to

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be a controversial take from me because people are going

0:24:35.160 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to be like, you should be protecting the doubles players.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I've said for a long time, if you're not in

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty or thirty at least playing doubles only,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not a very good tennis player, right.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 3>I have said that. You've said that, and.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, if you're playing doubles only, you should be

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>schooling people in doubles. You should be, you know, the best.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 3>In the world. You know.

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't a time I don't believe in like the

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years of my career, I wasn't in the

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>top ten and doubles. I mean, that's what you should

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.239
<v Speaker 1>be if you're concentrating only, I'm playing doubles only, and

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>there are not enough singles players playing doubles. There's no

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>question about that. Doubles has become a little bit There

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are some doubles only specialist players out there that I'm like, ah,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>really like this is not a great look, you know,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're making and they are making so much money, right,

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean. I was asked recently by the girl I've

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>been helping a little bit, Elan Perez, you know what

0:25:58.240 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was the most money you ever made in a year,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And I said, ah, I think close to eight hundred thousand, which, hey,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that's a lot of money. I'm not complaining

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>about that. But that year I won two Grand Slam

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>doubles titles, two Grand Slam Mixed doubles titles, and the

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>WTA finals, along with like five other tournaments. And I

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only won eight hundred thousand. If I did that now,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd be making two million dollars. So I'm like, don't

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>complain about it. Make yourself better. If you're top fifty,

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not good enough. So I'm okay with like having

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>top players play in these events and making it a

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, But to make it best, to make

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it to four games, that's a joke. That's just making

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>fun of the event and trying to make it. It's

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>an exhibition. It's an exhibition. Let's just fuck it is.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 3>It is definitely an exhibition.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a mixed doubles exhibition before the US Open, and

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we're to crown and winner and we're going to put

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it on slap it on the winner of the two

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty five US Open Mixed doubles along with

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>all the other former champions was this team and that's it,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And so will it change? I don't know. Will we

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>get top players singles players playing mixed doubles maybe? I

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But they're trying to do what Indian Wells did,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>which is have that little exhibition thing before the tournament.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think they had something before the US Open

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>last year on one night. Ye make sense, Like they're

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously trying to do something like that, but don't dumb

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it down to top to best of four games like

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>first to four or whatever. That's that's where I draw

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the line. It's a joke anyway, to be contented.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we might have some more chew over

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 2>on this as as more details merge to be continued.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so order in the court love that name. On

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on whether Janick Sinner getting a lengthy suspension

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>from CASS would prompt the powers that be intended to

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>take a stand with wider and finally say enough is

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>enough with blindly applying rules just for the sake of

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the rules. Now, I don't think it's casts that are

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this, that it's wider that they're trying to give

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>him a extended stay at home. Let's put it that way.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But my thing on this is I've said it before,

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to get into it too long today.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But last year, why are you moving the goalpost? It's

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>just wholeseshit. If the it IA has decided that he

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was not at fault and now you want to change

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the rules and say, oh, we've got to make sure

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the team are at fault as well, and you've got

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to pay the price for that, and like, meanwhile, this

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is like almost a year later and he's won two

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slam Since are we What are we doing here?

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 2>My thoughts can best be summed up about a lot

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>of this and a lot of things, and tell us

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>is just what are we doing here?

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? What are we doing here? That's going to be

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the name answers what I know, I've already picked the

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>name of the pod. What are we doing here?

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it just jumps out of here.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a joke, But I think the player What I

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going to say is that we need

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a stronger player union to make sure that you know

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that I agree that we do, all right, Caviti Cat says,

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>can you explain why the yon X racket suits Madison

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Keys more than the Wilson she had been using? Is

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it lighter, balanced differently as a pro does the racket

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>make that much difference? And just because her explanation was

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the X is a unique squareish shape, does that really

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>make a difference? Have you tested them out? Well, I'll

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>take this one first, and Caitlin, I know that you

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>like the YONYX rackets as well. I think it was

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is this racket gave her more power? Okay,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably thinking wide in Madison Keys need more power. Well,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't feel like she's got to absolutely redline the

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>racket to get the power. And also, you know she

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>did change the strings about a year ago to go

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to all polly, which gives her more control on the ball.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So she took out the gut, which if anyone that's

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>played with gut knows, which I have as well, sometimes

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you lose control when you get a bit nervous, so

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball flies on you. So it's just a little

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>bit lighter. It's giving her a lot more power without

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>her having to red line everything, and I think just

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the combination of everything has just been so good for

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>her clearly.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't have much to add. I actually am sort

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of surprised at this move. I've played with Berth theon

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>X and Wilson rackets. Wilson rackets are balanced more heavily

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>typically in the head, which given her long swing, actually

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of makes sense to me. But the UNIX because

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>it's sweet spot, is like larger because that unique head shape.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 2>As Caviti cat noted, you know, I think we're seeing

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 2>her play with like more margin and more power.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, obviously it's a great fit.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not a great look to lose your like longtime

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 2>athlete to a rival and then like the first thing

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>they do after twenty years of playing with your rockets

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is when their first Grand Slam with a competing product. So,

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, Wilson, I don't know, maybe they're like on notice,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe I don't care.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, but yeah, it's well, they should care.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 3>They should care.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It seems like after you know, losing Fed, losing Serena,

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a ton of players on the men's side.

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 2>You were playing with their rackets and outside of Arena soublanca,

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>which is hard to argue with from a results standpoint,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 2>But outside of arena, you know, the ranks are getting

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty thin on a good old team Wilson, So I

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember Lisa Raimond, Myle Dobs partner. She played with

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the classic Prince grap for Evan loved it, and I

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>remember her. I remember her telling me a couple of

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago she started using that red YONEX. She's like,

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, this is the best racket I've ever used,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and which I found really unique because of the waste

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>she plays. And I've hit with the X record as well,

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the bottom line is they just are

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so good at getting products made so well, the Japanese,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they are just so good at it. And I think,

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, they've got to be so pumped about

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this conversation that is round Madison Keys and her racket change.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when a racket is so closely associated with a

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>player the way that that was with with Maddie, and

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>then a change happens, and then a result of this,

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like it's so striking and you don't even have to

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 2>be like a die heard tennis fan. I think to

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 2>notice to notice this, but yeah, it was. It is

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of notable.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Love it, good question, Love it? Okay? Jill counts the

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>beck says why did the bulk of tennis media gloss

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>over zverevg curios? How come ESPN protects them both and

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in one case pays them for commentary. Also thoughts on

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hallip's legacy. Oh we just you're getting two for one,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't you, Jill.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Woll Jill just ask all the hard questions.

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Huh.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Jill, if you followed our podcast, you

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would know exactly that this media, me and Caitlin and

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone in between on this call has never glossed over Zverev.

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We have talked about him at nauseum. Caitlin even had

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a very big story in her magazine a few years

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ago that was quite controversial, and she's had to deal

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with that through the years. But we don't gloss over it.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>But what do you want us to do about it?

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't have a.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Great question aim it at the Athletic, the Tennis channel,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Sky Sports, BBC, Eurosport. Actually, Eurosport is probably the worst

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 2>defender because they employ his brother and seem to be

0:32:53.880 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>very very keen on glassing over any let's say, Pecadilla's

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 2>around the discussion. So yeah, I think it sort of

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 2>depends on where you look. As for curious. You know, again,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>this podcast has been pretty clear about, uh, you know

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>what grit Nick is great at, which used to be tennis,

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and what he is currently great at, which is playing himself.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think we can probably leave it at that.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I mean, it's very difficult for me to like

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sit here and rip on Maks. Uh, you know, would

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be really stupid for me to do. But at the

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, and I've said this many times about Nick,

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he is an amazing analyst, Like he is actually really

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fucking good at analyzing tennis, which is a shame because

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>everything else he does is ridiculous. And I think, you know,

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that he puts out on the social media's,

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly this fight with about and with Thinner, is ridiculous

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a good look. And I've said many

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>many times the Nick chuse himself in the foot and

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not for me. I don't pay the checks and

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't employ the people on television, So it's aimed

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at other people, don't aim it at us. We do

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not gloss over what we think of these two and

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>how a Lott's legacy. We talked about it last week

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with Sam. Look, I think she'll go down as one

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the great fighters in tennis. She's, you know, this

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>tiny little girl from Romania became an incredible tennis player,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and her legacy is somebody that I will always respect

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 1>her as a tennis player. I will always respect her

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>work ethic, her fight, her emotional ups and downs and

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>working her way through those and finally getting a couple

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of Grand Slain Belt titles under a belt. And to me,

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>she'll always be that person.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Great.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I think she's that with a little bit of an

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>astress for me, and I'll kind of leave it.

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course, there'll always be the asterisk, and

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that is you know, and let me tell you something.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>If she was, in her eyes innocent and it was

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>given to her and she didn't know it and all

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff by her team, I feel really

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>badly for her, because you never want to have that

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>asterisk next to your name. She will go into the

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. They've already the Hall of Fame have

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>already set that precedent by putting Maria Sharapo over in there,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so Hallott will go in and if they don't put

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a halipin then you're like, well, what the fuck? So

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Helup's going into the Hall of Fame. And so it's

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just a shame that if she is completely innocent of

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it and it was given to her by her team,

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel really bad for her. On the other hand,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>if she didn't know about it, then you know, two

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thumbs down.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>But two thumbs still.

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll never know, all right. Buffy Burford said, what is

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about tournaments using different brand balls and complaints

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that some brands are inferior and might be causing injuries

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 1>from overhitting flat balls. Well, first of all, Buffy love

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the name. There's no such thing as a flat ball.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>If it's flat, it gets thrown right back to the

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>umpire and told to change it out. But there are

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>different brands. There's Dunlop obviously that's been a little bit

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of controversial side. There's Wilson, there's Pens, there's all kinds

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. Here's the difference and here's the problem here,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and where the problem lies money money mone When the

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>tournament gets balls given to them for free because they

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>are a sponsor. They take that because the amount of

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>tennis balls that get used as a tournament are enormously

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot, so you have to understand that the

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>tournament is taking a sponsor, and the sponsor is free

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>tennis balls and sometimes some money given to the tournament

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to use those balls. So it's never going to change

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>until we have a uniformed ball in tennis, and the

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>tournaments and the Grand Slams and you know, all get

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 1>together and say this is going to be our one ball.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, in the NBA, it's Wilson, right, they use

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a Wilson basketball. That's not going to change.

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 2>American Chancellor of Sport is ready to rule, are really

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and one ball and one ball only?

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think that would be great.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Caitlin for and Slazenger, that's it.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Lazenger, are you out of your fing mind?

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't add that's no questions at this time?

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Well, what are you Trump? You're just like unilaterally

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just changing the shit.

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>This is what we do. I'm a chancellor. I didn't

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>say I was the president. This isn't that a diplomacy,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 2>This is that a democracy.

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I just like I'm the president of the Ken Kennedy

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>center the.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Lateral decision, making my bile pick as Chancellor Slazenger.

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Next question, all right, well here we go. All right,

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Pop fails. What do you think of this proposal to

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get more top players playing doubles? Double the prize money

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for people who play both. If you lose first round,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you get double what you would have gotten. Still, I

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>can't find a flaw in it other than the cost. Well,

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I will say Pop fails. We sort of touched upon

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it already. We do want more top players playing. And

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I believe that top players

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>don't play doubles anymore like they did in the old

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>days is because the prize money is so enormous in

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>singles they don't need to play doubles. You know, when

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I played back in the seventeen seventies, you know, the

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>prize money to win a singles event might have been

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars to win a huge event, and

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you thought, Okay, that's a lot of money, and you're

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>winning doubles. I mean, I remember winning Miami and Miami

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and Indian Wells, two huge tournaments that pay way over

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars to win the doubles. Now I

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>was winning that to win Grand Slams, and I was

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>winning maybe twenty five thousand to win those tournaments, which

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not you know, there's a lot of people

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out there going, oh, fuck are you that's a lot

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of money. But now they're winning well over one hundred

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for those tournaments. The top singles players don't need to

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>play doubles for money anymore because they're winning so much

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>money in bingles. So yes, is it an idea to

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>put more double money into doubles. I think there's one

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about the US Open. They make the draw a

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit you know less, But then again, the problem

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is you won't have the top players playing, so I

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can understand why they're trying to do this. But we'll

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>see if if any of the top players play in

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this mixed doubles event, and that will answer our questions,

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and how much well TV show it, because

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the ESPN does show the week before the US Open.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>We are on ESPN Plus, so I don't know. We'll see,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>But I like your idea, pop Fils, It's not a

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>bad one. You've got nothing.

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 2>My answer is wrapped up in a larger structural change

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>but you join the swams. You join the slams into

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 2>a consortium with a few masters one thousands, you probably

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 2>get rid of the tours. You have on one side

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the tournaments. On the other side of the players, they

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>split the entire PI fifty to fifty. They come together

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 2>in an annual meeting. They have a union. On one side,

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 2>they have the ownership on the other. They negotiate rule changes, updates,

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 2>schedule blah blah blah. Fewer events, all mandatory, all big deals,

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 2>all in cool places. We can't agree on which places

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 2>they are, but you know we'll table that. And then

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you have everybody agreeing that for these fewer amounts of tournaments,

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>they will play all the events, and they will play

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 2>all the events because that is and you know, everybody

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 2>pays into the system. You get a base salary, the

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>tour takes care of, you know, the bottom type the top.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, are subsidizing a little bit the bottom. But

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 2>also make sure that ecosyism healthy. Then you don't have

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 2>crazy ideas like it next. So turn it at the beginning,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 2>because if I can't see colors Acaaz play in week

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 2>two of a Slam because he lost in the second

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 2>round I can still see him play deep because mixed

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>doubles and doubles doesn't start until week two, So I

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 2>wonder maybe that's it.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Corlins the Akaraz will play with Radakanu

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 1>in the mixed doubles.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about RADICANU. Please ask that question now?

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I have to go back. Let's let's all

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>right fine. Someone asked me if I would consider coaching Radakanu,

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the first thing you would do with her? I

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>would consider it, of course, yes, her game. I'll never

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 1>say no to an opportunity of working with the Grand

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Slam champion. Oh god, there's what would I work on? Well?

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the first thing I would do is sit

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>her down and ask what she wants. And I think

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the key. You have to know what your player wants.

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 2>It does seem like maybe nobody's done that.

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think they all come in thinking, oh, I'm

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>going to tweak this, and I'm going to tweak that.

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do this, and that's a very I

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>would sit her down and say, what, let's be honest here,

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you want? How do you want to approach this?

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm going to tell you exactly what I think,

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and then we go from there, and it's a bit

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of a sit down and come to Jesus moment and

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be honest with her about what I feel like her

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>her top level is and where she can get to

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and not try and be like, yeah, we can win

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>another Slam tomorrow, because that's just, you know, unlikely at

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this point. So what is it? What are her goals realistically,

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and then what can we do to work to get there?

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people think, you know, it's coming

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in and tweaking, like, you know, if I were to

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 1>work with Coco, obviously there's things that I would work

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on structurally in her, in her game as far as

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>her technique is concerned. There are little things that I

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>really believe in. But you know, because you don't need

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to work on Coco, what do you want? You know

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what Coco wants. She wants to win every single tournament.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>She has the ability to win every tournament in every

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slam, but there's a few technical things that definitely

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>need to change, and she's working on them and she's

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to but she lost again in the first round

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in Doha, so there's some question marks about how coco

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is going right now, but anyway, all right, So that's

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how I thought It's on Emma Radakanu. I mean, listen,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got to know how they feel before you can

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>change a lot of things. All right, rain or Shine

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine, I have a few questions. Well, Rain or Shine,

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't answer them.

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>All.

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't there more women coaching women? Well, we've already

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>answered that question a few times. There's a few reasons. One,

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the women like, let's say myself, I

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>can't hit the ball as well as some dude that

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you know is thirty years of age and can hit

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a ball better than me now, and so they use

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>these cheaper guys that can hit balls with them also

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>tell them a little bit what to do, and you know,

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they think that that's better, and so sometimes that's part

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of it. Sometimes it's women have families, don't want to

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>travel very much, so that's that situation. And there's also

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the stigma attached to can a woman coach me, which

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is we know, horseshit. Of course they can look at

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Marta Kotchuk what she's been able to do over the

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months, just beating cocoa, goff herself this week

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and her coach is a female. Conchiita Martinaz has done

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a great job with many players through the years. Clearly,

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've done a good job with everybody

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I've worked with.

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 3>So also, it doesn't just extended tennis. Jalen Hurts has

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>an all female management team.

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Come on, hell yeah, how good was that?

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Amazing?

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 2>So not to derailium, but yes, I the reasons they're

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>economic and logistical, hopefully not perceptionaliz.

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and someone else as the same question, Rayna Shane,

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what the best way to see archive matches besides YouTube?

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anyway.

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 2>No, you know, I think we should start a letter

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 2>writing campaign to HBO loose in this country because they

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 2>sit on all of the archives of Wimbledon, for example,

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>they own years and years and years of archives when

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 2>they used to be the broadcast partner. They're sitting on

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>gold mines with no real sense of how to storytell.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure ESPN has a bunch of old ones. I

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 2>would love, love, love for somebody in broadcast to resurrect them.

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:35.959
<v Speaker 2>It'll turn them into stuff or steal them exactly we see.

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Well now that yeah, a good question.

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a good ood question. Yeah, I think it's

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the answer is YouTube.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin would love that, all right, somebody else. Tracy also

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 1>asked about the thoughts on the US Open mixed doubles.

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>It really does. It's really a question that came up

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>quite often from people, so I think you will know

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly how we feel about it now, el got it. No,

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was just going to read one counterpoint to

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>what we discussed. In the spirit of change. A friend

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of mine who's a tennis coach in Brooklyn said, shout

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 2>out to the USCA, and he was open for making

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 2>moves and switching up the mix steps. I love the

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 2>changing format and I love that the change in timing.

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 3>The ability to.

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Have men and women compete together is one of the

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 2>things that makes tennis unique. It deserves participation and viewership.

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Happy they're resurrecting the event. I don't know if I

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 2>would characterize it as a record's resurrection, but it I

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 2>just want to say there are some people who are

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.919
<v Speaker 2>seeing this as a win because it seems like more

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 2>fans and eyeballs and maybe prominent players will participate in it.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 2>If that's true, I don't know the players are about it.

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Sarahani is famously not having about it, so you know again,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that's why I was sort of like, I have a

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 2>feeling will not this will not be the last time

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 2>we talked about this.

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think my issue is, and I've stated already, is

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that to play the four is a joke.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 3>It's an exod that is stupid, indefensible.

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I will say I've spoke to Sam's

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>dooty yesterday and Sam's was like, uh, what the fuck

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to hold serve one time? Like what are

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:06.439
<v Speaker 1>we doing here? You know what I mean? I said,

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're thinking about making a comeback?

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think the best of you know, the

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>first of fourth the set being four games is just

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a it's a travesty. Just make it.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:19.240
<v Speaker 1>If you want to do the tournament the week before

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and have it be part of fan week and you

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>want top singles players to play, have it been what

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it is, best to two sets. You've already cut it

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>down to best of two sets and a match tiebreak.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Just keep it at that for fuck's sake. It's only

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like an hour and fifteen minute match anyway, yeah, what

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are we playing. We don't have ads. You don't have

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ad ads, so it's like, you know, juice, next point wins,

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you're going to make it to four.

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Like it does feel a little teddlywink.

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Ish, italy winkish.

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 3>There you go, tedderwinkish. That's feel free to use that.

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I won't use that as an episode total because we

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>already figured it out.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well. K Low On the other the other unnameless

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>social media site, asked about sits to pass any hope

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 1>question mark, that's just a real, just straight up there question.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I love Tessa Pats. I will go down defending this guy.

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's past the point in a return for him,

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 2>but until he keeps swinging a racket, I will still

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>root for this guy and almost every kind of I

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 2>just love his game. I love his game. I love

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 2>his game. I love his weird emos soul, I love

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 2>his fake quotes on social media.

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I love the whole package.

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 2>He's just a weirdo who I love and I will

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 2>fight to the death.

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I wish he hadn't said the things that he said

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about certain things a couple of years ago, when he

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was just like basically putting women as second class citizens essentially.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just like, dude, wake up. We're in the

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century anyway. So another question from Ellie Welch, what

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on this idea, Caitlin. She didn't say, Caitlin,

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm saying to you that has all three surfaces.

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Higher sees get to choose the surface they play on.

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, really the Pirate Slam love it the okay, well

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll play it in international waters.

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, a lot of people on X and on

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky and all that sort of stuff. One of

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the major questions they kept asking is was about Vukov

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We've already talked about, and of course about the mixed double.

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So those are the two biggest questions. One phil Nowinn

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>who asked, what do you think Alex Dimanon needs to

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>do to beat Sinner?

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Pray and hope Janick Sinner gets injured because he literally

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is playing himself. Who's better, who has bigger serve, bigger forehand,

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>bigger backhand, just as quick, not not a quick, not

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick, but pretty quick. He basically he's playing him.

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like he's playing himself as a junior. It's like

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Inner the man is playing Yanick Sinner the junior so

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and that is no slight against him.

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 3>He's a gofer golfer.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's got fat, he's great to watch, he's entertaining,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 2>he's fast, He's got other shots, just not one Zegger weapon.

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Paula Castro said, what do you think of the

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Seeds losing today, specifically Arena and Coco, And my answer

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to that is, that's why I believe that Mattie keys

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Is made a fantastic move. And I will say I

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>did chat to her husband Beyond after she won the

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Australian Open, and I'm not taking credit for this, but

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I did say one of the things that Sam Stows

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>had told me after she won the US openers, she

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>wished she hadn't gone and played in Asia right after that,

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because you have to be ready and prepared, as Sam

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>said last week, to still put the work in. Just

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because she won the Australian Open does not guarantee you

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>winning your next match, and so you have to be

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>prepared to put the work in, to be mentally prepared

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be out there, to be mentally prepared to be

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at a tournament. So I think that you know Coco's

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Coco probably can go there, but there's something

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to be said about playing a tournament of that size

0:49:56.520 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>not long after flying back from Australia, flying to the

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ace. It's a lot and so I think Maddy

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Keys has done a really smart job with not going

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Middle Ace and that great land. That question anyway, Kitlin,

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is there anything more you would like to talk to

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>our trusty fans about.

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I just want to give it a shout out to

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the Cuban national team with whom I got to train

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and visit this past weekend. Truly, truly, truly one of

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the highlights of my life to go to Havana, meet

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of teens, all of whom are now watsapping

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 2>me and represent the most talent in the country. And

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the legendary coach Belle Case Rodriguez, who's who's coaching them

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 2>all and who was in and o her own right,

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a phenomenal international player, having made several FED Cup then

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 2>called fed Cup now called BJK Cup appearances for a

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 2>country that not very many people have their eye on.

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 3>For tennas.

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So just like a super super super special time, I'll

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 2>be writing about it for our summer issue. And yeah,

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 2>just like any of those kids who might be paying

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 2>attention to thank thank for having me. It was a

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 2>total total posture.

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh look at you. That is really nice to see

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and here anyway, Well, we love tennis, we love everything

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>about it. I am still in Australia, as I talked about,

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm heading back to New York in a couple of days.

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing. Yes, I'm heading back on Saturday, so you'll

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>see me Saturday. I'm coming back to the cold. It's

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:24.399
<v Speaker 1>just been beautiful here in Australia, and I have to say,

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:27.439
<v Speaker 1>having my head in the sand literally at Bondo Beach

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and away from the mess and craziness of the United

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>States with what the f is happening back there, is

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just it's been a godsend, I will say. So, I'm

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about to get heads stuck right into all the bs

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to be dealing with, and I'm glad

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got my strain passport.

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 3>Still let me just say that smart move all right.

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>On that note, we have your Canadian passport.

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 3>Believe it. My whole family does.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh look at you. So you can go up north

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and I can go down south, and we can just

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>leave if we have to. Commonwealth forever, Commonwealth forever. Alright anyway,

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, well Caitlin, it's good to see you again

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll see you back in New York.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm everyone again.

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 1>As I say all the time, Please like and subscribe,

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 1>give us a good little rating. We do love you

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>guys for listening to us every single week and appreciate

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this one was a little bit late, but hey, we

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:16.439
<v Speaker 1>got it done.

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for don Bye bye, Thanks mate. I gotta make dinner, okay,

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 2>but he's out.