WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Guessing Lines Week 10

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Check it on man, No down, Man, good day. I

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>want to check the game right here at Vison as

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the man said, right here at Serious Sextep Channel two

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>or four, Visa dot Com, Visa in game plus. Good

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>morning to you. It's Gil Alexander. Jason Khan is here. Jason.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 1>How was your weekend? It was pretty good, girl. How

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about yours? I survived, It's all I care about. That's true. Literally,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you did survive all I care about. In the end,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's I've said it before, I'll say it again. The

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>brain just keeps coming back to Survivor three D ten entries.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, still alive in circuits Survivor. It was the

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>most compelling game of the weekend. We'll get to it.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I had Pittsburgh. We know how that went. But listen,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're still alive and you haven't had a close

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>call or two by this point, um, you are the outlier,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not the person that is the close call or two.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get into all that because we could talk

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about that for segments on end um. Because it's all

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's all headed towards Thanksgiving. Everybody's just sort of hanging

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>around untill the Thanksgiving implosion that will inevitably occur, and

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta be fine with that once Thanksgiving comes around

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in circa. But we're here to talk not only week

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>ten in the National Football leagu Wow, week ten moving forward,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but week nine yesterday. If you're just landing on this

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>show for the first time. On Mondays, what we do

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is something called Guessing Lines, tribute to the old Stardust

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>radio show of the same name with Roxy Roxborough. Uh

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course the star of the show, the person

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>who runs so adeptly the South Point Hotel Casino sports book,

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>My mish book, Chrissie Andrews. Good morning, Chris, Hello Gilly,

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>how are you surve Who did you have? Uh? Well,

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in with a couple of guys and I warned

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>them at the beginning of the weekend. I think I

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>even said it on you did you don't could blow it?

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, no, one could blow a game like there's

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to win, like the Pittsburgh Steels. But we have

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks to have four entries a lot. We started to

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>hear its five h I got we got Pittsburgh on one,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City on another, and I got the Patriots somebody

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on two of them. So I don't know now is

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this circle or is this your own survivor pool? Is

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you have four left? Look at you? I I was.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I heard your voice in my head the whole time

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that game was going on yesterday, because you did You

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>did say it on guessing lines. You're like, well, no

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one can blow a game like this. I'm like, oh,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>how first of yeah, before anything else, how are you

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling now? A week of For those who missed it

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago? Chris, he couldn't be here because he

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tested positive for COVID, was experiencing the ramifications of that

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, you felt good enough to come back on?

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Are you further a long in your recovery? Oh? Yeah,

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I have tested negative. However, I'm still

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>under quarantine because now my wife tested positive, so I

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for her. And you know, she's asymptomatic,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>so you would never know she had it. But it

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was just part of the procedure, you know, with me,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was pretty sure when I got tested that

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I was through with it at that point. That she

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>had to get tested, Like I said, it's just the procedure,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and she came up positive. We were shocked at both

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of us, but you know, if she gets the test again,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Thursday or Friday, and you know, pretty sure

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>she'll be negative. But you know, you never know. This

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>disease is just crazy. You know. I talked about my

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one friend and not like some guy I heard of,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like my cousin's brother as a guy who works with

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>his sister. No, it was a good friend of mine

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>got it and died the same day. And that and

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>then other guys just sail right through. It's just unbelievable.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know, like I said, five years

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from now that I'm sure they'll know a lot more

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about it than they do now. Yeah, we we just

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we And by the way, just coming over because we

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have multiple screens in here in studio nine Dodgers, not

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>nine Los Angeles Dodgers. Now they say test positive for

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. So that's from this weekend, you know, more

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>than a week after the actual final of the World Series.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So the conclusion of the World Series. So yeah, we

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>don't we know far less than we do know, is

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the headline to it all, for sure. But I'm glad

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your wife is feeling well, and uh, hopefully she'll get

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that she'll get through it without incident. How did how

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>did you do as a book this past weekend? Yeah,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we did good. It was a good week for us,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Saturday and Sunday both. Saturday was a little shaky and

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I got the results from Saturday night. How did we

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>win this much? Because it didn't seem like we were

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>doing some good during the day, but you know, just

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a grind to kind of work that in our favorite

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't knock them dead. We didn't not knock them

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>dead at all. Uh. And then yesterday it was kind

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of the same thing. Momma pretty good. Um. But once again,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as I was watching the scorers roll in, I wasn't

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>sure how good we were doing. But uh, you know,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>we picked up a little bit at the end, so

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a very good day, all right,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Skill Alexander, It's Chris Andrews. This is guessing lines on

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game at Vista in the sports betting that

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>works Serious x M channel two oh four. Visa had

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>not come. The Visa have food, boastling and game plus.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get it going. Um, of course we'll talk about

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this past week. We'll talk about again the premise of

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>this show. I'm in a cocoon for me yesterday, and

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that is the truth. I don't know what the lines are.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I I guess what the line I believe will be.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy will tell me what he posts after the show.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And within that exercise, we look to extract value. Thursday night, Sarah,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>what do we got the Colts at the Titans? Good game?

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Cults of the Titans um division game? Yeah? On paper

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I say that because after what happened last night between

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the Saints of the Bucks. So on paper we'll get

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to that. Uh, looks to be a good game. So

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this is for the a f C South lead. This

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is now, if I remember scheduling, this is the first

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of two games between these two teams in a three

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>week span. So, um, this is big because right now

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee is six and two Indianapolis five and three. Tennessee

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>six and two by virtue of their win over the

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Bears yesterday to seventeen in a game that was not

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly as close as that score suggests. They do cover

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the end um Tannehill ten of twenty one for

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one fifty eight two touchdowns. No Pixie was sacked three times,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry. I mean the Bears did their thing on

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry just twenty one carries for sixty eight yards.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown was Tannehills number one target four for

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one on one in a touchdown. But the Titans beat

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bears yesterday with only two hundred and twenty eight

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>total yards of offense. They ran fifty five place to

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago seventy five, but they held Chicago to two of

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on third down. Chicago was three or four on

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. I should I should note, but two of

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on third down. Uh, the key, you know, there's

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so much of this yesterday. The turnover number. Uh, if

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>there's ever a stat that we can look backwards on it,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we were just given a stat and the one stat

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that we could immediately assume wins or losses with typically

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is the turnover column. And they were plus two in turnovers,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>one of which for Tennessee was a scoop of a

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery fumble for a touchdown by Desmond King sixty

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>three yards. That made it sixteen to nothing with one

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with excuse me, with four thirty five left in the

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>third quarter. That was the big play of the game.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 1>So Tennessee gets it done there after, Folks weren't feeling

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>too good about him last week. Indianapolis loses to Baltimore. Um,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the game I liked the most coming into

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, along with Washington, which we'll get to. Baltimore wins. Uh,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 1>they beat Indianapolis twenty four to ten. Chrissie, but Indianapolis

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>gets They get one total yard of offense from halftime

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>till just over the eleven minute mark in the fourth quarter. Uh,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a and and and within that. And this

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>has been a numbers game staple here for years now.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a key fourth and one for the Colts.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You know where I'm going with this. They were down

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one to ten with five thirty four left in

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the game at the Baltimore sixteen yard line, and they

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>decided they're going for it. Now again, you're down eleven

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with five thirty four left, it's fourth and one. But

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who's your quarterback? It's Philip Rivers. And what do we

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>say here all the time? Whoever has Philip Rivers in

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a sneak situation? Is that a competitive disadvantage because he

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>does not sneake. It's like it's a Pruder film to

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>find a Philip Rivers sneak in his career, So what

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>happens an incomplete past that absolutely had no chance of

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ever being completed, and instead of kicking a field goal,

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of you know, having the sneak option on fourth

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and one, zero points that was their biggest threat in

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the second half. Rivers finishes twenty five or forty three

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for two, twenty seven, no touchdowns, one pick. He was sacked. Uh,

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he was not sacked. But they were two of twelve

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves on third down. Where the Colts in this game

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two of four on fourth down. Um, I know we

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>don't do a lot of these lazy threes anymore, but

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't this be Tennessee minus three? Well, one guy wanted

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to make a T shirt, and uh, I think this

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>would be the first one to qualify. I like your

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>number better. Someone didn't want to put that in the

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>vicent store. Yeah, well, you know, I came up with

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one that they still quite a few elm from what

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear, that's never under until it's over. So, gilly,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I see this one A little bit of two some

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, mostly two and a half. I'm

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna open a two and a half. And by the way,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for guys, just tuning in having hurt. I mean, I

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>don't give anything for home team, home field advantage. My

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>power Raidings come to Tennessee one and a half. But

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as I look at it, and I always say the

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>power Raidings just a place to start, I really think

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this needs to be at least two and a half.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably at three is even better. I'm gonna open two

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half just because they do see some sues

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. But you know, Gil in a in a cocoon,

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>when I do kind of like your number better, I

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just think, Uh, Tanys have been a little up and

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>down this year, no question about it, and I expected

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a little better things than early in the year. It

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>looked like we were gonna get them. It's been a

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>little inconsistent some somewhere along the line. I'm wonder if

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they maybe figured out Dana a little bit. They might have,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>but I don't. I don't like rivers um. I really

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like this Colt's roster, the fifty three man roster, but

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the more I look at it, I'm not sure they

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have any real game breakers. And t Y Hilton, by

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, without us day too, but T, I don't

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>see any real offensive game breakers for this team, and

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that might hurt them because I think Philip Rivers.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I've never been a big Rivers guy, but I think

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he I think he needs a lot of help and

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see anything that's really given it to

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>him offensively. So I'm gonna open to an half. Is

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>t y h t hy? Hilton really hasn't done much

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>this year two and a half? You said this year

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that existent this year before before he even got hurt.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>He was one of my fantasy players and he was

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bust. It's amazing going from from solid threat

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to nothing with the change to Philiper literally nothing. All right,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a half you said, Christie, Yeah, I'm gonna

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>open two and a half. Okay, I should probably I

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>probably should have waited to the Baltimore game to to

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>bring this up. But then think of the last thing

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, the Colts playing the Ravens. I wonder if

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just more you know, it's what we tend to

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>read in with recency into what we've just seen. But

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we've said it before with the Ravens, and when you

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>play the Ravens now, there's been great teams in NFL

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>history that you can say this about I get it,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But do you ever remember, I'll sort of drive this

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>home again about the Avens. Do you ever remember a

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>team that's not necessarily you know, one of the all

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>time great teams that is so different when they're behind

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and when they're ahead, when they're ahead, and when they

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to matriculate the ball down the field,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and and you can't get them off the field, they're

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they're impossible to beat, it seems like. And this was

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>one of those situations where it was just like the

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Ravens were going to They had their their foot on

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the Colt's neck in the second half, and they're like,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't stop us. We're gonna hold the ball forever,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is gonna be the most frustrating thing you've

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>ever experienced in your life. They're so interesting that it's

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>like the Uh, it's like a chess player who has

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you on your heels from the very beginning of your

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>chess match and there's nothing you can do about it

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole match through, like you can never get back

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in a positive situation. That's how it felt. Uh, if

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you were the cult yesterday. So two and a half

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. Three is what I guess that's

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday night game, which again looks great on paper.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's do a Sunday morning game. First game out of

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the blocks, the Bengals and at the Steelers. Do we

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have another one of these eight games early? Three late

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>situations here, Jason? No, Actually, there's a there's a lot

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of late games just coming in. No, no, go ahead.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, because of the Masters, right, so they tilted

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it later. Oh that's good. There's just five early games,

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>five early, five early games and six late in two

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>three four, five, six late games and then yeah the

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>prime time. Wow. Okay, so because of darkness they're going

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to play that. The Masters might be over by about

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>twelve noon Pacific, three pm Eastern. So that makes sense.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>So more games in the afternoon is what you're saying.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Literally more awesome. Alright? Uh you said it was the

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh game, Chrissy, Bengals at the Steelers, Bengals at Pittsburgh. Okay,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Bengals coming off of by Bengals to five and one,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh eight and oh eight, notes the first eight no

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>starting franchise history. They get by the Cowboys, and I

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do mean get by nine, don't those of us who

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>had them and survive or no, um wow. So big

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Ben forty two for three oh six, three touchdowns, no picks.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't sacked, but he did get hurt and had

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to leave early in the first half. Did come back

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to play in the second halves only missed uh you know,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute and a half or so in the fourth quarter.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben eleven of sixteen for one forty four and

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Pittsburgh was plus two in turnovers. Those ended

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>up being huge. They only ended up with forty six

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards a week after getting just forty eight against Baltimore.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But Pittsburgh had two missed extra points from Chris Boswell,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>who did hit a I believe it was a fifty

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>nine yard or after a false start saved him from

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>another miss at the end of the first half. But

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they Pittsburgh got twenty four points the opposite of the

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned way. It wasn't three touchdowns, three extra points

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at the field goal. It was two touchdowns of missed

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>extra points, another touchdown with a miss two point conversion,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and then a field goal. That's how they got to

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four uh and at the end of the game,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one at the Dallas fifteen with forty three

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. This is after Pittsburgh had taken the lead.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>All they needed is a yard James Conner four yard loss.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>They also had a fourth and one earlier. We're Big Ben.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>This is before his injury did not sneak So again

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>getting back to the Philip Rivers thing, the Big Ben

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>thing is your nickname is literally Big Ben. Can't you

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just fall over and get a yard? It's in your nickname.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about Riverboat Ron wanting to gamble

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because his nicknames riverboad. Your name is Big Ben. Just

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fall over and this and this, Christie, you know this

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>better than anybody. This is for Mike Tomlin, a guy

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who used to randomly go for two when they would

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>go up six to nothing. So it's the the inconsistency

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff drives me crazy. It's like, oh, now

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we're never doing that again. Now we're just going to

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hand off and pray. So Dallas ends up with the

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>ball with thirty eight seconds left at their own nineteen

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>seven plays later, the great Garrett Gilbert has them third

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and four at the Pittsburgh twenty three four seconds left

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Gilbert to Lamb broken up by Fitzpatrick

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh escapes. Oh god, I'm exhausted again. That game

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>took so much out of me. Chris. Anyway, what's this game?

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and Pittsburgh? Is that? But she's forgot Pittsburgh. I

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I respect Cincinnati and I think the market

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>probably does to um. They play a lot of close games,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it, but the line will probably be Pittsburgh

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>minus seven and a half and you're a little light.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's almost all nine. I do see one seven,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I see one eight, but mostly nine. It opened a

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>little higher like nine and a half, but it's come down.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Bengals and I talked about them

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, I thought that if the coach

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't blow it, because I don't like him at all,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of their roster I kind of like,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like some of the guys did bail.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Burrow, I think is really good. And

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be the kind of team that's gonna

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>cover a lot of numbers. They're gonna win a lot

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of games. No, They're gonna cover some big numbers, and

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of them, right here where

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they're really primed. Once again. My power ratings come to

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. But I like the lower number.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think nine is good. I wouldn't want to go

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as low as you did, but I wouldn't I don't

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>see a ten coming in this game. Personally, I think

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>nine is pretty good place to start. Cincinnati's six and

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>two against the spread so far this year, so Joe

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>has been covering a lot of numbers. Joe Burrow. Let's

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine these teams like that that you bring up, Joe Burr.

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Imagine these teams like I don't have to imagine it

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>because I grew up at Washington Football team fan. But

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>if you had Dwayne Haskins, or if you're the Giants

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have Daniel Jones, and you look around the league, right,

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and all of these great young quarterbacks Joe Burrow and

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh exciting Joe falling on their face. Yeah, let me mean,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>let me just list him. Joe Burrow, Josh Allen, Twa,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray, Um, Justin Herbert. There's five off the top

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of my head, right, I'm sure I'm forgetting Lamar Jackson.

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>These are all guys have been drafted in the last

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>three drafts. Uh, those are six right there, So you're

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>one short of a quarter of the league. I didn't

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>mention Baker Mayfield because I think he's probably a tear

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>below those guys. But that would be a quarter of

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the league. And you've got Dwayne Haskins and Daniel Jones

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or Sam Donald or Mitchell. I mean, well, but think

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>about that. That's the difference, right, Like, that's the difference

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>between hope and despondency. Anyway, Jake Lewton yesterday one game, Yeah, yeah,

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>get me started. But Christie, I did. I was hearing

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>your voice in my head that entire Pittsburgh game because

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you did selling lines. You're like, this would be the game.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, for god's sakes, don't be right about this. Yeah,

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>people texting me call me about different things that said,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>would you guys just leave me alone? I just Steelers,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>but win this game. Please let me alone. That's right.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if they cover. Just win, all right.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's stick up. Let's stick in one here in two

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 1>minutes here before the break. You're Washington football team the

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lion. There's not many lines on this. I'll tell

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you right now. I'm imagining because of Stafford, but you know,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or you know it could be because of we don't

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know what Washington. Well, that's really a story. So we

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do have a couple of numbers. Yeah, we'll do it

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Detroit gets blasted by Minnesota thirty four to twenty.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stafford does end up playing, but he does end

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>up leaving the game. Minnesota was super dominant. Washington had

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a chance to beat the Giants. But Alex Smith in

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>replacement of Kyle Allen just my opinion is he shouldn't

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>be out on the football field. And I'm just talking

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>about his leg, but certainly some of the decisions of

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the throws he made late in this game

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>also lend to yeah, maybe just maybe just enjoy your

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>millions and your family and not risk injury anymore. I

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>think they have to go to Dwayne Haskins here. I

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>really do, like, I don't know what the point of

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>playing Alex By the way, and terrible injury for Kyle Allen.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>The Washington football team. Between Joe Thisman, Alex Smith, and

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen, I don't know what they've done to the universe,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but those are three horrific quarterback injuries for that one franchise.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think you have to go to dayne Haskin's.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Usually there's no line whatsoever. Here. Now I see a

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of numbers. I see, Um, there's two numbers out there,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'd like to hear yours first. I would say

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Detroit minus six. If it's Haskins, well, you're you're a

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>little high. I see it's three and a half before

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>my power ring has come a lot lower. Um, you know,

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they just something wrong with this Lions team. You know

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about quarterbacks. How about Stafford got stuck on

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Detroit all these years. I'm an opening right now. I

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>want to see at I want to see a little

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more. So I'm not gonna open it just yet.

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington minus five and turnovers yesterday and they lose by

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>three to the Giants. Good lord, the NFCS. That was

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the game I like the most with Baltimore. Then your

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback gets hurt, then you go minus five and turnovers.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to betting the NFL. Wellcome back. Guessing lines continues

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Andrews right here in the numbers game at

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Visa the Sports Betting Network. Kiel Alexander Christie Andrews right

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>here at the South Point Hotel Casino. Last thing about

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Detroit, Chrissie, since there's no universal line here,

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but the the Washington football team minus five in turnovers

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>five turnovers to the Giants, nothing lose by a field goal.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith ends up with a fine box score line

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of forty two, one touchdown, three picks, sacked twice. But

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>those three picks, I mean those last two were brutal.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen before a gruesome leg injury, which was Dak

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Prescott esque five of seven from six, five of seven

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for sixty two UH. Terry McLaurin is always filling up

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the box score for the UH. For the football team

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or seven for one fifteen and a touchdown Cam Sims

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>three for one ten. But Washington was out t op out.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Time of possession thirty seven to thirty three. Lions in

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>defeat Stafford was twenty three thirty two for two eleven,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown, two picks. He was sacked twice. Chase Daniel

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>came in relief eight of thirteen, one touchdown, one pick.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The Lions minus three in turnovers in that game against Minnesota,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>so brutal um, so I said six, and you said,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is went on that game Washington Detroit.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I see one three and a half, but that that

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>might be just an old line pill before I don't

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>know if that's updated. And by the way, before we

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>move one, my wife reminded me, there's one other injury.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You forgot to mention Skins about r G three. What

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>do you mean you're talking about bad leg injuries? Thank you,

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Yeah, thank you, Pam, because Pam came up

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with that was the you know, that was a sprain

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>me against the Ravens his rookie year, late in his

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rookie year, which then in the game in the playoff

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>game against the Seahawks. I was there and the place

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was a morgue when he got hurt. Like remember the

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Skins were fourteen to nothing in that game

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle and then the leg injury. I don't remember

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that well, yeah, but I just remember him getting hurt.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was went from like a minor injury

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to I'm not quite a career ender, but certainly is

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>shot at superstar that he was. He was never the same,

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>never the same. People tend to forget. Yeah, thank you,

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>for that. Thank you, Pam. There you go, I'd forgotten

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. Alright, Let's go on another game on Sunday morning.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Only five early games. Love this Yeah. Houston Texans at

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Blount. Houston beats the Jaguars thanks to a

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>h failed two point conversion on the Jaguars part. They

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>win at twenty excuse it was twenty six and the

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>end was at the final score um Houston Deshaun Watson

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen of thirty two for two eighty one, two touchdowns

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>note picks. He was sacked twice. He was ten for

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty on the ground fifty yards rushing. Will Fuller the

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>fifth five catches for a hundred yards and a touchdown.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn said this place would have been hell. Would have

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>been hell had we uh cut will Fuller or had

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we traded rather Willful or not cut. But there was

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>rumors of a trade to the packers. He said, it

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been hell. Brandon Cooks three for eight, three

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to touchdown by the way, twenty seven to twenty five.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville fails to get the two point conversion to tie

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it in force overtime. Jake Luton did very well against Houston.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland coming off of bye, I will say Cleveland minus

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Uh, you know during the break

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>there are good friends a bear. Chris Felika put out

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a tweet we should rename the show. I like your

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>number better, your case number two. I like your number better.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>My number came to exactly Cleveland four and a half.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing excuse me, I'm seeing two and a half

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and three on the Browns. Uh. Yeah, I definitely like

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your number better. I'm gonna have to open three. I can't,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, three and a half. I'd be you know,

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>suicidal doing that. But uh, a little bit of tun

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>alf with juice on the on the favorite, but mostly

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>three and I'm gonna open three. But uh, once again,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I like your number better. Mine came to exactly four

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. My follow ratings, I think Houston still

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just not there and Cleveland is pretty good. And I

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>know we didn't put Maypold with the others that he's

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>coming around, and they have a very good roster. That's

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the team that they did roster in a good coach. Coach,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I understand you're putting in three, but there are two

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and a halves out there on this How is that?

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>How is that making one? Yeah, I see one, two

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half I think, I think, yeah, I think

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>even three is low. Wow that I'm surprised by that number.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That might be a pick right now. I might make

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that bet right now, coming back guessing lines like one already.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Right here, you're looking at a week ten right here

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game in visa the sports betting that

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where by the way, tonight's game between the Patriots and

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. What are you sing right now and see ten? Consensus?

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? I'm seeing tens in a lot of spots.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>You might see some nines out there, but ten, Yeah, Wow,

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that game is gonna move up. It's gonna be Joe Flacco.

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not Sam Donald. Ten's not enough. Tends tends not enough.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't think, No, why does this game worry me tonight?

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It would have worried me more if it was Donald.

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>But it still worries me a little bit. If you're

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a Patriots. There are seventy nine people out of the

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>remaining three ten and circus survivor that do have the

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Patriots tonight, so they'll have to uh, yeah, we'll have

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>you got two of them. I don't I don't think

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are going to go down to the Jets.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They may go down in the next week or two,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think this is the game where they fold.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Well that's the duke. Quit put me eyes on me, Jason.

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have any problem, Chris, none at all.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Every one of them is a problem. That's the thing

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I said about the Chiefs. Everyone's like, oh, just about

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. They're not going fifteen and one either, you know,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like somebody's We'll get to their game. They probably could

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have lost yesterday easily. What's the next one on Sunday morning? This?

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>How many have we done Sunday? Yeah? We did three more? Okay, um, okay,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we're Jacksonville at Green Bay. So we just talked about

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Jake Lewton from Oregon State six round pick handed up

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>being twenty six of thirty eight for three oh four

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>in his debut, one touchdown, one pick. He was sacked twice,

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>comported himself very well in a twenty seven to twenty

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>five loss to the Texans James Robinson touchdown Chark seven

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>for one six and a touchdown. Jacksonville had four hundred

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and twelve total yards of offense. Um, if you had

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville going into that game, you would have signed up

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for that every time. But they're at Green Bay. You said,

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you said at Green Bay? Yeah? Okay,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>al right, Well the only question here is is it

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fourteen or is it thirteen? I'll say it's fourteen. Yeah,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fourteen. I see a little bit of thirteen

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. H my power ratings come to fifteen

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and again another term guys love hearing, they say, diminishing returns.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to make the team that high. I think

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen is a good place to start, and that's where

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm that's I'm gonna put it and start with that

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay with extra rest, having played on Thursday night

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and having just a just a coaster against the Niners.

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why Aaron Rodgers was in that game

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for as long as he was and Aaron Jones, Aaron

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones who was like doubtful to play. They're like running

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.239
<v Speaker 1>him late in that game made no sense. Um, Can

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I just talk about Survivor one more time? People are

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, Jeezy really is obsessed with Survivor Green Bay.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the circum matrix, green Bay is available.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's three entries left headed into heading into

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Tonight in circa. Green Bay is available to like a

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and eighty nine of those entries. So this

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is the quintessential game theory game. Assuming there's not gonna

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger spread on the board, either everyone's going

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to play green Bay and you know, just either get

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>their free Bingo square or go down with the ship.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>The game theory way to play this would be to

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>not play green Bay because you figure this is my

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>chance to win a million bucks or gets super close

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. If green Bay happens to lose this, everybody

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and their mother is going to be on Green Bay.

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The question is do you want to play the game

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>theory way? You know, because I said from the beginning,

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this game should not be called survivor should be called winner. Right,

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a poorly named game. You're trying to

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>win it, You're actually not trying to survive. But in

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment, will people do that or will they just

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>take Green Bay and say, yeah, that's great, I'll just

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>survive to the next week. I may very well be

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in that ladder camp, but I'm just telling you how

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>how you're supposed to play this is to not play

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. But I would bet you this is going

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the most imbalanced week ever with the amount

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of people who have Green Bay available to them. Yeah,

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see who the Cowboys play. But yeah, yeah,

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, h next, you're being quite verbal this week too,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're Cesaris. Oh what did I say? Cowboys? Come on?

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You said it should be uh, you know, winner not surviving,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Cowboys and the Jets both have

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>buys this week. This weekend's the best fade. Teams are

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to there you go, okay, last one in

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the morning, Okay, okay, yeah, we got one more after it.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Eagles at the Giant all right, I don't have to

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>say much about this. Eagles coming off a by Giants,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, beat Washington by a field goal because

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they were plus five in turnovers. Um. Daniel Jones was

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three of thirty four for two twelve one touchdown

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>note picks. He was sacked five times. I don't know.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia minus oh okay, Chris, yeah, I thought I turned

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>my sound. Evidently not scared me a little bit. I'll

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>say Philly minus three Yeah, it's mostly three and three

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with some juice on the favorite. Uh no, I'm sorry,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. That was early this morning. It's not three

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And I even see it as high

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>as four. Uh well, I think it's a little high myself.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think four would have to be a take for me. Um.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought like three was an okay number. I thought

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the open up, but I got said open

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>three twenty this morning when I first started looking at

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>these numbers. But it's client to as high as four.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So evidently early money on the Eagles in this spot.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure. I still have a lot of

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>questions about the Eagles. There's twenty for the Giants too,

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure you should be going at three

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and half and four in the road with the Eagles.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I I kind of like the Giants in this front.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Giants shouldn't beat them last time. Giants are surprising six

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and three against the spread, six and three against the

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are I'm gonna open three and a half and they'll

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>probably bet me up. But uh, you know, I thought

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>three was a good opening number. Yeah, Giants and not

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>bad getting points and the course too many at home. Yeah,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Eagles with a chance to get to five hundred. Eagles

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to the NFC East at three four and one,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a one and a half game lead on Washington.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It's two and six, and Dallas and the Giants are

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>both two and seven. So the Eagles have an opportunity

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>here to stretch their lead or at least have a

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>shot as to win here. But I said, why would

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to win this division? I mean, really, if

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you step back, if you win the NFC East, the

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>highest you can draft is all the other three teams

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be top ten picks. That's a monstrous gap.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Um in terms of winning this division and getting a

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>home playoff game, We're more than likely you're gonna get housed.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it, you're not winning the super Bowl. You're

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting to the super Bowl. You really want to

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>win this division just so you can have that crown

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and have a much worse draft pick. I

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Eagles don't care. They draft weirdly. Anyway. I

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>will take Jalen Raaker here. I will take Jalen Hurts here. Anyway,

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back. Guessing lines continues Week ten in the

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>National Football League right here on a numbers with Visa

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Betting Network. Tampa at Carolina, Tampa at Carolina,

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, what what was that yesterday for Tampa Bay.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay loses to New Orleans. Alright, no surprise in

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that as as three point closing favorites, but they lose

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight to three, and the field goal was just

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that thirty one and nothing was like, we don't want

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to we don't want to get shut out, so we'll

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>kick a field goal, which is always a questionable move,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but New Orleans just stomps them, stops them.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we were doing on on Primetime Action

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the other night on MSG plus with my buddy Matt

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Kelly Bidlin and Daniel Lavary. We were doing

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like our mid season top fives, and I put New

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Orleans at five because I was like, I'm not gonna

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>do my list of what they were to this point,

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but what I think they'll be before the season. I

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had Kansas City in New Orleans and the Super Bowl.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>This is New Orleans at full strength, This is New

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Orleans getting their players back. I also had Tampa Bay

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>in by top five, though, and I don't know, like,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>can you be in the top five if you lose

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a game like that. No, no, I don't think he can. Yeah,

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So Tampa Bay, let me just be thorough. Let me

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>just give the the stats on this. Let me find

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that game. Tampa Bay Brady twenty two of thirty eight

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for two oh nine, no touchdowns, three picks. He was

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>sacked three times. They were out first downed, if you will,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>by the Saints to thirteen. The Bucks were one of

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>nine on third down, oh for three on fourth, one

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of nine on third, zero for three on fourth. They

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had eight rushing yards eight American rushing yards. Chrissy. They

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>were out gained four four. They were out time of

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>possession forty oh four to nineteen fifty six. They fall

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the six and three. Now there's Carolina. Carolina loses to

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City by the score of thirty three to thirty one.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>They were ten point dogs. They were ahead much of

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. They end up missing a sixty seven yard

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or with no time left on the clock. Joey Slide

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know, had to over kick it and didn't

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have a chance. Did get sixty seven yards but wasn't closed.

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater Teddy Bear thirty six and forty nine for

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>three ten, two touchdowns, no picks. He was sacked twice

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey and his return filling up a box score

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like nobody's business thirty six excusing partner eighteen for sixty

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and a touchdown on the ground ten for eighty

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>two and a touchdown through the air Samuel nine for

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>one oh five in a touchdown. There was an amazing

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>drive by the Panthers when they fell behind in the

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, an incredible Samuel catch at an incredible McCaffrey catch,

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>sandwiched by an awesome Teddy Bridgewater fourth and four fourth

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen conversion where he got it by leaping over

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>basically the yard to gain marker. They were three of

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>three on fourth by the way, the the Panthers yesterday,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but they had twelve penalties for eighty two yards despite

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>having the ball for over thirty eight minutes in this game.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Four straight losses for the Panthers, all by eight points

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.439
<v Speaker 1>or fewer. But here's what gets me, and it gets

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.959
<v Speaker 1>back to inconsistent officiating. I talked about it rampantly last week.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Incidents in the Eagles games and the Bears game, and

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Seahawks game certainly riddled in that Bucks Giants

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>game with inconsistencies. Can we show that that photo. This

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is the last drive of the game for the Panthers.

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to get a field goal to win this game,

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and this is the play with is this with nine

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.919
<v Speaker 1>seconds left on the clock? Look how offsides the Chiefs are?

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't call this nine seconds left in the game.

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>This is right beyond midfield. Should be a buzzer or

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>something like that, with something like a tennis line buzzer

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. And the reason I bring up the photo

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is because with the naked eye, you could tell the

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs were off sides. Now, I'm not saying that's going

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to win the game for the Panthers, but it does

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>turn a sixty seven yard field goal into a sixty

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 1>two yarder, and sixty seven has never been done before,

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty two has and WEASTI I won't feel the need

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to overkick it the same way. And so when you

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>don't call something like that just drives me nuts. And

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody said a word, None of the announcer said a word. Anyway,

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>It was the game Tampa Bay Carolina. Uh, Tampa Bay

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>still be a favorite here, but it won't be huge.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Minus six. Is that too much? Well, I think it's

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>too much. The market doesn't I see it's six and

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. I'm gonna open six. Um, you

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know my numbers come to four and a half. I

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>really downgraded Tampa Bay. You know a couple of weeks

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>ago when Tampa played the Packers and they blew them out,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and I said on this show, and I taught to

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>some other people too. You know, sometimes the game will

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>take on a life of its own and some crazy

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>things happened. I mean, it's football. There's turnovers and long

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>runs and passes and stuff. Sometimes it's not indicative of

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>how good the teams are good or back. And I

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>think that was the case with Tampa Bay in Green

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Bay a couple of weeks ago. I didn't really lower

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay at all. I didn't lace Tampa either, But

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>last night I think Campa got exposed. Um Brady, his

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>QBR is three point eight and we expected you much

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>more with all his uh, you know, his receivere a B.

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>You know Antonio Brown coming on the team, and you

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>know the receivers were supposed to be very healthy. But

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>their defense is got exposed. Their offense got exposed. That

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.439
<v Speaker 1>game did not take on a life of its own.

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 1>They legitimately got blasted. Um, I got this number four

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half, you know, And I think Carolina now

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with McCaffrey back in the lineup. And you know, my

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>love for Teddy Bridgewater. He's not what he was. He's not,

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. I hope he's still a good quarterback. He's

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be great, but I think this team's coming around.

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I love Matt Ruld. I think he's one hell of

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a jaw for that team. Uh, six looks a little

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>too high to me. Like I said, I made it

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. That's not a huge difference. But uh,

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Campa got a little exposed last night,

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and I definitely downgraded him quite a bit because I

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think they that was not The score was not an aberration.

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The game was, but the score was not. They legitimately

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like blasted. Christie. You've said it to me a million times.

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I will say it to you here. I think I

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like your line better in this case, because I was

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>debating between five and a half and six. In my head,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>five and a half seemed more, you know, was no

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>man's land. So I just for whatever reason, six came

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>out of my mouth. But six does seem a little high,

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying it's six or six and a half. Wow,

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I see some six and a half's. Yeah, I think

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm opening six. I think that's funny. They'll probably lay

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it to him and they're welcome to it. Um. But yeah,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought four and a half. I was going through

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the number. Geez, four, four and Alston. I might take

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.959
<v Speaker 1>a Sholott and Carolina there, you know, But at six

0:40:58.000 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and six and a half, how well? I mean, how

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>often do we see legit blastings to use your word,

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.439
<v Speaker 1>like we did last night, Legit blowouts like that, let

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>alone in a game that, on paper is supposed to

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>be this amazing competitive game, so bad that I would

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine three quarters of the country just turn that game

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.439
<v Speaker 1>off in the second half. I know I did. I did.

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Starting to watch The Queen's Gambit courtesy of Jeff Vogel's

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>recommendation It's excellent, by the way, little recommendation for you

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix. That's another story. We'll come back, we'll continue.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're halfway through guessing lines on a numbers

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>game at Visa, these sports betting network for number two

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of a numbers game right here at Visa the Sports

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Betting Network series except Channel two O four, Visa dot Com,

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Visa app Boobos Slinging Game plus Skill. Alexander Jason

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Conn is here. Christie Andrews, the star of guessing lines.

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just warning everybody our two camp be as good

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>as our web. This is my It's just the most

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fun way to start every week is just talking about

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>games yesterday, looking forward to next week. What an already,

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>let me just a calve yacht because we got a

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tweet here. Uh. And this gentleman is absolutely correct for

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 1>pointing this out. This is from Corey who says sing

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey is doubtful with the shoulder injury this week, So

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that is you know, you have to put that into

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the mix here of the number, So Caroline, all of

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a sudden makes a little more sense at six or

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. He did not miss any thing yesterday.

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Now he played. Christian McCaffrey did for the Panthers fifty

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>two of their seventy five snaps yesterday. He took eighteen

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of their twenty two handoffs, caught ten of his ten targets,

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and remember he played right to the end, right. He

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he had that play where he went out of bounds

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to stop the clock right before the sixty seven yard

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>attempt from Joey Fly, which was wide right to say

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the least, try to overkick the sixty seven yard So

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why we didn't notice it because he played through

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the games day. But there you go, Chrissie McCaffrey. Maybe

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:58.959
<v Speaker 1>right back on the shelf next week. Yeah, saw that

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some other guy tweet and two, Um, I still think

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm opening six, not six and a half. I still

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 1>think I had numbers two. I myself, Carolina hasn't won

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a game with him in the lineup, you know that's right,

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, little, a little, uh yeah, I don't

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>know how much I read into that, but it is interesting.

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, let's not go overboard with that. But it

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>mean it's just one factor. By the way, Jeff Bogol

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>gave you a Queen's Game, Jeff, smart guy. When I

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>got he's been on the COVID from the beginning, and

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>he and I conversed a lot or texted a lot

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>when it was when I had it, Um, smart guy,

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So Queen's Gamba. He recommended what we're sat on so

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's on Netflix. Now. Let me just say this. The

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>older I get. I've said this for a few years now,

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the older I get, the less ability I have to

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>stomach fiction of any kind, whether written, whether you know,

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on TV, whatever, Like I needed to be rooted in

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>some kind of fact asked to I'm a nonfiction kind

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of guy. The older I get it wasn't like this

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was younger. Perhaps I was a better human

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>when I was younger. I don't know what that says

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about me. But Queen's Gambit, which is based on a

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>novel which is not a true story, is excellent because

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's about it. For if anybody who has ever played

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>chess or is into just sort of it is there

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is a loose base of history of chess involved there. Uh,

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>your girl can watch it with you, because there's like

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 1>fashion elements to it. If you're into like mad Men

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>era of the early sixties, where it's just like, you know,

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>people were doing people were doing things that we would

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 1>never do today. Oh yeah, drinking at ten in the morning,

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, you know, smoking indoors. It's all of

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that melded into one. But the chess element of his excellence.

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's only a seven episode kind of season, so

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can watch it at your legion, but

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it is really well done. Excellent recommendation from Chess. Yeah,

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta let him by the way, I like fiction

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and non fiction. A lot of the fiction that I

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like, whether it's on TV, movies or books, they

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>get these characters that are so un realistic. They just

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they want them to be so bizarre with

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. You know, No, I want something that

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>told he's rooted in reality a little bit. Yeah, I'm sorry.

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I think just some things are just too crazy. I'm

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>with you on that. Anyway, next game, not to the

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>literary alit. Let's go back to football. Denver Denver at

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, the literary Hour with Chris Andrews your pipe?

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you say Denver? A who? Who's this? Denver

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at Las Vegas ratings? How about those radus? First of all, Denver,

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Denver. That Denver Atlanta game was like everyone could

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have scripted in advance. Atlanta is gonna go out to

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a big lead, then Denver is gonna do their thing

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>late in Atlanta is gonna flirt with blowing it. That's

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly how that game went. Atlanta ends up winning it

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>UH thirty four to twenty seven. Denver put up twenty

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one in the in the fourth quarter. UH Denver Lock

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 1>drew Lock for three thirteen, two touchdowns, one pick. He

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>was sacked once, did carry for six six times for

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>forty seven yards and a touchdown. I did not include

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>him in the great Young Quarterbacks list from earlier. Some

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>people in Denver might object, I don't have him in

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the top tier for sure, but even but but yeah,

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't either, but he's certainly better than

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what Washington and the Giants have shown or the Jets.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Right well, I don't know if Jets fans might object.

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy seven for one and a touchdown, four hundred

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and five total yards of offense for Denver in defeat

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.280
<v Speaker 1>at the hands of the Falcons. By the way, skill

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Chris Andrews, this is a numbers game, guessing lines.

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It's what we do each at every Monday tribute to

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the old Stardust radio show where we try to extract

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>value in this exercise and UH first look at handicapping

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the subsequent weeks or the upcoming weeks. Lines I should

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>say with Chris Andrews the Raiders. Yesterday, the Raiders get

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>it done. They beat the Chargers thirty one to twenty six.

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to the charge. We'll get to the Chargers

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. But the Raiders hang on the last

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>play of the game to win this. By the way,

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr was thirteen of twenty three, only completed thirteen

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>passes for one sixty two touchdowns, no picks. He was

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>sacked once. Derek Carr this year because this is the

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>this is the Raiders formula for success. Derek Carr this

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>year has sixteen touchdown passes in two picks. It's not

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mahomes Esk, but it's pretty good when you look at

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it through that through that lens. Sixteen touchdowns, two picks.

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The play I'm talking about one second left in the game.

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like every Chargers game ends this way. We're just

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about how every Denver. You know, if Denver Atlanta

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been scripted, you could have scripted this end

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to Chargers have the ball, chance to win it, one

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>second left. Herbert passes Donald Palm Jr. In the back

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone with no time remaining. It looks

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>like it's a touchdown. Its first rule to touchdown, then

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on replay correctly reversed ball moves, Raiders win. Raiders are

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>five and three. I think this team might go to

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Playoffs, playoffs five and three. I'll say the

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Raiders Bronco, Raiders Broncos. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if either team won this game. I'll say Raiders minus

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Well, you're dead on. That's exactly

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>what my power rating has come to. I think four

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half and five. I'm gonna open four and half.

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, exactly what my power rating came to.

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I talked about the Bengals being a kind of team

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to cover some numbers. I made that note

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in my journal that I thought that the Broncos were

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be that kind of team too. You know,

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like the coach, really know the fans. I think

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the game is totally passing by. But I think I

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty good squad and Lock isn't bad. Uh.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>He's certainly not in with the quarterbacks you mentioned earlier,

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But I like them getting a bunch of points. I

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call four and a half a bunch but I

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>think that is enough, you know, a good chance to cover. Uh.

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But Derek Carr, he's playing some pretty good football and

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about him much, nobody does. But this

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>guy is fine. I would be like a seven year

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.439
<v Speaker 1>veteran something like that. He's finally coming around to being

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty darn good quarterback. And Uh, this Raider team

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty legit. They're good. Derek Carr sixteen touchdown passes

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>again against two picks. Uh, And Derek Carr came out

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when he came out in teen draft. So yeah, do

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the mess seven year veteran right there, as you said.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the the NFL standings and

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at the a f C again, much football

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to be played. But if the playoffs were to start

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, and remember it's the new format with three

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>wild cards, the Raiders would be in a monster tie

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for the second and third wild cards with the Colts,

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, and the Dolphins all five and three. So

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>those four teams with jockey for those last two spots,

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with Baltimore getting the number one wild card spot as

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it's currently constituted. But yes, they're in the mix. In

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, are the Las Vegas Raiders, who, of course

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:13.879
<v Speaker 1>have a spanking new, brand new stadium that we drive

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>by every day, and no one's allowed in it, or

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at least Mark Davis said no one, no one this year. Anyway,

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what's Mark Davis gonna do next year if we still

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have this Is he gonna say everybody can come in?

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they playing college games in there? That's a double check,

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think that they're playing. But with the Raiders,

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he specifically said this year, nobody comes in there this year,

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>so he sort of painted himself into a corner with that.

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We're just speculating for next year, but anyway,

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a story. Hopefully we won't have these problems next year.

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So I'm just glad to get one right. So

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>four and a half on the button, both of you

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and I had that correct. Okay, next next, Bills at

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Bills at the Cardinals. Okay, Bills beat the

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks yesterday. Jason, you know where I'm going with this.

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Bills beat the Cardinals yesterday by the final score. Of

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>final score was forty four to thirty four. But this

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was a game that the Bills raced way out ahead

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>early and then they they really sort of staved off

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks got within a touchdown at one point, but

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That was quickly, Uh, you know, batted back

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the other way. Buffalo ends up winning it by ten.

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>First half of this game. Josh Allen twenty four of

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. This is the first half, twenty four of

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight for two eighty two, three touchdowns, no picks.

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked three times. He had one carry for

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>seven yards. First half two two eight two. Full game

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty one of thirty eight for four fifteen, three touchdowns,

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>no picks. He was sacked seven times. Is that right?

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Was he sacked seven times? To double check that. Stefan

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>digs nine catches for one eighteen And we talked about turnovers, man,

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday was the the turnover box score day plus four

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in turnovers. That's the story. By the way, they were

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>all Russell Wilson turnovers. Best start for the Bills at

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and two since nineteen three. And they're at Arizona.

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 1>You said Arizona loses to the Dolphins. Loses to the

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins by a field goal. Uh. Kyler Murray twenty one,

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six for two eighty three, three touchdowns, no Pixie

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Sack once eleven carries for one oh six and a touchdown,

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Kristen Kirk five for three and a touchdown a favorite target.

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Four hundred forty two total yards of offense for the

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals yesterday in defeat, a defeat that ended when Zane

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez had a forty nine yard field goal attempt with

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:41.800
<v Speaker 1>one fifty three in the game and it was short.

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It was the weirdest thing, short, not not wide, short

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 1>um one first down later by the Dolphins. It was

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Katie Barr. The door in that game was over. But

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I will just say this, and and Jason, this is

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about. How I think you know

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>where I'm going with this. We did the MGM Grid.

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.760
<v Speaker 1>This show is proudly brought to you by Bet MGM

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Nevada Everybody. And we did the bet MGM Grid on

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Fridays where we show Chrissy uh in all of ben

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>MGMs jurisdictions who the most popular bet team is by

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the betting public on tickets, not on money. We did

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>last week and so it's six different states, and then

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we show the overall and in every single state last week,

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>their number one most bet team was the Seattle Seahawks

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.919
<v Speaker 1>against the number. And I had some buddies who their

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>top play was the Seattle Seahawks, and I didn't. This

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:36.479
<v Speaker 1>is not in retrospect because I said it at the time.

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't bet the Bills, so I'm not saying I

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>bet against them, but I did openly wonder why was

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the conviction so strong on the Seahawks across every jurisdiction, right,

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So it overcame all kinds of biases, right, regional bias, um,

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>public bias, whatever. Everyone was so sure Seattle, Well that's

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Recency bias was probably the biggest at play

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>with that, but number one in every single state it

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was nuts. Uh. And so Buffalo Buffalo beats them easy.

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And then we talked about Arizona. All that said, buffaloes

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Here. This is an interesting line to

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>try to predict because I will say this in defeat,

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I know we like to say Russell Wilson's the

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>last guy we want to bet against. Do you want

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to bet against Kyler Murray? Ever? Good? God? Is he good?

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And how about the Cardinals for making the Josh Rosen

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>pick and then saying, you know what, we were wrong,

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna draft Kyler Murray. I think Arizona should be

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a favorite. Am I wrong by a field goal? Just

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 1>super c Josh Allen was sax seven times. He was

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sex seven. Thank you, Chris. It's uh one and a half.

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I even see it two out there. Um, a couple

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of twos now that I'm looking one and I need

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the game picked them. Um, I guess I'll start a

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. The boy I've said somebody tweeted

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on and I wish I could give credit to who

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>this was. But after halftime of that Bills game, the

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>guy said, you know, if Seattle manages to keep this

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>close to the second half, Josh Allen has a chance

0:55:16.280 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to break norm Van Brocklin's long standing record for total

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 1>passing yards in an NFL game, which I think it's

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like five or something like that. Uh, you know, Allen

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:31.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't come too close to that. But boy, I'll tell

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you what, this kid has really turned into a hell

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of a quarterback. And Buffalo you know they're they're not

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:41.880
<v Speaker 1>quite there yet with the high sessional lines of teams

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C. But I gotta tell you,

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the a f C is a lot better

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 1>than the NFC too, So I think I made the

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>game pick them. I like to pick. I mean, it's

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not getting one and a half or two isn't enough

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to make me play. But I would like Buffalo a

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit in this Spotify any kind of maybe plus

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:03.840
<v Speaker 1>money or something like that, I would take the Charlotte Buffalo.

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna go ahead and open one and a

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>half one and a half. Okay, my love of Kyler

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Murray maybe got the best of me there with the

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>three I will. I got a couple of tweets from

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are like, yeah, talk about their one dimensional

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Bills now. Bills fans were talking about

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:20.400
<v Speaker 1>their one dimensional offense. Now Gil, And I'm thinking to myself, like,

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I didn't bet against your team, so relax.

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, they were playing Seattle Seattle. Is his is

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>epically bad, like they're historically bad on defense, So stop

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it with that. Um. Anyway, that was my clap back

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on it. All right, what's next? Speaking of Seattle Seattle

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Rams? Oh wow, this is gonna be impossible

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to make a line for this. Russell Wilson yesterday and

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>defeat forty one for three nine two touchdowns, two picks

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>sacked five times, two fumbles lost, four turnovers for Russell Wilson,

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:01.280
<v Speaker 1>DK metcalf beast seven for what a wait in a touchdown.

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But as I mentioned, Seattle was minus four in turnovers,

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's all you really need to know, really, I mean,

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have access to the box score, if you

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:09.840
<v Speaker 1>can see into the future and you see that a

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 1>team is minus four in turnovers, you kind of know

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the result. Uh. And about that Seattle defense, just to

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>put numbers to it, this is the numbers game, after all,

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards allowed by any team through eight games

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl era period period, that what the

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>kids do on TikTok two thousand, eight hundred and nineties.

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Seven yards allowed through the air by the Seahawks through

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>eight games by far the worst through eight games in

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl era. So that's that's I mean to

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>say that that's their Achilles. Heel does a disservice to

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Achilles, which at least has the the decency to

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>remain kind of anonymous until the Achilles rears up. But

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this is just out front and center. I mean, it's

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just terrible. And Pete Carroll's a defensive coach. I mean,

0:57:58.000 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at some point you gotta look at him. I think

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they just gave them an extent they did. It feels

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like the game may have passed his defense by Dan Quinn,

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I like a girl with extensions in her hair,

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really like a guy of his age

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>getting extension that long when his suspect coaching decisions during game. Um,

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle let the rams rams coming off a bye, This

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a pick um if I've ever

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:28.840
<v Speaker 1>seen one, I wouldn't know what to make this line. Well,

0:58:29.560 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I liked your number better. Uh, I like pick because

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought the same as you. Uh. But I see

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the rams one and a half pretty much universally. Now.

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I will say about this, you know,

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think with the rams coming off of by uh,

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it may it may help them. They formulated gang playing

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>against this terrible, unbelievably terrible Seattle defense. So even though

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>my power raidings do come to a pick and I M,

0:59:00.720 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I can't see the one and a

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 1>half just because I think the situation maybe does favor

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams because of that buy. You know, we always

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hear that McVeigh is such an offensive genius he should

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to come up with something to exploit that

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>terrible defense. So I think one and a half is okay.

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, even though my power waiters come to

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 1>pick them. I know it's a stupid thing to say,

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'll be stupid for a second. If the playoffs

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>were to start right now, Seattle, Arizona, and the Rams

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all in the playoffs and the bet does not cash,

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 1>all four teams make the playoffs, well, and I think

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen. No, the Niners are such a mash unit.

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, between between injuries and COVID. If you're if

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you're like a nine, we'll get to the Niners in

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But if you're if you're a Niners fan

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or a Niners backer with like season win totals, overs

0:59:49.760 --> 0:59:52.439
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, you've got to be at the point where

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, it's just the car, it's just the

0:59:54.760 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hand we were dealt. There's nothing we can do about this.

0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You should never take the Super Bowl loser on an

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>over the next season. I mean, it's not their fault,

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, what's next? Speaking of the Niners, miners at

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Unplanned, how we do that? Uh? Niners extra

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>rest because they got beat by Green Bay. They got

1:00:16.640 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>housed by green Bay on Thursday. And then there's the Saints.

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about crushed the Bucks yesterday. Drew Brees

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty six of thirty two for two twenty two. Soon

1:00:26.760 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can't throw the ball down field ford touchdown passes,

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>no picks. He was sacked once. Um Taysom Hill was

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two for two forty eight, passing seven carries for fifty

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>four yards on the ground, one catch for twenty one.

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been mean to Taysom Hill over time and questioned

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton putting him in at random times, but it's

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to argue with his performance last night.

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me be the first and say night. By the way,

1:00:57.040 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamis was one for one for twelve. Can I add

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that as well? Uh the Saints. The Saints were nine

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of fourteen on third downs. I mean they just the

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bucks had no answers. I will say New Orleans by

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the full touchdown say minus seven. Well, it's almost universally nine.

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I even see a nine and a half. Wow, my

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>power is from the seven and a half, you know,

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell you I'm I'm still not

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>totally convinced on the Saints. I mean, I don't know

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what that is, but I have them rated pretty high,

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, but I don't have them up

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as highes like Green Bay or Pittsburgh or you know, Baltimore, Casey,

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have him quite in that category. Um, I

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean nine, that's hard to argue with it.

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You've talked about the Niners being such a mash. I

1:01:50.120 --> 1:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>don't even know who they got anymore. You know, at Mullins,

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he's one of those guys when I look at his

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>pure stats, don't look too bad. But where my A

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is QB was? You know, he just you know, he

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fills up the staff but I don't even want to

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>say fills it up. But he looks good in the

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>staff book, but you know, it just doesn't produce out

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on the field, you know, it just doesn't. And he's

1:02:11.760 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of good games, but he's yeah, he's

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a backup at best. Um, So I'm gonna go

1:02:18.040 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with the nine. EVI get a good place to start, Yeah,

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's there's no George Kittle for you know,

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the regular season. It's gonna be Mullins,

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>not Garoppolo. I don't know how much that means, but

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the guys from the beginning of the year, like

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Thomas and Bosta on the defensive line gone for the

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>entire season. How good is Kyle Shannon? I know we

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>he can throw in anybody. It's like a turnstyle in

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that backfield. Anybody performs. But yeah, at some point, you

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do you do worry that the Niners have a game

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in him where they can play very well in Shanahan's great,

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but man, um, it's just so tough. At some point

1:02:51.160 --> 1:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you need bodies. Remember on Thursday night they didn't have

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a single player who took a snap on offense in

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>last year's NFC Championship. Think about that, coming back guessing

1:03:00.920 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>lines right here on the Numbers game and feasting these

1:03:02.760 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sports betting network Chrissy, any more daytime games next week? Yeah,

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but back to the Literary Hour in case anybody's listening,

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a novel written and I'm still looking for

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an agent. So if you're out there, you certainly know

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>how to contact me. And as I was talking about

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>during the Literary Hour, my characters are very realistic. I mean,

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>these are guys that I know, and that's there's a

1:03:27.800 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>gambling theme to it, Greek theme and Vegas theme and

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. So I think I think I get

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it public. I think it'll sell really well and they

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and anyway, and I think it's good. I won't get

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>detailed on this, but that's different from what you were

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to me about the other day. Yeah. That the

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>novels written, and I'm working on another book right now

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that I don't really want to talk about too much yet.

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know how I know the novels written, Chrissy, because

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sitting here right on my computer, ready to be Well,

1:03:55.800 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there's uh, it's been edited since then, you know, and

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>even so, I had somebody helped me edit it. And

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's even better than the one that I say. It's

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. That's ready to Yeah, you sound super

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hype about it too. I'm looking forward to I am,

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. I may gets terrific, I really do. All right, Last, okay,

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to football. Last early game. You want

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to do the last early game because it's kind of

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out of location, but let's do it that way. Okay,

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Chargers at the Dolphins. Yeah, we'll save the prime time

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for last Chargers at the Dolphins. We mentioned the Chargers again. Uh,

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>last play of the game, chance to win it. Hey

1:04:33.600 --> 1:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they won the game. Oh no, they didn't. Ball moved again.

1:04:37.880 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That was Herbert to H. Daniel Parham Jr. No, Sir,

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Chargers lose. Chargers lose. Justin Herbert forty two for three,

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, two touchdowns, no picks. He was sacked twice.

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen nine for one oh three a touchdown, four

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty one total yards of offense for the

1:04:56.360 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in defeat at the hands of the Raiders. But

1:04:59.480 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>here is the damage when you do the inventory on

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this football team every week. We could do it, but

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>let's do it again. It's their sixth loss this season.

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind there two and six. All six losses

1:05:11.000 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>by seven points are fewer. Is that true? Fact check

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>me on that if you adjacent, all six losses this

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>season by seven points are fewer. Now, if you extended

1:05:19.680 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>back into last season, they are three and fifteen. Are

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers in one possession games since the start of

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last season, three and fifteen this year in that category,

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they are one in six one in six in one

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>possession games this year. It's their ninth straight division loss

1:05:39.880 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>if you take it back. And the reason on the Charges,

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I'm taking it back passed before, you know,

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>before this season is because's Anthony Lynn finally on the

1:05:49.960 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>hot seat? Like I can. I understand he's a wonderful

1:05:52.880 --> 1:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>human being, but can he finally be on the hut?

1:05:55.000 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>This can't keep happening. This can't keep happening. The Chargers, yeah,

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>within within a touchdown any to their losses, Thank you, Jason.

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Miami, who we just talked about. Beat

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Zane Gonzalez missing the forty nine yard or

1:06:06.920 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>short with one fifty three remaining, one first down later,

1:06:09.720 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Katie bar the door, Dolphins win it. The Dolphins have

1:06:12.800 --> 1:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>matched their season win total from last year. Last year

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they were five and eleven. Five and eleven, not too bad.

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's my Steve Spurrier best start since they outscored Arizona

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to nothing in the fourth quarter yesterday to a

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to a Tugo Violoa two touchdowns, no picks, sack three times,

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>made some nice little runs in consequential situations yesterday to

1:06:39.520 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>move the chains. I'll say Dolphins by three. You know

1:06:46.040 --> 1:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this game opened two and a half and three, and

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>since that time, money has been showing on the Chargers.

1:06:54.040 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any threes around, uh, even with Jews,

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>even with heavy juice. Uh so it's two and a half.

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I see a little bit of two an alf with

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>juice on the favorite. My numbers come to five one game,

1:07:09.760 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one game that finds a way to lose every week,

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and another being that finds the way to win every week. Now,

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing the Chargers, they do cover a lot of those

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers that you know, get a absorb absorbent. I know

1:07:22.800 --> 1:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I said that long, um, but you know five would

1:07:26.840 --> 1:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>probably be a take even for me, even though that's

1:07:28.640 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what my power ratings came to. I think this game

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>should be at least three. I am gonna open to

1:07:33.120 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>an app because, as Rocky says, go from to an

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ap of three and two is kind of actually created.

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna open two and a half on this one.

1:07:40.520 --> 1:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh but I'm putting a slash next to Miami

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and uh, well, I can hear the music. But I'll

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>make another comment when we get back about the Chargers,

1:07:51.360 --> 1:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami one wind and shy of pushing their season win

1:07:55.880 --> 1:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>total of six this year. I have that ticket and uh,

1:08:00.720 --> 1:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, knocking at the door. Two games back of

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bills in the a f C East, Brian Flores

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>some Coach of the Year considerations if they get there,

1:08:09.200 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Coming back, we'll wrap it up guessing lines.

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Two more games to get to right here on Visa

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Betting Network. Um, okay, back to the Chargers

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the Chargers game that we were just talking

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>about against the Dolphins, Chrisy, you wanted to say something

1:08:26.720 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about the Chargers. Last thing I will say about the Chargers.

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Shots was on the show from Football Outsiders last

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>week and he was talking about the least consistent teams

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and the most consistent teams per his numbers d v

1:08:37.560 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>O a UH in the NFL this year through the

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>previous week. And he was saying the least consistent teams

1:08:43.880 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of week to week performance San Francisco, which

1:08:47.200 --> 1:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is a lot to do with their you know, turnstyle personnel,

1:08:51.280 --> 1:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Cleveland Browns, who you don't know what you're

1:08:53.920 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>getting from them from one week to the next. The

1:08:56.400 --> 1:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are actually the most consistent team in ball in

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of week to week performance, Like you know exactly

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting with them every week, they're going to

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>show up and they're ultimately they're going to blow it.

1:09:09.040 --> 1:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna smack your head with your hand. But he's

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just saying, in terms of their level of performance, it's this,

1:09:13.800 --> 1:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the most consistent team in football. You wanted to say,

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Christy about the Chargers, Well, Warred Sharp has an article

1:09:20.800 --> 1:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't had a chance to read it yet,

1:09:22.160 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but Warren is always known for being extremely thorough and

1:09:25.800 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>just in kind of like the headline blurb, he's saying, yea,

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not a coincidence, and he goes through. He

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>says in his article that he's gonna go through the

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>time management, you know, game management with the clock and

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the play calling, and like I said, Warren is very thorough,

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>especially in things like that. I haven't had a chance

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>to read the article yet, but I think it can't

1:09:48.479 --> 1:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>be a coincidence. It can't be a coindtidence after all

1:09:51.360 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>these close losses and you know you have from the

1:09:53.560 --> 1:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>eland does seem like a wonderful human being. He's not

1:09:56.880 --> 1:09:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a head coach in the NFL. He just six loss

1:09:59.840 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>this season by seven points or fewer three and fifteen

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>in one position, one possession game since started last season,

1:10:05.640 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one in six this season. Cheese. They need a coordinator

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>for chronic management. Not a coincidence. Yeah, at some point

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a pattern, not a coincidence. Sunday night, Chrisie, what

1:10:14.439 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you got excuse me that the Ravens at the Patriots.

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Ravens at the Patriots, Jason, you said they need a

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:25.639
<v Speaker 1>management coordinator for clock management, that you need a game

1:10:25.760 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>situations coordinator. The head coaches don't seem to have mastery

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, and they're they're always the ones that seemed

1:10:32.360 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 1>to be taken the blame. We've been saying it for years.

1:10:34.920 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Just have somebody to look at the clock, fire everything

1:10:37.360 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in advance, yeah, and know the situations before they come up. Baltimore,

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about, beats the Colts. Lamar Jackson first

1:10:44.479 --> 1:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>half yesterday was nine of thirteen for fifty one yards.

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>First half, no touchdowns, Noe Pixy was sacked twice. He

1:10:51.000 --> 1:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>only had four carries for fifteen yards in the first half.

1:10:53.680 --> 1:10:57.519
<v Speaker 1>At halftime, the Ravens had fifty five total yards of offense,

1:10:57.720 --> 1:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the fewest and a half with Lamar Jackson a quarterback,

1:11:00.920 --> 1:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and everybody was like, oh, maybe you heard the whispers.

1:11:03.479 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Lamar Jackson's not as good as we thought. It

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was finished the game nineteen of twenty three for one

1:11:09.160 --> 1:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy no touchdowns, noe picks. He was sacked twice, thirteen

1:11:12.160 --> 1:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>carries fifty eight yards in a touchdown. It's Lamar Jackson's

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>first career win when trailing at halftime. How about that?

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>The raigning n L m v P, NFL m v P,

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:26.519
<v Speaker 1>want to say n L baseball mode. The raigning NFL

1:11:26.640 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>m v P is now twenty five and three, excuse me,

1:11:30.479 --> 1:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and five, pardon me, twenty five and five

1:11:33.439 --> 1:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season since taking over. Is the Ravens

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>start in the middle of the eighteen season that ties

1:11:38.680 --> 1:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Dan Marino for the best start by a quarterback since

1:11:41.720 --> 1:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty six. Dan Marino Lamar Jackson twenty five and

1:11:48.400 --> 1:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>five impressive company. They outscored the Colts seventeen to nothing

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, only had two hundred sixty six

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>totally yards of offense in that game. They want it, though,

1:11:57.400 --> 1:12:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and as I said earlier using the chess reference, once

1:12:00.840 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they have an advantage on you, where they get ahead,

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:08.519
<v Speaker 1>they have an ability to keep you down. That is

1:12:08.600 --> 1:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent of great NFL historically great historically NFL, I mean

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>historical great teams like the Skins. You know, you pick

1:12:16.200 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>your team the eight five Bears pick your great NFL team.

1:12:19.080 --> 1:12:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But they're not that, but yet they have this. They're

1:12:21.880 --> 1:12:24.799
<v Speaker 1>so different when they're behind and when their head. The Ravens,

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the and the Patriots haven't played. The Patriots played tonight,

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>so sight unseen with the Patriots tonight against the Jets.

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll say the Ravens is a placeholder minus six on

1:12:33.320 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the road here, Chris Well, it's mostly seven. Um, a

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of six and halves and mostly seven. Have my

1:12:42.760 --> 1:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>power ratings come higher, but again and then they inflect

1:12:45.520 --> 1:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the diminishing returns. You don't want to go to high

1:12:48.720 --> 1:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>against a Patriots team. But listen, they're a mess, the Patriots,

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and Jason, I'm gonna come looking for

1:12:57.720 --> 1:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you if they lose tonight because you put the eyes

1:12:59.840 --> 1:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on me way too many times and telling you, uh,

1:13:04.280 --> 1:13:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the employees do um I had a seven is probably okay?

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, seven half would probably a take my priorities

1:13:12.040 --> 1:13:15.479
<v Speaker 1>come a little a little higher, just because they are

1:13:15.840 --> 1:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>such such a mess. And by the way, you're talking

1:13:18.320 --> 1:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about the Ravens and knowing how to win a game

1:13:22.400 --> 1:13:24.479
<v Speaker 1>wants to get to leave. Reminds me of the Bill

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Walsh Joe Montana teams, and Joey definitely he's way up

1:13:29.920 --> 1:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there is like as far as fourth quarter comebacks and

1:13:32.120 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>all that other stuff, but probably not as many as

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>he should have because they put so many teams away

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. And between Joe and Bill Walsh,

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, everybody credits as being a genius, which

1:13:43.840 --> 1:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>she really is. You know, they knew how to just

1:13:46.760 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>milk a clock and not turn the ball over, just

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>not give that other team a chance to win. And

1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>they were a great, great team. But you go back

1:13:55.920 --> 1:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and look, and I don't have the numbers in front

1:13:57.720 --> 1:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of me, but they won so many games by it

1:14:00.560 --> 1:14:04.479
<v Speaker 1>was ridiculous. They just totally eliminated the possibility of the

1:14:04.479 --> 1:14:07.519
<v Speaker 1>team coming back on them. Uh and then wait, it's

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that a different, much much different style,

1:14:10.600 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, kind of like the same mantra and

1:14:14.000 --> 1:14:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night, Chrissie, Monday Night. You might turn this one off.

1:14:20.600 --> 1:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Early two Vikings and the Bears. Vikings dominate the Lions,

1:14:26.640 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is always the formula with the with the

1:14:28.880 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings thirteen twenty two twenty. As long as he doesn't

1:14:31.920 --> 1:14:33.439
<v Speaker 1>have to throw the ball that many times, you're good

1:14:33.479 --> 1:14:36.639
<v Speaker 1>to go. Three touchdowns, no picks it sack Ones Dalvin

1:14:37.120 --> 1:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook two carries for two oh six two touchdowns,

1:14:41.160 --> 1:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>two catches, forty six four eighty seven totally yards of

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>offense for the Vikings plus three in turnovers. And then

1:14:49.160 --> 1:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the Bears, so we've called paper tigers there back

1:14:51.280 --> 1:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to five and four now, or they're down to five

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and four after a quick start of the season. Two

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive first downs in the entire first half yesterday for

1:14:59.240 --> 1:15:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bay Airs too, they ended up with twenty

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>two Nick Foles thirty six of fifty two for three

1:15:05.400 --> 1:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty five two touchdowns. Doe Pacy was sacked three times,

1:15:07.960 --> 1:15:10.599
<v Speaker 1>but again two in the first half and then that

1:15:10.720 --> 1:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fumble return for a touchdown. Uh, this was just offensive

1:15:16.040 --> 1:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>ineptitude really when the game mattered. Cosmetic final score against

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Titans twenty three points are fewer in all of

1:15:22.760 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>full starts this year's. They're two and four with Nick

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Foles as a starter, minus two in turnovers in their game.

1:15:28.640 --> 1:15:34.479
<v Speaker 1>As mentioned, um Minnesota at Chicago. You said, yes, check

1:15:34.520 --> 1:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the weather. We got about thirty seconds here, because I

1:15:37.360 --> 1:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get a recap in Chrissie. But I'll say

1:15:39.040 --> 1:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Chicago minus of field goal just for expeditious sake. Here,

1:15:44.800 --> 1:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Chicago minusu Fielable. Oh no, no, pardon me, Minnesota minus

1:15:48.320 --> 1:15:51.559
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Pardon me? Okay, Well, once again, I like

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:54.719
<v Speaker 1>your number better. But it's two and a half. Even

1:15:54.720 --> 1:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half with a little bit of juice,

1:15:56.560 --> 1:15:58.599
<v Speaker 1>five numbers come to four and a half night. I'm

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna first admit four and a half is too much

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in a game like this, but I thought it should

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be at least three. I'll open to a half of

1:16:06.640 --> 1:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any threes opted, but if I see

1:16:08.479 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it going up, I'm gonna be on that bandwag and

1:16:11.920 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>moving it up because I think that Vikings should be

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:16.719
<v Speaker 1>at least three. The Bears's just terrible. They're just terrible,

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings are coming around. There's a team that's

1:16:21.000 --> 1:16:23.479
<v Speaker 1>really I think it's a chance to make a move here,

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you know. And Dalvin quote he turned into Gale Sayers

1:16:26.680 --> 1:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks here looks unbelievable. He really did so.

1:16:30.840 --> 1:16:32.559
<v Speaker 1>In the end, Chrissy. What I like the most is

1:16:32.680 --> 1:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland is the most peculiar line of them all. I,

1:16:36.280 --> 1:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, excuse, I'm gonna open three and a

1:16:39.800 --> 1:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>half because I see I don't see any three and

1:16:41.920 --> 1:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a halfs, but I see with three with juice on

1:16:43.880 --> 1:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the favorite, I don't want to take about at three

1:16:46.360 --> 1:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>minus ten, so I'm opening three and a half. Okay,

1:16:48.960 --> 1:16:51.639
<v Speaker 1>so even in these two hours, it's creeping towards towards

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>my number of minus four and a half. Uh. That

1:16:54.880 --> 1:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>line made no sense to me. I'm I like Cleveland.

1:16:58.280 --> 1:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>They're based on the line. The other one is I

1:17:00.200 --> 1:17:03.599
<v Speaker 1>like Carolina. But we will check on Christian McCaffrey status

1:17:03.600 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because that will matter a lot. But those are the

1:17:05.200 --> 1:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>two that for me were the ones that were noteworthy.

1:17:09.000 --> 1:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>You are you four? I got a mark next to

1:17:12.560 --> 1:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I like Cleveland. I like Carolina just like you. And

1:17:16.439 --> 1:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I also like the Giants and I like the Dolphins.

1:17:20.960 --> 1:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you have the Dolphins way up in that five.

1:17:23.360 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 1>You said, yeah, yeah, yeah, I like your Giant. I

1:17:27.520 --> 1:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>think I like your Giants too because I just don't

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think the Eagles are any good. But I can't be four.

1:17:33.240 --> 1:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on, yeah, if it's over three. That's yeah. This

1:17:36.200 --> 1:17:37.799
<v Speaker 1>thing is I don't want to race to the window

1:17:37.840 --> 1:17:40.519
<v Speaker 1>about the giants either, don't get me wrong. So that's why.

1:17:40.680 --> 1:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't get by the way, the boards are gone.

1:17:42.760 --> 1:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It's all three and a half. There you go. All right,

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>we'll get in on the action while you can't, because

1:17:46.479 --> 1:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I might come down to three, which was my number. Chrissy,

1:17:48.920 --> 1:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>can't thank you enough. The quickest two hours in sports.

1:17:51.760 --> 1:17:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Man, My pleasure, my pleasure, my friend.

1:17:55.560 --> 1:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you soon. All right, Christie Andrews right

1:17:57.800 --> 1:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>here guessing lines. We'll put it in podcast form case

1:18:01.120 --> 1:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you missed any parts. Good luck tonight, pat Patriots and

1:18:04.400 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Jets from all of the beating. We spotty that way.