1 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Ley. 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:27,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg So 5 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:30,760 Speaker 1: the President on the record sank he's open to an 6 00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:33,080 Speaker 1: interim deal. Please to say that Cashy Fisher is with 7 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: us Bernstein head of Wealth and Investment Strategy for the 8 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: next four hours, with us for the next six minutes. 9 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 1: So let's make the most of it. Cathy, great to 10 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 1: have you with us. Things aren't as bad as they seem, 11 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:44,919 Speaker 1: at least certainly not so compared to three weeks ago. 12 00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 1: That's right, um, Although I don't want to read too 13 00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:51,440 Speaker 1: much into the back and forth on things like interim 14 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:54,280 Speaker 1: trade deals. Yes, it's good news, but we all know 15 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: it can change tomorrow. Right. I think that's what the 16 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,680 Speaker 1: market has recognized. We're going to have ups and downs 17 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 1: the trade talks, and as I was saying before, I 18 00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:06,920 Speaker 1: think a much more realistic recognition that lower interest rates 19 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: are not a panacea. We are trying to figure out 20 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 1: how to deal in a world where global trade has 21 00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 1: been unmoored by these tariff issues, and countries are doing 22 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 1: what they can to offset it, but interest rates alone 23 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 1: cannot do it, which is why the topic of fiscal 24 00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:27,080 Speaker 1: stimulus is back on the table, because countries are going 25 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:28,840 Speaker 1: to try to do what they can at their own 26 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:32,040 Speaker 1: levels to adjust to a very different environment than we've seen. 27 00:01:32,200 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 1: Many people have come on this program and said, these 28 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:36,319 Speaker 1: tariffs aren't going anywhere regardless of who is in the 29 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:37,920 Speaker 1: White House, and I think we've got a real flavor 30 00:01:37,959 --> 00:01:40,959 Speaker 1: of that last night yesterday evening. It was about one 31 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: hour and about thirty minutes into the debates with the 32 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 1: Democratic presidential candidates, the moderator asked the candidates essentially one 33 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 1: simple question, and your first day in office, would you 34 00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 1: unwind remove the tariffs. I didn't hear a single candidate 35 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: come out firmly and say they would do that. Caine. Remember, 36 00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: the Democrats have always been the party that was anti 37 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: global trade, so of course the Democrats cannot protest what's 38 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:07,280 Speaker 1: going on with tariffs. Absolutely, so we do have to 39 00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:09,800 Speaker 1: expect that this is a new reality that's going with 40 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:13,040 Speaker 1: us for quite some time, and the rishes between the 41 00:02:13,160 --> 00:02:16,839 Speaker 1: US and and China are quite existential very much how 42 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:20,560 Speaker 1: you operate your economy. They're not just buying soybeans. So 43 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:21,800 Speaker 1: these things are going to be with us for a 44 00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: long time. When you work every day in wealth management, 45 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:27,200 Speaker 1: what do you rationalize as economic growth? I mean, if 46 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,399 Speaker 1: it's tariff induced, and by definition tariffs will reduce economic growth. 47 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:34,640 Speaker 1: Let's go with that core idea. What is the Canthy 48 00:02:34,720 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 1: Fisher run rate of the American economy for investment? Is 49 00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:42,600 Speaker 1: it sub three percent? Is its subs It's a very 50 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:44,799 Speaker 1: good question. It is certainly closer to two than three. 51 00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 1: And we we cannot ignore the bigger trends, which are demographics, 52 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:54,679 Speaker 1: which our technology, these are These are positives and negatives. 53 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: But we are clearly in a slower growth environment and 54 00:02:57,760 --> 00:03:01,280 Speaker 1: the deterioration and growth because of ter in recent quarters 55 00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:03,640 Speaker 1: has been quite Let me dovetail the four percent. Now 56 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: we're Joyce Chanin of JP Morgan with a four and 57 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:08,880 Speaker 1: a half percent out there for Chinese economic growth. And 58 00:03:08,919 --> 00:03:11,399 Speaker 1: the other four percent was the bombshell in the cover 59 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,520 Speaker 1: of the Times yesterday or the day before the Times 60 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:19,200 Speaker 1: of London of an actual annuity of four point one 61 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 1: percent on a life annuity that's in your Wheelhouse. I mean, 62 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 1: these are all lower numbers than any of our listeners 63 00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:30,880 Speaker 1: comprehend what I mean. It's back up saying we're a 64 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 1: little more optimistic on China. We think so something in 65 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:35,920 Speaker 1: the closest six is still possible in China that still 66 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 1: matters a great deal. But um Japan, Germany, these numbers 67 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,600 Speaker 1: are are notably weak, and we have to accept that 68 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: this is that we will have lower growth going forward 69 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: for quite some time. Populism is part of it. There's 70 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 1: a lot of big trends that are going to change 71 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 1: the dynamics we've been accustomed to. But remember, companies adjust, 72 00:03:57,320 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: and that's what I say all the time. Companies figure 73 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: out how to deal in a different environment, whether it's tariffs, 74 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 1: whether it's technology, whether it's changing changing consumer behaviors. And 75 00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:09,720 Speaker 1: that's what we're trying to decipher. Final question on policy, 76 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 1: and we're going to get a fiscal response in Europe. 77 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: You know, the tolerance for deficit spending is much greater 78 00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:21,360 Speaker 1: than it's been ever And while Germany in particular will 79 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:23,599 Speaker 1: be the last one to want to do that, I 80 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:26,680 Speaker 1: think there's more tolerance now than we've seen before for 81 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:31,240 Speaker 1: any kind of fiscal stimulus that could indeed cause greater deficits. 82 00:04:31,920 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 1: It's it's a very broad based trend in every part 83 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:36,880 Speaker 1: of the globe. Cathy, thank you so much. With a 84 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:54,719 Speaker 1: lot of break thanks helping on today. We've had a 85 00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: lot of news flow, and particularly on Europe. So we 86 00:04:57,040 --> 00:05:00,480 Speaker 1: are advantaged with Meredith Sumter of e Ray your group 87 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:03,599 Speaker 1: to go right to China, right to trade, and we 88 00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 1: can do this with their definitive knowledge of domestic China 89 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 1: and particularly how language is perceived. What will be the 90 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:15,360 Speaker 1: domestic language Bear Sumter of the idea they're gonna let 91 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:19,080 Speaker 1: soybeans and much needed pork into China. How does that 92 00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 1: play in the Chinese press? Great question, Tom, Well, certainly 93 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: Si Jumping will position this as providing relief to China's 94 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:32,880 Speaker 1: domestic market more so than any sort of concession that 95 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:37,320 Speaker 1: he's looking to to provide to President Trump. He's got, 96 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:39,919 Speaker 1: as you know, you know, he's got a very important 97 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:43,279 Speaker 1: political anniversary coming up on October one. This is a 98 00:05:43,320 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 1: sevenoth anniversary of the founding the People's Republic of China. 99 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,119 Speaker 1: So everything is gonna be very carefully stage managed. Uh 100 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:53,359 Speaker 1: And for that reason, actually more so than it was 101 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 1: strategically a move to to get back to talks Beijing. 102 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 1: Let to know that moving forth with a hike in 103 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 1: in tariff rates on October one would be politically unpalatable 104 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: to present She on such an anniversary. And that provided 105 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:16,240 Speaker 1: that first opening, that uh, that got us to where 106 00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: we are now, with Chinese negotiators working on the negotiators 107 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 1: coming over mid this month, followed by cabinet level negotiators 108 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:28,800 Speaker 1: meeting in October. Meredith to understand whether the softening of 109 00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:31,800 Speaker 1: stances is sustainable. We need a better understanding of what 110 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 1: underpins it and if it all comes down to October 111 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 1: first in a national celebration, I don't see that it's 112 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 1: sounding too sustainable, because once you get beyond that, we 113 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:42,440 Speaker 1: back to square one. What are your thoughts about what 114 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 1: underpends it beyond on October first celebration. Certainly we're moving 115 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:52,000 Speaker 1: towards a mini deal. This is not going to be 116 00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:57,119 Speaker 1: a structural improvement to the ballad of relationship. More so, 117 00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: it's going to be both sides. Trump and She both 118 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:03,119 Speaker 1: have in sentenced to avoid an escalation and to seek 119 00:07:03,160 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: economic relief when it's politically feasible to do so, but 120 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,880 Speaker 1: neither side is desperate enough to make the political concessions 121 00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:13,400 Speaker 1: necessary to reach a comprehensive agreement. And I think despite 122 00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:15,720 Speaker 1: the slight lift that we've seen this morning in markets, 123 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:19,160 Speaker 1: slight optimism, you know, I think underlying this there is 124 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: a broader realization among investors that even if you do 125 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:25,600 Speaker 1: get some kind of deal or many deals what we're 126 00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:28,560 Speaker 1: calling it, UH this autumn, this is not going to 127 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 1: result in a structural realignment of the of the two 128 00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: largest economies. The President went on the record yesterday evening 129 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: gets said that he would be open to an interim deal. Meredith, 130 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,720 Speaker 1: What would that include and what would it exclude? This 131 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 1: is a great question because what you hear from the 132 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 1: Chinese side and versus what you hear from the Washington side, 133 00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:52,239 Speaker 1: there's some slight, slight differences there, UH, In that President 134 00:07:52,280 --> 00:07:55,640 Speaker 1: Trump yesterday had mentioned i P as possibly being part 135 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:58,280 Speaker 1: of a mini deal. In order for Beijing to agree 136 00:07:58,320 --> 00:08:02,239 Speaker 1: to any kind of significant P concessions, they would expect 137 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:06,000 Speaker 1: that President Trump would not just delay onward tariff escalation, 138 00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:10,200 Speaker 1: but actually roll back some existing tariffs, which is something 139 00:08:10,240 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 1: that we judge at this stage President Trump is not 140 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 1: interested in moving forth with But you know, again, the 141 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:20,720 Speaker 1: the uptick and agg purchases in exchange for a delay 142 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: of on word teriff escalation and maybe some a few 143 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: licenses given to Huawei. UH. That's pretty much what we expect, Meredith. 144 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 1: We learned last night that the Democrats and Republicans, or 145 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:33,199 Speaker 1: at least the Democrats and President Trump, I should say, 146 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 1: are on the same page against China, doubtful of any 147 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: trade fairness and reciprocity UH. As well for the Communist 148 00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:45,440 Speaker 1: Party in China that Mr G has to attend to 149 00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 1: for the seventieth anniversary. Is the Communist Party all on 150 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 1: the same page? I mean, does he have sort of 151 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 1: a national uniform mistrust as does the president? Well, there 152 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:04,559 Speaker 1: are she domestically has his detractors. There are many within 153 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,839 Speaker 1: policy circles in China that that believe that she has 154 00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:12,000 Speaker 1: made some very big mistakes, such as being too assertive, 155 00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:16,720 Speaker 1: being too confident coming out, and being too aggressive UH 156 00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:20,080 Speaker 1: in it's it's it's aims for global leadership, but also 157 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:23,439 Speaker 1: its plans for for made in China UH and moving 158 00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 1: aggressively in ways that not just put the US gave 159 00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: the US pause, but also other major trading UH partners pause. 160 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:34,120 Speaker 1: So there's some criticism there. But this is what Trump's 161 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: that criticism is that when you have an outside power 162 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 1: that is looking to, in Beijing's views, gang up on 163 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:45,920 Speaker 1: China and forced China to to make moves that she, 164 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:49,920 Speaker 1: jumping is saying, is going to undermine that country's ability 165 00:09:49,960 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 1: to transform its economy in a way that is suitable 166 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: only to China being ganged up on by an outside 167 00:09:57,040 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: imperial power. You can see where this is going. Um 168 00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:03,199 Speaker 1: so he is. We do see that she is using 169 00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 1: that nationalist card, that nationalist sentiment in a way to 170 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,880 Speaker 1: shore up more domestic support for his pathway moving forward. 171 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 1: Let's talk about what may or may not happen at 172 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:14,640 Speaker 1: the back end of next year in the White House. 173 00:10:14,800 --> 00:10:17,960 Speaker 1: It was really interesting watching the Democratic presidential debates last night, 174 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 1: and the views of the Democrats, I have to say, 175 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: didn't seem too different from the view of the President 176 00:10:22,760 --> 00:10:24,520 Speaker 1: when it comes to China and the objective of leveling 177 00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:27,360 Speaker 1: the playing field. There was a great Washington Post piece recently, 178 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:31,319 Speaker 1: a great article in public opinion towards trade, and Democratic 179 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 1: voters are moving towards increasingly a favorable view of trade. Now, 180 00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:37,240 Speaker 1: some people might just say that the partisan shift. The 181 00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:39,840 Speaker 1: article admits to that might be just a shallow view. 182 00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:42,560 Speaker 1: Yet not a single candidate is willing to weaponize it. 183 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:49,040 Speaker 1: Why not? This is something also that we need to 184 00:10:49,040 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: watch us more closely, because if you look at the 185 00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:54,280 Speaker 1: Democratic Party and what the Canada's all said last night, 186 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:57,280 Speaker 1: not a single one of them came out and said 187 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,720 Speaker 1: that they would roll back the protectionist measures that President 188 00:10:59,760 --> 00:11:01,720 Speaker 1: Trump has put in place. They all agreed we need 189 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:05,400 Speaker 1: to do more to negotiate with China and more to 190 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,840 Speaker 1: realign the two economies. I think it's still too early 191 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:13,040 Speaker 1: to say that the Democrats or Democratic voters are moving 192 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:17,000 Speaker 1: toward free trade, but rather what they're saying is they're 193 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:20,000 Speaker 1: recognizing that President Trump's trade agenda has really not come 194 00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 1: up with any concrete winds that is impacting them positively, 195 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: and patience is beginning to run out. One European question, Uh, Meredith, 196 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:31,679 Speaker 1: and then we'll let you go, Midge Raman, on all 197 00:11:31,679 --> 00:11:35,199 Speaker 1: we've observed in the last twenty four hours. You're you're great, midman. 198 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:37,760 Speaker 1: What do you think? What do you think on on 199 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:44,680 Speaker 1: Brexit Europe? You know, the fiscal fiscal policy to the rescue. Yeah, 200 00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:47,240 Speaker 1: so you know, really that the relevant upshot from a 201 00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:51,079 Speaker 1: politics perspective with the ECB easing is that the environment 202 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:54,160 Speaker 1: caused by such easy money means that markets are going 203 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,120 Speaker 1: to be in a more forgiving mood for political risk 204 00:11:57,760 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 1: and you know, talking to Midge, when it comes down 205 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:02,719 Speaker 1: to is that investors need to remain focused on the 206 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:06,800 Speaker 1: stability or fragility of individual countries in case that risk 207 00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:10,400 Speaker 1: appetite reverses quickly. Okay, mere something, thank you so much. 208 00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:27,800 Speaker 1: Thank you, just hugely valuable there and China. Do you 209 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:29,679 Speaker 1: want to bring in Simon? I would love to love 210 00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:34,240 Speaker 1: to get his reaction quite clearly, not his name, Simon 211 00:12:34,280 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: friendship chan Will Gordon, the chief of karmis over there 212 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:38,120 Speaker 1: joining the sound of London. Sim In your view on 213 00:12:38,160 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 1: the data that just dropped a minute or so ago, 214 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:43,920 Speaker 1: I think you're right to focus on the inflationary aspect 215 00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 1: of that. It's um I think markets had a bit 216 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:48,760 Speaker 1: of a shocked and they stay with the core CPI 217 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:51,640 Speaker 1: print and the at least on the three months annualized 218 00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 1: breaking north of three percent, so that caused some anxiety. 219 00:12:55,920 --> 00:12:59,319 Speaker 1: I think this would reassure people that at least in 220 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 1: the net that feels like a healthcare related blip per 221 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:07,080 Speaker 1: seasonal blip rather than a significant push forward on on 222 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 1: import cost inflation. But it's look at all is playing 223 00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:13,040 Speaker 1: into the fact that J. Powell has and the rest 224 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: of them have plenty to absorb. Next week in terms 225 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:21,439 Speaker 1: of trying to tack a path between quite conflicting inflationary data, 226 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 1: we can it's in manufacturing, but ongoing resilience as we 227 00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 1: see in the headline retail sales in the US consumption, 228 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:30,719 Speaker 1: and just keep adjusting the federal funds right low assignment. 229 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:33,199 Speaker 1: They call it a mid cycle adjustment. Typically what we've 230 00:13:33,240 --> 00:13:36,040 Speaker 1: seen at recent history at least, does that suggest over 231 00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:38,760 Speaker 1: the last couple of decades that's about seventy five basis 232 00:13:38,840 --> 00:13:42,080 Speaker 1: points of cuts from the federal reserve? Something is that 233 00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 1: how you characterize frame things for clients right now, that 234 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:46,600 Speaker 1: that's what we're going to get. That is a mid 235 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:50,880 Speaker 1: cycle adjustment, just three cuts. What I'm saying to clients 236 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:54,439 Speaker 1: is that this is not a FED whether it likes 237 00:13:54,480 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 1: it or not, that is entirely data dependent. They may 238 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:00,760 Speaker 1: like to continue to use that terminology. It's beloved of 239 00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 1: many central bankers, but it's it's politically influenced, whether it's 240 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:08,040 Speaker 1: politically compromised as a separate point, but it's certainly politically influenced, 241 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:11,440 Speaker 1: and I think at the moment there is there is 242 00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:13,880 Speaker 1: more inflation in the US economy than the President likes 243 00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 1: to believe. And therefore the delicate path I need to 244 00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 1: be set out is it will just be a mixed 245 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 1: cycle adjustment of the type we saw perhaps last in 246 00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:29,280 Speaker 1: where you try and provide some support to underlying demand 247 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 1: given some sectoral weakness, or will it be something more 248 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:36,640 Speaker 1: perverse and ulter the answer that lies in the White 249 00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: House rather than the Federal Reserve. John I want to 250 00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:40,400 Speaker 1: point out in the tenure, because we're so used to 251 00:14:40,480 --> 00:14:43,960 Speaker 1: quoting yielded on a price basis, the tenure US is 252 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 1: now down three point that's not quite two years of 253 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 1: Cooper and forty basis points on a ten year. In 254 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 1: ten days, we've had a big move. It's a huge move. 255 00:14:57,000 --> 00:14:59,440 Speaker 1: It's a huge move in the context of positioning, and 256 00:14:59,480 --> 00:15:02,200 Speaker 1: I think that's key here, is that what you're seeing 257 00:15:02,240 --> 00:15:06,320 Speaker 1: in terms of the kind of our performance of value 258 00:15:06,400 --> 00:15:09,960 Speaker 1: versus momentum or inequities, which has been triggered by a 259 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 1: re assessment on the bond market, means that positioning was 260 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 1: very much skewed towards I mean I lost count the 261 00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 1: number of analyst notes that came out of talking about 262 00:15:19,800 --> 00:15:23,560 Speaker 1: potential zero percent tenure treasury. They they came out in 263 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:26,680 Speaker 1: a flurry, didn't they. Your positioning set up for that, 264 00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:29,320 Speaker 1: and then you recognize that it is not that simple. 265 00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 1: Then you have to do somewhat of a handbrake turn, 266 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 1: and I think that is what we're now seeing in 267 00:15:33,440 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 1: terms of the price action on the ten year rather 268 00:15:36,840 --> 00:15:39,160 Speaker 1: than just looking at the yields. Simons very quickly here, 269 00:15:39,200 --> 00:15:43,960 Speaker 1: I've got one European question. How did madamal guards Jab 270 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 1: change yesterday? I mean, what does she do November one, 271 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:52,080 Speaker 1: in November two, in November three of what we observed yesterday? 272 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:55,840 Speaker 1: I mean, great question. I think the regional banker, the 273 00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:59,440 Speaker 1: governor's national banks have have alluded to this point during 274 00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: the last twenty for hours. Madame Legarde has been given 275 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:06,920 Speaker 1: a state dependent set of policies from Mario Jargy, that 276 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:09,840 Speaker 1: is his legacy, and it moved away from time dependent 277 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:13,520 Speaker 1: forward guidance. Will she try and pull back from that 278 00:16:13,640 --> 00:16:15,880 Speaker 1: and say that things will change or will she hold 279 00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: that that is the key element that she has to 280 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 1: get across in the first couple of weeks well said 281 00:16:19,840 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 1: in John I literally wrote down in the heat of 282 00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:26,040 Speaker 1: the press conference when he said time dependent has done. 283 00:16:26,080 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 1: I can't remember the exact language, but really important concept 284 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:33,240 Speaker 1: there same in French or Gordon the American economy, John, 285 00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:34,560 Speaker 1: what do you think of the data? I mean yells 286 00:16:34,640 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: higher and look put it together with the data this 287 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:38,760 Speaker 1: week inflation came in a little bit hotter as well. 288 00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:41,480 Speaker 1: It looks like the tone is improved around the trade story. 289 00:16:41,480 --> 00:16:59,760 Speaker 1: I'm not sure how the mood music will adapting. Giles 290 00:16:59,760 --> 00:17:03,000 Speaker 1: turn joins us to talk a little. We works, Giles 291 00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 1: covers a technology in Europe. Joins us on the phone 292 00:17:06,280 --> 00:17:09,240 Speaker 1: from London. Giles, thanks so much for being with us. 293 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:11,679 Speaker 1: You know again, as Tom was suggesting, a lot of 294 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:13,520 Speaker 1: these high profile I p O s this year have 295 00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 1: really underperformed and underwhelmed. What is the thinking going here 296 00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:21,359 Speaker 1: for WE Works? This is this is not without a 297 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:23,640 Speaker 1: lot of hair on it. Just to start with, now, 298 00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:25,760 Speaker 1: we work thinking a lot different from any other I PO. 299 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 1: Just that this company seems to be a lot of 300 00:17:27,200 --> 00:17:29,160 Speaker 1: different from any other company. And you've got to remember 301 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:31,600 Speaker 1: that we work has to IPO. That's the feeling from 302 00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:34,840 Speaker 1: inside the company. It needs cash when the IPOs, it 303 00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:37,200 Speaker 1: needs to raise about three billions, and if it does 304 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:39,560 Speaker 1: that then it gets the further six billion from credit 305 00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:41,679 Speaker 1: lines from the bank and needs all this stuff to 306 00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 1: keep growing at the pace is going. If it doesn't IPO, 307 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 1: then it needs to find capital from the big dove 308 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 1: dove chill. What you just said with fifteen dollars a 309 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:54,359 Speaker 1: share are chief financial course, Aponent Bass says, that's the 310 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:57,320 Speaker 1: chip chat right now, what you just said about three 311 00:17:57,359 --> 00:18:00,240 Speaker 1: billion in cash. Does that equate to anything in the 312 00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:05,240 Speaker 1: vicinity of fifteen dollars this year plus or minus seven cents. Well, 313 00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: I've done, I'm done the math. It needs to be honest, 314 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:12,680 Speaker 1: but it looks it needs to It needs to get 315 00:18:12,680 --> 00:18:16,560 Speaker 1: evaluation of above about really like that's kind of the cap. 316 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 1: Fifteen billion is two low basin investor in all types 317 00:18:20,560 --> 00:18:22,159 Speaker 1: of the bankers trying to push this IPA want to 318 00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:26,480 Speaker 1: invest it. Paul Sweeney thirty Churchill Place, five Merchants Square 319 00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:32,040 Speaker 1: to Minster Court, the Monument, n Hackney Road, twelve Bore Gate, 320 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:36,840 Speaker 1: seventy seven Levenhall Street, Short Ditch near some Tide Place, 321 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:41,560 Speaker 1: thirteen Mirrored Street, the Stage fifty two Bedford Row one, 322 00:18:41,600 --> 00:18:45,360 Speaker 1: twenty more Gate, forty one, Black Friars ten fen Church one. 323 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:48,800 Speaker 1: I can't even get there. They gotta we work at 324 00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:52,080 Speaker 1: Buckingham Palace. They're everywhere in the big market. So, Charles, 325 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:53,840 Speaker 1: you know, one of the what has been some of 326 00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:56,919 Speaker 1: the pushback that you've heard in the marketplace as related 327 00:18:57,000 --> 00:18:59,360 Speaker 1: to we work and kind of walking down the valuation 328 00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 1: and what have you been hearing. Well, there's two kind 329 00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:06,400 Speaker 1: of two threats to this. The first obviously evaluation. I mean, 330 00:19:06,800 --> 00:19:09,960 Speaker 1: you can forgive a lot of government problems with tech companies. 331 00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:11,800 Speaker 1: It seems you've certainly seen it in the past. A 332 00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:14,080 Speaker 1: lot of people are making money. The problem is that 333 00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:16,760 Speaker 1: evaluation is too low. People are losing money. But no 334 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:19,440 Speaker 1: one really everyone will talk to talk about governance. We've 335 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:21,840 Speaker 1: seen today there's plenty of change in the government structure, 336 00:19:21,880 --> 00:19:24,359 Speaker 1: and investors obviously will make a big deal about this. 337 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:26,560 Speaker 1: But when it really comes down to if it was 338 00:19:26,600 --> 00:19:29,120 Speaker 1: going to list the forty seven billion evaluation, no one's 339 00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:31,560 Speaker 1: going to be talking about governance issues. The fact is 340 00:19:31,600 --> 00:19:33,880 Speaker 1: it's still hovering around fifteen and will wait and see 341 00:19:33,920 --> 00:19:36,680 Speaker 1: what happens today if it gets up to twenty full 342 00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:39,719 Speaker 1: disclosure number one poultry right next to where Gail Turners 343 00:19:39,800 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 1: coming from Queen Victoria's Street as well, Giles, do the 344 00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:48,280 Speaker 1: commercial landlords of London, in New York and the other cities, 345 00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:53,040 Speaker 1: is we worked their friend? Well, I don't know. It's 346 00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 1: hard to say at the moment. It's certainly their friend 347 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:58,159 Speaker 1: at the beginning because it's taken up a lot of 348 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:01,280 Speaker 1: demand for for rental based The problem is we workers 349 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:04,440 Speaker 1: managed to sign very long leases, which obviously looks good 350 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: in the short term, but obviously is trying to um 351 00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:11,240 Speaker 1: not pay much rent to begin with and signing very 352 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:13,399 Speaker 1: profitable deal for we work for her three years or 353 00:20:13,400 --> 00:20:15,399 Speaker 1: it doesn't have to pay much that's rent. There's this 354 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:18,040 Speaker 1: huge rent cliff coming. You know when that comes, if 355 00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:20,000 Speaker 1: we work can't pay his bills, then it's gonna be 356 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: no one's trends. I just noticed in New York is 357 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:26,280 Speaker 1: that we work in my living room exactly running out 358 00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:28,800 Speaker 1: the space. So, Giles, you kind of bring up a 359 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,479 Speaker 1: big fundamental issue for the real estate folks, which is 360 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:34,440 Speaker 1: you know, going out and leasing long as we worked 361 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:37,159 Speaker 1: as long term and then you know leasing out the 362 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:40,080 Speaker 1: space to its tennis on a short term basis. That's 363 00:20:40,080 --> 00:20:43,119 Speaker 1: not the way good real estate works, is it. No, 364 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 1: But that's the argument that we were making. Is not 365 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:48,399 Speaker 1: going to be like every other company. The idea is 366 00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:52,040 Speaker 1: that the attitude of people's work environment is changing. People 367 00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:54,400 Speaker 1: don't want to do job, you know, jobs to life anymore. 368 00:20:54,400 --> 00:20:56,159 Speaker 1: People are happy to work. The startups have to have 369 00:20:56,240 --> 00:20:59,920 Speaker 1: high turnover. That the argument is pushing very quickly. Gil. 370 00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: What happens Monday? I mean they get to the weekend, 371 00:21:02,640 --> 00:21:05,040 Speaker 1: everybody regroups. Are you waiting to hear in London or 372 00:21:05,040 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: New York from soft Bank or what's the next next? Yeah? 373 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:10,280 Speaker 1: I mean if that'd be the key thing. I mean 374 00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:12,480 Speaker 1: what soft Bank thinks about this being one with may 375 00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:15,040 Speaker 1: Shihold is just going to be key. Um. Well, if 376 00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 1: it's happy with this, then fine, I can spect to 377 00:21:17,119 --> 00:21:19,520 Speaker 1: my get away twenty. But if it's not, then they'll 378 00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: be more arguments to come over the weekend. I bet 379 00:21:22,040 --> 00:21:24,639 Speaker 1: Gail's turner brilliant update, thank you, thank you out of 380 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:27,720 Speaker 1: London as well, and we forget that the wee company 381 00:21:27,760 --> 00:21:46,680 Speaker 1: is uh truly international. This is a good Friday conversation, 382 00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:50,680 Speaker 1: which is after we saw yesterday Qui infinity, Paul. It's 383 00:21:50,720 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 1: open to debate how far out that goes. Let's talk 384 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:58,000 Speaker 1: about financial repression Infinity Brain Railings with Wells Fargo, Institute 385 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:01,320 Speaker 1: of St. Louis and Brian thrilled to have you with 386 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:03,000 Speaker 1: us here in the New York studios. And I want 387 00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:04,600 Speaker 1: to go back to a Bill Gross phrase, which is 388 00:22:04,640 --> 00:22:07,840 Speaker 1: financial repression, which can be either the negative real rates 389 00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:10,639 Speaker 1: we have are the very low nominal real rates that 390 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:14,600 Speaker 1: investors face in the United States? Does it go on forever? 391 00:22:14,920 --> 00:22:19,440 Speaker 1: Do we do we have to invest assuming forever this 392 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:23,080 Speaker 1: low rate environment? Well, for the time being, it certainly 393 00:22:23,119 --> 00:22:26,960 Speaker 1: appears that way. I think what you saw out of 394 00:22:26,960 --> 00:22:29,160 Speaker 1: the e c B and you're seeing from the other 395 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:35,280 Speaker 1: central banks is this strong desire to see fiscal policy 396 00:22:35,880 --> 00:22:39,600 Speaker 1: try to pull us out of UH. But who's gonna 397 00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:42,200 Speaker 1: help the savor? I mean it, Wells Fargo, with all 398 00:22:42,240 --> 00:22:45,159 Speaker 1: of your sprawl, the saver is flat under back, not 399 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:48,880 Speaker 1: like in Europe. I get that. That's terrible. What does 400 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:52,000 Speaker 1: a savor do on a September weekend when they have 401 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:56,440 Speaker 1: to find a real yield? Well, I think, and this 402 00:22:56,480 --> 00:22:59,200 Speaker 1: has been my thought for a while here. I think 403 00:22:59,240 --> 00:23:02,000 Speaker 1: what we're going to see, and we have been seeing, 404 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:06,480 Speaker 1: is this demand for yields. So the savers are going 405 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:08,840 Speaker 1: to start taking a little bit more risk because they 406 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:13,399 Speaker 1: have to find yields. So you're gonna have UM securities 407 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:16,440 Speaker 1: like preferred securities that one of the best performing fixed 408 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:24,560 Speaker 1: income sectors this year, UH dividends stocks, MLPs, reats UM. 409 00:23:24,600 --> 00:23:27,080 Speaker 1: I mean, those are the type of securities I think 410 00:23:27,119 --> 00:23:32,280 Speaker 1: these savers are going to gravitate to UM. You're causing 411 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:36,520 Speaker 1: savers to take more risk than they should otherwise probably 412 00:23:36,520 --> 00:23:39,159 Speaker 1: be taking, but they really don't have any other choice 413 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:41,840 Speaker 1: if they want some income here. So, Brian, I mean 414 00:23:42,320 --> 00:23:45,320 Speaker 1: Wells Fargo fifteen thousand brokers all over the country. I 415 00:23:45,359 --> 00:23:46,960 Speaker 1: know you probably spend a lot of your time on 416 00:23:47,000 --> 00:23:49,560 Speaker 1: the road visiting with those financial advisors and their clients. 417 00:23:50,119 --> 00:23:52,879 Speaker 1: Are they when you go to those offices across the country, 418 00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 1: are they willing to take that risk or do you 419 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:57,440 Speaker 1: think they maybe taking too much risk here as they 420 00:23:57,440 --> 00:23:59,600 Speaker 1: search for yield And we could be getting in a 421 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:02,440 Speaker 1: little bit the specuative situation. I mean, it all depends 422 00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:04,960 Speaker 1: on the client's situation, and I think this is what 423 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:08,280 Speaker 1: you're seeing in the broader market to right. So for 424 00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:12,520 Speaker 1: those clients that have accumulated enough wealth, right they're not 425 00:24:12,560 --> 00:24:14,720 Speaker 1: going to take the risk. You know, they're gonna hang 426 00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 1: out in short term securities, safe securities For clients that 427 00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:24,480 Speaker 1: are maybe inner approaching retirement, that maybe having saved uh 428 00:24:24,520 --> 00:24:27,160 Speaker 1: the amount they need to save and they need that income, 429 00:24:27,640 --> 00:24:29,600 Speaker 1: they're gonna be forced to take the risk. And so 430 00:24:29,640 --> 00:24:33,720 Speaker 1: we're trying to find ways for those types of clients, 431 00:24:33,840 --> 00:24:36,720 Speaker 1: uh to take a little bit more calculated risk, but 432 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:38,640 Speaker 1: it's still risk, don't get me wrong. So what are 433 00:24:38,640 --> 00:24:41,240 Speaker 1: some of the areas that you're finding or you're suggesting 434 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:45,680 Speaker 1: that your private wealth clients look for enhanced yield? Well, 435 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:48,080 Speaker 1: I mean I kind of go back to prefers again. 436 00:24:48,320 --> 00:24:50,400 Speaker 1: This is an area we've been pretty favorable on. They're 437 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:54,239 Speaker 1: getting more expensive, Um, no doubt. I think they're up 438 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:58,280 Speaker 1: over fourteen percent this year. And uh, really these securities 439 00:24:58,280 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 1: bought for the income, not for the totally return right. Um, 440 00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 1: but I mean still five to five and a half percent, 441 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:10,240 Speaker 1: where the underlying credit is a quality credit and you're 442 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:14,680 Speaker 1: getting the dividends treated dividend treatment, right. Major shoutout in 443 00:25:14,680 --> 00:25:16,520 Speaker 1: New York to Chris Whalen has been way out front 444 00:25:16,520 --> 00:25:18,800 Speaker 1: as you have in the preferred story as well. I 445 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:21,280 Speaker 1: mean I don't think well as far Ago is gonna 446 00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:23,000 Speaker 1: advocate for a hundred year bond, and we know what 447 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:25,439 Speaker 1: the Austrian pieces done in the yield back up. But 448 00:25:25,520 --> 00:25:28,639 Speaker 1: I got a forty seven year French piece with a 449 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:32,560 Speaker 1: one in three quarters percent coupon. They're giving it away today, Paul, 450 00:25:32,600 --> 00:25:35,119 Speaker 1: with a hundred and thirty two price that's enough to 451 00:25:35,160 --> 00:25:38,080 Speaker 1: make El Goldman choke. Uh. And and the yield is 452 00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:41,680 Speaker 1: point eight eight point eight nine percent And Brian, I 453 00:25:41,680 --> 00:25:45,160 Speaker 1: have enjoyed an eleven percent decline in this puppy over 454 00:25:45,200 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 1: the last three or four weeks as well. Are we 455 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: set in retail up to get killed with this bond 456 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: extension of a US fifty year piece. At some point 457 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:56,240 Speaker 1: they're all gonna roll over and take an eleven percent 458 00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 1: hitting a cup of coffee. I don't think a retail 459 00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 1: is buying these types of who's buying cur who's buying 460 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:07,240 Speaker 1: them uh, ascid liability matchers, right, pension funds, UM institutions 461 00:26:07,480 --> 00:26:13,320 Speaker 1: UH and UH clients or institutions that need to have 462 00:26:13,400 --> 00:26:17,200 Speaker 1: index exposure where these are there? So, but retails not 463 00:26:17,320 --> 00:26:21,120 Speaker 1: buying government elongated big story in your life, in my life, 464 00:26:21,119 --> 00:26:23,560 Speaker 1: in Paul's life, is in the Times of London this week. 465 00:26:24,040 --> 00:26:27,080 Speaker 1: The life annuity yield in the United Kingdom is in 466 00:26:27,119 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 1: the vicinity of four point one percent. I got a 467 00:26:30,080 --> 00:26:34,480 Speaker 1: forty seven year French coupon trading under one percent. We're 468 00:26:34,520 --> 00:26:38,960 Speaker 1: given out four point one percent. What's the actual assumption 469 00:26:39,080 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: for our listeners in the Brian Railey world. I don't know. 470 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:48,160 Speaker 1: I mean be four I mean, honestly, you know, four 471 00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:51,240 Speaker 1: or four percent type of returns over the long term 472 00:26:51,280 --> 00:26:54,639 Speaker 1: doesn't sound so bad these days, right, I mean I 473 00:26:54,640 --> 00:26:57,159 Speaker 1: don't I don't know when what's the what's the driver 474 00:26:57,400 --> 00:27:02,480 Speaker 1: to get um grow moving and returns moving fair, fair, 475 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:04,920 Speaker 1: to go right to productivity and economic It just means 476 00:27:05,080 --> 00:27:09,160 Speaker 1: you have to work longer, Tom. That's all Tom thought today, 477 00:27:09,200 --> 00:27:10,680 Speaker 1: was it. He was just gonna, you know, right off 478 00:27:10,680 --> 00:27:14,680 Speaker 1: and go to in Jamaica. But no, you gotta keep working. 479 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: You have to earn that return. Brian, What's when you 480 00:27:16,680 --> 00:27:18,880 Speaker 1: go out and talk to people at Well's far ago? 481 00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:22,320 Speaker 1: What do you hear from people that you know that's 482 00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:25,560 Speaker 1: not they romantically want the old days of nine c 483 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:28,880 Speaker 1: d s or nine percent annuities, seven percent city or that. 484 00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:33,800 Speaker 1: But what do people actually say about the mill you 485 00:27:33,840 --> 00:27:36,919 Speaker 1: we're in well, I think, I mean we've been here 486 00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:38,920 Speaker 1: for a while now, so people have kind of become 487 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:42,200 Speaker 1: accustomed to So we used to get a lot more questions, 488 00:27:42,680 --> 00:27:45,680 Speaker 1: you know, five, seven, eight years ago than we do today. 489 00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:49,000 Speaker 1: So people have adjusted. I'd say the bulk of the 490 00:27:49,119 --> 00:27:52,840 Speaker 1: questions we get today. UM, take it to the extreme. 491 00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:56,920 Speaker 1: People are actually working about rates going negative. Right, so 492 00:27:57,359 --> 00:28:03,200 Speaker 1: you know these two two and a half percent type yields. Um, 493 00:28:03,240 --> 00:28:05,800 Speaker 1: you know they're more worried about the extremes here than 494 00:28:05,920 --> 00:28:07,800 Speaker 1: really I mean, if you become accustomed to this little 495 00:28:07,960 --> 00:28:10,359 Speaker 1: as well, Fargo have a belief on this vector. Moving 496 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:13,480 Speaker 1: down to JP Morgan Young always making a huge splash 497 00:28:13,600 --> 00:28:16,480 Speaker 1: with a model, not a forecast, but a model. They 498 00:28:16,520 --> 00:28:20,400 Speaker 1: could drive us under one percent ten year yield even lower. Oh, 499 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:23,359 Speaker 1: I think certainly we could see you know, the ten 500 00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:26,399 Speaker 1: year fall below one percent. What would it take it 501 00:28:26,440 --> 00:28:32,639 Speaker 1: would take, yeah, I mean probably a recession and probably um, 502 00:28:32,680 --> 00:28:36,480 Speaker 1: you know, of somewhat meaningful slowdown, but we can definitely 503 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:39,440 Speaker 1: get there. I mean we're kind of do for one right, Okay, Brian, really, 504 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:42,920 Speaker 1: thank you so much. With Wills Fargo their institute talking 505 00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:48,560 Speaker 1: about the world of fixed income as well. Thanks for 506 00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:53,040 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to 507 00:28:53,240 --> 00:28:58,960 Speaker 1: interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. 508 00:28:59,480 --> 00:29:02,840 Speaker 1: I'm on Winter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You 509 00:29:02,880 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio