WEBVTT - SoftBank and OpenAI's Dangerous Game

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Media greetums. I'm at xytron and this is better offline.

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>In my last episode, I started by telling you about

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a report from the analyst wing of a major bank,

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>TD Cohen that revealed how Microsoft had drastically pulled back

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on its plans to build new data center capacity. At

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a bare minimum, Microsoft had canceled the equivalent of every

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>data center in London or Tokyo at least, that the

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>real figure is actually probably much much higher, and as

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I pointed out, that this is a real pale horse,

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a harbinger of bad times through generative AI and open

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>AI especially, and an indicator that the bubble is imploding

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>or popping or I really don't want to say it's popped,

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and I actually don't know if it's necessary to say

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>when it does, it's never going to be one thing.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I also mentioned that some may interpret this movie as

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a sponds to open AI's Stargate project, which aims to

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>build hundreds of billions of dollars of data centers and

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>power generation facilities in the US, all to power generator

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>FAI apps and tools that I'm not sure actually there's

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>really the demand for. But this begs the question how

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>feasible is the Stargate project. Let's start with a bit

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of background. The Stargate project was officially announced that the

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very beginning of the Trump presidency. Is open AI tried

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to court favor from the notoriously transactional and praise hungry

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>person of the United States of America, despite that the

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>project has been in the works for some time and

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>open AI had previously courted the Biden administration. Sam Allman's

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>previous pitch to that administration late last year was that

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it was necessary to build a five gigaw what data center.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how big Stargate will be, just that

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>it will initially involve spending one hundred billion dollars due

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and I quote developed data centers for artificial intelligence in

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the US according to the information, with the project potentially

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>scaling to five hundred billion dollars, a truly fucking, astoundingly

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>stupid number. Stargate's first and only data center deal currently

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>signed is in Abilene, Texas, and it's expected to be

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>operational in mid twenty twenty six. Though these centers usually

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>become operational in phases, this is especially likely to be

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the case here considering that, according to the information. Open

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Ai plans to have access to a gigawat of power

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on hundreds of thousands of GPUs. As part of this,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Stargate project will construct a three hundred and sixty

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>point five megawatt natural gas power station. And as I

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>said last episode, that one's about power. This power station is,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, still in the permitting phase.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It'll be some time before Stargate breaks ground on the facility,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>let alone starts to actually generate power. Now, as for funding,

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>things have got a little weird. Both open ai and

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank have committed to putting in either eighteen billion

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>or nineteen million dollars each into the project. I've seen

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>both numbers reported, by the way. Regardless, it's not that

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>big a difference to worry about, especially with well the

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that open ai does not really have the money

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>either way. What's a billion dollars when you don't have anything.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The company is currently trying to raise forty billion dollars

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>at a two hundred sixty billion dollar valuation, with the

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>quote CNBC part of the funding expected to be used

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for open AI's commitment to Stargate. Now, I'm old enough

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to remember when this round was previously rumored to be

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>valuing open Ai at three hundred and forty billion dollars

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and also at three hundred billion dollars, and soft Bank

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>appears to be taking full responsibility for raising the round,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>including syndicating as much as ten billion dollars of the amount,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>which means that it would include a group of other investors. Nevertheless,

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it certainly seems SoftBank will provide the majority of the

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>capital thirty billion dollars, with CNBC reporting that it will

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be paid out over the next twelve to twenty four months,

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>with the first payment coming as soon as spring. Soft

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Bank also has another problem, and this one's this one.

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think even the least technical of you can understand.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They also appear to not have the money. They don't

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have the money. They not the money to give open Ai,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not the money for Stargate. It's a little bit of

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>worrying math issues with this. According to the Information, SoftBank

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO Masayoshi's Sun is planning to borrow sixteen billion dollars

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to invest in Ai, and may borrow another eight billion

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars next year. The following points, by the way, are

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>drawn from the Information's reporting, and I give serious props

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to Duro Osawa and Corey Weinberg for their hard work here.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I attack the information sometimes with some of the framing,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but they actually do some of the best reporting in

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>tech journalism. Now let's do some maths. Soft Bank currently

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>only has thirty one billion dollars in cash and its

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet as of December twenty twenty four. It's net debt,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>which despite what you think, does not measure total debt,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but rather represents its cash minus any debt liabilities, sounds

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at twenty nine billion dollars. They plan to use the

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>loaning question to finance part of their investment in open Ai,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and there are acquisition of chip design firm Ampere. According

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to SoftBank's reported assets, its holdings are worth about two

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nineteen billion dollars, so thirty three point sixty

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>six trillion yen for those of you who deal with yen,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>including stock in companies like Alibaba and ARM. On a

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>side note, not every company in soft Bank's portfolio is

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>an arm or an Alibaba or like a good one.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>There are some real stinkers too, and I'm not just

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Morrobon carcass of we work. I recommend

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at and I'll link to the list in

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the episode of notes SoftBank's recent group report, which is

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>linked in the spreadsheet. Like I just said, which is

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>me reading a script out a little behind the curtain

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for you there. In particular, got to twenty nine in

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the report, which lists the ten largest publicly traded companies

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in soft Bank's Vision Fund portfolio. Now how all of them,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>without exception trade at a significant fraction of their peak market cap.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>In simpler terms, the ten biggest companies in soft Bank's

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>flagship tech fund are worth far far less than their

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all time high, and in some cases with less than

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>one fifth of their all time high. If soft Bank

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>liquidated its assets, and I admit this is a big

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ear for most likely a worst case scenario situation, how

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>big would their losses be? Separately, SoftBank has committed to

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a joint venture called SBO open Ai Japan and to

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>spend three billion dollars a year on open Ai. Is

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>take for the various companies across its group. We'll talk

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about that later, but there's some napkin mass. It is

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what soft Banks agreed to sixteen billion dollars sorry, eighteen

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars or nineteen billion dollars really do not know

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in funding for the Stargate Data Center project, three billion

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year in spend on open ai software, and

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as thirty billion dollars in funding for open

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Ai paid over twelve to twenty four months, according to

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Information, and by the way, twenty five billion has

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>also been reported. But the Information reports that open Ai

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>has told investors that soft Bank will provide it at

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>least thirty billion dollars of the forty billion dollars they need.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Jesus fucking Christ. Can you imagine if this went It's

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>something useful anyway, What I'm getting at is that soft

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Bank has effectively agreed to bankroll the entirety of open

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>AI's future, signing up for over forty six billion dollars

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of investments over the next few years, and does not

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>appear to be able to do so without selling its

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>current holdings in valuable companies like arm or taking at

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>least sixteen billion dollars of debt this year, representing a

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent increase of its current liabilities. Work still,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks to disagreement, open AI's future both in its ability

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to expand its infrastructure, which appears to be entirely contingent

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on the construction of Stargate with Microsoft pulling out, and

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>its ability to raise funding, which is also entirely dependent

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on soft bank and soft Bank in this case, where

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>open ai is entirely dependent on soft Bank to live,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>must borrow money to give to open Ai, a company

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that only only loses money. On top of that, open

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Ai also on the money losing front, anticipates it will

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>burn as much as forty billion dollars a year by

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight, and projects to only turn a profit

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the decade after the build out

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of Stargate, which I add is, like I said, almost

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>entirely dependent on soft bank, which has to take on

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>debt to fund both open Ai and the project required

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to theoretically make open ai profitable. How the fuck does

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this work? How does this work? How does this work?

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>How does this work? How the fuck does this work?

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai, a company that spent nine billion dollars to

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>lose five billion dollars in twenty twenty four, requires so

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>much money to be its obligations, both to cover its stupid, ruinous, unprofitable,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable operations and the eighteen billion to nineteen billion dollars.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>A committed to keep growing that it has to raise

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.679
<v Speaker 1>more money than any startup ever raised in history, forty

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>billion fucking dollars, with the cast iron guarantee that it

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>will need even more money within a year. Every goddamn month,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Sam Wilton has to go to someone and say, my huge,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>beautiful company is so powerful, but it's weak and sick

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and frail. I need more money than you have today,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'll need more money than you'll have tomorrow. My

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>company is so sick and weak, but it's the most

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful company of all time. Sam flipping off pisces me off.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if this money went literally anywhere else, you could

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>set it on fire at least be fucking warm. Soft Bank.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>On top of the thirty billion dollars of funding and

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars a year of revenue it's committed to,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>open ai itself also has to cough up eighteen billion

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars for Stargate, the data center project that open ai

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>will run and get this. Soft Bank will take financial

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for forty eight billion dollars in cash three billion

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue. You the latter of which, like all

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>open AI's offerings, will lose the company money. Open Ai

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>has no path to profitability guaranteeing it will need more

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>cash and right now at the time time, and it

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>needs it more than it's ever needed it. Soft Bank,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the only company willing to provide it and possibly the

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>only company with the money to do so, has proven

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that it will have to go to greet possibly ruinous

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>lengths to do so. If open ai needs forty billion

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in twenty twenty five, how much will it need

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six fifty billion, one hundred billion dollars.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Where is that money going to come from? While soft

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Bank might be able to do this once, what happens

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when open ai needs money in six to twelve months.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Soft Bank made about fifteen billion dollars a profit in

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the last year on about forty six billion dollars of revenue.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Three billion dollars is an absolutely obscene amount to commit

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to buying open ai software annually, especially when some of

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it is allegedly for access to open AI's barely functional

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>operator and mediocre deep research products. As per my previous

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and pieces, I do not see how open ai survives,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and soft Bank's involvement only gives me further concern. While

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>soft banker theoretically burn its current holdings to fund open

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Ai in perpetuity, its ability to do so is cast

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>into doubt by them having to borrow money from other

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>banks to get into this funding ground and to get

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Stargate done. Open Ai burned five billion dollars in twenty

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, a number it will likely double in twenty

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. And remember the information reported that open ai

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was projected to spend thirteen billion dollars on compute alone

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft in twenty twenty five, and has no path

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to profitability. SoftBank has already had to borrow to fund

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this round, and the fact that it had to do

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so suggests its inability to continue supporting open Ai without

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>accruing further debt. Open Ai. As a result of Microsoft's cuts,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the data center capacity now only has one path expansion

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>once it runs through whatever remaining buildout Microsoft has planned.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, and that's Stargate, a project funded by open

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>AI's contribution, which it's receiving from SoftBank and SoftBank which

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>is also having to take out loans to meet its share.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>How does this work exactly? How does this continue? Do

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you see anyone else stepping up to fund this. Who

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>else has got thirty to forty billion dollars to shit

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>out every year? While the answer is Saudi Arabia. SoftBank's

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO Massioshi Son recently said that he had had and

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I quote not given Saudi ruler Muhammed bin Salmon in

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>our return, adding that he still owed him. That's really

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>not the ideal thing you want to say after naming MBS.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Nothing about this suggests that Saudi money will follow soft

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>banks in anywhere near the volume necessary. As to the

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>m ratis. They're already involved through the MGX fund, and

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear how much more they'd be willing to commit. Really, really,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>are really, mate, buddy fellow? How does this? How does

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this work? In my opinion, this open Ai soft Bank

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>deal is wildly unsustainable, dependent on soft Bank continuing to

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>raise both debt and funnel money directly into a company

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that burns it burns it by the billions every year,

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's said to only burn more thanks to the

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>arrival of its latest bullshit model. And if it had

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge breakthrough that would change everything. Wouldn't Microsoft want

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to make sure they were building the data center capacity

0:11:52.800 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to support him? Hey, maybe they're not. Now. Perhaps this

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy level of spending would be necessary if open ai

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was still the leader in generator of AI and it

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>was still meaningfully improving its capabilities year after year or

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>two year after two years. And I think we all

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>know that that isn't the case. A few weeks ago,

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>open ai launched GPT four point five, it's latest model

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that well, this isn't brilliant, sam Alman says, and I quote,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is the first model that feels like talking to a

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful person, which, by the way, is really funny. It's

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really funny to say it, to be like, yeah, I

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have spent billions of dollars telling you that this bullshit

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is like a person, but this one really is. The

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>other one's not so much. I did not think that

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And it's not obvious what GPT four

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>point five does better, or even really what it does,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>other than Altman saying it is a different kind of

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and there's a magic to it that he has

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not felt before. Wow, wow, really really inspirational stuff. Sammy

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>fucking idiot. This was, by the way, in Altman's words,

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the good news. The bad news was that and I

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>quote GPT four point five is a giant expensive model,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>adding the open Ai was out of GPUs, but proudly

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>declaring that it had added tens of thousands of GPUs

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in the week following and would roll out to open aiyes,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a month plus here and that they would

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be adding hundreds of thousands of GPUs soon. Excited. Well,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be on top of a vague product set

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and interterminately high compute cost. GPT four point five costs

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>developers an incredible seventy five dollars put million input tokens

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in those are the prompts and data pushed into the model,

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and of absolutely astounding one hundred and fifty dollars per

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>million output tokens. That's the output it creates. And that's

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>roughly three thousand percent more for input tokens and fifteen

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent more expensive for output tokens than GPT four

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to zero For results that open Aiyes, andre J. Caapathy

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>described as a little bit better and awesome, but also

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not exactly that are trivial to point to, and one

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>developer described GPT four point five to our technica as

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a lemon when comparing its reported performance to its price.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Arstentnaca also reported the GPT four point five was terrible

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for coding relatively speaking, and other tests showed that the

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>model's performance was either slightly better or slightly worse across

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the board. With that according to Ours Technica, one success

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>metric being the open ai found open human evaluators preferred

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>GPT four point five's responses of a GPT four to

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>zero in about fifty seven percent of interactions. Wow, that's

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>very underwhelming. So, just to be crystal clear, the biggest

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>AI company's latest model appears to be even more ruinously

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>expensive than its last one, while providing modest at best

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>improvements and performing worse than several benchmarks done competing models

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>very good. Despite these piss poor results, Sam Wultman's reaction

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was to bring in hundreds of thousands of GPUs as

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a means of exposing as many as people as possible

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to his mediocre, ultra expensive model. And the best that

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Altman has to offer is that this is the first

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>time people have been emailing with such passion asking open

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ai to promise to never stop offering a specific model.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I am just going to say this. That is a tweet,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and it never happened, or it happened like once. This

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is some girlfriend in Canada share Sam Altman is washed

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>when all of this falls apart, Remember I said he

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was washed? Now, Remember how I talked about open AI's

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>lack of meaningful improvement as a reminder, GPT four point

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>five was meant to be GPT five, but, according to

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal, continually failed to make a model

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that advanced enough to justify the enormous cost, with a

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>six month training run costing five hundred million dollars and

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>GPT four point five requiring multiple runs of different sizes.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, open ai spent hundreds of millions of dollars

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to make this great stuff. And I haven't even mentioned

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the company's supported agent products. And no, I'm not talking

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about Operator, which is also dogshit. By the way, open

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ai wants to create tiers of AI agents, with the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>cheapest costing two thousand dollars a month and capable of

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>handling it administrative tasks, and the most expensive costing twenty

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars in having PhD level, Look, I wrote the

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>script right, and I'm gonna be honest. I can't even

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>read that sentence with a straight face. Operator cannot even

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>search trip Advisor properly. It can't even do a thing

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that let me google that for you does. And these

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>chunder fucks want to charge two thousand dollars a month

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for an agent that does what does some sort of

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what's it dou?

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Twenty thousand dollars for something with PhD level capabilities. I

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>think all the people with PhDs listen to this have

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just stood up and gone, I have an idea. And

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this is insane on many levels, not simply because the

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>base product is undercut by actual human workers in many

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, and even PhD students are typically

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I only paid twenty thousand to thirty thousand a year

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on average, and even people with actual doctorates in industries

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>really earn twenty thousand dollars a month unless they're working

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley occupying a C suite job. But forget

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all about that. What does it mean to have a

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>PhD level agent? Remember? Other lambs are guessing machines. They

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything or even understand the concepts behind the

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>words they spit onto a page. No, seriously, Sammy, what

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>does it mean? I'm fucking waiting you damp Goblin you pissant. Ah,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe I shouldn't just site here instarting him wanker. Anyway, This,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is the company that is about to

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>raise forty billion dollars led by a Japanese bank that

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>has to go into debt to fund both their operations

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and the infrastructure necessary for them to grow any further. Again,

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as we started with, Microsoft is canceling plans to massively

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>expand its data center capacity right at the time when

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>open ai just released its most computationally demanding model. Ever,

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you reconcile those two things without concluding either

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft expects GBT four point five to be a

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>flop although it's simply unwilling to continue bankrolling open AI's

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>continued growth, or perhaps it's having doubts about the future

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of generative AI in general. Hmm. Maybe now I have

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>been and remain hesitant to call the bubble bursting, because

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>bubbles do not burst, really, they certainly don't burst in

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>neat little events. Nevertheless, my pale horses I've predicted in

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the past were led by one specific call that reduction

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and capital expenditures by a hyperscaler was a sign that

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>things were collapsing. Microsoft walking away from over a gigawatt

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of data center plans equivalent to as much as fourteen

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of its current data center capacity, is a direct

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>sign that it does not believe that growth is there

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>in generative AI, and thus they are not building the

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure to support it, and indeed may have overbuilt something,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>as I've mentioned that Microsoft CEO Sachinidella has directly foreshadowed

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>in his interview with Dwarkesh and otherwise extremely boring waste

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of an hour of your life. The entirety of the

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tech industry and the AI bubble has been built on

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the assumption that generative AI was the next big growth

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for tech, and if Microsoft, the largest purchaser of

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia GPUs in the most aggressive builder of AI infrastructure,

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is reducing capacity, it heavily suggests that the growth is

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not there. Microsoft has, by the looks of things, effectively

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>given up on further data center expansion, at least at

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the breakneck pay suit runs promised, and that even suggests

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>that generator if AI will be a thing in a

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>few years, definitely not the scale it is right now.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>AI boosters will email me and they'll say there's something

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know that in fact, Microsoft has some

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>greater strategy and some efficiency play. But answer me this,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is Microsoft canceling over a giga? What of data

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>set expansion? And again this is the most conservative estimate.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The realistic number is much much higher. Do you think

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>it's because it expects there to be this dramatic demand

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for the AI services? Do you think it's reducing supply

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because of all the demand? Now you might think that

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this is an efficiency play they're playing with deep SIG right, No, sorry,

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter. Even if deep CG was this magical

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>efficiency play, which it may or may not be. I

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>actually think it is more efficient, Like that's true, but

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually don't know if it's profitable. Even then, they've

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>been talking about not having the capacity to deal with demand.

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>They've been talking about how incredible this is. They've been

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about how big this is gonna be. This sounds

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like they don't think it's gonna big, gonna be big.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Even it's gonna big, they're gonna get my ass in

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the comments on that one. Now, one might argue that

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's reduction and capacity build out it's just the sign

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>that open AI is moving its compute elsewhere. Maybe that's true.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And if starguate ever gets built, which I question anyway,

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>here are some questions to ask. Microsoft still sells access

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to open AI's API through asure. Does it not see

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the growth in that product? Do they not see it?

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not expanding? Is the growth not there? And Microsoft still,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>one would assume, makes money off of open AI's compute expenses,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>right or is that not the case due to the

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>vast seventy five percent discount the open ai gets on

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>using its services. I have been told that it's very

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>close to the wire by sources, but I can't say it.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>But you'd have to just look at the fact that

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they do actually do that was reported by the information.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Look look what that Microsoft making. So which a material

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>pullback on data center expansions suggests that the growth in

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>generative AI products, both those run on Microsoft servers and

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>those sold as part of Microsoft's products, do not have

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the revolutionary growth trajectory that both CFO Amhood and CEO

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of sach Inadella have been claiming. And this is all

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>deeply concerning, while also calling into consideration the viability of

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>generative AI as a growth vehicle for any hyperscaler. If

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I am correct, Microsoft is walking away not just from

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>expansion of its current data center operations, but from generative AI,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>writ large. I actually believe it will continue selling this unprofitable,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable software because the capacity it has right now is

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>more than sufficient to deal with the incredible lack of demand.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It's time for investors in the general public to begin

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>demanding tangible, direct numbers on the revenue and profits related

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to GENERATIVEAI, as it is becoming increasingly obvious that the

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>revenues are small and the profits are non existent. A

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.479
<v Speaker 1>gigawatt of capacity is huge, and walking away from that

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>much capacity is a direct signal that Microsoft's long term

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>plans do not include needing a great deal of compute.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>One counter could be that it's waiting for more of

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the specialized nvideo GPUs to arrive, to which the response

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is Microsoft still wants to build the capacity, so it

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>has somewhere to fucking put them again, These facilities take

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between three and six years to build. Do you

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>really think black will be so delayed that they won't

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>arrive until what twenty twenty eight? Ways, what are you

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about? From even alive then? Anyway, One counter could

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>be that there isn't the power necessary to power these

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>data centers, and if that's the case, it isn't but

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>let me human the idea.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Then.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>The suggestion is that Microsoft is currently changing its entire

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>data center's strategy so significantly they now has to issue

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>over a giga what's worth of statements of intent across

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the country to different places because of more power. There's

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>more power in those places, less than did they make

0:22:47.640 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like a giga what worth of mistakes? Now? Okay. Another

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>counter is that I'm only talking about leases and not purchases.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>In that case, I'll refer you to this article from CBRE,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>which is linked in the spreadsheet for this episode, and

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which includes a looser dating read on how hyperscalers actually

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>invest in data center infrastructure. Leases tend to account for

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the majority of spending simply because it's less risky. A

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>specialist takes care of the tough stuff location buying, land handling, construction,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and the hyperscaler isn't left trying to figure out what

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to do with the facility when it reaches the end

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of it's the useful life cycle. I also expect someone

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to chime in and say well, that's this Microsoft, What

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about Google and Amazon? Get out of my house. I'd

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>counter and say that these companies are comparatively less exposed

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to general IFAI. Amazon has invested eight billion dollars in Anthropic,

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a bit less than half of what Microsoft

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is reportedly invested in open Ai, which amounted to about

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen billion dollars as of December. When you consider the

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>discounted asure rates Microsoft offers to open ai too, the

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>real number is probably my much much higher. Google also

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>has three billion dollars in Anthropic, in addition to its

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>own AI services like Gemini. Open Ai, as I noted

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in my last newsletter, is pretty much the only real

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>generative AI company with market share and significant revenue, although

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I once again remind you that revenue is not the

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing as profim and this is true across mobile

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>web and likely it's APIs two. Similarly, nobody has quite

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pushed generative AI as aggressively as Microsoft, which has introduced

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it to an overwhelming number of its paid products, hiking

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>prices for customers as it goes. I suppose you could

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>say that Google has pushed GENII into its workspace products

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>as well as its sarch products, but the scale and

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>aggression of Microsoft's push feels different that, and as I've

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned repeatedly, they are the largest purchaser of Nvidia GPUs

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>by nearly twice as many four hundred and eighty five

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand as its nearest competitor to Meta, which brought two

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty four thousand in twenty twenty four. Ultimately,

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has positioned itself at the heart of generative AI,

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>both through its own strategic product decisions and its partnership

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>with open AI. And the fact that it's now scaling

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>back on the investment required to maintain that momentum is

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe pretty significant. I also recognize that all of

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a big juicy steake for someone some people

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>call a pig or an animal or a monster or

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>an AI cynic. Look, I've pulled over this data repeatedly

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and done all that I can to find less convenient

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>or satisfying conclusions. Let us off intent and likely the

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>weakest part of my argument. These are serious documents, by

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, but they're not always legally binding. Neither are

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>those statements of qualifications. But as Tdcoen pointed out, sqqs

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are generally treated as the green lights stop working on

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>construction even though a formal lease agreement hasn't yet been signed,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and to be clear, Microsoft let an interminate amount of

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>sqqs go. Nevertheless, it's incredibly significant that Microsoft is letting

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so many the equivalent of as much as fourteen percent

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of its current data set of capacity at a bare minimum.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>On top of the couple hundred so at least two

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred megabats of data center leases become canceled. I do

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not know why nobody else has done this analysis. I've

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>now read every single piece about the td co and

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>report from every single outlet the covenant. I've read some

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>weird seo stuff. It's it's not good, and I'm under

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kind of astounded by the lack of curiosity

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as to what one GW plus means and the report

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the meaningfully moved markets, as I'm equally astonished by the

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>lack of curiosity to contextualize most tech news. It's as

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>if nobody wants to think about this too hard, like

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to stop the pie. Nobody wants to accept

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what's being staring us in the face since last year,

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if not earlier, and we're given the most egregious, glaring evidence.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>People still must find ways to dismiss it or ignore

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it rather than give it the energy it deserves. Far

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>more resources were dedicated to finding ways to gussy up

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the releases of anthropics claudes on at three point seven

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or open ais GPT four point five. And we're given

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the report from an Investment Banks research wings that the

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 1>largest spender and generityve Ai, the largest backer for now

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>of open ai at least, is massively reducing its expenditures

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in data centers required for the industry and for open Ai,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a company of stems worth one hundred and fifty seven billion

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars to expand. Microsoft's stake in open Ai is a

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>bit fuzzy, is open Ai doesn't issue traditional equity, and

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a likelihood it may be diluted as more money

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>comes in. It reportedly owned forty nine percent in twenty

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, though assuming that's still the case, are we

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to believe that Microsoft is willing to strangle and that's

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it worth at least seventy five billion dollars several times

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>more than its investment today by canceling a few leases.

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>How many more alarms do we need to go off

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>before people recognize that something bad is happening. Why is

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that tangible, meaningful evidence that we're in a bubble and

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly a sign that it might be popping less interesting

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>than the fact that Claudes on it three point seven

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>can think longer. And if you're listening to this and

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you think I'm talking about you, I fucking am. I

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>am sick of this shit. I am absolutely sick of

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this shit. I'm sick of reading articles like that when

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>far more important and scary and damning things are happening,

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>things that actually matter. I don't care if Warrio Ama

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Day has allowed you to make it compute for longer.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't are compared to this. It does not matter

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>compared to a gig or what or more of capacity going.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sick of this. I'm sick of me having

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy. Sometimes. I do not say these

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>things to be right. I don't want to be a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>cynic or a hater. I say this all because I

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>am trying to understand what's going on, and if I

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>do not, I will actually go insane. Every time I

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sit down to write my newsletter or record this podcast,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it because I'm trying to understand what's happening

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>and how I feel about it, And these are the

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>only terms to dictate my creativity. It just happens that

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I've stared at the tech industry for too long and

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>now I can't look away. Perhaps it's driving me mad,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I'm getting smarter, or maybe it's an arm

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or palmer of the two. But what comes out of

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>my work is not driven by wanting to go viral

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or having a hot take, or be a renowned skeptic,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or being right or being anything, because such things suggest

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that I would do this differently if three people listened

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>versus actually can't say the amount of people that do.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I have rules, but fifty seven thousand people subscribe to

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>my newsletter extra. From there, I would do the same

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>goddamn thing. And in fact, if you look back in

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>my work, I've done the same thing from the beginning. Now,

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that Microsoft is dying or making any

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>grandiose claims about what happens next. What I am describing, however,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the material contraction of the largest investor in data centers,

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>according to TD Cohen, potentially at a scale that suggests

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft has meaningfully reduced its interest in further expansion

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of data centers. Writ large, this is a deeply concerning move,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one that suggests that Microsoft does not see demands sustain

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the current expansions, which has greater ramifications beyond generative AI,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>because it suggests that there isn't any other reason for

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it to expand the means of delivering software. What has

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>sat in Adella scene? What is Microsoft cfo amy Hood doing?

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What is the plan here? And really what's the plan

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with open Ai? SoftBank has committed over forty billion dollars

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of cost that it currently cannot afford, taking on as

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>much as twenty four billion dollars in debt in the

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>next year to help sustain one more funding round and

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the construction of data centers. Open Ai, a company that

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>loses money on literally every single customer. To survive, open

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Ai must continue raising more money than any startup has

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>ever raised before, and they are only able to do

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so from SoftBank, which in turn must take on debt.

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai burned five billion dollars in twenty twenty four

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and more likely burn eleven billion dollars or more in

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, and will continue burning money in perpetuity

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and to scale further will require funding for a data

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>center project funded partially by a funding from a company

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that's taken on debt to fund them. And when you

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>put this all together, all I can see is calamity.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Generative AI does not have meaningful mass market use cases,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and while chat GPT may have four hundred million weekly

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>active users, there doesn't appear to be meaningful consumer adoption

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of chat GPT, mostly because almost all AI media

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>coverage inevitably ends up marketing one company Open AI. Argue

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with me all you want about your personal experiences with

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT or how you personally found it useful. I

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't care. I stopped listening a while ago. Your points

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>never prove anything that doesn't make it a product with

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>mass market utility or enterprise utility, or worth the vast

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>sums of money being plowed into it. Worse still, that

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't appear to be any meaningful revenue. As discussed in

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>my last episode, Microsoft claims thirteen billion dollars in annual

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue not profit on all AI products combined on

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred billion dollars of capital expenditures since twenty

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and no other hyperscaler is willing to break

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out any AI revenue at all. Not Amazon, no matter,

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>not Google, Nobody does that. Not worry anyone. Is anyone

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to this who actually deals with the economy? Can

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you please listen to me? So we don't Actually I

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know what we do. I actually don't know. I

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. Where's the growth? Where's the money? Where's

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the money? Sammy? Where is it? Where's my money? Honey,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>give me the money, Sam Mormon? Where's my money? Why

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is Microsoft canceling a gigawat of data center capacity while

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>telling everybody that it didn't have enough data centers to

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>handle demands for its AI products. I suppose this is

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one way of looking at it. Microsoft may currently have

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a capacity issue, but soon one, meaning that further expansion

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is unnecessary. And that's the case, It'll be interesting to

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>see whether their peers follow suit either way. Look, I

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>see nothing that suggests that there's future growth in general

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of AI. In fact, I think it's time for everybody

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to seriously consider the big tech burn billions of dollars

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on something that nobody ever wanted or would pay for.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to this and scoff, I don't know

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>what should I have talked about anthropic adding a sliding

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking bar to a model GPT four point five. Who

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>gives a shit? Can you even tell me what it

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>does differently to GPT four to zero? Can you explain

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to me why it matters? Or are you more interested

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in nakedly captured imbeciles like Ethan Mollock sweatly oinking about

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>how powerful the latest ask and shit. It's like no

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one's interested in the things happening in the real world.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like nobody's thinking about the silicon and the infrastructure

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and how things actually get built. Wake the fuck up, everybody.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Things are on fire. Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>T O S O W s ki dot com. You

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>can email me at easy at better offline dot com,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or visit better Offline dot com to find more podcast

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>links and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you go to chat dot Where's youreaed dot at to

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>visit the discord and go to our slash Better Offline

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to check out our reddit. Thank you so much for listening.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 2>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zonemedia

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 2>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:33:47.360 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>F