1 00:00:03,279 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 1: Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg 2 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:09,800 Speaker 1: dot com the radio plus mobile app and on your radio, 3 00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:14,240 Speaker 1: this is a Bloomberg Business flag from Bloomberg World Handquarters. 4 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: I'm Charlie Pellett. Young Brands numbers are out. Young Brands, 5 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:20,759 Speaker 1: of course, the parent of Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut, 6 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:24,919 Speaker 1: reporting second quarter adjusted EPs of seventy five cents. Estimates 7 00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: there seventy four cents. Second quarter revenue three point oh 8 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 1: one billion. The estimate for Young was three point o 9 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:36,839 Speaker 1: nine billion. Stocks moving higher, SMP five hundred indexes climbed 10 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: in nine of the last eleven days, a record. The 11 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,160 Speaker 1: SMP up by less than half a point. Little change 12 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 1: there at twenty one fifty two, but an update nonetheless, 13 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 1: Dow Industrials up twenty four points, also a record at 14 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:50,920 Speaker 1: eighteen thousand, three hundred seventy two, a game of point 15 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 1: one percent. Nestack declined by three tenths of one percent, 16 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 1: ten You up twelve thirty seconds the old one point 17 00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:01,639 Speaker 1: four six percent, Gold up eight sixty v thirty three, 18 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 1: a gain of six tenths of one percent, and crude 19 00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:08,360 Speaker 1: oil down three point six A barrel of West Texas 20 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 1: intermediate Now at I'm Charlie Pollock. That's a Bloomberg Business Flash. 21 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:19,039 Speaker 1: This is taking Stock with Pim Box and Kathleen Mays 22 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio. China in Focus. A ruling by an 23 00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: international court on the South China Sea dispute hits the 24 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:34,479 Speaker 1: world overnight today. It looks like China maybe more willing 25 00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:38,480 Speaker 1: to negotiate on this, taking some focus on Brexit and 26 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,600 Speaker 1: certainly putting the focus back on Asia. Eric Shim joins 27 00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:46,360 Speaker 1: this now, policy adviser for the International Trade and Regulatory 28 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 1: Group at Alston and Bird in Washington, d C. So Eric, 29 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 1: start with the tribunals ruling, what they said, and China's 30 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: response today seeming a bit more cooperative. I don't know 31 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:03,520 Speaker 1: if I go so far as as cooperative today. You know, 32 00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:07,240 Speaker 1: yesterday the Chinese Foreign Ministry very quickly came out and 33 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:11,799 Speaker 1: and rejected the ruling in its entirety. Today in China, 34 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,840 Speaker 1: the Foreign Ministry followed up with a ninety minute press 35 00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: conference that was broadcast twice live uh to the nation, 36 00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 1: in which the Foreign Ministry rolled out about a thirteen 37 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: thousand word position paper in which it defended all of 38 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,920 Speaker 1: the claims that China had made and which the tribunal 39 00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:35,200 Speaker 1: in the Hague rejected yesterday. UH, So it's definitely rather 40 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: firm rhetoric from China. Another senior Chinese official also declared 41 00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:44,959 Speaker 1: that that China has the right to UH demarcate an 42 00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 1: air defense identification zone over the disputed islands where China 43 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: has has claimed sovereignty. So they're not relinquishing any claims today. Eric. 44 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 1: Just to be clear, this case was brought by the Philippines. Right. 45 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:02,320 Speaker 1: This is we're a dispute with China regarding the right 46 00:03:02,440 --> 00:03:05,960 Speaker 1: of the Philippines to exploit natural resources in what is 47 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:09,720 Speaker 1: described as the exclusive economic zone. It extends from territory 48 00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:12,359 Speaker 1: that it claims in the South China Sea. That's right. 49 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 1: This stems from a long running dispute between China and 50 00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 1: the Philippines over territory around the Spratley Islands UH, and 51 00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 1: territory that extends it's within UH, mainly within the Philippines 52 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:33,079 Speaker 1: exclusive two nautical mile UM exclusive economic zone. Over the 53 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 1: past several years, China has built artificial reefs UH and 54 00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 1: other structures within those waters UH, in effect laying sovereign 55 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: claim to that territory and by extension, to to all 56 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 1: the waters where where the Philippines had had previously enjoyed 57 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:52,680 Speaker 1: sovereign control. Well, you know, you have noted that there 58 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 1: are real risks to train in commerce through the South 59 00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: China Sea and all this. But is there a military 60 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:02,800 Speaker 1: risk here? There is a military risk, and I would 61 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:07,160 Speaker 1: say that the military and commercial are linked. Uh. There's 62 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,680 Speaker 1: now a lot of immediate public opinion pressure in the 63 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 1: Philippines saying, hey, we've been vindicated. Uh, those waters are 64 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 1: ours to fish or the ones that are not ours 65 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 1: are at least now internationally open high seas. Uh. The 66 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:24,839 Speaker 1: Philippines has a very lucrative national fishing industry. Many of 67 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:29,520 Speaker 1: those fishing vessels have lost significant revenues over the past 68 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: couple of years as they've been increasingly denied access to 69 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: their traditional fishing grounds by UH by either the Chinese 70 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 1: military vessels or by what's known as China's maritime militia, 71 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 1: which essentially are fishing fishing fleets under the under the 72 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:50,680 Speaker 1: supervision of China's military. Now we could see uh, you know, 73 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 1: all manner of fishing vessels, whether they be Filipino or 74 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:59,200 Speaker 1: Vietnamese or Indonesian, seeking to return to those international high 75 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 1: seas areas where where China's claims were we're rejected by 76 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:05,479 Speaker 1: the tribunal. The question is are those going to be 77 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 1: met by Chinese navel or other vessels? Are those going 78 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:12,359 Speaker 1: to provoke clashes at SEE which could lead to greater 79 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:16,839 Speaker 1: military involvement by all the parties UH in the region Erica. 80 00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 1: Other members of the region include Japan and I wonder 81 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:26,000 Speaker 1: if you could comment on the dispute between Japan and 82 00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:30,480 Speaker 1: China in the East China Sea and also the dispute 83 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:34,240 Speaker 1: that really comes when you talk about economic issues because 84 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:36,359 Speaker 1: it has to do with the natural gas projects that 85 00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 1: Beijing has been constructing. That's right. The China and Japan 86 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 1: have had UH an extremely long running UH argument over 87 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: the Senkaku or as the Chinese city of Dayu islands 88 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 1: in the East China Sea UH. That is a hotbed 89 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:58,800 Speaker 1: for natural resource development, with both National oilk On both 90 00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:01,920 Speaker 1: the Chinese National oilk Company in various Japanese oil companies 91 00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:08,280 Speaker 1: competing for UH for seabed exploration find um. The Japanese 92 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:12,240 Speaker 1: have long been considering whether or not to submit their 93 00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: case to arbitration at the Hague, and the Japanese strongly 94 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,280 Speaker 1: supported yesterday's ruling, So we might might expect the Japanese 95 00:06:20,279 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: effectively to to take China to court uh sooner than later, 96 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,040 Speaker 1: believing that now they've got the weight of international maritime 97 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: law on their side. Eric quickly back to China. Those 98 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:33,280 Speaker 1: social media flooded with thousands of comments testy, often for 99 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,919 Speaker 1: fane nationalism one of our Bloomberg view people rights, uh, 100 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:41,480 Speaker 1: some even calling for war. This was you know, blocked 101 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 1: to a certain extent. But the fact that the Chinese 102 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:45,880 Speaker 1: let any of these testy comments out does it show? 103 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:50,600 Speaker 1: Is this a little waving a warning flag at the US? Certainly? 104 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:56,599 Speaker 1: Um uh typical Chinese UM behavior. I mean they have 105 00:06:56,680 --> 00:07:00,080 Speaker 1: a uh, they have a public that has that has 106 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:03,560 Speaker 1: grown in its awareness of their country's strength, both economic 107 00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:06,840 Speaker 1: and military over the last decade and a half. Uh. 108 00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 1: In a way, the she government UM may have put 109 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:14,400 Speaker 1: itself in a bit of a corner by sticking out 110 00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:17,520 Speaker 1: such a strong position. So it's going to be hard 111 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 1: for China to climb down. And that's where the US 112 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 1: and a lot of diplomatic players will have to enter 113 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 1: and find a creative way to move forward. Thank you 114 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 1: very much. Eric Schimp, his policy advisor, International Trade and 115 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:32,840 Speaker 1: regulatory group for Austin Bird in Washington, d C. Home 116 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:36,600 Speaker 1: to one and one oh five point seven FM h 117 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:40,040 Speaker 1: D two. This is taking Stockheim pim Fox my co 118 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:46,720 Speaker 1: host Kathleen Hayes, and this is Bloomberg coming up. Bloomberg 119 00:07:46,760 --> 00:07:49,040 Speaker 1: Law brought you by Time Warner Cable Business Class. If 120 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:50,880 Speaker 1: your business relies on the phone company, you may be 121 00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:53,520 Speaker 1: getting less than you deserve. Make the switch to more speed, 122 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:56,720 Speaker 1: more value, and more savings. Visit Business dot t WC 123 00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: dot com, slash more