WEBVTT - The Fed, Insurance, VR, and Goldman (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to talk soccer,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>but before we can talk soccer, we got to talk

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about interest rates with Ira Jersey, chief US interest rate strategist. Ira.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was under the impression that twenty five

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>basis points the next meeting, maybe twenty five after that,

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and then let's pause, see how things are going. But

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>now people are telling me I need to folk pencil

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a third twenty five basis point rate increase. What's going

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on with all you fed people? Yeah? Well, obviously over

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the last month you've seen some pretty poor or higher

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>than expected inflation data, right, both CPI and the pc

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to flatter and then even just the small warning and

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why rates are selling off today has been

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than expected inflation in France and Spain. So with such,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with inflation still being the worry and the

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>fear of central bankers. You continue to see whenever we

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>get these surprises surprisingly high inflation prints, you're going to

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bind up pricing in more and more interest rate hikes.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so the market's now pricing in for a

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>five and a half percent terminal rate for the Fed

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Fund rate, and I think that and no cut and

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>no cuts this year, No no cuts this year. Well,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I see them coming down to a terminal rate of

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like five thirty something, which is still between five twenty

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>five and five fifty. Yeah, so you're still talking about

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you're still talking about maybe a half is of fifty bases,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent chance of a single cut by the

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. So not a full cut though,

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>which is to Matt to your point, is what we

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>were pricing, um, and because we're pricing three cuts at

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>one point, Yeah, we were pricing We're pricing pretty aggressive cuts,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>people thinking that we were going to have a significant slowdown.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the reasons why the market shifted

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so much, because we were kind of expecting the cumulative,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, rate hikes that we've had, and some of

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the data that we've seen certainly suggests that the economy

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is slowing, but the economy is just not slowing fast

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to bring inflation lower. And the interesting piece out

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent data, UM is services we expected

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to continue to grow. You know, wages are pretty strong.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that on this show before. But but

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>importantly in a lot of the data is that goods

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>prices didn't continue to fall as most of us expected

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that that to occur, and and mitigating the increases and services.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So since goods price is basically stabilized at near current levels, um,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's that's really given some people some pauses

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to exactly what the future ratepath will be ultimately for

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for the FED and then therefore for the rest of

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the market as well. And that's one reason why we're

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, testing four percent on the ten year for example,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, you know, I think you get one or

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>two more you know, better than expected data prints, and

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we can wind up breaking four percent again and maybe

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>testing for in a quarter, which is the next really

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>important technical level. It's actually four point two four percent

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if you really want to get pedantic. So I've made

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a career out of ignoring people like you and Lisa

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Bramwood to talk about yield curves and all that kind

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. But boys, I look at the two year tenure.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>It's negative, it's inverted eighty five basis points. That's the thing, right,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Should I pay attention to that? Yeah? Well, so the

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>market is still thinking that we're going to have high

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>rates now and then lower rates later, and that's I

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a reasonable assumption. I think the question

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes and this is where you know, people who try

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to use these indicators and use the market for determining,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the market things the recession is going

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to be ends up. That's when these types of indicators

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>end up failing. Because the reason why where where we

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are today is not necessarily because we think there's going

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a recession. The marketing it's going to be

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a recession this year, but that maybe there's going to

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>be a recession in twenty twenty five. And the Fed

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>cuts into states zero again, right, that still gets you

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to a ten year that's well below where the two

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>year yield is today. The two year yields right at

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fair value, by the way, based on the Fed hiking

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to five and a half percent and then staying there

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of this year. So the two year

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is probably right. The question is is the ten year

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>right or are we going to see inflation be much

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>more persistent than we have And that means that you

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>can wind up with what we call a bear steepener,

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>where you can wind up with ten year yields going

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up in two year yields not doing very much at all. Hey,

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>we focus so much on the US because you know,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the greatest country in the world and the only

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>place that's important. But nice Over in Europe, you had

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>French and Spanish inflation that was stronger than expected, a

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>record in France for the Euro Area, and we're now

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting or the markets are now pricing in four percent

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for the ecb which is I mean a lot. That's aggressive, right, Um,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the highest level on buns in what

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:13.119
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years? What's going on over there? And is that

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>part of what's driving the trade here? Yeah, it definitely is.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And today in particular, so you know you've seen you've

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seen actually the European bond market leading the US bond

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>market by by about five minutes during the course of

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the day today. Um, and the you know, there is

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a big worry because remember, unlike the US the European

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank only has a single mandate and that's to

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>keep inflation under controls for stable prices. They don't have

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the the same you know, full employment mandate that the

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>US and five other central banks have. But so because

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're so fixated on inflation, when you get higher than

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>expected inflation prints, that just means that it's likely that

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the ECB is going to be somewhat more hawkish. They

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>were very austious early on in this hiking cycle, but

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>now that they've gotten going. Hugh Worthington, who's my colleague

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in London, you know, he expects them to hike twenty

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty bases points at the next meeting and then probably

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit more after. So so you're right,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like Europe is worried about inflation. Obviously, some of it

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is not related to the economy, right. All the stuff

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>going on with the Ukraine and with guests and energy

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>prices is a separate issue from the um you know,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>from the underlying economy. But you know, central bankers only

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have a single tool to try and fight inflation, and

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's doing what they're doing, and that's increasing interestry sure,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and that they have to fight inflation, as you point out,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>without worrying about unemployment, A because it's not in their

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>mandate and be because unemployment just doesn't suck as much

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as it does here. Socialism, right, you have

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff, all right, Eira um Manchester United. Presumably

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they're selling a piece of the company. So of course

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>my advisors and I we are kicking at tires. I'll

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about that next time time. Get your input,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey. He's a chief US interest rate strategist for

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a bloomber cantell just giving us his thoughts on the FED.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got a couple maybe three rate increases coming up

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. After that, who knows. We'll keep

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in touch with Ira Jersey. He's got the skinny Pat Gallagher,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Gallagher Insurance, so I'm guessing that's like his company.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>This is in York Stock Exchange list of company A

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>JG is the ticker I pumping up on my Bloomberg terminal.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got a market cap of forty billion dollars. Pat,

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how come I don't know anything about your company and

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys are so big. Tell me about your company

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and where you guys fit in the insurance landscape. Well, okays,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thanks for the time today, but it

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's unfortunately one sense that we're kind of one

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world's best cap secrets. But they're very proud

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of both our heritage and where we are today. We

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>started off as a small broker in Chicago. My grandfather

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>started the business. Came public in eighty six. Uh finished

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>date year, I'm sorry, came Bubalan eighty four. Finished that

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>year about a seventy nine million dollar market chap. And

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really wonderful journey. Now we're one of

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the largest insurance brokerage and riskmans with claim spaying organizations

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world, operations over one hundred countries and as

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you say, about a forty billion dollar market cap. Well,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and the stock chart, Pat is just unreal in how impressive.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>When have we been met? I always um, you know,

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll gauge companies by pulling up the comp screen on

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg, which takes a five year snapshot of your

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>company versus competitors versus the index, and you're just stopping

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>all over everything, Paul, pull up the comp I'm sending

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm sending a message to my insurance and also Bloomberg Intelligencing.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>How come I don't know anything about this? Yeah, so

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what is driving your share price up into the right look?

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, it's a cliche to talk

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>about culture, but that is what I'm going to do.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been very lucky that a large part of our

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>organizational growth over the last forty years has been through acquisition.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>We look for people to do a really good job

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of taking care clients, and we bring them in and

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>build and hopefully build all kinds of capabilities around them

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that allow them to continue to expand their business. I

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make this sound like a roll up.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a real corporation, but made up of a lot

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of entrepreneurs I'm really really proud of. If you take

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a look at that chart, I forget what you said

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how far it is back there. You

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>don't got our ten year TSR it's about six hundred percent.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You look at at our five year TSR, it's over

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and twenty percent. So I don't like TSR

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>as a measure of success on a short term, three year,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>one year I have argument with Street on that, but

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look five ten, fifteen, twenty five years.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>T I was a really good at nicator of whether

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or not you're delivering for the shareholders. You need to

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>see the chart. Yeah, you've basically done that. We've basically

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>done that through the whole way. You can click on

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if you pull the TOMP screen, you can click on

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a ten year as well. And it's I mean to me,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just the outperformance that's so impressive, because the

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>whole industry is done pretty well over the last ten years,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>doubled and tripled. But you've quadrupled, Quinn tupled, sep sep,

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how say it. Yeah, you're up more

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>than six six times UM, so that that's fascinating. Let

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this then, Pat, what is You've been

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on the board of directors since nineteen eighty six, that

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>was back when Paul was still doing KEG stands at

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a duke. Yeah, but is born? What what does the

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>rising rate environment look like to you? And how does

0:10:55.400 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it affect your business after ten years of basically zero um?

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to you? This new way of

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>life for most of us, but you've been through it

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and back. Let me let me talk about that because

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good point for your listeners

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>as everybody frets about inflation and you take a look

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>at what's going on in the marketplace, and of course

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the stocks are down. The last year is a terrible year.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons we've outperformed and the industry's outperformed

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is that inflation really is a positive for Gallanthy. Now,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that if we have a recession that's

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a positive. And I could talk about that in the

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>middle minute. Because our commercial middle market clients are not

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in recession, we can touch on that. But how can

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation be positive? Remember, we get paid not on the

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>market value of your home, but the replacement cost of

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>your home or your building. And as inflation, as inflation

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>causes wages in costive construction to go up, insurance companies

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>rightfully demand more premium for the increased exposure we win

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in that environment. Secondly, we collect your money and we

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are allowed by agreement with you and our insurance carriers

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to hold that money in most for sixty days. So

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for ten years we've had to do the growth that

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we've done with no fiduciary income on the investial asset,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which is basically our premium we've collected to our clients.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a substantial lift in a rate environment like we

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>had today. So if you go back and you look

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>at the Sevanghata invented this growth in a zero rate environment,

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a zero inflation environment, who's the one winner in the

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>market when the inflation comes along. It's not the insurance companies.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And make no mistake, we're not an insurance company. We

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are a broker. So we help our clients manage their

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>risk and we use the carriers as our partners do that.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>They take the risk. So if inflation crimps their loss reserves,

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's their problem, not mine. But as premiums go up,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I benefit from any cruise commission. Hey, Pat, one of

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the reasons we like to get C suite executives on

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the show, it's just to really talked about how their

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>business has evolved. And you know, particularly over the last

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>three years with the pandemic. And I know you're based

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Chicago area, right in the heart of the

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>United States, and you know, as as a founder of

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this company, how has your company, how have your employees change?

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>How is your kind of workforce, your office life, how's

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that all changed? Well, first and foremost, I think, you know,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look when you look at our company. I know, again

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a cliche that our assets got up and done real

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it every day, but it's very very true. I'm really

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really pleased. We just completed our global forty three thousand

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>employee survey and the culture is incredibly strong, which I'm

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pleased with, especially with so much so many people working

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from home, so we've gone to kind of a high

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>bred model. There's a lot of people in our offices

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>three four days a week, and there are people working

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>from home, and there are some that will work from

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:06.359
<v Speaker 1>home continually. So that certainly has changed that. We've benefited

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>from the ability to utilize utilize it obviously, but the

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>business itself has changed. And the fact that all the

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>way down to your smaller accounts, people are demanding expertise,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you see so much growth. To you,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer just your local agent is your buddy.

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I play golf with them, thanks very much to take

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>care of my construction company. That's really changing fast as

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>millennials take over. I don't really care that you and

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>my dad played golf every weekend. The fact is I

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>need somebody to help me handle risk management, and I

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>need to know that there's breadth of understanding of what

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I do, and that's strength and capability by industry, so

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I refer women's voticals or niches. Has really changed. Then

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of course you have digitalization and everybody wants two things.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>They want data and analytics want to know what do

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people like me? What kind of claims have you really seen?

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And again there's thirty nine thousand agents and brokers in America,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the hundredth largest. Last you did thirty million in revenue.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We posted eight plus billions. So you are getting to

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this point where there's more and more every day A

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>David and blythe kind of thing, yep, And so that's

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that's it's a big part of what's so so much

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>change going on. That emphasizing culture continues to be the

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>most critical thing our management team goes every day. Pat

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>just about thirty seconds left. What do you think about

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of a recession? What's your view on the

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>economy going forward? Thirty seconds? Very interesting? Read all the

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>same stuff you've read, see the Bloomberg reports as well.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Understand high tech laying off people, our middle market clients.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>We measure this every single day, by endorsements and by

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and by audits, which means that you pay more if

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you pay me if your sales are up are stronger

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this year than last year. What's the takeaway on that

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>our middle market American and global companies are doing extremely well,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>which is why you see the pressure job growth. Fascinating,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Pat great Stuff really appreciated. This company located in Rolling Meadows,

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Rolling chat Chicago, right near Evanston. You know, it's pretty

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>close to the lake. All are just north of Chicago.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There's great great towns, commuter towns north of Chicago, so

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where they are. Rolling Meadows, Michigan, Great Stuff.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Pat Gallagher, Illinois, Uh yes, thank you very much. He

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>started company. He started the company much better than Michigan.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>He started the company in nineteen seventy two as an intern.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Great Stuff. Pat Gallagher CEO of Gallagher Insurance, Arthur Gallagher

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Company and the New York SAKA Chains symbol a

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>JG forty billion dollars market cap insurance brokerage firm. We

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>love getting diverse CEO folks and C suite folks on

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>from around the country, different businesses, getting a sense of

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of how business is out there in the real world.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like in a world of you know, tech,

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>there are two mega conferences you have to go to.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>One is Consermer Electronics Show in Vegas that's in January,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the other one is the Mobile World Conference in Barcelona.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And good job, by the way, saying that, thank you,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a five on my ap Spanish. Can't speak

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a lick. Dan O'Brien, president of the America's and Gender

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Manager of HTC, he joins us he is in Barcelona, Dan,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the story here? Like, I did not go to

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>CS this year, so I feel like I'm a step

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>behind or two on the whole metaverse thing, virtual reality,

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality, all AI, all that kind of stuff. What

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is the buzz at the Mobile World Conference this year? Well,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think thanks for having and apologies for any noise

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that we are actually here on the show floor. But

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on here at Mobile Congress. A

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lot has to do with five G right, and how

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is that going to create the connectivity for the metaverse? Right?

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, how are carriers and companies like infrastructure

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>partners like ericson and carriers like Verizon Wireless and AT

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and T Wireless and T Mobile and the likes, and

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>how are they going to be the infrastructure providers for

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse? Right? And then how do companies like HTC

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>deliver products and services and solutions for B to B

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and professional users and for consumers that will actually enjoy

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and experience those types of immersive experiences? All right, Dan,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I get that, and I know everybody there is drinking

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the kool aid. But to be honestly, if I'm a shareholder,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a large shareholder of Facebook slash Meta, I can't say

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in one sentence, I can't tell you, and I own

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a jillion dollars worth of the stock, I can't tell

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you in one sentence what the metaverse is? What is

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the meta verse to you? And what do you think

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the applications are to you? Sure? Well, the metaverse is

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>really just an extension of the Internet and what you

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>use today, what you're going to do in the metaverses

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue to interact with your computers, your

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Android phones, your iPhones, your iPads. You're just now also

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to interact with this digital content

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as a first person, whether it's with mixed reality glasses

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or virtual reality glasses or augmented reality glasses or or

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>glasses that do all of those functions, and you're going

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to actually interact inside of these digital spaces.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Our version of the metaverseus the viverse, and you know,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 1>here we think consumers are going to use it for

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>productivity and human performance improvement and things like training and

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>simulation and education, but it's also going to be used

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of entertainment and enjoyment as well. What

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are all of these acronyms. I know VR is virtual reality.

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what XR is or MR is. What

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are all these different kinds of realities? Sure so XR

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the umbrella. It's extended reality. It's the

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that extends you from your real space to a

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fully virtual space. Mixed reality is kind of you're interacting

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>with your real world and everything in your space, and

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you can see everything in your space. There's also a

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>digital overlay of content that you're also interacting with in

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>your real space. So you could be playing a game,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, in your living room where a portal opens

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>up on the wall and the aliens come out, and

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a game shooting at those things. You could

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>also be you know, having an educational experience and learning

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about world history or ancient Egypt right and in your

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>living room and actually doing it while you actually see

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>everything in your living room and including the other people

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in that living room. So it's really kind of a

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>mixture of the different levels of immersion that you can have.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Virtual reality means you are one included from the real

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>world and you are completely in a virtual world. So

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dan is the virtual world? Is it a I mean,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to have the headset. Is that just the

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>way it is? And it's just a question who has

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the better headset, the better mousetrap. Well, I think we're

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>all really driving at the industry to solve a lot

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of these different problems as quickly as possible. We all

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>started with virtual reality headsets because the easiest thing to

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do was put somebody inside of a completely virtual environment

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and control that and create the experience for the user.

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Augmented reality and mixed reality are more difficult, and you

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>actually have to have a network infrastructure deliver content to

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>those type of wearables or headsets. You know, the level

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of yes, we're all you know, in the future, you're

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>actually probably not going to have a smartphone anymore. And

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you will be using a wearable where you'll be able

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to actually have an augmented reality experience and just seeing

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>overlays of digital content inside of the real world. And

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then you'll also be able to have you know, different

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>levels of immersion with those types of headsets. We recently

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>announced the XR Elite headset, which actually does virtual reality

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>experiences and mixed reality experiences. So we're already moving there.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the industry and all the different OEMs and

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the different companies are trying to solve the different types

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>of experiences we can deliver. I'm wondering about HTC and

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what you can do in this country. I know it's

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a Taiwanese company, right, but a lot

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of Americans are going to think it's Chinese straight away.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>And you've got this you know, China backlash going on.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>What's what's your take on that? You know, growing up here,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>having gone to Marrymount, working your way up through KPMG

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and AT and T, now you're at HTC. Yeah, I think, um,

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Time one is a is a compliant country

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that actually makes compliant products that are very safe for

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>being used inside of Dude, I get that I'm just

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>saying like there's a slant, right, there's a there's a bias,

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and right away people hear HTC and think, you know,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they're not as educated as you. Okay, basically

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese company. Um, how do you dissuade them of that?

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>In marketing? How do you get around that? Sure? Well,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for starters, we don't take any user behavior or user

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>data or collect any of that data. We're actually a

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>very privacy first company. UM. So regardless of where people

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think they actually the product was made or whether it

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>was made with good intentions. UM. We talk a lot

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>about our brand, which is about innovation, creativity and humanity,

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and so all of our products are actually designed to

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>actually improve humanity and give people solutions that will actually

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>make their lives better. UM. And our products don't data

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>mind any of our users or their user behavior. We

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>want to protect all of that data as the best

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we can for all of our users. So those are

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that we talk about heavily in our marketing

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and about our brand, and we try to really gain

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the trust of our users. And we have a long

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>history of making things like smartphones and other products that

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>users you know, at one point HTC sold forty eight

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>million smartphones a year, and a lot of people were

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>using our products and a lot of people have a

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of positive sentiment towards our brand. Hey, Dan, just

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds. Is Meta or Samsung? Are they customers

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of HTC or competitors? Well, in some senses competitors, But

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways we were approaching the market

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>very differently. You know, Meta is you know, subsidizing their hardware,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you know, the user is kind of

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the product, right when it comes to a Facebook product

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or a Meta product. When it comes to our product,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the HTC product or the FIAT product that we sell you,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the product and you get to use it for

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of you, whether it's for entertainment or for

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>productivity or learning or education. But in terms of Samsung,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they exited the immersive portfolio and the immersive

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>products and so we'll see what they come to market

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with probably in the next year or so. Okay, Dan,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, Thanks for phoning in from Barcelona. Great stuff.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's at the Mobile World conference there again, one of

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the big big mobile conferences, maybe the biggest. Yeah, exactly right,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan o Brian, President of America's and general manager at

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>HTC talking about the metaverse and all things technology. Some

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>good stuff there. If you're into the investment banking biz

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like I am, you really pay attention to what the

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>big big players, the Morgan Stanley's, the Goldman Sacks of

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan's are saying, and we got a big How

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>do you do that? How do you do Is there

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>any interass that you reach out to? The one person

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that you owe to from is Alison william She's our

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>senior banks analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Literally one of the

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>first analysts be hired. We begged her to join us

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when we were forming Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>She's one of the best on the streets. Alison, you're

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>downtown Manhattan. I know it's hard for you to go

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>below fourteenth Street, but you're down in the financial district.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You're at Goldman Sachs. Are you learning anything today? Are

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they telling you in the street anything that maybe is surprising?

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot, And I would say not surprising. Although

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised the stock is down, I don't know. I

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think that we weren't We weren't expecting any new targets

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>from the bank. They already sort of you know, talked

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about their strategy shift late last year, kind of gave

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>new numbers and so what we were hoping for today

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think investors were expecting is you know, details

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on the path to better returns, and so they mapped

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>out some things. I would say if there was something

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that was maybe disappointing is on the cost side of things.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>They've missed their sixty percent cost ratio target in recent

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>years and than some of the cost cuts that they've

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>talked about are you know, are sort of not going

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to get them there this year. Um, But I feel

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like there is potential for downside coming into today just

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because um, you know, there there is a little bit

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of work to do to get to the returns. And

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they kept that return target and they do have you know,

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>most banks when they put out these return targets, a

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is dependent on the cost side of things. UM.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that structural changes to their business are going

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to help get them there. So I think that's that's

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a positive and something tangible. They're going to be working

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>down their their their balance sheet and asset management and

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>then working to get you know, profitable on the platform

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>business it just seems like, I know, Goldman Sacks is

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 1>still you know, top of class in a number of

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>different um swaths of the industry. Right, of course, it's

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>still Goldman Sacks, but they've had this about face with

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark is the consumer business. They've had this reorganization that's

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit messy. They've led the street in

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of having to layoff staff, and now they're holding

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>an investor day, the second one. And they used to

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be like above investor days, too good for investor days.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So is it like a red flag that they're having

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to try and get investors together and convince them that

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>it's still a good story. Well, I think you know,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, the consumer business was not successful, but it's

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a small part of it. I mean, the overall bread

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and butter of Goldman is phenomenal and doing great, and

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, the market share gains in

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that business which drives the majority of their profits, the

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>m and A business, which is one of the most

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, sought after businesses on Wall Street. You know,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they pointed out how their number one for twenty years,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but I would also point to, you know the fact

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have a big margin to the number two players,

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's keep that perspective. But I think the investor days,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've they've sort of come with the current management,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it's come with wanting to provide transparency, and it's come

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with some of the newer efforts. You know, you have

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to be good at what you're good at, but always

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>keep you know, trying new things. You know, the consumer

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>business has not worked out. There's been so much media

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and headlines about that, but the transaction backing business has

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>really done well, and you know, I think that's a

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>business that we're going to hope to continue to see

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>good things from. And the alternatives business, you know, they've

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>raised one hundred and eighty billion over the past few years.

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, in the range of people like you

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know just below Brookfield and then you know a kru

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone and the leaders, but within that range of like

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Areas and Carlisle, and I think that that's really a

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>story for investors that you know, as they continue to

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>move some of these investments off their balance sheet into

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the hands of customers, and they're going to release capital,

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>improve the returns on the business, improve the profile of

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the business. They've never gotten credit for the returns there,

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that is really a positive story

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see over the next couple of years.

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So Alis, I know from from talking to you and

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from reading your research that Goldman Sachs has typically had,

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the highest returns in the industry

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>year in and year out. I mean, I've competed against

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>them for decades and I know how good they are

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to the extents. To the extet, the returns have been

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>lagging recently. Is it just their investments in the consumer

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bank or other parts of their business kind of lagged

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit, So I think it is the

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>consumer part. But then you know, I will take you

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>back to sort of the business I was just talking about,

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which is their investment business. So, as you said, you've

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>known them for a long time, the private equity business

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and their investments has been a significant business for them,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the postfocal world, they've been trying to work

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that down. And while that business contribute to some of

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>their returns, investors just really never give them the credit

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for it because it can be very volatile and there

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and so there's there's just generally less of a multiple

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>applied to that business and so I think that is

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a part of the strategy to improve returns but also

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>improve the quality of that returns through you know, moving

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those gains to recurring management type of fees

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>which investors do value with a higher multiple, reducing the

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>capital that's going to reduce some of their capital requirements.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The thirty billion Shary purchase, that's almost twenty five percent

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of our market value that they talked about today, that's

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge positive. So I think there are some good things.

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>As I said, I think, you know, the negative side

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is maybe just that the costs they're going to continue

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a headwind. They're investing still in the platform business,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 1>so it'll take a while. So I think today's just

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk about execution. It's hard for the

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>stock to turn positively. But I think they're setting good

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>targets that they can meet and so you know we're

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have to see them them do that over

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. Well, it is interesting to

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>see the stock down almost two percent when other financials

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are gaining today. I don't want to leave you without

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>getting a chance to talk about credit Suiee, Alison, because

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you never tire of the Green Sills, Saga,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and apparently regulators are now saying Credit Suitee needs to

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hold board meetings occasionally to talk about their biggest counterparties,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and they have to issue like a responsibility report for

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>their top six hundred employees. It seems like so much work.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It does, and I think this just continues to focus

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on the process for Credit Sweeze. I think you know

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that there were some incremental positives in terms of their

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, remaining risk in the US. You know it's done.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's Who's our legal expert, and I depend on him

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for those views. But it just I think, you know,

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>from the local regulator perspective, continues to show that they

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have work to do. They're going to continue to be

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>under scrutiny. We had news earlier this week. Oh well,

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we had news last week, you know, related to some

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits about what they had said about flows. So I

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>think sort of the legal challenges do you can continue

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for them, and it's just going to be a long process.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Allison, great stuff, and I recommend after your

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.479
<v Speaker 1>analyst meeting today you hop on the ferry, take it

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>over to Hoboken, get the train home. That's a great

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>way to commute. That's how I uhould do it back

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the day from downtown. Alison Williams, Senior Global Banks

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and Asset Manager analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's at Goldman

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Sachs headquarters today in Lower Manhattan for their investor Day,

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>giving us the latest on all things Goldman talk technology.

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to talk Apple and anyway we can go here.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, got a couple of choices. You can go

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on a rock Rana or you can go Man deep

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sing to me they're interchangeable. They can you can ask

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about hardware, tell them that yeah, I mean, I don't know,

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>both are indispensable, indispensable that that's a better word. But

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on a rock RANI. He's actually in seven thirty one

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Lexington Avenue, are Bloomerck Global HQ. So we got him

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>here in Ore and there was a big Apple story today.

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>There was a big Apple story here as we reached

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>out to one of their suppliers in China and these supplier,

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this supplier tells us that they and their competitors, I guess,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are looking for ways to move out China as quickly

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as possible. I can't imagine that goes down too well

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>with the government there, but I can't imagine. Well, anyway,

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>we got on Rani here, he's a tech analyst for

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Rock. Just summarize Force takes back a little

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>bit and just summarize Force. Apple's exposure to China both

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>as a supplier of stuff that Apple needs to build

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>all the cold products, as well as an end user

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>customer base. Talk to us about China that may be

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>evolving for Apple. So if you look at the smartphone

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>supply chain that has taken I would say decades to build,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or any supply chain for consumer electronics, Apple pretty much

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>depends on China for all hits, all almost all its spots,

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, more than ninety eight percent of

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the iPhones are assembled there. Most of the lower end

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>MAX are there, you know, you you just name it.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Apart from the really high end Max. Everything else is

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>assembled in China. So given what the political tensions are,

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it is very logical. And it's not just Apple, it's

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the automotive industry. All industries are thinking how do I

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>manage to take some of that supply chain risk outside?

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be a big theme for

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the next decade. I'm not surprised about the new story.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I think more of that will come from exposure. On

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the revenue side, the Greater China region accounts for about

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of Apple's revenue, so for in both cases,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>applele is overly exposed to China, whereas a company like

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is, Google is not. What did they say about that?

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you could make an argument, I can't

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>own Apple, I think that China risk is to I

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>can't own the stock. But nobody says that. But nobody

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>says that, but that you're right. But but Apple's ten

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of NASTAC, Apple's what four or five percent of

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the SNP, So you're absolutely right. If something happens tomorrow,

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple cannot you know, go out and procure those parts.

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Imagine what would happen to their revenue base because remember,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the eighty percent of their revenue is products,

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and they have to sell new products every year. So

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a big risk. But having said that, they

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>performed very well from a supply chain point of view,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 1>even during the big you know, the I would say,

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the embargo or the big fights we had a few

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>years ago, they have been fine. But but you're right,

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a big risk. It is a big risk

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. I'm surprised eighty percent of the revenue is products.

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought they'd been boosting the services side

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. They are boosting, and the services is growing

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>in double digits. But having said that, I mean, you know,

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I phone is fifty. So we have a story on

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the terminal that maker of air pods called Gortech, one

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of their suppliers, which is a native China company, is

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>looking to move to Vietnam. While they're investing two hundred

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty million dollars to put a plant in Vietnam, they're

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>looking into an expansion in India. And a lot of

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>these other companies are doing the same. And it's not

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just Apple suppliers, right, it's also Sony suppliers, makers of

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the PlayStation and all of these consumer gadgets are they

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing that across the industry, just to spread

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>out to Vietnam, to India to other countries around China. Yeah,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, it's not just consumer electronics. I

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hear this from my friends who make autopods. The real

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mandate over time. Now the question here is how long

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take. And that's a very very big if.

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But over time, I do expect the global supply chain,

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which is let's say one hundred person independent of China,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>would only be fifty percent China and fifty percent elsewhere.

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm thinking. I don't think. I mean, if

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you're China, your incentive is to remain I would think

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>your economic incentive would be I want to be the

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>supplier to the world. No, they are, but fifty percent

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is big enough too. It's not as if, like you know,

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't, what are you gonna do? Cell only half

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>to cell phones? Well, and for now also right, I mean,

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they surely they look at the evolution of other countries

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that have gone through the same thing, and they know

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that they can't forever be the supplier to the world.

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>They can't forever have these low wage factories. The economy

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>has to grow and change over time. And again, you know,

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>they it's possible that the number of units you know,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>produced in China will remains the same. But the next

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>growth factor, whatever the next ten years of growth is,

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that's done from outside somebody else. Look what happened back

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in November. The Chinese factory that was making iPhone pro model,

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the expensive one got locked down with COVID and the

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Apple missed a fair amount of shipments and

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that so Apple basically said, I'm going to assemble a

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>second part of it somebody else. Now again, as I said,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>this is going to take years. This is not something

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you can entangle so quickly, all right. So that brings

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 1>me to India. If I'm an India technology person, I'm

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>going over to Cupertino and saying, hey, I'll manufacture your

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff in India. I've got as good or better cost structure,

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I've got as good or better workforce, and i don't

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have the China risk. Talk to us about India from

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a technology perspective. No, they are doing it. But historically

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>India has been very very you know, I could say,

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>focused on software development and less so on hardware. But

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's already happening that you know, what you just said

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is in process. But having said that, even after a

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of these news reports, we just looked at some

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 1>data you know, we got from IDC. Even now, ninety

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the phones are still made in China

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from you know, close to ninety nine points some percent,

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>so that the India you know, is less than a

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe less than one to two percent at

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. What is you cover a range of I

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>guess B to B companies right on the tech side.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>What is your favorite one? What do you get most excited?

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I look across your research from Workday to IBM, to

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple to Salesforce, Microsoft, what makes what makes your job

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>exciting for you? I think all these companies are something

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>special about them. Each one of them do something very unique.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>But the one that reported last night I'm a big

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fan of is work Day. They are one of the

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>most ethically sound companies. They really develop a very good

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>software product. They take care of their employees. I mean

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a very high quality company, and they grew, you know, numbers,

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty bookings pretty impressively last night. But Salesforce reports tomorrow.

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You know they're going through some growing pains. I think

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>their numbers are not going to be as good. But

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have activists invested there, and the big

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>question is going to be when does Benihoff say, you

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>know what, I've had enough and I'm going to walk away.

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And when that happens, you will see a Microsoft like story,

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, emerge over there. But work Day, so they

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they make products we use work Day for example, for

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>our benefits management. Yeah. Here at Bloomberg for Bloomberg employe.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So is the number one cloud R company in the

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>world HR company. Yeah, so, fifty five percent of Fortune

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>five hundred companies use workday software. But it does. Does

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we use it? Yeah? If you go to manage your benefits,

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>change your life insurance coverage, or anything like that, you

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>do day software, which is a pretty cool suite of

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>software products from a consumer from a user standpoint, Um,

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>what's the end story for them? Does a salesforce buy them?

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Does a Microsoft buy them? It would be too big,

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it would be very it's forty seven close to fifty

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>billion right now. It'd be very difficult for anybody to

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>buy them. But I'll tell you like a very interesting,

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, movie story behind it. This company is from,

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the founders of People's Soft, which went

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>through a very ugly battle with Auticle many many years ago,

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and Auticle basically acquired people Soft. And this found out

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.439
<v Speaker 1>who's probably at that time was in his seventies, walked

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>up and said, you know what, I'm going to create

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a company, cloud based HR software company and it's baking

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>taking share from PeopleSoft since then, so it is. I mean,

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>they can make a movie out of this. These guys

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have done such an amazing job. What's the Wall Street

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>call on Microsoft these days? And just kind of you know,

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at it here. I'm a big fan of the

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO there. But the stacks, you know, up four percent

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this year to day, down about fifteen percent on a

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>trailing twelve month basis. What's the Microsoft call? The Microsoft

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>call is the cloud is going to keep on slowing

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>down throughout this year, and hopefully, in my personal view,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as soon as the FED signals that they're ready to stop,

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the business confidence improve, people start spending money

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>back again on technology. And when that happens and Microsoft

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>comes back and comes back very strong, what is the tech?

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it tech spending for twenty twenty two, twenty

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. It doesn't decline, right, It's just it's the growth.

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So last five years it has grown. Top twenty software

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 1>companies have grown at an average of twenty percent PTY.

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But this year they're going to grow twelve thirteen percent,

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 1>so shabby compared to last few years, but it's still

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive. So, I mean software is still the play, right,

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the cloud. I'm still playing the cloud, right,

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>They're still playing the cloud. But this year is a

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bad year for cloud. So everybody is dumping Amazon. Everybody's

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>taking you know, getting out of Microsoft because of that.

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in reality, the long term prospects are

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so good. In fact, this is the biggest case for cloud.

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Is what's happening right now. You have a company, let's

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>say a corporation that has had a fixed cost structure

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of it and certainly decides that, okay, ten percent of

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>my acts go to the cloud, and now I'm charging

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on a per use basis. Certainly a cost structure becomes variable.

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In the next cycle, you're gonna go out and outsource

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:35.359
<v Speaker 1>more of that stuff because it's so beneficial for you.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>All Right, good stuff on Rona. Whenever we see them,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>they're in the AI and they're in the AI. They're

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the AI stuff. Oh that's good, that's good AI.

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's really good. Yeah. So by that, by that

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Ana rock Rana Techan also Bloomberg Intelligence. Whenever we see

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>him running the halls here in New York, we literally

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>just grab them, bring him into the studio and get

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the latest dump on what's going on in the world

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>of technology. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. And I'm

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio