WEBVTT - Washington Nationals team preview

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But obviously CJ he to all start first half, and

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see, you know, can he turn

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that into a full seasons worth of production. But I

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>think obviously, you know, as you're getting just getting ad

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>justed as a young player, it takes some time to

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out how teams are pitching you.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Here we go. Andrew Golden writes for The Washington Post,

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>joins us right now for the first time on FT

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to review the Washington Nationals coming up for the twenty

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty five season. Andrew, great to have you on here

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 2>for the first time. Appreciate you, stop and buy. How

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>you doing good?

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>How y'all doing I'm looking forward to talking with you guys.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's too. Let's rip through this all right, So

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>let's hit the storylines and we'll jump right into what

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 2>we want to get into with the Nats and then

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>some bonus questions after that. Cool, here's your review twenty

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty five Washington Nationals storylines. That the huest homers in

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the NL in twenty twenty four, they had a little thump.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Is it enough?

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Especially with the core that they'll have for a full

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>season now too? Like James Wood and Dylan Cruz next

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>step for the core like c J Abrams, James Wood

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>and Dylan Cruz. We'll get to that and bullpen questions. No,

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Finnegan, not a ton of work. Actually, some other

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>subtractions we can get into as well this offseason. Are

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>we okay with that? And the NL Beast three really

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>really good teams that they're looking at as competition in

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the division.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's start at the top.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>This team didn't have enough pop last year, and we

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>thought they should have gone after Pete Linz or at

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>least I'll speak for me and Kratz agrees. I know

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Prazinski agrees. I'm sure Todd Father agrees as well. But

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>what did you think of what they did this offseason

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>to put the offense in a better chance to thump?

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that was the big question.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been the big question for the past couple of

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all seasons, is how can they add more power their lineup?

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They sign a lot of guys to one year deals,

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but what they sign a guy to a longer term

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>deal to kind of get some more thump. It's their lineup.

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Pete Longso was a guy that was kind of interesting.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I also was kind of into a Christian Walker too,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and that was another guy I kind of liked.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think they did a good job in.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Terms of training for Nathaniel Lowe adding Josh Bell, and

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>as you guys mentioned, they're kind of hoping for improvements

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>from James Wind Dylan Cruz to kind of add some

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>power there. But I think they did a good job overall.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I think Josh Bell depends on which Josh Bell

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting. Obviously he could be kind of streaky. If

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the Josh Bell that he was when he

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was last in DC, that's a really really good player.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel low obviously when he was with the Rangers two

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I think twenty six horns, I want to

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>say twenty seven. He said he wants to get back

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to this offseason, and so I think they'll definitely increase

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>their power just just with those guys alone.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 5>Very nice. Now let's talk about the young core right

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 5>here for the National c j Abrams had an All

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Star year marred by basically the suspension as we know,

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 5>and you know it was a rough second half. Now

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 5>talking about James Wood and Dylan Cruise, are these guys

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 5>gonna step up here? They just got their feet wet

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 5>a little bit. Talk a little about the you know,

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 5>the young guys coming up.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm excited to see what they all can do,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>especially James and Dill. And I think the two of

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>them are definitely getting their feet with last year. You

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>looked at James like he was kind of getting feel

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>for what the big leagues were like, and you still

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>produced at the high level. And then Dylan had that

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>final month to kind of get his feet wet as well.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>He showed you could really hit fast ball as well,

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>struggle with breaking balls a little bit. So I'm interested

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to see how he adjusts there. And James to the

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>ball on the ground a little bit more last year,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'm kind of interested to.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>See how he adjusts.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And they obviously CJ he'd an all start first half, and

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see, you know, can he turn

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that into a full season's worth of production. But I

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think obviously, you know, as you're getting just getting adjusted

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>as a young player, it takes some time to figure

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>out how teams are pitching you and kind of how

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you adapt and adjust.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm expecting a big year for all those three, especially CJ.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>This is his third.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Full season with the Nationals, and so I'm expecting a

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>big year for him.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>The that's non tendered, they're all star closer Cal Finnigan.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Now there's names, there's names like recently signed or Helo

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 4>pet and Jose Ferrera. Where's this closing innings gonna come from?

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Because it's a huge part of a bullpen. Yeah.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So they just signed Colin Proche to a minor league

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>deal this morning, so I think that will definitely help.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Kyle, I think it was interesting, right, Like,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a question of do you sign

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>him to eight nine million dollars to be your closer

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or do you reallocate those resources for free agents.

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I think they decided to do that.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the big question was if they knew they

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were going to non tender Kyle, why not trade him

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>at the deadline?

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>That was my big question.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're just expecting their their young guys

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of take a step forward. I look, Zach

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Brickse's a guy could take a step forward. They're getting

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Mason Thompson back from Tommy Johns. That might take some time.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They have Derek Law who can definitely help on the

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>back end. He was a late inning reliever last year,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so they have some pieces, but they're definitely young. I

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's the big biggest question mark for them hanging

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to the season. So your guests as good as mine,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>mixtic kind of interesting to see how it all plays out,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think Colin Poste and Jorge Lopez will definitely

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>beat the back end.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Jose Ferrero took a big step forward and

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>other guys with to fill in.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Now we got to talk about the team wise. Here

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 5>they were fourteen and twenty five against the NL East

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 5>gauntlet of a schedule. They're playing against some of the

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 5>best teams Atlanta and New York Mets and the Braves.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 5>How are they going to do this year coming up

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 5>knowing that they got to face these guys again with

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 5>the guys that they picked up, how will they how

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 5>will they do against this team and how will they

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 5>stack up in the NL East.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the big question right when I look

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at their offseason, I think they've actually had a really

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>good offseason, but can they kind of compete against the guys?

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Actually last year against the Braves, they had a wing

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>record against the Braves and performed pretty well, So it's

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mainly the Mets and the Phillies, who have both gotten better,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Braves are obviously gonna be the Braves, and

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm interested to see, like can they hit and

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>kit for enough power to kind of compete with some

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of those teams.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really sure. Like I think the Mets got better.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Phillies are just as good, not bad

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>than they were last year, And the Braves are the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And so I think they can serve because

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they prove they can compete against the Braves. But I

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the Phillies and the Mets and the Brazs.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously as they get stridered back. They obviously still Chris Sale.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>They obviously have that great lineup, and so we'll see

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if they can replicate that again like they did last year.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 4>So ownership holding this team back is ownership holding the

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 4>team back from like really pursuing, like we said, like

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 4>that Alex Bragman, that kind of Jason Worth from two

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 4>thousand and eleven or twenty twelve type of contract with

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Pete Alonzo, that type of thing.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they're definitely were some talks that they're limited

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what they was spent maybe compared to

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a decade to go, and so I think there are

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>some limitations there in terms of how much they're willing

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to spend. I also know that Mike Rizzo also talks

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>about not wanting to hand out contracts. They guys are

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>qualifying offers because they really care a lot about their

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>draft picks, especially restocking their farm system. But I definitely

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>agree that I think that it's going to be harder

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for them to to compete if they are't willing to

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>spend the way they were a decade to go. I

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think given the mass and the hold up and all

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>those different things, I think there are some limitations in

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much they can spend.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Does it revolve around the possibility of the team being sold?

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I know, the whole mass and stuff, the whole masson

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 4>stuff's been going on for longer than you've been alive, Andrew,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Like that stuff's been ever since there was a Nationals there.

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, there wasn't an Andrew Golden Now there's you know,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>no more massive issue. But the sale. Do you feel

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 4>like some of the possibility of it being sold?

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I know my colleague Barriers for Luga wrote a couple

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago that Ted le Jones was kind of

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the front runner, but he hadn't made an offer this offseason.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's kind of going to be lingering

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>over the team. And I think there'll always be a

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>question right like are they waiting for the right price?

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Will they get the right prices?

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that also is always gonna be lingering over

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and definitely a question of will they sell the team,

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 1>will they get the right price?

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 3>But for now they're not.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>They're going to operate if they still have the team,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's a matter of are they willing

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to make the financial investments necessary to take this team

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the next level?

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Andrew run more free. From my side, how are we

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>feeling about third base for the team short term and

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>long term? It seems like they're trying to leave a

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a lane long term for Brady House.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay with that, but on the short term it's

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>disappointing because I feel like this team could have made

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>more of a surprise as a contender in the National

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>League for a wild card spot if the lineup looked

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>a little more whole. I like parts of it in

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the top half, but I mean, you tell me, right,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Now for the projected lineup pose EIGHTEENA. Is there is

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that good enough for a playoff team.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Jose ten or Trey Lipscomb, I think are

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the two options for third base. But I think the

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>key for them is they don't want to block prospects,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've repeated that a handful of times this offseason,

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>and so I think Brady's gonna get every chance to

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>try to get that if he can perform well.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Another guy like is Kayden Wallace.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They traded him or they acquired him in the Hunter

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Harvey trade last year, and he's a guy they like.

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>We haven't really seen him because he was injured.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Hit a rib injury and they didn't play in the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Arison the Fall League, and so those are two guys

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>who I think could be third base prospects. He just

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter of if how do they perform this year. I

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>think Brady House has some questions. I seen him drop

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>all some prospect list was kind of interesting. Maybe that's

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>prospect fatigue, maybe that is legitimate questions. But I think

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to give Brady every opportunity to be the

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>third base in the future, but he has to perform,

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm interested to see how that plays out.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Does Brady take the step forward? Maybe just Kaden Walls

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>take the step forward. But I definitely think it's a question.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But they don't want to block any prospects, and so

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>they're leaving it open.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we'll see. I mean depth is important, and yeah, House,

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know enough to make a comment yet.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen enough of him. I do know I

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>had a down year, so that's probably why he fell

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 2>off some list, or at least.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>He's also a young drop. I think it's I think

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like twenty one.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>He's young, so maybe give us some time, you know,

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is interesting, it's interesting for sure.

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 3>That is fair. That is fair.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I think you are too right your early twenties.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm twenty five, twenty five, not as young as Brady.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 3>There you go, there you go, probly great world. Also

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>exactly exactly well.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>When I was twenty five, I looked twelve, and social

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 2>media let me know about it almost every day when

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I was on television, so the beard definitely helped. I

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't allowed to do that back then. But Andrew, great job,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>great to have you on here. Man, Really appreciate the time.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll do it again. We'll have you on during the

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>season and we'll talk soon.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Sounds good man, Thanks for having me on.