WEBVTT - Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate's Troubles

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde of bloom Ugs weld tadquarters in New York,

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>and I met Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up. SVB Silicon Valley Bank. It suffers its

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>worst ever intra day drop as a CEO begs clients

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay calm. Well, this reflects about startups, about venture

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>capital firms and tech focused lenders, and the chat platform.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Discord turns to you've guessed it? Open AI to look

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at integrating AI into the platform. Will discuss. Then the

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>FED creates a crypto oversight team to overlook stable coins.

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>We discussed with the co found of DM stable coin program.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>For first, let's check in on the markets, because what

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a down day. What a worry that we're getting surrounding lenders,

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>banks in general, and of course a lot of those

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>our tech focus and nature NAZAC off by two percent,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>KBW Bank condext I shine a light on this index

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because the banking index is having its worst day since

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>June of twenty twenty, off by seven point seven percent,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's all regarding SVB and indeed silver Gate. I

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>look at a ten year treasury yield that gets bid.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>This risk of sentiment means money pours back in to

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>US treasury is yields stopped by eight basis points. Let's

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>move it on. Let's look at the world of crypto,

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because the worry, the contagion, that implications of a silver

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Gate unwinding, and indeed what SVB really talks about in

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of risk sentiment around technology, Crypto absolutely being battered

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>after the liquidation of Silvergate. We're off by more than

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Rod and Ed. Just dig into that a little bit

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for us, the implications of what now feels traditional finance

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>meets decentralized finance looks certainly. Sentiment depressed all day long

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to bitcoin is an example because of Silvergate.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>There's also some stuff out there about who being coucoin

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and what the New York Attorney General is looking at.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But here are the concerns right, SVB Financial parent group

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Valley Bank down sixty percent, Silvergate capital down

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>forty two. The concern here is that the impact of

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>higher rates has hit the froffiest corners of the market.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Where are the froffiest corners of the market, Caroline, crypto

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and technology. The story with SVB in particular is that

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>who are their clients clients, technology companies, startups who are

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>facing cash burn. They don't need cash in the bank,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they needed at hands. They're making basically withdrawals deposit outflows,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and Silicon Valley Bank is having to react in order

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to plug the gap. Just to make the point even further,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>let's look at this terminal chart really quick and just

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the drama. Biggest drop on record for this

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>stock and is lowest level since September twenty sixteen. Let's

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>get more details. Bloomberg Shnali Bassak joining us out of

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>New York. A lot of stories to cover, But how

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>core is that Silicon Valley Bank client based tech to

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this story? It is a big part of this story.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can also talk about balance sheet management here

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>being an issue when it comes to Silicon Valley Bank.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the Wall Street view on what

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>has happened here, part of the issues were exacerbated not

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just because of their client base, but because they had

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to sell securities at a loss. That is something we're

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not seeing just unique to Silicon Valley Bank. But I

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>will put some contacts here because the point you're making

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>here this not so long ago, a year ago, This

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank was the envy of the industry of many many banks,

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>from Goldman Sachs to JP Morgan. They loved what Silicon

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank was doing, to the point the you have

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, now, is Silicon Valley Bank going to eventually

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>become an acquisition target or is there too much weakness

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>here to make it so? What happens next, I think

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is the major question that's looming in the market. First

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, val and I think some of the threads

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to weave, and I know way want

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to imply that subs stop drop immediately means that we're

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see what happened with silver Gate. But ultimately

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>two companies, two banks, are currently facing the headwinds of

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates, and both got very focused on certain

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market. Yeah, and that is certainly what

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is in common here. And by the way, there are

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>other banks that also have similar worry around them. Think

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Signature Bank, where the deposit base was not so loaded

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to crypto about fifteen percent according to Anile ass estimates

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>its deposits. We're kind of tied to the crypto industry

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, but Signature ninety percent through September. We're really

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>tied of its deposits to the crypto industry. To the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>point you're making the issues in crypto are not the

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>same as all the issues in technology. But what you're

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing here is this exposure to the industry more broadly

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>becoming a worry for firms like this. I will say

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>one other thing. Remember concurrently they also announced the capital raise. Yes,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a market in which the reasons in which

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you're raising capital are very, very very sensitive. And that

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is another thing that is a concept of dilution and

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>why you're raising money is a big warning sign for

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>anybody raising money. Ahead suddenly saw that being really shown

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>out through the KBW Bank indext performance. Today, we really

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>want to function nati bast at the moment for all

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>things weaving together what is happening with the likes of SVG,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>but also what happened with Silvigate, and we want to

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dig into Silvigate and crypto a little bit more now

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>with ABA Lab's president John Woo, John, we turn to

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you for your expertise because you have announcements to make.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You are still building in a space, but ultimately you

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are currently a man who is trying to digitize the

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>entire and ultimately trying to digitize world's assets for traditional finance,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>for asset managers. How hard is that when we see

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Silvigate having to unwind, or clearly it's going to be

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder when all the intermediaries and seemingly all

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the intermedioris and the on ramps for institutions and individuals

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>into the crypto ecosystem are one by one getting removed

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>either through regulation through bad actors or risk management bad

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals like in silver Gate case. So it's not easy.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It makes it harder, but you continue to build and

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to get partnerships. John, you're operating in an ecosystem,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in an industry that still wants to build, have access

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to capital, needs banking services. Just very quickly give us

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>some insight into the conversations you're having with industry peers

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about silver Gate, about what this industry is going through

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. So when things get better, the issue is

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if there are no on ramps, no intermediaries to help

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>new institutions come into the space, that'll delay the growth

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the space. The other problem is even healthy balance

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sheets in this space, they need little things. Banking services

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like crypto is a fintech business and legitimate businesses need

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>banking services to pay people to do things that every

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>other company does. If we remove the banks that help

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>these companies do that, you're removing companies desire to be

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on short and unfortunately, US companies will move offshore for

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>banking services and other things that they need to just operate. Caroline,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go back to the point you

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I are making a top of the show, right,

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.239
<v Speaker 1>which is if you put silver Gate side by side

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with SVB, what's they have in common. It's a discussion

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>around what the impact of higher rates has been on FROTH,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas the froth it's in crypto and it's in technology

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, we're just seeing a delayed reaction, it seems,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and I've seen this, yeah, in my career, my first

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>part of my career, as in the financial markets. Every

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>time the fed raisers rates, things break, and the first

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>things that break are usually the bad actors and the frauds,

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and then at the tail end of that bad risk management,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>bare fundamental and driven company's break. So if there's a

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>silver lining here is now we're at layer two, yeah,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and then when things stabilize, hopefully we go back to

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a stable environment. John R. Regulates turning to you for

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>advice they should. I was down in DC and talking

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to senators and talking to other agencies. Are our general

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>counsels constantly down there talking. I think we need to

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>open up a healthy dialogue. It can't be just one way.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And if that happens, you'll bring a lot of the

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>capital markets back and a lot of the innovation bank. Otherwise,

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like I've been saying, things are going to continue to

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>move off short because a certainty in rules and regulations

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is happening in Europe, is happening actually even in Asia.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>What's so fascinating is, of course, at the same time

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>as we worry about silver Gates implications, we think about

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with Silicon Valley Bank at the moment. It's

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>exposure to technology to startups. John just want to bring

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>our audience and breaking news that interestingly, the Founders Fund,

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>which a key VC player, is advising that its own

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>companies should withdraw funds from Silicon Valley Bank. Now we

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>know the CEO of Silicon Valley Bank has been out

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there trying to reassure clients as to what the stock

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>drop means, what the conservation of its capital. At the

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>moment is trying to signify, but ultimately we are going

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to see some concerns being built. I founders found R

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>indeed advising their own portfolio companies to withdraw funds from SEB.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you, as a founder, John, do you

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>have money in traditional finance? Do you have money with

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank? Well, Silicon Valley Bank is one of

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the banks that we use, as well as some of

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the other ones that were mentioned, So I think the

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>right thing, the prudent thing we've learned is counterparty risk.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Once these things start, this is a classic bank run,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and when the blank run starts, you don't want to

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be the last guy there and wondering what happened. Unfortunately,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the way banks work. They rely on trust.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>When they lose that trust, their things really will happen.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>John S. I know we have so much to discuss

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>about AB and what's happening with Avalanche, but but we

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>have to stick with this story because it's happening in

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>before our eyes. What do you do in this situation?

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you follow the advice of names in the valley

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like Founders fund and pull the money? Do you stick

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with it. I mean, I have to just point out

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there were a number of names that Bloomberg cited in

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>its reporting that said, what we're seeing in Silicon Valley

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Bank is not the same as silver Gate, and actually,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>long term they have a completely solid future. What would

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you do in this circumstance, Well, hopefully there's enough. What

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I would do is you have to diversify out and

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not pull everything, We'll pull some. We experiened this

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>back in the Great Financial Crisis, where you have to

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>diversify your prime brokers. Luckily, we have already diversified, so

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we're less exposed and we were literally just a few

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks or months ago. Okay, And I think ultimately we're

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to dig to ask questions. Has it

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>been easy to gain that sort of information from Silicon

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank at the moment? Or relying on analyst reports

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that we get, and indeed some of the reporting coming

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from our own journalists. You're relying on your own interactions.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The operator always has a better view, you know, the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cadence of responses and how things are working, the size

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of transactions. All of those little subtle hints is what

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're relying on. As an operator by the time you

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>read it in the news or something. Unfortunately, it's probably

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit late. I just want to ask a

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Of course, you are there trying to ensure

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that your banking is secure, that where your money is putly,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>your business is on solid footing, and I'm sure you

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have done it. As you said, you've already diversified. You're

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>also diversifying your business. And just very briefly, John, we

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>bought you on the show because you've done this new deal.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You're bringing Web three to gaming in particular. How hard

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is that to sign these new sort of documents, get

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on board the likes of TSM and blitz up when

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>people are questioning the overall Web three trajectory. Great question,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's the fun part. By the way, no doubt

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it's harder, especially with US companies, but the cadence and

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign companies is actually happening in this TSM case. Just

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so people know, this is one of the largest gaming franchises,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the TSMS equivalent of a esports team. It's like the

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yankees for esports, and they're going to provide their gamers

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the requests the gamers want, which is

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to get more liquidity for their in game items through

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Avalanche based wallet. Right now, the world works as gamers

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have closed, loose systems where they buy in game assets

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on one place that they can't sell and move to

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>another very quickly, or they have to pay large fees

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to convert back to US dollars. So they're going to

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>create a wallet on Avalanche where all these different games

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>will have interoperability and make their lives better. John will

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>continue the conversation on the partnership with blitz TSM going forward.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>There's something happening here right now in Global Silicon Valley,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're grateful for your insight on it, the lads,

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>President John will thank you very much. How chat gptwo effect.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We have this thing called Erica, which is a virtual

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, virtual assistant natural language processing predictive technology that

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been running four or five years and eighty million

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>customers use it one hundred forty five hundred fifty million

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>times a quarter, so we're used to it, but this

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is now a new one that could change the game

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of America. CEO there Brian moynihan, And well, let's stick

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with CEOs who love all things AI. Because messaging platform

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Discords just announced its expansion of its own AI offerings,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>including guess what open aiyes technology they're incorporating into functions

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's chatbot, it's moderation systems, let spring blooms. Cecilia

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Dnastasio, who has the story at an event, just

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us about where they think this will be additive. Sure. So,

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Discord is a chat apps that one hundred and fifty

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>million people use every single month to discuss everything from

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>video games to anime to classical music. And now Discord

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>is integrating open aiyes Chat GPT technology, which creates kind

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of human like conversations using AI, into one of its bots.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>The bat's name is Clyde, and Clyde has existed for

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. It's kind of Discord's mascot. But now

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Clyde will be able to tell users things like the

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>weather or time in another country, or even suggest a

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>playlist for a Discord server using AI chat technology. All right, Bloomberg,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Cecilia Dnastasio, thank you so much for your reporting. Caroline.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got to bring you some more breaking news headlines

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Our sources now telling us that

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>why Combinator is advising its companies in its portfolios to

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>limit their exposure to SVB Financial y Combinator. The latest name,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>according to sources follows founders Fun just in the last

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes, those after our declines on Silicon Valley Bank

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>or SVB Financial Group now really accelerating down six percent

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>or so. We'll continue to track the names that are

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>adding to this story blow by blow. We're going to

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>get back to generative AI though. And let's keep talking

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about this with Dion Nicholas, who's the CEO and co

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>founder of four four to generative AI company for customer

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>support Automation which guess what carry They also recently announced

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>integration of open AI technology with the launch of their

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>own polls GPPT platform. I saw you smiling. Absolutely, I'm

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>super excited to be here. Let me ask you this,

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>why why open AI? Why not your own tech? Yeah? Absolutely? Well,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, four thoughts been around for four or five

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>years now, applying AI to help customers and help businesses

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>serve their customers better, and so with support GPT, we're

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>launching today the world's first generative AI platform for customer

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>support automation. The real big thing and the real answer

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to why why now is that in November, Chat GPT

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>changed the name of the game. For the customer experience

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and for consumer expectations, we've been building for four or

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>five years, and we've been very focused on correctness, very

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on building a generation of AI that actually can

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>help customers solve their problems. And what we're seeing now

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is that it's become mainstream for consumers and that experience,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that expectation has risen with Chat GPT, and so we've

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>combined that and we're building out. We're launching support GPT

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for customer support. So this is not a marketing exercise

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or a PR stunt. No, absolutely not, And that's one

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we wanted to be sure about. Sure,

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's about solving problems for our customers. We actually already

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>have customers of betaing and using our support GPT platform.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Folks like upwork, the world's largest talent marketplace, are already

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>leveraging this technology in production. Carol, We as we do

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>every day, we asked our audience what they think about

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>just endless announcements of partnerships between tech companies and open AI.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You know the results as well as I do, Caroline,

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>respondents think this is a pr stunt broadly what we're

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now in the industry. Yeah. And meanwhile, don

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, look, this isn't this is about servicing your clients.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just really interested in help me understand here. You're

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>already a leading generative AI company. You're already building your

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>own large language model. What was it that open ai has. Ultimately,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't build a house. So most customers when they

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>interact with customer support, they don't necessarily want a chit chat.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They want their problems solved first and foremost. And that

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was the premise that we launched forethought on all of

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>those years ago, was to use AI to help people

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to solve their problems. One of the things that people

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have seen with chat chypt, hundreds of millions of people

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have used it, from writers to bakers, to friends, family, everything.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>They have now seen what it's like to interact with

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a chatbot that's empathetic, that's human like. That really raises

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the game and raises the name for customer experience. And

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the things that we saw and

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>our customers saw. We actually I started getting texts from

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 1>heads of customer support saying, hey, our customers want this

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience, and we're betting on forethought, and that

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was actually the spark that actually helped us to realize, hey,

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there is actually something new here. There is not It

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is not just a publicity son, It is not just

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next fad. It is technology. And we

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ad forethought, have been all in on AI since day one,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and so we are staying we've always been on the forefront.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The expectations from customers have risen and we're rising, and

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we're launching support GPT to go and meet those expectations

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and bring customers that next level of customer support. Oh

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is your competition, ben Dion, because we're seeing other key

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that are very close to supporting sales people, supporting

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other areas of client facing individuals, and they're also using

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Yeah, the big competitor for us, quite frankly,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is the legacy chaplot. There have been hundreds, if not thousands,

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of legacy chaplots that have cropped up over the last

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>decade or so of innovation. And one of the things

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that you notice about chapblots is that one we've all

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>experienced them, and we've all found that they are super

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>clunky right, their manual, their decision tree base, and they're

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more artificial than they are intelligent. And so we've set

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>out to actually really transform the way customer s has done.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's really that host of chap our companies that

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to out innovate and that we've been out

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>innovating over the past few years. Yeah, we've got to

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>go to some more of this breaking news right around

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. Can I just for our audience ask

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are you a customer or client of Silicon Valley Bank? Yeah,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Silicon Valley Bank is one of the banks

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we actually use here at for though we obviously work

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>with a few banks. So it's interesting hearing the news

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>go out live these days, so really interesting. Thanks. We

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put you on the spot, but I

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>think you appreciate why we have to ask those questions,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>right Caroline, that this is happening before our eyes. Yeah,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately I have to ask you more on the spot. Therefore, Dion,

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be thinking about your relationship with SPB.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that the shares are extending their postmarket to

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>climb down why more than ten percent at the moment

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of venture capitalists and I know you're

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>back by VC asking their portfolio companies to cut their ties. Well,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a really dynamic situation. We're definitely evolving and adapting

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as we go. But what I can say is, you know, again,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we work with multiple banks here at Forethought, and our

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>goal at the end of the day is to best

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>serve our customers, which is again why we're launching this

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>support GPT. But again, there's a lot happening in the space,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we're excited and watching what's going on, excited

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>for AI, watching what's going on with SVB. We'll let

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you go and get attention to both of those things.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Dean Nicholas, we thank you, CEO and co founder of

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Forethought and all things AI and indeed Silicon Valley Bank.

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring you where the market is currently telling. The

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>concern is AD and it's in Silicon Valley Banks parent company.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>We're currently off by more than ten percent after hours

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as you break the news that we are seeing yet

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>further moves coming from why Combinator advising its companies to

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>limit SVB exposure at the moment, and indeed, we'd already

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>heard it from the Founders Fund advising its companies to

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>withdraw funds. SUV we remind of you as they currently

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bank about forty percent of all US VC backed companies,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>according to its own website from New York. From San Francisco,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. It does business with nearly half of

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>all venture backed companies in the United States, said Silicon

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank, the parent company, falling further after hours after

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, it worn the market earlier today that it's

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hame to shore up its own capital, selling off assets,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>doing a share sale, and ultimately, now seeing this talk

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of confidence, the ultimate depositor is moving away from them.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>VCS are advising their portfolio companies to cut ties. Yeah. Look,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>look this is really accelerating after hours with down seventeen percent.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we haven't even got to the reporting that. According

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to a source, Greg Becker, the CEO of the bank,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>held a call with VCS earlier today basically saying keep calm.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot more to come with this story thus far

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>not keeping calm. We currently see course Founders Fund and

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Why Combinator advising their portfolio companies to consider ending their

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>relationships with Silicon Valley Bank. So much more on this story,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a Blomberg. I want to know how tough it

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is out there for startups. Look no further than Silicon

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank that, as the name might suggest, it's a

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lender to venture backed startups. And well it's just announced

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the trouble that it's in. Its shares have plummeted the

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>parent company of it the most since nineteen ninety eight.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Why is it struggling, Well, because the companies that it banks,

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>those startups currently are struggling to get new funding. They

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are burning through cash and therefore they're having to withdraw

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some of their deposits. So q SVB having to sell

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>more shares, having to sell off some of its asset portfolio,

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately trying to shore up in some own capital position.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>This just comes one day after the crypto focused lender

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate announced that it was winding down, that it

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was liquidating after its own customers had to withdraw deposits

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>because crypto prices tumbled. Look what is to blame here?

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates? They're rising as the Federal Reserve raises interest

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>rates to tackle inflation. Suddenly, boring old safe US government

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bonds are pretty appetizing. They actually give you some yield,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So why take a riskier bet on a crypto company

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or a startup that may or may not pay off.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>This ultimately is the end of free money. It means

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that valuations are sinking and it's hurting certain lenders in

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>companies that bet everything on these tech and crypto sectors.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's get more into this unraveling story. As the shares

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to drop after hours for Silicon Valley Bank, We've

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>got putting bogs, Max Rays, who's been across this story

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and just talk to us. Ultimately, now it seems to

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be the venchure capitalists who we're getting the cools from

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO all of the slicon Valley Bank to calm

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and stay calm. And now I'm not saying Colm in

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>tending their portfolio companies to cut ties. Yeah, I think

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a great way of putting it. I think again,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing to keep in mind is what the interest

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>rate environment is doing to these banks that I've decided

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to really push into particular sectors. Silicon Valley Bank and

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Silvergate have a lot of differences. Obviously, Silicon Valley Bank

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>has been building out the specific franchise for decades, while

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Silver Gates pushing to crypto. It's relatively more recent, but

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the similarity is that they took a bet on a

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>very very specific sector of the US economy, and as

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates continue to climb, as you know, they're the

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>areas that they focused on their backyards as it were

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of dried up, they've been forced to reckon with that. Obviously,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that led to Silvergate to make some decision to wind down.

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>We're still seeing how this is playing out for Silicon

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank right but clearly client and investors are worried

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>max to recap the reporting twenty one billion dollars off

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>their securities portfolio. They're selling at a loss. According to

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>a source, Greg Becker met with venture capitalists and clients

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of reassure them what's going on. I do

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>want to show what Greg Becker had to say today

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>about the actions that Silicon Valley Bank has taken. We're

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>taking these actions because we expect to continue higher interest rates,

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pressured public and private markets, and the elevated cash burn

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>levels from our clients as they invest in their business.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You reported that actually in the market, many do not

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>believe that this situation with Silicon Valley Bank is the

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>same as with Silvergate, explain that to us correct, and

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>again it goes back to the idea of the franchisees

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>being different in terms of their value and in terms

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of what happening. Right, I would say that folks expect

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank to have more kind of more strength

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in its franchise because they've been doing the longer. They

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have more capabilities as a bank, while silver Gate wasn't

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>really interested in being a bank by any traditional sense. Right,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Silvergate's value was that it was a willing to touch

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto or at least Fiat currency from cryptoclients, and that

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I was giving them a way to exchange with those

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>funds with each other as part of their trading activity,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which is not really, you know something, the normal course

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of banking. While Silicon Valley Bank, even though it likewise

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>took a very narrow approach, does use both sides as

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>its boundary. You know, it does lending, it does deposit taking.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>It's not just trying to gain one side of it

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>or the other. So that's why folks are kind of

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>rooting for them and expecting them to pull through this

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>with more confidence than they did silver Gate. Let's therefore,

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about next step smax. What do you look for

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that Silicon Valley Bank can whether this current storm.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>The fundamental question going forward is going to be how

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>many more of these clients ought to pull their deposits

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>come more withdrawals we see, and how that affects the

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bank capitalization. What ended up killing Silvergate, right, but the

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>fact that even though it could honor the withdrawals that

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.239
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, it was no longer as capitalized as well

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>as it had been due to that, right, and there

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are various ratio of capital ratios and the one we

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>need to satisfy as a regulated financial institution. So that

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the key sort of issues affecting silver Gate.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Going into it again, investors, people who watch the market

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>see key differences between Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank, But

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that is what people will be looking for. How will

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the franchise fair as its continued max rays tterriffic reporting.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably just the start of this story.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll track it in the days to come. Now let's

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>get to the world of crypto kind of more broadly.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Today the FED announced plans to form a crypto oversight team.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>This has FED Vice chair for supervision. Michael Barr discuss

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the impact of stable coins on the financial system, listening

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>consider their consequences if a stable coin not subject to

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>appropriate supervision and regulation were to be adopted as a

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>widespread means of payment, which some stable coin developers state

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as a goal. Stable coins have the potential to scale

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly because of network effects. An unregulated, unsupervised deposit like

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>acid could create tremendous disruptions, not just for financial institutions,

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but for people who might rely on the coin if

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it were to get wide adoption. Let's talk about the

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>network effects as stable coins with Morgan Bella. She's the

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Facebook's DM stable coin program, but also

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>partner at NFX, a VC focused on network effects. One

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars of deployed capital assets under management.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You heard there what the fed vice share had to say.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you convinced by it? Thank you so much for

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>having me And yes. At NFX, which stands for Network

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>effects on the board, we are believers in network effects.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a creator of DM unbeliever in stable coins. So

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing Michael Barr acknowledge stable coins in that way, I'm

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to stay net optimistic, but I am admittedly a

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>bit nervous that oversight could maybe go too far. I

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily see network effects and these assets taking off

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly as a bad thing, which definitely feels like he's

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>coming at it with a negative tone. And of course

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that was the ultimate demise of DM when it had

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to sell itself, I have to say, ended up selling

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>itself to the likes of Silvigate Bank in and of itself,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the assets because they had to be and

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>went on into unwine because ultimately the didn't feel the

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment was ready for that. What are you hoping

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear from regulators that they do indeed recognize ultimately

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the importance of stable coins because you've written an essay

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on this. I did write an essay on this. Thank

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you for reading it or commenting on it. I'm hoping

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to hear that the US government recognizes that stable coins

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>are a huge asset. So dollarization is an effort that

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the US government has been trying to push for over

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.959
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years, and not necessarily in scalable ways, like

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the US government to this day backs up physical trucks

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of cash into villages around the world. If you believe

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that the future of money is more digital than it

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is physical. Stable coins are a real tool to further

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>push dollarization, which as an American is pretty awesome. And

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not all stable coins are created equally. I've said there's

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty shades of stable coins, but there are what we

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>coined as safe stable coins, which we define as assets

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with digital representations of actual dollars. So let's say a

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>safe digital US dollar has a physical US dollar in

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a bank account somewhere, and the US government should see

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that as a great tool. So I'm hoping that the

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>US government realizes that stable coins are really not an

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 1>issue or a matter of crypto first, It's really an

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>issue and matter of dollarization and US hegemony first. Yeah,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>financial works is second, and crypto is just kind of

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure of which is built. But when you have

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, bas saying they scale quickly due to network effects,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and he warned that therefore if they go unchecked, ultimately

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a risk they're a tremendous risk. Is the risk

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>really ultimately for him? That well, it gets bigger than

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>non digital cryptocurrency. I really just want to shake him.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>If he's listening, I'd love to shake you. So we'll

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>message him. The risk, yes, thank you. The risk where

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I will admit and see your risk is that there

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 1>are fifty shades of stable coins, as I mentioned, and

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not all quote safe in that people are using

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the three letters USD and tacking it onto various assets

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>which could be misleading to consumers. And the onus is

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer to do the homework on their own

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.959
<v Speaker 1>to decide if you know this version of digital USD

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is is this one not etc. But if they are

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>regulated for which there are some issuers for which there

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are actual physical dollars, like at least one in a

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>bank account for every digital version, Like if that takes

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>off quickly, like I don't, that could be a good thing.

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Like again, the US government has been trying to push

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar hegimony for two hundred years and not quick and

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>scalable ways, and this could really really be a great

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tool for that. Morgan DM the association's assets sold to Silvigate.

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You a co founder of DM, What is your reaction

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to what you're seeing happen with silvi Gate. It's all

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of disbelief. So I was not at DM for

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I left right around when that's it was being negotiated

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so I wasn't there for that, but I will say

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that I was. Even though DM did not take off

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>or succeed in the ways that we had hoped and dreamed,

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to see the assets live on with

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the hope that another entity, not Facebook, would potentially help

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bring these ideas to life. So it is a bummer

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to see that not be the case with silver Gate.

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But yes, a great partner at the time, and they like,

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we were happy to find the home. But it's all

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of surreal, Morgan. We have to ask as well.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The other big piece of breaking news is SVB Financial

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. Are you a deposit client of that bank?

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We're showing a chart on the screen, biggest drop on

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>record this Thursday. I have a friend visiting who got

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to the office today and was like, you didn't tell

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>me this guy would be falling. And I thought he

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was referencing a reigning in San Francisco, but he was

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>referencing Silicon Valley Bank. So definitely still in shock and awe.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Their NFX is a client of SVB. To be honest,

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been a great partner to us, as they've been

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a great partner to everyone else. In Silicon Valley, in

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the broader tech world, and they've really been a pillar

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of industry in a really positive way to date. So

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this is deeply upsetting to see we don't know much.

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We're watching it like everyone else is watching it, and

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>as information unfolds, advising both the portfolio and ourselves accordingly,

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but more good enough. Will you have to ultimately advise

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio clients, even if they are a great partner,

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to set their links to pull their deposits. Then that's

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like the multi billion eller question of the day. If

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we do feel that it is unsafe and puts our

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>companies at risk, we will do so. But we will

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>tell for that what would be the signal that you

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then think it's unsafe. The biggest question that we're asking

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is how will this impact our portfolio companies from operating

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>their businesses in the day to day. And I don't

0:34:54.760 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think we're worried about everything vanishing, you know, overnight, but

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we are worried about our companies being able to access

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>working capital that they need to run their businesses today,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and over the next few months. So it's unclear

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the objective sign is that we are looking

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for but that's kind of the question we're looking to answer. Morgan,

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on for talking all

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>things crypto, all things traditional finance, and make so clear

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with us. We appreciate it. ANFX partner, Morgan Bella coming up. Walmart, Well,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's narrowing the gap with Amazon for wealthier online shoppers.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll dig into it next. This is Bloomberg. Walmart Plus

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>launched in twenty twenty, and it's beginning to creep into

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the crucial demographic dominated by Amazon Prime, wealthy shoppers. New

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>data shows that the share of Walmart Plus subscribers with

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>an income of above one hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>actually rose thirteen percent in the past year alone. But

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a long way to catch up to Amazon Prime

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven percent control of the demographic. Let's get to

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>spend the SOAPA who covers all things e commerce for us,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately there is a flywheel effect going on here. Yeah.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So Walmart Plus launched in twenty twenty and it's starting

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick up some steam. And what we are seeing

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is just like Amazon early on back in two thousand

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and five, minutes to launched Prime, the whole prospect there was,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>let's offer a really good selection, really good prices, bringing

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>more customers, and it all feeds on itself, and we're

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to see some of that with Walmart. But the

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>real interesting thing was these more affluence shoppers that they're

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>getting more people in that one hundred and fifty thousand

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>plus a year annual income area that you normally associate

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon, and we're starting to see Walmart get more

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. All right, Bloomberg Spencer, SOAPA Triffic Rapporting, Thank

0:36:54.560 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you very much. South Korea is pushing to be a

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>major player in space exploration by twenty forty five. With

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>treaties that are limiting tech capabilities. South Korea's rocket scientists

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>turned to the Internet to find an engine that they

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>could mimic. Chief North Asia correspondent Stephen Engel got exclusive

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>access to South Korea's rocket launch program. Have a listen.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>South Korea has lofty goals for its fledgling space program

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that needed one giant leap of faith in a search

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>engine to get it off the ground. Treaties between established

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>space powers like the US, Russia, and France prohibits certain

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tech transfers to aspiring space club nations like South Korea,

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>leaving its small team of pioneering rocket scientists discour the

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>web for ideas. We looked up on the internet to

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>compare and find a suitable launch vehicle. La I was

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a SpaceX Falcon Merlin engine. We developed Nuri looking at

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the picture and using it as a point of reference

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to design. Carol Sin is a fuel tanker. This is

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an actual Nuri three stage launch vehicle, not a replica.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And Bloomberg News got an exclusive and unprecedented tour of

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the entire Naro Space Center where the first two Nouri

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>rockets were launched, including the first successful test mission last year.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>What did you feel when it launched for the first time?

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>My Harneyson feeding festive and praying please. The next launched,

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps by as early as this may, will deploy actual

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>commercial satellites powered into orbit by those SpaceX inspired but

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>locally made engines, and they're nearly three hundred tons of thrust.

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to build a SpaceX like company. It's a

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>model that Mary's elon must cost efficiency with South Korea's

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>prowess in advanced chips. At present, the Nuri costs about

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty million US dollars per launch, compared to sixty seven

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>million for the more powerful, larger payload Falcon nine. That's

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>largely why later this year, South Korea's government run Kari

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>will transfer its commercial rocket launching to a private company

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rocket engine maker, Hanwa Aerospace. We're seeking to see if

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Karnach can make the Neuri rocket profitable, but it's a

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard task. Elam must have made a very type

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>market for other companies. This is South Korea's main launch

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>center and launch pad for the last two Nuri rockets

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.959
<v Speaker 1>and the next one that will be launched sometime later

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. But over here they're going to

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>expand it because they have larger ambitions for destinations further afield,

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>including the Moon and beyond and liftoff of Artist one.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Namely participation in the NASA led Artemis program to return

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>man and payloads to the mood. National security too will

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be a key driver at a time when North Korea

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is improving its rocket capabilities and the sanctioned Russia means

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one less rocket launch provider available to South Korea. It's

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>important to find cheap launch vehicles from a business perspective,

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is very important for the country

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to have the ability to put satellites or things like

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this into space when we want to to get into

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the once fairly exclusive but now increasingly crowded global space club.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.760
<v Speaker 1>South Korea may emulate another American accomplishment, the Kennedy Space Center,

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to transform these sleepy islands in the nation's south into

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>an aerospace industry epicenter. Stephen Angel Bloomberg News at the

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Narospace Center, go Hoong, South Korea. From South Korea and

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>space to the here and now on the ground. When

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to financials, let's look at Silicon Valley Bank

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>still tumbling after hours after of course says concern about

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>companies starting to pull their deposits. Yet further from this

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>particular lender, Hannah Miller is with us and of course

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a key component of lending too VC back to US companies.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 1>But down now, Wollman twenty percent. What are you hearing

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from some of the venture capital companies. Yeah, so we

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a lot of concern among venture capitalists.

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We know firms are pulling funds from Silvergate and advising

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio companies to do the same from SVBS from SVB, Yes,

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. We know that there is a call this

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>morning where sbb CEO advised the clients, which included venture capitalists,

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to remain calm. He said this multiple times. But still

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of concern here, and this is a

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>developing story that we're keeping closehauts on. Just give us

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a sense of size and scope. Basically, most of Silicon

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Valley uses this as their banking of choice. Yes, this

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is a key component in Silicon Valley. We know venture

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>capitalists gravity towards this bank. We have big names connected

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley Bank and ultimately Hannah, we're hearing, you know,

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the Greg Becker. This CEO is saying, you know, stay calm,

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but when you've got founders fund of course, confounded by

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Teal saying that there's no downside to removing your

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>deposits when you've got why Combinator perhaps advising their companies

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to do the same. Feels like this is going to

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>be a crescendo effect. Yes, that's what we're keeping tabs on.

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>People are nervous. Yes they're being told to stay calm,

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but that seems to be sparking even more anxiety among investors.

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So we have portfolio companies on edge. We have vcs

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on edge. This is a very intend of story, very

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. What do we not know? What's still to

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>find out? We need? We are certain that more people

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>are pulling funds from SVP. We don't know what's going

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to happen here. In terms of getting them know right

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 1>side up, we of course put out our feelers and

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>we are in constant conversation with Silicon Valley Bank. We'll

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>bring you any up to date information from that particular lender.

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>But Hannah Miller, we thank you so much. And that

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>does it. From this edition of a very breaking news

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>heavy bloom Bag Technology. Yeah tomorrow, Twitter spaces twelve Eastern

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>nine MS. I know what you and I are going

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about. This is erupted into a huge

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>story around Silicon Valley Bank. This is Bloomberg