WEBVTT - Listener Questions

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Every bit of evidence has been gathered, what on the

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>off chance that it has not, and that could be

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the one piece that seals the fate of the case.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Either way, the big stunner of this case is that

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>these weren't people that necessarily even interface, not even once.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the Idaho Massacre, a production of KAT Studios

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and iHeartRadio, Season two, Episode twelve, Listener Questions. I'm Courtney Armstrong,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a producer at KAT Studios with Stephanie Leidecker and Gabe Castillo,

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>who you'll hear reading the questions. We wanted to take

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to answer some of the listener questions that

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have come in over the course of the season, and

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>also to have a couple of listeners who were able

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to make the time on the show so we can

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>speak with them. We're starting it off.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>With page from Hobooken.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>First, Stephanie high paid.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Hi. So my question is why you think the nine

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 4>one one call hasn't been released yet.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>There can be a multitude of things at play, for example,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and Stephanie and I were talking about just this very

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>thing recently. And in another case we covered, which is

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>another high profile mass murder, the Pike did Masaker, which

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is our other podcast. The nine one one call was

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>indeed released well before trial, well before the accused were known,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's something that can happen in this case. Obviously,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the nine on one call has not been released. There

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have been articles people quoting that the prosecution will release

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it quote when it's time, which means we may need

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to wait until the actual trial to hear the nine

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on one call.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Which is also interesting because I think this particular gular call,

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe unlike other calls from other cases, does speak a

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>lot to the circumstances of how the bodies were found

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and discovered. You know, there's been a couple of very

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 2>big questions about this timeline. One exactly who discovered the bodies.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>We know that the bodies were discovered hours later, and

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>who that person was. All we know it to be

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>is a friend of Ethan's. From my understanding, I would

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>imagine if we hear their voice on the nine to

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>one one call, that would no longer be anonymous. And

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 2>they've been very tight lipped about releasing the information of

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the nine one one call and also the surrounding roommates, right,

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>you could imagine that it must have been Mayhem when

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>they make this grizzly discovery. We've heard nine one one calls,

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>then there's nothing more harrowing or horrifying than hearing that

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>guttural sound. But we don't know.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And just to add to that, within the cloud

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of sort of confusion that Stephanie was speaking about, should

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we believe and there's no reason not to. The timeline

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of the murders, which places that happening between approximately four

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>am and four twenty am. The nine to one one

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>call was not placed until just a few moments before noon,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's eight hours later. And as Stephanie said, it's

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not clear precisely who necessarily made the call, but we

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>know the call came from one of the surviving roommate's

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>cell phones, but it was not them who was initially

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>making connection with nine one one. It was initially reported

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as an unconscious person or person's which seemed ought for

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>what was ultimately found. And it turns out that that

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually the categorization that that nine one one call

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>center used to let police know this is in the

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>realm of someone unconscious versus say a fire or something else.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>So it was a nine one one designation.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Which is such a really interesting point and page. It's

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>such a good question because it's such an unknowable thing, right,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>But that particular nine to one one call would answer

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 2>so many questions. It would answer the who, the how,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 2>the state of affairs at that time.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Anything else you want to say, ask or wonder about.

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>There was speculation that the fraternity across the street, the

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>two roommates went there and had some of the guys

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 4>go around the house to make sure that no one

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>was there, which I think might be another thing, Like

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there was a lot of foot traffic in

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the house before they called the police.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I have seen that as well, and I think it's

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>another thing that will come to bear. One thing that's

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>been reported is that there will quote multiple voices on

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine one one call. So who exactly all of

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>those voices are we don't yet know, but soon to

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>find out.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you for coming on, of course, have

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a good night, guys, Bye bye.

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 5>In a previous episode, it was mentioned that one of

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 5>the journalists had gone down to Moscow, Idaho, and noted

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>that in and around the area they noticed a lot

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 5>of ring cameras in the neighborhood and from what we

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 5>know there has been footage that was released from a

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 5>ring camera, So my question is, do you think police

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 5>have a lot more information than what has been released?

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Is this why we have yet to see the first

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 5>day of trial?

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Multilayered question, Do I think there's more we haven't seen?

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I would bet any amount of money in the world

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that there is. Do I bet that investigators on every

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>level canvassed the neighborhood and procured every piece of evidence

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>possible at the time. Absolutely, I do. Is that part

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of the delay and trial? I mean, it's interesting and

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have this stat at the tip of my tongue,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but I know we have to it before the enormity

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of digital and other evidence that has been gathered that

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be gone through by the prosecution, by investigators,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and then when hands it over by the defense as well.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's part of it. Also, of course,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>being a death penalty case that, as we've discussed, you know,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>exacerbates a timeline because there's so many things that need

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be done correctly. But my knee jerk too, is

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>there more evidence from ring cameras we don't know about?

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I would really really hope so, because so much of

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 2>the evidence that we've been unpacking and has been set

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 2>into the public or the media, you know, really has

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 2>some circumstantial sides to it. So I would have to

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>imagine that there is a larger footprint from a technology

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>standpoint that frankly, we're just not aware of. It's amazing

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that you can get away with any crime in today's

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 2>day and age, with the level of cameras and cell

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>phones and things that are tracking us real time. It's

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty astounding that there was such a blind spot

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>if in fact there was, so I would assume that

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't know this. But on the other side of that,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>we have interviewed defense attorneys that would say, look, if

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>there was a ton of great information, they would be

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>yelling that from the rooftops and that would be front

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>page news, and we would be unpacking the fact that

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a ring camera that has footage of someone else

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>other than the accused, Brian Coburger, walking into this murder house.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>If that was the case, I think we would really

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>know about it. So, on the one hand, I completely

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>agree with you, Courtney, and on the other no, no,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>some of this feels like a little bit of a

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>house of cards.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point because now that you say that,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the fact that even the identification of the

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>car took three times for the FBI, and this is

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no dig on them, but it took three times to

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>publicly get it correct what the carr was, assuming, of course,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the accused is whose car that we should.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Be looking for.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, we don't even have an actual

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>idea of the person driving that car. So yes, he

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>was driving a white Lantra, and yes it was in

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and around the area, and yes that is wildly suspicious,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>no question. But where's the visual of him actually behind

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the wheel? I have to assume that exists, or that

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>there is some way to get around the fact that

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't appear that we.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Have that it doesn't.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it certainly hasn't been public that or any

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>glimpse to the public's knowledge of a license plate.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know. Maybe my bet all the money

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>in the world was a little a little quick on

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the trigger to that end.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>So let's unpack a little of that, because there do

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>seem to be these big ticket items that gets discussed

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>in the press, and we certainly have discussed this here

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>as well, Like these big items that make.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 6>It this no question, This is the guy, there's DNA,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 6>and there's this car, and he was acting fishy and

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 6>bushy eyebrows and and and by the way, it does

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 6>all sort of seem like a pretty bad day and

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 6>a pretty bad morning and a pretty bad stretch frankly

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 6>of a lot of terrible things that had to happen

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 6>in the worst of timing for this accused Brian Coburger

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 6>to ultimately be accused of this crime. And then when

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 6>you take a step back, there are a lot of

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 6>these touch points that are like, what are the odds

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 6>of that happening?

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Number one? Having all of these images of this car

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>in and around the area, but no actual idea of

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>who's driving it or the license plate. I feel like

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>if I roll through a red light, not that I

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>ever have, I guarantee you that there's a ticket in

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 2>my mailbox waiting for me somehow. So big brother is

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>watching just not that morning, and then we talk about

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>this bushy eyebrow id but like, really, is is that.

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 3>The big thing?

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So a question we did get speaking of all the

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quote coincidences had to do with a shooting that happened

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on the morning that Brian Coberger and his father departed

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington to head on their cross country drive to Pennsylvania.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And the question comes from Amy from Warwick, Rhode Island.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there a connection between the swat shooting of Brent

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Kopaka related to the Idaho massacre.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it doesn't appear that there is, and we

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>have gone down this rabbit hole. It is shocking to

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 2>me that something that is violent, like holding somebody hostage,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>let alone holding your roommate hostage, happening in and around

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the time of these violent murders. But again, it does

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>seem as though that may have just been a coincidence.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It does, and for listeners who aren't aware, this incident

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>happened on December fifteenth, twenty twenty two, so it was

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about one month after the November thirteenth murders. A man

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>named Brent Kopaka was ultimately shot by Washington State Police

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in Pullman, Washington, where the accused Brian Coburger lived, and

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's where people burned up the connection. Officers were alerted

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that Kopaka was allegedly threatening the lives of his roommates.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a standoff, and according to reports, there were

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful negotiations, there was escalating behavior that ultimately ended in

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the swat team killing Kopaka. This happened to happen on

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that same morning of the drive, and in fact, when

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the Coburger men were pulled over, Brian Coberger's father mentioned

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the incident. Can hear it on the audio to one

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of the officers.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine? I can't. Can you imagine that you're

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>this father, You're getting pulled over and you're basically saying, wow,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel for you. Officers. A lot going on back there.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>You're in a white a Landra and you're allegedly driving

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the accused to be. But the police just happened to

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>pull the Coburger father son duo in this white car

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>driving across country. What are the odds that they get

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>pulled over two different times? That's been reported about so

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>many different ways here included. We were under the impression

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>because that's what we were told. We had early reported

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>that that was a very choreographed event that Brian Coberg

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 2>was being pulled over because the police were looking to

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>see if he had slashes on his hand, And now

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>we're hearing that that might not have been the case,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that it was just a really bad day behind the wheel.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it really was artis this is to

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>swallow coincidence. It has since come to bear and hold on.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I have actually from the report here. The FBI has

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>maintained its agents were not involved in the stops, and

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also the Sheriff's office in Indiana, who actually did the stops,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>also have said publicly that this had nothing to do

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>with the murders whatsoever. It was a separate drug interdiction check. Yes,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been confirmed by both the agencies that the FBI

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>did not call for those stops.

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 3>They did not know what was going to happen. It

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 3>was literally coincidence.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And it was coincidence that on the same day that

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Dad and son depart on their cross country escapade of

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 2>a trip, that there is also a hostage situation that

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 2>a nearby neighbor is shot down by authorities because he's

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>holding his roommate hostage, was suffering from mental illness, and

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 2>has many many layers to this story.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>All officials have said there is no connection, and in fact,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a really it's a good example of a

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>horrible thing which is when people do make connections because

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of circumstance or because of coincidence when indeed there isn't

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And actually Coopaka's family has spoken out, as have his

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>good friends, you know, saying that the speculation of his

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>involvement with the murders has marred his name.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>And he was a vet, he earned a purple heart.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's just a tragedy in and of itself, and

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a further tragedy of what can happen when people

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are linked, whether in the news or via social media,

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>without factual merit.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's stop here for a break. We'll be back in

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a moment.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 5>This is from Marcella via Instagram. Do you think if

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 5>Brian had left his phone at home he would have

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 5>been arrested? Could the DNA and surveillance of his vehicle

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 5>have been enough?

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Court, you got to take this one. This is a

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>rabbit hole that I may never get out of. It's

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>an excellent question, and it's.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>A much debated question, and it's ultimately an opinion. Right,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So the DNA, and this is just my opinion. The

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>DNA is what tied Coberger to this investigation by his

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>name through his father. Once the DNA on the knife

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sheath was found, and according to court documents, Coburger's DNA

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is at least five point three seven octillion times more

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>likely to match DNA found at the scene than a

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>person unrelated to Coburger's father. So those are pretty strong

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>odds to overcome.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Those numbers are shocking, of course, and we read that

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>for the first time it was like, Oh, I guess

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>this guy did it. However, listen, some of this stuff

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>can be explained away. I know we covered this at

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>some point this season, But imagine that you're a knife

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>enthusiast when you go to these like a convention for

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>people who are fishermen and hunters, and there's a lot

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of knives for sale there, and they're on display, and

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>you might be looking at the various knives for purchase,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, you want to pick it up, maybe handle

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>it a little bit, and in doing so, hey, guess what,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>It's possible that a droplet of your DNA is now

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>under the sheath of that knife. And now you put

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it back down, and this person goes about their merry way,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and that knife eventually gets sold to someone and it

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>winds up at a murder scene. That could be the connection.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>It's such a small amount on the other side of it.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>That is no question that the DNA that is found

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>on that she is connected to the accused Brian Coburger.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty damning.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, I think these are all points that

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>will be brought up by the defense if I had

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to guess, because you.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Know they are valid.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, just to simply answer your question, Marcella, yeah,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do think that and the surveillance of

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his vehicle would have been enough. Because the last thing

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say on this, because you said, you know

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what if we took the cell phone pings out of it,

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that during the time of the murders,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>as we understand it, there was no reporting to the

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>network from Coburger's phone. His phone was turned off or

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was somehow unavailable, whether it was under a rock or somehow.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It stopped pinging off of any cell phone towers at

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>two forty seven am, and then it did not go

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>back to being received by cell phone towers until four

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight. So in a way, there are no pings

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 1>at that time.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>What a coincidence, right, That would be hard to throw

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>under the coincidence box. I mean, I guess that's what

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>is so interesting about this case. Yes, while some of

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>these pieces of the puzzle do in fact seem circumstantial

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>when when looked at individually, I guess that's the whole point,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>right You dump them all in a bag and you're like,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a lot of circumstantial evidence in one bag.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 5>We do have a follow up question from Marcella. She

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 5>unfortunately couldn't join us today, but her follow up question is,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 5>I believe the killer was watching the house before he entered.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Do you think he entered the house after the food

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 5>was delivered in hopes that they would pin it on

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 5>the food delivery driver.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Great question, by the way, I mean we have discussed this,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 2>we really have. The difference is though here you would

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>have to be predicting that food would be ordered and

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>therefore delivered at a certain time to ping it on

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 2>the guy, unless they always received food at the same time,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 2>which is not untotally unheard of. I would imagine in

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>a college party house when you're out kind of late,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's sort of a leap. That would be a

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of premeditation. Or maybe the person who committed this

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 2>crime just went forward after they saw there was somebody

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>exiting and entering the house.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 5>And next up is another listener question. Here's Maya from Colorado.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 7>So my question is, like, let's say they ordered it

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 7>from Uber Eats. If he is an Uber Eats driver,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 7>which I don't know what if he is, he would

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 7>get a notification that at that address they ordered food,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 7>so he could be aware that they ordered food and

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 7>that it was going to be arriving at so and

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 7>so time.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like for that to be the case, then

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the murderer is would then have to themselves be a driver.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that question, but I think that actually goes

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>back to the fact that there was in Coberger's case,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>his phone was unresponsive to any cell phone towers. So

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>actually I think that because of that reason that that

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be the case.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 5>David from Massachusetts asks via email, do you think the

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 5>accused committed the murders that night knowing that he was

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 5>going home for Thanksgiving and had a reason to make

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 5>a cross country road trip, thinking that might be enough

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 5>to make the police look a different direction.

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>This goes to knowing what's in someone's mind, which I

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>do not, but the thought of knowing that fairly soon

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>after a crime is committed, you will have three thousand

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>miles worth of distance between yourself and the crime scene.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>That certainly could be something that comes into play, especially

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the alleged is a criminology student.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going out on a limb here, so to

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>take this with a grain of nothingness, But yes, of

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 2>course he was going home for the holidays, and that

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>there would be a break, and that that was a

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of a nice way to exit the worst situation ever.

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I always thought it was slightly interesting that his birthday

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>is a week later than the murders, so he would

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>be turning twenty nine in one week. So you commit

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>a murder of four, hop in a car with your dad,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 2>drive across country, get pulled over twice, and then go

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 2>home to your mom, who's cooking for you and maybe

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 2>preparing for your birthday celebration as you're oddly unpacking any

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>evidence from your car allegedly and putting things into baggies

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>because you're wearing plastic gloves. I don't know. It's just

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 2>so wild it seems impossible, but or does it.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 5>It's a follow up question, why did he coburger let

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 5>one roommate live after she had seen him? And the

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 5>murders were so violent and seemed so personal that the

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 5>accused doesn't really have any connection to the victims. Why

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 5>do you think that he made them look so violent?

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I'm going to jump in real quickly

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 2>here because I think this is the cross section of

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>this entire case, and what is so compelling and maddening

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 2>about it is, yes, it feels so intimate, but yes,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>there's no connection. And I guess that's the real look

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>at where we live today with social media is making

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>us feel so connected, not just social media. That's not

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>an attack on all things media obviously, but just we're

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 2>all really connected to people that we actually don't really

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>have access to. And you know, we can look at

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>that till we're blue in the face. But I think

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 2>that's probably what's the big stunner of this case is that, yeah,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>these weren't people that necessarily even interface, not even once necessarily,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>but probably had some cross section on their phones.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It's staggering, And I think you're right, Stephanie, so David

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>from a situate, you have your finger on the pulse

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of what is so compelled at the center of this case.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's so hard to imagine why whomever committed these

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>murders allowed an eyewitness and an ear witness to remain.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank god they did right, Thank god they did underscore

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 2>exclamation point in bold letters, shout it from the rooftop.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank goodness, the remaining roommates were spared. It's a stunner,

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>right to.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Your point, David, that the lack of connection that both

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution and the defense have stipulated for the court

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>record that previously it had been thought that there was

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>some stalking personally of the victims, and they have both

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>agreed that that was not the case. So yeah, we

0:23:54.359 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>will see this all come to bear. Let's stop here

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for another break. We'll be back in a moment.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 3>We have waded from Baltimore calling in, Hello, Wade. I

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>was wondering if you all feel that the house demolition

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 3>may alter the verdict.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I'm guilty, I want that house demolished.

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you're not guilty, wouldn't you also potentially want

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it there for any shred of evidence that could be

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>found to exonerate you and to then implicate the person

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>who actually did it.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, if I'm guilty, I want it gone because there's

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>no evidence to be had. But if I'm not guilty,

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 2>of course, yes, You're absolutely right. You want to be

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 2>able to make sure that there could be some proof

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 2>and some new evidence discovered.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 3>To specifically answer this.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Wead I felt different after speaking with a bunch of

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>art different experts and hearing their points of view, because

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>my knee jerk goes that, Okay, this has been gone over.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It has been gone over thoroughly, and there are three

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>D pictures and every bit of evidence has been gathered.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>What on the off chance that it has not, and

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that could be the one piece that seals the fate

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of the case either way. So yeah, I think it

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>could be affected by the demolition. Over the course of

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the season, we've gotten a lot of listener questions and

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate all of them. And I will say one

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most commented on episodes was about Howard Bloom's

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>book When the Night Comes Falling, and the questions are

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 1>all valid, all of them are, and it was a

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit controversial. People had different perspectives they walked away

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>from the episode with.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And I think our answer is, of course, we.

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Were going to interview the person who comes out with

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the book that's on the topic of what we're discussing.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It would have been odd for us, honestly, not to

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is it. You know, it's a big moment in time

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for the case, and we want to glean from all

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>perspectives and let all different avenues of information flow into

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>us and out to you. So that's the main thing

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I would say about it is it was a It

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>was a touch point in this timeline, and we thought

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it was important to note it.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Sheila, via email has asked, I wonder if Brian Koberger

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 5>is listening to you. It ennerves me a bit. Have

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 5>you ever thought about that?

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, now that unnerves me a bit too, because until

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this moment I have not what a question.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, think about it.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Though.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>This guy is by himself in a cell in the

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 2>basement of the courthouse with probably not too too much

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 2>going on. It's been reported that he watches the news

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>through the bars of his cell and that he is

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>interested in the coverage. No, I don't like it, but

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I will say this if they accused Brian Coburger, if

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 2>he has a burning listener question, we would like to

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hear it.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Last question, since it's the end of the season, is

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 5>there anything else you guys want to say? Any last

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 5>thoughts for the listeners?

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I would say, sometimes our contributors become a part of

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the headlines themselves because what they're reporting on catches wind

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 2>in the media. And it's worth noting that we get

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>every single thing legally vetted by First Amendment right lawyers,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So we have to take a lot of stuff out.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>You'd be shocked about all the things that we can air,

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 2>because look, we don't want to accuse anybody of murder.

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>We don't want to interrupt a police investigation, and we

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 2>don't want to get it wrong. So the spirit of

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 2>this has been to curate information because there's been so

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 2>much misinformation. The big ticket items, not only this season,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>but just seemingly in the case in general, is the

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 2>vehicle and then the fact that he's not IDD in

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 2>the vehicle DNA evidence. Hard to explain that away, except

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it's so little DNA evidence. Does that make that hard

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 2>to stick? And then there's odd, creepy, weird behavior. We've

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 2>heard all of those words. Those are not our words.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what we've been told. Does having an odd personality

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 2>make you a killer? Of course not. We really just

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>do not know. And I think the roommates, the first responders,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>the friends that had to call nine to one one.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Those are big pieces of the puzzle, and we just

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 2>don't have the answers, and we respect their privacy, and

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 2>we know quite obviously why authorities are keeping that information

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>very close to the vest they have to. There's been

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>so much back and forth about sharing of evidence in

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the defense saying that the prosecution is holding back evidence,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know, look, we just saw that not too

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>too long ago with the Alec Baldwin trial. Suddenly it

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>appeared that the prosecution was holding onto something that was

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 2>really relevant. Again, different cases. I'm not making any comparison

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and just simply this evidence piece of it, right, It's

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of an interesting nuance to this whole thing. And

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what's also really both scary and really

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting about this case. We've talked to so many people.

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>When you're in front of one person, you're like, that

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 2>totally makes sense, and then the next person's like, well,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Devil's advocate, and I'm like, good point, that makes sense,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Like there's a three sixty about good points. So I

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>guess it depends where you really want to throw your

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 2>heart into it. But our hearts are not the thing

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that are supposed to keep the justice wheel moving it's

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be facts, and in this case it's it's

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty plentiful on both sides. I'm more confused than ever.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I think part of our collective goal in this season

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast was, it's a very specific moment time.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>The arrest has been made of the one suspect in

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the case that happened a while ago. The trial has

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>not yet begun, However, there has been so much, so

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>many facts, so many feelings, and we wanted to kind

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of give that three p sixty view of what are

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the touchstones of what's going on now, what is the

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>importance of these pre trial motions, and so it was really,

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think for us, a really specific look at a

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>specific moment in time and to try and responsibly gather

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and present to you the information that exists to the

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>best of our ability. The trial is slated to happen

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>next summer, that summer twenty twenty five, and we will

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be keeping very close tabs on everything going on in

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the meantime. As new information arises, we will be back

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with new episodes and greatly look forward to the time.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 2>And also to listeners who have reached out with information

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and tips so interesting and helpful and we really do

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 2>try to address all of them, so please keep it coming.

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And I want to make sure that we touch on

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the point that because oftentimes we're always talking about the

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 2>case and the forensics and unpacking the legal process and

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 2>looking at jurisdictions, and our goal is to unpack and

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>offer all sides, and sometimes we could lose the reality

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>of the four victims that we're talking about and Xanna, Madison,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Ethan and Kayley. We just really want to make sure

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that anybody listening ourselves included, that we're all taking a

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 2>moment to send healing thoughts to their families and to

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 2>know that we are fighting with them alongside in our hearts,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and that the goal to find justice is one that

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>we all share. To make sure that everyone knows that collectively,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 2>we're all interested in them and want them to feel supported.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>For more information on the case and relevant photos, follow

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram at Kat Underscore Studios. The Idaho Masker

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Stephanie Leideger, Gabriel Castillo, and me Courtney Armstrong.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Editing and sound design by Jeff Trois, music by Jared Aston.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>The Idaho Masker is a production of Kat's Studios and iHeartRadio.

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts like this, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.