WEBVTT - Secret Fears and Q&A

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Hay yourballers.

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 2>If you haven't joined Stitcher Premium yet, now is the

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 2>perfect time. It gets you completely add free episodes of

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of shows like Comedy Bang Bang WTF with Mark

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Maren and Bitch Sesh a Real Housewives Breakdown. You also

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>get twenty one thousand hours of exclusive content new exclusive

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>originals like Freedom with hosts Scott Auckerman, Laura Lapkiz, and

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Paul F. Tompkins. They're launching every week for Premium members.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>If you love podcasts, you are missing out. Plus, most importantly,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>when you listen to add free episodes on Stitcher Premium,

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcasters get paid help support your favorite shows.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Enjoin Stitcher Premium today. You can get a free month

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of listening by going to Stitcherpremium dot com.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code verbal welcome to the Solid Verbal.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Come that for me. I'm a man, I'm forty. I've

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>heard so many players say why to be happy? You

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be happy? For day? Edith State is that

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>woo whoom?

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>And and Tye, welcome back to the Solid verbel boys

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and girls.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hilton brand joining me over there.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Where are you Dan? You're not in New York today,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are you I'm all over the place, Ty, we're talking mentally, emotionally, physically.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I do this, it becomes muscle memory.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm about to say New York City until I

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 2>realize that you're You're in Austin, Texas today.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The sun is beating down on me in Uta Country.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I just have some tacos. I'm I'm very happy to

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be in West Coast Kevin's house. Whoa in Austin, Texas?

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So is he? Hold on?

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Is he still West Coast Kevin despite the fact that

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>now he has moved to decidedly. Uh uh, that's a

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>good question.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Midwest Heartland, Great Plains, Southwest Hill Country. Yeah, he's on

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the east side of Austin, so he's not even on

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the west side of Austin. So I think that'd be disingenuous.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But we're still going to go with it because change

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is hard time sure, change is difficult. So how's Kevin?

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's Great West Coast Kevin, by the way, host the

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>House of Run. If you like track and Field, you

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should be listening to the House of Run, which is

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a play on words of Run's House, which has not

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>been on the air in quite some time. On MTV.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>You can read his work on flow track, and he's

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just a generally good guy. If you want Austin food

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>recommendations tweet, I think it's just k Sully seventy two

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>or House of Run. He'll get, he'll get you. Can

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we talk to him later? Is he around to talk

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about Yeah, we're gonna. I'm gonna. I'm gonna drag him

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>into this room and we're going to do so for

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>those who don't know, who are listening, who did not

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 1>see on Twitter, Facebook, or Reddit, we are doing sort

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of improved teams, not necessarily improved, but who you think

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>will be improved. We're also doing who you are secretly

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>scared of. So if you're a Michigan fan, you're not

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>scared of, You're not secretly scared of Ohio State. That

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>should be out in the open that a Michigan fan

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is scared of Ohio State, or a Washington fan

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is scared of Auburn, because that's an obvious team to

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be scared of. We wanted to hear from you regarding

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>your overlooked opponents that you're a little bit scared of.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk about that. Because you gave

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>us a lot of good answers, and then we asked

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for grilling, and so it's basically getting more specific from

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>last week grilling and outdoor eating tips and questions or whatever.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And we like to pretend we know what we're talking about.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the time we don't, so we're gonna

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>go with that absolutely.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>So also of note, starting next week, I may have

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>teased this a week too soon, but starting next week,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>we're actually going to start to get into some preseason stuff.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 2>How it's not going to be as in depth as

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>some of our team previews will be later as we

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>get into August and conference previews and all that, but

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>we have a cool concept that we're going to trot

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 2>out starting next week. It'll probably take us at least

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 2>two weeks to get through, but we're actually going to

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>start diving into a little bit of what you should

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>expect in the twenty eighteen season. So that's something you

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>have to look forward to. What to expect when you're expecting.

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right exactly.

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>We've also got some new merch that is forthcoming. It

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 2>is imminent courtesy of our friends over at Cotton Bureau.

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>They're going to help us blaunch a whole store, a

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of stuff, which is going to be a

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>ton of fun. It's going to continue all throughout the preseason,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>regular season, offseason, basically the foreseeable future. We will have

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>new merch at the ready if you're interested in supporting

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the verbal and donning it out in public, So that

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>is forthcoming, a new website courtesy of our friends over

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>at Superboss. I just talked to Sean from Superboss today.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot of cool things happening. We're about

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to happen out at Soliverbal dot com. And of course

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we announced the live show date and we've got a

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>bunch of people allow us out yep, August eleventh in Chicago,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of people checking things out, venues out, helping

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>us out on the ground, and hopefully we'll have a

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit more information on that in the very near future,

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 2>but for the time being anyway, a ton of people

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 2>have expressed interest out on the Facebook event that we

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>haphazardly created just to gather folks interests, and we're excited

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have to start putting that show together.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Lickety split. Best place to find out up to the date,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in up to date information on the live show merchandise website.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Everything going on with the show would be the newsletter

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of intent.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Newsletter of Intent, which you can find if you go

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to the Facebook page and click on sign up, or

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 2>if you go to our still active older version of

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>solid verbal dot com. Well on the right hand rail,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>you'll see a sign up form sign up for the newsletter.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>We promise we'll post all the updates there. All the

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 2>pertinent information will get sent out through the newsletter.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>First, should we get just jump in? Let's jump in dead.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>First off, we have brading news. You didn't. I like

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're not even playing the sounds because as you are,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>just I haven't found my overwhelming force of nature. I

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have not found my soundboard yet. Oh okay, that's a

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>good excuse. Someday our competitors might invest in production value

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>ties so we can't fall behind. Someday. That was mean. No,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that was mean. So I stand by everything. Do you

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get into news? So there?

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there were two I guess related bits of breaking

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>news on the NC double A front. Both pertain to transfers,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and I guess by extension red shirts.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But I guess yeah, directly and indirect transfers. Yeah, so

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>transfers are going to be easier. And what this amounts to,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm reading directly from the ESPN dot com article,

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>student athletes will now have the ability to transfer without

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>asking for permission, like real life human beings. This is

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole thing.

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>For as long as I can remember, if you wanted

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>to transfer, you had to go to your school or

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 2>your coach, and they had the right to restrict where

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you could transfer. Again, a whole thing. There's a new

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>process now that's going to take effect in October, and

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it allows an athlete to notify his current school of

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>his desire to transfer. Then the school is required to

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>enter the student's name into a database within two business days.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I love that they specify that.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>And then upon being entered into that database, college coaches

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>can just go out and contact any athlete freely without permission.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like the waiver wire in your fantasy league, Dan,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what this is going to turn into. It clearly

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>gives more independence, more rights to any.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Students up the process.

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, any student athlete who is actively seeking a transfer.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think I think this is a net positive.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a very good thing for students

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>who are pursuing an kind of transfer.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's it's not sort of a cart blanche thing

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because conferences can still sort of institute their own rules,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of process, it certainly speeds things up

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and helps kids who want to transfer and gauge with

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>coaches at potential destination. So I think it's a it's

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a good thing.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>The other bit of this is that there is a

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>new red shirt rule, And what this amounts to is

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>this is great. Yeah, somebody, a kid can play up

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to four games without burning a red shirt, which is

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me, and I thought about this all afternoon.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to turn into like a September call

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>up like we see in Major League Baseball? Could it

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>turn into like a November, a late November a bowl

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>season call up in college football?

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's a number of different ways that this can

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>be interpreted or instituted. Really. One of them, obviously, is

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>when you have games against teams that you're not terribly

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>worried about, if it's an FCS game early on or

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in the case of a number of SEC teams, I

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have schedules in front of me, but that November weekend,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the SoCon weekend that you can, you know, play a

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>starter for a quarter or not even play a starter

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>who might be nursing an injury, where you can have

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>depth that you didn't necessarily have in years past to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of what you might have in a

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>red shirt player. And maybe that's it's better in November,

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>where you have a better sense of that player on

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a scout team or throughout practice for a couple of months.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's early on in the season to see whether

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or not a potential red shirt should be an actual

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>red shirt or an actual contributor, because the talent is there.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's to find out whether or not. In the

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>case of I think Khalil Tait, somebody had talked about

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>this that it just wasn't a good practice player, but

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a gamer, and maybe you have somebody like

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that forever. Reason rises to the occasion once he is

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>between the lines, you know. I saw a couple of

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>people mentioned about Jalen Hurts where he could actually play

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>three four games and still take a red shirt and

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>graduate and transfer out of Alabama after the season exactly,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>stay fresh and showcase abilities and in ways perhaps that

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't before. So I think there are situations like that,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I think it's going to help in terms of,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a guy plays four games and breaks his

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>ankle and is unable to play the rest of the year,

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but can still maintain another year of eligibility that he

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise previously would not have had. Right now, I think

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious to see if coaches get creative with it,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>very curious to see if this is something that comes

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 2>into play again later in the year, depending on situations. Clearly,

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>what we saw with Tua this past season was not

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly the norm, but you can envision a scenario in

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 2>which there's somebody who's a red shirt that could be

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 2>of service to a team, maybe even in a particular package,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a particular situation come gain down the stretch.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just very curious to see if there's any bit

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of strategicy that goes on with this new four game rule.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we'll have a better sense as fans, we'll

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have a better sense for players that, oh, there's a

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of hype around this red shirt and what he

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>was able to do in practice, when ultimately practice is

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>important doesn't mean a ton As for future success in

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cases. Also, like let's say a team

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>who's not going to be all that good this year.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Give me a team, I don't know, Rutgers or something.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't expect Illinois that we don't expect a ton

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>from perhaps once they just are definitely not going to

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be eligible for a bowl game once they go to

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>two and seven or something like that. But they have

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a promising blue chip quarterback or something like that who

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they're red shirting now all of the sudden, especially schedule

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't crazy. Yes, four games's two last three and just

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like get some game rhythm, game experience, get that sort

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of speed of the game thing updated a little bit.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It's it's entirely possible that. And that's the September call

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>up thing telling you get a sense, yeah, but in November. Yeah,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the November call up, I guess we can. Yeah, the

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Sepvember call up, we can.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>We can be the first to coin that if it

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 2>hasn't already, Yes, November call up. All right, well, we'll

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 2>have to keep an eye on that. In other NCAA news,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't to you know, players transferring a red shirt,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>but three more bowl games are coming Our way. We've

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 2>had arguments with folks on Twitter who think there should

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>be fewer games, But starting in twenty twenty, it looks

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 2>like the total Bowl games will now increase two forty three.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 2>There'll be three more. According to our friend Brett McMurphy,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Chicago and Myrtle Beach reportedly are in line to get

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Bowl games. They could be two of the three sites. Chicago,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>if they got it, would play it at Wrigley Field,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of cool.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been in Chicago in late December. It's it's literally cool.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>It's literally really cool. It's extremely cool, cooler than being cool. Yeah. Yeah,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it does increase the likelihood.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That we're going to see more five and seven teams

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>getting into these Bowl games. Teams again five and seven

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>final record losing records. But I am long past the

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 2>point of really caring about whether or not a five

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and seven team gets in. I've gotten to this point

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>because we've talked to a lot of reporters, a lot

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of coaches, and in particular a lot of players who

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>all lax poetic about the Bowl experience and what that

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>means to a college athlete. Many of them talk about

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>how good of an experience that was how memorable it

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>was and how it really influenced them in a positive way.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So if there's a means to do this, if it's

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 2>not setting anyone back, I say, I say go for it.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And I'm always in favor of more football doing a

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>college football podcast, so what the hell?

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's in their exhibition TV shows that you don't

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have to watch having strong opinions about a five and

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>seventeen they don't deserve. It's like, it's almost as if

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting angry that, like Blue Bloods is getting a

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>spin off and you never really watch blue Bloods in

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the first place, Like blue What who cares about blue

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloods in a spin off? Exactly? Orange Bloods set in Miami,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I have never end honestly, just oh Orange Bloods. Didn't

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>even realize I was gonna go, yep, hook them. But

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's getting angry over something that you weren't even caring

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about in the first place and didn't need to patronize

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in the at all in late December. So whatever, it's fine.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's a great city. Myrtle Beach, I'm sure is a

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>good time if you're coming from a cold weather place

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's just just have fun. It's it's more time

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for college students putting themselves in harm's way to have fun.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Get a couple of eye slides along the way. Yeah right,

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>In other news, former five star Clemson quarterback Hunter Johnson

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>has announced he is transferring to Northwestern. This is a

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty significant move for the Northwestern Wildcats. They're hoping to

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 2>get Clayton Thorson back from an injury in twenty eighteen

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and have him be the starter as he's been yep,

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 2>but come twenty nineteen they're gonna need a new quarterback.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 2>And Hunter Johnson was formerly the number one pocket passer

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in the class of twenty seventeen, the number twenty one

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>overall player in that twenty seventeen class.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is a blue chip recruit who's signing on

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to play.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 2>He'll have three years of eligibility left after he sits

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>out the twenty eighteen campaign. He's from the Midwest, so

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>he's close to home. If in fact, Pat Fitzgerald can

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>spin some gold here out of Hunter Johnson, this is

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a pretty significant pickup for them.

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It is, and I'm not sure like they've always recruited

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>well enough like quarterback there's not a lot of Northwestern

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>teams you're like they're good other than the quarterback. Quarterback

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>play has always been pretty solid, not spectacular, but pretty

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>solid these past few years. And the fact that they're

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>led by their defense, the fact that coming in he

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>should have more talent than any Northwestern quarterback ever in

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of raw material, raw talent. The problem to me

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been that Northwestern hasn't been able to develop kids

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they're beating or hanging with I mean,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you watched Northwestern beat Notre Dame. I don't know if

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that's still a tender spot for you. But Northwestern has

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>developed kids to the point where they're competitive with the

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>best of college football, or at least the highest level

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of college football. The thing I'm concerned about, and I

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have the music at the ready. You certainly don't

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because you don't have a soundboard. It's not the people

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on the field that worry me about Northwestern. It's the

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>people with the laminated play cards and the headsets on

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>offense that worry me about Northwestern the past five years.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the disappointment. So this is there. This is

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a total offense against FBS teams yards per play a

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly not bulletproof metric, but something along the way of that.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Twenty thirteen seventy fourth, okay, around average time sure, twenty fourteen,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty second, two thy fifteen, one hundred

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and twentieth, twenty sixteen eighty eight, twenty seventeen ninety third yep,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and that's with an experienced quarterback. Last year, Justin Jackson

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously was a home run threat a lot of the time.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if it's been a talent thing or

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a we need to change things up on offense. And

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that's the case going into this year, because to

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get into a rhythm for next year when they do

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>have Hunter Johnson would be a pretty big deal for

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a Northwestern team That year in a year out is

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good. All right.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Elsewhere quarterback news Virginia Tech Josh Jackson may not be

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>eligible because of a quote academic issue. It depends where

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>you look about this news topic here. I think, for

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>what it's worth, Virginia Tech remains pretty optimistic that he'll

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>still be eligible and able to play. He was still

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>with the team as of like a week ago. He

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been suspended or anything like that. It sounds like

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>it's the kind of thing they're trying to work through.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So as of now, everything that I've seen, they're fairly

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>optimistic that he's still going to be the starter. But

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>certainly something to watch if you're an ACC fan, if

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>you're a Virginia Tech fan. Josh Jackson had a pretty

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>promising campaign a year ago through for like twenty nine

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards twenty touchdowns. Clearly a young kid still trying

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>to find his rhythm, but that would be a pretty

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>big blow for Justin Flinte.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, essentially no experience behind him in any sort of

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. They opened up the season against Florida State.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They were that offense took a pretty big step back

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>after I guess what the Duke game. They scored ten

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>against Miami, twenty two against Georgia Tech, twenty against Pitt

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>ten against Virginia, twenty one against Oklahoma State, so that

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a prolific offense the back half of the

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>season with I think some pretty good talent. So that

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>would be a pretty significant setback for both Josh Jackson

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Hokies. But the schedule is not terrible. Other

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>than that opening game against Florida State the first half

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year, so who knows. And finally a bit

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of somber news here. But you may have read stories

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago about Jordan McNair from Maryland,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the offensive lineman. He collapsed during a team workout. He

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has now passed away. Oh so awful.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks after that happens, So thoughts some prayers out

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to his family and the entire Maryland family. You hate

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>to read about this kind of thing, and it, unfortunately

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is something that happens. But man, what a bit of

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 2>terrible news for that Maryland program sad to hear it?

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Country Lucky Stars, it's a tough place. I hate

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>to hear it. Absolutely Okay.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>On that weird note, Dan, if we could go to

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the questions let's do it that we got

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 2>from the verballerhood now again reiterate or what kind of

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 2>questions we put the call out for, Whether the solid

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>verbal bat signal went up for questions of a of

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>a certain particular theme here.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, secret fear, who are you secretly scared of? Yes,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so we're not talking are you scared of? This season?

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>What we're not talking like you're scared of spiders. We're

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about what team are you? Are you a little

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>bit less excited to see on the schedule, then you

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>might think you could be scared of Richmond, and in

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that case, right right, scared of spiders. Pretty decent situation. Okay,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>who are you secretly scared of? Not the major teams

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on your schedule, with the teams that are perhaps overlooked

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or sandwiched. You know that let down, look ahead sandwich situation.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I do have one of those in our in our questions,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a prime let down, look ahead sandwich situation. So

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>there is let's get into it real quick. We have

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of overlapped questions and teams that multiple fans

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of the same team are scared of. We also have

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>candidates for improvement and a couple of random questions, and

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then be we'll get into the grilling and outdoor eating

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>questions with of course non West Coast West Coast Kevin.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure, all right, So Ryan sends in as a Penn

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>State fan, I'm secretly scared of app State in the

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>first game, Yes, Ryan, I am not.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Penn State wins that game going away by three touchdowns.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>What would concern you most about Penn State. We have

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good concept for app State, just because opening

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>week against a frisky team with the infrastructure of a

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>good defense, losing a defensive coordinator, new quarterback for app State,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but who is what is excuse me, the vulnerability in

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a game where you know, even James Franklin's not going

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to know how a new look Penn State team is

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look in week one. You know they there's

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of turnover on defense. Yep.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Some of the veteran leadership is gone now, and of

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>course Saquon Barkley is the headliner drafted number two overall

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 2>by the New York Football Giants, but they've got plenty

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of depth behind him to pick up at least some

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the slack trace bick Sorely being there is a pretty

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 2>big deal. Will he will continue the tradition of the

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>last two seasons now and I think propel them to

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>great things. So I am actually not at all concerned

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>about this football game. There's clearly going to be some

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>turnover that they're going to have to adjust for and

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>develop over the course of the season. But AP State

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Week one does not scare me. The game's in State College,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 2>which can cover up a lot of sins. So I'm

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>okay with this game, Ryan, don't worry.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fair enough? I mean, yeah, the concern is week

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>one cob Webs, a new play caller obviously on offense

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Moore had gone, and what if those Tommy

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Stevens shovel passes don't turn out? Alright? What happens then?

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the plan?

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Be Ty?

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, Joshua says, as a Georgia fan, I am

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>secretly terrified about Week two against South Carolina? Can you

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>whisper it's going to be okay? In my ear please,

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 2>I'll just be over here in the fetal position. Thanks.

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So all right, josh Well here's the deal. Yeah, Daniel,

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>let me ask you, are you afraid?

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What are you afraid of? The most?

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>If you are a Georgia fan as it relates to

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina, what about South Carolina scares you? Other than

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the game I believe is in South Carolina,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it's in Columbia.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. So besides that point, it's a new look

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina offense without Kurt Roper, who has let go?

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Brian McClendon who takes over, so they're

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>going to play faster. South Carolina has recruited, well, this

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is a new look offense, and the fact is South

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is going to be at its healthiest. So Georgia

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously has the depth that South Carolina doesn't have, so

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge advantage. October, November whatever. So South Carolina

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>should be healthy. They're talented enough at least that first

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven on defense Debo's back for South Carolina. I've given

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like four answers, but I think the health and experience,

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the healthy experience, I think should be the biggest thing

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for South Carolina that should worry Georgia in week two.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And also Georgia is gonna murder Austin P in week one,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but it should be noted, really good story last year

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Austin p going from zero to eleven and twenty sixteen

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to eight and four and twenty seventeen with like a

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty one year old head coach. I think his name

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is Will Keely. Just it's very tangential to the question

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>at hand, But Georgia might take a few weeks to

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>really get into a rhythm with a new look defense.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I could totally see that happening. I think it's an

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting game to bet the home dog, and I'm sure

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about our previews, definitely it's something that

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>we can bring up. But early in the year a

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>bit of an adjustment again, some turnover on the Georgia side.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina will be fine. They do have some turnover

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 2>on their defensive front that I think will be okay

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in the long term because Will musch Champ does defense

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty well. You're right in saying that the offense might

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit more wide open. But all in all,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Georgia wins the game. But I think it's

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a really good opportunity to go home dog because South

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Carolina at home is probably going to be getting like

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>thirteen fourteen points. I can see that game being a

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>little closer.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure, absolutely, all.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Right, Mike says FSU fan here. I am secretly scared

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>about Boston College after the beatdown we got last year.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Steve Dazio continues to keep BC moving

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 2>in the right direction? How do you think BC will

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 2>fare against FSU's new look offense. Can I answer this

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>question with a question of my own?

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Please?

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Do are we sure that BC's moving in the right

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>direction under Steve Doz.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, why are you so sure they're a ball team?

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the right direction. That's great, ty, come on, be

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>happy it's summer. But do you feel like they're getting

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that much better from year to year? So they developed

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the best freshman running backs in the country

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>last year, probably one of the best one twenty running

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>backs in the country in aj dillonfishent State, healthy, workman

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like whatever. Harold Landry developed really nicely on defense. You know,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the depth isn't going to be there. That's two players,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>which is great, two players. Anthony Brown was not particularly

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>good last year other than the Florida State game, so

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's I guess maybe a little bit worrisome. Yes, if

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Boston College is on a bowl streak, which I believe

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>they are, that at least on a very surface level,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>tells me that there's good momentum. I don't know if

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally convinced about that. Listen, they're in the ACC

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>so they're never going to win double digit games under

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Steve Adazio. That's not a hot take. It'd be wonderful

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>if they did because it's something new and novel, but

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Bowl eligibility tie is positive momentum in Chestnut Hill.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Here is what strikes me about that Boston College game

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>for Florida State. I'm not so much worse worried about

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Boston College winning the football game as I am Florida

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 2>State potentially being worn out because listen to this stretch

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of games that they've got.

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's what's coming up? What's the body blow?

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Here is what Florida State has before that game October

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventh, home against Clemson, biggest game on the schedule.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>The next week they're on the road at NC State

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>for Ryan Finley's like fifteenth year of eligibility.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's absolutely right. That's a huge letdown look ahead Sandwich.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>No matter what happens.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Saturday, November tenth, the week after at Notre Dame, which

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>should be I would think a pretty big game as well.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>And then they come back home the week after against

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Boston College the game in question, and then the week

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 2>after they've got their rivalry game at home but against Florida.

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of ammo there on the schedule Boston

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 2>College and a prime letdown look ahead spot. I still

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 2>think Florida State by that point later in the year

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 2>is good enough to just buwl them over. But there's

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 2>at least a question in my mind as to what

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 2>might happen there. But I still feel pretty confident.

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It's an ideal scenario other than the Tallahassee thing. I

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because I am a believer and it hurts me to

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>say this. In Willie Taggart's offense, like, I think what

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>he brings to Florida State is so much needed change.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And even if they don't get wonderful quarterback play either

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>out of either DeAndre frans Bola or James Blackman, there's

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>enough there that they should especially by then. Like if

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at what Oregon looked like when fully healthy

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>against and we can compare Boston College to some of

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the not so impressive teams that Oregon played when Justin

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Herbert was healthy last year, I would imagine they will

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be happy to be in a rhythm against a team

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>without the talent of Notre Dame, NC State, Clemson, etc.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Agree Dan, all right, let's one I think they could play,

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but it is ideal for Boston College scenario wise.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Ben says he's scared of Boise State ruining

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>his birthday when the Broncos visit Stillwater in Oklahoma State.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. I looked at this game. I'm equally as

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>terrified Ben. I gotta be honest.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Boise State brings back enough to feel pretty good

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>about what they're.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Going to do on offense. I e. Brett Rippen coming back,

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good quarterback. Mm hm. In Stillwater.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>If you're Mike Gundy, you've got a ton of turnover,

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 2>not the least of which is Mason Rudolph is now

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Pittsburgh Steelers, and you're going to be starting.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I believe Taylor Cornelius great name, will clearly end up

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>being Yukon Cornelius in this show.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Big dude six six, like two point thirty. But early

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in the year, I think a really low point spread,

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>probably single digits under a touchdown, could see it happening

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>where Boise State pulls an upset. They're going to be

0:29:58.120 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the best group of five team this year.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's fully true. I mean, I

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>still like UCF, I still like Houston Memphis. There's a

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lot I like. But yes, I think Boise State has

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a very good claim to that. Boise has not much

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>going in I think they have Yukon the week before.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State has even less. They have South Alabama coming

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in the week before. It's in still Water. The big

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is is, you know Cornelis, whoever ends up starting

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for Oklahoma State, what's his poise like? Because Boise States,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they're essentially led by their defensive line, the fact that

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they have a ton of talent and experience there and

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>return a quarterback in Brett Rippon, are well coached, and

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not much Boise State has to lose. They're going

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>too still Water. That's not like it's a playoff elimination

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>game for Boise So I think they can play with

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a little less abandoned. So I would happily take those points,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Moving on, Matthew says he's scared of Ohio State's post

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Penn State stretch. Okay, post Penn State stretch and the

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>way here's how he's labeled it. He says Indiana is

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>a chaos team, Minnesota has PJ Fleck looking for a

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 2>big win, and Purdue on the road is Jeff Brom.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He just says Jeff Bram here in parentheseason. That's the

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>worrisome thing.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, I looked at this a little bit more closely,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I fully agree. I think it's giving

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Indiana alog it's given him a lot of credit.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, PJ.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Fleck, Okay, maybe he starts building something. Maybe he built

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>like a quarterback on what he did a year ago. But

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the game is in Ohio Stadium, and again, who's playing quarterback?

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Ross Aids Stadium before a bye week in West Lafayette

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>could be interesting, but still Ohio States should be fairly

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>well loaded by that point in the season, like they'll

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>have it mostly figured out by the time they get

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the Halloween weekend. It's actually the games after that that

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>terrify me the most. Of course, Yeah, Nebraska at Michigan,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>State at Maryland, which we're gonna I think talk about

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Maryland a little bit later, and then the game back home.

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>But Michigan, who knows what we're going to get out

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 2>of Michigan. I'm not all that worried about those three

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>games after Penn.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 1>State, I'm not worried about Purdue. If I'm an Ohio

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>State fan. At this point, there's nothing Yeah, as you mentioned,

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing great leading in, there's nothing great the immediate

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>week after with a bye week there and The thing

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a bummer about Purdue is they were for as

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.479
<v Speaker 1>much credit as I think Jeff Brom rightfully deserves for

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being innovative and interesting on offense, it was the defense

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that led that team last year, and they replace a ton,

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>especially up front. So it feels like, you know, everybody

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>thinks when there's a new coach, like, wow, the first

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>year is going to be sort of an experimentation, rebuilding

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>type beer. But offensively produce should be a little bit

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>better in year two. But defensively, I think they're going

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to take a step back, and that's really what led

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>their sort of exciting resurgence last year. So I'm not

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>buying Prudue as being secretly scary right now.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 2>A and M fan Sean says that Arkansas makes him

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>nervous because John Chavis knows the defensive personnel and Chad

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Morris for several reasons. He says they will have plenty

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 2>of motivation to beat us. Does it seem legit or

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 2>is the talent gap too big for Arkansas? I think

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.239
<v Speaker 2>this is a legit concern. One of the things that

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>we talked about when Chad Morris came over from SMU

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>is how we both saw potential for Arkansas to be

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that sort of wild card team, you know, like, ah,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>they might not be consistent, but they're gonna beat somebody,

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and A and M with their turnover, they've got a

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>lot coming back. But could totally see a situation in

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 2>which A and M's beaten up from playing Alabama the

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 2>week before and Arkansas just sort of finds a way

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to wear him down in the line.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, I mean, at what point point as A and

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>m Arkansas ever normal? No, it's it's in a TNT,

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe once again, it's that Cowboy Championship Classic thing,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever they call it. Yeah, it's gonna go to three overtimes,

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get weird and wacky, and sure, no matter

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>who's coaching any of the teams involved, that should worry

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you because it's A and m Arkansas. Yeah, the perpetual

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>worry game. Yeah, A m Arkansas, I'm with you.

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Nathan says he's a Notre Dame fan from Indiana. It

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 2>seems like people out of state don't realize that there's

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 2>a perdue Notre Dame rivalry between fans. That being said,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it pains him to admit that Purdue might be a

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 2>fun team to watch this year. Notre Dame does not

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 2>play Perdue this year, but I do agree. I was

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>all in on the Purdue thing a year ago and

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited to see where they go in twenty eighteen.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Jeff Brohm's an incredible coach, and we've talked

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 2>at nauseam about the cindularity here the sinularity.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 1>And if Jeff Brohm has a good year this year,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gone. I don't know if he'll ever be playing

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>against Notre Dame, coaching against Notre Dame and Ross, but listen,

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>who knows hope for the best, similarly Notre Dame. This

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is just on the topic of scheduling. Why does Notre

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Dame make us such a disaster out of their skale?

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>From Ivan? Why not drop Stanford or Navy? And I'm

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>not looking for the typical we owe Navy right? Yeah?

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there any reason should Notre Dame make their schedule

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>easier or do they have to make their schedule what

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it is in order to maintain the credibility of independence.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to. Yeah, I think they have to,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm with you all they want to see it

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>at that playoff table.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with the Ivan. There are definitely years in

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 2>which and it's mostly every year if we're being honest,

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 2>where I look at the schedule and I'm like, man,

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 2>that's that situation is not going to play out well.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 2>You can see the writing on the wall. But at

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the same time, if you are Notre Dame, if you

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 2>do play such a high price on your own independence,

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 2>I think is something you have to do if you

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>want to try and compete for national championship. Otherwise gonna

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 2>find yourself in a situation later in the year where

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>we're arguing this top four thing out and Notre Dame

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 2>is left out of the conversation because they didn't maybe

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 2>have a game like a Stanford.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Brendan says his Notre Dame fan fear is Northwestern because

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of a letdown, look ahead Sandwich situation, after Navy, the

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>body the Notre Dame, the classic Notre Dame body blow situation,

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and before Florida State and that game is in Evanston yep.

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Brendan's onto something with that, something

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with that fear one hundred percent. What week is that

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in the in the season that Octmber, first week of November,

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>first week in November. Yeah, that's when Northwestern is getting

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a little frisky. Sure, absolutely, a night game.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Hold on one other thing, yeah, place a night game

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the week before against Navy.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. That game is being played in San Diego,

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of course it is. Yeah, all right, I mean it

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>does make sense with the Navy base there, but yeah,

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego. So there's travel involved. They're flying back

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>cross country, not like a true cross country flight. It's

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>not like the pure NFL scenario where you're going from

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>San Diego pretty far. It's pretty far from San Diego.

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 2>And just saying there's a lot there that makes you

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 2>potentially a little bit squeamish. And oh, by the way,

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 2>after that Florida State game in Notre Dame, the Irish

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 2>are back on the road. They play the game in

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the like the non Pinstripe Bowl Pinstripe Bowl in Yankee

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Stadium against Syracuse before traveling back across country to square

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>off against usc.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Final game of the year. Are you gonna go to

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Yankee Stadium game? Yeah, you're a Yankee fan in

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a Notre Dame. I'm not going to that game, mister mainstream,

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to that game. Who should Michigan be

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>more worried about on their schedule, aside from the big ones,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>which is Ohio State, Michigan State, Penn State, Notre Dame

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is from Abbot long time for baller, just crowd favorite

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Abbot Skelding, Nebraska, Northwestern Indiana. What do you think? Not

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Indiana at this point? Probably Nebraska's pretty early on, right,

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's not week one or two. I want to

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>say it's like week four. It's week four, yeah, second

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to last week of September. And I will also say

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska has there is another letdown look ahead situation. I

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have it in front of me, but I'm almost

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>positive Nebraska has Colorado, who shouldn't be all that good,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know they're well coached. Who knows they have Colorado?

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And then I think a Troy good Troy team once

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>again who beat LSU last year. New quarterback for Troy,

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of remaining pieces before that Michigan game.

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So disadvantage for Nebraska right there with a letdown look ahead,

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but who knows. I still think the highest ceiling of

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>those teams in terms of existing structure is Northwestern. It's

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>probably Northwestern. Yeah, where is that game? The game is

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at Northwestern. Actually, yes, okay, weird Kyle field Day. Who

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>knows what else we got here? Let's go to Libby,

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>another crowd favorite. Yeah, secretly terrified of Fau for Oklahoma's

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>home open, our first game without Baker Mayfield against a

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>motivated Fau. Is this an irrational fear? I think it's

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty warranted, ty not a rational link Kiffinlank Kiffin? What

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about here? Is now associated with the

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Weiss family. Charlie Weiss junior, who is your younger brother's

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>younger brother.

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Have you started looking at our fantasy things for twenty eighteen?

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I think Charlie Weiss somehow, some way

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.919
<v Speaker 2>being involved in our fantasy draft, even if it's Charlie

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Weiss Junior, has to be a thing.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I am excited for the possibility. If there is going

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a Brian Colangelo esque burner controversy in college

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>football this year one, you know it's going to be

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>within the orbit of Lane Kiffin, and it'll probably be

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin if it's not, because and you know this

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because you're somewhat local to it. Having Charlie Weiss Junior,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>have Charlie Weiss who I believe lives in Florida somewhere

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with the ability Charlie Weiss with a burner account defending

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>his son, like if there's weird play calling against Oklahoma,

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's weird, you know, there's some strange situation, that's

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the obvious pick for a college football burner because you

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>have the Kiffen and you have the father something with

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four year old twenty five year old and

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>do not get either one of us wrong. It's good

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>for everybody if we have like this crazy success story

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of a twenty five year old offensive coordinator. But that's

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>where my money would be.

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 2>A Charlie Weiss's senior scenario is odds on favorite to

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>forget to switch accounts on his phone, thinks he's tweeting

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 2>from his own personal or vice versa, and accidentally tweets

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 2>out the wrong thing.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, gives the whole game away. Yeah, Yes, Fau is

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in a good position. They'll have a new quarterback. Jason

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Driscoll retired. But I want to say it's Chris Robison

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>who transferred from Oklahoma after not really I don't think

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he just like enrolled in Oklahoma, had never even played

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or was really with the team, and then the Florida

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>State transferred DeAndre Johnson. I forget his name. I'm a

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>bad host and everybody already knows that. But FAU is

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>loaded with high ish level power five talent in multiple

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 1>spots early on against an Oklahoma team that is much

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more talented. From one to eighty five, I'm probably gonna

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>go Oklahoma that they might be close for two and

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a half quarters, but Oklahoma gets into a rhythm and

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>pulls away, probably by seventeen to twenty one points. So

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand the fear, but I think in the end

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll be all right.

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, So why don't we do this? I'm going

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to read our sponsor message, please do. Then let's get

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 2>to like one or two none? Who are you afraid

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of college football questions? Okay, I got a bunch more,

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and then I want to bring in there. Then I

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>want to bring in no longer West coast Kevin, Yes,

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 2>to help us answer the ring. So west of us

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 2>well west of Soliverble Headquarters.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Sure? Correct? Dan? When do you want to start paying

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>less interest on your credit card debt? Heysap? How about today?

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm with today with a credit card consolidation loan from

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 2>our good friends over at light Stream. Light Stream rewards

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 2>consumers who have good credit with a great interest rate

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 2>and no fees. You can get a credit card consolidation

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 2>loan from five point four to nine percent APR. With

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 2>auto pay, you could save thousands of dollars in interest.

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 2>The application is one hundred per sent online. You can

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 2>even get your funds as soon as today. Our listeners

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 2>can get an additional interest rate discount on top of

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 2>light Streams already low rates. The only way to get

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 2>this discount is to go to lightstream dot com slash Solid.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 2>That's l I G H T S t R E

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 2>A M dot com slash Solid. All the usual disclaimer

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>stuff applies so subject to credit approval. The rate includes

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a point five percent autopay discount available only when you

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 2>select autopay prior to the loan.

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Funding.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Terms and conditions it offers are subject change without notice.

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Visit lightstream dot com for important information about limits on

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 2>light Stream loans and same day funding. But again check

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 2>it out get your discount Lightstream dot com slash Solid.

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going, Dan, Let's go elsewhere? How about that? Yeah?

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Here we go? Uh, we want to go Okay, do

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have a list of your top five running backs this season?

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I have mine. This is from Patrick just a quick

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>little ranking time like Bryce Love, JK. Dobbins, Jonathan Taylor

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tail back, can't forget him horse Yep. I don't know

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if cam Akers is my top five, but I love

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>cam Akers. I'll put him in my top five top

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>five ceiling. Yeah, we mentioned AJ Dillon.

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I think he'll he'll certainly have numbers because they're gonna

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 2>give the ball every play. But like Miles Gaskin, Rodney Anderson,

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Damien Harris, there's so many names. It's a very good

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 2>year for running backs in college football.

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I would have Gaskin and Harris after Dobbins, Taylor

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Love, not in any particular order other than Love

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>number one. It's a yeah, it's a It's a pretty

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hardy class of running backs nationally. It's spread out pretty evenly,

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>which is nice. You know, Travis CTN I think has

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the potential to be up there. What happens? Sure, Uh,

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a good question. I really like this one

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:02.479
<v Speaker 1>from three people from Todd, John and Dennis. Wow, that'd

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>be great. They are going on a football pilgrimage, which

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing more and more about like as a secondary

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>bachelor bachelorette type situation, very much a thing that people

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>are talking to us about. They're making a good trip,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>They're going to College Station, which I think is I'm

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>not crazy about the town of college Station, not for

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>any real reason. Just didn't do it for me. But

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a game at Kyle Field is a terrific time, huge game.

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I would just spend more time in Houston. I would

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just come in for the game, watch the game, chill out.

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>If you want to eat well and having that hour

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half two hour proximity to Houston, you go

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to Hugos and eat Mexican food. You go eat some

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Vietnamese crawfish wherever you can. There's a place called Crawfish

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Noodles that just go wild in Houston eating and seeing

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the various, crazy, diverse neighborhoods. That would be my recommendation.

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 2>He also adds at the back end of this email. Yeah,

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 2>now I'm not sure if it's Todd, John or Dennis

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 2>all three years here as part of the email, but

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 2>he says, my son, so someone in this group is

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:12.760
<v Speaker 2>missing his Honors Society induction. To keep the pilgrimage streak alive, Dan.

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's right. I think that's the right move.

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I was president of my honor society in high school. Really,

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I was Would you rather have gone to an induction

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>ceremony or to Houston, to Mexicanowood and to watch a

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>major college for one college football? Yeah? You can't. In

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of your your building memories, You're just collecting memories

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>along the way. And I think this is more valuable

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>than an honor society induction.

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let's start here, Dan, let's go to

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 2>non football questions.

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what is the topic, du jure? The topic

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>appears to be grilling? Yeah, grilling is West Coast Kevin available.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>West Coast Kevin's making, I mean, appropriately enough a quick

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>grocery store run hellby. I'm going to drag him in

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>here as soon as he gets back. All right, Well,

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>let's start here. Have you ever used it's a public grill? Why?

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Or why not? Have you? I never have?

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, Ty, I'm I'm I'm not sure i'd

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 2>ever really want to up in your ivory castle.

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen those things? Sure? They're fine? And listen, Ty,

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you if they are like caked on and really gross.

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You just throw a piece of foil on top. It's fine.

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Throw some foil and some cooking spray, olive oil spray, whatever,

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and the charkath if your burgers or dogs, yeah, you

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>have some charcoal. You bring your own charcoal, you light

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it up, and you cook meat and or vegetables over Firetie.

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 2>How would you score your own aptitude when it comes

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to grilling?

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I like, I'm a B plus, Okay,

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I would not throw myself a parade, but yeah, I've

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:56.359
<v Speaker 1>done it at parks before. And my current apartment has

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like a communal grill that I've used actually a good amount.

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But you you clean it when you're done. Everybody seems

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty respectful. It's a nice girl. It's a

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>gas girl. So this one's not charcoal. So you make

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>sure you turn off the propane, you make sure you

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>turn off all the burners, you clean up after yourself,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and everybody seems to do a good job. It's wonderful, Tie.

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>It would be fun if we could somehow organize like

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a beat Bobby Flay style grilling competition between you and I.

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the like we would have to

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be like the same and like chicken thighs. What would

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to make like a flank steak? I had

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not thought about what I would like to make Dan,

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. But what are you most confident

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in in your grilling ability? I'm very confident at the

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>grilled steak. I mean, I know it's a I know

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a common thing. But and you'r do you reverse here?

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you do that? I've done both? Actually, what do

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you prefer? I prefer swede? Actually, oh great? Yeah? Man

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 1>for in the ivory castle. See it before or see

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it afterwards? Excuse me, but I think a competition would

0:48:57.800 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of fun. I don't know how we

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, but I mean we both have access to

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>grills now, so we do we do? All right? We

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just force our wives to be judges. All right? Next,

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go to This is interesting to me. Austin wants

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to know is it acceptable for an adult to refuse

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to eat anything with bits of onions or mushrooms, et

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>cetera in it? So it's not I don't think this

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is specific onions or mushrooms, but is it acceptable? And

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess within the context of grilling or just a big,

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>big pot of food or something like that. To refuse

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat something knowing that there are bits of something

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in it. I know a lot of people that won't

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>eat anything with onions in it. I am. I am

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not one of those people. I know. I actually like them.

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I like mushrooms, so for me, it's not an issue.

0:49:44.040 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's acceptable provided they don't make a

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>big stink out of it.

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't. Yeah, if it's the only thing being served and

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody's like, you know, I'm just gonna have gram crackers.

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, as long as you don't make a production

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 2>out of it because you've made if you've got some

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 2>aversion to onions or mushrooms, that's fine, but just don't

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 2>make a production out of it.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Be cool. In that case, I'd say, yes, it's acceptable.

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I would. And it's acceptable if somebody's like, if somebody's

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>grilling burgers and like the specialty, or they've decided to

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>make like mushroom burgers, not like grilling like a big

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>meaty portobello mushroom like cap or something, but they're like

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>sauteg mushrooms and putting it on all the burgers, I

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's fine. To say, you know what, maybe just

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>don't throw them on mine. But if it is, yes,

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's like a giant stew and there's just bits

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of onions and mushrooms, I think you gotta suck it up.

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're inoffensive enough and not change unless

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're allergic. But beyond that, I think you just

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>got to go for it. If you're a grown up,

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to all right, where are we going next

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to here? Quinn, I'm gonna go, Quinn. Sure. Optimal marinating

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 1>time for barbecuing chicken tie, uh, one to two hours?

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You would say a couple hours should be fine. I

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think chicken takes especially well to marinating to the

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>point where you need to do it for an overnight

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>period of time or something. I've actually I've done the

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>overnight thing, and I've done the two hour thing, and

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really notice much of a difference. So I

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 1>would I would just go like one or two hours.

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. Underrated foods for grilling This of

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>course comes to us from Krispy Brown. Shout out Krispy Brown,

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Smart Football. Underrated foods for grilling, as well as optimal

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>grilling efficiencies this is how you know it's this is

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you know it's from him, I e. Dishes

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>cooked inside and outside, transport of cooking, utensils, plates, et cetera. Ty,

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do you have efficiency and underrated grilling foods? Well? Have

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you ever grilled romaine lettuce? I have, and it's wonderful.

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It takes to it really nicely.

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Romaine lettuce would probably be my answer here for underrated

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 2>foods for grilling. It does take a little bit of finesse,

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 2>but it actually turns out a lot better than you'd expect.

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So for me, it's romine. My I think West Coast Cavin,

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>come on in when you're ready, All right, West Coast

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's gonna beautiful early, I'm gonna say so. I don't

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's underrated, but I think it's something that's overlooked

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are willing to put in the time. This

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.479
<v Speaker 1>is why this is inefficient. Grilled pizza can be quite

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>good because you can get that pizza steel if you

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have one of those pretty hot on a grill, and

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.839
<v Speaker 1>there's also add ons that can make it make your

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's the hotter the better with pizza obviously, but

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of efficiencies, I would add, and this is

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>actually West Coast Kevin's. Corn is a very efficient item

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to grill because whether you wrap it in foil or

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you go straight on, it takes a while. So

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you throw that on early on, and whenever it's done,

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just throw it up top to keep heated. Right. You

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to, you know, pay a ton of attention

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to corn. You turn it every so often, but it's

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not something that you have to look after constantly. A corn.

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good in terms of like actual he

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 2>mentions here utensils and plates, and I think he's talking

0:52:56.200 --> 0:53:01.319
<v Speaker 2>about utility items when you're actually on the grill again.

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Me and my ivory tower. I've got a seer burner

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 2>right on my grill, which is crazy efficient for doing

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 2>all the searing. So I'm perhaps a little spoiled in

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 2>that regard, but I go seer burner, is my answer.

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>West Coast Kevin's here, ty yo, So here's my So

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the question is underrated grilling food and efficiency. I already

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned your corn theory. Corn.

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 3>You also have yellow onions which turn very sweet.

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, and you can do it ahead of time, right.

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Longer you cook them, they're good, I mean really any

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:37.439
<v Speaker 3>vegetable is good because, like Dan said, the prep work

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 3>is relatively minimal, and I think the yield is good

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise you end up with just like a ton

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:42.439
<v Speaker 3>of meat.

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 3>And one of the great things about grilling that I

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 3>like is you just like the dishes are minimal afterwards.

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So it makes sense. You already have a going and

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 3>it's hot, you just keep throwing stuff on and throwing

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 3>stuff on. But then you're left with a meat parade.

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 3>The next day you create tons of chicken, tons of

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 3>ribs overcook Yeah, exactly. But so it's good to mix

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 3>in the vegetables.

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, fair, Yeah, you want leftover grilled vegetables. That's a

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>successful grilled situation to go with your meat parade. They're

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the spectators and the meat parade. The meat parade can

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>also lead to the meat sweatstan which we've talked about

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 1>at nauseum on our g chat. True. Yes, I would

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 1>also in terms of underrated foods, anything with natural sugars

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 1>like peaches or pineapples for desserts. I've grilled banana you

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>got you have been a lot of a lot of

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:32.359
<v Speaker 1>water in them that they can sort of grill out

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of that's a great idea. Yeah, yeah, I think I

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think those are all. And always make sure if you're

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>doing if you're grilling meats and you're bringing out a

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>plate of raw meat, always walk out with two plates

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're not going back in for a clean plate.

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure everything is set when you're when you're there,

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and if like, vegetables can be cooked ahead of the barbecue,

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>because you want to enjoy your time, excuse me the cookout,

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, everybody south of the Mason dates of mine.

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of things. Yes, you can grill vegetable and just

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>throw them on for thirty seconds. So that's a more

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>efficient method. All right, all right, the next question here, Yeah,

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:09.720
<v Speaker 1>charcoal or propane. I go propane, I go Arcole's fine,

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And just like with pancakes, I let everybody else do

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it and enjoy their work, and I'm just gonna do.

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I have gas and propane at my place. I've never

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>grilled on charcoal before it gets it gets warm, and

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hot and it burns a good long time, but

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's dirtier.

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for a while I was a charcoal purist. Really,

0:55:28.000 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I got a procaine. Well, because that's how my dad

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 3>did it. I want those little tiny grills in the backyard,

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and when I would go to parks and stuff to grill,

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 3>obviously those aren't propanees. You have to bring your own

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 3>charcoal and your lighter fluids. I learned how to do

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 3>it that way, but then I got a grill of

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 3>my own and it was propane, and I said, this

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 3>is way easier and no cleanup.

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Basically, So next question from David wants no best flavors

0:55:55.200 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to infuse into vodka, tequila, or rum. Neither one of

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>us speaking right now are huge drinkers on this end

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:04.879
<v Speaker 1>or on your end. But give me one. And by

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the way, camera guy Dave as opposed to West Coast

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Kevin for his wedding, was given. And they're pretty cool.

0:56:11.840 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>As a non drinker, I just they look good. They're

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:17.760
<v Speaker 1>called like a what's like a window on a subway.

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>What are those called, not a subway on like a submarine?

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:27.600
<v Speaker 1>A porthole. Yes, it's called a porthole. And you basically

0:56:28.120 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 1>put fruit into an area of this like very clear

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 1>looking canteen looking thing and you just have it hanging

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>around for two weeks and it infuses with fruit. You

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.760
<v Speaker 1>got to be a pretty big drinker to have somebody

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to be like, I know, I'm going to get this

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>person a fruit infuser alcohol porthole thing. But it's pretty good. Yeah,

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they do it for water too, but this was specific

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>for alcohol because you let it in there for like

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 1>two weeks instead of like a days. Cucumbers aren't bad,

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it can be refreshing. I would say pineapple would be

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>my answer that. Yeah, board, I have a tequila rum

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and oranges, watermelon that sort of thing. I don't know.

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I've never been a huge fan of that. It's a

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. It is a lot of work. But

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I had a pineapple actually with West Coast Kevin in Brooklyn,

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I had one of the best cocktails ever and it

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was a It was a pineapple mint julip I was

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at a cocktail bar.

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 3>What is the Can I ask you a question please?

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 3>What is the process to infuse something? Like? How long

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 3>beforehand do you need to begin the infusion?

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>A couple hours? If you have a picture of something,

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to serve like a pineapple infused rum

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or something at a barbecue excuse me, sorry, everybody's South

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Air on line cookout, or if you're actually smoking mates.

0:57:40.720 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a barbecue. I guess a couple hours. I would

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 1>say it just sits there. It just sits there, and

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the natural juices and sugars whatever run throughout, and you

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can shake it up. You can do all sorts of

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>even there's physical activity you can do to speed it along.

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes to us from Gary, and I thought

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>his name was Gary very strange, which was a great name.

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's almost that Gary wants to know I just

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>got a deep fryer and have access to a smoker

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and grill, which, by the way, is such a great

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 1>way of phrasing it, like does that mean his neighbors

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have it and like anytime you want to use it,

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or like he knows like the code to a local Low's.

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>In any case, Gary.

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Connected in the underground smoking.

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>No big deal. You want to smoke? I got a smoker?

0:58:26.120 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You had you own one? I have access, yeah, smoker. Anyway,

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Gary does affirmatively have a deep friar with access to

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a smoker and grill. What are good ideas to synergize

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>synergize wow friar with these tools, he already plans to

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 1>smoke and fry wings tie, do you have a deep

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:47.800
<v Speaker 1>friar slash smoker slash grill synergy idea.

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I do not have a synergy idea for this. I

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 2>see the bubble, I see deep friar. I think I

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 2>think of uh chicken.

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I think of potatoes, which I don't know if you

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>make fries the right way to think of it, but

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I am. I guess wings. You could do wings. He's

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 1>got the wings down. You could do sort of wings

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>three ways. What came to the top of my head

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>as a Mexican food nerd, I would say, fry some tortillas.

0:59:16.000 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You have some tostata shells. If you're smoking some smoke

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a pork button, carnitos or something like that, or you know, slowly,

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're making you're smoking a brisket, you have some

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>taco shells if you want it. It's very easy to

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 1>make taco shells and a fryer. I would also say,

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are grilling, even if you're making something basic

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like burgers and dogs, there are desserts you can fry

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time, ahead of your burger and dog grilling.

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Make some doughnut holes. Yeah, I think that that would

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be delicious. Okay, so that's what I would do. I

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would think about it in terms of the synergy of

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>frying something ahead of time that won't dry out or

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>lose its lust or while you're grilling or smoking something else.

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:58.919
<v Speaker 1>So churros, great churros are better out of the fryer.

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Never mind on the recommendation of either Dan or Scott.

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I got my wife a deep friar one time for

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 3>her birthday.

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This would be a lion I fan Scott. Yeah, and I.

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Think that was just for the sole purpose of when

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 3>you guys came over, she would fry stuff for us.

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Did we end up eating fried food out of the fryer?

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, she's made I think three things and then it's

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 3>never been used.

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>What are those three things?

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:22.959
<v Speaker 3>Sweep ptato, fries, and chicken. And I think she tried

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to make Benet's.

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Once power rank them.

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>How they turned out fried chicken made yourself is amazing. Yes,

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 3>And I never I never grew up with fried foods

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 3>or accessed I wasn't like Gary who had access to

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 3>a fried Gary.

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Has access to both a friar, a grill, and a smoke.

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I had the opposite. We ate very healthy. So that

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>was probably the first time I actually had homemade fried

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 3>chicken m hm, And I was like, this is this

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>is incredible because you know previously it was mostly KFC, right,

1:00:50.560 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, the fried chicken would be one, the fries

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>would be two. The Benet's that's just tough because you

1:00:56.640 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>have to eat them right away. Yes, and if you're

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>off by a little bit in terms of timing or

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 3>crispy cry out. Yeah, but those are my only contributions.

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Ray wants to know, is assigning someone quote, plate and

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>napkin duty so that you don't have to buy a

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ton yourself sort of insulting when inviting people to a party.

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. No, I don't think so at all. No,

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they're buying them.

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Food, essential tools to the cookout, barbecue, grill out, picnic,

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>what have you.

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>If you should only be inviting people to your home

1:01:28.520 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for a cookout or whatever, if they're the type of

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people that say something like, what can I bring even

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have no plan on asking anybody to bring anything,

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that those are the type of people you should be

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>associating yourself totally. So assigning someone plate napkin duty is

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>almost saying thank you for being the type of person

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>who asks, and yes, it'd be great if you could

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>bring this, because I've cleaned my house and went out

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and bought meat or vegetables or whatever, and I'm spending

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>time cooking them for you. So your contribution is the

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>easiest possible thing. Some paper, napkins and plates and one

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. No, that's perfectly fine.

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Nothing. There's nothing worse than going to a group food

1:02:12.200 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 3>gathering or a potluck at work where you have three

1:02:15.440 --> 1:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>times the amount of two liter bottles of so do

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 3>you need and no napkins and no napkins.

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>No, you need a napkin, or you're out of spoons,

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but everybody just needs you'd like as people are, there's

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand Like I think Alanis Morissette has a song

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about this. Well, all you need is a fork a knife. Okay,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But like if if somebody brings fruits out and you

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be fruit salad with a spoon, it's ridiculous.

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Or in my example, you have ten thousand ounces of

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>mister pib.

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you needed something to get the barbecue sauce off

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>your face. Next question, ty this is almost too close

1:02:48.760 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to home because the asker's name is Tyler. Is it acceptable?

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.479
<v Speaker 1>This has nothing to do with grilling with college football question.

1:02:55.600 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But Ty Hildenbrand fashions himself a bathroom etiquette maestro.

1:03:01.640 --> 1:03:05.080
<v Speaker 2>On the corporate on the corporate level, yeah, on professional experience.

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So corporate bathroom etiquette is like Ties minor on

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:13.479
<v Speaker 1>his show. So anytime anybody asks the bathroom etiquette question,

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter the theme of the rest of the episode,

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Tie is happy to oblige with an answer. Sure, is

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it acceptable to not lock the door and have it

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hanging open when going number one in a stall? It depends.

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>This could be applied to either work or like an

1:03:30.960 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>airport or a restaurant or anything.

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it depends. I think if you're at work,

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you gotta you gotta lock the door for just ping

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:40.959
<v Speaker 2>y it's a quick little tank. No, No, at work,

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 2>gotta lock the door. It's a professional setting. Okay, let's

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>be honest. But if you're at.

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Airport, restaurant, home depot, yeah.

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean if you're at if you're at more of

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a public setting where like an airport in particular, where

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the airport is sort of in a hurry

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to get to a gates and trying. Yeah, in

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>a setting like that, it's okay, I think it a

1:04:00.160 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>sports bar, you know, a restaurant. It's okay in a

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>public setting such as that, but in a professional setting

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>yet you have to cover your bases, if you will,

1:04:13.080 --> 1:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and make sure that you lock the door behind you.

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever made, and I know you've been in

1:04:17.920 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>such bathrooms, have you ever made one of a longer

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>visit to a bathroom stall, so a seated visit, but

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at a particularly nice bathroom, like at a really nice hotel,

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or a country club, or a probably not a house,

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a house would not have stalls, but something like that

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where you've closed the door thinking you've locked it, and

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>if the door were to swing open, it might be

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a little far away from your reach. Once you're already

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting down, and there you are faced with a choice

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that no man should have to make. It's a panicky moment, Dan,

1:04:56.880 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest, it's a panicky moment. The problem

1:04:58.840 --> 1:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that you have. Have you found your self in that scenario?

1:05:00.760 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I found myself in that scenario. The problem is that

1:05:03.440 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>most of well I shouldn't say most of, but a

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of the door latches in said stalls are not

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 2>properly installed.

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you think you're a lot, then they're not

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>inspected with the right and then you.

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Break into a cold sweat when the thing just swings

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 2>open because it wasn't installed on on the level or

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't latch properly. I found myself in that situation

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>many a time.

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So what you found yourself in a situation with a

1:05:28.480 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>door that you could not close from the seated position? Uh,

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>where I've had to make a choice? Okay, and what

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>would you say, as again the bathroom etiquette authority.

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It depends where you're at in the process. But if

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you can, if you can get up.

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>To let's call it mid process.

1:05:48.280 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I've never been in that situation before. I think you

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have to take care of the process. Trust the process before.

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You get up, Trust the process before you get up

1:05:57.040 --> 1:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to latch the door again, Dan, Otherwise you're talking about

1:05:59.400 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a bigger issue. So the correct order of operations is conclude,

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at least temporarily conclude process, complete the football move. If

1:06:12.160 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you're anticipating minutes more of processing, what if it's an

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>elaborate process. We're talking about a splash and go here,

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a very difficult maneuver. But I think you're

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hoping it. I think if you can, you have to

1:06:27.160 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the door to try and relatch it.

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any in this situation that Tyler proposed here?

1:06:32.000 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any sympathy for the people who are

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 3>coming in and want to check to know if someone's

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 3>in the store, right, And it's a great disservice to

1:06:39.120 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>them to have to bend all the way down to

1:06:41.040 --> 1:06:43.280
<v Speaker 3>see feet, whereas if the door was a jar, Oh,

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and you can walk by and you can see their back.

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, nothing more is revealed in a stall than

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>it would be.

1:06:49.320 --> 1:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's every man for himself in there, dude, and for

1:06:53.400 --> 1:06:54.439
<v Speaker 1>anyone else coming in.

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>But I hate doing that. Don't you hate doing that?

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Like at an airport and when you have bags and

1:06:58.120 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>you're carrying them in there and you have to like

1:06:59.720 --> 1:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>bend all the way down to see, like whose feet are? Well?

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Why whired, vacant and occupied signs limited to plane laboratories

1:07:08.480 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than every day? Oh?

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true, that would solve it. But I'm just

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>saying that's a that's a tough spot to be.

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>It's well, Jerry Seinfeld has a whole bit on this.

1:07:15.560 --> 1:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>He has a whole bit on this. Yeah, why why

1:07:17.600 --> 1:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>do they still make the doors from Dan and I

1:07:20.520 --> 1:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for bathrooms that don't go all the way down.

1:07:23.000 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, next question. I think I feel like we got

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to a good place with that. Yeah. Sure, Ryan wants

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to know it's twenty four. Would love to throw fourth

1:07:30.120 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the July party at his new apartment. We've a rooftop deck.

1:07:32.920 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>This is his word. He is a rooftop deck overlooking

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Harbor. Wow, Baltimore, Right, that's what they say, Baltimore. Yeah,

1:07:40.280 --> 1:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really broken it in yet. I want

1:07:42.440 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it a somewhat official event with a fair

1:07:44.160 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of people. But I tend to scoff at evites.

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of understandable. Sure, I get that evites.

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you know you never know when you're supposed to

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>actually one? By the way, do we talk through the

1:07:56.040 --> 1:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>issue of being engaged and kicking around the idea of

1:08:00.640 --> 1:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>sending out an evite for either the reception and or

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the rehearsal dinner. We have talked about that. I'm pro,

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I would talk more. I am pro as well.

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>However, I tried to advance that theory, Oh, never gonna happen,

1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and yeah it did.

1:08:14.960 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't even bother Ty, when you and I get married, Yeah,

1:08:18.000 --> 1:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's well, yeah, exactly, it'll be local evite city. How

1:08:21.080 --> 1:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do I make it official without sounding like it's a

1:08:22.920 --> 1:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>wedding or a bar mits of invitation. I'm excited to

1:08:25.640 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>make it nicer than an average Bio twenty four rac

1:08:28.320 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>type of party, but I'm a bit lost at drawing interest. Okay, so, Ty,

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to make it. You want to officially invite people,

1:08:35.160 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so like there's no doubt as to like what kind

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of party it is. Where it's not just like, yeah,

1:08:39.280 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing some burgers on the girl, come over. You

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>actually want it to be a thing that like people

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>take seriously about coming over for right, what is that

1:08:46.800 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>middle ground? I mean like group text and evite? I

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have it. Hit me, I have it because I've done it.

1:08:53.600 --> 1:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Here's what you do, Okay, if you can, if you

1:08:55.720 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 2>don't want to go over the top, use the Facebook

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:02.599
<v Speaker 2>event thing, all right, use a Facebook event thing and

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:04.680
<v Speaker 2>invite all your friends if you want to have them

1:09:04.680 --> 1:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>invite friends, so be it. But if you're a creative guy,

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think I know the question asker here, mm hmm,

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and I believe he is a creative type.

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:17.759
<v Speaker 1>If you're creative person. I believe, I believe. I believe

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this is Ryan, who's who helped us with our reverbs

1:09:20.160 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at one point. Yes, okay, great, perfect. Ryan's a really

1:09:23.080 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>creative dude. All right.

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:27.679
<v Speaker 2>You can make up a lot of ground without being

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 2>way over the top if you just write something funny

1:09:31.000 --> 1:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>in the description. Write something funny, right, Just write something

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>funny in the description. That's gonna it's gonna latch onto people,

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:40.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna make them want to come to your shindig. And

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>then you don't got to worry about like graphic design

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>or sending anything out through the mail, or even doing

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>one of those fancy evites.

1:09:46.520 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Just write something funny in the description and you're fine.

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>That's all you gotta do. Here's my quick counter. Facebook

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>is the creepy cousin of the evite. In twenty eighteen,

1:09:58.200 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fewer people perhaps are on Facebook or check Facebook as often,

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's a little trickier. Here's what I

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>would do. Still, go with a group email instead of

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>an evite, because also, you got it. With evites, you

1:10:08.439 --> 1:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>have to like select graphics and stuff can be cheesy.

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I say, you just sent out a group email subject

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:17.479
<v Speaker 1>line eleven and a half reasons you should become in

1:10:17.520 --> 1:10:20.519
<v Speaker 1>a Ryan's barbecue or the top barbares is same page

1:10:20.520 --> 1:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>here right, same page. So you're you're going with a

1:10:23.080 --> 1:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>lighthearted thing and you list out reasons because who doesn't

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>love a list on the internet and they can let

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>one we're gonna have like you describe the food. Two

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you describe some weird o friends. It's like a BuzzFeed article. Yeah,

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Brent's gonna be there and he's going to do his

1:10:39.720 --> 1:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>stupid magic tricks and he's gonna leave early. So don't

1:10:41.960 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. Like you just make different items weird

1:10:46.160 --> 1:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and funny. Our friend Andy Wall did this for her

1:10:48.439 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>rehearsal dinner and it was a great idea, not for

1:10:51.520 --> 1:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>inviting people, but for writing the restaurant itself. Here's like

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven reasons you should host the exactly it'd be perfect dinner.

1:10:57.840 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 2>And you could do it through do it through Google

1:10:59.600 --> 1:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Google as like a free Google forms.

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You can send out a Google form, do it. I

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think just direct emails is a good idea. Sure, all right,

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>let's doll like one or two more here we're running

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>pretty long. It's a free show.

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Tie wait before we move on, cam we back up

1:11:12.720 --> 1:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit place. Can you scroll down so I

1:11:14.680 --> 1:11:17.439
<v Speaker 3>can see that email. I've never felt older than when

1:11:17.520 --> 1:11:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Dat Dan said, Oh I know me too, e Yo

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty four rack type of party?

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I read it? And what type of party is that?

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I have no clue.

1:11:25.400 --> 1:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a bring your own case of beer,

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bring your own twenty four pound.

1:11:29.640 --> 1:11:31.639
<v Speaker 3>So I thought twenty four related to his age because

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:34.200
<v Speaker 3>it says he is twenty four, right, Oh, but then

1:11:34.240 --> 1:11:37.639
<v Speaker 3>twenty four racks, so twenty four modifies rack in that's

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>in that clause there.

1:11:39.000 --> 1:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So this last clarification is being brought to you by

1:11:41.479 --> 1:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Centrum Silver. We're all very old.

1:11:45.000 --> 1:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>But then I was wondering our twenty four year old's

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:47.759
<v Speaker 3>on Facebook anymore?

1:11:47.920 --> 1:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>On that theme, that's true, all the cool kids went

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>over to Instagram.

1:11:51.160 --> 1:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>So go send it out via blockchain, send it out

1:11:54.080 --> 1:11:57.200
<v Speaker 3>by a blockchain LinkedIn invite? Is that how blockchain works?

1:11:57.240 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I really do not know. I really don't know.

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to invite to Ryan's b YO twenty four.

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what? What is? What is your house of

1:12:05.800 --> 1:12:08.519
<v Speaker 1>run at gmail dot com? Yeah? Ryan, invite house of

1:12:08.600 --> 1:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>run at gmail dot com. He probably won't be there,

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but he will proof read it. Yeah, it'll be a

1:12:13.960 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>bad sign if I like it. Former English teacher.

1:12:16.360 --> 1:12:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm clearly not the target demo here, but I just

1:12:19.439 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>wanted to clarify and know if anybody else was confused.

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Joey wants to know tongues or spatula for outdoor booth. Now, obviously,

1:12:28.120 --> 1:12:31.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously the answer is both, depending on the meat, depending

1:12:31.760 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>on the vegetable whatever. You don't want to turn corn

1:12:34.479 --> 1:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>over with dispatch no, But if you had to choose

1:12:37.760 --> 1:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one tie, what do you think best defines your hand

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>grilling technique. I'm hashtag team tongs here all the way,

1:12:44.840 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Team tongs. Yeah.

1:12:46.760 --> 1:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>My problem with dispatula is when your your grilling subject

1:12:53.439 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>terrible way to freeze it. But whenever you're grilling something

1:12:56.280 --> 1:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>he gets stuck to the to the greats. Sometimes you

1:12:59.720 --> 1:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>have we'll get in the spatul underneath it. Sometimes you don't,

1:13:03.400 --> 1:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and you inadvertently gun the piece of meat all the

1:13:06.360 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>way against the back of the grill, which I know,

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:11.519
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a knock factor. I know it's like

1:13:11.600 --> 1:13:13.719
<v Speaker 2>sterile in there because it gets to eight hundred degrees,

1:13:13.760 --> 1:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's still it's it still creeps me out a little. Bit,

1:13:17.640 --> 1:13:18.959
<v Speaker 2>so I would I prefer.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say, without a doubt, tongues are a better utility.

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>They're more varied in their ability. But the sound a

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>spatula makes when you're scooping a burger right against that grill,

1:13:32.880 --> 1:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>great and have like that perfect flip, But that sound,

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that scoop sound, I think it is an elite sensation

1:13:40.479 --> 1:13:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that tongs just will never give you that I'm going,

1:13:44.640 --> 1:13:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going tongue if I had to choose one, Okay

1:13:47.520 --> 1:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for me.

1:13:47.840 --> 1:13:51.120
<v Speaker 3>It's tough though, because if you're doing burgers, you can't

1:13:51.160 --> 1:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>do burgers with tongs. Yeah, so I guess it just

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:55.400
<v Speaker 3>depends what your grill.

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably could do. You could you peak

1:13:58.200 --> 1:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to see if it's fully cooked on the bottom to

1:14:00.800 --> 1:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the point that you I mean, you'll see the puddle

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of meat juice.

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 3>But if the tops uncooked and you're flipping it over.

1:14:05.080 --> 1:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, do they do they make spatula tongues. Yeah, they

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>get flathead tongues. Yeah, I think you can get flathead tongus.

1:14:13.479 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's your answer. Yeah, Joey good nickname by the way, Yeah,

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>flathead tongue. Final question, This is an easy answer as well,

1:14:23.800 --> 1:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but we like to go out easy ty yeah, board commander,

1:14:27.000 --> 1:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really good screen name. When attending a we'll correct him

1:14:31.320 --> 1:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and say Google by someone who is certifiably grill literate. Oh,

1:14:36.960 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I love that good term. Good term. Probably didn't make

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it up, but used it really well. Perfect. What is

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the safest option to request hot dog, hamburger, chicken, something else.

1:14:46.120 --> 1:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the hardest thing to mess up? The answer is

1:14:48.320 --> 1:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly hot dog. It's definitely not chicken. Yeah, Chicken's the

1:14:52.320 --> 1:14:54.559
<v Speaker 1>easiest to screw up. It's dead easy.

1:14:54.840 --> 1:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Chickens either like bone dry because it's been on for

1:14:58.360 --> 1:15:02.479
<v Speaker 2>forty five minutes or potentially infected with salmonella, so you

1:15:02.479 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>don't want.

1:15:03.400 --> 1:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>No chicken sashimi for yeah.

1:15:05.960 --> 1:15:10.599
<v Speaker 2>And the hamburger, you know you're probably safe even if

1:15:10.640 --> 1:15:12.759
<v Speaker 2>you get it a little on the rawer side of things.

1:15:12.840 --> 1:15:16.639
<v Speaker 2>But still nobody likes getting a burger that's still bleeding.

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:19.799
<v Speaker 2>So hot dog is clearly the answer here. Hot dogs

1:15:19.920 --> 1:15:21.639
<v Speaker 2>arrive fully cooked exactly.

1:15:21.800 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The worst thing that will happen to a hot dog

1:15:24.280 --> 1:15:28.559
<v Speaker 1>is either it's served to you kind of warm or

1:15:28.960 --> 1:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of dry. But in terms of safety, hot dog

1:15:33.080 --> 1:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is because you can also just look at a hot

1:15:34.720 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>dog and be like, no, that's this is what I

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>want it right now. Just give it to me, Give

1:15:38.800 --> 1:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>me that hot dog. Okay. I'm gonna regret saying phrasing

1:15:41.439 --> 1:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>things like this, Give me that barbecue, that grill item

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, and that's fine because it'll be fine no

1:15:47.760 --> 1:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>matter when you take it off the grill. All right?

1:15:50.720 --> 1:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we get anything else in here? Do you want

1:15:52.200 --> 1:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to cover? Yeah? Just because just because he's such a

1:15:54.400 --> 1:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>illuminary Peter Hoffman quickly, Oh, better outdoor experience an evening

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with dinner outside or a good sunrise with a cup

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of coffee. It's tire you rolling dusk or don I'm

1:16:07.120 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>going to George Clooney salmahayak okay dusk. Yeah, I think

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I can respect it. It depends on where

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you are for the morning, like if you're overlooking an

1:16:18.920 --> 1:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ocean or something. But even still overlooking an ocean at

1:16:21.360 --> 1:16:25.599
<v Speaker 1>night is better. Yes, So yeah, I'm with uh chill

1:16:25.680 --> 1:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>breeze at night. Well, since we have him here West

1:16:29.280 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Coast Kevin no longer truly West Coast Kevin.

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>South of the Mason Dixon line, I'm here to correct

1:16:35.240 --> 1:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>all your barbecue.

1:16:36.640 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, tell true, Tell the people where they can find you.

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:44.439
<v Speaker 3>House of Run dot com is the website. It's a

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>track and field running podcast.

1:16:46.240 --> 1:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Come on more enthusiasm. I feel like it is the

1:16:50.720 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>quintessential track and field and running enthusiast podcast. We have

1:16:56.200 --> 1:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>crossover listeners, so you're doing them a disservice.

1:16:58.439 --> 1:17:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it still the Is it still the fastest running

1:17:00.840 --> 1:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>podcast online?

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 3>It is, although we changed we changed the logo when

1:17:05.280 --> 1:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I moved out here and change jobs. I believe we've

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>tapped out all the crossover listeners. I found out there

1:17:11.040 --> 1:17:14.120
<v Speaker 3>was like three or four college football people who said, hey,

1:17:14.160 --> 1:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I found you guys via the solid verbal. I was

1:17:17.080 --> 1:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>really happy just to take those three and move on.

1:17:18.960 --> 1:17:20.880
<v Speaker 3>But if there are any people out there, I mean,

1:17:20.880 --> 1:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's some USC fans who are very thrilled.

1:17:23.120 --> 1:17:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, they should be by.

1:17:24.439 --> 1:17:28.479
<v Speaker 3>Their women's title in the most it's a very connic way.

1:17:28.880 --> 1:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>That was incredible.

1:17:29.479 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>It's four by four. Maybe they're out there and they

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:34.160
<v Speaker 3>want to, you know, get track twenty four seven, three

1:17:34.280 --> 1:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>sixty five. You can check out the House of.

1:17:36.040 --> 1:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Run if you're a track and field nerd.

1:17:37.439 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm also Dan's personal running coach too.

1:17:39.160 --> 1:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That is true. It is going poorly, must say and

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's more on me than it is on Kevin. If

1:17:44.360 --> 1:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you're into track and field, if you're if you like

1:17:46.240 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it in the Olympics and you want to follow it

1:17:47.840 --> 1:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>more during non Olympic years. If you're into college running,

1:17:50.760 --> 1:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a runner yourself and you want Kevin and

1:17:53.000 --> 1:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason to help you out, they probably won't, but there's

1:17:55.320 --> 1:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance. Listen to the House of Run.

1:17:57.400 --> 1:17:59.439
<v Speaker 3>Dan comes on to previous the New York City Marathon

1:17:59.479 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>every year, and he inexplicably has gotten at least one

1:18:03.200 --> 1:18:06.200
<v Speaker 3>winner in the men's race or women's race for the

1:18:06.320 --> 1:18:08.519
<v Speaker 3>entire time we've done this, So we've done that episode

1:18:08.520 --> 1:18:13.400
<v Speaker 3>seven times. Ye. Danly picks a winner every year, and

1:18:13.400 --> 1:18:15.439
<v Speaker 3>it's getting to the point where it's frustrating because Jason

1:18:15.479 --> 1:18:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and I oftentimes get zero the two right. I think

1:18:18.560 --> 1:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not that hard to pick one of the winners, right,

1:18:20.400 --> 1:18:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Dan can do it, But it is because marathons are

1:18:22.600 --> 1:18:23.400
<v Speaker 3>hard to predict.

1:18:23.160 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent of the time. I'm either right or wrong.

1:18:25.160 --> 1:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Facts, Well, you get I think time you've got one

1:18:28.920 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 3>of them right? Did you tell them about you run

1:18:30.200 --> 1:18:30.599
<v Speaker 3>this morning?

1:18:31.040 --> 1:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I did not tell them about the run. It's just

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>that I tried to run and had to take a

1:18:35.560 --> 1:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>quick process break. Okay, yeah, and it was listen, I

1:18:40.600 --> 1:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>got a good sweat on, I got some some some

1:18:43.360 --> 1:18:47.559
<v Speaker 1>cow's bacon. But it was the door was swinging over

1:18:47.600 --> 1:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Austin's tough man. The Austin heat is rough.

1:18:51.040 --> 1:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>The door was swingle. But he went There was a

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:54.799
<v Speaker 3>line time about nine porta potties.

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's tough.

1:18:57.520 --> 1:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I was worried for Dan because I don't know what

1:18:59.320 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>his position is on porta potties. And I said, look,

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>this is the best I can I can give to you.

1:19:03.400 --> 1:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>But he came out I think in better shape than

1:19:06.000 --> 1:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>he went in. And ye, we were able to finish,

1:19:08.720 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 3>but again I still have my work cut out.

1:19:10.240 --> 1:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the closest you can feel to dying as

1:19:13.120 --> 1:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a man in a hot portal in a hot porta potty.

1:19:17.000 --> 1:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>About actually being sicker and any real peril the hot

1:19:20.160 --> 1:19:23.200
<v Speaker 2>porta pot is. That's enough to really test your metal.

1:19:23.680 --> 1:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Wep and tested it did, ty tested it did all right,

1:19:27.200 --> 1:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all everything we got.

1:19:28.120 --> 1:19:30.920
<v Speaker 2>This seems like a terrific moment to tell people that

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:33.360
<v Speaker 2>they can find us at soliverbal at gmail dot com

1:19:33.400 --> 1:19:36.040
<v Speaker 2>if they've got any further commentary they'd like to submit.

1:19:36.439 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 2>We're also at solid verbal dot com, iTunes dot com,

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>slash solid Verb. Will find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:47.759
<v Speaker 2>also where else. We're on Google, Spotify, tune in, stitch

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>or all the usual hot spots where you can find podcasts.

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:52.559
<v Speaker 1>We will be back in a week. We promise.

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:55.479
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk more college football in the meantime for my

1:19:55.520 --> 1:19:59.840
<v Speaker 2>good friend Dan Rubinstein down there in Austin, Texas, and

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 2>alongside him longtime friend of the pod who we have

1:20:03.240 --> 1:20:05.920
<v Speaker 2>to have back in again at some point to talk

1:20:06.680 --> 1:20:09.360
<v Speaker 2>about all things life and football and running or whatever else.

1:20:09.400 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>West Coast, Kevin, we'll catch you. We'll catch you on

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a week meantimes. Stay solid, hey,