WEBVTT - Nvidia’s Forecast Lifts AI Trade

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and v Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up in Vidia's strong revenue forecast.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>SOUTHS investor concerns about an AI bubble. Our exclusive conversation

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>with CEO Jensen one plus the.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Palo Alto Networks joins us to discuss its

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>own results and the latest acquisition to boost its AI offerings.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>An AI pioneer Yan Laccoon, will depart Meta at the

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>end of the year to start a new company.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Details later this hour.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Now we focus in on the broader markets. We said

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>yesterday so in video, so the market, So the market

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>follows in Vidia higher, but we're at one point percent.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Then that's that one hundred a breath of relief when

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>it comes to AI anxiety instead, So it's a quelled,

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>a bit ed, and not enough even to reshaking off

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 3>some of the anxiety that comes with the jobs report

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>that maybe maybe we could see a December rate cut.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 3>We built up a little bit the bond market pricing

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in now thirty five percent chance of a rate cup

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 3>come December, but really all eyes on this AI trade

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>today and all.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Eyes on in video.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 2>The stock is up about three percent, had opened up

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>about five percent and has paired some of that gain

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>in the last half hour or so. Sixty five billion

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars of sales in the fiscal fourth quarter. Many see

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that as being healthily above consensus. There was a lot

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of fighting talk on the demand side, on the supply side,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and how good in videous technology is. We spoke with

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Invidious CEO Jensen Wong in an exclusive interview post earnings.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Take a listen.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Sales are after charts for Blackwell and in video GPUs

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 5>in the Cloud are sold out. We got plenty of

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Blackwells to sell you. We have lots of Blackwells coming,

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 5>We're making a lot of Blackwells, and we have a

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 5>bunch of Vera Rubens coming, and so business is very,

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 5>very strong. But we've planned our supply chain incredibly well.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 5>We have the largest supply chain in the world. But

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 5>we've got a bunch of black Wells to sell.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Jensen I tried to go through what the CFO collect

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Cress said about China in the quarter gone. It seemed

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 2>like there was not meaning for H twenty sales because

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the demand wasn't there even if you were permitted to

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>sell EAH twenty and then in the current period and

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>going forward in video, seems committed to working with both

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the United States and China to sell what COLLECT called

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 2>more competitive compute. Where do we stand with that and

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>could you just clarify what COLLECT was talking about in

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the current state of play for China.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 5>The most important thing she said is that we've said

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 5>for time now our forecast for China is zero. All

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 5>of our forecasts, that guidance that we showed zero, we

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 5>should start. That's the most important thing that she said.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 5>She also said that effectively, China is a very important

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 5>market to us. It's very important to the United States,

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 5>It's very important to China. We would love the opportunity

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 5>to be able to re engage the Chinese market with

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 5>excellent products that we deliver and to be able to

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 5>compete globally.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 2>During the call, the US Commerce Department issued a statement

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>saying that you are now permitted to export up to

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thousand black Well chips each to both saudiast

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Humane and to the UAE through G forty two. But

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>there are some requirements that the US has a view

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in particular around controls of preventing tech transfer to China

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>through the Middle East. What can you tell us about

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>your understanding of what the US government's asking of you there.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 5>That element has been around for a long time is

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 5>to prevent diversion. Of course, over the years, people have

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 5>speculated about diversion. We've chased down every single concern and

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 5>we've repeatedly tested and sampled data centers around the world

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 5>and found no diversion. And so this is an area

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 5>that will continue to be rigorous on. And there's a

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 5>lot of different ways to comply, and one of them,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 5>of course, is to have it be run by American cloud.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Another way is just to make sure that we have

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 5>measures put in place, whether technology or processes, to ensure

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 5>that no diversion happens.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 3>In video CEO Jensen Huang speaking to us exclusively last night,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>let's dig in to that last bit from Jensen and

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>dressing concerns around selling to them, at least selling into China.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 3>From Maxcina editor Mike Shepard can break down what is

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 3>currently happening at the White House level. There's a pressure

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 3>on Congress in particular to allow Jensen Wang and Nvidia

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>to have greater access to some of these so called adversaries.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 6>What are you hearing, well, what we're hearing is that

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 6>the White House would like Congress to hold off on

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 6>legislation that would force Nvidia to put American customers first

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 6>ahead of adversarial nations like China. And of course, Nvidia

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 6>is proscribed from selling to China right now by US

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 6>export controls and even by Beijing rejecting those aged twenty

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 6>chips that we've talked about. That of one American authorization

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 6>to be sold inside China, Nvidia has been looking for

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 6>permission to do more, and that includes selling a deprecated

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 6>version of its market leading Blackwell chip to China. Jensen

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 6>Wang sees being able to compete in China as key

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 6>to being able to compete around the world. But this

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 6>measure is seen as really putting the handcuffs on Nvidia

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 6>and on Ada as well, and both companies have moved

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 6>against this.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 4>The bill is called the Gain Act.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 6>It would be attached to a piece of legislation that

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 6>must pass. It governs defense policy, and it has bipartisan support.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 6>But now the White House is weighing in and seeking

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 6>to get it pulled from the legislation, and it's unclear

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 6>what would emerge in its place, because right now, Caro,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 6>there really is no uniform code governing export controls, especially

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 6>as applied to China. And that's because if we go

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 6>back all the way to the beginning of the year,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 6>and it seems so long ago, the Biden administration had

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 6>tried to impose this AI diffusion rule, this framework that

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 6>would prevent tech from leaking from allies like Saudi Arabia,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 6>like the UAE to China, and we don't really have

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 6>anything here yet in place in Washington. So you see

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 6>the China hawks on Capitol Hill and even inside the

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 6>administration grasping for an alternative in this bill, which the

0:06:58.279 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 6>White House is not trying to head off.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Is at least an attempt at that.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Shed last night was a little bit an issue of

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>timing in chronology. So during the call the Analyst School,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.679
<v Speaker 2>the Commerce Department put out a statement confirming that Nvidia

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>is now allowed to export blackwell to the Gulf States.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that just kind of rubber stamping something we knew

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>was coming.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 6>We have widely expected this approval to come through, but

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 6>it does take some time to work its way through

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 6>the guts of the bureaucracy, but there is also a

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 6>hurdle to overcome, and that is the concerns as we

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 6>just discussed, that the technology does risk leaking to every

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 6>serial nations, especially China, and that is because both the

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Saudis and the Amortis have had long standing business ties

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 6>with China, and China's Huawei Technologies has a footprint in

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 6>each of those two nations, and the concern is that

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 6>the proximity of Huawei to American technology in a data

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 6>center creates risk of some sort of leakage, either through

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 6>software or something else, and that is something that the

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 6>US government was really trying to seek assurances on. We

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 6>don't have details on what was required of the emordis

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 6>and include also of the companies, and you did your

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 6>best in asking Jensen for specifics on that, but he

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 6>really dug in on the whole broader question of diversion,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 6>and that is something that the company has been sensitive about.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 6>They have insisted that they know your customer programs have

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 6>done enough to prevent diversion, and yet that hasn't assuaged

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 6>all the concerns of China hawks here in Washington that

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 6>advanced American technology could eventually leak back to China and

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 6>somehow support its military and intelligence bureaucracies.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mike Shepard, thank you very much. Let's get back

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to the Nvidia in the earning story. Ioko your Showcus

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>portfolio consulting director at Wealth Enhancement Group one hundred and

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty four point five billion dollars in assets onder management

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and a pretty healthy chunk of Nvidia shares as well.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 4>I feel like.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>Gensen one was trying to give the trifecta a positive

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>picture on demand, positive picture on supply, and even had

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to kind of throw a bit of shade

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>at A six or Google TPUs, saying that customers looked

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 2>at alternatives and they came back to Nvidia. There was

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot there. What is the most important data point

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 7>Hied, Good to see you. Perhaps maybe the most important

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 7>one was that Jensen wasn't wearing his signature leather jacket.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 7>But for the most part, for us, the when you

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 7>look at the financials and when you look at the

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 7>growth rate that Nvidia has posted and really delivering beyond

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 7>expectations for where consensus estimates were, that was the most

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 7>important metrics for us as we listen to the call.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>What I tried to do at the beginning of the

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>conversation was get a sense of how supply constrained they

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>are and how conservative that five hundred billion dollar forecast

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>through the end of next year is.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's start there. Listen to this.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Sales are off the charts for Blackwell and and video

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 5>GPUs in the cloud are sold out. We got plenty

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 5>of black Walls to sell you. We have lots of

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 5>Blackwells coming, We're making a lot of Blackwells, and we

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 5>have a bunch of Vera Rubens coming, and so business

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 5>is very very strong.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that five hundred billion dollar figure which excludes China

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and is Blackwell Rubin through the end of calendar twenty

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 2>six a bit conservative?

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, we heard analysts ask that question, right, and they

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 7>have visibility into that five hundred billion dollar number, and

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 7>so that doesn't include sort of the demand that will

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 7>be coming forward in the next you know, fourteen to

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 7>eighteen months, and so it perhaps is conservative. And I

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 7>think that's the part that's so difficult for all of

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 7>us to really wrap our heads around. These numbers are

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 7>so large and they're growing at such a rate that

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 7>we haven't seen before that it really becomes you know,

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 7>for most of us, we're all skeptical that this is

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 7>going to happen at the rate that it continues to

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 7>happen at.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 3>What was interesting was the depreciation question was tackled. This

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 3>is what's got Michael Burry and Itzzy. It's got what

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 3>many have been seeing as a little bit of anxiety

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>that ultimately the consumersm in video chips have been saying, look,

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>these last longer than some had anticipated. But really it

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>was made clear that the A one hundreds, the older

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>type of chips are still working six years on. Ioka.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Did that put that anxiety to bed?

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 7>I think it was a great way for collect to

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 7>sort of clap back at that depreciation argument. You know

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 7>that we are still using these older chips. They are

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 7>still getting consumed simply because the demand is so great.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 7>So I do think there was a little bit of

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 7>that that was put to rest and a relief I

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 7>think from investors to an extent that they were still

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 7>being utilized.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 3>To that extent, there's a relief today and we are

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 3>up two percentage point Syoko. But I feel as though

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>the entire market is a bit of an anxious boyfriend

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, trying to have soothing words currently given

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 3>to it from whomever they can class and say, hey,

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I girlfriend in many ways, but what are you thinking

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 3>of in terms of that this will soothe for the

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>longer term? Are we're going to need weekly updates that

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 3>we're not in some sort of bubble?

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 7>You know, it is really difficult to sort of wrap

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 7>our heads around. I think on one hand, we do

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 7>see all of the demand continuing to grow at these

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 7>exponential rates, But on the other hand, you see all

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 7>this circularity and financing that I think concerns all of us,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 7>and then all of us who kind of grew up

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 7>during the sort of tech bubble era. We've kind of

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 7>seen this movie before, and we don't want it to

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 7>end the way that it ended back in two thousand

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 7>and So there's a lot of push and pull and

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 7>a lot of monitoring on a daily, weekly, quarterly basis.

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's why in Video's earnings calls continue

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 7>to be sort of the super Bowl of you know,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 7>equity investors sort of you know the calendars.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>What about in Video's valuation specifically, do you feel comfortable

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's trading at twenty times next year's numbers,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 7>it's growing revenue at sixty percent, it's growing earnings at

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 7>fifty plus percent. You know, it's there are reasonable valuations.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 7>They are not astronomical at like we saw during the

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 7>tech bubble.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 8>However, you know.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 7>It's still relatively expensive. And it all hinges upon the

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 7>duration of this growth rate. You know, does this continue

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 7>at these levels for three five years or is it

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 7>just this sort of near term twelve month growth rate

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 7>that we're seeing. And I think that's this anxious investor

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 7>base that's sort of watching this. When does the growth

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 7>rates start to deteriorate?

0:13:59.240 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 9>What?

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>According to Blomberg analysis, if you're looking at what the

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>general consensus is by twenty twenty eight, revenue growth is

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>going to have slowed to twenty six percent. Just in

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty seven, it will have slowed to forty five percent.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 3>But it's not just the law of ever greater numbers.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're already almost a five trillion dollar company.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 3>How can we expect it to keep growing at sixty

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>percent out into twenty twenty eight and above?

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's the thing that's the skepticism that

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 7>really sort of creeps into you know, the investor mindset

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 7>is that how large can this get? And the numbers

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 7>when you start to just grow at sixty percent plus

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 7>year after year, it's just astronomical. And yet you know,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 7>Jensen's talking about three to four trillion dollars of annual

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 7>spend for data center and AI infrastructure, and you know,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 7>if all of that or a good portion of that

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 7>goes to Nvidia, the numbers continue to grow, and then

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 7>you know the hyperscalers will grow as well because that

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 7>benefits their cloud revenue. So it's just something that we

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 7>continue to keep monitoring and we'll have to see each

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 7>quarter not just from Nvidio, but from all of the

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 7>tech ecosystem in terms of how large this AI platform

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 7>is going to become.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Yeshioka, it's always great to get your analysis from

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Welfare Enhancement Group.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 10>We thank you.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up AI pioneer Jan Lacun. He's leaving Meta

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>to launch his own startup. What's next for him and

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>what it says about Meta's own AI plans that's next?

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Jan Lukun, one of the so called godfathers of AI,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>is leaving his role at Meta to launch his own startup.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Rumors of his departure have been swirling from more than

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a week, and it comes as the social media giant

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>makes big changes to its AI efforts, including forming a

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>new AI app lab earlier this summer and spending billions

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to high.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 4>New talent Bloom. As Kurt Wagner break the story I see.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 2>After we published our report, Jan Lkin posted on LinkedIn

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>referring to rumors and clarified a few things. But I

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>guess let's start with why he's leaving, what he's doing,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>where he's going.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So Jan Lucuhn is an AI researchature in sort

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 11>of every sense of the term. He is looking at

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 11>things on a very long time horizon. And as Meta

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 11>has come into this sort of AI fight that we're

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 11>seeing right now with open Ai and Google and Anthropic,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 11>they had really started to focus their AI efforts on

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 11>the here and now, right on the chatbots, on the lms,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 11>the things that consumers are using today, and so Lacuhn's

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 11>work is years of not decades, sort of down the line.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 11>And what we had heard in our reporting is that

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 11>because of Meta's focus, he was starting to have trouble

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 11>getting the resources that he felt he needed in order

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 11>to do his research. The focus was certainly on things

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 11>that were not what he was paying attention to, and

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 11>ultimately Meta was going in a bit of a different direction,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 11>I think on AI than what he envisioned. And so,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 11>as you mentioned ed, this was something that had been

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 11>discussed and sort of talked about really since this summer

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 11>when they started pivoting towards the superintelligence effort, and you know,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 11>they did try to leave on good terms. Meta is

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 11>going to be sort of involved in some capacity in

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 11>his new startup, but it was time for him to

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 11>move on and do his research elsewhere.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he describes as advanced machine intelligence, more sensory information,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>more physical AI. In many ways, the story articulates how

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the tide moved against him, and he certainly executives moved

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 3>against him because Alexander Wang came in and sort of

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 3>superseded him.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, lacun is a legend in the AI industry, or

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 11>he's considered a quote godfather of this entire field. And

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 11>yet when Meta decided to build this new lab the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 11>summer TV deal and go out and Acchoir essentially Alexander

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 11>Wang from Scale Ai.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 4>He became Jan mccun's boss, right.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 11>I think he's more than thirty years younger, obviously very

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 11>different type of expert in terms of AI, and so

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 11>there was a feeling sort of in that moment where Okay,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 11>if they have this legendary AI researcher in the building

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 11>and yet they're still going outside the company to bring

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 11>in people to run their new AI effort, what is

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 11>that signal right for John's future here? And I think

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 11>again this was something that in some ways was a

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 11>long time coming because of the fact that he is

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 11>so forward and future looking with what he does, and

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 11>Meta is fighting sort of for its AI life right

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 11>here and now. But I think that layering of executives

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 11>over the summer was probably another big reason that he's leaving.

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Today, and a big supporter of open sourcing that perhaps

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 3>metas shifted slightly away from as well. Rumos Coo Wagner,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 3>great breakdown, Thank you very much. Indeed, while coming up,

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk about the Chinese university shaping the country's AI

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>sector and its future startup leaders. This is blom Beg Tech,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 3>China's Singua University, but it's having an outsized impact on

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the country's AI industry and the school's professors and students.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 3>They received more patterns each year than MIT, Stanford, Princeton,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Harvard combined. Let's go out to bluembg's executive tech editor

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Peter Elstrom for more on all this signifies about China's

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 3>AI ambitions. They are wholly focused on making sure that

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 3>they have many, many more experts and potential employees of

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the future.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Qingwa is a very prestigious university. For many years,

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 12>it's educated the best in the brightest, especially in science

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 12>and engineering in China. But what's really changing now is

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 12>you're seeing this momentum in AI in particular. A couple

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 12>things are feeding into that. First of all, Deep Seek.

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 12>The success of Deep Deep Seek in its breakthrough model

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 12>earlier this year really gave a lot of confidence to

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 12>these young students that they too could build businesses that

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 12>would be very, very successful. In addition to that, Chi

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 12>Jinping and the Communist Party have been calling on the

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 12>tech sector in China to be able to build in

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 12>a number of very key areas for them, strategically important

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 12>areas for them, especially AI. So you can get government funding,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 12>you can get tax subsidies, there's a lot of momentum

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 12>to be able to build businesses, so the students there

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 12>feel like they have a lot more opportunities in front

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 12>of them. Venture capitalists are coming, They're funding a lot

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 12>of these businesses. We're seeing quite impressive AI startups coming

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 12>out of Chinwan the rest of China, Peter.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>As part of this Bloomberg Big Take, you look at

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the alumni that have gone away founded key startups, but

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 2>also that those that have quite senior jobs at China's

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>biggest technology companies. What are the best examples we need

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>to know about.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, Chinua has put their graduates in a number of

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 12>different places, including leading companies like Ali Babo, which has

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 12>done a lot of impressive work with the Gwen model

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 12>in particular, bte Dance, the parent company of TikTok, and

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 12>they founded startups like Jipu, which is another cutting edge

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 12>company there. And really what you're seeing is this massive students.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 12>China graduates many more STEM graduates than the United States,

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 12>and they have done that for many years. So you're

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 12>seeing three and a half million students at last count,

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 12>compared to eighty thousand in the United States. So it's

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 12>a big magnitude difference for them in particular, and now

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 12>they're able to get this kind of funding to be

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 12>able to build up their tech sector, and you're seeing

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 12>these impressive startups come out of the country's technology opportunities

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 12>in the university city. Universities like Changhwa are also starting

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 12>up their own incubators where students can get funding. They

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 12>run a short tank like competition to be able to

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 12>give these kids a chance to pitch their stories and

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 12>possiblely get funding for them too.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom, thank you very much on the latest

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>big take. Actually, since we come to air on Bloomberg Tech,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you see Nvidia kind of pairing some of its gains.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>We're up one point seven percent the way off session highs,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's having an impact.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Of course at the index level.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 2>I think about the NAZAQ one hundred or the S

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred, and from a waiting perspective, in

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Vidia is the top dog, so market's kind of losing

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit of steam. We're going to get back to

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that key in Nvidia earnings forecast and help understand why

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the enthusiasm around AI and some of the

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>concern around the bubble is dissipating a little bit. This

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. In market,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it's in video, it's really off its session high is

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 2>now actually in the last thirty minutes or so, we've

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>gone from a gain of around three percent, we're now

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>at one point seven percent. But part of the story

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 2>when that Nvidia print hit was some belief that the

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 2>AI investment cycle as and staying power. You saw neo

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 2>clouds like Call, we've really jump in after hours last night,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>still up three percent on core. We've in the session

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that had been much higher at one point. Gensen Wong

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>name checked quite a lot of model labs, and you

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 2>know Google was including on that continues to be at

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 2>record at high as Alphabet parent company of Google. Although

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 2>I keep reminding myself that Gemini three, which we went

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>over this week was trained on TPUs, and of course,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 2>as part of that interview and part of the Only School,

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>gensle one carrow through a bit of shade some of

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the alternative to in Vidia's GPU offering.

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Saying they keep on coming back even when they're using rivals.

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 13>Let's talk about video a bit more.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg US secuitis reporter come and Ryinikey is here and

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 3>you had a great story really talking about how much

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 3>in video was hinge and on the rest of the

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>market mood and it on in video talking about that basically,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 3>we're anxious about AI spending. It seems as it offered

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 3>some well relief rally, but why are we fighting it?

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 14>Well, I mean we're really seeing like so goes in video,

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 14>so goes the rest of the market. And you're right,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 14>this report was really overwhelmingly positive. And you know, we

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 14>did see a share spike sort of immediately after popped

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 14>in after hours, it was up this morning. It seemed

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 14>to be broadening out into other AI names. But I

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 14>think what we might be seeing now is just a

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 14>little bit of fatigue. I spoke to at least one

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 14>investor that said they were actually surprised and thought the

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 14>move was quite.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 13>Muted for how good the report was.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 14>You know, the revenue guidance was great, and then they

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 14>even sort of doubled down in this five hundred billion

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 14>dollar forecast.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 13>And so they might do even better than that.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 14>That's hugely bullish, and you know, shows that spending for

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 14>AI is set to continue. So we could just be

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 14>seeing some fatigue here some shakeout, and video shares are

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 14>still up forty percent this year, and over all the

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 14>Nasdaq has done really well and valuations are high. So

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 14>we could just see a little bit of thrashing here

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 14>because of that.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>On the so goes and Video so goes the market

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 2>point which corners of the technology sector. Did we see

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Mate moves even though it's fading a bit now because

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 2>of Nvidia, and I guess, like I've been looking at

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the neo clouds, but it's broader than that.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it was actually very broad based. So we did

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 14>see the neoclouds move, like you mentioned, you know, core Weave,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 14>nebuus were up after hours, but we even saw you

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 14>know rival chip makers move. AMD was up, Broadcom was up,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 14>you know, Marvel was up, Micron, the other hyperscalers, you know,

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 14>the mag seven names, so Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, although I

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 14>think that's dipped into the red just now, and Alphabet

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 14>you know, closed at another record high yesterday and was

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 14>extending those games as well. So we did see some

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 14>you know, broad based moves that seem to be linked

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 14>to AI optimism in those AI names, and you know,

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 14>just seeing a little bit of a turn there now.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Micronsat show you off by now five percent. I mean,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>it's had a phenomenal rally this year. Are we going

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to keep needing adrenaline hits to sustain as we as

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 3>we see more broadly, investors tie up their books as

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 3>we go into the market, what are some of the

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 3>narratives that they're going to have to face? The AI

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>trade versus the FED, versus rebalancing.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 14>Will you make such a good point, which that there

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 14>are all these other macro backdrop things happening that are really.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 13>Important and are also weighing on the market.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 14>It's not just in Vidia as much as we're focused

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 14>on that. So yes, they're going to need some AI reinvigoration.

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 14>I think everybody's also really watching if we're gonna get

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 14>more cuts from the FED.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 13>That's going to be really important.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 14>And I think that maybe optimism is a little dull

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 14>for the end of the year. I've definitely heard people

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 14>say that they're not expecting a Santa Claus rally, which, well,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 14>you know, we'll see it will be kind of a

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 14>sad Christmas without one. But you know, it might be

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 14>that just valuations are stretched, investors are looking to take

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 14>some of their profits into the end of the year

0:26:58.600 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 14>and then see what twenty twenty.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Six, Luoma's Carmen ron Nicky. Great to have you back

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>on bloombog Tech. Thank you very much. Let's get some

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 2>more Wall Street reaction to Nvidia's print. Joining us now

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Ruben Roy Steefel apply technology analysts by rating on Nvidia

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 2>maintaining a two hundred and fifty.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Dollars price target.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's start just with the outlook for the fiscal fourth

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 2>quarter around sixty five billion dollars depending on where you

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>stood going into that, that is meaningfully above consensus to

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 2>some how do you react to that data point?

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the data.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 9>Point is that the slope of the spend is continuing

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 9>to move higher, and I think that that was a

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 9>concern going into the print, especially after Jensen sort of

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 9>let the cat out of the bag on how strong

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 9>demand has been going with the five hundred billion dollars

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 9>of backlocks that you talk about at GPC back in October,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 9>and you know, I think expectations because of that had

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 9>increased going into to expectations for the results for the

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 9>October quarter as well as the guidance and so you know,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 9>with with the acceleration of revenue in both the October

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 9>quarter versus July, and then further acceleration into the January quarter.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 9>I think that took away, you know, some of the concerns.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 9>And then you know, the commentary on the call, which

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 9>I thought was very important, was that they're obviously taking

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 9>more orders. And so I think you just talked about this,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 9>which is that there could be you know, not could

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 9>be there will be further upside to that five billion

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 9>dollars backflog as we think about twenty six. You know,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 9>one of the things in addition to the slope increasing

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 9>is that the runway here is increasing. So we get

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 9>a lot of questions from investors around sustainability.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:44.959
<v Speaker 8>Of the spend.

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 9>Obviously, the hyperscalers have been increasing capex on a quarterly

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 9>basis for quite a while right now. But you know,

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 9>these types of data points would suggest that the runway

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 9>on the spend and the demand for AI compute continues to.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 8>Lengthen.

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 9>And so I think I think those are very strong

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 9>data points for the ANI trade from you know, looking forward.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Reuben, just as you were speaking, and Vidia's gain is

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>now just nine tenths of a percent in a session.

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that's your fault. That's just curious time.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>The base case assumption is zero revenues from China. You know,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Jensen could not have been more clear about that. But

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 2>does that not then give give quite a lot of

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for some upside if they can get the China

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 2>situation resolved.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think I think that's right.

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, at some point it is likely

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 9>that we'll see you know, companies that can video and

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 9>potentially am D and others figure out ways to work

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 9>with both governments. The company talked about this on the

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 9>call last night. But you know, to your point, even

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 9>without China, and you know this came up on last quarter.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.959
<v Speaker 9>I mean they had to beat in another raids without

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, any h twenty assumptions in the guidance. But

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, even with without that, you do have what

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 9>I mentioned, which is the hyperscale CAPEX going up. And

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 9>I think something that is still not fully appreciated is

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 9>the rate at which sovereign governments are spending on AI.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 8>So you know, we talk about the five.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 9>Major hyperscalers in the United States and the capex budgets

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 9>that are growing there. But and video is doing you know,

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 9>quite a bit of growth and sovereign nation AI deployments,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 9>and I think that that's something that's going to continue

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 9>as well. So even without China, obviously there's a big

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 9>demands backdrop here, and like I said, that backdrop is

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 9>extending into sort of a multi year investment cycle.

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Jensen and the company more broadly really spelled out again

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 3>they own ninety percent of the AI accelertor market or

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the data center market. Is that going to change? You

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>just reference AMD?

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, I think you know, at some point

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 9>you will see, you know, just it's for nothing else,

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, capacity that am D that's I'm sorry, video

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 9>can bring to the table, you know, could could enable

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 9>others to participate here. The hyperscalers obviously have their own

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 9>AGA platforms that they're trying to bring to the market.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 9>But I think, you know, the way to think about

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 9>this is that the overall TAM assumptions continue to rise.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 9>Right So a year ago or so, we were talking

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 9>about multiple hundreds of billions of dollars and potentially I

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 9>compute TAM and now we're talking about trillions of dollars.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 9>Right so in video's talk about one to three trillion dollars.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 9>AMD you had an analyst meeting just a few weeks

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 9>ago where they talked about a million dollar I'm sorry,

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 9>a trillion dollar TAM as you get out to the

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 9>end of the decade, and as that TAM increases, even

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 9>if in Video's share comes down, which it likely will.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 9>I think you know this concept of all boats rise.

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, they're going to continue to grow revenue and

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 9>our view, you know, just on the overall TAM assumption increasing.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Ruben Roy Stephel great to have your analysis on the show.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Indeed, this is the market continues

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 3>to fade, but we've got some more earnings for you. Next.

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Parallel So Network CEO joining us to discuss the report.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 3>The latest acquisition that's next. This is a Bloomberg Tech

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's dig into earnings a little bit more now, but

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 3>this time is Palo Alto Networks, a cybersecurity firm reporting

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 3>sixteen percent increase in revenue. That was yesterday, but it

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>also announced a three point four billion dollar plan to

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 3>acquire Chronosphere. It's a boost to its AI enabled cybersecurity offerings.

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 3>Palo Alto Network CEO nikosha Urra joins us for more now,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and look, your stock is lower because many is saying

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>it's an M and A well digestion risk that maybe

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is being faced here. You put twenty five billion dollar

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 3>offer into cyber Arc, now another M and A piece.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Why does it work for you?

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, Carol, I'm nice to see you.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 10>This is our twenty eighth acquisition in about seven and

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 10>a half years, and we've demonstrated to the market that

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 10>we have been able to to establish our business and

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 10>adjacent markets for the last seven years by paying attention

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 10>to the market, looking at where the puck is going,

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 10>understanding what is important for our customers, and I think Coronosphare,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 10>which is our latest acquisition, fits right.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 8>Banks make in the middle of where the market's going.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 8>If you look at what you.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 10>Guys were talking about before this, you're talking about in

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 10>Vidia AMD. Eventually, all this compute power is going to

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 10>result in people building faster and more and more relevant

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 10>applications the end consumer or enterprises. All those applications have

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 10>to be observed and make sure they don't have problems

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 10>or go down.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 8>And that's what coronos Fair does.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 10>It observes applications and infrastructure, make sure you have nine

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 10>nine point nine percent uptime, and then we are going

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 10>to combine that with our agentic capabilities to make sure

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 10>agents will go fix that if they go down. So

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a phenomenal opportunity going forward. It's fine,

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 10>the stock will recover. I think investors are beginning to

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 10>understand the story's all right.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously has not performed price target two fifty,

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>well above where you are, and they're saying that you're

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a top tist software vendor seeing AI tailwinds as it

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 3>grows ahead of industry pairs. But how does observability take

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you into a whole new ecosystem that you're now fighting

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 3>data dog, diner trace? Why is that the right total

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>addressable market for you? As well as security.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, observability is a space.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 10>As I said, as we get more and more AI deployed,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 10>we're going to need more and more real time capability,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 10>real time capability and actions, real time capability and applications.

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Real time capabilities required ninety nine point nine to nine percent.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 10>Availability, which means you have to make sure your infrastructure

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 10>is always up and running.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 8>If it has a problem, you should be able to

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 8>fix it right away.

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 10>Sort of similar to security, we also have to watch

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 10>security on a constant basis, make sure something happens, we

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 10>fix it right away.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 8>So actually, over the last ten to fifteen years, if

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 8>we look.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 10>There are companies who've tried to play in both spaces,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 10>and typically that ended up really well in one side

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 10>not the other. We've not made a foray into observability

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 10>because we never thought we could build it organically. We

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 10>don't have the skill set. But we went out looking

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 10>for data pipelining. We found Chronosphare Cronos Fair has some

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 10>of the best engineers in the space. Observably suffers from

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 10>two problems. One is too expensive and two it doesn't

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 10>scale well well. Cruisers solve that problem. It is two

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 10>and a half times cheaper than anybody else on the market,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 10>and two it could scale to giggle what size in

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 10>terms of what is needed from an AI perspective. So

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 10>we think the time is right, the asset is right,

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 10>and the opportunity is right.

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Taken in aggregate, that is an astonishing amount of M

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and A. Is there any reason why you can't just

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 2>keep going and keep using M and A as the

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 2>tool to position the platform where you want it in

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a kesh.

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 10>Look, in the last seven and a half years, i'd say,

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 10>thirty percent of our opportunity has been created by strategic

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 10>and timely m and a seventy percent of our opportunity

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 10>has been on organic innovation as a company.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 8>Now that's worked out really well for us.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 10>Even now we've announced two big deals cyber Arc and Chronosware. Collectively,

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 10>we're going to spend slightly hundred thirty percion dollars. But

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 10>that gave us the confidence to increase our tour gets

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 10>for ARR in five thirty by five billion dollars. If

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 10>I can go spend thirty billion dollars and buy five

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars of AR five years.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 8>So now I do that every day.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to the fundamentals of where you are

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 3>already r PO, in particular remaining performance obligation growth. It

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 3>was strong in the court to just announce, but when

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 3>you're pushing out to the fiscal twenty twenty six, our

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 3>own intelligence ana and is just a little bit worried

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 3>about the slowdown in growth.

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 4>Are you worried about it?

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 10>You know when I started seven and a half, he's

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 10>go a two billion dollar company. RPR now has fifteen

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 10>and a half billion dollars, set a target of twenty

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars in ARR.

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 8>Those are big numbers.

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 10>So I think part of what people fail to understand

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 10>is absolute numbers get bigger and bigger on the margin

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 10>growth rates change. But I think from a pro capability perspective,

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 10>if we start doing twenty billion dollars in ARR, we'll

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 10>be generating ten or fifteen billion.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 8>Dollars a free cast flow year.

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 10>That's a far cry from where we started at a

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 10>few hundred dollars seven years ago. So I think you

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 10>have to look at it from a slightly multi year perspective.

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 8>From that perspective, we think we're well positioned.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 10>We think this is going to be the largest cybersecurity

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 10>in company in the world world, and we have aspirations

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 10>to take it and double the triple to where.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 8>We are.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Right now.

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Any given technology company might use a dozen several dozen

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 2>different tools across cyber and AI, right and your pitch

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 2>is you just put everything in one place, you know,

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>offer a suite of things in one place.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Is that strategy working to.

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Convince software companies in particular that it's better it's come

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to paramount to networks then do business with a handful

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of different players.

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 10>Yes, of course it is working. We call that platformization APA.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 10>So we continue to at fifty to seventy five customers

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 10>every quarter and sometimes more in about the fourth quarter.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 10>But I think more importantly look at the evolution of technology.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 10>Almost every industry, vertical and technology has started that way.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 8>From the application.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 10>Perspective, people had fifteen or twenty different vendors that you

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 10>did the entire solutioning for CRM. Today we see single

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 10>vendors platforms in CRM, same thing in HR. And I

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 10>used to work in programming twenty five years ago. We

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 10>used to have multiple applications that solved the problem. Today

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 10>there's one platform, same thing in ITSM. I think the

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 10>same thing is coming to cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a twenty

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.959
<v Speaker 10>year old industry. It usually takes thirty thirty five years

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 10>to build that platform capability in industries and make them

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 10>become ubicuous.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 8>So I think we're the right place right time. We

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 8>are seeing that move towards platformization.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 10>If you look at what happened most recently a few

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 10>weeks ago, there was an attack using an ALLLM.

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 8>That means the I was used.

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 10>By bad actors to go and attack customers and they

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 10>were able to do it in real time. You have

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 10>to have real time capability on your side to defend yourself.

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 10>The only way to deliver real time capability in your

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 10>side is to not have a mess of forty or

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 10>fifty products. The idea is to have them all be consolidated,

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 10>running on a singular data layer, and building agents that

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 10>go and defend you, just the way bad actors are

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 10>using agents can attack you.

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 2>In case, we just very briefly dropped into negative territory

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and then as that one hundred having been up at

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>one point two point four percent.

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 4>And the story this.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Morning when I woke up was that in Vidia's forecast,

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 2>it's print with soothing fears that we have about an

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 2>AI market bubble. This might be the last chance I

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 2>get for a while, so I'm going to do it.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Give me the nikeshur nikesh Aurora.

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Cool. Are we or are we not? In an AI bubble?

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 8>Look, we are in an exuberant phase of AI.

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 10>I think it is the fastest technology evolution we've seen

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 10>in our lifetimes, and I don't think it's about to stop.

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 10>You can see huge bets being made by almost everybody.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a lot of promise.

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 10>You are seeing the consumer case, I think we underestimate

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 10>how much the entire consumer landscape is changing, and it's

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 10>going to change in the next twenty four months. The

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 10>idea of having applications where we have to go to

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 10>all the work ourselves is going to become our gane.

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, you'll have agents that'll go book your Uber,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 10>we'll go get your food from door dash, we'll book

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 10>your airline ticket. We can all imagine a future like that.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 10>We all want a future like that. It's going to

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 10>require significant amounts of compute at the end. So I

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 10>think from an infrastructure perspective, in history, if you've never

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 10>had a situation where we built infrastructure, it didn't get

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 10>consumed if we wanted more. So I don't think the

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure problem is a real problem. Whether the demand comes

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 10>right away or it comes an ear or two later,

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 10>I think that time will tell. But from a demand

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 10>from a technology fit, we're there. From an AI perspective,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 10>enterprises are slightly lagging that consumer adoption, but I think

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 10>they're actually working hard to get there. You know, every

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 10>time we do some AI experimentation internally, we come back

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 10>and say, Wow, that is cool. I wish we could

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 10>deploy that faster across the entire enterprise. So I think

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 10>the demand's going to come. The timing is up to

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 10>you guys. You guys follow that on a daily basis.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 8>We don't. We put our heads down and see where

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 8>am I going to be three to five years from now?

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 8>How do I position power out a network in that context?

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 8>And are we going to plot our way there?

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 10>And if we think that AI opportunity is going to

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 10>create explosive opportunity for almost every technology subsector and even cybersecurity.

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Palle alto network see Nikesha raw. It's great to have

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 2>you back on Bloomberg Tech. Thank you very much. Now

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 2>coming up, what more on in video is the company

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 2>is set to get a global boost from Middle East

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>steals for AI chips. We're going to get the house

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 2>view from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:14.439
<v Speaker 4>Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 2>The US has approved the sale of tens of thousands

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 2>of AI chips to the UAE in Saudi Arabia, a

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 2>move that could further cement in videos global dominance. Bloomberg

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence senior analyst con Jensavani wrights the US approval of

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell GPU's four golf stations quote is tangible proof of

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 2>sovereign AI momentum. What we're trying to do con Jan

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>is take that five hundred billion dollar figure which takes

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>us through Canada twenty six and find some upside and

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 2>you think it's in sovereign AI.

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 15>And just for context, as five hundred dollars figure was

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 15>already about five to six percent above consensus said of yesterday,

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 15>this new deals that they announced, the three to four

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 15>new deals mostly on the sovereign could add five around

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 15>billions of dollars on top of that if they were

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 15>able to execute well and the supply keeps coming.

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 3>On and yet shares and now down three tens of

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 3>a percent, we're negative. We were raised all of our

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 3>gains on the day. And then as that follows suit,

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.439
<v Speaker 3>why wasn't this enough to ease concerns? Do you think

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 3>what was there anything left that you needed to hear

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Knjin fundamentally know.

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 15>I mean, this was one of the more bullish quarters

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 15>or earnings we have seen from in media, not just

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 15>in terms of the three Q four Q numbers, which

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 15>by the way, they blew pass the loftiest byside bogies,

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 15>but reaffirming their five hundred billion target. The key point

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 15>that people are missing is holding gross margin to mid

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 15>seventies even when way for HBM packaging costs are all rising.

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 15>If you're able to hold that and execute that, that

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 15>speaks a lot about their pricing power.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I just want to play your samdbite from Gensuwang about

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Vera rub and listen to.

0:42:54.440 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 5>This billions of dollars. Yeah, and so for our Ruben system,

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 5>a one gig of our data center is probably something

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 5>along the lines of fifty to fifty five and vidious

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 5>contribution is probably about thirty five of that.

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.240
<v Speaker 2>That's data on some confusion for the cell side content.

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Just to explain your view on it real quick.

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, when you think about the total cost it takes

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 15>to build a data center, I mean we're talking about

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 15>fifty to sixty percent just going to one company taking

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 15>up a whole That bomb how important that is and

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 15>what that mode speaks to. I don't think the debate

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 15>around a sken GPU is going to go away, but

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 15>this should give some investors key factual data points that

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 15>despite we are going to see a future where companies

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 15>will do risk management and vendor diversity and have a

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 15>six or of second mertue supplier but the dominant share

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 15>will still go to.

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 3>N media contry and Savani. I'm pretty back intelligence me.

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Boomberg Tech ed

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 3>we are in negative territory to end the show.

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's an astonishing turnaround in the first couple of

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>hours the session. And as like one hundred now down

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 2>half percentage point and video downholf percentage point. That's worth

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a recap on the pod. You know where to find it.

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 2>From New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech