WEBVTT - Trump Says Intel CEO ‘Conflicted’ and Should Resign

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and Ev Love in San Francisco.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>President Trump calls the Intel CEO highly conflicted and urges

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the resignation, causing shares to slump. Plus, Apple announces it's

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>added one hundred billion dollar US investment as it dodges

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Chip Harris.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 2>We discussed the likelihood of.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>A US produced iPhone, and a number of earnings are

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>out our discussions with the CEOs of Lyft, DraftKings, and

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>due Lingo throughout the hour.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>But first we dive deep.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Into our top story, which is Intel shares currently up

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 3>by two and quarter percent. They were lower by more

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>than five percent in early trading. All of this as

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>we see President Trump call for a resignation of lit Boutanna,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 3>only just took over in March twenty twenty five. This

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>following Tom Cotton, the Republican senator, deep diving in his

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 3>relations lip Butan's to China. Let's get the context for you.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Peter Elstrom joins us for more and just we see

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 3>that there's a concern about his CEO role at Cadence

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Design and their relationships with China, but it was well

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 3>known that he's been a long term investor in China himself.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Peter, Yeah, this was certainly a big surprise. I don't

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 4>think anybody saw this coming, certainly not in the tech industry.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Trump comes out and he calls for the resignation of

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Lip Bhutan, who, as you say, just arrived in March

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>in that CEO role. He'd clearly been vetted very much

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 4>by the board before he got that position. Now what

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>they're talking about, Tom So, Trump did not explain exactly

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>what he's talking about with these conflicts, but as you say,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 4>it comes in the context of Tom Cotton, the Republican senator,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 4>asking questions about Tan's ties to China. In particular, there's

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Cadence Design System, the company that Tan ran for more

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 4>than a decade. They have done business with China. In fact,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 4>they pled guilty to doing some business with a university

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 4>that's affiliated with the People's Liberation Army there. In addition

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 4>to that, Tan worked for a long time in venture capital,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>making investments in companies, including companies in China. He made

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 4>some investments in Smike in particular, which is sort of

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the most advanced chip maker within China. So Cotton was

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 4>asking questions about how those investments are doing it at

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 4>this point, if he still has any conflicts of interest.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump didn't go into those details in particular, but he

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 4>did flag them. Now, it's important to say what Intel

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>has said in the past. They've said that they value

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 4>national security, and Tan is certainly aligned with US interests

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in the region. You've got to imagine that the board

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>of Intel is going to come back pretty forcefully in

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 4>this situation because they're the ones that hired Tan in

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the first place.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And we're already seeing the statement from Intel in response

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>to Republican Senator Cotton's query saying, Intel and mister Tan

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and deeply committed to the national security of the United

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>States and the integrity of our role in the US

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>defense ecosystem. Because this is where the question lies as

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>someone who potentially and we get to hear whether he

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>really has disclosed how much of his venture investments he

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>still holds in certain Chinese startups and indeed he had

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>prior board experience at Smith. What are the implications for

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the investment which Tom Cotton makes of eight billion dollars

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 3>of US chip funding into Intel to manufacture locally for

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>potentially the US government and indeed the Department of Defense.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are a couple of very big questions here.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, first of all, Intel's board housted Pat Gelsinger,

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the previous CEO. Last year they brought in lit Bhutan

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 4>as that replacement after a long search. They looked at

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of different candidates, and the best and the

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>brightest in the chip industry are not dying to take

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 4>on Intel. It's a very difficult turnaround project at this point.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 4>In addition to that, Intel is supposed to be a

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 4>cornerstone of this Washington led effort to rebuild the semiconductor

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>industry in the United States. Of course it's American. They

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 4>want it to be part of this whole effort to

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>bring chip manufacturing.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Back to the United States.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 4>They've also given money to other companies, including Taiwan Semiconductor,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Samsung Electronics. But Intel was supposed to be really the cornerstone.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 4>They were supposed to do some work with the military

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 4>in particular, as you mentioned, they were in line to

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>get about eight billion dollars, but it's unclear exactly where

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 4>that money is going to go. At this point, and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>one of the issues for the board is going to

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 4>be if they're going to stand behind Tan and support

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 4>him as CEO, is that money coming from the federal

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>government going to be in jeopardy.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>And the context also being that Libhutan was on the

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 3>board of Intel for a very long time, so they

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>were well aware of all of his prior history. For

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>what's happened more recently, Peter is the articulation from Lipbutan

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 3>himself that he might not go along with fabrication of

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>chips here in the US much longer anyway, right.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Right, This context is important. Also, his predecessor, Gelsinger had

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 4>pushed very hard to rebuild Intel's manufacturing expertise. They're in

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 4>the process right now trying to develop up new techniques

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 4>for manufacturing. They appear to be making quite a bit

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>of progress on that front now. Tannas said he doesn't

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>believe if you build it, they will calm. He's referring

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 4>to this whole foundry business where Gelsinger wanted to compete

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>pretty directly with TSMC and making customized chips for the

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 4>likes of Apple and Nvidia. In particular, Intel's not made

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot of progress on that front. So Tanna's

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 4>not has said he's not necessarily going to stick with

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 4>that strategy that of course kind of runs counter to

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 4>the Washington effort to try to rebuild the US chip industry.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 4>If he's tentative with some of his investments, that maybe

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 4>counter to their priorities at this point.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 3>Peter Els from Brilliant Research, we thank you very much.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with well the Trump focus on semiconductors right

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>now from Morblue Megs. Tyler Kendall joins us from the

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>White House because President Trump to that end, we're just

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>hearing how Intel fits into the broader idea of bringing

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing back to the United States. A big hefty tariff

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>being promised on semiconductors unless you I'm built in the US, Tila.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 6>Right exactly, Caroline, President Trump declaring his plans for a

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 6>one hundred percent tariff on chips. Unless the understanding is

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 6>a company makes a similar investment commitment to what we

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 6>saw yesterday when Apple's Tim Cook was in the Oval Office,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 6>a pledge to at least move part of their manufacturing

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 6>reshore supply chains in the US, then those companies would

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 6>be exempt from this chip tariff.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>But there's a few different important.

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Distinctions that we have to make, including as you well know,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 6>that these big tech companies have been experiencing at least

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 6>a temporary reprieve from tariff since April when the administration

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 6>first launched that Section two thirty two investigation into the

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 6>entire chip supply chain, which extended to those consumer electronics

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 6>for example. So as we wait for that formal investigation

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 6>to wrap up and a formal announcement on the teriffs,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 6>one of the big questions here is whether or not

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 6>that reprieve is going to extend to some of those

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 6>other items that have been under investigation, like what chips

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 6>go into such as smartphones or cars. So the conversation

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 6>is going to start to turn to whether or not

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be any sort of carve out here,

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 6>such as Apple with its iPhone for example, because those

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 6>are expected to face a separate levee and Caroline, we

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 6>know that the industry has been lobbying at this White House.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Of course, Tim Cook was here yesterday, but then just

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 6>hours after that visit, we had Nvidia's Jensen Wong also

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 6>meeting here with President Trump at the White House, and

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 6>the White House says that cumulative, the total that they've

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 6>gone an investment when it comes to these big tech

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 6>companies now is over one trillion dollars in pledges.

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of that money coming from big Asian

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>tech builders like TSMC in Arizona, for example. We've also

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 3>understand from leaders in Korea that they think Samsung and

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe sk Heinex have some sort of carve out here. Tyler,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>We're really gettingdrip fed information right exactly.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 6>And at that point it looks like really most of

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 6>the tech sector is covered here you had mentioned. So

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 6>if we just show the companies that could be facing

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 6>this exemption, Apple and Nvidia, TSMC, South Korea, Samsung and

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 6>sk Heinex, and really this has been a big push

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 6>from this administration from the beginning. We saw a lot

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 6>of these tech CEOs attend President Trump's inauguration as just

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 6>one key example here. So that's why it's really interesting

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 6>to also see this dynamic that's starting to merge with

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 6>the Intel CEO and how President Trump really does feel

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 6>heavily involved when it comes to the private sector and

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 6>trying to get to this ultimate goal of reshoring manufacturing. Though,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 6>of course, as you well know and I know you're

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 6>about to discuss. This does fall short of the administration's

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 6>initial push here to reshore manufacturing completely into the US,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 6>and we know that's going to be pretty inheasible when

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 6>it comes to the financials, but also just the timeline,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 6>which makes that Intel dynamic even more interesting, since we

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 6>do know that we need their chips to make this happen.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Weaving it beautifully together, Tyler Kendall, we thank you from

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 3>the White House. Let's talk some more than about the

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 3>impact of TARIS on big tech after Donald Trump, of

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>course promised to exempt companies like Apple, as Tinna mentioned

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that move production back to the US.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 7>We're doing these things now in the United States instead

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 7>of other countries, far away countries. This is a significant

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 7>step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhone sold

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 7>in the United States of America also are made in

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 7>America with the mass infusion of capitalists. Announcing today, Apple

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 7>will also build a two hundred and fifty thousand square

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 7>foot server manufacturing facility in Houston and avest billions of

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 7>dollars to construct data centers across the country from North

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Carolina to Iowa to Oregon.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Currently no Melanas Prince Well Analystic Creative Strategies joins us

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Hot on the heels of that moment of Tim Cook

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 3>in the White House, one hundred billion dollars extra being

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>committed that six hundred billion dollars in total. What did

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 3>you make of the allocation towards glass, for example, particularly

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 3>in Kentucky and United States.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 8>I think Tig Cook has been very strategic about giving

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 8>the administration what they want, which is investment in the US,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 8>but doing so in a way that is feasible. So

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 8>it's still not about bringing production of the iPhone back,

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 8>but really leaning into some of the partners like Corning

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 8>and manufacture. The mastery of this is not just about

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 8>the iPhone and Apple watches that are sold in the

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 8>States that will source glass from cornering in Kentucky, but internationally.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 8>So is given that extra part to the administration about saying, okay,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 8>we are manufacturing here and shipping outside the US the

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 8>glass that goes in every iPhone and every Apple Watch.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting we are seeing Tim Cook speaking there, but

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 3>he was previously holding a box, a box that contained

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>circular Corning glass plaque engraved for the President's name, mounted

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>onto a twenty four carrot gold stand, which we understand

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>is also just signed by an Apple designer who's previously

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 3>a US marine Carolina.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>This was politicking at its best from Tim Cook.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, there was a lot of political theater during the

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 8>press conference. It was about really making sure that Apple

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 8>doesn't get into DII of a cyclone when he comes

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 8>to tariffs, and really lifting what is possible. So for

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 8>instance the mention of Houston and the server factory. Again,

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 8>we are not talking about bringing iPhone or Mac for

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 8>that matter, or anything else back to the US. We

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 8>are trying to invest where it makes sense from a

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 8>business perspective for Apple, while creating some jobs, but most

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 8>importantly bringing money back to the US and letting the

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 8>administration then talk about it.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 3>But we actually heard President Trump talk about it with

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the words coming out of his mouth that was the

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 3>long term goal of having US so old iPhones made

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 3>in the US. It's just the glass enough and maybe

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 3>the odd wafer and semiconductor.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Is enough for now.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 8>The long term is really critical here because it will

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 8>take time. The supply chain, most of the supply chain

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 8>is still not in the US of this skill sets

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 8>that we need from from just a factory perspective and

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 8>workers is not in the US, and the cost, of course,

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 8>so is giving enough during the four year of the administration,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 8>and you know, to placate maybe the demands and continue

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 8>to invest in America.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Interesting that skill set, you say, And they're actually Apple

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 3>investing in Detroit in particular on sort of a manufacturing

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>academy for training people and companies in terms of manufacturing locally.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 2>But going to the intricacy.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Is of supply chain here, Carolina, you're getting glass from

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the US in Kentucky and maybe some wafer in the future,

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and then you're shipping that back to China to then

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 3>have it all put together and neatly built and then ship.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Back to the US because feels very expensive.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 8>It's cheaper than not having it done here, and that's

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 8>the problem. We don't have the facilities yet. And I

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 8>think it's interesting, as you pointed out the Detroit manufacturing

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 8>learning facility that Apple is setting up, because maybe the

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 8>point is to create different sets of skills that are

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 8>linked to automation, and that is where maybe with AI

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 8>and automation, we will see manufacturing being brought back to

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 8>the US. But yeah, shipping back and forth is not ideal.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 8>But the pieces that you're shipping back and forth, and

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 8>where the rest of the iPhone is is still in Asia.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Briefly, I lean into your supply chain expertise here because

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't just cover Apple, a plethora of companies. What

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>do you make of this threat for one hundred percent

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 3>tariff and semiconductors and who that ultimately implicates if they

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>don't get a carve out.

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, obviously that is you know, we've seen the impact

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 8>of the towers so far on earnings and we're still

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 8>in the middle of earning season. But what is important

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 8>that we don't have a clarification is what that building

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 8>in the US means. How much investment is a company

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 8>going to have to make in the US to not

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 8>fall into this tariff promise of one hundred percent? And

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 8>Apple seems to have made enough. Nvidia is also investing here,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 8>and I'm sure others like DS and C have done

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 8>will continue to do so.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Krolyn Iven Anazy Granula.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 3>We thank you creative Strategies.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Lift.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on them because the company reported earnings

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 3>after the bell yesterday, including record number of rides completed.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 3>We're currently up three and a half percent. Lift CEO

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>David Richard joins us to talk us through the results

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that for some there was a bit of something for everyone.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>The revenue number behave perhaps a little bit shy of expectations.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 3>But the sheer number of people riding with you at

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a record what's driving that?

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 9>David, Yeah, I mean I love that fact, the number

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 9>of the sheer number of people riding with us, because

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 9>it shows that we're doing something right right. So I've

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 9>been saying for a long time customer obsession drives profitable growth.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 5>We're now profitable. We're growing, you know, as is our

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 5>ninth consecutive quarter of double digit growth.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 9>And in terms of customer adoption, you know, we've never

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 9>had more riders.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 5>And drivers on the platform. So you know what's driving it.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 9>It's innovations like Lift Silver, It's partnerships like our Door

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 9>Dash partnership. We just announced a new partnership with the

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 9>United A lot of the sort of ecosystem work we're

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 9>doing is really helping us grow faster than ever.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about partnerships when it comes to autonomous because

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 3>that's where the future, where the puck is moving.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>How are you ensuring that you're moving with.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>And taking on what seems to be future competition coming

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>from I don't know, the likes of Weimo, but also

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>even a Tesla.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know what, I don't think of it as

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 9>future competition. I mean, of course there'll be competitive skirmishes,

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 9>but big picture, as self driving cars come onto our platform,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 9>it's going to expand the marketplace. And we can see

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 9>that already even in the cities where self driving cars

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 9>are operating in the US right now, we're seeing something

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 9>like five x the growth of cities where they're not operating.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 5>So because what.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 9>They're safe, they're interesting, they're kind of you know, they're novel,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 9>they're reliable. In terms of partnerships, we have a couple

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 9>of great partnerships. We have one with main Mobility, which

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 9>launches officially this summer in Atlanta, so you can take

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 9>a self driving car if you live in Atlanta starting

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 9>in a little over.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 5>A month, we hope.

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 9>And then big picture, we just signed a big agreement

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 9>with Baidu, who is one of the world's largest, probably

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 9>the world's largest self driving car company, to expand into Europe,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 9>into a couple countries in Europe. So a lot of

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 9>action going on in the self driving world. Obviously still

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 9>very early, but we see huge opportunity for us in

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 9>the future.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Plan Germany UK twenty twenty six with regulatory approvals

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 3>speak to that international growth that you've really brought to

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 3>bear of late. How much is that a winning formula

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>for revenue for profitability?

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, for both, I think, and actually for resilience too.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, one of the things that I've seen over

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 9>the last two and a half years since I've been

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 9>in this job is being so focused on North America

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 9>has been great because it's allowed us to really innovate

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 9>and drive the industry forward. But now that we're in

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 9>a very strong position, we can afford to and frankly,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, sort of our customers want us to be

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 9>a more global company. So we just acquired a company

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 9>called free Now in Europe. It's a taxi focused aggregator.

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 9>You know, the taxis in Europe, of course you know

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 9>this well, are sort of a higher end product than

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 9>people might think in the United States, and so it

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 9>will allow us to have a footprint across Europe. Then,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 9>when we tie it back to your earlier question about

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 9>self driving, as self driving comes to Europe and Europe

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 9>is a little bit behind the United States. The relationship

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 9>that we now have with regulators and of course with

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 9>millions of customers is really going to help us form

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 9>a platform that we can build on to bring self

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 9>driving cars to the UK and Germany and hopefully beyond.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So when you're leaning into some of these expansions

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 3>more broadly, will there be more.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 2>M and A to play here? You've already done it

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>in Europe.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 3>I knew you've got to integrate, but would you look

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>further afield too?

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 5>Maybe?

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, you never say never about this sort of thing,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 9>you know. I think we're in a very strong position

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 9>now to do this kind of work. But as you say,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 9>the first order business for us is that integration work.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 9>And we just closed the free Now deal last week.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 9>I was actually in Barcelona the week before with a

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 9>team there. They're so excited to get started and already now,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 9>if you open the free now app in Europe, you'll

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 9>get a prompt that says, you know, we're a partnership

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 9>with Lyft and vice versa. If you open the lift

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 9>app in Europe, maybe more importantly, you'll be directed to

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 9>go over to free Now.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 5>So we're just beginning that integration.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a lot more work to do there

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 9>before we really think about additional acquisitions.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>And David, you've got such sort of a bird's eye

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 3>perspective on.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>The consumer early at this moment.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>How resilient is that consumer, particularly here in the US

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 3>people trying to read the team.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 9>I understand, you know, every single day people sort of

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 9>look deep in the teacup and try to figure out

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 9>what's going on. All I can say is, if you're

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 9>looking for weakness, look elsewhere.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 5>We're not seeing it.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing record rides, you know, double digit growth, even airports,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 9>which people often look at as sort of a leading indicator.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Now it's true.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 9>I think TSA volumes are moderating a little bit, but

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 9>we're growing faster than TSA volumes are and we've grown

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 9>airports now quarter.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 5>Over quarter and year over year. So it's such an

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 5>interesting thing.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 9>I know people are sort of desperate to find, you know,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 9>sort of the cloud and the silver lining, but at

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 9>least from our perspective, we're not seeing it.

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 3>If CEO David Risher, great to have you back on

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the show, stay well, thank you.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 2>It's time now for talking tech and first up.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Softbag Swan or quarterly profit, posting a net income of

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>two point nine billion dollars in the fiscal first quarter,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 3>more than double on.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Analysts had predicted.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Now, the surprise gains our reflection of CEO Masaoshi's sons

0:19:55.560 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 3>aggressive vets on artificial intelligence, plus China's export growth expectedly

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>accelerated in July. Is global demand helped offset a slump

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 3>in US shipments. Now, total exports rows seve point two

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>percent from a year earlier, just three hundred and twenty

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>two billion dollars. This is China saw strong shipments to

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>the EU, Southeast Asia.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And Australia In Hong Kong, and Amazon's Zooks gets an exemption.

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 3>From the Trump administration allowing its driverless vehicles to operate without.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 2>A traditional driving control like steering wheels.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Now the decision is a boost for Zooks, which plans

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to produce ten thousand purpose built robotaxes a year.

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It's California facility are coming up. If you were benning,

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>we'd be covering more earnings news. Yeah'd be right. We've

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>got so many.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 3>CEOs coming up drafting CEO Jason Robbins is one of them.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Joins us next.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's just check in on the world of semiconductors.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 3>That one hundred percent tariff being threatened if you don't

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 3>build an America. But who's building in America? Samsung, sk Heinex,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Korean leaders saying that their cell warts in the world

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>of technology are getting an exemption from its one hundred

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>percent tariff threat coming from the White House. The question

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 3>is who else get those exemptions? Tsmc apple more on that. Next,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>take a look at these markets because actually the NASZAC

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 3>outperforms other indices today and we're helped in part by

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>chip makers. Look at the big rebound we're getting inn

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 3>AMD after yesterday's sell off post its earnings, so we're

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 3>now up more than six percent, basically shaking.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Off yesterday's sell off.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 3>That's as we really focus in more on the geopolitical

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 3>picture here, same for in video up more than a

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 3>percentage point.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 2>What carve outs will we get for.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Semiconductors that are made and shipped into the United States?

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Now President Trump threatening one hundred percent tariffs on chips

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 3>made abroad imported into the US and less you're investing

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>big in the United States, and what are these companies

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 3>doing investing in the United States. We dig into that

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more later on, but move on to

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>some of the earnings picture that we get mixed reactions

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>that we're getting for the likes of Airbnb of by

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 3>now more than seven percent, as we don't see a

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 3>acceleration in growth that so Brian Chesky wants to do.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And Door Dash though up more than five percent as

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>it manages to deliver once again in terms of the

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>food into your home and its expansion with M and A.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Let's get into those numbers more broadly, Natalie Lungs, he

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 3>joins us after what was a very busy post bell

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 3>for you, I want to go for the optimism first

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Door Dash.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 2>What's it doing right?

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 10>It's been increasing a lot of the use of frequency

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 10>and membership from its paid program Dash Pass, and people

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 10>are ordering more restaurant owners as well as the New

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 10>York categories like grocery and retail.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 3>And what do they speak to in terms of the

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>expansion plans. Because this is a company that's been inquisitive,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 3>we're not seeing it show up and the numbers yet

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>because they've got to absorb the business, particularly over in

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the UK, for delivery, But what is the potential here.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so that deal hasn't closed yet today, so expecting

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 10>it to close at the fourth quarter. So we'll see

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 10>later this year in terms of what it adds to

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 10>their outlook. But what we know is that they have

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 10>completed acquisitions off restaurant tech company seven Rooms, as well

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 10>as advertising these Symbiosis and that's already adding to their

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 10>sort of their enterprise offerings for restaurants.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 3>We just had David Rishid from lyft On and his

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>exact response to what you're seeing in terms of consumer

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 3>weakness was you're not finding it here.

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>It seems that we're not seeing it indoor dash.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 3>They say they got high levels of consumer engagement, but

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 3>flip over to Airbnb.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>They've been trying to win us over, not just with.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 3>What's happening in terms of travel and houses, but access

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>to experiences.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't they able to reaccelerate growth at.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 10>The moment, So there are a couple of factors working

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 10>against them. First, they've warned that the growth might moderate

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 10>later into the year because what happened last year was

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 10>that people actually made those trips that they delayed, and

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 10>so results were very strong last year, and so the

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 10>year comparison would be not as strong this year. And

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 10>if you look at the second quarter results, the North

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 10>American travel was a drag on the results. It was

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 10>like a low single digit growth, and like without the

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 10>North America region they would have grown double digits. So

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 10>we'll have to see how the US trail those fear hah.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>So maybe that's a bit of a shift in terms

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 3>of what consumers are feeling in the US, at least

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>around travel and revenge spending. But what about the new

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 3>offerings and new products. What's Brian Chesk going to do

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 3>to try and drive that growth to get American spen it.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 10>So they are actually considering a loyalty program now. They're

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 10>saying with all these new categories, they're able to offer

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 10>something more compelling than just, you know, the larger category,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 10>so that it would be something we'll be very excited

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 10>to keep track of.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Natalie Lang, she will keep track of it. We thank

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you very much.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, let's stick with earnings and let's dive in to

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>one that is showing stronger user growth.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Down one point six percent. I'm talking about DraftKings.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at Jason Robbins, the CEO now who managed

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 3>to deliver what was record second quarter performance, your revenue

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>up thirty seven percent year on year, and you're talking

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>about delivering revenue closer to the high end of twenty

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty five for the full year. So what's the investor

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 3>digestion going on?

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:24:59.400 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 11>I think right now we have a ton of momentum

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 11>in the business. We also had some you know, good

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 11>luck on the sport outcome side in Q two, so

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 11>that was nice, and we're geared up for what is

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 11>the most important time of year coming up with NFL

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 11>and then obviously college sports, NBA World Series, NHL just

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 11>a big, big time of year. It's when we make

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 11>our most revenue and acquire most customers and make our

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 11>most adjusted ebit US so really excited for that, and

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 11>I think we have some great plans in place and

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 11>you know, really expecting strong growth in the back part

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 11>of the year.

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your shares are up twenty percent year to date,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 3>so it might be why we come off a little

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 3>bit from our highs overall.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 2>But what about the core.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Value drivers here, Like we're talking about you know, the

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>sports book friendly outcomes. You talk about how the calendar

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 3>is looking.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Good for you.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 3>But where else do you focus on investing because you'll

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>CFO in particular and talking about some growth initiatives, and

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone's wondering about these prediction markets that might or might

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>not come to bear.

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 11>Well, even if you just for the outcomes, we were

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 11>still up twenty five percent revenue wise year over years,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 11>so really healthy growth. And I think we're seeing, you know,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 11>just very strong demand in our underlying customer cohorts. And

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 11>I also think the advancements we've made on the product

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 11>side have been huge. We've really built out our parlay offering.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 11>Now we have the best in class and leading offering

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to in game betting. That's become the

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 11>real growth driver of the industry right now by far

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 11>more growth happening and live betting than anywhere else. So

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 11>I think really we positioned ourselves well from a product

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 11>and customer experience perspective. Our marketing has been very effective.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 11>I also think on the internal side, we've gained a

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 11>ton of efficiency through use of AI, which means we're

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 11>getting more done for the customer and also saving money.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, like, what how you managing to interject generative AI

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 3>across the board?

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean, the simple thing that we've been able to

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 11>do is get everyone in the company to realize that

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 11>they can drive value and it doesn't have to be

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 11>the engineering team doing everything. So much of you to

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 11>right now through AI can be used by non engineers

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 11>and everyone throughout the company knows that there's tons of

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 11>manual workflows that can be automated through AI, and we've

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 11>been on a tear doing that. We've also been working

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 11>on select projects that are customer facing too, things like

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 11>optimizing our trading engine because human can't possibly take in

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 11>all of the data and all the things happening at

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 11>the same time when a live game is going on,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 11>So having AI agents support that and help make lower

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 11>level decisions I think is also a huge unlock that

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 11>we're pursuing. So I think the best is yet to

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 11>come as far as AI, and we've got a ton

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 11>of organizational momentum around it.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 3>And when you talk about the adoption by your own

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 3>employees thinking about how they can drive efficiency is efficiency

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 3>what's necessary at the moment when you do have a

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 3>few well known headwinds coming up in terns of just costs,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the tax implications that you're getting in Illinois,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 3>or what's happening over in New Jersey for example.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm also thinking.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 3>About well, Missouri, you're like expanding, but that takes a

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>cost upfront.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 11>Now, You're absolutely right think that being able to self

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 11>fund some of these things through efficiency gains with AI

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 11>has been a.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Big driver of our focus.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 11>Also, I think there's other parts of the cost structure

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 11>that we've found that we have value that can be

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 11>achieved too. So really, you know, it's always a balance

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 11>for us. We're obviously very much in growth mode now

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 11>we had thirty seven percent year over year revenue growth,

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 11>but we also are constantly looking at how we can

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 11>be more efficient. We view the two is very linked. Oftentimes,

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 11>when you do things that are more efficient, it frees

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 11>up better time to be spent on, you know, better

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 11>things for the customer as well.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>So I go back to the expansion potentially into prediction markets.

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I know it's about federal regulation in many ways, Jason,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 3>But what gets you there?

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>What gets you tipping your toe into it?

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 11>Oh, I don't know that we are going to We're

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 11>still evaluating our options. Obviously, it's brand new, and you

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 11>know we're watching it unfold right before our eyes and

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 11>we're learning a lot as we get educated on the space.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 11>So right now that's been our focus, and you know,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 11>we'll see what happens from that.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>You have but one cell rating morning Star. What would

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 3>you say to analyst over a morning style that convinces

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>them to say, look at the moment, our price point

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>is where its should be.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I'm looking up the wrong one.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Let me go to my proper DraftKings analyst recommendations. Sorry,

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>live interaction with a terminal. Right now, I have and

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 3>this recommendations zero cell ratings.

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>But you have five buys, five holds.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>What gets your five holds to a by rating, Jason.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 11>I think just continuing to prove ourselves. You know, performing

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 11>over time is what gives people confidence in a company.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 11>And we've been public five years now, so we have

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 11>a bit of a track record, but we're still a

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 11>relatively new public company and I've only been profitable for

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 11>the last year or so. So I think really showing

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 11>that we can now grow our bottom line while continuing

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 11>to post impressive top line numbers, that's our focus and

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 11>I think that'll get more people on board.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Thirty two buys, five holds, zero cells, Jason Robbins DraftKings CEO.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 2>We thank you very much. Indeed, as check in on

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>shares of Duo Lingo.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Surging today, company posting second quarter earnings that beat expectations

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>for daily active users growing forty percent year of a

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 3>year now. The company is also expanding outside of its

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 3>language learning business, acquiring beat Star and country Star or

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the makers of that service, to bolster it's dual lingo music.

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Here to discuss, Luis van Ar Duelingo CEO, you're making

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 3>M and A is showing growth? Just tell us the

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 3>vision because many would say, okay, due Lingo's about language learning,

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>but it's actually about a broader education offering right now.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, ultimately we want to teach multiple subjects.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 12>I mean, at the moment you can already learn certainly

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 12>languages and the lingo, and that's what we're most well

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 12>known for, but you can also learn math and music

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 12>and of late chess, and ultimately the idea is I mean,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, we're we're around one hundred and thirty million

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 12>monthly active users. The idea is to have a billion

0:30:55.760 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 12>people really learning useful things are on their phone as

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 12>opposed to doom scrolling. That's that's really what we're trying

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 12>to do.

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating a billion that used music literacy with the nextpeak

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 3>to acquisition.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 2>As you say, growth in Chess seems to be of

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the chart.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, though, is we reference your daily active users

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 3>that did rise forty percent, but actually that was the

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>weakest rate of expansion since twenty twenty two.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Why is that slowing? Will it reaccelerate? Louise?

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, we had forty percent year of young growth,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 12>but that's lapping a quarter from last year that had

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 12>sixty percent year of ear growth, which in turn is

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 12>lapping another quarter from the year before that that had

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 12>sixty percent year ear growth. So our growth has been

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 12>tremendous over the last several years, and you know we

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 12>expected to continue being really good.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Really good.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 3>What gets you there other than product innovation, what you

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 3>thought would get you there in many ways has been

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 3>generative AI, whether it's intweaving it within the product itself, Louise,

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 3>But also you then went wholeheartedly into AI within your

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>own HR Ultimately in that backfired. And I know you've

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 3>spoken a lot about what happened on April the twenty eighth,

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>but just tell us where you stand in terms of getting.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Employees on board with the use of genitive AI.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean AI is really really important for us

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 12>from the time we launched to a Lingo, which was

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 12>thirteen years ago. The idea is to have an app

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 12>teach you something, and so ultimately you need some form

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 12>of artificial intelligence to teach to be able to teach you.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 12>So we've always leaned into it internally. You know, I

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 12>sent an email internally this was not controversial. We've always been,

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 12>you know, adopters of the latest technology. Externally, I think

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 12>I failed to give context. You know, the realities for us,

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 12>AI is about reaching more people and being able to

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 12>teach more. We've been able through the use of AI.

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 12>We've been able to create way more content than we

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 12>had before, and also we are able to provide things

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 12>like conversational practice that was not possible before AI. So

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, we really think that in order to teach

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 12>more people and teach them better, we can use AI,

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 12>and that's the main goal for it.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're just looking at some visuals of what

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 3>is Lily, your sort of purple head chatbot. She's meant

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>to be a little bit sarcastic and SASE team. Basically

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 3>she previously I think helped replace yous partly on your

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>earning school and you said, eventually you can just.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Retire and she'll do more and more of a job.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But that was tongue in cheap.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, how much more you're going to be able

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>to outsource the general to AI within your workplace, within you?

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 12>And the goal here is not to outsource to AI.

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 12>The goal is to use AI to be a lot

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 12>more efficient. I mean, we you know, we continue hiring employees,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 12>so that's that's really not the goal. It's we're just

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 12>trying to teach better. In the case of teaching people,

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 12>you know, with something like Lily. Up until we were

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 12>able to do video call with Lily, we couldn't really

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 12>teach conversation with due LINGO. The only way we had

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.479
<v Speaker 12>to practice, or users had to practice conversation was if

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 12>they could talk to another human. But it turns out

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 12>that in learning a language, most users will tell you

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 12>they would like to practice with another human, but they

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 12>actually don't. You know, when you when you show a

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 12>person the ability to talk to another human in a

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 12>language that they're not very comfortable with, they just don't

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 12>want to do it. It's a small fraction of people

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 12>that are extreme extroverts that are willing to do it.

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 12>But if you're talking to a computer, you feel like

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 12>it's not judging you. So for when when you are

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 12>just not very comfortable in the language, it's much better

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 12>to talk to a computer at first.

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating because there is a bit of pushback about

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the idea that maybe generative AI will end up being

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 3>or we look at in terms of ads, or we

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 3>discuss too in our social media apps. But for you

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 3>with language where we have some insecurity, that's the case.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 3>What about the chess and the way in which you

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 3>push more broadly, will that be an integration A person

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 3>on personal always personal on computer.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 12>Just is different because there's you know, when you're learning

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 12>a foreign language and you're just a beginner, you're very

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.959
<v Speaker 12>nervous about talking. But chess ultimately is about playing the game.

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 12>So yes, with chess, we do expect to have games

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 12>for player versus players, so between two people. At the moment,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 12>we don't have them. At the moment, we're just teaching

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 12>you the basics of chess and we're seeing great pickup

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 12>for that, but we are going to have games between people.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 2>When did you get to a billion? Luis? When's the aim?

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 12>Oh, I don't know, it'll take us several years, but

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 12>I really do think. I mean, we're growing very fast

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 12>in you know, every single country in the world, and

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 12>you know, the goal is that when people are learning something,

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 12>they're doing so through the phone and through dual lingo.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 12>So we really want to be, you know, the main

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 12>place where people are learning languages, but also a main

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 12>place where people get better at math music. We just

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 12>did this acquisition of Next Speed, which I'm very excited about,

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 12>or chess, and then later we'll probably do other subjects.

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we're not working on any other subjects at

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.479
<v Speaker 12>the moment, but I would be interested in also having

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, science and and stuff like that.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Come back as you add as potentially there's more. N

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 3>M and a Luis Fanan of Joe Lingo, thank you

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>very much for joining us in the yearnings. Meanwhile, far

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Fly Aerospace we'll start training today in the New York's

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 3>after raising close to nine hundred million dollars in an

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 3>upside IPO, and the company CEO Jason Kim says that

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the funds raised for the IPO, we'll go towards ramping

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 3>up the cadence of its Alpha rockets and fast tracking

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 3>other product lines now.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 2>He spoke with Bluemberg earlier this morning.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 13>We got orbital flight heritage on our Alpha rocket on

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 13>our second launch, and we landed on the Moon just

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 13>in March of this year. It's something that's really hard.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 13>Space is hard, but landing on the Moon is even harder,

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 13>and this company did it successfully. And then if you

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 13>look at what we're doing, we have a production line

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 13>of Alpha rockets, and we're building our Eclipse reusable sixteen

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 13>ton rocket as well as lunar landers annually. And we're

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.439
<v Speaker 13>building Electra spacecraft to serve you know, the Golden Dome

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 13>customer SpaceX four as well as commercial ticket And so

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 13>if you look at what the CEO of NASDAC said,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 13>Data Friedman, you know, the markets are strong and they're growing,

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 13>and we've gotten really great reception and conviction from investor

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 13>investors over time, and so this is the right moment.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 13>You're going to raise almost a billion dollars looks like

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 13>eight hundred and sixty eight million dollars.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Jason, what are you going to do with the money, Well.

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 13>You know it's kind of like what I already said,

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 13>we're going to rate up. We're going to continue to

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 13>increase capacity because there's so much more demand in the

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 13>space markets right now because of national security, because of

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 13>space exploration to the Moon. You know, the Moon is

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 13>really important. It's the ultimate high ground. It's also important

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 13>if we're going to put humans on the Moon again

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 13>starting in a couple of years. We want to know

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 13>everything about the Moon. We want to put more lunar

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 13>landers up there, more infrastructure, more power systems up there too.

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 13>So we want to make the Moon more frictionalists for everybody.

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 13>For America.

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 3>First fire Fly CEO Jason Kim there from the Nasdaq.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Shares indicated to open at seventy dollars a piece. I've

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 3>here priced at forty five dollars. Let's get back to

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 3>a key story in tech today, President Trump's plans for

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent chip tariffs, but there are carveouts springing.

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst man Deep Sing for more shares

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 3>actually going higher for many chip makers and indeed companies

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 3>that make things with chips in them. Because Apple gets

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a carve out because it's building in the US. TSMC,

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:39.720
<v Speaker 3>we understand Samsung, how are you managing to dissect which

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 3>company is going to be implicated here?

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, I mean, look, when it comes to Apple, they

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 14>have benefited from, you know, outsourcing to TSMC. So to

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 14>my mind, you know there it makes it very hard

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 14>for Apple to do something on their own. Like think

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 14>of how Intel has struggled over the years because it's

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 14>an id versus an Apple and Nvidia being a fabulis

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 14>chip design company and then letting TSMC manufacture. In fact,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 14>TSMC manufacturers for everyone. So if Apple was to invest

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 14>one hundred and fifty billion dollars in process, node technology

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 14>and packaging, would it really make them better in any

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 14>way without TSMC? And so I'm just thinking, where is

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 14>that Capex going to go? Glass is clearly one of

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 14>the components of Apple's bill of materials, maybe less than

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 14>ten percent. The other is camera. They're not going to

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 14>make cameras.

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 5>So what is it in.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 14>Apple's bill of materials where Apple is going to set

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 14>up a factory and say, okay, this is what we

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 14>are going to invest in. To my mind, data centers,

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 14>hyperscale data centers is the one thing which Apple needs

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 14>as well, even though they vertically integrate. They have a

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 14>services business, they need data center capacity. That's where their

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 14>chip design actually could help. So that's the natural thing

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 14>to do. But there is still so much kind of

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 14>me hype around what they could end up doing and

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 14>not enough details for me to say, Okay, this is

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 14>what they would end up doing in the US.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because at six hundred billion dollars and thus far

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 3>we understand, of course the glass, we understand servers, We

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 3>understand maybe data centerces, you say, but higher end manufacturing

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 3>and indeed manufacturing academies help train people.

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 2>But I go broader for a moment.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Then when you are hit by a headline one hundred

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.439
<v Speaker 3>percent tariffs, who do you worry about? Well?

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 14>I mean, look, there are companies like the Japanese companies.

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 14>So if it's a Sony and you are sending your

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 14>modules to the US for all types of use cases,

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 14>I think they could get hit. And they're not investing

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 14>big time in the US. So they haven't announced anything.

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 14>Samsung and other guys Micron, they have done that, but

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 14>that's where where will the real investment show up. So

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 14>it's one thing to announce something, it's another thing to

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 14>have a tangible idea where you know, you can create

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 14>a supply chain and do things like Texas Instruments has

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 14>done a great job diversifying their fabs over the years.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 14>Can't say the same about others.

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, We'll seeing where the money lands might keep seeing

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Intelligence trying to discern the latest headlines for us.

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 3>But that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out our podcast find Out on

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the terminal as well as online on Apples, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.