WEBVTT - Surveillance: Virus Impact on Americans With Gallup's Younis

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg with Us.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Now with a broader picture all the emerging markets is

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Grenhardt. She is at Harvard Kennedy School, but far

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more than that, has been our most astute academic on

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the linkages of the developed world to emerging markets. Carmen,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>John and Lisa really want to dive into emerging markets.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with them. But I've got to ask

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you in your magisterial effort with Ken Rogoff back to

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish Armada. I remember reading your chapter on this

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>time is different in the Spanish Armada. What does your

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>tone say about pandemics? What in your study of eight

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred years with Ken, what did you learn about pandemics? Uh? Tom,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I recently wrote a piece for it for Projects Syndicates,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, this time it's truly different because we haven't

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lacked pandemics. Uh. But in history, but the kind of

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>policy reactions to try to save lives by basically shutting

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>down economy. Is this is this is this time is different,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's new. So the idea of using path pandemics to

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>throw light on what's going on, I don't think it

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>will work. The major one that influenza of nineteen eighteen

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was during World War One. We had nine real GDP

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>growth in nineteen eighteen because is of the war effort,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not because you know, there were measures like what we're

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing taken today. So it's limited, very limited what we

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>can draw. Professor Einhardt Adam Two's a Columbia professor, wrote

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a piece for Foreign Policy that was pretty stark, and

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it said the coronavirus is the biggest emerging markets crisis ever,

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that the pandemic is starting to topple one of

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the pillars of the globalization era. His argument was that

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this time is different, as you say, in part because

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the developed market, the developed world cannot assist the emerging

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>markets right now, given what we're seeing. Do you agree

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with him that this is the biggest crisis ever facing

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that that sector, Well, it's certainly as big as the nineties,

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>which was very big. Uh, and it has the added

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dimensions that it goes well beyond its origins are not

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, but its origins already helped. So yes,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a stark start situation. Professor Jonathan here,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we've talked many times, just to jump in if I

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>can forgive me, I've talked many times about dollar denominated

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>debt building up in emerging markets over the last ten

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>years or so. Are you starting to see those problems

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>materialized now in the face of a strong good dollar,

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown in various economies, and a collapse for the

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>backdrop going forward from here? Uh. Look, it's the the

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>overused term perfect storm does apply because don't forget that

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>underlying as the coronavirus wasn't big enough. We also have

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi Russia War. Many of these countries are commodity producers,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>oil producers and commodity producers. So they have, going to

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>your question, a massive shortage of dollars because their exports.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The export values are way down, export volumes are down,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and they do have dollar debt. So the expectation and

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that debt servicing, uh, and that and defaults and restructurings

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be on the rise. Is something to

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know be expected. We thought many people, not including myself,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and many people would come on this program, Professor and

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>question dollar privacy, dollar hegemony in the next economic downturn.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We finding out that the dollar is the place to

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be once again, even in this downturn. Well, Uh, it's

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>funny you should mention that Ethan el Setki, a former student,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Ken Roboff, and I have had several recent pieces on

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this very issue. And indeed, what we find is that

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in the ten years after the two thousand eight two

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>thou nine UH financial meltdown, UH, the dollar gained a

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of ground internationally as the reserve currency. For two reasons.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>One is UH, the euro UH fell back UH concerns

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about its sustainability. It fell back it. And the second

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is Chinese lending, which was has been massive while over

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>the world is dollar denominated. So it's Chinese, but it's

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>not in Remember, for the most parties in dollars. So

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, Yes, it's the dominant currency and no evidence

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to the contrary at this stage, so, professor. But tiling

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>this forward from a market's perspective, dollar denominated emerging market

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>stat just had its worst quarter since nineteen Are we

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see more of the same and a rash

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of defaults that rivals what we saw during the nineteen

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>eighties and Latin America. It's very possible. It's very possible now. UH.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I have been hoping that the international community, the multilaterals,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>with the major government moved towards a uh A death

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>stand still, you know, a moratorium. Before that the false

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>materialized because after all the everybody's incomes. This is that

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the household at the firm level, at the country level

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>has been paralyzed. So debt payments should also likewise be

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>temporarily UH suspended. But absence that, it's already it's already happening.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing the down the downgrades in the credit rating agencies,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>with countries moving into junk and near junk UH status coming.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Always great to get your thoughts on this program. We

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>appreciate time this morning, our thoughts with you and yours.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Come and run. How there Harvard Kennedy School Professor Cricket

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>introduction to our steam guest. He has is the view

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of America more than anyone I know. Mohammed units with

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>us of the acclaimed Gallop polling organization. Mohammed, you don't

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the horse race. As you look at the

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fabric of the country, it's a country flat on its back.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>What portion of America can't get to the next rent payment?

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>According to our estimates and based on the polans we

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>were doing last week, percent of employ of those employees

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>say that their employers cut jobs, reduced hours, throsen hirings.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Sixty two percent say that the their financial situation has

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>already been affected by it. A third the one and

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>seventies million workers in the US cannot get to the

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>next paycheck. They're living literally page xcupation. That sixty to

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>forty million Americans, UM. And that's just the workers, so

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine their families. U. At this point, I

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>think even with reporting just this morning out of Italy

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on some of the social unrest that now is becoming

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a concerned UM. I think after we all think through

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the public health issues, what we're trying to do at

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Gallup is also attacked. How Americans are feeling UM and

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the impact this will have on social just disintegration. Unfortunately

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in some situation. I'm coming to you, Mohammad from uh

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Central work in New York. It is an island of prosperity.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking down at billionaires Row seven skyscrapers. This is

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not America. What is the distance of Governor Culomo's New

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>York State or Washington, or even the burgeoning crisis in

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta or Miami in Boston. What's the distance of those

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>urban areas in this pandemic from the rest of a

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>more rural, more suburban America. UM. We always see very

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>dramatic differences. UM. Once seemed to point out you mentioned

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Governor Clomo. UM. And a lot has been made about

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>leadership and how leadership is doing in this crisis. We

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>consistently find the Americans are much more positive on than

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a local government at any level compared to the federal government.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Americans are now most an approval of health care workers

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and their local hospitals in this crisis. UM. How Americans

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>react to the situation, of course, depends on what's happening locally.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that the federal government apparently today is going

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to roll out UM guidelines on how local government can

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>also react based on their local reality. This is a

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>huge country. UM. When we talk about the United States

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to ultimately talking about you know, fifty different countries with

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>different realities. The economics that hurt that's happening across the country.

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And now you know, even with the social distancing, uh

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, seven to eight out of Pan Americans on

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every metric now are basically social distance. And

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>when we started tracking this, there was only about people

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that said they were going to be changing their lives.

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>At this point, everything is uh so the reality of

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>not being able to make that paycheck. These is the

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the public health concerns, even just locally, I think are

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>going to become the crux of the issue for leadership

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>um and it's what we're going to try very closely.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Is the other thing is just a well being. I

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>mean people we've seen now reports of domestic violence uh

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>increasing in some localities. How people are managing the stress

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of not only the economic challenges, but also trying to

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>jump work if you can, virtually having children at home,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not having educational institutions operating. All of these things we

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know from our research from other crises over the past

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>few decades have a real impact on how society. Paul,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>let me report here on online learning at the Keen Household.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We're in a free period and Minecraft is being play,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and Minecraft is being played. I'm sure it is Mohammed

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of you know, how much longer

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>does he? The most Americans feel like this, we'll go

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on this coronavirus disruption at this point to see one

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for scent of Americans thinks that this will go on

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for a few months. Actually, excuse me, fifty The numbers

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>are coming in daily. We started off with about half

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of Americans. It's expecting it to go on for a

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>few months. These numbers actually predate President Trump's UM change

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you will, in expending UH the isolation guidelines,

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>so we probably would expect that number to go up.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>That being said, Americans are also overwhelmingly in support of

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the rescue package compared to other UH stimulus packages like

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>harpings and then other situations of crisis. Today there be

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of Americans to prove of it, it's by

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>partisan of who will actually Democrats to present one are

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly are more likely to support it than than Republicans. UM.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But this again it gets back to UM what the

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>larger picture means. I think for people's pocketbooks of Americans

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, think it's very likely that the United States

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that this will send the United States into our procession.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>If you will so people are really planning for the

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>worst or expecting the worst, whether they have the wherewithall

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to really get through it. I think it's really up

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for graphs um. I mean in terms of the local

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>learning or talent learning. Actually just came up in my

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>four year old. He's on a ZOW meeting with his

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>other students, uh and teachers and even just for education.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing how a lot of this was possible before technologically.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, see a situation where the crisis pushes us

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>over the edge, right right, it's been hugely valuable. Mohammed units,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your good work at Gallup Today. However,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the securities analyst business one of those wonderful

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people that not only writes the reports that actually goes

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>in the stores. He can't go in the stores now

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>they're all closed. He is with Cowen and joins us today, Oliver,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>there's an American Eagle two blocks down from our world headquarters.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It's closed. How critical is that they open as soon

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as possible. It's really critical just because the majority of

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sales still happen in store. So for all these retailers,

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they're in survival mode because they're their number one source

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>of revenue is is at risk and for the foreseeable future,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there's so much uncertainty. I mean, the employees are load

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>across Macy's gap and polls um it's it's uncertain wind

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>stores will open as we pull executives. It could be

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>four or more months, and our analysis indicates that liquidity

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is at risk after five So one in four Americans

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>work in retail, and retail really played the important art

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in the consumer, so that this is something we're watching.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And we continue to see a bifurcation where people who

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>need household essentials and food and beverages that's really obviously

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>worked ing, discretionary purchases are are less important, and at

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>home fitness is working too. Oliver. There's a huge amount

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of confusied confusion at the moment over whether Sames who

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>decided to follow employees before the aid became available from

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington d C, whether they're eligible for any of those loans,

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>any of those grants um from the fiscal aid package

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that went through over last week, are they If you

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>got any clarity on that whatsoever. Yeah, I think as

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I talked to CEOs and um my contacts on the

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>business everybody's analyzing it closely and logging on and looking

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>um with with no specific conclusions. So I think it's

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's a point of transition where where people are

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>really seeking out what what what's available. Also, when you

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>furlow a worker, there's different standards by state regarding unemployment,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's a blanket answer regarding allocating

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>these resources to where they're needed most um to be

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>frank and we're just seeing all kinds of different efforts

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to support workers and in places of business in the

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>time of need. More than five hundred thousands that is

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of furloughed or laid off retail employees in

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States, Big retailers across the board closing down.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking right now at some of the names

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Victoria's Secret, I'm looking at gap Nemon, Marcus. I'm struggling

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand how much this entire episode is going to

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>force companies that were already struggling to the break. I mean,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how much is just just accelerating a process that would

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have been underway already with some of these struggling retailers,

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>versus actually killing really viable and strong and Frankly, thriving businesses. Yeah,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you regarding what's happening next. It's the

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>big getting bigger. So we're moving towards the world of Walmart, Target, Amazon,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and then mega players like LVMH. So consolidation is one

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>key theme with with related m and a of some

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>good brands that aren't necessarily as profitable are good valuations.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>UM too, I think we'll see store closures and permanent

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>changes in malls. We already had struggling malls about more

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of malls UM are B in C class and that's

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a big issue. And then rethinking rent um the rent

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>expenses will need to come down UM and this will

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot depend on the pace of recovery. So going forward, UM,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we believe stores will be closed until May at least,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if not longer UM. And the pace of the consumer

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>coming back will be a big question mark is it

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>VU or L And that will matter for long term viability.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But department stores were already struggling. The big theme I

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>also want to mention is this curbside pickup and rethinking

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>retail in terms of contact lists and what does experiential

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>mean in a contactless world. So we've already been seeing

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the digital innovation with zero check out and curbside pickup

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that's accelerating by a couple of years now, Oliver, I

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up on the consolidation theme that you

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Gap, for example, offered information to employees about

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>getting jobs at Walmart. I'm wondering, I mean, what kind

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>of consolidation. What are some names that you see? I mean,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is Walmart going to go buy Gap? Anything can happen.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're seeing is um. You know, Walmart

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest grocer and it also sells lots of

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>soft goods and essential the businesses grocery and Amazon grocery

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and apparel um and and rethinking, and Amazon is even

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>interested in luxury good So retail has really been fueled

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>by scale because even before this, the digital investments, the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chain investments, the need for speed um has really

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>been the domain and easier for larger players. The artificial

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence data rethinking data scale matters for the training models

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and the algorithms. So that's something to think of and

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and anything can happen. I think every retailer is working together,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is also a time for the industry to

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>come together to reallocate resources where they're needed. And clearly, um,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>there's so many stockouts and labor is necessary as the

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>whole country gets ready olive right now, John wants to

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>take us in a different direction. You know, as you

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>look at retail across America. We had a listener our

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>call in vet Bille was barking earlier and Vet Bill

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>wants to know. Our dog wants to know what are

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we gonna do with Chewi? I mean, Chewie is hugely successful.

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Is Chewy a no brainer for Amazon? Well, I think

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the reality is this at home experience and taking care

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of your dogs. And also health and wellness is a

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>huge theme and rethinking wellness. Um, you know stock we

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like is peloton. I was just on the bike. And

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>also we're seeing concepts like Neo Yeah, I was on

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the bike. You know, you know life will be about

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>self care as well. Listen to you, Okay, okay, folks,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I just got We're gonna stop the show here. We

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>got aim to do this. John. The number one argument

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the last three days in our isolation, our kingdom

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of isolation is someone in the house is demanded we

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>get a peloton. What happens when the gym reopens again.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>That's what I said, thank you, thank you. I think

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thinking in the same way. One

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think might change, though, Oliver, and it

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>came up in conversations that I was having recently as well,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the rush to go to services like rent the Runway

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>through where you're essentially a sharing clothes with a monthly subscription.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course those clothes are cleaned, Oliver. Many companies were

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at following Rent the Runways practice through last year

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and the great success it had. Are we going to

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>start to question that in a massive way as we

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>come through this and come out of it. Well, as

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>we come out of it, I think what will happen

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>is we have a consumer that's going to be laser

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>focused on value. So as you think about rental and

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>um and what it can do as well as a

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>re commerce it's forty tw eight percent off. So we

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>already had the t J Max's of the world be

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really successful in taking share from Macy's and full price

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>department stores, but you know, repricing these goods and offering value.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the Rent the Runway has a very sophisticated

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>cleaning facility, and I think people will want less stuff.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think people will care about sustainability and environment and

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody's rethought um what experiential means in terms of staying

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>home and spending time with with loved ones and others.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>We have a chance, always great, get your thoughts on

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the show. Come and see your equity research analysts on

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the retail outlook and on social distancing. Let's get to

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the first conversation of the morning. Shall we please to

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>say that Jaha Chanleus joins us now Credit Sweets head

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of f FX and macro trading strategy. You have always

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>great to get you on the program. Let's talk about it,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>shall we? Shahab dollar strength back on the table. Last

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>week we thought there was some science of success from

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. We're saying signs of stress once again.

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think what we're seeing right

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>now is a much anticipated month end flow linked to

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>changing hedge ratios, which this might happen to mean that

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar buying is in order. There's there's an anticipation that

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>once this is outsd the way, the market will start

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to look again at the underlying drivers at a dollar

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and that for now more broadly seems

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the capacity of FED in particular to to

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>provide dollars to the market via its various facilities, but

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>also hopes for more US fiscal stimulus, which historically would

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have been seen as a dollar positive, but at the

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>moment um this is seen as something that again helps

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>put more dollars into the system. So as long as

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>these factors are driving the market, I would imagine dollar

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>strength to be relatively short term, and then after that

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for the dollar to again start to trade in line

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>with markets. More broadly, if we're settling for the end

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of the first quarter, what is your positioning for the

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the second quarter? What is the Jalones strategy?

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Given the total chaos we're living in It's it's obviously

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a very tactical market. Do we can't pretend to try

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a fully strategic position for an entire quarter

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>when realized volatility is as as as high as it is.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We're taking each week as it comes. At this point,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what I would say, though, is that the market is

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>already a pricing and fairly negative outcomes for the second

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter in terms of data, So to undershoot these negative

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>outcomes in terms of actual outcomes is actually going to

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>be quite a tall order now at this point, um,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And I do believe that there's still more of a

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>focus at this point on the possibility of more stimulus measures.

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>For example, Japan has just announced or is looking at

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>announcing a very large package of its own as well.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So as these come through, I believe that these still help,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at least within the g tent space. The pro risk currencies,

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Australian dollar the Canadian dollar in the

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>very years term, UM, But I think in the in

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the medium terms, to see a real turnaround in these

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>types of currencies, we do need to see other factors

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>comes through. So for example, we do need to see

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>oil prices base. We do need to see virus infection

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>growth rates come down so that markets can believe transport

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>around the world can resume again. These are the types

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of things that they are still the big unknowns from

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>medium some perspectives. So those helicopters that Tom Keaton seeks

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to talks about all week and has been talking about

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for the past few weeks dropping money into his triple

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>triple leverage cash fund, they're going to continue and in

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the short term maybe that won't necessarily debase the dollar

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, though, how does the US get

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>out of this other than just printing money and leading

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to inflation and in the basement of the dollar, well, look,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the key here is effect at the end

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day is a relative price um. And the

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>truth of the matter is all the other central banks

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are doing the same thing in one form of another,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>exactive in what you know would have been seen as

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very difficult a few years ago, which is emerging markets

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>doing qunstantiveas ing um without necessarily seeing their currency is

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>getting crushed. You know, that's also happening right now, so

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>across the broad range of emerging markets. So the truth

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is it's it's very difficult to look

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>at the dollar in isolation from that perspective, given that

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is doing the same thing. So when we

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about debasement, it could be the case that we

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>see down the line a general rise in price levels

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Basis, that's not necessarily going to mean

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that the dollar falls against other currencies in a in

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a material way. Um. Given that it's a very common

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>policy at this point in time. If someone comes to

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you shab and says, I have a belief oil will

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>recover in some way or form. What is the best

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>way to express strong oil. Yes, that's a good question.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think. You know, if you look at things like

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>futures prices, futures, because the situation is that there's so

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>little storage available for all right now, it means that

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 1>futures prices are actually much higher than the spot prices,

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, trying to buy you know, oil for future

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>delivery in futures, for example, you'll be paying a much

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>higher price than the spot price anyway. So I'm not

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that there is a very efficient and simple way

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting around this conundrum. If you have access to

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>cheap storage, you could try to buy Uh. Yeah, I

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have that. We've we've moved, after thought out in her bedroom,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>barrels of oil. Jerm, we're not all big clash. Har

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we can't go and get a super tanker. Let's talk

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>about foreign expect Let's talk about foreign exchange and what

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in the dates around of China. Some confusion

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the p M S. The p M I s

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not the twin of g d P, it's a

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>derivative of of g d P, and all you're asking

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>people in China at the moment, are things better this

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>month than last month? And the answer to that question

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is yes, But does that main output is recovered what

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it lost in February. The answer to that is no.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Social hab talked to me about the trajectory you're looking

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>for for the Chinese economy. Yeah, that's a that's a

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very good point. So according to our credits with China economists,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by his calculations, all the all the big jump in

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the pm MYA shows in March is that the level

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of activity is not only nine, isn't only twenty below

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's peak levels as opposed to in February. So it's

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>still a long way down, it's just improved a bit.

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So in that context, we don't believe that the Chinese

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>currency is on the verge of of of a dramatic

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>recovery at this point. Ultimately, China just this week cut

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>rates again and added more money to the system. Again

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to your points around helicopter money. Um, you know, even

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in China, where there is already a large people fear,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a large debt problem potentially brewing down the line, what's

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>still going on is more money being pumped into the system,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So we do believe that that will keep the REMEMBER

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhat contained. And what applies to the Remember applies across

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the emerging market space. So for those looking for a

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar turnaround, it's easier, though view, to play that within

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the detain complex, within the higher quality currencies, you could say,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>than some of the the risky occurrencies at this point

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in time that are still plagued by weak growth. Um

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>China as one of those guests, but but again in

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Latim as well, for example, plagued by weak growth, but

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have maybe weaker underlying fundamentals at a structural level as well,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and are still experimenting with with quintitive easing as well

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>in some cases. Brazil is another one that might do this,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.239
<v Speaker 1>for example. So these these put huge question marks these

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of issues around these risky occurrency job always gad

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>skate thoughts on a program. I'm best to you and yours,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>johap John credit Sway, his head of f X and

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Macro training Strategy. Let's begin our labor analysis. Normally, folks,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we really wouldn't do this on a Tuesday, but we're

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it today. Break the rules with Julia Carnado

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Macro policy perspective. Quoted I believe in the Washington Post

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>lead article this morning on the American economy. Julia, good morning.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>What number do we expect Thursday and claims? Is it

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a guess or can you come up with some form

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of statistic? Well, it's a guest. Uh, it's it is

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the leading indicator. So all we're basing it on is

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>um the reports that we're getting from individual states. But

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we're going to have another record breaking number.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So the three point two million last week is not

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a one off. We're probably going to see another maybe

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>two million in claims this week, UM, and that's going

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to translate into men the millions uh loss of payrolls

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the April report, not the report throughout this Friday,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but the following report comes in early May. Julia. The

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>expectations are getting increasingly dire. Goldman Sachs came out with

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a forecast a couple of weeks ago saying the US

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>will shrink by an annualized in the second quarter. Now

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out saying it's going to be thirty four percent

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and saying unemployment will soar to fifteen percent by mid year.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for in the data to either

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>confirm that dire view or that perhaps gives you a

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of what we're looking at. So claims is probably

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the more reliable indicators we have right now

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and timely. Uh So, I think how high it goes

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and how persistent that is. Obviously, in this episode, we're

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing forward a contraction um in a really unusual way.

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Um So the duration of this matters a lot, and

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>then how much it still go over from the immediately

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>impacted sectors hotels, restaurants, the travel industry into other sectors.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh is something that we're going to be watching for.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So high frequency indicators are much more valuable, uh than

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>than usual in the current context. You say, bringing forward

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a contraction, and when people talk about how unusual this

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is a forced shutdown in order to fight a pandemic,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have any sense or or the number is

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>going to give us any clues as to how quickly

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these people can get their jobs back. You know,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it really is going to be dependent on how effective

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>all of these stimulus measures are. So I think with

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the two trillion and the four trillion in fiscal stimulus

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and the four trillion in lending capacity at the fed.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>How quickly can that get out the door? How much,

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how effectively does that serve as a bridge loan for

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>businesses so that they can stay in business and restart

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>operations in a timely way. Um I don't think it's

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be a v The shutdowns may start to end,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but then I think we're going to resume normal activity

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>very cautiously and gradually. UM So, I think it's going

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a you And once we really

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get to address this virus and test and develop a vaccine,

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then we can really resume activity with with confidence, and

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that probably won't be util next year, Junior. On a

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>program like this, we're really fortunate to have one of

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the most sophisticated smart audiences. I think there is anywhere

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world of media worldwide on a program like

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance, but we have a broader audience when things

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>get stressful in markets and we have the kind of

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>draw down we've had over the last couple of weeks,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think we need to do a better job

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of trying to translate what the feed is actually doing.

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So a headline just across the Bloomberg just moments ago,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'll read it out the batim. It said, the

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>FEED is launching a temporary repo facility with foreign central banks,

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the facility and our central banks to repo treasuries for

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars to facility. See is an alternative dollar source to

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>selling securities? Can you translate what they're doing for a

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>much wider audience and why they're doing what they're doing? So, UM,

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is the reserve currency of the world us UM.

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>How we UH engage in international trade, it's it's contracted

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and executed in dollars. So what we often see in

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a crisis is that there's a shortage of dollars globally. UM.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of borrowing and commerce and investing is done

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in dollars UH. And when you have a dollar crunch

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, it can turn from you know, a recession

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or a contraction and activity into a financial crisis very

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly because the dollar shortage can trigger default and de leveraging.

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is what the SET is trying

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to address by providing that dollars liquidity through global central banks.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That we did that with the swap lines, now we're

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it with ripo UM. So I think it's again

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to short circuit. This what is clearly going to

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be a deep and painful recession from becoming a full

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>blown financial crisis. And that's been the objective of all

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of these various activities that that has been engaged in.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And to follow on from John's Wilfriend question, Dr Coronado,

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is the idea here is to get out in front

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of crisis. And as we've all studied that crisis comes

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from emerging markets. Are we at a point where the

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets in dollar shortage are so fragile and they

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have the power against the great reserve currency that

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna need I m F assistance. Soonest um, more

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>than likely we will see some countries in that level

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of distress. Um. Again, I think that the said has

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>been very aggressive, very early. So that was one of

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the lessons learned from two thousand and eight. You don't

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hold your ammunition back, um, And I think that will

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>help um. But nonetheless, I think we're already seeing signs

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of distress. And UM, you know that this is unfolding

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with unprecedented speed. Uh So you know, whereas as you

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>were saying earlier, Tom, just a few months ago, the

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>picture looked pretty benign um, boy, have things changed, and

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so UM, I think even some of all of these

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>efforts aren't likely to be universally effective in in presenting

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>all distress. There will be distress in some countries. And

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the U S. There's a question about the

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>world's largest economy and the safety net that the consumer had,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the strong consumer where some reports towards the slock of

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank in particular coming out and saying they don't

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have six hundred dollars on average to cover an emergency,

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and people are looking to the April one rent which

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>may or may not get paid. Do you have a

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of just the sort of resources of the consumer

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>right now? How strong the household balance she is heading

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>into this? Well? I think this is where the distribution

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of income is relevant. Um, We household have strong balance sheets,

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but that those strong balance sheets are concentrated at the

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>high end of the income spectrum. Meanwhile, it is the

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lower end of the income spectrum that is most vulnerable

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and experiencing the greatest job losses. So UM, many households,

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>most households don't even have four hundred dollars emergency. Households

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can't pay rent on April turns at least, I'm so

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>glad you brought this up at Dr Cornada. You go

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>right to the heart of the matter. Everyone listening to

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>this to the show with or without means maybe they

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have family members that can't get that four hundred dollars

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of that rent check for April. Why is our politechs

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>pussy footing around with an alphabet soup of politically generated programs.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>What we need is massive income substitution. Yes, you're absolutely right, Tom,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and some other countries have been much more aggressive on

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that front, providing rent and mortgage payment holidays for their

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>consumers for a number of months. That is what you

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>need to bridge Uh, this cash crunch for consumers. Uh,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and we have not, Julia. You're a huge student of

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>history on this. Where where did this come from? Is

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>this some lackian Calvinist ethos from the nineteenth century? Is

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it some pseudo Victorian psychology? People? And many folks this

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is Republicans and Democrats they gotta pay the rent? Yeah, yeah, No,

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I I don't. I can't explain the political rationale for this,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>tom Um. And even the Fed has it in its

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>power to be more aggressive on this front. They could

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>mandate Uh, they have issued supervisory guidance to banks to

0:36:55.600 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>encourage forbearance and um payment holidays. They could be a

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more forceful on that front and really find

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to finance a payment holiday for agency mortgages

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and sort of mandated for the banks and figure out

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the financing uh that's required. I think we could see

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a stronger effort from the BED to set the standard

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there and get that use the financing in the creative

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>way to address that cash crunch. And I hope that's

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the direction they start to go in, because it certainly

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is within their power. Judy, thank you and thank you

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>for this morning. Thank you for taking the time to

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 1>speak with us. We really appreciate it. Judy krn Out

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of that macro policy perspective, FUNDA and president as well.

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Radio