WEBVTT - Ep. 65: CB Draft Prospects, Foye Extension & O-Zone Mailbag | Jags A.M. Podcast 0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.439 Welcome in to jag Zam. I'm Kayannie Stevens. Are in 0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.880 the month of April. Now free agency is behind us, 0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.000 so now we're looking ahead to the twenty twenty four 0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.200 NFL Draft. Now, Brian Sexson is off today John Oser 0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:27.720 is back with me here in studio. We're going to 0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.880 do a deep dive as we start looking into potential 0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.280 draft picks who may be coming to town and positions 0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.920 of interest. Our big thing, number one is twenty three days, 0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.040 because there's twenty three days until the first day of 0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.640 the NFL Draft. Now, a lot of US preps started 0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.680 months and months ago, but John, they're still looking into 0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.120 things right now. Talking to people. How much of this 0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:47.680 is set in stone at this point or is they're 0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.480 still room to move about who they're looking at. 0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:54.520 Well, I think their thoughts and their research on guys 0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.360 is mostly set in stone. You're doing sort of punch 0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.400 out work now, if you will, still setting the board. 0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.759 Once they set that board, it's pretty much set in stone. 0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.360 I think that's a couple of weeks down the road. 0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.200 The work actually started for a lot of these guys 0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.039 year year and a half ago. The area of scouts 0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.880 actually are already looking ahead to next year's draft, most 0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:22.080 likely with the setting of the board being done by 0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.679 sort of the upper level guys, Trent Balke and his posse, 0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:26.240 if you will. 0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.640 The posse is getting all in on the big board, 0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.640 so we'll have more on that as the week's come along, 0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.640 and we'll talk a little bit more about prospects later 0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.240 in the show. We do want to talk about our 0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.559 second big thing, though, which is an extension for Foya 0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.240 Lewis and the linebacker captain of this team. Last year 0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.840 was on the final year of a three year deal, 0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.520 but now we've seen a contract extension for him. John 0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.640 This was something we weren't really sure he had a 0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.800 big cap number this year, but now he's going to 0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:49.800 be around for a bit longer. 0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.240 Yeah, it's credit to him. 0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.800 A couple of free agents from the twenty twenty one 0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.880 class seman line to do this. 0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.640 Christian kirk Is the other guy comes in mind. This 0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:01.440 might be down the road. 0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.320 Usually players who sign big free agent contracts are two 0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.320 or three year players and don't really become part of 0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.959 your core. The Air exceptions to that, but that's sort 0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.480 of the norm. Foya Lucan led the league and tackled 0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.919 his first year with the Jags twenty twenty two, came 0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.400 close again last year, solid player, became a little more 0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.400 of a turnover guy last year. So he's locked up. 0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.200 He's part of the core of this team. And credit 0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.000 to him again, because that doesn't always happen with second 0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.040 contract free agents on new teams. He's now a Jaguar, 0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.160 I want to say for life, but for the long 0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:40.240 term doesn't always happen. 0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.359 Is this extension due to just what the performances we've 0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:45.800 seen on the field, or is it a bit of 0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.680 an indictment against those two other guys that they drafted 0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.080 just a year ago. 0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:52.680 I don't think as much to do with Devin Lloyd. 0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.200 Perhaps Chad Muma. They may have. 0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.000 Looked at him as a possible replacement when they drafted 0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.320 him in twenty twenty two. I think the year was 0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.440 it all runs together. At my age, Ventrel Miller last 0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.480 year when he was drafted seemed like a guy who 0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.280 might be an inside back or starter at some point. 0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:12.200 And totally get on the field. 0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.919 Last year at all, he was hurt, so I think 0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.320 the circumstance and injury maybe more than an indictment. 0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.359 All right, freeze up some money and he'll be here 0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.520 to stay. So that's good leadership to have on this team. 0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.919 But speaking of that extension, there's another extension or new 0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.280 contract that hasn't gotten done a waiting game. We're still 0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.639 waiting on Josh Allen. And now with those twenty three 0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.200 days until the draft, John, we've talked about hoping this 0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.760 deal gets done before the draft. Is that still the 0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.600 plan or is this going to be something that dragged 0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:39.240 out even further. 0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.320 Yeah, I'm not sure there's that much. 0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:46.600 You know, My experience with these is usually deadlines create deals. 0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.000 I don't know that there's that much of a deadline 0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.240 before the draft because they've already gotten through the league year, 0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.120 so they're cap they're not trying to get under anything 0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.400 in any sort of deadline like that. The deadline or 0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.440 the pressure points might be more when they want to 0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.760 sign the rookie class or get other deals done that 0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.520 might prompt Josh. I don't know that the April twenty 0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.400 fifth start of the draft is a magic deadline beyond 0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.080 the fact that I think they'd like to get this 0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.160 done and get it in order and sort of know 0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.000 what these numbers are gonna look like. To me, the 0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.640 two numbers that might matter the most for the next 0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.359 five years, Josh's contract, in Trevor's contract. When it happens, 0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.599 those will sort of set the template to the tent poles, 0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:29.080 if you will. 0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:30.880 Everything else we worked around. 0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.480 That when they're that big, and that perhaps even unusual 0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.719 trying to get certain numbers in certain years. Sometimes you 0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.440 want to get that done before you start doing other things. 0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.839 So I think it gets done before July fifteenth. Don't 0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.359 really have a feel for any date beyond that with 0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:48.040 Josh Allen. 0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.680 All right, Josh Allen Contract Watch continues. We'll keep you 0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:52.200 an eye on that, keep you posted. 0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:52.680 Of course. 0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.800 Coming up after the break, we're going to look at 0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.640 some of the cornerback prospects for this year's draft and 0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:58.919 who the Jags might be targeting. 0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.040 Move the Freight, Move the Freight. 0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.200 Magellan Transportation voted coolest office space in Jacksonville. You can 0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:19.440 apply online at www. Dot Magellan Logistics dot com. Welcome 0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.720 back to jag zam here in the Hyundai studios, Kan 0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.200 Nannie Stevens, Brian Sexton not with us. We'll be back 0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.520 next week. But John Osier is back in studio, and 0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.200 that's really all we need this time in the year, John, 0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.480 thank you for joining us. 0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:31.800 No problem, it. 0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.880 Is sor all you need anyway, it's all we need. 0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:34.279 Were worth. 0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:35.080 Let's talk draft. 0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.400 Let's talk draft because we're gonna dive into this for 0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.400 the next few weeks pretty much as we all try 0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.600 to guess what's gonna go down and probably get it very, 0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.320 very wrong. But we're gonna start with cornerbacks because that's 0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.200 a position we've talked about obviously, that's a skill position 0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.600 that you really only see maybe you know, a starting 0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.560 cornerback in the first round less she gets super lucky 0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.000 after the fact. So we're gonna look at some of 0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.880 the picks that we have not necessarily mocked to us, 0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.960 but you know, just kind of the top availability in 0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.360 the cornerback class this year. 0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.000 So well, first of all, on corner I think it's 0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.120 if you had to pick a position right now that 0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.720 makes the most sense for him, it feels like corners. 0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.239 Yet I know O lot of people are saying wide receiver, 0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.800 the people are saying offensive line corner. 0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.600 To me, it still feels like. 0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.440 They might not only take one in the first round, 0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.800 but might take one somewhere again. 0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:27.720 By Dave, I mean not. 0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.839 I say by day four, by round four, it feels 0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.839 like the biggest need, and it is a spot historically. 0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.040 The good news on that to me, sometimes offensive linemen 0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.799 can need more time, their certain positions need more time. 0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.800 Corner is a position where guys can often come in 0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.480 and be who they are right away. 0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:47.080 So it's good. 0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.200 It's a young man's position, right as we always say, 0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.080 so it's good to get some young blood in here. 0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.640 Quinyan and Mitchell is the guy from Toledo, which you 0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.240 don't se see a lot of Matt Conference guys necessarily, 0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.960 but that's someone where we're looking at. I don't know, 0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.040 fall to seventeen, it might be something where you needed 0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.080 to trade up. But he's kind of the CB one, 0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.120 if you will, starting out of this class. 0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.520 Yeah, and came out of nowhere a little bit, has 0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.760 had a really good off season. He's a guy off 0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.880 So when you go to Toledo, people come in with questions. 0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.440 Everything you hear is that he's answered all those questions. 0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.720 In terms of the draft, seems right now like it 0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.320 might be a little surprising if he's there at seventeen. 0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.200 You sort of mentioned during the break trading up. Boy, 0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.920 I'd be surprised. If they trade up for a corner, 0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.880 mainly because there's so many sitting there sort of in 0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.080 the sweet in the sweet spot of number seventeen, So 0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.160 I'm not sure there would be a trade up, But 0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:43.200 if you love a guy. 0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:44.200 Go get him fair. 0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.880 Cooper de John's probably one of the more versatile corners 0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.000 coming out of Iowa. He's someone that I think people 0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.360 think they could probably use in a multitude of ways. 0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.440 Maybe safety as well, but just that versatility. That's something 0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.920 we know. Trent Bulke likes a versatile player. But is 0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.680 that someone that you could see in the system or 0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:03.360 do you think maybe not. 0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.440 Yeah, I think Caitlin Clark's off the board here, so. 0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:07.800 She's too expensive. 0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:14.840 Yeah, you know, for what they need, versatility makes sense. 0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.320 The interesting at corner, you feel like Darby, who they've signed, 0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.280 Ronald Darby and Tyson Campbell are probably their outside corners 0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.360 next year, possibly wanting to play inside, but it. 0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:27.680 Would be interesting. 0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.760 The challenge for them, I think is trying to get 0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.600 a guy who can be a long term outside corner 0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:40.000 and play Nickel early. Cooper Jjohn with his versatility, could 0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.719 fit that. Again, it sort of feels like you may 0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.360 have to go up and get him at this point. 0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:45.280 So. 0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:47.760 He makes sense. 0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.320 Don't know that he'd be available when they're picking, but 0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.440 I think that versatility makes a lot of sense for him. 0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.240 All right, let's go over those two Alabama guys, Terry Arnold, 0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.520 Koley McKinstry one of those getting mocked to the Jaguars 0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.199 quently that you've been seeing. 0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.400 Yeah, Terry and Arnold has been mocked a lot. Kool 0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.559 Aid I don't know as much about. I haven't studied 0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.480 him quite as much. Terry and Arnold seems like the 0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.120 guy right now that people think will be available with 0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.160 fill in need. You know, there are people It's an 0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.319 interesting draft class for many positions with cornerby and one 0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.680 of them where there's so many guys that it might 0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.240 be a matter of how you think a guy fits 0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.640 rather than oh they didn't go get the quote best guy. Well, 0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.120 there is a school thought here you can go get 0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:40.319 the best guy for what you need. With Terran and 0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.559 other players, there are people who think he might be 0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.760 the best corner in the draft, even though he's only 0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.720 ranked third or fourth right now. So it sounds like 0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.360 he's a fit. It sounds like he's a guy who 0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.600 would work him and be available. I've probably seen him 0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.679 mocked more to the Jaguars than any other player. 0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.000 Maybe in the last two or three weeks, which means 0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:00.920 means nothing. 0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:02.240 That means we're not going to get him. 0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.800 That's probably means nothing, probably what it means. 0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.080 And then finally we'll look at Clemson product Nate Wiggins. 0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.240 We've seen him kind of move up and down a 0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.920 little bit. Is he someone that would fit the system 0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:13.280 as well? 0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.280 Or well, good, good, good player. 0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.040 Uh again, I have not sit here and poured through 0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.480 tape on on Nate Wiggins or any of these guys, 0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.040 but from what you hear, the size you even see 0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:27.480 right there. 0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.720 I never want to call an NFL player frail because 0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.280 it's not that, but his size and frame. 0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.120 Would it's going to scare some teams, and you wonder 0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.520 if he fits When this team is getting ready to 0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.800 move to an aggressive man, demand guard the short pass, 0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.240 be physical, you wonder if that fits what they. 0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:52.640 Want to do. 0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.320 If he's the guy there, there's fit. And then there's 0:10:58.360 --> 0:10:59.960 also the case of well, you don't want to pay 0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.680 us on good players. So not ruling Nate Wagans out, 0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.600 but the frame is what you hear pundits talk about 0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:07.880 with Nate Wagans and the Jags. 0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.720 Very good. Those are the top five we've got for cornerbacks. 0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.720 We're going to be looking at different positions the next 0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.600 coming weeks. We'll look at a different position group and 0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.320 what we think the Jags are going to be looking 0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:17.800 at and the top prospects for that. 0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:18.720 Stay with us though. 0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.160 We've got Ozone mail bag questions for you after the break. 0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.560 Jaguars fans guro up at fanatics dot com with all 0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.200 the latest styles. Shop now and get today's special offer. 0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:45.360 Fanatics dot Com officially licensed everything. Please God, welcome back 0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.200 to jag Zam. Ozone is back with us, so we're celebrating. 0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.200 We're do some ozone mail bag questions because John we 0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:53.760 need your answers on all of the things. 0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.720 Well, yes, uh, I guess you did, Yes we do. 0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.000 Our first question is about the offensive line. There's been 0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.080 a lot of changes to that from what we've seen 0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.560 so far. So Daniel from Johnston, Iowa wants to know 0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.120 a lot of iowant today. Are you satisfied with the 0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.640 efforts made on fixing the O line thus far? He says, 0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:14.559 not convinced yet. 0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:19.920 I'm not satisfied or unsatisfied. I guess I wasn't sure 0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:24.679 what to expect. I thought that going into the off season, 0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.640 I thought that they might move on from Brandon Sheriff. 0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.440 He his salary cap. That's the one thing that didn't 0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:37.200 happen that I thought might happen. So I don't know 0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.520 necessarily that they think they should have because he's a 0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.480 good veteran player. I don't know that he's in the 0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.439 prime of his career anymore, but he certainly you can 0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.280 get by with good veteran guards you know how to play, 0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:52.360 and he does. Beyond that, they resigned, I mean, they 0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.800 signed Mitch Morse, they resigned Ezra Cleveland. And I think 0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.160 the important thing to remember about Ezra Cleveland. Everybody wants 0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.160 to look at at what the Jaguars didn't say, Well, 0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.240 they only did one thing. 0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.559 Well, I don't know that we actually saw. 0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.800 What Ezra Cleveland can really bring. Last year he played 0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.800 five games. It never felt like he got in and 0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.520 got into a rhythm. He was in and out of 0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.000 the lineup. 0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.000 Not his fault at all. 0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:24.840 So there thought clearly is Cameraroms can go into his 0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:25.280 eighth year. 0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.360 Brandon Sheriff going. 0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.160 Into his tenth, Mitch Morse going into his tenth, and. 0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.280 Ezra Cleveland I believe going into his fifth or sixth. 0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:40.240 Fifth, maybe well the left side of that or the 0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.360 first three guys I mentioned. That's a little old for 0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.480 my taste, but they clearly look at it and say 0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.240 we can get there. This is a veteran line who 0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.920 knows what they're doing. They believe that there will be 0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:56.040 continuity there. Age makes me wonder about the continuity. I 0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.040 think that's the risk in the continuity card. But you 0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.960 have to believe in something right now. They believe in 0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.840 continuity veteran that this bunch can go do it. To 0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.800 their credit, they also have some depth. They have Walker 0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:14.800 Little there. You believe they'll have Luke Fortner. I also 0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.920 think that somewhere on the first two days of the draft, 0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.600 I think you could see this position to dress to 0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.840 get younger because Cam and Walker Little both in their 0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.440 last year of their contract, and with Morrison Sheriff being 0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.160 tenth of your guys, they need to draft and get 0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.600 younger behind this now. But if they say healthy, it 0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.320 can work. I think that's the big key. Can an 0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.720 older line that hasn't been healthy in the last couple 0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.280 of seasons, stay healthy. To me, that's the storyline to 0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:43.320 wash the offensive. 0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.840 Line, health will certainly be an issue. We saw a 0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.960 lot of different lineups last year, so hopefully we can 0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.320 avoid that this season. Second question we have for you 0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.880 here today is going to be about two of the 0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.200 defensive backs because we were just talking about cornerback. But 0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.920 would you offer an extension to safety Andre Cisco or 0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.440 cornerback Tyson Campbell this offseason to void an inflated number 0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.000 after a possible Pro Bowl season this year? 0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.880 Yeah, I don't think you can. I like both guys 0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:07.320 a lot. 0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:12.960 I mean, I'm pulling form to be core NFL players 0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.560 that you pay. I think they have the potential to 0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.640 be that, because I am I. I think they have 0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.360 the potential to be that. I don't know that they've 0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.960 shown enough of that yet to go sign them to 0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:25.760 long term deals. 0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.200 And they may not want that yet because you want 0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:28.960 to prove yourself. You want to have a great season 0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.760 before you sign that long term deal, because you might 0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.240 not get that money that you're expecting. I think if 0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.880 they were to give them an offer, it's probably not 0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.040 going to be the money of them would want right now. 0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:37.920 And that's what they ran into. 0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.920 If you remember with Josh Allen last year, Yep, Jaywarsy've 0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.240 got a lot of criticism for not signing Josh to 0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.960 a long term deal when the bargain was there, when 0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.160 you or when it was affordable. I never got the 0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.760 idea at all ever, talking to Josh that he thought 0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.360 that he had earned the long term deal that he 0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.880 believed he was capable of, if that makes sense. 0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:03.600 I believe he knew he. 0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.360 Was worth it, but also from a league point of view, 0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.920 he hadn't shown that, so there was no way that 0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.320 was going to get done before this offseason. I kind 0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.600 of feel like to a lesser degree, Cisco and Campbell 0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.000 I don't think. I'm not sure that they are players 0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.240 who will reach Josh's level at his position, But even so, 0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.840 I don't think there's any rush to do it, and frankly, 0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.160 I think it'd be a risk to do it at 0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.480 this point, and I would be surprised if it was 0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:30.960 on the table. 0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:32.720 I don't think it is on the table. I think 0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.320 that's definitely something they'll look at next year, and I 0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.680 would imagine they would want to play a full, healthy 0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.600 season both of those players to hopefully get their highest value. 0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.760 Our final question today for the Ozone Nail Guy is 0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.120 coming from Art in New Jersey says, I think the 0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.040 new kickoff rules will be fun. Do you think they 0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.360 will lead to more running backs returning kicks? 0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:49.760 Yeah. 0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.480 My first thing was to say no because of the 0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.880 injury factor, and then I sort of rethought it a 0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.440 little bit and read a little bit more about it, 0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.680 and it could. I don't think the Jaguars will use 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.640 Travis etn in that role unless. 0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.960 Devin Durbiny were already get hurt, but it does. 0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.240 The reason that running backs hadn't been used before was 0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.960 he didn't want to risk your star players for injuries. 0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.760 Now I do think you could see more quote star 0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.040 players playing back there. For the Jaguars, They've already got 0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.359 their star returner, so it's gonna be interesting. I don't 0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.399 know that we know the answer to this question yet. 0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.080 I think it will evolve next season, but I think 0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.960 you could get back to a point where teams are 0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.760 putting Back in the day when Washington was really good, 0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.080 they would put Darryl Green back there, who was an 0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.480 all Pro cornerback, and when they needed it, they would 0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:46.680 put him back on kicks. 0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:47.800 It was mainly punts. 0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.920 But point being, if you take the injury risk out 0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:55.080 of it, and it does look like this new format 0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.240 will significantly take the injury risk away from the returner, 0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.119 then maybe you we'll see more running backs. 0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.959 You watch some of the setups they have for XFL 0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.199 and stuff. It just looks so strange. But I'm very 0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:07.040 excited to see that. 0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.920 But it looks like the pace once they get going, 0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.800 it does look strange, but the pace does feel more 0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.639 like a running back's pace, if that makes any sense. Yes, 0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:23.000 because you're sort of starting more from a standing position. 0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.400 You're kind of building accelerate. Yeah. 0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.560 So yeah, I think a lot of this it is 0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.760 to be played out. It'll take some innovative coach to 0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.280 do something that'll work. 0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:35.119 People will follow it. 0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.359 This is a good change I think we can agree on. 0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:38.800 I think it'll be fun at least at least a 0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.119 little bit different. Not I feel like every time we 0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.719 get a rule change, we're always complaining. With this one, 0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:42.960 I'm kind of interested. 0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.479 In well credited for trying something because the kickoff had 0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.960 been taken out of the game. The shame is that 0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.960 I I've yet to see anything that can bring the 0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.199 on side kickback because the danger and I think the 0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:55.879 on side kicked the way they've got it having to 0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.520 tell teams you're going to do it and you're. 0:18:59.440 --> 0:18:59.920 Sort of silly. 0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:05.120 But they'll figure out a way to bring that element back, 0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.600 maybe the fourth and twenty five past they've been talking about. 0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.919 But I do think this will add more excitement. It 0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.200