WEBVTT - Moonlight Review + Barry Jenkins & Naomie Harris Interview | Archive

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.645 --> 0:00:27.565
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.725
<v Speaker 1>with no blackout dates or restrictions. Sign up now on

0:00:34.765 --> 0:00:36.964
<v Speaker 1>the Regal app or at the link in our description

0:00:37.165 --> 0:00:41.004
<v Speaker 1>and use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen

0:00:41.045 --> 0:00:44.845
<v Speaker 1>percent off time for another archive drop. Josh and we

0:00:44.885 --> 0:00:49.724
<v Speaker 1>are continuing our best Picture winners theme building up to

0:00:49.885 --> 0:00:53.844
<v Speaker 1>the Oscars. We've got a look back at Barry Jenkins

0:00:53.965 --> 0:00:58.005
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen. Yes it won not La La Land. Moonlight

0:00:58.365 --> 0:01:02.645
<v Speaker 1>one best picture that year, surprise at the moment, and

0:01:03.685 --> 0:01:09.045
<v Speaker 1>seems like the better and better choice every year that

0:01:09.125 --> 0:01:11.884
<v Speaker 1>has gone by, which isn't always the case necessarily for

0:01:12.605 --> 0:01:15.524
<v Speaker 1>Best Picture winners. I think people and sometimes us we

0:01:15.685 --> 0:01:18.325
<v Speaker 1>like to joke about them, but in this case, I

0:01:18.325 --> 0:01:20.244
<v Speaker 1>think they probably got it right. And that's no shade

0:01:20.285 --> 0:01:22.125
<v Speaker 1>on Lalla Land, which I still love and think is

0:01:22.164 --> 0:01:25.924
<v Speaker 1>an incredible film. But yeah, for me at least, there's

0:01:26.444 --> 0:01:31.165
<v Speaker 1>increasing resonance with Moonlight, even beyond what we found in

0:01:31.205 --> 0:01:32.164
<v Speaker 1>our original review.

0:01:32.405 --> 0:01:34.684
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see what we had to say in our

0:01:34.725 --> 0:01:38.124
<v Speaker 2>original review, and also we'll get to hear what Barry

0:01:38.205 --> 0:01:41.765
<v Speaker 2>Jenkins himself, along with his star Naomi Harris, had to

0:01:41.765 --> 0:01:44.804
<v Speaker 2>say about the film. I had the opportunity to talk

0:01:44.845 --> 0:01:47.525
<v Speaker 2>to them back when the film was released in October

0:01:47.565 --> 0:01:51.005
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen, So you're going to get that conversation followed

0:01:51.005 --> 0:01:52.245
<v Speaker 2>by our review.

0:01:53.805 --> 0:01:54.485
<v Speaker 3>What happened?

0:01:56.525 --> 0:01:57.525
<v Speaker 4>What happens? Chiron?

0:01:58.085 --> 0:01:59.765
<v Speaker 5>Why you didn't come home like you're supposed to?

0:02:00.485 --> 0:02:02.725
<v Speaker 4>Huh?

0:02:02.765 --> 0:02:03.404
<v Speaker 2>And who is you?

0:02:04.285 --> 0:02:10.005
<v Speaker 3>Nobody? I found him yesterday, found him in a hold

0:02:10.085 --> 0:02:12.885
<v Speaker 3>on fifteen, Yeah, that one.

0:02:14.125 --> 0:02:17.045
<v Speaker 4>Some boys chased him in a cut scared more than anything.

0:02:17.885 --> 0:02:19.685
<v Speaker 4>Wouldn't tell me where he lived on this morning.

0:02:21.205 --> 0:02:24.965
<v Speaker 5>Wow. Thanks for seeing to them. You usually can take

0:02:25.005 --> 0:02:25.805
<v Speaker 5>care of itself.

0:02:27.285 --> 0:02:31.285
<v Speaker 4>Be good that way, Barry. I'll start with you.

0:02:31.365 --> 0:02:34.644
<v Speaker 2>Medicine from Melancholy was a movie that certainly earned some acclaim.

0:02:34.685 --> 0:02:38.165
<v Speaker 2>I remember it got generally very favorable reviews. But the

0:02:38.204 --> 0:02:40.364
<v Speaker 2>response to this movie Moonlight seems to be its own

0:02:40.484 --> 0:02:42.525
<v Speaker 2>kind of whirlwind. Do you have a sense of what

0:02:42.565 --> 0:02:46.165
<v Speaker 2>it is that audiences are connecting with so strongly and

0:02:46.484 --> 0:02:48.285
<v Speaker 2>is it the same thing as what drew you to

0:02:48.365 --> 0:02:48.924
<v Speaker 2>the material?

0:02:49.325 --> 0:02:52.285
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? You know, I think it's really the movie's very personal,

0:02:52.484 --> 0:02:54.685
<v Speaker 3>you know, and I think people just sort of they

0:02:54.725 --> 0:02:58.365
<v Speaker 3>identify with, you know how specifically we sort of engage

0:02:58.405 --> 0:03:01.084
<v Speaker 3>Hyonn's struggle, you know, and it's not this thing where

0:03:01.445 --> 0:03:03.965
<v Speaker 3>what Chiron goes through is relatable to everyone. I think

0:03:04.005 --> 0:03:07.205
<v Speaker 3>people see just how deep we dove into that one character,

0:03:07.484 --> 0:03:10.244
<v Speaker 3>and they go, oh, I wish someone could add the

0:03:10.365 --> 0:03:13.445
<v Speaker 3>deeply into me. You know, they see themselves in the character.

0:03:13.445 --> 0:03:15.965
<v Speaker 3>They don't see everyone in the character. And I think

0:03:15.965 --> 0:03:18.484
<v Speaker 3>in that one to one exchange, the movie is just spreading,

0:03:18.565 --> 0:03:18.925
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:03:19.325 --> 0:03:20.885
<v Speaker 4>And you don't have to get too personal, but what

0:03:21.125 --> 0:03:21.685
<v Speaker 4>you see in the.

0:03:21.685 --> 0:03:25.005
<v Speaker 3>Character, well, you know, for Chirone, you know, and Naomi

0:03:25.085 --> 0:03:27.005
<v Speaker 3>sitting next to me, And to be brutally honest, you know,

0:03:27.044 --> 0:03:29.365
<v Speaker 3>when I first read Suel's Peace, which was written here

0:03:29.405 --> 0:03:31.765
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago actually when he was an undergrader to Paul

0:03:32.245 --> 0:03:35.525
<v Speaker 3>Naomi plays his character Paula, who is a composite of

0:03:35.565 --> 0:03:38.005
<v Speaker 3>my mom and t Where's Mom? And so I could

0:03:38.045 --> 0:03:40.525
<v Speaker 3>just relate to Chirone as a kid who was watching

0:03:40.525 --> 0:03:42.845
<v Speaker 3>this person who he loves, you know, go through this

0:03:42.965 --> 0:03:44.245
<v Speaker 3>is just terrible ordeal.

0:03:44.925 --> 0:03:47.645
<v Speaker 2>And now we speaking of your character Paula. As viewers,

0:03:47.685 --> 0:03:50.445
<v Speaker 2>we make certain assumptions and judgments about her. I think

0:03:50.485 --> 0:03:53.404
<v Speaker 2>before we even meet her, her son is so determined

0:03:53.445 --> 0:03:55.205
<v Speaker 2>not to go home and to hang out with these

0:03:55.445 --> 0:03:58.805
<v Speaker 2>total strangers, we wonder how horrible his home life must be.

0:03:59.165 --> 0:04:01.285
<v Speaker 2>When we do meet her, we recognize she may not

0:04:01.365 --> 0:04:03.684
<v Speaker 2>be perfect, but she is caring and she is protective,

0:04:03.765 --> 0:04:06.165
<v Speaker 2>like we expect a mother to be. There's a decline

0:04:06.205 --> 0:04:08.605
<v Speaker 2>from there. But how did you go about not judging

0:04:08.645 --> 0:04:10.365
<v Speaker 2>this incredibly flawed character.

0:04:11.205 --> 0:04:13.525
<v Speaker 5>I didn't, I think initially. I think that was my

0:04:13.725 --> 0:04:16.605
<v Speaker 5>biggest discovery. Actually when I started, when I took on

0:04:16.685 --> 0:04:19.525
<v Speaker 5>the role, I thought initially that I didn't want to

0:04:20.325 --> 0:04:22.725
<v Speaker 5>play paul Or. I had some resistance to playing her

0:04:22.805 --> 0:04:27.405
<v Speaker 5>because I wanted to portray positive images of women and

0:04:27.605 --> 0:04:30.485
<v Speaker 5>positive images of black women in particular. But actually, once

0:04:30.525 --> 0:04:33.925
<v Speaker 5>I started researching the character, I really realized I had

0:04:33.925 --> 0:04:35.685
<v Speaker 5>to be honest with myself that a lot of the

0:04:35.725 --> 0:04:39.805
<v Speaker 5>resistance was about my own judgment about addiction. I'm miscontrol freak.

0:04:39.885 --> 0:04:42.285
<v Speaker 5>I'm teetotal and a drink and of smoke and don't

0:04:42.284 --> 0:04:46.045
<v Speaker 5>even drink coffee. So I had a real problem getting

0:04:46.085 --> 0:04:49.685
<v Speaker 5>wrapping my head around what drives someone to have an

0:04:49.685 --> 0:04:52.765
<v Speaker 5>addiction to something like crack cocaine. And it was a

0:04:52.805 --> 0:04:55.685
<v Speaker 5>wonderful journey where I had to learn deep compassion well,

0:04:55.725 --> 0:04:59.844
<v Speaker 5>first of all, understanding and then deep empathy for Paula's choices.

0:05:00.005 --> 0:05:02.485
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and without spoiling too much of the movie and

0:05:02.525 --> 0:05:05.164
<v Speaker 2>the journey Paula goes on, did you come to see

0:05:05.485 --> 0:05:07.125
<v Speaker 2>her journey as a positive one?

0:05:07.485 --> 0:05:12.284
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely? I think it's a shining example of how you

0:05:12.325 --> 0:05:14.565
<v Speaker 5>know you can only give to others what you have

0:05:14.685 --> 0:05:18.725
<v Speaker 5>received yourself. You know, if your love tank is empty

0:05:18.805 --> 0:05:21.205
<v Speaker 5>because you didn't receive what you needed as a child, wild,

0:05:21.525 --> 0:05:24.445
<v Speaker 5>it's very difficult to give that to another human being.

0:05:24.844 --> 0:05:28.045
<v Speaker 5>And also another human being is who that's your child

0:05:28.165 --> 0:05:30.484
<v Speaker 5>because often your child is you know, your child is

0:05:30.485 --> 0:05:33.405
<v Speaker 5>an extension of yourself. So I think your self loathing

0:05:33.765 --> 0:05:36.125
<v Speaker 5>and Paula has a lot of that is taken out

0:05:36.125 --> 0:05:38.044
<v Speaker 5>on your child because when you look at them, you

0:05:38.085 --> 0:05:41.005
<v Speaker 5>see yourself. So until you heal that relationship with yourself,

0:05:41.005 --> 0:05:43.205
<v Speaker 5>I think it's very difficult to have another.

0:05:43.045 --> 0:05:44.885
<v Speaker 2>Human I think that really comes through in particular in

0:05:44.964 --> 0:05:47.645
<v Speaker 2>one scene kind of at her worst moment, where she

0:05:47.765 --> 0:05:50.364
<v Speaker 2>says almost in a hunting way but also in a

0:05:50.445 --> 0:05:53.805
<v Speaker 2>loving way, that you're my only and I'm yours. There

0:05:53.844 --> 0:05:56.805
<v Speaker 2>is that reflection back in those characters. So what's more

0:05:56.885 --> 0:06:00.325
<v Speaker 2>challenging than shooting a Bond film in this den bowl

0:06:00.365 --> 0:06:03.205
<v Speaker 2>with all these action scenes, or playing someone so opposite

0:06:03.205 --> 0:06:04.005
<v Speaker 2>who you really are?

0:06:06.245 --> 0:06:11.445
<v Speaker 5>I would say, actually, yeah, yes, because of all the stunts.

0:06:11.725 --> 0:06:16.325
<v Speaker 5>Yeah it's that's no. They're just completely different challenges, aren't they.

0:06:16.404 --> 0:06:19.365
<v Speaker 5>They're sure and yeah, it's challenging in a completely different way.

0:06:19.404 --> 0:06:20.685
<v Speaker 2>Well, so I guess the more serious version of that

0:06:20.765 --> 0:06:22.685
<v Speaker 2>question is why is it important to you as an

0:06:22.685 --> 0:06:26.725
<v Speaker 2>actress to take both kinds of roles, these big action spectacles,

0:06:26.725 --> 0:06:28.685
<v Speaker 2>but do these smaller, more intimate movies as.

0:06:28.565 --> 0:06:33.725
<v Speaker 5>Well, Because I think because I'm ultimately interested both as

0:06:33.725 --> 0:06:37.364
<v Speaker 5>a performer and as an individual in growth and learning.

0:06:38.365 --> 0:06:41.645
<v Speaker 5>I think that in life we often play one character,

0:06:42.205 --> 0:06:46.125
<v Speaker 5>and actually we are made up of multiple characters that

0:06:46.485 --> 0:06:49.165
<v Speaker 5>usually most people don't get to discover. And I think

0:06:49.205 --> 0:06:52.165
<v Speaker 5>the joy in acting is discovering all those different parts

0:06:52.245 --> 0:06:55.765
<v Speaker 5>of yourself. And that's what acting allows you to do.

0:06:55.925 --> 0:06:58.164
<v Speaker 5>And if I play varied roles and I get to

0:06:58.205 --> 0:07:01.005
<v Speaker 5>exercise those parts of myself I never knew existed.

0:07:01.605 --> 0:07:04.085
<v Speaker 2>Barry, I wanted to ask you about the influences, because

0:07:04.085 --> 0:07:05.525
<v Speaker 2>I know you've gotten this question a lot. At the

0:07:05.605 --> 0:07:09.044
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Film Fest Q and A after the movie, you

0:07:09.325 --> 0:07:11.605
<v Speaker 2>throughout the three movies that you said had the biggest

0:07:11.605 --> 0:07:14.165
<v Speaker 2>influence on the style of this film, both Travia, three

0:07:14.205 --> 0:07:16.805
<v Speaker 2>Times Happy Together, and I think you can definitely see

0:07:16.805 --> 0:07:18.925
<v Speaker 2>those influences in the film and the way that it's

0:07:19.005 --> 0:07:22.725
<v Speaker 2>quite lyrical. It's certainly not focused on gritty realism necessarily.

0:07:23.125 --> 0:07:25.085
<v Speaker 2>And the moments that, as I reflect back on it

0:07:25.125 --> 0:07:27.325
<v Speaker 2>to stand out to me in the movie are actually

0:07:27.725 --> 0:07:29.965
<v Speaker 2>just those There. There are moments, There are the moments

0:07:30.005 --> 0:07:32.965
<v Speaker 2>that you kind of draw out or heighten or return to.

0:07:33.085 --> 0:07:35.285
<v Speaker 2>There are kind of moments that these tableaux kind of

0:07:35.325 --> 0:07:37.565
<v Speaker 2>moments that almost take you out of time and space.

0:07:37.805 --> 0:07:40.525
<v Speaker 2>And I thought that was appropriate because I think those

0:07:41.325 --> 0:07:44.165
<v Speaker 2>those are the moments we remember from our childhoods. As

0:07:44.205 --> 0:07:46.685
<v Speaker 2>we reflect back, we think of those. We we forget

0:07:46.765 --> 0:07:49.765
<v Speaker 2>a lot, but we remember just certain images and certain sounds.

0:07:49.885 --> 0:07:52.365
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And as a person who has you know, kind

0:07:52.365 --> 0:07:56.165
<v Speaker 3>of found their voice through creating visual storytelling, you know,

0:07:56.245 --> 0:07:59.005
<v Speaker 3>through through images, you know, it was something to roll

0:07:59.005 --> 0:08:01.125
<v Speaker 3>on to always discussed this project as sort of being

0:08:01.205 --> 0:08:03.365
<v Speaker 3>like a like a fever dream. You know, I said

0:08:03.365 --> 0:08:05.685
<v Speaker 3>to him, you've taken memories of my memories and and

0:08:05.965 --> 0:08:08.765
<v Speaker 3>and sort of like presented them as his fever dream.

0:08:09.325 --> 0:08:11.165
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like in the film, you know, I

0:08:11.205 --> 0:08:14.245
<v Speaker 3>wanted the audience to experience, you know, what Shyrona is experiencing.

0:08:14.525 --> 0:08:16.925
<v Speaker 3>And he is almost like he's a participant in his

0:08:16.965 --> 0:08:19.645
<v Speaker 3>own life. But at some point this consciousness sort of

0:08:19.685 --> 0:08:21.405
<v Speaker 3>like you know, it sort of gets away from him,

0:08:21.445 --> 0:08:24.605
<v Speaker 3>you know, and it takes on this heightened quality, you know,

0:08:24.605 --> 0:08:26.845
<v Speaker 3>And I wanted to find a way to translate that,

0:08:26.885 --> 0:08:28.725
<v Speaker 3>you know, in a way that the audience can experience

0:08:28.805 --> 0:08:30.765
<v Speaker 3>what the character is experiencing.

0:08:30.925 --> 0:08:33.525
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that notion of it being a fever dream,

0:08:33.645 --> 0:08:36.285
<v Speaker 2>it reminds me of what Terrell said about having written

0:08:36.325 --> 0:08:38.765
<v Speaker 2>this this script or written this play and then realized

0:08:38.765 --> 0:08:41.405
<v Speaker 2>that he couldn't really stage it. You obviously saw something

0:08:41.485 --> 0:08:43.725
<v Speaker 2>cinematic in the material, was say.

0:08:43.685 --> 0:08:44.205
<v Speaker 4>Yeah right away.

0:08:44.245 --> 0:08:46.885
<v Speaker 3>You know. It was partly because you know, as a filmmaker,

0:08:46.885 --> 0:08:49.444
<v Speaker 3>I've never made anything that was like personal in this way,

0:08:49.485 --> 0:08:51.325
<v Speaker 3>but which I mean that was like at the foundation

0:08:51.405 --> 0:08:53.325
<v Speaker 3>of how I grew up, where I grew up, when

0:08:53.325 --> 0:08:56.364
<v Speaker 3>I grew up and Terrell's Peace gave me the opportunity

0:08:56.365 --> 0:08:58.645
<v Speaker 3>to do that, and because of that, it's like a

0:08:58.645 --> 0:09:01.444
<v Speaker 3>one to one sort of like translation. It's like, Oh,

0:09:01.525 --> 0:09:03.325
<v Speaker 3>I know exactly what that looks like and what that

0:09:03.365 --> 0:09:05.445
<v Speaker 3>feels like. I don't need to travel, you know, two

0:09:05.485 --> 0:09:08.325
<v Speaker 3>thousand miles to Miami to know what that corner feels like.

0:09:08.485 --> 0:09:10.605
<v Speaker 3>I've been there, you know, and in a beautiful way,

0:09:10.645 --> 0:09:13.285
<v Speaker 3>and then took this filmmaking voice I've developed, which is

0:09:13.365 --> 0:09:16.805
<v Speaker 3>absent from my home environment where I grew up, and now.

0:09:16.684 --> 0:09:17.525
<v Speaker 4>I can I think.

0:09:17.564 --> 0:09:20.885
<v Speaker 3>I think film has given me a chance to speak about,

0:09:21.085 --> 0:09:23.165
<v Speaker 3>you know, the way I grew up in a voice

0:09:23.205 --> 0:09:25.405
<v Speaker 3>that I didn't think myself capable of, you know, And

0:09:25.845 --> 0:09:28.965
<v Speaker 3>then the converse happened, where now my filmmaking voice has

0:09:29.005 --> 0:09:31.685
<v Speaker 3>been elevated because I know this world so viscerally.

0:09:31.965 --> 0:09:34.564
<v Speaker 2>The films that you mentioned as influences are those films

0:09:34.605 --> 0:09:37.885
<v Speaker 2>that you came to through film school and kind of

0:09:37.925 --> 0:09:39.565
<v Speaker 2>later as you got into cinema, or were they some

0:09:39.564 --> 0:09:41.805
<v Speaker 2>of the films that really turned you on to cinema

0:09:41.845 --> 0:09:42.525
<v Speaker 2>in the first place.

0:09:42.605 --> 0:09:44.365
<v Speaker 3>You know, The two things happened at once. Yeah, I

0:09:44.365 --> 0:09:47.005
<v Speaker 3>didn't I wasn't in love with cinema at all. Growing up,

0:09:47.045 --> 0:09:49.204
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really care that much about movies. I kind

0:09:49.205 --> 0:09:51.565
<v Speaker 3>of stumbled into it after I was already at Florida

0:09:51.564 --> 0:09:55.045
<v Speaker 3>State doing my undergrad and creative writing, and I'm a

0:09:55.045 --> 0:09:57.925
<v Speaker 3>big football fan, and there just happened to be a

0:09:57.965 --> 0:10:00.125
<v Speaker 3>film school in the football stadium. That's where the film

0:10:00.125 --> 0:10:02.285
<v Speaker 3>school was at Florida State. Yeah, so I was going

0:10:02.325 --> 0:10:05.045
<v Speaker 3>to a football game because they rebuilt the stadium, and

0:10:05.085 --> 0:10:06.765
<v Speaker 3>I think out of guilt, they had to put something

0:10:06.765 --> 0:10:09.445
<v Speaker 3>there that wasn't football related, and that was the film school.

0:10:09.645 --> 0:10:10.845
<v Speaker 3>So I thought, oh, I kind of like movies.

0:10:10.885 --> 0:10:11.605
<v Speaker 4>I'll check this out.

0:10:12.245 --> 0:10:14.805
<v Speaker 3>And I saw right away that everybody was the movies

0:10:14.845 --> 0:10:17.405
<v Speaker 3>they were watching were sort of informing their aesthetic, and

0:10:17.445 --> 0:10:19.844
<v Speaker 3>I thought, I want my aesthetic to be unique, and

0:10:19.885 --> 0:10:22.605
<v Speaker 3>so I'm gonna watch nothing but Horn films. And some

0:10:22.645 --> 0:10:25.245
<v Speaker 3>of those films are the movies I watched as I

0:10:25.285 --> 0:10:28.045
<v Speaker 3>was first falling in love with filmmaking. And I think

0:10:28.165 --> 0:10:30.605
<v Speaker 3>it's not a surprise that my voice has been heavily

0:10:30.645 --> 0:10:33.285
<v Speaker 3>influenced by those things. And I think the work of

0:10:33.285 --> 0:10:35.565
<v Speaker 3>the last fifteen years as a filmmaker has been Okay, Now,

0:10:35.804 --> 0:10:37.645
<v Speaker 3>this is where the influence stops, and this is where

0:10:37.645 --> 0:10:41.245
<v Speaker 3>Barry Jenkins begins. And this project gave me just the

0:10:41.285 --> 0:10:42.805
<v Speaker 3>greatest palette to express that.

0:10:43.725 --> 0:10:46.485
<v Speaker 2>NI. At that same Chicago film fest, Q and A. A.

0:10:46.525 --> 0:10:48.564
<v Speaker 2>Trell mentioned one of the central questions in the movie

0:10:48.645 --> 0:10:51.365
<v Speaker 2>being am I a man? What kind of man?

0:10:51.445 --> 0:10:51.765
<v Speaker 4>Am I?

0:10:51.885 --> 0:10:55.725
<v Speaker 2>What defines me? Is it my sexuality? How tough I am,

0:10:55.845 --> 0:10:58.805
<v Speaker 2>how I look? But I recognize I think that that

0:10:58.965 --> 0:11:01.725
<v Speaker 2>identity struggle doesn't just apply to the boys.

0:11:01.765 --> 0:11:01.925
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:11:01.925 --> 0:11:06.005
<v Speaker 2>There's a certain expectation placed on women like Paula as

0:11:06.205 --> 0:11:08.765
<v Speaker 2>women to be a certain type of mother, and there's

0:11:08.765 --> 0:11:11.125
<v Speaker 2>a lot of baggage associated with that that I don't

0:11:11.165 --> 0:11:12.965
<v Speaker 2>know that most of us think about every day, but

0:11:13.045 --> 0:11:13.765
<v Speaker 2>probably should.

0:11:14.285 --> 0:11:18.125
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I think you know, that's a really interesting question.

0:11:18.165 --> 0:11:22.445
<v Speaker 1>We haven't actually, we have never gotten that question.

0:11:22.525 --> 0:11:23.204
<v Speaker 4>I apologize.

0:11:23.205 --> 0:11:26.845
<v Speaker 5>I minded spinning like that's a good question.

0:11:27.085 --> 0:11:32.204
<v Speaker 3>What do you think? I think the question is getting

0:11:32.205 --> 0:11:34.804
<v Speaker 3>at something that that's really interesting, which is all these

0:11:34.885 --> 0:11:37.885
<v Speaker 3>characters have a full, full life. It's like the Iceberg

0:11:37.965 --> 0:11:41.324
<v Speaker 3>theory from Himingway. Uh. Because of the pace we tell

0:11:41.325 --> 0:11:44.285
<v Speaker 3>the story yet Chyne's Iceberg, we do reveal all these

0:11:44.285 --> 0:11:46.245
<v Speaker 3>things beneath the surface. It's a part of the character.

0:11:46.325 --> 0:11:48.765
<v Speaker 3>He's pushing everything down and we're like, Okay, we're going

0:11:48.804 --> 0:11:50.645
<v Speaker 3>to take you down there, and we want to see

0:11:50.645 --> 0:11:52.605
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the iceberg. I think with a character

0:11:52.645 --> 0:11:54.885
<v Speaker 3>like Paula, you know, we're not privy to those things,

0:11:55.165 --> 0:11:57.285
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like it's in the performance. And I

0:11:57.285 --> 0:11:59.405
<v Speaker 3>think when we meet her on that very first scene,

0:11:59.445 --> 0:12:02.645
<v Speaker 3>on that porch, you can see all these pressures, all

0:12:02.684 --> 0:12:05.365
<v Speaker 3>these things, you know that that that she has to

0:12:05.445 --> 0:12:09.565
<v Speaker 3>be both for herself and for chirone, and it's a

0:12:09.605 --> 0:12:11.765
<v Speaker 3>lot to deal with, and I think it's part of

0:12:11.804 --> 0:12:16.324
<v Speaker 3>the reason why, you know, the sort of addiction overcomes her,

0:12:16.445 --> 0:12:18.205
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think there's just so much weight.

0:12:18.525 --> 0:12:20.765
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think that weight is there because actually

0:12:21.005 --> 0:12:24.965
<v Speaker 5>that's a good point about mothering, because it takes a

0:12:25.005 --> 0:12:29.084
<v Speaker 5>community to raise a child, and ultimately, what Paula is

0:12:29.125 --> 0:12:30.965
<v Speaker 5>trying to do is do it on her own because

0:12:31.485 --> 0:12:35.445
<v Speaker 5>she's surrounded by so many negative influences, and on top

0:12:35.485 --> 0:12:37.885
<v Speaker 5>of that, she doesn't have the personal resources to be

0:12:37.965 --> 0:12:40.525
<v Speaker 5>able to do that. She hasn't had the good parenting

0:12:40.605 --> 0:12:42.804
<v Speaker 5>model that she needed to be able to parent her

0:12:42.845 --> 0:12:44.325
<v Speaker 5>son on top of all of that.

0:12:44.525 --> 0:12:46.005
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's very and I just love that

0:12:46.045 --> 0:12:48.165
<v Speaker 3>we're in a world where and she has a boy,

0:12:48.405 --> 0:12:50.765
<v Speaker 3>you know, who is not going to be embraced by

0:12:50.804 --> 0:12:54.205
<v Speaker 3>everyone in the community for certain stigmas.

0:12:53.885 --> 0:12:56.564
<v Speaker 2>And that moment that you have really one of the

0:12:56.564 --> 0:12:59.565
<v Speaker 2>most powerful scenes in the film, where you have a

0:12:59.605 --> 0:13:02.285
<v Speaker 2>confrontation with jan That's kind of the undercurrent of that

0:13:02.885 --> 0:13:05.084
<v Speaker 2>whole scene is that it's very easy for him to

0:13:05.165 --> 0:13:07.565
<v Speaker 2>judge and suggests that you should be a certain type

0:13:07.564 --> 0:13:09.605
<v Speaker 2>of mother, but he doesn't actually have the responsibility.

0:13:09.765 --> 0:13:11.925
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's partly that, and I think it's

0:13:11.965 --> 0:13:15.285
<v Speaker 5>also partly because that's an example for me of how

0:13:15.365 --> 0:13:18.165
<v Speaker 5>Paula has been let down by men so often in

0:13:18.205 --> 0:13:22.205
<v Speaker 5>her life in the past that she can't accept any

0:13:22.245 --> 0:13:24.925
<v Speaker 5>form of help because she's not used to having any

0:13:24.965 --> 0:13:27.525
<v Speaker 5>and if anybody does offer help, it's always because they've

0:13:27.525 --> 0:13:30.245
<v Speaker 5>got an angle they want to take something ultimately, so

0:13:30.285 --> 0:13:33.645
<v Speaker 5>she's very suspicious to that point. Yeah, she's like, what's

0:13:33.725 --> 0:13:35.645
<v Speaker 5>going to come next? Like, what do you want from

0:13:35.684 --> 0:13:36.085
<v Speaker 5>my son?

0:13:36.325 --> 0:13:36.485
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:13:36.925 --> 0:13:39.045
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask Barry about the casting and the

0:13:39.085 --> 0:13:41.925
<v Speaker 2>directing of the three actors who play the three incarnations

0:13:41.925 --> 0:13:45.525
<v Speaker 2>of Sharon, Alex Hibbert, Ashton Sanders, Travante Rhodes. But I

0:13:45.564 --> 0:13:48.365
<v Speaker 2>first want to ask you, I think you're the only

0:13:48.525 --> 0:13:52.324
<v Speaker 2>direct link between those three characters in terms of seeing

0:13:52.325 --> 0:13:54.925
<v Speaker 2>you in all three stories. What was it like for

0:13:55.005 --> 0:13:59.804
<v Speaker 2>you having to maintain some continuity emotionally and psychologically opposite

0:13:59.885 --> 0:14:00.965
<v Speaker 2>those three different actors.

0:14:01.845 --> 0:14:04.805
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I didn't really find that difficult, because you know,

0:14:05.885 --> 0:14:08.685
<v Speaker 5>I had to have done that research beforehand, in known

0:14:10.125 --> 0:14:13.125
<v Speaker 5>Paula's arc and journey and her history and so on,

0:14:13.564 --> 0:14:16.045
<v Speaker 5>and I just brought that to bear in each of

0:14:16.085 --> 0:14:18.645
<v Speaker 5>the chapters. But I think it really did help having

0:14:19.565 --> 0:14:22.525
<v Speaker 5>charone played by a different acts is because my relationship

0:14:22.565 --> 0:14:25.445
<v Speaker 5>with my three sons those in those three stages is

0:14:25.485 --> 0:14:30.325
<v Speaker 5>fundamentally extraordinarily different, because paul is in such a completely

0:14:30.365 --> 0:14:33.245
<v Speaker 5>different emotional state. It's not just that they've changed just

0:14:33.245 --> 0:14:36.645
<v Speaker 5>because she's almost you know, she's changed dramatically in each

0:14:36.685 --> 0:14:39.325
<v Speaker 5>of those chapters. So I think it helped.

0:14:40.245 --> 0:14:42.485
<v Speaker 2>I was shocked to hear you say, Arry at that

0:14:42.565 --> 0:14:45.725
<v Speaker 2>Q and A that you didn't have those actors interact

0:14:45.805 --> 0:14:48.485
<v Speaker 2>with each other, didn't watch footage of each other. It

0:14:48.565 --> 0:14:50.765
<v Speaker 2>really was shocking to me, just because they're they're not

0:14:50.805 --> 0:14:54.245
<v Speaker 2>only similar in appearance, but they're similar in their physicality

0:14:54.325 --> 0:14:57.485
<v Speaker 2>and their demeanors, how they hold their heads when they're silent,

0:14:57.565 --> 0:14:59.725
<v Speaker 2>which is a key part of these performances. I would

0:14:59.765 --> 0:15:02.365
<v Speaker 2>have assumed exactly the opposite, that you were really meticulous

0:15:02.365 --> 0:15:04.645
<v Speaker 2>about having them study each other.

0:15:04.765 --> 0:15:06.285
<v Speaker 4>So how did you pull that off?

0:15:06.285 --> 0:15:08.325
<v Speaker 2>Because I think it's so crucial that at the end,

0:15:08.325 --> 0:15:10.445
<v Speaker 2>when we see the character Black, we have to see

0:15:10.765 --> 0:15:13.885
<v Speaker 2>little and Chirne in him, and we do.

0:15:14.165 --> 0:15:19.285
<v Speaker 3>There's two words bruh, hocus pocus no. No. You know,

0:15:19.605 --> 0:15:21.965
<v Speaker 3>it's almost like Naomi was just saying, you know, so

0:15:22.085 --> 0:15:24.485
<v Speaker 3>much time passes between each chapter that you know, I

0:15:24.525 --> 0:15:27.045
<v Speaker 3>think there's this commentary in the film of how the

0:15:27.085 --> 0:15:29.485
<v Speaker 3>world shapes us, you know, or how we can allow

0:15:29.565 --> 0:15:31.925
<v Speaker 3>the world to shape us, both for good and for bad.

0:15:32.525 --> 0:15:34.965
<v Speaker 3>And so I wanted to show, or to illustrate in

0:15:35.045 --> 0:15:37.685
<v Speaker 3>the physical embodiment of this character that the world has

0:15:37.685 --> 0:15:39.845
<v Speaker 3>made him a different person. So I wanted to cast

0:15:40.205 --> 0:15:42.565
<v Speaker 3>different actors, you know, to play the same person, and

0:15:42.645 --> 0:15:44.925
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want them to physically mimic one another, you know,

0:15:44.965 --> 0:15:47.205
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want them to try to carry the performance

0:15:47.245 --> 0:15:50.245
<v Speaker 3>that came before and to their performance, because again, I

0:15:50.245 --> 0:15:53.365
<v Speaker 3>wanted to show just how different the world can make us,

0:15:53.405 --> 0:15:55.165
<v Speaker 3>how the world can shape us if we allow it,

0:15:55.165 --> 0:15:57.565
<v Speaker 3>and if we don't have this nurturing you know that

0:15:57.605 --> 0:16:00.045
<v Speaker 3>we see in the first story that isn't present in

0:16:00.085 --> 0:16:03.485
<v Speaker 3>the second and the third stories. But and yet at

0:16:03.485 --> 0:16:07.405
<v Speaker 3>the same time, there is a continuity, you know, amongst

0:16:07.405 --> 0:16:09.245
<v Speaker 3>those three young men. And I'm sure when we were

0:16:09.245 --> 0:16:11.405
<v Speaker 3>casting them, we were trying to find this feeling, you know,

0:16:11.485 --> 0:16:14.765
<v Speaker 3>the soulfulness, because I think there's this idea of spiritual

0:16:14.765 --> 0:16:17.085
<v Speaker 3>transference in the film. It's why the swimming scene, you know,

0:16:17.245 --> 0:16:19.325
<v Speaker 3>is the way it is. You know, there's this transference

0:16:19.365 --> 0:16:22.685
<v Speaker 3>between one in little in that scene. And it felt

0:16:22.685 --> 0:16:25.005
<v Speaker 3>like if you could look into Travante Rose's eyes and

0:16:25.045 --> 0:16:28.285
<v Speaker 3>you could still see Ashton Sanders, still see Alex Hibbert,

0:16:28.365 --> 0:16:31.125
<v Speaker 3>that you would feel like this character has changed. Yes,

0:16:31.205 --> 0:16:34.085
<v Speaker 3>he's a different person, but he's still He's still in there,

0:16:34.125 --> 0:16:36.125
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I think it's interesting because you know,

0:16:36.125 --> 0:16:38.005
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to create this journey for Travante and the

0:16:38.005 --> 0:16:41.125
<v Speaker 3>third story where he is the characters crawled so deep

0:16:41.165 --> 0:16:44.365
<v Speaker 3>inside and buried himself so deep inside that the work

0:16:44.445 --> 0:16:47.645
<v Speaker 3>Travante is doing aided by you know, Andre Holland and

0:16:47.765 --> 0:16:50.405
<v Speaker 3>Kevin is to slowly dig his way back out to

0:16:50.445 --> 0:16:52.365
<v Speaker 3>the surface, and I want to do that. I thought

0:16:52.365 --> 0:16:54.925
<v Speaker 3>it was it would be best, you know, to literally

0:16:55.045 --> 0:16:57.005
<v Speaker 3>have the character embodied by a different person.

0:16:57.285 --> 0:17:01.445
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how confident were you in your decision to did

0:17:01.485 --> 0:17:02.685
<v Speaker 2>not have them mirror each other at all?

0:17:02.725 --> 0:17:03.965
<v Speaker 4>Did you ever have doubts about that?

0:17:04.205 --> 0:17:06.205
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? You know. So, you know, we shot them with

0:17:06.325 --> 0:17:08.445
<v Speaker 3>me mostly in sequence. You know, we did a story one,

0:17:08.485 --> 0:17:10.645
<v Speaker 3>story two, story three. The only overlap was when Naomi

0:17:10.685 --> 0:17:12.885
<v Speaker 3>showed up because she had visa issues. We did all

0:17:12.885 --> 0:17:15.805
<v Speaker 3>her work in three days. But other than that, that

0:17:15.885 --> 0:17:18.325
<v Speaker 3>was the only time those three days when the main

0:17:18.405 --> 0:17:20.205
<v Speaker 3>characters jumped, you know, I had to work with all

0:17:20.205 --> 0:17:22.885
<v Speaker 3>of them. So Travante shows up and does his first

0:17:22.925 --> 0:17:26.165
<v Speaker 3>two days and because of the way the shoot was scheduled,

0:17:26.205 --> 0:17:28.165
<v Speaker 3>his first two days, I mean and Travante.

0:17:27.845 --> 0:17:28.925
<v Speaker 4>Roads this is radio all say.

0:17:29.285 --> 0:17:32.005
<v Speaker 3>He is just just hulking, you know, like you know,

0:17:32.205 --> 0:17:35.365
<v Speaker 3>five to eleven, two hundred twenty pound guy, like two

0:17:36.005 --> 0:17:38.925
<v Speaker 3>percent body fact, just like ripped. And his first two

0:17:39.005 --> 0:17:42.205
<v Speaker 3>days he's walking around in his boxes like working out,

0:17:42.325 --> 0:17:45.165
<v Speaker 3>and he's like, you know, on the phone and count money.

0:17:45.205 --> 0:17:47.845
<v Speaker 3>And it was like it was like really jarring departure

0:17:47.885 --> 0:17:50.925
<v Speaker 3>from this real thin teenager you know that we worked

0:17:50.925 --> 0:17:53.405
<v Speaker 3>with before, which was Ashton Sanders, whose shoulders are always

0:17:53.405 --> 0:17:56.085
<v Speaker 3>trooped and he was always like kind of sad and brooding.

0:17:57.005 --> 0:18:00.165
<v Speaker 3>And I thought, man, did we go too far? Because

0:18:00.205 --> 0:18:03.005
<v Speaker 3>it was so jarring going from working with Ashton to

0:18:03.045 --> 0:18:05.485
<v Speaker 3>working with Travante. And then we did the phone call

0:18:05.805 --> 0:18:09.525
<v Speaker 3>where Travante call or Kevin calls, and Black picks up

0:18:09.525 --> 0:18:12.245
<v Speaker 3>the phone and it's just Travante in the room and

0:18:12.245 --> 0:18:15.045
<v Speaker 3>Andre Holland's voice is actually on the phone, and I

0:18:15.045 --> 0:18:18.645
<v Speaker 3>can see Travante just breaking and just so this huge,

0:18:18.685 --> 0:18:22.485
<v Speaker 3>hulking guy, just so sensitive, vulnerable. And after the first

0:18:22.485 --> 0:18:24.485
<v Speaker 3>take I looked at him, I said, that's why you

0:18:24.525 --> 0:18:26.685
<v Speaker 3>got the part, and I was like, okay, we're on

0:18:26.765 --> 0:18:29.165
<v Speaker 3>the right track certainly, but but for those that day

0:18:29.205 --> 0:18:32.805
<v Speaker 3>and a half, I was like, oh, man, but but

0:18:32.805 --> 0:18:34.325
<v Speaker 3>but but then I said in the audience, and I

0:18:34.365 --> 0:18:36.885
<v Speaker 3>see the audience have the same reaction he comes from screening,

0:18:36.965 --> 0:18:40.285
<v Speaker 3>and sometimes the audience will go yeah, like literally it

0:18:40.325 --> 0:18:43.565
<v Speaker 3>takes the breath because they just the gasp, this is

0:18:43.605 --> 0:18:45.605
<v Speaker 3>what this is what the world is done to this guy,

0:18:45.685 --> 0:18:45.845
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:18:46.045 --> 0:18:48.885
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But then when we when we see him at

0:18:48.885 --> 0:18:52.525
<v Speaker 2>the diner sitting across from Kevin, and we see we

0:18:52.565 --> 0:18:55.445
<v Speaker 2>see chirone in him in those moments, then I think

0:18:55.445 --> 0:18:55.885
<v Speaker 2>we gasp.

0:18:56.405 --> 0:18:58.445
<v Speaker 3>Well, And the beauty of this process is, you know,

0:18:58.525 --> 0:19:01.005
<v Speaker 3>I can only write this thing and get the actions

0:19:01.005 --> 0:19:03.965
<v Speaker 3>in place and push the button, and then an intellectual idea,

0:19:04.085 --> 0:19:06.445
<v Speaker 3>you know, a scripted idea, you know, it's given this

0:19:06.645 --> 0:19:10.605
<v Speaker 3>flesh and blood emotion when somebody like Dramonte can actually

0:19:10.925 --> 0:19:14.885
<v Speaker 3>express that vulnerability and sensibility that we don't associate or

0:19:14.925 --> 0:19:17.525
<v Speaker 3>we don't think someone who's that masculine this case, Sure.

0:19:17.405 --> 0:19:19.845
<v Speaker 2>Enough, just two more quick questions and I'll get you

0:19:19.885 --> 0:19:22.565
<v Speaker 2>guys on your way, nail we the mention there of

0:19:22.645 --> 0:19:25.285
<v Speaker 2>doing this whole role in just three days. Is there

0:19:25.325 --> 0:19:28.445
<v Speaker 2>any advantage at all to having to work that quickly?

0:19:28.525 --> 0:19:30.325
<v Speaker 2>There is as an actress, Yeah, there are many?

0:19:30.405 --> 0:19:35.285
<v Speaker 5>Actually, well yeah, because you don't spend hours in your

0:19:35.685 --> 0:19:38.845
<v Speaker 5>trailer agonizing about what you're going to do, plodding it

0:19:38.885 --> 0:19:41.045
<v Speaker 5>out in your head. You know, you just have to

0:19:41.085 --> 0:19:45.405
<v Speaker 5>get on and deliver. And the best place to be

0:19:45.565 --> 0:19:47.805
<v Speaker 5>always is out of your head. But the place you

0:19:47.805 --> 0:19:50.285
<v Speaker 5>always want to go to is your head. Sure, sure,

0:19:50.725 --> 0:19:54.005
<v Speaker 5>but yeah, I think it actually really helped me doing

0:19:54.045 --> 0:19:55.285
<v Speaker 5>it in those three days.

0:19:55.885 --> 0:19:59.085
<v Speaker 2>Very last question for you then, a film school film

0:19:59.125 --> 0:20:00.845
<v Speaker 2>geek question, because we have a lot of them who

0:20:00.845 --> 0:20:02.685
<v Speaker 2>listen to the show, people who are just really getting

0:20:02.725 --> 0:20:05.805
<v Speaker 2>into film or who are aspiring filmmakers. At that Q

0:20:05.925 --> 0:20:08.205
<v Speaker 2>and A, you mentioned Walter Merchant in The Blink of

0:20:08.245 --> 0:20:10.485
<v Speaker 2>an Eye, And that's a book that whenever people write

0:20:10.485 --> 0:20:12.085
<v Speaker 2>into the show and ask me to recommend books, I

0:20:12.125 --> 0:20:14.205
<v Speaker 2>read that in film school. It's one of my top five,

0:20:14.245 --> 0:20:16.125
<v Speaker 2>I always say, but can you just talk about the

0:20:16.125 --> 0:20:18.685
<v Speaker 2>influence of that book on your visual approach with this

0:20:18.685 --> 0:20:20.765
<v Speaker 2>film or any other work that you've done. And what

0:20:20.805 --> 0:20:23.005
<v Speaker 2>a their books do you throw out when you get

0:20:23.005 --> 0:20:23.645
<v Speaker 2>asked that question?

0:20:23.765 --> 0:20:25.205
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The only other book I throw out is a

0:20:25.245 --> 0:20:27.485
<v Speaker 3>book called Masters of Light, you know, and I would

0:20:27.525 --> 0:20:30.205
<v Speaker 3>say find the original version. It was this book where

0:20:30.205 --> 0:20:34.245
<v Speaker 3>they really thick book, thin paper, thick book. They interviewed

0:20:34.245 --> 0:20:38.845
<v Speaker 3>cinematographers about their process and it's really really dense, but

0:20:38.885 --> 0:20:41.165
<v Speaker 3>it will teach you, if you pay attention, some really

0:20:41.205 --> 0:20:44.405
<v Speaker 3>solid things about the visual approach I mean craft, yeah,

0:20:44.405 --> 0:20:47.125
<v Speaker 3>to the process, how craft can be elevated or sublimated

0:20:47.445 --> 0:20:49.805
<v Speaker 3>into art. So that book is the only the only

0:20:49.845 --> 0:20:52.125
<v Speaker 3>other one I recommend as far as Merch, you know,

0:20:52.165 --> 0:20:55.245
<v Speaker 3>Walter Merch was an editor and sound designer. He worked

0:20:55.245 --> 0:20:57.445
<v Speaker 3>with Coppola on some of his just greatest, some of

0:20:57.485 --> 0:20:59.885
<v Speaker 3>the greatest films in the history of American cinema. And

0:20:59.965 --> 0:21:02.125
<v Speaker 3>he wrote this book as a thesis statement on what

0:21:02.245 --> 0:21:04.565
<v Speaker 3>he thought, you know, was the true essence of craft

0:21:04.565 --> 0:21:07.885
<v Speaker 3>and cinema, which was the eyes of the actors and

0:21:07.965 --> 0:21:10.725
<v Speaker 3>the eyes being the window into the soul. And literally

0:21:11.485 --> 0:21:14.045
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to break down why editorially when you make

0:21:14.085 --> 0:21:17.045
<v Speaker 3>a cut, you know what that does thematically emotionally to

0:21:17.085 --> 0:21:20.005
<v Speaker 3>the audience, because you're breaking the link between you know,

0:21:20.085 --> 0:21:22.685
<v Speaker 3>the actor and the audience. So for me, I use

0:21:22.725 --> 0:21:25.805
<v Speaker 3>it for casting because if I'm close on two actors

0:21:26.125 --> 0:21:28.045
<v Speaker 3>and they're pretty much neck and neck, you know, the

0:21:28.045 --> 0:21:30.965
<v Speaker 3>same ability, whoever blinks the less they're getting the part,

0:21:31.365 --> 0:21:33.205
<v Speaker 3>you know. And it came in to play a little

0:21:33.205 --> 0:21:35.005
<v Speaker 3>bit on the casting of this the old Michael Kaine

0:21:35.045 --> 0:21:38.365
<v Speaker 3>acting school trick as well. Yeah, exactly, and well, because

0:21:38.405 --> 0:21:40.725
<v Speaker 3>you want to have that continuum that continue on, that

0:21:40.805 --> 0:21:44.645
<v Speaker 3>continuous sort of feeling with the audience. And then like

0:21:44.685 --> 0:21:46.165
<v Speaker 3>I said, you know, I knew I wanted to cast

0:21:46.165 --> 0:21:49.885
<v Speaker 3>three different actors to play Chirne in this film, and

0:21:49.925 --> 0:21:52.925
<v Speaker 3>what we found ourselves honing in on was it's got

0:21:52.965 --> 0:21:55.085
<v Speaker 3>to be in the eyes, you know. It was why

0:21:55.285 --> 0:21:58.005
<v Speaker 3>casting someone like Travonte Rhodes. I was okay with it,

0:21:58.085 --> 0:22:00.165
<v Speaker 3>or I was comfortable with it because I thought he

0:22:00.325 --> 0:22:03.845
<v Speaker 3>looks so different than Ashton, you know, just because he's

0:22:03.845 --> 0:22:05.965
<v Speaker 3>so bulked up. But I thought, you know what, I'm

0:22:05.965 --> 0:22:09.845
<v Speaker 3>gonna have faith in this principle now of my filmmaking process,

0:22:09.845 --> 0:22:12.285
<v Speaker 3>which is the eyes of the window into the soul.

0:22:12.685 --> 0:22:14.685
<v Speaker 3>Find the eyes and you'll see the soul, and if

0:22:14.685 --> 0:22:17.125
<v Speaker 3>the soul is the same, the audience will follow the character.

0:22:17.805 --> 0:22:19.805
<v Speaker 2>Thank you both so much for the movie. Thank you

0:22:20.005 --> 0:22:21.805
<v Speaker 2>for your time, best of luck with it.

0:22:22.125 --> 0:22:26.685
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, man, I ain't seeing you in like a decade.

0:22:26.885 --> 0:22:28.005
<v Speaker 4>That's not what I expected.

0:22:31.365 --> 0:22:38.565
<v Speaker 2>What did you respect My thanks again to Barry Jenkins

0:22:38.645 --> 0:22:40.725
<v Speaker 2>and Naomi Harris. I knew they would be a delight

0:22:40.805 --> 0:22:42.445
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you after hearing them talk for a

0:22:42.445 --> 0:22:44.805
<v Speaker 2>little bit at that film fest Q and A the

0:22:44.885 --> 0:22:48.885
<v Speaker 2>night before, But they exceeded my expectations and I was

0:22:48.925 --> 0:22:51.245
<v Speaker 2>the last stop on their way out of town. I

0:22:51.325 --> 0:22:53.045
<v Speaker 2>knew they had been locked up in a hotel room

0:22:53.085 --> 0:22:56.125
<v Speaker 2>all day answering questions from idiots like me, and then

0:22:56.125 --> 0:22:57.885
<v Speaker 2>they were stopping to see me at the studio and

0:22:57.965 --> 0:23:01.245
<v Speaker 2>head out. And usually that can mean sometimes they're a

0:23:01.245 --> 0:23:04.285
<v Speaker 2>little tired and maybe not quite as engaged as even

0:23:04.325 --> 0:23:05.805
<v Speaker 2>they'd like to be, and I'd like them to be.

0:23:05.885 --> 0:23:07.365
<v Speaker 2>That certainly wasn't the case with them.

0:23:07.725 --> 0:23:10.925
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad that Jenkins brought up cinematography there at

0:23:10.925 --> 0:23:13.325
<v Speaker 1>the end and mentioned the book Masters of Light, where

0:23:13.485 --> 0:23:16.365
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Schaeffer and Larry Salvado they have conversations with some

0:23:16.405 --> 0:23:20.405
<v Speaker 1>of the most noted cinematographers, and Jenkins comment too about

0:23:20.445 --> 0:23:24.445
<v Speaker 1>how the book explains how cinematography can be a craft

0:23:24.725 --> 0:23:28.045
<v Speaker 1>that can be elevated to art, because that is exactly

0:23:28.365 --> 0:23:32.725
<v Speaker 1>what my takeaway was from Moonlight is watching that actually

0:23:32.805 --> 0:23:36.365
<v Speaker 1>happen on the screen. This is just a master work

0:23:36.405 --> 0:23:40.005
<v Speaker 1>in cinematography. And Jenkins was working here with James Laxton

0:23:40.165 --> 0:23:44.365
<v Speaker 1>as his cinematographer, and really it becomes it's not only

0:23:44.365 --> 0:23:47.765
<v Speaker 1>that the movie is beautifully lit, but it's that the

0:23:48.085 --> 0:23:52.325
<v Speaker 1>skin tones, particularly the African American skin tones, are just

0:23:52.485 --> 0:23:55.245
<v Speaker 1>exquisitely lit in this movie and I single that out

0:23:55.285 --> 0:23:58.485
<v Speaker 1>because it's not always the case. Even when you're talking

0:23:58.605 --> 0:24:04.485
<v Speaker 1>about you big Hollywood films with massive budgets, sometimes they

0:24:04.485 --> 0:24:07.165
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to light all of the actors correctly.

0:24:07.525 --> 0:24:10.365
<v Speaker 1>And this connects very much with what I think Moonlight

0:24:10.485 --> 0:24:13.805
<v Speaker 1>is doing on a thematic level as well. There is

0:24:14.005 --> 0:24:18.645
<v Speaker 1>just this aura of compassion that seeps down from the movie.

0:24:18.645 --> 0:24:21.285
<v Speaker 1>And obviously they're getting this a little bit by the

0:24:21.325 --> 0:24:23.725
<v Speaker 1>reference that the title pulls from, you know, the illumination

0:24:23.845 --> 0:24:26.725
<v Speaker 1>of the moon. That's a guiding light in a couple

0:24:26.725 --> 0:24:29.085
<v Speaker 1>of ways for this film, but it really carries through

0:24:29.125 --> 0:24:33.205
<v Speaker 1>no matter whether they're in a dark night scene or

0:24:33.285 --> 0:24:35.605
<v Speaker 1>whether they're in one of the high school classrooms where

0:24:35.605 --> 0:24:38.405
<v Speaker 1>there's fluorescent lights, or wherever they may be. There is

0:24:38.525 --> 0:24:42.925
<v Speaker 1>such care to make these varied skin tones illuminate and

0:24:42.965 --> 0:24:45.645
<v Speaker 1>you can see the texture and the detail. And I

0:24:45.685 --> 0:24:49.165
<v Speaker 1>think that carries over again to how the movie sees Schyron,

0:24:49.205 --> 0:24:52.605
<v Speaker 1>how it sees really all of its characters, but particularly him,

0:24:52.765 --> 0:24:57.205
<v Speaker 1>in just giving this sort of beneficent hue that makes

0:24:57.285 --> 0:25:00.005
<v Speaker 1>us just fall in love with this kid, an ache

0:25:00.005 --> 0:25:02.205
<v Speaker 1>for him, really ache for him in a way that

0:25:02.405 --> 0:25:04.605
<v Speaker 1>few movies manage to make audiences do.

0:25:04.845 --> 0:25:08.605
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you mention the reference there in the title Moonlight,

0:25:08.685 --> 0:25:11.685
<v Speaker 2>and it does come up within the text there of

0:25:11.805 --> 0:25:15.925
<v Speaker 2>the screenplay. But the story that McCraney originally wrote, the

0:25:15.965 --> 0:25:18.925
<v Speaker 2>piece he originally wrote that he couldn't stage, is called

0:25:18.965 --> 0:25:22.525
<v Speaker 2>in Moonlight, black Boys Look Blue, And that is such

0:25:22.925 --> 0:25:26.685
<v Speaker 2>a brilliantly striking central metaphor. Like I said, that does

0:25:26.725 --> 0:25:30.725
<v Speaker 2>come up in this movie because it sets up exactly

0:25:30.725 --> 0:25:32.685
<v Speaker 2>what this whole film is about, but in a pretty

0:25:32.725 --> 0:25:36.765
<v Speaker 2>subtle way, which is that other people are always going

0:25:36.805 --> 0:25:38.965
<v Speaker 2>to try to define you. They are going to see

0:25:39.005 --> 0:25:41.285
<v Speaker 2>you how they see you within a certain moment, and

0:25:41.365 --> 0:25:43.845
<v Speaker 2>you may not be able to escape the way they

0:25:43.925 --> 0:25:46.965
<v Speaker 2>see you. It is ultimately on you to define yourself.

0:25:47.005 --> 0:25:49.485
<v Speaker 2>And as simplistic as that might be, there's nothing simple

0:25:49.885 --> 0:25:53.485
<v Speaker 2>about this film or about the performances. And one of

0:25:53.525 --> 0:25:55.645
<v Speaker 2>the things that I was really glad Barry Jenkins said

0:25:56.085 --> 0:25:59.525
<v Speaker 2>in my conversation there in praise of Harris, he mentioned

0:25:59.605 --> 0:26:03.045
<v Speaker 2>how we're not privy to a lot of information about her,

0:26:03.245 --> 0:26:06.205
<v Speaker 2>but it comes through in her performance, and that's so true,

0:26:06.245 --> 0:26:08.965
<v Speaker 2>and that must be so hard for any actor or

0:26:09.005 --> 0:26:12.245
<v Speaker 2>actress to pull off. But I felt like I knew

0:26:12.285 --> 0:26:16.045
<v Speaker 2>her entire backstory. I understood her relationship with men, I

0:26:16.125 --> 0:26:19.765
<v Speaker 2>understood her problems as a mother raising this boy just

0:26:19.805 --> 0:26:23.805
<v Speaker 2>from the performance, no flashbacks, no other dialogue to spell

0:26:23.845 --> 0:26:26.205
<v Speaker 2>it out. It really does all come through in the

0:26:26.325 --> 0:26:28.645
<v Speaker 2>experience of watching the performance.

0:26:28.845 --> 0:26:31.005
<v Speaker 1>And she does have the benefit, as you mentioned in

0:26:31.045 --> 0:26:33.605
<v Speaker 1>the interview, of appearing in each of the three sections.

0:26:33.725 --> 0:26:36.925
<v Speaker 1>So not she doesn't have huge part in each of those,

0:26:36.965 --> 0:26:39.685
<v Speaker 1>but she does appear and makes a large impact in

0:26:39.725 --> 0:26:43.005
<v Speaker 1>those scenes that she has. But really, every actor we

0:26:43.085 --> 0:26:46.885
<v Speaker 1>see manages to make the most of their time on screen,

0:26:46.925 --> 0:26:49.525
<v Speaker 1>and there's a continuity as you guys talked about among

0:26:49.565 --> 0:26:53.445
<v Speaker 1>the three actors playing Chyron and how they manage to

0:26:53.485 --> 0:26:57.325
<v Speaker 1>capture things that are similar in each section but also

0:26:57.445 --> 0:26:59.885
<v Speaker 1>make him distinct in each section. I think the through

0:26:59.925 --> 0:27:02.245
<v Speaker 1>line again is the cinematography. When we see him in

0:27:02.245 --> 0:27:05.685
<v Speaker 1>the same literal light, we connect him as being the

0:27:05.765 --> 0:27:08.725
<v Speaker 1>same person. But I also want to take time to

0:27:08.805 --> 0:27:14.085
<v Speaker 1>praise Mahashala Ali because that was the performance that I

0:27:14.125 --> 0:27:19.125
<v Speaker 1>don't know why just and it's devastating when he disappears

0:27:19.125 --> 0:27:24.085
<v Speaker 1>from the narratives, feel that absence in the other segments

0:27:24.125 --> 0:27:27.125
<v Speaker 1>that he's not in because he makes such an impact

0:27:27.125 --> 0:27:29.525
<v Speaker 1>in that first segment, and not because he gets any

0:27:29.525 --> 0:27:34.045
<v Speaker 1>grand standing scene. He's almost in the background, so quiet

0:27:34.165 --> 0:27:38.845
<v Speaker 1>as this drug dealer who takes young little under his wings,

0:27:38.885 --> 0:27:41.205
<v Speaker 1>and at first he's almost you wonder, is this a

0:27:41.245 --> 0:27:45.205
<v Speaker 1>wolf in sheep's clothing? You just were trained by other movies, right,

0:27:45.285 --> 0:27:46.285
<v Speaker 1>more than anything else.

0:27:46.125 --> 0:27:47.765
<v Speaker 4>To that, and this is a bad situation. He does

0:27:48.205 --> 0:27:48.725
<v Speaker 4>hand either way.

0:27:48.765 --> 0:27:51.005
<v Speaker 1>No, he does not. I mean, you still get a

0:27:51.045 --> 0:27:54.125
<v Speaker 1>sense that maybe this could go wrong near the end,

0:27:54.165 --> 0:27:57.245
<v Speaker 1>even after you've seen him and really feel that his

0:27:57.325 --> 0:28:01.165
<v Speaker 1>protection is genuine. There's that gorgeous scene where he takes

0:28:01.325 --> 0:28:04.285
<v Speaker 1>little swimming and teaches him how to swim, and I

0:28:04.285 --> 0:28:07.285
<v Speaker 1>think that's where we finally begin to understand that his

0:28:07.405 --> 0:28:10.605
<v Speaker 1>interest is genuine in the boy. But just the way

0:28:10.765 --> 0:28:15.925
<v Speaker 1>Ali makes these quiet moments hit so hard again without

0:28:16.005 --> 0:28:19.885
<v Speaker 1>pushing any sort of demonstrative personality, you would think, as

0:28:19.925 --> 0:28:22.845
<v Speaker 1>this drug dealer who runs the block, the temptation would

0:28:22.925 --> 0:28:25.165
<v Speaker 1>be to go big, right right, No, it's just his

0:28:25.365 --> 0:28:28.965
<v Speaker 1>quiet presence and it's really one of my favorite performances

0:28:28.965 --> 0:28:29.285
<v Speaker 1>of the year.

0:28:29.365 --> 0:28:31.885
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you, And I think that gets back

0:28:31.925 --> 0:28:34.725
<v Speaker 2>to what I was saying about Harris as well, where

0:28:35.005 --> 0:28:38.285
<v Speaker 2>she's playing the crack addicted, negligent mother. We've seen a

0:28:38.365 --> 0:28:40.645
<v Speaker 2>character like her in plenty of films. We've seen a

0:28:40.725 --> 0:28:44.325
<v Speaker 2>character like Ali's playing one in a lot of films,

0:28:44.325 --> 0:28:46.485
<v Speaker 2>that drug dealer, even the drug dealer with a heart

0:28:46.485 --> 0:28:49.165
<v Speaker 2>of gold, which sure he is more or less as

0:28:49.205 --> 0:28:52.205
<v Speaker 2>we get to know him. But there isn't anything cliche

0:28:52.245 --> 0:28:54.765
<v Speaker 2>at all about these characters as it comes through in

0:28:54.805 --> 0:28:58.405
<v Speaker 2>these performances. And Ali's one of those faces where as

0:28:58.405 --> 0:29:00.485
<v Speaker 2>soon as I saw him on screen, I felt comfortable.

0:29:00.885 --> 0:29:03.605
<v Speaker 2>I knew I had seen him before. Recently, I looked

0:29:03.685 --> 0:29:06.125
<v Speaker 2>up IMDb later and he's been in a bunch of things,

0:29:06.165 --> 0:29:10.165
<v Speaker 2>but recently in the Hunger Games movies, and that's where

0:29:10.165 --> 0:29:12.285
<v Speaker 2>I did have his face in my mind. But what

0:29:12.365 --> 0:29:16.565
<v Speaker 2>about Andre Holland. Andre Holland, he plays Kevin. He's talking

0:29:16.565 --> 0:29:20.605
<v Speaker 2>about your scenes, yeah, that third act of this film,

0:29:21.045 --> 0:29:23.445
<v Speaker 2>and he's someone again I'm watching him going. Not only

0:29:23.525 --> 0:29:26.885
<v Speaker 2>is he remarkable, I could watch him and Ali in

0:29:26.925 --> 0:29:29.125
<v Speaker 2>their scenes. Just give me a movie that's just in

0:29:29.165 --> 0:29:31.685
<v Speaker 2>those their stories. I would so watch those films. I'd

0:29:31.725 --> 0:29:34.245
<v Speaker 2>watch multiple films with those guys. But he was another

0:29:34.285 --> 0:29:36.645
<v Speaker 2>face that seemed really familiar to me, and I couldn't

0:29:36.685 --> 0:29:38.605
<v Speaker 2>place it, and then I looked up later he was

0:29:38.605 --> 0:29:42.205
<v Speaker 2>in the Nick the Steven Soderberg series, and he's another

0:29:42.525 --> 0:29:47.925
<v Speaker 2>wonderful actor. And I wanted to remention the three titles

0:29:48.125 --> 0:29:51.565
<v Speaker 2>that came up in the interview that Jenkins listed as

0:29:51.605 --> 0:29:54.765
<v Speaker 2>the biggest influences on this film, because some people may

0:29:54.805 --> 0:29:56.685
<v Speaker 2>not be familiar with them, or maybe they just went

0:29:56.685 --> 0:29:58.645
<v Speaker 2>by too fast and they didn't catch the titles. But

0:29:58.725 --> 0:30:01.845
<v Speaker 2>you talk about cinematography and the craft of that and

0:30:01.885 --> 0:30:04.925
<v Speaker 2>how that's art. Not as surprise that those elements would

0:30:04.965 --> 0:30:07.845
<v Speaker 2>come through in this film when those influences were Clardoni's

0:30:07.925 --> 0:30:11.325
<v Speaker 2>film Bo Trava Ho, Shau Shen's Three Times, and then

0:30:11.365 --> 0:30:12.605
<v Speaker 2>wankar wi Is Happy Together?

0:30:12.645 --> 0:30:13.965
<v Speaker 4>Now Have you seen Happy Together?

0:30:14.165 --> 0:30:15.885
<v Speaker 1>Having Days of Being Wild was the last one I

0:30:15.925 --> 0:30:16.245
<v Speaker 1>caught up.

0:30:16.325 --> 0:30:19.605
<v Speaker 2>So that's a Wankar Wai film. I regretfully haven't seen either.

0:30:19.685 --> 0:30:22.325
<v Speaker 2>But a friend of mine who loves that film and

0:30:22.365 --> 0:30:24.565
<v Speaker 2>who was at the same Moonlight screening I was, and

0:30:24.605 --> 0:30:28.805
<v Speaker 2>who loved Moonlight, said that there's definitely some one car

0:30:28.845 --> 0:30:31.325
<v Speaker 2>why happy to get our touches there, especially in that

0:30:31.445 --> 0:30:36.605
<v Speaker 2>third sequence with Trevante Rhodes and Andre Holland. We meet

0:30:36.765 --> 0:30:40.805
<v Speaker 2>Andre Holland's character first through a phone conversation he's having.

0:30:40.885 --> 0:30:42.525
<v Speaker 2>We hear his voice, and we only see parts of

0:30:42.605 --> 0:30:44.685
<v Speaker 2>him as he's a cook, he's in a kitchen. We

0:30:44.725 --> 0:30:47.165
<v Speaker 2>don't actually see his face for a while. And my

0:30:47.245 --> 0:30:50.165
<v Speaker 2>friend said that that is really something that is mirrored

0:30:50.245 --> 0:30:51.925
<v Speaker 2>actually in the Wan car Why film. So I did

0:30:52.005 --> 0:30:54.445
<v Speaker 2>want to mention that for people who love that film

0:30:54.565 --> 0:30:56.645
<v Speaker 2>as well. A couple other things that came out of

0:30:56.685 --> 0:30:59.365
<v Speaker 2>the Q and A after the screening that I thought

0:30:59.365 --> 0:31:00.165
<v Speaker 2>were really fascinating.

0:31:00.245 --> 0:31:01.885
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to throw out there. Trell.

0:31:01.925 --> 0:31:05.085
<v Speaker 2>Alvin McCraney, the playwright and writer of the original piece,

0:31:05.325 --> 0:31:07.365
<v Speaker 2>was part of the Q and A, and he said

0:31:07.405 --> 0:31:09.525
<v Speaker 2>something that I don't know that I would have been

0:31:09.565 --> 0:31:13.845
<v Speaker 2>able to articulate at all, but absolutely felt in every

0:31:13.845 --> 0:31:18.085
<v Speaker 2>moment of that third act with those actors, those grown

0:31:18.125 --> 0:31:20.845
<v Speaker 2>up versions of these characters we've met earlier in the film.

0:31:21.085 --> 0:31:25.525
<v Speaker 2>He talks about how there's heightened tension and a sense

0:31:25.565 --> 0:31:28.765
<v Speaker 2>of urgency in there because of the fact that they

0:31:28.805 --> 0:31:32.405
<v Speaker 2>are what he termed real minutes, and what he was

0:31:32.525 --> 0:31:34.885
<v Speaker 2>articulating or what I took away from it is that

0:31:34.965 --> 0:31:38.405
<v Speaker 2>he was saying, when you're watching this film that starts

0:31:38.445 --> 0:31:40.965
<v Speaker 2>with one version of this character in the past, and

0:31:40.965 --> 0:31:43.005
<v Speaker 2>then we go to another version and we realize that

0:31:43.045 --> 0:31:46.765
<v Speaker 2>he's older. We know we're watching this construct where we're

0:31:46.845 --> 0:31:50.885
<v Speaker 2>very aware that this happened in another place and time,

0:31:51.085 --> 0:31:53.525
<v Speaker 2>and it's almost like it's not really happening now. And

0:31:53.565 --> 0:31:56.685
<v Speaker 2>when we get to that version of him right now

0:31:56.885 --> 0:32:00.805
<v Speaker 2>in the present day, these two characters meet again. Now

0:32:00.845 --> 0:32:04.485
<v Speaker 2>we know that we're watching them starting a whole new trajectory,

0:32:04.525 --> 0:32:06.845
<v Speaker 2>and we have no idea where it's going to go.

0:32:06.925 --> 0:32:09.285
<v Speaker 2>It's where their lives in some way begin for us

0:32:09.325 --> 0:32:11.325
<v Speaker 2>as viewers, and we have to fill in the blanks.

0:32:11.325 --> 0:32:14.445
<v Speaker 2>And there is something inherently fascinating about that that does

0:32:14.605 --> 0:32:17.205
<v Speaker 2>raise the stakes of two people mostly.

0:32:16.925 --> 0:32:19.845
<v Speaker 1>Just talking real minutes? Was that the phrase real minutes? Yeah,

0:32:19.925 --> 0:32:22.205
<v Speaker 1>that's my impression, and while I was watching it is

0:32:22.685 --> 0:32:26.725
<v Speaker 1>what incredible patience on the part of Jenkins to allow

0:32:26.845 --> 0:32:31.405
<v Speaker 1>this reunion to spread out in what almost feels like

0:32:31.525 --> 0:32:33.525
<v Speaker 1>real time. There's the phone call to set it up,

0:32:33.845 --> 0:32:37.165
<v Speaker 1>and then when Sharon, who's now goes by the name Black,

0:32:37.525 --> 0:32:41.405
<v Speaker 1>shows up at the restaurant to meet with Kevin. He

0:32:41.485 --> 0:32:44.325
<v Speaker 1>first says hello, and then Kevin goes to serve some

0:32:44.405 --> 0:32:47.565
<v Speaker 1>other people, just minute boring things that I won't go

0:32:48.005 --> 0:32:50.845
<v Speaker 1>on to describe except to say that it extends the

0:32:50.925 --> 0:32:53.445
<v Speaker 1>scene so that it's not that all we get are

0:32:53.485 --> 0:32:56.485
<v Speaker 1>there conversation together, and even their conversation is interrupted by

0:32:56.565 --> 0:32:59.445
<v Speaker 1>Kevin having to go do some more work, and that

0:32:59.605 --> 0:33:02.325
<v Speaker 1>does exactly what you're talking about. It breaks up the

0:33:02.365 --> 0:33:04.845
<v Speaker 1>pattern of what we've seen before, where they're not vignettes,

0:33:05.245 --> 0:33:08.885
<v Speaker 1>they're not episodes. We're here with these two in the

0:33:09.005 --> 0:33:12.045
<v Speaker 1>right now, and that lends it so much more drama.

0:33:12.125 --> 0:33:14.365
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the other part, and this is something I certainly

0:33:14.805 --> 0:33:17.965
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have been aware of had Jenkins not expressed it

0:33:18.245 --> 0:33:21.125
<v Speaker 2>and described it in answer to a question someone the

0:33:21.165 --> 0:33:23.885
<v Speaker 2>audience who was aware of this style of music. But

0:33:24.285 --> 0:33:26.605
<v Speaker 2>what he did with the score here in the music

0:33:26.645 --> 0:33:28.645
<v Speaker 2>as well, it really comes through in that third sequence.

0:33:28.925 --> 0:33:30.285
<v Speaker 4>But you reflect back on.

0:33:30.365 --> 0:33:34.805
<v Speaker 2>How some of the more traditional movie score sounds are

0:33:34.845 --> 0:33:38.405
<v Speaker 2>rendered in this film, where they seem distorted in some way,

0:33:38.445 --> 0:33:40.485
<v Speaker 2>they seem like they are perfectly in keeping with this

0:33:40.565 --> 0:33:42.885
<v Speaker 2>notion of a kind of heightened fever dream.

0:33:43.045 --> 0:33:44.285
<v Speaker 4>But I couldn't put my finger on it.

0:33:44.325 --> 0:33:46.925
<v Speaker 2>I didn't understand exactly what was being done to the

0:33:46.965 --> 0:33:50.525
<v Speaker 2>sounds to manipulate them, to make them have that distorted,

0:33:50.565 --> 0:33:53.405
<v Speaker 2>heightened effect. And what he described is this style of

0:33:53.485 --> 0:33:56.485
<v Speaker 2>music that came out of Houston in the early nineties,

0:33:56.525 --> 0:33:59.765
<v Speaker 2>mainly called chopped and screwed, and it's where you take

0:34:00.325 --> 0:34:04.365
<v Speaker 2>hip hop and you remix it so that everything is

0:34:04.485 --> 0:34:08.884
<v Speaker 2>slowed way down and it does have that distorting kind

0:34:08.885 --> 0:34:11.924
<v Speaker 2>of effect. So we hear that in the songs that

0:34:11.965 --> 0:34:15.364
<v Speaker 2>are playing in Black's car really the whole time that

0:34:15.565 --> 0:34:18.205
<v Speaker 2>we are with him. But then you realize that even

0:34:18.445 --> 0:34:21.884
<v Speaker 2>the obos and the other strings and things that you're

0:34:21.925 --> 0:34:24.525
<v Speaker 2>hearing in earlier portions of the film, they have that

0:34:24.605 --> 0:34:27.285
<v Speaker 2>same technique applied to them to give it that effect.

0:34:39.685 --> 0:34:42.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's just the use of those classical music

0:34:42.405 --> 0:34:46.165
<v Speaker 1>instruments all together where you might not expect it. In

0:34:46.205 --> 0:34:48.565
<v Speaker 1>the early segment where the boys are just out on

0:34:48.605 --> 0:34:51.885
<v Speaker 1>the field, you know, rough housing and wrestling and messing around,

0:34:52.125 --> 0:34:54.645
<v Speaker 1>we get this lyrical music to it that makes it

0:34:54.685 --> 0:34:56.845
<v Speaker 1>suddenly seem as if it's something from a Malick film.

0:34:57.045 --> 0:34:59.685
<v Speaker 1>And I believe the same sort of music accompanies that

0:34:59.845 --> 0:35:03.605
<v Speaker 1>swimming scene, which is some sort of you know, baptism

0:35:03.685 --> 0:35:07.845
<v Speaker 1>moment taking place, and so these are other uses of

0:35:08.765 --> 0:35:12.805
<v Speaker 1>the usual cinematic techniques in ways that maybe we've seen

0:35:12.845 --> 0:35:15.125
<v Speaker 1>here or there, but not always applied to a story

0:35:15.205 --> 0:35:15.405
<v Speaker 1>like this.

0:35:20.085 --> 0:35:20.565
<v Speaker 4>There are, of.

0:35:20.485 --> 0:35:25.485
<v Speaker 1>Course, any other reviews and interviews in the Film Spotting Archive.

0:35:26.005 --> 0:35:28.445
<v Speaker 1>Access to that archive is just one of the benefits

0:35:28.485 --> 0:35:32.005
<v Speaker 1>of joining the Film Spotting Family. You'll also get bonus shows,

0:35:32.005 --> 0:35:34.924
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a weekly newsletter, early access to events, and

0:35:35.005 --> 0:35:37.325
<v Speaker 1>more so, if you'd like to join, head on over

0:35:37.445 --> 0:35:39.725
<v Speaker 1>to film spottingfamily dot com.

0:35:39.765 --> 0:35:44.085
<v Speaker 3>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore but burn