WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: May 18th, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app Under Savannahs this morning,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the President's nuclear red line.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>They can't have a new blue weapon. I don't think

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>about americans financial situation, I don't think about anybody. I

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>think about one thing. We cannot let Iran have a

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>new blue weapon.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:55.319
<v Speaker 4>There's all.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>So here's the lass this morning, President Trump issuing a

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>warning to Iran, saying the quote clock is tick for

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Tehran to make a deal to build on this. Terry

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Haynes of Pangaea Policy, Terry, welcome back to the program.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Let's set the stage.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>You're a Republican in a tight race facing down a

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>midterm election. What are you thinking about the messaging coming

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>from the president.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 6>I think the I think the quote's unfortunate, of course,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 6>but the context can be built on if I'm if

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm that person. You know. The President's ultimate point here

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 6>is that kind of tightly bound around the quote in question,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 6>is that you can't have you can't let around have

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 6>a nuclear weapon. Republicans are forcewhare behind the president in that,

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 6>and so I think you can make that case and

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 6>and and push with voters number one, number two, there's

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 6>only you know a handful of races a dozen or

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 6>that are that are genuinely competitive. So the vast majority

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 6>of those Republicans may see this as an irritant, but

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 6>not as some sort of an existential setback, and they're

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 6>for their own political futures.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Terry, though, are potentially at risk of making the same

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 4>mistakes that Biden administration made.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 6>Oh sure, always, I think it's much less likely that

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 6>they make that sort of they make those sorts of

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 6>errors principally because they understand better than the Biden people

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 6>did that they're going to that they're going to go

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 6>need to make the economic case. Number one and it's

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 6>linked to geopolitics. And number two that people by and

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 6>large aren't convinced. The Biden people kind of like to

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 6>concuone themselves and talk about how, you know, as other

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 6>administrations did too in the past, that if only you know,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 6>people understood a little bit better, and sure they will

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 6>and all the rest, and kind of relying on faith.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 6>These folks aren't going to rely on faith. I think

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 6>that's a bit of a difference.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Terry, how are they doing geopolitically? The Treasury secretaries at

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 4>the G seven Finance ministers meeting, and he came out

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 4>and he said that they call upon G seven and

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 4>all their allies and the rest of the world to

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>follow sanctioned regimes. At the same time, when the President

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>left Beijing, he said he was going to consider lifting

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 4>sanctions on Chinese firms that are buying a running crude.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Which is it?

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm a big believer in Emerson's consistency is

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 6>the hobgoblin of little minds when it comes to politics,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 6>And in this case, I think it might be a

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 6>little bit of both. Of Course, what the President's doing

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>is carrot and stick, whereas what Besson is doing is

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more stick to try to get the

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 6>allies to stick together.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>How important is it that the US clarifies it stands

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on Taiwan after the President said that he might think

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about delaying some of the sales that the US has

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>promised to the nation the region.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think I think Taiwan's right to be nervous.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 6>But I think Taiwan's right to be nervous at least

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 6>since Biden pulled the United States out of Afghanistan, frankly,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 6>because that led to perceptions of a power vacuum in

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 6>the Asia Pacific region that are still with US today.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not blaming Biden, like I'm not what about here.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm just saying this goes back years. This isn't a

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 6>situation the president is creating. So I think Taiwan's entirely

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 6>right to be nervous. At the same time, I think

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 6>the president of the President's a little bit less, a

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 6>little bit more ambiguous, frankly, rather than less, because you've

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 6>got a situation here where there's no there's no change

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 6>to the bottom line. And number one number two that

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 6>what the President's doing is saying what people already knew

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>to be true, that he's considering a particular arm sales.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 6>So we'll see where this goes. But I point out

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>that there's a linkage here between what goes on in

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 6>the straight of horn moves China's ability to tell its

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 6>client state Iran, look, you better cool it and open

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 6>the straight and you know exactly how things proceed, whether

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 6>it be on Taiwan or trade and tech for that matter.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Do per sense who within the cabinet of President Trump

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is the guiding light right now in all of this

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>or is it really President Trump? I mean, does anyone

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have an edge and what the overall goal is or

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the overall strategy.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 6>Look, I looked the best at economically, I looked to

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 6>Rubio as as far as the diplomacy goes. But you know,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 6>but this is very much, very much the president, you know,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 6>with those particular whispers on board and kind of helping.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 5>To guide Terry.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>What did we get out of the China summit? I

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 4>spoke to Ambassador Career there. He said he gives China

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 4>a passing grade when it comes to rare Earth's but

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 4>still admitted to what I said we hear from companies,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 4>which is that China continues to drag its feet, What

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 4>did the United States actually walk away with?

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think what they want, but I think

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 6>we don't know yet. And because and that's why I

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 6>say that markets need to watch the Strait really because

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 6>for for trade and tech as much as for oil.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 6>China has made much in the past three to four

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 6>weeks about saying that they think the Strait should be

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 6>open iron it's client state. You can't put too fine

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 6>a point on that. And as a result, what you

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 6>end up with is a situation where either China could

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 6>tell around that it needs to come to some sort

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 6>of an understanding or not, and that's going to be

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 6>a directional signal for the entire China United States competitive relationship,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 6>whether it be geopolitically or frankly in terms of whether

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 6>the summit result is some sort of a continuation of

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 6>a colder truce that's existed for more than a year,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 6>or whether we're going to get to something that's that's

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 6>a little more directionally positive.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Terry, you suggesting that might be an agreement here that's

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>just not been talked about publicly yet.

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 6>Oh sure, yeah, yeah, I'm suggesting saying that absolutely out loud.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, you get a lot of people on your air,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 6>other air, you know from past administrations, kind of you know, John,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 6>I'll speak English English for a minute, kind of boffins

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 6>who you know work work in trade or somewhere saying, well,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's not like the old days where there

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 6>used to be agreements and whatever else before the the

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 6>leaders met. Well that's true, but uh, but what's happening here,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 6>I think is a world where the lack of agreements,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 6>the lack of progress over periods of years over trade deals,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 6>for example, led to the kind of difficulties geopolitically and

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 6>geoeconomically that we see today. Leaders of all stripes want

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 6>to speed that up. And because they've speed that up,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's kind of a situation where you know,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 6>their their behavior at the summits and agreements at the

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 6>summits dictate future performance in the markets rather than the

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 6>other way around.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us mult Bloomberg Surveillance. Coming up after this,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Ryan Ashares rising after posting a record

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>full year profit, the budget carrier warning of rising costs

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>this year from guess what higher fuel prices joining us

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>now legend of the industry, The run Boss, Michael Leary,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Michael good morning and see come with you friends very well.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 5>You're a part of the industry. How would you describe yourself?

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 5>Fat old fart? I think, yeah, I think it's fasting dinosaur.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>You've seen it, o, sat have you seen something like

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>this before? The situation from five.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 7>Years ago the Russians invaded Ukraine twenty years ago, the

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 7>second goal Forard the first golf War nine to eleven.

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 5>This happens regularly within our industry.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 7>That's why in Ryan here we typically hedge eighty percent

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>of our fuel. We're eighty percent heged out to March

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 7>twenty seven, sixty seven bucks a barrow. We're in great shape,

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 7>apart from the find our share prices tanked in the

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 7>last two weeks because they were.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 5>Oh they're their line. Got the hell?

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 7>We're just reported record full your results, two hundred eight

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 7>million passengers, two point two six billion euros profit after attacks,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 7>spitting off cash to shareholders, share buybacks and with a

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 7>bit of look if this continues, although you know, we

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 7>can all have a debate how long we think this

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 7>will continue in the Middle East over the straight's foremost,

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 7>some of the flaky competitors in Europe will get taken

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 7>out in carrier baskets by about September October because they're

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 7>not edged on oil and they're borrowed up to the ryeballs.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 5>In net debt.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you ready to buy?

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 7>We are certainly rated by cheap aircraft. If anyone got

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 7>any cheap aircraft. I'm really excited. We are about to

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 7>get the first ten of our Max ten aircraft fifth

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 7>verse fifteen of our Max ten aircraft from Boeing in

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 7>the spring of twenty twenty seven. Twenty percent more seats

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 7>per plane, burns twenty percent less oil. Like, the technological

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 7>efficiency of the new engines is remarkable, and we will.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 5>Take we're ordered. We've ordered three hundred of those from Boeing.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 7>We priced them during COVID, so we've basically stolen them,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 7>and they will transform even our operating economics in Europe

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 7>for the next decade.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So are you interested, though, in buying a carrier in

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>its entirety, aside from just their aircraft.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 5>There is nothing in Europe you would want to buy.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 7>It's all crap. You know, it will go bust, you

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 7>know in the not too distant future. Europe is inexorably

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, moving the same direction US did twenty years

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 7>ago three large connecting carriers BA loffans at Air France KLM.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 7>They are making out like bandits at the moment because

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 7>all the long haul connecting traffic has switched off the

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.359
<v Speaker 7>golf carriers and is going on those legacy guys shorthold.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 7>Ryanair will continue to dominate the short hold space in

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 7>Europe because we have much lower fares and much lower costs.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 7>We're the only really low fare, low cost carry in Europe.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 7>There's a few other low fare not so low cost

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 7>carriers in Europe, but they're all good to They're all

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 7>going to go the same way as spiriting from Tire

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 7>in the States.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 5>That's what I wanted to ask.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the model in the US is really struggling.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 5>We had Spirrigo bankrupt.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>There's talk of mass consolidation among some of the other

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>low cost carriers and this idea that every consumer is

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>expecting higher quality and that that is what's generating a

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the revenues. How does Ryanair succeed in that environment,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>in that demand backdrop.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the problem for the last twenty years in

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 7>the States is there's really been no low cost carriers anymore.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we copied out this formula originally from Southwest

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 7>back in the late nineteen eighties when herb Keller her

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 7>within each pomp, you know, Southwestern charging ten dollars fares.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 7>Now Southwest average fair last year one hundred and forty bucks.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 7>It's not a low fair carrier anymore. If you had

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 7>a real low fair carrier here in the States, as

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 7>Ryan Air is in the US, our average fair last

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 7>year was forty bucks, they would still be very strong

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 7>demand because the main airlines here, I mean, they've had

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 7>control of the amount of supplying the market for the

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 7>last twenty years, and they've been pricing up. The cost

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 7>of air travel in the States is incredibly high, particularly

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 7>given that you don't pay for ATC.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Could you expand into the US, No, absolutely not.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 7>We're too busy expanding in Europe and then those countries

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 7>around Europe.

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 5>There is so much growth available to US in Europe.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 5>You look at it.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 7>Last year we grew four percent with the biggest airline

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 7>in Europe, we grew four percent to two hundred eight

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 7>million pastors. This year I grow another four percent two

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 7>hundred and sixteen million pastors. And in the next decade

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 7>with these max ten aircraft. I'm going to go to

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 7>three hundred million passengers all in Europe. I mean, Europe

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 7>is the best playground for low cost around that you

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 7>could possibly imagine a couple of big, useless legacy airlines

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 7>charging more, charging annual salaries for their long haul travel,

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 7>but nobody able to do the low cost stuff. We

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 7>do the low cost stuff. Well, we're cheap irish guys,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, and so we do it well with the

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 7>with a with an order for three hundred really fantastic aircraft.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Used to be sig Maine back in the night, which

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>used to be sim Maine, it was Brudesald.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 5>Remember that we were never brutal. The were cheap and less.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 5>We were cheap and mean.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 7>Now we're just cheap and cheerful new aircraft on time

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 7>flights huge com Last year, our customer were record customer

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 7>service metrics. Customer service satisfaction were done for eighty six

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 7>to eighty nine percent. I never thought I'd see the

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 7>day when I got more than fifty percent customer satisfaction,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 7>but hey, who knew?

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Can I ask you where are Europeans traveling to this

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 4>summer for vacation?

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Do they want to come to America? Anymore. No, No,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean that's not truly.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, they do, but the problem is that the cost

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 7>of long hold travels got very expensive, so you you know,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 7>there isn't much competition across the Atlantic between the European

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 7>legacies and the US majors. The Gulf carriers were the

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 7>real disruptors for the last twenty years, and they have

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, their capacity has been halved in recent months,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 7>so a huge amount of Europeans who will holiday at

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 7>home in Europe this year, in Portugal and Spain and

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 7>Italy and Greece. A lot of Americans are still coming

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 7>to Europe for the quality, for the sunshine, the culture

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 7>and the alcohol, and along with they continue to travel.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 7>But I think there's a real seed change this year

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 7>of people who would historically have gone to the Middle

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 7>East or using the Middle East carriers to connect to

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 7>long haul probably going to stay at home in Europe

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 7>this summer.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 4>When we'll e're up run out of fuel jet fuel

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 4>in won't.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 7>There was a real concern. I think back in April,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, there was real worries over supply jet supply.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 7>The jet supply has now we met with all of

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 7>our fueld suppliers in Paris last week. There's no issues

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 7>over jet fuel supply right now through to the end

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 7>of September.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 5>There's one issue in the UK.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 7>Q eight, which is the subsidiary of the state of Qaight,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 7>have about thirty percent market share some of the airports

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 7>in the UK even they now are resourcing that supply.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Most of Europe's Jeta one supply comes from West Africa,

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 7>the America is Norway, and the lifting of Russian sanctions

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 7>has also easy to supply Jet one into Eastern European countries.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 4>So you don't seem concerned with what's going on right

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 4>now with the conflict in Iran.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 7>I'm very concerned about the price of oil, but I

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 7>don't believe the conflict in Iran will have any disruption

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 7>on European jet supplies.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 5>I do.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 7>The question for US is how long will the straightsuform

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 7>moves remain closed.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, we gave guidance this morning.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 7>If it remains closed till March twenty twenty seven, our

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 7>unit because of our on head twenty percent, our unit

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 7>costs might rise, you know, mid single diges this year.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Nobody believes what are you gonna stand too? You can

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you just explain your current hedge and strategy where you've.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Had that fuel.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 7>We have bought eighty percent of our jet fuel requirements

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 7>John out to March twenty twenty seven at sixty seven

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 7>dollars a barrow. So we're sitting you know, we're in

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 7>great quite position, great position. But nobody really believes that

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 7>the Straightsform moves are going to stay closed until March

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 7>of next year. It's just we don't know when they're

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 7>going to reopen. Iran is going to starve if they

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 7>don't get it ready. The Straightsform moves reopened to the

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 7>next couple of months. The midterm election season kicks off

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 7>in Memorial Day at the end of May. You know,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 7>Trump is going to lose the House and the Senate

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 7>if he doesn't get this result and reopened. But the

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 7>timing is none of us know when the timing will be.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 7>But you know, I hope it's sooner rather than later.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 7>But if it stays, if it becomes later, say it's

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 7>stay out for something happens to None of us expect

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 7>the straight stay closed to September, October November. Then we

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 7>are looking at our unit cost will be up about

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 7>five percent. But you'll be looking at kind of airlines

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 7>failing all over Europe on the way. Well, I can't

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 7>really name them, but you know some of our low

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 7>fare but not so low cost competitors, wiz.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't think easy yet will fail.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I don't make any money this year with him,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 7>could well be a candidate for failure. Air Baltic, which

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 7>was recently built out by the Latvian government gave it

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 7>a thirty million loan to get them from June through

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 7>to August, but they have to repay the loan in August.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, good luck with the Latvians trying to get

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 7>that repaid at the end of August.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think there will be asualties.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 7>But again a lot depends on how I mean, you

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 7>know more about this than how long the streets film

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 7>remains remain closed. When can Trump declear a victory and

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, kick off the midterms, And I suspect it's

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 7>probably going to be the end of.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 5>May, maybe early June.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 7>But but I mean, if I was any if if

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 7>my prediction is really good, I wouldn't be working in

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 7>the airline business. In a proper functioning business like Bloomberg,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 7>I'll get it right with star salary.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll get it right this time. Stay with us. More

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this. Can this fat cut

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>rights not once, not twice, but maybe three times this year?

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Veronica Clark of City thinks so gradual wakening in demand

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>will lead to a rising unemployment right in the summer months.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>For Anica joins us now for more Veronica, good morning,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>good morning. Each passing day. This sounds more and more contrarian,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>just laying out your argument.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 8>For no, it definitely, you know, to get seventy five

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 8>bays points about. To get any cuts at all, it

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 8>does have to start with the labor market data, right

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 8>and right now. Yeah, nothing really looks like it's breaking

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 8>in the labor market. We even had a stronger jobs

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 8>report last month. I would take the payroll numbers with

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 8>a bit of caution. They are very volatile now, and

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm not really encouraged by what we see in the

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 8>unemployment rate. We've had this big slowing and labor supply,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 8>labor force participation rate has come down, and the unemployment

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 8>rate is still stuck at four point three four point

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 8>four percent. That means that demand got worse, and that's

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 8>ahead of the summer months when you usually hire a

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 8>lot of people, when you get students entering the labor force,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 8>new graduates. And it's been the summer when we've seen

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 8>the unemployment rate rise the last couple of years. Is

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 8>the reason that is cut in September. For the last

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 8>two years, it's when we see the summer data.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 2>You've got unemployment coming up, then yeah, why have you

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 2>got inflation?

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 5>It needs to look better?

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 8>So the inflation focused right now, it's still uncomfortable. Right,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 8>So even the May data I think will look uncomfortably strong.

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 8>But I think if we see monthly inflation readings for June, July,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 8>August data that we'll have before that September meeting, if

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 8>those monthly reports look better, annual inflation will still be high.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 8>But you do need inflation, at least on a monthly

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 8>basis slowing for the Fed to be comfortable.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Cutting What would you have to say to change your view.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Stickier inflation for longer? Not seeing the seasonality in the

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 8>labor market data. Really within the next couple weeks, that

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 8>seasonality starts to first play out in initial jobless claims.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 8>Once you get around the start of the summer Memorial

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 8>Day holiday mid May. Certainly by June you do see

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 8>claims starting to trend higher. So that's the first thing

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 8>I'm watching for. If that doesn't happen within the next

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 8>month or two, then okay, maybe the labor market has

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 8>durably gotten better.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Isn't there a bit of a stress on this entire

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>equation because it might not be as hinged to the

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>labor market as it has been in the past, That

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation could be stickier even without the participation of the

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>labor economity, just based on all the spending coming from hyperscalers.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I'm certainly worried about that AI related inflation.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 8>That actually does get a big part, a big weight

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 8>in core pcees and with computer software really components. So yeah,

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 8>we are getting inflation there. But you know, the demand driven,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 8>tight labor market kind of inflation the FED would be

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 8>most reactive to. That's what we really don't see. And

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 8>I do wonder if having the dual mandate kind of

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 8>forces them into caring about that kind of inflation.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Even last week we.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 8>Got an update for the Atlanta Fed wage tracker that's

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 8>like the monthly proxy for an ECI Fed's preferred wage measure,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 8>it's very low. Again, it fell a lot, so you

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 8>definitely don't see that labor market tightness kind of inflation.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this Fed is going to have

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to tacitly accept three percent inflation in order to continue

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the path that you see?

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean on an annual basis, core pc is

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 8>going to look more like three for most of this year,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 8>right I think the most officials will be really cautious

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 8>on that for now. But it was interesting to hear,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, new incoming Chair Warsh talk about other measures

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 8>of inflation. Right the trimmed mean PCE, even CPI is

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 8>running softer than core PCE right now, maybe they can,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, adjust a little bit in what they're they're

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 8>caring about.

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 4>The President thinks, potentially you need to wait until there's

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 4>the proper figures look at them after the war is over,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 4>almost signaling that he will give Kevin Morrismith Moore a

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 4>breathing space. So when would these three cuts actually happen.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, it would happen later in the year after

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 8>if we see if we see the weaker labor market data.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, for right now, I don't expect that he

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 8>can be particularly duvish going into that June meeting, especially

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 8>if markets perceive that we're not taking inflation seriously, then

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 8>it's you know, we get yeld higher.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 4>John has brought up a lot that this is the

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>man who said in his Senate hearing inflation is a choice.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 4>So how hawkish do you think verbally he's going to be?

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 8>It's really tricky, and you know, he's definitely been more

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 8>hawkish when it comes to things like the balance sheet

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 8>and trying to offset that with sounding more.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Dubvish on policy rates.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 8>But it is really hard to know what his views

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 8>are going to be coming and he is more traditionally hawkish.

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 8>You know, is there going to be you know, one

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 8>to eighty? I don't.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so we'll have.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 8>To see it.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Initially, inflation is a choice, sanded hawkish, and then in

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the actual hearing it's started to sound increasingly davish because

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>you get to choose your index.

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, exactly, Yeah, Yeah, we don't really know where this

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 8>is going to go. Yeah, we have not heard the.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Op dicks aren't great, are they? They've missed their target

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>for five years and they're talking about changing their preferred index.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they will.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Time is not good.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't think other FED officials are going to

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 8>be comfortable with that, But I mean it is an

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 8>interesting signal that you know, what you were supposed to

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 8>care about is the strongest of the core inflation measurer.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I was reading some research from BMP POWAPA, and they've

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 2>got a different view on things for the power Ahead.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's entitled to their own forecast, of course, they think

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 2>on the hike, and the way you discuss the potential

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 2>for one is to start reflecting on the insurance cuts

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 2>you took a year ago and the year before and

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 2>emphasize that they were just insurance cuts and talk about

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>taking them back. Yeah, what would you think of that

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of move?

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the market's already done that a little bit, right,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 8>And I think most FED officials will still see that

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 8>rates are on the restrictive.

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Side of a neutral range.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 8>So if you do start to see any wobbles in

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 8>the labor market, then suddenly you don't need roots even

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 8>more restrictive, of course, right, And I would kind of

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 8>agree with that restrictive assessment just because of what we

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 8>see in all the wage growth, slowing home prices that

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 8>are pretty weak.

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 2>How mess is the SEP going to be next month?

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 8>I yeah, pretty much. Maybe at some point we even

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 8>get some changes to it, right. You know, worsh was

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 8>talking about scaling back some communications potentially. Maybe that's an

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 8>easy out right, you just say very little In June.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendics podcast, bringing you the best

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angient politics. You can watch the show

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business out