WEBVTT - 2021 Ig Nobel Prize Grab Bag, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we're back with part two of this year's talk about

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the ig Nobel Prize winners. If you haven't heard part one,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you can go back and check that one out. First,

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>long story short, we're talking about the ig Nobel Prizes

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>again this year. We're not going to cover every prize,

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but just pick out a few of the highlights that

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to discuss. And Rob I think you're going

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>to kick us off today with the Biology Prize if

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not wrong, Yes, this is the Biology Prize. It

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>went to Suzanne Shots Robert Ecklund and used fond of

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>aga for analyzing variations in purring, chirping, chattering, trilling, tweeting, murmuring,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>me owing, moaning, squeaking, hissing, yowling, howling, growling, and other

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>modes of cat human communication. Those are all cat human communication. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>so this is so one the couple of questions I

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to ask myself about any Ignoble prize winning study

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or paper right up, is first of all, why is

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it funny? And then then secondly, why is it important?

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Why does it matter? And of course it's pretty obvious

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>why this one. It's funny. It's cats. Anything cats do

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>has the potential to be hilarious because they are. They

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>are amusing, They are are strange fur babies, are are

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the weird desert goblins that live in so many of

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>our houses or haunt our yards. I think in many ways,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>cats are funny, almost exactly to the extent that they

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>appear to take themselves very seriously. Yeah, well so they

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that's true. But they're also some very silly looking cats.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they they do often have this kind of

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>serious demeanor and they it's easy too for us to

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>apply human motivations to their behavior and thinking, oh, well,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're covering for a mistake here, they're they're they're

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to, uh, you know, uphold their dignity. Uh. There's

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot we can read into the behaviors of cats,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but the the actual scenario with cat, I mean, any

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>human domestication of another animal species is inherently interesting. That

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the cat model may be one of the most interesting

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of all because it is this kind of at times

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>arguably a self domestication. It's this uh this interesting um

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, um balance that is struck between what the

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>cat wants and what the human wants. Um. And you

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>know so many of us live that every day, that

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that uneasy truce with the feline kind. You're always wondering

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if your cat really respects you. This is less a

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>problem for dog owners. Oh I don't know. I mean

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>I I never wonder and I know my cat doesn't

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>respect me. It's but but well we'll get into that.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So this this uh, this study or actually it's really

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a series of studies. Um. You know, they deal with

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the vocalization of cats. And uh, if if you're not

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that familiar with cats, if you're not around the much,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>you might be surprised by this because cats are often

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty quiet. Um, they can be very quiet, very stealthy.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And while the meal is the most famous cat noise

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and one that is sometimes treated it as kind of

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a monolithic vocalization, there's actually quite a diversity

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to the sounds you're liable to hear come out of

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a cat if you listen enough. So everyone everyone's cat

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is different. I mean cats have have can have amazingly

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>different personalities but concerning my own current cat, Mochi, here

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are some of her most common utterances, so that I

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>might mention these before getting into some of the researchers findings.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, uh, there's there is of course purring. Uh.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Mochi will do this while seated close to or on

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a human uh, you know, whilst relaxing. There's also the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hiss she will generally she'll hiss in other situations, like

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if she's surprised or something, but uh, straight antually enough,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>she most commonly hisses after she has just randomly attacked

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>my foot. She'll be near my foot, she will like

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>play by my toe, and then she will recoil and

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hiss at me like I did something. One of my

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>most vivid memories of a cat hissing is when I

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was in college, a friend of mine called me to

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>come over and help deal with an incredibly large spider

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>discovered in the apartment, and the cat in the apartment

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there was just was just hissing at it, just violently

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hissing at a at a huge black spider. Interesting again,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>cats are so so different than they have such such

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>an interesting personalities. I don't think I've ever heard my

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>cat hiss at a non human entity, but then again,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>she's she's an indoor cat and it's kind of cut

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>off from most non human entities. My cat Mochi will

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>also do something that we affectionately refer to as the

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>midnight baby parade, sometimes not affectionately, depending on the circumstances.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But this is when she carries a toy or small

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stuffed animal around the house, generally after we've all gone

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to bed, and as a kind of repetitive, mournful howling

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about it about you, like something about the toy has

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>made her sad. Now, based on some of the readings

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into, um, I believe it is a communication

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>aimed at us, at us humans, uh, saying hey, I

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have I have caught you something I have provided, I

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have a treat for you, or and or I'm teaching

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you how to hunt something to that effect. So um,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's not actually mournful. That's just our read of it.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>It sounds kind of weird and pathetic, but see it is,

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but it is a vocal communication of sorts. Finally, Mochi

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>will use what I think of as the bossy mew,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a kind of sharp, truncated meal that feels bossy and

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is often administered when she is ready to be fed

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're being too slow about it. Oh, from Charlie

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in that same situation, we get the huffs where he

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fully bark, but it's them. Yeah, yeah, I mean,

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's It's really remarkable when you when you think

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about it, you know, all these these various communications that

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are going on between us and these these non human

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>beings in our homes. Now, there are probably some other

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds from Mochi that I'm forgetting, and there's still others

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that our old cat would make, such as the chirping

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>at birds, which I'll definitely get into. But those are

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the main ones that are in my life that I

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>carried into reading about this research. And and again, one

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the crazy things about all this is that we

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>can we can anthropomorphize our cats all day, but we're

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>left with with very real questions regarding what these sounds

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are and what purpose they serve. And on top of that,

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at it within the context of domesticated cohabitation

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with human beings. Right, so are these sounds that are

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>naturally part of the part of the cat's behavioral repertoire

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in their ancestral environment, or do they somehow emerge from

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>being domesticated and being partnered with humans. Yeah, so it

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>gets it gets very complicated. So um, the lead author

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>on I think all what five studies that were referenced

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the the Ignoble Prize being awarded here, the lead

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>author and all of them was Susan Shots. And if

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you're interested in Shots's work, she actually has a book

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>aimed at general readers and cat owners titled The Secret

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Language of Cats. Um, and I actually picked this up

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and kind of focused on this more than the individual studies, uh.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>In it, she details seventeen different cats sounds, and I'm

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to go through all of them, but it's

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fascinating how these include sounds that are targeted at seemingly

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>targeted at prey, but also targeted at other cats and

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>targeted at humans. Which ones are we closer to the

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're talking to humans. Is it more like their

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 1>interactions with prey or more like other cats? It seems

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to be like other cats. And I've I've read other

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>research that that that summarizes it, you know, in the

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>same way saying like, well, your cat basically thinks of

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you as a giant cat, or your cat basically thinks

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of you as a giant kitten, that sort of thing. So,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just rolling through some of the sounds here and what

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>shots have to say about them. For instance, purring, uh

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is complex because while it is largely associated with with

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the cat feeling content, you can also mean that the

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>cat is hungry, that it is pain, that the cat

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is anxious, or that the cat is giving birth or dying.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, well that's a range. Yeah. So she writes

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that purring probably would translate in human language, and she

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>she does a lot of this, like like, if you

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>were to translate this into human language, what is the

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>cat saying? It probably means something like I am no threat,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or please leave everything as it is, or keep doing

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh I can see that. Okay, So whether the cat

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is happy with what's going on right now and doesn't

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>want to be disturbed, or is in a vulnerable state

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of some kind and doesn't want to be disturbed, it's

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>basically just kind of like, hey, things are fine. Yeah.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I've heard that tidbit about the dying before, and

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I was was having to think back where i'd heard it,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think I actually heard about it the first

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>time in a poem titled Purring by Coleman Barks, who

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>uh incidentally, I think we've brought up on the podcast before,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>because in addition to being a poet of his own work,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he is also the the Roomy interpreter, who has sometimes

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>criticized for not being an actual translator in the true

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of the word. He neither reads nor writes Persian,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but rather sort of rephrases the poems of roomi um

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as English language poems. But anyway, the poem in question

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is is rather good and has nothing to do with

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the poetry of of of Roomy or Persia. It's all

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about cat purring. And this is the key part. Quote

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>here is something I have never heard. A feline purrs

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and two conditions when deeply content and when mortally wounded

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to calm themselves reading for the death opening. Oh that's

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of chilling. Yeah. I've aways found this part of

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the poem very spot on regarding cats and death, because

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Mochi if she gets too cold or

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>if she has some sort of health flare up, she

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.599
<v Speaker 1>basically says to us, I must now settle down and

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>await the death opening, and we're usually like, no, there's

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>no there's no reason to just accept death. You should

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should drink some water instead, You're probably dehydrated.

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And she's like, no, I would prefer death. Oh yeah yeah.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So is is that in general that cats are likely

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to have kind of strange relationships with water or is

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that more specifically your cat? I mean, I've heard that.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you if you look back to where

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cats come to us from, that you know they have

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>ties to desert environments where they wouldn't have access to

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of water. But you spend any amount of

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>time on the internet and you see that the cats

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are kind of all over the place. There are cats

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that habitually drink water from faucets and toilets, you know,

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there are cats that that actually use their fountains. Uh.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And there then their households like ours, where I feel

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like we have we put out various fountains and and

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>bowls of water as kind of a spiritual offering, so

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of water is present. So in the end,

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>she gets I think all of her moisture through her

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>wet food, and otherwise I think she would just dry up. Strange, Now,

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the meals. Shots points out that

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>meals are very often about getting the attention of humans,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and there are really a whole suite of mews. Uh.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there's the mew, which is a very high

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>pitched meal probably generally something that translates as a call

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to attention or help. And then outside of cat human relations,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this is also the sound a kitten makes to its mother.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is a situation where we're we're kind of

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a giant cat mother to our cats, at least in

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>some circumstances. Oh, you can almost look at that as

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of counterpoint to the purring. So if the

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>purring is could sort of be understood as an expression

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of no need to change what's going on, uh, the

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>meal could be a sort of request for change. Yeah.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The squeak, however, is like a shorter, truncated version of this.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is what Mochi is doing when

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>she is demanding to be fed. Uh. So um, so

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not just a general call for attention or help,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but a specific one like hey, I am standing next

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the food bowl and there is no food. Now.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>As for the hiss, uh, it's still confounds me. Because

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in shots is writing here. She mostly writes that

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it is exactly what it sounds like, a warning that

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>says enough, do not come any closer or I will

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>attack you. But again, Mochi regularly does this to me

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>after she bites me. Uh and and I should stress

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>after I do not retaliate. It's not like I I

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>come at her at that point then she has to

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>hiss at me. I'm just standing there, dumbfound at the

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>whole time. But but who knows. It's also a situation

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>where sometimes they hiss when they're startled. Um. I think

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of videos online of cats hissing

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>at cucumbers that have been secreted behind them, that sort

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Oh, now, the chirp and the chatter. This,

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this is where it gets really interesting. And now this

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is something I don't see Mochi doing much. But I

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>had a former cat named Biscuit who would do this

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot while watching birds. Um. I think if you've

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of cat owners out there are people

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that have been around cats, especially indoor cats, can relate

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to this. You know, your cat is watching birds or

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe even some rodents outside the window, and they're very

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>like drawn into it. They're they're they're enticed by they're

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of hypnotized by the display, and then they kind

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of they kind of go ch ch chat or a

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>church of church chirp kind of a sound, and kind

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of kind of like moving their mouths in a weird way,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and it does seem like it's almost like they're trying

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk to the bird. I don't know if I've

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ever ever seen this happen. It's very interesting. And now

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>shots describes them as as quote these sounds as quote

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a hunting instinct where the cat attempts to imitate the

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>calls of the prey or the killing bite for example,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>when a bird or an insect catches the attention of

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the cat. Wow, I feel like I need to look

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up video of this. Yeah, it's either interpretation. I find

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting because first of all, the idea of your cat

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of trying to speak to the prey or

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to sound like it, and you know, they're trying to

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>speak to an its own tongue, Like that's inherently weird

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and interesting. But also this idea that like they're literally

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>chomping at the bit to deliver a killing bite to

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the neck of that organism out there. It's like, oh,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't get to you, but if I could, oh,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I would just right into your neck. Okay, Rob, I

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>take it back. I was totally wrong. I just looked

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>up a video of the chattering, and I have seen

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this before. For some reason, I just didn't connect to

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying. Yes, the the chat well, it's

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like the chattering cinnabite almost. It's just the yeah, the

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>teeth going up and down and the little noise there.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I have seen this, and and it is it is

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>quite strange. I never knew what to make of it. Uh,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what shots also adds inner quote.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>A cat who sees an unreachable bird chatters and imitates

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a killing bite in a stereotypical way. The action could

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>serve as a means of stress relief. Some cats also

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>chatter as a means of protest, for example, when they

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>feel they have been mistreated by their humans, or when

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they are annoyed. It's kind of like punching the air. Yeah,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like, oh, I want to eat you

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and I can't expression, which again especially makes sense for

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>indoor cats who are looking out through the glass at

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a delicious bird. So anyway, if you want to dive

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>deeper into uh in the actual research. Again, the the

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prize website has links to all of these all

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>five of these studies that are mentioned in the awards.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I have to say, The Secret Language of Cats

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Is is a very interesting book, very readable, and it's

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not just about like you know, uh, direct one to

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>one sort of you know, translations. It's about like, what

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are these strange creatures that we live with? Um, you know,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how are we supposed to think about them? Uh? And uh?

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And she also shares some like personal experience with cats,

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>um about you know, her desire to have a cat

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as a child and how she didn't get to have one,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but then later I believe as an adult that's when

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>cats actually entered her life and her home and uh

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ended up being a part of her work. Bravo, thank you,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you. All right, Joe, what what do you have

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for us next? Well? I figured, since in the last

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>episode I talked about people slamming their faces into each

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>other while colliding on a on a sidewalk, I should

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>continue the face slamming theme and UH and talk about

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Peace Prize, for which was given to Ethan Bisserah,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Nailway, and David Carrier quote for testing the hypothesis

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that humans evolved beards to protect themselves from punches to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the face. This is fun because we've we've discussed David

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Carrier's research on the show before, not only related to beards,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but to particularly remember the evolution of human fists and

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the possible connection into punching. Right. So, yeah, Carrier has

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>got this research is part of an arc. Uh, and

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about other parts of this arc on the

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>show before. Um So, David Carrier is a University of

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Utah biologist and one of his big projects that seems

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for a few years is the pursuit of a broader

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.239
<v Speaker 1>theory of human evolution that places a big emphasis on

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>punching people in the face. Uh. Basically the idea that

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>much of the way that human bodies are today was

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of pressure that arose from male fist fighting

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and punching to the jaw. So before the beard thing,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah you mentioned there was he did a study about

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>human hands and try to argue that the current shape

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the human hand could be an adaptation for better

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>fist fighting. UM. I think the more common understanding is

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that the primary evolutionary pressure on the morphology of the

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>human hand is that it was built for dexterity, for

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gripping and manipulating object and little fine motor tasks. But

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of carriers research, if I remember

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it correctly, and this is that it's also getting into

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, yes, you need to do all that stuff,

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but you also need to be able to deliver a

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>punch without robbing yourself of the ability to use that

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fine dexterity later. Right, Yeah, So, in in support of

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>his broader argument, Carrier has done experiments to show back

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>with the example to hand. He did some research showing

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that the shape of the human hand allows for the

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>formation of a tight fist. I think it's the form

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that he calls the butt trest fist, where the thumb

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is curled under to protect the fingers and tuck them

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>into the palm um. And this allows the fist to

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>serve as a club which can deliver heavy blows with

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>reduced risk of injury to the hand as compared to

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a more open handed punch where the fingers and the

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thumb are not curled tightly like that. And so I

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>want to say, this may be true that the human

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hand happen to be good at forming a fist, and

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I have no reason to doubt their findings that that

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>can help deliver blows with reduced risk of injury to

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the hand, though I still think it wouldn't necessarily prove

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that punching behaviors were were the main or even a

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>major part of what the hand evolved for, because I mean,

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to think about analogies, see if the

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>same logic holds up. Um, you could find that certain

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>characteristics of the human skull helped protect the brain during headbutting,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>but that wouldn't necessarily prove that the need to deliver

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>headbuts was a decisive factor in shaping how human skulls

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are today. So in the past, along these lines, I

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>think I've expressed some skepticism about the idea of of

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>carriers punching focused view of human evolution. I certainly don't

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>want to be dismissive. I just I just feel a

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of doubts, like it raises a lot of questions

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for me. One, I was trying if I maybe He's

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>addressed this somewhere, but I was trying to find if

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>there's actually even any evidence that closed fist punching is

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a natural instinctual behavior in humans, as opposed to a

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>relatively rare modern convention that has to be learned and

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>enforced by social norms. Because like you you can go

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>if you read, um, you know, like boxing coaches and

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>people say, you know, they talk about how you like

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>have to learn how to make the right kind of

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fist and if you don't, you could injure your hand.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's not something that people just do by instinct.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It's something that has to be taught. But but maybe

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that has been addressed somewhere, And I want to be fair,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>but I also just think about how, like you know,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you can obviously do even more damage in a fight

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>with less risk of injury to yourself by holding a

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>stick or a rock in your hand, uh than by

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>punching with a closed fist. Um. But you know, all

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of those questions aside, I would of course remain open

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>minded too good evidence in this vein, even though I

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>got my doubts so uh. In this study, the authors

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>extend the the fist punch morephology question to beards, and

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the question here would be why do human males tend

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to grow beards. UM, So the evolutionary pressures driving sexual

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>dimorphism and facial hair are still up for debate, So

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this is not in any way considered a settled question

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's perfectly good arena for people to

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>h to advance different hypotheses and try to test them.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the main hypotheses in this area in the

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>past have been based on social signaling, right, that beards

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>exist primarily to make some kind of impression on other

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>people in the minds of other humans, rather than to

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>serve any kind of mechanical function. So maybe beards are

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>supposed to make you more sexually attractive, though there is

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some doubt about that one, because I think modern studies

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>do not find that women consistently find beards more attractive.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The prevalence of preferences for beards among heterosexual women tends

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to be dependent on a lot factors on social context like.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>For example, one thing I recall reading at some point

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>UM was that average female preferences for facial hair and

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>men tend to follow what's known as a negative frequency

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>dependence model, so that basically, if if your society has

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>more people with beards, more people will find clean shaven

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>men attractive, and if more people are clean shaven, more

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>people will find bearded men attractive. So it's just whatever

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>is less common but within reason though, right, because you

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be too much of an outlier. Um,

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we can all imagine various facial hair choices that are

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>either you know, just's just too problematic or just too strange.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're just going to decide to grow like

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>U two uh, like two globs of hair on either side,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on either cheek, you know, one cut in the shape

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the planet Saturn and the other cutting the shape

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of of Jupiter like that would that would be kind

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of strange. I don't know if anyone would really go

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for that, Robert, I'm finding you incredibly closed minded about

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>cosmic beard sculpting. But anyway, okay, So it's it seems

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like maybe maybe sexual attraction is not the best signaling hypothesis.

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Another possibility is that beards evolved for intra sexual competition

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>among males. Maybe they're supposed to make you look more

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>formidable and dominant and encourage respect and deference. So they're

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to encourage people to think, you know, I

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>am no mere boy. Look at my beard. I am

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a wise and powerful, full grown man. Listen to me.

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's still an open question. People don't know why

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>beards evolved. But this research from argues as follows. They say, quote,

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we hypothesize that beards protect the skin and bones of

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the face when human males fight by absorbing and dispersing

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the energy of a blunt impact. Um. So okay. So

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the points the authors make are uh. They say, you know,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there are other cases where hair appears to serve some

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of defensive function. Uh. For example, the long hair

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of Alliance, Maine is sometimes thought by biologists who have

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>evolved to protect vulnerable spots like the throat and the

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>jaw from damage during violent encounters. Um. And they point

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>out quote the mandible meaning the jaw. The lower jaw,

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>which is superficially covered by the beard, is one of

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the most commonly fractured facial bones in interpersonal violence. So

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 1>they went on to perform some physical tests. They ran

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>tests to simulate the extent to which a beard would

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>protect a jaw from blunt trauma. And so they described

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their method as follows. Quote, we tested this hypothesis by

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>measuring impact force and energy absorbed by a fiber epoxy

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>composite which served as a bone analog when it was

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>covered with skin that had thick hair referred to here

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as furred, versus skin with no hair referred to here

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>as sheared and plucked. We covered the epoxy compile as

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it with segments of skin dissected from domestic sheep and

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>used a drop weight impact tester affixed with a load

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>cell to collect force versus time data. Tissue samples were

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>prepared in three conditions, furred, plucked, and sheared. Okay, so

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>they do this experiment and what do they find? Well,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they find that simulated jaws covered in fur

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>were indeed able to absorb more energy than the ones

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that were plucked or sheared. They say that peak force

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was six greater in the plucked versus the furred conditions,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and total force was thirty seven percent greater. So what's

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference there, Well, they say that fur provides some

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>degree of padding, it increases the time over which the

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>blow is absorbed, and finally they say quote these data

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>support the hypothesis that human beards protect vulnerable regions of

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the facial skeleton from damaging strikes. So I feel like, uh,

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was this was interesting. I'm still kind

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of doubtful about the overall theory, um, just for example,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>using my analogy from earlier. And by the way, I

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mean the researchers are aware of this, you know. They

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>say like that many of these traits could have evolved

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>for other reasons, but they're trying to build a cumulative

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>case that sees fist fighting and male physical aggression as

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a major factor shaping human morphology. So I guess I

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have some doubts that it it's as big as they

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>might be suggesting, But I don't know. Um. But to

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>use the analogy from earlier, it could be true that

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a beard makes it slightly easier to absorb punches to

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the jaw, And it looks like, based on their experiment,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that probably is to to some degree true at least

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly true. And yet that still wouldn't necessarily prove that

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the need to shield against punches to the jaw is

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the primary reason our species has beards. This would be

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one to hear from our our various martial

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>arts listeners about because the direction my mind goes in

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>on this and I instantly think about, uh, though the

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>world of like mixed martial arts, which today is like

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this this highly um uh you know, it's it's a

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a top you know sport. It's it's a situation

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>where people devote their lives to reaching like peak uh skill,

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>peak conditioning, and it becomes like, um, you know, it

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>comes a game of degrees, right, like what what whatever?

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, little thing you can do to give you

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>an edge. It seems like you would do that thing,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>including grow a beard. Uh. And yet when you look

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>at at mixed martial artists, yes, some have beards, some

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have have I guess pretty robust beards, but you don't

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>see like a universal shift to beards like you might

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>see and say, uh, you know certain evolutionaries situations, but

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>also in certain warfare situations where there's some sort of

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a design, uh, some sort of an adaptation that gives

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a clear advantage and then it becomes ubiquitous suddenly everyone

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>who can adopt it does. Yeah. So that's where my

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>main question would be. But but then again I have

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to remind myself that by virtue of being this kind

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of over engineered interpersonal combat sport, perhaps like it's gone

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond the level at which a beard could be at

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>all helpful, Like it just doesn't matter. Maybe like maybe

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like a beard adaptation. Evolutionarily, you're dealing with with something

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>less than you know, a punch that or or a

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>kick or what have you that has like, uh, you know,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>decades of training behind it aimed at just this one thing. Yeah.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that I'm just curious about is is there

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>any kind of evidence that if you actually go back

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a million years or so, that our ancestors would have

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>been practicing a lot of consistent closed fist punching or

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is that a more modern convention of human culture. Yeah,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And then once you start using weapons, um, you know,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you you quickly reach a point where are

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the technology vastly outweighs any kind of natural armoring we

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>might have via beards. You know, once you get to

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like the level of the mace like we discussed before,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just instant skull putting. Unless there's some

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a helmet involved. It doesn't matter what kind

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of hair you have or what kind of beards you're packing.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the counter argument there is, once you're

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you have maces, um, any kind

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of selection that would have been involved, would have already

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>taken place. So yeah, of course that'd be among anatomically

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>modern humans. Yeah. Well, anyway, though, I do want to

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>come back and say, despite the fact that I am,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I still feel some some pretty strong doubts and skepticism

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>about the fist punch theory. Overall, I do appreciate the

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>research because, of course it's always good to explore alternative explanations,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they will pay out. Maybe a lot of

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>more research will pile up in these columns, um and uh.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And then of course also the actual physical findings of

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the experiment, like show the force absorbing properties of hair

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or fur, could be useful to future researchers, even if

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the fist punch hypothesis itself eventually turns out to be

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>universally ruled incorrect. Absolutely, thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>All right for our final selection here, I thought we

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>might talk about the winner of the Transportation Prize, and

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this went to Robin Radcliffe at All for determining by experiment,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it is safer to transport an airborne rhinoceros upside down. Okay,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a good one. Yeah, yeah, this this was

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so this one puzzled me at first, because yes, there's

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>something about an upside down rhino suspended from a helicopter

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that is initially funny. But then I struggled to explain

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>why it was initially funny. I guess it's just maybe

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because the rhino is such a grounded animal and the

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of it being upside down in the sky is

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is is worth a giggle, I guess though, So just

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and get this part out there, like

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this concerns conservation efforts in Namibia, in Africa UM and

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason the various researchers were tied to Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Brazil,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK and the USA UM and it has to

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do quite simply with moving, with translocation, moving one rhinoceros

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>from here to there, from one point to another. How

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do you do that? And what is the best way

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that, not only for the humans doing the moving,

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but also the technology involved and the animal itself. What

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is the least stressful method of carrying this out? Okay,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so is somebody with no expertise at all in this area.

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>My mind immediately goes to scenes from Jurassic Park where

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they're transporting dinosaurs in what looked like giant, giant metal

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>shoe boxes with their holes in the right and uh.

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And apparently that used to be the way. That was

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just how you moved a large animal like a rhino around.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You would trink it and then as it woke up,

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you would groggy lee sort of push it into a crate,

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you would close up the crate and then

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you could transport that crate generally by truck uh to

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you needed to take it. But you could of

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>course also air to lift that crate um via helicopter

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>or something, you know, loaded into a cargo plane something

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of that nature. Okay, So the paper here in question,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it was titled the Pulmonary and metabolic effects of suspension

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>by the feet compared with lateral recumbency in immobilized black

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Rhinoceros captured by aerial darting um and this came out

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal of wild Life Diseases. Now, the paper

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>itself here is pretty technical, getting into you know, a lot. Basically,

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it focuses a lot on the breathing of the rhinoceros.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But I found a lot of wonderful clarity on the

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>topic in a Manga Bay article by Malavica via Waharre

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in which the author interviews Robin Radcliffe, UM, the lead

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>author and one of the key researchers involved in this

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>award winning paper. So essentially what happened is the researchers

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.239
<v Speaker 1>were asked to weigh in on a new practice of

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>translocating rhinos that was being pioneered by UM animal relocation

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>efforts in Namibia and Cornell University veterinarian Robin Radcliffe is

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rhino expert, so he's exactly the right person to bring

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in on this question. So, uh, like we we just mentioned, Yeah,

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the crate was the the old way of doing it,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, interestingly enough, I was looking for pictures of

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>rhinos and crates and one of the top things that

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>came up was a matchbox toy set that features a

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>toy rhino, a toy crate, and then a helicopter for

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>lifting said crate off the ground. The way does the

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>helicopter powered? Uh no, I think it's just like a

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>matchbox thing. But you know this is the use your imagination.

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It looks it's a fun kid. You know, it's not

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a matchbox kid. I'm just only you know, in my household.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So my son is not super into vehicles, but like,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this toy tells a story. Here's the helicopter, here's the

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the the crate. Here is the rhino. Fly the

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>rhino to safety, says the matchbox label. Wait, Rob, I

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>think maybe the blades do spin. It looks like it's

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>got a handle on the top of the rotor, and

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of those where you can like

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>spin it by manual force. Either maybe you spin it

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with just by spinning it with your hand, or you

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you you pull a cord or something. Okay, yeah, it

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like you do get some spinning action. It's not

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna fly by itself. It's not a drune but um,

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but it does look fun. Um. But I think the

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>toy here relays some of the challenges involved in this method.

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, you look at it. Okay, you

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have a huge helicopter or you know, you can imagine

0:34:58.040 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>if it was just using a truck. You still need

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sizeable truck. It's a pretty huge crate, it's

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty huge animal. Uh. And if you're transporting the

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>rhino by truck, then you need roads to take you

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're going. And if you're going by helicopter. Well,

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you've got to transport this big grate out there to

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the location where you're acquiring the animal, and you're gonna

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>need a secondary, smaller copter to trink the rhino and

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>carry the capture team. So so it's a big operation. Yeah,

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>big operation any way to shake it. But wildlife teams

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in the video were interested in trying some different methods.

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>They were interested in fine tuning the chopper tactic as

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>well as expediting the whole process. Uh and uh. You

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>know one of the key advantages again if of using

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>a helicopter is it it allows you to move the

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>animal to more remote locations and to do so in

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a faster manner. Um, you don't have to worry about

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>what can a road take me there? And do I

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have to how how far do I have to wind

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>around with this? Uh? This this poor rhino in the

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>trunk right how bumpy is it? Right now? One of

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that that Radcliffe points out, and that has

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pointed out in that Manga Bay article, is that translocation

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>efforts have something of a checkered history in the past,

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of factors to consider, um

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And therefore you could even consider these Namibia

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>efforts as being kind of a leap of faith, uh

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we've got to do something from a

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>conservation standpoint. Let's try and move the animals to a

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>more secure location, a place where they can they can

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>live and um. But again, there's a lot of stuff

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to consider, and this paper deals with one

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of them. Because to streamline the translocation by helicopter, Uh,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the big things you can do is dispense

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with that crate and try to get them into the

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>air while they're still under you know, they're they're still tranquilized.

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's try and you know, harness them up in something

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>carrying them in the sky and make a bee line

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>for wherever we're going. Um, hopefully as the animal never

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>even wakes up. Uh. And you know this gonna make

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it easier not only on the animal itself, but also

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on the people that have to do the carrying. Okay,

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So one tactic that has been used is

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to force a sledge underneath the animal once it's laying

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on the side, so it's been tranked, it's laying on

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 1>its side, force a sledge underneath its body, then secure

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it to the sledge and you airlift that sledge um

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, up into the air, take it to

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 1>another location. I included a photograph of what this looks

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like for you, Joe. Okay, this already looks strange enough.

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a sideways rhino with four feet hanging out

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>over the sky. Yep, it looks pretty good, looks stable.

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It makes a lot of sense. You see, you see

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly how they got there. But but Ratcliffe new from

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>previous studies that this position for the rhino increases what's

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>known as dead space, the volume of ventilated air that

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>does not participate in gas exchange. An extended time in

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>this position means the animal is getting less out of

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>each breath. Okay, so the rhino is not grad at

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>breathing in this position, right. So this brings us to

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this this new idea, this this new way of carrying

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the rhino that was being that's been UH was that

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was brought up by Annidian conservationist that they brought in

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Radcliff Radcliffe into UH to study. And that is, while

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the the rhino is out, you secure all of its

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>legs to harness and you lift it up into the

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>air in an inverted posture. And carry it that way. Okay,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so we've gone from upright rhino to sideways rhino to

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>completely upside down rhino. You're just doing the ninety degree

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>rotate command repeatedly, right, Um, And you know it's it's

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting right because like the rhino normally is standing up

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and it could you know, it's sometimes going to be

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on its side, but it's never going to be inverted

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the natural world. Like this is a new position

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>for the living rhinoceros. Uh. So that's why they wanted

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to study, well what does this do to the rhino's breathing? Um?

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything you know essential that we need to

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>know about this before we really roll this out as

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>our chief means of carrying rhinos from one place to another? Okay,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>well I want to know does it work? Um? The

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>short answer is yes, it does seem to work. Um.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Now there's still it still requires a lot of work.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing they really drive home here is that, Um,

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're still gonna have to have that second chopper.

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 1>You're still gonna have to have somebody in there to

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to drink the rhino. It's gonna involve a whole team.

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like, we've perfectly streamlined this to to

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>something that is not hard. It's still difficult. Um, it's

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in it's still a stressful situation. Um. But uh so.

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But Radcliffe was was mainly looking at breathing with the rhino.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Here they used a crane instead of a chopper um,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and their findings, while not final and all inclusive and

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>also utilizing a small sample size, they stressed, we're certainly encouraging.

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, you don't encounter that increase of

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>dead air. In fact, it might actually improve oxygen intake.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>But apparently that's that's an issue where the authors are like, well,

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have a huge sample size here, so we

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't put as much emphasis on bad aspect of it. Okay,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but they at least know that in this small group

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of animals, hanging upside down was no worse for breathing

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>than lying sideways on a sledge, and it might possibly

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>improve oxygen saturation a little bit, but that's not clear, right,

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the case. And secondly, while some

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>animals would be worse off being transported in an inverted position,

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the rhino does really well. And in fact, here's a

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>quote from Vala Bajara's interview with Radcliffe. This is a

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>quote from Radcliffe quote. If you look at the anatomy

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of the rhino, it has a very heavy, a very

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>large neck and head. When you hang them upside down,

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the head hangs really low. That does two things. It

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>straightens out the spine and it also straightens out the airway.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 1>From a strictly anatomical perspective, it's actually an ideal position

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for a rhino to be in. It's an ideal endpoint

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for rhino evolution in in in a million years, the

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>rhinos will all move around upside down. Yeah, so I

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 1>love that. It's like, not only is the upside down rhino? Um, Okay,

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it is? It is in some sense optimal. This is

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>optimal rhinoceros. Here, don't some people have contraptions for flipping

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 1>themselves upside down for I have no idea if there's

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>anything to this but for some perceived medical benefit or

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>physicotherapy at least or something. Yeah, inversions, you you do.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is probably something we'd have to

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>come back to in a full episode. But m yeah,

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some studies about it, and there's

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of claims about it um both uh,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly within like say the yoga community, but

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>also yeah, you see people who have just advocated being

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>upside down as a as as an effective life choice.

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Not full time, I guess, but no, no, that'd be

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting to look into. Maybe maybe we should come back

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to that now with the rhinos here there there's more

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>work to be done here, uh, such as looking at

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the circulation of the animal, which I don't think was

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>really a focal point of this particular study, but still

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's insightful and it's an important study into the

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>effects of transporting. Uh these animals by Chopper and conservation

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>groups are already using the same technique with giant sable

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>antelope and with the African elephant. Wow. Yeah, So with

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>an upside down rhinoceros, this means when it finally gets

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>set down, makes gentle contact with the ground, does it

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>go horn first? Uh? Well, they have to be very

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>gentle setting it down, you know. Then then then you

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't just drop it. Uh. It's it's like a

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>very very careful game of the claw machine, right right.

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I should add that another important note about this is

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can't just have any helicopter do this, Like

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the rhino is a very heavy animal. So one of

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the things that Raticlo stresses is that, yeah, you still

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>need two helicopters. You need the smaller helicopter for the

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>trank team, but you need a pretty sizeable helicopter to

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>actually lift this creature, even if there's no crate involved.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, but that's not cheap. Okay, here's how to

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>make the image funnier the upside down. Right now, sir

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is dangling from not a helicopter but a Harrier jet.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that idea. That doesn't sound good. Some

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of vertical takeoff airplane. Yeah that does somehow, that

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like it would work. All right, Well, I

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>guess that's it for this episode. Um uh. Like we

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>said before, we're not covering all the winners this this year,

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but we just looked at four of them. But if

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to find the rest of them, head on

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>over to the Ignobile Prizes website. Uh and they have

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a full listing of them, along with links to the

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>individual studies. And also there was a webcast of the ceremony.

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, they're usually high jinks of some sort.

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>All love to them, but often some kind of cringe

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>e humor. All right, well, we're gonna go and close

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it out here in the meantime, If you would like

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:58.760
<v Speaker 1>head on over to wherever you get your podcasts, because

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>wherever that is you'll find this Have to Blow Your

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Mind podcast feed. We run core episodes of the show

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesdays and Thursdays, Artifact on Wednesdays, listener mail on Mondays,

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and on Fridays we do a little weird ou cinema.

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>That's our time to set aside most serious considerations and

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>just focus in on a strange film. Huge thanks as

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello, you can

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for My Heart Radio,

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're

0:44:47.160 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to your favorite shows. Three three Proper Chara