WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Whistling, Part 4

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. We're going on

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>into the vault. This episode originally aired August sixteenth, twenty

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, and it's Part four of our series on whistling.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the Whistling, Part four, The Final Conflict, Let's Do It.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part four

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>of our series about whistling. This episode's going to be

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a little weird today because we literally already recorded this

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>episode and then lost the whole thing to a technical glitch. Rob,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm understand that as I was talking when we were

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>recording this episode the first time, it was just constantly

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 2>making the sounds of hell in your ears and can

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you describe the terror and the anguish?

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of like your dialogue was an Afix

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>twin remix the entire time, and so at first it

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was I was like, Okay, I can I can put

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>up with this. This is fine. We've already gone so

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>far into the episode, we should just you know, finish

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>it out. By the end of it, it was kind

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of headache and doucing. But I was like, well, at

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>least we got the episode. This is just audio distortion

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that I'm hearing. It's not going to transfer over to

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the recorded finished product. Sadly it did, and so here

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we are.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the worst.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 2>We were like, well, at least it won't be on

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the actual audio, and then it was, and so here

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 2>we are. Okay, so this is this is take two.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I could have been much worse, So no big deal. Hey,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>looking on the bright side, we got a rehearsal in there.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>How often do we have a rehearsal for a by

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>guest episodes? So I think it's going to be stronger

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because of that.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I was like, is it gonna make the episode better

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>or worse? I really don't know. We'll see.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see out better better for sure.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>All Right, So we're picking up in this series about whistling.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>Let's see, what did we talk about in the previous episodes.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we're picking up where we left off from

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the last Whistling episode, which was Whistling, Part three regarding

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>superstitions and beliefs concerning whistling. We were talking about whistling

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>as an ill omen at sea, as a potential mark

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of witchcraft, and women as bad theater luck in England

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and much more. So we're going to continue this journey

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>through folklore and mythology concerning whistling, and we're going to

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be referencing some of what we covered in another previous

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>episode about Chinese transcendental whistling, in which a specialized Taoist

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>form of whistling was almost like meditation, but was also

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>said to give one both insight and perhaps even power

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>over the energy of things in the world. So once

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>more I'm going to be referencing that excellent whistling and

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Antiquity paper by AV Van Stakellenberg, but also some other sources. Now,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Ed Edwards, in the two thousand and nine

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>paper The Principles of Whistling, a ten dynasty text called

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the shau Chi says that whistling simply calls out to

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>all spirits, good or bad, and sta Kellenberg summarizes this

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a supernatural neutrality concerning whistling. So whistling

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't something that is used by bad people or necessarily

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>use by good people. It's just it's this thing that

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>signals out into the world around us, into the unknown,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you could potentially attract the attention of

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>things you don't want to attract the attention of. But

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it also could be basically harmless. It kind of depends

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on the circumstances.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The raps Un whistling, which was a text we

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>cited in a previous episode. It talks about whistling having

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a kind of withdrawing or distancing power on the whistler.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It says, you know, like the whistling gentleman sort of

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>distances himself from the things of the world and lets

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>out a long drawn whistle.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's a thread we're going to definitely come

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>back to. But first I wanted to add another note

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on whistling in Chinese history. So first of all, you know,

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>anytime we're talking about Chinese history, Chinese culture covers a

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>great deal of territory, both in terms of distance and

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of years, So you know, it's hard to

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>say with any certainty like this is the traditional Chinese

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>view of it versus another thing. But mainly, I don't

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>want to imply here that that whistling was just something

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that Dallas sorcerers engaged in. I was looking at a

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>paper by Julungsu from two thousand and six titled Whistling

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and its Magico Religious Tradition, A comparative Perspective, and at

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this points out that there are Han Dynasty accounts of

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>women whistling for both sorrow and this seems in some

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>cases to tap into this idea of sighing as well. Again,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>look thinking back to previous episodes where we've discussed whistling

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's similarity to other non linguistic sounds that we make,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>other breath based sounds that can be used to communicate

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>something or to get somebody's attention.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we were talking about cases where sometimes it's

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe difficult to precisely translate a word because a word

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>could be interpreted as meaning like whistling, or could mean

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>hissing or some other kind of controlled expulsion of breath.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>There's sort of some blurriness in the breath based lexicon.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, according to Sue here, it's not just for sorrow.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>There are also accounts of women whistling out of happiness

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or joy. It does seem like it is linked to

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>traditions of wailing in some cases, and sort of wailing

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>one might might might engage in, say at a grave,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, but also not just women. In

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>other sources as well, even the Yellow Emperor is said

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to whistle, but the terminology here might actually mean hiss,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>or it might mean a sigh. And in the Classic

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of Mountains and Seas, the Queen Mother uses a whistle

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of battle cry to disply her ferocity.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of a wide spectrum of possible uses

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for the whistle even within Chinese tradition here now. Sue

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>also points out that while yes, in English customs and

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Western customs there are a lot of these superstitions against

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>women whistling particularly, and we don't really see this in

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese traditions, though it is sometimes seen as ominous in

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>general whistling due to the connection between whistling and various

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>death rituals and you know, and attracting the spirits, but

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it is more in inherently magical and not gendered. Sue

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>also shares some other examples from Western traditions to you know,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for a comparative experience here, but they point out here

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>quote the Germans believe that a woman's whistling will make

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the angels weep and the devil's rejoice.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>This is This would be a fantastic basis for a

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>German metal band, all female metal band that just employs

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>whistling instead of singing.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, now, that's a question to what extent has whistling

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>been used in metal? The metal scene has come to

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>encompass a lot of different sounds and ideas, but I

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they've gotten around a whistling have they?

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's the metal version of the rule thirty four idea?

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like, if you can imagine it, there

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>is a metal a metal band of it, right.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what you classifies metal too,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Like are the Scorpions metal? I don't know, probably not,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>probably not now. Sue also shares that among various Chinese minorities,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>whistling while you work, as in Snow White and the

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>song the Dwarfs Sing, whistling while you work, at least

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the field was thought to summon demons to damaged crops,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>or it could summon demons to damage crops, so it

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was discouraged. This Sioue Stresses does not seem to be

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>linked to say dallast ideas regarding whistling, but is instead

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>rooted in particular folk traditions. Now here's another really interesting

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one that Sue brings up. Sue shares an example from Mythraism.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So Mythraism for sci fi fans out there, some of

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you might be familiar with this religion because you may

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have watched the really excellently weird HBO mac sci fi

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>series Raised by Wolves, in which one of the two

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>factions that's going out into space and colonizing other worlds

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>are are devoted Mithraists. And you might well think, oh,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this is some sort of cool religion they made up

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for the show, but it is not. It is this

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is a reference to the Roman street cult of mithras

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and in there recorded rituals, and Joe, You're going to

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>get into this a little bit and talk about what

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we mean when we when we bring out the idea

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of recorded rituals of Mithraism. But supposedly there is a

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>system of whistling and tongue clicking that was used to

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>attract what Sue refers to as theeomorphic star deities.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, theeomorphic meaning animal formed, so like beast beast forms

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>of star gods.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Now I haven't seen the show Raised by Wolves, but

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 2>I think i'm to understand you were saying that the

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>title there is a reference to like the myth about

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the founding of Rome, the Romulus and Rima story.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. That seems to be the direct reference

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>made there, and there are other references as well, and

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of just sheer weirdness on top of it.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So if nothing else, it's a show that's going to

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>give you lots of strange imagery. It's kind of like

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Ridley Scott's continuation of the android centered alien sequels or

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>prequels that he was working on.

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Hmm, okay, so well anyway, I love the idea that

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the show would incorporate actual things about Mithraism because I've

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>long thought we should do a series or at least

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 2>an episode on Mithraism because I find it really interesting

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 2>because it is a religion that clearly commanded an enormous

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>following and had huge cultural significance in the Roman Empire.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Like you can find the ruins of their underground temples

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>called Mithrium, and they're all throughout Roman settlements, and yet

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>we know way less about this religion than one might assume.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>And one of the big reasons for that is that,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>as far as I understood, and I guess the text

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>that you just referred to maybe a counterexample to this,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>but modern scholars generally thought, we have basically no access

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to any primary literary sources about the religion. So if

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>it had religious texts, we don't have any of them,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and so what we know about it we've had to

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 2>try to piece together through detective work based on imagery

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and simple inscriptions and archaeological clues and comments and references

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>made by external writers trying to say, hey, you know,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 2>this is what's going on with Mithraism. So for a

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of hopefully interesting analogy, imagine trying to understand what

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 2>Christianity was if it like mostly died out and disappeared

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth century or so, and we did not

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>have any of the writings of the New Testament or

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>any other writings by Church fathers or any other early Christians,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and we were trying to reconstruct what Christianity was based

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>entirely on like imagery and artifacts and what other external

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 2>writers said about it. So it's a really fascinating problem,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and one of the most common images in Roman mythraism

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>is apparently important scene from their mythology of the god

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Mithras slaughtering some kind of divine bull. But there's another

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting complication here too, which is that there is a

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>pre Roman Persian cult of Mithras or Mitra, which is

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a Zoroastrian or pre Zoroastrian god of the Persian people

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 2>who's kind of a solar deity of justice who I

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>think was associated with contracts and the honoring of bargains.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>And then later you get this widespread Roman mystery cult

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that seems to be based on an appropriated version of

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that deity. And of course we know the Romans loved

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>absorbing and reprocessing other cultures gods, like the main Roman

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>pantheon is mostly a photocopy of the Greek. And then

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>you've got the Persian Mithras becoming the Roman savior god

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 2>of some kind, and even the way you can think

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>about a Jewish messianic figure in Jesus and the original

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>context of monotheistic Judaism rather quickly becomes a popular savior

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>god to people throughout the empire who had been Polytheists

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>up until the moment they converted to Christianity, So that

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>whole process is really interesting. But the idea of a

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>text of Mithraism was very interesting to me because I

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't think we had one of these. But this is

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 2>referring to something called the mithras Liturgy, which I think

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>is commonly dated to roughly the fourth century. But there's

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 2>dispute about whether it actually reflects original Mithraic theology or

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>whether it's some kind of later synthesis.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is the quote from it that Sue shares

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in the paper. Quote. But after you have said the

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>second prayer, where silence is twice commanded, then whistle twice

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and click twice with the tongue, and immediately you will

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>see stars coming down from the disk of the sun,

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>five pointed in large numbers and filling the whole air.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>But say once again, silence, silence.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Whistle twice, click twice, and then shut up. Here come

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the gods.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, coming back to we were talking earlier about scholars

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the woods. In Chinese history, there is this idea

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that comes up, Sue mentions, and we see this in

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Han dynasty, for example, where you would have Confucian scholars,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>other reclusive scholars who would whistle as a means of

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>expressing disdain for the world and or their absolute freedom.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is an interesting concept, and it was also

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>done by other classes as well, Sue writes quote in general, poets, hermits,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and people of all types in the Six Dynasties utilized

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whistling to express a sense of untrammeled individual freedom, or

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>an attitude of disobedience to authority or traditional ceremony, or

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to dispel suppressed feelings and indignation. Whistling was not limited

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to a certain class, but was practiced by men from

0:14:58.200 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all walks of life.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>This idea of whistling as a kind of like middle

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>finger to social customs and authority. So it's like you

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 2>might imagine the behavior of Diogenes the cynic, or something

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 2>just completely behaving in inappropriate ways in public as an

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>expression of contempt for norms and authority.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I whistle, I do what I want Now another

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>paper I look to when I was looking around for

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>various superstitions, we of course found superstitions regarding whistling at sea,

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but we also find them in another interesting place below

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the earth, in mines ooh, yeah, And

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't really thought about this, but this is apparently

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a big one paper I was looking as an older paper.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>This is California Miners Folklore. This is from a nineteen

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>forty two edition of California Folklore Quarterly written by Waylan

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>d Hand. And yeah, it's a really interesting read. This

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one's out there on the internet if anyone wants a

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>deeper dive into it. But for example, he goes into

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the fear of the Tommy Knockers in the tunnels.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, Rob, I am only familiar with Tommy Knockers from

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the Stephen King novel or actually I never read the novel.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I watched the made for TV movie adaptation

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of it, which is quite bad, and I think Stephen

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 2>King himself regards that as a terrible book. But I

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the original reference here is in the book.

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it's aliens.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can never get very far with the book, but.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Not aliens here.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>No, but it apparently refers to a fair variety of things,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're very haunting and they kind of I feel

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like they also kind of connect to perhaps older European

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas of creatures that live in the Earth, getting into

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>various ideas of dwarfs and so forth. The Cobald, Yeah,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cobald. This is what Hand writes in the paper.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>These daizens of the deep dark chambers of the Earth

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>are conceived in different forms as disembodied spirits of dead

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>miners hovering in a working as patrons, or as little

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>men elf like be whiskered and wizened. They are usually

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thought of as benign, occasionally even assisting in the location

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of ore bodies. If they are not so well disposed,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>their conduct tends to be mischievous rather than malignant. Many

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>California miners, though not having themselves seen these creatures in person,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>recall having seen small effigies of them made of clay

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and set upon portal, sets to a tunnel or on

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the lagging or elsewhere where their patronage is desired. So

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that image of not only the idea that

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>there are these beings living elsewhere in the tunnels, but

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>there's this kind of we talked about a little, you know,

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about when people set to sea, when

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>they return, when they're when seamen are out there on

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the waters, there the newer religions that they have taken

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to might be set aside for the older ways, the

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>older gods. And here we have this example of California

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>miners potentially having little altars to kind of dwarven elven

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>beings in the mines.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 2>That's too good.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>So Hand discusses some other ideas as well, you know,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the ghosts of dead miners working in the tunnels, also

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>phantom white mules, headless mules, and strange lights. Apparently he

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>said that there weren't really that many creature myths concerning

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the minds, though occasionally you would have like a cat

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>come down into the mines and would just scare the

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Bejesus out of everybody, because it would either way, I'm imagining,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cat would get down there, it would

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be lurking about, its eyes gleaming and the light and

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>just give everyone the proper spooks. But there were also

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>these superstitions about the about bad luck concerning well, first

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of all, bringing women anywhere near the cave, but also

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a widespread superstition against anyone whistling down there,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be sort of twofold. On one hand,

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a real fear of vibrations in the caves

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and So there's this idea that you shouldn't whistle because

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what that's going to do. You're going

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to set up vibrations that could potentially cause a cave in.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But it also seems linked to this older, wider idea

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that if you're whistling, you could draw in spirits and

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hand shares. A fun little rhyme here quote whistle by

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>night you'll bring the sprite. Whistle by day you'll drive

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>them away.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>And this is not a sprite you want to bring.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, or certainly you don't want them. You don't

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>want anything going on down there in the mind. You

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want you don't want any spirits bonking about. You

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want any vibrations going wild. You want everything to

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just be as safe and quiet as possible.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, so this is not like a friendly tinker bell.

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>This would be a sprite that's going to maybe pollute

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 2>your ore or make a rock fall on your head

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I guess coming back to the idea of

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tommy Knockers, it kind of comes back to the

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of neutrality of spirits, right. It's the idea that well, there,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>there are, or may be spirits around. They might do

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>some bad things, they might do some good things. We

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't call them. We shouldn't call in extra spirits,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and we should try and be on the good side

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of any spirits that are present.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, I think all of the examples we've talked about

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>so far are superstitions. That the way that whistling relates

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to monsters or spirits or dangerous entities is that it's

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>something humans could do that might in some cases attract them.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, be careful about whistling because you might

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 2>get a monster on your tail. But I was thinking

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>about are there stories of monsters that themselves whistle or

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>do some thing like whistling?

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was curious about this. So first of all,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I turned to Carol Rose, who has two Extraordinary volumes,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one about monsters and giants and so forth, and the

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>others more about fairies and sprites. And there's some overlap

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two books, but there are also things in

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>each book that are not covered by the other, and

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so there were at least a couple of examples that

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stood out. One of them is an interesting monster of

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the people of the Xingu River in Brazil, and this

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>creature is called midhata karaya, and these are said to

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have been giants that were as tall as the trees,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>with fruit growing out of their armpits, which the giants

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>then consume to sustain themselves. So it sounds like they

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>weren't themselves dangerous. They weren't like eating humans. But they're big,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tall giants. So if they're coming your way, you want

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to know to get out of their way. And the

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>way you knew this is because the male giants had

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a hole in the top of their head and it

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>emitted a high pitched whistle when they moved.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a good monster. Okay, so we got armpit autophagi.

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>They eat the fruit of their own armpits and their

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>heads whistle.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now another monster that Rose shares Here is a

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Russian creature that I think we might well describe as

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a harpie, or at least a harpy

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in them the way that modern people will think of

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the harpy a kind of bird human hybrid, though in

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this case I think they tend to be more male

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>than female. And its name is soleve Rachtmash, and in

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian folklore it's said to give a piercing whistle, and

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this whistle will kill anyone who hears it, and then

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the monster will come and rob.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Your corpse, rob your corpse. So it's looking for money.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's not here to eat you either. It's

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in one thing, and it's whatever money you got on.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 2>You checking your armpits for fruit.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But and it's kind of an interesting thing because

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the next monster I wanted to mention also is not

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>going to kill you. This one just wants to scare

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you real bad. This is a yokai. I was looking

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>around in yokai traditions because I'm thinking, well, that's just

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>such a rich font of creatures and beings that it

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that there'd be something out there that whistled.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And the one that I found, some descriptions of it

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that I found translated, of course mentioned whistling as something

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it does. Others don't mention it, so I can't be

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred persent certain if this is something that is

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>actually part of it or a lot of these yokaia too.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They and when you get into modern ghost stories as well,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like there's there's there's still kind of rich in alive,

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so something's could add it and also somethings could added

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in translation, but this one is called Oa Guru Batari

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and its name apparently means nothing but blackened teeth, which

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>already sounds pretty pretty amazing. So this is the way

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this okais encountered. She appears as a beautiful woman in

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a traditional wedding kimono, and I guess you might see

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>her at a distance, and in some cases as you

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get as you're interested and you move closer, she may

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whistle to get the attention of single men. Other accounts

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>say that she may speak in the voice of a

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>loved one. Others don't seem to mention any kind of

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>real sound at all. But as you get closer, this

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is the main thing that happens. She, like a lot

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of these type creatures, will reveal her face. And when

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>she reveals her face, you find not a not a

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>beautiful humanoid face, but instead a face that is largely

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>blank except for a great, big, gaping mouth that's filled

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with nothing but blackened teeth. And then she cackles, and

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you just scream and run away terrified, And that's it.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>She's not interested in hurting you. She's just here to

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>scare the Bejesus out of you.

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 2>No eyes, no nose, just the teeth. And but yeah,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>so she doesn't bite your head off. It's just a

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>show you the teeth and get you upset.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, just a ghost. Now. I didn't look super

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>close at various pop culture and modern whistling entities, but

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought I would mention briefly that there is something

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>called the whistling Fiend in Dungeons and Dragons raven Loft setting.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be just like this horrible monster, like

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a fiend from the pits of Hell, but it will

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>whistle beautifully as it's approaching, so before anything goes terribly wrong,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear the whistling. And then if you happen to

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>witness what it does when it gets there, well it's

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>whistling the whole time as well as it's doing, you know, horrible,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>gruesome things to people. Now I was I was interested

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to run across this. I don't really know much about

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>old radio dramas, but there was also an old radio

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>drama about crime and fate titled The Whistler, And apparently

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on this show, the titular whistler kind of emerges out

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the night. It's very much a kind of you know,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>crime noir kind of a figure. You hear him whistling

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a catchy tune, and then he serves as the narrator

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and kind of host of the program. And there were

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>apparently eight different Whistler films during the nineteen forties, and

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the first of them was nineteen forty four is the Whistler,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was directed by William Castle.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh, William Castle of the Tingler fame.

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, so I.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Have to assume he installed special seats in the movie

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 2>theaters that what would the whistle into your bud or something.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it sounds like the kind of thing

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>he would do. Yeah, I mean, he is perhaps best

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>remembered for figuring out what kind of gimmick would get

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>people into the theater. Maybe just the gimmick here was

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>just the existing ip. I don't know. But I don't

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think you really hear about the Whistler much anymore. I

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think there was a nineteen fifties TV series, and I

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know that anyone's really gone back to this, but

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I like this idea because it's essentially it's kind of

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like a cripkeeper, you know, it's an anthology host and Apparently

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the movies is you would have the

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>same star actor in each of them, not the Whistler

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but somebody else, though each story is different, and so

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he's playing a different character. So it's kind of like

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the modern version would be. I don't know, Ryan Gosling

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is in every Whistler movie, but Ryan Gosling plays a

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>different protagonist, a different character that's all wound up in

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of tale of crime and fate.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 2>We just got a producer chime in from Seth who,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 2>by the way, is actually a devoted listener to The Whistler.

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know if you can be devoted

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to something that is not currently produced, but he's a fan.

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>He says, it's great.

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know this idea of the stranger who whistles, and

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's unknown exactly what their knowledge is, what their powers

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>may be. I guess you do see that in a

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of cinema. It's often We've had

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some listeners right in and mentioned that Westerns are a

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>place where we see a lot of such suspicious whistling.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>It brings to mind a nineteen ninety one TV movie

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that I don't remember was especially good, but it was creepy,

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was called Into the bad Lands, and it

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>starred Bruce Dern as this creepy old bounty hunter in black,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and if memory serves, he does various things. He cooks

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some eggs, he shoots some outlaws, and drags him around

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of rotting behind his cart. He smiles a big

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>creepy grin. But I think he also whistles in that one,

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's a particular ditty that's reoccurring, So there is

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>something to this. The stranger who whistles, what is he

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>whistling about? He kind of ties into some of these

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>other ideas, like he's an outsider that is not tied

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to the same rules as everything else. He may have

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of communication with knowledge beyond himself, with spirits,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Another producer, Chime ins Seth, had a great example of this,

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's Earl Hannah and kill Bill, who does a

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>very creepy whistling while she is on the way to

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>kill the protagonist.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's a great example too, because this is this

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is a female character whistling. So many of these examples,

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>even if we're touching on traditions where where whistling is

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not gendered. It seems like a lot of them tend

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to involve male figures that are whistling. So so yeah,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 1>great example seth. All right, So that's all I have

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for now anyway, concerning whistling superstitions and whistling monsters. Certainly

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear from everyone out there who has

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>additional things they would like to bring up, be it

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, folkloric creatures, strange traditions, and certainly any kind

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, movie tie in characters who whistle. I'd

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>love to hear about any of that. So yes, by

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all means right in.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So, I guess the next thing we should look at

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is some of the psychology research on whistling, which I

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 2>have to say, I was shocked how sparse this literature is.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>There is, from what I could tell, very little psychological

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 2>research about when and why people whistle. One of the

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>only major papers I could find on it wasn't really

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>experimental in nature. It was very theoretical, and though it

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>had a few interesting ideas in it that I do

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about, to the extent that it is theoretical,

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it seems kind of based in Freudianism, So it's gonna

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>be a big caveat there. But before we get to that,

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I did want to talk about a medical case report

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I came across that had a title that really grabbed

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>my attention. So this is a paper by pallac at

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 2>All published in BMC Psychiatry in twenty twelve, and it's

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>called Compulsive Carnival Song Whistling following Cardiac arrest. A case

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>study Compulsive Carnival Song Whistling.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, So is it the pro is that

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the music? You think that?

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was assuming. Unfortunately, the case report is

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>not attached a recording or sheet music or anything. So,

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.239
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't name the tunes, so I don't know

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 2>what song it is. The most they say about it

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 2>is that it is a carnival song. All right, what

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 2>are the options? Yeah, so you got that one is

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>like the Binny Hill theme? Possible? I don't know.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I don't want to get too far

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>into this because this is like, this is a realm

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I know virtually nothing about. But apparently there's a there's

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of what we might think of his

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>circus music that you know, we're talking about circus band stuff.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about waltzes and fox trots, so there there's

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a lot there, but them is the thing

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that that mostly comes to the surface for folks like me.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in this case, report the medical history the patient.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 2>In this case it's anonymous of course, so we don't

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>know their name. But it was a man who was

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>found unconscious in his car in February nineteen ninety two

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>at the age of forty eight, having so a heart attack.

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>He was in cardiac arrest for some period of time,

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>but he was reanimated successfully in the emergency room at

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>a nearby hospital, so he survived the heart attack he had.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>His heart had stopped, there was reduced a supply of

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>oxygen to the brain, but they resuscitated him and he

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 2>was all right. But during rehabilitation he presented with some symptoms,

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>including neurological impairment, and so several of the things they

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>report are disorientation, apathy, what they call bradyphrenia meaning slowness

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of thought, short term memory problems and things like that.

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>And imaging, particularly EEG showed decreased functioning in the brain,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>especially in the bezo temporal areas, and he continued to

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 2>exhibit some neurological symptoms in the following years. And here's

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 2>where we get to the music. I'll read straight from

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the case report quote. We were approached in May two

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight by the patient's wife, who got to

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>know our center of expertise through the internet. She was

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 2>close to desperation from listening to the whistling of the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>same carnival song for nearly sixteen years. It would go

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>on for five to eight hours every day and got

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>worse when the patient was tired. Oh wow, so it's

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a mix. Like obviously it's you know, I was snagged

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>by the idea of repetitive whistling of a carnival song,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but when you actually hear the details, it is I

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know, it's a very unfortunate situation to imagine that,

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>like the whistling of the same song goes on for

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>five to eight hours a day for sixteen years.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, the authors here talk about treatments that were tried,

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 2>including a drug called clomipramine, which is a tricyclic antidepressant

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that is sometimes used to treat obsessive compulsive disorder, which

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously share some features with what's being described here. That

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>among other conditions. But basically this drug regimen did manage

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 2>to decrease the whistling by about half, but it also

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 2>came with some very difficult side effects in this man's case,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and the repetitive whistling of a carnival song non stop

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>for five to eight hours a day could be considered

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 2>an example of what psychiatrists would call compulsivity, which the

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 2>authors describe as quote, the repetitive, irresistible urge to perform

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 2>a behavior, the experience of loss of voluntary control over

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 2>this intense urge, and the tendency to perform repetitive acts

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in a habitual or stereotyped manner. So they talk about

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 2>how the man would whistle the song on a loop

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 2>all day pretty much, and that at certain points they

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 2>could make him stop doing it, though he reported after

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 2>he stopped that he experienced anxiety. And in their discussion,

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the authors explain how the man in this report showed

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>symptoms that could be consistent with three different interpretations of

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 2>his condition. So, first of all, they talk about the

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 2>idea of a frontal syndrome characterized by impulsivity and disinhibition.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I think frontal syndrome there because it's the frontal lobe

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that is very important for inhibiting behavior that's your sort

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 2>of like self control mechanism. And then second a compulsivity

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 2>condition known as punding, which is characterized by quote purposeless

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and repetitive behavior such as collecting or arranging things often

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>related to the patient's personal hobbies or occupation, and attributed

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to alterations of the brain's reward and motor systems in

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 2>both the ventral and dorsal stra atom. And then the

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>final interpretation would be a sort of acquired form of

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 2>obsessive compulsive disorder or OCD. And there are other examples

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of people acquiring OCD after a brain injury later in life.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 2>The OCD is usually acquired gradually earlier on in life.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And they say all of these explanations match the observations

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 2>in some ways but not in others. But one thing

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 2>they got into that I thought was interesting here was

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about the different characteristics of impulsivity versus compulsivity in

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the brain. So they write, quote, one may conclude that

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the whistling with its repetitions is primarily compulsive rather than

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 2>impulsive or disinhibitive, as the patient had a constant urge

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 2>to whistle and felt anxiety when asked to stop rather

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 2>than acting without foresight. The fact that anxiety was felt

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 2>is in line with compulsivity rather than impulsivity, assuming that

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>compulsive behaviors are performed to prevent perceived negative consequences from happening.

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 2>So this is a useful distinction for thinking about because

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>when we you know, outside of the medical context, when

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>we think about these words impulsive or compulsive, they both

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I think usually refer to situations where a person seems

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to lack executive control. They lack the ability to control

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>their own behavior or prevent themselves from doing something, but

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 2>in very different ways. So in impulsivity, you feel an

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 2>urge to do something, but some process taking place in

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>your frontal lobe tells you that's not appropriate and stops

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you from doing it. But the urge itself might be

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>something normal that like we would all think of doing

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>for a second. It might cross our mind to do it,

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>but then we would turn away from actually doing it

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 2>because of some inhibition mechanism in the brain. Examples of

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 2>this include all kinds of stuff, spitting on the floor

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 2>or making a rude or inappropriate comment and conversation, or

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 2>jumping out of a moving car. They can vary wildly

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 2>from you know, minor things to extreme things. They would

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>all be things though, that even a person with typical

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 2>neuroanatomy might think for a second about doing, but then

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>they would be able to stop themselves.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>All right. I think we can all think of examples

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of this from our own life, where yeah, you're just

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in a situation and you may think of like something

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous or absurd or antisocial that you theoretically could do,

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you sort of but you recoil from it

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and you realize, oh, well, of course I'm not going

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And it can be a little shocking

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to think that you even thought about doing that. Why

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>did I think that, hey, I could take my wallet

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>out and throw it off of this building or off

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of this bridge that I'm on. Yeah.

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. We did a whole episode one time called The

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>imp of the Perverse that was about this idea that

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 2>like that there is some kind of It was about

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the first half before the inhibition comes in. It's like,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 2>what is that urge to do things that are obviously

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 2>not in your best interests but you suddenly just feel like, ooh,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 2>I should do that. But then you're able to put

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the you know, put the lid on it and say no,

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't do that. People with a frontal syndrome often

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 2>have impulsivity problems because they whatever the normal disinhibition mechanism

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>in the brain is, that has been damaged in some

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>way by their injury. Right, So contrasts that that impulsivity

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 2>with compulsivity, where a person also lacks the ability to

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 2>stop themselves from performing an action, but it's an action

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 2>that they feel they must do repetitively in order to

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 2>prevent some kind of bad consequence from happening. So remember

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>it was said that the man here would whistle constantly,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>but he felt the immediate onset of anxiety if he

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 2>stopped whistling the carnival song. So that makes it sound

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 2>more like it's compulsivity here, that it's something that he

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 2>felt he had to do repetitively or else negative consequences

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>would emerge. And the case history here mentions that the

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 2>man once worked as head of a carnival association, and

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the authors don't say this, so we don't know this,

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like a reasonable guess that the carnival

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 2>tune he was whistling was one he was familiar with

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 2>from his own past to working as the head of

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 2>a carnival association, maybe even one he associated with a

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>time when he was more in control.

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating because it also this ties into sort of

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the power of music, right. We all use music, I think,

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>at times to augment our current mental state, to draw

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in mental feelings of power or assertiveness, but also sadness,

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case might be, whatever we feel like we

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>need to connect with that is not our current state exactly.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 2>But it also ties into something that came up in

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 2>previous episodes. So here again we have a case of

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a man who suffers neurological damage after a period where

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 2>his brain isn't getting enough oxygen. He never had any

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 2>symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder or anything before this, but

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>after this event he acquired this tendency to engage in

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>compulsive whistling. And I thought it was interesting that the whistling,

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 2>if it is best interpreted as a way of staving

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 2>off anxiety, which the authors here suggested, is it made

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 2>me think of our discussion about whistling past the graveyard

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>or whistling in the dark, other cases where it's commonly

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 2>observed that people whistle in order to push out a

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 2>fear or thoughts of danger.

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, yeah, more whistling past the graveyard for sure.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, again, as I mentioned earlier, it seemed like the

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 2>psychological research on whistling was far less developed than I

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 2>would have expected. Maybe there are some great studies out

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 2>there that I just wasn't able to find, So if

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 2>you know of them, please send them into the show

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.760
<v Speaker 2>account contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 2>But the other major one I found, and this was

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>cited in some other papers, is a paper from nineteen

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine published in the journal Language and Speech called

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 2>When People Whistle, and it's by the UC San Francisco

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 2>professor of psychiatry, Peter F. Austwald. As I said earlier,

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I do want to mention this one because it has

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>some interesting ideas in it, but also it is an

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.479
<v Speaker 2>older paper. It clearly is not constricted by empirical method.

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 2>This is not like reporting on original experiments. It's more

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of theorizing about what whistling might mean and why

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 2>people whistle, based on models that seem at least influenced

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 2>by Freudianism. A lot of it's about fixations that are

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of emerge from childhood development. But anyway, okay, so

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 2>who is this guy who wrote this? Ostwald? He seems

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 2>like a kind of interesting guy. So he lived from

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty eight to nineteen ninety six, and his life

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 2>is sort of divided between an interest in psychiatry on

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 2>one hand, and music and music history on the other.

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 2>So he wrote biographies of musicians and composers like Schumann

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and Glenn Gould. But also, to quote from his New

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 2>York Times obituary quote, in nineteen eighty six, he founded

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 2>the Health Program for Performing Artists, a voluntary group of

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>specialists engaged in research, education, and clinical care of the

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 2>particular mental and medical problems afflicting musicians, dancers, and other

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 2>performing artists, both professionals and students. And I thought that

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>was very interesting because now that I think about it,

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 2>it clearly makes sense that you could have medical center

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 2>focused on the mental and physical health needs of performing

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 2>artists in particular, because I'd imagine there would be patterns

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in their needs. But it never occurred to me that

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 2>such a thing would exist.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it makes sense, right, because we have

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sports medicine athletes do extreme things with their bodies. It

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>puts special types of wear and tear on them, and

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you could I think you can very fairly say the

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing for performers, especially when you're thinking about something

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like dance or vocal performance.

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Totally, but okay, what does ast Falds say in this

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>language psychology paper? Mainly this article is focused on questions

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 2>of why humans whistle, what purpose it serves, what whistling

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>tends to mean, and how it differs from other forms

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of noise production. I'm not gonna get into everything he

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 2>theorizes about in this paper, but I did want to

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 2>focus on one part where he's sort of taking a

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 2>look at the phenomenology of whistling. What does it feel

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 2>like to whistle?

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it pleasurable to people? And if it is, which

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it often seems to be, why is it pleasurable? So

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 2>to check one of the very Freudian boxes, he argues that,

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 2>first of all, the act of whistling involves manipulation of

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the muscles in the face and the mouth in a

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 2>way that may produce hedonic states feelings of comfort and

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 2>pleasure because of its similarity to the facial and mouth

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 2>movements of what he calls oral gratification, and so he

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 2>expands that to all kinds of things like eating and smoking,

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 2>but he specifically ties it into the facial and mouth

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 2>muscle movements of a feeding infant. So this is one

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 2>of those things that, well, it's hard to disprove that,

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not convinced there's much evidence to establish that

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 2>exact causal chain that like doing the same thing with

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 2>your face muscles that you did when you were a

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 2>baby in your mother's arms produces comfort and for the

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 2>same reason. I don't know how you would show that, yeah, Yeah,

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 2>And also I'd be skeptical that there's a general principle

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 2>that doing something with the you know, the skeletal muscle

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 2>in your body that is similar to what that muscle

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 2>does in some other unrelated activity that is pleasurable in

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 2>some way gives you pleasure in the secondary activity just

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 2>because you're using the same muscles. I don't know. I mean,

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you could think of ways that you would use the

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 2>same muscles you might use in some pleasurable activity, but

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't bring pleasure. Does just like pretending to chew

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 2>bring you the same kind of pleasure you get from

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 2>eating and so forth?

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh, yeah, generally not. Uh yeah, yeah, you can't. You

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>can't just say, pretend to be eating your favorite dish.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And I mean maybe if you're hungry enough, you can

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you can lean into it a little bit. I don't know,

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, for the most part, I don't really put

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stock in this notion.

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I got doubts about that. But then you

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 2>make some other points that I think are I don't know,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 2>more worth considering. This next one is still sort of

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 2>along Freudian lines, but I think it's it's I don't know,

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 2>it feels different to me. So see what you think

0:45:59.280 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 2>about this, he says.

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 2>In addition to the mouth and face, whistling involves the

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 2>respiratory structures. These structures chest, abdomen, lungs, wind pipes, and

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>throat move of their own accord, regulated by neuronal and

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 2>chemical processes beyond voluntary control. But the whistler in effect

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 2>willfully imposes his own rhythm, amplitude, and organization pattern on

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 2>these automatic movements. Psychological studies show that if the individual

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is rewarded by attention or praise when he first gains

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>control over such automatic processes, he may continue to expect

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 2>satisfaction from this display of skill. As will be shown later,

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 2>whistling arouses the attention of listeners so that the whistler's

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 2>bodily mastery is almost universally rewarded in some way. And

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, at a gut level, this seemed a

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>little more plausible to me that there could be like

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 2>a learned association of positive reinforcement upon gaining conscious control

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>over previously automatic or autonomic processes. And I think one

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of the main ideas this ties into here is like

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>toilet training, that you know, there could be some kind

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.959
<v Speaker 2>of bleed over with pleasure upon a general pleasure upon

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 2>taking conscious control of things like breath, and that would

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of check out with other things. I mean, there

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of things people do to seemingly bring

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 2>themselves pleasure and comfort just by taking conscious control of breath,

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 2>which is normally automatic.

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this does remind me of certain potty training techniques

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for kids where they'll be for instance, if you're trying

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to teach the very young child to have some degree

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of control over when they defecate, that there's a there's

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a like a technique where you're getting them to hum

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 1>while they do it. So it's yeah, I can see

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 1>where you can have a lot of connection between the

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:50.839
<v Speaker 1>two here.

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh and in the next section I want to talk

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:57.280
<v Speaker 2>about he actually ties directly into that. So Ostwald writes, quote,

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 2>some of the emotions that accompany the act of whistling

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.399
<v Speaker 2>would appear to result from wishful thoughts and magical fantasies

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 2>in the mind of the whistler. Whistling, because it involves

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 2>the production of wordless sounds, may bring back memories of

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that very early period during which the child could not

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 2>distinguish between those sounds which came from the outside world

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 2>and those sounds which came from his own body. During

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 2>this phase of personality development, one is unsure of the

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>significance of sounds. One cannot tell whether a certain noise,

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 2>say one's footsteps, has personal meaning referable only to his

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 2>own body, or has a public meaning with some reference

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to the world of other people. In this confused state,

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the individual may come to believe that the sounds he

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 2>produces have some causal relationship to what he experiences. Whistling,

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>like other noises he makes, may thus be associated with

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 2>fantasies of omnipotence, which, unless corrected by reality can lead

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to delusions of grandeur. This was really interesting to me

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 2>because think about how many things we've already looked at

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 2>where there's some belief that, like whistling gives you power

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to like change the external world somehow.

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, ties directly into the wind magic we've been

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>discussing in getting and even connects back to the Taoist

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>transcendental whistling as.

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Well totally, or even the Terence McKinney thing. Yeah yes, yeah, yeah,

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 2>but okay, So coming back to this, Ostwald writes, quote

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Occasionally parents or other adults inadvertently encourage magical behavior in

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 2>their children and thus reinforce fanciful thoughts about whistling and

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 2>other sounds. For example, nurses have been known to employ

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 2>whistles to quote make the child urinate and kindly. Grandparents

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 2>not infrequently whistle away the aches and bruises of a youngster.

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I can see the again whistling as the

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as a sound of wind, but also the sound of

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>water moving water. We touched on that, and that's some

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of these ideas that you can get an ox or

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a horse to drink water by whistling at it, which

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>there may not be anything to that, but using it

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as some sort of a potty training. Yeah, I can

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine the humming sound being for the defecation though, the

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>whistling sound being for the you know, the creation of

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>water with one body, that sort of thing.

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And that could actually have efficacy when you're whistling to

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a person, right because they hear that that has some

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 2>associative significance for them that may actually help motivate, i

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know, going to the bathroom, or may actually make

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 2>them feel subjectively less pain or something like that. But

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 2>that could lead to the erroneous assumption therefore, that you

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 2>can have physically implausible control over the external world with

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 2>whistling somehow.

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anyway.

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Ostwald then relates this to reports tying directly back into

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 2>our previous episode about sailors who have intense superstitions about

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 2>whistling and believe that it contains powerful and dangerous magic,

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, again whistling for the wind. And he also

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 2>discusses magical beliefs about whistling to summon birds and Celtic

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 2>tales and this involves a mediating technology. Plenty of stories

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 2>about beasts and magical creatures that are commanded by a flute.

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, think of the god pan and the magical

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 2>syringx and so forth, but.

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Also the piper, pied piper. Yes, yeah, yeah.

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But the interesting observation that sort of puts a bow

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 2>on this whole thing is he ends up talking about

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 2>whistling as a form of non verbal signaling. So here

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 2>he would specifically not be talking about actual languages that

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 2>use whistles, where there's a full language and the whistles

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 2>actually mean words, So you know, he's not talking about

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 2>whistling with precise informational content, but rather the more informal

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:56.720
<v Speaker 2>type of communication done via whistling in other contexts, He writes, quote,

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>wordless signals usually have a vague and imprecise meaning. They

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 2>do not usually communicate ideas, but serve rather to attract attention.

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 2>And he described some of the same research we've already

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 2>talked about, for example, that whistling is a type of

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 2>noise making that travels especially well by concentrating energy in

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 2>the one to four kilohertz range, which is the best

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 2>window for humans to hear. It's sort of a perfect

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 2>attention getter. But in the context of most cultures, cultures

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 2>where whistling does not constitute a language. It doesn't contain

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 2>words or precise information. Again, its meaning is vague. It's

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 2>just an attention getter. And personally, I think maybe it's

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in this vagueness that a lot of the superstitions and

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:44.840
<v Speaker 2>ideas about the magical danger of whistling could emerge, because

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of a one to two punch. It's this paradox.

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Whistling is like the most powerful signal you can make

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:54.880
<v Speaker 2>with your body to attract attention, the most powerful sound

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 2>signal you can make. Right, it's this piercing sound. It

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 2>travels far, it it makes people turn their heads. It's

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 2>like a beacon, and yet in most cases it doesn't

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 2>form precise words or phrases, so you can't be sure

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 2>what kind of attention you are attracting. It's just a

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 2>general beacon. It could attract a friend, or if you're

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 2>in a dangerous place, maybe you're on the sea and

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 2>there are all kinds of forces at work, it could

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 2>just as likely attract unwanted attention, a dangerous enemy of

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 2>some kind. And because you can't form precise words with it,

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:31.919
<v Speaker 2>you also don't know what you're saying or what you're

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:34.719
<v Speaker 2>asking for. It's like the scene in the movie where

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you like read a spell from an ancient

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 2>book in another language and you don't know what the

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 2>words are, so you don't know what kind of spell

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you're enacting or what kind of trouble you're getting into.

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or thinking about the transmissions that we send into

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>outer space, or that are sent from somewhere else in

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:56.399
<v Speaker 1>outer space by some you know, presumably intelligent or ones

0:53:56.440 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>intelligent species, like the potential danger or of just of

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:05.359
<v Speaker 1>whistling into the cosmic darkness, and you don't know who

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to receive the signal and what they'll make

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of the signal.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a perfect analogy. Yeah, It's like I

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of these fears and superstitions about the

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 2>magical power of whistling would be like if somebody in

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the real context said, I have created the most powerful

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 2>radio transmitter that will omni directionally broadcast an incredibly clear,

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 2>powerful signal that any other intelligence out there could detect.

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what they'll make of it, but let's

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 2>just start transmitting. There would obviously be some real concerns

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 2>about that from some of the less sanguine of extraterrestrial theorists.

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean imagine if we just piped circus music out,

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.399
<v Speaker 1>like just non stop circus music, what would they make

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.919
<v Speaker 1>of it? Maybe the killer clowns from out of space

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>show up. That's the problem.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 2>God help us.

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we're gonna go ahead and wrap up

0:54:57.040 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this four part Whistling series here, but we'd love to

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>hear from everyone out there, because whistling is something that

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I think all of us have some connection to. You

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 1>can whistle, or you can't whistle, or you can sort

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of whistle where there's some sort of cultural ideas about whistling.

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>There's something about whistling in the way you were brought up.

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>There's whistling in various pieces of media, So all of

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this is fair game. Writ in. We would love to

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. In the meantime, you can always find

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 1>core episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind on Tuesdays

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays in these Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed.

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 1>On Mondays we do listener mail, on Wednesdays we do

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a short form artifact or monster fact episode, and on

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Fridays we do Weird House Cinema. That's our time to

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns and just talk about a

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>strange film.

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks, as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:52.840
<v Speaker 2>say hello, you can email us at contact Stuff to

0:55:52.880 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Blow your Mind dot com.

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from iHeart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:24.280
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>H