WEBVTT - Week 6 Waiver Wire Adds And Drops, Monday night recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever m Do To to Do, din It Do

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to Do? Do? Din It Do? Do Do? Do? Did

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>It Do? Yo is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Staffel. I

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Susman. What's going on, Money, Greggy? What's up man?

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Week five in the books? Kind of a mixed bag

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>last night in terms of overall sports fantasy. He pulled

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out a much needed win in the GFC League against

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>our guy, Christopher Carrol, mark Ingram came through and Jordan

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Reed was the invisible man last night, Yes he was.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees went off broke the record, so I'm sure

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that. Alvin Kamara owners are probably freaking

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>out frustrated. I lost in in the Carton League by

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like two or three adventure. They have a camaros. I

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't even look kind of like how in the GST.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I didn't look at the s warners or whatever. And

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted that one I lost. I lost Carton's League.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, but how about them Yankees moving on? Nobody

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>cares for baseball? Frankie, you know that. Yeah, of course

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that. So last night mark Ingram, that's the

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>story to me, right, mark Ingram return lead the backfield

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and carries lead the backfield and touchdowns. What was with

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the breakdown between Marking Room and Alvin Kamara. That's what

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the story is to start start us off here on

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a Tuesday. Yeah, so mark Ingram stepped in immediately saw

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a fifty four percent of the snatch ball. Alvin Kamara

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>only played forty six percent of the snatch and I saw, um,

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, people on Twitter talking about how you know,

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he came into this game with a bum knee that

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of got out to a lead very early in

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this game. They were dominating pretty much from like the

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>second quarter on, So basically in the second half. They

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't really need Alvin Kamara. You know, as weird as

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds, they you know, they were just dominating this game,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so he didn't play a lot there in the second half. Um,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be freaking out. If anyone in your league

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is freaking out and they're an Alvin Kamara owner, I

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would try and buy low. Uh. And I'm not gonna

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.839
<v Speaker 1>try and like pat myself on the back too hard

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for this one. But a couple of weeks ago, I said,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>just try just float Alvin Kamara out there and see

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what you can get. I still think he's going to be,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a top five running back from here on out.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But God bless you, Greggy, there is no doubt that

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram provides something there that they haven't had all seasons. So,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the days of getting twenty targets out of

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara, the days of getting you know, fifteen plus

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>targets out of him, I think those are gone. But

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I still think that he's going to be good enough

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for you know, twelve thirteen carries a game and probably

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like seven to eight targets in competitive games. This was

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>really not a competitive game grade. Yeah, so it's interesting,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder how much of this has to do

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>with being Ingram's first game back and the Saints having

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a buy next week. Right, you can give Camara almost

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an extended break because they've used them a lot more

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>than they probably have wanted to um over the first

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>four weeks because they had no backup. Jonathan Williams didn't

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>work out, Mike gillisly didn't work out, nobody worked out

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as as the potential backup. They look very very hard

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to find someone to feel that mar At Ginghram role.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>They found nobody, so they had to use Ingram over

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and over, use Kimara more and more and more every

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>single week, and I usould just could not continue. I

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's a chance we see a lot of what

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year with Ingram and Camara, which is

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it pretty even split. But mark Ingram very heavily involved

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. And I said to you back in January,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I go, everyone's talking about Alvin Camara as a top five,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>top six, top seven pick, but shouldn't mark Ingram be

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in that close to first round discussion. He got suspended

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and it never happened, And before he got suspended, he

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>was I believe going like late second round, early third

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>round around that turn that the Jordan Howard area. Um,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>if you will and it last night is any proof

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that it is. That's probably where

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he deserved to go, if not earlier. Marking was fantastic

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>last night. Yeah he was. He You know, he saw

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen carries in this game. The efficiency wasn't great, just

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>around three yards per carry. But you know something I

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>spoke about yesterday. You can't really notice it now because

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it was nineteen the final score. The Redskins defense overall

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>had been pretty good coming into this game, so they

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>shut down the run for the most part in terms

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of efficiency, but he still scored two touchdown. They used

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>some a ton in the red zone. I don't know

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to change, um, But you know where

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara was dominating this year was indeed in the

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>red zone. Coming into this week, the most red zone

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>touches in the NFL. So that's you know, carries plus receptions. Um,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna change a little bit. But in

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>games where like it's higher scoring, their shootouts, I think

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>we see more Kamara. But look, we knew that once

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>mark ingram was going to return that the Saint's offense

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gets something back that they hadn't had all season, and

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that was like a competent one to punch to Alvin Kamara.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think if if you got marking her back,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you're excited about that. He I think instantly jumps in

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as like a high end RBV two um And you know,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara instead of being the consensus RB one, he's

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>probably closer to like top five now still n RB one,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just not the consensus RB one. That that he may

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have been other than TDD Gurley to me. Yeah, alright,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's the big story of the Running Game last night.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk more about Drew Brees and the wide receivers.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>There was no Ted gain last night. Tracolon Smith, who

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people really really like, scores touchdown a

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>DFS target. He did. He he was fantastic, wide wide

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>open on one of the touchdowns last night. Yeah. Still

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>only saw three targets in this game, but if you

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>look at the target breakdown, nobody had more than five.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of receivers in this game between

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>two targets and five targets. Michael Thomas had five targets.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>In this game, Cray Koon Smith showed some of that explosiveness.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was kind of a preseason darling. A

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the fantasy industry on Twitter talking him up

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>throughout the preseason. Uh, you know, turn those three receptions

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>into a hundred eleven yards and two touchdowns, So maybe

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he gives them that added element that they were missing, um,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know without Ted Gain. Tedgain, you know, a little

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>bit an older player. He plays his part in the offense.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Cam Meredith also had five targets tied

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from Michael Thomas for the team lead yesterday called all

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>five for seventy one receiving yards. So I think some

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>people are going to look at Cameron Meredith and tray

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Smith as ads this week, and today is a

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire show, so I'm sure we'll talk about that,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really not sure, Like, you know, one week,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be Trae Kwon is like the number two

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher or number three rather outside of Michael Thomas

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and Kamara, and then maybe one week gets to came Meredith.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know how much consistency you're gonna

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>get out of either one of those guys. Greg, Yeah,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I I tend I tend to ultimately agree with you

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that you look at Kuan Smith and you look at

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Ted Gain and Smith younger, more exciting. He's a lot

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>better than Ted Gain is at this point in his career.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But will it be consistent? Will it be week to week?

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The New Orleans Saints have so many weapons to deal

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>with and then you can't count on it. It took

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>us forever to count on Ted again. I like Smith,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I liked him to the DFS play. We all like

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Mary to coming into the year. But with mark Ingram back,

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with Ben Watson and Josh Hill still things there's just

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>no reliability week to week. We can talk about it

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and then by coming up next week, like you're not

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>spending it in all these guys. Yeah, outside of like

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues, we're playing a few of those where you know,

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like twenty plus round drafts maybe where you have like

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>eight bench spots something like that. But in your standard,

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve team maybe five bench league. I don't

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think that you're going out and adding these guys. And

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, I know the snap percentage might

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be a little misleading because last night obviously you know,

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that game felt like it never was gonna end. You know,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going into the fourth quarter, this game was already over,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was over by the end of the third quarter,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the fourth quarter you probably see a

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of those players resting. But Michael Thomas played seventy

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snaps, track Kuon Smith was next up

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with sixty six percent of the snaps, and then Cameron

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Meredith comes in at about forty percent of the snaps.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But again, you don't know how much does that due

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to the guys just leaving the game late and just

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>not playing the fourth quarter because they didn't need to

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>totally totally, that's on the other side of things last night,

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>do we have to know? Not really? Now we should um, So,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be the worst game I've seen of Alex

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith's career. It was bad. It was so bad. Twenty

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>three or thirty nine, a guy who typically completes a

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of his passes two seventy five yards, zero passing touchdowns.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>He did have the rushing touchdown, but through an interception,

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a terrible interception, like you know, throwing off his back

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>foot across his body. Bad. It was just not your

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>typical Alex Smith game. And you know, also yesterday I

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>brought up the Saints defense. Did they start to turn

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>around in that game against the Giants? You didn't really

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know because the Giants offense is very inconsistent. Was that

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just the Giants offense having a bad game or was

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it the Saints defense kind of turning around? And I

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>think the answer now over the past two weeks is

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, the Saints defense is kind of

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>turning around. The Sts defens Maybe that Giants game wasn't

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a fluke slowly incrementally going getting better. And they think

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>last night and everybody liked Washington, Cory, you me, we

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we all liked Washington. And the thing is, that's very

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>frustrated Giant fan. You beat Carolina, You're like injianver sheet here. Um,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>but what a terrible division right now? Oh my god.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think with it's a really tough

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>spot for Washington. I know they're coming off by but

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's Monday night, it's in New Orleans, it's a Drew

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Brees record breaking game. It's a really tough spot, and

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>all the momentum goes against Washington in that one. So

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm buying the Saints defense back. Yet.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand the narratives in this game, but when you

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have a bye week and you have that much time

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to game plan for all of these players, I don't know.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of inexcusable to get blown out, Like, yeah,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Saints were probably going to win this game regardless

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the narrative and Drew Brees going for history here,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that it's like Monday night, I don't

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think that matters, Like coming off a bye week, I

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just I don't see how you get trounced this badly

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>when you have that much time to game plan for

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a team, unless indeed it's just you know, the Saints

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are turning that corner and their defense is playing well,

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is throwing for sixty yards and three touchdowns.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every single week against the Giants, we

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have certainly zero We have certainly seen in the past

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these a lot of teams have worked themselves into a

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>better defense, the Saints last year as an example of

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. Seemingly every year. So these old Giants teams

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that through the first two, three or four weeks they

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>really struggle before the pieces fit and the scheme works.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, they don't come out of the gun

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>slingin right Like it's a process and maybe that process

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>is now in stage two. When it comes to the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints, I think it's I think it's possible.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>With Washington, I really liked their defense before last night. Uh,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that turned into a disaster. Chris Thompson was involved and

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Drew and Alex Smith almost killed him. So that was

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't so great. Um. Adrian Peterson revenge game didn't

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>really work out. Jordan Reed, as mentioned, was a zero

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>all these wide receivers. It was. It was a struggle

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all night long really for Washington, and Jordan's read two targets.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a season low for him. We thought this

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>would be a solid matchup to Um, you know, playing

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 1>while he's healthy. It seems like he's healthy right now.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the biggest play you saw make last

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>night was a chasdown tackle that he saved, that interception

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>from Alex Smith being a pick six. That was the

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>most action we saw in Jordan read last night. So

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's one reception for twenty one yards. Obviously you were

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>expecting more. That was a letdown. Chris Thompson still had

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>his standard PPR game six receptions for forty five yards.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Neither running back did much on the ground because obviously

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>this game got out of hand very fast. You like

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that Jamison Crowder was targeted eight times but only hauled

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in four for fifty five. I actually thought it could

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>have been a better game for Crowder because the Saints

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lost their slot corner um a week ago and we

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>saw Sterling Shepard kind of have a big game because

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, and I thought that as a result, Jameson

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Crowder would be in for a big game as well here. Uh,

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't. It was just kind of like a

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>standard four for fifty five. I do like the fact

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that he saw eight targets. Um, Washington has to bounced back. Now.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>They are going up against the Panthers next week, so

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll be at home in that game. We'll see what happens.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly um been some offense there. Hey, I wanted

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to do certainly get into waivers today. We have a

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>whole lot to get you. Um. I know people don't

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have all that money left or not all the much

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>money left, but there hasn't there nobody has a hundred

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars left essentially, or a thousand dollars left. It's draining.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And the big news that comes out yesterday has to

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>do with j h I. A j I out of

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>nowhere tears his a c L. And I know you

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>were very off j j I this year coming into

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the year for not necessarily injury concerns, but orkloud concerns

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with Doug Peterson with the Eagles and rotating running backs

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in and out. Well, I have good news. One of

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the running backs are gone. You don't have to deal

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with j j I anymore. Bad news is JGI is

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best out of the running mass. He tours

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a c L and that sucks. But he's gone, which

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>opens up Corey Clement, Wendel Smallwood, Darren Sprowls when he's healthy.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And who's the fourth guy again? Was that like rookie

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>people like for a little while, Josh. It's not Josh

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds but Adams. I think that's right, Josh Adams. So

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a called up off the practice squad, right, So

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>then you have those four guys to worry about. So

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question that we've gotten on Twitter, we've gotten

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>from our friends, We've gotten on the phone lines today

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is how much do we spend on guys like Corey

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Clement when the smallwood, Darren Sprawls and Josh Adams if

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they're on the way a wire. That's the big question,

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I throw to you. I think it

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>depends obviously how much you meet a running back. If

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you were a j JID owner, I'm not breaking the

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>bank on any of the running backs here. I think

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement and went into small wood. You're looking at

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>another running back by committee. Again, this is a Doug

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Peterson led offense. And I said the same thing coming

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>into the year, Greg, was that was the reason why

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like j j. I. You look at the

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years and this is actually our stat

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Greg. To this point in the season,

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>no running back, the totality of their snaps, has played

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>more than of the snaps on the season. Last season,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>no Eagles running back played more than forty one percent

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps over the entire season. Not just I'm

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about like in a single game, because there were

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>games where you know, obviously running backs dominated the snaps,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's just so in consistent. This is what Doug

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Peterson likes to he likes to rotate running backs, and

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to continue to frustrate fantasy owners. So again,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>if you lost a Ji, you're gonna look at Clement,

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna look at Wendel Smallwood. Honestly, I'm not spending

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>more than of my fab budget on either. I think

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they're they're both in that range, and honestly, to try

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and choose one, I think you're gonna be pulling your

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hair out there as well, because we've seen Wendel small

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>would have good games so far this year. We've seen

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement have a good game so uh to this

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>point in the season. I think those are kind of

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like the early down guys. And in Darren's browls, if

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he ever gets healthy, we'll just kind of have his role,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe like a handful of targets per game.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna continue to be a running back by

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>comedie in Philadelphia. Now, you are desperate for running back,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. We're all desperate for running backs, and

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree it's gonna be running back by committe. You're

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull your hair out when Wendel small is doing really,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>really well and you started Corey Clement and vice versa

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, and Corey Clements having a great drive. Wise,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Wendel Smallwood in at the goal line. You're gonna be

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>very very frustrated when Doug Peterson stops running the ball.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>These are all the things that we have seen with

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia in the past, and all these things have been very,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating to US Eagles owners. The rumors that you

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday, and there were two of them. The first

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>was Levian Bell, and every source of imaginable has said

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not a thing. The Eagles are not trying to

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>trade for Levian Bell. It's not gonna work whatever. Okay,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Florio actually just texted us saying he thinks Lashaw McCoy

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>could end up back in Philadelphia. Supposedly Eagles have reached

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>out of them. Somebody has reached out. Obviously makes sense

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Bills who were going nowhere. Um, you got

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>up so interestingly enough, those are the rumors. Are they true?

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly you have to worry about what it comes to

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>your bid. Yeah, the Levian Bell, they've already shut that down. Um,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they want to give up that

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>high a draft pick, but you could probably get Losa

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>McCoy for a lot cheaper. Still, even if they get

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Losa McCoy, it's going to be a running back by committee.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He's never going to dominate snapsh for this team. Fair enough,

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break when we come back. More from

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the Waiver Wire actual the BFFs Daily Rhodo dot Com

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't just

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>give you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stop industry leading DFS tools

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>optimize that in minutes, building optimized line up for cast

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>games and turneys learned from the game's best DFS players

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>joined Daily Rodo dot Com. Visit today. We are back

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>with you here on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network. I gotta tell you you canna get

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on man on Sunday Collin's Room, Daily Rodo dot Com

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>on seven Grant on Draft Kings, and you is Daily

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodos NFL Optimizer last night first place and he won

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy five thousand dollars Are you kidding me?

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Two dred grand in two days believable. Tonight he's playing

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the DFS hockey and trying to win a DFS tournament

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>three second days. I don't get it. We knew at

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rotor dot com produce winners and produce millionaires, but

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this is ridiculous. They produced seven multimillion dollar tournament winners

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and clearly countless more, including our own Colin Drew. You

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>guys won two d seven thousand dollars in the last

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>two days, and it over Daily Rotor dot com right now.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code f n t s Y for

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a special discount and take part in the daily Fantasy winnings.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. If you're a sports wager and we have

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sports wet betting tab as well, and you can use

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the same optimizer, but for betting rather than for DFS.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rotor dot Com the industry website where millionaires are

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>made and Colin Drew is too unbelievable. Frankie crazy really

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is man, shouts Colin Drew again. Greg has a wedding

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>next year, so if you want to contribute to that, um,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>all donations are welcome. Hell yeah, that was a band

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and god, so much money, so much money. You get

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the wedding singer Adam Sandler will not be at my wedding.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean he kind of would fit right in. I

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>guess why because, um he you're a good singer and

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a good singer. All right, cool, Yeah, that makes

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>sense obviously, it's alright. It seems like seeing what you

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were going with that. Okay, all right, So Window small Wood,

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Corey collect those are the two guys that are out

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>there in quite if you leaves Frank, you're not breaking

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the bank for them by any means. You said yes,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and Wendells Smallwood is by far much more widely available.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>He's only owned in ten percent of CBS sports leagues,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>while Corey Clement is still owning sixty three percent of leagues.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And there was just a report that Corey Clement is

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>at the start of practice today. They're practicing on a

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday because obviously they have the short week the game

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night against the New York Giants, so he

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is practicing. Looks like he's going to be ready for

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that game. But again this past week, Wind Smallwood in

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>JGI the snaps each split. Now if he makes Darren

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Sprowls into that, assuming that he's back for this game

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. Maybe he plays like twenty of the snaps

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and then the rest is kind of divvied up between

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement and Windal Smollent. I'm just I'm breaking it

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>down for you again, this is just going to be

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a mess of of of a situation. Like one week

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna start Corey Clement, it will be the week

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>when small Wood goes off. So I'm not breaking the

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bank for either. If I lost a GI, I'm willing

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to go as high as twenty percent maybe, like if

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you just want to get over that like two percent

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of my budget, But I'm not going up to like

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent something that I was doing early on in

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the season like a Geovanni Bernard. I'm not doing that

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>for either one of these Eagles running backs. Greg. I

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just think they're going to frustrate you. Ultimately. I'm gonna

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>spend underwent um for sure, but not much less than

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>um for Corey Clement. I'm more interested in maybe Hill

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be around and maybe when no smaller would be closer

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen. I think I think that's what I would do.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense. Yeah, I don't love either though. I don't

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think the waiver wider this week is all the great.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not, it's it's not, it's it's it's obviously not. Um.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis actually owned in under of lease. Now after

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one week, he didn't necessarily get picked up everywhere because

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you knew Chris Carson was coming back. Last week. We

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>saw the role that Mike Davis has. He's the goal

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>line guy. He had twelve carries, he was good, Chris

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Carson was great. How much do you spend that a

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>guy like Mike Davis. It's pretty similar to the Eagles

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>situation right now in terms of the running backs for

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, because again, Chris Carson, I highlighted this yesterday.

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>He played about fifty percent of the snaps and Mike

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis was right around. So you're looking at that sixty

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>forty split. I think we can continue to see that,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but you can't put Mike Davis in your lineup now

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>saying all right, he's definitely gonna get the goal line work,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get the red zone work, he's gonna score

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. I still think there's kind of no rhyme

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or reason to Pete Carroll's you know, Seahawks offense right now, Um,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just they're probably just gonna ride the hot hand.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But Mike Davis looks good right now. Any time we

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>see a running back who is performing like this and

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it is getting at least of the snaps and and

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>getting double digit touchdowns, uh touchdowns, touches overall, you have

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhat interested. So similar to the Eagles guys,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not breaking the bank for this, maybe like

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of my budget, that's about as high as I'm willing

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to go for Mike Davis. Yeah, you know it's for me,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's even high, I think because I get Chris Carson.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>If something happens to Carson again, and you're looking at

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Davids like a like a low end Army two, right,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So that was the thing. Carson hasn't exactly been picture

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>perfect healthy over the bad last two years, so that's true.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>She said, a great. Look, there's just no thing backs

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 1>out there like these are the guys who are highlighting

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire right now. It's the Eagles guys, it's

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis who's still only owned in leaves. I mean

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>some of their names that will bring up Alfred Blue

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Doon Toon Foreman, like the Texans can't really run the

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>football right now? Do you want to get involved in

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that mess? Like, I think Deonta Foreman has some upside

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>only owned, but I think they're probably gonna slowly work

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>him in like you're not. If they do decide to

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>give it over to Deontay Foreman, it's not going to

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>be right away, like we're looking at maybe like week eight,

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>week nine, where like he takes over and maybe sees

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen plus touches for this team. It's not gonna

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>happen right away. So there's no one that gives you

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an immediate impact. At least, Mike Davis, if you're like

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>super desperate for reflex, we have no carry on Johnson

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this week. He's on a buy obviously, the Saints running

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>backs being on a buy in marketingroom and Alvan Kamara

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't help you. So Mike Davis, you're probably looking

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at him as like another flex option this week. There's

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just not much on the way bar No, there's not.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>There's really really not. So maybe maybe I'm under cutting

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis here a little bit. Maybe I should be

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>spending more. And for what it's worth, the Seahawks have

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>been better at run bocking. Since they got DJU the

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks, they've just been able to run, run, run,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think ultimately that's what they want to do,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Like Russell Wilson, if not running to the football. I

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think they want to put the load on Russell

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Wilson again like they had to last year at you know,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at their peak, Pete Carroll and the Seahawks were run, run, run,

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>run the football, play defense. A lot of that was

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>with Marshawn Lynch. They're still trying to find their Marshaw Lynch.

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously not for Shot Penny, even though they use

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick on him. Now, I'm not

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>writing the guy off for dead. I mean, he's still

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>only a rookie in the NFL, but it doesn't look

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's gonna happen for him this season. It looks

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>like we have a two headed monster between Chris Carson

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Davis. So I was gonna stay around five percent.

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I want to go up to ten percent

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>after the after our conversation with them, Like Davis, for you,

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to go with highwe Yeah, that's fine, and

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a twelve percent. I think it's a fine number

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Mike Davis, which leads me to

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Houston where Lamar Miller sucks. Keep pounding that update update.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller sucks. He is expected to be back this weekend.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Blues out there. Spoiler alert, Alfred Blue also sucks, okay,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in the past game better than anything we've

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>ever seen at Lamar Miller, who sucks, indeed. And then

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you get to week seven, not this week, that's week six,

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but the week after Week seven, where people still seem

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to be excited about Deanta Foreman. Is there a reason

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to me? I don't know. Will he even make the

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>jump over Alfred Blue again? I don't know. What I

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>can tell you is he's out there, Alfred Blues out

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there the rest of the season. Frank Rank, Lamar Miller,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Blue, and Foreman. For me, honestly, I would take

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the upside shot just based on the explosiveness we saw

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from him last year. And I know I just kind

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of bashed the fact that you know, he's eligible to

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>come off the pup in week seven, so he's still

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not even back this week. But this is a prime

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Statt candidate and he has been all season long. He's

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>owned in nineteen percent of leagues. But again, that explosiveness,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that um, that youth that he provides that we haven't

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>seen out of Lamar Miller, Like Mar Miller brings nothing

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to the table right now for this team. And they're

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>already talking about how they expect him to be back

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for Week six. So again, like Alfred Blue, while he

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>helped in the receiving game last week, you know, he

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of is he is. He's like a jag at

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this point. So I think Deonta Foreman, they used a

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>draft pick on him last year, they obviously like him.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think at some point they're going to give him

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to be the guy on this team. So

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I would rank it Deonton Foreman, Lamar Miller, and then

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Lufford Blue Um. And you know, if if Lamar

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Miller can't go again this week, then you're probably looking

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>at a similar usage game out of Alfred Blue again

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in week six. But they're talking about Lamar Miller going

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to be back, but I don't think it'll be long

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>before Deonta Foreman returns. And then and they start to

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like phase he ultimately like it's probably just

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>another frustrating situation. It was last year too, even in

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the game's Yonta Foreman did well and it looked like

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he was like starting to take off before he got injured.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>He was never getting a big workload like they I

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're ever going to completely go away from

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller, but there's no doubting that he has more

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>explosiveness and has big playability that Lamar Miller doesn't agree

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's working, you know, there are things working against him.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He's coming back from an achilles injury. It's a very

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very hard injury to come back from. I don't know

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen a running back come back from an

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>achilles injury and and be great, to be honest, but

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, he's still only why two years old.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>If there's anyone who could do it, it's probably a

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>guy this year, probably probably so. But again, we don't

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>know how healthy he will be when he comes back

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>at week seven. And that's kind of what scares me

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>because this is a brutal, brutal injury, and well, I

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>think his talent might be the best out of Lamar

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Miller out for Blue and himself. Ultimately, will he be

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>will he be the same explosive guy that we saw

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>last year? And I don't anybody can ask the answer

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's fair. So it sounds like you're leaning towards

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ranking Lamar Miller number one on this list, right, I

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want any of them, to be honest with you,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that's fair, and that's that's probably the right answer. Like,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if I had to choose one, Lamar Miller just doesn't

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bring anything to the table at this point, and Alfred

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Blue maybe he has his role as the pass catcher,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but who has the highest upside of the group in

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>my opinion? For now? Let me throw this at you,

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>how much do you spend on them? Alfred? Like, I

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>got Alfred Blue in my home league last week for

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>zero dollars and that was even with the possibility of

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller not playing, so everyone knew that possibility and

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he still went for nothing. Right, So I'm not like,

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what three to five like a couple of bucks on

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Blue. I don't, you know, I don't think there's

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>much there totally. Not to foreman, I'm a little bit

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>more interested in But again, if you need help right away,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna help you. He's heard, he's not playing

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, he's coming off the pub next week. There,

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, no idea until week or week nine when

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they're really really using him. So if you're if you

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have a positive record, if you're three and two or better,

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can afford to stash him, you have someone

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on your bench, you're just not using like all right,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>something like that. For Donce Foreman, I'm just I'm talking

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>him up. But again, like I'm not overly excited about

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody in Houston, I'm not, you know, going higher than

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent on him. I was excited. I think that

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>forman last week and I are for nothing. I just

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>poked about that. If I had to bid on him

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, I have no idea, man, I really really

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. But obviously rather own the Eagles and

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis over Downs Foreman. Would would you rather own

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones over Donson Foreman, Because I think that's kind

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of like similar territory. I would take it. I would

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>take Ronald Jones. I don't think either team can run

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>block overall. I think Ronal Jones got an opportunity last week,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right and healthy. He's healthy, That's the thing. So would

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you rather mean him? But and that's a very potent offense.

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if they really do kind of pass

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the torch onto Ronald Jones, maybe you get some scoring opportunities.

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather own Um Foreman or Rashan Penny Foreman?

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's there's two guys ahead of Rashan Penny

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle, and I think once the Foreman comes back,

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he kind of goes to the top of the list.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm just being a little bit naive here,

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but why why would you have any trust in anything

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller has done. He's done nothing, and he is

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>completely job of Shot Penny at this point. How would

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you hold He didn't play a single snap last week.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>He was effective two weeks ago when he got to

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>play behind Mike Davis. But even in that game, Mike

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Davis dominated snaps, dominated carries, and and and targets. In

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a deeper league, you you probably want to hold onto

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Roshot Penny. And I'm talking like deep, like fourteen teams

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are deeper, or if you have like more than six

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or seven bench spots, okay, but I would rather stash

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Foreman or Ronald Jones of roshot Penny.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I tend to agree with you. Somebody

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>else you wrote to drop out? Here? Are there any

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of the running backs you wanted to mention? You're kind

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of use check on here. This is just a PPR

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dart throw. But Matt Breeder looks like he's gonna be

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>out a few weeks with that, you know, mint to

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>high ankle sprain that they're talking about right now, and

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we know, um, how do you check? You know? It

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>was just using the past game a week ago, so um,

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris not really going to catch many passes and

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle you Scheck has that role in this offense. So again,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a dart throw, a PPR like whatever.

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he catches like five or six balls a week.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of like that THEO ridic mold, right, I

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just I just thought i'd mentioned him. Hm, cool, you're

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>not in I'm I'm sorry, okay. So what I did

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you was were getting wide receivers now right?

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of the players that you had on your

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>drop list is Antonio Callaway, which shocked me because when

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we do the fane of hurry up coming up in

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>an hour or so or two hours or whatever. He's

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on my ad list, and that's are the difference opinion,

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly is what it comes to. Antonio Callaway. You think

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he's dropable. I think this is a perfect time to

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>buy lew Sean Higgins out the next two to four

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks and m c L injury. Yeah, David and jokers

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there and obviously Jarvis Landry is there. When they that

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's it, do Johnson maybe maybe maybe do Johnson somebody.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We have to talk about les pick up because Baker's

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw it to somebody man. Yeah, and he's still

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing by a ton to Jarvis Landry. So you like that.

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's not like Landry is doing much

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>with these targets right now. He's actually been very inefficient

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. But look at Callaway, he's he got the

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>targets the past three weeks. He had ten targets in

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>week three, he had nine targets in week four. That

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>number went down to just five targets this week. And

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>while I know Richard Higgins uh is out, like you mentioned, um,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Derek Willie's got five targets in this game as well.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So that was tied with Antonio Callaway and overall, Cavaway

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't done much with his targets on the year,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's just a lot of Jarvis Landry.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a lot of David and Joku,

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>who has had eleven targets this past week and has

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>had seven times at least seven targets and four to

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>five games this year. I think it's a lot of

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in Joku, a lot of Landry. We probably see a

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more Duke Johnson sprinkled in here, but overall,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield and really any quarterback has not been on

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the same page with Antonio Callaway right And I just

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it's going to happen, especially now in

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a game where we just saw his targets um come

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>down instead of kind of stay consistent where they were at.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And then a guy like Derek Willis who did not

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>play much in this game, but he still had the

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>same number of targets as Antonio Callaway. Um. Overall, I'm

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just not very excited about him. I'd rather take a

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>shot on you know, some of these guys, Like what's

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the difference between Robbie Anderson and Antonio Callaway right now?

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>They're they're both d threats for their respective teams. Except

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we've actually seen Robbie Anderson do it one week out

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season. We haven't seen Antonio Callaway do it yet.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true, That's completely true. How How is Duke Johnson

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>out there? Um? The Duke? I just picked him up

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this past week just because, like I, you know, in

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>my home league, which is deeper than usual, it's like

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>seven bench spots and like we start like eleven positions,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I felt like he should be owned. He's out. So

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he's out there in Yahoo, I know you don't. He's

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>owning thirty six percent of leagues. Yahoo ownership is usually low,

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>usually lower. So yeah, let me pull this up in CBS,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>where I just picked him up. With thirty six percent

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of leagues, i'd imagine it's probably a closer to fifty.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>It's forty percent on cbstent on CBS, ESPN, he's owning

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and a half percent, So he's about owning

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>half league hal half leagues. I was probably worth picking

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>up Man still in terms of like the running macks

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>though that we mentioned in my opinion. Behind the Eagles,

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he's still behind Mike Davis, Deonta Foreman, and Ronald Jones.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I have higher upside because they could be

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the starters for their respective teams. You probably just comes

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in ahead of Kylie Shick. It's about it, okay, So

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that tells you how much you need to know enough

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but fair enough, as I had more than five carries

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in any game this year, targets have been inconsistent. He's

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>had six twice. In the other three games he's had two.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He said two, he had one. Well, it should be

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>trending in the right direction with the injury. Chard, Higgins

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and Jogu arerope as well. Yeah, we'll get more to

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, more players that you can drop. It's

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the same players we always say. But but

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we're you nervous to drop them. Let's talk about that

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Fantasy Sports Radie.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're someone that needs fantasy sports advice every day,

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered. When you

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>download the n T s Y Sports Radio Network GAP,

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you get the top fantasy advice every single day right

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>through the weekend. Be sure to listen to our weekend

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Weekend fantasy updates. The fantasy Jesus in this league is

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>never short of exciting at I T L and so

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network app in

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes and Google play Store now and keep the

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>best fantasy experts right in your pocket all day long

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and all week long. If you enjoyed playing daily Fantasy

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sports but are sick of dealing with professionals using the

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>algorithms to select hundreds of lot of centries, try to

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>prodis builder tool at my bookie dot ag. Forget having

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to create multiple lineups, Ditch the hassle of dealing with

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>late laugh of scratches and avoid experts winning ninety percent

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of the money. Invest in the players that you want

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>without salary caps. And if you sign up for a

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>new account using the promo code F and t S

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Y you can receive a deposit bonus. No more dealing

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with late lad of scratches. No experts are competed, yest,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>just you and the prop that you choose. Go to

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie dot a G. The promo code is f

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>n T S. Why would you sign up and choose

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>your matchup using the Prosperilder tool And that's my Boogie

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>dot a G. The promo code is f n T

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>s HY Back with you here in the Fantasy Best

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Ray Network. I feel like there

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was a name that we should mention. I just saw

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it in the YouTube chat. Alfred Morris only owning fifty

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues and was probably dropped in a lot.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually in one of my home leagues. I had no

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>choice but to drop him last week because, as I mentioned,

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to drop the Bears defense, and I

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>needed a defense while they were on the buy. My

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 1>running backs in that league war, you know, mark ingram

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle, Alex Collins, Safwan Barkley. Alfred Morris was clearly

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>my worst running back, so I went out and dropped

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 1>him so he might be available in your league. He's

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>h He's owning about fifty of CBS leagues. He played

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snaps uh this past week, which was

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 1>his highest over the past three weeks for them. Uh.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Kyle Uscheck actually played of the snaps for

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco this past week. So whenever they're trailing and

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 1>they're behind. This is kind of why I mentioned Kyle

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Check just because whenever they're trailing and are behind, which

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be a decent amount because

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>like the forty Niners are just not very good right now.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>With the c J. Betha as their quarterback, he's gonna

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>be on the field and c J Better likes to

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball to the running back. He's you know,

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr checkdown. I know that's something that Corey Parson, the

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy executive, has dubbed. But if Alfred Morris was dropped,

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the guy that you look at. And

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>then with the news about Lashawn McCoy kind of being

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 1>inquired on by the Philadelphia Eagles, we need to throw

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>out um Chris Ivory Chris Ivory as a as a

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>possible speculative ad in deeper leagues, just because if Shan

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>McCoy is traded, we saw that big usage game out

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Ivory. Again, Look, the Bills offensive line is

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not great. When he means the Bills overall are not great.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But anytime you could get a running back who could

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 1>potentially be the starter for his team if Lasha mcoy

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>were treated, I think you gotta look into it. He's

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>only owning sixteen of CBS. Yeah, I think you throw

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on Ivory. I don't think ultimately, where

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>would Alfred Morris rank among the group of running backs

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that spoke about today. He's he's probably he's probably ahead

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Davis, is for sure. I was considering putt

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>him ahead of the Eagles as well, man because with

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this range, if this team trains Briller Sean Good, it's

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. True, but that's just speculative right now, Like

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. Yeah, he's probably right in that same range.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say close. I think he's ahead of Mike Davis.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I was very close with the Eagles guys.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But again, the forty nine is not a good team. Like,

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spend a lot of fab on

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>him either, like twelve to fiftcent. But here's probably my max.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alfred Moore. So here here was the thing, right,

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I said when he was a small one, I

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>was gonna spend eight twelve percent. I said it was

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the number Mike Davis eight. I don't remember anymore. Mike

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Davis was eight twelve. And then I think you said

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent for small Wood, right. I know I gave

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, but I think when it was all said

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and done, I think I would put the highest bid

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on Alfred Morris. I really think I would. I get

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the Niners are terrible and you can never get away

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>from Kyle Shanahan running back. You're right, You're absolutely right,

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and buy it man, they do, I understand that. And

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they use Alfred Morris a lot this past week, and

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brina actually scored the receiving touchdown down near the

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>goal line. Maybe normally that would be an outfite to

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>know how much how often the forty Niners offense is

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 1>going to get near the goal line? How many points

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are they going to score this year? With c J. Bethard,

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They're just an absolute mess. So I agree that he

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>needs to be owned in more than of leagues. He's

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>probably like a must add player just because just while

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brina misses time which looks like it might be

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like two to four weeks or whatever, what you know,

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I don't. I don't feel great about

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>any of these Russians, like the Eagles. The honestly, the

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>one that high us on the right right now is

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. I'm not high on the Eagles because they

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>use a lot of their guys. Forty Niners are just

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not a great team that you want to buy in on.

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>The The Texans can't run the football tree the Bucks

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>can't run the football. So what are we talking about it? Yeah?

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it, man, I I completely get it. We

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted the wide receivers, so I want to get that

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in as well. You look at the wide receivers are

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>out there this week. Not much here either there. In

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>all honesty to me, the number one wide receiver out

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there is probably Robbie Anderson. He's owning thirty eight percent

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy leagues. Listen, only caught three balls, two of

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>them were touchdowns on Sunday. But Sam Donald basically said, listen,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take some shots deep now, and and they did.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Um Anderson's own and thirty percent of CBS leagues. Are

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you buying back in on your boy? Uh? Not really.

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about him a little bit yesterday. I just

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there's gonna be much consistency there with him.

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm wrong, maybe they continue to take deep

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>shots every single week now with Robbie Anderson. But the

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>thing is, how often is he going to convert those

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>deep shots that they take, and it's really it helps

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if Quincy and Nouma misses any time now because of

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this hand or risk injury, obviously, that would help Robbie Anderson.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just kind of like a bye week guy.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a boom er bus guy. I don't know that

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we ever see much consistency out of him, just because

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald is the quarterback. I think we saw obviously

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>much more consistency out of Robbie Anderson. Last year we

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>had a guy like Josh mccowens, a gun slinger, was

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>willing to just kind of like throw the ball down

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the field and let his wide rechievers make a play.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And again I could be wrong, but I just don't

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>trust that to me. The guys who I think who

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are I'd rather add over Robbie Anderson. Kikuta, who we

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>spoke about last week, is still own, so a lot

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of people. I don't think that they bought in ultimately

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on him, but I do think that he fits right

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>into this offense very well. Though he used in Texans

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 1>offense have Hopkins on the outside to have a full

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>learn the outside, and then they have Kiki just kind

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of like roaming over the middle of the field close

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to the line of scrimmage. And I like guys like

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>this for teams that can't run the football because they're

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>using him as an extension of the run game. And

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>if you watch that game on Sunday night, they line

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>him up in the backfield, they have like these trick

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>plays where he kind of like runs across, kind of

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like how the Chief use Tyreek Hill. They're using Kiki

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Kota in a sim her way in Houston. So to me,

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if he's still out there in your league, only owning

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forty one percent of leagues, he's the top wide receiver

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>AD for me. And then another guy who I'd rather

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.919
<v Speaker 1>own than Robbie Anderson, it's Mohammed Sanu. Everyone talking about

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones every single week, you talk about Calvin Ridley

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>every single week, it's mohammeds Knew who's being targeted. He's converting.

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>He has more touchdowns on the season than Julio Jones does.

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And not to mention he has a great, great matchup

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this week going up against the Tampa Bay Bucks secondary.

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're you lost out on a lot of wide

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers this week because of the Lions on a bye,

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the Saints on a bye. We have no

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, no Golden Tate, no Marvin Jones, no Kenny Golladay.

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You need to replace these guys. I trust a guy

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like Mohammed Sanu going up against the Tampa Bay Bucks

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>more so than I do Robbie Anderson, even though it's

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a solid matchup against the Indianapolis Colts. So I like

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed Sanu and Kikuta more so than Robbie this week.

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I like for sure because I think his role in

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the offense is secure. You like him in the slot,

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I cannot on the ball. He gave the great reasons.

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>With Fuller and Um Hawkins on the outside and Kiki's

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>doing his thing inside, it made sense. So Kicky's my

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 1>number one guy. I think Robbie Anderson would be too,

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>depending on the availability of Jonada Allison Randall Cobb. Let

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>me say that. Let me preface it with that Um

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Robby and would probably be too for me. I'm not

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>buying the upside. Mohammedsan New is just very very small.

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>See the same thing every year though the past three

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks at least seven targets in every game, right, Like

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>he's the one who's consistently getting targets. And I know

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I spoke about this with Calvin Ridley last week, and

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I still do like Calvin Ridley because he gets a

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of single coverage, He's going to have opportunities to

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>score touchdowns. We saw a lot of Calvin Lee touchdowns

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this year have been wide open, nobody around him, and uh,

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't be surprised if he scores a

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>touchdown again this week because it is a very good

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Tampa Bay Bucks. But if you look

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 1>at snap percentage and total targets right now, Hamed san

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>New is still the number two wide receiver on this team,

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think we need to respect that. You're right,

0:44:55.440 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right by that. But like, how much upside

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.479
<v Speaker 1>does Robbie Anderson have in an offense with Sam Donald

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as the quarterback? So I think that's a question that

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a Noah offense with Jeremy b It is

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>what they took shots, and I wonder if what we

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>saw this on it it is a thing that we're

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna like, It's a thing to come ultimately. Yeah, I

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just feel like that the target usage overall is just

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I get it, out on the Jets,

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>like there's no number one guy. We even saw Terrell

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Prior score a touchdown in this game. Noon, you know

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>when healthy is still going to get his targets. I

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>think height ends are kind of sprinkled in with Jordan

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Leggett and and Chris Herndon. So I think what you

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>really like about mohammedson new is this the first three

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season. Even the one where he had

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>seven targets, his long reception was thirteen yards, right, Like,

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.439
<v Speaker 1>there's there's nothing down the field. Two weeks ago there's

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a thirty six year recepsion, and then last week there

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was there was a bomb for a forty three year reception.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>You like that a lot, And they're taking shots with

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>him down the field. It's not just Julio Jones and

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Calvin Ridley. So you want to spend

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of dollars dollars in Mohammedsan you find like

0:45:57.480 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he is as he is every single year, Like I

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>put flex playing like all right, maybe you get something

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>done and I don't think that changes. So I think

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're actually this week against Tampa, especially this week against Tampa,

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right about that. I think we would

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have said the same thing realistically last week. It's Pittsburgh too,

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like you really, especially Pittsburgh, and it works. And I

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>had Mohammed's new ranked, you know, inside my top forty,

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe, last week. So I didn't have him quite

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>as like a wide receiver three. He was right there

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 1>on the cut off. But in my in my home

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.959
<v Speaker 1>league havel PPR, He's had at least thirteen points six

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points in each of the past three games. He's

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>had a touchdown or at least a hundred and eleven

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>yards receiving in each of the past three games. And

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>now he gets uh match up with the Tampa Bay

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Bucks for allowing the second most fantasy points to opposing

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. I'm in at least for this week eight

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six st eight seven not

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I was taking your calls here on the Fantasy Sports Network,

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>other wide receivers. Let me get an MVS. Let's do

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>it m v s. Radel Cobb. We're not gonna hear about.

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna hear enough about JOHNO. Allison. We're not

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear an about before waivers go through for people

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>tonight into Wednesday. If MVS is still out there and

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he isn't what a few leagues, how much do you

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>spend on him not knowing the deal of the other

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in Green Bay? The number that comes to mind,

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like seven or eight percent right off the bat

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with MVS. And I think, look, a lot of people

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say, well, you know, he's gonna be the

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver four once Alison and Cobb come back. Sometimes

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>these things have a weird way of working out where,

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it just so happens that Aaron Rodgers says, no,

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 1>this kid has earned my trust. You know, I target

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>him double digit times last week he converted you know,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he called I believe you call like six of those

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>he had, you know, six yards and a touchdown. If

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 1>it just so happened that he's like, no, like, let's

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:40.959
<v Speaker 1>move on from Randall Cobb, Like they're going to listen

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to Aaron Rodgers. So there's always a chance, especially in

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>this potent passing attack. Aaron Rodgers looked like he turned

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that corner. He looks like Aaron Rodgers again. Over four

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>passing yards and three touchdowns this past week. They haven't

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really been able to run the ball all that effectively.

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think anytime you see a guy on the packers

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving corps have a big game like this, you have

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to be interested. Even if you know if everyone's health,

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he's the number four guy, I think he's still gotta

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>take a shot. Okay, would you rather take a shot

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>on MVS or take the shot on Josh Reynolds because

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>he's in a very similar position. Brandon Cookes, Cooper Cup

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>both couldn't cussed last week in week five weeks six.

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Although Sean they optimistic about both guys, he's not. He's

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>got a little Pete Carrollton where he's optimistic about all

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of his players. Who are you taking the shot on

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.720
<v Speaker 1>MVS or Josh Reynolds. I think it's a good question,

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>But I take a shot on MVS, a guy that

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we just saw do it this past week against the

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>defense which is pretty respectable in the line secondary, So

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I would take MVS. I think it's a it's a

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>fair question. But if you play in deeper leagues where

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know Mark has Valdes Scantling was already picked up

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.359
<v Speaker 1>last week, and you own Brandon Cookes or your own

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Cooper cup and you're and you're really in a bind

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and you just you need a guy to pick up

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in case, just to be sure if one of those

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>guys don't go. And I think Josh Reynolds kind of

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>comes into play there more so. I don't think he's

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.439
<v Speaker 1>like a universal like must add kind of guy. Fair enough,

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And with that, we're gonna sign off uge for today.

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I remember the Fantasy Football Frenzy comes your way. Next,

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Venture, Jim Day, and the Fantasy executive Corey Parson.

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>If you're still with us, we appreciate it. We go

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>for the next five minutes to the top of the hour,

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're live on the radio. If you listen to

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast for sure you subscribe, rate us five stars

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and leave us a comment. We're on the phone lines now,

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Frank before we wrap eight four eight four, three, seven nine,

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and we begin with Chris and l A. What's up? Chris, Hey,

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>good morning, guys, Hey guys, I I got proposed. I'm

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I'm in at ten team PPR League

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have James Conner. I got proposed Marshall H.

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Lynch and John Brown for Connor, and I also have

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>three coin how one are your thoughts on that just

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 1>because of Bell possibly coming back? What was that? What

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was they was Lynch and John Rown, Honnor and Cohen

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>for Marshall, Lynch and John Brown in a full PPR.

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Who are your wide receivers again? So I got Hilton

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and I have Stefon Diggs, and I also have Cup

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I used once in a while, has a flex mhm.

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I was I was wondering because of uh, you know,

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to keep Connor, but just because Bell might

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:15.799
<v Speaker 1>be coming back. Yeah, no, I get it. Listen, it's

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a fair concern, and I'm very I agree with you.

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Keeping Connor is like the high upside play on the

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>off chance that Levian Bell gets traded. I think I

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>would do the trade. I think I would cover myself.

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You also, he also into was like, I know it's PPR,

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but he's still like solid in RB three he's a

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>flex two in honesty, UM, here's my here's my real interest. Um,

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>basically John Brown at the wide receiver position. He needs him.

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 1>John Browns was target to double the just like every

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>game in fourteen. Targets is past correct and with te

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>why Hilton banged up, Cooper Cup banged up he needs

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver, and I think John Brown pushing me

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>over the edge. I know John, I know James Connor

0:50:56.400 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is great, but I I think you played with a

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>long term. You make the championship move. I think you

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>make the deal. It's tough one. That good question. Man.

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll have the trade show tomorrow too. So I have

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a feeling James Conner's name is gonna come up a

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot like a sell high candidates. But it makes a

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Eight four four eight four three six

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Let's go out to Nathan in New Jersey.

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Nathan? Hey, what's up? Guys? How are you

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.919
<v Speaker 1>doing good? What's up? Dude? Yeah? So I'm a five

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in oh for this week, so I'm undefeat it still

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.360
<v Speaker 1>here and I need. I'm trying to trade Jimmy Graham

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>because he hasn't done anything right now. Uh So, actually

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing Greg old kind of available on my fantasy

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>waiveror bar and if I don't trade Jimmy Graham, what

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is the latest on Greg Goldson? Do you guys know

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or no? So the latest was Greg Oldson practice last

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>week trying he's trying to return this week. He's trying

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to return this week if he's not very optimist next week.

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think mentioning him as a as a waiver

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>ad right now is very sneaky. He's owning six percent

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of leagues, but he might be out there in like

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ten team leagues. Greg. So if so, if I can trade,

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>if I can't trade Jimmy Graham because I have Zach

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Roots in my starting lineup, so I'm keeping keeping him.

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>But if I don't find the trade partner for Jimmy Graham,

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is it? Do you think I should drop him for

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olson? Or I wouldn't. I wouldn't drop Jimmy Graham

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>for Greig Golson. I think they're kind of similar. But look,

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you have Zach ertz Um. I agree with trying to

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 1>trade Jimmy Graham. Look, if you have Earth's like it,

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't you know, it doesn't make sense to have Graham.

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of teams that are hurting

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position. So I think at the

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>least you should be able to turn Jimmy Graham into

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like a flex running back or a high end wide

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver three. So that's something I would look into. And

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.399
<v Speaker 1>then if you trade Jimmy Graham. Once you do that,

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>then you pick up a Greg Olsen just to like

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>cover yourself, to have that backup tight end. But I

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's really necessary to be honest. Four four

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>eight four three six seven nine. Let's go out to

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Stephen in Massachusetts. What's up, Stephen? Hey? What's up? My man?

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Dude? Al Right, So I'll try to be

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>quick for you. So I'm trying of struggling right now.

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I have the number two Waiver acclaim and uh we

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:07.319
<v Speaker 1>have one of those small woods out there, and I

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to pick him up. But the problem

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is is on the ESPN leagues, I have like I

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.320
<v Speaker 1>R spots and Leonard four nets on my I R spot.

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>But I guess like instead of him being ruled out

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>even though like you should be, it says he's listed

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as doubtful. That's thanks, that's brutal. Who else can you

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>drop that? Uh? So these are the people that I

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 1>can We got ten seconds, dude, all right, Derrick, Henry

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 1>buck Allen and uh Ronald Jones. Would you drive any

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of those guys? Boyndel Small and Frankie I wouldn't neither

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>would I. You can't do it? I'm sorry, Stephen for

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Franks Standile. My name is Gregs with the Fantasy Football

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy comes your way next Chris Venture, Corey Parson, and

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day. Thank you so much for watching The Fantasy

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Forever. We'll do it all go tomorrow, we

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hope