1
00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:05,400
Speaker 1: When I was a young staffer on Capitol Hill, I

2
00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:07,520
Speaker 1: met a man named Stephen Bryer who was a law

3
00:00:07,520 --> 00:00:10,280
Speaker 1: professor at Harvard. I thought, very smart, he'll probably be

4
00:00:10,320 --> 00:00:12,680
Speaker 1: an academic the rest of his life. But actually he

5
00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:15,200
Speaker 1: became a Justice of the Supreme Court and has been

6
00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: in that role for twenty seven years. I recently had

7
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:20,360
Speaker 1: a conversation with him about his future and about the

8
00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:22,640
Speaker 1: future of the Supreme Court. I have to start with

9
00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:27,280
Speaker 1: the questions on everybody's mind. Obviously, why is this book

10
00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:30,000
Speaker 1: that you've just written so small? It's a very small book,

11
00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:32,000
Speaker 1: and I'm used a bigger books. So why is this

12
00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:33,760
Speaker 1: book so small? I mean, why didn't you get a

13
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:39,960
Speaker 1: bigger book? Um, this is the Constitution and it's smaller. Okay,

14
00:00:40,040 --> 00:00:44,040
Speaker 1: all right? A lot of Justices of the Supreme Court

15
00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:46,760
Speaker 1: carry around the Constitution all the time. Is that because

16
00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:49,639
Speaker 1: you're gonna forget what's in it? Or are you? It's

17
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:51,639
Speaker 1: just like their mind. People are just read it over

18
00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:54,800
Speaker 1: and over again. You never never know when somebody's going

19
00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:57,320
Speaker 1: to ask you a question. You see, somebody says, what

20
00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:00,760
Speaker 1: does the Article three, Section nineteen? Say? Okay, and they

21
00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:03,000
Speaker 1: expect you to know okay. So you have to have

22
00:01:03,080 --> 00:01:07,640
Speaker 1: it here. It is so your book. This book is

23
00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:10,200
Speaker 1: a interesting book in the sense that it came from

24
00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:13,759
Speaker 1: a series of lectures you gave. Um named after somebody

25
00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:17,920
Speaker 1: who was an ideological, let's say, opponent of some of

26
00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:22,399
Speaker 1: your views, and that was Justice Scalia. So Um, were

27
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:26,120
Speaker 1: you a friend of his even though you had ideological differences? Yes,

28
00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,840
Speaker 1: I think so. We would we would uh debate those

29
00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:32,959
Speaker 1: differences and we'd go. I thought we had a terrific

30
00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:38,560
Speaker 1: debate in Lubbock, Texas. There were several thousand students would come.

31
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:42,600
Speaker 1: They've never seen the Supreme Court justice, and we talked

32
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:47,080
Speaker 1: about our differences. You know, I say, hey, if I

33
00:01:47,160 --> 00:01:50,360
Speaker 1: had your theory, my goodness, don't you think that. Do

34
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:54,120
Speaker 1: you think George Washington knew about the internet for free speech?

35
00:01:54,480 --> 00:01:59,800
Speaker 1: You're thinking? And Scalia would say I knew that. Well,

36
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,160
Speaker 1: good point. Then he would say, I'm not saying my

37
00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,920
Speaker 1: theory is perfect. He would say, you know, the two

38
00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:11,080
Speaker 1: hunters they're hunting bears and one's putting on his tennis shoes.

39
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:15,239
Speaker 1: Where are you going? And he says, I'm bears coming.

40
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,040
Speaker 1: You can't outrun a bear, he s yeah, but I

41
00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,440
Speaker 1: can outrun you. Say that was his view of my

42
00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 1: way of deciding cases, and we of course I never

43
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,240
Speaker 1: in and I still twenty eight years now, I've never

44
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:34,919
Speaker 1: heard a voice raised in anger in that conference room.

45
00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:39,800
Speaker 1: I've never heard one just to say anything mean or

46
00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:43,920
Speaker 1: table or anything like that. Good would that do? I

47
00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:47,160
Speaker 1: try to explain that to the students. You know, you

48
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,320
Speaker 1: get all excited, and all that happens is people disagree

49
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:53,079
Speaker 1: with you. Think, well, you know, he's all excited, he

50
00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:58,200
Speaker 1: must be wrong, and that's that's so true. So we

51
00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:03,560
Speaker 1: get on well personally, and we're friends personally, and we

52
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:07,000
Speaker 1: disagree on some things, not as many as you think,

53
00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:10,480
Speaker 1: but some It's not always been the case. There wasn't

54
00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:13,560
Speaker 1: a Supreme Court justice who refused to talk to or

55
00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:17,600
Speaker 1: be in the presence of justice grandise because he was Jewish. McReynolds, right,

56
00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,679
Speaker 1: So it hasn't always been that friendly. But you're saying

57
00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:22,959
Speaker 1: right now, since you've been on the court twenty eight years,

58
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,639
Speaker 1: people don't yell and scream at each other, and they

59
00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,200
Speaker 1: don't insult each other, and they're not rude to each other.

60
00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:32,520
Speaker 1: And it's a professional job, and you go in and

61
00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:35,760
Speaker 1: do your best professionally, and if you want people to

62
00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:39,360
Speaker 1: listen to you the most. The best you can do

63
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:44,760
Speaker 1: is to think through this problem, listen to where the

64
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:47,680
Speaker 1: other person is coming from, and see what you can

65
00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,960
Speaker 1: contribute to that thought. But sometimes that a censor a

66
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:54,280
Speaker 1: little bit tough on the person who wrote the majority opinion.

67
00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:58,560
Speaker 1: That's nobody takes that personally. I get that question a lot,

68
00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:00,360
Speaker 1: and I used to get it more with Ninas Scalia

69
00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:02,560
Speaker 1: was on the court and the two of us would

70
00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:06,480
Speaker 1: be there, and somebody to ask that question, and I'd

71
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:08,520
Speaker 1: tried to answer it because I didn't want him to

72
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:11,480
Speaker 1: and I'd say, I'd say, look, I know you're not

73
00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:15,600
Speaker 1: aiming that question at me. You're aiming it at Nino. Okay,

74
00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:18,920
Speaker 1: I get it. But what you don't understand is that

75
00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:25,960
Speaker 1: some people suffer from a disease. It's called good writer's disease.

76
00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:30,640
Speaker 1: And if a good writer finds a felicitous phrase, he

77
00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:34,000
Speaker 1: won't give it up. Let the word, let him destroy himself,

78
00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:35,720
Speaker 1: let the world come to an end. It's like a

79
00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:40,599
Speaker 1: good comedian, you can't give up that joke. Now that's Nino.

80
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:44,040
Speaker 1: He is a very good writer. He has a felicitous phrase,

81
00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:47,240
Speaker 1: and we all know that and we don't take it personally.

82
00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,360
Speaker 1: Do you have a lot of unanimous decisions in these

83
00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,719
Speaker 1: days or they don't get that much attention? And do

84
00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:53,800
Speaker 1: you really have a lot of five four decisions and

85
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:55,520
Speaker 1: they get all the attention it seems, But is that

86
00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:58,280
Speaker 1: where the court really has its arguments with each other

87
00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:02,120
Speaker 1: the five to four decisions and no, not necessarily what

88
00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,280
Speaker 1: you read about are the ones that the press thinks

89
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:08,120
Speaker 1: the public will be interested in, which usually has a

90
00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:13,200
Speaker 1: political or a social content, and they'll say that's the

91
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,120
Speaker 1: most important. I don't know that. One of the most

92
00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:19,520
Speaker 1: important decisions I wrote this last year was called Google

93
00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,960
Speaker 1: versus Oracle, right, and and it was it took a

94
00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:26,120
Speaker 1: year for me to write that. It was about copyright

95
00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:31,800
Speaker 1: and something called programs, uh interface programs, And I was

96
00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:36,520
Speaker 1: told that that was very very important. Well for me,

97
00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:39,040
Speaker 1: it was like learning Latvian. I mean, I don't know

98
00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:41,640
Speaker 1: how I did that, but but you see it, it's

99
00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:45,479
Speaker 1: it's it's it's I'm not saying all the I see

100
00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:48,559
Speaker 1: what they're saying. I see what they're saying. And it's

101
00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:51,800
Speaker 1: true that a lot of the sort of exciting cases

102
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,400
Speaker 1: are more close. But the justice is I suppose you

103
00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:58,280
Speaker 1: have a decision. It's five to four, and well, I'm

104
00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:01,479
Speaker 1: one justice kind of go to other justices chambers and say,

105
00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:04,200
Speaker 1: you know, your argument isn't so good and maybe you

106
00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:06,440
Speaker 1: should do something different? Or is everything just done by

107
00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:08,760
Speaker 1: memos and writing? You don't have people going down the

108
00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:11,320
Speaker 1: hall and saying, let's have lunch together and maybe I

109
00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:13,680
Speaker 1: can persuade you my position is better than yours. That

110
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:17,760
Speaker 1: does that ever happen? Most of it is memo, but

111
00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:22,360
Speaker 1: quite a lot can be business two chambers. But if

112
00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:26,080
Speaker 1: I'm going into your chambers, I'm not going to say no,

113
00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:29,640
Speaker 1: your argument isn't so good. This would not be a

114
00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:33,520
Speaker 1: helpful way to start the conversation. And if you go

115
00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:37,479
Speaker 1: into somebody else's chambers, you better be prepared to listen

116
00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:41,239
Speaker 1: to them as well as hoping that they will listen

117
00:06:41,279 --> 00:06:45,200
Speaker 1: to you. And then you try to see and that's

118
00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:47,640
Speaker 1: what I learned in the Senate. That's what you try

119
00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:50,760
Speaker 1: to see is where is there some common ground? And

120
00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:55,040
Speaker 1: is there common ground enough that you can work with it.

121
00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:58,440
Speaker 1: Let's go back to your earlier life. Um, I work

122
00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:01,040
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill and you work Premium Capital. Who you

123
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:03,560
Speaker 1: were a Harvard law professor and I'm just curious when

124
00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:05,919
Speaker 1: you go to Harvard Law School and you're at the

125
00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,520
Speaker 1: top of your class. When you start Harvard Law School,

126
00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:10,800
Speaker 1: there's always kind of an intimidation factor. You have six

127
00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:13,080
Speaker 1: hundred people. You have to figure out, you know, where

128
00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:14,720
Speaker 1: you're going to be good or not. When did you

129
00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:17,600
Speaker 1: realize you were really good at at law school kind

130
00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:20,400
Speaker 1: of things taking exams? Did you know right away you're

131
00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,720
Speaker 1: gonna be a great law school student and therefore become

132
00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:25,640
Speaker 1: a potential law school professor or were you nervous the

133
00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:29,720
Speaker 1: first year or so? I think God's pretty nervous. I

134
00:07:30,040 --> 00:07:32,360
Speaker 1: mean I remember talking to a friend of mine I've

135
00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:35,440
Speaker 1: been an undergraduate with and he was there too, pulled

136
00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:38,160
Speaker 1: dotic actually, and we both said, well, this is the

137
00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:42,000
Speaker 1: end of our great careers after our first year. And

138
00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:43,840
Speaker 1: we both did pretty well in law school. Are you

139
00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:45,440
Speaker 1: were on the Harvard Law Review. And when you're on

140
00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:47,600
Speaker 1: the Harvard Law Review, sometimes you get the clerk on

141
00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:51,640
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court for another justice and you clerk for r.

142
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:54,680
Speaker 1: Through Goldberg And what was that like? It was terrific.

143
00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:58,280
Speaker 1: He was great, He was an enthusiast, He had loads

144
00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:01,800
Speaker 1: of energy. Jack Kennedy said that he was the smartest

145
00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:04,200
Speaker 1: man he ever met. So you clerked for him, and

146
00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,800
Speaker 1: then you went to teach at Harvard Law School. And

147
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:09,080
Speaker 1: when you went to Harvard Law School, did you say,

148
00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:11,560
Speaker 1: this is gonna be my life. I'm gonna be a professor,

149
00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:14,760
Speaker 1: nothing terrible about that. You can teach great law school

150
00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,840
Speaker 1: students and so forth. Or did you say, maybe someday

151
00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:20,119
Speaker 1: I'll be on the Supreme Court, maybe I'll be a judge.

152
00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:21,800
Speaker 1: It was that in the back of your mind. I

153
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:25,600
Speaker 1: didn't think maybe someday. Anybody who thinks maybe someday I'll

154
00:08:25,640 --> 00:08:28,600
Speaker 1: be on the Supreme Court. I mean, I don't want

155
00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:30,880
Speaker 1: to say there's something wrong with him, but there is something.

156
00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:34,920
Speaker 1: Right after teaching at Harvard Law School, you got a

157
00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:38,720
Speaker 1: very good reputation. Senator Kennedy invited you to come down

158
00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:40,440
Speaker 1: and work on his staff. I think, to work on

159
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:44,840
Speaker 1: regulatory reform and um, and that's where I first encountered you.

160
00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,040
Speaker 1: And I was working Capitol Hill and and so forth.

161
00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:49,920
Speaker 1: You've got a very good reputation, and then something happened

162
00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:54,040
Speaker 1: that was a surprise to people. Uh. President Carter nominated

163
00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:56,800
Speaker 1: you to be a judge on the First Circuit. And

164
00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,839
Speaker 1: that's not a surprise, given your your reputation and so forth.

165
00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:03,040
Speaker 1: But it required a Republican to sign off on it.

166
00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:06,760
Speaker 1: Strom Thurman one of the most conservative Republicans. Why did

167
00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,480
Speaker 1: you think strom Thurman said he would let a presumably

168
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:14,840
Speaker 1: some somewhat liberal Harvard Laft professor get on the first circuit.

169
00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:17,640
Speaker 1: I mean those are days. It was a different day.

170
00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:21,880
Speaker 1: You remember that people did try to work together. And

171
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,800
Speaker 1: every single morning Ken Feinberger was like I was chief

172
00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:29,559
Speaker 1: counsel and he was a general counselor of the Judiciary Committee.

173
00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:33,440
Speaker 1: And we would have breakfast with Emery Snedden, who was

174
00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:37,920
Speaker 1: a former JAG general, and it was Strong Thurman's chief

175
00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:42,160
Speaker 1: person on Judiciary, and we would plan the day. We

176
00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:45,760
Speaker 1: planned out the day. We wanted no secrets. We wanted

177
00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,880
Speaker 1: to try to accomplish something, and we'd figure out how

178
00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:50,840
Speaker 1: do we color it red for this party and how

179
00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:53,080
Speaker 1: do we color it blue for the other party. But

180
00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:55,920
Speaker 1: the important thing is if it's desirable, let's try to

181
00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:59,959
Speaker 1: get it through. That happened a lot. I can't say

182
00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,360
Speaker 1: there was no conniving, but Ken and I and ever

183
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:08,000
Speaker 1: used to call what we did open conniving. Openly arrived

184
00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:11,400
Speaker 1: at okay, so you went on the first Circuit and

185
00:10:11,480 --> 00:10:14,840
Speaker 1: you had a very good reputation there, and then um,

186
00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:16,920
Speaker 1: you were being considered to be on the Supreme Court,

187
00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:20,600
Speaker 1: and so you came down for an interview with President Clinton.

188
00:10:20,640 --> 00:10:23,640
Speaker 1: But you had a bike accident and you had a

189
00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:27,800
Speaker 1: lot of injured bones. If I recall so that you

190
00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:29,760
Speaker 1: can think that was a bad karma that you had

191
00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:32,920
Speaker 1: this accident before you had the interview. And did that

192
00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:34,800
Speaker 1: affect your ability to do the interview well or it

193
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,920
Speaker 1: didn't make a difference. I have no idea. I mean,

194
00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,960
Speaker 1: that's the truth of the matter. And later, later I

195
00:10:43,160 --> 00:10:46,559
Speaker 1: thought about it, and of course the newspaper people wanted

196
00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:50,120
Speaker 1: to say, weren't you terribly disappointed? Da da, da, da da?

197
00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:53,480
Speaker 1: And I said, I'll tell you what I said. Well,

198
00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:55,959
Speaker 1: you know, it's not such a terrible thing in your

199
00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:59,120
Speaker 1: life to be seriously considered to be on the Supreme Court,

200
00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:03,679
Speaker 1: even if you're not appointed, and that's about the best

201
00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:07,120
Speaker 1: you can do. And I was thinking, partly I said

202
00:11:07,160 --> 00:11:11,640
Speaker 1: that because it's true, and partly I said it because

203
00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:18,080
Speaker 1: I did have children. Hey, my friend, you don't always

204
00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:23,000
Speaker 1: win everything you want, and my goodness, what you want

205
00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:27,800
Speaker 1: those children to learn? And you want them to learn. Fine,

206
00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:32,600
Speaker 1: sometimes you'll get everything you heart desires, not very often,

207
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:36,960
Speaker 1: and sometimes you won't. And you better be a good

208
00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:40,200
Speaker 1: sport about when you don't as well as when you

209
00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:42,800
Speaker 1: do well. Mick Jagger has a song about that. You

210
00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:46,000
Speaker 1: can't always get what you want, and so you didn't

211
00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:52,240
Speaker 1: get us. After my generation, Justice Skinsburg was appointed first,

212
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:55,120
Speaker 1: but then you were appointed next by President Clinton. So

213
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:57,240
Speaker 1: when you've got on the court, how had it changed

214
00:11:57,280 --> 00:11:59,600
Speaker 1: from when you were a clerk? Was it much different?

215
00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:03,679
Speaker 1: Were you surprised by the changes? Yes, I thought it

216
00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:08,280
Speaker 1: was different in this respect. When I clerked, I felt

217
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:13,480
Speaker 1: it was a court with a mission. What mission? In

218
00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:18,280
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty four, the Court had decided that plus c v.

219
00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:25,640
Speaker 1: Ferguson rightly was down the drain and legal segregation is

220
00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:29,880
Speaker 1: contrary to this document equal protection of the law. They

221
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:34,160
Speaker 1: said it in nineteen fifty four, And we both know

222
00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:38,760
Speaker 1: what happened in nineteen fifty five, nothing next to nothing.

223
00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:44,520
Speaker 1: Nineteen fifty six, yeah, double nothing. Nineteen fifty seven, a

224
00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:49,679
Speaker 1: rather brave judge in Little Rock said, those Little Rock nine,

225
00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:53,680
Speaker 1: those nine brave black students are going into that white school,

226
00:12:54,080 --> 00:13:00,480
Speaker 1: Central High School. But the governor. Governor Fables said, maybe

227
00:13:00,600 --> 00:13:03,200
Speaker 1: those students have a court order, but I have the

228
00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:08,520
Speaker 1: state militia and they're not. And Eisenhar, I'd like to

229
00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,200
Speaker 1: see that at the monument that they're building for him.

230
00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:15,800
Speaker 1: He called in a thousand troops from from Fort Bragg,

231
00:13:16,440 --> 00:13:19,040
Speaker 1: the hundred and first Airborne, and they took those nine

232
00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:24,880
Speaker 1: black children and walked into that white school. No. I'd

233
00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:28,440
Speaker 1: like to say that's the end of the story, but

234
00:13:28,559 --> 00:13:33,160
Speaker 1: it wasn't. What happened was after a few months, the

235
00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:37,160
Speaker 1: troops had to withdraw. And when that happened, the school

236
00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:40,360
Speaker 1: board said, we're not going to integrate anymore. And when

237
00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:43,160
Speaker 1: that happened, a very famous case went to the Supreme Court,

238
00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:47,679
Speaker 1: Cooper versus Erin, And when that happened, all nine justices

239
00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:52,680
Speaker 1: signed the opinion saying, integrate, now do it right now

240
00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:56,400
Speaker 1: in Little Rock. Hey, but they're nine people. Maybe there

241
00:13:56,440 --> 00:14:01,760
Speaker 1: could have been nine, maybe nine thousand. U uh huh.

242
00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:07,400
Speaker 1: Foulbus closed the school. That's what happened for those of

243
00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:10,400
Speaker 1: us who remember and those of us who don't. But

244
00:14:12,440 --> 00:14:16,440
Speaker 1: they couldn't keep it closed because that was the era

245
00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:23,760
Speaker 1: of Martin Luther King, the Freedom Writers, and suddenly the

246
00:14:23,800 --> 00:14:28,760
Speaker 1: North woke up and others woke up and said, this

247
00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:33,520
Speaker 1: is an intolerable situation. And eventually, through a lot of

248
00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:35,840
Speaker 1: work and a lot of work, and a lot of

249
00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:38,280
Speaker 1: moral effort, and a lot of physical effort, and a

250
00:14:38,320 --> 00:14:46,760
Speaker 1: lot of organizing effort and so forth, eventually legal segregation

251
00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:51,200
Speaker 1: was brought to a conclusion. And the reason that I

252
00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:54,240
Speaker 1: find that story important and I told that story to

253
00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:57,280
Speaker 1: a woman from Ghana who is the Chief Justice who

254
00:14:57,360 --> 00:15:03,400
Speaker 1: is trying to improve the constitutional system there and asked me,

255
00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:10,640
Speaker 1: why do people do what you say? And my response was, ma'am,

256
00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:14,120
Speaker 1: three million people in this country and three hundred million

257
00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:19,400
Speaker 1: are not lawyers. That comes as a surprise. And those

258
00:15:19,480 --> 00:15:24,400
Speaker 1: are the people you have to convince, convince what convinced

259
00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:29,200
Speaker 1: that they should try to follow the court to the

260
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:32,360
Speaker 1: rule of law when they don't like it, when they

261
00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:38,000
Speaker 1: think it's wrong. And that's why I wrote this book.

262
00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:41,600
Speaker 1: In a sentence, that is why I want people to

263
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:46,240
Speaker 1: see in some detail. It's not moralizing, it's my experience

264
00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:52,160
Speaker 1: and I want them to see what the court can do.

265
00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:56,880
Speaker 1: But when you say the court can do, it doesn't

266
00:15:56,960 --> 00:16:03,520
Speaker 1: mean nine people. It means the country as it's come

267
00:16:03,920 --> 00:16:09,000
Speaker 1: to develop, a long time, two hundred years, and then

268
00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:19,080
Speaker 1: maybe maybe we have a country that can use this

269
00:16:19,120 --> 00:16:23,640
Speaker 1: weapon called the rule of law in order to prevent

270
00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:28,000
Speaker 1: some pretty terrible things. Let's talk about what's called the

271
00:16:28,040 --> 00:16:31,280
Speaker 1: shadow docket for the people who are not lawyers. What

272
00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:33,840
Speaker 1: is the shadow docket and why hasn't becoming such a

273
00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:39,720
Speaker 1: big thing. What it is is that in between hearing

274
00:16:39,760 --> 00:16:43,760
Speaker 1: the cases on which we have decided to hear, someone

275
00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:48,320
Speaker 1: will make an emergency motion. Now that's what it is,

276
00:16:48,360 --> 00:16:52,680
Speaker 1: an emergency motion. The country is divided. I'm in charge

277
00:16:52,680 --> 00:16:55,480
Speaker 1: of the first circuit for example. That everybody is in

278
00:16:55,560 --> 00:16:59,400
Speaker 1: charge of some circuit. So if there is a litigant

279
00:16:59,520 --> 00:17:05,560
Speaker 1: in the circuit who believes that he needs immediate attention

280
00:17:06,680 --> 00:17:11,280
Speaker 1: to issue an injunction or to stop an injunction, well

281
00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:14,720
Speaker 1: then he'll file it with me and I'll look at it.

282
00:17:15,080 --> 00:17:17,720
Speaker 1: And if most of them there isn't much too, and

283
00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:20,600
Speaker 1: so it's easy to deny it. But some there is

284
00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:23,560
Speaker 1: something too, and then you, I use, you will refer

285
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,119
Speaker 1: it to the whole conference. And if I should have

286
00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:28,680
Speaker 1: and didn't, he can go to any other judge and

287
00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:32,240
Speaker 1: it will be referred to the whole conference. Most of

288
00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:35,960
Speaker 1: these that are the subject of the whole conference has

289
00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:39,640
Speaker 1: our death cases and at the very last minute because

290
00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:44,679
Speaker 1: of COVID. I think there have been some recent cases

291
00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:48,639
Speaker 1: which did not just involve the death penalty or something

292
00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:54,280
Speaker 1: that wasn't too difficult, and there I I thought I

293
00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:56,800
Speaker 1: was in the descent in those cases. Well, the most

294
00:17:56,840 --> 00:18:00,040
Speaker 1: recent abortion case, I was in decent. I thought it

295
00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:01,879
Speaker 1: was wrong and I thought we should have heard the

296
00:18:01,880 --> 00:18:04,840
Speaker 1: whole thing. It was a procedural matter. They didn't decide

297
00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:09,320
Speaker 1: the substance of the status. There will be a case

298
00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:11,080
Speaker 1: presumably working its way up to the court, but it

299
00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:13,480
Speaker 1: might take a year or so for a well where

300
00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:15,840
Speaker 1: we're having there is a case in November where that's

301
00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:18,080
Speaker 1: the sighting matter. You've been on the court now twenty

302
00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:20,600
Speaker 1: eight years. What are you most proud of having done?

303
00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:22,560
Speaker 1: And what's the pleasure of being on that Supreme Court.

304
00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:27,320
Speaker 1: It's a great privilege to be on the court. I mean,

305
00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:31,440
Speaker 1: there's no no doubt. And from a personal point of view,

306
00:18:31,560 --> 00:18:35,879
Speaker 1: I'd say it requires you in middle age when you

307
00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:41,880
Speaker 1: get there, uh, to give your best to this every minute.

308
00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:46,040
Speaker 1: And you say, is that a big virtue? Yeah? Yeah.

309
00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:48,040
Speaker 1: And the older you get, the more you see it

310
00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:52,800
Speaker 1: as an enormous virtue. Einstein famously said, if you try

311
00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:55,600
Speaker 1: something over and over again and expect a different result,

312
00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:59,280
Speaker 1: that's the definition of insanity. So if somebody asked you

313
00:18:59,320 --> 00:19:01,639
Speaker 1: the same question and over and over again expecting a

314
00:19:01,640 --> 00:19:05,640
Speaker 1: different answer, I guess that's the definition of an insane interviewer.

315
00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:08,680
Speaker 1: But let me ask the question you've already been asked many, many,

316
00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,480
Speaker 1: many times. I know you're not going to give it

317
00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:13,919
Speaker 1: differ an answer, but I have to ask you the question,

318
00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:18,080
Speaker 1: what are your thinking about all of the issues relating

319
00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:25,119
Speaker 1: to your retirement? Okay? Einstein was right? Einstein was right. Okay,

320
00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:27,320
Speaker 1: So you have said that you don't want to die

321
00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:29,800
Speaker 1: on the court, and presumably nobody would want you to

322
00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:35,960
Speaker 1: die on the court. So what do you It's Einstein

323
00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:39,680
Speaker 1: is coming back. So what is it that you would

324
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,720
Speaker 1: like to do when you were alive after you're off

325
00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:44,320
Speaker 1: the court? In other words, would you like to go

326
00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,240
Speaker 1: teach again, if you like to write, would you like

327
00:19:47,359 --> 00:19:50,280
Speaker 1: to just take life easy? What would you like to do?

328
00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:54,119
Speaker 1: It's hard to take life easy, but I do. We'll see. Okay,

329
00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:55,919
Speaker 1: so you haven't thought about what you might want to do?

330
00:19:56,080 --> 00:20:02,000
Speaker 1: Or yeah, go through my mind. President Biden has put

331
00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:05,320
Speaker 1: together a commission that's going to look at the court. Um,

332
00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:08,120
Speaker 1: and you have already articulated your view that you don't

333
00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:11,040
Speaker 1: think expanding the size of the court is a wonderful idea.

334
00:20:11,040 --> 00:20:13,040
Speaker 1: I think you've said that. What I've said is that

335
00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,440
Speaker 1: they better be pretty careful about it, because two can

336
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:18,800
Speaker 1: play at that game. And of course, what's worrying me,

337
00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:21,600
Speaker 1: and I say that I try to explain to people

338
00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:25,240
Speaker 1: in the book the extent to which politics is relevant

339
00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:27,959
Speaker 1: or not relevant, or president or not president, and in

340
00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,760
Speaker 1: what form uh in in in the work of our court.

341
00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:35,280
Speaker 1: And what worries me is that people will think we're

342
00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:38,520
Speaker 1: junior league politicians. And if they think that, the first

343
00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:40,520
Speaker 1: second thought should be why I don't have a senior

344
00:20:40,600 --> 00:20:44,520
Speaker 1: league politician. And once you begin to think along those lines,

345
00:20:44,600 --> 00:20:46,679
Speaker 1: two can play at that game. As I said, you

346
00:20:46,680 --> 00:20:51,000
Speaker 1: could have Republicans appointing and the Democrats appointing and vice versa.

347
00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:55,240
Speaker 1: But I see the overall tendency of that is, given

348
00:20:55,280 --> 00:20:57,680
Speaker 1: the history, given the way we work, given the country,

349
00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:02,880
Speaker 1: et cetera, as weakening the confidence of the average person

350
00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:07,040
Speaker 1: in the decisions of the Court. And you can say

351
00:21:07,040 --> 00:21:09,040
Speaker 1: what's wrong with that? And I say, well, that's sort

352
00:21:09,080 --> 00:21:13,880
Speaker 1: of a step towards or away from a rule of law.

353
00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:17,399
Speaker 1: What would you like most people to know about the

354
00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,520
Speaker 1: Supreme Court? If you could say to the average citizen,

355
00:21:20,240 --> 00:21:22,320
Speaker 1: here's what you should know in a paragraph about the

356
00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:26,119
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. I assume you know it would be something

357
00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:28,520
Speaker 1: along the lines that it's not as political as some

358
00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:30,720
Speaker 1: people think. But what would it be? You would say

359
00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:35,440
Speaker 1: a judge, once he puts on that black robe, I'm

360
00:21:35,480 --> 00:21:38,920
Speaker 1: not going to say it's a midnight transformation, but look

361
00:21:39,600 --> 00:21:41,880
Speaker 1: a judge, and I have to think this about myself

362
00:21:41,960 --> 00:21:47,639
Speaker 1: there too. I have to a judge is there for

363
00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:54,080
Speaker 1: all Americans. He's not there just for Democrats. He's not

364
00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:58,320
Speaker 1: there just for Republicans. He's not there just for the

365
00:21:58,359 --> 00:22:02,600
Speaker 1: president of the party that a pointed him. And even

366
00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:05,040
Speaker 1: if half the country thinks he's a real idiot and

367
00:22:05,119 --> 00:22:09,480
Speaker 1: they can't stand what he writes in his own mind

368
00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:16,000
Speaker 1: and the way he approaches the job, he has to remember,

369
00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:21,399
Speaker 1: he said, for everybody, all three hundred and thirty one million.

370
00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:25,119
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to hear more of my interviews. You

371
00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:29,240
Speaker 1: can subscribe and download my podcast on Spotify, Apple, or

372
00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:30,119
Speaker 1: wherever you listen,