WEBVTT - Markets, Crypto, Porsche, And The Queen (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg markets podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller, every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOS, market pros and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg markets podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Dot com slash podcast. Let's get right to

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, William Houston, see io of Bay Street

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Capital Holdings. So William, you prefer William or bill? How

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are we going here? Yeah, William, awesome. Great. So William portfolio.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with that. That didn't work for me

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so well this year. What are you kind of doing

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>their over at bay street in terms of allocating access

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>between equities, fixed income, maybe some commodities, maybe some alternatives.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do you do in a market environment

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like this? MM HMM. It's not so much the allocation

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>right now as much as what the marketing anticipating. So,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as the Fed continues down this

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>course of raising rates, we're going to see more of

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the same of what we're seeing in the market, you know,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>until they are able to reverse course once the inflation

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>has slowed down. Regards what someone's allocation is, they're going

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at a difficult, a difficult path in

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the equities market. So, Um, it's not like a binary thing,

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>that Um. I always think about it like that. Either

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they're raising or they're cutting, but they could. I guess

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the market expectation is that they plateau at some point

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and just hold for a while. How do you see

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that going, and how important is your fed call to

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>your investment strategy? Yes, that's the right process. You know,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the the market is pricing in the pace that we're

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see these these rate hikes, as you said,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone's anticipating the seventy basis points. And yes, as soon

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as that trend reverse this course, you know, we stopped

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing this inversion in the yield curve where, you know,

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>investors are being actually rewarded at a higher rate on

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>these on these shorter term uh will say like like

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like like yields as opposed to longer term reels. As

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>long as that's the case, yeah, equities are going to

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>perform poorly, um, and and that's where that's what we're

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at for right now. So what do you do?

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you tell your clients these days again, their

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>their bonds haven't worked for them. Their stocks haven't worked

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>for them. I mean, unless they've got a barrel of oil,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, sitting in their apartment. What do they do?

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of investors have also gone to cash in

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a very strong way. Yeah, what do you do? What

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are your cash balances and where do you put them

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to work? If you do so, for a lot of

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>folks that are rebalancing at the end of the year,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year, they would have already,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, positioned themselves with some sort of cash allocation.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We went into the year in January with cash. With that,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've still seen similar performance in in the market.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We're still down about or team per sent a year

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to date. You know, with that cast, it's there that

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to be opportunistic with Uh. You know,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say for the next six months the housing

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>market is going to look uh soft. You know, housing

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>also shot up over the last couple of years. With

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>rates as high as they are, though, you know, there's

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>less offers that are coming in. That means there's going

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be lower inventories, which means that prices are going

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to start coming down. So I would say, for for

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking today, the smartest thing to do

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is to just wait. You know, a lot of things

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have been announcing layoffs. So just in general, the market

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to see some softness in the next six months,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>nine months. But that doesn't mean, you know, don't be alert,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>don't be village and it just means let's look around,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, prepared for, as these opportunities come up, as

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we intestipate, these prices to come down. Welleam I want

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about Um, your life, your studies and

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what you do out there on the left coast,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because I initially, you know, I saw your resume, restruck

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>by how much you studied Um investment management at Wharton,

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech, mathematics Alabama, and classically

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>trained pianist at Vanderbilt's Blair School of Music, which made

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>me think about the fact that a lot of times

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>musicians are so innovative and Um so successful in the

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>world of business and and on Wall Street. And I

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just wonder what you think about that and how it's

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>how it's affected you. M Hm. So I think you know,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>no individual is able it's going to be able to

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>outperform the market. You know, fortunately for me, I've been

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>able to surround myself with other individuals from very diverse

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>backgrounds and, you know, it's that diversity of thought in

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>this concept around idea flow. A friend of mine at

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Stanford d school, he actually just released a book on,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, how to come up with good ideas, you know,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and the truth to that is, when you're looking at

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an investment opportunity, every one knows that it's art, you know,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Part Art, part science, but the best ideas actually come

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>from actually the abundance of ideas, you know. So something

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that we do internally as a team is speak through

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that we're looking at, speak through what's going

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on in the market, but also be comfortable to go

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>through as many ideas as possible as a team so

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that we can so that we can field test these

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>options that are coming up and actually, through trial and error,

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>see well, what is the best option to to to

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to take in the in the in the in the

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're experiencing at that at that moment. So

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>will you what's you know? What do you think you

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>really bring? What do you try to bring to your

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>clients in terms of value, service insight. You know, what

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think is most important that you bring to

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your clients? Yeah, so something we've always stood behind is

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>investing through the lens of history, right. So we want

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to look at an opportunity. We want

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to help investors see around the corner. We want to

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>prevent any emotional decision making. So for us, you know,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>we want to be able to see what's going on and,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when market sentiment is where it is today, be able

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to explain the position that we're in. Uh, and also,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, even though we were only in cash,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>instead of going back hindsight and trying to make an

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>impulsive decision, say, okay, this is where we position and

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, uh, you know, over time equity

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>markets will pull back up. We can speak investors through

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this next six to nine months that we see coming

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so that they're able to have a little rest in

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>peace of mind as we as we step into it. All. Right,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, Hey, William, thanks so much for joining us.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you taking some time out of your day

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to chat with us. William Houston, C I O of

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Bay Street Capital Holdings and one of investipedia's top one

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred most influential advisors. That's a second year Ro. He's

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>been nominated for that prestigious award. Yeah, we've got a

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve. They're gonna be chatting with us on Wednesday, Bloomberg.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course we'll have full coverage of our Federal Reserve

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the press conferences and all that good stuff. But

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the question is, okay, you're raising interest rates. Are you

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can push this economy into a recession? Let's check in

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who thinks about this stuff for a living.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Marcus schomer, chief economists at Pine Bridge Investments. Marcus, what's

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your recession call with a Federal Reserve? That seems pretty

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, hell been on kind of getting its handle

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on inflation. Uh, it's really hard to to get to

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get your head around the recession call forecast right now. Um,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>because it depends a little bit what it's all about,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>depending what what do you think the Fed will do,

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as opposed what the feds should do, if you really

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think that they're hell bend on a recession, if you

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>really think they're so ignorant that they don't see how

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the inflation environment is turning, and it is changing rapidly

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of months. If they really, if

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you really believe they're so ignorant that they're not see that,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>then Um, if we do get a recession next year,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's all about them and it will be the second

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>major policy era after last year getting the inflation story

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>completely wrong. They may get the inflation story completely wrong

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>again and push the economy into recession next year. So, Um,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sticking I'm sticking out with the non recession forecast

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because I, maybe somewhat naively, believe they will get some

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>some sort of economic sense over the next six months

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or so, realize where we are and stop this kind

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>of ridiculous hawkishness that's coming out of every every remember

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>right now and it's pushing up expectations for rate higher

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and higher and higher. Marcus, I love your take because, um,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the Fed is going to play it as

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>hawkish as possible. They want to bring inflation expectations down

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the only way to do that is to convince

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>everybody in America or in the world, and that means

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>market participants too, that they will do everything they have

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to do to crush inflation, that that doesn't mean they're

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>actually going to do it. It doesn't mean they're actually

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>going to ignore a recession, high unemployment, you know, um

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>unrest in the streets, just in order to bring this

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>number that's already coming down down. But they have to

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>put on that Hawk Ish Um uh show. Is that

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>how you think it's gonna work, that they're that they're

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>actually they actually are going to be smart enough or

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or Um sensitive enough too, if not turn around, at

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>least pause when we start to get unemployment really ticking up.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You said, you obviously right in your description there Um,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but inflation expectations, I'm not rising inflation next. True, you

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>mission numbers were very were very good. Yet months ago

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at the New York site, has another one

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with the New York site. Is a three UH inflation

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>outlook number, inflation expectations number there that's been turning. Tips, number, tips,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation forecast has turned. I mean, I don't see any

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>indicator that suggests inflation expectations are rising. But that's the

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>other problem. Um, I'm kind of very that they have

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue to to talk hawkish, right, otherwise that turns

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>back around. No, it wouldn't. I don't think in face

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>expectation not reven what the Fed says its lasin expectation

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of driven what people see on the street, and you

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>know what they're seeing. They're seeing falling gas prices and

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing certainly a reduction in the upward pressure and

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>prices in other areas. And if you look at look

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at things like like import prices, import prices, I think,

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>already point to the next deflationary impulse that's coming because

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the dollars super strong. The rest of the world is

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>slowing much harder than the US. Everything we import right

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>now is going down in prices and I think that

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that that deflationary impults will only intensify in the next

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>six months Um. So I don't see but thefts still

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sees the problem. It looks at core CPI, which is

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a terrible number to look at. We should start looking

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at CPI without housing, because housing is obscuring the turn

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>right now and it is all about the turn and

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>getting conference in the turn. Once operation turns, it has

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been my view for a while that then the debate

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would change from how high to how fast will we

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>get to two percent? And that's a very different kind

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of discustion. Isn't it hard to leave out rents. That's

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>such a sticky component. We hear of inflation, but and

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been out of control on the upside. So it

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't a sticky component. It isn't. It's only sticky because

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the way it works right, because the way they do

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that they include rents and CPI, is by taking the

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>very latest information on rent and only using of that

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for the rental component of CPI. Because you know what,

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody rents a new home every month, right, and nobody

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>buys a house every month. So housing really shouldn't be

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in there. But SP and CPI should be things that

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you basically buy every month or every every other month

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or so you can notice the price is going up

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>or down. But things that you buy only every five

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>years or every two years should really be in the CPI,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or at least we should kind of adjust the CPI

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for the frequency of transaction of that product. And the

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's going still up right now, but it's

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>not exactly two but the one thing that's going up

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>right now making everybody worried is housing. Is that what

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>any going down now? He's collapsing right now. Is I'm

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>not going up anymore and rensom are going up anymore.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>So I was gonna say that's not the case in

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City. But Housing is, uh, you know, rolling over.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We get mortgage rates over six per cents. Marcus Scholmer,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us there. Marcus Scholmer, chief

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>economers for pint bridge investments. I think he's kind of

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in that Vince Signarella camp, which is hey man, inflation

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is rolling over. If I'm the Federal Reserve, I can

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>afford the Pauls, if not now, then maybe the next time,

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but we'll have to see how that plays out. Here

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg interactive broker's Radio Studio we got a

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wall of video screens for all the networks kind of

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>up in front of us and just seeing some video

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Queen's coffin now is arriving at Windsor Castle.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This huge, huge procession lined with just throngs of people.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Just extraordinary, uh kind of day here. And I was

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at the schedule, man, it starts at six thirty

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a m this morning the you know, some of these

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>uh rights and events, and doesn't end until seven thirty

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this evening. So a long day for all involved. And

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get a sense of what's going on there

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. We bring in Leanne Garan's she's a

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>radio anchor and producer for for Bloomberg News in London. Leanne,

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time to join us.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to you should get your your view of

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of how the day hasn't folded so far in London,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of course. Um. So this morning I was down at

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Westminster Abbey and you know, the queue that we've seen

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>here in London has been somewhat of a phenomenon. Just

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of people have nine the streets to

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>see the queen lying in states and I spoke to

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the last people to enter that Great Westminster

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Hall to say their Final Goodbyes today and they've been

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting in the queue for thirteen hours. Shortly after that

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the queue was closed about six thirty am and then

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we also saw the queen loaded onto the gun carriage

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and she was pulled by members and sailors from the

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>military here to Westminster Abbey, which is just eight minutes away,

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and I witnessed that and it was a moment of

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>raw emotions. We've seen Um pageantry and pomp and ceremony

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and just a feeling of emotion in London. The gun

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>carriage is so cool. So here's the deal of the

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>gun carriage. Basically, Um, it is an actual carriage for

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a twelve pound gun. Okay. That was built, I think,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighteen hundreds and when Queen Victoria died

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>um they went to pull it with horses, but the

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>funeral was in February and it was too cold. The

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>horses were freaking out, so they had UM. It was

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>actually Dickie's father, Louis Mount Batten, the original Louis Mount Batton,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>who said, you know what, we're gonna pull this ourselves,

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and they had like a hundred guys get out there

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kidding and pull it. And ever since then it's become

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>an institution in royal funerals. Um So cool. Now they're

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>marching into Windsor Castle. It's gigantic. I never noticed how

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>big it is. I believe it is the biggest royal

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>palace that's still inhabited by kings and Queens in the

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>whole world. Have you been there, Liam? I have been

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>there and I do actually spend a lot of time

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in one. It's one of my favorite places here in

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the UK and it was actually one of the Queen's

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite places. She loved it and during the pandemic it

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was called the Windsor Bubble, where she spent a long

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>time with her former husband and also with the staff

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of Windsor Castle, and that's because, as we know, the

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Queen always loved to be outdoors, she loved to walk

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>her Corgis and also have access to the horses, and that's,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Windsor Castle is the place where that happens.

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And I could not believe just the volume of people

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that have lined the long walk to see the Queen

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a hearst made away, we saw all the

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>roses that had been thrown onto the front of it.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And this, for a lot of the British people, is

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the last time we will really see her. Majesty. She

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>now will go into a service at four o'clock. That's

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a committal service, and then later on this evening she'll

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have a private burial with her family and the cameras

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>will not be watching any of that, you know. You

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know she mentions the Queen's late husband, the late Queen's

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>late husband, Prince Philip. He was Dickie's nephew, dicky Mount

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Betton so and I watched a crown. I did a

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into this today. Apparently Dickie tried to get

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Prince Charles to marry his granddaughter. I mean they're all

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>related anyway, but they wanted to get even more interrelated.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess King Charles now the Third Leanne. What what's

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Um? What's the feeling, because I know there has

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have been times in the past when people wanted him

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to abdicate and pass the throne straight onto William. He's

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>been very vocal about certain Um issues like climate change,

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>which made him for for some time unpopular, and now

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that the left has to at least given

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>points for that. How is he being seen now that

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting on the throne, so to speak? Well, I

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think first of all he has big shoes to follow.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>That's undoubted. His mother reigned over this country for seven

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>decades and she's much loved. But one thing that King

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Charles has done, and it's one the people's hearts, is

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as soon as he realized that he was to come

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to the throne, he went to all four corners of

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK and he visited his whole kingdom. He started

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>off in Scotland, he went in to Northern Ireland, he

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>went to Wales and of course we've seen him here

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in England. He's been out and about shaking people's hand,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>connecting with everybody who's come out to pay their respects

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to their mother. We've also seen an emotional speech given

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>by him thanking his mother and saying I'm going to

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>carry on the legacy, I'm going to carry on the service.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So really we see Prince King Charles. I always want

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to say Prince Charles, King Charles the third. I know

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's always on the shoe front of my mind. So

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we see King Charles the third really coming out and

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>giving people that reassurance that we need after seven decades.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember another queen. Most of my friends you know.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So he's really gone out and given the reassuring to

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the whole of the United Kingdom that he's here to

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>carry on his mother's legacy and he has worked nonstop

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and so many people have recognized that and also felt

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a real sense for him because he's mourning the loss

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>of a mother. Well, first of all, um, that's terrible.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make light of that at all.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a tragedy. Everyone loved her and, of course, her

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>children for for their loss. I am sorry. Having said that,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this has to be an incredible PR campaign for the

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom because for ten days we've all followed along,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we've all watched. You know, if you haven't been there,

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you probably want to go and check it out. If

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you have, you may want to go back. I mean

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Um in a way, this has to kind of prove

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>how important the world's are too, uh to tourism dollars

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>right Ly, and there must be an influx of people

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>who want to go to the UK to pay their

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>respect and to check it out. I have never seen

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>London so busy. I've almost not known what to do

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with myself. People have come in from all over the

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>world and I've actually gone and visited the queue a

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>few times and reported from the queue, and many people

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I met were foreign who had flown into the country,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>who said the queen had always struck a chord with them,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>especially people from the US. They said we don't have

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>this pomp and pageantry and it's something that we really

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be immersed in and involved in and we

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>loved the Queen From Afar. And you are right. It

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is something that has just bought the light here to

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the UK and today I have a feeling, and I'm

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sure many people would agree with me, everything almost went seamlessly.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It has been so well rehearsed, it has been so

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>well practiced. The queen made a lot of those approvals

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for the service that we saw today and I feel

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like London and the UK has done themselves justice. Absolutely agree. Lean.

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have you back later in the program that's

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>how important this stuff is and how interesting compelling parents

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg radio. All right, it's Monday, it's eleven eighteen ish.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>That means we talk e t F, and when we

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>do that we do with Katie Greifeld, cross asset reporter

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for a Bloomberg News N A N C K R

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>U Z. What kind of e t F Vance and cruise?

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The world has been waiting for these filings. So, if

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you haven't guessed so, these are filings. They haven't been

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>launched at the filings for e t f s that

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would track the personal portfolios of members of Congress and

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>their families and their dependent children, because, because members of

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress tend to beat the S and P by a mile,

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>who knows where they get that kind of investing edge,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's the acumen that you need to become

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>a good politicians just being great at investing. We have

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>aric cultures. He actually crunched the numbers for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>which did prove that point that these portfolios do tend

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to outperform. Whether or not it's going to be like

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a great portfolio, something you would actually want to invest in,

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's almost guaranteed to generate buzz because obviously there's been

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of controversy when you're talking. Okay, so people

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of our age here, the things we want to invest in,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>our things that make the most money. Yeah, for sure,

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's different with people in your generations. Yeah, what over,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>General Generalization, Um, but let me tell you about the methodology.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>The financial world, and financial twitter especially, has been waiting

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for someone to try to do this. The fact that

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>these filings finally landed uh, sort of went viral, but

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in any case. So they're going to look at disclosures.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Members of Congress have to disclose any transactions they make

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>valued more than a thou and dollars within forty five days.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>So you do run the risk of missing those short

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>term trades, but you can see what their long term

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>holdings are and you can construct a portfolio around five hundred,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>six hundred names, and that's what this issue is trying

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. What's give me just a sense of how

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>many e t f s come to market on a

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>weekly basis. It seems like every time you come you've

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>got more new crazy names. It's a cost of launching

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the TF like next to nothing. It would appear that way.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>The cost to file and E T F certainly doesn't

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>cost very much. We see so many interesting filings. The

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>reality is that if you look at the e t

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>f market at this point, you have three thousand e

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 1>t f s in the US, just the US. Um

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of weights. Nine trillion dollar market

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly a TV show about it. You have a TV

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>show about it. Issuers have to get creative to find

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>any sort of white space, any area of that nine

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar industry that isn't saturated. And if these actually

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>come to pass, they will be the only existing e

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>t f s on the market that are trying to

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>do this well. But these to me make the most

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of all of everything because, Um, if you a

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people get angry about the fact that members

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of Congress are investing and very cynical people think, hey,

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're using their position of power to make a profit. Um,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and now you can do it along with them.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. So the only problem I have is

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with the disclosures. As a member of Congress you only

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have to disclose your investments within a, I think a

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>forty five day period. Exactly are those laws gonna Change?

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Is this gonna stay legal? Well, it's interesting. There was

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this big bipartisan push last year to basically change the

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>laws require more disclosures or maybe make it so that

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers would only be able to invest in SMP five

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>dred tracking funds, are indextracting funds which a lot of

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>corporate employees. Those are the restrictions were under. We're on

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>our show going to hear from Emily Wilkins, she's a

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>congressional and government reporter at Bloomberg News, about those efforts

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because again it was a big bipartisan sort of unity moment.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like that pushes largely stalled. I don't

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's been any action on the legislatives front. Funds flow.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>People still putting the money in. Oh, here's the thing.

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk converting mutual funds. Like Matt and

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with mutual funds. You put the fidelity,

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Contra Fund, the fidelity. Think about how revolutionary

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>they were at the time. Vogel is man a myth,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>a legend who changed the way we invest. But now

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds are converting to e t S. right. It

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is a growing trend. The first happened about two years ago. Honestly,

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's slowed down a little bit. Uh. Some

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>proponents in the et f industry would tell you that

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still growing, but we did have new Burger Berman.

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>They did convert earlier this month, uh, some of their

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds into an e t f. This trend, it's

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>expected to grow to basically a one trillion dollar wave.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not close to that point yet, but if you

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>look at the flow of funds, new money or money

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>coming into the ecosystem, it's all it's like a zero

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>sum sort of flow picture. But in terms of issuers

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>actually converting their mutual fund into E T F S,

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>people think there's a lot more runway. But you have

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to consider the fact that mutual funds are the preferred

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>structure for retirement plans for four oh one case. So

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there's incentive to convert, but there's also plenty of reasons

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to stay in that specific structure. One PM Wall Street time.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you and that gonna be up to? We're

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>going to talk, I think, a lot about the congressional

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trading e t f s, again, just filings. They haven't

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>launched yet. That would probably take until November. So we're

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>also going to talk to invest goes, head of thematic

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>research theme the E T S. it's been a little

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of a struggle to attract the same magnitude of

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>flows that we saw in some of the years past.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've guys heard, but we've keep

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>toggling in and out of the bear market. That tends

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to be PAT news for themes, but they do have

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some winners. They're including the P B J e t f.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a food and beverage GTF. I'm excited to dig in.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Themes are different than factors. They are they are now.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, momentum quality, those are factors inflation, robotics.

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you's all right, she's smart. I'm ready that's why

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we have around the program Harford College. That's a really

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good college, by the way. On the mainline, yes, the mainline,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Katie Graydfeld, cross asset reporter for Bloomberg News. I want

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring in now Christopher Ralph. He is the Frankfurt

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Bureau chief and he is my go to source on

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>anything V W related. And then, because he's my go

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to source on Folkswagon, that means he's automatically my go

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to source on Porsche, Bentley, Audi, Bugatti, Scoda is the

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>one right. Ducatti is my own thing, but yeah, Bugatti

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>is a great, cool company. Anyway, Christoph, thanks so much

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Paul and I um both noticed the

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing when we saw the initial stories coming out

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. Porsche is going now for a much

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lower valuation than we thought. I mean ten billion dollars

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lopped off the valuation. Now Seventies, seventy five rather than

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty five. Why is that? Yeah, I'm Matt. I think.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the IT basically bolts down to the fact

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that actually they have been looking at a very broad

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>range of different valuations. When you like, like, uh, sort

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of like look a few weeks back, we've had like

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the number of like eighty five billions floating around. Some

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>some analytis actually speculating might be as worth as much

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as one dred billion. Uh. And then our last Thursday

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or Friday was we saw an HSS. No doubt it

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>basically said, oh no, it's like gonna it's gonna be

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>worth much. Basically they were looking at about forty five

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to fifty billion. So I think they sit pretty much

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the valuation which has been

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>basically discussed through a pretty broad range. So I do

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think they try really hard to not not push it

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>too hard from a pricing perspective and, yeah, aim for

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>something that sits pretty much right in the middle of them.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>To get this is my first thought is Um, you know,

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>were I too, if I were allowed to invest in this,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously I would back up the truck and buy as

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>many shares as I could. I'd have to call every

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>broker I know to try and get some syndicate. How

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna deal with that kind of demand? Yeah,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they basically have like a group of banks that is

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>targeting specifically institutional investors. Four of the big anchor investors

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have been out there already, have been announced and we

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>reported them before. But they also aligned up a number

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of banks, torture bank being one of them, who are

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>specifically targeting, targeting retail customers, because they who have a

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty sort of affluent group of customers that are very

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like loyal to the brand. I've been driving posts for

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years or decades maybe, are members of

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Porsche Club. So that's definitely a group of

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>potentially invested as well. Alright, so the the anchor investors,

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are like the Saudi right, Um, Norwayway,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>nor just. They have the biggest. Who? Who? Who else

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>are the big anchor investors? Remind us? UH, yeah, it was.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It was in August, the the the sovereign wealthfront from uh,

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>from Norway, then Qatar was was was one. was another investor.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>T ro always on board, a D Q, I think. So. Yeah,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a number of like pretty pretty established names out there.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Now I understand there's some weird family dynamics going on

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>here in this. I P O will dress some of it.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if you can do this in a

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>simplified version, but family. That in a book. Yeah, the

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Porsche family and the peach. Is it peach, Peach Peach.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't even pronounce it correctly. Christoph, can you give

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it a shot? Yeah, the name is is it pronounced Pah?

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I'll do my best at the night's challenge.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You wrapped it up in a few seconds and I'll

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>write that book and send it to you, Matt, right

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>after this show wraps up. The thing is, basically they

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lost direct control over what used to be their family

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>business just over a decade ago, back in the day's

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Porsche's previous management is tried to to take over the

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>much larger Folkswagen group. The whole thing basically like ran

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>out of funding during the dead crisis and as part

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of like a pretty complex deal for Porsche a g,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Cup business was folded into Folkswagen, and now

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea allows the family to regain some direct influence.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't go at Porsche at the at the sports cooperation.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't get like full control, but they will receive

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a blocking minority of twenty five percent of the voting

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stock in that Sports Cup business. When is this still

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? Is this this week? This month? What's

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the timing? We've just heard that the German financial market

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>regulator Baffin has signed off on the on the prospective,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on the on the ibe of Prospectus, so that should

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>land at some point later this this afternoon, at the

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>coming hours. And Yeah, basically then it then the preparation.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The preparations are going to continue and the goal is

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that the first day of trading will be September twenty nine.

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty exciting. Um. The only thing that is kind

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of a bummer for me, and probably cool for Kristoff,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is that they're doing it on the Frankfurt Bersia, which is,

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so lame. No offense, Christoff, but there's nobody

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that even works there. Like, why not doing on the

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange where there's real pomp and UH

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and and and celebration? Yeah, I think I'm I'm I

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm totally biased that because like the Frankfort stock

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ex changes to stock a walk from our office. So

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for it, Matt Uh and, yeah, I guess

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to bring you back to Germany, guess, Christopher.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to do like a road show, like

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.959
<v Speaker 1>go to New York, go to London, did that kind

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of thing? Well, that they have been on a pretty

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>sent the FROAD trow over the past few, uh, well

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>months really, they've been to to Boston, to New York,

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to London, they've been touring Asia, so they've really like

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>travel the globe, basically. But they decided, yeah, it's it's

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a Germany, it's a German company. They want to

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>be what they wanted to be listed in Germany. So

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that's basically why they picked Frankfurt. Alright, good stuff now,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe we'll send Matt over there for that.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That can be a good little uh police boot markets. Yeah,

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll send we'll send him your away, Christoph Rovald, bureau

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>chief Frankfort Munich, pretty much all of Germany for Bloomberg News.

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>He kind of keeps us on top of what's happening

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. And again this I P O of Porsche

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>looking to raise as much as nine point four billion euros.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg markets podcast. You can

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with apple podcasts or whatever

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on twitter

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller. Three pet on Boll Sweeney, I'm on

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>twitter at PT Sweeney. Before the podcast you can always

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>catch US worldwide at Bloomberg Radio M