Speaker 1: This is a Jesse Kelly Show. Hello everyone, this is
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show. Jamie Allman so happy to be
Speaker 1: filling in for the great Jesse Kelly. Glad to be
Speaker 1: with you. And oh yeah, Creedens is the perfect intro
Speaker 1: for this one, because I've been saying all along that
Speaker 1: we are the new hippies. We common sense conservatives are
Speaker 1: the new hippies. We are the new piece Nicks. We're
Speaker 1: anti establishment. We're into clean food and even for that matter,
Speaker 1: clean water in terms of fluoride free water. You know,
Speaker 1: and who would have ever imagined that our hippie leader
Speaker 1: would actually be a guy who never takes a tie
Speaker 1: off even when he is wearing a sanitation jacket. It's
Speaker 1: pretty cool and it's kind of a happy time. The
Speaker 1: only thing we're maybe not doing I think. I don't
Speaker 1: think we really have been pulled into the Birkenstock kind
Speaker 1: of category. Yet we're not wearing those shoes and never will.
Speaker 1: But that's about it. And we're also, of course into changes.
Speaker 1: We're into changing the establishment. We're actually not worshippers of
Speaker 1: the FBI and the CIA. Remember back in the day,
Speaker 1: the people who were the worshippers of the CIA and
Speaker 1: the FBI and all these government institutions were supposedly these
Speaker 1: jack booted conservative thugs or whatever it was. And no, no,
Speaker 1: we're we're the new ones. We're we're even into weed,
Speaker 1: which is really pretty interesting. I personally am not, but
Speaker 1: you know other people are, and knock yourself out, and
Speaker 1: we're they're also counter cultural, if you can believe that,
Speaker 1: except our counter culturalism is coming in a little bit
Speaker 1: different format. I'll get that to you in just a
Speaker 1: little bit. So one of our hippie leaders also could
Speaker 1: wind up being RFK Junior, and he is really going
Speaker 1: full bore against big pharma, which basically is keeping us
Speaker 1: from having anything but pills to resolve our issues. In
Speaker 1: pills manufactured by pharmaceutical companies. They're the largest contributor to
Speaker 1: contributors to political campaigns and politicians in this country, the
Speaker 1: number one contributor to political campaigns, which is another reason
Speaker 1: why you're not seeing a lot of really great alternative
Speaker 1: medicines getting through because the pharmaceutical industry lobbies so hard
Speaker 1: against it. He's also going after the food in industrial complex,
Speaker 1: which I'm glad that President Trump brought that up, and
Speaker 1: I love that term. And going after stuff that's in
Speaker 1: our food that we shouldn't be eating. And you know what,
Speaker 1: oddly enough, as much as the liberals worship Europe, the
Speaker 1: one thing that they seemingly are not in congruence with
Speaker 1: Europe on it is would be additives in our food.
Speaker 1: And so RFK juniors on this tear regarding our food
Speaker 1: supply and the kinds of dies and additives and things
Speaker 1: like that we're putting in the food supply and allowing
Speaker 1: it in spite of the fact that much of what
Speaker 1: is used in this country in our food isn't even
Speaker 1: allowed in European countries. And so RFK put out this
Speaker 1: really great video. It's on YouTube.
Speaker 2: This is how and Tocsin's end up in every supermarketisle.
Speaker 2: Let me show you what I'm I mean Dorito's cheese.
Speaker 2: It's cap'n Crunch, gummy bears.
Speaker 1: I love the fact that he pronounced cap'n Crunch correctly,
Speaker 1: you know, because normally you and me just say Captain
Speaker 1: to Crunch, Captain crunch. But he's like cap'n Crunch, He's
Speaker 1: like right on, he's like very detailed.
Speaker 2: Everyone knows that these are jump foods.
Speaker 1: So and then he picks up a box of fruit loops. Now,
Speaker 1: I have to admit because I didn't grow up with
Speaker 1: sugar cereal. My mom was not didn't allow anything with
Speaker 1: sugared cereus. So I would watch cartoons and see all
Speaker 1: these kids eating fruit loops and tricks and everything else,
Speaker 1: and that was never part of my diet as a kid.
Speaker 1: So we had grape nuts, Life Cereal, which is about
Speaker 1: as sugar as anything get and maybe Raisin brand where
Speaker 1: the where the raisins are sugared a little bit, but
Speaker 1: other than that, no, it was not. There was no
Speaker 1: processed foods anywhere in the land in my home, so
Speaker 1: I wasn't exposed to a lot of these really things
Speaker 1: that I really wanted to eat. You know, I would
Speaker 1: watch other kids eat hell. We didn't even have boloney
Speaker 1: for crying out loud that now that's a sin. But anyway,
Speaker 1: so it was the first time that I ever knew
Speaker 1: that fruit in fruit loops was spelled with two o's.
Speaker 1: And that's because I never looked at the box, because
Speaker 1: I never saw the box in my house, and so
Speaker 1: I didn't know that That's something I learned through this
Speaker 1: process of watching RFK. But he's pointing out all of
Speaker 1: these dyes and additives in our cereals and in our
Speaker 1: food because you all know remember back in the day,
Speaker 1: like I remember this very explicitly nineteen ninety two, and
Speaker 1: that was kind of a turn about in people attempting
Speaker 1: to kind of redo our health profile. So first they
Speaker 1: came up with olestra. Oh, look, we're going to make
Speaker 1: potato chips with olestra until people ate half a bag
Speaker 1: of potato chips and wound up on the toilet for
Speaker 1: the next hour because a lestro was going right through you.
Speaker 1: But there was a lot of identifiers, like, for instance,
Speaker 1: Pepsi clear. Pepsi clear came out, you remember that, and
Speaker 1: people kind of liked it. Some people liked it. It
Speaker 1: was it gave this impression that it was cleaner and
Speaker 1: everything else, and technically it was because it didn't have
Speaker 1: the dye in it that made pepsi brown, for instance.
Speaker 1: But the problem is a lot of people are like,
Speaker 1: I'm not drinking that because it's not brown. And I
Speaker 1: grew up with pepsi. Pepsi was always brown. Pretty much
Speaker 1: everything is clear until you put a dye in it
Speaker 1: or whatever it happens to be. And that's been the problem.
Speaker 2: Maybe you wouldn't be too surprised to see that the
Speaker 2: ingredients include a lot of poisons, including a harmful yellow
Speaker 2: dye called tatrazine or yellow dye number five. Well you
Speaker 2: may not know is that this di was originally made
Speaker 2: out of the sludge this left over when you turn
Speaker 2: coal into coke for blastphern It's called colt aar. And
Speaker 2: I've actually ursued many big industries or legacy contamination of
Speaker 2: coultar all around the country because it's so toxic and
Speaker 2: it's so harmful to the environment in human beings.
Speaker 1: And he's showing this yellow dye and then he shows
Speaker 1: a chicken wing being dipped into really what I have
Speaker 1: to admit looks like delicious looking cheese, except it's dyed yellow.
Speaker 1: But it made me hungry. But anyway, that's the problem.
Speaker 1: And so what happened is he said that these dyes
Speaker 1: have to go. There has to be a new regulatory profile.
Speaker 1: And so what happened The New York Times, and again
Speaker 1: this is slapping yourself in the face, right the media
Speaker 1: constantly doing this. The New York Times decided to fact
Speaker 1: check RFK Junior and here's how it went. Mister Kennedy
Speaker 1: has singled out fruit loops as an example of a
Speaker 1: product with too many artificial ingredients, questioning why the Canadian
Speaker 1: version had fewer than the US version, But he was wrong.
Speaker 1: The ingredient list is roughly the same, although Canada's has
Speaker 1: natural colorings made from blueberries and carrots, while the US
Speaker 1: product contains red dye forty and yellow five. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: New York Times, that's a fact check. No, it's not.
Speaker 1: It's a reaffirmation of what Kennedy was talking about. All
Speaker 1: the other ingredients in there, of course, are terrible, but
Speaker 1: the main focus of RFK Junior is on those dyes,
Speaker 1: and they're like, well, it's not really true that the
Speaker 1: ingredients are markedly different. It's like, well, on the two
Speaker 1: most important things, It's true Canada uses blueberries and carrots
Speaker 1: for its dyes and the US uses red dye number
Speaker 1: forty and yellow number five, which are all having toxic
Speaker 1: effects on our children and what we're doing now. I
Speaker 1: don't want him to go in and, for instance, mandate
Speaker 1: that McDonald's not sell two for one big Max. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's some degree of personal responsibility in our intake and
Speaker 1: what we eat and everything else. But there's also a
Speaker 1: responsibility on the part of these manufacturies to stop poisoning us,
Speaker 1: and that's what he's talking about. But again to my
Speaker 1: point about the media constantly slapping itself in the face
Speaker 1: and reaffirming what we already know. And this was not
Speaker 1: a fact check. This was an absolute reaffirmation of everything
Speaker 1: OURFK Junior was talking about. And there's another example. The
Speaker 1: media just can't win for losing and lying. That's for sure. Hey,
Speaker 1: are you folks ready for high speed rail in the US.
Speaker 1: They're pushing that even after Trump's elected. This is the
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly Show, and I'm Jamie Allmon. Hello, my friends,
Speaker 1: this is the Jesse Kelly Show. Jamie Allman here, super
Speaker 1: Plas used to be filling in for the great Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 1: And you know, watching football over the weekend, and what's
Speaker 1: one game where there was an interception and the quarterback
Speaker 1: basically just threw it right to the defense and it
Speaker 1: was intercepted. And imagine a post game the quarterback or
Speaker 1: the coach of the team that threw the interception comes
Speaker 1: out and says, you know what we ought to do.
Speaker 1: We ought to keep throwing interceptions. That's what we ought to.
Speaker 1: That seems like a key. That seems like that one
Speaker 1: of the ingredients of a sure victory is just throwing
Speaker 1: more interceptions. Well, similarly, we have the woke left and
Speaker 1: the Democrats who are all at this point coming back
Speaker 1: for another round of humiliation. And by this, I'm telling
Speaker 1: you the people on the internet deciding now's a good
Speaker 1: time to promote nationwide high speed rail. And I'm thinking you,
Speaker 1: what are you thinking? You guys aren't like thinking about
Speaker 1: maybe changing up your patterns or changing up your outreach
Speaker 1: or whatever. You're just gonna keep doing this. You're just
Speaker 1: gonna keep throwing these ideas out there, and you're still
Speaker 1: going at it even after you've been defeated, even after
Speaker 1: voters have rejected the Democrat policies. And we'll get into
Speaker 1: this a little later too, because now the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is basically the party of white people making one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars or more. So there you go. But actually,
Speaker 1: the high speed rail thing is a great example of
Speaker 1: the liberals who just can nasal naval gaze and think
Speaker 1: about things that most of us don't have the luxury
Speaker 1: to think about. And this would be for since high
Speaker 1: speed rail let's spend more money. Let's spend more tax
Speaker 1: dollars on something that nobody is going to use. And
Speaker 1: I understand other European countries and they do. You have
Speaker 1: in France the tajeve and people get around that way
Speaker 1: in France. France is the size of Wisconsin, so it
Speaker 1: works pretty well. But a high speed rail system in
Speaker 1: the United States of America isn't going to work. They're
Speaker 1: trying to build one out in California constantly over budget,
Speaker 1: and not to mention what you have to clear out
Speaker 1: in order to make the high speed rail system. So
Speaker 1: you think those windmills are an obstruction to our environment,
Speaker 1: just wait until they start tearing things up along a
Speaker 1: highway or whateverwhere where we're going to do it to
Speaker 1: make room for a high speed rail project. Now I
Speaker 1: know there are a bunch of projects that we're going
Speaker 1: to do, like a tube or something like that. It
Speaker 1: would be like a cylinder that would go high speed
Speaker 1: from Saint Louis to Kansas City or from Kansas City
Speaker 1: and beyond whatever. But we have tubes that go faster
Speaker 1: than cars and they're called airplanes, which is a phenomenal
Speaker 1: invention that gets us from one place to another faster
Speaker 1: And is it more expensive to fly? Yeah? Is it
Speaker 1: more expensive to the taxpayer to fly? No, there's your example.
Speaker 1: If you want to fly, you can fly. The high
Speaker 1: speed rail system requires an investment by the government that
Speaker 1: the government at this point can't afford. And so you
Speaker 1: have a system. And plus, nobody wants it because most
Speaker 1: people like to be in their cars and and take
Speaker 1: their road trips and take their things. And if they
Speaker 1: don't want to do that, they buy an airplane ticket
Speaker 1: and they fly to their locations. And plus, you know,
Speaker 1: I guarantee you Obviously, crashing an airplane is certainly not pleasant,
Speaker 1: but if you can imagine derailing at four hundred miles
Speaker 1: an hour in a ground level cylinder, that would not
Speaker 1: be fun either. In fact, it'd probably be more fun
Speaker 1: to be in a plane crash and it would be
Speaker 1: to be in a high speed rail crash. But that's
Speaker 1: what they're doing. So all over the internet they're now
Speaker 1: trying to bring up and they're trying to force the
Speaker 1: Trump administration to start to get in with this idea
Speaker 1: of creating a high speed rail system. Well I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: but that's not going to be part of any Trump
Speaker 1: administration policy, and you know how Trump feels about the
Speaker 1: windmills and that kind of thing. Anyway, disrupting the environment.
Speaker 1: There's nothing more anti environment than cutting through swatches of
Speaker 1: natural turf to build a high speed rail. But they're
Speaker 1: still doing it all over the internet. These are people
Speaker 1: who say, hey, you know, a lot of our lives
Speaker 1: would be incredibly different if this existed, and it's a
Speaker 1: high speed rail. And I'm wondering if anybody ever borowed
Speaker 1: to ask it. These people tell me, how would our
Speaker 1: lives be incredibly different except for the fact that we'd
Speaker 1: be spending a lot more government money on building up
Speaker 1: these high speed rail systems, and not only would they
Speaker 1: be over budget, but then nobody's going to use them.
Speaker 1: I personally, flying is so much easier and it's so
Speaker 1: much better, and driving is the other option, and there
Speaker 1: you go. And then some people who don't want to
Speaker 1: do that, either don't have a car or are scared
Speaker 1: to fly. They take the unending train trip, which basically
Speaker 1: is an unending event. Sometimes it's fun, but very few
Speaker 1: of us have time to take twelve hours, for instance,
Speaker 1: to go from one city to the next. That was
Speaker 1: way back in the day when airplanes flew at fifty
Speaker 1: miles an hour and it took twelve hours or eight
Speaker 1: hours to go from Pittsburgh to Dallas. That kind of thing.
Speaker 1: But these people keep on coming back for these second
Speaker 1: helpings of idiocy and refuse to give up on this
Speaker 1: idea of trying to change our lives, presumably because it's greener,
Speaker 1: and there's no way that a high speed rail system
Speaker 1: is in any way, shape or for greener. And to
Speaker 1: the point even where the proof is that even electric
Speaker 1: cars are not greener electric cars. You could have one
Speaker 1: hundred percent electric car usage in America and you still
Speaker 1: will have an effect on the environment on carbon emissions
Speaker 1: of about zero point zero three percent. It's why the
Speaker 1: rental car companies are selling them off, because no one
Speaker 1: rents an electric car. When you're on a business trip
Speaker 1: or a vacation. You don't want to stop and plug
Speaker 1: your car in somewhere for two hours before you can
Speaker 1: move anywhere. So these guys keep on coming back for
Speaker 1: a second up. And I have an idea though for them,
Speaker 1: actually it's a great parody ad, but it's a great
Speaker 1: idea to let some of these crazies live trump free
Speaker 1: for the next four years. I'll have that for you next. Oh,
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show. This is Jamie Almon feeling a
Speaker 1: little stocky. Follow lunch and subscribe on social at Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly DC. Hello everyone, this is the Jesse Kelly Show,
Speaker 1: Jamie Almon filling in for you. And by now you've
Speaker 1: probably heard of the cruise line that is out there
Speaker 1: and they are offering people a trip that will last
Speaker 1: four years, and it goes to one hundred and forty
Speaker 1: different countries. And if you don't want to have to
Speaker 1: put up with a Trump America, you can buy a
Speaker 1: ticket on this cruise line that will take you to
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty different countries. And oddly enough, it's
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty six thousand dollars for the trip.
Speaker 1: And I was thinking to myself. I was doing the math,
Speaker 1: and I'm not even good at math, but this math
Speaker 1: seemed kind of easy. I'm thinking, two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: six thousand dollars to go on a cruise and visit
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty different countries, if of course, you
Speaker 1: have the time and don't need and don't need to work,
Speaker 1: seems like kind of a bargain because I figured it
Speaker 1: out that it boils down to about one hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy five dollars a day. Now, for most of us,
Speaker 1: we'd think, well, that's expensive, because that's like staying in
Speaker 1: a hotel every night. But when you think about all
Speaker 1: the things that you don't have to buy or for,
Speaker 1: since presumably you'd sell your house or rented or whatever,
Speaker 1: and so you wouldn't have to pay a mortgage. You
Speaker 1: could sell your car and you wouldn't have to make
Speaker 1: a car payment, You wouldn't have to buy groceries, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't have to spend money on electric bills or gas
Speaker 1: bills or anything of the sort. You wouldn't have to
Speaker 1: spend anything. I think for the most people, if you
Speaker 1: really boil down your daily life, we're probably already maybe
Speaker 1: spending one hundred and seventy five dollars a day to
Speaker 1: a certain degree. So it doesn't seem like it's that
Speaker 1: hard of a deal to go ahead and go on
Speaker 1: the cruise. Although I'm not one of those people who
Speaker 1: would want to leave the United States of America, I
Speaker 1: want to see how this whole thing plays out, because,
Speaker 1: as President Trump says, we're going to be in the
Speaker 1: golden age of America a new Golden age, which I love,
Speaker 1: a new common sense conservative age where everybody is kind
Speaker 1: of on the same page. Everybody's dancing to YMCA, and
Speaker 1: so it just seems almost like overdone in how wonderful
Speaker 1: it is and how exciting it is. And of course,
Speaker 1: the only thing that President Trump has to do is
Speaker 1: accomplish what he wants to accomplish. And I think most
Speaker 1: people will be happy jd vance president in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: eight and we'll never see Democrats again, quite possibly in
Speaker 1: the White House at least. And so the people who
Speaker 1: ran the cruise line basically said that we planned this
Speaker 1: a long time ago. So it was even for people
Speaker 1: who if Kamala Harris got elected, if you wanted to
Speaker 1: leave the country or not be in the country for
Speaker 1: four years and take this cruise, then it would be
Speaker 1: offered to you too. So we weren't doing it just
Speaker 1: as an anti Trump measure or whatever. And my feeling
Speaker 1: is if in this case with Trump as president and
Speaker 1: Able really wants to get away, then they can do that.
Speaker 1: Or there's an even better idea, and that is to
Speaker 1: go ahead and invest in don't cry cryo, And this
Speaker 1: is a great idea even though it is a parody
Speaker 1: and this is fantastics come from our guys over at
Speaker 1: newsy dot com. Don't cry, cryo, need a break from
Speaker 1: Trump's term? Freeze yourself for four years.
Speaker 3: Are you distraught after the recent presidential election? Hear it,
Speaker 3: don't cry cryo. We understand your pain and we're here
Speaker 3: to help. Our expert team of cryogenic care providers. Love.
Speaker 1: I love how it has a piano music, Like every
Speaker 1: covid ad had piano music in it, so of course
Speaker 1: they do the piano music. Although piano is a great,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of thing for any kind of ad,
Speaker 1: but still it's funny.
Speaker 3: Hear it, don't cry, cryo. We understand your pain and
Speaker 3: we're here to help. Our expert team of cryogenic care
Speaker 3: providers can cryogenically freeze you until the Trump presidency has ended.
Speaker 3: No more crying, no more anxiety attacks, just blissful sleep
Speaker 3: until Trump is gone. When you awaken from your slumber.
Speaker 1: This is my favorite part, and that is the JD
Speaker 1: vance discount.
Speaker 3: We'll even have a party ready and waiting for you.
Speaker 3: It will be like his presidency never even happened. It
Speaker 3: was all just a bad dream. As an added bonus,
Speaker 3: you can choose the Vance add on package. We'll extend
Speaker 3: your sleep for an additional four years at a fifty
Speaker 3: percent discount in the event JD. Vance wins the next
Speaker 3: presidential election.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just outrageously funny.
Speaker 3: Everything will be okay. We're here to take care of
Speaker 3: you in your time of need. So remember, don't cry cryo.
Speaker 1: Don't cry cryo. And then what happens is, as an
Speaker 1: addition to this little get up on this ad, then
Speaker 1: they have something to fast forward to. And that's twenty
Speaker 1: thirty three. So the people who have frozen themselves presumably
Speaker 1: for maybe even eight years, are going to wake up
Speaker 1: realizing something that they maybe didn't expect. Start eight January
Speaker 1: sixth twenty three.
Speaker 4: Oh, please tell me it's over.
Speaker 3: Wait, something isn't right.
Speaker 1: This is your Captain, Elon Musk. I want to be
Speaker 1: the first one to welcome you to Mars. So Elon
Speaker 1: Musk has reconfigured his his whole project, his space project
Speaker 1: SpaceX into a ship where these people who have been
Speaker 1: asleep so they wouldn't know, presumably, and so at that
Speaker 1: point Elon Musk then would put them and their cryout
Speaker 1: chambers into a ship and take them to Mars. Sorry,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Junior was just elected president. And so this
Speaker 1: is twenty thirty two and Trump Junior is elected president.
Speaker 1: And Nick Bosa, you know, the forty nine ers guy
Speaker 1: who interrupted the and I think he still got fined
Speaker 1: for it or whatever to to wear his make America
Speaker 1: Great Again hat and all that kind of stuff. He's
Speaker 1: vice president.
Speaker 3: And he deported all don't cry cry out customers to Mars.
Speaker 1: So the people who were who were frozen were ultimately
Speaker 1: then deported to Mars. What, yeah, welcome to Musk City
Speaker 1: on Mars. This is the fate. So people are either
Speaker 1: going to get used to it or they're going to
Speaker 1: have to find some escape. And you see them kind
Speaker 1: of clamoring and trying to figure out, well, maybe if
Speaker 1: we just keep pushing high speed rail, everything will change.
Speaker 1: If we just got to stick to our same old,
Speaker 1: same old, if we just keep calling Pete Hegseth a
Speaker 1: racist and a white supremacist, maybe things will change for us.
Speaker 1: These people are never going to learn. And the reality
Speaker 1: is that I thought about this even before the election.
Speaker 1: I knew that there might be a lot of liberals
Speaker 1: thinking to themselves, you know, Trump might not really be
Speaker 1: that bad. I mean, we're dealing with all these people
Speaker 1: who continue to embarrass us with their woke policies and
Speaker 1: their name calling, and their lack of productivity, and their
Speaker 1: terrible economies and their wars and everything else. And I'm
Speaker 1: thinking maybe electing Trump wouldn't be so bad. And I
Speaker 1: think ultimately, and we haven't been able to kind of
Speaker 1: determine this yet, but I think ultimately there were a
Speaker 1: lot of people Democrats. I'd love to see what the
Speaker 1: Democrat vote totals were for President Trump, and these would
Speaker 1: be the closet vote totals for President Trump. This coalition
Speaker 1: is now just an incredible one. And believe it or not,
Speaker 1: it doesn't include a lot of the Nikky Haley Republicans
Speaker 1: and the others who clutched their pearls and basically prayed
Speaker 1: that Trump wouldn't get elected and now basically are going
Speaker 1: to have to create their own party. I would suggest
Speaker 1: calling it the Whigs, because that's the fate of the
Speaker 1: Whigs is just basically going away. Trump won this election
Speaker 1: without Republicans, if you can believe it, well some Republicans,
Speaker 1: and I knew he was going to win it with
Speaker 1: all the people who perhaps didn't vote Republican before, especially
Speaker 1: the minorities. People who won't associate themselves with Republicans but
Speaker 1: definitely associate themselves with Donald Trump and his policies a
Speaker 1: beautiful thing. And that's the world we're living in, and
Speaker 1: the world these people can choose not to live in.
Speaker 1: This is the Jesse Kelly Show. I'm Jamie Alman, happy
Speaker 1: to be filling in. You're listening to the Jesse Kelly Show.
Speaker 1: Jamie Almen here, happy to be filling in for the
Speaker 1: Great Jesse Kelly. I guess the other option, aside from
Speaker 1: freezing yourself or taking a four year cruise, is to
Speaker 1: just simply not cooperate with the Trump policies and the
Speaker 1: Trump initiatives, And that would be the left's answer is, well,
Speaker 1: we're just not gonna it's not gonna cooperate. That's that's
Speaker 1: a good idea. We just won't participate in this revolution.
Speaker 1: So there are a lot of people who are part
Speaker 1: of the sanctuary city craze who are saying, well, it's
Speaker 1: illegal for Trump to come in and support these people,
Speaker 1: and you know, we're not. We're not going to cooperate.
Speaker 1: We're a sanctuary city. And that's how we're gonna go.
Speaker 1: And the only problem with that is that you're going
Speaker 1: to be basically overrun with ICE agents. That's what Tom
Speaker 1: Homan is promising. He's the new borders are as, you know,
Speaker 1: and these people who want to stick with their sanctuary
Speaker 1: cities are going to find themselves not only overrun with
Speaker 1: ice agents, but also overrun with protests from their citizenry.
Speaker 1: So you have a situation, for instance, in Chicago. That's
Speaker 1: a great example. And if you look at the Chicago
Speaker 1: voting totals coming out of the black community specifically, they
Speaker 1: almost doubled their support for Donald Trump over the last election.
Speaker 1: And they did that because Black people in Chicago, as
Speaker 1: they have been saying to the city Council and the
Speaker 1: Cook County Council and anybody who will listen, that we're
Speaker 1: suddenly second class citizens. And we've been there and done that.
Speaker 1: We don't like throwback Thursday, you guys. We don't like
Speaker 1: to be suddenly second class citizens again, and this time
Speaker 1: second class citizens to illegal aliens who come into our
Speaker 1: city and who are burning up resources that otherwisewise would
Speaker 1: go to us. They're displacing veterans and homeless shelters, they're
Speaker 1: being housed in the rec centers. You know, the rec
Speaker 1: centers that liberals always create to somehow stem crime among
Speaker 1: black youth. Well maybe if they just played basketball all night,
Speaker 1: everything will be fine. And then they just suddenly spend
Speaker 1: gobs of money on rec centers. Well, now those rec
Speaker 1: centers are being used to house illegal aliens. So there
Speaker 1: are a lot of unhappy people in Chicago. Chicago is
Speaker 1: a sanctuary city, and there were people. It wound up
Speaker 1: right before the election where there were black citizens showing
Speaker 1: up at these city council meetings wearing Make America Great
Speaker 1: Again hats and they were chanting no more blue, no
Speaker 1: matter who. And yet these city leaders aren't listening. They
Speaker 1: didn't understand what the true problem was. They didn't understand
Speaker 1: that every city, every state became ultimately a border state.
Speaker 1: And so there they were angry. They were they were
Speaker 1: they were upset about what was going on, and they
Speaker 1: voted accordingly. Now, the only people left to fumigate would
Speaker 1: be the local leaders who continue to hang on to
Speaker 1: this idea that being a sanctuary city is a good idea.
Speaker 1: Boston's Democrat Mayor Michelle Wu said that she would resist
Speaker 1: cooperation with the Trump administration on any plan to deport illegals.
Speaker 4: What will Boston's response be if these mass deportations take place. Yeah, Look,
Speaker 4: elections have consequences, and the federal government is responsible for
Speaker 4: a certain set of actions and cities. No individual city
Speaker 4: can reverse or override some parts of that. But what
Speaker 4: we can do is make sure that we are doing
Speaker 4: our part to protect our residents in every possible way,
Speaker 4: that we are not cooperating with those efforts that actually
Speaker 4: threaten the safety of everyone by causing widespread fear and
Speaker 4: having large scale economic impact.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Boston's a pretty nice city and hasn't actually had
Speaker 1: the suffering that New York and Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami have
Speaker 1: had as a result of their policies. But you notice
Speaker 1: she called them residents. Illegal aliens are not residents. They're
Speaker 1: illegal aliens, That's what they are. So Tom Homan, who
Speaker 1: is of course the borders are I love this guy.
Speaker 1: He kind of has this attitude and the way he
Speaker 1: comports himself. It's straight out of like a Bowery Boys movie.
Speaker 1: You know, he's like really tough, and you know, other
Speaker 1: otherwise wouldn't be as polished verbally as other people would be.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't matter. That never matter to any of us.
Speaker 1: We weren't looking for polished people. We were looking for,
Speaker 1: even if they're flawed, people who knew exactly what the
Speaker 1: needs of America happened to be. So he's interviewed and
Speaker 1: is asked to respond to this Democrat mayor and has
Speaker 1: a money answer.
Speaker 5: Defending our residents every possible way. Well, she's not very smart.
Speaker 5: I'll give her that because I just what I just
Speaker 5: said is President Trump's going to prioritize public safety threats.
Speaker 5: What mayor or governor doesn't want public safety threats to
Speaker 5: out of the communities. Man, that's your number one responsibilities
Speaker 5: to protect your communities, and that's exactly what we're going
Speaker 5: to do. So she helps us, she gets the hell
Speaker 5: out of the way, because they're going to do it.
Speaker 5: And look, there's a clear line here and they can't
Speaker 5: cross the clear line. I will suggest she read titled
Speaker 5: eight United States called thirteen twenty four triply that says,
Speaker 5: you know you can't at harbor can steal from front
Speaker 5: lawenforce now, so I hope she don't cross that line.
Speaker 5: They cannot cooperate, but there are certain laws in place
Speaker 5: that they can't cross and I hope she doesn't cross it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, you're not a you're not a sovereign city.
Speaker 1: And we all understand obviously the Constitution in the tenth Amendment,
Speaker 1: and we and we and we understand the need to
Speaker 1: have a level of sovereignty for states. But when it
Speaker 1: comes to a federal law, when you are basically institutionalizing
Speaker 1: a violation of federal law, that's not going to work.
Speaker 1: And and and Holman is indicating that you can stand
Speaker 1: in the way, We'll just double the number of agents.
Speaker 1: We'll we'll overrun you. And if it's not us who
Speaker 1: will teach you a lesson? And much like we put
Speaker 1: the dog's nose in its poop, then your citizens are
Speaker 1: going to teach you a lesson as well, because your
Speaker 1: citizens don't like that attitude. They don't like being a
Speaker 1: saxury city. They've seen the kind of damage it has caused.
Speaker 1: And so you might stand in the way, but Tom Homan,
Speaker 1: President Trump, Ice, and your own citizens are going to
Speaker 1: be standing in the way of you. That's how it's
Speaker 1: all going to work, all right. Coming up, a completely
Speaker 1: red state decides they're going to put a few Bibles
Speaker 1: in classrooms, and hubbub ensues. We'll have that for you
Speaker 1: other side of this. This is the Jesse Kelly Show,
Speaker 1: and I'm Jamie Alman with you