WEBVTT - Tech News: Why Facebook Went Offline

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and it is time

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for the tech news for Tuesday, October five, twenty one.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's get at it. Chances are you are aware that

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>yesterday Facebook and all of its services went offline for

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>several hours. That includes Facebook itself, Messenger, Instagram, What's That,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and Oculus VR. The outage began at approximately eleven forty

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a m. Eastern time. That's when facebooks records on the

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>domain name system suddenly went So. The domain name system

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or d n S is like an address or or

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>phone book for the Internet. So you probably know about

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>IP addresses, those numerical addresses, especially I p v four

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is numerical, I p v six is a mix. But

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this is how say a web browser connects to a

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>specific web page. It actually connects through an I p address.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But IP addresses are not easy for most humans to

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>remember because again they just look like a jumble of

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers or with I p v six numbers and possibly letters.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So we use words for our u r ls like

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot Com, for example, and the d n S

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>translates those words, which doesn't you know, words don't really

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>mean anything to web browsers. That's just how we navigate

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the web. And so d n S says, all right, well,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>let me look and see what I P address that

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>particular series of words relates to, and then serves that up. Now,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook's case, the problems seemed to be that Facebook somehow,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>probably through a miscon figuration, eliminated its Border Gateway Protocol

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or b GP route. This is kind of like a

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>map of how data can get to Facebook's servers. Facebook

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>servers published this route to neighboring servers, and they propagated outwards.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like if you're driving through an

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar town and you stop to ask a local for directions.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You say something like, hey, do you happen to know

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the way to get to Facebook, and they say, well, yeah,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>go down this road a peace and when you see

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the sign for Old Donigan's farm, you turn left. Now,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>if you pass an ambulatory scarecrow, you've done gone too far,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>except because Facebook withdrew the b g P. If you

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>were to stop and ask for directions, and say do

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know the way to Facebook? You would get the

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>answer you can't get that from hreh. But wait, it

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>gets worse. See Facebook's systems are all internal ones built

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on these computers that connect to these particular servers. That

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>got effect of Lee severed from the Internet and the

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>loss of the b g P meant that not only

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>could you as a user no longer check your Facebook

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or Instagram or use WhatsApp, and you couldn't play Oculus VR.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>If you were a Facebook employee, you couldn't access your

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>internal systems. You might not even be able to access

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the building I saw. One person suggests that the security

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>system itself is tied into those servers and that your

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>security badge wouldn't work to let you in in that case. Also,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has Facebook log In. This is where you know

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>various apps use your Facebook login for you to access

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the app. That way, you don't create a user name

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and a password for that specific app. Instead, you use

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook login. Well, with Facebook servers down, there was

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>no way to authenticate that. So if you were not

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>actually actively signed into those services, you might have found

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it impossible to connect to all those apps. It took

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>several hours to reconfigure the b GP routes, and that

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has made more complicated because obviously the computers that you

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>would normally use to reconfigure that were the same ones

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that were you know, quote unquote disappeared from the Internet.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So it was a pretty rough day for Facebook. Now,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this was just part of the drama that Facebook is

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>currently going through. On Sunday this past Sunday, former Facebook

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.559
<v Speaker 1>employee Francis Howgan appeared on Sixty Minutes and it turns

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>out that Francis is the person who leaked internal research

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>documents to the Wall Street Journal. You know, the studies

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that showed that Facebook researchers were concerned that Instagram was

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>harmful to mental health, particularly for teenage girl who girls

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who were using the service um and that Facebook was

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>well aware of how misinformation was spreading across the platform

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and how the algorithm was elevating misinformation campaigns. On the interview,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>she alleged that Facebook, when faced with a decision to

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>either go for making a profit or go with an

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>option that would be better for users, would always choose

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the profit option every single time. Today, she has scheduled

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to appear before the United States Senate to answer questions

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about her former employer, And of course we have been

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>having ongoing conversations within the government, the US government and

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the European government as well about whether or not Facebook

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>represents a monopoly and if perhaps it might be a

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>good idea to, you know, force the company to divest

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>itself of properties like Instagram and WhatsApp. Now, I've also

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>seen some people suggest that somehow the outage yesterday was

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>linked to the hearing that's happening today and and the

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes expose that had happened on Sunday, that perhaps

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>someone over at Facebook was trying to hide something and

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just took extreme measures. But that doesn't seem like that

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to hold up even under casual screw utiny.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that the outage hurt the company big time,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and at the worst possible moment for Facebook, for one thing,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>because Facebook went down and all these various integrated services

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>then became unavailable. The people who say Facebook has too

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>much influence have way more ammunition, right, because millions of

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>people rely on, say, WhatsApp to stay in touch with

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>family and friends around the world, including vulnerable populations who

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>use WhatsApp in order to maintain contact with people, like say,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back in Africa or in South America. But because WhatsApp

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>runs on Facebook's systems, that whole service became unavailable globally

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>for like six hours. This, the critics argue, is what

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>happens when we put all of our digital eggs in

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one social media platforms basket. Right, If we have our

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>logins tied to Facebook, If the service as we rely

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>upon to stay in touch with everybody are part of

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Facebook goes down, all of that becomes unavailable

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to us. That, as the argument goes, is an argument

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>against this kind of consolidation that we've been seeing with

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Facebook, where you know, they're not just building

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>out their own tools, they're buying up tools that overlap

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what Facebook already does. A lot of people have pointed

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out over the years that Facebook has acquired companies when

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that Facebook itself was not going to

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to compete against those companies, and those companies

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially stood as a threat when it comes to getting

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>people to spend more and more time on Facebook. Now,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond those pieces of evidence that suggests that this is

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not something that the company would have wanted Bloomberg estimated

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that the outage and the dip and Facebook's stock price,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>which has been going on since, you know, earlier in September. UH,

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that also meant that CEO Mark Zuckerberg saw his wealth

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>decreased by around seven billion dollars. Now that is beyond

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a princely some obviously, and that's not to say that

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he won't regain that wealth now that Facebook is back

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up and running. Maybe he will. Maybe the company's UH

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>stock prices will improve, although with the hearing in front

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the U. S. Senate that's not certain. I would

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>argue no one would authorize some sort of extreme pull

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the plug UH strategy at the cost of seven billion bucks.

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty confident this was all coincidental. It was a

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>miss configuration, It was not done on purpose, and it

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was just supremely bad timing for Facebook for all this

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen at once. Will the U. S. Government force

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to say bye bye to Instagram and WhatsApp? I

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know. There is precedent. We have seen the

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>government break up big company years before, but it hasn't

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>happened in a long time, and I'm not sure that

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it will happen in this case. However, I figure there's

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>never been a time with more obvious support for that

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>argument than right now. Yesterday really brought that into, you know,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>into the light. Last week, I reported that Amazon would

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>hold a hardware reveal event, but that my recording session

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>happened before the event occurred, so I couldn't actually say

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what they were going to show off. I did mention

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Verge had predicted a wall mounted echo device,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we got one. It's called the Echo Show. But

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that site also predicted we wouldn't see anything about the

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>robot that Amazon had had in development for a few

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>years at that point. However, Amazon surprised us all and

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact brought out a robot that it now calls Astro.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>The robot will initially sell to a limited customer base

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>by invitation only, so you actually have to request and invite,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and you must hand over the princely sum of nine

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>dollars to buy it. Later on, that price is actually

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>going to go up to around one tho. The robot

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>has a tablet like screen for a face, like it's

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>got these digital eyes. Essentially kind of looks a little

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bit like Wally from the Pixar film. It moves around

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on two twelve inch wheels, and it's got a little

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>castor like wheel in the back to provide more stability.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's got cameras, including a five megapixel camera built into

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the screen, but it's also got a periscope camera it

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>can extend and use to look around at surroundings. It's

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>got a speaker, it's got a microphone. It has facial

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology built into it. It can learn a map

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>of your home, so you can have it learned the

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>layout of your home and assigned specific names to specific rooms. Thus,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you could tell your robot, hey, you know, go to

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen and it would navigate over to the chin

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>from wherever it happened to be. Um. It's got all

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Alexa capabilities built into it so that it can

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>respond to the request that you would typically use to

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ask Alexa for stuff like what the weather is, or

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to play a certain song and all that kind of stuff.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone is sold on this robot. The m I

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>T Technology Review has called the robot stupid. The Verge

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ran a follow up piece saying that developers who had

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>worked on the robot had reportedly called it terrible and

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>claimed it would make dumb mistakes such as throwing itself

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>off the stairs, So if you have stairs in your home,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you might not want to have this thing on an

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>upper level. I think I would advise folks to maybe

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>pump the brakes a bit before shelling out a grand

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or more for this thing. While we have stuff like

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>room Buzz and those are reasonably popular, we're really still

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting on the household robot that is a must buy.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of people suggest that this robot

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do a whole really when you get down to it,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and the stuff that it does do, it doesn't necessarily

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>do super well, so it's not like a wise purchasing decision. Um.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would potentially give Amazon a lot more

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to figure out how to sell stuff to you.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they've got essentially a computer that can

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>move around your house and observe stuff, then you could

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>argue this could just be another way for Amazon to

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>position itself in order to sell more products to customers.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, I suspect that that is a large part

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. And you you have to pay for that privilege, right,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to pay like a thousand dollars or more

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to have the privilege of having a surveillance

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>device that is potentially giving more information to a company

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to sell you more stuff. Anyway. Besides the robot and

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the wall mounted Echo Show, which again is like a

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>smart display that you can attach to a wall, we

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>also saw the Echo Glow. This is a table top

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>tablet for video conferencing for kids, and it's meant to

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>appeal to children so that they video conference with distant

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>friends and family and they don't get bored and just

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>wander off. That was what Amazon said. The purpose was

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>behind the design. So in this case, the tablet actually

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>has incorporated inside of it a projector. The projector can

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>display stuff on the tabletop in front of the tablet.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It even comes with like a white mat. It's kind

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of like a movie screen, so you lay the mat down,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you put the tablet behind the mat, and it can

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>project a screen down on the mat that's on the table.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh that can become an interactive story book, you can

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>become a game. And there are infrared sensors inside the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>tablet so it can track things like hand motion, so

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>when you're you know, moving stuff around on this screen,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's acting almost like a touch screen. It's kind of

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a neat idea. I'm not entirely sold on it, but

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>then I also don't have any kids, so um. Amazon

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>also revealed a smart thermostat fitness track your devices, and

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>also a version of its Echo device specifically designed for

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney properties. So in the future, should you stay at

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like a Walt Disney World resort, you might find that

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a Disney themed Echo and you can use

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it to ask questions like checking on dining reservations or

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>asking about park hours, that kind of stuff. Um, I

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was not super impressed with the Amazon presentation, but then

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I also don't want this to be an Amazon ad.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're just gonna go to break and listen to

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>other ads and then come back with some more news

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're back. Researchers at Trendy College in Dublin, Ireland,

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is one of my favorite spots

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in Ireland, have released a research paper that looked into

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how much data iOS and Android devices gather from their

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>respective users. The paper says that both operating systems send

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>packets of data back to you know, their their respective

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>h q s approximately every four and a half minutes.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're using it or not. This happens even if

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you've gone to the trouble of setting all data sharing

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>options to off. Keep in mind, some data sharing isn't optional,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's mandatory. And the study did find some differences between

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the two. Google, they said, collects much larger volumes of data.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The size of packets that Google sending back is much

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>greater than what Apple is doing. However, Apple, while sending

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>less data, overall, sent a wider variety of data, including

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>data about other devices that are connected to whichever network

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you connect to. Android doesn't do that, so Apple is

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in what other devices are on the same network

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you're on. I guess. The Google reps have said this

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is really just kind of how smartphones work. They compared

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it to how modern day vehicles have components that send

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>data back to car companies for safety purposes. The researchers

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>said that if users really want to limit how much

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of your data your phone collects and shares, you should

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>really go with an Android phone because despite the fact

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's sending more data, you have more options. You

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can have network connections disabled when you activate your phone,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and you should also disabled Google Play and YouTube, and

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the Google Play Store. That cuts down on most of

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the data collection. You would still need to sideload apps

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and get them from someplace other than the Google Play

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Store in order to avoid that data collection. Even then,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just minimizing the amount of data that's being collected

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and shared. They did say that Apple users are just

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>out of lock because Apple requires a network connection to

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>activate an iPhone. So Apple users are subjected to data

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>collection no matter what they do. Speaking of Apple, the

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal parts that Apple made more operating profit

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>from games than Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, and Activision Blizzard combined.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And Apple doesn't make games, but profited more from games

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>than all those other companies. Al Right, so in some

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>ways this actually is not a big surprise, right. I

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Mean we're talking operating profit, we're not talking revenue. So

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>companies like Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony, and Activision Blizzard they actually

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>make games. Now that means that there are costs associated

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 1>with that business. You know, Profit is what you've got

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>after you've accounted for the costs of producing whatever it

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is you're producing. So if I decide I'm going to

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>go and make a chair, and I sell that chair

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for fifty dollars, but it turns out the materials cost

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>me sixty dollars. Well, I lost money on that, right,

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't make a profit. That's a loss. While Apple

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>generates revenue by taking a cut of all digital sales

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>up to in some cases, so Apple gets a slice

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the pie, which is I guess, Apple pie. Every

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>time someone purchases a game from the Apple App Store,

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or and this is really important, they get a slice

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of the pie if a person makes an in game

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>purchase on an app that was taken from the Apple

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>App Store. Apple has been going through a series of

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>court cases about those in game purchases, having recently been

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ordered by a judge to offer alternatives or allow for

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to Apple's own in app purchasing system. This would

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>give users the option to go with something else and

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not go through Apple. This is at the heart of

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the matter between Apple and Epic Games, the creator of Fortnite.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, yes, Apple has made more profiting games than

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>official game companies, but then Apple also doesn't have to

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have the expense of development for those. A man named

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>O N. D As, a former elevator operator at Tesla,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sued the company, charging that Tesla is a hostile work environment,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and that he and other employees were the targets for

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>things like racial slurs and intimidation. A court found in

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>his favor, and the court has awarded him some one

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars or so in damages. Now, one thing

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes this story really important is the fact that

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Diaz was even able to sue at all. Tesla, like

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tech companies, has a policy that requires

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>employees to sign an arbitration agreement. Now, these agreements say

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>that employees must work within company systems to resolve problems.

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>They are not allowed to go outside the company and say,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>address the media or sue the company in a court

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and take it to a public trial. However, Diaz never

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>signed that kind of an agreement, so he wasn't held

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to those restrictions. He could sue without breaking an agreement

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>he had made with the company. And you might even say, hah,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounds to me like these sorts of agreements

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>would allow for a toxic work environment to flourish, and

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that there would be no real way you could address

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it because all the disputes have to be handled internally,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and if the system is rotten, then you'll never come

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>out on top because the game is stacked against you

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. You would not be the only person

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to think that way. In fact, one of one of

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the the investors of Tesla, an organization called NIA Impact

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Capital Um, has sent uh the board of directors a

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>request to review this arbitration policy, raising concerns that the

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>policy enables harassment. Now, I would go even further than that.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say it encourages harassment. Also, I mean, is

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it just me or do you sense that there's like

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a growing labor movement in the United States? You know,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still in the very early stages and

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>it could just fizzle out. But I also feel like

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>younger generations in particular are getting a bit more head

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>up about the status quo, and they're demanding things change

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or they won't play ball. And hey, young folks, I

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>am with you on this one. You know, I might

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not understand your squid games and your TikTok's, but I'm

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>all for overhauling the labor system. Also, here's hoping Tesla

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>cracks down on those internal problems and really does try

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to change that toxic work environment. It would be really

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>nice to hear about companies actually making substantial transformational changes

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in workplaces and find a place where employees are all

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>treated with respect and dignity, which I know that's crazy talk,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but it would be a nice change of pace from

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the stories we constantly get about companies that have terrible

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>work environments, really demoralized employees, and just it just sounds

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like the worst. So I am hoping that Tesla makes

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>those changes. Also, I hope that we start to see

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more resistance to this trend of arbitration agreements being put

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in place. It's just a way for companies to protect

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>themselves at the expense of their employees. And I don't

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's I don't when we're talking about protection, I

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the companies that need to be protected.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the individual employees who need the protection. Again,

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's my own opinion. Sticking with cars, since we just

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about Tesla, let's chat a bit about California because

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's that state's Department of Motor Vehicles that just granted

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>permits to a pair of self driving car companies, that

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>being Way Moo and Cruise. They both have been given

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>permits to operate light duty self driving taxi cabs in

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and in way most case beyond. But these

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>permits do come with some restrictions. However, they're not open ended.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So in cruises case, that company's cabs will only be

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>able to operate between ten pm and six am, so

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they can only operate it overnight. They are allowed a

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>maximum speed of thirty miles per hour, and they can't

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>operate during particularly foggy or rainy conditions. I actually find

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that ten pm to six am really odd. I mean,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's to avoid traffic. Um. I was trying to

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>find more confirmation on this and make sure that it

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just a transcription error and that they didn't they

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean between six am and ten pm, but rather

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ten pm and six am. I I don't know, so

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going with what the press release said. So,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>since we're talking San Francisco, and this does limit when

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles can operate and they can't operate in bad weather,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it really does restrict when they would be able to

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>two autonomously drive the streets of San Francisco. WAYMO, which

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is part of Alphabet that's the company that's also apparent

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to Google, gets a bit more leeway the way MOO

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>cars will be authorized to travel up to sixty five

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour, so they could go on too highways.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>They can go beyond just San Francisco, but not the

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>entire state. Uh. They don't appear to have a limitation

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on when they are allowed to operate, so we don't

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have like restricted hours for waymo as far as I

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can suss out. They also are not allowed to drive

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if the weather is too nasty, so that restriction does

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>still apply. But does this actually mean that robo taxis

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>are right now prowling the streets of San Francisco. Not

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>quite yet, because the companies will still need to get

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>approval from California's Public Utilities Commission, and that commission might

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have more restrictions or more requirements. Uh, so we'll have

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to just keep an eye out for it. Last week,

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the website Lyons posted an essay written primarily by Alexandra Abrams,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who used to be the head of Blue Origins employee Communications.

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Blue Origin, in case you don't recall, is Amazon founder

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos's space industry company anyway, Abrams, in around twenty

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>other folks who either work or have worked for Blue Origin,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>detailed that the company has a truly toxic work culture

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a common theme. The essay alleges that

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>numerous male senior leaders have acted inappropriately with women, including

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one who CEO Bob Smith, would then appoint as part

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of a hiring committee for a senior HR position. Now,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in case that didn't quite register with you, I'll put

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>it in in another way, a guy who had numerous sexual

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>harassment claims against him was then put on a committee

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>in charge of finding a human resources executive. That's like

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>giving an inmate in solitary confinement the authority to choose

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>who the warden is for the prison. The essay lists

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>several incidents and examples and makes the case that Blue

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Origins work environment is harmful, and it's harmful to productivity,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it's harmful to mental health and Abrahams also said that

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>many of the authors of the essay would never go

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>up on a Blue Origin rocket out of concerns for safety,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>because they said that the work conditions were so intense

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and so rushed that they feel that safety has been

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>uh neglected too much. Meanwhile, Blue Origin has announced that

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>William Shatner is scheduled to go up on the next trip,

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're going with all systems go. I guess Today

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>representatives from Microsoft, Google, and Amazon will be meeting with

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the US government's Office of Science and Technology Policy at

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the White House to talk about quantum computing. Now, for

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>those who are not familiar with that term, quantum computing

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>involves the strange world of quantum mechanics. So your classic

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>computers operate by processing information in the form of binary

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>digits or bits, and a bit can be a zero

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or a one. It's kind of like a light switch.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's either off or it's on. But quantum computers use

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what we call cubits or quantum bits. Now, these can

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>be a zero, a one, anything in between, and all

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of them at the same time. Quantum computing get involve

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>strange stuff like superposition. That it's what we were just

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Superposition is where you have a quantum element

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that can occupy all possible states simultaneously. It would be

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like if you could be awake in a sleep at

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time. You know, those are two different states.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what superposition is, but it only applies

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to the quantum world, alright, So anyone who's trying to

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>sell you anything about superposition that could be observed in

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>our classical universe, they're full of it. That is not

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the way the world works. Quantum computers can also involve entanglement. Now,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is where you have the state of one quantum

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>element tied to the state of another, no matter how

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>far apart those two quantum elements are, and by observing

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those two you can tell what the state

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other one was at that exact moment. So

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about electron spin. This is a pretty common one.

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you've got two entangled electrons. One of

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>them is spinning up and the other one spinning down.

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And let's say that they're a universe apart. It doesn't

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>matter as long as they're tied together. So while one

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>spinning up, the other one spinning down, you observe the

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them. You see that spinning up, You know

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the other one was spinning down. However, the crazy thing

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about the quantum world is that when you start to

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>observe things, you actually change their behavior, and things like

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>entanglement breakdown. So while you might be able to say

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at that specific moment that other electron was spinning down,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what it's doing now because the entanglement

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>has been severed. Now quantum computers can solve a subset

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of computational problems with insane speed, assuming that the quantum

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>computer has enough cubits to do it, and that you

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have developed an algorithm that can tackle that sort of problem.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And these are computational problems that would take classic computers

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.239
<v Speaker 1>hundreds or thousands or millions of years to complete, and

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you can do it relatively quickly with a quantum computer. Now,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't apply for all types of computational problems. So

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you wouldn't want to use a quantum

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>computer to play call of duty because it wouldn't work

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>nearly as well as a classic computer would. Anyway, the

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>experts from Microsoft and Amazon and Google are meeting today

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about possible future applications of quantum computing, some

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of which relate to security. Encryption is one of those

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>things that quantum computers could really disrupt, because with a

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently powerful quantum computer and the right algorithm, you could

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially break even the toughest encryption schemes in a very

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>little amount of time. It's amazing and also kind of scary.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a couple more stories to get to But

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>before we do that, let's take another quick break. So,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the continuing battle against robo calls, the United States

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Communications Commission or FCC is considering new restrictions on

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>domestic gateway providers and they would have to follow these

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>new rules to cut back on robocalls that originate outside

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States. All right, this gets to how do

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you deal with a problem that doesn't necessarily originate inside

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>your own country? Right? We see this with the Internet,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and we see it with the telephone system because the

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>FCC doesn't have jurisdiction outside the United States, right Like,

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 1>they can't, you know, the f c C can't go

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to a German telephone company and say, hey, knock it off,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because the FCC has no authority over telecommunications companies that

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are outside the United States, and yet illegal robocalls from

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>other nations are a real problem. So the FCC's proposal

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is to require gateway phone companies. These are US based

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that accept and facilitate calls that are coming from

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>outside the country and routing them to the correct you know,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>phone line in inside the country. They will be required

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to verify the accuracy of color I D and to

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>authenticate that a call is legitimate, or presumably they would

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have to block it. The FCC has already created protocols

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>called Stir and Shaken, which are meant to crack down

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on US based robo calls. And here's hoping that these

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>proposals become actual rules and that we see a dramatic

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>decrease in robo calls as a result. I don't know

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about any of you, but for me, I answer maybe

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one call out of twenty that comes to my phone

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because the vast majority of calls I get our numbers,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize. Most of them never bother to leave

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a message once it goes to voicemail. The ones that do,

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's prerecorded nonsense. That doesn't you know, it's nothing important.

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like you need to renew this warranty that I

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have on often on something that I don't own,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's not not something that I really want. And

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be really nice if you know, when my

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>phone rings, I could be reasonably sure that it's from

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>someone I know and possibly someone I want to talk to,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or maybe like I know, oh, that call is coming

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>from you know, the power company, and they're letting me

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>know about maybe a planned outage in order to do

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>some work in the neighborhood. Those are the kind of

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>calls where, yeah, I'd kind of like to be able

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to get them, but I don't get anything because I

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just let them all go to voicemail because there are

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>too many robocalls. All right, I know, you know this

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is a problem. If you have a phone, you're aware

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. I'll be quiet now. Finally, the activist group Anonymous,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which honestly I kind of lost tabs on for a while.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They I'm not sure if they went quiet or if

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I just stopped, you know, hearing about their exploits. Anyway. UH,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some group that's associated with Anonymous has been actively defacing

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese government website that promotes tourism in China. The

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>group has repeatedly altered that website, adding in images, a

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of them images of various leaders that the Chinese

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>government has vilified, and UH also sending in messages that

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>call for people who visit the website to reject communism

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and authoritarianism. I'm not sure how effective those strategies are

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're targeting a tourism page, but it does show

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>how Anonymous will use a combination of subversion and you know,

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of juvenile memes to poke at a target. The

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>group says it discovered that the server hosting the site

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was using default password credentials. That speaks really poorly of

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that website's approach to security. As a rule, you should

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>always change the default password settings on all your network devices,

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you run the risk of someone using the default

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>password credentials to access your stuff and mess with it.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to guess your password if you've never

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>changed it. If I try to log into your router

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and I use admin and password as the credentials and

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it gets in, that's really on you because you didn't

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>take the steps to I mean it's on me too,

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the jerk who's trying to access your system, but

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's on you for also for not taking the steps

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>to change those defaults. So changing defaults is really good

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Anonymous in case you're not familiar with them. It's a

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very loose organization, actually using the word organization as even

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>a little grandiose. It's a collective of hackers and activists

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>who will target various companies and individuals for different reasons.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's to fight against what is seen as authoritarian regimes.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's to fight against companies that are seen to

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be hypocritical. Uh, it really just depends, and there's no

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>centralized leadership. Really. You can have people who sort of

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>take the lead on specific initiatives, but it's a very

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>loose collective at which works to the group's both benefit

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and detriment. It all depends on what anyone's trying to do.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's it for the tech News for Tuesday,

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>October one. Will be back later in the week with

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>more tech News and more episodes of tech Stuff. If

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for topics I should cover on

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, reach out to me on Twitter. The handle

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is text stuff h s W and I'll talk to

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Y. Tech Stuff is an I

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.